UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) 

☐ Definitive Proxy Statement

☒ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 

The Walt Disney Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒ No fee required

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 

The Walt Disney Company will begin distribution of the following investor presentation:

The Walt Disney Company THE RIGHT BOARD, THE RIGHT STRATEGY Disney’s Plan For   Shareholder Value Creation MARCH 2024

Disclaimer

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this presentation may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding the Company’s expectations; beliefs; plans; strategies; priorities and opportunities; future performance; business or financial prospects or outlook; future shareholder value; expected growth and value creation; profitability, including with respect to attendance at theaters and the success of Disney’s streaming platform; investments; capital allocation, including dividends and share repurchases; financial performance; earnings expectations; expected drivers and guidance, including future adjusted EPS, free cash flow and funding sources; expected benefits of new initiatives; cost reductions and efficiencies; content, products, experiences or service offerings (including timing and nature); priorities or performance; businesses and assets; future investments and creative output; collaborations; expected benefits; and other statements that are not historical in nature. These statements are made on the basis of the Company’s views and assumptions regarding future events and business performance and plans as of the time the statements are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update these statements unless required by applicable laws or regulations, and you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Such differences may result from actions taken by the Company, including restructuring or strategic initiatives (including capital investments, asset acquisitions or dispositions, new or expanded business lines or cessation of certain operations), our execution of our business plans (including the content we create and intellectual property we invest in, our pricing decisions, our cost structure and our management and other personnel decisions), our ability to quickly execute on cost rationalization while preserving revenue, the discovery of additional information or other business decisions, as well as from developments beyond the Company’s control, including: the occurrence of subsequent events; deterioration in domestic or global economic conditions or failure of conditions to improve as anticipated, including heightened inflation, capital market volatility, interest rate and currency rate fluctuations and economic slowdown or recession; deterioration in or pressures from competitive conditions, including competition to create or acquire content, competition for talent and competition for advertising revenue, consumer preferences and acceptance of our content and offerings, pricing model and price increases, and corresponding subscriber additions and churn, and the market for advertising and sales on our direct-to-consumer services and linear networks; health concerns and their impact on our businesses and productions; international, political or military developments; regulatory or legal developments; technological developments; labor markets and activities, including work stoppages; adverse weather conditions or natural disasters; and availability of content. Such developments may further affect entertainment, travel and leisure businesses generally and may, among other things, affect (or further affect, as applicable): our operations, business plans or profitability, including direct-to-consumer profitability; our expected benefits of the composition of the Board; demand for our products and services; the performance of the Company’s content; our ability to create or obtain desirable content at or under the value we assign the content; the advertising market for programming; income tax expense; and performance of some or all Company businesses either directly or through their impact on those who distribute our products.

Additional factors are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2023, including under the captions “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business”, and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including, among others, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Additional Information and Where to Find it

Disney has filed with the SEC a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, containing a form of WHITE proxy card, with respect to its solicitation of proxies for Disney’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) FILED BY DISNEY AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANY SOLICITATION. Investors and security holders may obtain copies of these documents and other documents filed with the SEC by Disney free of charge through the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed by Disney are also available free of charge by accessing Disney’s website at www.disney.com/investors

Participants

Disney, its directors and executive officers and other members of management and employees will be participants in the solicitation of proxies with respect to a solicitation by Disney. Information about Disney’s executive officers and directors is available in Disney’s definitive proxy statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting, which was filed with the SEC on February 1, 2024. To the extent holdings by our directors and executive officers of Disney securities reported in the proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting have changed, such changes have been or will be reflected on Statements of Change in Ownership on Forms 3, 4 or 5 filed with the SEC. These documents are or will be available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This presentation includes the presentation and discussion of certain financial information that differs from what is reported under U.S. GAAP, including diluted EPS excluding certain items, free cash flow, EBITDA, net debt, net leverage and DTC businesses operating income. These measures should be reviewed in conjunction with the most comparable GAAP financial measures and should not be considered substitutes for, or superior to, those GAAP financial measures.

“Diluted EPS excluding certain items” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as diluted EPS less certain items affecting comparability of results from period to period and amortization of TFCF and Hulu intangible assets, including purchase accounting step-up adjustments for released content. Disney’s management believes that information about diluted EPS excluding certain items allows investors to evaluate the performance of Disney’s operations exclusive of these items, which is how senior management evaluate segment performance. Quantitative reconciliation of historical measures of diluted EPS excluding certain items to diluted EPS, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is provided at the end of this presentation. Disney is not providing forward-looking measures for diluted EPS, or a quantitative reconciliation of the forward-looking diluted EPS excluding certain items to that most directly comparable GAAP measure. Disney is unable to predict or estimate with reasonable certainty the ultimate outcome of certain items required for the GAAP measure without unreasonable effort. Information about other adjusting items that is currently not available to Disney could have a potentially unpredictable and significant impact on its future GAAP financial results.

“Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as cash provided by continuing operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Disney’s management believes that information about free cash flow provides investors with an important perspective on the cash available to service debt obligations, make strategic acquisitions and investments and pay dividends or repurchase shares. Quantitative reconciliation of measures of free cash flow to cash provided by continuing operations, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is provided at the end of this presentation.

“EBITDA” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as segment operating income minus corporate and unallocated shared expenses plus depreciation and amortization plus equity-based compensation minus minority interest. EBITDA is used in the calculation of net leverage defined below.

“Net debt” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as total borrowings less net debt issuance discounts, costs and purchase accounting adjustments less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt is used in the calculation of net leverage defined below.

“Net leverage” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by dividing net debt by EBITDA. Disney’s management believes that information about net leverage provides investors the ability to evaluate and compare leverage between companies. Quantitative reconciliation of historical measures of net leverage to total leverage, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is provided at the end of this presentation.

“DTC streaming businesses operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as entertainment segment direct-to-consumer operating income plus ESPN+ operating income from the sports segment. Disney’s management believes that information about DTC streaming businesses operating income provides investors with the performance of its portfolio of streaming businesses and progress against Disney’s goal of reaching profitability in its combined streaming businesses. Disney is not providing forward-looking measures for segment operating income for the entertainment and sports segments, which are the most directly comparable GAAP measures, or a quantitative reconciliation of the forward-looking DTC streaming businesses operating income to those most directly comparable GAAP measures. Disney is unable to predict or estimate with reasonable certainty the ultimate outcome of certain items required for the GAAP measures without unreasonable effort. Information about other adjusting items that is currently not available to Disney could have a potentially unpredictable and significant impact on its future GAAP financial results.

“Return on Invested Capital” or “ROIC” of a segment is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by dividing annual after-tax operating performance by the average of invested capital at the end of such fiscal year and the end of the immediately prior fiscal year for such segment. Annual after-tax operating income is calculated as the sum of segment operating performance for each segment and corporate and unallocated shared expenses, minus tax at the U.S. tax rate in effect during that fiscal year on segment operating income and corporate and unallocated shared expenses. Invested capital is defined as the remainder of Disney’s total assets at a fiscal year end minus the sum of such segment’s (a) cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of the last day of the fiscal year, (b) deferred tax assets and (c) non-interest bearing liabilities and income and property tax liabilities. Quantitative reconciliation of historical measures of ROIC to operating income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is provided at the end of this presentation.

You cannot “restore the magic” if you do n ’t understand magic 3 Disney has an unparalleled creative engine that drives shareholder value creation  Our 100 years of incomparable storytelling excellence has resulted in best in class assets and timeless, beloved characters for all ages  Our creativity makes the impossible possible and is a source of inspiration in a cynical world  Our creative engine is rejuvenated and thriving Disney is uniquely positioned to thrive amid generational disruption  We built leading streaming platforms supported by our differentiated IP, global scale, and the #1 sports media brand, ESPN  We have an unequaled ability to create franchises with longevity and to engage consumers across our unique assets  We have unique monetization capabilities that drive superior economics and outsized revenue and margin opportunities Nelson Peltz and Trian’s approach would absolutely damage Disney  Peltz has no experience managing creative businesses … you don’t manage creativity the way you manage a hedge fund  Peltz’s suggestion for a “board led creative review” process is value destructive … bureaucracy doesn’t drive box office or crea tive success  Peltz’s idea to bundle ESPN with Netflix, our biggest streaming competitor, underscores how little he understands about media an d our business

This Board is already delivering on Disney s potential 4 1 Diluted EPS excluding certain items is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is diluted EPS. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and why Disney is not providing a forward looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure; 2 Free cash flow reflects cash provided by operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Free cash flow is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by continuing operations, which is expected to tot al ~$14bn in FY24 representing a ~40% YoY increase. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAA P m easure.; 3 Represents committee composition following Disney’s 2024 annual meeting Disney is positioned to thrive amid unprecedented industry disruption  In Q 1 FY 24 we delivered GAAP and Non GAAP Diluted EPS 1 growth of 49 and 23 respectively, and have guided to Non GAAP Diluted EPS growth 1 of at least 20 for FY 24  We are successfully executing against detailed plans for growth in each of our businesses to drive superior, sustainable shareholder value – Reinvigorating creativity in our film studios by restoring decision making to creative leaders increasing ROI by prioritizing quality over output – Line of sight to streaming profitability beginning in Q 4 FY 24 with opportunities for subscriber and ARPU growth and margin expansion ahead – Continuing to advance ESPN as the preeminent digital sports platform with ESPN flagship DTC, ESPN Bet, and the FOX WBD joint venture – Turbocharging growth in Experiences with detailed 10 year, 60 bn investment plan, building upon our strong track record of outsized returns – On pace to exceed 7 5 bn annual cost savings target, up 2 bn from original Q 2 FY 23 target  Leveraging robust FCF 2 the Board approved a 50 increase to the previous dividend 0 30 to 0 45 / and a share buyback targeting 3 bn in FY 24  Disney is deftly managing generational disruption in media, which has challenged economic models and forced legacy players to evolve or be left behind A strong, independent, and well qualified Board is focused on delivering sustained shareholder value  The Board recognized sector disruption early and oversaw a carefully planned, long term strategy to position Disney for future success  This Board has been constructed around the diverse skills and experiences critical to Disney’s success in a complex global landscape – Five independent directors were added within the last three years and two more were added within the last five and a half years  The Succession Planning Committee is empowered to support a top Board priority a successful CEO transition – Composed of four highly successful CEOs 3 two of whom have recently executed high profile, seamless CEO transitions  Executive compensation is heavily tied to Disney’s performance and aligned with shareholders Nelson Peltz, Isaac Perlmutter, and Jay Rasulo are not what Disney needs now  Trian seeks to replace two Disney directors whose expertise is critical to the Board with nominees who lack relevant and non duplicative expertise  Nelson Peltz, Isaac Perlmutter (who owns 79 of Peltz’s stake), and Jay Rasulo will harm Disney  We believe Peltz, Perlmutter, and Rasulo would be a destabilizing distraction with a questionable agenda when Disney needs total focus on execution  Despite agitating for nearly two years, Peltz still has not communicated any novel ideas that aren’t inane  Neither Peltz, who does not understand media, nor Rasulo, who has not managed through the industry’s disruption, have the skills to help Disney  Peltz has a history of establishing “shadow management teams” that sidetrack execution and historically have not delivered superior TSR performance

DISNEY IS POSITIONED TO THRIVE AMID UNPRECEDENTED INDUSTRY DISRUPTION 5

Our strategic transformation, building on four key priorities, is working 6 1 DTC streaming businesses operating income is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measures are segment operati ng income for the Entertainment segment and Sports segment. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and why D isn ey is not providing a forward looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure; 2 The formation of the streaming sports service is subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements among the parties; 3 Bloomberg, Disney made 'huge strides' in streaming profitability , 02/07/24; 4 Wall Street Journal, Disney Turns to Taylor Swift, ‘Fortnite’ to Bolster Its Fortunes , 02/07/24; 5 TD Cowen, equity research, 02/07/23  Bloomberg 3 “Twenty percent EPS growth, where do you get that in old media right now? If this doesn't satisfy Nelson Peltz, I don't know what will. Bob Iger has obviously done everything that he can … We're seeing some tangible results when it comes to streaming profitability  Wall Street Journal 4 “ The new, rebuilt Disney that Bob Iger has been promising investors and fans is coming into focus … Iger presented a vision of a new Disney that will embed the entertainment giant further into the American pop culture psyche.”  TD Cowen 5 “ Whatever chance of success these activist investors had is being buried by 100,000 tons of Disney carbonite The market likes what it sees.” Studio Creativity  Committed to telling the best stories and leaning into core franchises  Best in class storytelling continues with 6 of the top 10 most streamed movies across all the US streaming platforms in 2023  Robust lineup of franchise titles in FY24 and beyond to drive audiences to theaters and Disney+ Streaming Profitability  Poised to reach profitability by the end of FY24 and aiming to deliver double digit profit margins 1 in the future  Entertainment DTC OI improved by 86% year over year in Q1 FY24  Successfully expanded Disney+ ad tier outside the US with launches in EMEA and Canada Future of ESPN  Confident in the value of sports and the power of ESPN, the world’s leading sports brand  Domestic sports business continues to grow  Plan to launch ESPN flagship DTC in Fall 2025  Announced a JV with Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery to launch a streaming sports service to extend reach outside of Pay TV 2 Experiences Growth  Strategically investing to turbocharge growth  Recent openings of World of Frozen (Hong Kong) and Zootopia (Shanghai) are gener ating excitement and high guest satisfaction  Together with Epic Games, we plan to create an all new gaming and entertainment universe to further expand the reach of beloved Disney stories and experiences

