UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
| REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended |
OR
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to |
OR
| SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report |
Commission file number:
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Nu Holdings Ltd.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Cayman Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Grand Cayman,
+
(Address of principal executive offices)
Tel: +
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Copies to:
Manuel Garciadiaz | Byron B. Rooney
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
450 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 450-4000 Fax: (212) 701-5800
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
The number of outstanding shares as of December 31, 2021 was Class A ordinary shares (including Class A ordinary shares underlying the BDRs), and Class B ordinary shares.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐
Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer ☐
Accelerated Filer ☐
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this annual report:
U.S. GAAP ☐ International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by Other ☐
☒
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
| ☐ | Item 18 ☐ |
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
☐
Table of Contents
 |
Presentation of Financial and Other Information
All references to “U.S. dollars,” “dollars,” or “US$” are to the U.S. dollar. All references to “IFRS” are to International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the IASB.
Financial Statements
Nu Holdings Ltd., or “Nu,” was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on February 26, 2016 as an exempted company incorporated with limited liability.
We maintain our books and records in U.S. dollars, which is the presentation currency for our financial statements and also our functional currency. The functional currency of our Brazilian, Mexican and Colombian operating entities, respectively, is the Brazilian real, the Mexican peso and the Colombian peso. The financial statements of each of our subsidiaries are maintained using the relevant functional currency for such subsidiary, which we determine is the currency that best reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that entity. See note 2.a to our audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this annual report, for more information about our and our subsidiaries’ functional currencies.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 1 |
| |
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS. Unless otherwise noted, our consolidated statement of financial position data presented herein as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 and the consolidated statements of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 is stated in U.S. dollars, our reporting currency. Our consolidated financial information contained in this annual report is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, together with the notes thereto. Any financial information contained in this annual report comparing growth in the year ended December 31, 2019 against the prior period has been prepared based on accounting records for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was prepared in accordance with IFRS.
This financial information should be read in conjunction with “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this annual report.
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. References in this annual report to a fiscal year, such as “fiscal year 2021,” relate to our fiscal year ended on December 31 of that calendar year.
Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures
This annual report presents our Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and certain FX Neutral measures and their respective reconciliations for the convenience of investors, which are non-IFRS financial measures. A non-IFRS financial measure is generally defined as a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flow that purports to measure financial performance but excludes or includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable IFRS measure. Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and the FX Neutral measures, however, should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, profit (loss), or other measures of the financial performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is prepared and presented to eliminate the effect of items from profit (loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent company that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance within the period presented. We define Adjusted Net Income (Loss) as profit (loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent company, adjusted for expenses related to share-based compensation, allocated tax effects on share-based compensation, finance costs related to results with convertible instruments, as well as expenses (revenue deduction) and allocated tax effects related to the Initial Public Offering (IPO)-related customer program (NuSócios).
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is presented because our management believes that this non-IFRS financial measure can provide useful information to investors, securities analysts and the public in their review of our operating and financial performance, although it is not calculated in accordance with IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as a measure of performance in isolation. We also use Adjusted Net Income (Loss) as a key profitability measure to assess the performance of our business. We believe that Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is useful to evaluate our operating and financial performance for the following reasons:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 2 |
| |
| · | Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is widely used by investors and securities analysts to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items that can vary substantially from company to company and from period to period, depending on their accounting and tax methods, the book value and the market value of their assets and liabilities, and the method by which their assets were acquired; |
| · | Non-cash equity grants made to executives, employees or consultants at a certain price and point in time, and their income tax effects, do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time and the related expenses are not key measures of our core operating performance; |
| · | Expenses related to the customer program (NuSócios), and their income tax effects, do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time as they were related to a specific marketing effort event we carried out in connection with our IPO are not key measures of our core operating performance; and |
| · | Finance costs with convertible instruments include fair value adjustments relating to the embedded derivative conversion feature, which are based upon subjective assumptions and do not reflect the cash cost of our convertible debt, and do not directly reflect how our business is performing at any particular time. The related expense adjustment amounts are not key measures of our core operating performance. |
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is not a substitute for profit (loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent company, which is the IFRS measure of earnings. Additionally, our calculation of Adjusted Net Income (Loss) may be different from the calculation used by other companies, including our competitors in the technology and financial services industries, because other companies may not calculate these measures in the same manner as we do, and therefore, our measure may not be comparable to those of other companies. A reconciliation of our Adjusted Net Income (Loss) to its most directly comparable measure of income (loss) can be found in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.”
FX Neutral Measures
FX Neutral measures are prepared and presented to eliminate the effect of foreign exchange, or “FX,” volatility between the comparison periods, allowing management and investors to evaluate our financial performance despite variations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook.
FX Neutral measures are presented because our management believes that these non-IFRS financial measures can provide useful information to investors, securities analysts and the public in their review of our operating and financial performance, although they are not calculated in accordance with IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as a measure of performance in isolation.
The FX Neutral measures included in this annual report were calculated to present what such measures in preceding years would have been had exchange rates remained stable from these preceding years until the date of our most recent financial information, as detailed below.
The FX Neutral measures for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were calculated by multiplying the as reported amounts of Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and the key business metrics for such years by the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (R$5.240, R$3.952 and R$3.681, to US$1.00, respectively), and using such results to re-translate the corresponding amounts back to U.S. dollars by dividing them by the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 (R$5.415 to US$1.00), so as to present what certain of our statement of profit and loss amounts and key business metrics would have been had exchange rates remained stable from these past periods/years until the year ended December 31, 2021.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 3 |
| |
The average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates were calculated as the average of the month-end rates for each month in the years 2021, 2020, 2019 and 2018, as reported by Bloomberg.
