XML 18 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.3
DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS  
DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Description of Business

On June 27, 2023, Lordstown Motors Corp., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (“Lordstown,” the “Company,” “the Debtors” or “we”), filed voluntary petitions for relief (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”).

In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, we ceased production and sales of our flagship vehicle, the Endurance, and new program development and began a comprehensive marketing and sale process for all, substantially all or some of the Company’s assets in order to maximize the value of those assets. Furthermore, we continued our aggressive cost cutting actions that included significant personnel reductions. On September 29, 2023, we entered into an agreement to sell specified assets related to the design, production and sale of electric light duty vehicles focused on the commercial fleet market free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and other interests, and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Company for a total purchase price of approximately $10.2 million in cash in a transaction that closed on October 27, 2023 (discussed below under “Voluntary Chapter 11 Petition,” Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies and Note 9 - Subsequent Events). As a result of these actions, the Company has no remaining revenue-producing operations and its primary operations consist of expenses associated with completing the Chapter 11 Cases, including resolving substantial litigation, and preparing for emergence as contemplated in the Proposed Plan described below.

Prior to the consummation of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company was an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) of electric light duty vehicles focused on the commercial fleet market and, since inception, had been developing the Endurance. The Company’s strategy was designed to accelerate the launch of new commercial electric vehicles (“EVs”). This included working on its own vehicle programs as well as partnering with third parties, including Foxconn and its affiliates (as defined below), as the Company sought to leverage its vehicle development experience, its proprietary and open-source code and other non-proprietary technologies, its existing Endurance vehicle platform, and potential new vehicle platforms to drive commonality and scale, and more efficiently develop and launch EVs, to enhance capital efficiency and achieve profitability.

In the third quarter of 2022, the Company started commercial production of the Endurance and began to record sales in the fourth quarter of 2022. Engineering readiness, quality and part availability governed the initial timing and speed of the Endurance launch. The rate of Endurance production remained very low in 2023 until June 2023, when management made the decision to cease production and file the Chapter 11 Cases.

Leading up to filing the Chapter 11 Cases (as further discussed below), it became apparent that we would be unable to effectively implement and realize the anticipated benefits of the Foxconn Transactions (as defined below) as Foxconn failed to meet funding commitments and refused to engage with the Company on various initiatives contemplated by the Foxconn Transactions that were essential to sustain ongoing operations. Due to the failure to identify a strategic partner for the Endurance, lack of expected funding and other support from Foxconn (as discussed in more detail below) and extremely limited ability to raise sufficient capital in the current market environment, we determined it was in the best interests of the Company’s stakeholders to take aggressive actions to cut costs and preserve cash, file the Chapter 11 Cases and cease production of the Endurance and new program development. As part of these initial actions, two notices were provided to a substantial number of employees under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN Act”)

in May 2023, for job eliminations occurring during the third quarter of 2023. We have fewer than 20 employees as of November 13, 2023, with additional employees anticipated to leave the Company by December 1, 2023.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, we sold 35 Endurance trucks to customers.

Voluntary Chapter 11 Petition

On June 27, 2023, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. Additional information about the Chapter 11 Cases, including access to documents filed with the Bankruptcy Court, is available online at https://www.kccllc.net/lordstown/document/list, a website administered by Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC ("KCC"), a third-party bankruptcy claims and noticing agent. The information on this website is not incorporated by reference and does not constitute part of this Form 10-Q.

The Bankruptcy Court has approved certain motions filed by the Debtors under which they were authorized to conduct their business activities in the ordinary course, including to, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions of such orders: (i) pay employees’ wages and related obligations; (ii) pay certain taxes; (iii) pay critical vendors; (iv) continue to honor certain customer obligations; (v) maintain their insurance program; (vi) continue their cash management system and (v) establish certain procedures to protect any potential value of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes (the “NOLs”).

As part of the Chapter 11 Cases, on August 8, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court approved procedures (the “Bidding Procedures Order”) for the Debtors to conduct a comprehensive marketing and sale process for all, substantially all or some of their assets in order to maximize the value of those assets.

The Debtors’ investment banker, Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), and other professionals conducted a comprehensive marketing process for the sale of assets consistent with the Bidding Procedures Order. In connection with that marketing and sale process, the Debtors received a “Qualified Bid” (as defined in the Bidding Procedures Order) from LAS Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LAS Capital”) to purchase certain specified assets of Debtors.

