EX-99.3

EX-99.3 22 d371501dex993.htm EX-99.3 EX-99.3

Exhibit 99.3

PRO FORMA VALUATION REPORT

MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY

STOCK OFFERING

PDL Community Bancorp | Bronx, New York

PROPOSED HOLDING COMPANY FOR:

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank | Bronx, New York

Dated as of February 24, 2017

LOGO

1100 North Glebe Road Suite 600

Arlington, Virginia 22201

703.528.1700

rpfinancial.com

LOGO LOGO

February 24, 2017

Board of Directors

Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company

PDL Community Bancorp

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank

2244 Westchester Avenue

Bronx, New York 10462

Members of the Board of Directors:

At your request, we have completed and hereby provide an independent appraisal (“Appraisal”) of the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock which is to be issued in connection with the stock issuance transaction described below.

This Appraisal is furnished pursuant to the requirements stipulated in the Code of Federal Regulations and has been prepared in accordance with the “Guidelines for Appraisal Reports for the Valuation of Savings and Loan Associations Converting from Mutual to Stock Form of Organization” (the “Valuation Guidelines”) of the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and accepted by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and applicable regulatory interpretations thereof.

Description of Plan of Reorganization and Stock Offering

On November 17, 2016, the Board of Directors of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank adopted a plan of reorganization (the “Reorganization”) pursuant to which Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will reorganize into a two-tier mutual holding company structure. After the Reorganization, PDL Community Bancorp (the “Company”), a federal corporation, will be the mid-tier stock holding company and Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company (the “MHC”), a federally chartered mutual holding company, will be the top-tier mutual holding company. The Reorganization will be completed as follows:

(i)

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will organize an interim stock savings association as a wholly owned subsidiary (“Interim Bank”);

(ii)

After Interim Bank receives approval from the FDIC for insurance of accounts and the FDIC has issued it a certificate number, Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will transfer pursuant to a purchase and assumption agreement all of its assets and liabilities, except $200,000 in cash, to Interim Bank, and Interim Bank will become the stock savings association resulting from the reorganization, including the purchase and assumption transaction pursuant to the plan (the “Stock Bank”);

(iii)

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will amend its charter and bylaws to read in the form of a federal mutual holding company to become Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company;


Washington Headquarters
Three Ballston Plaza		Telephone: (703) 528-1700
1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 600		Fax No.: (703) 528-1788
Arlington, VA 22201		Toll-Free No.: (866) 723-0594
www.rpfinancial.com		E-Mail: mail@rpfinancial.com

Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Page 2

(iv)

Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company will organize PDL Community Bancorp as a wholly-owned subsidiary, and transfer $1,000 to PDL Community Bancorp in exchange for 100 shares of PDL Community Bancorp common stock; and

(v)

Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company will transfer all of the initially issued stock of the Stock Bank to PDL Community Bancorp in exchange for additional shares of PDL Community Bancorp common stock, and the Stock Bank will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of PDL Community Bancorp, operating under the name Ponce Bank.

For purposes of this document, Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will hereinafter be referred to as Ponce Bank or the “Bank”.

Concurrent with the Reorganization, PDL Community Bancorp will issue a majority of its common stock to the MHC and sell a minority of its common stock to the public. At the completion of the public stock offering, the Company will retain up to 50% of the net stock proceeds. The MHC will own a controlling interest in the Company of at least 51%, and the Company will be the sole subsidiary of the MHC. The Company will own 100% of the Bank’s outstanding stock. The Company’s initial activity will be ownership of its subsidiary, Ponce Bank, investment of the net cash proceeds retained at the holding company level and extending a loan to the employee stock ownership plan.

PDL Community Bancorp will offer its common stock in a subscription offering to Eligible Account Holders, Tax-Qualified Plans including Ponce Bank’s employee stock ownership plan (the “ESOP”), Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Members as such terms are defined for purposes of applicable regulatory guidelines governing stock offerings by mutual institutions. To the extent that shares remain available for purchase after satisfaction of all subscriptions received in the subscription offering, the shares may be offered for sale to members of the general public in a community offering and a syndicated community offering. At least 50% of the net proceeds from the stock offering will be invested in Ponce Bank and the balance of the net proceeds will be retained by the Company.

At this time, no other activities are contemplated for the Company other than the ownership of Ponce Bank, a loan to the newly-formed ESOP and reinvestment of the proceeds that are retained by the Company. In the future, PDL Community Bancorp may acquire or organize other operating subsidiaries, diversify into other banking-related activities, pay dividends or repurchase its stock, although there are no specific plans to undertake such activities at the present time.

The Reorganization provides for the establishment of a new charitable foundation (the “Foundation”). The Foundation contribution will be funded with 3.3% of the number of shares of common stock issued in the stock issuance and $200,000 of cash funded by the net proceeds retained by the Company. The purpose of the Foundation is to provide financial support to charitable organizations in the communities in which Ponce Bank operates and to enable those communities to share in the Bank’s long-term growth. The Foundation will be dedicated completely to community activities and the promotion of charitable causes.

Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Page 3

RP^® Financial, LC.

RP^® Financial, LC. (“RP Financial”) is a financial consulting firm serving the financial services industry nationwide that, among other things, specializes in financial valuations and analyses of business enterprises and securities, including the pro forma valuation for savings institutions converting from mutual-to-stock form. The background and experience of RP Financial is detailed in Exhibit V-1. We believe that, except for the fee we will receive for the Appraisal, we are independent of the Company, the Bank, the MHC and the other parties engaged by the Bank, the Company or the MHC to assist in the stock conversion process.

Valuation Methodology

In preparing our Appraisal, we have reviewed the regulatory applications of the Company, the Bank and the MHC, including the prospectus as filed with the FRB, the OCC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have conducted a financial analysis of the Company, the Bank and the MHC that has included a review of audited financial information for the years ended December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2016, a review of various unaudited information and internal financial reports through December 31, 2016, and due diligence related discussions with the Bank’s management; WeiserMazars LLP, the Bank’s independent auditor; Locke Lord LLP, the Bank’s counsel for the Reorganization and Raymond James Associates, Inc., the Bank’s marketing advisor in connection with the stock offering. All assumptions and conclusions set forth in the Appraisal were reached independently from such discussions. In addition, where appropriate, we have considered information based on other available published sources that we believe are reliable. While we believe the information and data gathered from all these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information.

We have investigated the competitive environment within which Ponce Bank operates and have assessed Ponce Bank’s relative strengths and weaknesses. We have kept abreast of the changing regulatory and legislative environment for financial institutions and analyzed the potential impact on Ponce Bank and the industry as a whole. We have analyzed the potential effects of the stock offering on Ponce Bank’s operating characteristics and financial performance as they relate to the pro forma market value of PDL Community Bancorp. We have reviewed the economic and demographic characteristics of the Bank’s primary market area. We have compared Ponce Bank’s financial performance and condition with selected publicly-traded thrifts in accordance with the Valuation Guidelines, as well as all publicly-traded thrifts and thrift holding companies. We have reviewed the current conditions in the securities markets in general and the market for thrift stocks in particular, including the market for existing thrift issues and initial public offerings by thrifts and thrift holding companies. We have excluded from such analyses thrifts subject to announced or rumored acquisition, and/or institutions that exhibit other unusual characteristics.

The Appraisal is based on Ponce Bank’s representation that the information contained in the regulatory applications and additional information furnished to us by Ponce Bank and its independent auditor, legal counsel and other authorized agents are truthful, accurate and complete. We did not independently verify the financial statements and other information provided by Ponce Bank, or its independent auditor, legal counsel and other authorized agents nor did we independently value the assets or liabilities of Ponce Bank. The valuation considers Ponce Bank only as a going concern and should not be considered as an indication of Ponce Bank’s liquidation value.

Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Page 4

Our appraised value is predicated on a continuation of the current operating environment for Ponce Bank and for all thrifts and their holding companies. Changes in the local, state and national economy, the legislative and regulatory environment for financial institutions and mutual holding companies, the stock market, interest rates, and other external forces (such as natural disasters or significant world events) may occur from time to time, often with great unpredictability and may materially impact the value of thrift stocks as a whole or the value of Ponce Bank’s stock alone. It is our understanding that there are no current plans for selling control of Ponce Bank following completion of the stock offering. To the extent that such factors can be foreseen, they have been factored into our analysis.

The estimated pro forma market value is defined as the price at which PDL Community Bancorp’s common stock, immediately upon completion of the stock offering, would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.

Valuation Conclusion

It is our opinion that, as of February 24, 2017, the estimated aggregate pro forma market value of the shares to be issued immediately following the offering, both shares issued publicly as well as to the MHC, was $139,607,030 at the midpoint, equal to 13,960,703 shares issued at a per share value of $10.00. Pursuant to conversion guidelines, the 15% offering range indicates a minimum value of $118,665,980 and a maximum value of $160,548,080. Based on the $10.00 per share offering price determined by the Board, this valuation range equates to total shares outstanding of 11,866,598 shares at the minimum of the valuation range and 16,054,808 total shares outstanding at the maximum of the valuation range. In the event that the appraised value is subject to an increase, the aggregate pro forma market value may be increased up to a super maximum value of $184,630,290 without a resolicitation. Based on the $10.00 per share offering price, the super maximum value would result in total shares outstanding of 18,463,029. The Board of Directors has established a public offering range such that the public ownership of the Company will constitute a 45.0% ownership interest of the Company prior to the issuance of the shares to the Foundation. Accordingly, the offering range to the public of the minority stock will be $53,399,690 at the minimum, $62,823,160 at the midpoint, $72,246,630 at the maximum and $83,083,620 at the super maximum. Based on the public offering range, and inclusive of the shares issued to the Foundation, the public ownership of the shares will represent 48.3% of the shares issued, with the MHC owning the majority of the shares.

Limiting Factors and Considerations

The valuation is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing shares of the common stock. Moreover, because such valuation is determined in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines and is necessarily based upon estimates and projections of a number of matters, all of which are subject to change from time to time, no assurance can be given that persons who purchase shares of common

Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Page 5

stock in the stock offering will thereafter be able to buy or sell such shares at prices related to the foregoing valuation of the estimated pro forma market value thereof. The appraisal reflects only a valuation range as of this date for the pro forma market value of PDL Community Bancorp immediately upon issuance of the stock and does not take into account any trading activity with respect to the purchase and sale of common stock in the secondary market on the date of issuance of such securities or at anytime thereafter following the completion of the stock offering.

RP Financial’s valuation was based on the financial condition and operations of Ponce Bank as of December 31, 2016, the date of the financial data included in the prospectus.

RP Financial is not a seller of securities within the meaning of any federal and state securities laws and any report prepared by RP Financial shall not be used as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any securities. RP Financial maintains a policy which prohibits RP Financial, its principals or employees from purchasing stock of its client institutions.

This valuation will be updated as provided for in the conversion regulations and guidelines. These updates will consider, among other things, any developments or changes in the financial performance and condition of Ponce Bank, management policies, and current conditions in the equity markets for thrift shares, both existing issues and new issues. These updates may also consider changes in other external factors which impact value including, but not limited to: various changes in the legislative and regulatory environment for financial institutions, the stock market and the market for thrift stocks, and interest rates. Should any such new developments or changes be material, in our opinion, to the valuation of the shares, appropriate adjustments to the estimated pro forma market value will be made. The reasons for any such adjustments will be explained in the update at the date of the release of the update. The valuation will also be updated at the completion of PDL Community Bancorp’s stock offering.

Respectfully submitted,

RP^® FINANCIAL, LC.

Ronald S. Riggins

Managing Director

Gregory E. Dunn

Director

RP^® Financial, LC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PDL COMMUNITY BANCORP

PONCE BANK

Bronx, New York


	PAGE
DESCRIPTION	NUMBER
CHAPTER ONE OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Introduction		I.1
Plan of Reorganization and Stock Offering		I.1
Strategic Overview		I.3
Balance Sheet Trends		I.5
Income and Expense Trends		I.7
Interest Rate Risk Management		I.9
Lending Activities and Strategy		I.10
Asset Quality		I.12
Funding Composition and Strategy		I.13
Subsidiary Activities		1.13
Legal Proceedings		I.14

CHAPTER TWO MARKET AREA

Introduction		II.1
National Economic Factors		II.1
Market Area Demographics		II.5
Local Economy		II.7
Unemployment Trends		II.8
Market Area Deposit Characteristics and Competition		II.9

CHAPTER THREE PEER GROUP ANALYSIS

Peer Group Selection		III.1
Financial Condition		III.4
Income and Expense Components		III.6
Loan Composition		III.8
Interest Rate Risk		III.8
Credit Risk		III.9
Summary		III.9

RP^® Financial, LC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PDL COMMUNITY BANCORP

PONCE BANK

Bronx, New York

(continued)


	PAGE
DESCRIPTION	NUMBER
CHAPTER FOUR VALUATION ANALYSIS

Introduction		IV.1
Appraisal Guidelines		IV.1
RP Financial Approach to the Valuation		IV.1
Valuation Analysis		IV.2
1. Financial Condition		IV.3
2. Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings		IV.4
3. Asset Growth		IV.6
4. Primary Market Area		IV.6
5. Dividends		IV.8
6. Liquidity of the Shares		IV.8
7. Marketing of the Issue		IV.9
A. The Public Market		IV.9
B. The New Issue Market		IV.12
C. The Acquisition Market		IV.13
8. Management		IV.14
9. Effect of Government Regulation and Regulatory Reform		IV.15
Summary of Adjustments		IV.15
Valuation Approaches: Fully-Converted Basis		IV.15
Basis of Valuation- Fully-Converted Pricing Ratios		IV.17
1. Price-to-Earnings (“P/E”)		IV.17
2. Price-to-Book (“P/B”)		IV.18
3. Price-to-Assets (“P/A”)		IV.19
Comparison to Publicly-Traded MHCs		IV.19
Comparison to Recent MHC Offerings		IV.21
Valuation Conclusion		IV.21

RP^® Financial, LC.

LIST OF TABLES

iii

LIST OF TABLES

PDL COMMUNITY BANCORP

PONCE BANK

Bronx, New York


TABLE NUMBER	DESCRIPTION	PAGE
1.1	Historical Balance Sheet Data		I.6
1.2	Historical Income Statements		I.9
2.1	Summary Demographic Data		II.6
2.2	Primary Market Area Employment Sectors		II.7
2.3	Market Area Largest Employers		II.8
2.4	Unemployment Trends		II.9
2.5	Deposit Summary		II.10
2.6	Market Area Deposit Competitors – As of June 30, 2016		II.11
3.1	Peer Group of Publicly-Traded Thrifts		III.3
3.2	Balance Sheet Composition and Growth Rates		III.6
3.3	Income as a Pct. of Avg. Assets and Yields, Costs, Spreads		III.9
3.4	Loan Portfolio Composition and Related Information		III.12
3.5	Interest Rate Risk Measures and Net Interest Income Volatility		III.13
3.6	Credit Risk Measures and Related Information		III.15
4.1	Market Area Unemployment Rates		IV.7
4.2	Pricing Characteristics and After-Market Trends		IV.14
4.3	Market Pricing Comparatives		IV.15
4.4	Fully-Converted Market Pricing Versus Peer Group		IV.20
4.5	MHC Market Pricing Versus Peer Group		IV.21
4.6	Calculation of Implied Per Share Data- Incorporating MHC Second Step Conversion		IV.25
4.7	MHC Institutions Implied Pricing Ratios, Full Conversion Basis		IV.26


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.1*

I. OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Introduction

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank, established in 1960, is a federally-chartered mutual savings association headquartered in Bronx, New York. The Bank serves the New York metropolitan area through its headquarters office and 13 full service branch offices. A map of the Bank’s office locations is provided in Exhibit I-1. Ponce Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system and its deposits are insured up to the maximum allowable amount by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). As of December 31, 2016, Ponce Bank had total assets of $745.0 million, total deposits of $643.1 million and total equity of $93.0 million equal to 12.48% of total assets. The Bank’s audited financial statements are included by reference as Exhibit I-2.

Plan of Reorganization and Stock Offering

(i)

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will organize an interim stock savings association as a wholly owned subsidiary (“Interim Bank”);

(ii)

(iii)

Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will amend its charter and bylaws to read in the form of a federal mutual holding company to become Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company;

(iv)


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.2*

(v)

For purposes of this document, Ponce De Leon Federal Bank will hereinafter be referred to as Ponce Bank or the “Bank”.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.3*

Strategic Overview

Ponce Bank maintains a local community banking emphasis, with a primary strategic objective of meeting the borrowing and savings needs of its local customer base. Historically, as a traditional thrift institution, the Bank’s lending activities were concentrated in origination of 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans and such loans continue to comprise the largest concentration of the loan portfolio. In recent years, the Bank embarked on a new strategic direction designed to build a full service community banking franchise dedicated to meeting the banking needs of business and retail customers in the communities that are served by the Bank. In connection with the implementation of a full service community banking strategy, the Bank invested in infrastructure and personnel to manage and facilitate growth strategies. Most notably, in support of implementation of a diversified lending strategy, the Bank has been building a team of commercial lenders experienced in developing full service commercial banking relationships in the local market. The Bank’s objective is to fund asset growth primarily through deposit growth, emphasizing growth of lower cost core deposits. Core deposit growth is expected to be in part facilitated by growth of commercial lending relationships, pursuant to which the Bank is seeking to establish a full service banking relationship with its commercial loan customers through offering a full range of commercial loan products that can be packaged with lower cost commercial deposit products.

Investments serve as a supplement to the Bank’s lending activities and the investment portfolio is considered to be indicative of a low risk investment philosophy. U.S. Government and federal agency securities constitute the largest portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio, with other investments consisting of mortgage-backed securities that are guaranteed or insured by government sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) or backed by GInnie Mae and certificates of deposit (“CDs”) held in other financial institutions.

Deposits have consistently served as the primary funding source for the Bank, with supplemental funding provided by utilization of borrowings as an alternative funding source for purposes of managing funding costs and interest rate risk. CDs constitute the largest portion of the Bank’s deposit base. Borrowings currently held by the Bank consist of FHLB advances.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.4*

Ponce Bank’s earnings base is largely dependent upon net interest income and operating expense levels. The Bank has experienced some net interest margin compression during the past two years, which has been primarily attributable to a more significant decline in interest-earning assets yields as interest-bearing funding costs have been relatively stable in recent years. Operating expense ratios have trended higher in recent years, primarily in connection with building out the Bank’s commercial lending platform. Non-interest operating income has been a fairly stable but limited contributor to the Bank’s earnings, reflecting limiting diversification into fee-based products and services. The amount of loan loss provisions established has decreased significantly in recent years, which was facilitated by improving trends in the Bank’s credit quality.

The post-offering business plan of the Bank is expected to continue to focus on implementing strategic initiatives to develop and grow a full service community banking franchise. Accordingly, Ponce Bank will continue to be an independent full service community bank, with a commitment to meeting the retail and commercial banking needs of individuals and businesses in the New York metropolitan area.

The Bank’s Board of Directors has elected to complete a public stock offering to sustain growth strategies and facilitate implementation of its strategic plan. The capital realized from the stock offering will increase the Bank’s operating flexibility and allow for additional growth of the balance sheet. The additional funds realized from the stock offering will provide an alternative funding source to deposits and borrowings in meeting the Bank’s future funding needs, which may facilitate a reduction in Ponce Bank’s funding costs. Additionally, Ponce Bank’s higher equity-to-assets ratio will enable the Bank to pursue expansion opportunities. Such expansion would most likely occur through the acquisition of other financial institutions or financial service companies that would increase market penetration in the markets currently served by the Bank or to gain a market presence into nearby complementary markets. At this time, the Bank has no specific plans for expansion. The projected uses of proceeds are highlighted below.

•

The Company. The Company is expected to retain up to 50% of the net offering proceeds. At present, funds at the Company level, net of the loan to the ESOP and the cash contribution to the Foundation, are expected to be primarily invested initially into liquid funds held as a deposit at the Bank. Over time, the funds may be utilized for various corporate purposes, possibly including acquisitions, infusing additional equity into the Bank, repurchases of common stock and the payment of cash dividends.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.5*

•

The Bank. Approximately 50% of the net conversion proceeds will be infused into the Bank. Cash proceeds (i.e., net proceeds less deposits withdrawn to fund stock purchases) infused into the Bank are anticipated to become part of general operating funds and are expected to be primarily utilized to fund loan growth over time.

Overall, it is the Bank’s objective to pursue controlled growth that will serve to increase returns, while continuing to emphasize management of the overall risk associated with Ponce Bank’s operations.

Balance Sheet Trends

Table 1.1 shows the Bank’s historical balance sheet data for the past five years. From yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, Ponce Bank’s assets decreased at a 0.55% annual rate. Total assets trended lower from yearend 2012 through yearend 2015, which was followed by a healthy increase in assets during 2016. Both loans and cash and investments declined during the period of asset shrinkage, while asset growth during 2016 was sustained by loan growth. Asset shrinkage and borrowings funded deposit run-off from yearend 2012 through yearend 2015, while deposit growth in 2016 funded asset growth and the pay down of borrowings. A summary of Ponce Bank’s key operating ratios for the past five years is presented in Exhibit I-3.

Ponce Bank’s loans receivable portfolio increased at a 2.37% annual rate from yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, in which the loans receivable balance declined from yearend 2012 through yearend 2014 and then increased during the past two years. The most significant loan growth was realized during 2016, which was primarily attributable to growth of multi-family loans. Loan growth combined with asset shrinkage provided for an increase in the loans-to-assets ratio from 76.77% at yearend 2012 to 86.20% at yearend 2016.

Trends in the Bank’s loan portfolio composition since yearend 2012 show that the concentration of 1-4 family mortgage loans comprising total loans decreased from 52.67% of total loans receivable at yearend 2012 to 49.88% of total loans receivable at yearend 2016. Commercial real estate loans also decreased from 19.45% of total loans receivable at yearend 2012 to 18.64% of total loans receivable at yearend 2016 and construction and land loans decreased from 5.00% of total loans receivable to 4.66% of total loans receivable. Comparatively, from yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, multi-family increased from 18.16% of total loans receivable to 24.28% of total loans receivable. Over the same time period, the relative concentration of commercial business loans decreased from 4.47% of total loans


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.6*

receivable to 2.41% of total loans receivable, while the Bank’s holdings of consumer loans was nominal throughout the five year period. Additionally, loans held for sale, fluctuated from a zero balance at yearend 2012 to a high of $5.7 million at yearend 2013 and equaled $2.1 million or 0.29% of assets at yearend 2016.

The intent of the Bank’s investment policy is to provide adequate liquidity and to generate a favorable return within the context of supporting Ponce Bank’s overall credit and interest rate risk objectives. It is anticipated that proceeds retained at the holding company level will be invested into liquid funds held as a deposit at the Bank. Since yearend 2012, the Bank’s level of cash and investment securities (inclusive of FHLB stock) ranged from a low of 8.77% of assets at yearend 2016 to a high of 17.20% of assets at yearend 2012. The decrease in the balance of cash and investments since yearend 2012 was largely related to redeployment of those funds for purposes of funding loan growth during 2015 and 2016. U.S. Government and federal agency securities totaling $41.6 million comprised the most significant component of the Bank’s investment portfolio at December 31, 2016. Other investments held by the Bank at December 31, 2016 consisted of mortgage-backed securities ($10.6 million) and CDs ($500,000). As of December 31, 2016, all investments were maintained as available for sale and reflected a net unrealized loss of $253,000. Exhibit I-4 provides historical detail of the Bank’s investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank also held $11.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and $964,000 of FHLB stock.

Since yearend 2012, Ponce Bank’s funding needs have been addressed through a combination of deposits, borrowings and internal cash flows. From yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, the Bank’s deposits decreased at a 0.90% annual rate. Deposits declined from yearend 2012 through yearend 2015, which was followed by deposit growth during 2016. Overall, deposits as a percent of assets remained fairly stable over the past five year, equaling 87.57% of assets at yearend 2012 and 86.32% of assets at yearend 2016. CDs account for the largest concentration of the Bank’s deposits and comprised 59.54% of average deposits during 2016.

Borrowings serve as an alternative funding source for the Bank to address funding needs for growth and to support management of deposit costs and interest rate risk. From yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, borrowings ranged from a zero balance at yearend 2012 to high of $11.0 million at yearend 2013. As of December 31, 2016, borrowings equaled $3.0 million or 0.40% of assets and consisted of overnight FHLB advances.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.7*

The Bank’s equity increased at a 1.93% annual rate from yearend 2012 through yearend 2016, which was largely related to retention of earnings. The increase in equity combined with asset shrinkage since yearend 2012 provided for an increase in the Bank’s equity-to-assets ratio from 11.31% at yearend 2012 to 12.48% at yearend 2016. Similarly, the Bank’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio increased from 11.24% at yearend 2012 to 12.48% at yearend 2016. The Bank maintained a nominal core deposit intangible balance at December 31, 2016. The Bank maintained capital surpluses relative to all of its regulatory capital requirements at December 31, 2016. The addition of stock proceeds will serve to strengthen the Bank’s capital position, as well as support growth opportunities. At the same time, the increase in Ponce Bank’s pro forma capital position will initially depress its ROE.

Income and Expense Trends

Table 1.2 shows the Bank’s historical income statements for the past five years. The Bank’s reported earnings ranged from a low of $1.4 million or 0.20% of average assets during 2016 to a high of $4.1 million or 0.53% of average assets during 2012. Net interest income and operating expenses represent the primary components of the Bank’s recurring earnings, while non-operating income has been somewhat of a limited source of earnings for the Bank. Loan loss provisions have had a varied impact on the Bank’s earnings over the past five years. Non-operating gains and losses have not been a factor on the Bank’s earnings over the past five years.

During the period covered in Table 1.2, the Bank’s net interest income to average assets ratio ranged from a low of 3.83% during 2016 to a high of 4.14% during 2014. The decline in the Bank’s net interest income ratio since 2014 has been largely attributable to interest rate spread compression that has resulted from a more significant decrease in the yield earned on interest-earnings assets relative to the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. As the result of the prolonged low interest rate environment, the decline in yield earned on less rate sensitive interest-earning assets has become more significant relative to the rate paid on more rate sensitive liabilities which had more significant downward repricing earlier in the prevailing interest rate environment. In fact, the Bank’s cost of funds increased slightly during 2016. Partially offsetting decline in yield earned on interest-earning assets during the past two years has been a shift in the Bank’s interest-earning asset composition towards a higher concentration


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.8*

of loans, which earn higher yields relative to investments and short-term liquid funds. Overall, during the past three years, the Bank’s interest rate spread ranged declined from a high of 4.26% during 2014 to a low of 3.82% during 2016. The Bank’s net interest rate spreads and yields and costs for the past five years are set forth in Exhibit I-3 and Exhibit I-5.

Non-interest operating income has been somewhat of a limited contributor to the Bank’s earnings over the past five years, reflecting the Bank’s limited diversification into products and services that generate non-interest operating income. Revenues derived from non-interest income sources is also limited by the relatively high concentration of deposits maintained in CDs, as opposed to fee-based deposit products. Throughout the period shown in Table 1.2, sources of non-interest operating income ranged from a low of $2.4 million or 0.34% of average assets during 2016 to a high of $3.1 million or 0.42% of average assets during 2013. Fees and service charges and mortgage banking brokerage commissions constitute the major sources of the Bank’s non-interest operating revenues.

Operating expenses represent the other major component of the Bank’s earnings, ranging from a low of $24.0 million or 3.11% of average assets during 2012 to a high of $27.9 million or 3.84% of average assets during 2016. The increase in the Bank’s operating expense ratio since 2012 reflects infrastructure that has been put into place to facilitate implementation of the Bank’s strategic plan and, in particular, the additional resources that have been devoted to building the Bank’s full service commercial lending platform.

Overall, during the past five years, the Bank’s expense coverage ratios (net interest income divided by operating expenses) ranged from a low of 1.00x during 2016 to a high of 1.32x during 2012. Similarly, the Bank’s efficiency ratio (operating expenses as a percent of the sum of net interest income and other operating income) reflected a downward trend in core earnings, based on efficiency ratios of 69.27% and 92.09% during 2012 and 2016, respectively.

During the period covered in Table 1.2, the amount of loan loss provisions established ranged from a reversal of loan loss provisions of $57,000 or 0.01% of average assets during 2016 to a high of $5.1 million or 0.67% of average assets during 2016. The reduction in loan loss provisions established was facilitated by improving credit quality trends, including decreases in the amount of net charge-offs recorded. As of December 31, 2016 the Bank maintained loan loss allowances of $10.2 million, equal to 1.57% of total loans receivable and 132.15% of non-accruing loans. Exhibit I-6 sets forth the Bank’s loan loss allowance activity for the past five years.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.9*

Over the past five years, the Bank’s effective tax rate ranged from a low of 25.83% during 2012 to a high of 54.17% during fiscal year 2014 and equaled 41.36% during 2016. As set forth in the prospectus, the Bank’s marginal effective tax rate is 34.0%.

Interest Rate Risk Management

The Bank’s balance sheet is liability-sensitive in the short-term (less than one year) and, thus, the net interest margin will typically be adversely affected during periods of rising and higher interest rates. Comparatively, the Bank’s net interest margin benefits from a declining interest rate environment. As interest rates have remained at or near historically low levels for an extended period of time, the Bank has experienced interest spread compression as the average yield earned on interest-earning assets has started to decline more relative to the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. As of December 31, 2016, an analysis of the Bank’s Net Economic Value (“NEV”) and net interest income indicated that in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates NEV would decrease by 9.91% and net interest income would decrease by 4.60% in year one (see Exhibit I-7).

The Bank pursues a number of strategies to manage interest rate risk, particularly with respect to seeking to limit the repricing mismatch between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The Bank manages interest rate risk from the asset side of the balance sheet through investing in investment securities with adjustable interest rates, maintaining the investment portfolio as available for sale and emphasizing origination of adjustable rate and shorter term fixed rate loans, for retention in the Bank’s loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2016, of the Bank’s total loans due after December 31, 2017, adjustable rate loans comprised 79.02%% of total loans receivable (see Exhibit I-8). On the liability side of the balance sheet, management of interest rate risk has been pursued through emphasizing growth of lower costing and less interest rate sensitive transaction and savings accounts and seeking to extend CD maturities through offering attractive rates on certain longer term CDs. Transaction and savings account deposits comprised 40.46% of the Bank’s average total deposits during 2016.

The infusion of stock proceeds will serve to further limit the Bank’s interest rate risk exposure, as most of the net proceeds will be redeployed into interest-earning assets and the increase in the Bank’s capital position will lessen the proportion of interest rate sensitive liabilities funding assets.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.10*

Lending Activities and Strategy

Historically, Ponce Bank’s lending activities have emphasized 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans and such loans continue to comprise the largest concentration of the Bank’s loan portfolio composition. Pursuant to the Bank’s strategic plan, the Bank is pursuing a diversified lending strategy emphasizing commercial real estate/multi-family loans and commercial business loans as the primary areas of targeted loan growth. Other areas of lending diversification for the Bank include construction and land loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. Exhibit I-9 provides historical detail of Ponce Bank’s loan portfolio composition for the past five years and Exhibit I-10 provides the contractual maturity of the Bank’s loan portfolio by loan type as of December 31, 2016.

1-4 Family Residential Loans. As a portfolio only lender, Ponce Bank presently only offers adjustable rate 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans. The Bank generally limits owner-occupied 1-4 family loans to loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of 80% and investor owned 1-4 family loans to a to LTV ratio of 70% on purchases and 65% on refinances. A minimum debt-coverage ratio of 1.2 times is required for investor owned 1-4 family loans. Adjustable rate loans offered by the Bank generally have repricing terms of one or five years and are indexed to the comparable term Treasury note. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank’s outstanding balance of 1-4 family loans equaled $325.0 million or 49.88% of total loans receivable and consisted of $227.4 million of investor owned loans and $97.6 million of owner occupied loans.

Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. Included in the Bank’s 1-4 family loan portfolio are home equity loans and lines of credit, which totaled $9.4 million at December 31, 2016. Home equity loans are originated with comparable terms as 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans. Home equity lines of credit are tied to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal and are offered for terms of up to a five year draw period followed by a 25 year repayment period. The Bank will originate home equity loans and lines of credit up to a maximum LTV ratio of 75%, inclusive of other liens on the property.

Construction Loans. Construction loans originated by the Bank consist primarily of loans to finance the construction of multi-family properties and, to a lesser extent, to finance the construction of commercial properties and 1-4 family residences. Construction loans are generally offered as fixed rate interest only loans during the construction period, which is typically up to 24 months. Construction loans are generally offered up to a maximum LTV ratio of 70% of the appraised value of the completed property. The Bank’s 1-4 family construction lending activities consist of originations to professional developers, contractors and builders, and individuals. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank’s outstanding balance of construction loans equaled $30.3 million or 4.66% of total loans receivable.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.11*

Commercial Real Estate and Multi-Family Loans. Commercial real estate and multi-family loans consist largely of loans originated by the Bank, which are collateralized by properties in the Bank’s regional lending area. Ponce Bank generally originates commercial real estate and multi-family loans up to a LTV ratio of 75% and generally requires a minimum debt-coverage ratio of 1.3 times. Commercial real estate and multi-family loans are originated with amortization terms of up to 30 years. Loan terms offered on commercial real estate and multi-family loans generally consist of adjustable rate loans, which are indexed to the corresponding FHLB advance rate of the repricing term. Properties securing the commercial real estate and multi-family loan portfolio include office buildings, industrial and warehouse facilities, retail and wholesale facilities, apartments, churches, restaurants, hotels and motels and service facilities (doctor, dentist, beauty, etc.). As of December 31, 2016, the Bank’s outstanding balance of commercial real estate and multi-family loans totaled $279.7 million equal to 42.92% of total loans outstanding and included $158.2 million of multi-family loans.

Commercial Business Loans. The commercial business loan portfolio is generated through extending loans to businesses operating in the local market area. Expansion of commercial business lending activities is a desired area of loan growth for the Bank, pursuant to which the Bank is seeking to become a full service community bank to its commercial loan customers through offering a full range of commercial loan products that can be packaged with lower cost commercial deposit products. Commercial business loans offered by the Bank consist of lines of credit and term loans, with terms of generally no more than seven years. Commercial business loans are typically indexed to The Wall Street Journal prime rate. The commercial business loan portfolio consists substantially of loans secured by business assets such as accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and real estate. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank’s outstanding balance of commercial business loans equaled $15.7 million or 2.41% of total loans receivable.

Consumer Loans. Consumer lending other than home equity lines of credit has been a limited area of lending diversification for the Bank, with such loans consisting of installment loans and loans secured by savings accounts or CDs. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank held $843,000 of consumer loans or 0.13% of total loans receivable.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.12*

Exhibit I-11 provides a summary of the Bank’s lending activities over the past five years. Total loans originated ranged from a low of $76.9 million during 2012 to a high of $162.8 million during 2016. The increase in loans originated was primarily driven by increased originations of 1-4 family loans, multi-family loans and commercial real estate loans. The Bank was not active in purchasing or selling loans over the past five years, with the exception of selling $838,000 of multi-family loans during 2014. Following three years of decline from 2012 through 2014, the Bank’s net loan activity showed increases of $24.4 million in 2015 and $75.0 million in 2016.

Asset Quality

Historically, the Bank’s lending emphasis on lending in local and familiar markets generally supported maintenance of relatively favorable credit quality measures. However, following the national recession and bursting of the housing bubble in 2008, the Bank experienced elevated levels of problems assets. In recent years, the Bank has taken proactive measures to address credit quality deterioration and significantly reduce the balance of non-performing balance assets from peak levels. Over the past five years, Ponce Bank’s balance of non-performing assets ranged from a high of $60.8 million or 7.99% of assets at yearend 2012 to a low of $7.7 million or 1.04% of assets at yearend 2016. As shown in Exhibit I-12, non-performing assets at December 31, 2016 consisted of $7.7 million of non-accruing loans. Non-accruing loans held by the Bank at December 31, 2106 were primarily concentrated in 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans totaling $4.2 million.

To track the Bank’s asset quality and the adequacy of valuation allowances, the Bank has established detailed asset classification policies and procedures which are consistent with regulatory guidelines. Classified assets are reviewed monthly by senior management and quarterly by the Board. Pursuant to these procedures, when needed, the Bank establishes additional valuation allowances to cover anticipated losses in classified or non-classified assets. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank maintained loan loss allowances of $10.2 million, equal to 1.57% of total loans receivable and 132.15% of non-performing loans.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.13*

Funding Composition and Strategy

Deposits have consistently served as the Bank’s primary funding source and at December 31, 2016 deposits accounted for 99.54% of Ponce Bank’s combined balance of deposits and borrowings. Exhibit I-13 sets forth the Bank’s deposit composition for the past three years and Exhibit I-14 provides the interest rate and maturity composition of the CD portfolio at December 31, 2016. CDs constitute the largest component of the Bank’s deposit composition; although, the concentration of CDs comprising total deposits has declined slightly during the past three years, as the result of growth of transaction and savings account deposits and a decrease in CDs. For 2016, the balance of CDs averaged $371.3 million or 59.54% of average deposits, versus comparable measures of $379.9 million and 62.07% of average deposits for 2014. CDs with scheduled maturities of one year or less comprised 45.82% of the Bank’s CDs at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, jumbo CDs (CD accounts with balances of $100,000 or more) amounted to $233.5 million or 63.33% of total CDs. The Bank did not maintain any brokered deposit as of December 31, 2016.