We are delivering on our commitments to create superior, sustainable shareholder value in a rapidly changing ecosystem 7 1 As of Q1 FY24; DTC streaming businesses operating income is a non GAAP financial measure. See page 2 for how we define and calc ulate this measure and why Disney is not providing a forward looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP mea sure; 2 ROIC is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is operating income. Please see page 2 for a definition of ROIC and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the mo st comparable GAAP measure; 3 Free cash flow reflects cash provided by operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Free cash flow is a n on GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by continuing operations, which is expected to total ~$14bn in FY24 representing a ~40% YoY increase. See page 2 for ho w we define and calculate this measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP meas ure STRATEGIC COMMITMENTS WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND WHERE WE ARE GOING Reinvigorate creativity, driving unmatched IP engine  Reorganized Disney to restore decision making and authority across the content lifecycle to our creative teams  Intensely focusing on strengthening the creative output of our film studio, reducing overall slate volume and driving improve d r eturns on spend Achieve sustained growth and profitability in streaming  Significantly reduced entertainment DTC operating losses … $928mm full year reduction from FY22 and $846mm from prior year Q1 1  Reiterated intent to achieve profitability in streaming by the end of FY24 … within 5 years of launching Disney+ (compared to 10 years for Netflix) Continue building ESPN into the preeminent digital sports platform  Announced sports streaming service with Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery (Fall 2024 target launch) and plan to launch ESPN flag shi p in Fall 2025  Entered into an agreement with PENN Entertainment, which launched ESPN BET in November 2023 Invest strategically in Experiences  Announced ~$60bn investment plan over 10 years that includes capital to continue expanding parks and cruise line capacity  Building upon a strong track record of investments generating outsized returns … FY23 ROIC was nearly 2.5x our cost of capita l 2 Rationalize cost  Expecting to achieve at least $7.5bn of annual cost savings by the end of FY24, exceeding the $5.5bn target announced in Febr uar y 2023  Continuing to seek additional efficiencies without compromising commitment to quality, growth, and value creation Improve free cash flow and maintain strong financial flexibility  Trending to exceed FY24 FCF guidance of ~$8bn 3 (>60% YoY increase), which is approaching levels we last achieved pre pandemic  Declared $0.30/share dividend for January 2024; announced 50% increase for July 2024 dividend; initiated share buyback target ing $3bn in FY24  Maintaining the strongest balance sheet in the sector, which supports future growth opportunities and return of capital 1 2 3 4 5 6

Disney’s unparalleled IP and storytelling have been a core strategic advantage for over 100 years 8 1 Unmatched content creation and storytelling capabilities generate our iconic IP and franchise tentpoles to maximize our audience and impact A FILM AND TV STUDIOS CONTENT DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS AND EXPERIENCES A Our content is seamlessly delivered to billions of global consumers in a highly engaging entertainment experience B B C We extend the relevancy and lifetime value of our content by bringing beloved franchises to consumers through products and experiences around the world C

Enduring franchises highlight our powerful IP and unique monetization capabilities 9 Source: Company data. 1 Reflects the ratio between revenue and investment on titles released following Disney’s acquisition of the IP. Revenue reflec ts aggregate 10 year revenue streams, both generated and expected, directly associated theatrical releases, including theatrical, home entertainment, TV (pay and free), and consumer products. Does not include derivative revenue streams, such as park attractions, nor does it include DTC originals associated with those franchises or p re established franchise consumer products revenue. Investment reflects film production costs and print & advertising associated wi th the theatrical release of the titles, and in the case of animated titles it also includes production overhead. Investment does not include any additional distribution costs or overhead; 2 Frozen (11/27/13), Frozen 2 (11/22/19); 3 Toy Story (11/22/95), Toy Story 2 (11/24/99), Toy Story 3 (06/18/10), Toy Story 4 (06/21/19), Lightyear (06/17/22); 4 Avengers (05/04/12), Age of Ultron (05/01/15), Infinity War (04/27/18), Endgame (04/26/19); 5 The Force Awakens (12/18/15), Rogue One (12/16/16), The Last Jedi (12/15/17), Solo (05/25/18), The Rise of Skywalker (12/20/ 1 Return on Investment 1 9. 9x NOV 2013 Frozen JUL 2014 For the First Time in Forever at WDW OCT 2020 Once Upon a Snowman JUN 2024 Frozen Kingdom at TDR TBD Frozen 4 MAY 2016 Frozen Live at the Hyperion at DLR JUN 2016 Frozen Ever After at WDW NOV 2019 Frozen 2 NOV 2021 Olaf Presents NOV 2023 World of Frozen at HKDL TBD World of Frozen at DLP TBD Frozen 3 5. 5x NOV 1995 Toy Story NOV 1998 Space Ranger Spin at WDW NOV 1999 Toy Story 2 MAY 2006 Acquired Pixar MAY/JUN 2008 Toy Story Midway Mania! at WDW/DLR JUN 2010 Toy Story 3 AUG 2010 Toy Story Land at DLP NOV 2011 Toy Story Land at HKDL APR/JUN 2018 Toy Story Land at SHDR/WDW APR 2019 Jessie’s Critter Carousel at DLR JUN 2019 Toy Story 4 JUN 2022 Lightyear OCT 2023 NFL Alt Cast TBD Toy Story 5 3. 3x DEC 2009 Acquired Marvel MAY 2012 The Avengers MAY 2015 Avengers: Age of Ultron APR 2018 Avengers: Infinity War APR 2019 Avengers: Endgame JUN 2021 Avengers Campus at DLR JUL 2022 Avengers Campus at DLP MAY 2026 Avengers 5 MAY 2027 Avengers: Secret Wars 2. 9x 1977 1983 Original Star Wars Trilogy 2026 2027 3 untitled films 1987/1989 Star Tours at DLR/WDW DEC 2012 Acquired Lucasfilm MAY 2011/2013 Star Tours Adventures Continue DLR/WDW/TDL 2015 2019 Sequel Trilogy MAR 2017 Star Tours Adventures Continue at DLP MAY/AUG 2019 SW: Galaxy’s Edge at DLR/WDW NOV 2019 The Mandalorian DEC 2021 The Book of Boba Fett MAY 2022 Obi Wan Kenobi SEP 2022 Andor AUG 2023 Ahsoka 1999 2005 Prequel Trilogy

By restoring authority to creative leaders, Disney is improving efficiency and effectiveness 10 1 BEST-IN-CLASS BUSINESS CREATIVE LEADERSHIP MANAGING ICONIC FRANCHISES Alan Bergman & Dana Walden CO-CHAIRMEN, DISNEY ENTERTAINMENT Josh D’Amaro CHAIRMAN, DISNEY EXPERIENCES Jimmy Pitaro CHAIRMAN, ESPN Asad Ayaz CHIEF BRAND OFFICER Named Disney’s first-ever Chief Brand Officer in April 2023 to steward and elevate the Disney brand globally across the entire ecosystem of company touchpoints and consumer experiences  Creative teams now determine what content is made and how it is marketed, distributed, and monetized – Promotes global accountability and more efficient decision-making processes – Creates a more cost-effective, coordinated, and streamlined approach to the content lifecycle, which is incorporated into our cost reduction plan – Rationalizes our streaming business to prioritize sustained growth and profitability, as demonstrated by our significantly improved operating income  Recent changes to organizational structure addressed key challenges, including: – Separated content creation from content distribution, reducing visibility and accountability for economic performance – Created inefficiencies and misalignment of incentives by removing direct linkage between content creation, investment, and economic performance

UNPARALLELED PORTFOLIO OF CORE BRANDS AND FRANCHISES Disney is focusing on core brands and franchises to deliver higher returns 11  Disney has the ability to create, distribute, and monetize our IP in unparalleled ways  The longevity of our franchises and our ability to progress consumers across our unique set of assets is unequaled  We have reduced content output with fewer projects and improved quality  We are targeting a $4.5bn reduction of annualized entertainment cash content spend 1 FILM TELEVISON SPORTS

UPCOMING FILMS: ORIGINALS, REIMAGINED CLASSICS & SEQUELS UNPARALLELED SUCCESS OF DISNEY’S FILM STUDIOS Our creative engine remains powerful 12 Note: Reflects select publicly announced planned releases as of 02/07/24 and is subject to change 1 Rationalize volume and cost of content Carefully evaluate each film project Apply our unparalleled creativity Focus on core franchises Create both fresh, new IP and sequels “Entertainment first” mentality HOW WE DRIVE CREATIVE EXCELLENCE 20 Academy Award Nominations in 2024 the most of any company 2024 2025 2026 AND BEYOND New Star Wars movie bringing the Mandalorian and Grogu to the big screen for the first time Frozen 3 6 of 10 most streamed movies across all streaming platforms in the US in 2023 #1 in global box office 7 of the last 8 years 8 of 10 and 13 of 20 highest grossing films of all time globally Our films reach global audiences in theaters and become important anchors on our global streaming platforms , driving subscription and engagement while fueling growth in Experiences First Toy Story movie since 2019

TV and streaming consumption habits dramatically shifted  Streaming consumption is projected to nearly double from 2019 to 2027, primarily at the expense of linear  Audiences want the flexibility to decide what, when, and how they watch  Ad free offerings have conditioned consumers to reduced ad loads TV & streaming consumption (avg daily hrs) Pay TV ecosystem continues to decline at an accelerated rate  Streaming provides lower price points, more flexibility, and personalization that Pay TV cannot match  Significant cord cutting has permanently impaired the legacy ecosystem  According to third party research, Pay TV subscribers are forecasted to decline industry wide by 25% from 2023 through 2027 Pay TV subscribers (mm) 1 Streaming economics vs. Pay TV  Industry streaming losses peaked in 2022 and are expected to improve going forward  Economics to a streaming platform owner have been less profitable than the Pay TV bundle  Aspects of streaming that consumers prefer are at odds with maximizing economics (e.g., ease of cancellation) Traditional media sector DTC losses ($bn) 2 Evolving theatrical distribution model  Day and date / accelerated streaming windows for theatrical releases conditioned consumer to “wait until it’s on streaming”  Global box office has improved following the pandemic but remains 26% below pre pandemic levels  The availability of more social, out of home options provides consumers additional entertainment possibilities Global box office ($bn) 3 Streaming has disrupted the industry s historic economic models 13 Source: Kagan, Wall Street Research, Insider Intelligence (eMarketer), Activate Consulting 1 Includes households with a subscription to a traditional pay TV service and excludes pure play online video services; 2 Reflects combined DTC EBITDA for Comcast, Disney, Paramount, and Warner Bros. Discovery; Disney Entertainment segment (exclud in g ESPN+) in 2023; 3 Reflects reported cumulative box office gross revenue (weekend box office for non US markets) of dominant genres across 17 major markets in the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific 2 100.5 84.0 64.9 43.6 14A 15A 16A 17A 18A 19A 20A 21A 22A 23E 24E 25E 26E 27E ($6.0) ($10.5) ($4.8) 2021 2022 2023 3:13 2:56 2:22 2:01 1:50 2:22 2:56 3:24 5:03 5:19 5:18 5:25 2019 2021 2023 2027E Traditional TV Streaming CAGR ’14 --’20 = ( ’20 --’27 = ( $35.6 $26.1 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