Although the Debtors received several non-binding proposals for the purchase of specified assets, the Debtors through their Board of Directors, determined that none of these other proposals was a Qualified Bid in accordance with the Bidding Procedures and determined LAS Capital to be the successful bidder under the Bidding Procedures. As a result, the Debtors cancelled the auction in accordance with the Bidding Procedures, and proceeded to seek Bankruptcy Court approval of the sale.

On September 29, 2023, the Debtors entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “LandX Asset Purchase Agreement”) with LAS Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LAS Capital”), and Mr. Stephen S. Burns, an individual, as guarantor of certain obligations of LAS Capital under the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement. The LandX Asset Purchase Agreement was assigned to LAS Capital’s affiliate, LandX Motors Inc., a Delaware corporation (the assignee and “Purchaser”) and approved by the Bankruptcy Court on October 18, 2023. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement occurred on October 27, 2023, at which time the Purchaser acquired substantially all of the assets held for sale of the Debtors related to the design, production and sale of electric light duty vehicles focused on the commercial fleet market free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and other interests, and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Debtors for a total purchase price of approximately $10.2 million in cash. Upon consummation of the sale, Jefferies became entitled to a Transaction Fee (as defined below) of $2.0 million after crediting the Monthly Fees (as defined below) paid to Jefferies since entering into the Engagement Letter and, subject to payment of the $2.0 million Transaction Fee, no further amounts will be payable to Jefferies under the Engagement Letter. See Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies and Note 9 - Subsequent Events.

The Debtors have a limited amount of assets remaining (other than cash on hand, the claims asserted in the Foxconn Litigation and other potential claims that the Company may have against other parties, and tax attributes) following the closing under the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement. The sale of any remaining assets (whether in whole or in part) may not be consummated and would not result in any meaningful proceeds. No assurance can be made regarding the sufficiency of the Debtor’s assets to complete the Chapter 11 Cases, provide estimated recoveries to claimants and fund anticipated post-emergence activities. Further, the assets included in this report or in any filing we make with the Bankruptcy Court may not reflect the fair values thereof during the pendency of or following the Chapter 11 Cases or the value of our assets in light of the uncertainty of the estimates and assumptions used in the applicable reporting principles, and such values may be higher or lower as a result.

The Company has also been seeking to use the tools of Chapter 11 to fully, finally, and efficiently resolve its contingent and other liabilities and to pursue the Foxconn Litigation before the Bankruptcy Court. However, the Company provides no assurance as to the timing or outcome of the resolution of these matters by the Bankruptcy Court or any other court in which these matters may be adjudicated, including as a result of the proceedings that will occur outside of the Bankruptcy Court prior to a final disposition by the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court established October 10, 2023, as the deadline by which parties were required to file proofs of claim in the Chapter 11 Cases and December 26, 2023 for all governmental entities to file their proofs of claim. In addition, additional claims may be filed for executory contracts and unexpired leases rejected pursuant to the Proposed Plan. The Company cannot provide any assurances regarding what the Company’s total actual liabilities based on such claims will be.

On September 1, 2023, the Debtors filed a Joint Plan of Lordstown Motors Corp. and Its Affiliated Debtors and a related proposed disclosure statement. On October 24, 2023, the Debtors filed the First Amended Joint Plan of Lordstown Motors Corp. and Its Affiliated Debtors (the “First Amended Plan”) and a related proposed disclosure statement (the “First Amended Disclosure Statement”) with the Bankruptcy Court. On October 29, 2023, the Debtors made certain modifications to the First Amended Plan and First Amended Disclosure statement based on negotiations with parties and filed with the Bankruptcy Court Modified First Amended Joint Plan of Lordstown Motors Corp. and Its Affiliated Debtors (the “Proposed Plan”) and a related proposed modified disclosure statement (the “Disclosure Statement”). On October 30, 2023, the Debtors further revised the Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement.

On October 31, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court held a hearing on the approval of the Disclosure Statement and the procedures to solicit votes to accept or reject the Proposed Plan. The Bankruptcy Court announced, among other things, that it would approve the Debtors’ Disclosure Statement and the procedures to be used in connection with the solicitation of votes on the Proposed Plan (the “Solicitation and Voting Procedures”). On November 1, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement and the Solicitation and Voting Procedures (the “Disclosure Statement Order”). The Bankruptcy Court’s entry of the Disclosure Statement Order does not constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s confirmation or acceptance of the Proposed Plan and the Company can provide no assurance that the Proposed Plan will be accepted by creditors or stakeholders, who may object to the Proposed Plan, or confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court (or, even if confirmed, that the Proposed Plan will become effective).