Transaction and savings account deposits comprised 40.46% of average total deposits during 2016, as compared to 37.93% of average total deposits during 2014. Savings account deposits comprised the largest concentration of the Banks core deposits during 2016, averaging $126.7 million or 50.21% of average core deposits.

Borrowings serve as an alternative funding source for the Bank to facilitate management of funding costs and interest rate risk Borrowings totaled $3.0 million at December 31, 2016 and consisted entirely of FHLB advances on an overnight line of credit basis. At December 31, 2016, the FHLB advances had a weighted average interest rate of 078%. Exhibit I-15 provides further detail of the Bank’s borrowings activities during the past three years.

Subsidiary Activities

Ponce Bank maintains two wholly-owned subsidiaries: PFS Service Corp, which owns two the Bank’s properties, and Ponce de Leon Mortgage Corp., which is a mortgage banking entity.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.14*

Legal Proceedings

The Bank is not currently party to any pending legal proceedings that the Bank’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.1*

II. MARKET AREA

Introduction

Headquartered in Bronx, New York, Ponce Bank serves the New York metropolitan area through its headquarters office and 13 full service branch offices The Bank’s branch network covers a four-county market area in New York: Bronx County (4 branches), Queens County (3 branches), Kings County (3 branches) and New York County (2 branches). Ponce Bank also maintains one branch location in Hudson County, New Jersey. Exhibit II-1 provides information on the Bank’s office facilities.

With operations in a major metropolitan area, the Bank’s competitive environment includes a significant number of commercial banks, thrifts and other financial services companies, some of which have a regional or national presence. These institutions also have greater resources at their disposal than the Bank. The New York metropolitan area has a highly developed economy, with a relatively high concentration of highly skilled workers who are employed in a number of different industry clusters including financial services, healthcare and technology.

Future growth opportunities for Ponce Bank depend on the future growth and stability of the local and regional economy, demographic growth trends, and the nature and intensity of the competitive environment. These factors have been briefly examined to help determine the growth potential that exists for the Bank, the relative economic health of the Bank’s market area, and the resultant impact on value.

National Economic Factors

The future success of the Bank’s operations is partially dependent upon various national and local economic trends. In assessing national economic trends over the past few quarters, manufacturing and service sector activity expanded at slightly lower rates in July 2016, with respective index readings of 52.6 and 55.5. The U.S. economy added a better-than-expected 255,000 jobs in July, while the July unemployment rate held steady at 4.9%. Retail sales for July showed little change compared to June. Housing starts were up 2.1% in July and July new home sales were up a solid 12.1% compared to June. However, July existing home sales fell 3.2%, suggesting that higher home prices were reducing housing demand. Durable-goods orders for July rose 4.4%, which was the largest monthly jump since October 2015. Readings


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.2*

for manufacturing and service activity in August signaled a slowing U.S. economy, as August manufacturing activity contracted and August service sector activity expanded at a slower rate. Job growth also slowed in August, with a monthly gain of 151,000 jobs. The August unemployment rate remained at 4.9%. A 0.3% decline in August retail sales provided another indication of a slowing U.S. economy. Both new and existing home sales were also lower in August, while durable-goods orders were unchanged for August. Manufacturing activity for September rebounded with an index reading of 51.5. Likewise, service sector activity for September picked-up as well with an index reading of 57.1. Comparatively, September employment data was fairly stagnant, as employers added 156,000 jobs in September and the unemployment rate edged up to 5.0% as more people entered the labor force. Retail sales increased 0.4% in September, keeping the Federal Reserve on a path to raise interest rates in 2016. September data for housing showed a pick-up in home demand, as September existing and new home sales increased 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Pending home sales were also up 1.5% in September. Third quarter GDP growth provided another indication that the U.S. economy was gaining traction, as third quarter GDP increased at an annual rate of 2.9% (subsequently revised up to 3.5%).

Manufacturing activity picked up slightly in October 2016 with an index reading of 51.9. Comparatively, service sector activity for October expanded at a slower rate with an index reading of 54.8. Employers added 161,000 jobs in October and the unemployment rate for October ticked down to 4.9%, which was due to a decline in the number of people participating in the workforce. Notably, wage gains for October were the strongest since 2009 and, thereby, keeping the Federal Reserve on a pace for a December rate hike. Housing starts jumped 25.5% in October, while existing home sales for October climbed 2.0%. Comparatively, new home sales declined 1.9% in October and October pending home sales increased 0.1%. U.S. employers added 178,000 jobs in November and the November unemployment rate fell to a nine-year low of 4.6%. Manufacturing and service sector activity accelerated in November, with respective readings of 53.2 and 57.2. Following a strong October, housing starts declined 18.7% in November. However, existing home sales were up for the third straight month in November, increasing 0.7% which was the highest sales pace since February 2007. Sales of new homes for November showed a healthy increase of 5.2%, while November pending home sales declined 2.5%. Manufacturing activity for December rose to 54.7, hitting its highest level since December 2014, and December service sector activity held steady with a reading of 57.2. The U.S. economy added 156,000 jobs in December and the December unemployment rate


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.3*

ticked up to 4.7%. The pace of home sales slowed in December, as existing home sales for sales decreased 2.8% compared to November. New home sales plunged 10.4% in December compared to the prior month, which was viewed as an indication that affordability challenges were beginning to cut into demand. However, December pending home sales increased 1.6% compared to November. Fourth quarter GDP increased at a 1.6% annual rate.

Job growth for the first month of 2017 was stronger than expected, as U.S. employers added 227,000 in January 2017. However, the January 2017 unemployment rate for the U.S. edged up to 4.8%, due to more Americans actively seeking employment. Manufacturing activity for January accelerated with a reading of 56.0, while January service sector activity grew at a slightly slower pace with a reading of 56.5. Retail sales for January showed a healthy 0.4% increase from December. Housing starts for January declined 2.6%, which was due to a drop in multi-family construction. Comparatively, January existing home sales increased 3.3%, in which existing home sales for January increased at the fastest pace since February 2007.

In terms of interest rates trends over the past few quarters, investors sold risky assets in favor of safe haven investments in early-July 2016, which drove the yield on the 10-year Treasury to a record low of 1.37%. Long-term Treasury yields rose going into mid-July, as investors moved back into riskier assets on the heels of the strong job growth reported for June. During the second half of July and into early-August, long-term Treasury yields remained fairly stable, as the Federal Reserve concluded its late-July policy meeting keeping its target interest rate unchanged as expected. Long-term Treasury yields remained fairly stable throughout August and into-early September. Going into the second half of September the 10-year Treasury yield edged higher ahead of the Federal Reserve’s policy meeting. The Federal Reserve concluded its September meeting leaving interest rates unchanged, but signaled it expected to raise rates before the end of the year. Following the Federal Reserve meeting, the 10-year Treasury yield edged back below 1.60% in late-September.

Stronger readings for September manufacturing and service sector activity helped to push the 10-year Treasury yield above 1.70% in mid-October 2016. Long-term Treasury yields continued to edge higher going into late-October, as signs of inflation ticking up pushed the 10-year Treasury yield to its highest level in four months. The Federal Reserve concluded its early-November policy meeting leaving interest rates unchanged, but noted that inflation had increased somewhat and left the door open for a rate increase in December. Interest rates stabilized ahead of the Presidential election and then surged higher following the election,


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.4*

based on expectations that there would be an increase in government spending and a pick-up in inflation under the Trump administration. The upward trend in long-term Treasury yields continued through the end of November and into December, in which the 10-year Treasury yield rose to a 17-month high of 2.44% on December 1, 2016. Treasury prices continued to slide lower through mid-December, as the Federal Reserve concluded its two-day policy meeting raising its target interest rate by 0.25% and signaled interest rates would rise faster than previously projected based on growing optimism about the strength of the U.S. economy. After hitting a mid-December high of 2.60%, the yield on the 10-year Treasury eased lower in the closing weeks of 2016.

Long-term Treasury yields edged lower during the first half of January 2017, as the December employment report showed weaker than expected job growth. Treasury yields reversed course in the second half of January, with renewed optimism about the U.S. economy prompting investors to buy stocks and lighten up on their holdings of safer assets such as Treasury bonds. At the start of February, the Federal Reserve concluded its two-day policy meeting with no change in its target interest rate and indicated it remained on track to gradually raise short-term interest rates this year. Long-term Treasury yields edged lower following the release of the January jobs report. Interest rates edged higher going into the second half of February, as increases in retail sales, factory output and inflation pointed to a healthy start in 2017 for the U.S. economy and the growing possibility of another rate increase by the Federal Reserve. As of February 24, 2017, the bond equivalent yields for U.S. Treasury bonds with terms of one and ten years equaled 0.80% and 2.31%, respectively, versus comparable year ago yields of 0.55% and 1.75%. Exhibit II-2 provides historical interest rate trends.

Based on the consensus outlook of economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal in January 2017, GDP growth was projected to increase to 2.4% in 2017. The unemployment rate was forecasted to decline to 4.6% in June 2017 and to 4.5% in December 2017. An average of 166,000 jobs were projected to be added per month during 2017. On average, the economists forecasted an increase in the federal funds rate to 0.93% in June 2017 and to 1.31% in December 2017. On average, the economists forecasted that the 10-year Treasury yield would increase to 2.65% in June 2017 and increase to 2.89% by the end of 2017. The surveyed economists also forecasted home prices would rise 4.4% in 2017 and housing starts were forecasted to continue to trend slightly higher in 2017.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.5*

The January 2017 mortgage finance forecast from the Mortgage Bankers Association (the “MBA”) was for 2017 existing home sales to increase by 5.3% from 2016 sales and new home sales were forecasted to increase by 13.8% in 2017 from sales in 2016. The 2017 median sale prices for new and existing homes were forecasted to increase by 1.9% and 5.2%, respectively. Total mortgage production was forecasted to decline in 2017 to $1.563 trillion, compared to $1.891 trillion in 2016. The forecasted decrease in 2017 originations was based on a 10.3% increase in purchase volume and a 47.7% decrease in refinancing volume. Purchase mortgage originations were forecasted to total $1.092 trillion in 2017, versus refinancing volume totaling $471 billion. Housing starts for 2017 were projected to increase by 8.3% to total $1.265 billion.

Market Area Demographics

Demographic and economic growth trends, measured by changes in population, number of households, age distribution and median household income, provide key insight into the health of the market area served by Ponce Bank (see Table 2.1). The primary market area counties are densely populated markets, ranking among the largest populations in New Jersey and New York. Kings County (Brooklyn) has the largest population among the four primary market area counties and is the largest county in New York, followed by Queens County and New York County as the second and third largest counties in New York. Bronx County is the fifth largest county in New York and Hudson County is the fifth largest county in New Jersey. Four out of the five primary market area counties served by Ponce Bank experienced relatively strong growth during the 2010 to 2017 period, as New York County was the only county that lagged the comparable U.S. population and household growth rates. All five of the primary market area counties posted stronger population and household growth rates compared to the state of New York. Population and household growth rates for the primary market area counties are projected to slow slightly over the next five years and, therefore, be more comparable to the projected U.S. population and household growth rates.

Age distribution measures reflect that the primary market area counties has a somewhat similarly-aged population relative to the state of New York and the U.S.

Income measures show New York County is a relatively affluent market. Comparatively, income measures for Bronx County, which has a relatively broad socioeconomic spectrum, were well below the comparable state measures as well as the other four primary market area counties. Projected income growth rates for the primary market area counties were generally fairly consistent with the projected income growth rates for New Jersey, New York and the U.S, with the highest income growth rates projected for Kings County and the lowest income growth rates projected for Bronx County.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.6*

Table 2.1

Ponce Bank

Summary Demographic Data


	Year						Growth Rate
	2010		2017		2022		2010-2017			2017-2022
							(%)			(%)
Population (000)
USA		308,746		325,139		337,393		0.7	%		0.7	%
New York		19,378		19,892		20,287		0.4	%		0.4	%
Bronx, NY		1,385		1,476		1,535		0.9	%		0.8	%
Kings, NY		2,505		2,668		2,768		0.9	%		0.7	%
New York, NY		1,586		1,657		1,703		0.6	%		0.6	%
Queens, NY		2,231		2,368		2,455		0.9	%		0.7	%
Hudson, NJ		634		684		713		1.1	%		0.8	%
Households (000)
USA		116,716		123,357		128,247		0.8	%		0.8	%
New York		7,318		7,568		7,745		0.5	%		0.5	%
Bronx, NY		483		518		539		1.0	%		0.8	%
Kings, NY		917		988		1,030		1.1	%		0.8	%
New York, NY		764		802		827		0.7	%		0.6	%
Queens, NY		780		828		858		0.9	%		0.7	%
Hudson, NJ		246		269		282		1.3	%		0.9	%
Median Household Income ($)
USA		NA		57,462		61,642		NA			1.4	%
New York		NA		62,222		65,981		NA			1.2	%
Bronx, NY		NA		34,959		36,302		NA			0.8	%
Kings, NY		NA		50,530		55,811		NA			2.0	%
New York, NY		NA		77,932		83,752		NA			1.5	%
Queens, NY		NA		60,760		64,427		NA			1.2	%
Hudson, NJ		NA		62,864		67,490		NA			1.4	%
Per Capita Income ($)
USA		NA		31,459		34,068		NA			1.6	%
New York		NA		35,725		38,286		NA			1.4	%
Bronx, NY		NA		18,469		19,260		NA			0.8	%
Kings, NY		NA		28,958		32,012		NA			2.0	%
New York, NY		NA		67,621		71,740		NA			1.2	%
Queens, NY		NA		28,283		30,311		NA			1.4	%
Hudson, NJ		NA		36,657		39,939		NA			1.7	%

2017 Age Distribution (%)	0-14 Yrs.		15-34 Yrs.		35-54 Yrs.		55-69 Yrs.			70+ Yrs.
USA		18.8		27.1		25.7		18.1			10.3
New York		17.6		27.6		26.1		18.2			10.5
Bronx, NY		21.3		30.1		25.8		14.8			8.0
Kings, NY		20.2		29.5		26.3		15.4			8.5
New York, NY		13.2		32.4		27.8		16.3			10.3
Queens, NY		17.3		27.1		28.3		17.6			9.7
Hudson, NJ		17.9		31.1		28.5		14.8			7.6


	Less Than		$25,000 to		$50,000 to
2017 HH Income Dist. (%)	25,000		50,000		100,000		$100,000+
USA		21.9		22.9		29.5		25.7
New York		22.1		20.2		27.6		30.1
Bronx, NY		39.2		24.4		23.6		12.8
Kings, NY		28.2		21.4		25.9		24.4
New York, NY		22.4		14.7		21.5		41.4
Queens, NY		21.4		21.1		30.3		27.2
Hudson, NJ		22.6		19.4		27.2		30.9

Source: SNL Financial


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.7*

The relative affluence of New York County is further evidenced by a comparison of household income distribution measures, as New York County maintains a much higher percentage of households with incomes over $100,000 relative to the U.S and New York. Comparatively, Bronx County maintains a relatively high percentage of households with incomes of less than $25,000 and a relatively low percentage of households with income over $100,000.

Local Economy

The markets served by the Bank have large and diverse economies. Comparative employment data in Table 2.2 shows that employment in services constitutes the primary source of employment in all of the primary area counties with the exception of Bronx County. Jobs in the education/healthcare/social services sector was the largest source of employment in Bronx County, as well as the state of New York, and was the second largest employment sector in the other four primary market area counties. Service jobs were the second largest source of jobs for Bronx County and the state of New York. The prominence of Wall Street jobs on the New York County economy is highlighted by the County’s relatively high concentration of jobs in finance/insurance/real estate sector, while wholesale/retail jobs were the third largest employment sector for the other primary market area counties and the state of New York.

Table 2.2

Ponce Bank

Primary Market Area Employment Sectors

(Percent of Labor Force)


				Bronx			Kings			New York			Queens			Hudson
Employment Sector	New York			New York			New York			New York			New York			New Jersey
	(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)
Services		26.5	%		27.1	%		29.5	%		35.1	%		30.0	%		28.3	%
Education,Healthcare, Soc. Serv.		27.4	%		32.3	%		28.7	%		22.7	%		23.8	%		20.1	%
Wholesale/Retail Trade		13.1	%		13.1	%		11.5	%		9.8	%		12.5	%		14.0	%
Manufacturing		6.1	%		3.7	%		3.4	%		2.7	%		4.0	%		6.8	%
Construction		5.6	%		5.4	%		4.9	%		1.9	%		7.0	%		5.5	%
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate		7.9	%		6.4	%		7.3	%		15.8	%		7.6	%		11.2	%
Transportation/Utility		5.4	%		7.0	%		6.5	%		3.1	%		8.3	%		7.7	%
Government		4.4	%		3.1	%		3.7	%		2.5	%		4.2	%		2.9	%
Information		3.0	%		1.7	%		4.3	%		6.4	%		2.5	%		3.4	%
Agriculture		0.6	%		0.1	%		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.2	%		0.0	%

		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.8*

The market area served by the Bank, characterized primarily as the New York MSA, has a highly developed and diverse economy, Healthcare, transportation, education and banking companies or institutions constitute major sources of employment in the Bank’s market area. Tourism also is a prominent component of the market area’s economy, as New York City annually ranks as one of the nation’s top tourist destinations. Table 2.3 lists in detail the major employers in the New York metropolitan area.

Table 2.3

Ponce Bank

Market Area Largest Employers


Employer		Industry
American Airlines		Transportation
Columbia University		Education
JPMorgan Chase		Banking
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center		Healthcare
Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospitay		Healthcare
Mount Sinai Hospital		Healthcare
New York-Presbyterian Hospital		Healthcare
Nielsen Company		Marketing
Northwell Health, Inc.		Healthcare
Verizion		Telecom

Source: Division of Research & Statistics Analysis of InfoUSA ARC employer database and publicly available Information

Unemployment Trends

Comparative unemployment rates for the primary market area counties, as well as for the U.S, and New York, are shown in Table 2.4. December 2016 unemployment rates for the primary market area counties ranged from a low of 3.8% for Hudson County to a high of 6.2% for Bronx County. With the exception of Bronx County, December 2016 unemployment rates for the primary market counties were equal to or lower than the comparable U.S. and New York unemployment rate of 4.5%. Consistent with the national trend, all of the primary market area counties and the state of New York reported lower unemployment rates for December 2016 compared to a year ago.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.9*

Table 2.4

Ponce Bank

Unemployment Trends


	Unemployment Rate						Net
Region	Dec. 2015			Dec. 2016			Change
USA		4.8	%		4.5	%		-0.3	%
New York		4.7	%		4.5	%		-0.2	%
Bronx County, NY		7.0	%		6.2	%		-0.8	%
Kings County, NY		5.2	%		4.5	%		-0.7	%
New York County, NY		4.3	%		3.9	%		-0.4	%
Queens County, NY		4.4	%		3.9	%		-0.5	%
Hudson County, NJ		4.0	%		3.8	%		-0.2	%

Source: SNL Financial, LC.

Market Area Deposit Characteristics and Competition

The Bank’s retail deposit base is closely tied to the New York metropolitan market area and, in particular, to the markets that are nearby to the Bank’s branch locations. Table 2.5 displays deposit market trends from June 30, 2012 through June 30, 2016 for the primary market counties. Additional data is also presented for the state of New York. The data indicates that commercial banks gained or maintained deposit market share in all five of the primary market area counties during the four year period covered in Table 2.5. Similar to the states of New York, commercial banks maintained a larger market share of deposits than savings institutions in all five of the Bank’s primary market area counties.

Ponce Bank’s largest holding and highest market share of deposits is in Bronx County, where the Bank is headquartered and maintains its largest branch presence. The Bank’s $232.2 million of deposits at the Bronx County branches represented a 1.9% market share of bank and thrift deposits at June 30, 2016. The Bank’s deposit market share in the remaining four counties was nominal, based on deposit market shares of 0.3% or less in those four counties.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.10*

Table 2.5

Ponce Bank

Deposit Summary


	As of June 30,
	2012							2016							Deposit
			Market			No. of				Market			No. of		Growth Rate
	Deposits		Share			Branches		Deposits		Share			Branches		2012-2016
	(Dollars in Thousands)														(%)
New York	$	1,043,365,000		100.0	%		5,433	$	1,496,993,000		100.0	%		5,167		9.4	%
Commercial Banks		969,334,000		92.9	%		4,484		1,426,672,000		95.3	%		4,406		10.1	%
Savings Institutions		74,031,000		7.1	%		949		70,321,000		4.7	%		761		-1.3	%
Bronx	$	10,422,908		100.0	%		150	$	11,935,315		100.0	%		149		3.4	%
Commercial Banks		8,516,218		81.7	%		123		10,112,143		84.7	%		123		4.4	%
Savings Institutions		1,906,690		18.3	%		27		1,823,172		15.3	%		26		-1.1	%
Ponce Bank		266,474		2.6	%		4		232,186		1.9	%		4		-3.4	%
Kings	$	37,603,197		100.0	%		358	$	50,596,933		100.0	%		370		7.7	%
Commercial Banks		31,438,290		83.6	%		276		43,203,681		85.4	%		284		8.3	%
Savings Institutions		6,164,907		16.4	%		82		7,393,252		14.6	%		86		4.6	%
Ponce Bank		125,298		0.3	%		3		107,791		0.2	%		3		-3.7	%
New York	$	682,762,089		100.0	%		689	$	1,025,152,281		100.0	%		690		10.7	%
Commercial Banks		677,597,223		99.2	%		649		1,019,350,801		99.4	%		650		10.7	%
Savings Institutions		5,164,866		0.8	%		40		5,801,480		0.6	%		40		2.9	%
Ponce Bank		59,844		0.0	%		1		63,792		0.0	%		2		1.6	%
Queens	$	43,546,874		100.0	%		451	$	59,702,067		100.0	%		437		8.2	%
Commercial Banks		32,234,175		74.0	%		334		44,521,594		74.6	%		320		8.4	%
Savings Institutions		11,312,699		26.0	%		117		15,180,473		25.4	%		117		7.6	%
Ponce Bank		181,006		0.4	%		3		191,836		0.3	%		3		1.5	%
Hudson, NJ	$	26,423,125		100.0	%		177	$	29,643,052		100.0	%		166		2.9	%
Commercial Banks		23,201,789		87.8	%		134		26,782,392		90.3	%		128		3.7	%
Savings Institutions		3,221,336		12.2	%		43		2,860,660		9.7	%		38		-2.9	%
Ponce Bank		44,476		0.2	%		1		36,833		0.1	%		1		-4.6	%

Source: FDIC.

As implied by the Bank’s low market shares of deposits, the Bank faces significant competition. Among the Bank’s competitors are much larger and more diversified institutions, which have greater resources than maintained by Ponce Bank. Financial institution competitors in the Bank’s primary market area include other locally based thrifts and banks, as well as regional, super regional and money center banks. Table 2.6 lists the Bank’s largest competitors in the five counties currently served by its branches, based on deposit market share.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*MARKET AREA*
		*II.11*

Table 2.6

Ponce Bank

Market Area Deposit Competitors - As of June 30, 2016


		Market
Location	Name	Share		Rank
			(%)
Bronx County	JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY)		35.00
	Citigroup Inc. (NY)		18.33
	Apple Financial Holding Inc. (NY)		9.12
	Capital One Financial Corp. (VA)		7.00
	Bank of America Corp. (NC)		5.19
	Ponce Bank		1.95		10 of 23

Kings County	JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY)		28.89
	Banco Santander		11.95
	Citigroup Inc. (NY)		11.72
	Toronto-Dominion Bank		6.56
	Capital One Financial Corp. (VA)		6.19
	Ponce Bank		0.21		27 of 41

New York County	JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY)		46.14
	Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (NY)		12.87
	HSBC Holdings		10.37
	Citigroup Inc. (NY)		7.63
	Bank of America Corp. (NC)		6.20
	Ponce Bank		0.01		71 of 90

Queens County	JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY)		23.09
	Citigroup Inc. (NY)		13.57
	New York Community Bancorp (NY)		11.90
	Capital One Financial Corp. (VA)		8.82
	Toronto-Dominion Bank		6.04
	Ponce Bank		0.32		32 of 54

Hudson County	Bank of America Corp. (NC)		52.86
	JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY)		5.59
	Capital One Financial Corp. (VA)		5.12
	Banco Santander		4.91
	Toronto-Dominion Bank		4.04
	Ponce Bank		0.12		24 of 31

Source: SNL Financial, LC.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.1*

III. PEER GROUP ANALYSIS

This chapter presents an analysis of Ponce Bank’s operations versus a group of comparable savings institutions (the “Peer Group”) selected from the universe of all publicly-traded savings institutions in a manner consistent with the regulatory valuation guidelines. The basis of the pro forma market valuation of Ponce Bank is derived from the pricing ratios of the Peer Group institutions, incorporating valuation adjustments for key differences in relation to the Peer Group. Since no Peer Group can be exactly comparable to Ponce Bank, key areas examined for differences are: financial condition; profitability, growth and viability of earnings; asset growth; primary market area; dividends; liquidity of the shares; marketing of the issue; management; and effect of government regulations and regulatory reform.

Peer Group Selection

The Peer Group selection process is governed by the general parameters set forth in the regulatory valuation guidelines. Accordingly, the Peer Group is comprised of only those publicly-traded savings institutions whose common stock is either listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ, since their stock trading activity is regularly reported and generally more frequent than non-publicly traded and closely-held institutions. Institutions that are not listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ are inappropriate, since the trading activity for thinly-traded or closely-held stocks are typically highly irregular in terms of frequency and price and thus may not be a reliable indicator of market value. We have also excluded from the Peer Group those companies under acquisition or subject to rumored acquisition and recent conversions, since their pricing ratios are subject to unusual distortion and/or have limited trading history. A recent listing of the universe of all publicly-traded savings institutions is included as Exhibit III-1.

Ideally, the Peer Group, which must have at least 10 members to comply with the regulatory valuation guidelines, should be comprised of publicly-traded MHCs with comparable resources, strategies and financial characteristics as Ponce Bank. However, there are currently only eight publicly-traded MHCs. Accordingly, in deriving a Peer Group comprised of institutions with relatively comparable characteristics as Ponce Bank, the companies selected for Ponce Bank’s Peer Group are all fully-converted companies. The valuation adjustments applied in the Chapter IV analysis will take into consideration differences between the Bank’s MHC form of ownership relative to the fully-converted Peer Group companies. Also included in Chapter IV is a pricing analysis of the publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.2*

From the universe of publicly-traded thrifts, we selected ten institutions with characteristics similar to those of Ponce Bank. In the selection process, we applied two “screens” to the universe of all public companies that were eligible for consideration:

•

Screen #1 Mid-Atlantic institutions with assets between $500 million and $1.5 billion, tangible equity-to-assets ratios of greater than 7.5% and positive reported and core earnings. Seven companies met the criteria for Screen #1 and six were included in the Peer Group: Bay Bancorp, Inc. of Maryland, Clifton Bancorp, Inc. of New Jersey, Elmira Savings Bank of New York, Malvern Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania, Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. of New York and Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania. Severn Bancorp, Inc. of Maryland met the selection criteria, but was excluded on the basis of earnings being distorted by a reversal of a $10.8 million valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax asset. Exhibit III-2 provides financial and public market pricing characteristics of all publicly-traded Mid-Atlantic thrifts.

•

Screen #2 New England institutions with assets between $500 million and $1.5 billion, tangible equity-to-assets ratios of greater than 7.5% and positive reported and core earnings. Four companies met the criteria for Screen #2 and all four were included in the Peer Group: Coastway Bancorp Inc. of Rhode Island, PB Bancorp, Inc. of Connecticut, Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts and Western New England Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts. Exhibit III-3 provides financial and public market pricing characteristics of all publicly-traded New England thrifts.

Table 3.1 shows the general characteristics of each of the ten Peer Group companies and Exhibit III-4 provides summary demographic and deposit market share data for the primary market areas served by each of the Peer Group companies. While there are expectedly some differences between the Peer Group companies and Ponce Bank, we believe that the Peer Group companies, on average, provide a good basis for valuation subject to valuation adjustments. The following sections present a comparison of Ponce Bank’s financial condition, income and expense trends, loan composition, interest rate risk and credit risk versus the Peer Group as of the most recent publicly available date. Comparative data for all publicly-traded thrifts, and publicly-traded New York thrifts have been included in the Chapter III tables as well.

In addition to the selection criteria used to identify the Peer Group companies, a summary description of the key comparable characteristics of each of the Peer Group companies relative to Ponce Bank’s characteristics is detailed below.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.3*

•

Bay Bancorp, Inc. of Maryland. Comparable due to similar size of branch network, similar interest-bearing funding composition, similar return on average assets, similar net interest income to average assets ratio, relatively high operating expense ratio and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Clifton Bancorp, Inc. of New Jersey. Comparable due to similar size of branch network and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Coastway Bancorp Inc. of Rhode Island. Comparable due to similar size of branch network, similar interest-earning asset composition, relatively high operating expense ratio and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Elmira Savings of New York. Comparable due to similar size of branch network, similar interest-earning asset composition and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Malvern Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania. Comparable due to similar asset size, limited earnings contribution from sources of non-interest operating income and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. of New York. Comparable due to similar asset size and lending diversification emphasis commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

PB Bancorp, Inc. of Connecticut. Comparable due to similar return on average assets ratio, similar concentration of 1-4 family loans as a percent of assets and lending diversification emphasis commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania. Comparable due to similar size of branch network, similar impact of loan loss provisions on earnings, limited earnings contribution from sources of non-interest operating income, similar concentration of 1-4 family loans as a percent of assets, lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans and similar ratio of non-performing assets as a percent of assets.

•

Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts. Comparable due to similar asset size, similar interest-earning asset composition, limited earnings contribution from sources of non-interest operating income, similar concentration of 1-4 family loans as a percent of assets and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

•

Western New England Bancorp, Inc. of Massachusetts. Comparable due to similar return on average assets ratio, limited earnings contribution from sources of non-interest operating income and lending diversification emphasis on commercial real estate/multi-family loans.

In aggregate, the Peer Group companies maintained a slightly higher level of tangible equity than the industry average (12.58% of assets versus 11.97% for all public companies), generated lower earnings as a percent of average assets (0.56% core ROAA versus 0.72% for all public companies), and earned a lower ROE (4.81% core ROE versus 6.03% for all public companies). Overall, the Peer Group’s average P/TB ratio and average core P/E multiple were below and approximately same compared to the respective averages for all publicly-traded thrifts.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.4*


	All Publicly-Traded			Peer Group
Financial Characteristics (Averages)
Assets ($Mil)	$	3,274		$	777
Market capitalization ($Mil)	$	580		$	139
Tangible equity/assets (%)		11.97	%		12.58	%
Core return on average assets (%)		0.72			0.56
Core return on average equity (%)		6.03			4.81
Pricing Ratios (Averages)(1)
Core price/earnings (x)		20.60	x		20.21	x
Price/tangible book (%)		146.71	%		128.46	%
Price/assets (%)		16.27			15.05

(1)	Based on market prices as of February 24, 2017.

Ideally, the Peer Group companies would be comparable to Ponce Bank in terms of all of the selection criteria, but the universe of publicly-traded thrifts does not provide for an appropriate number of such companies. However, in general, the companies selected for the Peer Group were fairly comparable to Ponce Bank, as will be highlighted in the following comparative analysis. Comparative data for all publicly-traded thrifts and publicly-traded New York thrifts have been included in the Chapter III tables as well.

Financial Condition

Table 3.2 shows comparative balance sheet measures for Ponce Bank and the Peer Group, reflecting the expected similarities and some differences given the selection procedures outlined above. The Bank’s and the Peer Group’s ratios reflect balances as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively. Ponce Bank’s equity-to-assets ratio of 12.48% was slightly lower than the Peer Group’s average net worth ratio of 13.05%. With the infusion of the net proceeds, the Bank’s pro forma equity-to-assets ratio will exceed the Peer Group’s equity-to-assets ratio. Tangible equity-to-assets ratios for the Bank and the Peer Group equaled 12.48% and 12.58%, respectively. The increase in Ponce Bank’s pro forma capital position will be favorable from a risk perspective and in terms of future earnings potential that could be realized through leverage and lower funding costs. At the same time, the Bank’s higher pro forma capitalization will initially depress return on equity. Both Ponce Bank’s and the Peer Group’s capital ratios reflected capital surpluses with respect to the regulatory capital requirements.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.5*

The interest-earning asset compositions for the Bank and the Peer Group were somewhat similar, with loans constituting the bulk of interest-earning assets for both Ponce Bank and the Peer Group. The Bank’s loans-to-assets ratio of 86.48% was higher than the comparable Peer Group ratio of 71.32%. Comparatively, the Bank’s cash and investments-to-assets ratio of 8.77% was lower than the comparable Peer Group ratio of 23.39%. Overall, Ponce Bank’s interest-earning assets amounted to 95.25% of assets, which was slightly higher than the comparable Peer Group ratio of 94.71%. The Peer Group’s non-interest earning assets included bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) equal to 2.21% of assets and goodwill/intangibles equal to 0.47% of assets, while the Bank maintained a zero balance of BOLI and a very nominal balance of goodwill/intangibles.

Ponce Bank’s funding liabilities reflected a funding strategy that was somewhat similar to that of the Peer Group’s funding composition. The Bank’s deposits equaled 86.32% of assets, which was above the Peer Group’s ratio of 72.52%. Comparatively, the Bank maintained a lower level of borrowings to fund assets, as indicated by borrowings-to-assets ratios of 0.40% and 13.48% for Ponce Bank and the Peer Group, respectively. Total interest-bearing liabilities maintained by the Bank and the Peer Group, as a percent of assets, equaled 86.72% and 86.00%, respectively.

A key measure of balance sheet strength for a thrift institution is its interest-earnings assets/interest-bearing liabilities (“IEA/IBL”) ratio. Presently, the Bank’s IEA/IBL ratio is approximately the same as the Peer Group’s ratio, based on IEA/IBL ratios of 109.84% and 110.13%, respectively. The additional capital realized from stock proceeds should serve to provide Ponce Bank with an IEA/IBL ratio that exceeds the Peer Group’s ratio, as the increase in capital provided by the infusion of stock proceeds will serve to lower the level of interest-bearing liabilities funding assets and will be primarily deployed into interest-earning assets.

The growth rate section of Table 3.2 shows annual growth rates for key balance sheet items. Ponce Bank’s and the Peer Group’s growth rates are based on annual growth for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively. Ponce Bank recorded a 5.95% increase in assets, versus asset growth of 14.24% recorded by the Peer Group. The Peer Group’s higher growth rate was in part due to acquisition related by Bay Bancorp, Inc. and Prudential Bancorp, Inc. Asset growth for Ponce Bank was driven by a 12.84% increase in loans, which was in part funded by a 31.83% reduction in cash and investments. Comparatively, asset growth for the Peer Group was driven by an 18.72% increase in loans and was supplemented with a 16.04% increase in cash and investments.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.6*

Asset growth for Ponce Bank was funded by a 7.27% increase in deposits, which also funded a 62.50% decrease in borrowings. Asset growth for the Peer Group was funded through deposit growth of 13.19% and a 27.72% increase in borrowings. The Bank’s tangible capital increased 2.12%, which was largely attributable to retention of earnings. Comparatively, the Peer Group’s tangible capital increased 6.88%, with the Peer Group’s higher growth rate in part supported by PB Bancorp’s relatively high capital growth rate realized in connection with its second-step conversion. The Bank’s post-conversion capital growth rate will initially be constrained by maintenance of a higher pro forma capital position. Additionally, implementation of any stock repurchases and dividend payments, pursuant to regulatory limitations and guidelines, could also slow the Bank’s capital growth rate in the longer term following the stock offering.

Income and Expense Components

Table 3.3 displays statements of operations for the Bank and the Peer Group. The Bank’s and the Peer Group’s ratios are based on earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively. Ponce Bank and the Peer Group reported net income to average assets ratios of 0.20% and 0.56%, respectively. The Peer Group’s higher return was realized through a higher ratio for non-interest operating income, a lower ratio for operating expenses and a lower effective tax rate, which were partially offset by the Bank’s higher ratio for net interest income and lower ratio for loan loss provisions

The Bank’s higher net interest income to average assets ratio was realized through a higher interest income ratio, which was partially offset by the Peer Group’s lower interest expense ratio. The Bank’s higher interest income ratio was supported by maintaining a higher overall yield earned on interest-earning assets (4.88% versus 3.69% for the Peer Group), as well as maintaining a slightly higher concentration of interest-earning assets as a percent of assets. Likewise, the Peer Group’s lower interest expense ratio was supported by a lower cost of funds (0.86% versus 1.06% for the Bank), as well as maintaining a slightly lower ratio of interest-bearing liabilities funding assets. Overall, Ponce Bank and the Peer Group reported net interest income to average assets ratios of 3.83% and 2.82%, respectively.

