XML 35 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
15.
Fair Value Measurements
 

In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches including market, income and/or cost approaches. FASB standard ‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’ (Topic 820) establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs are those that reflect the Company’s expectation of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
 
Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include marketable securities that are actively traded.
 
Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
 
Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Asset and liability measurements utilizing Level 3 inputs include those used in estimating fair value of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities in purchase acquisitions, those used in assessing impairment of property, plant and equipment and other intangibles and those used in the reporting unit valuation in the annual goodwill impairment evaluation, contingent consideration and those used in the valuation of the warrant liability.
 

The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a wide variety of factors. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment required in determining fair value is greatest for assets and liabilities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Fair value measurements can be volatile based on various factors that may or may not be within the Company’s control.


The following tables summarize the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30,
 
    2021
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
    ($ in thousands)
 
Liabilities:
     
Contingent Consideration
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
12,072
   
$
12,072
 
 
   
2020
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
   
($ in thousands)
 
Liabilities:
     
Contingent Consideration
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
5,520
   
$
5,520
 
 

There were no transfers between the valuation hierarchy Levels 1, 2, and 3 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, and 2021.
 

We estimate the fair value of contingent consideration using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model based on forecasted future earnings. The acquisition contingent consideration liability has been accounted for based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement (Level 3). The contingent consideration balance is recorded in in other payables and accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in fair value and net present value of contingent consideration are included in loss (gain) on contingent consideration in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of contingent consideration is reassessed on a quarterly basis.



The following table sets forth the changes in fair value of our contingent consideration for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2021:
 
($ in thousands)
  Contingent Consideration
 
Balance as of September 30, 2019
 
$
1,456
 
Additions from acquisitions
   
-
 
Settlement of contingent consideration
   
(2,698
)
Change in fair value and net present value of contingency
   
6,762
 
Balance as of September 30, 2020
   
5,520
 
Additions from acquisitions
   
9,200
 
Settlement of contingent consideration
   
(5,897
)
Change in fair value and net present value of contingency
   
3,249
 
Balance as of September 30, 2021
 
$
12,072
 
 

We determined the carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, other payables and accrued expenses, floor plan notes payable, term note payable with Truist Bank, seller notes payable and company vehicle notes payable approximate their fair values because of the nature of their terms and current market rates of these instruments.