FX Neutral measures for deposits and interest-earning portfolio presented in this annual report were calculated by multiplying the as reported amounts as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 by the spot Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates as of these dates (R$5.199, R$4.030 and R$3.875 to US$1.00, respectively), and using such results to re-translate the corresponding amounts back to U.S. dollars by dividing them by using the spot rate as of December 31, 2021 (R$5.576 to US$1.00) so as to present what these amounts would have been had exchange rates been the same as those on December 31, 2021. The Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates were calculated using rates as of such dates as reported by Bloomberg.
FX Neutral measures do not include adjustments for any other macroeconomic effect, such as local currency inflation effects, or any price adjustment to compensate for local currency inflation or devaluation. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral measures to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with IFRS can be found in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.”
Special Note Regarding Certain Operational Metrics
Customers and Active Customers
This annual report presents information regarding our number of customers and our number of monthly active customers.
Number of customers information is prepared and presented as an important indicator of the size and momentum of our business, particularly as we continue to operate at a high growth pace. We define customers for a given measurement period as the individuals or SMEs that have previously or within such measurement period opened an account with us and we exclude any such individuals or SMEs that have been charged-off or blocked or have voluntarily closed their account. Number of customers is presented because it allows us to track our capacity to attract and retain customers and can provide useful information to investors, securities analysts and the public in their review of our operating performance.
Monthly active customer information is prepared and presented as an important indicator of the size and momentum of our business based on the number of customers we consider to be active. We define monthly active customers as all customers that have generated revenue in the last 30 calendar days, for a given measurement period. Monthly active customers information is presented because it allows us to track our capacity to attract and retain active customers and can provide useful information to investors, securities analysts and the public in their review of our operating performance.
Moreover, we differentiate between total number of customers (which includes customers we consider to be non-active) and active customers, to enable our management to evaluate performance metrics exclusively on the customers that we define as active. Doing so allows us to track performance based on revenue (defined as Monthly ARPAC) and cost (defined as Monthly Average Cost to Serve). For an explanation of how we calculate Monthly ARPAC and Monthly Average Cost to Serve per Active Customer please see the “Glossary of Terms” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 4 |
| |
Information regarding both total number of customers and monthly active customers should be analyzed in conjunction with other operating and financial metrics, and should not be considered as a measure of performance in isolation. Additionally, our calculation of these measures may be different from the calculation used by other companies, including our competitors in the technology and financial services industries, because other companies may not calculate these measures in the same manner as we do, and therefore, our measures may not be comparable to those of other companies.
Market Share and Other Information
This annual report contains data related to economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. The information contained in this annual report concerning economic conditions is based on publicly available information from third-party sources that we believe to be reasonable. Market data and certain industry forecast data used in this annual report were obtained from internal reports and studies, where appropriate, as well as estimates, market research, publicly available information (including information available from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission website) and industry publications. We obtained the information included in this annual report relating to the industry in which we operate, as well as the estimates concerning market shares, through internal research, a report dated October 28, 2021 by management consulting company Oliver Wyman Consultoria em Estratégia de Negócios Ltda. commissioned by us, public information and publications on the industry prepared by official public sources, such as the national association of financial and capital markets entities (Associação Brasileira das Entidades dos Mercados Financeiro e de Capitais, or “ANBIMA”); the World Bank; the International Monetary Fund, or the “IMF;” the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or “OECD;” the Central Bank of Brazil; the Colombian Central Bank; the Central Bank of Mexico; the Inter-American Development Bank; the Brazilian social and economic development bank (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, or “BNDES”); the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, or the “IBGE”); the Institute of Applied Economic Research (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, or “IPEA”), the Superintendence of Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados, or “SUSEP”), the CVM; the Colombian National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE – Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística); the Mexican National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI – Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática); the Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service (Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas) or “SEBRAE;” the GSMA; and the Brazilian Association of Credit Card and Services Companies (Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Cartões de Crédito e Serviços), or “ABECS;” as well as private sources, such as B3, Bloomberg and Forbes, consulting and research companies in the Brazilian financial services industry, and Fundação Getulio Vargas, or “FGV,” among others. We estimate that we are one of the largest digital banking platforms in the world by comparing what we believe to be the largest (by number of customers) digital banking platforms around the world (according to public statements made by these platforms and data from an independent research firm) to the number of customers on our platform.
Industry publications generally state that the information they include has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Although we have no reason to believe any of this information or these reports are inaccurate in any material respect and believe and act as if they are reliable, we have not independently verified it. Governmental publications and other market sources, including those referred to above, generally state that their information was obtained from recognized and reliable sources, but the accuracy and completeness of that information is not guaranteed. In addition, the data that we compile internally and our estimates have not been verified by an independent source. Except as disclosed in this annual report, none of the publications, reports or other published industry sources referred to in this annual report were commissioned by us or prepared at our request. Except as disclosed in this annual report, we have not sought or obtained the consent of any of these sources to include such market data in this annual report.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 5 |
| |
Calculation of Net Promoter Score
Net promoter score, or “NPS,” is a widely known survey methodology that measures the willingness of customers to recommend a company’s products and services. It is used to gauge customers’ overall satisfaction with a company’s products and services and their loyalty to the brand, and it is typically based on customer surveys. NPS measures satisfaction using a scale of zero to 10 based on a customer’s response to the following question: “How likely is it that you would recommend Nu to a friend or colleague?” Responses of nine or 10 are considered “promoters.” Responses of seven or eight are considered neutral. Responses of six or less are considered “detractors.” The NPS, a percentage expressed as a numerical value, is calculated by subtracting the percentage of respondents who are detractors from the percentage who are promoters.
