XML 30 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
1
3
.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in an estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts The Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been
re-evaluated
or updated for purpo
s
es of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of
 
these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each
year-end.
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements accounting guidance (FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements
), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell
a
n asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The Company uses a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing are as follows:
    
 
Level I:
 
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
     
 
 
Level II:
 
Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
     
 
 
Level III:
 
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not required to be measured or reported at fair value are as follows:
 
 
  
At June 30, 2021
 
  
At December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Carrying
Amount
 
  
Fair

Value
 
  
Carrying
Amount
 
  
Fair

Value
 
Financial assets:
  
     
  
     
  
     
Cash and cash equivalents (Level 1)
   $ 31,449      $ 31,449      $ 9,002      $ 9,002  
Loans (Level 3)
     409,427        405,474        323,214        324,160  
Accrued interest receivable (Level 1)
     2,509        2,509        1,842        1,842  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock (Level 1)
     1,015        1,015        2,615        2,615  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
                                   
Non-maturity deposits (Level 1)
     238,381        238,381        140,013        140,013  
Time Deposits (Level 3)
 
 
133,672
 
 
 
128,804
 
 
 
143,041
 
 
 
142,787
 
Short-term borrowings (Level 1)
                   41,667        41,667  
Long-term borrowings (Level 3)
     23,087        23,087        37,315        37,738  
Subordinated Notes (Level 3)
     20,000        20,479        20,000        20,256  
Accrued interest payable (Level 1)
     81        81        414        414  
Off-balance-sheet
financial instruments (Level 3)
     —          —          —          —    
The following tables present the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s available-for-sale investment securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an independent third party. The valuations are based on market data. They utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.
    
June 30, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Assets:
        
U.S. treasury securities
   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ —    
Mortgage backed securities
     —          3,398        —          3,398  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
Total
   $ —       
$
3,398
 
   $ —       
$
3,398
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Assets:
        
U.S. treasury securities
   $ —        $ 74,999      $ —        $ 74,999  
Mortgage backed securities
   $ —        $ 4,206        —          4,206  
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
Total
     —       
 
79,205
 
   $ —       
$
79,205
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
    
 
 
 
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, are as follows:
 
    
June 30
, 2021
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Impaired loans
   $ —        $ —        $ 2,844      $ 2,844  
 
 
 
 
    
December 31, 2020
 
(In Thousands)
  
Level I
    
Level II
    
Level III
    
Total
 
Impaired loans
   $ —        $ —        $ 988      $ 988  
The following tables provide inf
o
rmation describing the valuation processes used to determine nonrecurring fair value measurements categorized within Level III of the fair value hierarchy:
 
 
  
June 30, 2021
 
 
  
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
 
(In Thousands)
  
Fair Value
 
  
Valuation
Techniques
 
 
 
 
  
Unobservable
Input
 
  
Range (Weighted
Average)
 
Impaired loans
  
$
2,844
 
  
 
Appraisal of
collateral
 
 
 
 
(1
  
 
Liquidation
expenses
 
 
  
 
10
   
 
  
December 31, 2020
 
 
  
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
 
(In Thousands)
  
Fair Value
 
  
Valuation
Techniques
 
 
 
 
  
Unobservable
Input
 
  
Range (Weighted
Average)
 
Impaired loans
  
$
988
 
  
 
Appraisal of
collateral
 
 
 
 
(1
  
 
Liquidation
expenses
 
 
  
 
10
 
 
(1)
Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which include various Level III inputs that are not identifiable.
Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors, such as economic conditions, aging, and/or estimated liquidation expenses incurred when selling the collateral. The range and weighted average of appraisal adjustments and liquidation expenses are presented as a percentage of the appraisal.