In another key area of core earnings strength, the Bank maintained a significantly higher level of operating expenses than the Peer Group. For the period covered in Table 3.3, the Bank and the Peer Group reported operating expense to average assets ratios of 3.84% and 2.59%, respectively. The Bank’s higher operating expense ratio was consistent with the comparatively higher number of employees maintained relative to its asset size. Assets per full time equivalent employee equaled $4.282 million for the Bank, versus $7.028 million for the Peer Group.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.7*

When viewed together, net interest income and operating expenses provide considerable insight into a thrift’s earnings strength, since those sources of income and expenses are typically the most prominent components of earnings and are generally more predictable than losses and gains realized from the sale of assets or other non-recurring activities. In this regard, as measured by their expense coverage ratios (net interest income divided by operating expenses), the Bank’s earnings were less favorable than the Peer Group’s. Expense coverage ratios for Ponce Bank and the Peer Group equaled 1.00x and 1.09x, respectively.

Sources of non-interest operating income provided a larger contribution to the Peer Group’s earnings, with such income amounting to 0.34% and 0.49% of Ponce Bank’s and the Peer Group’s average assets, respectively. Taking non-interest operating income into account in comparing the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s earnings, Ponce Bank’s efficiency ratio (operating expenses, as a percent of the sum of non-interest operating income and net interest income) of 92.09% was less favorable than the Peer Group’s efficiency ratio of 78.25%.

Loan loss provisions had a larger impact on the Peer Group’s earnings, with loan loss provisions established by the Peer Group equaling 0.13% of average assets. Comparatively, the Bank recorded a reversal to loan loss provisions equal to 0.01% of average assets.

Net non-operating gains equaled 0.01% of average assets for the Peer Group and were not a factor in the Bank’s earnings. Typically, gains and losses generated from the sale of assets and other non-operating activities are viewed as earnings with a relatively high degree of volatility, particularly to the extent that such gains and losses result from the sale of investments or other assets that are not considered to be part of an institution’s core operations. Extraordinary items were not a factor in either the Bank’s or the Peer Group’s earnings.

Taxes had a more significant impact on the Bank’s earnings, as the Bank and the Peer Group posted effective tax rates of 41.36% and 18.38%, respectively. As indicated in the prospectus, the Bank’s effective marginal tax rate is equal to 34.0%.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.8*

Loan Composition

Table 3.4 presents data related to the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s loan portfolio compositions (including the investment in mortgage-backed securities). The Bank’s loan portfolio composition reflected a lower combined concentration of 1-4 family permanent mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities in comparison to the Peer Group (45.06% of assets versus 52.75% for the Peer Group), as the Peer Group’s higher concentration of mortgage-backed securities was only partially offset by the Bank’s higher concentration of 1-4 family loans. The Bank did not hold any loans serviced for others, while loans serviced for others for the Peer Group equaled 4.06% of the Peer Group’s assets; thereby indicating that loan servicing income and expenses were a larger factor in the Peer Group’s earnings. Loan servicing intangibles constituted a modest balance sheet item for the Peer Group.

Overall, diversification into higher risk and higher yielding types of lending was more significant for the Bank, which was primarily attributable to the Bank’s higher concentration of multi-family loans (21.24% of assets versus 2.72% for the Peer Group). Commercial real estate loans constituted the most significant type of lending diversification for the Peer Group (17.37% of assets versus 16.31% for the Bank). The Bank also maintained a slightly higher concentration of construction/land loans, while the Peer Group maintained higher concentrations of commercial business loans and consumer loans. In total, construction/land, commercial real estate, multi-family, commercial business and consumer loans comprised 43.84% and 29.88% of the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s assets, respectively. Overall, the Bank’s asset composition provided for a higher risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio of 74.19%, versus a comparable Peer Group ratio of 66.58%.

Interest Rate Risk

Table 3.5 reflects various key ratios highlighting the relative interest rate risk exposure of the Bank versus the Peer Group. In terms of balance sheet composition, Ponce Bank’s interest rate risk characteristics were considered to be fairly similar to the comparable measures for the Peer Group. Most notably, the Bank’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio and IEA/IBL ratio were similar to the comparable Peer Group ratios. Likewise, the ratio of non-interest earning assets as a percent of assets were similar for the Bank and the Peer Group. On a pro forma basis, the infusion of stock proceeds should serve to provide the Bank with more favorable balance sheet interest rate risk characteristics than maintained by the Peer Group, as the result of the increases that will be realized in Bank’s equity-to-assets and IEA/IBL ratios following the infusion of stock proceeds.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.9*

To analyze interest rate risk associated with the net interest margin, we reviewed quarterly changes in net interest income as a percent of average assets for Ponce Bank and the Peer Group. In general, the comparative fluctuations in the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s net interest income ratios implied that the interest rate risk associated with the Bank’s net interest margin was greater than the Peer Group’s implied net interest margin interest rate risk, based on the interest rate environment that prevailed during the period covered in Table 3.5. The stability of the Bank’s net interest margin should be enhanced by the infusion of stock proceeds, as interest rate sensitive liabilities will be funding a lower portion of Ponce Bank’s assets and the proceeds will be substantially deployed into interest-earning assets.

Credit Risk

Overall, based on a comparison of credit risk measures, the Bank’s implied credit risk exposure was viewed to be greater relative to the Peer Group’s credit risk exposure. As shown in Table 3.6, the Bank’s ratios for non-performing/assets and non-performing loans/loans equaled 3.50% and 4.01%, respectively, versus comparable measures of 1.29% and 1.62% for the Peer Group. It should be noted that the measures for non-performing assets and non-performing loans in Table 3.6 include accruing loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings, which accounted for slightly more than 70% of the Bank’s non-performing loan balance at December 31, 2016. The Bank’s and Peer Group’s loss reserves as a percent of non-performing loans equaled 39.09% and 158.08%, respectively. Loss reserves maintained as percent of loans receivable equaled 1.57% for the Bank, versus 0.86% for the Peer Group. Net loan charge-offs were a larger factor for the Peer Group, as net loan charge-offs for the Peer Group equaled 0.06% loans. Comparatively, the Bank recorded a net recovery equal to 0.12% of loans.

Summary

Based on the above analysis, RP Financial concluded that the Peer Group forms a reasonable basis for determining the pro forma market value of the Bank. Such general characteristics as asset size, capital position, interest-earning asset composition, funding composition, core earnings measures, loan composition, credit quality and exposure to interest rate risk all tend to support the reasonability of the Peer Group from a financial standpoint. Those areas where differences exist will be addressed in the form of valuation adjustments to the extent necessary.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.1*

IV. VALUATION ANALYSIS

Introduction

This chapter presents the valuation analysis and methodology prepared pursuant to the regulatory guidelines, and valuation adjustments and assumptions used to determine the estimated pro forma market value of the common stock to be issued in conjunction with the Bank’s minority stock offering.

Appraisal Guidelines

The federal regulatory appraisal guidelines required by the OCC, FRB, the FDIC and state banking agencies specify the pro forma market value methodology for estimating the pro forma market value of an institution. Pursuant to this methodology: (1) a peer group of comparable publicly-traded institutions is selected; (2) a financial and operational comparison of the subject company to the peer group is conducted to discern key differences; and (3) a valuation analysis in which the pro forma market value of the subject company is determined based on the market pricing of the peer group as of the date of valuation, incorporating valuation adjustments for key differences. In addition, the pricing characteristics of recent conversions, both at conversion and in the aftermarket, must be considered. Given the unique differences in the pricing characteristics of publicly-traded MHCs relative to fully-converted thrift stocks, we have also reviewed the pricing characteristics of publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis.

RP Financial Approach to the Valuation

The valuation analysis herein complies with such regulatory approval guidelines. Accordingly, the valuation incorporates a detailed analysis based on the Peer Group, discussed in Chapter III, which constitutes “fundamental analysis” techniques. Additionally, the valuation incorporates a “technical analysis” of recently completed conversions, including closing pricing and aftermarket trading of such offerings. It should be noted that these valuation analyses cannot possibly fully account for all the market forces which impact trading activity and pricing characteristics of a stock on a given day.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.2*

The pro forma market value determined herein is a preliminary value for the Company’s to-be-issued stock. Throughout the stock issuance process, RP Financial will: (1) review changes in the Bank’s operations and financial condition; (2) monitor the Bank’s operations and financial condition relative to the Peer Group to identify any fundamental changes; (3) monitor the external factors affecting value including, but not limited to, local and national economic conditions, interest rates, and the stock market environment, including the market for thrift stocks; and (4) monitor pending conversion offerings, both regionally and nationally. If material changes should occur prior to the close of the offering, RP Financial will evaluate if updated valuation reports should be prepared reflecting such changes and their related impact on value, if any. RP Financial will also prepare a final valuation update at the closing of the offering to determine if the prepared valuation analysis and resulting range of value continues to be appropriate.

The appraised value determined herein is based on the current market and operating environment for the Bank and for all thrifts. Subsequent changes in the local and national economy, the legislative and regulatory environment, the stock market, interest rates, and other external forces (such as natural disasters or major world events), which may occur from time to time (often with great unpredictability) may materially impact the market value of all thrift stocks, including Ponce Bank’s value, the market value of the stocks of public MHC institutions, or Ponce Bank’s value alone. To the extent a change in factors impacting the Bank’s value can be reasonably anticipated and/or quantified, RP Financial has incorporated the estimated impact into its analysis.

Valuation Analysis

A fundamental analysis discussing similarities and differences relative to the Peer Group was presented in Chapter III. The following sections summarize the key differences between the Bank and the Peer Group and how those differences affect the pro forma valuation. Emphasis is placed on the specific strengths and weaknesses of the Bank relative to the Peer Group in such key areas as financial condition, profitability, growth and viability of earnings, asset growth, primary market area, dividends, liquidity of the shares, marketing of the issue, management, and the effect of government regulations and/or regulatory reform. We have also considered the market for thrift stocks, in particular new issues, to assess the impact on value of Ponce Bank coming to market at this time.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.3*

1.	Financial Condition

The financial condition of an institution is an important determinant in pro forma market value because investors typically look to such factors as liquidity, capital, asset composition and quality, and funding sources in assessing investment attractiveness. The similarities and differences in the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s financial strengths are noted as follows:

•

Overall A/L Composition. Loans funded by retail deposits were the primary components of both Ponce Bank’s and the Peer Group’s balance sheets. The Bank’s interest-earning asset composition exhibited a higher concentration of loans and a greater degree of diversification into higher risk types of loans. Overall, the Bank’s asset composition provided for a higher yield earned on interest-earning assets and a higher risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio in comparison to the Peer Group’s ratios. Ponce Bank’s funding composition reflected a higher level of deposits and a lower level of borrowings in comparison to the Peer Group’s ratios, which provided the Bank with a slightly higher cost of funds than maintained by the Peer Group. Overall, as a percent of assets, the Bank maintained slightly higher levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities relative to the comparable ratios for the Peer Group, which translated into a similar IEA/IBL ratio for the Bank and the Peer Group. After factoring in the impact of the net stock proceeds, the Bank’s IEA/IBL ratio will be more comparable to or exceed the Peer Group’s ratio. On balance, RP Financial concluded that asset/liability composition was a neutral factor in our adjustment for financial condition.

•

Credit Quality. The Bank’s ratios for non-performing assets as a percent of assets and non-performing loans as a percent of loans were higher than the comparable ratios for the Peer Group, which was due the Bank’s comparatively higher balance of accruing loans classified as troubled debt restructurings. In comparison to the Peer Group, the Bank maintained lower loss reserves as a percent of non-performing loans and higher reserves as a percent of loans. Net loan charge-offs as a percent of loans were higher for the Peer Group, as the Bank recorded a net recovery during 2016. The Bank’s risk weighted assets-to-assets ratio was higher than the Peer Group’s ratio. Overall, RP Financial concluded that credit quality was a slightly negative factor in our adjustment for financial condition.

•

Balance Sheet Liquidity. The Peer Group operated with a higher level of cash and investment securities relative to the Bank (23.39% of assets versus 8.77% for the Bank). Following the infusion of stock proceeds, the Bank’s cash and investments ratio is expected to increase as a portion of the proceeds retained at the holding company level will initially be held in short-term liquid funds. The Bank’s future borrowing capacity was considered to be slightly greater than the Peer Group’s borrowing capacity, based on the lower level of borrowings that are funding the Bank’s assets. Overall, RP Financial concluded that balance sheet liquidity was a neutral factor in our adjustment for financial condition.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.4*

•

Funding Liabilities. The Bank’s interest-bearing funding composition reflected a higher concentration of deposits and a lower level of borrowings relative to the comparable Peer Group ratios, which translated into a higher cost of funds for the Bank. The Bank’s ratio of total interest-bearing liabilities as a percent of assets was slightly above the Peer Group’s ratio. Following the stock offering, the increase in the Bank’s capital position will reduce the level of interest-bearing liabilities funding the Bank’s assets to a level that is more comparable to or lower than the Peer Group’s ratio of interest-bearing liabilities as a percent of assets. Overall, RP Financial concluded that funding liabilities were a neutral factor in our adjustment for financial condition.

•

Capital. The Peer Group currently operates with a slightly higher equity-to-assets ratio than the Bank. Following the stock offering, Ponce Bank’s pro forma capital position will exceed the Peer Group’s equity-to-assets ratio. On balance, RP Financial concluded that capital strength was a slightly positive factor in our adjustment for financial condition.

On balance, Ponce Bank’s balance sheet strength was considered to be comparable to the Peer Group’s balance sheet strength and, thus, no adjustment was applied for the Bank’s financial condition.

2.	Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings

Earnings are a key factor in determining pro forma market value, as the level and risk characteristics of an institution’s earnings stream and prospects to generate future earnings heavily influence the multiple that the investment community will pay for earnings. The major factors considered in the valuation are described below.

•

Reported Earnings. The Bank’s reported earnings were lower than the Peer Group’s on a ROAA basis (0.20% of average assets versus 0.56% for the Peer Group). The Peer Group maintained more favorable ratios for non-interest operating income, operating expenses and effective tax rate, which were partially offset by the Bank’s more favorable ratios for loan loss provisions and net interest income. Reinvestment of stock proceeds into interest-earning assets will serve to increase the Bank’s earnings, with the benefit of reinvesting proceeds expected to be somewhat offset by higher operating expenses associated with operating as a publicly-traded company and the implementation of stock benefit plans. Overall, the Bank’s reported earnings were considered to be less favorable than the Peer Group’s reported earnings and, thus, RP Financial concluded that this was a moderately negative factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

•

Core Earnings. Net interest income, operating expenses, non-interest operating income and loan loss provisions were reviewed in assessing the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s core earnings. In these measures, the Bank operated with a higher net interest income ratio, a higher operating expense ratio and a lower level of non-interest operating income. The Bank’s higher net interest income and operating expense ratios translated into a lower expense coverage ratio in comparison to the Peer Group’s ratio (equal to 1.00x versus 1.09x for the Peer Group). Similarly, the Bank’s


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.5*

efficiency ratio of 92.09% was less favorable than the Peer Group’s efficiency ratio of 78.25%. Loan loss provisions had a larger impact on the Peer Group’s earnings. Overall, these measures, as well as the expected earnings benefits the Bank should realize from the redeployment of stock proceeds into interest-earning assets and leveraging of post-conversion capital, which will be somewhat negated by expenses associated with the stock benefit plans and operating as a publicly-traded company, indicate that the Bank’s pro forma core earnings will remain less favorable than the Peer Group’s core earnings. Therefore, RP Financial concluded that this was a moderately negative factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

•

Interest Rate Risk. Quarterly changes in the Bank’s and the Peer Group’s net interest income to average assets ratios indicated that a greater degree of volatility was associated with the Bank’s net interest margin. Other measures of interest rate risk, such as capital levels, IEA/IBL ratios and levels of non-interest earning assets were fairly similar for the Bank and the Peer Group. On a pro forma basis, the infusion of stock proceeds can be expected to provide the Bank with equity-to-assets and IEA/ILB ratios that exceed the Peer Group ratios, as well as enhance the stability of the Bank’s net interest margin. Accordingly, on balance, this was a neutral factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

•

Credit Risk. Loan loss provisions were a slightly larger factor in the Peer Group’s earnings (0.13% of average assets versus a reversal of 0.01% of average assets for the Bank). In terms of future exposure to credit quality related losses, the Bank maintained a higher concentration of assets in loans and greater diversification into higher risk types of loans. The Bank’s credit quality measures generally implied a higher degree of credit risk exposure relative to the comparable credit quality measures indicated for the Peer Group. Overall, RP Financial concluded that credit risk was a slightly negative factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

•

Earnings Growth Potential. Several factors were considered in assessing earnings growth potential. First, the Bank currently maintains a higher interest rate spread than the Peer Group, which would tend to facilitate a continuation of a higher net interest margin for the Bank goring forward. Second, the infusion of stock proceeds will provide the Bank with greater growth potential through leverage than currently maintained by the Peer Group. Third, the Bank’s lower ratios of non-interest operating income and higher operating expenses were viewed as disadvantages to sustain earnings growth during periods when net interest margins come under pressure as the result of adverse changes in interest rates. Overall, earnings growth potential was considered to be a neutral factor in our adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

•

Return on Equity. Currently, the Bank’s core ROE is lower than the Peer Group’s core ROE. As the result of the increase in capital that will be realized from the infusion of net stock proceeds into the Bank’s equity, the Bank’s pro forma return equity on a core earnings basis will remain lower than the Peer Group’s core ROE. Accordingly, this was a moderately negative factor in the adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.6*

On balance, Ponce Bank’s pro forma earnings strength was considered to be less favorable than the Peer Group’s and, thus, a moderate downward adjustment was applied for profitability, growth and viability of earnings.

3.	Asset Growth

Comparative asset growth rates for the Bank and the Peer Group showed a 5.95% increase in the Bank’s assets, versus a 14.24% increase in the Peer Group’s assets. The Peer Group’s stronger asset growth was in part attributable to acquisition related growth. Asset growth for the Bank was sustained by a 12.84% increase in loans, which was partially funded with cash and investments. The Peer Group’s asset growth was primarily sustained by an 18.72% increase in loans and also included an increase in cash and investments. Overall, net of the Peer Group’s acquisition related growth the Bank’s recent asset growth trends would tend to be viewed fairly comparable to the Peer Group’s asset growth trends in terms of supporting future earnings growth. On a pro forma basis, the Bank’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio will exceed the Peer Group’s tangible equity-to-assets ratio, providing the Bank with greater leverage capacity than maintained by the Peer Group. On balance, a slight upward adjustment was applied for asset growth.

4.	Primary Market Area

The general condition of an institution’s market area has an impact on value, as future success is in part dependent upon opportunities for profitable activities in the local market served. Ponce Bank serves the New York metropolitan area through the headquarters office and 13 full service branches. Operating in a densely populated market area provides the Bank with growth opportunities, but such growth must be achieved in a highly competitive market environment. The Bank competes against significantly larger institutions that provide a larger array of services and have significantly larger branch networks than maintained by Ponce Bank.

The Peer Group companies generally operate in markets with smaller populations compared to Bronx County. Population growth for the primary market area counties served by the Peer Group companies reflected a range of growth rates, but, overall, population growth rates in the markets served by the Peer Group companies were less than Bronx County’s recent historical and projected population growth rates. Bronx County has a lower per capita income compared to the Peer Group’s average per capita income and, on average, the Peer Group’s primary market area counties were more affluent markets within their respective states


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.7*

compared to Bronx County’s per capita income as a percent of New York’s per capita income (96.6% for the Peer Group versus 51.7% for Bronx County). The average and median deposit market shares maintained by the Peer Group companies were greater than the Bank’s market share of deposits in Bronx County. Overall, the degree of competition faced by the Peer Group companies was viewed as less than the Bank’s competitive environment in Bronx County, while the growth potential in the markets served by the Peer Group companies was for the most part viewed to be slightly less favorable than provided by the Bank’s primary market area. Summary demographic and deposit market share data for the Bank and the Peer Group companies is provided in Exhibit III-4. As shown in Table 4.1, the average unemployment rate for the primary market area counties served by the Peer Group companies was below the unemployment rate reflected for Bronx County. On balance, we concluded that no adjustment was appropriate for the Bank’s market area.

Table 4.1

Market Area Unemployment Rates

Ponce Bank and the Peer Group Companies (1)


	County		December 2016 Unemployment
Ponce Bank - NY		Bronx		6.2	%
Peer Group Average				4.3
The Peer Group
Bay Bancorp, Inc. – MD		Howard		2.7
Clifton Bancorp, Inc. – NJ		Passaic		4.9
Coastway Bancorp, Inc. – RI		Kent		4.0
Elmira Savings Bank – NY		Chemung		5.1
Malvern Bancorp, Inc. – PA		Chester		3.4
Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. – NY		Ocean		6.7
PB Bancorp, Inc. – CT		Windham		4.1
Prudential Bancorp, Inc. – PA		Philadelphia		5.9
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. – MA		Norfolk		2.4
Western New England – MA		Hampden		3.8

(1)	Unemployment rates are not seasonally adjusted.

Source: SNL Financial, LC; Department of Labor.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.8*

Dividends

At this time the Bank has not established a dividend policy. Future declarations of dividends by the Board of Directors will depend upon a number of factors, including investment opportunities, growth objectives, financial condition, profitability, tax considerations, minimum capital requirements, regulatory limitations, stock market characteristics and general economic conditions.

Six out of the ten Peer Group companies pay regular cash dividends, with implied dividend yields ranging from 0.58% to 4.28%. The average dividend yield on the stocks of the Peer Group institutions equaled 0.92% as of February 24, 2017. Comparatively, as of February 24, 2017, the average dividend yield on the stocks of all fully-converted publicly-traded thrifts equaled 1.56%.

Our valuation adjustment for dividends for Ponce Bank also considered the regulatory policy with regard to payment of dividends to the MHC. Under current FRB and OCC policy, any dividends declared by the Company would be required to be paid to all shareholders. Accordingly, dividends paid by the Company would increase the amount of assets held by the MHC, after adjusting for applicable income taxes, and, thereby, increase the implied dilution incurred by the minority shareholders in a second-step conversion pursuant to the calculation to account for net assets held by the MHC in a second-step offering.

Overall, while the Bank has not established a definitive dividend policy prior to its stock offering, the Bank will have the capacity to pay a dividend comparable to the Peer Group’s average dividend yield based on pro forma earnings and capitalization. At the same time, dividend payments retained by the MHC would increase the implied dilution to minority shareholders in a second-step offering. On balance, we concluded that a slight downward adjustment was warranted for purposes of the Bank’s dividend policy.

6.	Liquidity of the Shares

The Peer Group is by definition composed of companies that are traded in the public markets. All ten of the Peer Group members trade on the NASDAQ system. Typically, the number of shares outstanding and market capitalization provides an indication of how much liquidity there will be in a particular stock. The market capitalization of the Peer Group companies ranged from $59.1 million to $376.0 million as of February 24, 2017, with average and median market values of $139.4 million and $81.6 million, respectively. The shares issued and outstanding of the Peer Group companies ranged from 2.5 million to 30.4 million, with average and median shares outstanding of 10.1 million and 7.2 million, respectively. The Bank’s stock offering is expected to have a pro forma public market value and shares


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.9*

outstanding of public shareholders that will be similar to the median market values and shares outstanding indicated for the Peer Group companies. Like all of the Peer Group companies, the Bank’s stock will be quoted on the NASDAQ following the stock offering. Overall, we anticipate that the Bank’s public stock will have a comparable trading market as the Peer Group companies on average and, therefore, concluded no adjustment was necessary for this factor.

7.	Marketing of the Issue

Three separate markets exist for thrift stocks: (1) the after-market for public companies, both fully-converted stock companies and MHCs, in which trading activity is regular and investment decisions are made based upon financial condition, earnings, capital, ROE, dividends and future prospects; (2) the new issue market in which converting thrifts are evaluated on the basis of the same factors but on a pro forma basis without the benefit of prior operations as a publicly-held company and stock trading history; and (3) the thrift acquisition market. All three of these markets were considered in the valuation of the Bank’s to-be-issued stock.

The Public Market

The value of publicly-traded thrift stocks is easily measurable, and is tracked by most investment houses and related organizations. Exhibit IV-1 provides pricing and financial data on all publicly-traded thrifts. In general, thrift stock values react to market stimuli such as interest rates, inflation, perceived industry health, projected rates of economic growth, regulatory issues and stock market conditions in general. Exhibit IV-2 displays historical stock market trends for various indices and includes historical stock price index values for thrifts and commercial banks. Exhibit IV-3 displays various stock price indices as of February 24, 2017.

In terms of assessing general stock market conditions, the overall stock market has trended higher in recent quarters. The broader stock market rallied higher at the start of July 2016, with the stronger-than-expected job growth reflected in the June employment report propelling the S&P 500 to a record high close. Stocks continued to trend higher going in the second half of July, as a string of economic data releases that showed improvement in home building, retail sales and job creation helped to propel the Dow Jones Industrial Average (the “DJIA”) higher for nine consecutive sessions. Following the extended rally, the DJIA closed lower for seven consecutive sessions going into early-August. A decline in oil prices amid


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.10*

concerns of a glut in the supply of oil and weaker-than-expected second quarter GDP growth were factors that contributed to the downturn in the broader stock market. A rally in energy and financial shares helped to snap the seven day losing streak in the DJIA ahead of the July employment report. Better-than-expected job growth reflected in the July employment report fueled a rally in the broader stock market to close out the first week of trading in August. All three major stock indexes closed at record highs in mid-August, led by gains in commodity-linked shares. The broader stock market eased lower during the second half of August with the DJIA finishing down for the month of August, which snapped a six-month winning streak for the DJIA. Some lackluster data for the U.S. economy provided for a narrow trading range in the broader stock market in early-September, as investors reassessed the likelihood of a rate increase in the near term. Volatility prevailed in the broader stock market in mid-September, based on various hawkish and dovish comments from Federal Reserve officials for a near term rate hike. Stocks rebounded after the Federal Reserve concluded its September meeting leaving interest rates unchanged and then seesawed higher and lower to close out the third quarter. Overall, all three of the major U.S. stock indexes posted gains for the third quarter.

Stocks traded unevenly at the start of the fourth quarter of 2016, as investors reacted to third quarter earnings reports that had varied results. Consumer shares weighed on the broader stock market in the second half of October, following a string of disappointing earnings reports coming out of the consumer sector and a downbeat outlook for the rest of 2016. The DJIA fell for a third month in a row to close out October, with a monthly decline of 0.9%. Stocks extended their losing streak in early-November, as investors reacted to tightening polls for the presidential election. News of the FBI finding no new evidence to warrant charges against Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton sent stocks sharply higher the day before the presidential election. However, investors embraced Trump’s election, as stocks surged higher based on expectations for reduced corporate taxes and regulation and greater infrastructure spending under a Trump administration. Following seven consecutive sessions of closing higher, the DJIA closed down in mid-November 2016 as investors pared gains in shares that led the post-election stock market rally. The post-election stock market rally resumed during the second half of November, as U.S. stocks notched new record highs. Overall, the DJIA finished up 5.4% for the month of November. Led by gains in financial shares, stocks continued to surge higher during the first half of December. Stocks retreated after the Federal Reserve raised its target rate by a quarter of a percentage point at the conclusion of its mid-December policy meeting. After trading in a narrow range heading into late-December, stocks slumped in the final trading days of 2016. However, overall, the major U.S. stock indexes posted solid gains for 2016, with the DJIA and NASDAQ increasing 13.4% and 7.5%, respectively, in 2016.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.11*

Bank and healthcare stocks led the stock market higher at the start of 2017, as the DJIA approached the 20000 milestone in the first week of trading during 2017. Stocks traded in a narrow range heading into the fourth quarter earnings season and then edged lower in mid-January, as investors weighed both the timing and ultimate impact of expected policy changes from the Trump administration. The DJIA closed above 20000 for the first time in late-January, as President Trump’s moves during his first week in office to promote infrastructure spending and cut regulation propelled stocks higher. Stocks stumbled at the end of January, as President Trump’s restriction on immigration took a toll on the stock market’s optimism. The broader stock market rebounded during the first half of February, as the major U.S. stock indexes moved to fresh highs in response to President Trump taking action to scale back financial regulations and advancing campaign promises to lower taxes. Data pointing towards continuing growth in the U.S. economy sustained the bull market in the second half of February, as the DJIA notched eleven consecutive closing record highs through February 24, 2017. On February 24, 2017, the DJIA closed at 20821.76, an increase of 25.1% from one year ago and an increase of 5.4% year-to-date, and the NASDAQ closed at 5845.31, an increase of 27.3% from one year ago and an increase of 8.6% year-to-date. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index closed at 2367.34 on February 24, 2017, an increase of 21.5% from one year ago and an increase of 8.6% year-to-date.

The market for thrift stocks has also generally trended higher in recent quarters. Thrift stocks participated in the broader stock market rally at the start of July 2016, with the strong jobs report for June fueling additional gains for the thrift sector. Some stronger-than-expected second quarter earnings reports coming out of the banking sector, along with favorable data on the U.S. economy, helped to sustain the positive trend in thrift shares going into the second half of July. Financial shares traded in a narrow range to closeout July and into early-August, as the Federal Reserve concluded its late-July policy meeting with no change in its target interest rate as expected. Financial shares posted healthy gains on the heels of the favorable jobs report for July, as the S&P 500’s financial sector moved into positive territory for the first time in 2016. After trading in a narrow range into the second half of August, some favorable housing data helped thrift shares to rally in late-August. The positive trend in thrift stocks continued into early-September, as a slowdown in August job growth reduced expectations that the Federal Reserve would soon raise rates. Thrift shares followed the broader stock market lower in mid-September, as investors reacted to oil prices moving to a one-month low. For the balance of September, thrift shares traded in a narrow range.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.12*

In advance of third quarter earnings reports, thrift shares remained stable during the first half of October 2016. Financial shares led the stock market higher heading into the second half of October, in light of third quarter earnings reports generally offering fresh evidence of profitability improving for banks. Thrift stocks were largely trendless through the end of October and then pulled back along with the broader stock market in early-November. Bank and thrift stocks were among the strongest performers in leading the post-election stock market rally, reflecting investor expectations for reduced regulation of the banking sector. Financial shares retreated along with the broader stock market following the mid-December rate hike by the Federal Reserve. While thrift shares traded in a tight range in the closing weeks of 2016, the SNL Index for all publicly-traded thrifts finished 2016 with a gain of 19.49% in which the substantial portion of the gains occurred following the presidential election.

Financial shares led the stock market higher at the start of 2017, which was followed by a pullback as investors dumped shares of financial companies and bought government bonds. Despite generally favorable fourth quarter earnings reports posted by the money center banks, the downturn in financial shares continued heading into the second half of January. Financial shares paralleled trends in the broader stock market in late-January and then led the stock market rally in early-February following action by President Trump to scale back financial regulations. Financial shares also led the market lower heading into mid-February, as investors reacted to a flattening of the yield curve. Data indicating the U.S. economy was poised for additional growth contributed to thrift stocks rallying along with the broader stock market during the second half of February. On February 24, 2017, the SNL Index for all publicly-traded thrifts closed at 954.4, an increase of 25.4% from one year ago and a decrease of 1.3% year-to-date.

The New Issue Market

In addition to thrift stock market conditions in general, the new issue market for converting thrifts is also an important consideration in determining the Bank’s pro forma market value. The new issue market is separate and distinct from the market for seasoned thrift stocks in that the pricing ratios for converting issues are computed on a pro forma basis, specifically:


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.13*

(1) the numerator and denominator are both impacted by the conversion offering amount, unlike existing stock issues in which price change affects only the numerator; and (2) the pro forma pricing ratio incorporates assumptions regarding source and use of proceeds, effective tax rates, stock plan purchases, etc. which impact pro forma financials, whereas pricing for existing issues are based on reported financials. The distinction between pricing of converting and existing issues is perhaps no clearer than in the case of the price/book (“P/B”) ratio in that the P/B ratio of a converting thrift will typically result in a discount to book value whereas in the current market for existing thrifts the P/B ratio often reflects a premium to book value. Therefore, it is appropriate to also consider the market for new issues, both at the time of the conversion and in the aftermarket.

As shown in Table 4.2, two standard conversion offerings were completed during the past three months. No first-step MHC offerings were completed during the past three months. The most recent first-step MHC offering was completed by HarborOne Bancorp of Massachusetts, which completed its mutual holding company offering on June 30, 2016. HarborOne Bancorp’s offering was closed at the top of its offering range equal to gross proceeds of $144.5 million and a pro forma fully-converted price/tangible book ratio of 71.6%. After the first week of trading, HarborOne Bancorp’s stock price was up 29.2% from its IPO price.

Shown in Table 4.3 is the current pricing ratios for HV Bancorp, Inc., which was the only fully-converted offering completed during the past three months that trades on NASDAQ. HV Bancorp’s current P/TB ratio is 99.37%, based on its closing stock price as of February 24, 2017.

The Acquisition Market

Also considered in the valuation was the potential impact on Ponce Bank’s stock price of recently completed and pending acquisitions of other savings institutions operating in New York. As shown in Exhibit IV-4, there were three New York thrift acquisitions completed from the beginning of 2013 through year-to-date 2017, and there is currently one acquisition pending for a New York savings institution. To the extent that speculation of a re-mutualization may impact the Bank’s valuation, we have largely taken this into account in selecting companies for the Peer Group which operate in markets that have experienced a comparable level of acquisition activity as the Bank’s market and, thus, are subject to the same type of acquisition speculation


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.14*

that may influence the Company’s stock. However, since converting thrifts are subject to a three-year regulatory moratorium from being acquired, acquisition speculation in the Company’s stock would tend to be less compared to the stocks of the Peer Group companies. Furthermore, in comparison to the stocks of the fully-converted Peer Group companies, the degree of acquisition speculation in the Company’s stock is also viewed to be relatively more limited since there will be fewer potential acquirers for the Company’s stock as a re-mutualization transaction can only be completed by a mutual institution or an institution in the MHC form of ownership. Additionally, there tends to be less acquisition speculation in the stocks of publicly-traded MHCs in general, given the majority of the shares are held by the MHC rather than public shareholders which own 100% of the stocks of the fully-converted Peer Group companies. Accordingly, the Peer Group companies are considered to be subject to a greater degree of acquisition speculation relative to the acquisition speculation that may influence the Company’s trading price.

* * * * * * * * * * *

In determining our valuation adjustment for marketing of the issue, we considered trends in both the overall thrift market, the new issue market including the new issue market for MHC shares and the local acquisition market for thrift stocks. Taking these factors and trends into account, RP Financial concluded that no adjustment was appropriate in the valuation analysis for purposes of marketing of the issue.

8.	Management

Ponce Bank’s management team appears to have experience and expertise in all of the key areas of the Bank’s operations. Exhibit IV-5 provides summary resumes of Ponce Bank’s Board of Directors and senior management. The financial characteristics of the Bank suggest that the Board and senior management have been effective in implementing an operating strategy that can be well managed by the Bank’s present organizational structure. The Bank currently does not have any senior management positions that are vacant.

Similarly, the returns, capital positions and other operating measures of the Peer Group companies are indicative of well-managed financial institutions, which have Boards and management teams that have been effective in implementing competitive operating strategies. Therefore, on balance, we concluded no valuation adjustment relative to the Peer Group was appropriate for this factor.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.15*

9.	Effect of Government Regulation and Regulatory Reform

In summary, as a federally-insured savings institution operating in the MHC form of ownership, Ponce Bank will be operating in substantially the same regulatory environment as the Peer Group members — all of whom are adequately capitalized institutions and the substantial majority are operating with no apparent restrictions. Exhibit IV-6 reflects the Bank’s pro forma regulatory capital ratios. Accordingly, no adjustment has been applied for the effect of government regulation and regulatory reform.

Summary of Adjustments

Overall, based on the factors discussed above, we concluded that the Bank’s pro forma market value should reflect the following valuation adjustments relative to the Peer Group:


Key Valuation Parameters:		Valuation Adjustment
Financial Condition		No Adjustment
Profitability, Growth and Viability of Earnings		Moderate Downward
Asset Growth		Slight Upward
Primary Market Area		No Adjustment
Dividends		Slight Downward
Liquidity of the Shares		No Adjustment
Marketing of the Issue		No Adjustment
Management		No Adjustment
Effect of Government Regulations and Regulatory Reform		No Adjustment

Valuation Approaches: Fully-Converted Basis

In applying the accepted valuation methodology promulgated by the OCC and the FRB, i.e., the pro forma market value approach, we considered the three key pricing ratios in valuing the Company’s to-be-issued stock — price/earnings (“P/E”), price/book (“P/B”), and price/assets (“P/A”) approaches — all performed on a pro forma basis including the effects of the stock proceeds. In computing the pro forma impact of the conversion and the related pricing ratios, we have incorporated the valuation parameters disclosed in the Company’s prospectus for reinvestment rate, effective tax rate, stock benefit plan assumptions, the Foundation and


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.16*

offering expenses (summarized in Exhibits IV-9 and IV-10). The assumptions utilized in the pro forma analysis in calculating the Bank’s full conversion value were consistent with the assumptions utilized for the minority stock offering, except expenses were assumed to equal 2.5% of gross proceeds (summarized in Exhibits IV-7 and IV-8).

