XML 29 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Firm Transportation Agreements. The Company is party to two firm transportation contracts to provide capacity on natural gas pipeline systems. The contracts require the Company to pay minimum volume transportation charges through July 2021 regardless of the amount of pipeline capacity utilized by the Company. These monthly transportation payments are included in unused commitments expense in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result of previous divestitures in 2013 and 2014, the Company will likely not utilize the firm capacity on the natural gas pipelines.

The Company is party to one firm pipeline transportation contract to provide capacity on an oil pipeline system. The contract requires the Company to pay minimum volume transportation charges from May 2020 through April 2025 regardless of the amount of pipeline capacity utilized by the Company.

The amounts in the table below represent the Company’s future minimum transportation charges:

As of June 30, 2020
 (in thousands)
2020$12,732  
202119,777  
202213,064  
202314,600  
202414,640  
Thereafter4,800  
Total$79,613  

Gas Gathering and Processing Agreements. The Company is party to one minimum volume commitment and two reimbursement obligations. The minimum volume commitment requires the Company to deliver a minimum volume of natural gas to a midstream entity for gathering and processing. The contract requires the Company to pay a fee associated with the contracted volumes regardless of the amount delivered. The reimbursement obligations require the Company to pay monthly gathering and processing fees per Mcf of production to reimburse midstream entities for their costs to construct gas gathering and processing facilities. If the costs are not reimbursed by the Company via the monthly gathering and processing fees, the Company must pay the difference. The amounts in the table below represent the Company’s future minimum charges under both types of agreements:

As of June 30, 2020
 (in thousands)
2020$1,089  
20215,268  
Thereafter—  
Total$6,357  
Other Commitments. The Company has one drilling commitment with a joint interest partner that requires the Company to drill and complete two wells by July 2022 and three wells by July 2023. If the drilling commitment is not met, the Company must return the associated leases that are not held by production to the joint interest partner, which cover approximately 13,000 acres. The Company is party to two minimum volume commitments for fresh water. The minimum volume commitments require the Company to purchase a minimum volume of fresh water from a water supplier. The contracts require the Company pay a fee associated with the contracted volumes regardless of the amount delivered. The Company also has non-cancellable agreements for information technology services. Future minimum annual payments under these agreements are as follows:

As of June 30, 2020
(in thousands)
2020$1,098  
20211,285  
2022 (1)
11,485  
2023 (1)
16,285  
Thereafter—  
Total$30,153  

(1)Includes $10.2 million in 2022 and $15.3 million in 2023 related to a drilling commitment.

Litigation. The Company is subject to litigation, claims and governmental and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of the Company’s management that current claims and litigation involving the Company are not likely to have a material adverse effect on its Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet, Cash Flows or Statements of Operations, other than the following.

Sterling Energy Investments LLC v. HighPoint Operating Corporation, 2020CV32034, District Court in Denver, Colorado. On June 15, 2020, Sterling Energy Investments LLC (“Sterling”) filed a complaint against HighPoint Operating Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, for breach of contract related to a Gas Purchase Agreement dated effective November 1, 2017, by and between HighPoint Operating Corporation and Sterling. Sterling alleges that HighPoint Operating Corporation breached the contract by failing to use reasonable commercial efforts to deliver to Sterling at Sterling’s receipt points all quantities of gas not otherwise dedicated to other gas purchase agreements. The Company vigorously denies Sterling’s claims. Sterling seeks monetary damages in an amount not yet specified. On July 31, 2020, the Company filed a counterclaim against Sterling for breach of Sterling’s obligations under the Gas Gathering Agreement. The Company is seeking monetary damages in an amount not yet specified.