XML 33 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

10. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of derivative financial instruments and contingent consideration obligations. The following table summarizes these items, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, as of June 30, 2020 and March 31, 2020:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Quoted in

 

Significant Other

 

Significant



 

Balance at

 

Identical Markets

 

Observable Inputs

 

Unobservable Inputs

Description

 

June 30, 2020

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

Interest rate cap agreements

 

$

(44,503)

 

$

 —

 

$

(44,503)

 

$

 —

Contingent consideration obligation

 

 

(550)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(550)

Total

 

$

(45,053)

 

$

 —

 

$

(44,503)

 

$

(550)







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Quoted in

 

Significant Other

 

Significant



 

Balance at

 

Identical Markets

 

Observable Inputs

 

Unobservable Inputs

Description

 

March 31, 2020

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

Interest rate cap agreements

 

$

(47,408)

 

$

 —

 

$

(47,408)

 

$

 —

Contingent consideration obligation

 

 

(3,000)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,000)

Total

 

$

(50,408)

 

$

 —

 

$

(47,408)

 

$

(3,000)



Derivative Financial Instruments

The valuation of our derivative financial instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair value of the interest rate cap agreements is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments) using the overnight index swap rate as the discount rate.

We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements and measured the credit risk of our derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments utilize Level 3 inputs to evaluate the likelihood of both our own default and counterparty default. As of June 30, 2020, we determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the derivatives. As a result, the derivative valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Contingent Consideration

The valuation of our contingent consideration obligations was determined using a discounted cash flow method that involved a Monte Carlo simulation. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the purchase agreements (i.e., minimum and maximum payments, length of earn-out periods, manner of calculating amounts due, etc.) and utilizes assumptions with regard to future cash flows that were determined using a Monte Carlo simulation which were then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate. Significant increases with respect to assumptions as to future revenue would have resulted in a higher fair value measurement while an increase in the discount rate would have resulted in a lower fair value measurement.

The table below presents a reconciliation of the fair value of the liabilities that use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Three Months Ended

 

Three Months Ended



 

June 30, 2020

 

June 30, 2019

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

(3,000)

 

$

 —

Gain/(loss) included in contingent consideration

 

 

2,450 

 

 

 —

Balance at end of period

 

$

(550)

 

$

 —



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value upon Initial Recognition

The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments held as of June 30, 2020 and March 31, 2020 were as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

June 30, 2020

 

March 31, 2020



 

Carrying Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying Amount

 

Fair Value

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

178,351 

 

$

178,351 

 

$

410,405 

 

$

410,405 

Accounts receivable

 

$

627,305 

 

$

627,305 

 

$

740,105 

 

$

740,105 

Investment in business purchase option

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

146,500 

 

$

146,500 

Senior Credit Facilities (Level 2)

 

$

3,689,853 

 

$

3,674,961 

 

$

3,682,457 

 

$

3,452,687 

Senior Notes (Level 2)

 

$

1,316,928 

 

$

1,318,375 

 

$

997,772 

 

$

950,000 

Debt component of tangible equity units (Level 2)

 

$

32,008 

 

$

31,966 

 

$

35,431 

 

$

34,806 



Additionally, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the acquisitions of eRx and PDX were recorded at fair value upon initial recognition. See Note 4, Business Combinations, for additional information.