In our estimate of value, we assessed the relationship of the pro forma pricing ratios relative to the Peer Group, recent conversions and publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis.

RP Financial’s valuation placed an emphasis on the following:

•

P/E Approach. The P/E approach is generally the best indicator of long-term value for a stock. At the same time, recognizing that (1) the earnings multiples will be evaluated on a pro forma fully-converted basis for the Bank; and (2) the Peer Group on average has had the opportunity to realize the benefit of reinvesting net conversion proceeds, we also gave weight to the other valuation approaches.

•

P/B Approach. P/B ratios have generally served as a useful benchmark in the valuation of thrift stocks, particularly in the context of an initial public offering, as the earnings approach involves assumptions regarding the use of proceeds. RP Financial considered the P/B approach to be a valuable indicator of pro forma value taking into account the pricing ratios under the P/E and P/A approaches. We have also modified the P/B approach to exclude the impact of intangible assets (i.e., price/tangible book value or “P/TB”), in that the investment community frequently makes this adjustment in its evaluation of this pricing approach.

•

P/A Approach. P/A ratios are generally a less reliable indicator of market value, as investors typically assign less weight to assets and attribute greater weight to book value and earnings. Furthermore, this approach as set forth in the regulatory valuation guidelines does not take into account the amount of stock purchases funded by deposit withdrawals, thus understating the pro forma P/A ratio. At the same time, the P/A ratio is an indicator of franchise value, and, in the case of highly capitalized institutions, high P/A ratios may limit the investment community’s willingness to pay market multiples for earnings or book value when ROE is expected to be low.

The Bank will adopt “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans” (“ASC 718-40”), which will cause earnings per share computations to be based on shares issued and outstanding excluding unreleased ESOP shares. For purposes of preparing the pro forma pricing analyses, we have reflected all shares issued in the offering, including all ESOP shares, to capture the full dilutive impact, particularly since the ESOP shares are economically dilutive, receive dividends and can be voted. However, we did consider the impact of ASC 718-40 in the valuation.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.17*

Based on the application of the three valuation approaches, taking into consideration the valuation adjustments discussed above and the dilutive impact of the stock contribution to the Foundation, RP Financial concluded that as of February 24, 2017, the pro forma market value of Ponce Bank’s full conversion offering equaled $139,607,030 at the midpoint, equal to 13,960,703 shares at $10.00 per share.

Basis of Valuation - Fully-Converted Pricing Ratios

1. Price-to-Earnings (“P/E”). The application of the P/E valuation method requires calculating the Bank’s pro forma market value by applying a valuation P/E multiple (fully-converted basis) to the pro forma earnings base. In applying this technique, we considered both reported earnings and a recurring earnings base, that is, earnings adjusted to exclude any one-time non-operating items, plus the estimated after-tax earnings benefit of the reinvestment of the net proceeds. The Bank’s reported earnings equaled $1.425 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and were also viewed to be representative of the Bank’s core earnings.

Based on Ponce Bank’s reported and core earnings and incorporating the impact of the pro forma assumptions discussed previously, the Bank’s pro forma reported and core P/E multiples (fully-converted basis) at the $139.6 million midpoint value both equaled 145.85 times, which provided for premiums of 706.25% and 621.67% relative to the Peer Group’s average reported and core P/E multiples of 18.09 times and 20.21 times, respectively (see Table 4.4). In comparison to the Peer Group’s median reported and core earnings multiples which equaled 19.03 times and 20.67 times, respectively, the Banks pro forma reported and core P/E multiples (fully-converted basis) at the midpoint value indicated premiums of 666.42% and 605.61%, respectively. The Bank’s pro forma P/E ratios (fully-converted basis) at the minimum and the super maximum equaled 115.55 times and 228.77 times, respectively.

On an MHC reported basis, the Bank’s reported and core P/E multiples at the midpoint value of $139.6 million both equaled 123.76 times (see Table 4.5). The Bank’s reported and core P/E multiples provided for premiums of 584.13% and 512.37% relative to the Peer Group’s average reported and core P/E multiples of 18.09 times and 20.21 times, respectively. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median reported and core earnings multiples which equaled 19.03 times and 20.67 times, respectively, the Bank’s pro forma reported and core P/E multiples (MHC basis) at the midpoint value indicated premiums of 550.34% and 498.74%, respectively.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.18*

The Bank’s pro forma P/E ratios (MHC basis) at the minimum and the super maximum equaled 101.60 times and 177.18 times, respectively.

2. Price-to-Book (“P/B”). The application of the P/B valuation method requires calculating the Bank’s pro forma market value by applying a valuation P/B ratio, as derived from the Peer Group’s P/B ratio, to Ponce Bank’s pro forma book value (fully-converted basis). Based on the $139.6 million midpoint valuation, Ponce Bank’s pro forma P/B and P/TB ratios (fully-converted basis) both equaled 66.71%, respectively. In comparison to the average P/B and P/TB ratios for the Peer Group of 120.30% and 128.46%, respectively, the Bank’s ratios reflected a discount of 44.55% on a P/B basis and a discount of 48.07% on a P/TB basis. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios of 123.16% and 123.96%, respectively, the Bank’s pro forma P/B and P/TB ratios (fully-converted basis) at the midpoint value reflected discounts of 45.83% and 46.18%, respectively. At the top of the super range, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios (fully-converted basis) both equaled 74.79%. In comparison to the Peer Group’s average P/B and P/TB ratios, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the top of the super range reflected discounts of 37.83% and 41.78%, respectively. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the top of the super range reflected discounts of 39.27% and 39.67%, respectively. RP Financial considered the discounts under the P/B approach to be reasonable, given the nature of the calculation of the P/B ratio which mathematically results in a ratio discounted to book value. The discounts reflected under the P/B approach were also supported by the significant premiums reflected in the Bank’s P/E multiples.

On an MHC reported basis, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the $139.6 million midpoint value both equaled 95.42%. In comparison to the average P/B and P/TB ratios indicated for the Peer Group of 120.30% and 128.46%, respectively, Ponce Bank’s ratios were discounted by 20.68% on a P/B basis and 25.75% on a P/TB basis. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios of 123.16% and 123.96%, respectively, the Bank’s pro forma P/B and P/TB ratios (MHC basis) at the midpoint value reflected discounts of 22.52% and 23.02%, respectively. At the top of the super range, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios (MHC basis) both equaled 112.36%. In comparison to the Peer Group’s average P/B and P/TB ratios, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the top of the super range reflected discounts of 6.60% and 12.53%, respectively. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/B and P/TB ratios, the Bank’s P/B and P/TB ratios at the top of the super range reflected discounts of 8.77% and 9.36%, respectively.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.19*

3. Price-to-Assets (“P/A”). The P/A valuation methodology determines market value by applying a valuation P/A ratio (fully-converted basis) to the Bank’s pro forma asset base, conservatively assuming no deposit withdrawals are made to fund stock purchases. In all likelihood there will be deposit withdrawals, which results in understating the pro forma P/A ratio which is computed herein. At the $139.6 million midpoint of the valuation range, Ponce Bank’s pro forma P/A ratio (fully-converted basis) equaled 16.16% of pro forma assets. Comparatively, the Peer Group companies exhibited an average P/A ratio of 15.05%, which implies a premium of 7.38% has been applied to the Bank’s pro forma P/A ratio. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/A ratio of 13.49%, the Bank’s pro forma P/A ratio (fully-converted basis) at the midpoint value reflects a premium of 19.79%.

On an MHC reported basis, Ponce Bank’s pro forma P/A ratio at the $139.6 million midpoint value equaled 17.42%. In comparison to the Peer Group’s average P/A ratio of 15.05%, Ponce Bank’s P/A ratio (MHC basis) indicated a premium of 15.75%. In comparison to the Peer Group’s median P/A ratio of 13.49%, the Bank’s pro forma P/A ratio (MHC basis) at the midpoint value reflects a premium of 29.13%.

Comparison to Publicly-Traded MHCs

As indicated in Chapter III, we believe there are a number of characteristics of MHC shares that make them different from the shares of fully-converted companies. These factors include: (1) lower aftermarket liquidity in the MHC shares since less than 50% of the shares are available for trading; (2) no opportunity for public shareholders to exercise voting control; (3) the potential pro forma impact of second-step conversions on the pricing of MHC institutions; and (4) the regulatory policies regarding the accounting for net assets held by the MHC in a second-step conversion and, thereby, lessening the attractiveness of paying cash dividends. The above characteristics of MHC shares have provided MHC stocks with different trading characteristics versus fully-converted companies. To account for the unique trading characteristics of MHC shares, RP Financial has placed the financial data and pricing ratios of the publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis to make them comparable for valuation purposes. Using the per share and pricing information of the publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis accomplishes a number of objectives. First, such figures eliminate distortions that result when


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.20*

trying to compare institutions that have different public ownership interests outstanding. Secondly, such an analysis provides ratios that are comparable to the pricing information of fully-converted public companies and are directly applicable to determining the pro forma market value range of the 100% ownership interest in Ponce Bank as an MHC. This technique is validated by the investment community’s evaluation of MHC pricing, which also incorporates the pro forma impact of a second-step conversion based on the current market price.

To calculate the fully-converted pricing information for MHCs, the reported financial information for the public MHCs incorporates the following assumptions: (1) all shares owned by the MHC are assumed to be sold at the current trading price in a second step-conversion; (2) the gross proceeds from such a sale are adjusted to reflect reasonable offering expenses and standard stock based benefit plan parameters that would be factored into a second-step conversion of an MHC institution; and (3) net proceeds are assumed to be reinvested at market rates on a tax effected basis. Book value per share and earnings per share figures for the public MHCs were adjusted by the impact of the assumed second step-conversion, resulting in an estimation of book value per share and earnings per share figures on a fully-converted basis. Table 4.6 on the following page shows the calculation of per share financial data (fully-converted basis) for each of the eight publicly-traded MHC institutions.

The table below shows a comparative pricing analysis of the publicly-traded MHCs on a fully-converted basis versus the Bank’s Peer Group. In comparison to the Peer Group’s P/TB ratio, the P/TB ratio of the publicly-traded MHCs reflected a discount of 26.49%. In comparison to the Peer Group’s core P/E multiple, the core P/E multiple of the publicly-traded MHCs reflected a premium of 155.81%. Detailed pricing characteristics of the fully-converted MHCs is shown in Table 4.7.


	Publicly-Traded MHCs			Peer Group
Pricing Ratios (Averages)(1)
Core price/earnings (x)		51.70	x		20.21	x
Price/tangible book (%)		94.43	%		128.46	%
Price/assets (%)		21.76			15.05

(1)	Based on market prices as of February 24, 2017.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.21*

In comparison to the publicly-traded MHCs, the Bank’s pro forma P/TB ratio (fully-converted basis) of 66.71% at the midpoint of the valuation range reflected a discount of 29.36%. At the top of the super range, the Bank’s P/TB ratio (fully-converted basis) of 74.79% reflected a discount of 20.80%. In comparison to the publicly-traded MHCs, the Bank’s pro forma core P/E multiple (fully-converted basis) of 145.85 times at the midpoint of the valuation range reflected a premium of 182.11%. At the top of the super range, the Bank’s core P/E multiple (fully-converted basis) of 228.77 times reflected a premium of 342.50%.

It should be noted that in a comparison of the publicly-traded MHCs to Ponce Bank, the publicly-traded MHCs maintain certain inherit characteristics in support of increasing the attractiveness of their stocks relative to Ponce Bank’s stock as an MHC that will just be completing an IPO: (1) the seasoned publicly-traded MHCs are viewed as potential candidates to complete a second-step offering; and (2) some of the publicly-traded MHCs have been grandfathered to waive dividend payments to the MHC pursuant to receiving an annual majority vote by the depositors to approve the waiver of dividends.

Comparison to Recent MHC Offerings

As indicated at the beginning of this chapter, RP Financial’s analysis of recent conversion offering pricing characteristics at closing and in the aftermarket has been limited to a “technical” analysis and, thus, the pricing characteristics of recent conversion offerings can not be a primary determinate of value. Particular focus was placed on the P/TB approach in this analysis, since the P/E multiples do not reflect the actual impact of reinvestment and the source of the stock proceeds (i.e., external funds vs. deposit withdrawals). The most recent first-step MHC offering that is comparable to Ponce Bank’s first-step MHC offering was completed by HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. of Brockton, Massachusetts. HarborOne Bancorp’s offering, which closed in June 2016, raised gross proceeds of $144.5 million through the sale of 45.0% of its stock in a public offering. HarborOne Bancorp’s offering closed at the top of the super range at a fully-converted pro forma price/tangible book ratio of 71.60%. In comparison, the Bank’s pro forma fully-converted price/tangible book ratio at the midpoint value reflects an implied discount of 6.83% and at the top of the range reflects an implied premium of 4.46%.

Valuation Conclusion

Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of February 24, 2017, the estimated aggregate pro forma market value of the shares to be issued immediately following the conversion, both shares issued publicly as well as to the MHC, equaled $139,607,030 at the


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*VALUATION ANALYSIS*
		*IV.22*

midpoint, equal to 13,960,703 shares offered at a per share value of $10.00. Pursuant to conversion guidelines, the 15% offering range indicates a minimum value of $118,665,980 and a maximum value of $160,548,080. Based on the $10.00 per share offering price determined by the Board, this valuation range equates to total shares outstanding of 11,866,598 at the minimum and 16,054,808 at the maximum. In the event the appraised value is subject to an increase, the aggregate pro forma market value may be increased up to a super maximum value of $184,630,290 without a resolicitation. Based on the $10.00 per share offering price, the super maximum value would result in total shares outstanding of 18,463,029. The Board of Directors has established a public offering range such that the public ownership of the Bank will constitute a 45.0% ownership interest prior to the issuance of shares to the Foundation. Accordingly, the offering to the public of the minority stock will equal $53,399,690 at the minimum, $62,823,160 at the midpoint, $72,246,630 at the maximum and $83,083,620 at the super maximum of the valuation range. Based on the public offering range and inclusive of the shares issued to the Foundation, equal to 3.3% of the shares issued in the stock issuance, the public ownership of shares will represent 48.3% of the shares issued throughout the valuation range. The pro forma valuation calculations relative to the Peer Group (fully-converted basis) are shown in Table 4.4 and are detailed in Exhibit IV-7 and Exhibit IV-8; the pro forma valuation calculations relative to the Peer Group based on reported financials are shown in Table 4.5 and are detailed in Exhibits IV-9 and IV-10.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.6*

Table 1.1

Ponce Bank

Historical Balance Sheet Data


																											12/31/12-
																											12/31/16
	At December 31,																									Annual.
	2012					2013					2014					2015					2016					Growth Rate
	Amount		Pct(1)			Amount		Pct(1)			Amount		Pct(1)			Amount		Pct(1)			Amount		Pct(1)			Pct
	($000)		(%)			($000)		(%)			($000)		(%)			($000)		(%)			($000)		(%)			(%)
Total Amount of:
Assets	$	761,544		100.00	%	$	730,644		100.00	%	$	706,414		100.00	%	$	703,157		100.00	%	$	744,983		100.00	%		-0.55	%
Cash and cash equivalents		21,141		2.78	%		12,752		1.75	%		15,849		2.24	%		12,694		1.81	%		11,716		1.57	%		-13.72	%
Investment securities/CDs		108,693		14.27	%		102,305		14.00	%		100,574		14.24	%		82,034		11.67	%		52,690		7.07	%		-16.56	%
Loans held for sale		—		0.00	%		5,667		0.78	%		2,707		0.38	%		3,303		0.47	%		2,143		0.29	%		NM
Loans receivable, net		584,606		76.77	%		561,623		76.87	%		543,289		76.91	%		567,662		80.73	%		642,148		86.20	%		2.37	%
FHLB stock		1,124		0.15	%		1,596		0.22	%		1,267		0.18	%		1,162		0.17	%		964		0.13	%		-3.77	%
Core deposit intangible		564		0.07	%		420		0.06	%		276		0.04	%		132		0.02	%		3		0.00	%		-72.99	%
Deposits	$	666,851		87.57	%	$	627,060		85.82	%	$	599,697		84.89	%	$	599,506		85.26	%	$	643,078		86.32	%		-0.90	%
Borrowings		—		0.00	%		11,000		1.51	%		10,000		1.42	%		8,000		1.14	%		3,000		0.40	%		NM
														0.00	%
Equity	$	86,147		11.31	%	$	87,711		12.00	%	$	89,600		12.68	%	$	91,062		12.95	%	$	92,992		12.48	%		1.93	%
Tangible equity	$	85,583		11.24	%	$	87,291		11.95	%	$	89,324		12.64	%	$	90,930		12.93	%	$	92,989		12.48	%		2.10	%
Loans/Deposits				87.67	%				89.56	%				90.59	%				94.69	%				99.86	%
Number of offices		12					13					13					13					13

(1)	Ratios are as a percent of ending assets.

Sources: Ponce Bank’s prospectus, audited and unaudited financial statements, SNL Financial and RP Financial calculations.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*OVERVIEW AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS*
		*I.9*

Table 1.2

Ponce Bank

Historical Income Statements


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2012						2013						2014						2015						2016
	Amount			Pct(1)			Amount			Pct(1)			Amount			Pct(1)			Amount			Pct(1)			Amount			Pct(1)
	($000)			(%)			($000)			(%)			($000)			(%)			($000)			(%)			($000)			(%)
Interest income	$	41,078			5.33	%	$	37,162			4.98	%	$	35,495			4.93	%	$	33,590			4.70	%	$	33,741			4.65	%
Interest expense		(9,504	)		-1.23	%		(7,701	)		-1.03	%		(5,730	)		-0.80	%		(5,650	)		-0.79	%		(5,936	)		-0.82	%

Net interest income	$	31,574			4.10	%	$	29,461			3.95	%	$	29,765			4.14	%	$	27,940			3.91	%	$	27,805			3.83	%
Provision for loan losses		(5,132	)		-0.67	%		(3,426	)		-0.46	%		(1,183	)		-0.16	%		(353	)		-0.05	%		57			0.01	%

Net interest income after provisions	$	26,442			3.43	%	$	26,035			3.49	%	$	28,582			3.97	%	$	27,587			3.86	%	$	27,862			3.84	%
Non-interest operating income	$	3,042			0.39	%	$	3,106			0.42	%	$	2,749			0.38	%	$	2,462			0.34	%	$	2,431			0.34	%
Operating expense		(23,970	)		-3.11	%		(24,671	)		-3.31	%		(25,797	)		-3.59	%		(26,216	)		-3.67	%		(27,863	)		-3.84	%

Net operating income	$	5,514			0.72	%	$	4,470			0.60	%	$	5,534			0.77	%	$	3,833			0.54	%	$	2,430			0.34	%
Net income before tax	$	5,514			0.72	%	$	4,470			0.60	%	$	5,534			0.77	%	$	3,833			0.54	%	$	2,430			0.34	%
Income tax provision		(1,424	)		-0.18	%		(2,015	)		-0.27	%		(2,998	)		-0.42	%		(1,315	)		-0.18	%		(1,005	)		-0.14	%

Net income (loss)	$	4,090			0.53	%	$	2,455			0.33	%	$	2,536			0.35	%	$	2,518			0.35	%	$	1,425			0.20	%
Adjusted Earnings
Net income	$	4,090			0.53	%	$	2,455			0.33	%	$	2,536			0.35	%	$	2,518			0.35	%	$	1,425			0.20	%
Add(Deduct): Non-operating income		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%
Tax effect (2)		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%		0			0.00	%

Adjusted earnings	$	4,090			0.53	%	$	2,455			0.33	%	$	2,536			0.35	%	$	2,518			0.35	%	$	1,425			0.20	%
Expense Coverage Ratio (3)		1.32	x					1.19	x					1.15	x					1.07	x					1.00	x
Efficiency Ratio (4)		69.27	%					75.74	%					79.42	%					86.35	%					92.09	%

(1)	Ratios are as a percent of average assets.

(2)	Assumes a 34.0% effective tax rate.

(3)	Expense coverage ratio calculated as net interest income before provisions for loan losses divided by operating expenses.

(4)	Efficiency ratio calculated as operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest income before provisions for loan losses plus non-interest operating income.

Sources: Ponce Bank’s prospectus, audited & unaudited financial statements, SNL Financial and RP Financial calculations.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.3*

Table 3.1

Peer Group of Publicly-Traded Thrifts

As of September 30, 2016

As of

February 24, 2017

Ticker

Financial Institution

Exchange

City

State

Total
Assets

Offices

Fiscal
Year End

Conv. Date

Stock
Price

Market
Value

($Mil)

($)

($Mil)

BYBK

Bay Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Columbia

606

Dec

1/0/1900

7.50

78.42

CSBK

Clifton Bancorp Inc.

NASDAQ

Clifton

1,312

Mar

4/2/2014

16.33

375.98

CWAY

Coastway Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Warwick

633

Dec

1/15/2014

16.95

74.63

ESBK

Elmira Savings Bank

NASDAQ

Elmira

567

Dec

3/1/1985

21.50

59.05

MLVF

Malvern Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Paoli

821

Sep

10/12/2012

20.90

137.11

PBHC

Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Oswego

717

Dec

10/17/2014

14.84

62.87

PBBI

PB Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Putnam

506

Jun

1/8/2016

10.75

84.71

PBIP

Prudential Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Philadelphia

559

Sep

10/10/2013

17.23

155.35

WEBK

Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Wellesley

666

Dec

1/26/2012

27.50

68.33

WNEB

Western New England Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Westfield

1,378

Dec

1/4/2007

9.80

297.73

Source: SNL Financial, LC.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.6*

Table 3.2

Balance Sheet Composition and Growth Rates

Comparable Institution Analysis

As of September 30, 2016


			Balance Sheet as a Percent of Assets																														Balance Sheet Annual Growth Rates																					Regulatory Capital
			Cash &			MBS &						Net						Borrowed			Sub.			Total			Goodwill			Tangible						MBS, Cash &									Borrows.			Total			Tangible			Tier 1			Tier 1			Risk-Based
			Equivalents			Invest			BOLI			Loans (1)			Deposits			Funds			Debt			Equity			& Intang			Equity			Assets			Investments			Loans (1)			Deposits			&Subdebt			Equity			Equity			Leverage			Risk-Based			Capital
Ponce Bank		NY
December 31, 2016				1.57	%		7.20	%		0.00	%		86.48	%		86.32	%		0.40	%		0.00	%		12.48	%		0.00	%		12.48	%		5.95	%		-31.83	%		12.84	%		7.27	%		-62.50	%		2.12	%		2.12	%		13.32	%		17.96	%		19.21	%
All Public Companies
Averages				5.61	%		16.71	%		1.85	%		72.30	%		73.84	%		11.71	%		0.46	%		12.70	%		0.73	%		11.97	%		14.12	%		8.46	%		17.61	%		15.87	%		17.03	%		9.70	%		8.84	%		12.10	%		18.28	%		19.39	%
Medians				3.82	%		14.69	%		1.81	%		74.94	%		73.61	%		11.55	%		0.00	%		11.51	%		0.08	%		11.02	%		10.15	%		0.68	%		14.36	%		11.19	%		0.79	%		3.79	%		3.56	%		10.98	%		15.40	%		16.51	%
State of NY
Averages				4.43	%		12.78	%		1.47	%		77.80	%		73.53	%		14.13	%		0.83	%		10.05	%		1.25	%		8.80	%		4.77	%		-2.84	%		6.33	%		7.01	%		9.13	%		7.21	%		7.87	%		9.54	%		14.67	%		15.79	%
Medians				1.95	%		10.13	%		1.53	%		78.61	%		74.43	%		13.30	%		0.36	%		9.69	%		0.81	%		8.17	%		1.35	%		-1.12	%		5.60	%		2.39	%		-4.84	%		4.10	%		4.90	%		9.92	%		13.63	%		14.98	%
Comparable Group
Averages				4.32	%		19.07	%		2.21	%		71.32	%		72.52	%		13.12	%		0.36	%		13.05	%		0.47	%		12.58	%		14.24	%		16.04	%		18.72	%		13.19	%		27.72	%		6.02	%		6.88	%		12.59	%		19.61	%		20.53	%
Medians				3.49	%		18.01	%		2.29	%		68.98	%		72.05	%		13.01	%		0.00	%		10.85	%		0.00	%		10.75	%		14.28	%		14.47	%		15.83	%		9.34	%		14.56	%		0.02	%		0.38	%		11.14	%		14.44	%		15.57	%
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		7.63	%		8.94	%		0.94	%		79.63	%		87.59	%		0.33	%		0.00	%		10.76	%		0.54	%		10.22	%		27.88	%		93.65	%		21.24	%		39.18	%		-90.55	%		-2.48	%		-3.28	%		10.84	%		13.13	%		13.62	%
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		1.73	%		25.04	%		4.64	%		67.18	%		58.86	%		17.11	%		0.00	%		23.08	%		0.00	%		23.08	%		13.72	%		-13.10	%		30.17	%		13.80	%		81.05	%		-10.46	%		-10.46	%		23.15	%		42.34	%		43.07	%
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		4.02	%		1.19	%		0.70	%		87.32	%		61.77	%		26.24	%		0.00	%		10.95	%		0.00	%		10.95	%		19.78	%		39.17	%		21.29	%		9.16	%		75.71	%		-2.04	%		-2.04	%		9.25	%		12.44	%		12.98	%
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		2.04	%		9.48	%		2.38	%		81.02	%		81.67	%		7.40	%		0.00	%		9.83	%		2.18	%		7.66	%		0.22	%		-21.89	%		3.98	%		4.83	%		-33.33	%		2.08	%		2.80	%		8.15	%		12.59	%		13.78	%
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		11.78	%		13.68	%		2.24	%		69.91	%		73.31	%		14.37	%		0.00	%		11.52	%		0.00	%		11.52	%		25.25	%		-9.31	%		46.73	%		29.33	%		14.56	%		16.22	%		16.22	%		11.45	%		15.11	%		16.03	%
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		3.30	%		26.04	%		1.59	%		65.16	%		77.41	%		11.45	%		2.09	%		8.27	%		0.66	%		7.60	%		18.10	%		30.87	%		14.24	%		11.84	%		182.48	%		-16.73	%		-17.90	%		9.69	%		13.85	%		15.11	%
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		2.75	%		40.67	%		2.43	%		50.56	%		70.78	%		11.64	%		0.00	%		16.87	%		1.36	%		15.51	%		8.05	%		3.27	%		12.17	%		1.69	%		-3.06	%		64.42	%		74.30	%		12.24	%		20.87	%		21.72	%
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		2.55	%		32.37	%		2.33	%		61.66	%		69.56	%		9.05	%		0.00	%		20.38	%		0.00	%		20.38	%		14.84	%		25.67	%		10.34	%		6.61	%		NM			-2.56	%		-2.56	%		20.41	%		38.57	%		39.70	%
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		3.72	%		10.96	%		1.09	%		82.66	%		74.42	%		15.36	%		1.47	%		8.31	%		0.00	%		8.31	%		13.02	%		37.08	%		9.68	%		9.52	%		35.17	%		7.75	%		7.75	%		9.28	%		12.21	%		13.29	%
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		3.69	%		22.34	%		3.73	%		68.06	%		69.86	%		18.25	%		0.00	%		10.54	%		0.00	%		10.54	%		1.52	%		-24.97	%		17.43	%		5.89	%		-12.58	%		4.02	%		4.02	%		11.43	%		15.02	%		16.02	%

(1)	Includes loans held for sale.

Source:

SNL Financial, LC. and RP^® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*Peer Group Analysis*
		*Page III.9*

Table 3.3

Income as Percent of Average Assets and Yields, Costs, Spreads

Comparable Institution Analysis

For the 12 Months Ended September 30, 2016


						Net Interest Income															Non-Interest Income									Non-Op. Items									Yields, Costs, and Spreads
															Loss			NII			Recurring			Other			Total									Provision												MEMO:		MEMO:
			Net												Provis.			After			Gain on Sale			Non-Int			Non-Int			Net Gains/			Extrao.			for			Yield			Cost			Yld-Cost			Assets/		Effective
			Income			Income			Expense			NII			on IEA			Provis.			of Loans			Income			Expense			Losses (1)			Items			Taxes			On IEA			Of IBL			Spread			FTE Emp.		Tax Rate
			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)					(%)
Ponce Bank		NY
December 31, 2016				0.20	%		4.65	%		0.82	%		3.83	%		-0.01	%		3.84	%		0.00	%		0.34	%		3.84	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.14	%		4.88	%		1.06	%		3.82	%	$	4,282		41.36	%
All Public Companies
Averages				0.70	%		3.54	%		0.59	%		2.95	%		0.07	%		2.85	%		0.35	%		0.54	%		2.77	%		-0.01	%		0.00	%		0.27	%		3.78	%		0.79	%		2.99	%	$	7,034		22.89	%
Medians				0.62	%		3.52	%		0.56	%		2.92	%		0.07	%		2.86	%		0.06	%		0.44	%		2.65	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.28	%		3.73	%		0.73	%		2.96	%	$	5,792		32.98	%
State of NY
Averages				0.54	%		3.50	%		0.72	%		2.78	%		0.05	%		2.73	%		0.19	%		0.41	%		2.46	%		-0.03	%		0.00	%		0.30	%		3.70	%		1.09	%		2.61	%	$	8,189		32.08	%
Medians				0.49	%		3.56	%		0.79	%		2.82	%		0.07	%		2.74	%		0.03	%		0.43	%		2.35	%		0.03	%		0.00	%		0.21	%		3.75	%		1.00	%		2.86	%	$	5,819		32.84	%
Comparable Group
Averages				0.56	%		3.48	%		0.66	%		2.82	%		0.13	%		2.69	%		0.10	%		0.39	%		2.59	%		0.01	%		0.00	%		0.12	%		3.69	%		0.86	%		2.83	%	$	7,028		18.38	%
Medians				0.49	%		3.45	%		0.70	%		2.78	%		0.11	%		2.71	%		0.02	%		0.36	%		2.40	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.17	%		3.68	%		0.89	%		2.80	%	$	6,542		31.42	%
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		0.33	%		4.35	%		0.34	%		4.01	%		0.25	%		3.76	%		0.17	%		0.97	%		4.37	%		-0.02	%		0.00	%		0.18	%		4.55	%		0.52	%		4.03	%	$	4,295		35.66	%
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		0.36	%		3.04	%		0.83	%		2.20	%		0.16	%		2.05	%		0.00	%		0.15	%		1.69	%		0.01	%		0.00	%		0.15	%		3.26	%		1.17	%		2.09	%	$	11,513		29.72	%
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		0.59	%		3.55	%		0.44	%		3.11	%		0.08	%		3.03	%		0.25	%		0.41	%		3.43	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.39	%		3.84	%		0.67	%		3.17	%	$	4,423		39.69	%
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		0.77	%		3.71	%		0.80	%		2.92	%		0.10	%		2.81	%		0.53	%		0.48	%		2.74	%		0.03	%		0.00	%		0.35	%		4.08	%		1.03	%		3.05	%	$	4,435		31.25	%
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		1.59	%		3.36	%		0.89	%		2.46	%		0.13	%		2.33	%		0.02	%		0.22	%		1.85	%		0.08	%		0.00	%		-0.79	%		3.57	%		1.07	%		2.50	%	$	9,890		-99.83	%
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		0.48	%		3.58	%		0.53	%		3.05	%		0.16	%		2.89	%		0.01	%		0.56	%		2.89	%		0.07	%		0.00	%		0.16	%		3.78	%		0.54	%		3.24	%	$	5,554		25.35	%
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		0.18	%		2.84	%		0.65	%		2.19	%		0.19	%		2.00	%		0.02	%		0.48	%		2.26	%		-0.01	%		0.00	%		0.05	%		2.99	%		0.94	%		2.05	%	$	4,767		20.33	%
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		0.51	%		3.27	%		0.62	%		2.65	%		0.04	%		2.61	%		0.00	%		0.16	%		2.04	%		0.02	%		0.00	%		0.24	%		3.39	%		0.83	%		2.56	%	$	9,010		31.64	%
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		0.50	%		3.90	%		0.75	%		3.15	%		0.08	%		3.07	%		0.06	%		0.21	%		2.54	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.31	%		3.98	%		0.86	%		3.12	%	$	8,860		38.38	%
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		0.33	%		3.24	%		0.79	%		2.44	%		0.07	%		2.38	%		0.00	%		0.31	%		2.12	%		-0.10	%		0.00	%		0.15	%		3.45	%		0.92	%		2.53	%	$	7,529		31.60	%

(1)	Net gains/losses includes gain/loss on sale of securities and nonrecurring income and expense.

Source:


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*PEER GROUP ANALYSIS*
		*III.12*

Table 3.4

Loan Portfolio Composition and Related Information

Comparable Institution Analysis

As of September 30, 2016


			Portfolio Composition as a Percent of Assets
						1-4			Constr.			Multi-						Commerc.						RWA/			Serviced		Servicing
Institution			MBS			Family(1)			& Land			Family			Comm RE			Business			Consumer			Assets			For Others		Assets
			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			($000)		($000)
Ponce Bank		NY		1.43	%		43.63	%		4.07	%		21.24	%		16.31	%		2.11	%		0.11	%		74.19	%	$	0	$	0
December 31, 2016
All Public Companies
Averages				9.53	%		32.64	%		3.80	%		9.95	%		18.64	%		4.60	%		1.55	%		68.79	%	$	1,500,818	$	8,303
Medians				8.40	%		32.60	%		2.87	%		3.63	%		17.62	%		3.94	%		0.35	%		70.39	%	$	59,991	$	385
State of NY
Averages				7.46	%		36.82	%		1.42	%		22.03	%		13.57	%		3.32	%		0.94	%		65.67	%	$	2,878,584	$	26,079
Medians				6.68	%		34.32	%		0.73	%		6.41	%		13.38	%		1.69	%		0.04	%		71.33	%	$	67,686	$	449
Comparable Group
Averages				11.05	%		41.70	%		3.96	%		2.72	%		17.37	%		4.99	%		0.84	%		66.58	%	$	31,551	$	235
Medians				8.93	%		40.94	%		3.21	%		2.30	%		16.12	%		4.48	%		0.16	%		68.35	%	$	3,149	$	22
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp Inc.	MD		5.71	%		32.84	%		4.07	%		2.86	%		29.98	%		9.92	%		0.33	%		83.15	%	$	5,506	$	0
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc	NJ		20.17	%		48.51	%		0.00	%		8.36	%		10.59	%		0.08	%		0.04	%		54.52	%	$	0	$	0
CWAY	Coastway Bncp, Inc.	RI		0.00	%		57.27	%		1.91	%		1.32	%		22.80	%		4.24	%		0.18	%		71.36	%	$	0	$	0
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		2.92	%		56.15	%		2.55	%		1.79	%		11.06	%		3.80	%		6.44	%		64.11	%	$	246,989	$	1,751
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp Inc	PA		2.90	%		33.50	%		3.48	%		2.38	%		26.26	%		4.72	%		0.23	%		72.78	%	$	0	$	328
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp Inc.	NY		12.14	%		30.32	%		4.65	%		2.16	%		17.80	%		8.80	%		0.77	%		65.33	%	$	18,046	$	43
PBBI	PB Bancorp Inc.	CT		31.57	%		39.78	%		0.82	%		1.07	%		7.23	%		1.77	%		0.14	%		56.95	%	$	26,459	$	86
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp Inc.	PA		17.52	%		42.09	%		2.94	%		2.23	%		14.22	%		0.02	%		0.14	%		52.46	%	$	0	$	0
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp	MA		2.72	%		45.43	%		15.43	%		2.46	%		14.45	%		5.67	%		0.02	%		71.51	%	$	17,721	$	138
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp	MA		14.82	%		31.14	%		3.74	%		2.59	%		19.28	%		10.88	%		0.10	%		73.68	%	$	792	$	0

(1)	Includes home equity loans and lines of credit.

Source:

SNL Financial LC. and RP^® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*Peer Group Analysis*
		*Page III.13*

Table 3.5

Interest Rate Risk Measures and Net Interest Income Volatility

Comparable Institution Analysis

As of September 30, 2016


			Balance Sheet Measures
			Tangible						Non-IEA			Quarterly Change in Net Interest Income
			Equity/			IEA/			Assets/
			Assets			IBL			Assets			9/30/2016		6/30/2016		3/31/2016		12/31/2015		9/30/2015		6/30/2015
			(%)			(%)			(%)			(change in net interest income is annualized in basis points)
Ponce Bank		NY
December 31, 2016				12.5	%		109.8	%		4.8	%		-8		-36		16		3		-5		-8
All Public Companies				12.0	%		128.7	%		7.3	%		0		2		-5		1		3		1
State of NY				8.9	%		117.3	%		6.1	%		-1		-1		-3		5		-1		2
Comparable Group
Average				12.6	%		110.5	%		5.3	%		1		2		-6		-1		2		3
Median				10.7	%		107.8	%		5.7	%		4		1		-1		-2		2		4
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		10.2	%		109.4	%		3.8	%		-40		14		-31		-16		-13		18
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		23.1	%		123.7	%		6.0	%		-2		-2		-1		-4		2		10
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		11.0	%		105.1	%		7.5	%		1		-2		2		-4		3		9
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		7.7	%		103.9	%		7.5	%		8		-5		-1		25		-3		-4
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		11.5	%		108.8	%		4.6	%		10		3		-7		2		2		1
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		7.6	%		103.9	%		5.5	%		14		1		-8		-13		6		4
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		15.5	%		114.0	%		6.0	%		6		6		-1		0		8		4
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		20.4	%		122.9	%		3.4	%		2		1		4		-4		15		-14
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		8.3	%		106.7	%		2.7	%		4		-2		-16		6		-7		6
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		10.5	%		106.8	%		5.9	%		5		1		0		3		7		0

NA=Change is greater than 100 basis points during the quarter.

