XML 181 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
number in Millions
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for PEO(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO(2)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs(3)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs(4)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net Income
(millions)(7)
Adjusted
EBITDA
(millions)(8)
Total
Stockholder
Return(5)
Peer Group
Total
Stockholder
Return(6)
2022$1,297,529 $(40,020,404)$10,457,995 $(1,906,478)$23.38$65.92(1,028)(94)
2021$796,124,647 $175,168,894 $139,119,242 $54,186,005 $51.01$96.85(3,687)33 
  
Company Selected Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA  
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block] The dollar amounts represent the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Tenev for each of 2022 and 2021, the years in which we were a public company and subject to public reporting.The dollar amounts represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Tenev, who has served as our CEO or co-CEO since our founding) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Tenev) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022, Mr. Warnick, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Quirk, Ms. Howard, and Ms. Chennapragada; and (ii) for 2021, Mr. Bhatt, Mr. Warnick, Ms. Chennapragada, Ms. Howard and Ms. Christina Smedley.  
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block] Represents the weighted peer group TSR value as of each measurement date (December 31, 2022, and 2021) of an initial investment of $100 in a custom peer group index from July 29, 2021 (i.e., the date of our IPO), weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization as of the date of our IPO. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: KBW NASDAQ Financial Technology Index.  
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 1,297,529 $ 796,124,647
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ (40,020,404) 175,168,894
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block] The dollar amounts represent the amount of compensation “actually paid” to Mr. Tenev as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Tenev during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Tenev’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid:
Year
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of Equity
Awards(a)
Equity
Award
Adjustments(b)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
2022$1,297,529 — $(41,317,933)$(40,020,404)
2021$796,124,647 $794,011,732 $173,055,979 $175,168,894 
(a)The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b)The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; and (iii) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:
YearYear End Fair
Value of Granted Equity
Awards		Change in Fair
Value of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity Awards		Change in Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted in Prior
Years that Vested
in the Year
Total
Equity
Award
 Adjustments
2022— $(36,250,087)$(5,067,846)$(41,317,933)
2021$31,425,000 $26,981,892 $114,649,087 $173,055,979 
  
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 10,457,995 139,119,242
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ (1,906,478) 54,186,005
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block] The dollar amounts represent the average amount of compensation “actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Tenev), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Tenev) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Tenev) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note 2, except that such adjustments also include the average fair value as of the vesting date of equity awards granted and vested in the applicable year, which adjustment was not applicable to Mr. Tenev:
Year
Average
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
Average
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
Average
Equity Award
Adjustments(a)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
2022$10,457,995 $9,662,586 $(2,701,887)$(1,906,478)
2021$139,119,242 $137,246,783 $52,313,546 $54,186,005 
(a)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:
Year
Average
Year End Fair
Value of Equity
Awards
Average Change
in Fair Value of
Outstanding and
Unvested Equity
Awards		Average Fair
Value as of
Vesting Date
of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in
the Year		Average
Change in Fair
Value of Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years
that Vested in
the Year
Total
Average
Equity
Award
 Adjustments
2022$5,387,436 $(6,559,443)$1,102,308 $(2,632,188)$(2,701,887)
2021$10,531,262 $6,290,290 $2,313,383 $33,178,610 $52,313,546 
  
