Document

☒

No fee required.

☐

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(4)

Date Filed:


Date/Time	Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT)

Virtual Meeting Access	To attend the meeting, vote, examine the stockholders list, and ask questions, go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STZ2020. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. Because the Annual Meeting is virtual and being conducted over the Internet, stockholders will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

Items of Business	1.Elect as directors the twelve (12) nominees named in the Proxy Statement;

		2. Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2021;

		3. Approve, by an advisory vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement; and

		4. Transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement.

Record Date	Holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of the record date of May 22, 2020 are entitled to notice of and to vote on the matters listed in the Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important to us, and we encourage you to vote your shares as soon as possible even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. You can vote in the following ways:

Visit the website listed on your Notice or proxy card(s) to

VOTE VIA THE INTERNET

If you received paper copies of your proxy materials in the mail, sign, date, and return your proxy card(s) in the enclosed envelope to

VOTE BY MAIL

Call the telephone number specified on your proxy card(s) or on the website listed on your Notice to

VOTE BY PHONE

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on July 21, 2020: This Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2020 Annual Report are available on our website at www.cbrands.com/annual-meeting


			Page
ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION			1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			2
The Board of Directors and Committees of the Board			2
Director Compensation			9
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors			12
Director Nominees			12
Beneficial Ownership			19
Beneficial Ownership of More Than 5% of the Company’s Voting Common Stock			19
Beneficial Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers			24
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions			26
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			27
AUDIT MATTERS			28
Proposal 2 – Ratification of the Selection of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			28
Fees Paid to KPMG LLP			28
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures			29
Audit Committee Report			30
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			31
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			31
Compensation Committee Report			49
Compensation Tables and Related Information			50
Summary Compensation Table			50
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2020			53
Outstanding Equity Awards at February 29, 2020			55
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020			58
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation			58
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control			60
CEO Pay Ratio			64
Proposal 3 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation			64
OTHER MATTERS			66
Proxy Solicitation Costs			66
Stockholder Proposals for the 2021 Annual Meeting			66
Householding of Proxy Materials			67
Available Information; Website Materials			67
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS			68
Appendix 1: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Items			72

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the holders of the common stock of Constellation Brands, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). The proxies are for use at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Meeting”). This year we will again hold a virtual annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders may participate online by logging onto www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STZ2020. There will not be a physical meeting location. See the Questions & Answers section near the end of this Proxy Statement for additional information.

We are delivering proxy materials to many stockholders via the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) Notice and Access rules. Using this method of distribution, on or about June 5, 2020, we will mail an Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) that contains information about our 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting of Stockholders and instructions on how to view all proxy materials, and vote electronically, on the Internet. If you receive the Notice and prefer to receive a paper or e-mail copy of the proxy materials, follow the instructions in the Notice for making this request, and the materials will be sent promptly to you via your preferred method. If you prefer to vote by phone, the website listed on the Notice, www.proxyvote.com, has instructions for voting by phone. If you received paper copies of our proxy materials in the mail, you may submit your proxy by properly executing and returning the proxy card(s) in the enclosed envelope(s). If you received paper copies of this year’s proxy materials by mail, you can elect to receive in the future an e-mail message that will provide a link to those documents on the Internet.

The Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that there is no predetermined policy as to whether the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separate and, if the roles are to be separate, whether the Chairman of the Board should be a non-management director. If the Chief Executive Officer serves as Chairman of the Board or if there is a separate Chairman of the Board who is also a member of management, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the designation of one of the independent directors as lead director. The lead director schedules and presides at executive sessions of non-management directors (and, if any non-management director is not independent, executive sessions of independent directors). As required, the lead director also facilitates communication between other members of the Board, the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer. Since the Chairman of the Board is currently an executive officer and serves as a member of management, a lead director has been designated. Currently, Mr. Locke serves in this capacity. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that there is no fixed schedule for the rotation of the lead director, although rotation may be desirable from time to time.

We have created a management committee named the Enterprise Risk Management Committee. This committee is comprised of members of management whose job functions relate to a wide variety of risk-sensitive areas, including operations, internal audit, finance, accounting, legal, and information technology. The committee meets periodically for the purposes of identifying and assessing risks that we face and developing and implementing processes and procedures to manage, mitigate, or otherwise address identified risks. To facilitate the Board’s and the Board committees’ oversight functions as they relate to risk issues, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee periodically reports to, and receives comments from, the Board and the Audit Committee.

In April 2020, the Human Resources Committee received a report from its independent compensation consultant analyzing our executive compensation programs for potential risks created by such programs, as well as the design elements in our programs that mitigate any such risks. The Human Resources Committee also received a comparable report with respect to our non-executive compensation programs prepared by the Human Resources Department. The Human Resources Committee’s review process did not identify any compensation-related risks that it considered reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The Human Resources Committee reached this conclusion after considering a number of features of our compensation programs that are designed to mitigate risk, including but not limited to: (i) a mix of cash and equity compensation and a mix of short-term and long-term compensation; (ii) effective controls and plan governance, including centralized management by Human Resources and oversight by Finance; (iii) capped maximum opportunities under the annual short-term incentive compensation program and the Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) programs that discourage excessive risk-taking and protect against the possibility that actions are taken to maximize short-term results at the expense of long-term objectives; (iv) annual short-term incentive compensation that is dependent upon our performance against multiple performance metrics; (v) a mix of equity awards, including non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and PSUs (for all named executive officers other than the Executive Chairman of the Board and the Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, who receive stock options only); and (vi) our robust stock ownership guidelines.

The Board adopted and reviews on an annual basis the Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines, which were most recently reviewed in October 2019, include categorical standards of independence which are designed to assist the Board in determining whether certain relationships between our directors and the Company or its subsidiaries are “material relationships” for purposes of the NYSE independence standards. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, including its categorical standards of independence, are available on our website at www.cbrands.com/investors under the section entitled Board of Directors’ Committee Charters. The Board has adopted the following categorical standards under the Corporate Governance Guidelines in order to guide its determination of whether a Director is independent:

In April 2020, The Board reviewed the independence of each incumbent director and director nominee. Based on the Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, including its categorical standards of independence, the Board has affirmatively determined that none of the following directors and director nominees had any material relationship with the Company and are therefore independent: Christy Clark, Jennifer M. Daniels, Jerry Fowden, Ernesto M. Hernández, Susan Somersille Johnson, James A. Locke III, Jose Manuel Madero Garza, Daniel J. McCarthy, and Judy A. Schmeling. The Board had also previously determined that Barry A. Fromberg, Robert L. Hanson, and Keith E. Wandell, who were directors for a portion of fiscal 2020 but either resigned or did not stand for re-election at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on July 16, 2019, were independent. Therefore, each director and director nominee, other than Robert Sands, Richard Sands, and William A. Newlands, is independent. Following the Meeting, assuming all of the nominated directors are elected, the Board is expected to consist of twelve directors, nine of whom, representing 75% of the Board, will be independent.

In determining the independence of each director, the Board considered and deemed immaterial to the directors' independence transactions involving financing arrangements, charitable contributions, or the sale of products and services in the ordinary course of business between the Company and companies or organizations at which some of our directors or their immediate family members were directors, officers, or employees. In each case, the amount paid to or received from these companies or organizations in each of the last three years was below thresholds in the guidelines. The Board determined that none of the relationships it considered impaired the independence of the directors.

This committee performs the Board’s oversight responsibilities as they relate to our accounting policies, internal controls, and financial reporting practices, including, among other things, the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and the independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, this committee maintains a line of communication between the Board and our financial management, internal auditors, and independent registered public accounting firm. The Board has determined that Ms. Daniels, Mr. Madero, Mr. McCarthy, and Ms. Schmeling are independent (as independence is determined for audit committee members under NYSE listing standards) and that all are financially literate. The Board has also determined that Ms. Schmeling, the Chairperson of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. Additional information regarding the experience of each committee member is set forth under the heading “Director Nominees.” No committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than two other public companies.

This committee functions as the nominating committee of the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with criteria and qualifications for membership approved by the Board and selects, or recommends that the Board select, director nominees for each annual meeting of stockholders. The Corporate Governance Committee advises the Board concerning the appropriate composition of the Board and its committees, develops and recommends corporate governance guidelines to the Board, and advises the Board regarding appropriate corporate governance practices and assists the Board in achieving them. Among other matters, this committee also makes recommendations to the Board with respect to an officer to be designated as Chief Executive Officer, directors to serve as Chairman of the Board and Vice Chairman of the Board, and, if applicable, an independent director to serve as lead director. In addition, this committee advises the Board regarding compensation for the non-management directors and reviews related person transactions involving the Company and its directors, director nominees, executive officers, or significant stockholders.

The Corporate Governance Committee will also consider director nominations identified by our stockholders. Nominations by stockholders must be provided in a timely manner and must include sufficient biographical information so that the Corporate Governance Committee can appropriately assess the proposed nominee’s background and qualifications. In its assessment of potential candidates, the Corporate Governance Committee will review the candidate’s character, wisdom, judgment, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, business experiences, understanding of our business environment, acumen, and ability to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities, all in the context of the perceived needs of the Board at that time. For a stockholder to

Pursuant to our Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, individual diversity as well as diversity in experience and areas of expertise are factors that are considered by the Corporate Governance Committee in its assessment of candidates. The Board, however, has not adopted any objective diversity-driven criteria or composition requirements. The Board seeks individuals having knowledge and experience in such disciplines as finance and accounting, international business, marketing, law, human resources, and consumer products. The Board also seeks individuals who bring unique and varied perspectives and life experiences to the Board. As such, the Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by selecting or recommending director candidates who it believes will enhance the overall diversity of the Board.

This committee fulfills the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, and engages an independent consultant to assist with its review and analysis of executive compensation. Additionally, the Human Resources Committee monitors: our human resources policies and procedures as they relate to our goals and objectives and good management practices; our material policies and procedures which relate to compliance with pertinent human resources laws and regulations, the ethical conduct of the business as it relates to human resources matters, and the management of human resources capital; and our procedures and internal controls that relate to personnel administration, pay practices, and benefits administration. The Human Resources Committee is responsible for evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and approves each element of his compensation, as well as the compensation of our other executive officers. This committee also annually reviews with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and, as appropriate, recommends to the Board that it be included in our applicable filings with the SEC.

This committee presently oversees our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, Annual Management Incentive Program, and 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and reviews our senior management development and succession plans as well as other important human resources issues. The Human Resources Committee has not delegated any authority with respect to the compensation of our executive officers. The Human Resources Committee has delegated to our Chief Human Resources Officer limited authority to grant equity awards to non-executive officer employees, subject to certain limitations on the aggregate annual value of such awards and the annual value of awards granted to an individual recipient.

The Corporate Governance Committee advises the Board with regard to compensation of non-management directors. The Corporate Governance Committee directly engaged FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant to assist with such matters during fiscal 2020. Management personnel within the Human Resources Department support the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board in their work concerning non-management director compensation. Executive officers may make recommendations or provide information to, or answer questions from, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board regarding non-management director compensation. Messrs. Newlands, Robert Sands, and Richard Sands, who are also executive officers of the Company, receive no additional compensation for serving as directors.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash⁽¹⁾		Stock Awards⁽²⁾		Option Awards⁽³⁾		All Other Compensation⁽⁴⁾		Total
Christy Clark⁽⁵⁾	$	46,154	$	85,297	$	45,817	$	—	$	177,268
Jennifer M. Daniels	$	97,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	—	$	254,553
Jerry Fowden	$	115,433	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	5,000	$	277,726
Barry A. Fromberg⁽⁶⁾	$	46,250	$	—	$	—	$	9,999	$	56,249
Ernesto M. Hernández	$	97,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	5,000	$	259,553
Susan Somersille Johnson	$	97,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	9,788	$	264,341
James A. Locke III	$	137,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	231	$	294,784
Jose Manuel Madero Garza⁽⁵⁾	$	25,000	$	85,297	$	45,817	$	—	$	156,114
Daniel J. McCarthy	$	97,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	5,000	$	259,553
Judy A. Schmeling	$	117,260	$	102,304	$	54,989	$	5,000	$	279,553
Keith E. Wandell⁽⁶⁾	$	46,250	$	—	$	—	$	3,818	$	50,068

⁽¹⁾

This column reflects the following amounts earned or paid during fiscal 2020: (i) a cash retainer for Board service and (ii) fees for serving as lead director or as a committee Chair.