Rounding
We have made rounding adjustments to some of the figures included in this annual report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 6 |
| |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or our future financial or operating performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of these words or other similar terms or expressions that concern our expectations, strategy, plans, or intentions. Forward-looking statements contained in this annual report include statements about:
| · | general economic, financial, political, demographic and business conditions in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, as well as any other countries we may serve in the future and their impact on our business; |
| · | fluctuations in interest, inflation and exchange rates in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia and any other countries we may serve in the future; |
| · | our ability to timely and efficiently implement any measures that are necessary to combat or reduce the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, cash flow, prospects, liquidity and financial condition; |
| · | competition in the consumer technology and financial services industry; |
| · | our ability to implement our business strategy; |
| · | our ability to adapt to the rapid pace of technological changes in the sectors in which we operate; |
| · | the reliability, performance, functionality and quality of our products and services, reliability and performance of our suitability, risk management and business continuity policies and processes; |
| · | the availability of government authorizations on terms and conditions and within periods acceptable to us; |
| · | our ability to continue attracting and retaining new appropriately-skilled employees; |
| · | our capitalization and level of indebtedness; |
| · | the interests of our founding shareholder; |
| · | our ability to manage our growth effectively; |
| · | our ability to successfully expand in Latin America and other new markets; |
| · | changes in government regulations applicable to the financial services industry in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia and elsewhere; |
| · | our ability to compete and conduct our business in the future; |
| · | our ability to maintain, protect and enhance our brand and intellectual property; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 7 |
| |
| · | the success of operating initiatives, including advertising and promotional efforts and new product, service and concept development by us and our competitors; |
| · | changes in consumer demands regarding the products and services we offer, and our ability to innovate to respond to such changes; |
| · | changes in labor, distribution and other operating costs; |
| · | our compliance with, and changes to, government laws, regulations and tax matters that currently apply to us; |
| · | the size of our addressable markets, market share and market trends; |
| · | other factors that may affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations; and |
| · | other risk factors discussed under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.” |
We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this annual report. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including those described in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report. We cannot guarantee that the results, events, and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results, events, or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
Neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward- looking statements. Moreover, the forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this annual report to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward- looking statements. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.
In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this annual report, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 8 |
| |
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
| A. | Directors and Senior Management |
Not applicable.
| B. | Advisers |
Not applicable.
| C. | Auditors |
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
| A. | Offer Statistics |
Not applicable.
| B. | Method and Expected Timetable |
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
| A. | [Reserved] |
| B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not applicable.
| C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
| D. | Risk Factors |
Risk Factors Summary
Investing in our Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making a decision to invest in our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs. If any of these risks actually materialize, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs would likely decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. The following is a summary of some of the principal risks we face:
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
| · | Our business depends on a well-regarded and widely known brand, and any failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand and image, including through effective marketing strategies, would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
| · | Failure to successfully implement and improve our risk management policies, procedures and methods, including our credit risk management system, would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 9 |
| |
| · | Our international expansion efforts may not be successful, or may subject our business to increased risks. |
| · | Our business is highly dependent on the proper functioning of information technology systems, particularly at scale. |
| · | Any failure of these systems would disrupt our business and impair our ability to provide our services and products effectively to our customers. |
| · | We depend on data centers operated by third parties and third-party Internet hosting providers and cloud computing platforms, and any disruption in the operation of these facilities or platforms or access to the Internet would adversely affect our business. |
| · | We have incurred losses since our inception, and we may not achieve profitability. |
Risks Relating to Intellectual Property, Privacy and Cybersecurity
| · | Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information or our failure or the perception by our customers that we failed to comply with privacy laws or properly address privacy concerns could harm our business and standing with our customers. |
| · | Unauthorized disclosure of, improper access to, or destruction or modification of data through cybersecurity breaches, computer viruses or otherwise, or disruptions to our systems or services, could expose us to liability, protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation. |
| · | Claims by others that we infringe their proprietary technology or other rights could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation
| · | We are subject to extensive regulation and regulatory and governmental oversight as a digital banking platform and as a payment institution. Compliance with or violation of present or future regulations could be costly, expose us to substantial liability and force us to change our business practices, any of which could harm our business and results of operations. |
| · | Certain ongoing legislative and regulatory initiatives under discussion by the Brazilian Congress, the Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry may result in changes to the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries and may have an adverse effect on us. |
| · | We are subject to costs and risks associated with enhanced or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to data privacy, security and protection. Developments in laws and regulations could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. |
Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate
| · | Exchange rate and interest rate instability may have a material adverse effect on the economies of the countries in which we operate and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs. |
| · | Disruption or volatility in global financial and credit markets could adversely affect the financial and economic environment in the countries in which we operate, most notably Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, which could have a material adverse effect on us. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 10 |
| |
| · | Governments have exercised, and continue to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy and the other economies in which we operate. This influence, as well as political and economic conditions in Brazil and the other countries in which we operate, could harm us and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs. |
Risks Relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our BDRs
| · | An active trading market for our Class A ordinary shares may not be sustainable. If an active trading market is not maintained, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price paid and you could lose a significant part of your investment. |
| · | Our founding shareholder and CEO David Vélez Osorno owns 86.2% of our outstanding Class B ordinary shares, which represents 74.9% of the voting power of our issued share capital. This concentration of ownership and voting power may limit your ability to influence corporate matters. |
| · | We have granted the holders of our Class B ordinary shares preemptive rights to acquire shares that we may sell in the future, which may impair our ability to raise funds. |
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
Our business depends on a well-regarded and widely known brand, and any failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand and image, including through effective marketing strategies, would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe our brand has contributed significantly to the historical success of our business. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing our brand is critical to expanding our customer base, our loan portfolio and our third-party partnerships, as well as increasing engagement with our products and services. Our success in this regard will depend largely on our ability to remain – or, in markets into which we expand, become – widely known, gain and maintain our customers’ trust, be a technology leader and provide reliable, high-quality and secure products and services that continue to meet the needs of our customers at competitive prices, as well as the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and our ability to differentiate our services and platform capabilities from competitors’ products and services.