The Board is overseeing a carefully planned, long-term strategy that positions Disney for future success and value creation 14 2 2015-16: Deterioration of Pay TV ecosystem became increasingly evident  Pay TV bundle was still the dominant video product but competition from new video services was growing as tech disruptors were investing heavily in streaming  Disney needed to adapt its strategy to the changing environment … doing nothing was not an option  Acquired 33% stake in BAMTech, a global leader in streaming, data analytics, and commerce management 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2017: Board supported a decisive strategy to accelerate the transition to streaming  Significant investment required to build a scaled, global subscriber base  TFCF acquisition enabled our streaming strategy by adding content franchises, production capabilities, and control of Hulu  Acquired controlling stake in BAMTech  Balanced transition to protect existing cash flows but respond to market demands 2020-22: Management and Board deftly handled severe impacts from the global pandemic  Satisfied the rapid acceleration in global consumer demand for streaming due to earlier bold investments  Revamped the Parks guest experience and undertook key margin-expanding opportunities  Continued to broadcast live sports on ESPN while introducing innovative tech and remote capabilities  Hosted NBA and MLS in a “bubble” at Walt Disney World by leveraging our unique assets and strengths  Rolled out new health & safety procedures across all our operations, enabling continued high productivity 2024: Disney is uniquely well positioned for the future due to our:  Global scale and broad consumer reach, which are required for success in today’s marketplace  Ability to create enduring franchises with unmatched longevity and unique monetization  Best-in-class streaming platforms now on the cusp of achieving profitability  Strong balance sheet with significant capacity for investment, M&A, and return of capital to shareholders 2019: Successful launch of Disney+  Domestic launch in November 2019 with ~500 films and 7,500 episodes of television across Disney brands/franchises  Had 10mm sign-ups on the first day, 60mm subscriptions after eight months, and 100mm after 16 months  Methodically began roll-out to international markets 2023: Implemented significant transformation to further adapt our strategy to the current environment  Reducing cost structure  Prioritizing a path to profitability for streaming  Investing in our core brands and franchises  Building ESPN into preeminent digital sports platform  Declaring a dividend for our shareholders

(41%) (81%) (83%) +22% (18%) (39%) Disney’s TSR outperformed relevant peers facing a similar transition from legacy Pay TV to streaming 15  The most relevant peers to evaluate Disney’s business challenges, progress, and TSR are “pure-play” legacy media companies managing the generational disruption across Pay TV and theatrical – Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount are the most relevant performance peers from a comparable business perspective – Fox and AMC Networks are undergoing a similar transition but are not included in our proxy due to differences in scale  Other companies cited in the proxy for compensation-planning purposes have key differences in business attributes that make them less relevant as performance peers – Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Meta are large-cap tech companies but generate a small portion of their total revenue from media-related assets – Comcast, with only 35% of its total revenues from mediarelated assets, has a very different business mix and business challenges than Disney – Netflix is a “digital native” company with no exposure to legacy media assets 2 TSR SINCE IGER RETURNED1 3-YEAR TSR +0% (70%) (75%) +728% +181% (9%) 5-YEAR TSR TSR OF IGER’S TENURES AS CEO2 Source: FactSet as of 02/29/24 Note: Paramount reflects Class B shares; Paramount pre-merger TSR reflects CBS TSR. Warner Bros. Discovery pre-merger TSR reflects Discovery TSR. Assumes dividends reinvested; 1 From 11/20/22 closing until 02/29/24; 2 Bob Iger’s terms as CEO from 09/30/05 to 02/24/20 and 11/20/22 to 02/29/24; 3 From 02/26/14 to 02/29/24 Trian misrepresents the facts: over the past 10 years3, investors actually made money on approximately 7 out of 10 trading days when taking into account both dividends paid and Disney’s stock price as of 02/29/24

Disney has built leading, scaled global streaming platforms in just four years, differentiated by difficult to replicate content 16 Source: Company filings, FactSet; 1 Global subscriptions based on most recent earnings report for each company except Prime Video which is based on Bank of Ameri ca equity research from 01/11/24 and Apple TV which is based on Jefferies equity research from 07/18/23. Disney global subscript io ns excludes Hotstar and Hulu Live; 2 Reed Hastings, New York Times Dealbook Summit , 11/30/22  Disney’s “must have” streaming platforms will be a long term winner  We are competitively differentiated by our IP, global scale, and the #1 sports media brand, ESPN – Content bundle with “something for everyone” reduces churn and increases lifetime value of subs – One app experience will further streamline the consumer experience and increase engagement – Pooled audiences and sports’ large, unduplicated reach allow us to maximize our advertising potential – Large installed base with Disney+ and Hulu will help upsell ESPN flagship DTC when launched in Fall 2025  Each of our streaming services attracts deeply engaged viewers from broad age and demographic groups 2  Dedicated home for Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic content  >13,000 shows and movies, 8,000 hours of content in 150 markets and 39 languages  Leading all in one premium streaming service with live and on demand content  >70,000 TV episodes and movies and >95 live channels in the US  Thousands of live events, studio shows, and series that aren’t on linear ESPN  >32,000 live events (vs. 27,000 in 2022) and >3,000 hours of original content in 2023  Will leverage ESPN content to continue growing the preeminent digital sports platform  Will combine all of ESPN linear and ESPN+ into one innovative product for sports fans FLAGSHIP 111 45 25 260 182 ~150 98 68 31 ~25  Reed Hastings, Executive Chair, Netfli x 2 “ Disney is pretty strong , but it was pretty strong before. It will be at least the two of us duking it out for a long time BUILDING LEADING PLATFORMS IN A HIGHLY COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT GLOBAL SUBSCRIPTIONS 1 (

COMPELLING STRATEGIC RATIONALE FOR BOTH ACQUISITIONS Major deals further differentiated Disney s streaming business, with key content from TFCF (Fox) and technology from BAMTech 17 Source: Company data, public filings 2  Broadened our portfolio of world class IP and general entertainment content  Enabled us to gain a controlling stake in Hulu  Significantly enhanced our content output capability  Provided a deep bench of experienced, proven management  Opened new avenues for growth in attractive international regions TFCF BAMTECH  Provided tech infrastructure to quickly scale and monetize streaming capabilities  Served as a backbone for the ESPN+ and Disney+ streaming services  Used its video delivery platform for Disney’s authenticated / ad supported applications  Provided a management team with streaming experience to help launch our services  Enhanced personalization of content and advertising for consumers BEST IN CLASS ASSETS TOP GLOBAL FILM FRANCHISES  $5.2bn cumulative global box office  #1 and #3 highest grossing films of all time  >$6bn cumulative global box office UNIFIED KEY DISNEY IP AWARD WINNING TV LIBRARY ~760 episodes ~420 episodes ~250 episodes KEY TFCF ASSETS AND IP ACQUIRED

Disney is driving profitabili t y toward double digit levels 18 Source: Company data. 1 DTC streaming businesses operating income is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measures are segment operat ing income for the Entertainment segment and Sports segment. See page 2 for how we define this measure and why Disney is not pro viding forward looking quantitative reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure; 2 Defined as operating income net of Domestic DVD contribution to profit; 3 Launch in January 2007 per company filings; 4 CNBC, Squawk Box , 02/09/24; 6 As of Q1 FY24. Represents total subscribers added on a de duplicated basis, with each bundle subscriber counted one time (as opposed to being counted for each service to which they are entitled via the ir bundle subscription); 6 Includes Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+  Operating losses of our entertainment streaming business have significantly improved  We remain focused on achieving profitability 1 in streaming by the end of FY24, which is within five years of launching Disney+  Netflix reached profitability 2 in 2016 ten years after launch 3 in a benign DTC competitive landscape vs. today  Netflix had a 21% operating income margin in 2023, seven years after reaching profitability and seventeen years after launch 2  CNBC 4 “The Netflix comparison may be a little bit fatuous … They [Netflix] have a ten year head start on Disney. I think we have to drop that analogy . I understand why Bob Iger would sound frustrated about that” SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED ENTERTAINMENT DTC OPERATING LOSSES ($BN) FAVORABLE STREAMING PACING VS. NETFLIX 1 Subs: Subs:+6.7mm unique subs across Disney+ Core and Hulu, driven by new tiers and bundling 5 ARPU: Primarily +$0.88 Disney+ Core ARPU growth driven by new tiers and price increases and +$6.84 for Hulu Live subs Slower programming growth driven by reductions in slate investment, which does not reflect the full benefit of current reduce d spending due to long tail amortization accounting Savings reflecting Disney’s aggressive cost reduction program ($1.4) ($0.1) $1.1 $0.6 ($0.4) Q4 FY22 OI Revenue growth SG&A and marketing savings Programming expense Q1 FY24 OI B C A B C A Netflix is nearly 13 years further along than Disney on its DTC journey OI MARGIN 5 YRS FROM LAUNCH FUTURE TARGET OI MARGIN 21% Double digit % TODAY TARGET (15%) Breakeven (FQ4’11) (FQ4’24E) 2 6

Disney s delta in profitabili t y to Netflix results from explainable di f ferences that we are actively addressing 19  Netflix and Disney DTC launched at different times with unique strategies and investment requirements, resulting in different fi nancial profiles reflecting their respective circumstances  Netflix used their first mover advantage, limited competition, and robust portfolio of relatively low cost premium content licen sed from top studios to quickly achieve scale and profitability  We built our services in a highly competitive streaming environment requiring significant upfront investment in content and m ark eting to meet high consumer expectations 2 Content  Netflix has a significant volume of global content including local, original, and long tail content (especially in EMEA) tha t has taken a long time to aggregate  Disney+ launched in 2019 with its franchise content and general entertainment content available via the Disney bundle … our i nte rnational offerings are more nascent  We’re focusing on Disney brands, increasing international content / third party licensing to extend the content library, and lev eraging unique ESPN live sports assets Technology  Netflix has a near term tech advantage, enabling reduced customer acquisition / retention costs that contribute to the significa nt difference in marketing costs  Disney built globally scaled technology platforms that service >180mm global subscriptions … we are now highly focused on enhanc ing the consumer experience  We’re investing to improve product capabilities, especially content discovery and personalization, and are unifying platforms in to an one app experience Distribution  Netflix incurs lower billing costs and has fewer wholesale subscribers given their first mover advantage in streaming  We launched in a more competitive environment, using app stores and wholesale relationships to maximize distribution, which i ncu rs greater cost and impacts ARPU  We are optimizing our distribution relationships to improve ARPU and drive incremental profitability Pricing  Netflix has a higher ARPU both domestically and internationally, which they have built over an extended period of time  Because of the competitive environment described above, Disney strategically decided to price at a highly compelling value fo r c onsumers to drive adoption  We’re optimizing our pricing strategies by rolling out tiering, including advertising and account sharing, to facilitate cont inu ed price increases and ARPU growth CURRENT KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DISNEY STREAMING AND NETFLIX

Disney continues to build ESPN into the preeminent digital sports platform 20 3 World’s leading sports brand, reaching millions of fans daily across platforms Reimagine digital viewing experience to drive engagement and maximize monetization 96 of top 100 US broadcast telecasts in 2023 were sports DTC offerings will include greater interactivity to serve sports fans Premier portfolio of sports rights Includes NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, UFC, CFP, SEC, PGA, US Open, and more Sports can convene millions of fans with live “appointment Largest share of linear sports impressions and record streaming growth on ESPN+ in 2023 Utilize partnerships to enhance our capabilities and reach In discussions with potential content, marketing, and technology partners Sports content is a competitive advantage for Disney and a key differentiator vis à vis Netflix Favorable demographics and attractive advertising platform with broad reach Sports fans’ “go to” across linear and digital platforms #1 sports media brand reaches 200mm Americans monthly across platforms Proven success in developing streaming sports offering with ESPN+ ESPN+ streams more live sports than any DTC streaming service

ESPN’s offerings represent our vision for the future of sports 21 3 BUILDING INTO THE PREEMINENT DIGITAL SPORTS PLATFORM Unparalleled portfolio of rights Dedicated focus on sports Strong reach Integrate betting, commerce, games, etc. Utilize data to maximize monetization and serve fans Leverage best in class advertising team and capabilities Create a range of offerings across price points to serve fans (ESPN+, flagship DTC, WBD / Fox JV, MVPDs) Reinvent the fan experience with greater interactivity Provide new, more flexible ways and outlets to subscribe outside of Pay TV Improve Pay TV proposition with ESPN flagship included