⁽²⁾

These amounts represent the full grant date fair value of awards of RSUs granted in fiscal 2020. This represents the aggregate amount that we expected to expense for such grants in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 over the grants’ respective vesting schedules. We do not include any impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting terms in these calculations. The aggregate number of shares of unvested RSUs held at the end of fiscal 2020 was 517 RSUs by each non-management director other than Ms. Clark and Mr. Madero who each held 416 unvested RSUs at the end of fiscal 2020.

⁽³⁾

These amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2020 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. We do not include any impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting terms in these calculations. Assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 19 of our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020 (“2020 Form 10-K”). All fiscal 2020 stock option awards to directors fully vested during the fiscal year, and we completely expensed these awards during fiscal 2020. The aggregate number of shares subject to stock option awards outstanding at the end of fiscal 2020 for each non-management director was: Ms. Clark - 1,094; Ms. Daniels - 2,094; Mr. Fowden – 21,481; Mr. Fromberg – 6,101; Mr. Hernández – 7,390; Ms. Johnson – 3,345; Mr. Locke – 21,481; Mr. Madero - 1,094; Mr. McCarthy – 5,784; Ms. Schmeling – 11,446; and Mr. Wandell – 2,056.

⁽⁴⁾

The amounts in this column include each directors product allowance and the amount of any matching donations provided by the Company pursuant to a charitable matching program available to all U.S. employees and directors.

The Board has nominated twelve (12) directors to be elected by the stockholders at the Meeting to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. The nominees for election to the Board are Christy Clark, Jennifer M. Daniels, Jerry Fowden, Ernesto M. Hernández, Susan Somersille Johnson, James A. Locke III, Jose Manuel Madero Garza, Daniel J. McCarthy, William A. Newlands, Richard Sands, Robert Sands, and Judy A. Schmeling, all of whom are currently serving as directors of the Company until the Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. Of the twelve (12) nominees, Mr. Fowden, Mr. Hernández, and Ms. Johnson have been designated as the three (3) nominees to be elected by holders of Class A Stock, voting as a separate class. The remaining nine (9) nominees are to be elected by holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock, voting together as a single class.

Each of these nominees was recommended to the Board by the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. In making its recommendation, the Corporate Governance Committee considered (i) the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of each nominee, (ii) each director’s past performance on and contributions to the Board, and (iii) which director nominees should be presented for election by holders of Class A Stock and which director nominees should be presented for election by holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock, voting as a single class. Management does not anticipate that any of the nominees will become unavailable to serve for any reason, but if that should occur before the Meeting, proxies will be voted FOR another nominee or nominees to be selected by the Board. The reported age of each nominee as presented in the following biographies is as of May 29, 2020.

Ms. Clark has served as a Senior Advisor at Bennett Jones LLP, an internationally recognized Canadian law firm, since July 2018. Prior to that, she served as the Premier of the Province of British Columbia, Canada from March 2011 through July 2017. She has served as a director of Shaw Communications Inc. (NYSE: SJR), a Canadian telecommunications company, since June 2018, and of Recipe Unlimited Corporation (TSX: RECP), a Canadian full-service restaurant company, since May 2018. She is also an Advisor for ThoughtWire Corp., an organization focused on advancing the Canadian technology sector. Ms. Clark brings to the Board extensive leadership experience, as well as valuable insights into Canadian and international markets, fiscal management, and government relations.

Ms. Daniels has served as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE: CL), a leading global consumer products company, since November 2014. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of NCR Corporation from 2010 to 2014. She also served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Barnes & Noble, Inc. from 2007 through 2010. Ms. Daniels has not served as a director of any other public company during the past five years. Ms. Daniels brings to the Board significant legal expertise with a global lens on consumer business, a strong transactional track record, and in-depth knowledge of the corporate governance requirements for publicly-traded companies.

Mr. Fowden has served as the Chairman of the Board of Primo Water Corporation (NYSE: PRMW), formerly known as Cott Corporation, since April 1, 2020. Primo Water Corporation is a pure-play water solutions provider (including bottled water, filtration, water dispensers, purified bottled water, and self-service refill drinking water) in North American and Europe. Prior to that, he served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Primo Water Corporation from December 29, 2018 to April 1, 2020. From 2009 until December 29, 2018, Mr. Fowden served as Chief Executive Officer of Primo Water Corporation. Prior to his service as Primo Water’s Chief Executive Officer, he served as President of its International Operating Segment, Interim President North America, and Interim President of its UK and European business from 2007 to 2009. Prior to joining Primo Water Corporation, Mr. Fowden served as Chief Executive Officer of Trader Media Group and was a member of the Guardian Media Group plc’s board of directors from 2005 to 2007. Prior to this time, he served in a variety of roles at multiple companies,

including Global Chief Operating Officer of AB InBev S.A. Belgium, an alcoholic beverage company, Chief Executive Officer of Bass Brewers Ltd., a subsidiary of AB InBev S.A. Belgium, Managing Director of the Rank Group plc’s Hospitality and Holiday Division and member of the Rank Group plc’s board of directors, Chief Executive Officer of Hero AG’s European beverage operations and various roles within PepsiCo Inc.’s beverage operations and Mars, Incorporated’s pet food operations. Mr. Fowden has served as a director of Primo Water Corporation since 2009. Since September 2019, Mr. Fowden also has served as a member of the Board of Directors of British American Tobacco (NYSE: BTI). As a current board chairman and former chief executive officer of a public company, Mr. Fowden brings his extensive experience in executive leadership, the beverage industry, and international operations to the Board.

Mr. Hernández retired from General Motors de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“GM de Mexico”), a subsidiary of General Motors Company, a global automobile manufacturing company which through a subsidiary also provides automotive financing services, effective September 1, 2019. From June 2011 until his retirement, he served as President and Managing Director of GM de Mexico. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President and Executive Director of Sales, Service and Marketing of GM de Mexico, having served in that role from April 2003 through May 2011. Mr. Hernández began his career with GM de Mexico in 1980 and has held numerous positions of growing responsibility within that company. He has not served as a director of any other public company during the past five years. Mr. Hernández brings to the Board his extensive leadership skills, insight, and perspective from his many years of service with a major manufacturing company as well as valuable insights regarding Mexican business operations.

Ms. Johnson has served as an Executive Vice President and as Chief Marketing Officer of Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE: TFC), formerly SunTrust Banks, Inc., a financial services provider, since August 2014. Prior to that, she served as the Vice President of Global Marketing at NCR Corp. from April 2012 to August 2014. She also served as Global Head of Operator Marketing at Nokia and held leadership roles in a number of technology organizations, including Nuance Communications, Fujitsu, and Apple. Ms. Johnson has not served as a director of any other public company during the past five years. Ms. Johnson brings to the Board a proven track record of building and revitalizing brands by enhancing the client experience and a combination of skills across creative and analytical marketing specializing in big data to draw on consumer insights.

Mr. Locke has been engaged in the practice of business and corporate law, including primarily mergers and acquisitions, since 1971. Currently, Mr. Locke is Senior Counsel to the law firm of Nixon Peabody LLP. From 1996 through January 2008, he was a partner with Nixon Peabody LLP. He is located in the Rochester, New York office of the firm. Nixon Peabody LLP is the Company’s principal outside counsel. Prior to joining Nixon Peabody LLP, Mr. Locke practiced law in Rochester as a partner with another law firm. Mr. Locke has not served as a director of any other public company during the past five years. Mr. Locke brings to the Board his extensive knowledge in the areas of business and corporate law, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions. He also has had direct experience with the Company and its management since the Company first became a public company, including through his more than 30 years of service on the Board. As a result, he is able to have a broad understanding of and provide insight and guidance with respect to the Company’s development and strategies. He currently serves as the lead director.

Mr. Madero is currently an independent business consultant based out of Mexico City. He served as honorary advisor of the COFINECE (national council for the promotion of investment, employment and economic growth) at the Office of the Chief of Staff of the President of Mexico from March 2019 until his term ended in December 2019. Prior to that, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Bepensa from February 2015 through February 2019. From 2005 to 2015, Mr. Madero held various roles of growing responsibility with Monsanto Company, a global agriculture company, including Vice President of International Business Development from September 2014 to January 2015, President and Regional Lead EMEA from February 2013 to August 2014, President and Regional Lead Latin America North from August 2009 to January 2013, Vice President of Commercial Operations for Latin America South from December 2007 to August 2009, and President and Regional Lead of Australia and New Zealand, from August 2006 to December 2007. Mr. Madero has not served as a director of any other public company during the past five years. As a former chief executive officer, Mr. Madero brings to the Board his expertise in executive leadership, international business matters, operations, finance, and strategic planning.

President and Chief Executive Officer, having been elected to the Frontier Board of Directors in May 2014. Prior to that he was President and Chief Operating Officer from April 2012 to April 2015, and, previously, was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2006 to April 2012, Senior Vice President, Field Operations from December 2004 to December 2005, and Senior Vice President, Broadband Operations from January 2004 to December 2004. Mr. McCarthy began his career with Frontier Communications Corporation in 1990 and has held numerous positions of increasing responsibility within that company. Mr. McCarthy has not served as a director of any other public company (other than Frontier Communications Corporation) during the past five years. Mr. McCarthy brings to the Board his leadership skills as well as his experience in strategic planning, financial reporting, the competitive environment, mergers and acquisitions, and regulatory affairs.

William A. Newlands is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He has served as Chief Executive Officer since March 2019 and as President since February 2018. He served as Chief Operating Officer from January 2017 through February 2019 and as Executive Vice President of the Company from January 2015 until February 2018. From January 2016 to January 2017 he performed the role of President, Wine & Spirits Division and from January 2015 through January 2016 he performed the role of Chief Growth Officer. Mr. Newlands joined the Company in January 2015. Prior to that he served from October 2011 until August 2014 as Senior Vice President and President, North America of Beam Inc., as Senior Vice President and President, North America of Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc. from December 2010 to October 2011, and as Senior Vice President and President, USA of Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc. from February 2008 to December 2010. Beam Inc., a producer and seller of branded distilled spirits products, merged with a subsidiary of Suntory Holding Limited, a Japanese company, in 2014. Prior to October 2011, Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc. was the spirits operating segment of Fortune Brands, Inc., which was a leading consumer products company that made and sold branded consumer products worldwide in the distilled spirits, home and security, and golf markets. Mr. Newlands has served as a director of Hormel Foods Corporation (NYSE:HRL), a global branded food company, since November 2018 and has also served as a director of Canopy Growth Corporation (NYSE:CGC), a world-leading diversified cannabis and hemp company, since November 2018. Mr. Newlands brings to our Board operational leadership experience gained through holding a variety of senior management roles within the beverage alcohol industry. He also contributes a broad understanding of industry trends and innovation, as well as insights about consumer product marketing and international business.

Robert Sands is the Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company, having served in that role since March 2019 and as a director since January 1990. Previously, he served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 2007 through February 2019. Mr. Sands also served as President of the Company from December 2002 to February 2018, as Chief Operating Officer from December 2002 to July 2007, as Group President from April 2000 through December 2002, as Chief Executive Officer, International from December 1998 through April 2000, as Executive Vice President from October 1993 through April 2000, as General Counsel from June 1986 through May 2000 and as Vice President from June 1990 through October 1993. He is the brother of Richard Sands. Mr. Sands brings to the Board over 30 years of experience in a variety of legal, operational, and management roles at the Company, including over eleven years of service as Chief Executive Officer. He also possesses substantial knowledge of, and has extensive relationships within, the beverage alcohol industry.