Source:


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*Peer Group Analysis*
		*Page III.15*

Table 3.6

Credit Risk Measures and Related Information

Comparable Institution Analysis

As of September 30, 2016


						NPAs &			Adj NPAs &												Rsrves/
			REO/			90+Del/			90+Del/			NPLs/			Rsrves/			Rsrves/			NPAs &			Net Loan			NLCs/
			Assets			Assets (1)			Assets (2)			Loans (1)			Loans HFI			NPLs (1)			90+Del (1)			Chargeoffs (3)			Loans
			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			($000)			(%)
Ponce Bank		NY
December 31, 2016				0.00	%		3.50	%		1.04	%		4.01	%		1.57	%		39.09	%		39.09	%	-$	778			-0.12	%
All Public Companies
Averages				0.10	%		1.08	%		0.67	%		1.34	%		1.00	%		116.73	%		98.37	%	$	1,621			0.06	%
Medians				0.05	%		0.88	%		0.55	%		1.09	%		0.94	%		90.49	%		78.50	%	$	180			0.03	%
State of NY
Averages				0.07	%		0.90	%		0.60	%		1.11	%		0.81	%		138.56	%		114.71	%	$	1,043			0.05	%
Medians				0.09	%		0.88	%		0.63	%		1.10	%		0.86	%		112.19	%		100.07	%	$	245			0.03	%
Comparable Group
Averages				0.10	%		1.29	%		1.02	%		1.62	%		0.86	%		158.08	%		149.59	%	$	204			0.06	%
Medians				0.07	%		0.91	%		0.75	%		1.15	%		0.94	%		95.94	%		88.67	%	$	263			0.04	%
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		0.27	%		2.60	%		2.51	%		2.40	%		0.51	%		21.03	%		15.55	%	$	451			0.11	%
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		0.07	%		0.38	%		0.29	%		0.45	%		0.59	%		129.90	%		105.14	%	$	348			0.05	%
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		0.06	%		2.20	%		0.86	%		2.43	%		0.47	%		18.19	%		17.65	%	$	96			0.02	%
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		0.04	%		0.93	%		0.93	%		1.09	%		0.94	%		85.00	%		81.43	%	$	345			0.08	%
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		0.00	%		0.53	%		0.28	%		0.63	%		0.94	%		148.63	%		124.86	%	$	180			0.04	%
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		0.09	%		0.89	%		0.63	%		1.21	%		1.29	%		106.87	%		95.91	%	$	634			0.14	%
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		0.38	%		1.32	%		1.19	%		1.79	%		0.94	%		52.30	%		36.98	%	$	637			0.26	%
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		0.10	%		3.39	%		2.94	%		5.28	%		0.94	%		17.79	%		17.24	%	($	114	)		-0.03	%
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		0.00	%		0.09	%		0.09	%		0.11	%		0.96	%		878.64	%		878.64	%	$	146			0.03	%
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		0.00	%		0.59	%		0.53	%		0.86	%		1.05	%		122.46	%		122.46	%	($	680	)		-0.08	%

(1)	Includes TDRs for the Company and the Peer Group.

(2)	Excludes TDRs that are in compliance with their modified terms.

(3)	Net loan chargeoffs are shown on a last twelve month basis.

Source:

SNL Financial, LC and RP^® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obrained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.

Table 3.8

Ponce Bank

Peer Group Market Area Unemployment Rates


		Unemployment
		Rate
	County	Dec.2016
Se-Fed Bancshares, Inc.	Walker, AL		7.0	%
Peer Group Average			4.4	%
Peer Group
Equitable Financial Corp.	Hall, NE		3.6	%
IF Bancorp, Inc.	Iroquois, IL		6.1	%
HMN Financial, Inc.	Olmsted, MN		3.0	%
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.	Morgan, IL		5.1	%
Westbury Bancorp, Inc.	Washington, WI		3.1	%
Poage Bankshares, Inc.	Boyd, KY		7.2	%
United Community Bancorp	Dearborn, IN		4.4	%
Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc.	Wayne, OH		3.9	%
WCF Bancorp, Inc.	Hamilton, IA		3.8	%
Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.	Midland, MI		4.1	%

Source: SNL Financial, LC.


States & Counties	SNLTable
SNL Market Key	Name		Unemp. Rate		Unemp. Rate
		227545		227560		227560	*Edit these formulas to change dates*
				#PEND		#PEND
Cnty31079		Hall, NE		3.7		3.6
Cnty17075		Iroquois, IL		6.5		6.1
Cnty27109		Olmsted, MN		2.6		3.0
Cnty17137		Morgan, IL		5.6		5.1
Cnty55131		Washington, WI		3.4		3.1
Cnty21019		Boyd, KY		7.4		7.2
Cnty18029		Dearborn, IN		4.7		4.4
Cnty39169		Wayne, OH		3.8		3.9
Cnty19079		Hamilton, IA		4.1		3.8
Cnty26111		Midland, MI		3.8		4.1
Cnty01127		Walker, AL		7.6		7.0	Bank’s County

EXHIBITS

LIST OF EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description

I-1		Map of Office Locations

I-2		Audited Financial Statements

I-3		Key Operating Ratios

I-4		Investment Portfolio Composition

I-5		Yields and Costs

I-6		Loan Loss Allowance Activity

I-7		Interest Rate Risk Analysis

I-8		Fixed and Adjustable Rate Loans

I-9		Loan Portfolio Composition

I-10		Contractual Maturity by Loan Type

I-11		Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments

I-12		Non-Performing Assets

I-13		Deposit Composition

I-14		Maturity of Time Deposits

I-15		Borrowing Activity

II-1		Description of Office Properties

II-2		Historical Interest Rates

LIST OF EXHIBITS (continued)


Exhibit Number		Description

III-1		General Characteristics of Publicly-Traded Institutions

III-2		Public Market Pricing of Mid-Atlantic Thrift Institutions

III-3		Public Market Pricing of New England Thrift Institutions

III-4		Peer Group Market Area Comparative Analysis

IV-1		Stock Prices: As of February 24, 2017

IV-2		Historical Stock Price Indices

IV-3		Stock Indices as of February 24, 2017

IV-4		New York Thrift Acquisitions 2013 – Present

IV-5		Director and Senior Management Summary Resumes

IV-6		Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Ratios

IV-7		Pro Forma Analysis Sheet – Fully Converted Basis

IV-8		Pro Forma Effect of Conversion Proceeds – Fully Converted Basis

IV-9		Pro Forma Analysis Sheet – Minority Stock Offering

IV-10		Pro Forma Effect of Conversion Proceeds – Minority Stock Offering

V-1		Firm Qualifications Statement

EXHIBIT I-1

Ponce Bank

Map of Office Locations

Exhibit I-1

Ponce Bank

Map of Office Locations

LOGO

Source: SNL Financial, LC.

EXHIBIT I-2

Ponce Bank

Audited Financial Statements

[Incorporated by Reference]

EXHIBIT I-3

Ponce Bank

Key Operating Ratios

Exhibit I-3

Ponce Bank

Key Operating Ratios


	At or For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		0.20	%		0.35	%		0.35	%		0.33	%		0.53	%
Return on average equity		1.53	%		2.76	%		2.80	%		2.79	%		4.68	%
Interest rate spread (1)		3.82	%		3.96	%		4.26	%		3.98	%		4.16	%
Net interest margin (2)		4.02	%		4.14	%		4.42	%		4.17	%		4.36	%
Noninterest expense to average assets		3.84	%		3.67	%		3.59	%		3.30	%		3.13	%
Efficiency ratio (3)		92.15	%		86.23	%		79.34	%		75.75	%		69.25	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest- bearing liabilities		123.84	%		121.66	%		119.27	%		117.72	%		115.75	%
Average equity to average assets		12.81	%		12.78	%		12.58	%		11.79	%		11.41	%
Capital Ratios:
Total capital to risk weighted assets (bank only)		19.21	%		20.72	%		20.32	%		18.85	%		17.97	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets (bank only)		17.96	%		19.46	%		19.06	%		17.59	%		16.71	%
Common equity Tier 1 caital to risk-weighted assets (bank only)		17.96	%		19.46	%		N/A			N/A			N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets (bank only)		13.32	%		13.67	%		13.46	%		12.65	%		11.86	%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans		1.57	%		1.64	%		1.71	%		1.74	%		1.69	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans		132.15	%		99.78	%		58.77	%		21.63	%		18.02	%
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average outstanding loans during the year		0.13	%		(0.06	%)		(0.30	%)		(0.61	%)		(0.48	%)
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans		1.19	%		1.65	%		2.91	%		8.05	%		9.39	%
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets		1.04	%		1.35	%		2.28	%		6.29	%		7.33	%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		1.04	%		1.36	%		2.30	%		6.44	%		7.49	%
Total non-performing assets, accruing loans past due 90 days or more, and accruing troubled debt restructured loans as a percentage of total assets		3.50	%		4.19	%		5.23	%		7.55	%		9.25	%
Other:
Number of offices		14			14			14			14			13
Number of full-time equivalent employees		174			175			164			168			168

(1)	Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

(2)	Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(3)	Represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-4

Ponce Bank

Investment Portfolio Composition

Exhibit I-4

Ponce Bank

Investment Portfolio Composition


	At December 31,
	2016				2015				2014				2013				2012
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and Federal Agencies	$	41,906	$	41,559	$	71,899	$	71,166	$	88,828	$	87,088	$	90,823	$	86,662	$	96,022	$	95,894
Certificates of Deposit		500		500		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Mortagage-Backed Securities
FHLMC Certificates		192		216		202		222		212		234		222		238		332		355
FNMA Certificates		3,600		3,606		4,411		4,432		5,732		5,872		6,536		6,548		872		948
GNMA Certificates		6,745		6,809		6,084		6,214		7,211		7,380		8,668		8,857		11,158		11,496

	$	52,943	$	52,690	$	82,596	$	82,034	$	101,983	$	100,574	$	106,249	$	102,305	$	108,384	$	108,693

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-5

Ponce Bank

Yields and Costs

Exhibit I-5

Ponce Bank

Yields and Costs


	At December 31, 2016			2016							For the Years Ended December 31, 2015							2014
				Average							Average							Average
	Average			Outstanding				Average			Outstanding				Average			Outstanding				Average
	Yield/Rate			Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate			Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate			Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans		5.23	%	$	605,878		32,660		5.39	%	$	569,032		32,100		5.64	%	$	558,761		33,867		6.06	%
Available-fot-sale securities		1.45	%		70,142		1,012		1.44	%		96,777		1,429		1.48	%		102,715		1,567		1.53	%
Other (1)		0.42	%		15,365		69		0.45	%		9,465		61		0.64	%		11,788		61		0.52	%

Total interest-earning assets					691,385		33,741		4.88	%		675,274		33,590		4.97	%		673,264		35,495		5.27	%
Non-interest-earning assets					33,759							38,769							46,058

Totat assets				$	725,144						$	714,043						$	719,322

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts		0.10	%		126,573		327		0.26	%		122,533		240		0.20	%		127,200		248		0.19	%
Interest-bearing demand		0.28	%		54,493		96		0.18	%		46,692		77		0.16	%		44,546		60		0.13	%
Certificates of deposit		1.48	%		371,313		5,502		1.48	%		366,958		5,268		1.44	%		379,860		5,376		1.42	%

Total deposits					552,379		5,925		1.07	%		536,188		5,585		1.04	%		551,606		5,684		1.03	%
Advance payments by borrowers		1.25	%		4,770		4		0.09	%		3,815		4		0.10	%		3,740		3		0.08	%
Barrowings		0.78	%		1,145		7		0.61	%		15,050		61		0.41	%		9,129		43		0.47	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities					558,294		5,936		1.06	%		555,053		5,650		1.02	%		564,475		5,730		1.02	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing demand					70,407		—					61,524		—					60,318		—
Other non-interest bearing liabilities					3,519		—					6,195		—					4,024		—

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities					73,926		—					67,719		—					64,342		—

Total liabilities					632,220		5,936					622,773		5,650					628,817		5,730
Total equity					92,924							91,270							90,505

Total liabilities and total equity				$	725,144				1.06	%	$	714,043				1.02	%	$	719,322				1.02	%

Net interest income						$	27,805						$	27,940						$	29,765

Net interest rate spread (2)									3.82	%						3.96	%						4.26	%

Net interest-earning assets (3)				$	133,091						$	120,221						$	108,789

Net interest margin (4)									4.02	%						4.14	%						4.42	%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities									123.84	%						121.66	%						119.27	%

(1)	Includes FHLB demand accounts and FHLB stock dividends.

(2)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)	Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(4)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-6

Ponce Bank

Loan Loss Allowance Activity

Exhibit I-6

Ponce Bank

Loan Loss Allowance Activity


	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance at beginning of year	$	9,484		$	9,449		$	9,940		$	10,056		$	7,872
Provision for loan losses		(57	)		353			1.184			3.426			5,132
Charge-offs:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		(38	)		(282	)		(701	)		(1,533	)		(504	)
Multifamily residences		(3	)		(257	)		(252	)		(254	)		(26	)
Nonresidential properties		—			(19	)		(268	)		(184	)		—
Construction and land		(85	)					(32	)		(434	)		(467	)
Nonmortgage loans:
Business loans		—			—			(945	)		(1,440	)		(1,954	)
Consumer loans		(13	)		(8	)		(19	)		(18	)		(56	)

Total charge-offs		(139	)		(643	)		(2,217	)		(3,863	)		(3,007	)
Recoveries:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		160			63			235			4			2
Multifamily residences		1			—			61			32			11
Nonresidential properties		9			31			10			—			6
Construction and land		5			—			—			133			—
Nonmortgage loans:
Business loans		733			224			231			147			34
Consumer loans		9			7			5			5			6

Total recoveries		917			325			542			321			59
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		778			(318	)		(1,675	)		(3,542	)		(2,948	)

Allowance at end of year	$	10,205		$	9,484		$	9.449		$	9.940		$	10,056

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans		132.15	%		99.78	%		58.79	%		21.63	%		17.39	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans		1.57	%		1.64	%		1.71	%		1.74	%		1.69	%
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average outstanding loans during the year		0.13	%		(0.06	%)		(0.30	%)		(0.60	%)		(0.48	%)

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-7

Ponce Bank

Interest Rate Risk Analysis

Exhibit I-7

Ponce Bank

Interest Rate Risk Analysis

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, the calculation of the estimated changes in our net interest income that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.


	Net Interest Income		Year 1 Change
Rate Shift (1)	Year 1 Forecast		from Level
	(Dollars in thousands)
+400	$	24,717		-10.69	%
+300		25,584		-7.56	%
+200		26,403		-4.60	%
+100		27,122		-2.00	%
Level		27,677		—
-100		27,540		-0.49	%

(1)	Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, the calculation of the estimated changes in our NEV that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.


									NEV as a Percentage of Present
									Value of Assets (3)
			Estimated Increase (Decrease) in									Increase
Change in Interest	Estimated		NEV						NEV			(Decrease)
Rates (basis points) (1)	NEV (2)		Amount			Percent			Ratio (4)			(basis points)
	(Dollars in thousands)
+400	$		$					%			%
+300		105,305		(20,805	)		-16.50	%		14.59	%		(171	)
+200		113,610		(12,501	)		-9.91	%		15.35	%		(94	)
+100		120,720		(5,390	)		-4.27	%		15.94	%		(36	)
Level		126,111		—			0.00	%		16.29	%		—
-100		131,301		5,190			4.12	%		16.65	%		36

(1)	Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.

(2)	NEV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.

(3)	Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on interest-earning assets.

(4)	NEV Ratio represents NEV divided by the present value of assets.

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-8

Ponce Bank

Fixed and Adjustable Rate Loans

Exhibit I-8

Ponce Bank

Fixed and Adjustable Rate Loans

The following table sets forth our fixed and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2016 that are contractually due afterDecember 31, 2017.


	Due After December 31, 2017
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
			(In thousands)
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences	$	75,312	$	243,333	$	318,645
Investor owned		33,225		189,254		222,479
Owner occupied		42,087		54,079		96,166
Multifamily residences		15,126		140,877		156,003
Nonresidential properties		24,170		95,517		119,687
Construction and land		8,004		—		8,004

Total mortgage loans		122,612		479,727		602,339
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		4,623		2,093		6,716
Consumer		717		—		717

Total nonmortgage loans		5,340		2,093		7,433

Total	$	127,952	$	481,820	$	609,772

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-9

Ponce Bank

Loan Portfolio Composition

Exhibit I-9

Ponce Bank

Loan Portfolio Composition


	At December 31,
	2016						2015						2014						2013						2012
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
							(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences	$	325,040			49.88	%	$	309,292			53.64	%	$	295,948			53.59	%	$	307,014			53.74	%	$	313,065			52.67	%
Investor Owned		227,409			34.90	%		204,334			35.44	%		190,726			34.54	%		195,762			34.27	%		207,981			34.99	%
Owner-Occupied		97,631			14.98	%		104,958			18.20	%		105,222			19.05	%		111,252			19.47	%		105,084			17.68	%
Multifamily residences		158,200			24.28	%		122,836			21.30	%		110,978			20.10	%		107,541			18.82	%		107,949			18.16	%
Nonresidential properties		121,500			18.64	%		106,462			18.46	%		111,806			20.24	%		109,603			19.19	%		115,614			19.45	%
Construction and land		30,340			4.66	%		22,883			3.97	%		18,707			3.39	%		25,567			4.48	%		29,708			5.00	%

Total mortgage loans		635,080			97.46	%		561,473			97.37	%		537,439			97.32	%		549,725			96.23	%		566,336			95.28	%
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		15,719			2.41	%		14,350			2.49	%		14,206			2.57	%		20,349			3.56	%		26,545			4.47	%
Consumer		843			0.13	%		788			0.14	%		614			0.11	%		1,210			0.21	%		1,537			0.25	%

Total nonmortgage loans		16,562			2.54	%		15,138			2.63	%		14,820			2.68	%		21,559			3.77	%		28,082			4.72	%

		651,642			100.00	%		576,611			100.00	%		552,259			100.00	%		571,284			100.00	%		594,418			100.00	%

Net deferred loan origination costs		711						535						479						279						244
Allowance for losses on loans		(10,205	)					(9,484	)					(9,449	)					(9,940	)					(10,056	)

Loans, net	$	642,148					$	567,662					$	543,289					$	561,623					$	584,606

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-10

Ponce Bank

Contractual Maturity by Loan Type

Exhibit I-10

Ponce Bank

Contractual Maturity by Loan Type


	1-4 family		1-4 family
	residences -		residences -
	Investor		Owner		Multifamily		Nonresidential
December 31, 2016	Owned		Occupied		Residences		properties
			(In thousands)
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	4,930	$	1,465	$	2,197	$	1,813
More than one to five years		13,915		4,078		6,593		9,598
More than five years		208,564		92,088		149,410		110,089

Total	$	227,409	$	97,631	$	158,200	$	121,500


December 31, 2016	Construction and Land		Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	22,336	$	9,003	$	126	$	41,870
More than one to five years		8,004		6,716		717		49,621
More than five years		—		—		—		560,151

Total	$	30,340	$	15,719	$	843	$	651,642

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-11

Ponce Bank

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments

Exhibit I-11

Ponce Bank

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments


	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Total loans at beginning of year	$	576,611		$	552,259		$	571,284		$	594,418		$	622,359
Loans originated:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		71,908			51,864			46,228			54,509			30,715
Investor owned		57,167			39,309			34,603			31,508			20,544
Owner occupied		14,741			12,555			11,625			23,001			10,171
Multifamily residences		51,876			34,048			28,965			21,986			19,955
Nonresidential properties		31,408			18,365			15,972			13,850			9,902
Construction and land		5,693			3,497			15,485			10,389			13,589

Total mortgage loans		160,885			107,774			106,650			100,734			74,161
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		1,222			7,451			4,540			5,084			1,924
Consumer		718			692			277			516			782

Total nonmortgage loans		1,940			8,143			4,817			5,600			2,706

Total loans originated		162,825			115,917			111,467			106,334			76,867
Loans purchased:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		—			—			—			—			—
Investor owned		—			—			—			—			—
Owner occupied		—			—			—			—			—
Multifamily residences		—			—			—			—			—
Nonresidential properties		—			—			—			—			—
Construction and land		—			—			—			—			—

Total mortgage loans		—			—			—			—			—
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total nonmortgage loans		—			—			—			—			—

Total loans purchased		—			—			—			—			—
Loans sold:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		—			—			—			—			—
Investor owned		—			—			—			—			—
Owner occupied		—			—			—			—			—
Multifamily residences		—			—			(838	)		—			—
Nonresidential properties		—			—			—						—
Construction and land		—			—			—			—			—

Total mortgage loans		—			—			(838	)		—			—
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total nonmortgage loans		—			—			—			—			—

Total loans sold		—			—			(838	)		—			—
Principal repayments and other		(87,794	)		(91,565	)		(131,330	)		(129,468	)		(104,808	)

Net loan activity		75,031			24,352			(19,025	)		(23,134	)		(27,941	)

Total loans at end of year		651,642			576,611			552,259			571,284			594,418

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-12

Ponce Bank

Non-Performing Assets

Exhibit I-12

Ponce Bank

Non-Performing Assets


	At December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences	$	2,270		$	2,713		$	3,757		$	12,342		$	19,266
Investor owned		811			1,635			2,721			7,300			13,219
Owner occupied		1,459			1,078			1,036			5,042			6,047
Multifamily residences		—			—			2,957			4,040			4,320
Nonresidential properties		1,614			1,660			72			1,579			3,232
Construction and land		1,145			637			259			3,019			7,143
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		22			13			14			236			1,686
Consumer		—			—			—			29			40

Total nonaccrual loans (not including nonaccruing troubled debt restructured loans)		5,051			5,023			7,059			21,245			35,687
Nonaccruing trouble debt restructured loans:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		1,888			3,654			6,508			17,911			13,194
Investor owned		1,240			2,599			4,589			10,059			6,478
Owner occupied		648			1,055			1,923			7,851			6,716
Multifamily residences		—			—			—			396			450
Nonresidential properties		783			828			2,427			5,658			5,508
Construction and land		—			—			—			—			154
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		—			—			79			751			824
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total nonaccruing troubled debt restructured loans		2,671			4,482			9,018			24,715			20,130
Total nonaccrual loans		7,722			9,505			16,077			45,960			55,817

Real estate owned:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		—			—			—			—			—
Investor owned
Owner occupied
Multifamily residences		—			—			—			—			—
Nonresidential properties		—			—			—			—			—
Construction and land		—			76			162			1,059			1,200
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total real estate owned		—			76			162			1,059			1,200

Total nonperforming assets		7,722			9,581			16,239			47,019			57,017

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Mortgage Ioans:
1-4 family residences		—			—			—			—			—
Investor owned		—			—			—			—			—
Owner occupied		—			—			—			—			—
Multifamily residences		—			—			—			—			—
Nonresidential properties		—			—			126			127			299
Construction and land		—			—			1,257			894			—
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		—			—			600			—			3,511
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more		—			—			1,983			1,021			3,810
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans:
Mortgage loans:
1-4 family residences		13,712			14,909			14,177			4,859			8,347
Investor owned		6,435			6,579			5,179			2,383			5,321
Owner occupied		7,290			8,330			8,998			2,476			3,026
Multifamily residences		—			—			—			—			—
Nonresidential properties		4,066			4,186			3,590			2,262			1,256
Construction and land		—			—			—			—			—
Nonmortgage loans:
Business		593			814			970			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total accruing troubled debt restructured loans	$	18,384		$	19,909		$	18,737		$	7,121		$	9,603

Total nonperforming assets, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and accruing troubled debt restructured loans	$	26,106		$	29,490		$	36,959		$	55,161		$	70,430
Total nonperforming loans to total loans		1.19	%		1.65	%		2.91	%		8.05	%		9.39	%
Total nonperforming assets to total assets		1.04	%		1.35	%		2.28	%		6.29	%		7.32	%
Total nonperforming assets, accruing loans past due 90 days or more and accruing troubled debt restructured loans to total assets		3.50	%		4.19	%		5.23	%		7.55	%		9.24	%

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-13

Ponce Bank

Deposit Composition

Exhibit I-13

Ponce Bank

Deposit Composition


	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016								2015								2014
						Weighted								Weighted								Weighted
	Average					Average			Average					Average			Average					Average
	Balance		Percent			Rate			Balance		Percent			Rate			Balance		Percent			Rate
																	(Dollars in thousands)
Deposit type:
Savings	$	126,689		20.32	%		0.26	%	$	122,538		20.50	%		0.20	%	$	127,200		20.79	%		0.20	%
Interest-bearing demand		54,564		8.75	%		0.18	%		46,692		7.81	%		0.16	%		44,546		7.28	%		0.13	%
Certificates of deposit		371,267		59.54	%		1.48	%		366,958		61.40	%		1.44	%		379,860		62.07	%		1.42	%

Interest-bearing deposits		552,520		88.61	%		1.07	%		536,188		89.71	%		1.04	%		551,606		90.14	%		1.03	%
Non-interest bearing demand		71,045		11.39	%		—			61,524		10.29	%		—			60,318		9.86	%		—

Total deposits	$	623,565		100.00	%		0.95	%	$	597,712		100.00	%		0.93	%	$	611,924		100.00	%		0.93	%

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-14

Ponce Bank

Maturity of Time Deposits

Exhibit I-14

Ponce Bank

Maturity of Time Deposits


	Period to Maturity
	Less Than or Equal to One Year		More Than One to Two Years		More Than Two to Three Years		More Than Three Years		Total		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate Range:
0.05% - 0.99%	$	58,717	$	157	$	—	$	—	$	58,874		15.97	%
1.00% - 1.49%		77,407		58,789		7,655		342		144,193		39.11	%
1.50% - 1.99%		23,524		10,219		11,147		21,565		66,455		18.02	%
2.00% - 2.49%		9,292		808		20,543		63,751		94,394		25.60	%
2.50% - 2.99%		—		—		1,345		3,460		4,805		1.30	%

Total	$	168,940	$	69,973	$	40,690	$	89,118	$	368,721		100.00	%

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT I-15

Ponce Bank

Borrowing Activity

Exhibit I-15

Ponce Bank

Borrowing Activity


	At or For the Year December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(Dollars in Thousands)
FHLB Advances:
Balance outstanding at end of year	$	3,000		$	8,000		$	10,000
Average amount outstanding during the year		1,172			15,050			9,129
Maximum outstanding at any month end		12,000			24,000			18,000
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.60	%		0.41	%		0.47	%
Weighted average interest rate at the end of year		0.78	%		0.56	%		0.45	%

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT II-1

Description of Office Properties

Exhibit II-1

Ponce Bank

Description of Office Properties


Location	Leased or Owned		Year Acquired or Leased		Net Book Value of Real Property
					(In thousands)
Main Office:
2244 Westchester Avenue Bronx, NY 10462		Owned		1995	$	6,584
Other Properties:
980 Southern Blvd. Bronx, NY 10459		Leased		Pre 1990	$	1,282
37-60 82nd Street Jackson Heights, NY 11372		Owned		2006	$	8,702
30 East 170th Street Bronx, NY 10452		Owned		1987	$	133
169-174 Smith Street Brooklyn, NY 11201		Owned		1988	$	50
1925 Third Avenue New York, NY 1996		Leased		1996	$	20
2244 Westchester Avenue Bronx, NY 10462		Owned		1995	$	593
5560 Broadway Bronx, NY 10463		Owned		1998	$	1,137
3405-3407 Broadway Astoria, NY 11106		Leased		2001	$	—
3821 Bergenline Avenue Union City, NJ 07087		Owned		2001	$	1,816
1900-1960 Ralph Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11234		Leased		2007	$	363
20-47 86th Street Brooklyn, NY 11214		Owned		2010	$	1,965
100-20 Queens Blvd Forest Hills, NY 11375		Leased		2010	$	697
319 First Avenue New York, NY 10003		Leased		2010	$	1,231

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT II-2

Historical Interest Rates

Exhibit II-2

Historical Interest Rates(1)


		Prime			90 Day			One Year			10 Year
Year/Qtr. Ended		Rate			T-Note			T-Note			T-Note
2004:	Quarter 1		4.00	%		0.95	%		1.20	%		3.86	%
	Quarter 2		4.00	%		1.33	%		2.09	%		4.62	%
	Quarter 3		4.75	%		1.70	%		2.16	%		4.12	%
	Quarter 4		5.25	%		2.22	%		2.75	%		4.24	%
2005:	Quarter 1		5.75	%		2.80	%		3.43	%		4.51	%
	Quarter 2		6.00	%		3.12	%		3.51	%		3.98	%
	Quarter 3		6.75	%		3.55	%		4.01	%		4.34	%
	Quarter 4		7.25	%		4.08	%		4.38	%		4.39	%
2006:	Quarter 1		7.75	%		4.63	%		4.82	%		4.86	%
	Quarter 2		8.25	%		5.01	%		5.21	%		5.15	%
	Quarter 3		8.25	%		4.88	%		4.91	%		4.64	%
	Quarter 4		8.25	%		5.02	%		5.00	%		4.71	%
2007:	Quarter 1		8.25	%		5.04	%		4.90	%		4.65	%
	Quarter 2		8.25	%		4.82	%		4.91	%		5.03	%
	Quarter 3		7.75	%		3.82	%		4.05	%		4.59	%
	Quarter 4		7.25	%		3.36	%		3.34	%		3.91	%
2008:	Quarter 1		5.25	%		1.38	%		1.55	%		3.45	%
	Quarter 2		5.00	%		1.90	%		2.36	%		3.99	%
	Quarter 3		5.00	%		0.92	%		1.78	%		3.85	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.11	%		0.37	%		2.25	%
2009:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.21	%		0.57	%		2.71	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.19	%		0.56	%		3.53	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.14	%		0.40	%		3.31	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.06	%		0.47	%		3.85	%
2010:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.16	%		0.41	%		3.84	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.18	%		0.32	%		2.97	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.18	%		0.32	%		2.97	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.12	%		0.29	%		3.30	%
2011:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.09	%		0.30	%		3.47	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.03	%		0.19	%		3.18	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.02	%		0.13	%		1.92	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.02	%		0.12	%		1.89	%
2012:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.07	%		0.19	%		2.23	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.09	%		0.21	%		1.67	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.10	%		0.17	%		1.65	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.05	%		0.16	%		1.78	%
2013:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.07	%		0.14	%		1.87	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.04	%		0.15	%		2.52	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.02	%		0.10	%		2.64	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.07	%		0.13	%		3.04	%
2014:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.05	%		0.13	%		2.73	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.04	%		0.11	%		2.53	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.02	%		0.13	%		2.52	%
	Quarter 4		3.25	%		0.04	%		0.25	%		2.17	%
2015:	Quarter 1		3.25	%		0.03	%		0.26	%		1.94	%
	Quarter 2		3.25	%		0.01	%		0.28	%		2.35	%
	Quarter 3		3.25	%		0.00	%		0.33	%		2.06	%
	Quarter 4		3.50	%		0.16	%		0.65	%		2.27	%
2016:	Quarter 1		3.50	%		0.21	%		0.59	%		1.78	%
	Quarter 2		3.50	%		0.26	%		0.45	%		1.49	%
	Quarter 3		3.50	%		0.29	%		0.59	%		1.60	%
	Quarter 4		3.75	%		0.51	%		0.85	%		2.45	%
As of Feb. 24, 2017			3.75	%		0.52	%		0.80	%		2.31	%

(1)	End of period data.

Sources: Federal Reserve and The Wall Street Journal.

EXHIBIT III-1

General Characteristics of Publicly-Traded Institutions

Exhibit III-1

Characteristics of Publicly-Traded Thrifts

February 24, 2017

As of

February 24, 2017

Ticker

Financial Institution

Exchange

Region

City

State

Total
Assets

Offices

Fiscal
Mth End

Conv.
Date

Stock
Price

Market
Value

($Mil)

($)

($Mil)

ANCB

Anchor Bancorp

NASDAQ

Lacey

436

Jun

1/26/11

26.35

ASBB

ASB Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Asheville

797

Dec

10/12/11

32.50

123

Astoria Financial Corporation

NYSE

Lake Success

14,814

Dec

11/18/93

18.68

1,891

BCTF

Bancorp 34, Inc.

NASDAQ

Alamogordo

328

Dec

10/12/16

12.75

BKMU

Bank Mutual Corporation

NASDAQ

Milwaukee

2,653

Dec

10/30/03

10.00

457

BYBK

Bay Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Columbia

606

Dec

1/0/00

7.50

BNCL

Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Philadelphia

5,580

Dec

1/13/15

16.85

1,279

BHBK

Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Norwood

2,314

Dec

7/22/14

18.65

499

BOFI

BofI Holding, Inc.

NASDAQ

San Diego

7,855

Jun

3/14/05

30.84

1,954

BYFC

Broadway Financial Corporation

NASDAQ

Los Angeles

413

Dec

1/9/96

1.59

BLMT

BSB Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Belmont

2,074

Dec

10/5/11

27.85

254

CFFN

Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.

NASDAQ

Topeka

9,267

Sep

12/22/10

15.29

2,110

CARV

Carver Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

New York

702

Mar

10/25/94

3.25

CHFN

Charter Financial Corporation

NASDAQ

West Point

1,438

Sep

4/8/13

19.82

298

CSBK

Clifton Bancorp Inc.

NASDAQ

Clifton

1,312

Mar

4/2/14

16.33

376

CWAY

Coastway Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Warwick

633

Dec

1/15/14

16.95

DCOM

Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.

NASDAQ

Brooklyn

5,822

Dec

6/26/96

21.75

815

ESBK

Elmira Savings Bank

NASDAQ

Elmira

567

Dec

3/1/85

21.50

ENFC

Entegra Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Franklin

1,218

Dec

10/1/14

23.15

150

EQFN

Equitable Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Grand Island

228

Jun

7/9/15

10.15

ESSA

ESSA Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Stroudsburg

1,772

Sep

4/4/07

16.48

189

FCAP

First Capital, Inc.

NASDAQ

Corydon

742

Dec

1/4/99

33.00

110

FBNK

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Farmington

2,832

Dec

6/30/11

24.30

386

FDEF

First Defiance Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Defiance

2,450

Dec

10/2/95

49.61

446

FNWB

First Northwest Bancorp

NASDAQ

Port Angeles

1,049

Jun

1/30/15

15.61

190

FBC

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

NYSE

Troy

14,273

Dec

4/30/97

28.47

1,618

FSBW

FS Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Mountlake Terrace

827

Dec

7/10/12

37.41

114

FSBC

FSB Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Fairport

260

Dec

7/14/16

14.24

HBK

Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Towson

517

Mar

10/10/12

15.30

HIFS

Hingham Institution for Savings

NASDAQ

Hingham

1,960

Dec

12/13/88

189.90

405

HMNF

HMN Financial, Inc.

NASDAQ

Rochester

686

Dec

6/30/94

18.15

HFBL

Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana

NASDAQ

Shreveport

390

Jun

12/22/10

28.15

HVBC

HV Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Huntingdon Valley

177

Jun

1/12/17

14.16

IROQ

IF Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Watseka

589

Jun

7/8/11

20.40

ISBC

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Short Hills

22,536

153

Dec

5/8/14

14.75

4,564

JXSB

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Jacksonville

331

Dec

7/15/10

30.01

KRNY

Kearny Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Fairfield

4,523

Jun

5/19/15

15.30

1,350

MLVF

Malvern Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Paoli

821

Sep

10/12/12

20.90

137

MELR

Melrose Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Melrose

267

Dec

10/22/14

18.00

EBSB

Meridian Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Peabody

4,173

Dec

7/29/14

19.15

1,026

CASH

Meta Financial Group, Inc.

NASDAQ

Sioux Falls

4,006

Sep

9/20/93

87.05

814

MSBF

MSB Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Millington

434

Dec

7/17/15

16.18

NYCB

New York Community Bancorp, Inc.

NYSE

Westbury

49,463

259

Dec

11/23/93

15.40

7,501

NFBK

Northfield Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Woodbridge

3,785

Dec

1/25/13

18.90

917

NWBI

Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

NASDAQ

Warren

9,715

177

Dec

12/18/09

18.59

1,891

OCFC

OceanFirst Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Toms River

4,151

Dec

7/3/96

29.38

944

ORIT

Oritani Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Township of Washington

3,795

Jun

6/24/10

17.15

787

OTTW

Ottawa Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Ottawa

276

Dec

10/12/16

13.84

PBHC

Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Oswego

717

Dec

10/17/14

14.84

PBBI

PB Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Putnam

506

Jun

1/8/16

10.75

PBSK

Poage Bankshares, Inc.