We believe that maintaining and promoting our brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our products and services and to expand our customer base. Maintaining and promoting our brand will depend largely on our ability to continue to provide useful, reliable and innovative products and services, which we may not do successfully. Our brand promotion activities may not generate customer awareness or increase revenue, and even if they do, any increase in revenue may not offset the expenses we incur in promoting our brand. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, we would lose significant market share and our business would be materially and adversely affected. Further, our success in the introduction and promotion of new products and services, as well as the promotion of existing products and services, may be partly dependent on our visibility on third-party advertising platforms. Changes in the way these platforms operate or changes in their advertising prices or other terms could make the introduction and promotion of our products and services and our brand more expensive or more difficult. If we are unable to market and promote our brand on third-party platforms effectively, our ability to acquire new customers would be materially harmed, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 11 |
| |
Failure to successfully implement and improve our risk management policies, procedures and methods, including our credit risk management system, would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The management of risk is an integral part of our activities. We seek to monitor and manage our risk exposure through a variety of separate but complementary financial, credit, market, operational, compliance and legal policies, procedures and reporting systems, among others. We employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques, which may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all economic market environments or against all types of risk, including risks that we may fail to identify or anticipate.
We use certain tools and metrics for managing market risk, including statistical models, which are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior. We apply statistical and other tools to these observations to quantify our market risk. However, in part because these tools and metrics are based on historical market behavior, and in part because the models do not take all market risks into account, they may fail to predict future market risks, including those that arise from factors we did not anticipate or correctly evaluate in our statistical models. This would limit our ability to effectively manage our market risk, which could result in our losses being significantly greater than predicted.
Because certain of our operating subsidiaries are financial or payments institutions, our business is also subject to inherent credit risk. An important feature of our credit risk management system is an internal credit score system that assesses the particular risk profile of a customer. As this process involves detailed analysis of a customer that takes into account both quantitative and qualitative factors, it is subject to error, and our internal risk models may not always be able to accurately predict the future credit risk of our customers or assign an accurate credit score, which may result in our exposure to higher credit risks than indicated by our risk management system. We also rely on certain publicly available customer credit information, information relating to credit agreements and other public sources to assess a customer’s creditworthiness. Due to limitations in the availability of information and the underdeveloped information infrastructure in the markets in which we operate, our assessment of credit risk associated with a particular customer may not be based on complete, accurate or reliable information. In addition, we cannot ensure that our credit scoring systems collect complete or accurate information reflecting the actual behavior of customers or that their credit risk can be assessed correctly. Without complete, accurate and reliable information, we have to rely on other publicly available resources and our internal resources, which may not be effective. As a result, our ability to effectively manage our credit risk and subsequently determine our credit loss allowances may be materially adversely affected.
Relatedly, we are exposed to counterparty risk, which may arise from, for example, investing in securities of third parties, entering into derivative contracts under which counterparties have obligations to make payments to us or executing securities, futures or currency trades from proprietary trading activities that fail to settle at the required time due to non-delivery by the counterparty or systems failure by clearing agents, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries. Many of the routine transactions we enter into expose us to significant risk in the event of default by one of our significant counterparties, although we do not currently face specific counterparty risk from concentration within our loan portfolio. If these risks give rise to losses, this could materially and adversely affect us. Separately, because we routinely transact with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks and other institutional customers, defaults by, and even rumors or questions about the solvency of, certain financial institutions and the financial services industry could lead to market-wide liquidity problems that could lead to substantial losses for our business.
We also face operational and foreign exchange risk. Although we have adopted policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage our operational risk, these policies and procedures may not be fully effective. For a discussion of the risks we face with respect to foreign exchange rates, see “—Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate—Exchange rate and interest rate instability may have a material adverse effect on the economies of the countries in which we operate and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 12 |
| |
If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not successful in capturing all risks to which we are or may be exposed, we may suffer harm to our reputation or be subject to litigation or regulatory actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Further, if management were to rely on risk models – whether with respect to market, credit or operational risks – that were flawed or poorly developed, implemented or used, or if management were to misunderstand or use such information for purposes for which it was not designed, we may fail to adequately manage our risk. In addition, if existing or potential customers or counterparties believe our risk management is inadequate, they could take their business elsewhere or seek to limit their transactions with us. Further, certain of the models and other analytical and judgment-based estimations we use in managing risk are subject to review by, and require the approval of, our regulators. If our models do not comply with their expectations, our regulators may require us to make changes to such models, may approve them with additional capital requirements or we may be precluded from using them, any of which could limit our ability to operate our businesses.
Failure to effectively implement, consistently monitor or continuously refine our risk management systems may result in a material adverse effect on our reputation, operating results and financial condition.
Our international expansion efforts may not be successful, or may subject our business to increased risks.
We currently operate in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, and we have information technology and support operations in Argentina, Germany, the United States and Uruguay. As part of our growth strategy, we may expand our operations by offering our products and services in additional regions, as well as additional countries in Latin America, where we have little or no experience, and by expanding our business in the jurisdictions in which we currently operate. We may not be successful in expanding our operations into these or other markets in a cost-effective or timely manner, if at all, and our products and services may not experience the same market adoption in such international jurisdictions as we have enjoyed in Brazil. In particular, the expansion of our business into new geographies (or the further expansion in geographies in which we currently operate) may depend on the local regulatory environment or require a close commercial relationship with one or more local banks or other intermediaries, which could prevent, delay or limit the introductions of our products and services in such countries. Local regulatory environments may vary widely in terms of scope and sophistication.
Further, our international expansion efforts have and will continue to place a significant strain on our personnel (including management), technical, operational and financial resources, and our current resources may not be adequate to support our planned geographical expansion. We also may not be able to recoup our investments in new geographies in a timely manner, if at all. If our expansion efforts are unsuccessful, including because potential customers in a given jurisdiction fail to adopt our products and services, our reputation and brand may be harmed, and our ability to grow our business and revenue may be adversely affected.
