XML 25 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
8.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in an estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts The Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements accounting guidance (FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or

other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The Company uses a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing are as follows:

 

 

Level I:

Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

 

 

 

 

Level II:

Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

 

 

 

 

Level III:

Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

 

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not required to be measured or reported at fair value are as follows:

 

 

 

At September 30, 2022

 

 

At December 31, 2021

 

(In Thousands)

 

Carrying
Amount

 

 

Fair
Value

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

 

Fair
Value

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (Level 1)

 

$

74,796

 

 

$

74,796

 

 

$

22,590

 

 

$

22,590

 

Certificates of deposit with other banks (Level 3)

 

 

8,358

 

 

 

8,318

 

 

 

12,828

 

 

 

12,828

 

Securities held to maturity (Level 2)

 

 

32,571

 

 

 

30,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans (Level 3)

 

 

863,969

 

 

 

800,085

 

 

 

711,664

 

 

 

705,706

 

Accrued interest receivable (Level 1)

 

 

4,058

 

 

 

4,058

 

 

 

3,022

 

 

 

3,022

 

Restricted investments in bank stock (Level 1)

 

 

3,327

 

 

 

3,327

 

 

 

2,685

 

 

 

2,685

 

Cash surrender value of life insurance (Level 1)

 

 

19,127

 

 

 

19,127

 

 

 

18,787

 

 

 

18,787

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-maturity deposits (Level 1)

 

 

757,534

 

 

 

757,534

 

 

 

591,344

 

 

 

591,344

 

Time Deposits (Level 3)

 

 

194,176

 

 

 

188,985

 

 

 

180,321

 

 

 

180,485

 

Other borrowings (Level 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,814

 

 

 

19,819

 

Subordinated Notes (Level 3)

 

 

40,526

 

 

 

37,285

 

 

 

20,696

 

 

 

20,696

 

Accrued interest payable (Level 1)

 

 

917

 

 

 

917

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

The following tables present the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s available-for-sale investment securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an independent third party. The valuations are based on market data. The valuations utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.

 

 

 

September 30, 2022

 

(In Thousands)

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Small Business Administration loan pools

 

$

 

 

$

901

 

 

$

 

 

$

901

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

 

38,347

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,347

 

Mortgage backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

39,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,450

 

Total

 

$

 

 

$

78,698

 

 

$

 

 

$

78,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

(In Thousands)

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Small Business Administration loan pools

 

$

 

 

$

1,084

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,084

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

 

48,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,482

 

Mortgage backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

54,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

54,217

 

Total

 

$

 

 

$

103,783

 

 

$

 

 

$

103,783

 

 

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 are presented in the table below.

 

 

 

September 30, 2022

 

(In Thousands)

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Impaired loans

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,687

 

 

$

5,687

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

(In Thousands)

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Impaired loans

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

751

 

 

$

751

 

Loans Held for Sale

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,860

 

 

$

3,860

 

 

 

The following tables provide information describing the valuation processes used to determine nonrecurring fair value measurements categorized within Level III of the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

September 30, 2022

 

 

 

Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements

 

(In Thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

 

Valuation
Techniques

 

 

 

 

Unobservable
Input

 

Range (Weighted
Average)

 

Impaired loans

 

$

5,687

 

 

Appraisal of
collateral

 

 

(1

)

 

Liquidation
expenses

 

 

10

%

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements

 

(In Thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

 

Valuation
Techniques

 

 

 

 

Unobservable
Input

 

Range (Weighted
Average)

 

Impaired loans

 

$

751

 

 

Appraisal of
collateral

 

 

(1

)

 

Liquidation
expenses

 

 

10

%

Loans Held for Sale

 

$

3,860

 

 

Appraisal of
collateral

 

 

(1

)

 

Liquidation of collateral

 

 

15

%

 

(1)
Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which include various Level III inputs that are not identifiable.

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors, such as economic conditions, aging, and/or estimated liquidation expenses incurred when selling the collateral. The range and weighted average of appraisal adjustments and liquidation expenses are presented as a percentage of the appraisal.