The Debtors are authorized to solicit votes from their creditors and the Company’s shareholders for approval of the Proposed Plan. The Proposed Plan (and its consummation) remain subject to Bankruptcy Court approval and satisfaction of other conditions contained in the Proposed Plan. A hearing to consider confirmation of the Proposed Plan is scheduled for December 19, 2023, but may be rescheduled.

The Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement describe, among other things, the terms of the Proposed Plan; the events leading to the Chapter 11 Cases; the treatment of claims and Interests under the Proposed Plan; certain events that have occurred or are anticipated to occur during the Chapter 11 Cases, including the process for the solicitation of votes to approve the Proposed Plan from certain of the Debtors’ creditors and Interest holders; and certain other aspects of the Proposed Plan.

The Proposed Plan would, among other provisions: (i) provide an orderly structure for distributions to holders of claims of creditors (“Claims”) and treatment of equity interests of shareholders (“Interests”), (ii) preserve retained causes of action, including against Foxconn, to be pursued by the post-effective date Company, and (iii) seek to preserve the value of the Company’s NOLs, by leaving preferred and common equity Interests in the post-effective Company in place.

All distributions under the Proposed Plan would come from the Debtors’ cash on hand and other assets, which would generally be distributed, subject to the terms of the Proposed Plan, to classes of Claims and Interests in order of their respective priorities under the Bankruptcy Code. The Disclosure Statement provides disclosures regarding the anticipated recoveries to holders of Claims and Interests pursuant to the Proposed Plan, including holders of the Class A common stock, which remain to be determined. No assurance can be made with respect to any distributions or recoveries with respect to Claims or Interests under the Proposed Plan.

The Proposed Plan provides for the treatment of Claims filed against the Debtors in the securities class action captioned In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Securities Litigation, Case No. 4:21-cv-00616 (DAR) (the “Ohio Securities Class Action”), with holders of allowed Claims (if any) in the applicable class (if any) receiving Class A common stock in an amount calculated pursuant to the formula set forth in the Proposed Plan, after accounting for any recoveries from applicable insurers or other third parties and subject to the post-effective date Debtors’ election to cash out such Class A common stock Interests. Alternatively, the Proposed Plan provides for an elective class that permits the Ohio Securities Action lead plaintiff (the “Ohio Lead Plaintiff”) to elect to receive a $1.0 million settlement on behalf of a putative class of claimants in lieu of the treatment set forth in the preceding sentence. If the Ohio Lead Plaintiff elects to accept such treatment, a putative class will be sought to be certified solely for purposes of receiving distributions under the Proposed Plan and to the extent that such class is certified members of such class who do not opt-out will receive their pro rata share of the settlement amount, subject to the terms of the Proposed Plan. There is no guarantee that the proposed settlement will be accepted or that a settlement class would be certified even if the proposed settlement were accepted.

The Proposed Plan also provides for the treatment of Claims filed against the Debtors on the same or similar basis as those set forth in the putative securities class action filed against the Debtors’ current Chief Executive Officer (Edward Hightower) and Chief Financial Officer (Adam Kroll) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, styled Bandol Lim v. Edward Hightower et al., No.: 4:23-cv-01454-BYP (N.D. Ohio), which alleges claims arising from the purchase or acquisition of securities of Lordstown Motors Corp. between August 4, 2022 through and including June 26, 2023. The Proposed Plan limits recoveries (if any) from the Debtors on account of such Claims to available insurance. The Debtors dispute the merits of any such claims.

Holders of Claims and Interest in the Debtors that are in a class that is impaired under the Proposed Plan are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Proposed Plan unless their class is deemed to accept or reject pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Plan. After the approval of the Disclosure Statement on November 1, 2023, the Company promptly began soliciting votes on the Proposed Plan pursuant to the Solicitation Procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

The Proposed Plan contemplates releases to directors and officers of the Debtors that served in the capacity as a director or officer of any of the Debtors at any time from the Petition Date through the effective date of the Proposed Plan. Subject to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval, the releases would be binding on holders of Claims and Interests (a) that affirmatively vote to accept the Proposed Plan or (b) are entitled to vote on the Proposed Plan, vote to reject the Proposed Plan, and check a box on their ballot opting into the releases. The releases are also binding on related parties to those described in (a) and (b) (e.g., affiliates, predecessors, successors, and related parties as set forth in the Proposed Plan), but only to the extent the parties in (a) and (b) have authority to bind such persons or entities to the releases.