NASDAQ

Ashland

449

Dec

9/13/11

20.20

Exhibit III-1

Characteristics of Publicly-Traded Thrifts

February 24, 2017

As of

February 24, 2017

Ticker

Financial Institution

Exchange

Region

City

State

Total
Assets

Offices

Fiscal
Mth End

Conv.
Date

Stock
Price

Market
Value

($Mil)

($)

($Mil)

PROV

Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.

NASDAQ

Riverside

1,243

Jun

6/28/96

19.12

152

PFS

Provident Financial Services, Inc.

NYSE

Iselin

9,390

Dec

1/16/03

26.78

1,770

PBIP

Prudential Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Philadelphia

559

Sep

10/10/13

17.23

155

RNDB

Randolph Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Stoughton

490

Dec

7/1/16

14.87

RVSB

Riverview Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Vancouver

984

Mar

10/1/97

7.55

170

SVBI

Severn Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Annapolis

778

Dec

1/0/00

7.15

SIFI

SI Financial Group, Inc.

NASDAQ

Willimantic

1,538

Dec

1/13/11

14.80

181

SBCP

Sunshine Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Plant City

564

Dec

7/15/14

18.87

151

TBNK

Territorial Bancorp Inc.

NASDAQ

Honolulu

1,849

Dec

7/13/09

33.27

325

TSBK

Timberland Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Hoquiam

891

Sep

1/13/98

21.16

155

TRST

TrustCo Bank Corp NY

NASDAQ

Glenville

4,813

145

Dec

1/0/00

8.40

805

UCBA

United Community Bancorp

NASDAQ

Lawrenceburg

528

Jun

1/10/13

17.50

UCFC

United Community Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Youngstown

2,160

Dec

7/9/98

8.75

434

UBNK

United Financial Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Glastonbury

6,545

Dec

3/4/11

18.30

930

WSBF

Waterstone Financial, Inc.

NASDAQ

Wauwatosa

1,795

Dec

1/23/14

18.75

552

WAYN

Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc.

NASDAQ

Wooster

446

Dec

1/9/03

17.50

WCFB

WCF Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Webster City

124

Dec

7/14/16

9.87

WEBK

Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Wellesley

666

Dec

1/26/12

27.50

WBB

Westbury Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

West Bend

703

Sep

4/10/13

21.19

WNEB

Western New England Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Westfield

1,378

Dec

1/4/07

9.80

298

WBKC

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

NASDAQ

Midland

369

Dec

1/20/11

34.27

WSFS

WSFS Financial Corporation

NASDAQ

Wilmington

6,628

Dec

11/26/86

46.60

1,463

WVFC

WVS Financial Corp.

NASDAQ

Pittsburgh

335

Jun

11/29/93

15.40

GCBC

Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)

NASDAQ

Catskill

893

Jun

12/30/98

22.30

190

HONE

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)

NASDAQ

Brockton

2,347

Dec

6/30/16

19.79

636

KFFB

Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (MHC)

NASDAQ

Frankfort

295

Jun

3/3/05

10.00

LSBK

Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)

NASDAQ

Dunkirk

478

Dec

4/4/06

15.86

MGYR

Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)

NASDAQ

New Brunswick

584

Sep

1/24/06

13.17

OFED

Oconee Federal Financial Corp. (MHC)

NASDAQ

Seneca

484

Jun

1/14/11

23.82

138

PVBC

Provident Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)

NASDAQ

Amesbury

768

Dec

7/16/15

19.05

184

TFSL

TFS Financial Corporation (MHC)

NASDAQ

Cleveland

12,906

Sep

4/23/07

17.17

4,867

Source: SNL Financial, LC.

EXHIBIT III-2

Public Market Pricing of Mid-Atlantic Thrift Institutions

Exhibit III-2

Public Market Pricing of Mid-Atlantic Institutions

As of February 24, 2017


			Market				Per Share Data
			Capitalization				Core			Book																	Dividends(3)								Financial Characteristics(5)
			Price/		Market		12 Month			Value/		Pricing Ratios(2)															Amount/					Payout			Total		Equity/			Tang. Eq./			NPAs/			Reported						Core
			Share		Value		EPS(1)			Share		P/E			P/B			P/A			P/TB			P/Core			Share		Yield			Ratio(4)			Assets		Assets			T. Assets			Assets			ROAA			ROAE			ROAA			ROAE
			($)		($Mil)		($)			($)		(x)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(x)			($)		(%)			(%)			($Mil)		(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)
All Non-MHC Public Companies(6)
Averages			$	22.59	$	579.95	$	1.07		$	16.18		20.02	x		133.03	%		16.27	%		146.71	%		20.60	x	$	0.36		1.56	%		46.46	%	$	3,274		12.70	%		12.05	%		1.06	%		0.70	%		5.90	%		0.72	%		6.03	%
Median			$	18.23	$	153.70	$	0.79		$	14.60		19.49	x		124.89	%		16.06	%		135.08	%		20.15	x	$	0.24		1.35	%		40.49	%	$	938		11.51	%		11.04	%		0.88	%		0.62	%		5.14	%		0.65	%		5.22	%
Mid-Atlantic Institutions
Averages			$	17.37	$	1,013.56	$	0.73		$	13.22		20.32	x		133.92	%		16.35	%		154.20	%		20.03	x	$	0.33		1.73	%		56.74	%	$	5,725		12.83	%		11.75	%		1.16	%		0.65	%		5.44	%		0.70	%		5.68	%
Medians			$	16.33	$	375.98	$	0.66		$	13.66		19.41	x		125.97	%		16.06	%		144.64	%		20.15	x	$	0.25		1.51	%		52.90	%	$	1,772		11.53	%		10.27	%		0.85	%		0.49	%		4.36	%		0.65	%		4.48	%
Comparable Group
AF	Astoria Financial Corporation	NY	$	18.68	$	1,890.61	$	0.67		$	15.57		30.13	x		119.34	%		13.10	%		135.13	%		29.33	x	$	0.16		0.86	%		25.81	%	$	14,814		11.53	%		10.41	%		1.69	%		0.49	%		4.41	%		0.51	%		4.56	%
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD	$	7.50	$	78.42	$	0.18		$	6.28		NM			119.64	%		12.64	%		125.44	%		NM		$	0.00		0.00	%		NM		$	606		10.76	%		10.27	%		2.19	%		0.33	%		2.50	%		0.41	%		3.14	%
BNCL	Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.	PA	$	16.85	$	1,279.15	$	0.40		$	13.41		NM			125.64	%		NA			151.43	%		NM		$	0.24		1.42	%		52.94	%	$	5,580		18.34	%		15.70	%		0.30	%		0.44	%		2.13	%		0.56	%		2.73	%
CARV	Carver Bancorp, Inc.	NY	$	3.25	$	12.01	($	0.42	)	$	2.51		NM			190.58	%		1.84	%		190.58	%		NM		$	0.00		0.00	%		NM		$	702		7.75	%		7.75	%		2.45	%		-0.06	%		-0.80	%		-0.18	%		-2.36	%
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ	$	16.33	$	375.98	$	0.19		$	13.12		NM			124.17	%		27.45	%		124.17	%		NM		$	0.24		1.47	%		120.00	%	$	1,312		23.08	%		23.08	%		0.38	%		0.36	%		1.40	%		0.36	%		1.38	%
DCOM	Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.	NY	$	21.75	$	814.66	$	1.05		$	14.79		11.04	x		143.97	%		13.57	%		159.67	%		22.52	x	$	0.56		2.57	%		28.43	%	$	5,822		9.54	%		8.67	%		0.24	%		1.57	%		15.89	%		0.73	%		7.42	%
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY	$	21.50	$	59.05	$	1.23		$	16.80		17.20	x		128.45	%		10.48	%		175.58	%		17.69	x	$	0.92		4.28	%		73.60	%	$	567		9.83	%		7.83	%		NA			0.77	%		7.81	%		0.75	%		7.67	%
ESSA	ESSA Bancorp, Inc.	PA	$	16.48	$	189.49	$	0.71		$	15.48		22.89	x		110.20	%		10.62	%		121.64	%		23.90	x	$	0.36		2.18	%		50.00	%	$	1,772		9.95	%		9.11	%		1.26	%		0.45	%		4.40	%		0.44	%		4.31	%
FSBC	FSB Bancorp, Inc.	NY	$	14.24	$	27.61	$	0.28		$	16.20		29.06	x		86.68	%		10.09	%		86.68	%		NM			NA		NA			NM		$	260		12.11	%		12.11	%		0.01	%		0.22	%		2.52	%		0.21	%		2.42	%
HBK	Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.	MD	$	15.30	$	52.16	$	0.15		$	18.10		NM			86.08	%		10.45	%		101.85	%		NM			NA		NA			NM		$	517		11.95	%		10.32	%		1.16	%		-0.01	%		-0.04	%		0.11	%		0.78	%
HVBC	HV Bancorp, Inc.	PA	$	14.16	$	30.90		NA			NA		NM			NA			NA			NA			NM			NA		NA			NM		$	177		7.45	%		7.45	%		0.93	%		NA			NA			NA			NA
ISBC	Investors Bancorp, Inc.	NJ	$	14.75	$	4,564.38	$	0.60		$	10.03		23.05	x		146.14	%		19.70	%		151.29	%		23.22	x	$	0.32		2.17	%		43.75	%	$	22,536		13.82	%		13.49	%		0.49	%		0.86	%		5.64	%		0.86	%		5.64	%
KRNY	Kearny Financial Corp.	NJ	$	15.30	$	1,350.08	$	0.19		$	12.57		NM			122.41	%		29.76	%		135.67	%		NM		$	0.12		0.78	%		52.38	%	$	4,523		24.75	%		22.89	%		0.57	%		0.39	%		1.51	%		0.39	%		1.52	%
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA	$	20.90	$	137.11	$	1.80		$	14.42		11.36	x		143.22	%		15.60	%		143.22	%		11.64	x	$	0.11		0.00	%		NM		$	821		11.52	%		11.52	%		0.45	%		1.59	%		14.05	%		1.54	%		13.61	%
MSBF	MSB Financial Corp.	NJ	$	16.18	$	92.43	$	0.12		$	12.71		NM			126.30	%		20.02	%		126.30	%		NM		$	0.00		0.00	%		NM		$	434		16.74	%		16.74	%		3.53	%		0.18	%		0.90	%		0.26	%		1.34	%
NYCB	New York Community Bancorp, Inc.	NY	$	15.40	$	7,500.67	$	1.20		$	12.50		15.25	x		122.48	%		15.33	%		203.40	%		15.05	x	$	0.68		4.42	%		67.33	%	$	49,463		12.31	%		7.77	%		0.12	%		-0.05	%		-0.39	%		1.16	%		9.57	%
NFBK	Northfield Bancorp, Inc.	NJ	$	18.90	$	917.15	$	0.58		$	12.84		33.16	x		147.64	%		23.82	%		157.83	%		30.06	x	$	0.32		1.69	%		56.14	%	$	3,785		16.40	%		15.50	%		0.83	%		0.66	%		3.93	%		0.74	%		4.41	%
NWBI	Northwest Bancshares, Inc.	PA	$	18.59	$	1,890.59	$	0.78		$	11.48		NM			161.50	%		19.65	%		227.56	%		21.58	x	$	0.64		3.44	%		124.49	%	$	9,715		11.97	%		8.76	%		1.24	%		0.46	%		3.57	%		0.88	%		6.79	%
OCFC	OceanFirst Financial Corp.	NJ	$	29.38	$	944.18	$	1.41		$	16.14		29.98	x		165.06	%		18.27	%		226.94	%		20.15	x	$	0.60		2.04	%		57.14	%	$	4,151		10.05	%		8.50	%		1.25	%		0.69	%		6.95	%		0.91	%		9.22	%
ORIT	Oritani Financial Corp.	NJ	$	17.15	$	786.57	$	0.87		$	11.94		16.98	x		146.06	%		19.60	%		146.06	%		18.12	x	$	0.70		4.08	%		118.81	%	$	3,795		14.22	%		14.22	%		0.30	%		1.37	%		9.19	%		1.07	%		7.19	%
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY	$	14.84	$	62.87	$	0.65		$	13.91		19.03	x		108.54	%		NA			118.19	%		21.71	x	$	0.20		1.35	%		25.64	%	$	717		8.27	%		7.66	%		0.89	%		0.48	%		4.88	%		0.43	%		4.41	%
PFS	Provident Financial Services, Inc.	NJ	$	26.78	$	1,769.68	$	1.40		$	18.84		19.41	x		141.37	%		18.63	%		215.26	%		19.46	x	$	0.76		2.84	%		52.90	%	$	9,390		13.25	%		9.16	%		0.76	%		0.96	%		7.12	%		0.98	%		7.28	%
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA	$	17.23	$	155.35	$	0.35		$	14.17		NM			122.55	%		23.49	%		122.55	%		NM		$	0.12		0.70	%		29.27	%	$	559		20.38	%		20.38	%		3.39	%		0.51	%		2.36	%		0.49	%		2.29	%
SVBI	Severn Bancorp, Inc.	MD	$	7.15	$	86.74	$	1.14		$	6.90		6.01	x		102.44	%		11.06	%		102.84	%		6.01	x	$	0.00		0.00	%		NM		$	778		11.16	%		11.12	%		4.11	%		2.00	%		17.36	%		2.00	%		17.36	%
TRST	TrustCo Bank Corp NY	NY	$	8.40	$	804.55	$	0.43		$	4.56		18.88	x		185.94	%		16.52	%		186.18	%		19.21	x	$	0.26		3.13	%		58.99	%	$	4,813		9.05	%		9.04	%		0.88	%		0.88	%		9.92	%		0.87	%		9.75	%
WSFS	WSFS Financial Corporation	DE	$	46.60	$	1,462.77	$	2.22		$	22.08		22.62	x		212.82	%		21.62	%		280.92	%		21.29	x	$	0.28		0.60	%		12.62	%	$	6,628		10.44	%		8.05	%		0.64	%		1.04	%		9.85	%		1.18	%		11.12	%
WVFC	WVS Financial Corp.	PA	$	15.40	$	30.93	$	0.73		$	16.44		19.49	x		92.80	%		9.09	%		92.80	%		19.57	x	$	0.24		1.56	%		27.85	%	$	335		9.85	%		9.85	%		0.08	%		0.42	%		4.32	%		0.42	%		4.26	%

(1)	Core income, on a diluted per-share basis. Core income is net income after taxes and before extraordinary items, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, gain on the sale of securities, amortization of intangibles, goodwill and nonrecurring items. Assumed tax rate is 35%.

(2)	P/E = Price to earnings; P/B = Price to book; P/A = Price to assets; P/TB = Price to tangible book value; and P/Core = Price to core earnings. P/E and P/Core =NM if the ratio is negative or above 35x.

(3)	Indicated 12 month dividend, based on last quarterly dividend declared.

(4)	Indicated 12 month dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month earnings.

(5)	ROAA (return on average assets) and ROAE (return on average equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month earnings and average equity and assets balances.

(6)	Excludes from averages and medians those companies the subject of actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.

Source: SNL Financial, LC. and RP Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this report has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.

EXHIBIT III-3

Public Market Pricing of New England Thrift Institutions

Exhibit III-3

Public Market Pricing of New England Institutions

As of February 24, 2017


			Market				Per Share Data
			Capitalization				Core		Book																	Dividends(3)								Financial Characteristics(5)
			Price/		Market		12 Month		Value/		Pricing Ratios(2)															Amount/					Payout			Total		Equity/			Tang. Eq./			NPAs/			Reported						Core
			Share		Value		EPS(1)		Share		P/E			P/B			P/A			P/TB			P/Core			Share		Yield			Ratio(4)			Assets		Assets			T. Assets			Assets			ROAA			ROAE			ROAA			ROAE
			($)		($Mil)		($)		($)		(x)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(x)			($)		(%)			(%)			($Mil)		(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)			(%)
All Non-MHC Public Companies(6)
Averages			$	22.59	$	579.95	$	1.07	$	16.18		20.02	x		133.03	%		16.27	%		146.71	%		20.60	x	$	0.36		1.56	%		46.46	%	$	3,274		12.70	%		12.05	%		1.06	%		0.70	%		5.90	%		0.72	%		6.03	%
Median			$	18.23	$	153.70	$	0.79	$	14.60		19.49	x		124.89	%		16.06	%		135.08	%		20.15	x	$	0.24		1.35	%		40.49	%	$	938		11.51	%		11.04	%		0.88	%		0.62	%		5.14	%		0.65	%		5.22	%
New England Institutions
Averages			$	31.60	$	333.88	$	1.58	$	18.88		21.13	x		136.43	%		15.54	%		141.95	%		23.38	x	$	0.34		1.19	%		31.20	%	$	1,952		12.04	%		11.68	%		0.81	%		0.55	%		5.07	%		0.56	%		5.12	%
Medians			$	18.30	$	253.72	$	0.67	$	14.63		20.81	x		124.89	%		14.34	%		132.61	%		22.53	x	$	0.20		1.12	%		24.00	%	$	1,538		10.54	%		10.54	%		0.69	%		0.50	%		4.83	%		0.49	%		4.83	%
New England Institutions
BHBK	Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	18.65	$	499.07	$	0.27	$	14.43		NM			128.99	%		20.21	%		132.61	%		NM		$	0.20		1.07	%		40.00	%	$	2,314		16.84	%		16.45	%		0.35	%		0.33	%		1.78	%		0.32	%		1.73	%
BLMT	BSB Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	27.85	$	253.72		NA	$	17.23		20.94	x		157.66	%		11.75	%		157.66	%		NM			NA		NA			NM		$	2,074		7.56	%		7.56	%		0.41	%		0.57	%		7.15	%		NA			NA
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI	$	16.95	$	74.63	$	0.79	$	15.52		20.67	x		108.84	%		11.59	%		108.84	%		20.67	x		NA		NA			NM		$	633		10.95	%		10.95	%		2.20	%		0.59	%		4.83	%		0.59	%		4.83	%
FBNK	First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	CT	$	24.30	$	386.31	$	0.87	$	16.17		24.30	x		148.48	%		13.61	%		148.48	%		24.38	x	$	0.36		1.48	%		24.00	%	$	2,832		9.03	%		9.03	%		1.01	%		0.49	%		5.34	%		0.48	%		5.22	%
HIFS	Hingham Institution for Savings	MA	$	189.90	$	405.01	$	10.31	$	72.35		17.44	x		251.52	%		20.10	%		251.52	%		17.61	x	$	1.28		0.67	%		14.33	%	$	1,960		7.86	%		7.86	%		0.28	%		1.21	%		15.48	%		1.20	%		15.32	%
MELR	Melrose Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	18.00	$	46.84	$	0.28	$	16.61		NM			108.38	%		17.58	%		108.38	%		NM			NA		NA			NM		$	267		16.23	%		16.23	%		0.00	%		0.42	%		2.26	%		0.29	%		1.55	%
EBSB	Meridian Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	19.15	$	1,026.37	$	0.56	$	11.12		29.46	x		169.01	%		23.14	%		172.90	%		31.26	x	$	0.12		0.63	%		18.46	%	$	4,173		14.31	%		14.03	%		0.69	%		0.80	%		5.05	%		0.79	%		5.02	%
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT	$	10.75	$	84.71	$	0.12	$	10.85		NM			98.95	%		16.27	%		107.64	%		NM		$	0.12		1.12	%		54.76	%	$	506		16.87	%		15.72	%		NA			0.18	%		1.23	%		0.19	%		1.27	%
RNDB	Randolph Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	14.87	$	87.27		NA	$	14.63		NM			101.65	%		17.83	%		101.78	%		NM			NA		NA			NM		$	490		17.54	%		17.52	%		1.41	%		NA			2.73	%		NA			3.81	%
SIFI	SI Financial Group, Inc.	CT	$	14.80	$	180.72		NA	$	13.08		15.58	x		109.71	%		11.65	%		122.75	%		NM		$	0.20		1.35	%		17.89	%	$	1,538		10.39	%		9.35	%		1.13	%		0.42	%		3.98	%		NA			NA
UBNK	United Financial Bancorp, Inc.	CT	$	18.30	$	929.69	$	1.02	$	13.00		18.48	x		141.75	%		14.09	%		173.88	%		17.02	x	$	0.48		2.62	%		48.48	%	$	6,545		10.03	%		8.32	%		0.84	%		0.72	%		7.12	%		0.82	%		8.08	%
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	27.50	$	68.33	$	1.32	$	22.52		22.18	x		123.76	%		9.83	%		123.76	%		NM		$	0.16		0.58	%		12.90	%	$	666		8.31	%		8.31	%		NA			0.50	%		5.81	%		0.50	%		5.79	%
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA	$	9.80	$	297.73	$	0.30	$	7.92		NM			124.89	%		14.34	%		135.20	%		29.34	x	$	0.12		1.22	%		50.00	%	$	1,378		10.54	%		10.54	%		0.59	%		0.33	%		3.11	%		0.39	%		3.71	%

(1)	Core income, on a diluted per-share basis. Core income is net income after taxes and before extraordinary items, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, gain on the sale of securities, amortization of intangibles, goodwill and nonrecurring items. Assumed tax rate is 35%.

(2)	P/E = Price to earnings; P/B = Price to book; P/A = Price to assets; P/TB = Price to tangible book value; and P/Core = Price to core earnings. P/E and P/Core =NM if the ratio is negative or above 35x.

(3)	Indicated 12 month dividend, based on last quarterly dividend declared.

(4)	Indicated 12 month dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month earnings.

(5)	ROAA (return on average assets) and ROAE (return on average equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month earnings and average equity and assets balances.

(6)	Excludes from averages and medians those companies the subject of actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.

EXHIBIT III-4

Peer Group Market Area Comparative Analysis

Exhibit III-4

Peer Group Market Area Comparative Analysis


						Proj.								Per Capita Income					Deposit
		Population				Pop.		2010-2017			2017-2022			2017		% State			Market
Institution	County	2010		2017		2022		% Change			% Change			.		Average			Share(1)
Bay Bancorp, Inc. - MD	Howard		287,085		320,499		340,706		1.6	%		1.2	%		53,069		134.6	%		0.34	%
Clifton Bancorp, Inc. - NJ	Passaic		501,226		513,394		523,070		0.3	%		0.4	%		30,738		76.4	%		4.56	%
Coastway Bancorp, Inc. - RI	Kent		166,158		164,657		164,480		-0.1	%		0.0	%		36,695		107.5	%		5.54	%
Elmira Savings Bank - NY	Chemung		88,830		86,282		85,256		-0.4	%		-0.2	%		29,868		83.6	%		26.23	%
Malvern Bancorp, Inc. - PA	Chester		498,886		520,584		533,821		0.6	%		0.5	%		47,548		148.5	%		3.85	%
Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. - NY	Oswego		122,109		119,387		118,576		-0.3	%		-0.1	%		25,871		72.4	%		24.36	%
PB Bancorp, Inc. - CT	Windham		118,428		115,983		114,922		-0.3	%		-0.2	%		29,250		69.8	%		18.61	%
Prudential Bancorp, Inc. - PA	Philadelphia		1,526,006		1,577,265		1,608,752		0.5	%		0.4	%		24,834		77.6	%		0.98	%
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. - MA	Norfolk		670,850		702,290		726,490		0.7	%		0.7	%		52,193		125.5	%		1.78	%
Western New England - MA	Hampden		463,490		472,757		483,326		0.3	%		0.4	%		29,242		70.3	%		14.47	%
	Averages:		444,307		459,310		469,940		0.3	%		0.3	%		35,931		96.6	%		10.07	%
	Medians:		375,288		396,628		412,016		0.3	%		0.4	%		30,303		80.6	%		5.05	%
Ponce Bank - NY	Bronx		1,385,108		1,475,915		1,534,568		0.9	%		0.8	%		18,469		51.7	%		1.95	%

(1)	Total institution deposits in headquarters county as percent of total county deposits as of June 30, 2016.

Sources: SNL Financial LC, FDIC.

EXHIBIT IV-1

Stock Prices:

As of February 24, 2017

RP^® Financial, LC.

Exhibit IV-1A

Weekly Thrift Market Line - Part One

Prices As of February 24, 2017


			Market Capitalization						Price Change Data												Current Per Share Financials
			Price/		Shares		Market		52 Week (1)						% Change From						LTM		LTM Core		BV/		TBV/		Assets/
			Share(1)		Outstanding		Capitalization		High		Low		Last Wk		Last Wk		52 Wks (2)		MRY (2)		EPS (3)		EPS (3)		Share		Share (4)		Share
			($)		(000)		($Mil)		($)		($)		($)		(%)		(%)		(%)		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
Companies
ANCB	Anchor Bancorp	WA		26.35		2,505		66.0		27.50		22.61		26.65		-1.13		14.64		-3.13		0.29		0.29		25.46		25.46		174.06
ASBB	ASB Bancorp, Inc.	NC		32.50		3,788		123.1		32.71		24.07		32.45		0.15		31.31		9.24		1.47		1.21		24.12		24.12		210.46
AF	Astoria Financial Corporation	NY		18.68		101,210		1,890.6		19.26		14.11		18.88		-1.06		24.45		0.16		0.64		0.67		15.57		13.74		146.37
BCTF	Bancorp 34, Inc.	NM		12.75		3,438		43.8		13.45		7.91		12.70		0.39		45.03		1.27		0.34		0.35		9.01		8.92		95.43
BKMU	Bank Mutual Corporation	WI		10.00		45,692		456.9		10.20		7.20		9.85		1.52		35.32		5.82		0.37		0.38		6.32		6.32		58.07
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		7.50		10,456		78.4		8.25		4.76		7.85		-4.46		56.25		13.64		0.14		0.18		6.28		5.96		57.99
BNCL	Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.	PA		16.85		75,914		1,279.2		19.00		12.34		16.80		0.30		35.45		-8.42		0.31		0.40		13.41		11.13		73.51
BHBK	Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc.	MA		18.65		26,760		499.1		19.73		13.29		18.90		-1.32		39.49		-0.53		0.28		0.27		14.43		14.03		86.46
BOFI	BofI Holding, Inc.	CA		30.84		63,362		1,954.1		31.07		15.29		29.72		3.77		73.55		8.02		1.91		1.89		11.32		11.32		123.97
BYFC	Broadway Financial Corporation	CA		1.59		27,301		43.4		2.50		1.42		1.49		6.71		-1.85		-2.75		0.23		0.23		1.63		1.63		15.14
BLMT	BSB Bancorp, Inc.	MA		27.85		9,110		253.7		30.05		21.50		27.95		-0.36		28.34		-3.80		1.19		NA		17.23		17.23		227.63
CFFN	Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	KS		15.29		137,976		2,109.6		17.04		12.45		15.41		-0.78		22.71		-7.11		0.63		0.63		10.13		10.13		67.17
CARV	Carver Bancorp, Inc.	NY		3.25		3,696		12.0		5.99		2.99		3.13		3.83		-12.16		0.79		-0.19		-0.42		2.51		2.51		189.86
CHFN	Charter Financial Corporation	GA		19.82		15,038		298.1		19.98		12.36		19.48		1.75		45.20		18.90		0.79		0.86		13.52		11.36		95.65
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		16.33		23,024		376.0		17.49		14.11		16.42		-0.55		11.09		-3.49		0.19		0.19		13.12		13.12		56.99
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		16.95		4,403		74.6		17.05		12.10		16.50		2.73		34.42		8.31		0.79		0.79		15.52		15.52		143.75
DCOM	Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.	NY		21.75		37,456		814.7		22.48		16.10		21.70		0.23		28.47		8.21		2.26		1.05		14.79		13.31		155.43
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		21.50		2,747		59.0		22.25		16.83		21.50		0.00		20.98		5.13		1.26		1.23		16.80		12.29		206.60
ENFC	Entegra Financial Corp.	NC		23.15		6,468		149.7		23.35		16.95		23.10		0.22		35.54		12.38		0.92		1.04		21.37		20.90		188.38
EQFN	Equitable Financial Corp.	NE		10.15		3,391		34.4		10.15		8.15		10.01		1.40		19.41		2.53		0.31		0.32		10.43		10.43		67.21
ESSA	ESSA Bancorp, Inc.	PA		16.48		11,498		189.5		16.91		12.93		16.72		-1.44		22.99		4.83		0.73		0.71		15.48		14.05		154.15
FCAP	First Capital, Inc.	IN		33.00		3,338		110.1		35.00		26.00		33.00		0.00		24.53		1.79		1.91		2.04		23.55		21.22		222.34
FBNK	First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	CT		24.30		15,898		386.3		25.00		15.49		24.35		-0.21		51.97		7.28		0.89		0.87		16.17		16.17		178.14
FDEF	First Defiance Financial Corp.	OH		49.61		8,984		445.7		52.31		34.80		49.94		-0.66		28.22		-2.23		3.08		3.10		32.53		25.49		272.70
FNWB	First Northwest Bancorp	WA		15.61		12,154		189.7		16.75		12.29		15.97		-2.25		24.88		0.06		0.29		0.27		14.60		14.60		86.27
FBC	Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.	MI		28.47		56,825		1,617.8		29.64		19.02		28.44		0.11		48.44		5.68		2.60		2.74		22.72		22.72		251.18
FSBW	FS Bancorp, Inc.	WA		37.41		3,060		114.5		39.70		23.60		37.50		-0.24		53.32		4.06		3.35		3.58		26.02		24.65		270.46
FSBC	FSB Bancorp, Inc.	NY		14.24		1,939		27.6		14.90		9.19		14.31		-0.48		45.54		0.29		0.30		0.28		16.20		16.20		133.95
HBK	Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.	MD		15.30		3,409		52.2		15.60		13.19		15.25		0.33		9.83		7.37		-0.01		0.15		18.10		15.34		151.70
HIFS	Hingham Institution for Savings	MA		189.90		2,133		405.0		203.01		116.03		188.80		0.58		60.93		-3.50		10.41		10.31		72.35		72.35		919.15
HMNF	HMN Financial, Inc.	MN		18.15		4,489		81.5		18.70		11.01		18.50		-1.89		61.76		3.71		1.22		1.23		16.67		16.39		152.75
HFBL	Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana	LA		28.15		1,954		55.0		29.85		21.20		28.00		0.54		27.19		4.81		1.80		1.80		22.44		22.44		199.40
HVBC	HV Bancorp, Inc.	PA		14.16		2,182		30.9		14.58		13.08		13.95		1.51		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA		81.17
IROQ	IF Bancorp, Inc.	IL		20.40		3,940		80.4		20.44		17.29		20.28		0.59		18.26		10.27		1.08		0.98		21.12		21.12		149.40
ISBC	Investors Bancorp, Inc.	NJ		14.75		309,449		4,564.4		14.99		10.67		14.90		-1.01		28.60		5.73		0.60		0.60		10.03		9.75		72.83
JXSB	Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.	IL		30.01		1,798		54.0		37.20		25.00		30.01		0.00		22.74		0.03		1.70		1.57		26.84		25.33		183.90
KRNY	Kearny Financial Corp.	NJ		15.30		88,240		1,350.1		16.10		11.74		15.60		-1.92		30.32		-1.61		0.19		0.19		12.57		11.34		51.26
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		20.90		6,560		137.1		21.50		15.00		21.00		-0.48		26.02		-1.18		1.86		1.80		14.42		14.42		125.19
MELR	Melrose Bancorp, Inc.	MA		18.00		2,602		46.8		18.10		14.60		17.30		4.05		20.00		0.28		0.41		0.28		16.61		16.61		102.50
EBSB	Meridian Bancorp, Inc.	MA		19.15		53,596		1,026.4		20.55		13.41		19.45		-1.54		38.67		1.32		0.56		0.56		11.12		10.86		77.86
CASH	Meta Financial Group, Inc.	SD		87.05		9,346		813.5		106.90		39.39		86.90		0.17		113.78		-15.40		3.92		4.65		39.30		31.57		428.69
MSBF	MSB Financial Corp.	NJ		16.18		5,714		92.4		16.30		12.25		15.44		4.77		28.59		10.04		0.12		0.12		12.71		12.71		75.89
NYCB	New York Community Bancorp, Inc.	NY		15.40		487,057		7,500.7		17.68		13.74		15.19		1.38		0.85		-3.21		-0.08		1.20		12.50		7.50		101.55
NFBK	Northfield Bancorp, Inc.	NJ		18.90		48,527		917.2		20.59		14.31		18.35		3.00		23.05		-5.36		0.52		0.58		12.84		12.00		77.99
NWBI	Northwest Bancshares, Inc.	PA		18.59		101,699		1,890.6		19.10		12.44		17.96		3.51		49.38		3.11		0.41		0.78		11.48		8.11		95.52
OCFC	OceanFirst Financial Corp.	NJ		29.38		32,137		944.2		30.70		16.77		29.44		-0.20		73.85		-2.16		1.07		1.41		16.14		13.42		129.17
ORIT	Oritani Financial Corp.	NJ		17.15		45,864		786.6		19.00		15.27		17.25		-0.58		2.57		-8.53		1.12		0.87		11.94		11.94		82.74
OTTW	Ottawa Bancorp, Inc.	IL		13.84		3,467		48.0		13.94		8.39		13.16		5.16		64.99		8.72		0.39		0.41		9.23		8.93		79.62
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		14.84		4,237		62.9		15.19		10.76		15.09		-1.66		23.67		10.01		0.73		0.65		13.91		12.79		169.26
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		10.75		7,880		84.7		10.85		8.20		10.85		-0.92		23.85		8.63		0.12		0.12		10.85		9.97		64.27
PBSK	Poage Bankshares, Inc.	KY		20.20		3,714		75.0		20.90		15.50		20.20		0.00		19.53		7.45		0.52		0.60		18.78		18.14		120.88
PROV	Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.	CA		19.12		7,953		152.1		20.66		16.81		18.88		1.27		11.75		-5.44		0.80		0.81		16.70		16.70		156.23
PFS	Provident Financial Services, Inc.	NJ		26.78		66,082		1,769.7		28.92		18.58		26.53		0.94		43.21		-5.37		1.37		1.40		18.84		12.44		142.10
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		17.23		9,016		155.3		17.95		13.80		17.48		-1.43		12.76		0.64		0.36		0.35		14.17		14.17		62.05
RNDB	Randolph Bancorp, Inc.	MA		14.87		5,869		87.3		16.50		12.06		15.25		-2.49		NA		-7.75		NA		NA		14.63		14.61		83.42
RVSB	Riverview Bancorp, Inc.	WA		7.55		22,511		170.0		8.16		4.20		7.50		0.67		77.26		7.86		0.29		0.30		4.93		3.79		43.71
SVBI	Severn Bancorp, Inc.	MD		7.15		12,131		86.7		8.08		5.05		7.20		-0.69		38.83		-9.49		1.14		1.14		6.90		6.87		64.11
SIFI	SI Financial Group, Inc.	CT		14.80		12,211		180.7		16.23		12.30		15.00		-1.33		5.87		-3.90		0.53		NA		13.08		11.64		125.96
SBCP	Sunshine Bancorp, Inc.	FL		18.87		7,986		150.7		19.05		13.85		18.81		0.32		32.89		10.09		-0.35		-0.33		13.82		11.92		70.62
TBNK	Territorial Bancorp Inc.	HI		33.27		9,779		325.3		34.00		24.96		33.55		-0.83		28.51		1.31		1.69		1.66		23.39		23.39		189.04
TSBK	Timberland Bancorp, Inc.	WA		21.16		7,345		155.4		22.75		12.20		22.01		-3.86		70.51		2.42		1.43		1.42		13.95		13.13		121.35
TRST	TrustCo Bank Corp NY	NY		8.40		95,780		804.6		9.00		5.60		8.50		-1.18		48.15		-4.00		0.44		0.43		4.56		4.55		50.25
UCBA	United Community Bancorp	IN		17.50		4,193		73.4		17.50		13.25		17.30		1.16		29.63		4.79		0.86		0.81		16.83		16.17		125.95
UCFC	United Community Financial Corp.	OH		8.75		49,619		434.2		9.50		5.53		8.90		-1.69		47.31		-2.13		0.38		0.37		5.51		5.48		43.54
UBNK	United Financial Bancorp, Inc.	CT		18.30		50,803		929.7		18.66		11.57		18.41		-0.60		57.76		0.77		0.90		1.02		13.00		10.60		128.83
WSBF	Waterstone Financial, Inc.	WI		18.75		29,430		551.8		19.40		13.50		19.20		-2.34		35.57		1.90		0.81		0.81		13.94		13.92		60.99
WAYN	Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc.	OH		17.50		2,782		48.7		18.75		11.90		18.30		-4.37		35.66		6.06		0.92		0.92		14.88		14.27		160.25
WCFB	WCF Bancorp, Inc.	IA		9.87		2,563		25.3		10.97		8.15		9.91		-0.41		6.76		-1.33		0.10		0.07		11.54		11.51		48.40
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		27.50		2,485		68.3		28.00		18.58		27.10		1.48		46.98		-0.90		1.33		1.32		22.52		22.52		268.13
WBB	Westbury Bancorp, Inc.	WI		21.19		4,073		86.3		23.00		18.75		22.62		-6.35		11.62		2.35		0.93		0.83		19.43		19.43		172.51
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		9.80		30,380		297.7		9.95		7.35		9.60		2.08		19.22		4.81		0.25		0.30		7.92		7.92		45.35

RP^® Financial, LC.