FY09 FY23 $4.9 $7.0 FY19 FY23 $21.6 $28.2 FY19 FY23 Disney is investing strategically in our most profitable segment, Experiences 22 Source: Company data. 1 Includes Domestic Parks, International Parks, Disney Vacation Club and Cruise Line; 2 OI and margin based on FY12 FY23 period; 3 ROIC is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is operating income. Please see page 2 for a definition of ROIC and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation of historical measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure  In September 2023, we announced a ~$60bn investment plan over 10 years, including capital to expand domestic / international par ks and cruise line capacity  Investments will build upon our strong track record of generating outsized returns and will focus on: – Accelerating storytelling by utilizing our wealth of intellectual property, untapped stories, and unmatched creativity – Expanding our footprint … we have over 1,000 acres of available development across our six existing resorts in North America, Eu rope, and Asia – Investing in innovative technology to improve the guest experience – Reaching new fans around the world … for every park guest today, we believe there are >10 consumers with Disney affinity who don ’t visit the Parks in a given year 4 ATTRACTIVE RETURNS ON INVESTED CAPITAL 3 STRONG OPERATING LEVERAGE ($BN) 1 FY12 FY23 INVESTMENTS AND RETURNS 1,2 REVENUE 4x OI +10pts Margin OPERATING INCOME  ROIC has increased ~3x between FY09 and FY23  FY23 ROIC was nearly 2.5x our cost of capital, creating significant economic value for shareholders

Strong ROIC guides and innovation enable our investment plans 23 Note: Reflects publicly announced planned openings and events as of 02/07/24; list is not exhaustive; 1 TEA = Themed Entertainment Association, IAAPA = International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions, VES = Visual Ef fe cts Society 4  Plan supports investments to create magical new experiences and refresh existing infrastructure  ~70% of the plan is earmarked for capacity expanding investments 10 YEAR INVESTMENT PLAN 50% 30% 20% PARKS AND RESORTS TECH & MAINTENANCE CRUISE / OTHER ~$60BN CAPITAL ALLOCATION PLAN SELECT OPENINGS AND LAUNCHES Frozen themed lands at Hong Kong Disneyland (opened November 2023) and coming to Tokyo Disneyland and Disneyland Paris First ever Zootopia themed land with an all new attraction and unique entertainment, food, beverages, and merchandise at Shanghai Disney Resort (opened December 2023) Expansion of Tokyo DisneySea with three new themed areas recreating the worlds of Frozen, Rapunzel, and Peter Pan (opens June 6, 2024) Tiana’s Bayou Adventure is a thrilling attraction inspired by The Princess and the Frog , coming to both Walt Disney World (summer 2024) and Disneyland Resort (later in 2024) Three cruise ship deliveries in FY25 and FY26 to increase the total fleet from five to eight ships AWARD WINNING INNOVATION 1 In the last decade, Disney’s theme parks and cruise line have earned more than 600 awards and accolades from world renowned organizations, high profile media, and industry experts for innovation, visual effects, and creativity, among others. Cars Land awarded Outstanding Achievement / New Theme Park Land by TEA 2013 Pirates of the Caribbean : Battle for the Sunken Treasure awarded Outstanding Visual Effects by VES 2017 Pandora the World of Avatar named one of the World’s Greatest Places by Time Magazine Star Wars : Galaxy’s Edge (DLR) named one of the World’s Greatest Places by Time Magazine 2019 Star Wars : Galaxy’s Edge Symphonic Suite named Best Instrumental Composition in the 62 nd Annual Grammy Awards Walt Disney Imagineering recognized as one of the Best Workplaces for Innovators by Fast Company 2021 Stuntronics Aerial Robotics Technology awarded Outstanding Achievement / Technical Innovation by TEA Tale of the Lion King (DLR) named Best Theatrical Production by IAAPA DLP 30th Anniversary Celebration named Most Creative Property Wide Event by IAAPA Guardians of the Galaxy : Cosmic Rewind awarded Outstanding Achievement / Attraction by TEA ( 2023

Disney is rationalizing costs and driving operating leverage 24 Source: Company data. 1 Puck, The Villain of the Year Is … The Three-Headed Monster Tormenting Disney, 01/02/24; 2New York Times, A Big Day for the House of Mouse, 11/08/23  We continue to seek additional efficiencies without compromising our commitment to quality, growth, and value creation  Within three months of Iger’s return, we announced a $5.5bn cost reduction program focused on SG&A, other operating expenses, and content spend (excluding sports)  We now expect to reduce costs by at least ~$7.5bn by the end of FY24, ~$2bn ahead of our original target – Annualized efficiency target for total SG&A and other operating expenses of $3bn (vs. $2.5bn previously), primarily from marketing, labor, technology, and procurement – Annualized entertainment cash content spend reduction target of $4.5bn (vs. $3bn previously), primarily from slate / volume reductions and lower spend per title ‣ Due to the difference between cash content expenses and their amortization, it will take a few years for the bulk of these savings to be reflected in the P&L  Our expense base in FY24 will only increase slightly vs. FY23 5 TOTAL ANNUALIZED COST SAVINGS ($BN) “When …[Nelson Peltz] first appeared last year, he said he wanted Disney to cut costs aggressively, lay off employees, and return the dividend to shareholders. Which was fine … except that Iger, by all accounts, was already doing exactly that, as any competent chief executive would when presented with the stark numbers.” Puck1 SG&A and other operating cost savings Savings on cash content spend (excluding sports) ~$2.5 ~$3.0 ~$3.0 ~$4.5 $5.5 $7.5 February 2023 target On track to exceed +36% +50% +20% % increase vs. initial target New York Times2 “Helping Iger now is a new CFO, Hugh Johnston. During his 13 years at PepsiCo, Johnston showed an ability to cut costs at a sprawling business …”

Disney restored robust FC F , enabling capital return to shareholders 25 Source: Company data, FactSet. 1 Free cash flow reflects cash provided by operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Free cash flow is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by continuing operations, which is expected to tot al ~$14bn in FY24 representing a ~40% YoY increase. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP me asu re; 2 Includes cash dividend paid in January 2024 and authorized cash dividend to be paid in July 2024 and share repurchase announc ed in February 2024; 3 Fiscal 2019 included the payment of approximately $7.6bn of non recurring tax obligations that arose from the spin off of Fox Corporation in connection with the TFCF acquisition  Disney has long maintained a disciplined and balanced approach to capital allocation  As a result of the global pandemic, which we estimate caused billions in losses to cash from operations, we suspended our div ide nd in Spring 2020  Given our strong balance sheet, commitment to cost cutting, and continued growth and improvement across our businesses, we ar e t rending to exceed our FY24 free cash flow guidance of ~$8bn 1 , a >60% year over year increase that approaches levels we last achieved pre pandemic  As a result, we have re initiated our capital return program to shareholders  Paid a cash dividend of $0.30 / share in January 2024, and the Board authorized an additional dividend of $0.45 / share (50% inc rease over prior dividend) to be paid in July 2024  Announced a $3bn share repurchase target for FY24 6 SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVING FCF PROFILE POST COVID 1 ($ AVERAGE RETURN OF CAPITAL DURING IGER’S CEO TENURE ($BN) $5.9 FY06-FY20 $1.1 $4.9 $8 $8.7 FY19 FY23 FY24E $4.4 FY24 2 3 ~ +

Debt ($bn)1 Total $25 $21 $44 $56 $52 $46 $45 $46 Net 21 17 39 39 36 35 30 39 Disney maintains the strongest balance sheet in the sector, which supports future growth opportunities and shareholder returns 26 1 Each of Net Debt and Net Leverage is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please see page 2 for a definition of each of Net Debt and Net Leverage and why Disney is not providing forward-looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation of historical measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure; 2 EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is segment operating income. Please see page 2 for a definition of EBITDA and why Disney is not providing forward-looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation of historical measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure; 3 Leverage metrics shown on LTM basis and based on latest reported debt and cash balances, including subsequent issuances and repayments disclosed to date  We have the highest-rated balance sheet in the sector with senior unsecured credit ratings of A2 / stable (Moody’s) and A- / positive (S&P)  Our Q1 FY24 net debt and net leverage are consistent with post-TFCF deal closing levels in FY19 despite the significant impact of COVID on our businesses 6 STRONG BALANCE SHEET RELATIVE DISNEY LEVERAGE1 (MULTIPLE OF EBITDA2) TO MEDIA PEERS3 NET LEVERAGE TOTAL LEVERAGE 1.5x 1.2x 2.6x 5.2x 5.1x 3.1x 2.9x 2.8x 1.3x 0.9x 2.3x 3.5x 3.5x 2.3x 1.9x 2.4x FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 Q1 FY24 C O V I D 2.4x 1.0x 1.5x 4.0x 4.9x 2.8x 1.9x 2.5x 4.3x 5.9x A2 / ABaa2 / BBB+ Baa2 / BBB Baa3 / BBBBaa3 / BBBMoody’s / S&P rating NET LEVERAGE TOTAL LEVERAGE 1

Disney is successfully delivering transformational change in a rapidly changing marketplace 27 Source: Company filings. 1 Based on Disney Entertainment DTC; 2 Free cash flow reflects cash provided by operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Free cash flow is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by continuing operations, which was ~$6bn for FY22 and is expected to total ~$14bn in FY24. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the mo st comparable GAAP measure Return of capital No dividend / buybacks Reinstated dividend and buyback programs Free cash flow 2 $ 1. 1bn FCF for FY22 Trending to exceed FY24 FCF guidance of ~$8bn Cost control Elevated spend to support prior media org structure Annualized cost savings target of at least $7.5bn Outlook uncertain ~$60bn investment to turbocharge growth Organization and culture Creativity and accountability restored Misaligned accountability structures Streaming path to profitability 1 FY23 OI increased +$0.9bn YoY ($3.4bn) FY22 operating loss Creative engines Focused on core franchises and higher quality High volume of content Parks Continued post COVID normalization for some businesses ESPN Multiple headwinds and ongoing churn Planning to launch new distribution platforms Linear networks Focused on driving ongoing cost efficiencies NOVEMBER 2022 TODAY

A STRON G , INDEPENDEN T, AND QUALIFIED BOARD IS FOCUSED ON DELIVERING SUSTAINED SHAREHOLDER VALUE 28

The Board launched a clear, transparent process to deliver a top priority: a successful CEO transition 29 1 Represents committee composition following Disney’s 2024 annual meeting; 2 Puck, Iger’s Peltz Defense, 12/10/13  The Board is focused on both selecting a new CEO and positioning the new CEO for long-term success – Independent Chairman Mark Parker, who was integral to Nike’s well-regarded and successful succession from his tenure as CEO, was appointed to lead a Succession Planning Committee (SPC) composed of other highly successful CEOs – Former Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman – who had just completed a similarly well-regarded transition at Morgan Stanley – has joined both the Board and the SPC  The SPC met seven times in 2023, consistently discussing its progress with the full Board, including: – Retaining appropriate advisors, including a well-regarded search firm – Developing a timeline for the search process and identifying relevant skills / expertise – Reviewing both internal and external candidates Puck2 Disney has “been very clever in bringing James Gorman, the outgoing CEO of Morgan Stanley, onto the Disney board … What value does Peltz bring to the succession question on the Disney board if Gorman is already there? Perhaps not much, at this point.” SUCCESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS1 Mark Parker EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN AND FORMER CEO, NIKE James Gorman EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN AND FORMER CEO, MORGAN STANLEY Mary Barra CHAIR AND CEO, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY Calvin McDonald CEO, LULULEMON ATHLETICA

NIKE’S AND MORGAN STANLEY’S CEO TRANSITIONS WERE BOTH WELL REGARDED Directors Mark Parker and James Gorman have both executed high-profile, seamless CEO transitions 30  Mark Parker was President and CEO of Nike for 14 years  The Nike Board conducted a thorough search, evaluating the skills needed in the next CEO to best serve Nike, including global strategy, e-commerce, and enterprise tech  The Nike Board chose John Donahoe, a member of the Nike Board for five years and former President and CEO of both ServiceNow and eBay  It was a seamless transition, executed over more than three months as Donahoe stepped into the CEO role and Parker stepped into the Executive Chairman role  James Gorman was CEO of Morgan Stanley for 14 years  The Board deliberately prepared executives over a decade to take over as CEO, ultimately selecting three internal candidates as finalists  One of those candidates became CEO and the other two stayed as Co- Presidents  underscoring the careful, thoughtful nature of the process  Gorman is now Executive Chairman and will relinquish this role by end of 2024 Telsey Advisory, 10/22/19 “We view the announcement as a bit of a surprise, but the transition seems to have been well-planned.” UBS, 10/23/19 “This news is a modest positive because it signals business as usual for Nike: succession planning is a core competency at Nike.” Reuters, 10/25/23 “As with all his endeavors, his [James Gorman’s] succession has been well-planned, facilitating a smooth transition.” FT, 12/21/23 “The smooth process has branded Gorman as a kind of succession savant. He is set to join Disney’s board next year where he will sit on a special succession planning committee.”