Pursuant to the Proposed Plan, the Company would emerge from the bankruptcy proceedings and the Foxconn Litigation and other causes of action of the Debtors would be preserved and continue (and proceeds

therefrom would be generated, if any), Claims filed in the Chapter 11 cases would continue to be resolved pursuant to the claims resolution process with allowed claims being treated in accordance with the Proposed Plan, the Debtors’ tax attributes would be preserved, distributions to holders of allowed Claims and allowed Interests would be made, and the Debtors’ ability to conduct business and enter into one or more transactions after the bankruptcy proceedings to maximize value would be preserved as set forth in the Proposed Plan, including transactions that could permit the post-bankruptcy Debtors to make use of substantial tax attributes. At this time, however, the Debtors do not know what the post-effective date operations will include and no assurances can be provided that the Proposed Plan would generate any value for the Company’s post-effective date equity holders.

The Proposed Plan provides for the appointment of new members to serve on the Company’s board of directors (the “New Board”) as of the effective date of the Proposed Plan. The New Board will be identified by the equity committee appointed by the Bankruptcy Court to represent the equity Interests in the Chapter 11 Cases (the “Equity Committee”) with the consent of the Debtors (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld). The New Board will, among other things, oversee and direct the administration of the post-effective date Debtors’ operations in accordance with the Proposed Plan. On the effective date, or as soon as is reasonably practicable thereafter, the New Board will establish such procedures and protocols as it deems necessary to carry out its duties and appoint officers of the Debtors. The officers of the post-effective date Debtors will have the rights and responsibilities set forth in the new organizational documents of the Post-Effective Date Debtors, which may include the NOL Trading Restrictions to facilitate the preservation of the Company’s NOLs.

Neither the Debtors’ filing of the Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement, nor this report, is a solicitation of votes to accept or reject the Proposed Plan. Votes on the Proposed Plan will be solicited in accordance with the Solicitation and Voting Procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court and applicable law. See Note 9 – Subsequent Events.

The description of the Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement contained in this report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the solicitation versions of the Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement, copies of which are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as Exhibit 10.2 and are incorporated herein by reference.

Information contained in the Proposed Plan and the Disclosure Statement is subject to change substantially, whether as a result of amendments, supplements, or other modifications to the Proposed Plan, third-party actions, including governmental claims, or otherwise. The Proposed Plan is not binding on any party, including the Debtors, unless and until it is approved by the stakeholders entitled to vote and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court and consummated. Information in the Disclosure Statement is subject to change and may be further supplemented. Neither the Debtors’ filing of the Proposed Plan and Disclosure Statement, nor this report, is a solicitation of votes to accept or reject the Proposed Plan. Votes on the Proposed Plan will be solicited in accordance with the solicitation and voting procedures filed with and approved by the Bankruptcy Court and applicable law.

Foxconn Litigation

On June 27, 2023, the Company commenced an adversary proceeding against Foxconn (the “Foxconn Litigation”) in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief for fraudulent and tortious conduct as well as breaches of the Investment Agreement (as defined below), the parties’ joint venture agreement, the Foxconn APA (as defined below), and the CMA (as defined below) that the Company believes were committed by Foxconn. As set forth in the complaint relating to the adversary proceeding, Foxconn’s actions have caused substantial harm to the Company’s operations and prospects and significant damages. See “Foxconn Transactions” above and Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information. The Foxconn Litigation is Adversary Case No. 23-50414.

Cessation of Production

Shortly after commencing the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company ceased production of the Endurance and new program development. As a result of closing the transactions contemplated by the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company has no remaining revenue-producing operations and its primary operations consist of expenses associated with completing the Chapter 11 Cases. Accordingly, the Company lacks any revenue related to selling vehicles, and may have substantial contingent obligations related to those vehicles we sold (see “NHTSA Matters” under Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies for additional information). Our ongoing operations during the third quarter of 2023 primarily included support of vehicles that had been delivered to customers, custody and maintenance of our assets for prospective sale under the process established in the Chapter 11 Cases or otherwise (which sale was completed on October 27, 2023), support for the sale process, legal matters, and administration and facilitation of the Chapter 11 Cases and related proceedings.

Foxconn Transactions

The Company entered into a series of transactions with affiliates of Hon Hai Technology Group (“HHTG”, either HHTG or applicable affiliates of HHTG are referred to herein as “Foxconn”), beginning with the Agreement in Principal that was announced on September 30, 2021, pursuant to which we entered into definitive agreements to sell our manufacturing facility in Lordstown, Ohio under the Foxconn APA (as defined below) and outsource manufacturing of the Endurance to Foxconn under the CMA. On November 7, 2022, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Foxconn under which Foxconn agreed to make additional equity investments in the Company (the “Investment Agreement”). The Foxconn APA, the CMA and the Investment Agreement together are herein referred to as the “Foxconn Transactions.”