Exhibit IV-1A

Weekly Thrift Market Line - Part One

Prices As of February 24, 2017


			Market Capitalization						Price Change Data												Current Per Share Financials
			Price/		Shares		Market		52 Week (1)						% Change From						LTM		LTM Core		BV/		TBV/		Assets/
			Share(1)		Outstanding		Capitalization		High		Low		Last Wk		Last Wk		52 Wks (2)		MRY (2)		EPS (3)		EPS (3)		Share		Share (4)		Share
			($)		(000)		($Mil)		($)		($)		($)		(%)		(%)		(%)		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
Companies
WBKC	Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.	MI		34.27		2,099		71.9		34.35		25.26		34.27		0.00		33.84		8.45		2.14		2.14		29.97		29.97		175.88
WSFS	WSFS Financial Corporation	DE		46.60		31,390		1,462.8		48.20		28.01		46.05		1.19		59.59		0.54		1.97		2.22		22.08		16.59		211.14
WVFC	WVS Financial Corp.	PA		15.40		2,008		30.9		15.50		10.73		15.11		1.95		32.67		4.58		0.74		0.73		16.44		16.44		166.85
MHCs
GCBC	Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NY		22.30		8,503		189.6		25.20		15.40		23.55		-5.31		14.51		-2.62		1.10		1.10		9.00		9.00		105.04
HONE	HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	MA		19.79		32,121		635.7		20.19		12.53		19.57		1.12		NA		2.33		NA		NA		10.21		9.79		73.07
KFFB	Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (MHC)	KY		10.00		8,484		84.8		10.15		8.00		9.98		0.22		11.11		11.28		0.16		0.16		7.96		6.25		34.79
LSBK	Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NY		15.86		6,098		96.7		16.59		12.97		15.91		-0.31		20.61		-2.50		0.71		0.51		12.68		12.68		78.46
MGYR	Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NJ		13.17		5,821		76.6		13.24		9.51		13.00		1.27		34.15		9.71		0.19		0.18		8.20		8.20		100.40
OFED	Oconee Federal Financial Corp. (MHC)	SC		23.82		5,791		137.9		24.25		18.53		23.25		2.45		17.92		1.36		0.87		0.86		14.70		14.13		83.62
PVBC	Provident Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	MA		19.05		9,652		183.9		19.95		12.88		19.65		-3.05		46.54		6.42		NA		NA		11.41		11.41		79.59
TFSL	TFS Financial Corporation (MHC)	OH		17.17		283,468		4,867.2		19.89		16.35		17.39		-1.27		1.90		-9.82		0.28		NA		5.84		5.81		45.53
Under Acquisition
EVER	EverBank Financial Corp	FL		19.42		127,658		2,479.1		19.52		12.55		19.44		-0.10		54.37		-0.15		0.96		NA		13.92		13.53		224.84
GTWN	Georgetown Bancorp, Inc.	MA		25.80		1,841		47.5		26.00		19.15		25.80		0.00		33.33		-0.19		0.43		0.46		17.62		17.62		0.00

(1)	Average of High/Low or Bid/Ask price per share.

(2)	Or since offering price if converted of first listed in the past 52 weeks. Percent change figures are actual year-to-date and are not annualized.

(3)	EPS (earnings per share) is based on actual trailing 12 month data and is not shown on a pro forma basis.

(4)	Excludes intangibles (such as goodwill, value of core deposits, etc.).

(5)	ROA (return on assets) and ROE (return on equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month common earnings and average common equity and total assets balances.

(6)	Annualized based on last regular quarterly cash dividend announcement.

(7)	Indicated dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month earnings.

(8)	Excluded from averages due to actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.

(9)	For MHC institutions, market value reflects share price multiplied by public (non-MHC) shares.

Source: SNL Financial, LC. and RP^® Financial, LC. calculations. The information provided in this table has been obtained from sources we believe are reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.

RP^® Financial, LC.

Exhibit IV-1B

Weekly Thrift Market Line - Part Two

Prices As of February 24, 2017


			Key Financial Ratios												Asset Quality Ratios				Pricing Ratios										Dividend Data (6)
			Equity/		Tang Equity/		Reported Earnings				Core Earnings				NPAs/		Rsvs/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Div/		Dividend		Payout
			Assets(1)		Assets(1)		ROA(5)		ROE(5)		ROA(5)		ROE(5)		Assets		NPLs		Earnings		Book		Assets		Tang Book		Core Earnings		Share		Yield		Ratio (7)
			(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(x)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(x)		($)		(%)		(%)
Companies
ANCB	Anchor Bancorp	WA		14.63		14.63		0.17		1.14		0.17		1.14		NA		39.88		45.95		104.17		15.14		104.17		45.95		NA		NA		NM
ASBB	ASB Bancorp, Inc.	NC		11.46		11.46		0.70		5.91		0.57		4.87		1.33		114.00		NM		134.88		15.45		134.88		22.58		NA		NA		NM
AF	Astoria Financial Corporation	NY		11.53		10.41		0.49		4.41		0.51		4.56		1.69		37.20		30.45		120.61		13.24		136.57		29.65		0.16		0.85		25.81
BCTF	Bancorp 34, Inc.	NM		9.44		9.36		0.41		3.85		0.43		4.04		0.37		179.30		37.14		140.93		13.31		142.31		35.86		0.59		0.00		NM
BKMU	Bank Mutual Corporation	WI		10.89		10.89		0.65		5.85		0.66		5.95		0.54		164.11		26.62		157.01		16.99		157.01		26.62		0.22		2.23		59.46
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD		10.76		10.27		0.33		2.50		0.41		3.14		2.19		21.03		49.06		125.22		13.23		131.29		40.90		0.00		0.00		NM
BNCL	Beneficial Bancorp, Inc.	PA		18.34		15.70		0.44		2.13		0.56		2.73		0.30		286.82		49.41		125.26		NA		150.98		40.06		0.24		1.43		52.94
BHBK	Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc.	MA		16.84		16.45		0.33		1.78		0.32		1.73		0.35		221.90		54.00		130.72		20.48		134.39		56.38		0.20		1.06		45.71
BOFI	BofI Holding, Inc.	CA		9.19		9.19		1.70		18.81		1.68		18.63		0.56		89.01		15.09		251.54		23.07		251.54		15.18		NA		NA		NM
BYFC	Broadway Financial Corporation	CA		11.50		11.50		1.74		15.02		1.71		14.81		2.91		38.17		6.48		91.17		10.48		91.17		6.57		0.04		0.00		NM
BLMT	BSB Bancorp, Inc.	MA		7.56		7.56		0.57		7.15		NA		NA		0.41		152.33		21.02		158.23		11.80		158.23		NA		NA		NA		NM
CFFN	Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	KS		15.03		15.03		0.74		5.95		0.74		5.91		0.60		16.33		24.85		155.34		23.25		155.34		25.01		0.34		2.21		141.94
CARV	Carver Bancorp, Inc.	NY		7.75		7.75		-0.06		-0.80		-0.18		-2.36		2.45		29.93		NM		183.54		1.77		183.54		NM		0.00		0.00		NM
CHFN	Charter Financial Corporation	GA		14.12		12.14		0.98		5.90		1.07		6.43		0.77		124.65		23.76		142.48		20.03		169.04		19.12		0.24		1.23		26.22
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ		23.08		23.08		0.36		1.40		0.36		1.38		0.38		129.90		NM		124.85		27.60		124.85		83.00		0.24		1.46		120.00
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI		10.95		10.95		0.59		4.83		0.59		4.83		2.20		18.19		20.12		105.95		11.28		105.95		20.12		NA		NA		NM
DCOM	Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.	NY		9.54		8.67		1.57		15.89		0.73		7.42		0.24		158.94		11.02		143.64		13.53		159.30		22.47		0.56		2.58		28.43
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY		9.83		7.83		0.77		7.81		0.75		7.67		NA		NA		17.20		128.45		10.48		175.59		17.69		0.92		4.28		73.60
ENFC	Entegra Financial Corp.	NC		11.34		11.12		0.54		4.45		0.62		5.05		1.78		53.29		23.57		112.27		11.56		114.90		21.15		NA		NA		NM
EQFN	Equitable Financial Corp.	NE		15.92		15.92		0.46		3.00		0.47		3.08		NA		NA		30.33		95.00		14.68		95.00		29.59		NA		NA		NM
ESSA	ESSA Bancorp, Inc.	PA		9.95		9.11		0.45		4.40		0.44		4.31		1.26		45.86		23.22		111.80		10.78		123.41		24.25		0.36		2.15		50.00
FCAP	First Capital, Inc.	IN		10.61		9.66		0.89		8.39		0.95		8.90		1.25		65.73		16.10		140.13		NA		155.50		16.17		0.84		2.55		40.98
FBNK	First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	CT		9.03		9.03		0.49		5.34		0.48		5.22		1.01		73.97		24.35		148.79		13.64		148.79		24.43		0.36		1.48		31.00
FDEF	First Defiance Financial Corp.	OH		11.92		9.59		1.19		9.93		1.20		10.00		1.14		94.92		15.66		153.10		18.12		195.15		15.35		1.00		2.00		28.53
FNWB	First Northwest Bancorp	WA		18.05		18.05		0.34		1.79		0.32		1.67		0.83		89.70		46.97		109.73		18.60		109.73		49.40		NA		NA		NM
FBC	Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.	MI		9.01		9.01		1.30		11.55		1.17		10.40		0.92		123.28		10.69		120.97		11.50		120.97		NA		0.00		0.00		NM
FSBW	FS Bancorp, Inc.	WA		9.61		9.16		1.32		13.33		1.41		14.26		0.08		NM		10.68		141.59		13.86		149.00		10.20		0.40		1.07		11.40
FSBC	FSB Bancorp, Inc.	NY		12.11		12.11		0.22		2.52		0.21		2.42		0.01		NM		29.20		87.09		10.14		87.09		NA		NA		NA		NM
HBK	Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.	MD		11.95		10.32		-0.01		-0.04		0.11		0.78		1.16		34.98		NM		85.80		10.42		101.52		88.71		NA		NA		NM
HIFS	Hingham Institution for Savings	MA		7.86		7.86		1.21		15.48		1.20		15.32		0.28		193.31		17.34		250.06		19.99		250.06		17.50		1.28		0.68		14.33
HMNF	HMN Financial, Inc.	MN		10.91		10.75		0.89		8.02		0.90		8.10		1.04		162.38		13.81		109.39		12.18		111.23		NA		0.00		0.00		NM
HFBL	Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana	LA		11.29		11.29		0.92		7.63		0.92		7.63		0.24		331.61		15.14		124.02		13.34		124.02		15.14		0.36		1.29		18.92
HVBC	HV Bancorp, Inc.	PA		7.45		7.45		NA		NA		NA		NA		0.93		41.67		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA		NA
IROQ	IF Bancorp, Inc.	IL		14.23		14.23		0.70		4.93		0.64		4.46		0.82		118.60		16.90		97.13		13.80		97.13		18.02		0.16		0.79		13.33
ISBC	Investors Bancorp, Inc.	NJ		13.82		13.49		0.86		5.64		0.86		5.64		0.49		210.34		23.28		147.63		19.90		152.83		23.46		0.32		2.15		43.75
JXSB	Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.	IL		14.60		13.89		0.99		6.53		0.92		6.05		1.33		71.34		17.65		116.82		16.90		124.14		19.30		0.40		1.33		23.53
KRNY	Kearny Financial Corp.	NJ		24.75		22.89		0.39		1.51		0.39		1.52		0.57		102.49		NM		124.81		30.34		138.33		73.95		0.12		0.77		52.38
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA		11.52		11.52		1.59		14.05		1.54		13.61		0.45		148.63		11.41		143.90		15.67		143.90		11.70		0.11		0.00		NM
MELR	Melrose Bancorp, Inc.	MA		16.23		16.23		0.42		2.26		0.29		1.55		0.00		NM		42.20		104.17		16.90		104.17		61.76		NA		NA		NM
EBSB	Meridian Bancorp, Inc.	MA		14.31		14.03		0.80		5.05		0.79		5.02		0.69		134.22		29.92		171.65		23.50		175.61		31.75		0.12		0.62		18.46
CASH	Meta Financial Group, Inc.	SD		8.36		6.83		1.10		10.80		1.30		12.80		0.02		945.47		24.41		217.49		19.19		405.49		19.91		0.52		0.60		14.61
MSBF	MSB Financial Corp.	NJ		16.74		16.74		0.18		0.90		0.26		1.34		3.53		26.42		NM		120.55		19.11		120.55		77.20		0.00		0.00		NM
NYCB	New York Community Bancorp, Inc.	NY		12.31		7.77		-0.05		-0.39		1.16		9.57		0.12		380.89		15.04		120.81		15.12		200.63		14.84		0.68		4.48		67.33
NFBK	Northfield Bancorp, Inc.	NJ		16.40		15.50		0.66		3.93		0.74		4.41		0.83		77.25		32.19		143.35		23.13		153.24		29.19		0.32		1.74		56.14
NWBI	Northwest Bancshares, Inc.	PA		11.97		8.76		0.46		3.57		0.88		6.79		1.24		54.76		36.65		156.02		18.98		219.85		20.85		0.64		3.56		124.49
OCFC	OceanFirst Financial Corp.	NJ		10.05		8.50		0.69		6.95		0.91		9.22		1.25		36.40		30.04		165.39		18.31		227.40		20.19		0.60		2.04		57.14
ORIT	Oritani Financial Corp.	NJ		14.22		14.22		1.37		9.19		1.07		7.19		0.30		273.73		17.08		146.92		19.72		146.92		18.22		0.70		4.06		118.81
OTTW	Ottawa Bancorp, Inc.	IL		11.54		11.21		0.59		4.15		0.62		4.37		2.00		42.36		37.35		87.77		19.83		89.51		35.74		0.16		1.22		11.35
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY		8.27		7.66		0.48		4.88		0.43		4.41		0.89		106.87		19.35		110.36		NA		120.19		22.07		0.20		1.33		25.64
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT		16.87		15.72		0.18		1.23		0.19		1.27		NA		NA		51.67		99.87		16.43		108.64		64.11		0.12		1.11		54.76
PBSK	Poage Bankshares, Inc.	KY		15.54		15.09		0.43		2.68		0.50		3.08		1.78		33.13		38.85		107.55		16.71		111.33		33.65		0.24		1.19		53.85
PROV	Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.	CA		10.72		10.72		0.56		4.88		0.57		4.93		1.09		87.14		21.70		112.74		12.54		112.74		21.50		0.52		2.75		58.62
PFS	Provident Financial Services, Inc.	NJ		13.25		9.16		0.96		7.12		0.98		7.28		0.76		99.95		19.22		140.05		18.45		213.25		19.28		0.76		2.86		52.90
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA		20.38		20.38		0.51		2.36		0.49		2.29		3.39		17.79		42.63		124.33		23.83		124.33		43.65		0.12		0.69		21.95
RNDB	Randolph Bancorp, Inc.	MA		17.54		17.52		NA		2.73		NA		3.81		1.41		47.29		NA		104.25		18.28		104.38		NA		NA		NA		NA
RVSB	Riverview Bancorp, Inc.	WA		11.28		8.91		0.71		5.94		0.74		6.27		1.48		71.92		25.00		154.33		17.13		201.40		23.61		0.08		1.07		26.67
SVBI	Severn Bancorp, Inc.	MD		11.16		11.12		2.00		17.36		2.00		17.36		4.11		29.33		6.05		103.15		11.14		103.56		6.05		0.00		0.00		NM
SIFI	SI Financial Group, Inc.	CT		10.39		9.35		0.42		3.98		NA		NA		1.13		72.00		15.79		111.19		11.81		124.41		NA		0.20		1.33		17.89
SBCP	Sunshine Bancorp, Inc.	FL		12.89		11.32		-0.26		-1.85		-0.29		-2.04		0.41		126.26		NM		134.00		16.13		167.29		58.74		NA		NA		NM
TBNK	Territorial Bancorp Inc.	HI		12.36		12.36		0.85		7.00		0.84		6.86		0.38		39.11		19.06		142.78		17.47		142.78		19.35		0.80		2.38		53.41
TSBK	Timberland Bancorp, Inc.	WA		10.86		10.29		1.19		11.00		1.19		10.94		1.72		93.56		14.58		153.68		16.58		162.92		14.66		0.44		2.00		24.50
TRST	TrustCo Bank Corp NY	NY		9.05		9.04		0.88		9.92		0.87		9.75		0.88		117.51		19.10		188.16		16.72		188.40		19.44		0.26		3.09		44.24
UCBA	United Community Bancorp	IN		13.38		12.92		0.68		5.14		0.64		4.84		1.02		84.53		21.63		105.41		13.81		109.84		22.03		0.24		1.39		30.00
UCFC	United Community Financial Corp.	OH		11.87		11.81		0.89		7.33		0.86		7.09		1.96		45.00		22.31		166.14		18.92		167.19		22.14		0.12		1.35		28.82
UBNK	United Financial Bancorp, Inc.	CT		10.03		8.32		0.72		7.12		0.82		8.08		0.84		78.87		18.60		142.60		14.17		174.92		17.12		0.48		2.61		48.48
WSBF	Waterstone Financial, Inc.	WI		22.82		22.79		1.26		5.59		1.26		5.59		1.38		90.49		23.70		137.76		31.43		137.96		23.70		0.48		2.50		40.74
WAYN	Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc.	OH		9.29		8.94		0.57		6.20		0.57		6.20		0.96		68.18		22.32		124.08		11.19		129.51		NA		0.36		1.97		43.90
WCFB	WCF Bancorp, Inc.	IA		23.85		23.80		0.19		1.44		0.13		0.98		NA		105.80		NM		85.85		20.47		86.05		142.65		0.20		2.02		147.33
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA		8.31		8.31		0.50		5.81		0.50		5.79		NA		NA		21.85		121.96		9.69		121.96		NA		0.16		0.59		12.10
WBB	Westbury Bancorp, Inc.	WI		11.33		11.33		0.51		4.49		0.46		4.02		0.52		146.36		26.61		117.64		12.57		117.64		30.03		NA		NA		NM
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA		10.54		10.54		0.33		3.11		0.39		3.71		0.59		122.46		40.00		122.34		14.05		132.44		28.74		0.12		1.25		50.00

RP^® Financial, LC.

Exhibit IV-1B

Weekly Thrift Market Line - Part Two

Prices As of February 24, 2017


			Key Financial Ratios												Asset Quality Ratios				Pricing Ratios										Dividend Data (6)
			Equity/		Tang Equity/		Reported Earnings				Core Earnings				NPAs/		Rsvs/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Price/		Div/		Dividend		Payout
			Assets(1)		Assets(1)		ROA(5)		ROE(5)		ROA(5)		ROE(5)		Assets		NPLs		Earnings		Book		Assets		Tang Book		Core Earnings		Share		Yield		Ratio (7)
			(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(x)		(%)		(%)		(%)		(x)		($)		(%)		(%)
Companies
WBKC	Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.	MI		17.20		17.20		1.13		7.00		1.13		7.00		1.92		132.93		16.01		114.35		19.67		114.35		16.01		1.60		4.67		74.77
WSFS	WSFS Financial Corporation	DE		10.44		8.05		1.04		9.85		1.18		11.12		0.64		100.10		22.35		210.31		21.37		277.61		21.04		0.28		0.61		12.62
WVFC	WVS Financial Corp.	PA		9.85		9.85		0.42		4.32		0.42		4.26		0.08		149.21		19.12		91.03		8.92		91.03		19.20		0.24		1.59		27.85
MHCs
GCBC	Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NY		8.56		8.56		1.12		12.84		1.12		12.84		0.61		193.63		20.13		255.47		21.49		255.47		20.13		0.38		1.61		32.26
HONE	HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	MA		13.97		13.47		0.20		1.99		0.34		3.29		2.17		32.29		NA		190.84		25.68		199.05		NA		NA		NA		NA
KFFB	Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (MHC)	KY		22.87		18.88		0.43		1.86		0.43		1.86		NA		NA		NM		125.48		27.68		159.85		71.27		0.40		4.01		285.71
LSBK	Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NY		16.16		16.16		0.88		5.56		0.64		4.03		1.38		36.15		27.43		125.46		NA		125.46		NA		0.32		2.01		50.00
MGYR	Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NJ		8.17		8.17		0.19		2.28		0.18		2.19		3.69		32.31		68.42		157.94		12.88		157.94		69.76		NA		NA		NM
OFED	Oconee Federal Financial Corp. (MHC)	SC		17.59		17.03		1.05		6.21		1.04		6.16		1.15		19.69		24.73		160.46		27.93		166.94		25.05		0.40		1.72		42.55
PVBC	Provident Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	MA		14.10		14.10		0.82		5.71		0.78		5.42		0.65		168.33		28.48		173.77		23.84		173.77		30.64		NA		NA		NM
TFSL	TFS Financial Corporation (MHC)	OH		12.87		12.80		0.65		4.73		NA		NA		1.58		31.39		59.97		296.05		37.38		297.79		NA		0.50		2.88		155.17
Under Acquisition
EVER	EverBank Financial Corp	FL		6.60		6.45		0.49		7.07		NA		NA		0.74		45.16		18.34		132.32		8.92		135.81		18.65		0.24		1.23		22.64
GTWN	Georgetown Bancorp, Inc.	MA		10.30		10.30		0.25		2.39		0.27		2.55		NA		NA		NM		147.82		14.92		147.82		NA		0.20		0.78		181.82

(1)	Average of High/Low or Bid/Ask price per share.

(2)	Or since offering price if converted of first listed in the past 52 weeks. Percent change figures are actual year-to-date and are not annualized.

(3)	EPS (earnings per share) is based on actual trailing 12 month data and is not shown on a pro forma basis.

(4)	Exludes intangibles (such as goodwill, value of core deposits, etc.).

(5)	ROA (return on assets) and ROE (return on equity) are indicated ratios based on trailing 12 month common earnings and average common equity and total assets balances.

(6)	Annualized based on last regular quarterly cash dividend announcement.

(7)	Indicated dividend as a percent of trailing 12 month earnings.

(8)	Excluded from averages due to actual or rumored acquisition activities or unusual operating characteristics.

(9)	For MHC institutions, market value reflects share price multiplied by public (non-MHC) shares.

EXHIBIT IV-2

Historical Stock Price Indices

Exhibit IV-2

Historical Stock Price Indices(1)


								SNL		SNL
						NASDAQ		Thrift		Bank
Year/Qtr. Ended		DJIA		S&P 500		Composite		Index		Index
2004:	Quarter 1		10357.7		1126.2		1994.2		1585.3		562.20
	Quarter 2		10435.5		1140.8		2047.8		1437.8		546.62
	Quarter 3		10080.3		1114.6		1896.8		1495.1		556.00
	Quarter 4		10783.0		1211.9		2175.4		1605.6		595.10
2005:	Quarter 1		10503.8		1180.6		1999.2		1516.6		551.00
	Quarter 2		10275.0		1191.3		2057.0		1577.1		563.27
	Quarter 3		10568.7		1228.8		2151.7		1527.2		546.30
	Quarter 4		10717.5		1248.3		2205.3		1616.4		582.80
2006:	Quarter 1		11109.3		1294.8		2339.8		1661.1		595.50
	Quarter 2		11150.2		1270.2		2172.1		1717.9		601.14
	Quarter 3		11679.1		1335.9		2258.4		1727.1		634.00
	Quarter 4		12463.2		1418.3		2415.3		1829.3		658.60
2007:	Quarter 1		12354.4		1420.9		2421.6		1703.6		634.40
	Quarter 2		13408.6		1503.4		2603.2		1645.9		622.63
	Quarter 3		13895.6		1526.8		2701.5		1523.3		595.80
	Quarter 4		13264.8		1468.4		2652.3		1058.0		492.85
2008:	Quarter 1		12262.9		1322.7		2279.1		1001.5		442.5
	Quarter 2		11350.0		1280.0		2293.0		822.6		332.2
	Quarter 3		10850.7		1166.4		2082.3		760.1		414.8
	Quarter 4		8776.4		903.3		1577.0		653.9		268.3
2009:	Quarter 1		7608.9		797.9		1528.6		542.8		170.1
	Quarter 2		8447.0		919.3		1835.0		538.8		227.6
	Quarter 3		9712.3		1057.1		2122.4		561.4		282.9
	Quarter 4		10428.1		1115.1		2269.2		587.0		260.8
2010:	Quarter 1		10856.6		1169.4		2398.0		626.3		301.1
	Quarter 2		9744.0		1030.7		2109.2		564.5		257.2
	Quarter 3		9744.0		1030.7		2109.2		564.5		257.2
	Quarter 4		11577.5		1257.6		2652.9		592.2		290.1
2011:	Quarter 1		12319.7		1325.8		2781.1		578.1		293.1
	Quarter 2		12414.3		1320.6		2773.5		540.8		266.8
	Quarter 3		10913.4		1131.4		2415.4		443.2		198.9
	Quarter 4		12217.6		1257.6		2605.2		481.4		221.3
2012:	Quarter 1		13212.0		1408.5		3091.6		529.3		284.9
	Quarter 2		12880.1		1362.2		2935.1		511.6		257.3
	Quarter 3		13437.1		1440.7		3116.2		557.6		276.8
	Quarter 4		13104.1		1426.2		3019.5		565.8		292.7
2013:	Quarter 1		14578.5		1569.2		3267.5		602.3		318.9
	Quarter 2		14909.6		1606.3		3404.3		625.3		346.7
	Quarter 3		15129.7		1681.6		3771.5		650.8		354.4
	Quarter 4		16576.7		1848.4		4176.6		706.5		394.4
2014:	Quarter 1		16457.7		1872.3		4199.0		718.9		410.8
	Quarter 2		16826.6		1960.2		4408.2		723.9		405.2
	Quarter 3		17042.9		1972.3		4493.4		697.7		411.0
	Quarter 4		17823.1		2058.9		4736.1		738.7		432.8
2015:	Quarter 1		17776.1		2067.9		4900.9		749.3		418.8
	Quarter 2		17619.5		2063.1		4986.9		795.7		448.4
	Quarter 3		16284.7		1920.0		4620.2		811.7		409.4
	Quarter 4		17425.0		2043.9		5007.4		809.1		431.5
2016:	Quarter 1		17685.1		2059.7		4869.9		788.1		381.4
	Quarter 2		17930.0		2098.9		4842.7		780.9		385.6
	Quarter 3		18308.2		2168.3		5312.0		827.2		413.7
	Quarter 4		19762.6		2238.8		5383.1		966.7		532.7
As of Feb. 24, 2017			20821.8		2164.5		2367.3		954.4		555.4

(1)	End of period data.

Sources: SNL Financial and The Wall Street Journal.

EXHIBIT IV-3

Stock Indices as of February 24, 2017

Index Values

Industry:

Banking

Geography:

United States and Canada

Index
Value

Last
Update

Day’s
Change

Day’s
Change
(%)

Market Breadth

–

SNL Custom** Indexes

SNL Banking Indexes

SNL U.S. Bank and Thrift

531.78

2/24/2017

(5.41

(1.01

285

SNL U.S. Bank

555.35

2/24/2017

(5.73

(1.02

241

SNL U.S. Thrift

954.41

2/24/2017

(4.90

(0.51

SNL TARP Participants

90.20

2/24/2017

(1.27

(1.39

KBW Nasdaq Bank

95.85

2/24/2017

(0.92

(0.95

KBW Nasdaq Regional Bank

113.03

2/24/2017

(0.93

(0.82

S&P 500 Bank

299.28

2/24/2017

(3.39

(1.12

NASDAQ Bank

3,913.53

2/24/2017

(25.01

(0.64

S&P 500 Commercial Banks

427.57

2/24/2017

(4.85

(1.12

S&P 500 Diversified Banks

506.58

2/24/2017

(6.04

(1.18

S&P 500 Regional Banks

109.00

2/24/2017

(0.98

(0.89

S&P 500 Thrifts & Mortgage Finance

4.56

11/2/2015

(0.01

(0.31

SNL Asset Size Indexes

SNL U.S. Bank < $250M

31.48

2/24/2017

0.94

3.09

SNL U.S. Bank $250M-$500M

427.49

2/24/2017

(5.77

(1.33

SNL U.S. Thrift < $250M

1,244.68

2/24/2017

(0.31

(0.02

SNL U.S. Thrift $250M-$500M

6,063.81

2/24/2017

(5.46

(0.09

SNL U.S. Bank < $500M

814.54

2/24/2017

(10.62

(1.29

SNL U.S. Thrift < $500M

2,068.53

2/24/2017

(1.72

(0.08

SNL U.S. Bank $500M-$1B

968.04

2/24/2017

(2.64

(0.27

SNL U.S. Thrift $500M-$1B

2,906.93

2/24/2017

(21.64

(0.74

SNL U.S. Bank $1B-$5B

1,168.65

2/24/2017

(6.81

(0.58

108

SNL U.S. Thrift $1B-$5B

3,585.17

2/24/2017

(24.03

(0.67

SNL U.S. Bank $5B-$10B

1,396.21

2/24/2017

(10.55

(0.75

SNL U.S. Thrift $5B-$10B

1,077.85

2/24/2017

(2.80

(0.26

SNL U.S. Bank > $10B

480.64

2/24/2017

(5.11

(1.05

SNL U.S. Thrift > $10B

168.71

2/24/2017

(0.97

(0.57

SNL Market Cap Indexes

SNL Micro Cap U.S. Bank

613.67

2/24/2017

(0.05

(0.01

103

365

SNL Micro Cap U.S. Thrift

1,042.33

2/24/2017

(0.48

(0.05

SNL Micro Cap U.S. Bank & Thrift

712.62

2/24/2017

(0.10

(0.01

132

116

437

SNL Small Cap U.S. Bank

669.12

2/24/2017

(3.51

(0.52

SNL Small Cap U.S. Thrift

797.59

2/24/2017

(2.99

(0.37

SNL Small Cap U.S. Bank & Thrift

694.77

2/24/2017

(3.48

(0.50

SNL Mid Cap U.S. Bank

440.56

2/24/2017

(3.49

(0.79

SNL Mid Cap U.S. Thrift

372.17

2/24/2017

(2.04

(0.55

SNL Mid Cap U.S. Bank & Thrift

437.59

2/24/2017

(3.34

(0.76

SNL Large Cap U.S. Bank

342.25

2/24/2017

(3.70

(1.07

SNL Large Cap U.S. Thrift

158.11

2/24/2017

(0.72

(0.45

SNL Large Cap U.S. Bank & Thrift

344.40

2/24/2017

(3.71

(1.07

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence | Page 1 of 3

Index Values


SNL Geographic Indexes
SNL Mid-Atlantic U.S. Bank	502.55	*	2/24/2017	(5.33	)*	(1.05	)*	14	*	49	*	5	*
SNL Mid-Atlantic U.S. Thrift	3,623.49	*	2/24/2017	(22.33	)*	(0.61	)*	8	*	17	*	5	*
SNL Midwest U.S. Bank	661.44	*	2/24/2017	(4.57	)*	(0.69	)*	11	*	53	*	10	*
SNL Midwest U.S. Thrift	3,197.90	*	2/24/2017	(18.75	)*	(0.58	)*	3	*	10	*	8	*
SNL New England U.S. Bank	590.78	*	2/24/2017	(6.10	)*	(1.02	)*	8	*	12	*	0	*
SNL New England U.S. Thrift	3,082.44	*	2/24/2017	(11.25	)*	(0.36	)*	5	*	10	*	1	*
SNL Southeast U.S. Bank	346.77	*	2/24/2017	(4.04	)*	(1.15	)*	15	*	68	*	3	*
SNL Southeast U.S. Thrift	415.27	*	2/24/2017	(0.62	)*	(0.15	)*	2	*	2	*	2	*
SNL Southwest U.S. Bank	1,155.70	*	2/24/2017	(9.13	)*	(0.78	)*	2	*	25	*	1	*
SNL Southwest U.S. Thrift	813.48	*	2/24/2017	(1.31	)*	(0.16	)*	1	*	1	*	0	*
SNL Western U.S. Bank	1,494.65	*	2/24/2017	(16.04	)*	(1.06	)*	11	*	34	*	4	*
SNL Western U.S. Thrift	151.85	*	2/24/2017	0.05	*	0.03	*	5	*	4	*	0	*
SNL Stock Exchange Indexes
SNL U.S. Bank NYSE	474.32	*	2/24/2017	(5.27	)*	(1.10	)*	0	*	47	*	1	*
SNL U.S. Thrift NYSE	147.62	*	2/24/2017	(0.62	)*	(0.42	)*	1	*	4	*	0	*
SNL U.S. Bank NYSE MKT	896.69	*	2/24/2017	(8.07	)*	(0.89	)*	1	*	4	*	1	*
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ	939.15	*	2/24/2017	(6.23	)*	(0.66	)*	60	*	190	*	21	*
SNL U.S. Thrift NASDAQ	2,841.10	*	2/24/2017	(15.73	)*	(0.55	)*	23	*	40	*	16	*
SNL U.S. Bank Pink	380.13	*	2/24/2017	0.08	*	0.02	*	71	*	48	*	369	*
SNL U.S. Thrift Pink	303.71	*	2/24/2017	3.42	*	1.14	*	15	*	3	*	57	*
SNL Bank TSX	1,155.04	*	2/24/2017	(17.24	)*	(1.47	)*	1	*	9	*	1	*
SNL Other Indexes
SNL U.S. Thrift MHCs	5,990.56	*	2/24/2017	(25.03	)*	(0.42	)*	0	*	4	*	4	*
SNL Pink Asset Size Indexes
SNL U.S. Bank Pink < $100M	204.06	*	2/24/2017	0.58	*	0.28	*	1	*	1	*	23	*
SNL U.S. Bank Pink $100M-$500M	410.49	*	2/24/2017	0.73	*	0.18	*	38	*	19	*	230	*
SNL U.S. Bank Pink > $500M	334.10	*	2/24/2017	(0.10	)*	(0.03	)*	32	*	28	*	116	*
Broad Market Indexes
DJIA	20,821.76	*	2/24/2017	11.44	*	0.05	*
S&P 500	2,367.34	*	2/24/2017	3.54	*	0.15	*
S&P Mid-Cap	1,736.68	*	2/24/2017	2.26	*	0.13	*
S&P Small-Cap	853.19	*	2/24/2017	0.06	*	0.01	*
S&P 500 Financials	405.25	*	2/24/2017	(3.08	)*	(0.75	)*
SNL U.S. Financial Institutions	883.42	*	2/24/2017	(6.04	)*	(0.68	)*
MSCI US IMI Financials	1,511.78	*	2/24/2017	(11.01	)*	(0.72	)*
NASDAQ	5,845.31	*	2/24/2017	9.80	*	0.17	*
NASDAQ Finl	4,145.16	*	2/24/2017	(4.36	)*	(0.11	)*
NYSE	11,541.29	*	2/24/2017	(14.86	)*	(0.13	)*
Russell 1000	1,313.54	*	2/24/2017	1.98	*	0.15	*
Russell 2000	1,394.53	*	2/24/2017	(0.10	)*	(0.01	)*
Russell 3000	1,405.60	*	2/24/2017	1.95	*	0.14	*
S&P TSX Composite	15,533.47	*	2/24/2017	(247.73	)*	(1.57	)*
MSCI AC World (USD)	445.32	*	2/24/2017	(1.42	)*	(0.32	)*
MSCI World (USD)	1,840.80	*	2/24/2017	(4.56	)*	(0.25	)*
Bermuda Royal Gazette/BSX	1,958.57	*	2/24/2017	2.48	*	0.13	*

Intraday data is available for certain exchanges. In all cases, the data is at least 15 minutes delayed.

* - Intraday data is not currently available. Data is as of the previous close.

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence | Page 2 of 3

Index Values

** - Non-publicly traded institutions and institutions outside of your current subscription are not included in custom indexes. Custom indexes including foreign institutions do not take into account currency translations. Data is as of the previous close.

All SNL indexes are market-value weighted; i.e., an institution’s effect on an index is proportional to that institution’s market capitalization.

Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products.