Disney s independent, highly qualified Board is focused on delivering superio r , sustained shareholder value 31 Source: Proxy Statement of The Walt Disney Company, 02/01/24 Five independent Directors ( (**) were added within the last three years and two more (**) were added within the last five and half years Mary Barra CEO, GENERAL MOTORS Expertise in long term strategic planning and brand evolution during periods of technological change, as well as expertise in large scale cost rationalization and organizational restructuring. Safra Catz CEO & FORMER CFO, ORACLE Expertise in capitalizing on and managing risk within a rapidly changing technological landscape that affects our businesses, strategic planning, large scale cost rationalization, and strategic M&A and acquisition integration. Amy Chang FORMER EVP, CISCO SYSTEMS Expertise in emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, and in the implementation of responsive business strategies for consumer and retail businesses. Jeremy Darroch FORMER EXEC. CHAIR AND GROUP CEO, SKY Expertise in navigating the changing media landscape (having transformed a linear satellite broadcaster into one of Europe’s largest multi platform TV providers) as well as expertise in content creation and creative talent management. Carolyn Everson FORMER VP OF GLOBAL MARKETING SOLUTIONS, META Expertise in navigating evolving media and advertising landscapes as well as branded, consumer facing technology and its intersection with marketing. Michael Froman PRESIDENT, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS Expertise in and strategic guidance on international markets in which Disney currently and potentially could participate, including factors affecting international trade, complex digital governance, and cyber issues. James Gorman EXEC. CHAIR, MORGAN STANLEY Expertise in driving strategic transformation of a large, global company with a long term sustainable business model, and overseeing a successful, well regarded CEO succession process. Robert Iger CEO, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY Unmatched knowledge of and expertise in Disney’s creative content, expanding Disney’s geographic presence and revenue channels, and delivering superior shareholder value of 579% TSR during his initial CEO tenure. Maria Elena Lagomasino CEO & MP, WE FAMILY OFFICES Deep investor perspective from her significant private banking and wealth management experience, as well as governance and social thought leadership. Calvin McDonald CEO, LULULEMON ATHLETICA Expertise at integrating and innovating the customer experience across multiple channels and geographies, plus retail and brand building experience. Mark Parker (Chair) EXEC. CHAIR, NIKE Expertise in driving consumer product growth via international and DTC expansion, managing creative talent, and delivering a successful, well regarded CEO succession. Derica Rice FORMER EVP, CVS HEALTH CORP Expertise in aligning financial and strategic objectives in brand focused organizations, cost discipline, and creating effective organizational structures. * * * * * * *

This Board is built around diverse skillsets critical to Disney s success 32 Source: Proxy Statement of The Walt Disney Company, 02/01/24; please see Proxy Statement for additional detail describing eac h s kill SKILLS CENTRAL TO DISNEY’S STRATEGY Barra Catz Chang Darroch Everson Froman Gorman Iger Lagomasino McDonald Parker Rice Media and entertainment l l l Direct to Consumer l l l l l l l l Technology and innovation l l l l l l Strategic transformation l l l l l l 360 degree brand activation l u l l l l l l l l l u l u l Succession planning l l l l l CORE COMPETENCIES Business dev., M&A and growth l l l l l l l l l l l l Corporate responsibility l p l l l p l l p l l l p l l l Executive management l À l À l l À l l l À l À l l À l À l Finance and accounting l ln l ln l l l l l l l ln Global business operations l l l l l l l l l l l l Risk management l l l l l l l l l l l l OTHER Cybersecurity l l l Diversity l l l l l l u Denotes particular expertise in brand leadership and integration with consumer experience p Denotes formal service in an ESG thought leadership role À Denotes public company CEO experience n Denotes public company CFO experience

Trian s campaign targets t wo Disney directors with skillsets and expertise that are an impo r tant component of the Board s oversight 33 Extensive foreign relations expertise provides uniquely valuable insights on complex geopolitical issues affecting our strate gy and operations  Mr. Froman has significant expertise in international trade issues honed throughout his career particularly as U.S. Trade Representative and his current role as President of the Council on Foreign Relations  His expertise is highly relevant to Disney’s current businesses and growth strategy on such matters as: – Digital issues, such as the flow of data across borders and the taxation of digital products, which is critical to streaming and other Disney businesses; – International enforcement of intellectual property rights, which is foundational to Disney’s global business, and the special In tellectual Property Courts he helped establish to significantly improve the enforcement of U.S. intellectual property rights; and – International supply chain risk assessment and mitigation, which is essential to Disney’s licensed consumer products  As the global economy confronts fundamental questions around integration, globalization, and decoupling, Mr. Froman provides the Board key insights and context about key issues, including: – Impact of evolving geopolitics on the global economy (e.g., trade and investment rules, economic security trends) and on busi nes s; – Implications of the wars in Europe and the Middle East; – Changing nature of alignments between countries around the world; – Dynamics around differential economic growth in the U.S., Europe, Asia, and elsewhere  Losing Mr. Froman’s perspectives and experience would be a disservice to Disney and its shareholders at a time of increased g eop olitical tensions and international regulatory pressures Michael Froman

Trian s campaign targets t wo Disney directors with skillsets and expertise that are an impo r tant component of the Board s oversight 34 Long term shareholder perspective, capital markets experience, and corporate governance expertise inform the Board’s ongoing accountability and responsiveness to shareholders  Ms. Lagomasino’s extensive capital markets career has been centered on fiduciary responsibility, honing an investor perspecti ve, and deep expertise in corporate governance – She has, among other roles, served as the President and CEO of JPMorgan Private Bank, a Trustee of Carnegie Corporation of Ne w Y ork and the Chair of its Investment Committee overseeing $4bn, and the CEO of WE Family Offices managing $14bn for clients  Ms. Lagomasino is active in corporate governance more strategically, including: – As a founder of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard; and – A member of the Advisory Board of the Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership, which seeks to positively inf luence the future of the corporation amid a seismic shift in patterns of corporate ownership and calls for sustainable investment strategies  As an active Disney director, she: – Provides valuable insight from her service on the boards of other large consumer oriented global companies, including The Coca C ola Company, where she serves as Lead Independent Director; – Engages frequently and directly with many of Disney’s shareholders on behalf of the Board; – Spearheads efforts, as Chair of the Compensation Committee, to incorporate shareholder feedback into compensation strategy an d p lanning, ensuring executive compensation is aligned with the achievement of Disney’s key financial and strategic goals; and – Has consistently increased shareholder support for Disney’s say on pay proposal in every year since she became Chair of the Comp ensation Committee in 2019  Losing Ms. Lagomasino’s long term shareholder perspective and governance expertise would undermine Disney and its shareholders o n a critical dimension of Board accountability Maria Elena Lagomasino

Trian wants to replace these valuable directors with nominees who lack relevant and non duplicative expertise 35 Source: FactSet as of 02/22/24; 1 Reflects stock performance of iHeartMedia from 05/17/19 to 02/22/24 Nelson Peltz ⨯ At Disney, Bob Iger not Jay Rasulo was the driver of the company’s strategy and value creation ⨯ His leadership of Parks and being the CFO do not automatically translate to leading the creative soul of Disney or building a st reaming business ⨯ No further executive experience at any public company since leaving his role at Disney eight years ago ⨯ His perspectives are stale given Disney today is a radically different company in an industry experiencing generational disru pti on ⨯ Exceptionally poor TSR as Lead Independent Director at iHeartMedia (stock has declined 87% since he joined the Board) 1 Jay Rasulo ⨯ No media expertise, despite his stated desire to have a Board led review of the creative processes at Disney ⨯ His only novel ideas demonstrate his lack of understanding of the media ecosystem ⨯ In previous Board experience, was known to establish “shadow management teams” committed to advancing Trian’s agenda ⨯ Creates maximum disruption to ensure demands are met, which would be a destabilizing distraction when Disney needs total focu s o n execution ⨯ Track record of significant value destruction outside of the consumer packaged goods industry ⨯ Ike Perlmutter, Peltz’s silent partner who owns ~79% of Trian’s shares, has a fraught history with Bob Iger that could inhibi t P eltz from working constructively

100% 101% 102% 124% 160% 53% 36% 7% 4% Management compensation is heavily tied to Disney performance 36 Source: Company filings and public filings 1 Reflects actual compensation as of latest fiscal year 2 Reflects average of co-CEOs’ latest total compensation figures  Disney’s Compensation Committee has a multi-year track record of making changes to its executive compensation program that are responsive to shareholder feedback – Increased CEO’s performancebased RSUs (“PBUs”) to comprise 60% of overall longterm incentive (LTI) grant value for FY23, up from 50% for FY22 – Starting in FY22, increased PBUs to comprise 50% of overall LTI grant value for all other NEOs (other than Interim CFO), up from 30% in FY21 – Increased relative TSR target performance level for all NEOs to above median (55th percentile of the S&P 500) starting in FY22 PERFORMANCE ALIGNMENT % OF IGER FY23 TARGET COMPENSATION AT RISK COMPENSATION OF MEDIA CEOS RELATIVE TO IGER’S1 96% variable or at-risk Base salary Target annual incentive Earned based on company performance against preset goals Stock options Value depends on appreciation in Disney share price PBUs Tied to (i) achievement of relative TSR and (ii) absolute ROIC performance (equally weighted) 2 Higher total $ compensation vs. Iger

This Board has “skin in the game” and, more importantly, has the expertise to deliver on our growth strategy 37 Source: Company filings and public filings; 1 Excludes Directors Darroch, Gorman, and Everson, who have served on the Board for less than three years, and equity value is based on shares and stock units at Disney’s closing stock price as of 02/01/24, the date Disney’s definitive proxy was filed; 2 S&P 500 Outside Director Compensation Analysis Insights, Meridian Compensation Partners, 11/30/23; 3 Trian definitive proxy statement, 02/01/24; 4 CNBC, Squawk on the Street, 02/15/24  Trian claims ownership of >$3bn of Disney stock … in reality, Trian only owns ~$650mm Disney shares  Trian has sold over 2.3mm shares since Dec 2022 (25% of stake) and sold ~534K shares from Sep 2023 to Dec 2023 in the middle of the proxy fight  Isaac Perlmutter, a former Disney executive, owns the vast majority of shares that Trian claims to own MEDIAN VALUE OF SHARES HELD BY INDEPENDENTS1 OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES EXCEED S&P 500 AVG2 TRIAN CLAIMS TO BE MORE INVESTED THAN IT IS3 CNBC4 “[Trian] sold stock from the third quarter to the fourth quarter … It's odd to see a company and/or an investment manager sell stock during a proxy fight … it is rare following these things to see that. Unless they have redemptions that they had to sell some stock for.” $1.6mm E A C H 5x annual cash retainer in vs. S&P 500 3 Y E A R S 5 Y E A R S Assets Under Management  particularly assets someone else owns and manages themselves  are not the right criterion for assessing director effectiveness Trian 21% Rasulo 0.0% Perlmutter 79%

NELSON PELTZ, IKE PERLMUTTER, AND JAY RASULO ARE NOT WHAT DISNEY NEEDS RIGHT NOW 38

Peltz, Perlmutter, and Rasulo are not what Disney needs now 39 Peltz does not understand the challenges Disney is facing Peltz’s “theses” are nothing new and underscore his lack of understanding of both Disney and the media industry Peltz’s slate, including his silent partner Ike Perlmutter, would harm Disney and jeopardize our strategic transformation Peltz’s agenda is misaligned with other shareholders’ long term interests Disney has sought constructive engagement with Peltz, but he is unwilling to consider any other resolution besides a Board se at for himself Neither Peltz nor Rasulo have the skills to help Disney Peltz’s TSR track record at his current and previous directorships (and his partners’ as well) is deeply concerning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Peltz doesn’t understand the challenges Disney is facing … 40 1CNBC, Squawk Box, 02/08/24; 2 Puck, The Crocodile’s Idea, 02/04/24  Peltz has ignored the central challenges Disney is facing and the core strengths it is leveraging to successfully navigate this moment in time – The media sector is undergoing generational disruption – We have made great strides executing our strategic plan – Disney has positioned itself to thrive in the evolving media ecosystem – Managing creative businesses is different than managing a hedge fund  We already have in motion the vast majority of Peltz’s “suggestions,” and his “novel ideas” demonstrate how unequipped he is for boardroom and strategy discussions at Disney 1 CNBC1 “I don’t know if he [Peltz] has any idea what to do with a media company. He used to do consumer products companies and Jeff Sonnenfeld said he has no idea what he’s doing. So he likes to go in and stir things up … He [Peltz] wants a higher stock price but I don’t think he has any idea how to get there.” “His agenda includes a few notable but perplexing goals. Foremost among them is: Get the board to review Disney’s “creative processes and structure” to enable Disney to reclaim its box office luster. Okay, I get this. But I’m not sure what a board of directors can do to inspire the rank and file to make better movies. Another is: Get management to make Disney’s streaming business as profitable as Netflix’s. Okay, that’s a worthy goal. But these are two very different companies. Netflix had a blank sheet of paper when it came to developing its streaming business. It’s not so simple for Disney…” Puck2