Investment Agreement

Under the Investment Agreement, Foxconn agreed to make additional equity investments in the Company through the purchase of $70 million of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Class A common stock”), and up to $100 million in Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), subject to certain conditions, including, without limitation, regulatory approvals and, with regard to the Preferred Stock, satisfaction of certain EV Program (as defined herein) budget and EV Program milestones established by the parties. The Preferred Stock funding could only be used in connection with planning, designing, developing, engineering, testing, industrializing, certifying, homologating and launching one or more EVs in collaboration with Foxconn (the “EV Program”).

On November 22, 2022, the parties completed the initial closing under the Investment Agreement, pursuant to which Foxconn purchased approximately $22.7 million of Class A common stock and $30 million of Preferred Stock (the “Initial Closing”).

The Investment Agreement provided for the second closing of Class A common stock (the “Subsequent Common Closing”), at which time, the Company maintains that Foxconn was required to purchase approximately 10% of the Class A common stock for approximately $47.3 million. The Subsequent Common Closing was to occur within 10 business days following the parties’ receipt of a written communication from the U.S. government’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) that CFIUS has concluded that there are no unresolved national security concerns with respect to the transactions (“CFIUS Clearance”) and subject to satisfaction of the other conditions set forth in the Investment Agreement (which the Company believes were or would have been satisfied). CFIUS Clearance was received on April 25, 2023, which means the Subsequent Common Closing was to occur on or before May 8, 2023. The Company was ready, willing and able to complete the Subsequent Common Closing on a timely basis.

In addition, following the parties’ agreement to the EV Program budget and the EV Program milestones and satisfaction of those EV Program milestones and other conditions set forth in the Investment Agreement, Foxconn was to purchase in two tranches, a total of 0.7 million additional shares of Preferred Stock at a

purchase price of $100 per share for aggregate proceeds of $70 million (the “Subsequent Preferred Funding”). The parties agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to agree upon the EV Program budget and EV Program milestones no later than May 7, 2023.

The completion of the Subsequent Common Closing and the Subsequent Preferred Funding would have provided critical liquidity for the Company’s operations. Since April 21, 2023, Foxconn has disputed its obligations under the Investment Agreement to consummate the Subsequent Common Closing and to use necessary efforts to agree upon the EV Program budget and EV Program milestones to facilitate the Subsequent Preferred Funding. Foxconn initially asserted that the Company was in breach of the Investment Agreement due to the Company’s previously disclosed receipt of a notice (the “Nasdaq Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), which Nasdaq Notice indicated that the Company’s Class A common stock price dropped below the $1.00 per share threshold set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the “Bid Price Requirement”) and that the Company had a 180-day period to remedy the drop in the stock price. As previously disclosed, Foxconn purported to terminate the Investment Agreement if that purported breach was not cured within 30 days.

The Company continues to believe that the breach allegations by Foxconn are without merit, and that Foxconn was obligated to complete the Subsequent Common Closing on or before May 8, 2023. Despite the Company taking action to satisfy the Bid Price Requirement as of June 7, 2023, and discussions between the parties to seek a resolution regarding the Investment Agreement, Foxconn did not proceed with the Subsequent Common Closing or any Subsequent Preferred Funding. As a result of Foxconn’s actions, the Company was deprived of critical funding necessary for its operations. To seek relief for Foxconn’s contractual breaches and other fraudulent and tortious conduct the Company believes were committed by Foxconn, the Company commenced the Foxconn Litigation.

Closing of the Foxconn APA

On May 11, 2022, Lordstown EV Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Lordstown EV”), closed the transactions contemplated by the asset purchase agreement with Foxconn EV Technology, Inc., an Ohio corporation, and an affiliate of HHTG, dated November 10, 2021 (the “Foxconn Asset Purchase Agreement” or “Foxconn APA” and the closing of the transactions contemplated thereby, the “Foxconn APA Closing”).

Pursuant to the Foxconn APA, Foxconn purchased Lordstown EV’s manufacturing facility located in Lordstown, Ohio. Lordstown EV had continued to own our hub motor assembly line, as well as our battery module and pack line assets, certain tooling, intellectual property rights and other excluded assets, and had outsourced all of the manufacturing of the Endurance to Foxconn under the Contract Manufacturing Agreement. Lordstown EV also entered into a lease pursuant to which Lordstown EV had leased space located at the Lordstown, Ohio facility from Foxconn for Lordstown EV’s Ohio-based employees for a term equal to the duration of the Contract Manufacturing Agreement plus 30 days.