Ms. Schmeling served as Chief Operating Officer of HSN, Inc., an interactive multichannel retailer, from May 2013 to December 2017 and as President of Cornerstone Brands, a retailing segment of HSN, Inc. from August 2016 to December 2017. She also served as Chief Financial Officer of HSN, Inc. from May 2013 to November 2016. From August 2008 to May 2013, Ms. Schmeling served as HSN, Inc.’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that, Ms. Schmeling held positions of increasing responsibility within the HSN operating segment. She served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSN (when it was IAC Retailing) from February 2002 to August 2008; as Senior Vice President, Finance from November 1999 to February 2002; as Chief Operating Officer of international operations from January 2001 to February 2002; as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Analysis from January 1998 to November 1999; and as Director of Investor Relations and Operating Vice President, Finance from September 1994 to January 1998 (during the time when HSN was a separately traded public company). Ms. Schmeling has served as a director of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (Nasdaq: CASY) since March 2018 and of Canopy Growth Corporation (NYSE: CGC), a world-leading diversified cannabis and hemp company, since November 2018. Ms. Schmeling has been a chief operating officer of a public company and brings to the Board extensive accounting and financial expertise and valuable experience associated with operations as well as with the oversight of treasury, financial planning and analysis, tax, and investor relations functions.

This section presents information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by certain individuals, entities and groups. Determinations as to whether a particular individual, entity or group is the beneficial owner of our common stock have been made in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. Under Rule 13d-3, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares as to which such person: (i) directly or indirectly has or shares voting power or investment power, or (ii) has the right to acquire such voting or investment power within sixty (60) days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The fact that a person is the beneficial owner of shares for purposes of Rule 13d-3 does not necessarily mean that such person would be the beneficial owner of securities for other purposes. The percentages of beneficial ownership reported in this section were calculated on the basis of 167,952,564 shares of Class A Stock, 23,291,874 shares of Class B Stock, and 1,694,803 shares of Class 1 Stock outstanding as of the close of business on May 15, 2020, subject to adjustment as appropriate in each particular case in accordance with Rule 13d-3.

The following tables present information, as of May 15, 2020 (except the information relating to those certain entities described in footnotes 11, 12, and 13 to the tables is as of the dates disclosed in such footnotes and percentages are calculated assuming continued beneficial ownership at May 15, 2020), regarding the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock or Class B Stock by each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of such classes of stock. Many shares reported in the following tables for Robert Sands, our Executive Chairman of the Board, Richard Sands, our Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, and other Sands related beneficial owners are reflected more than once as many of those shares are held by various Sands family related investment vehicles and foundations in which more than one of the beneficial owners listed in the tables below serves as a partner, manager, trustee, director, or officer. The information reported for the “stockholders group” in the tables and footnotes

below effectively represents the aggregate shares beneficially owned by Messrs. Robert and Richard Sands and other Sands related beneficial owners without counting any shares more than once. This stockholders group beneficially owns an aggregate of 29,946,372 shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock. The outstanding shares included in this number represent approximately 16% of the combined outstanding Class A Stock and Class B Stock and approximately 59% of the combined voting power of the outstanding Class A Stock and Class B Stock when voting together as a single class. Except as otherwise noted below, the address of each person or entity listed in the tables is c/o Constellation Brands, Inc., 207 High Point Drive, Building 100, Victor, New York 14564.


	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Sole Power to Vote	Shared Power to Vote	Sole Power to Dispose	Shared Power to Dispose	Total Shares⁽¹⁾				Percent of Class⁽¹⁾
											Class A Only	If Class B Converted	Class A Only	If Class B Converted

Robert Sands	554,535⁽²⁾	973,983	554,535⁽²⁾	6,457,825⁽³⁾	7,012,360	29,759,146	4.2	%	15.6	%
Richard Sands	149,876⁽⁴⁾	973,983	149,876⁽⁴⁾	6,457,825⁽⁵⁾	6,607,701	29,391,837	3.9	%	15.4	%
Abigail Bennett	58,030⁽⁶⁾	–	58,030⁽⁶⁾	1,190,908⁽⁷⁾	1,248,938	9,343,489	0.7	%	5.3	%
Zachary Stern	33,415	–	33,415	1,190,908⁽⁷⁾	1,224,323	9,298,179	0.7	%	5.3	%
A&Z 2015 Business Holdings LP⁽⁸⁾	–	1,190,908⁽⁸⁾	–	1,190,908⁽⁸⁾	1,190,908	9,264,764	0.7	%	5.3	%
Astra Legacy LLC⁽⁹⁾	–	5,483,842⁽⁹⁾	–	–	5,483,842	28,230,628	3.3	%	14.8	%
Stockholders Group Pursuant to Section13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934⁽¹⁰⁾	–	7,162,236⁽¹⁰⁾	–	7,162,236⁽¹⁰⁾	7,162,236	29,946,372	4.3	%	15.7	%
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055⁽¹¹⁾	10,965,272	–	12,597,797	–	12,597,797	NA	7.5	%	NA
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355⁽¹²⁾	244,232	48,648	12,032,420	280,877	12,313,297	NA	7.3	%	NA
Capital Research Global Investors 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071⁽¹³⁾	9,096,283	–	9,096,529	–	9,096,529	NA	5.4	%	NA

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Percent of Class

Sole Power to Vote

Shared Power to Vote

Sole Power to Dispose

Shared Power to Dispose

Total

Robert Sands

–⁽²⁾

–

22,746,786⁽³⁾

22,746,786

97.7

Richard Sands

37,350⁽⁴⁾

–

37,350⁽⁴⁾

22,746,786⁽⁵⁾

22,784,136

97.8

Abigail Bennett

20,695⁽⁶⁾

–

20,695⁽⁶⁾

8,073,856⁽⁷⁾

8,094,551

34.8

Zachary Stern

–

8,073,856⁽⁷⁾

8,073,856

34.7

A&Z 2015 Business Holdings LP⁽⁸⁾

–

8,073,856⁽⁸⁾

–

8,073,856⁽⁸⁾

8,073,856

34.7

Astra Legacy LLC⁽⁹⁾

–

22,746,786⁽⁹⁾

–

22,746,786

97.7

RES Business Holdings LP⁽¹⁴⁾

–

5,300,000⁽¹⁴⁾

–

5,300,000⁽¹⁴⁾

5,300,000

22.8

RSS Business Holdings LP⁽¹⁵⁾

–

4,518,258⁽¹⁵⁾

–

4,518,258⁽¹⁵⁾

4,518,258

19.4

RCT 2015 Business Holdings LP⁽¹⁶⁾

–

1,350,000⁽¹⁶⁾

–

1,350,000⁽¹⁶⁾

1,350,000

5.8

RHT 2015 Business Holdings LP⁽¹⁷⁾

–

1,350,000⁽¹⁷⁾

–

1,350,000⁽¹⁷⁾

1,350,000

5.8

RSS 2015 Business Holdings LP⁽¹⁸⁾

–

1,162,492⁽¹⁸⁾

–

1,162,492⁽¹⁸⁾

1,162,492

5.0

Stockholders Group Pursuant to Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934⁽¹⁰⁾

–

22,784,136⁽¹⁰⁾

–

22,784,136⁽¹⁰⁾

22,784,136

97.8

⁽²⁾The reported shares of Class A Stock with respect to which Robert Sands has sole power to vote or dispose, as noted in footnote (1), exclude 1,597,496 shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon conversion of Class 1 Shares. If the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of Mr. Sands’ Class 1 Shares were included in the shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands, Mr. Sands would beneficially own a total of (i) 8,609,856 shares of Class A Stock, representing 5.1% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands were not converted, and (ii) 31,356,642 shares of Class A Stock, representing 16.3% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands were converted.

⁽³⁾The reported shares of Class A Stock over which Robert Sands has the shared power to vote or dispose include 973,983 shares of Class A Stock held by two family foundations where Robert Sands serves as a director and officer. The reported shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock over which Robert Sands has the shared power to dispose also include 5,483,842 shares of Class A Stock and 22,746,786 shares of Class B Stock held by several family limited partnerships of which Mr. Sands indirectly controls a co-general partner. The reporting of these shares as beneficially owned by Mr. Sands shall not be construed as an admission that Mr. Sands is the beneficial owner of such shares for purposes of Sections 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act or otherwise. The reported shares are also included in the shares reported as beneficially owned by Richard Sands and the stockholders group described in footnote (10). Amounts reflected in the tables above do not include 21,098 shares of Class A Stock owned directly, or indirectly, by Robert Sands’ spouse. Mr. Sands disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

⁽⁴⁾The reported shares of Class A Stock with respect to which Richard Sands has sole power to vote or dispose, as noted in footnote (1), exclude 2,301,581 shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon conversion of Class 1 Shares. If the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of Mr. Sands’ Class 1 Shares were included in the shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands, Mr. Sands would beneficially own a total of (i) 8,909,282 shares of Class A Stock, representing 5.2% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands were not converted, and (ii) 31,693,418 shares of Class A Stock, representing 16.4% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sands were converted.

⁽⁵⁾The reported shares of Class A Stock over which Richard Sands has the shared power to vote or dispose include 973,983 shares of Class A Stock held by two family foundations where Richard Sands serves as a director and officer. The reported shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock over which Richard Sands has the shared power to dispose also include 5,483,842 shares of Class A Stock and 22,746,786 shares of Class B Stock held by several family limited partnerships of which Mr. Sands indirectly controls a co-general partner. The reporting of these shares as beneficially owned by Mr. Sands shall not be construed as an admission that Mr. Sands is the beneficial owner of such shares for purposes of Sections 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act or otherwise. The reported shares are also included in the shares reported as beneficially owned by Robert Sands and the stockholders group described in footnote (10). Amounts reflected in the tables above do not include 15,720 shares of Class A Stock owned by Richard Sands’ spouse. Mr. Sands disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

⁽¹⁰⁾The stockholders group, as reported, consists of Robert Sands, Richard Sands, and Astra Legacy LLC. The reporting of shares as beneficially owned by the stockholders group shall not be construed as an admission that an agreement to act in concert exists or that the stockholders group is the beneficial owner of such shares for purposes of Sections 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act or otherwise. The shares reported as beneficially owned by Robert Sands, Richard Sands, and Astra Legacy LLC are included in the shares reported as beneficially owned by the stockholders group. If the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of Robert Sands’ and Richard Sands’ Class 1 Shares were included in the shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned by the stockholders group, the stockholders group would beneficially own a total of (i) 11,061,313 shares of Class A Stock, representing 6.4% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by the stockholders group were not converted, and (ii) 33,845,449 shares of Class A Stock, representing 17.4% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by the stockholders group were converted. Certain shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock were pledged as of May 15, 2020 as follows: (i) an aggregate of 1,818,462 shares of Class A Stock and 3,289,366 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to a financial institution to secure obligations of Sands family investment vehicles (the “Borrower”) under a credit facility, (ii) an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of Class A Stock and 9,000,000 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to a second financial institution to secure obligations of the Borrower under a separate credit facility, (iii) an aggregate of 150,000 shares of Class A Stock and 1,304,294 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to a third financial institution to secure obligations of the Borrower under a separate credit facility, (iv) an aggregate of 1,042,994 shares of Class A Stock and 1,620,000 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to a fourth financial institution to secure obligations of the Borrower under a separate credit facility, (v) an aggregate of 4,210,476 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to a fifth financial institution to secure obligations of the Borrower under two separate credit facilities, and (vi) an aggregate of 2,010,000 shares of Class B Stock were pledged to one additional financial institution to secure obligations of the Borrower under a separate credit facility. All of these pledged shares are included in the shares reported as beneficially owned by the stockholders group. Subject to the terms of the various credit facilities, the number of shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock pledged to secure the credit facilities may increase or decrease from time to time and may be moved by the applicable pledgors among the various financial institutions from time to time. In the event of noncompliance with certain covenants under the credit facilities, the financial institutions have certain remedies including the right to sell the pledged shares subject to certain protections afforded to the borrowers and pledgors. However, pursuant to the terms of the various credit facilities, the financial institutions would be required to convert the Class B Stock to Class A Stock prior to any sales.

