XML 28 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2.2
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies

11. Commitments and Contingencies

401(k) Plan

The Company has a defined-contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan covers all employees who meet defined minimum age and service requirements and allows participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. The Company has made contributions to the 401(k) Plan and recorded contribution expense of $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively. The Company did not make any contributions during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.

Indemnification Agreements

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnification of varying scope and terms to vendors, lessors, contract research organizations, business partners, and other parties with respect to certain matters including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with members of its board of directors and certain of its executive officers that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is, in many cases, unlimited. The Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications and is not currently aware of any indemnification claims.

Legal Proceedings

The Company, from time to time, may be party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company was not subject to any material legal proceedings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022.

On October 31, 2022, Ryan O’Dell, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned O’Dell v. Akouos, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-9313 (the “O’Dell Complaint”). On November 10, 2022, Brian Dixon, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Dixon v. Akouos, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-01479-UNA (the “Dixon Complaint” and, together with the O’Dell Complaint, the “Complaints”). The Complaints name as defendants the Company and each member of the Company Board. The Complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants violated Sections 14(d), 14(e), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder by omitting and/or misrepresenting certain material facts related to the transaction from the Schedule 14D-9 filed by the Company on October 31, 2022. The Complaints seek, among other relief, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, (ii) recission of the Merger Agreement or rescissory damages, (iii) other damages purportedly incurred on account of the alleged omissions or misstatements, and (iv) an award of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements of the action, including attorneys’ and expert fees and expenses. In addition, the Dixon Compliant seeks a declaration that the defendants violated Section 14(a) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act.

The Company also received (a) one demand letter on November 3, 2022, sent on behalf of Alex Ciccotelli, a purported stockholder of the Company (the “Ciccotelli Demand”), (b) two demand letters on November 8, 2022, sent on behalf of Marc Waterman (the “Waterman Demand”) and Christopher Scott (the “Scott Demand”), each a purported stockholder of the Company, (c) two demand letters on November 9, 2022, sent on behalf of James Ayer (the “Ayer Demand”) and Tim Chase (the “Chase Demand”), each a purported stockholder of the Company, (d) two demand letters on November 10, 2022, sent on behalf of David Elliot (the “Elliot Demand”) and Miriam Nathan (the “Nathan Demand”), each a purported stockholder of the Company, and (e) one demand letter on November 11, 2022, sent on behalf of Sean Riley (the “Riley Demand”), a purported stockholder of the Company. Each of the Ciccotelli Demand, the Waterman Demand, the Scott Demand, the Ayer Demand, the Chase Demand, the Elliot Demand, the Nathan Demand and the Riley Demand alleges omissions of material information with respect to the transaction from the Schedule 14D-9 filed by the Company on October 31, 2022 and demands that the Company promptly provide stockholders with additional disclosure. In addition, each of the Ayer Demand and the Nathan Demand includes a draft complaint, which contains allegations and requests for relief substantially consistent with those set forth in the Complaints, and states an intention to file such complaint.

The outcome of the matters described above cannot be predicted with certainty. However, the Company believes that the allegations in the Complaints, Ciccotelli Demand, the Waterman Demand, the Scott Demand, the Ayer Demand, the Chase Demand, the Elliot Demand, the Nathan Demand and the Riley Demand are without merit. Additional complaints may be filed against the Company, the Company Board, Parent and/or Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Schedule TO and the Schedule 14D-9. If such additional complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, the Company, Parent and/or Purchaser will not necessarily announce such additional complaints.