… which he readily admits every time he is on CNBC … 41 1 CNBC interview, Squawk on the Street , 01/18/24; 2 CNBC interview, Money Movers , 02/14/24 1 NELSON PELTZ SAID: IT IS CLEAR THAT: “… they question the relevant experience you have in terms of the entertainment and media business and why you would add anything?” 1 “By the way, they said I have no media experience. I don't claim to have any Peltz doesn’t understand media “I do wonder how you fix that [creativity] at the board level?” 2 “I think what you do at the board level is you start to make sure that you have the right creative people in place Peltz knows nothing about managing creativity “What do you think they should do with ESPN?” 2 “Let me tell you, I don't know Peltz has no plan at all for Disney THE INTERVIEWER ASKED:

… and his partner, Jay Rasulo, is equally oblivious on CNBC 42 1CNBC interview, Money Movers, 02/27/24; 2 Reflects stock performance of iHeartMedia from 05/17/19 to 02/22/24 1  Jay Rasulo doesn’t understand why Disney acquired 21st Century Fox  He’s stuck with legacy “analog thinking” since his only media experience in the last eight years is on the Board of iHeartMedia, which has declined 87% since he joined the Board2 Bob Iger, MoffettNathanson Conference, 05/14/19 “And when we started looking at what we might be able to buy from 21CF; of those assets … we realized that we could create significant value from buying those assets within a DTC strategy. So the lens that we analyzed 21CF through, was with an eye toward eventually launching DTC businesses. It wasn't -- interestingly enough -- it wasn't just about buying franchises and content that existed. It was about getting the talent that we would ultimately need to create the content, to fuel all these services.” “One of the most exciting aspects of our Fox acquisition is that it will allow us to greatly accelerate our DTC strategy, enabling us to better serve consumers around the world. As I’ve said before, we believe creating a DTC relationship is vital to the future of our media businesses, and it’s our highest priority. Combined, our DTC will include a controlling interest of Hulu here in the U.S. … in addition to our upcoming Disney- and ESPN-branded offerings. And the combination of Fox’s properties – including the franchises I mentioned a moment ago with Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, ESPN, and ABC content  provides the opportunity for us to create even more compelling entertainment experiences and value propositions via DTC services, across a wider array of audiences.” Bob Iger, Transaction Announcement Call, 12/14/17 AS DISNEY SAID FROM THE START, THE FOX DEAL WAS ABOUT STREAMING “And, frankly, he [Iger] did the Fox acquisition, which is very hard to understand, which doubled down on the linear business” CNBC1

Peltz s “theses” are nothing new and underscore his lack of understanding of both Disney and the media industry 43 1 Trian Definitive Proxy Statement, 02/01/24; 2 Bloomberg, Peltz’s Plan to Fix Disney Includes Bundling ESPN+ With Netflix , 01/30/24; 3 For our combined streaming businesses; 4 DTC streaming businesses operating income is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measures are segment operat ing income for the Entertainment segment and Sports segment. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and why Disney is not providing a forward looking quanti tative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure; 5 ROIC is a non GAAP financial measure. Please see page 2 for a definition of ROIC and the end of this presentation for a reconci liation to the most comparable GAAP measure 2 TRIAN GOAL DISNEY PERSPECTIVE STUDIO CREATIVITY Initiate Board led review of creative process 1  Clearest example that Trian has no understanding of creative led businesses  Bureaucracy does not drive global box office or creative success  Reorganization has re empowered our creative leaders to create best in class content STREAMING PROFITABILITY Target Netflix like margins of 15 20% by FY 2027 1  Peltz does not understand streaming and does not have a plan to support his arbitrary timeline  We are making strong progress to date ($0.9bn OI improvement in FY23 for Disney Entertainment  Committed to breakeven by end of FY24 3 , with a long term double digit margin target 4 FUTURE OF ESPN Bundle ESPN+ with a competitor like Netflix 2  ESPN is a clear differentiator vs. other peers, including Netflix  Sports is a core element of our streaming bundle  Concrete progress against digital vision (e.g., Fall 2025 flagship DTC launch, FOX/WBD JV, ESPN EXPERIENCES GROWTH Execute on clear vision for Parks to achieve high single digit OI growth 1  The clear vision we laid out in September 2023 already achieves Experiences OI growth in HSD/LDD  Long track record of high Experiences ROIC … FY23 ROIC was nearly 2.5x our cost of capital 5  Steady pipeline of new attractions opening to high consumer demand and excitement CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Adopt best in class governance and complete succession process 1  We have best in class governance with very shareholder friendly bylaws and robust shareholder engagement  Succession is a top Board priority , led by four successful CEOs with two recently leading well regarded successions  Robust, ongoing Board refreshment , including five new independent directors in past three years

Peltz’s slate  exacerbated by his silent partner, Ike Perlmutter  would harm Disney … 44 3 Peltz has never been involved in a business with creativity at its core and doesn’t understand the media sector Peltz’s “suggestions” are dangerous, uninformed, and value-destructive Former Marvel exec Ike Perlmutter  whose fraught history with Bob Iger is publicly documented  owns ~79% of the shares Trian claims to represent and has collaborated with Peltz to run two consecutive proxy contests In previous Board experience, Peltz characteristically established a “shadow management team” committed to advancing his own agenda in lieu of long-term shareholder value Peltz  particularly under Perlmutter’s continued influence  would create a significant distraction and waste time and resources when management needs total focus on execution Peltz on the Board sends a message that creativity is being deprioritized in favor of financial engineering just as we are restoring creative confidence across Disney Roy Disney, 02/29/24 “These activists must be defeated. They are not interested in preserving the Disney magic, but stripping it to the bone to make a quick profit for themselves.” Abigail Disney, 02/29/24 “… I know for a fact that the worst thing that could happen to the company is Nelson Peltz.”

… and does not serve shareholders’ long-term interests 45 1 Represents the period from May 2013 through April 2021 and assumes the reinvestment of dividends; 2 Fortune, ‘The wizard vs. the illusionist’, 11/07/23; 3 13D Monitor, The Most Activist Place on Earth, 12/14/23; 4 Puck, What I’m Hearing: Thursday Thoughts, 12/14/23; 5 Bloomberg, Iger Has Enough Antagonists for Three Disney Films, 12/18/23 4 WHY ARE THEY INTERESTED IN DISNEY? TRIAN TRIO LOOKING TO SETTLE SCORES  Perlmutter’s fraught history with Bob Iger appears to have driven his collaboration with Peltz to run a proxy contest (he owns ~79% of the shares Peltz claims to own)  Perlmutter’s oversight of Marvel’s studio was severed in 2015 due to his ongoing antagonization of the creative team and vehement opposition to expanding the group’s output to films like Black Panther and Captain Marvel, which ultimately made >$1.3bn and >$1.1bn, respectively, in global box office  Perlmutter left Disney in March 2023 as part of the company’s cost reduction program  Trian was terminated as an investment manager within Disney’s pension plan in 2021 after underperforming the S&P 500 by more than 500 basis points on an annualized basis over 8 years1  Peltz offered excuses for the underperformance and pressured Disney executives to reverse the termination decision  Peltz met with Perlmutter in July 2022 and the two began working together to get Peltz a Disney board seat  Rasulo resigned after not being appointed Disney COO in 2015  Rasulo “is also Perlmutter’s guy. He was the guy that Perlmutter wanted to take over [Disney] and Perlmutter and Bob Iger have been on the outs ever since”2  When Iger told Perlmutter that Rasulo wouldn’t be COO in 2015, Perlmutter responded: “You broke my heart”3 Nelson Peltz Jay Rasulo Ike Perlmutter Fortune 2 “Peltz’s campaign against Disney reeks of a personal vendetta against Iger rather than a compelling strategic vision for value creation.” 13D Monitor 3 “The decision to add Jay Rasulo to the slate further indicates that this proxy fight is about Ike Perlmutter versus Bob Iger.” Puck 4 “Ike’s pity party adds one … Now Ike is shadowpuppeting his West Palm bro Peltz in this proxy fight and, lo and behold, Rasulo appears to declare, “The Disney I know and love has lost its way.” Scorned former employees do tend to think that way.” “But for Perlmutter, it’s personal. Perlmutter became one of the company’s biggest shareholders after selling Marvel to Disney in 2009 for $4bn. Over time, Iger chipped away at Perlmutter’s power, leaving him angry and marginalized.” Bloomberg 5

Disney has consistently sought constructive engagement, which Peltz has ignored 46 1 Proxy Statement of The Walt Disney Company, 02/01/24 and 02/10/23 5 WHAT HAVE PELTZ, PERLMUTTER, AND RASULO BROUGHT? WHAT HAS DISNEY OFFERED? 2 proxy fights >20 meaningful interactions since Feb. 2023 and 3 meetings with the Board No substantive ideas Disney isn’t already executing Comprehensive strategic transformation to adapt to current environment 27 requests to join the Board Information sharing agreement and quarterly meetings with Board Massive distraction for over 20 months wasting time, money, and resources Robust strategic plan to drive growth and value 2 director nominees who can’t help Disney now 3 new independent directors in last 18 months who can help Disney now Peltz (18x), Perlmutter on Peltz’s behalf (7x), or together (2x) suggested Peltz should be added to the Board at least 27 times from July 2022 to December 2023 1 7x JULY 2022 2x AUG 2022 9x NOV 2022 1x DEC 2022 2x MAY 2023 1x OCT 2023 3x NOV 2023 1x DEC 2023 1x JAN 2023

Disney has always been open to constructive shareholder engagement, as ValueAct can attest 47 Source: FactSet. 1 Summary metrics reflect investments in 21st Century Fox, Adobe, Microsoft, The New York Times, Salesforce, Spotify and Nintendo; 2 Includes Adobe, Microsoft, Salesforce and 21st Century Fox; 3 Reflects duration between first and final 13F filing disclosing ValueAct position; excludes current positions; 4 Reflects TSR between first and final 13F filing disclosing ValueAct position for closed positions; for current positions, reflects TSR from first 13F filing disclosing ValueAct position through January 31, 2024 5 HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT WITH VALUEACT STRONG TRACK RECORD WITH INVESTMENTS RELEVANT TO DISNEY Board Seats2 4 Avg. Ann. TSR vs. S&P 5001,4 +32ppt Avg. Duration Held1,2 2.9 years Avg. Annualized TSR1,4 47% Summer 2023 ValueAct begins investing in Disney amidst the Hollywood strikes, when the Disney share price was around $80 Mason Morfit, ValueAct Co-CEO and CIO “As legacy technologies transition to digital platforms, we believe Disney can lead the media industry forward. We could not be more excited to partner with Bob and the Board to help create long-term sustainable shareholder value.” November 15, 2023 News breaks that ValueAct has been building a stake in Disney and is reported to be one of ValueAct’s largest positions January 2024 ValueAct enters into an information sharing arrangement to facilitate strategic consultation with Disney and agrees to support its director nominees in fight with Peltz

May '19 May '20 May '21 May '22 May '23 As their track records on other media related boards demonstrate, neither Peltz nor Rasulo have the skills to help Disney 48 Source: FactSet as of 02/22/24. 1 Reflects TSR of MSGN from 10/28/14 (when Peltz joined Board, based on announcement date) to 09/30/15 (spin off of Sports and En tertainment business), and MSGS from 09/30/15 to 02/22/23; 2 CNBC interview, 01/12/23; 3 IHRT share price data first available on 05/07/19 at listing on OTC Pink after Rasulo was appointed to Board on 05/01/19; 4 Reflects EPS of Success Company coming out of Chapter 11 bankruptcy from 05/01/19 to 12/31/19  Nelson Peltz does not understand the media industry and does not bring additive skills to the Disney Board  Neither does Jay Rasulo, who has not managed through the industry’s disruption or had an executive role since leaving Disney ove r eight years ago 6 PELTZ : MSG SPORTS TSR TRAILS MARKET 1  Peltz has been on the MSGS Board since October 2014  TSR is nowhere near outperforming the S&P 500 by 900bps annually, as Peltz claims all his Boards have 2 RASULO : IHEARTMEDIA METRICS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN ACROSS THE BOARD  Rasulo was appointed to the iHeartMedia Board on 05/01/19 as Lead Independent Director  Stock price and key performance metrics are worse today than when Rasulo joined the Board STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE 3 EPS ($) EBITDA MARGIN (%) S&P 500 121 ppt under underperformanceperformance84% 205% TSR 27% 22% 2019A 2024E $0.77 4 $0.08 2019A 2024E 5.2x 6.5x 03/31/19 09/30/23 Declined ~500bps 8.6x 6.3x 07/18/19 02/09/24 Stock declined 87% since Rasulo joined Board Declined 90% FIRM VALUE / NTM EBITDA DEBT / LTM EBITDA Increased ~1.3x Declined (2.3x)