Even if our international expansion efforts are successful, international operations will subject our business to increased risks, including:
| · | increased licensing and regulatory requirements; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 13 |
| |
| · | competition from service providers or other entrenched market participants that have greater experience in the local markets than we do; |
| · | increased costs associated with and difficulty in obtaining, maintaining, processing, transmitting, storing, handling and protecting intellectual property, proprietary rights and sensitive data; |
| · | changes to the way we do business as compared with our current operations; |
| · | a lack of acceptance of our products and services; |
| · | the ability to support and integrate with local third-party service providers; |
| · | difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations in an environment of diverse culture, language, laws and customs; |
| · | difficulties in recruiting and retaining qualified employees and maintaining our company culture; |
| · | increased travel, infrastructure and legal and compliance costs; |
| · | compliance obligations under multiple, potentially conflicting and changing, legal and regulatory regimes, including those governing financial institutions, payments, data privacy, data protection, information security, anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-money laundering; |
| · | compliance with complex and potentially conflicting and changing tax regimes; |
| · | potential tariffs, sanctions, fines or other trade restrictions; |
| · | exchange rate exposure; |
| · | increased exposure to public health issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and related industry and governmental actions to address these issues; and |
| · | regional economic and political instability. |
As a result of these risks, our international expansion efforts may not be successful or may be hampered, which would limit our ability to grow our business.
Our business is highly dependent on the proper functioning of information technology systems, particularly at scale. Any failure of these systems would disrupt our business and impair our ability to provide our services and products effectively to our customers.
Our continued growth depends in part on the ability of our existing and potential customers to access our products and platform capabilities at any time and within an acceptable amount of time. Continued access to our products and platform capabilities depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of numerous systems, including our computer systems, software, data centers and telecommunications networks, as well as the systems of third parties, such as credit and debit card transaction authorization providers, national financial system network infrastructure providers, back office and business process support, information technology production and support, Internet and telephone connections, network access, data center infrastructure services and cloud storage and computing. However, these systems and technologies are vulnerable to disruptions, failures or slowdowns. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, introductions of new functionality, human or software errors, capacity constraints due to an overwhelming number of customers accessing our products and platform capabilities simultaneously, denial of service attacks or other security-related incidents, natural disasters, power outages, terrorist attacks, hostilities, and other events beyond our control.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 14 |
| |
As our business grows, it may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve the performance of our information technology systems, especially during peak usage times and as our products and platform capabilities become more complex and our customer traffic increases. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Specifically, if our products and platform capabilities are unavailable or if our customers are unable to access our products and platform capabilities within a reasonable amount of time, we may experience a loss of customers, lost or delayed market acceptance of our platform and products, delays in payment to us by customers, injury to our reputation and brand, the diversion of our resources, additional operating and development costs, loss of revenue, legal claims against us, the loss of licenses, loss of Central Bank of Brazil authorizations or fines or other penalties imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil (including intervention, temporary special management systems, the imposition of insolvency proceedings or the out-of-court liquidation of our operating subsidiaries), or by the Brazilian National Data Protection Authority (Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados, or the “ANPD”). In addition, we do not maintain insurance policies specifically for property and business interruptions, meaning we would directly and without setoff incur any losses we suffer as a result of the aforementioned occurrences. For further information, see “—Our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover all claims.”
Our business is highly dependent on the ability of our information technology systems to accurately process a large number of highly complex transactions across numerous and diverse markets and products in a timely manner and at high processing speeds, and on our ability to rely on our digital technologies, computer and email services, software and networks, as well as on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential data and other information on our computer systems and networks. Specifically, the proper functioning of our financial control, risk management, accounting, customer service and other data processing systems is critical to our business and our ability to compete effectively. Any failure to deliver an effective and secure service, or any performance issue that arises with a service, could result in significant processing or reporting errors or other losses. See “—We depend on data centers operated by third parties and third-party Internet hosting providers and cloud computing platforms, and any disruption in the operation of these facilities or platforms or access to the Internet would adversely affect our business.”
We do not operate all of our systems on a real-time basis and cannot assure that our business activities would not be materially disrupted if there were a partial or complete failure of any of these primary information technology systems or communication networks. In particular, because all customer transactions on the Nu Plataforma occur on our mobile application, any failure of our mobile application would cause our platform and services to be unavailable to our customers. Such failures could be caused by, among other things, major natural catastrophes, software bugs, computer virus attacks, conversion errors due to system upgrading, security breaches caused by unauthorized access to information or systems or malfunctions, loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment. Any such failures would disrupt our business and impair our ability to provide our services and products effectively to our customers, which could adversely affect our reputation as well as our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to remain competitive and achieve further growth will depend in part on our ability to upgrade our information technology systems and increase our capacity on a timely and cost-effective basis. We must continually make significant investments and improvements in our information technology infrastructure in order to remain competitive. We cannot guarantee that in the future we will be able to maintain the level of capital expenditures necessary to support the improvement or upgrading of our information technology systems. Any substantial failure to improve or upgrade our information technology systems effectively or on a timely basis would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 15 |
| |
We depend on data centers operated by third parties and third-party internet-hosting providers and cloud computing platforms, and any disruption in the operation of these facilities or platforms or access to the Internet would adversely affect our business.
Our business requires the ongoing availability and uninterrupted operation of internal and external transaction processing systems and services. We primarily serve our customers from third-party data center hosting facilities provided by a third-party service provider, which we rely on to operate certain aspects of our products and services, and we depend on third-party Internet-hosting providers and third-party bandwidth providers for continuous and uninterrupted access to the Internet to operate our business. Any disruption of or interference with our use of such services would impair our ability to deliver our products and services to our customers, resulting in customer dissatisfaction, damage to our reputation, loss of customers and harm to our business. Further, we have designed our products and services and computer systems to use data processing, storage capabilities and other services provided by such third-party service providers. As such, we cannot easily switch our operations to another cloud provider, so any disruption of or interference with our use of such providers’ services would increase our operating costs and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and we might not be able to secure service from an alternative provider on similar terms or at all.