We received $257 million in proceeds related to the sale, consisting of the $230 million initial purchase price for the assets, plus $8.9 million for expansion investments and an $18.4 million reimbursement payment for certain operating costs incurred by us from September 1, 2021 through the Foxconn APA Closing. Foxconn made down payments of the purchase price totaling $200 million through April 15, 2022, of which $100 million was received in both 2022 and 2021. The $30 million balance of the purchase price and a reimbursement payment of approximately $27.5 million were paid at the Foxconn APA Closing; $17.5 million was attributable to the reimbursement of certain operating expenses reported in research and development and $10 million was attributable to expansion costs. Under the terms of the Foxconn APA, the $17.5 million reimbursement costs were an estimate which upon final settlement was subsequently increased to $18.4 million.

Research and development costs are presented net of the $18.4 million reimbursement of costs under the Foxconn APA for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. Included in the $18.4 million reimbursement were approximately $7.7 million of research and development costs incurred in 2021. Also, in connection with the Foxconn APA Closing, the Company issued the Foxconn Warrants (as defined herein), which are

exercisable until the third anniversary of the Foxconn APA Closing for 0.13 million shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $157.50 per share (the “Foxconn Warrants”). In October 2021, prior to entering into the Foxconn APA, Foxconn purchased 0.48 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for approximately $50.0 million.

Contract Manufacturing Agreement

On May 11, 2022, Lordstown EV and Foxconn entered into a manufacturing supply agreement (the “CMA” or “Contract Manufacturing Agreement”) in connection with the Foxconn APA Closing. Pursuant to the CMA, Foxconn was to (i) manufacture the Endurance at the Lordstown facility for a fee per vehicle, (ii) following a transition period, procure components for the manufacture and assembly of the Endurance, subject to sourcing specifications provided by Lordstown EV, and (iii) provide certain post-delivery services. Foxconn did not provide the aforementioned procurement and post delivery services. The CMA was intended to provide us with an almost entirely variable manufacturing cost structure and to alleviate the burden to invest in and maintain the Lordstown facility.

The CMA required Foxconn to use commercially reasonable efforts to assist with reducing component and logistics costs and reducing the overall bill of materials (“BOM”) cost of the Endurance, and otherwise improving the commercial terms of procurement with suppliers. However, we did not realize any material reduction of raw material or component costs or improvement in commercial terms based on Foxconn’s actions. Foxconn was required to conduct testing in accordance with procedures established by us and we were generally responsible for all motor vehicle regulatory compliance and reporting. The Contract Manufacturing Agreement also allocated responsibility between the parties for other matters, including component defects, quality assurance and warranties of manufacturing and design. Foxconn invoiced us for manufacturing costs on a fee per vehicle produced basis, and to the extent purchased by Foxconn, component and other costs. Production volume and scheduling were based upon rolling weekly forecasts we provided that were generally binding only for a 12-week period, with some ability to vary the quantities of vehicle type.

The CMA became effective on May 11, 2022 and continues for an initial term of 18 months plus a 12-month notice period in the event either party seeks to terminate the agreement. In the event neither party terminates the Contract Manufacturing Agreement following the initial term, it will continue on a month-to-month basis unless terminated upon 12 months’ prior notice. The CMA can also be terminated by either party due to a material breach of the agreement and terminates immediately upon the occurrence of any bankruptcy event. The CMA was not part of the assets assigned under the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to these rules and regulations. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our interim financial results. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not indicative of results for the full fiscal year. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include our accounts and those of our controlled subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ materially from those estimates.

