Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Accounts Receivable	Accounts Receivable Through the adoption of ASU 2016-13 and the related standards, the Company revised its policy regarding the recognition of expected credit losses and for its accounts receivable portfolio. Accounts receivable are recorded at the amount invoiced to customers and do not bear interest.
Credit Loss	The Company estimates credit losses for trade receivables by aggregating similar customer types, because they tend to share similar credit risk characteristics, taking into consideration the number of days the receivable is past due. Provision rates for the allowance for doubtful accounts are based upon the historical loss method by evaluating factors such as the length of time receivables are past due and historical collection experience. Additionally, provision rates are based upon current and future economic and competitive environment factors that could impact the collectability of the receivable. Trade and other receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include past due status greater than 360 days or bankruptcy of the debtor.
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards	Newly Adopted Accounting Standards FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2016-13 and various other related issuances, related to measurement of credit losses on financial instruments which requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. This new guidance replaces the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss methodology, which will result in more timely recognition of credit losses. The Company has determined that the impact of this new accounting guidance will primarily affect our trade receivables. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard had an impact of $9,319 on the beginning Accumulated deficit balance in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2020. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, which provides targeted improvements or clarification and correction to the ASU 2016-01 Financial Instruments Overall, ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments Credit Losses, and ASU 2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging accounting standards updates that were previously issued. The guidance is effective upon adoption of the related standards. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. This standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance, ASU 2018-15, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this update. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All future capitalized implementation costs incurred related to these hosting arrangements will be recorded as a prepaid asset and as a charge to operating expenses over the expected life of the contract. Recently Issued Accounting Standards Except as noted below, there have been no material changes from the recently issued accounting standards previously disclosed in the Annual Report. Please refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 3” section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the recently issued accounting standards that relate to the Company. In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, which enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance, including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination, ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for enacted changes in tax law. The guidance is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, albeit early adoption is permitted. The Company determined during the first quarter of 2020 that it would not early adopt and is monitoring the impact the guidance would have been to the interim tax provision throughout the year, if early adopted. The Company has determined there would have been no material impact on its Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2020 and we will continue to evaluate this standard through the required adoption date. In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The guidance is effective for all entities from the period March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company has elected the optional expedients for its interest rate swap agreements and debt agreements with reference to LIBOR. Upon meeting the specified criteria in the guidance, the Company will continue to account for its interest rate swaps in accordance with hedge accounting and will not apply modification accounting to its debt agreements. In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity, which simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity and amends the scope guidance for contracts in an entity's own equity and certain aspects of the EPS guidance. The guidance is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, albeit early adoption is permitted no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company evaluated the initial impact of the adoption of this standard on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and determined there is no impact as of September 30, 2020.
Fair Value Measurement	A three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value is described below. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: •Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. •Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. •Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2020

Through the adoption of ASU 2016-13 and the related standards, the Company revised its policy regarding the recognition of expected credit losses and for its accounts receivable portfolio.

Accounts receivable are recorded at the amount invoiced to customers and do not bear interest.

Credit Loss

The Company estimates credit losses for trade receivables by aggregating similar customer types, because they tend to share similar credit risk characteristics, taking into consideration the number of days the receivable is past due. Provision rates for the allowance for doubtful accounts are based upon the historical loss method by evaluating factors such as the length of time receivables are past due and historical collection experience. Additionally, provision rates are based upon current and future economic and competitive environment factors that could impact the collectability of the receivable. Trade and other receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include past due status greater than 360 days or bankruptcy of the debtor.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2016-13 and various other related issuances, related to measurement of credit losses on financial instruments which requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. This new guidance replaces the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss methodology, which will result in more timely recognition of credit losses. The Company has determined that the impact of this new accounting guidance will primarily affect our trade receivables. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard had an impact of $9,319 on the beginning Accumulated deficit balance in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2020.

In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, which provides targeted improvements or clarification and correction to the ASU 2016-01 Financial Instruments Overall, ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments Credit Losses, and ASU 2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging accounting standards updates that were previously issued. The guidance is effective upon adoption of the related standards. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. This standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued guidance, ASU 2018-15, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this update. The Company prospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All future capitalized implementation costs incurred related to these hosting arrangements will be recorded as a prepaid asset and as a charge to operating expenses over the expected life of the contract.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Except as noted below, there have been no material changes from the recently issued accounting standards previously disclosed in the Annual Report. Please refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 3” section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the recently issued accounting standards that relate to the Company.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, which enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance, including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination, ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for enacted changes in tax law. The guidance is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, albeit early adoption is permitted. The Company determined during the first quarter of 2020 that it would not early adopt and is monitoring the impact the guidance would have been to the interim tax provision throughout the year, if early adopted. The Company has determined there would have been no material impact on its Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2020 and we will continue to evaluate this standard through the required adoption date.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The guidance is effective for all entities from the period March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company has elected the optional expedients for its interest rate swap agreements and debt agreements with reference to LIBOR. Upon meeting the specified criteria in the guidance, the Company will continue to account for its interest rate swaps in accordance with hedge accounting and will not apply modification accounting to its debt agreements.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity, which simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity and amends the scope guidance for contracts in an entity's own equity and certain aspects of the EPS guidance. The guidance is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, albeit early adoption is permitted no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company evaluated the initial impact of the adoption of this standard on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and determined there is no impact as of September 30, 2020.

Fair Value Measurement

A three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value is described below. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

•Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

•Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.