The following table sets forth, as of May 15, 2020, the beneficial ownership of Class A Stock, Class B Stock, and Class 1 Stock by our directors, the named executive officers (as defined under the heading “Compensation Tables and Related Information” below) and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The Class A Stock information in the table below does not include shares of Class A Stock that are issuable upon the conversion of either Class B Stock or Class 1 Stock, although such information is provided in footnotes where applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the individuals listed in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares attributed to them.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Class A Stock⁽¹⁾				Class B Stock				Class 1 Stock⁽¹⁾
		Shares Beneficially Owned⁽²⁾		Percent of Class Beneficially Owned	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class Beneficially Owned	Shares Beneficially Owned
												Outstanding Shares	Shares Acquirable Within 60 Days⁽³⁾	Total Shares	Percent of Class Beneficially Owned⁽⁴⁾
William A. Newlands	18,904	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	71,863	71,863	4.1	%
Robert Sands⁽⁵⁾	7,012,360	4.2	%	22,746,786	97.7	%	718,352	879,144	1,597,496	62.1	%
Richard Sands⁽⁵⁾	6,607,701	3.9	%	22,784,136	97.8	%	947,442	1,354,139	2,301,581	75.5	%
Garth Hankinson	4,811	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	11,343	11,343	*
Robert Hanson	3,949	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	9,176	9,176	*
David Klein⁽⁷⁾	45,193	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	–	–	*
Christy Clark	–	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	1,094	1,094	*
Jennifer M. Daniels	879⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	2,094	2,094	*
Jerry Fowden	17,934⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	21,481	21,481	1.3	%
Ernesto M. Hernández	2,347⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	7,390	7,390	*
Susan Somersille Johnson	1,442⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	3,345	3,345	*
James A. Locke III	39,517⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾⁽⁹⁾		264	*		10,447	21,481	31,928	1.9	%
Jose Manuel Madero Garza	–	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	1,094	1,094	*
Daniel J. McCarthy	2,665⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	5,784	5,784	*
Judy A. Schmeling	4,276⁽⁸⁾	*⁽⁶⁾		–	*		–	11,446	11,446	*
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (20 persons) ⁽¹⁰⁾	7,378,196⁽¹⁰⁾	4.4	%	22,784,400	97.8	%	1,676,241	2,682,993	4,359,234	99.6	%

⁽¹⁾The numbers and percentages reported with respect to Class A Stock do not take into account shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of Class 1 Stock owned as of May 15, 2020, or that can be purchased by exercising stock options that are exercisable on or within sixty (60) days after May 15, 2020 (the “Class 1 Option Shares”, and together with the Class 1 Stock owned as of May 15, 2020, the “Class 1 Shares”). These shares are not taken into account because, in accordance with the Company’s certificate of incorporation, any shares of Class A Stock issued upon conversion of shares of Class 1 Stock must be sold immediately in connection with the conversion and, therefore, cannot be held by the beneficial owner of the Class 1 Shares. However, the numbers of shares and percentages of ownership taking into account the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of Class 1 Shares are provided in footnotes where appropriate.

⁽⁴⁾In accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, the percentages reported with respect to Class 1 Stock are calculated on the basis that (i) the relevant director, executive officer or group holds the shares of Class 1 Stock that such director, executive officer or group can purchase by exercising Class 1 Option Shares, and (ii) the only outstanding shares of Class 1 Stock are the shares deemed to be held by such director, executive officer or group, as applicable, and the 1,694,803 shares of Class 1 Stock outstanding as of May 15, 2020. The high percentages reported for each director, executive and group are a function of the small number of shares of Class 1 Stock outstanding as of May 15, 2020 and this calculation methodology.

⁽⁵⁾See tables and footnotes under the heading “Beneficial Ownership of More Than 5% of the Company’s Voting Common Stock” for information with respect to sole and shared voting or dispositive power and for the numbers and percentages of shares of Class A Stock that would be beneficially owned if Class 1 Shares were included in the number of shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned and assuming the conversion of Class B Stock into Class A Stock. Of the number of shares reported, 6,457,825 shares of Class A Stock and 22,746,786 shares of Class B Stock are included in the numbers reported by both Robert Sands and Richard Sands. Of the shares reported as beneficially owned by Robert Sands as of May 15, 2020, 5,861,580 shares of Class A Stock and 21,396,786 shares of Class B Stock were pledged, and of the shares reported as beneficially owned by Richard Sands as of May 15, 2020, 5,472,810 shares of Class A Stock and 21,434,136 shares of Class B Stock were pledged. All of the shares described as pledged are pledged under the facilities described in footnote (10) to the table under the heading “Beneficial Ownership of More Than 5% of the Company’s Voting Common Stock.”

⁽⁶⁾If the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of the named individual’s Class 1 Shares were included in the shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned by the individual, the individual would beneficially own the shares of Class A Stock as noted below, which for each individual represents less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding Class A Stock: Mr. Newlands - 90,767; Mr. Hankinson - 16,154; Mr. Hanson - 13,125; Mr. Klein - 45,193; Ms. Clark - 1,094; Ms. Daniels - 2,973; Mr. Fowden – 39,415; Mr. Hernández – 9,737; Ms. Johnson – 4,787; Mr. Locke – 71,445; Mr. Madero - 1,094; Mr. McCarthy – 8,449; and Ms. Schmeling – 15,722.

⁽¹⁰⁾This group consists of our executive officers and directors as of May 15, 2020; therefore, David Klein is not included in this group. The reported shares in this group include an additional 45,942 shares over which the power to vote and dispose is shared, and an additional total of 3,729 shares that are indirectly beneficially owned by members of the group. Assuming the conversion into Class A Stock of a total of 22,784,400 shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned as of May 15, 2020 by such executive officers and directors as a group, this group would beneficially own 30,162,596 shares of Class A Stock, representing 15.8% of the outstanding Class A Stock after such conversion. If the shares of Class A Stock that can be received upon the conversion of this group’s Class 1 Shares were included in the shares of Class A Stock beneficially owned by this group of executive officers and directors, this group would beneficially own (i) 11,737,430 shares of Class A Stock, representing 6.8% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by this group were not converted, and (ii) 34,521,830 shares of Class A Stock, representing 17.7% of the outstanding Class A Stock, if the shares of Class B Stock beneficially owned by this group were converted.

The Board and the Corporate Governance Committee have adopted a written policy providing that all related person transactions or series of similar transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC Regulation S-K Item 404(a) must be presented to the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board for pre-approval or ratification. The policy requires each of our (i) directors or director nominees, (ii) executive officers, and (iii) security holders known by the Company to own of record or to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of our voting securities to notify the General Counsel promptly and, whenever possible, in advance of the occurrence of any potential related person transaction in which such person is directly or indirectly involved.

The General Counsel is responsible for reviewing all potential related person transactions and taking reasonable steps to ensure that all related person transactions requiring disclosure under Regulation S–K Item 404(a) are presented to the Corporate Governance Committee for pre-approval or ratification by members of the committee in their discretion at the committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting or, if deemed appropriate, by consent in lieu of a meeting. No director may engage in a vote to pre-approve or ratify any related person transaction in which he or she or any member of his or her immediate family has a material interest; provided, however, that such director must provide any information concerning such related person transaction that the Corporate Governance Committee may reasonably request. If a potential related person transaction involves the General Counsel, the Chief Financial Officer would assume the responsibilities of the General Counsel under the policy with respect to that transaction.

The Corporate Governance Committee may consider all factors it deems relevant when determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction. In the context of evaluating potential transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee may consider, among other factors, the nature of the transaction and the related person’s interest in the transaction, the size of the transaction, whether we are able to engage in a comparable transaction with an unaffiliated party on more favorable terms, the benefit of the transaction to us, and the impact of the transaction on the related person. We are not aware of any related person transaction required to be reported under Regulation S-K Item 404(a) since the beginning of fiscal 2020 that has not been pre-approved or ratified pursuant to this policy.

On April 2, 2020, the Audit Committee determined to engage KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2021. Although ratification by stockholders of this selection is not required, the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will be presented to the stockholders for their ratification at the Meeting as a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider its choice, but may nevertheless retain KPMG LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the Meeting and will be given an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to any appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services that may be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP prior to the engagement. Any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair authority to pre-approve proposed audit and non-audit services that arise between Audit Committee meetings, provided that the decision to approve the service is presented at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting. All audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG LLP during the fiscal years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019 were pre-approved in accordance with this policy. These services have included audit services, audit-related services, and tax services. The Audit Committee did not pre-approve any other products or services that did not fall into these categories, and KPMG LLP provided no other products or services during the past two fiscal years.

The Audit Committee of the Board provides oversight to our financial reporting process through periodic meetings with our independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors, and management. Our management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial reporting information and related systems of internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and for issuing reports thereon. The Audit Committee, in carrying out its role, relies on our senior management and independent registered public accounting firm.

In an effort to better align our wine & spirits portfolio with consumer trade-up trends and enhance our growth and financial profile going forward, in April 2019 we announced the divestiture of a portion of our lower-end wine and spirits portfolio and related facilities to E.J. Gallo. Subsequently, in December 2019, we agreed to revise the original divestiture agreement in connection with Federal Trade Commission review. This revision excluded the Cooks, J. Roget, and Paul Masson Grande Amber Brandy brands as well as our Concentrate business. We are pursuing opportunities to divest the Paul Masson Grande Amber Brandy brand as well as our Concentrate business to other viable buyers. We have communicated our intent to retain the Cook’s and J. Roget brands. In a separate, but related, transaction we also agreed to divest the Nobilo wine brand to Gallo. Lastly, in November 2019, we divested Black Velvet Canadian Whiskey and the brands associated with the production facility.

Due to the company’s strong cash flow generation, we achieved our commitment of de-leveraging to our targeted leverage range, excluding non-cash Canopy related equity earnings; maintained our investment grade debt rating; and returned more than $600 million to shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases. We remain focused on our goal of returning $4.5 billion to shareholders of which approximately $2 billion is related to dividend payments and the remainder share repurchases. However, in the short term, given the unprecedented COVID-19 events that began to abruptly and dramatically impact consumers and the marketplace almost concurrently with the start of our fiscal 2021, we will be maximizing free cash flow and utilizing that free cash flow to pay dividends and reduce debt and leverage in an effort to create the flexibility needed to fulfill our remaining share repurchase commitment longer term.

At that time, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also recognized the importance of ensuring the continuity of our leadership team. In 1945, Marvin Sands purchased a small bulk wine company that would eventually become Constellation Brands. Over the next 70 years, Marvin Sands, joined later by his sons Richard and Robert, continuously grew and evolved that small bulk wine company into a global, best-in-class total beverage alcohol company. Over the 25 plus years that Richard or Robert led Constellation as its Chief Executive Officer, Constellation’s stock price increased from approximately $3 a share to approximately $175 a share, an increase of approximately 5,900% over that period. During that period, Richard and Robert developed indispensable knowledge of the beverage alcohol industry, as well as building valuable relationships in our industry and in the communities in which we operate. Given the industry expertise and leadership experience embodied in Richard Sands and Robert Sands, the Board sought to retain both of them as part of this executive succession process. Following the

Effective January 13, 2020, David Klein resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Also effective January 13, 2020, the Board elected Garth Hankinson to the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As discussed further below, the structure of Mr. Hankinson’s executive compensation is consistent with the compensation program for our other named executive officers. Mr. Hankinson is party to our standard form of executive employment agreement, and his compensation package consists of: (1) a base salary of $575,000; (2) a short-term cash incentive target of 85% of base salary (prorated for service as our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2020); and (3) a long-term equity incentive award target of 240% of base salary for fiscal 2021.

