XML 38 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies


Operating leases: In January 2015, the Company entered into a noncancelable lease agreement for warehouse, research and development, and vehicle development and installation facilities in Quincy, Illinois through December 31, 2020.


In December 2019, the Company signed a noncancelable lease agreement for office, warehouse, research and development, and distribution facilities in California through February 2025.


The Company entered into a noncancelable lease agreement in Michigan for offices, prototype testing, and research and development through February 2024.


Future minimum lease payments for these operating leases for the years ending December 31 are as follows:


2021  $791 
2022   606 
2023   582 
2024   462 
2025   74 
Thereafter   - 
      
   $2,515 

See Note 16 for related-party operating lease commitment.


Legal proceedings: The Company is periodically involved in legal proceedings, legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business, including proceedings relating to product liability, intellectual property, safety and health, employment and other matters. Management believes that the outcome of such legal proceedings, legal actions and claims will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


On March 8, 2021, a putative class action complaint was filed in federal district court for the Southern District of New York (Suh v. XL Fleet Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02002) against the Company and certain of its current officers and directors. (the “Suh Complaint”). On March 12, 2021, a second putative class action complaint was filed in federal district court for the Southern District of New York (Kumar v. XL Fleet Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02171) against the Company and certain of its current officers and directors (the “Kumar Complaint”). Both the Suh Complaint and the Kumar Complaint allege that certain public statements made by the defendants between October 2, 2020 and March 2, 2021 violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Company believes that the allegations asserted in the Suh Complaint and Kumar Complaint are without merit, and the Company intends to vigorously defend both lawsuits. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful. At this time, the Company is unable to estimate potential losses, if any, related to either lawsuit.