While we maintain oversight of our third-party data center hosting facilities and Internet-hosting providers, such third parties are ultimately responsible for maintaining their own network security, disaster recovery and system management procedures, and such third-parties do not guarantee that our customers’ access to our solutions will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. These third-party providers may experience website disruptions, outages and other performance problems, which may be caused by a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, viruses, security attacks, fraud, spikes in customer usage and denial of service issues. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. In particular, we do not control the operation of the third-party data center hosting facilities, and such facilities are vulnerable to damage or interruption from human error, intentional bad acts, power loss, hardware failures, telecommunications failures, improper operation, unauthorized entry, data loss, power loss, cyberattacks, fires, wars, terrorist attacks, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, natural disasters or similar catastrophic events. They also could be subject to break-ins, computer viruses, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and other misconduct. The occurrence of a natural disaster or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice or terminate our hosting arrangement or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in the delivery of our solutions, cause system interruptions, prevent our customers from accessing their accounts online, reputational harm and loss of critical data, prevent us from supporting our solutions or cause us to incur additional expense in arranging for new facilities and support.
If we lose the services of one or more of our Internet-hosting or bandwidth providers for any reason or if their services are disrupted, for example due to viruses or denial of service or other attacks on their systems, or due to human error, intentional bad acts, power loss, hardware failures, telecommunications failures, fires, wars, terrorist attacks, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes or similar catastrophic events, we could experience disruption in our ability to offer our solutions and adverse perception of our solutions’ reliability, or we could be required to retain the services of replacement providers, which could increase our operating costs and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 16 |
| |
Furthermore, prolonged interruption in the availability, or reduction in the speed or other functionality, of our products or services could materially harm our reputation and business. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our products and services could cause customers to believe that our products and services are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid our products and services, and would likely permanently harm our reputation and business.
Any of the foregoing, in addition to any of the factors described in “—We are dependent on third-party service providers in our operations, any failure of a third-party service provider could disrupt our operations,” could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Negative publicity about us (including our directors or employees) or our industry could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
Negative publicity about us (including our directors or employees) or our industry, including the transparency, fairness, customer experience, quality and reliability of our products or services, effectiveness of our risk model, our ability to effectively manage and resolve complaints, our privacy and security practices, our ESG and diversity and inclusion practices, litigation, regulatory activity, misconduct by or statements made by our directors or employees, funding sources, service providers or others in our industry, could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in, and the use of, our products and services. For example, in late 2020, we issued a public apology and reaffirmed our commitment to diversity after comments made by one of our co-founders received significant negative publicity. This and any future negative publicity could harm our reputation and cause disruptions to business. Any such reputational harm could further affect the behavior of customers and, as a result, materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.
The credit quality of our loan portfolio may deteriorate and our ECL allowance could be insufficient to cover our losses, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks arising from changes in credit quality and the recoverability of amounts due from counterparties are inherent in many aspects of our businesses, in particular our customer credit card and lending businesses. We expect the amount of reported non-performing loans to increase in the future on an absolute basis as a result of the expected growth in our total loan portfolio, the credit quality of which may turn out to be worse than anticipated. The amount of reported non-performing loans may also increase due to factors beyond our control, such as adverse changes in the credit quality of our borrowers and counterparties or a general deterioration in economic conditions in the markets in which we operate.
Our provisions for credit losses are based on our current assessments and expectations concerning various factors affecting the quality of our loan portfolio. These factors include, among other things, our borrowers’ financial condition, government macroeconomic policies, interest rates and the legal and regulatory environment. As many of these factors are beyond our control and there is no infallible method for predicting loan and credit losses, we cannot guarantee that our current or future reserves for credit losses will be sufficient to cover actual losses. If our assessment of and expectations concerning the above-mentioned factors differ from actual developments, if the quality of our total loan portfolio deteriorates, for any reason, or if the future actual losses exceed our estimates of expected losses, we may be required to increase our provisions for credit losses, which may adversely affect our financial condition. As such, any unexpected increase in the level of our non-performing loans could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 17 |
| |
We depend on key management, as well as our experienced and capable employees, and any failure to attract, motivate and retain our employees would harm our ability to maintain and grow our business.
Our business functions at the intersection of rapidly changing technological, social, economic and regulatory developments that require a wide-ranging set of expertise and intellectual capital. Our future success is significantly dependent upon the continued service of our executives and other key employees, and in particular our founding shareholder and chief executive officer David Vélez Osorno. If we lose the services of any member of management or any key employee, we may not be able to locate a suitable or qualified replacement, and we may incur additional expenses to recruit and train a replacement, which would severely disrupt our business and growth.
To maintain and grow our business, we will need to identify, attract, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled employees, which requires significant time, expense and effort. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, in our industry in particular. We may need to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract and retain new employees, and we may never realize returns on these investments. In addition, from time to time, there may be changes in our management team that may be disruptive to our business. If our management team, including any new hires that we make, fail to work together effectively and to execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business would be harmed.
Furthermore, our international expansion and our business in general may be materially adversely affected if legislative or administrative changes to immigration or visa laws and regulations impair our hiring processes or projects involving personnel who are not citizens of the country where their work is to be performed. If we are not able to add and retain employees effectively, our ability to achieve our strategic objectives will be adversely affected, and our business and growth prospects will be harmed.
Increases in our remuneration expenses for our management that will be recognized in our future results will have an adverse effect on our accounting results
Our operations and strategies depend on the attraction and retention of qualified personnel with different levels of expertise, and as such, we offer competitive remuneration structures. As discussed in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Executive Compensation—Contingent Share Awards,” the cost of remuneration for our managers increased in the year ended 2021 compared to the year ended 2020 given the 2021 Contingent Share Awards and we expect that the cost of remuneration for our managers will continue to increase in the next few years. Total expenses for the 2021 Contingent Share Awards was determined to be US$422.6 million and the expenses will be recognized over a period of 7.5 years since its issuance. The recognition of these additional expenses as management remuneration will have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business would be harmed.