Effective June 3, 2019, Robert L. Hanson was hired as our Executive Vice President and President, Wine & Spirits Division. As discussed further below, the structure of Mr. Hanson’s executive compensation is consistent with the compensation program for our other named executive officers. Mr. Hanson is party to an executive employment agreement with us, and his compensation package consists of: (1) a base salary of $770,000; (2) a short-term cash incentive target of 85% of base salary; and (3) a long-term equity incentive award target of 250% of base salary. He is also entitled to reimbursement of up to $100,000 for reasonable and customary expenses actually incurred in connection with his relocation to the San Francisco area.

After the conclusion of fiscal 2020, the Committee reviewed our performance and approved short-term cash incentive payments to our named executive officers under our Annual Management Incentive Program (“AMIP”), which operates under our stockholder approved Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (“LTSIP”). For fiscal 2020, Company performance approximated the target operating goal for Net Sales, exceeded the target operating goal for Comparable EBIT, and exceeded the maximum operating goal for Free Cash Flow performance under our fiscal 2020 AMIP. Based on those fiscal 2020 results, our named executive officers other than Mr. Hanson received AMIP payments at approximately 135% of the target award levels set by the Committee.

At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we conducted an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the 2019 Proxy Statement (a “say-on-pay” vote). Our stockholders approved our named executive officer compensation at that time, with approximately 97% of the vote being cast in favor of approval. The Committee believes that the outcome of the say-on-pay vote confirms that our compensation philosophy is sound and our objective of linking our executives’ compensation to achieving operational goals and generating stockholder value is effective. We view this level of support as an affirmation of our current pay practices.

The Committee directly engaged FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant for fiscal 2020. FW Cook assisted with the Committee’s review and analysis of executive compensation, including providing information on executive compensation trends and regulatory developments. FW Cook also provided data and advice related to peer group, comparator group, and general executive compensation survey data, which the Committee used as a validation or market check in connection with compensation decisions. Those decisions included the individual and aggregate compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Executive Vice Chairman, base salary adjustments, adjustments to AMIP and long-term equity incentive targets for our other named executive officers, and Committee deliberations on other elements of executive compensation during fiscal 2020. As discussed above under the subheading “The Role of the Compensation Consultants,” the Committee has considered the independence of FW Cook and, based on such review, has not identified any conflicts of interest regarding the services of FW Cook or its employees.

by the Committee in October 2018. In establishing this peer group, the Committee worked with FW Cook and sought to ensure that the group consisted of companies of appropriate size, type, and complexity. The Committee accomplished this by: (1) reviewing metrics such as gross revenues (targeting companies with gross revenues between 0.4 and 2.5 times those of the Company), market capitalization (targeting companies with market capitalizations between 0.33 and 3.0 times that of the Company), and profit margin structure; (2) considering whether the potential peers were competitors for executive talent or investor capital; (3) considering whether the potential peers were a “peer-of-peers” (a common member of the peer groups of the Company’s peer group companies); and (4) assessing the overall reasonableness of designating a particular potential peer as a member of the Company’s peer group.

Based on that review in October 2018, and the continued reasonableness of the current peer group companies from an overall size and business comparability standpoint, the Committee elected to maintain the existing peer group with the exception of two companies that were acquired since the prior peer group analysis (Mead Johnson and Reynolds American). The executive compensation peer group for fiscal 2020 compensation decisions for our named executive officers other than our Executive Chairman and Executive Vice Chairman consisted of the following 16 companies, which emphasize companies in the consumer goods industry, with a focus on companies in the beverage alcohol industry and/or those that are involved in managing and marketing premium brands:

The Committee used this executive compensation peer group to validate decisions for specific compensation elements for our other named executive officers as discussed in the CD&A sections below for each element of compensation. The Committee also used this executive compensation peer group to validate the target TDC of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as the aggregate target TDC of our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Executive Vice Chairman against the target TDC of the top three most highly compensated executives at our peer group companies. Based on the role, responsibilities, experience, and contributions of our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Executive Vice Chairman, the Committee approved a structure for fiscal 2020 compensation that considered the relative expected contributions of the executives, as well as the aggregate target TDC for our peer companies. The Committee determined to revisit that initial process and structure on a periodic basis going forward.

The executive compensation peer group data shared with the Committee by FW Cook in January 2019 indicated that our Chief Executive Officer’s target TDC was between the 25^th percentile and the median of peer group practice. This peer group data also indicated that the aggregate target TDC of our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Executive Vice Chairman are within the competitive range of the 75^th percentile of peer group practice. The Committee believed that this positioning appropriately reflected our culture, the dynamics of our industry, the experience, expected contributions and unique skill sets and knowledge of our business embodied in these executives, as well as the sustained

Pay Element

Objective & Performance Rewarded

Fixed

Annual

Base Salary

Provide current, predictable compensation for day-to-day services, taking into account individual roles, responsibilities, and performance, as well as respective experience and abilities

Performance Based

Annual

AMIP (annual cash incentive)

Achieve annual goals measured in terms of financial performance (Net Sales, Comparable EBIT and Free Cash Flow) linked to creation of stockholder value

Long-Term

PSUs

Establish rigorous long-term performance alignment and drive retention. Relative TSR provides an effective comparison of our performance against the broader market. PSUs typically require continuous service through a three-year performance period

NQSOs

Reward absolute value creation (stock options have no value unless our stock price increases after the grant date) and typically vest pro rata annually over four years, encouraging both performance and retention

RSUs

Provide link to stockholder value creation and drive retention, typically vesting pro rata annually over four years

We generally seek to have the aggregate of the base salaries of our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, and Executive Vice Chairman be within the competitive range of the 75^th percentile of our executive compensation peer group, reflecting the skill set, experience, and performance of these executives. We also generally seek to pay each of our other named executive officers a base salary that is between the median and the 75^th percentile of our executive compensation peer group. The Committee may decide, however, to set an individual named executive officer’s salary at an amount above or below this level based on factors specific to a particular named executive officer.

The Committee selects targets for Comparable EBIT, Net Sales, and Free Cash Flow that it views as challenging but achievable. For fiscal 2020, each target corresponds to the targeted level of performance under our fiscal 2020 operating plan approved by the Board in April 2019. The performance targets under the fiscal 2020 AMIP were adjusted to reflect the unplanned delay in the closing of the divestiture of a portion of our wine and spirits business, including approximately 30 lower-margin, lower-growth wine and spirits brands, wineries, vineyards, offices, and facilities to E. & J. Gallo Winery (the “W&S Divestiture”), the divestiture of our Black Velvet Canadian whiskey business and the brand’s associated production facility, along with a subset of Canadian whisky brands produced at that facility (the “Black Velvet Divestiture”), and certain other immaterial developments during the fiscal year. The adjusted fiscal 2020 target performance levels for Comparable EBIT and Net Sales each exceeded our adjusted target performance levels and actual performance for fiscal 2019. The fiscal 2020 Free Cash Flow target performance level was set below our actual performance for fiscal 2019, reflecting a planned increase in capital expenditures under our fiscal 2020 operating plan.


Performance Measures ($ in millions)	Definition⁽¹⁾	Purpose	Weighting	Fiscal 2020 Targets	Company Performance⁽²⁾				Bonus Payout⁽²⁾
Net Sales	Net sales less net sales of products of acquired businesses, historical net sales of products which have been disposed of, or historical net sales of a business that has been contributed to a joint venture.	Serves as a measure of our ability to grow market share	40% (20% for Mr. Hanson)		<96.0%			0%
									$	8,098.5	96.0%	Threshold	25%
									$	8,435.9	100.0%	Target	100%
									$	8,731.1	103.5%	Maximum	200%
Net Sales: Wine & Spirits Division			20% (only for Mr. Hanson)		<95.0%			0%
						$2,641.4		95.0%	Threshold		25%
						$2,780.4		100.0%	Target		100%
						$2,877.7		103.5%	Maximum		200%
Comparable EBIT⁽³⁾	EBIT is the sum of our operating income plus income from unconsolidated investments. When calculating Comparable EBIT, we exclude the effects of comparable adjustments.	Serves as a measure of our profitability	40% (20% for Mr. Hanson)		<94.0%			0%
									$	2,532.9	94.0%	Threshold	25%
									$	2,694.6	100.0%	Target	100%
									$	2,815.8	104.5%	Maximum	200%
Comparable EBIT: Wine & Spirits Division			20% (only for Mr. Hanson)		<92.5%			0%
						$	705.9	92.5%	Threshold		25%
						$	763.1	100.0%	Target		100%
						$	801.3	105.0%	Maximum		200%
Free Cash Flow	Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment.	Reflects our ability to generate the cash required to operate the business and pay down debt	20%		< 80.0%			0%
									$	865.6	80.0%	Threshold	25%
									$	1,082.0	100.0%	Target	100%
									$	1,298.4	120.0%	Maximum	200%

The resulting fiscal 2020 AMIP awards paid to our named executive officers are set forth below and also appear in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. The fiscal 2020 AMIP paid to Mr. Hankinson was prorated to reflect his start date as our Chief Financial Officer, with the amount paid to him prior to such date calculated based on the annual incentive plan and target percentage in effect for his former role as Senior Vice President, Corporate Development. In addition to the AMIP adjustments described above, the Net Sales and Comparable EBIT targets under the annual incentive plan for Mr. Hankinson’s former role were adjusted to account for certain additional operational challenges posed by the unplanned delay in the closing of the W&S Divestiture. Mr. Klein forfeited his fiscal 2020 AMIP in connection with his departure.

During fiscal 2020, the Committee granted our named executive officers (other than Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands) a mix of stock options, RSUs, and PSUs. The chart below reflects the methodology used by the Committee for calculating the total equity target value of the fiscal 2020 equity awards, as well as the percentage allocated to each award type. The equity target percentage was a percentage of each officer’s base salary, and, for the purpose of determining the number of shares subject to each type of award, stock options were valued on a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, RSUs were valued at face value, and PSUs were valued at face value of the target award.

In addition to the fiscal 2020 equity awards described above which were granted to Mr. Hanson when he commenced employment with us, he received three additional special awards in fiscal 2020. In June 2019, he received a $500,000 RSU which vests 25% per year over four years. This RSU award serves an inducement for him to join our Company and for retention purposes. Also in June 2019, he received a $2,000,000 PSU grant under the Net Debt Leverage Ratio PSU Program first adopted by the Committee in fiscal 2019. All of our named executive officers other than Mr. Robert Sands and Mr. Richard Sands commenced participation in this program in October 2018. The purpose of this performance-based incentive program is to ensure that our leadership team continues to drive the performance of our core business, while also providing the necessary resources to support our significant investment in Canopy and provide it with the velocity to achieve its strategic initiatives during a critical period in the cannabis industry.

No shares are earned under this program unless certain targets are met regarding a reduction in the Company’s net debt leverage ratio and the achievement of a threshold level of earnings performance from our investment in Canopy. Awards are forfeited if the threshold Canopy earnings performance, which is tied to the Company’s strategic plan for the Canopy investment, is not achieved. The combined requirement to achieve a net debt leverage ratio reduction target and a threshold level of earnings performance from the Canopy investment was viewed by the Committee as challenging based on the anticipated size of the legal cannabis opportunity in Canada, as well as the uncertainties in the emerging global cannabis industry.

