XML 47 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.0.1
Goodwill and intangible assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Goodwill and intangible assets  
Goodwill and intangible assets

Note 10 – Goodwill and intangible assets

Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following:

2020
(As Restated)

2021

Balance

Transferred to

Balance

at

PPA

Impairment

Assets

Year-to-date

Foreign

at

   

December 31,

   

Acquisitions

   

Adj

   

Charge

   

held for sale

   

Amortization

   

Exchange

   

December 31, 

Licenses

$

536,287

$

362,106

$

53,890

$

(11,392)

$

(45,719)

$

(52,824)

$

(5,364)

$

836,984

Trade names

 

137,403

 

11,156

 

 

(444)

 

(9,925)

 

(201)

 

137,989

Service agreements

9,936

(653)

9,283

Intellectual property and know-how

3,134

(581)

(37)

2,516

Non-compete agreements

 

24,008

 

3,434

 

 

(4,601)

 

(41)

 

22,800

Customer List

 

 

500

 

 

 

(64)

 

 

436

Total intangible assets, net

$

707,634

$

380,330

$

53,890

$

(11,392)

$

(46,163)

$

(68,648)

$

(5,643)

$

1,010,008

    

2019

2020 (As Restated)

Balance

    

    

    

Transferred to

    

    

Balance

at

PPA

Impairment

Assets

Year-to-date

Foreign

at

December 31,

Acquisitions

Adj

Charge

held for sale

Amortization

Exchange

December 31, 

Licenses

$

182,969

$

424,830

$

(505)

$

(23,659)

$

(20,785)

$

(26,563)

$

$

536,287

Trade names

1,921

143,480

767

(629)

(8,136)

137,403

Service agreements

10,340

(404)

9,936

Non-compete agreements

745

24,870

(45)

(1,562)

24,008

Total intangible assets, net

$

185,635

$

603,520

$

217

$

(23,659)

$

(21,414)

$

(36,665)

$

$

707,634

Amortization of intangible assets was $68,648 and $36,665 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Impairment losses on licenses were $11,392 and $23,659 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $5,672 related to the Eureka license when it was classified as held-for-sale in order to reflect the entity at its fair value less cost to sell, as well as an impairment loss of $5,720 on the Vermont retail and wholesale licenses as described below. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $23,659 related to the Eureka license.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:

    

Total

Balance at December 31, 2020 (As Restated)

$

538,825

Purchase price adjustments (Note 4)

(37,922)

Change in assets held for sale (Note 7)

(2,230)

Loss on Impairment

(3,181)

Acquisitions (Note 4)

111,451

Foreign exchange movements

(1,447)

Balance at December 31, 2021

$

605,496

Balance at December 31, 2019

    

$

69,326

Purchase price adjustments (Note 4)

76

Change in Assets Held for Sale (Note 7)

(12,938)

Acquisitions (Note 4)

482,361

Balance at December 31, 2020 (As Restated)

$

538,825

As described in Note 23 – Restatement, the purchase price allocation for the Select acquisition was restated as the Company’s initial identification and measurement of intangible assets acquired was not appropriately reflected in accordance with IFRS 3 and IAS 38. The restatement resulted in a decrease in intangible assets and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2020. Purchase price adjustments relate to remeasurement period adjustments, which were retrospectively reflected in the acquisition tables in Note 4 – Acquisitions.

The Company allocated goodwill to CGUs within its cannabis operating segment; accordingly, each CGU represents the operations dedicated to the cultivation, processing and sale of cannabis within the applicable jurisdiction and related to the Select brand. Upon finalization of purchase price accounting in the current year, assets, including goodwill, that were previously classified within the Grassroots Acquisition CGU has been allocated to the applicable states in which these entities operate utilizing a relative fair value approach

At the Company’s annual impairment assessment date, management tested the individual CGUs for impairment. The recoverable amount of the CGUs were determined based on the value in use (“VIU”) method using level 2 and level 3 inputs that were ultimately determined to be market participant assumptions. The recoverable amount for all CGUs were valued using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model, a variation of the income approach, and corroborated with value indications from certain market approaches, specifically the publicly-traded guideline company method and the comparable transaction method.  It is reasonably possible that future changes in assumptions may negatively impact future assessments of the recoverable amount of the Company’s assets. The Company will continue to evaluate the recoverability of its assets on a yearly basis.

The significant assumptions applied in the determination of the recoverable amount are described as follows:

i.Cash flows: Estimated cash flows were projected based on actual operating results from internal sources as well as industry and market trends. The forecasts were extended to a total of nine years (with a terminal year thereafter) based on the relative immaturity of the industry;
ii.Terminal value growth rate: The terminal growth rate was based on historical and projected consumer price inflation, historical and projected economic indicators, and projected industry growth;
iii.Post-tax discount rate: The post-tax discount rate is reflective of the CGUs Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”). The WACC was estimated based on the risk-free rate, equity risk premium, beta adjustment to the equity risk premium based on a direct comparison approach, an unsystematic risk premium, and after-tax cost of debt based on corporate bond yields; and
iv.Tax rate: The tax rates used in determining the future cash flows were those effectively enacted based on jurisdiction at the respective valuation date.

Key assumptions used in calculating the recoverable amount for each CGU grouping tested for impairment is outlined in the following table:

Terminal Value Growth Rate

Discount Rate

Recoverable Amount

Arizona CGU

3%

14%

$ 321,440

Connecticut CGU

3%

15%

$ 146,820

Florida CGU

3%

15%

$ 619,940

Illinois CGU

3%

14%

$ 287,630

Maryland CGU

3%

16%

$ 209,930

Massachusetts CGU

3%

14%

$ 131,320

Michigan CGU

3%

14%

$ 25,870

Nevada CGU

3%

14%

$ 84,480

New Jersey CGU

3%

16%

$ 1,248,690

Ohio CGU

3%

14%

$ 71,590

Pennsylvania CGU

3%

14%

$ 512,450

European CGU

3%

18%

$ 442,989

Select Brand CGU

3%

15%

$ 873,990

The recoverable amount of the CGUs were compared to the total CGU carrying amount for each CGU grouping for impairment testing procedures. As a result of the impairment tests, management concluded that the carrying value of the CGUs were lower than their recoverable amounts and recorded no impairment, except as it relates to the Vermont CGU. The Vermont analysis utilized a discount rate of 14%. The indicated impairment loss for Vermont was allocated first to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill related to the CGU, with remaining pro rata to the other assets of the units, in a manner that did not reduce the carrying amount of any assets below its fair value less costs of disposal or value in use. As a result, the Company recognized an impairment loss related to the Vermont CGU in the amount of $8,901, allocated $3,181 to Goodwill and $5,720 to licenses for the year ended December 31, 2021.