Since filing the Chapter 11 petitions, the Company has operated as debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In the accompanying Balance Sheet, the “Liabilities subject to compromise” line is reflective of the expected or estimated amount of the total allowed claims in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 852-10. However, the ultimate settlement of these liabilities remain subject to analysis and negotiation, approval of the Bankruptcy Court, application of the Bankruptcy Code remaining deadlines for claims to be submitted (including governmental claims), and these liabilities may be settled or resolved for materially different amounts based on these proceedings and continued consideration of claims that may be modified, allowed, or disallowed. These amounts are also subject to adjustments if we make changes to our assumptions or estimates related to claims as additional information becomes available to us. Such adjustments may be material, and the Company will continue to evaluate the amount and classification of its pre-petition liabilities. Any additional liabilities that are subject to compromise will be recognized accordingly, and the aggregate amount of “Liabilities subject to compromise” may change materially. Refer to Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies for further detail.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue in operation one year after the date these consolidated financial statements are issued and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As a result of the Company’s recurring losses from operations, accumulated deficit, cessation of production of the Endurance, lack of any sources of revenue, as well as the risks and uncertainties related to (i) the Company’s ability to successfully complete the Chapter 11 Cases, including our ability to realize further value from our assets, to successfully resolve litigation and other claims that may be filed against us, and to develop, negotiate, confirm and consummate a Plan, after which our ongoing operations are expected to be limited, (ii) the effects of disruption from the Chapter 11 Cases, including the loss of a significant number of personnel, (iii) the costs of the Chapter 11 Cases and (iv) the costs of defending the Company in substantial litigation and claims, along with the risk of future litigation or claims that we have and may continue to experience, substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least one year from the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying amounts and classification of assets, liabilities, and reported expenses that may be necessary if the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.

Pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 205-40, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, management must evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date these consolidated financial statements are issued. This evaluation does not take into consideration the potential mitigating effect of management’s plans that have not been fully implemented or are not within control of the Company as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued. When substantial doubt exists under this methodology, management evaluates whether the mitigating effect of its plans sufficiently alleviates substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of management’s plans, however, is only considered if both (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued, and (2) it is probable that the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued.

The Company had cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments of approximately $93.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $1.2 billion at September 30, 2023 and net losses of $16.5 million and $342.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, respectively.

Due to the failure to identify a strategic partner for the Endurance, lack of expected funding and other support from Foxconn (as discussed in more detail above and elsewhere in this report) and extremely limited ability to raise sufficient capital in the current market environment, we determined it was in the best interests of the

Company’s stakeholders to take aggressive actions to cut costs and preserve cash, file the Chapter 11 Cases and cease production of the Endurance and new program development. On June 27, 2023, we voluntarily initiated the Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy Court. Since filing the Chapter 11 petitions, we have operated our business as debtors-in-possession in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. After we filed our Chapter 11 petitions, the Bankruptcy Court granted certain relief enabling us to conduct our business activities in the ordinary course, including, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions of such orders, authorizing us to pay employee wages and benefits, to pay taxes, to maintain our insurance policies, to honor certain of our customer obligations, to continue to operate our cash management system in the ordinary course, to pay the prepetition claims of certain of our vendors and to establish certain procedures to protect any potential value of the Company’s NOLs.

Our liquidity and ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things: (i) our ability to develop, confirm and consummate the Proposed Plan or other alternative liquidating transaction, (ii) the resolution of contingent and other claims, liabilities and the Foxconn Litigation (see Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies), (iii) the outcome of the Company’s efforts to realize value, if any, from its remaining assets, and (iv) the cost, duration and outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases.

We have incurred significant professional fees and other costs in connection with preparation for and prosecution of the Chapter 11 Cases and expect to continue to incur significant professional fees and costs throughout our Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, we are subject to significant contingent liabilities, the full scope of which is uncertain at this time (see Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies). The Bankruptcy Court established October 10, 2023 as the deadline by which parties were required to file proofs of claim in the Chapter 11 Cases, and December 26, 2023 as the bar date for all governmental entities to file their proofs of claims. We cannot provide any assurances regarding what the Company’s total actual liabilities based on such claims will be.

The Bankruptcy Court approved procedures for the Debtors to conduct a comprehensive marketing and sale process with respect to all, substantially all or some of their assets in order to maximize the value of those assets. The marketing process culminated in the Debtors entering into the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement on September 29, 2023, providing for the sale of specified assets of the Company related to the design, production and sale of electric light duty vehicles focused on the commercial fleet market free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and other interests, and assume certain specified liabilities of the Company for a total purchase price of $10.2 million in cash. This transaction closed on October 27, 2023. Upon consummation of the sale in the fourth quarter of 2023, Jefferies became entitled to a Transaction Fee of $2.0 million after crediting the Monthly Fees paid to Jefferies since entering into the Engagement Letter and, subject to payment of the $2.0 million Transaction Fee, no further amounts will be payable to Jefferies under the Engagement Letter. See Note 9 – Subsequent Events.