•Named executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan on the same terms as other eligible employees. Each year, eligible employees may elect to defer up to 50% of their annual compensation, up to the annual limit set by the Internal Revenue Code, on a before-tax and/or after-tax basis. We currently provide a 50% match on the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed by the participant, as well as an annual non-elective contribution equal to 3% of eligible compensation. All participants are immediately 100% vested in their contributions, the 3% annual contribution made by us, and any earnings on these contributions. Until a participant completes five years of service, our matching contributions, any supplemental profit sharing contributions, and the earnings on those amounts vest at the rate of 20% per year for the first five years of service.

In the event of certain terminations of employment, our named executive officers are entitled to receive the severance benefits set forth under their employment agreements. The employment agreements with Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands were executed in 2008 and provide for severance in the event of the executive’s death, disability, good reason termination, termination without cause, or retirement. Our employment agreements with Messrs. Newlands, Hankinson, and Hanson provide for severance benefits only in the event of good reason termination or termination without cause. Mr. Klein resigned from the Company as of January 13, 2020. No severance compensation was paid to him in connection with his departure.

We provide our named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe to be reasonable and competitive with those offered by comparable companies to their executive officers. The Committee annually reviews and approves or ratifies the perquisites and other personal benefits offered to our named executive officers. The Committee believes these benefits further our objective of attracting, motivating, and retaining key executive talent and assist executive officers in promoting our brands, working more efficiently, and dedicating the appropriate amount of time and attention to business initiatives. Other than taxes related to certain relocation benefits, our named executive officers pay the personal income taxes that are attributable to the taxable perquisites we provide. Our named executive officers receive certain perquisites, including:

•Product Allowance – We provide product allowances to our employees, including our named executive officers. We believe that a product allowance enhances their knowledge and appreciation of our products and serves as an additional tool to facilitate their role as ambassadors for our brands in both on- and off-premise retail establishments. For the 2019 calendar year, the allowance was $10,000 each for Messrs. Newlands, Robert Sands, and Richard Sands, and $5,000 for each of our other named executive officers. In certain limited instances, we may also provide product samples to our employees, including our named executive officers, to enable them to become stronger brand ambassadors. Our U.S. based employees, including our named executive officers, are also eligible from time-to-time to purchase products from us at a discounted rate. Such samples and discounts typically do not result in any incremental cost to us.

In order to further align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders, the Board has established guidelines for the amounts of our common stock that our executive officers should beneficially own. We allow individuals five years in which to reach the applicable ownership guideline. The five-year period is measured from the date the individual assumed the executive officer role to which the stock ownership guideline applies. The ownership guidelines can be satisfied by the ownership of stock, unvested RSUs, and unvested (but certified) PSUs after the relevant performance period has been completed. The current guidelines for our executive officers are as follows:

The Committee has adopted a formal clawback policy. This policy applies in the event the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material noncompliance with the securities laws. In such an instance, the independent members of the Board, in their sole discretion, may cancel or seek to recover all or any portion of any excess cash or equity incentive-based compensation that is earned or vested based wholly or in part on the attainment of a financial reporting measure. In order for the clawback to apply to the incentive compensation awarded to executive officers or certain other executives of the Company, such individual’s fraud or intentional misconduct must have been a significant contributing factor to the need for the financial restatement.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain “covered employees” in excess of $1 million per year. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed by Congress in December 2017, there was an exception to this deduction limitation for compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation.” The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly changed Section 162(m) by, among other things, repealing the performance-based compensation exemption and reducing the federal corporate income tax rate. As a result, compensation paid to certain current and former executive officers in excess of $1 million a year generally will not be deductible unless such compensation qualifies for certain transition relief.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Stock Awards ⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ⁽²⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation⁽³⁾		All Other Compensation ⁽⁴⁾		Total
William A. Newlands, President and Chief Executive Officer	2020	$	1,234,038	$	3,086,226	$	2,400,479	$	2,504,296	$	167,611	$	9,392,650
		2019		$	846,154	$	4,910,425	$	1,168,786	$	779,139	$	150,438	$	7,854,942
		2018		$	750,000	$	1,150,590	$	937,468	$	880,081	$	45,220	$	3,763,359
Robert Sands, Executive Chairman of the Board	2020	$	1,072,374	$	—	$	4,080,848	$	2,176,223	$	1,292,970	$	8,622,415
		2019		$	1,388,715	$	3,278,749	$	2,717,885	$	1,918,094	$	1,009,335	$	10,312,778
		2018		$	1,348,239	$	3,238,464	$	2,638,447	$	2,498,017	$	1,120,370	$	10,843,537
Richard Sands, Executive Vice Chairman of the Board	2020	$	917,844	$	—	$	3,468,709	$	1,862,628	$	1,120,157	$	7,369,338
		2019		$	1,361,731	$	—	$	3,997,645	$	1,880,823	$	735,945	$	7,976,144
		2018		$	1,322,027	$	—	$	3,880,580	$	2,449,452	$	904,674	$	8,556,733
Garth Hankinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer⁽⁵⁾	2020	$	362,575	$	1,159,061	$	123,640	$	284,209	$	32,106	$	1,961,591
Robert Hanson, Executive Vice President and President, Wine & Spirits Division ⁽⁶⁾	2020	$	600,625	$	5,122,402	$	481,260	$	575,060	$	157,974	$	6,937,321
David Klein, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	2020	$	749,962	$	1,285,928	$	1,000,220	$	—	$	139,385	$	3,175,495
		2019		$	773,077	$	4,555,786	$	875,066	$	676,257	$	142,280	$	7,022,466
		2018		$	697,308	$	1,074,138	$	874,992	$	818,249	$	85,877	$	3,550,564

⁽¹⁾These amounts represent the full grant date fair value of awards of RSUs and PSUs granted in each fiscal year noted. For PSUs granted in fiscal 2020, fiscal 2019, and fiscal 2018 having relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) as the performance criterion, the grant date fair value was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Since the performance criteria underlying the relative TSR PSUs are each considered a market condition as opposed to a performance condition for accounting purposes, the expense associated with those awards is not subject to fluctuation based on the actual outcome and is therefore reported at maximum value. For the Net Debt Leverage Ratio PSUs granted to Mr. Hanson in fiscal 2020 whose performance criterion relates to our net debt leverage ratio, the grant date fair value is based on the market price of our Class A Stock on the grant date and the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date (which was performance at target level). If the Net Debt Leverage Ratio PSUs were included in these calculations at their maximum level (as opposed to the target level), the grant date fair value set forth above for those PSUs would be: $3,000,099. For the Wine & Spirits Division PSUs granted to Mr. Hanson in fiscal 2020 whose performance criteria relate to the performance and margin profile of a strategic portion of our wine and spirits division, the grant date fair value is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date (which was performance at target level). If the Wine & Spirits Division PSUs were included in these calculations at their maximum level (as opposed to the target level), the grant date fair value set forth above for those PSUs would be: $2,000,025. Each amount included in this column represents the aggregate amount that we expected to expense for grants in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 over the grants’ respective vesting schedules. Assumptions used in calculating these values with respect to PSUs may be found in Note 19 of our financial statements in our 2020 Form 10-K. We do not include any impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting terms in these calculations. A more complete description of the fiscal 2020 PSUs can be found in the CD&A under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” and subheading “Named Executive

The aggregate incremental cost to us for each named executive officer’s personal use of corporate aircraft is as follows: Mr. Newlands - $43,942; Mr. Robert Sands – $877,493; Mr. Richard Sands – $975,585; Mr. Hankinson – $0; Mr. Hanson - $40,926; and Mr. Klein - $45,005. These amounts represent the aggregate incremental cost to us for the personal use of our corporate aircraft by our named executive officers and certain of their family members. Such amounts are calculated by multiplying an aircraft’s hourly variable operating costs by the portion of the trip’s flight time allocated to such named executive officer, reduced by the amount of voluntary reimbursements, if any, to us by such named executive officer. Variable operating costs include fuel costs, variable maintenance costs, and other variable expenses, including crew hotel and meals, on-board catering, trip-related landing fees, hangar and parking costs, and similar costs. Since our aircraft are used primarily for business travel, the methodology excludes fixed, capital, and similar costs. In instances where family members or guests fly on our aircraft as additional passengers on business flights with an executive, the aggregate incremental cost to us is de minimis in amount, and no amount is reflected in the table for these additional passengers.


Name	Grant Date		Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾					Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units⁽³⁾		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options⁽⁴⁾	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards⁽⁵⁾	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards⁽⁶⁾
				Award Type	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Threshold	Target	Maximum
William A. Newlands	NA	AMIP	462,764	1,851,057	3,702,115
		4/23/2019	PSU				1,446	5,784	11,568					$	1,886,162
		4/23/2019	RSU							5,784				$	1,200,064
		4/23/2019	NQSO								50,579	$	207.48	$	2,400,479
Robert Sands	NA	AMIP	402,140	1,608,561	3,217,123
		4/23/2019	NQSO								85,985	$	207.48	$	4,080,848
Richard Sands	NA	AMIP	344,192	1,376,767	2,753,533
		4/23/2019	NQSO								73,087	$	207.48	$	3,468,709
Garth Hankinson	NA	AMIP	49,483	197,930	395,861
		4/23/2019	PSU				75	298	596					$	97,178
		4/23/2019	RSU							298				$	61,829
		4/23/2019	RSU							4,820				$	1,000,054
		4/23/2019	NQSO								2,870	$	207.48	$	123,640
Robert Hanson	NA	AMIP	127,633	510,531	1,021,063
		6/26/2019	PSU				651	2,602	5,204					$	659,555
		6/26/2019	PSU				0	10,810	16,215					$	2,000,066
		6/26/2019	RSU							2,703				$	500,109
		6/26/2019	RSU							5,203				$	962,659
		6/26/2019	NQSO								12,299	$	185.02	$	481,260
		7/11/2019	PSU				2,530	5,059	10,118					$	1,000,013
David Klein ⁽⁷⁾	NA	AMIP	178,116	712,463	1,424,927
		4/23/2019	PSU				603	2,410	4,820					$	785,901
		4/23/2019	RSU							2,410				$	500,027
		4/23/2019	NQSO								21,075	$	207.48	$	1,000,220

⁽⁴⁾These amounts represent the number of options to purchase shares of Class 1 Stock granted to the named executive officer under our LTSIP. These stock options are scheduled to vest and become exercisable at 25% of the award per year at each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. Further information concerning these awards can be found in the CD&A under the heading “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” and subheading “Named Executive Officer Awards – Fiscal 2020.” No trading market exists for Class 1 Stock. Class 1 Stock may be converted into shares of Class A Stock on a one-for-one basis, provided such conversion is permitted only if the holder immediately sells the Class A Stock. Under the LTSIP, the fair market value of a share of Class 1 Stock is equal to the fair market value of a share of Class A Stock unless the Human Resources Committee of the Board determines otherwise.

The term of the agreements with each of our named executive officers expires at the end of our fiscal year, at which time they each automatically renew for an additional one-year period. Each agreement will continue to renew for successive one-year periods unless we provide at least 180 days’ notice of a decision not to renew such agreement. These agreements provide for an initial minimum annual base salary level for each executive, which may be adjusted upward by the Human Resources Committee. The actual fiscal 2020 base salaries for the named executive officers are set forth above in the Summary Compensation Table. The severance benefits provided under the employment agreements are summarized under the subheading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control.” The employment agreements do not provide for any specific perquisites or other personal benefits for our named executive officers during their terms of employment.