Mid-Atlantic: DE, DC, MD, NJ, NY, PA, PR		Midwest: IA, IN, IL, KS, KY, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI

New England: CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT		Southeast: AL, AR, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV

Southwest: CO, LA, NM, OK, TX, UT		West: AZ, AK, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, WY

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence | Page 3 of 3

EXHIBIT IV-4

New York Thrift Acquisitions 2013 - Present

Exhibit IV-4

New York Thrift Acquisitions 2013-Present


						Target Financials at Announcement									Deal Terms and Pricing at Announcement
Announce Date	Complete Date	Buyer Short Name		Target Name		Total Assets ($000)	E/A (%)		TE/A (%)		LTM ROAA (%)	LTM ROAE (%)	NPAs/ Assets (%)	Rsrvs/ NPLs (%)	Deal Value ($M)	Value/ Share ($)	P/B (%)	P/TB (%)	P/E (x)	P/A (%)	Prem/ Cdeps (%)
12/16/2016	Def. Agrmt.	Wallkill Valley FS&LA	NY	Hometown Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)	NY	122,950		6.73		6.44	-0.03	-0.38	NA	NA	7.0	3.010	84.60	88.68	NM	5.70	-1.00
02/24/2015	12/04/2015	Community Bank System Inc.	NY	Oneida Financial Corp.	NY	798,169		12.01		9.01	0.66	5.44	0.17	326.98	142.1	19.986	146.60	202.07	27.38	17.80	11.58
09/25/2014	04/28/2015	Putnam County SB	NY	CMS Bancorp, Inc.	NY	273,045		8.72		8.72	0.25	2.91	NA	NA	25.4	13.250	110.58	110.58	40.15	9.29	1.72
01/30/2014	06/30/2014	Kearny Financial Corp. (MHC)	NJ	Atlas Bank	NY	110,480		13.68		13.68	-0.93	-6.18	0.60	109.79	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA

				Average:		326,161		10.29		9.46	-0.01	0.45	0.38	218.39			113.93	133.78	33.77	10.93	4.10
				Median:		197,998		10.37		8.87	0.11	1.26	0.38	218.39			110.58	110.58	33.77	9.29	1.72

EXHIBIT IV-5

Ponce Bank

Director and Senior Management Summary Resumes

Exhibit IV-5

Ponce Bank

Director and Senior Management Summary Resumes

The business experience for the past five years of each of our directors is set forth below. The biographies also contain information regarding the person’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the board of directors to determine that the person should serve as a director. Unless otherwise indicated, directors have held their positions for the past five years.

James C. Demetriou is the President and Chief Executive Officer of First Management Corp., a property management company located in Astoria, New York, established in 1985 and which has a portfolio of over one hundred and thirty residential, cooperative, condominium and commercial buildings. Mr. Demetriou is also a partner in the accounting firm, J. Demetriou & Co., established in 1970. In addition, Mr. Demetriou has been a New York licensed real estate broker and sponsoring broker of Archway Realty, Inc., in Astoria, New York since 1985. Furthermore, Mr. Demetriou is the President and Founder of Foxx Capital Funding, Inc. a New York licensed mortgage broker established in 1999.

William Feldman has been investing in and managing commercial and residential real estate properties in the New York metropolitan area for over 30 years. As the present time, Mr. Feldman is managing 13 properties, with ownership interests varying between 12.5% to 50.0%, held by The Feldman Living Trust. Mr. Feldman is also President of the Southern Boulevard Business Improvement District, a not-for-profit entity whose mission is to increase the economic growth and stability of the Southern Boulevard shopping area. Prior to 2013, Mr. Feldman owned several men’s clothing stores.

Julio Gurman is an investor in and manager of commercial and residential real estate properties in the New York metropolitan area. Mr. Gurman is a co-investor/manager of the same 13 properties as Mr. Feldman.

Nick R. Lugo is an investor in real estate properties located in the New York area and holds these investments in several limited liability companies. Mr. Lugo is also President of Nick Lugo Travel Corp., which he founded in 1980. In addition, Mr. Lugo is also the owner and publisher of LaVoz Hispana, a weekly newspaper. Mr. Lugo also founded in 2006 the New York City Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and serves as its Chairman and President. Mr. Lugo is a Director of the Southern Boulevard Business Improvement District.

Carlos P. Naudon has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank since 2015, having joined the Board of Directors in 2014. No later than one year after completion of the reorganization, or January 1, 2019, if earlier, Mr. Naudon will become President and Chief Executive Officer of Ponce Bank. Upon completion of the reorganization, Mr. Naudon will become President and Chief Executive Officer of PDL Community Bancorp and President and Chief Operating Officer of Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company. Prior to becoming President of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank, Mr. Naudon served as a consultant and compliance counsel to Ponce De Leon Federal Bank. Mr. Naudon owns Banking Spectrum, Inc., now a banking publishing company, formerly a bank consulting company. Until 2015, Mr. Naudon was a partner in the law firm of Allister & Naudon. Both of the foregoing firms were established in 1984 to provide services to banking institutions. Mr. Naudon became Of Counsel to the law firm Cullen & Dykman in 2015. Mr. Naudon has also previously served in many senior management positions at other companies. Before retiring from his consulting and law firms in 2015, Mr. Naudon was a frequent lecturer and speaker on banking issues, corporate governance, quality assurance and performance incentives. Mr. Naudon has current and previous service in various healthcare and community organizations. Mr. Naudon is a member of the New York State Bar Association, the New York City Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and other professional associations.

Manuel A. Romero is President of Manuel A. Romero, P.C., a professional corporation specializing in personal injury law matters. Mr. Romero is the head trial lawyer at the law firm and has served in that capacity for over 28 years. Mr. Romero serves as a member of the Finance Committee of the New York State Bar Association and teaches trial techniques at Cornell Law School on behalf of the Trial Academy of the New York State Bar Association.

Steven Tsavaris is currently the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank. No later than one year after completion of the reorganization, or January 1, 2019, if earlier, Mr. Tsavaris will become Executive Chairman, a salaried officer, of Ponce Bank. Upon completion of the reorganization, Mr. Tsavaris will become Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company and Executive Chairman, a salaried officer, of PDL Community Bancorp. Mr. Tsavaris joined Ponce De Leon Federal Bank as an Executive Vice President in 1995, became President in 1999, and was made Chief Executive Officer in 2011. In 2013, Mr. Tsavaris became Chairman of the Board.

Exhibit IV-5 (continued)

Ponce Bank

Director and Senior Management Summary Resumes

Executive Officer of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank, Ponce Bank, Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company and PDL Community Bancorp who is Not a Director

Frank Perez, age 49, was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank in January 2017. Upon completion of the reorganization, Mr. Perez will become Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ponce Bank, Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company and PDL Community Bancorp. Mr. Perez is a certified public accountant and has over 20 years of experience in the banking industry. Until recently, Mr. Perez was the sole employee of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Franklin, Tennessee, a former bank holding company in the process of winding down its residual operations. Prior to joining Ponce De Leon Federal Bank, Mr. Perez was, from January 2015 until July 2016, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Volunteer Bank, Chattanooga, Tennessee, a privately held bank. From May 2012 until January 2015, Mr. Perez was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Service Corporation, the bank holding company for First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown, Elizabethtown, Kentucky. From August 2008 to February 2012 Mr. Perez was the Chief Financial Officer and Investment Relations Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Bank. On January 27, 2012, Tennessee Commerce Bank was closed by the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. Subsequent to this receivership, Mr. Perez assumed his positions at First Financial Service Corporation and First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown. As a consequence of First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown being designated at that time as a troubled bank by the FDIC, First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown had to file a notice of change of a senior executive officer as required by federal law and regulation. Upon completion of its review, the FDIC issued a notice that it did not object to Mr. Perez’s appointment as Chief Financial Officer of First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown.

Executive Officers of Ponce De Leon Federal Bank and Ponce Bank who are Not Directors

The following sets forth information regarding our executive officers who are not directors. Age information is as of December 31, 2016. The executive officers of PDL Community Bancorp and Ponce Bank are elected annually.

Ioannis Kouzilos, age 38, is currently our Senior Vice President, Chief Lending Officer, a position he assumed in March, 2017. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Kouzilos was our Senior Vice President, Asset Management. Mr. Kouzilos has been employed by Ponce De Leon Federal Bank since July 2013 and has managed a number of departments, primarily focusing on asset quality, credit risk, asset recovery and lending operations. From April 2011 to June 2013, Mr. Kouzilos was Vice President, Credit Administrator for Alma Bank, New York, New York.

Elizabeth Macias, age 60, is currently our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Systems Officer. In this position, Ms. Macias manages our Information Technology, Vendor Management, Loan Servicing Systems and Facilities Management. Ms. Macias joined Ponce De Leon Federal Bank in August 2015. Prior to this time, Ms. Macias served as Vice President of Information Technology at Intervest National Bank for ten years and has held senior management positions in information technology, management information systems and information security for over 30 years.

Madeline V. Marquez, age 59, is currently our Senior Vice President of SBA/CDFI Initiatives and assumed this position on February 1, 2017. Prior to that time, Ms. Marquez served as Executive Vice President of the Business Initiative Corporation of New York (“BICNY”) which is a Certified SBA 504 Lender in New York State. Ms. Marquez held various positions of increasing responsibility with BICNY starting in 1998. In October 2012, Ms. Marquez became Chief Operating Officer of BICNY and Executive Vice President in January 2016.

David Rodriguez, age 61, has been employed by Ponce De Leon Federal Bank since April 2005. Mr. Rodriquez is currently Senior Vice President, Chief Relationship Manager and was, until March 2017, Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer and had held this position since 2007.

Rafael Sanchez, age 43, was appointed our Senior Vice President of Retail and Commercial Banking in November 2016. Mr. Sanchez is responsible for the oversight of the Sales and Marketing Department, Branch Operations Control Department, Regional Commercial Relationship Officers and Retail Banking. Prior to joining Ponce De Leon Federal Bank, Mr. Sanchez has held various positions in retail banking, most recently as Senior Vice President and Regional Manager at Popular Community Bank, Bronx, New York from February 2012 until joining Ponce De Leon Federal Bank.

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT IV-6

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Ratios

Exhibit IV-6

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Ratios


						Pro Forma at December 31, 2016, Based Upon the Sale in the Offering of (1)
	Ponce De Leon Federal Bank Historical at December 31, 2016					5,339,969 Shares						6,282,316 Shares						7,224,663 Shares						8,308,362 Shares(2)
	Amount		Percent of Assets(3)			Amount			Percent of Assets(3)			Amount			Percent of Assets(3)			Amount			Percent of Assets(3)			Amount			Percent of Assets(3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Equity	$	92,992		12.48	%	$	111,497			14.48	%	$	114,934			14.83	%	$	118,372			15.18	%	$	122,324			15.58	%
Tier 1 leverage capital	$	99,240		13.32	%	$	117,545			15.26	%	$	120,982			15.61	%	$	124,420			15.96	%	$	128,372			16.35	%
Tier 1 leverage capital requirement		37,256		5.00	%		38,520			5.00	%		38,753			5.00	%		38,987			5.00	%		39,255			5.00	%

Excess	$	61,984		8.32	%	$	79,025			10.26	%	$	82,229			10.61	%	$	85,433			10.96	%	$	89,117			11.35	%

Tier 1 risk-based capital(4)	$	99,240		17.96	%	$	117,545			21.07	%	$	120,982			21.65	%	$	124,420			22.23	%	$	128,372			22.89	%
Tier 1 risk-based requirement	$	44,217		8.00	%		44,621			8.00	%		44,696			8.00	%		44,771			8.00	%		44,857			8.00	%

Excess	$	55,023		9.96	%	$	72,924			13.07	%	$	76,286			13.65	%	$	79,649			14.23	%	$	83,515			14.89	%

Total risk-based capital(4)	$	106,190		19.21	%	$	124,495			22.32	%	$	127,932			22.90	%	$	131,370			23.47	%	$	135,322			24.13	%
Total risk-based requirement	$	55,271		10.00	%	$	55,777			10.00	%	$	55,870			10.00	%	$	55,964			10.00	%	$	56,071			10.00	%

Excess	$	50,918		9.21	%	$	68,718			12.32	%	$	72,062			12.90	%	$	75,406			13.47	%	$	79,251			14.13	%

Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital(4)	$	99,240		17.96	%	$	117,545			21.07	%	$	120,982			21.65	%	$	124,420			22.23	%	$	128,372			22.89	%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based requirement		35,926		6.50	%		36,255			6.50	%		36,316			6.50	%		36,376			6.50	%		36,446			6.50	%

Excess	$	63,314		11.46	%	$	81,290			14.57	%	$	84,666			15.15	%	$	88,044			15.73	%	$	91,926			16.39	%

Reconciliation of capital infused into Ponce Bank:
Net offering proceeds to Ponce Bank						$	25,483					$	30,151					$	34,820					$	40,189
Less: Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan							(4,652	)					(5,473	)					(6,293	)					(7,238	)
Less: Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit plans							(2,326	)					(2,736	)					(3,147	)					(3,619	)
Less: Assets retained by Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company adjustment							(200	)					(200	)					(200	)					(200	)

Pro forma increase						$	18,305					$	21,742					$	25,180					$	29,132

(1)

Pro forma capital levels assume that the employee stock ownership plan purchases 3.92% of our total outstanding shares (including shares issued to Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company and our charitable foundation) with funds we lend and that one or more stock-based benefit plans purchases 1.96% of our total outstanding shares (including shares issued to Ponce Bank Mutual Holding Company and our charitable foundation) for restricted stock awards. Pro forma capital calculated under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and regulatory capital have been reduced by the amount required to fund these plans. See “Management—Employee Stock Ownership Plan”.

(2)	As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares, which could occur due to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in market conditions following the commencement of the offering.

(3)	Tier 1 leverage capital levels are shown as a percentage of total adjusted assets. Risk-based capital levels are shown as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.

(4)	Pro forma amounts and percentages assume net proceeds are invested in assets that carry a 20% risk weighting.

Source: Ponce Bank’s prospectus.

EXHIBIT IV-7

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Analysis Sheet – Fully Converted Basis

Exhibit IV-7

PRO FORMA ANALYSIS SHEET - FULLY CONVERTED BASIS

Ponce Bank

Prices as of February 24, 2017


							Peer Group						New York Companies						All Publicly-Traded
Price Multiple		Symbol	Subject (1)				Average			Median			Average			Median			Average			Median
Price-earnings ratio (x)		P/E		145.86		x		18.09x			19.03x			20.08x			18.88x			20.02x			19.49x
Price-core earnings ratio (x)		P/Core		145.86		x		20.21x			20.67x			20.92x			20.46x			20.60x			20.15x
Price-book ratio (%)	=	P/B		66.71	%			120.30	%		123.16	%		135.75	%		125.46	%		133.03	%		124.89	%
Price-tangible book ratio (%)	=	P/TB		66.71	%			128.46	%		123.96	%		156.93	%		167.62	%		146.71	%		135.08	%
Price-assets ratio (%)	=	P/A		16.21	%			15.05	%		13.49	%		11.56	%		13.10	%		16.27	%		16.06	%

Valuation Parameters


Pre-Conversion Earnings (Y)	$	1,425,000		ESOP Stock Purchases (E)	8.00	%	(5)
Pre-Conversion Earnings (CY)	$	1,425,000		Cost of ESOP Borrowings (S)	0.00	%	(4)
Pre-Conversion Book Value (B)	$	92,992,000		ESOP Amortization (T)	15.00		years
Pre-Conv. Tang. Book Val. (TB)	$	92,989,000		RRP Amount (M)	4.00	%
Pre-Conversion Assets (A)	$	744,983,000		RRP Vesting (N)	5.00		years (5)
Reinvestment Rate (2)(R)		1.93	%	Foundation (F)	3.56	%
Est. Conversion Expenses (3)(X)		2.50	%	Tax Benefit (Z)	1,634,390
Tax Rate (TAX)		34.00	%	Percentage Sold (PCT)	100.00	%
Shares Tax	$	0		Option (O1)	10.00	%	(6)
				Estimated Option Value (O2)	27.40	%	(6)
				Option vesting (O3)	5.00		(6)
				Option pct taxable (O4)	25.00	%	(6)


Calculation of Pro Forma Value After Conversion

1. V=	P/E * (Y)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/E * PCT * ((1-X-E-M-F)R(1-TAX) - (1-TAX)E/T - (1-TAX)M/N) - (1-(TAXO4))(O1*O2)/O3)

2. V=	P/Core * (Y)	V=	#REF!
	1 - P/core * PCT * ((1-X-E-M-F)R(1-TAX) - (1-TAX)E/T - (1-TAX)M/N) - (1-(TAXO4))(O1*O2)/O3)

3. V=	P/B * (B+Z)	V=	#REF!
	1 - P/B * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)

4. V=	P/TB * (TB+Z)	V=	#REF!
	1 - P/TB * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)

5. V=	P/A * (A+Z)	V=	#REF!
	1 - P/A * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)


Conclusion	Shares Issued To the Public		Price Per Share		Gross Offering Proceeds		Shares Issued To Foundation		Total Shares Issued		Aggregate Market Value of Shares Issued
Supermaximum		17,853,750		10.00	$	178,537,500		609,279		18,463,029	$	184,630,290
Maximum		15,525,000		10.00		155,250,000		529,808		16,054,808		160,548,080
Midpoint		13,500,000		10.00		135,000,000		460,703		13,960,703		139,607,030
Minimum		11,475,000		10.00		114,750,000		391,598		11,866,598		118,665,980

(1)	Pricing ratios shown reflect the midpoint value.

(2)	Net return reflects a reinvestment rate of 1.93 percent and a tax rate of 34.0 percent.

(3)	Offering expenses shown at estimated midpoint value.

(4)	No cost is applicable since holding company will fund the ESOP loan.

(5)	ESOP and MRP amortize over 15 years and 5 years, respectively; amortization expenses tax effected at 34.0 percent.

(6)	10 percent option plan with an estimated Black-Scholes valuation of 27.40 percent of the exercise price, including a 5 year vesting with 25 percent of the options (granted to directors) tax effected at 34.0 percent.

EXHIBIT IV-8

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Effect of Conversion Proceeds – Fully Converted Basis

Exhibit IV-8

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Minimum


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization								$	118,665,980
	Less: Foundation Shares									3,915,980

2.	Offering Proceeds								$	114,750,000
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses									2,868,750

	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	111,881,250
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	111,881,250
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation									200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)									14,239,918

	Net Proceeds Reinvested								$	97,441,332
	Estimated net incremental rate of return									1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income								$	1,241,208
	Less: Shares Tax									0
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)									0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)									417,704
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)									595,015
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)									626,556

	Net Earnings Impact								($	398,068	)

				Before Conversion		Net Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)			$	1,425,000	($	398,068	)	$	1,026,932
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)			$	1,425,000	($	398,068	)	$	1,026,932

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,992,000	$	97,441,332	$	1,399,433		$	191,832,766
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,989,000	$	97,441,332	$	1,399,433		$	191,829,766

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,983,000	$	97,441,332	$	1,399,433		$	843,823,766

(1)	Includes ESOP and RRP stock purchases equal to 8.0 and 4.0 percent of total shares issued, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assumes 25 percent is taxable.

(5)	RRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-8

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Midpoint


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization								$	139,607,030
	Less: Foundation Shares									4,607,030

2.	Offering Proceeds								$	135,000,000
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses									3,375,000

	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	131,625,000
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	131,625,000
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation									200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)									16,752,844

	Net Proceeds Reinvested								$	114,672,156
	Estimated net incremental rate of return									1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income								$	1,460,694
	Less: Shares Tax									0
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)									0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)									491,417
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)									700,018
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)									737,125

	Net Earnings Impact								($	467,866	)

				Before Conversion		Net Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)			$	1,425,000	($	467,866	)	$	957,134
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)			$	1,425,000	($	467,866	)	$	957,134

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,992,000	$	114,672,156	$	1,634,390		$	209,298,547
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,989,000	$	114,672,156	$	1,634,390		$	209,295,547

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,983,000	$	114,672,156	$	1,634,390		$	861,289,547

(1)	Includes ESOP and RRP stock purchases equal to 8.0 and 4.0 percent of total shares issued, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assumes 25 percent is taxable.

(5)	RRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-8

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Maximum Value


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization								$	160,548,080
	Less: Foundation Shares									5,298,080

2.	Offering Proceeds								$	155,250,000
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses									3,881,250

	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	151,368,750
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	151,368,750
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation									200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)									19,265,770

	Net Proceeds Reinvested								$	131,902,980
	Estimated net incremental rate of return									1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income								$	1,680,180
	Less: Shares Tax									0
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)									0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)									565,129
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)									805,020
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)									847,694

	Net Earnings Impact								($	537,663	)

						Net
				Before Conversion		Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)			$	1,425,000	($	537,663	)	$	887,337
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)			$	1,425,000	($	537,663	)	$	887,337

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,992,000	$	131,902,980	$	1,869,347		$	226,764,328
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,989,000	$	131,902,980	$	1,869,347		$	226,761,328

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,983,000	$	131,902,980	$	1,869,347		$	878,755,328

(1)	Includes ESOP and RRP stock purchases equal to 8.0 and 4.0 percent of total shares issued, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assumes 25 percent is taxable.

(5)	RRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-8

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Super Maximum Value


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization								$	184,630,290
	Less: Foundation Shares									6,092,790

2.	Offering Proceeds								$	178,537,500
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses									4,463,438

	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	174,074,063
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds								$	174,074,063
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation									200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)									22,155,635

	Net Proceeds Reinvested								$	151,718,428
	Estimated net incremental rate of return									1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income								$	1,932,589
	Less: Shares Tax									0
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)									0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)									649,899
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)									925,773
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)									974,848

	Net Earnings Impact								($	617,930	)

						Net
				Before Conversion		Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)			$	1,425,000	($	617,930	)	$	807,070
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)			$	1,425,000	($	617,930	)	$	807,070

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,992,000	$	151,718,428	$	2,139,549		$	246,849,976
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,989,000	$	151,718,428	$	2,139,549		$	246,846,976

		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution			After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,983,000	$	151,718,428	$	2,139,549		$	898,840,976

(1)	Includes ESOP and RRP stock purchases equal to 8.0 and 4.0 percent of total shares issued, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assumes 25 percent is taxable.

(5)	RRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

EXHIBIT IV-9

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Analysis Sheet – Minority Stock Offering

EXHIBIT IV-9

PRO FORMA ANALYSIS SHEET - MINORITY STOCK OFFERING

Ponce Bank

February 24, 2017


						Peer Group						New York Companies						All Publicly-Traded
Price Multiple		Symbol	Subject (1)			Average			Median			Average			Median			Average			Median
Price-earnings ratio (x)		P/E		123.76	x		18.09	x		19.03	x		20.06	x		18.88	x		20.02	x		19.49	x
Price-core earnings ratio (x)		P/Core		123.76	x		20.21	x		20.67	x		20.92	x		20.46	x		20.60	x		20.15	x
Price-book ratio (%)	=	P/B		95.42	%		120.30	%		123.16	%		135.75	%		125.46	%		133.03	%		124.89	%
Price-tangible book ratio (%)	=	P/TB		95.42	%		128.46	%		123.96	%		156.93	%		167.62	%		146.71	%		135.08	%
Price-assets ratio (%)	=	P/A		17.49	%		15.05	%		13.49	%		11.56	%		13.10	%		16.27	%		16.06	%

Valuation Parameters


Pre-Conversion Earnings (Y)(2)	$	1,422,000		ESOP Stock Purchases (E)	8.12	%	(6)
Pre-Conversion Earnings (CY)(2)	$	1,422,000		Cost of ESOP Borrowings (S)	0.00	%	(5)
Pre-Conversion Book Value (B)(2)	$	92,792,000		ESOP Amortization (T)	15.00		years
Pre-Conv. Tang. Book Value (TB)(2)	$	92,789,000		MRP Amount (M)	4.06	%
Pre-Conversion Assets (A)(2)	$	744,783,000		MRP Vesting (N)	5.00		years (6)
Reinvestment Rate (3)(R)		1.93	%	Foundation (F)	7.33	%
Est. Conversion Expenses (4)(X)		4.01	%	Tax Benefit (Z)	1,634,390
Tax Rate (TAX)		34.00	%	Percentage Sold (PCT)	48.30	%
				Option (O1)	10.14	%	(7)
				Estimated Option Value (O2)	28.20	%	(7)
				Option vesting (O3)	5.00		(7)
				Option pct taxable (O4)	25.00	%	(7)

Calculation of Pro Forma Value After Conversion


1. V=	P/E * (Y)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/E * PCT * ((1-X-E-M-F)R(1-TAX) - (1-TAX)E/T - (1-TAX)M/N) - (1-(TAXO4))(O1*O2)/O3)
2. V=	P/Core * (Y)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/core * PCT * ((1-X-E-M-F)R(1-TAX) - (1-TAX)E/T - (1-TAX)M/N) - (1-(TAXO4))(O1*O2)/O3)
3. V=	P/B * (B+Z)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/B * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)
4. V=	P/TB * (TB+Z)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/TB * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)
5. V=	P/A * (A+Z)	V=	$139,607,030
	1 - P/A * PCT * (1-X-E-M-F)


Conclusion	Shares Owned by The MHC		Shares Issued To the Public		Price Per Share		Gross Offering Proceeds		Shares Issued to Foundation		Total Shares Issued Publicly		Aggregate Market Value of Shares Issued Publicly		Full Value Total Shares
Super Maximum		9,545,388		8,308,362		10.00	$	83,083,620		609,279		8,917,641	$	89,176,410		18,463,029
Maximum		8,300,337		7,224,663		10.00	$	72,246,630		529,808		7,754,471		77,544,710		16,054,808
Midpoint		7,217,684		6,282,316		10.00	$	62,823,160		460,703		6,743,019		67,430,190		13,960,703
Minimum		6,135,031		5,339,969		10.00	$	53,399,690		391,598		5,731,567		57,315,670		11,866,598

(1)	Pricing ratios shown reflect the midpoint value.

(2)	Adjusted for capitalizing MHC with $200,000.

(3)	Net return reflects a reinvestment rate of 1.93 percent, and a tax rate of 34.0 percent.

(4)	Offering expenses shown at estimated midpoint value.

(5)	No cost is applicable since holding company will fund the ESOP loan.

(6)	ESOP and MRP amortize over 15 years and 5 years, respectively; amortization expenses tax effected at 34.0 percent.

(7)	10 percent option plan with an estimated Black-Scholes valuation of 28.20 percent of the exercise price, including a 5 year vesting with 25 percent of the options (granted to directors) tax effected at 34.0 percent.

EXHIBIT IV-10

Ponce Bank

Pro Forma Effect of Conversion Proceeds – Minority Stock Offering

Exhibit IV-10

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Minimum


1. Pro Forma Market Capitalization	$	57,315,670
Less: Foundation Shares		3,915,980

2. Offering Proceeds	$	53,399,690
Less: Estimated Offering Expenses		2,434,660

Net Conversion Proceeds	$	50,965,030
3. Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
Net Conversion Proceeds	$	50,965,030
Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation		200,000
Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)		6,977,566

Net Proceeds Reinvested	$	43,787,464
Estimated net incremental rate of return		1.27	%

Reinvestment Income	$	557,765
Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)		0
Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)		204,675
Less: Amortization of Options (4)		300,070
Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)		307,013

Net Earnings Impact	($	253,993	)


	Before Conversion		Net Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4. Pro Forma Earnings
12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)	$	1,422,000	($	253,993	)	$	1,168,007
12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)	$	1,422,000	($	253,993	)	$	1,168,007


	Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
5. Pro Forma Net Worth
December 31, 2016	$	92,792,000	$	43,787,464	$	1,399,433	$	137,978,897
December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,789,000	$	43,787,464	$	1,399,433	$	137,975,897

	Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
6. Pro Forma Assets
December 31, 2016	$	744,783,000	$	43,787,464	$	1,399,433	$	789,969,897

(1)	Includes ESOP and MRP stock purchases equal to 8.12 percent and 4.06 percent of the public shares, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assuming 25 percent taxable.

(5)	MRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-10

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Midpoint


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization	$	67,430,190
	Less: Foundation Shares		4,607,030

2.	Offering Proceeds	$	62,823,160
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses		2,520,686

	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	60,302,474
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	60,302,474
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation		200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)		8,208,900

	Net Proceeds Reinvested	$	51,893,574
	Estimated net incremental rate of return		1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income	$	661,020
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)		0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)		240,794
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)		353,023
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)		361,192

	Net Earnings Impact	($	293,989	)


		Before Conversion		Net Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)	$	1,422,000	($	293,989	)	$	1,128,011
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)	$	1,422,000	($	293,989	)	$	1,128,011


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,792,000	$	51,893,574	$	1,634,390	$	146,319,964
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,789,000	$	51,893,574	$	1,634,390	$	146,316,964


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,783,000	$	51,893,574	$	1,634,390	$	798,310,964

(1)	Includes ESOP and MRP stock purchases equal to 8.12 percent and 4.06 percent of the public shares, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assuming 25 percent taxable.

(5)	MRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-10

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Maximum


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization	$	77,544,710
	Less: Foundation Shares		5,298,080

2.	Offering Proceeds	$	72,246,630
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses		2,606,711

	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	69,639,919
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	69,639,919
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation		200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)		9,440,234

	Net Proceeds Reinvested	$	59,999,685
	Estimated net incremental rate of return		1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income	$	764,276
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)		0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)		276,914
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)		405,977
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)		415,370

	Net Earnings Impact	($	333,985	)


		Before Conversion		Net Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)	$	1,422,000	($	333,985	)	$	1,088,015
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)	$	1,422,000	($	333,985	)	$	1,088,015


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,792,000	$	59,999,685	$	1,869,347	$	154,661,032
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,789,000	$	59,999,685	$	1,869,347	$	154,658,032


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,783,000	$	59,999,685	$	1,869,347	$806,652,032

(1)	Includes ESOP and MRP stock purchases equal to 8.12 percent and 4.06 percent of the public shares, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assuming 25 percent taxable.

(5)	MRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

Exhibit IV-10

PRO FORMA EFFECT OF CONVERSION PROCEEDS

Ponce Bank

At the Super Maximum Value


1.	Pro Forma Market Capitalization	$	89,176,410
	Less: Foundation Shares		6,092,790

2.	Offering Proceeds	$	83,083,620
	Less: Estimated Offering Expenses		2,705,641

	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	80,377,979
3.	Estimated Additional Income from Conversion Proceeds
	Net Conversion Proceeds	$	80,377,979
	Less: Cash Contribution to Foundation		200,000
	Less: Non-Cash Stock Purchases (1)		10,856,268

	Net Proceeds Reinvested	$	69,321,711
	Estimated net incremental rate of return		1.27	%

	Reinvestment Income	$	883,020
	Less: Estimated cost of ESOP borrowings (2)		0
	Less: Amortization of ESOP borrowings (3)		318,451
	Less: Amortization of Options (4)		466,873
	Less: Recognition Plan Vesting (5)		477,676

	Net Earnings Impact	($	379,980	)


				Net
		Before Conversion		Earnings Increase			After Conversion
4.	Pro Forma Earnings
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (reported)	$	1,422,000	($	379,980	)	$	1,042,020
	12 Months ended December 31, 2016 (core)	$	1,422,000	($	379,980	)	$	1,042,020


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
5.	Pro Forma Net Worth
	December 31, 2016	$	92,792,000	$	69,321,711	$	2,139,549	$	164,253,259
	December 31, 2016 (Tangible)	$	92,789,000	$	69,321,711	$	2,139,549	$	164,250,259


		Before Conversion		Net Cash Proceeds		Tax Benefit Of Contribution		After Conversion
6.	Pro Forma Assets
	December 31, 2016	$	744,783,000	$	69,321,711	$	2,139,549	$	816,244,259

(1)	Includes ESOP and MRP stock purchases equal to 8.12 percent and 4.06 percent of the public shares, respectively.

(2)	ESOP stock purchases are internally financed by a loan from the holding company.

(3)	ESOP borrowings are amortized over 15 years, amortization expense is tax-effected at a 34.0 percent rate.

(4)	Option valuation based on Black-Scholes model, 5 year vesting, and assuming 25 percent taxable.

(5)	MRP is amortized over 5 years, and amortization expense is tax effected at 34.0 percent.

EXHIBIT V-1

RP^® Financial, LC.

Firm Qualifications Statement

LOGO

FIRM QUALIFICATION STATEMENT

RP^® Financial (“RP^®) provides financial and management consulting, merger advisory and valuation services to the financial services industry nationwide. We offer a broad array of services, high quality and prompt service, hands-on involvement by principals and senior staff, careful structuring of strategic initiatives and sophisticated valuation and other analyses consistent with industry practices and regulatory requirements. Our staff maintains extensive background in financial and management consulting, valuation and investment banking. Our clients include commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions, mortgage companies, insurance companies and other financial services companies.

STRATEGIC PLANNING SERVICES

RP^®’s strategic planning services are designed to provide effective feasible plans with quantifiable results. We analyze strategic options to enhance shareholder value, achieve regulatory approval or realize other objectives. Such services involve conducting situation analyses; establishing mission/vision statements, developing strategic goals and objectives; and identifying strategies to enhance franchise and/or market value, capital management, earnings enhancement, operational matters and organizational issues. Strategic recommendations typically focus on: capital formation and management, asset/liability targets, profitability, return on equity and stock pricing. Our proprietary financial simulation models provide the basis for evaluating the impact of various strategies and assessing their feasibility and compatibility with regulations.

MERGER ADVISORY SERVICES

RP^®’s merger advisory services include targeting potential buyers and sellers, assessing acquisition merit, conducting due diligence, negotiating and structuring merger transactions, preparing merger business plans and financial simulations, rendering fairness opinions, preparing mark-to-market analyses, valuing intangible assets and supporting the implementation of post-acquisition strategies. Our merger advisory services involve transactions of financially healthy companies and failed bank deals. RP^® is also expert in de novo charters and shelf charters. Through financial simulations, comprehensive data bases, valuation proficiency and regulatory familiarity, RP^®’s merger advisory services center on enhancing shareholder returns.

VALUATION SERVICES

RP^®’s extensive valuation practice includes bank and thrift mergers, thrift mutual-to-stock conversions, goodwill impairment, insurance company demutualizations, ESOPs, subsidiary companies, merger accounting and other purposes. We are highly experienced in performing appraisals which conform to regulatory guidelines and appraisal standards. RP^® is the nation’s leading valuation firm for thrift mutual-to-stock conversions, with appraised values ranging up to $4 billion.

OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES

RP^® offers other consulting services including evaluating the impact of regulatory changes (TARP, etc.), branching and diversification strategies, feasibility studies and special research. We assist banks/thrifts in preparing CRA plans and evaluating wealth management activities on a de novo or merger basis. Our other consulting services are facilitated by proprietary valuation and financial simulation models.

KEY PERSONNEL (Years of Relevant Experience & Contact Information)


Ronald S. Riggins, Managing Director (37)	(703) 647-6543	rriggins@rpfinancial.com
William E. Pommerening, Managing Director (33)	(703) 647-6546	wpommerening@rpfinancial.com
Marcus Faust, Managing Director (29)	(703) 647-6553	mfaust@rpfinancial.com
Gregory E. Dunn, Director (34)	(703) 647-6548	gdunn@rpfinancial.com
James P. Hennessey, Director (30)	(703) 647-6544	jhennessey@rpfinancial.com
James J. Oren, Director (30)	(703) 647-6549	joren@rpfinancial.com
Carla Pollard, Senior Vice President (27)	(703) 647-6556	cpollard@rpfinancial.com

Washington Headquarters
Three Ballston Plaza		Telephone: (703) 528-1700
1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 600		Fax No.: (703) 528-1788
Arlington, VA 22201		Toll-Free No.: (866) 723-0594
www.rpfinancial.com		E-Mail: mail@rpfinancial.com


*RP^® Financial, LC.*		*Peer Group Analysis*
		*Page III.13*

Table 3.5

Interest Rate Risk Measures and Net Interest Income Volatility

Comparable Institution Analysis

As of September 30, 2016


			Balance Sheet Measures
			Tangible				Non-IEA	Quarterly Change in Net Interest Income
			Equity/	IEA/			Assets/
			Assets	IBL			Assets	9/30/2016	6/30/2016	3/31/2016		12/31/2015	9/30/2015	6/30/2015
			(%)	(%)			(%)	(change in net interest income is annualized in basis points)
Ponce Bank		NY
December 31, 2016			12.5%		109.8	%	4.8%	-8	-36		16	3	-5	-8
All Public Companies			12.0%		128.7	%	7.3%	0	2		-5	1	3	1
State of NY			8.9%		117.3	%	6.1%	-1	-1		-3	5	-1	2
Comparable Group
Average			12.6%		110.5	%	5.3%	1	2		-6	-1	2	3
Median			10.7%		107.8	%	5.7%	4	1		-1	-2	2	4
Comparable Group
BYBK	Bay Bancorp, Inc.	MD	10.2%		109.4	%	3.8%	-40	14		-31	-16	-13	18
CSBK	Clifton Bancorp Inc.	NJ	23.1%		123.7	%	6.0%	-2	-2		-1	-4	2	10
CWAY	Coastway Bancorp, Inc.	RI	11.0%		105.1	%	7.5%	1	-2		2	-4	3	9
ESBK	Elmira Savings Bank	NY	7.7%		103.9	%	7.5%	8	-5		-1	25	-3	-4
MLVF	Malvern Bancorp, Inc.	PA	11.5%		108.8	%	4.6%	10	3		-7	2	2	1
PBHC	Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.	NY	7.6%		103.9	%	5.5%	14	1		-8	-13	6	4
PBBI	PB Bancorp, Inc.	CT	15.5%		114.0	%	6.0%	6	6		-1	0	8	4
PBIP	Prudential Bancorp, Inc.	PA	20.4%		122.9	%	3.4%	2	1		4	-4	15	-14
WEBK	Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.	MA	8.3%		106.7	%	2.7%	4	-2		-16	6	-7	6
WNEB	Western New England Bancorp, Inc.	MA	10.5%		106.8	%	5.9%	5	1		0	3	7	0

NA=Change is greater than 100 basis points during the quarter.

Source: