XML 31 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable.  Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity's pricing based upon their own market assumptions.  The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level I - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level II - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level III - Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.
The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, the Company's financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
Level I
 
$
218,940

 
$
5,949

Investment securities pledged as collateral
Level I
 
1,409,361

 
1,720,357

Prepaid forward contracts
Level II
 
110,630

 
52,545

Interest rate swap contracts
Level II
 
369

 

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Prepaid forward contracts
Level II
 
9,623

 
162,049

Interest rate swap contracts
Level II
 
123,470

 
77,902

Contingent consideration related to 2017 acquisitions
Level III
 
2,233

 
32,233


The Company's cash equivalents, investment securities and investment securities pledged as collateral are classified within Level I of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
The Company's derivative contracts and liabilities under derivative contracts on the Company's balance sheets are valued using market-based inputs to valuation models.  These valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, and measures of volatility.  When appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit risk considerations.  Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence.  Since model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment, the Company has concluded that these instruments should be classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the contingent consideration as of June 30, 2018 related to the acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2017 amounted to approximately $2,233. The estimated amount recorded as of June 30, 2018 is approximately 51% of the contractual amount. The fair value of the consideration was estimated based on a probability assessment of attaining the targets as of June 30, 2018.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate:
Credit Facility Debt, Collateralized Indebtedness, Senior Notes and Debentures, Senior Secured Notes, Senior Guaranteed Notes, and Notes Payable
The fair values of each of the Company's debt instruments are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for instruments of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of notes payable is based primarily on the present value of the remaining payments discounted at the borrowing cost.
The carrying values, estimated fair values, and classification under the fair value hierarchy of the Company's financial instruments, excluding those that are carried at fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
 
Carrying
Amount (a)
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount (a)
 
Estimated
Fair Value
CSC Holdings debt instruments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Credit facility debt
Level II
 
$
4,435,479

 
$
4,470,000

 
$
3,393,306

 
$
3,435,000

Collateralized indebtedness
Level II
 
1,392,648

 
1,338,105

 
1,349,474

 
1,305,932

Senior guaranteed notes
Level II
 
3,283,795

 
3,195,375

 
2,291,185

 
2,420,000

Senior notes and debentures
Level II
 
6,107,472

 
6,727,849

 
6,409,889

 
7,221,846

Notes payable
Level II
 
36,161

 
35,962

 
56,956

 
55,289

Cablevision senior notes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and debentures
Level II
 
1,072,340

 
1,165,034

 
1,818,115

 
1,931,239

Cequel debt instruments:
 
 


 


 


 


Cequel credit facility debt
Level II
 
1,244,153

 
1,252,350

 
1,250,217

 
1,258,675

Senior secured notes
Level II
 
2,572,438

 
2,535,500

 
2,570,506

 
2,658,930

Senior notes
Level II
 
2,804,435

 
2,942,800

 
2,770,737

 
2,983,615

Notes payable
Level II
 
36,356

 
36,356

 
8,946

 
8,946

 
 
 
$
22,985,277

 
$
23,699,331

 
$
21,919,331

 
$
23,279,472

 
(a)
Amounts are net of unamortized deferred financing costs, premiums and discounts.
The fair value estimates related to the Company's debt instruments presented above are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.