Name	Grant Date	Grant Type	Option Awards⁽¹⁾							Stock Awards⁽²⁾
						Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price⁽³⁾	Option Expiration Date⁽⁴⁾	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽⁵⁾	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽⁶⁾	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested⁽⁷⁾	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested⁽⁶⁾
William A. Newlands	4/28/2015	NQSO	17,160		117.12	4/28/2025
		4/25/2016	NQSO	12,662	4,220	156.84	4/25/2026
		4/25/2016	RSU					564	97,222
		4/21/2017	NQSO	10,264	10,263	172.09	4/21/2027
		4/21/2017	RSU					1,362	234,782
		4/21/2017	PSU					2,577	444,223
		4/23/2018	NQSO	4,890	14,668	228.26	4/23/2028
		4/23/2018	RSU					1,920	330,970
		4/23/2018	PSU							2,561	441,465
		11/1/2018	PSU							17,424	3,003,549
		4/23/2019	NQSO		50,579	207.48	4/23/2029
		4/23/2019	RSU					5,784	997,046
		4/23/2019	PSU							11,568	1,994,092
Robert Sands	4/5/2011	NQSO	274,000		20.60	4/5/2021
		4/3/2012	NQSO	212,380		24.50	4/3/2022
		4/26/2013	NQSO	114,560		47.79	4/26/2023
		4/28/2014	NQSO	72,010		79.61	4/28/2024
		4/28/2015	NQSO	64,460		117.12	4/28/2025
		4/25/2016	NQSO	40,626	13,542	156.84	4/25/2026
		4/25/2016	RSU					1,810	312,008
		4/21/2017	NQSO	28,886	28,886	172.09	4/21/2027
		4/21/2017	RSU					3,833	660,733
		4/21/2017	PSU					7,251	1,249,927
		4/23/2018	NQSO	11,370	34,110	228.26	4/23/2028
		4/23/2018	RSU					4,465	769,677
		4/23/2018	PSU							5,954	1,026,351
		4/23/2019	NQSO		85,985	207.48	4/23/2029
Richard Sands	4/5/2011	NQSO	435,780		20.60	4/5/2021
		4/3/2012	NQSO	357,030		24.50	4/3/2022
		4/26/2013	NQSO	167,370		47.79	4/26/2023
		4/28/2014	NQSO	105,200		79.61	4/28/2024
		4/28/2015	NQSO	94,170		117.12	4/28/2025
		4/25/2016	NQSO	59,356	19,785	156.84	4/25/2026
		4/21/2017	NQSO	42,486	42,484	172.09	4/21/2027
		4/23/2018	NQSO	16,724	50,171	228.26	4/23/2028
		4/23/2019	NQSO		73,087	207.48	4/23/2029


Name	Grant Date	Grant Type	Option Awards⁽¹⁾							Stock Awards⁽²⁾
						Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price⁽³⁾	Option Expiration Date⁽⁴⁾	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽⁵⁾	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽⁶⁾	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested⁽⁷⁾	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested⁽⁶⁾
Garth Hankinson	4/26/2013	NQSO	2,270		47.79	4/26/2023
		4/28/2014	NQSO	1,550		79.61	4/28/2024
		4/28/2015	NQSO	1,470		117.12	4/28/2025
		4/25/2016	NQSO	1,701	566	156.84	4/25/2026
		4/25/2016	RSU					70	12,067
		4/21/2017	NQSO	1,232	1,232	172.09	4/21/2027
		4/21/2017	RSU					145	24,995
		4/21/2017	PSU					276	47,577
		4/23/2018	NQSO	610	1,829	228.26	4/23/2028
		4/23/2018	RSU					197	33,959
		4/23/2018	PSU							263	45,336
		11/1/2018	PSU							7,468	1,287,334
		4/23/2019	NQSO		2,870	207.48	4/23/2029
		4/23/2019	RSU					298	51,369
		4/23/2019	RSU					4,820	830,872
		4/23/2019	PSU							596	102,738
Robert Hanson	6/26/2019	NQSO		12,299	185.02	6/26/2029
		6/26/2019	RSU					2,703	465,943
		6/26/2019	RSU					5,203	896,893
		6/26/2019	PSU							5,204	897,066
		6/26/2019	PSU							10,810	1,863,428
		7/11/2019	PSU							2,530	436,121
David Klein	4/23/2018	NQSO	3,661		228.26	4/21/2020


Name	Plan	Executive Contributions in Last FY ⁽¹⁾	Registrant Contributions in Last FY ⁽²⁾		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ⁽³⁾		Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ⁽⁴⁾
William A. Newlands	SERP		$	—	$	3,204	$	—	$	52,796
William A. Newlands		NQSP	$	123,404	$	22,219	$	1,173	$	—	$	138,159
Robert Sands	SERP		$	—	$	308	$	—	$	1,713,380
Robert Sands		NQSP	$	—	$	24,347	$	—	$	—	$	—
Richard Sands	SERP		$	—	$	(96,735)	$	—	$	1,804,610
Richard Sands		NQSP	$	—	$	20,468	$	—	$	—	$	—
Garth Hankinson	SERP		$	—	$	68	$	—	$	973
Garth Hankinson		NQSP	$	—	$	1,030	$	—	$	—	$	—
Robert Hanson	SERP		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Robert Hanson		NQSP	$	14,808	$	4,483	$	(975)	$	—	$	13,833
David Klein	SERP		$	—	$	4,829	$	—	$	52,965
David Klein		NQSP	$	68,846	$	13,512	$	248	$	—	$	82,302

In the event of specified terminations of employment, or a change-in-control of the company, our named executive officers would become entitled to certain payments and benefits under their respective employment agreements, the terms of their outstanding equity awards under the LTSIP, our AMIP, our SERP, and our NQSP. The following information describes and quantifies the compensation and benefits for our named executive officers that would have become payable if a named executive officer’s employment had terminated on February 29, 2020, or if a change-in-control of the company occurred on February 29, 2020, based on the terms and conditions of their respective employment agreement, and our agreements, plans, and arrangements in effect on such date. These benefits are in addition to the benefits generally available to salaried employees, such as our 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, life and disability insurance programs, and medical, dental, and vision benefits.

The employment agreements with our named executive officers in effect as of the end of fiscal 2020 provide for specified post-termination payments and benefits in the event of the occurrence of certain termination events. In order to receive the payments and benefits set forth below, a terminating executive must execute a release in favor of us and agree not to compete with us without our consent for a period of three years in the case of Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands, or two years in the case of each of the other executives (other than Mr. Hanson, whose post-termination restrictive covenants are limited as required by California law). The employment agreements also prohibit the executives, for a period of 18 months after termination in the case of Messrs. Robert Sands or Richard Sands, and for a period of 12 months after termination in the case of the other executives, from seeking to induce our employees to leave their employment with us. Finally, the agreements provide the executives with certain indemnification rights and prohibit the executives, whether during or after employment, from divulging our confidential information or trade secrets or using such information in connection with any outside business activity.

Under the employment agreement with each of our named executive officers, post-termination payments and benefits are triggered in the event that the executive’s employment terminates upon the expiration of the employment agreement, or if (i) the executive voluntarily terminates his employment for “good reason,” or (ii) the executive’s employment is involuntarily terminated by us for any reason other than “for cause.” Under the 2008 employment agreements with Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands, post-termination payments and benefits are also triggered in the event of the executive’s (i) death, (ii) disability (which requires the executive to be unable to perform his duties for six months as determined by the Board), or (iii) retirement (which requires the executive to be at least 60 years of age and have 10 years of service). These triggering terminations are each referred to as a “qualifying termination.” As of February 29, 2020, each of Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands were eligible for retirement under the terms of their respective employment agreement. Under the employment agreements with our named executive officers, a qualifying termination results in:

The agreements with each of our named executive officers define a “good reason” termination as the executive’s ability to terminate his employment for the occurrence of any of the following events without his consent: (i) a material reduction of the executive’s employment band or his duties and responsibilities; (ii) a material reduction of the executive’s base salary; or, (iii) a material breach of the executive’s employment agreement by us. Under the agreements with Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands, a “good reason” termination also includes an action by us to move their principal workplace to a location more than 30 miles from our headquarters or an immaterial reduction of the executive’s base salary. Under the agreement with Mr. Hanson, a “good reason” termination also includes an action by us to move his principal workplace to a location more than 50 miles from our San Francisco office.

⁽²⁾We do not believe any excise tax gross-up payments would have been incurred due to a termination of the employment of any named executive officer on February 29, 2020 in connection with a change-in-control. Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, only Messrs. Robert Sands and Richard Sands are eligible for an excise tax gross-up payment under such circumstances. The employment agreements with each of our other named executive officers provides for a “best net” approach under which the severance payment is either reduced to an amount $1 below that which would subject the executive to the excise tax or, if it would provide a greater net payment to the executive after the payment of any excise tax, paid in full without any gross-up payment from us.

Potential Equity Vesting Triggers⁽¹⁾

Equity Type (Grant Year)

Change-in-Control

Qualifying Termination following a Change-in-Control

Death or Disability

Retirement

For Cause Termination

Other Voluntary or Involuntary Termination

Stock Options (pre-fiscal 2015)

Yes

Yes⁽²⁾

Stock Options (fiscals 2015-2017)

Yes

Yes⁽³⁾

Yes⁽⁴⁾

Stock Options (fiscals 2018-2020)

Yes⁽⁵⁾

Yes

Yes⁽⁶⁾

RSUs (fiscals 2016-2017)

Yes

Yes⁽⁷⁾

RSUs (fiscals 2018-2020)

Yes⁽⁵⁾

Yes

Yes⁽⁶⁾

PSUs (fiscal 2017)

Yes⁽⁸⁾

Yes⁽⁹⁾

PSUs (fiscals 2018-2020)

Yes⁽⁵⁾

Yes⁽⁸⁾

Yes⁽⁹⁾

⁽⁵⁾In the event of a change-in-control of the company in which the outstanding equity awards are assumed or replaced by the acquirer, if the executive is involuntarily terminated by the company without cause, or voluntarily terminates employment for good reason, in each case within 24 months following the occurrence of the change-in-control: (i) outstanding stock options shall become fully vested and exercisable and shall be exercisable for 90 days following such termination; (ii) outstanding RSUs shall become fully vested and shall be delivered within 30 days following such termination; and (iii) outstanding PSUs shall become vested at target and shall be delivered within 30 days following such termination.

Annual Management Incentive Program Payments. Our AMIP is described in the CD&A under the heading “Short-Term Cash Incentives: Fiscal 2020 AMIP.” The fiscal 2020 award program provides that in the event a named executive officer’s employment terminates for any reason other than retirement (defined as attained age 60 with at least five years of service), disability, death, or involuntary termination without cause prior to the end of the performance period, the named executive officer forfeits all rights to a short-term cash incentive bonus payment for such period. In the event of a named executive officer’s retirement, disability, death, or involuntary termination without cause prior to the end of the performance period, the named executive officer will become entitled to a pro-rated portion of the short-term cash incentive bonus payment that would have been payable had the individual not terminated employment. Such bonus, if any, will be paid at the same time bonuses are paid to similarly situated participants who do not terminate employment. Actual payouts under the plan to the named executive officers for fiscal 2020 are set forth above in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

For fiscal 2020, the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer is $9,392,650, and the annual total compensation of our median employee is $40,373. The ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee is approximately 233 to 1. This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable SEC requirements. We re-identified our median employee this year based on the information available in our human resources information system, and we include all U.S. and non-U.S. employees, full and part-time employees, and temporary and seasonal employees in the universe of possible employees when identifying our median employee.

We determined our median employee as of the last day of our 2020 fiscal year, the same date that we use for determining the compensation of our CEO under the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules. For purposes of identifying our median employee, we calculate compensation as the sum of: (i) annualized base salary (not including overtime); (ii) target bonus as of the determination date; and (iii) target equity award percentage of base salary (multiplied by annualized base salary to provide a dollar value). We do not make cost of living adjustments for the compensation of employees based outside of the U.S. We convert the compensation paid to non-U.S. employees in local currency to U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate in effect as of the determination date.

Once we identify our median employee, we calculate his or her compensation under the Summary Compensation Table rules in a manner that is consistent with the calculation of our CEO’s compensation, without any adjustments or estimates. In this manner, the compensation of our CEO in the Summary Compensation Table matches the compensation that we use for our median employee for purposes of the CEO pay ratio. The SEC requirements for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Accordingly, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by us.