As a result of closing the transactions contemplated by the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company has no remaining revenue-producing operations, and its primary operations consist of expenses associated with completing the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors have a limited amount of assets remaining (other than cash on hand, the claims asserted in the Foxconn Litigation and other potential claims that the Company may have against other parties, and tax attributes) following the closing under the LandX Asset Purchase Agreement. The sale of any remaining assets (whether in whole or in part) may not be consummated and would not result in meaningful proceeds. No assurance can be made regarding the sufficiency of the Debtor’s assets to complete the Chapter 11 Cases, provide estimated recoveries to claimants and fund anticipated post-emergence activities. Further, the assets included in this report are historical and are being reported prior to, and without regard to, the sale of assets to LandX and therefore, do not reflect the value ascribed by such sale. The assets in any filing we make with the Bankruptcy Court may not reflect the fair values thereof during the pendency of or following the Chapter 11 Cases or the value of our assets in light of the uncertainty of the estimates and assumptions used in the applicable reporting principles, and such values may be higher or lower as a result.

The Company has also been seeking to use the tools of Chapter 11 to fully, finally, and efficiently resolve its contingent and other liabilities and to pursue the Foxconn Litigation before the Bankruptcy Court. However, the Company provides no assurance as to the timing or outcome of the resolution of these matters by the Bankruptcy Court or any other court in which these matters may be adjudicated, including as a result of the proceedings that will occur outside of the Bankruptcy Court prior to a final disposition by the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court established October 10, 2023, as the deadline by which parties were required to file proofs of claim in the Chapter 11 Cases and December 26, 2023 for all governmental entities to file their proofs of claim. In addition, additional claims may be filed for executory contracts and unexpired leases under the Proposed Plan. We are conducting an extensive claims reconciliation process to analyze approximately $25.6 million in claims asserted against the Company from its suppliers and vendors for amounts those parties believe the Company owes. We have accounts payable and accrued vendor claims of approximately $15.9 million as of September 30, 2023 that reflect both undisputed and partially disputed amounts we may owe, reported in Liabilities subject to compromise. The remainder are disputed for one or more reasons, including a lack of information provided by the claimant. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances regarding what the Company’s total actual liabilities based on such claims will be. A number of additional claims may be filed in the Chapter 11 Cases, including those for which the deadlines to file proofs of claim have not yet passed as of the date of this report. Such additional claims may be substantial and may result in a materially greater amount of allowed Claims than estimated in the Disclosure Statement. See Note 1 – Description of Organization and Business Operations - Description of Business – Voluntary Chapter 11 Petition, Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies and Note 9 – Subsequent Events. In addition, we remain subject to additional liabilities and the uncertainties related thereto for the legal matters discussed in Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies.

If confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of the Proposed Plan or alternative plan under Chapter 11 does not occur, or if the Bankruptcy Court otherwise finds that it would be in the best interest of holders of Claims and Interests or upon the showing of cause, the Bankruptcy Court may convert the Chapter 11 Cases to cases under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. In such event, a Chapter 7 trustee would be appointed or elected to liquidate the Company’s assets for distribution in accordance with the priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. As a result of these and other circumstances, there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. The value available to our various stakeholders, including our creditors and stockholders, is highly uncertain. The trading prices for our securities may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by holders of our securities in the Chapter 11 Cases, if any.

Reverse Stock Split

At the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 22, 2023 (the “2023 Annual Meeting”), the stockholders of the Company approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter”) to effect a reverse split of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock at a ratio within a range of between 1:3 and 1:15, with the timing and the exact ratio of the reverse split to be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in its sole discretion. The Board authorized a 1:15 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the outstanding Class A common stock, which became effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2023 (the “Effective Time”).

The Company filed a Certificate of Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Charter on May 22, 2023, which provided that, at the Effective Time, every fifteen shares of the issued and outstanding Class A common stock would automatically be combined into one issued and outstanding share of Class A common stock.

The Reverse Stock Split was intended to improve the marketability and liquidity of the Class A common stock. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split was intended to increase the per share market price of the Class A common stock in order to satisfy the Bid Price Requirement. On June 7, 2023, the Company received a written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq informing the Company that it had regained compliance with the Bid Price Requirement.

Nasdaq Delisting

On June 28, 2023, the Company received written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq notifying the Company that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b) and IM-5101-1, Nasdaq had determined that the Company’s Class A common stock was no longer suitable for listing on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Trading of our Class A common stock was suspended at the opening of business on July 7, 2023 and a Form 25 was filed with the SEC on July 27, 2023 to remove the Class A common stock from listing and registration on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Delisting became effective ten days thereafter and deregistration under Section 12(b) of the Act became effective 90 days later. We remain subject to SEC reporting obligations.