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block] For the full year 2021, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from the increase in our stock price from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2021, as well as the grant of the 2021 Market-Based RSUs and the satisfaction of the liquidity event vesting requirement of RSUs granted in periods prior to our IPO. However, when measured for only the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), there was an inverse correlation due to the decline in our stock price from the IPO to the end of the year. For 2022, there was also a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from a decrease in our stock price from December 31, 2021, to December 31, 2022, impacting the value of outstanding equity-based awards. When measured for the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), our TSR initially outpaced that of our peers before ending the year lower (on a relative basis) than that of our peer group. For 2022, our TSR largely trended in the same direction of our peer group. We have not observed a relationship between compensation actually paid and net income, and net income is not a metric used in our compensation plans. Finally, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 and 2022.  
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block] For the full year 2021, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from the increase in our stock price from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2021, as well as the grant of the 2021 Market-Based RSUs and the satisfaction of the liquidity event vesting requirement of RSUs granted in periods prior to our IPO. However, when measured for only the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), there was an inverse correlation due to the decline in our stock price from the IPO to the end of the year. For 2022, there was also a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from a decrease in our stock price from December 31, 2021, to December 31, 2022, impacting the value of outstanding equity-based awards. When measured for the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), our TSR initially outpaced that of our peers before ending the year lower (on a relative basis) than that of our peer group. For 2022, our TSR largely trended in the same direction of our peer group. We have not observed a relationship between compensation actually paid and net income, and net income is not a metric used in our compensation plans. Finally, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 and 2022.  
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block] For the full year 2021, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from the increase in our stock price from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2021, as well as the grant of the 2021 Market-Based RSUs and the satisfaction of the liquidity event vesting requirement of RSUs granted in periods prior to our IPO. However, when measured for only the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), there was an inverse correlation due to the decline in our stock price from the IPO to the end of the year. For 2022, there was also a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from a decrease in our stock price from December 31, 2021, to December 31, 2022, impacting the value of outstanding equity-based awards. When measured for the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), our TSR initially outpaced that of our peers before ending the year lower (on a relative basis) than that of our peer group. For 2022, our TSR largely trended in the same direction of our peer group. We have not observed a relationship between compensation actually paid and net income, and net income is not a metric used in our compensation plans. Finally, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 and 2022.  
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block] For the full year 2021, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from the increase in our stock price from December 31, 2020, to December 31, 2021, as well as the grant of the 2021 Market-Based RSUs and the satisfaction of the liquidity event vesting requirement of RSUs granted in periods prior to our IPO. However, when measured for only the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), there was an inverse correlation due to the decline in our stock price from the IPO to the end of the year. For 2022, there was also a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our TSR, which resulted from a decrease in our stock price from December 31, 2021, to December 31, 2022, impacting the value of outstanding equity-based awards. When measured for the portion of the year from our IPO in July 2021 to December 31, 2021 (as TSR is required to be calculated for purposes of the table above), our TSR initially outpaced that of our peers before ending the year lower (on a relative basis) than that of our peer group. For 2022, our TSR largely trended in the same direction of our peer group. We have not observed a relationship between compensation actually paid and net income, and net income is not a metric used in our compensation plans. Finally, there was a positive correlation between our compensation actually paid and our Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 and 2022.  
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 23.38 51.01
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 65.92 96.85
Net Income (Loss) $ (1,028,000,000) $ (3,687,000,000)
Company Selected Measure Amount (94) 33
PEO Name Mr. Tenev  
Additional 402(v) Disclosure [Text Block]
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation “actually paid” and certain measures of Company financial performance. The figures shown below are disclosed in the manner required by SEC rules, but in certain cases, particularly with respect to the valuation of equity awards, the values do not correspond to the actual economic benefit received by the applicable executives upon receipt of the applicable compensation. For further information concerning the Company’s executive compensation, see “Executive Compensation–Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
pg93-gfx_payvsperf.jpg
Cumulative TSR reflects the value as of each measurement date (December 31, 2022, and 2021) of an initial investment of $100 in the Company’s Class A common stock from July 29, 2021 (i.e., the date of our IPO).The dollar amounts represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of the Company. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:While the Company uses numerous financial and non-financial performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s executive compensation programs, the Company has determined that Adjusted EBITDA is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link compensation “actually paid” to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance. As described above in “2022 Executive Compensation Program—Cash Bonuses,” half of the annual bonus plan payout is determined by Adjusted EBITDA. We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our results of operations, as well as providing a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business performance. 		 
Measure [Axis]: 1    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Measure Name •Stock Price  
Measure [Axis]: 2    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Measure Name •Adjusted EBITDA  
Non-GAAP Measure Description [Text Block] Our Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss), excluding (i) interest expenses related to credit facilities, (ii) provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (iii) depreciation and amortization, (iv) share-based compensation, (v) change in fair value of convertible notes and warrant liability, (vi) significant legal and tax settlements and reserves, and (vii) other significant gains, losses, and expenses (such as impairments, restructuring charges, and business acquisition or disposition-related expenses), that we believe are not indicative of our ongoing results.  
Measure [Axis]: 3    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Measure Name •NCFAs  
PEO [Member] | Equity Awards Reported Value [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ 0 $ 794,011,732
PEO [Member] | Equity Award Adjustments [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (41,317,933) 173,055,979
PEO [Member] | Equity Awards, Year End Fair Value [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 0 31,425,000
PEO [Member] | Equity Awards Granted During the Year, Unvested [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards (36,250,087) 26,981,892
PEO [Member] | Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years, Vested [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards (5,067,846) 114,649,087
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Awards Reported Value [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 9,662,586 137,246,783
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Award Adjustments [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (2,701,887) 52,313,546
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Awards, Year End Fair Value [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 5,387,436 10,531,262
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Awards Granted During the Year, Unvested [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards (6,559,443) 6,290,290
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years, Vested [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards (2,632,188) 33,178,610
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity Awards Granted During the Year, Vested [Member]    
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]    
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards $ 1,102,308 $ 2,313,383