XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Financial instruments fair value
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial instruments fair value Financial instruments fair valueWe report financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, which are required to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and credit risk.
ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a hierarchy framework to classify the fair value based on the observability of significant inputs to the measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1: Fair value is determined using an unadjusted quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Fair value is estimated using unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
The Company invests in money market funds with original maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less, which are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Money market funds are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets and classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
In addition, the contingent consideration associated with the Digita and cmdReporter acquisitions are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The estimated fair value of the contingent payments associated with the Digita acquisition is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which uses Level 3 inputs, including assumptions about the probability of growth of subscription services and the related pricing of the services offered. Significant increases (decreases) in the probability of growth of subscription services as well as the related pricing of the services offered would have resulted in a higher (lower) fair value measurement. The estimated fair value of the contingent payments associated with the cmdReporter acquisition was determined using projected contract wins, which used Level 3 inputs, including assumptions about the probability of closing contracts based on their current stage in the sales process. See Note 4 for more information.
The fair value of these financial instruments were as follows:
March 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(in thousands)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds$126,048 $— $— $126,048 
Total cash equivalents$126,048 $— $— $126,048 
Contingent consideration:
Accrued liabilities$— $— $5,600 $5,600 
Total contingent consideration$— $— $5,600 $5,600 
December 31, 2021
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(in thousands)
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds$146,037 $— $— $146,037 
Total cash equivalents$146,037 $— $— $146,037 
Contingent consideration:
Accrued liabilities$— $— $4,588 $4,588 
Other liabilities— — 5,512 5,512 
Total contingent consideration$— $— $10,100 $10,100 
The carrying value of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to their short maturities and are excluded from the tables above.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in contingent consideration, which is classified as Level 3:
Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period$10,100 $8,200 
Additions— 359 
Total (gains) losses included in:
Net loss88 300 
Payments(4,588)— 
Other— (60)
Balance, end of period$5,600 $8,799 
The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration is included in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2022 primarily reflected updated assumptions about the probability of growth of subscription services.
Fair value measurements of other financial instruments
The following table presents the net carrying value and estimated fair value of the 2026 Notes, which are not recorded at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Net Carrying ValueEstimated Fair ValueNet Carrying ValueEstimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
2026 Notes
$362,648 $371,044 $362,031 $398,044 
As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the difference between the net carrying value of the 2026 Notes and the principal amount of $373.8 million represents the unamortized debt issuance costs of $11.1 million and $11.7 million, respectively. See Note 8 for more information. The estimated fair value of the 2026 Notes, which is classified as Level 2, was determined based on quoted bid prices of the 2026 Notes in an over-the-counter market on the last trading day of the reporting period.