We have experienced and expect in the near term to continue to experience rapid growth. For instance, our total revenue increased by 130.4%, reaching US$1,698 million in 2021 from US$737.1 million in 2020. On a FX Neutral basis, our total revenue increased by 138.0%, reaching US$1,698 million in 2021 from US$713.3 million in 2020. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures.” The number of our full-time employees increased by 107%, reaching 6,068 on December 31, 2021 compared to 2,929 as on December 31, 2020. Our growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our administrative, operational and financial resources. Our ability to effectively manage our growth will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to:
| · | expand our sales and marketing, technology, finance and administration teams; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 18 |
| |
| · | grow our facilities and infrastructure; |
| · | adapt and scale our information technology systems; |
| · | refine our operational, financial and risk management controls and reporting systems and procedures; |
| · | recruit, integrate, train and retain a growing employee base and maintain our corporate culture; |
| · | maintain and grow our customer base and provide quality customer service; and |
| · | obtain, maintain, protect and develop our strategic assets, including our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. |
Executing on these factors will require significant capital expenditures and the allocation of valuable management and employee resources. We may be unable to effectively manage any future growth in an efficient, cost-effective or timely manner, or at all. Any failure to successfully implement systems enhancements and improvements will likely negatively impact our ability to manage our expected growth, ensure uninterrupted operation of key business systems and comply with the rules and regulations that are applicable to public reporting companies. Moreover, if we do not effectively manage the growth of our business and operations, the quality of our platform would suffer, which would negatively affect our reputation, results of operations and overall business. Furthermore, we encourage employees to quickly develop and launch new features for our products and services; as we grow, we may not be able to execute as quickly as smaller, more efficient organizations.
A decline in the use of credit or prepaid cards as a payment mechanism for consumers or adverse developments with respect to the payment processing industry in general would have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If consumers do not continue to use credit or prepaid cards as a payment mechanism for their transactions or if there is a change in the mix of payments between cash, credit, and prepaid cards and other means of payment, including real-time payments, that is adverse to us, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe future growth in the use of credit, prepaid cards and other means of payment will be driven by the cost, ease-of-use and quality of services offered to consumers and businesses. In order to consistently increase and maintain our profitability, consumers and businesses must continue to use electronic payment methods including credit, debit and prepaid cards and real-time payment methods, such as PIX. Moreover, if there is an adverse development in the payments industry or Brazilian market in general, such as new legislation or regulation that makes it more difficult for our customers to do business or utilize such payment mechanisms, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from our credit card business, and losses or a significant reduction in our credit card business, or our failure to successfully expand and diversify our revenue sources beyond our credit card business, would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The commercial success of our consumer technology platform has depended and may continue to depend in part on the success of our credit card business. We have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from (i) the interchange fees we collect when a customer uses a Nu credit card to make a purchase and (ii) the interest rates we receive from the financing or revolving of Nu credit card balance by our customers. In the year ended December 31, 2021, interchange fees and interest related to credit cards accounted for 27.8% and 22.1% of our revenue, respectively (34.5% and 29.5% in the year ended December 31, 2020). While we expect our revenue concentration to decline in the future as we expand our suite of products and services, our efforts to diversify our revenue sources, such as new products and regional diversification, may not be successful and our reliance on credit card-related revenue may increase. Further, our revenue would be significantly harmed if we were to lose all or a substantial portion of our credit card business, whether due to loss of customers, regulatory or legislative developments or otherwise. In particular, our revenue would be harmed if the interchange fees that we collect or the interest rates that we charge become capped by regulators (or, in markets in which regulatory caps already exist, if such caps were reduced). Please see “—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—Certain ongoing legislative and regulatory initiatives under discussion by the Brazilian Congress, the Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry may result in changes to the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries, which may have an adverse effect on our business and cause us to incur increased compliance costs.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 19 |
| |
Further, on July 2, 2021, Brazilian Law No. 14,181, or the “Super Indebtedness Law,” created a chapter in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code dedicated to responsible credit and financial education, with new provisions that require specific information to be provided to the consumer when granting credit or in installment sales, such as the effective monthly interest rate, interest on arrears and late payment charges. This new set of rules may contribute to driving customers and potential customers away from our credit card product, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “—A decline in the use of credit or prepaid cards as a payment mechanism for consumers or adverse developments with respect to the payment processing industry in general would have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
If we are unable to attract new and retain existing customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.
We believe that our customer base is the cornerstone of our business. The growth of our business depends on existing customers expanding their use of our products and services and on our ability to attract new customers, including customers who may be reluctant to seek alternatives to incumbent financial institutions, by offering new products and services. If we are unable to attract new customers to our platform or encourage customers to broaden their use of our products and services, our growth may slow or stop, and our business may be materially and adversely affected.
Our ability to maintain and expand our customer base depends on a number of factors, including our ability to provide relevant and timely products and services to meet their changing needs at a reasonable cost. We have invested and will continue to invest in improving our platform and our suite of products and services. For example, we recently acquired NuInvest, our broker-dealer subsidiary, and have announced plans to expand our insurance broker activities. However, if new or improved features, products and services fail to meet shifting customer demands and fail to attract new customers or encourage existing customers to expand their engagement with our products and services, our growth may slow or decline. Further, these and other new products and services must achieve high levels of market acceptance before we are able to recoup our up-front investment costs, which may never occur if such products and services fail to attract new and retain existing customers.
Our existing and new products and services, including our payments, investments, insurance and credit solutions, could fail to attract new and retain existing customers for many reasons, including:
| · | we may fail to predict market demand accurately and provide products and services that meet this demand in a timely fashion; |
| · | customers may not like, find useful or agree with any changes we make to our products or services; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 20 |
| |
| · | the reliability, performance or functionality of our products and services could be compromised or the quality of our products and services could decline; |
| · | we may fail to provide sufficient customer support; |
| · | customers may dislike our pricing, in particular in comparison to the pricing of competing products and services; |
| · | competing products and services may be introduced or anticipated to be introduced by our competitors; and |
| · | there may be negative publicity about our products and services or our platform’s performance or effectiveness, including negative publicity on social media platforms. |
Further, our customers have no obligation to continue to use our products and services, and we can make no assurances that our customers will continue to do so. We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers; customer deposits and investments may be withdrawn without notice, and the consumer credit solutions we offer may be prepaid and canceled at any time. Further, recent changes in regulations have increasingly enabled customers to more easily switch to our competitors.