Peltz and his Trian colleagues chronically underdeliver on boards 49 Source: FactSet as of 02/22/24. 1 Nelson Peltz, CNBC interview, 01/12/23; 2 The performance numbers represent total shareholder returns, including the impact of dividend reinvestment and adjusting for sp in offs, from one business day prior to Peltz or another Trian representative effectively joining Board until date Peltz or Tria n representative exited Board (or 02/06/24 if currently on Board), compared to the total shareholder return of the S&P500 index for the same period of each cas e; 3 Trian Fund Management, preliminary proxy statement, 02/02/23; 4 Includes Trian Co Founders Ed Garden and Peter May, Trian Partner Brian Baldwin and Nelson’s son Matt Peltz whose board positio ns are enumerated on Trian’s website (except Garden on Chemtura Board) 7 WHAT NELSON PELTZ SAYS 1 THE ACTUAL FACTS 2 “I have probably served on more boards than anybody that I know … whatever Board it was, has outperformed the S&P by 900bps annually “ Nelson wakes up every day trying to find ways for Trian’s investments to generate the best returns 3 NELSON PELTZ  Served on 14 boards  Only 6 have outperformed the total shareholder return (TSR) of the S&P annually over his Board tenure  Average board performance has been ~50bps WORSE annually than the S&P  Median board performance has been ~250bps WORSE annually than the S&P OTHER TRIAN REPRESENTATIVES 4  Served on 8 boards  Only 1 has outperformed the TSR of the S&P annually (and that by less that 1%)  Average board performance has been ~1,500bps WORSE annually than the S&P  Median board performance has been ~1,000bps WORSE annually than the S&P f

Peltz s investment returns relative to his benchmark do not support his rhetoric … 50 7  Peltz claimed: “I have probably served on more boards than anybody that I know … whatever Board it was, has outperformed the S&P by 900bps annually 1  But when using a complete dataset, Peltz or Trian involvement on boards resulted in TSR underperformance versus the S&P 500 in ~68% of cases NELSON PELTZ AS BOARD MEMBER 2 OTHER TRIAN REP AS BOARD MEMBER 2 (14%) (5%) (19%) 21% 5% (2%) 25% (5%) (3%) 14% 7% (6%) (29%) 2% (9%) (14%) (14%) (5%) (10%) 1% (7%) Unileve r Wendy's Janus Henderson Group Invesco Procter & Gamble Sysco Legg Mason Mondele z Legg Mason Trane Te chnologie s H. J. Heinz MSG Ne tworks / MSG Sports CI FC Encore Capital Group Janus Henderson Group General Electric nVent Electric Bank of New York Mellon Pentair Tiffany & Co. Family Dollar Stores Chemtura Unilever Wendy’s Janus Henderson Invesco P&G Sysco Legg Mason Mondelez Legg Mason Trane Tech. H.J. Heinz Janus Henderson GE nVent Electric BNY Mellon Pentair Tiffany & Co. Family Dollar Chemtura (59%) MSG Sports Encore Capital CIFC Source: FactSet as of 02/22/24. 1 Nelson Peltz, CNBC interview, 01/12/23; 2 Bars in chart illustrate total shareholder returns, including impact of dividend reinvestment and adjusting for spin offs, from one business day prior to Peltz or another Trian representative effectively joining Board until date Peltz or Trian representati ve exited Board (or 02/22/24 if currently on Board) minus total shareholder return of S&P 500 during same period for each case; 3 Reflects Peltz’s tenure from 02/01/22 to 11/15/22; 4 Reflects Peltz’s second tenure from 05/20/19 to 07/31/20; 5 Reflects Peltz’s first tenure from 10/27/09 to 12/01/14; 6 Reflects Ed Garden’s tenure starting 02/01/22 3 4 5 6

09/30/05 02/29/24 … on the other hand, Bob Iger has delivered strong returns for Disney shareholders throughout his tenure as CEO 51 Source: FactSet. 1 Nelson Peltz, CNBC interview, 01/12/23; 2 TSR represents stock price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends; 3 Currently includes CHTR, CMCSA, DIS, EA, FOX, FOXA, GOOG, GOOGL, IPG, LYV, META, MTCH, NFLX, NWS, NWSA, OMC, PARA, T, TMUS, T TW O, VZ, and WBD; 4 TFCFA returns up to unaffected date of 11/03/17 prior to news leak regarding a potential sale; 5 Viacom Class A returns up to the closing of Viacom and CBS’s merger and Paramount Global Class B returns since  The Board acted decisively in November 2022 when it determined that a CEO change was necessary – Determined that Bob Iger is the right CEO at the right time to navigate Disney through generational disruption and successful ly execute our strategic transformation – Subsequently implemented a robust succession process, led by CEOs with strong succession experience, to find Disney’s next le ade r by the end of 2026  The true measure of a CEO’s success is the TSR during their tenure as CEO relative to pure play performance peers  Peltz suggested on CNBC 1 that investors “take a look at that TSR and then you tell me the answer” so we did DISNEY VS. S&P TSR 2 (IGER’S COMBINED TERMS AS DISNEY VS. MEDIA PEERS TSR (IGER’S FIRST TERM) S&P 500 381% 728% 363% S&P 500 Comm. Services Index 3 Chapek as CEO First term: 09/30/05 to 02/24/20 Second term: 11/20/22 to 02/29/24 49% 104% 244% 579% 5 4 DISNEY VS. MEDIA PEERS TSR (COMBINED TERMS) 5 4 (9%) 104% 181% 728%

CONCLUSION 52

You cannot “restore the magic” if you do n ’t understand magic 53 Disney has an unparalleled creative engine that drives shareholder value creation  Our 100 years of incomparable storytelling excellence has resulted in best in class assets and timeless, beloved characters for all ages  Our creativity makes the impossible possible and is a source of inspiration in a cynical world  Our creative engine is rejuvenated and thriving Disney is uniquely positioned to thrive amid generational disruption  We built leading streaming platforms supported by our differentiated IP, global scale, and the #1 sports media brand, ESPN  We have an unequaled ability to create franchises with longevity and to engage consumers across our unique assets  We have unique monetization capabilities that drive superior economics and outsized revenue and margin opportunities Nelson Peltz and Trian’s approach would absolutely damage Disney  Peltz has no experience managing creative businesses … you don’t manage creativity the way you manage a hedge fund  Peltz’s suggestion for a “board led creative review” process is value destructive … bureaucracy doesn’t drive box office or crea tive success  Peltz’s idea to bundle ESPN with Netflix, our biggest streaming competitor, underscores how little he understands about media an d our business

This Board is already delivering on Disney s potential 54 1 Diluted EPS excluding certain items is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is diluted EPS. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and why Disney is not providing a forward looking quantitative reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure; 2 Free cash flow reflects cash provided by operations less investments in parks, resorts and other property. Free cash flow is a non GAAP financial measure. The most comparable GAAP measure is cash provided by continuing operations, which is expected to tot al ~$14bn in FY24 representing a ~40% YoY increase. See page 2 for how we define and calculate this measure and the end of this presentation for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAA P m easure.; 3 Represents committee composition following Disney’s 2024 annual meeting Disney is positioned to thrive amid unprecedented industry disruption  In Q 1 FY 24 we delivered GAAP and Non GAAP Diluted EPS 1 growth of 49 and 23 respectively, and have guided to Non GAAP Diluted EPS growth 1 of at least 20 for FY 24  We are successfully executing against detailed plans for growth in each of our businesses to drive superior, sustainable shareholder value – Reinvigorating creativity in our film studios by restoring decision making to creative leaders increasing ROI by prioritizing quality over output – Line of sight to streaming profitability beginning in Q 4 FY 24 with opportunities for subscriber and ARPU growth and margin expansion ahead – Continuing to advance ESPN as the preeminent digital sports platform with ESPN flagship DTC, ESPN Bet, and the FOX WBD joint venture – Turbocharging growth in Experiences with detailed 10 year, 60 bn investment plan, building upon our strong track record of outsized returns – On pace to exceed 7 5 bn annual cost savings target, up 2 bn from original Q 2 FY 23 target  Leveraging robust FCF 2 the Board approved a 50 increase to the previous dividend 0 30 to 0 45 / and a share buyback targeting 3 bn in FY 24  Disney is deftly managing generational disruption in media, which has challenged economic models and forced legacy players to evolve or be left behind A strong, independent, and well qualified Board is focused on delivering sustained shareholder value  The Board recognized sector disruption early and oversaw a carefully planned, long term strategy to position Disney for future success  This Board has been constructed around the diverse skills and experiences critical to Disney’s success in a complex global landscape – Five independent directors were added within the last three years and two more were added within the last five and a half years  The Succession Planning Committee is empowered to support a top Board priority a successful CEO transition – Composed of four highly successful CEOs 3 two of whom have recently executed high profile, seamless CEO transitions  Executive compensation is heavily tied to Disney’s performance and aligned with shareholders Nelson Peltz, Isaac Perlmutter, and Jay Rasulo are not what Disney needs now  Trian seeks to replace two Disney directors whose expertise is critical to the Board with nominees who lack relevant and non duplicative expertise  Nelson Peltz, Isaac Perlmutter (who owns 79 of Peltz’s stake), and Jay Rasulo will harm Disney  We believe Peltz, Perlmutter, and Rasulo would be a destabilizing distraction with a questionable agenda when Disney needs total focus on execution  Despite agitating for nearly two years, Peltz still has not communicated any novel ideas that aren’t inane  Neither Peltz, who does not understand media, nor Rasulo, who has not managed through the industry’s disruption, have the skills to help Disney  Peltz has a history of establishing “shadow management teams” that sidetrack execution and historically have not delivered superior TSR performance

BLACKWELLS IS PROPOSING A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF A PROBLEM 55 APPENDIX A

Blackwells “theses” underscore their lack of understanding of Disney 56 1 Blackwells Capital Letter to Fellow Shareholders, 02/06/24; 2 Proxy Statement of Blackwells Capital, 02/06/24; 2 Blackwells Capital Releases its Vision for the Future of Technology at Disney, 02/26/24 BLACKWELLS THESIS THE REALITY BREAK DISNEY INTO PIECES “…exploring all strategic possibilities with cold eyes, including the potential separation of Disney into three entities…” 1  Our businesses the studios, media platforms, parks, cruise lines, and consumer products work together as a whole and are fueled by original studio content from our unparalleled creativity and storytelling  What makes Disney unique is our ability to leverage our best in class IP to monetize our franchises across all our lines of business and extend their longevity for generations to create differentiated returns on our investments  Blackwells demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of Disney’s strengths derived from synergies across our businesses SPIN OFF PROPERTY INTO A REIT “Disney could separate its owned real estate into an independent publicly listed REIT” 2  Real estate is strategic, not incidental, to Disney’s ability to create sustainable, long term shareholder value  A REIT structure would have burdensome limitations, including numerous, complex operational restrictions and a reduction of operational / ownership control over core assets, particularly our Parks  The traditional financial advantages of separating real estate assets (valuation arbitrage, tax efficiency, alternative sourc es of capital) have limited applicability for Disney’s owned real estate portfolio RELY MORE ON AI, VIRTUAL REALITY, AND AUGMENTED REALITY “Disney should be dominating in the fields of spatial computing and AI… AI…”3  Disney is at the forefront of spatial computing and AI in numerous ways  Disney is one of the few companies that successfully marries deep technical know how, innovative thinking, unmatched creative power, and some of the most valuable IP in the world  Blackwells doesn’t understand Disney’s current technology prowess and the strength of our innovation pipeline