As described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have designed the elements of our executive compensation program to operate together in a manner that seeks to reward our named executive officers for their respective abilities and day-to-day service, assistance with the achievement of annual goals and financial targets, and contributions toward enhancing long-term stockholder value. We believe the overall design of our executive compensation program has provided the intended results, and we continue to periodically review the program elements in an effort to maintain or improve the alignment of the executive compensation program with our strategic priorities and with our performance. We believe our compensation is market competitive and has resulted in the attraction, motivation and retention of executives who can contribute to our future success. In addition, we believe the program creates a strong linkage between pay and performance through our incentive bonuses and equity awards such that executives will receive higher compensation in more successful periods and lower compensation during less successful periods.

This proposal gives you, as a stockholder, the opportunity to express your views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address specific items of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our executive compensation policies and programs as described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, the Board, or the Human Resources Committee. Even though it is not binding, we will describe in our next Proxy Statement how we considered the results of this vote and how that consideration affected our executive compensation decisions and policies.

This solicitation of proxies is being made by the Board of Directors of the Company, and the cost of such solicitation will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation by use of the Internet and the mail, directors, officers, or regular employees of the Company, without extra compensation, may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, facsimile, Internet, or electronic mail. Banks, brokerage firms, and other entities holding stock for others in their names or in the names of nominees are requested to forward the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares. If requested, the Company will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in forwarding the proxy materials.

Section 1.13 of our By-Laws requires advance notice of stockholder business and nominations to be considered at a meeting of stockholders. Those requirements define the procedures that a stockholder of the Company must follow if the stockholder intends to nominate a person for election to the Company’s Board of Directors or to propose other business to be considered directly at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, rather than for inclusion in our Proxy Statement. These procedures include, among other things, that the stockholder of record give timely notice to the Secretary of the Company of the nomination or other proposed business, that the notice contain specified information, and that the stockholder comply with certain other requirements.

Accordingly, assuming that the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held not more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the anniversary of the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholder must deliver a notice of such nomination or proposal to the Company’s Secretary no later than the close of business on March 23, 2021, and no earlier than the close of business on February 21, 2021, and comply with the requirements of our By-Laws. In accordance with our By-Laws, the Chairperson of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may determine, if the facts warrant, that a nomination or other proposal has not been properly brought before the meeting and, therefore, may be disregarded and not be considered at the meeting. These procedures are only a summary of the

The Company and some brokers “household” the Annual Report and proxy materials, delivering a single copy of each to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or the Company that they or the Company will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If at any time you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials, including the Annual Report, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker, if your shares are held in a brokerage account, or the Company, if you hold registered shares, at which time we will promptly deliver separate copies of the materials to each of the affected stockholders or discontinue the practice, according to your wishes. You can notify us by sending a written request to Constellation Brands, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 207 High Point Drive, Building 100, Victor, New York 14564 or by telephone at 888-922-2150.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Global Code of Responsible Practices for Beverage Alcohol Advertising and Marketing are available on our website at www.cbrands.com/story/policies. Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Executive Code of Ethics, policy regarding Communications from Stockholders or Other Interested Parties, Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Human Resources Committee are available on our website at www.cbrands.com/investors and are also available in print to any stockholder who requests them. Such requests should be directed to Constellation Brands, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 207 High Point Drive, Building 100, Victor, New York 14564. Additionally, any amendments to, and waivers granted to our directors and executive officers under, our codes of ethics referred to above will be posted in this area of our website.

Except as otherwise required by Delaware law, holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock will vote together as a single class on all matters other than the election of directors as set forth below. When holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock vote together as a single class, each holder of Class A Stock is entitled to one (1) vote for each share of Class A Stock registered in such holder’s name, and each holder of Class B Stock is entitled to ten (10) votes for each share of Class B Stock registered in such holder’s name. Therefore, holders of Class A Stock are entitled to cast a total of 167,954,251 votes for proposals at the Meeting and holders of Class B Stock are entitled to cast a total of 232,918,740 votes for proposals at the Meeting.

Proposal

Required Vote

Routine/Non-Routine

Treatment of Abstentions

Treatment of Broker Non-Votes

To elect the twelve directors named in this proxy statement

Under Delaware law and the Company’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast (the highest number of votes cast) by the holders of the shares entitled to vote in person or by proxy.^*

Non-Routine

No effect^***

To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2021

Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.^**

Routine

Have the effect of a vote against

Broker non-votes should not occur with respect to routine matters

To approve, by an advisory vote, the compensation of the named executive officers

Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.^**

Non-Routine

Have the effect of a vote against

No effect^***

^*Pursuant to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and based on the number of shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock that were outstanding on the Record Date, holders of Class A Stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect one-fourth of the number of directors to be elected at the Meeting (rounded up to the next number if the total number of directors to be elected is not evenly divisible by four). Holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock, voting as a single class, are entitled to elect the remaining number of directors to be elected at the Meeting, with holders of Class A Stock having one (1) vote per share and holders of Class B Stock having ten (10) votes per share. Since the Board nominated twelve (12) directors, holders of Class A Stock will be entitled to elect three (3) directors and holders of Class A Stock and holders of Class B Stock, voting as a single class, will be entitled to elect nine (9) directors. Because the directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast in each election, votes that are withheld (including broker non-votes) will not affect the outcome of the elections.

The rules of the NYSE determine whether proposals presented at stockholder meetings are routine or non-routine. If a proposal is routine, a broker or other nominee holding shares for an owner in “street name” may vote on the proposal without receiving voting instructions from the owner under certain circumstances. If a proposal is non-routine, the broker or other entity may vote on the proposal only if the owner has provided voting instructions. “Broker non-votes” occur when brokers or other nominees submit proxies relating to shares held in “street name” that they may vote with respect to at least one of, but not all, the matters to be considered at the Meeting because they have not received instructions from the respective beneficial owners of the shares.


	Fiscal 2020 Performance		Fiscal 2019 Performance
(in millions)
Net income (loss), reported basis	$	21.4	$	3,459.1
Plus (Less): Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	(966.6)		685.9
Plus: Interest expense	428.7		367.1
Plus: Loss on extinguishment of debt	2.4		1.7
EBIT	(514.1)		4,513.8
Plus (Less): Comparable adjustments
Acquisitions, divestitures, and related costs ⁽¹⁾	(51.2)		(56.9)
Restructuring and other strategic business development costs ⁽²⁾	607.1		26.0
Other ⁽³⁾	2,502.1		(1,850.0)
Comparable adjustments	3,058.0		(1,880.9)
EBIT, comparable basis	2,543.9		2,632.9
Less: Equity losses and related activities - comparable basis, EIE	(221.7)		(16.5)
EBIT - comparable basis, excluding Canopy EIE	$	2,765.6	$	2,649.4

⁽¹⁾For fiscal 2020, consists primarily of a net gain recognized in connection with the sale of the Black Velvet Canadian Whisky business and a gain related to the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in Nelson’s Green Brier Distillery, LLC to the acquisition-date fair value; partially offset by flow through of inventory basis adjustments associated with our investment in Canopy Growth Corporation. For fiscal 2019, consists primarily of a net gain recognized in connection with the sale of our remaining interest in our previously-owned Australian and European business and a gain on the sale of certain assets, partially offset by transaction and other acquisition-related costs recognized in connection with the November 2018 investment in Canopy Growth Corporation.


Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.			Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.
Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.

You hereby appoint James O. Bourdeau and Brian Bennett, or either of them, proxies for you with full power of substitution to vote all shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. (the "Company") that you would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held online on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT) and any adjournment thereof (the "Meeting"). Class A Stockholders, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect three (3) directors at the Meeting. Class A Stockholders and Class B Stockholders, voting as a single class, are entitled to elect nine (9) directors at the Meeting. Please refer to the Proxy Statement for details. The number of shares of Class A Common Stock entitled to vote appears on the back of this card.


Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.			Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.
Please note there are two proxy cards, one for Class A Stockholders and one for Class B Stockholders. Stockholders who receive a Class A proxy card and a Class B proxy card must vote the shares represented by each card separately.

You hereby appoint James O. Bourdeau and Brian Bennett, or either of them, proxies for you with full power of substitution to vote all shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. (the "Company") that you would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held online on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT) and any adjournment thereof (the "Meeting"). Class A Stockholders, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect three (3) directors at the Meeting. Class A Stockholders and Class B Stockholders, voting as a single class, are entitled to elect nine (9) directors at the Meeting. Please refer to the Proxy Statement for details. The number of shares of Class B Common Stock entitled to vote appears on the back of this card.


Fee Type	Fiscal Year Ended February 29, 2020		Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2019
Audit Fees	$	7,836,673	$	7,619,692
Audit-Related Fees	9,840		166,292
Tax Fees	2,688		5,644
All Other Fees	—		—
Total	$	7,849,201	$	7,791,628


Performance Measures⁽¹⁾	Fiscal 2020 Operating Plan		Fiscal 2020 Performance		Fiscal 2020 Performance as a % of Fiscal 2020 Plan	Fiscal 2020 Performance as a % of Fiscal 2019 Performance
($ in millions)
Net Sales	$	8,435.9	$	8,343.5	98.9%	102.8%
Comparable EBIT	$	2,694.6	$	2,765.6	102.6%	104.4%
Free Cash Flow	$	1,082.0	$	1,824.6	168.6%	134.2%


• Brown-Forman Corporation			• Hershey Company (The)
• Campbell Soup Company			• J. M. Smucker Company (The)
• Clorox Company (The)			• Kellogg Company
• Colgate-Palmolive Company			• Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
• Conagra Brands, Inc.			• McCormick & Company, Incorporated
• Diageo plc			• Molson Coors Brewing Company
• Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (The)			• Monster Beverage Corporation
• General Mills, Inc.			• Starbucks Corporation


• CACI International, Inc.			• J. M. Smucker Company (The)
• Carnival Corp.			• Markel Corp.
• CenterPoint Energy, Inc.			• News Corp.
• CGI, Inc.			• O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.
• D.R. Horton, Inc.			• QUALCOMM, Inc.
• Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (The)			• Ralph Lauren Corp.
• Garmin Ltd.			• Ross Stores, Inc.
• Gilead Sciences, Inc.			• Select Medical Holdings Corp.
• Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.			• TechnipFMC plc
• Huntsman Corp.			• Thor Industries, Inc.
• Hyatt Hotels Corp.			• Westlake Chemical Corp.


	Fiscal 2020 Actual Results		Percent of Approved Plan		Fiscal 2020 Bonus Payout %⁽¹⁾		Weighting	Resulting Weighted %⁽¹⁾
($ in millions)
Net Sales	$	8,343.5	98.9	%	79.56	%	40%	31.82%
Comparable EBIT	$	2,765.6	102.6	%	158.67	%	40%	63.47%
Free Cash Flow	$	1,824.6	168.6	%	200.00	%	20%	40.00%
									135.29%


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 1


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 2


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 3


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 4


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 5


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 6


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 7


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 8


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 9


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 10


PROXY STATEMENT			Corporate Governance			Table of Contents


PROXY STATEMENT			Corporate Governance			Table of Contents


PROXY STATEMENT			Corporate Governance			Table of Contents


PROXY STATEMENT			Corporate Governance			Table of Contents


Name	Product Allowance		Charitable Matching Contributions
Jerry Fowden	$	5,000	$	—
Barry A. Fromberg	$	4,999	$	5,000
Ernesto M. Hernández	$	5,000	$	—
Susan Somersille Johnson	$	4,788	$	5,000
James A. Locke III	$	231	$	—
Daniel J. McCarthy	$	5,000	$	—
Judy A. Schmeling	$	5,000	$	—
Keith E. Wandell	$	3,818	$	—


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 11


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 12


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 13


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 14


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 15


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 16


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 17


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 18


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 19


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 20


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 21


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 22


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 23


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 24


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 25


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 26


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 27


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 28


Constellation Brands, Inc. 2020 Proxy Statement			#WORTHREACHINGFOR I 29