XML 59 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]    
Fair Value Measurements
8.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in an estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts The Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been
re-evaluated
or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each
year-end.
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements accounting guidance (FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements
), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The Company uses a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be
appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing are as follows:
 
      
 
Level I:
  
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
 
  
 
Level II:
  
Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
 
  
 
Level III:
  
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not required to be measured or reported at fair value are as
follows:
 
 
  
At June 30, 2022
 
  
At December 31, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Carrying
Amount
 
  
Fair
Value
 
  
Carrying
Amount
 
  
Fair
Value
 
Financial assets:
                                   
Cash and cash equivalents (Level 1)
   $ 62,996      $ 62,996      $ 22,590      $ 22,590  
Certificates of deposit with other banks (Level 3)
     11,088        11,088        12,828        12,828  
Securities held to maturity (Level 2)
     28,816        28,290        —          —    
Loans (Level 3)
     786,516        774,687        711,664        705,706  
Accrued interest receivable (Level 1)
     3,797        3,797        3,022        3,022  
Restricted investments in bank stock (Level 1)
     2,567        2,567        2,685        2,685  
Cash surrender value of life insurance (Level 1)
     19,012        19,012        18,787        18,787  
Financial liabilities:
                                   
Non-maturity
deposits (Level 1)
     689,249        689,249        591,344        591,344  
Time Deposits (Level 3)
     213,124        210,984        180,321        180,485  
Other borrowings (Level 3)
     1,639        1,639        19,814        19,819  
Subordinated Notes (Level 3)
     40,585        38,026        20,696        20,696  
Accrued interest payable (Level 1)
     325        325        103        103  
The following tables present the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s
available-for-sale
investment securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an independent third party. The valuations are based on market data. They utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads,
two-sided
markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.
 
 
  
June 30, 2022
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
 
  
Level II
 
  
Level III
 
  
Total
 
Assets:
  
  
  
  
Small Business Administration loan pools
  
$
—  
 
  
$
693
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
693
 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
  
 
—  
 
  
 
40,993
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
40,993
 
Mortgage backed securities
  
 
—  
 
  
 
44,070
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
44,070
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total
  
$
—  
 
  
$
85,756
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
85,756
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
December 31, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level

I

 
  
Level II
 
  
Level III
 
  
Total
 
Assets:
                                   
Small Business Administration loan pools
   $
 
—        $ 1,084      $ —        $ 1,084  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
     —          48,482        —          48,482  
Mortgage backed securities
     —          54,217        —          54,217  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
Total
   $ —       
$
103,783
 
   $ —       
$
103,783
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 are presented in the table below.
 
 
  
June 30, 2022
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
 
  
Level II
 
  
Level III
 
  
Total
 
Impaired loans
  
 
$
—        $
 
—        $ 8,297      $ 8,297  
   
    
December 31, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level

 I

    
Level 

II

    
Level III
    
Total
 
Impaired loans
   $ —        $ —        $ 751      $ 751  
Loans Held for Sale
   $ —        $ —        $ 3,860      $ 3,860  
The following tables provide information describing the valuation processes used to determine nonrecurring fair value measurements categorized within Level III of the fair value
hierarchy:
 
    
June 30, 2022

 
     Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements  
(In Thousands)
   Fair
Value
     Valuation
Techniques
    Unobservable
Input
     Range
(Weighted
Average)
 
Impaired loans
   $
 
8,297     
 

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

(1)
 
   
Liquidation
expenses

 
     10
 
  
December 31, 2021
 
 
  
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
 
(In Thousands)
  
Fair
    Value    
 
  
Valuation
    Techniques    
 
 
Unobservable
Input
 
  
Range
(Weighted
Average)
 
Impaired loans
   $ 751     
 

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

(1)
 
   
Liquidation
expenses

 
     10
Loans Held for Sale
   $ 3,860     
 

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

(1)
 
   

Liquidation
 
of
collateral
 
 
 