Breaking Disney up, including its real estate assets, would destroy key competitive advantages 57  Our core competitive advantage is our unparalleled IP coupled with the unique ability to leverage and monetize it through film, streaming, consumer products, parks, and experiences  Walt Disney’s Synergy Map has proven to be a highly relevant, foundational strategy over an extended period of time – The strategic vision that Walt created has fueled a long track record of value creating growth for Disney shareholders – While the Synergy Map and our asset base have evolved over the past 67 years, Walt’s underlying insight remains highly relevant today  We are not going to jeopardize that powerful value creation engine by focusing on short term financial engineering – We have already rationalized our real estate portfolio and divested non core assets; the real estate that remains in our portfolio is strategic to our operations and integral to our ability to drive sustainable, long term shareholder value – A REIT structure would impose burdensome limitations and reduce operational control over core assets, particularly in our Parks, and could impair our ability to make changes to attractions, sell integrated vacation packages and other examples that would have negative implications to potential profit growth DIS SYNERGIES FROM BREAKING DISNEY UP WOULD DWARF ANY POTENTIAL UPSIDE

Disney is already a leader in deploying emerging technologies 58 1 Blackwells Capital Releases its Vision for the Future of Technology at Disney, 02/26/24 BLACKWELLS THESIS 1 THE REALITY FRAGMENTATION “Severe technological fragmentation between Disney’s segments and sub segments”  Disney has taken multiple steps beginning as early as 2018, and especially in the past year to create unified platforms and organizations, and to streamline technology leadership that aligns with our core business strategy. ̶ TWDC has unified consumer identity / data platforms that both Experiences and Entertainment / ESPN technology stacks utilize ̶ Technology unification in our media businesses has led to material annual cost efficiencies including cost reductions, build vs buy optimization, and enabling the workforce to focus on higher value added areas  Our CTOs play an important role on Disney’s leadership team, have direct collaboration with our top leadership and Board, and are deeply involved in many of our biggest decisions  We take a “constant improvement” posture, and consistently evaluate and evolve our technology delivery models UNHURRIED INNOVATION “Consistently behind the technological advancement curve”  We don’t create or use technology for technology’s sake; we leverage technology to differentiate and elevate entertainment experiences, services, and content  The tech powering many of our outward touch points is intentionally invisible, which is critically important to the guest experience … but it is pervasive … since 2021, Disney has filed for or been granted more than 1,600 patents worldwide  Disney is repeatedly the partner of choice for major technology companies: we have the technical skills to work on the most complex and technically challenging projects with unmatched creativity, content, and brands  Disney has consistently pioneered tech advancements such as Disney+ on Apple Vision Pro (one of the top native app experiences on a ground breaking platform)

Disney is already a leader in deploying emerging technologies (cont.) 59 1 Blackwells Capital Releases its Vision for the Future of Technology at Disney, 02/26/24 BLACKWELLS THESIS 1 THE REALITY MISSING NATIVE TECHNOLOGY STACK “Disney bolts on technological services, rather than developing them from the ground up”  Native technology development a core focus for decades, since Imagineering began has been accelerating  We have built or rebuilt multiple core technological systems and platforms and several of the most technologically advanced content production & distribution facilities in the world – Disney’s ad tech is driven off a proprietary, unified platform which enables addressable advertising technology and data targeting – Our unified ad tech platform enabled us to launch Disney+ Ad Tier in just 6 months, and is powering our ad tier rollout around the world  Many of our platforms, systems, and software combine core proprietary designs and technologies purpose built and differentiating with commonly used component tech SPATIAL COMPUTING AND AI MEDIOCRITY “Disney’s cutting edge AI and spatial computing initiatives are stale at best”  Disney is at the forefront of spatial computing and AI in many ways: – USD a foundational element of spatial computing was created by Pixar (and open sourced) – Our Parks business has been working with AI for more than a decade – Disney was a signature launch partner on Apple Vision Pro – ESPN worked with the NBA & Brooklyn Nets to produce the first ever live volumetric video telecast, which blended live sports, live television and video game experience  We are active in spatial computing and AI, but also cognizant that the technology is still ahead of the business model  Disney is mindful of protecting intellectual property, our consumers, workforce, creative partners, brands, and business, and ensuring we understand uses and guidelines for AI

Blackwells nominees are unqualified for election to Disney’s Board 60 1 Blackwells Disney Investor Presentation, 03/04/24 Craig Hatkoff ⨯ Has never served as a director of a public company ⨯ Her executive and investor experience which focused on online marketplaces, early stage consumer, SaaS, and infrastructure companies is not aligned with Disney’s strategy, objectives, or needs ⨯ Has not worked with companies of Disney’s scale … deploying $60bn of capex is different than $25mm in venture capital funding Leah Solivan ⨯ No experience with large, public media and entertainment companies, particularly in Disney’s area of focus, nor any other con sum er facing businesses, let alone theme parks, cruises, and experiences ⨯ His experience is primarily in real estate and financial investment businesses ⨯ Heads the Nomination and Governance committee at a company which has four board members with over 20 years of tenure ⨯ Chairing a small publishing company and helping to start a film festival do not qualify as “deep media industry knowledge” 1 Jessica Schell ⨯ Has never served as a director of a public company or an operating company, despite having served on the management teams of cer tain media and entertainment companies ⨯ Her media experience mostly is rooted in legacy media, and Hulu was in its infancy and far from profitable when she was there ⨯ Would not be considered independent (her brother and/or entities with which he is affiliated have ongoing contractual busines s relationships with Disney) THE BLACKWELLS NOMINEES ARE LESS QUALIFIED AND WOULD HINDER DISN EY’S TRANSFORMATION EFFORTS UNDERWAY Blackwells nominees do not possess the appropriate range of talent, skill, perspective, and/or expertise to effectively suppo rt Disney’s priorities in the face of continuing industry wide challenges

FINANCIAL RECONCILIATIONS 61 APPENDIX B

Reconciliation of DTC streaming businesses operating losses 62 Source: Company filings  The following tables reconcile Entertainment and Sports segment operating income (loss) to the DTC streaming businesses opera tin g loss: Quarter Ended ($MM) December 30, 2023 December 31, 2022 Entertainment Sports DTC Streaming Services Entertainment Sports DTC Streaming Services Linear Networks $1,236 ($25) $1,130 ($95) (+) DTC streaming businesses (DTC and ESPN+ businesses) (138) (78) ($216) (984) (69) ($1,053) (+) Content Sales / Licensing and Other (224)  (1)  Total $874 ($103) $345 ($164) Year Ended ($MM) September 30, 2023 October 1, 2022 Entertainment Sports DTC Streaming Services Entertainment Sports DTC Streaming Services Linear Networks $4,119 $2,581 $5,198 $3,299 (+) DTC streaming businesses (DTC and ESPN+ (2,496) (116) ($2,612) (3,424) (589) ($4,013) (+) Content Sales / Licensing and Other (179)  352  Total $1,444 $2,465 $2,126 $2,710

Reconciliation of Diluted EPS excluding certain items 63 Source: Company filings; 1 Tax benefits / expense is determined using the tax rate applicable to the individual item; 2 Before noncontrolling interest share; 3 Net of noncontrolling interest share, where applicable. Total may not equal the sum of the column due to rounding; 4 For the quarter ended 12/30/23, intangible asset amortization was $380mm, step up amortization was $68mm and amortization of intangible assets related to TFCF equity investees was $3mm. For the quarter ended 12 /31/22, intangible asset amortization was $417mm step up amortization was $159mm and amortization of intangible assets related t o TFCF equity investees was $3mm; 5 Charges related to exiting our businesses in Russia; 6 DraftKings loss ($70mm), partially offset by a gain on the sale of a business ($28mm)  The following table reconciles reported Diluted EPS to Diluted EPS excluding certain items: ($MM except EPS) Pre Tax Income / Loss Tax Benefit / Expense 1 After Tax Income / Loss 2 Diluted EPS 3 Change vs. prior year period Quarter Ended December 30, 2023 As reported $2,871 ($720) $2,151 $1.04 49% Exclude: Amortization of TFCF and Hulu intangible assets and fair value step up on film and television costs 4 451 (106) 345 0.18 Excluding certain items $3,322 ($826) $2,496 $1.22 23% Quarter Ended December 31, 2022 As reported $1,773 ($412) $1,361 $0.70 Exclude: Amortization of TFCF and Hulu intangible assets and fair value step up on film and television costs 4 579 (135) 444 0.24 Restructuring and impairment charges 5 69 (8) 61 0.03 Other income, net 6 42 (16) 26 0.01 Excluding certain items $2,463 ($571) $1,892 $0.99

Reconciliation of free cash flow 64 Source: Company filings; 1 Trending to exceed $8bn in free cash flow for FY24  The following table reconciles the Company’s consolidated cash provided by continuing operations to free cash flow: Year ended ($MM, unless otherwise noted) Sept. 28, 2019 Oct. 3, 2020 Oct. 2, 2021 Oct. 1, 2022 Sept. 30, 2023 FY2024E Cash provided by operations continuing operations $5,984 $7,616 $5,566 $6,002 $9,866 ~$14bn ( (--) Investments in parks, resorts and other property (4,876) (4,022) (3,578) (4,943) (4,969) (~6bn) Free cash flow $1,108 $3,594 $1,988 $1,059 $4,897 ~$8bn 1

EBITDA, net debt and leverage reconciliation 65 Source: Company filings. Note: numbers may not tie due to rounding. 1 Excludes TFCF and Hulu amortization of intangible assets ($BN) FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 Q1 FY23 Q1 FY24 LTM Q1 FY24 Income from continuing operations before income taxes $13.8 $14.7 $13.9 ($1.7) $2.6 $5.3 $4.8 $1.8 $2.9 $5.9 (+) Content license early termination 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (+) Corporate and unallocated shared expenses 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.3 0.3 1.2 (+) Restructuring and impairment charges 0.1 0.0 1.2 5.7 0.7 0.2 3.8 0.1 0.0 3.8 (+) Other (income) expense, net (0.1) (0.6) (4.4) (1.0) (0.2) 0.7 (0.1) 0.0 0.0 (0.1) (+) Interest expense, net 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.3 0.2 1.2 (+) Amort. of TFCF/Hulu intangible assets & fair value step up on film & TV costs 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.0 0.6 0.5 1.9 (+) Impairment of equity investments 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Segment operating income $14.8 $15.7 $14.9 $8.1 $7.8 $12.1 $12.9 $3.0 $3.9 $13.7 ( (--) Corporate and unallocated shared expenses (0.6) (0.7) (1.0) (0.8) (0.9) (1.2) (1.1) (0.3) (0.3) (1.2) (+) Depreciation and amortization 1 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.8 0.9 0.9 3.8 (+) Equity based compensation 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.3 0.3 1.2 ( (--) Minority interest (0.4) (0.5) (0.5) (0.4) (0.5) (0.4) (1.0) (0.1) (0.2) (1.2) EBITDA $17.0 $17.9 $17.2 $10.9 $10.3 $15.0 $15.4 $3.8 $4.5 $16.3 Debt (+) Total borrowings $25.3 $20.9 $47.0 $58.6 $54.4 $48.4 $46.4 $48.4 $47.7 $47.7 ( (--) Net debt issuance discounts, costs and purchase accounting adjustments - 0.1 (2.5) (2.2) (2.1) (1.9) (1.8) (1.9) (1.8) (1.8) Total debt $25.3 $21.0 $44.5 $56.4 $52.3 $46.5 $44.6 $46.5 $45.9 $45.9 ( (--) Cash and cash equivalents (4.0) (4.2) (5.4) (17.9) (16.0) (11.6) (14.2) (8.5) (7.2) (7.2) Net debt $21.3 $16.8 $39.1 $38.5 $36.3 $34.9 $30.4 $38.0 $38.7 $38.7 Total leverage 1.5x 1.2x 2.6x 5.2x 5.1x 3.1x 2.9x 2.8x Net leverage 1.3x 0.9x 2.3x 3.5x 3.5x 2.3x 1.9x 2.4x

Return on invested capital reconciliation 66 1 Reflects the average of invested capital at the end of such fiscal year and the end of the immediately prior fiscal year. Inv est ed capital is defined as the remainder of the segment's total assets at a fiscal year end minus the sum of such segment's a) cas h, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of the last day of the fiscal year, (b) deferred tax assets and (c) non interest bearing liabilities and income and property tax liabilities; 2 Includes Parks & Resorts, Consumer Products, and Interactive Media  The following table reconciles the Experiences segment’s consolidated operating income to return on invested capital: ($MM) Year Ended September 30, 2009 Year Ended September 30, 2023 Operating income $1,732 2 $8,954 ( (--) Taxes (641) (1,880) Operating income, net of taxes $1,091 $7,074 (/) Average invested capital 1 $15,033 $34,471 Return on invested capital 7.3% 20.5%

The Walt Disney Company @Disney and related entities