     15
 
 
(1)
Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which include various Level III inputs that are not
identifiable.
Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors, such as economic conditions, aging, and/or estimated liquidation expenses incurred when selling the collateral. The range and weighted average of appraisal adjustments and liquidation expenses are presented as a percentage of the
appraisal.
14.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in an estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts The Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been
re-evaluated
or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each
year-end.
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements accounting guidance (FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements
), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The Company uses a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires
the use of significant judgment. The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing are as follows:
 
         Level I:    Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
     
    Level II:    Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
     
    Level III:    Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not required to be measured or reported at fair value are as follows:
 
    
At December 31, 2021
    
At December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Carrying
Amount
    
Fair
Value
    
Carrying
Amount
    
Fair
Value
 
Financial assets:
                                   
Cash and cash equivalents (Level 1)
   $ 22,590      $ 22,590      $ 33,162      $ 33,162  
Certificates of deposit with other banks
(Level 3)
     12,828        12,828        17,051        17,051  
Loans (Level 3)
     711,664        705,706        233,795        236,030  
Accrued interest receivable (Level 1)
     3,022        3,022        1,675        1,675  
Restricted investments in bank stock (Level 1)
     2,685        2,685        2,268        2,268  
Cash surrender value of life insurance (Level 1)
     18,787        18,787        8,941        8,941  
Financial liabilities:
                                   
Non-maturity
deposits (Level 1)
     591,344        591,344        294,469        294,469  
Time Deposits (Level 3)
     180,321        180,485        80,655        81,164  
Long-term borrowings (Level 3)
     19,814        19,819        1,120        1,116  
Subordinated Notes (Level 3)
     20,696        20,696        —          —    
Accrued interest payable (Level 1)
     103        103        233        233  
The following tables present the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s
available-for-sale
investment securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an independent third party. The valuations are based on market data. They utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads,
two-sided
markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.
 
    
December 31, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Assets:
                                   
Small Business Administration loan pools
     —          1,084        —          1,084  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
     —          48,482        —          48,482  
Mortgage backed securities
     —          54,217        —          54,217  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
Total
  
$
—  
 
  
$
103,783
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
103,783
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
    
December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Assets:
                                   
Small Business Administration loan pools
   $ —        $ 7,994      $ —        $ 7,994  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
     —          52,059        —          52,059  
Mortgage backed securities
     —          65,394        —          65,394  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
Total
   $ —        $ 125,447      $ —        $ 125,447  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used as of December 31, 2021 are presented in the table below. There were no impaired loans measured at their fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2020.
 
    
December 31, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Impaired loans
   $ —        $ —        $ 751      $ 751  
Loans Held for Sale
   $ —        $ —        $ 3,860      $ 3,860  
 
    
December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Loans Held for Sale
   $ —        $ —        $ 1,015      $ 1,015  
The following tables provide information describing the valuation processes used to determine nonrecurring fair value measurements categorized within Level III of the fair value hierarchy:
 
    
December 31, 2021
 
     Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value
Measurements
 
(In Thousands)
   Fair
Value
     Valuation
Techniques
            Unobservable
Input
     Range
(Weighted
Average)
 
Impaired loans
   $ 751       

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

 
  
 
(1
    
Liquidation
expenses

 
     10
Loans Held for Sale
   $ 3,860       

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

 
  
 
(1
    

Liquidation
of
collateral
 
 
 
     15
   
    
December 31, 2020
 
     Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value
Measurements
 
(In Thousands)
   Fair
Value
     Valuation
Techniques
            Unobservable
Input
     Range
(Weighted
Average)
 
Loans Held for Sale
   $ 1,015       

Appraisal
of
collateral
 

 
  
 
(1
    

Liquidation
of
collateral
 
 
 
     10
 
(1)
Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which include various Level III inputs that are not identifiable.
Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors, such as economic conditions, aging, and/or estimated liquidation expenses incurred when selling the collateral. The range and weighted average of appraisal adjustments and liquidation expenses are presented as a percentage of the appraisal.