Any one or a combination of these factors could lead to customer attrition, and in particular at rates that are higher than we expect, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we cannot keep pace with rapid technological developments to provide new and innovative products and services, the use of our products and services and, consequently, our revenue could decline or our revenue growth rate could slow.
Rapid, significant and disruptive technological changes have impacted or may in the future impact the industries in which we operate, including changes in:
| · | artificial intelligence and machine learning (e.g., in relation to fraud and risk assessment); |
| · | payment technologies (e.g., real-time payments, payment card tokenization, virtual and crypto currencies, including distributed ledger and blockchain technologies, and proximity payment technology, such as near-field communication and other contactless payments); |
| · | mobile and internet technologies (e.g., mobile phone app technology); |
| · | commerce technologies, including for use in-store, online and via mobile, virtual, augmented or social-media channels; and |
| · | digital banking features (e.g., balance and fraud monitoring and notifications). |
In order to remain competitive and maintain and enhance customer experience and the quality of our products and services, we must continuously invest in the development of new products and features to keep pace with technological developments. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, in part, on certain third parties for the development of, and access to, new technologies. However, there can be no assurance that our development efforts, including through such third-party providers, will be successful, as we or such third parties may experience cost overruns, delays in delivery, performance failure or lack of customer adoption, among other potential issues. Further, there can be no assurance that our financial resources will be sufficient to maintain the levels of investment required to support such development efforts, which may require substantial capital commitment. Any failure in our development efforts, including any failure to adopt emerging technologies or to accurately predict and address market demand, and any delay in delivery of new products or services integrating emerging technologies, could render our services less desirable, or even obsolete, to our customers. Furthermore, our competitors may have the ability to devote more financial and operational resources than we can to the development of new technologies and services and, if successful, their development efforts could render our services less desirable to customers, resulting in the loss of customers or a reduction in the fees we can generate. If our development efforts prove unsuccessful, or if we are unable to develop, adapt to or access technological changes on a timely and cost-effective basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 21 |
| |
We are dependent on third-party service providers in our operations, any failure of a third-party service provider could disrupt our operations.
We utilize numerous third-party service providers in our operations, including payments, credit card transaction processing, back office and business process support, information technology production and support, Internet connections, network access and cloud computing. For example, our credit and debit (pre-paid) card transaction authorization is provided by Mastercard, our infrastructure services and connection to the National Brazilian Financial System Network, or “RSFN,” depends on the infrastructure of Rede de Telecomunicações para o Mercado Ltda., or “RTM,” a datacenter and link provider, our cloud data processing and storage services and, separately, our datacenter infrastructure services are both provided by third-party service providers, among other third-party service providers on which we rely for the continuity of our business. A failure by a third-party service provider could expose us to an inability to provide contractual services to our customers in a timely manner. Additionally, if a third-party service provider is unable to provide these services, we may incur significant costs to either internalize some of these services or find a suitable alternative. Significantly, certain third-party service providers, including Mastercard, are the sole source or one of a limited number of sources of the services they provide for us. It would be difficult and disruptive for us to replace some of our third-party vendors in a timely manner if they were unwilling or unable to provide us with these services in the future (as a result of their financial or business conditions or otherwise), and our business and operations likely would be materially adversely affected. Further, any failure in the performance of our due diligence processes and controls related to the supervision and oversight of these third parties in detecting and addressing conflicts of interest, fraudulent activity, data breaches and cyber-attacks, noncompliance with relevant securities and other laws could cause us to suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions or damage to our reputation.
Inadequacy or disruption of our disaster recovery plans and procedures in the event of a catastrophe would adversely affect our operations.
We have made a significant investment in our infrastructure, and our operations are dependent on our ability to protect the continuity of our infrastructure against damage from catastrophe or natural disaster, breach of security, cyber-attack, loss of power, telecommunications failure or other natural or man-made events. A catastrophic event could have a direct negative impact on us by adversely affecting our customers, partners, third-party service providers, employees or facilities, or an indirect impact on us by adversely affecting the financial markets or the overall economy. If our business continuity and disaster recovery plans and procedures were disrupted, inadequate or unsuccessful in the event of a catastrophe, we could experience a material adverse interruption of our operations.
We serve our customers using third-party data centers and cloud services. While we have electronic access to the infrastructure and components of our platform that are hosted by third parties, we do not control the operation of these facilities. Consequently, we may be subject to service disruptions as well as failures to provide adequate support for reasons that are outside of our direct control. These data centers and cloud services are vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, system failures, cyber-attacks, physical or electronic break-ins, human error or interference (including by employees, former employees or contractors), and other catastrophic events. Our data centers may also be subject to local administrative actions, changes to legal or permitting requirements and litigation to stop, limit or delay operations. Despite precautions taken at these facilities, such as disaster recovery and business continuity arrangements, the occurrence of a natural disaster or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice or other unanticipated problems at these facilities could result in interruptions or delays in our services, impede our ability to scale our operations or have other adverse impacts upon our business. See “—We depend on data centers operated by third parties and third-party Internet hosting providers and cloud computing platforms, and any disruption in the operation of these facilities or platforms or access to the Internet would adversely affect our business.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 22 |
| |
Our disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
Disclosure controls and procedures, including internal controls over financial reporting, are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” and the applicable rules and regulations of the CVM is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s and the CVM’s respective rules and forms.
These disclosure controls and procedures have inherent limitations, which include the possibility that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and result in errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by any unauthorized override of the controls. Consequently, our business is exposed to risk from potential noncompliance with policies, employee misconduct, negligence and fraud, which could result in regulatory sanctions, civil claims and serious reputational or financial harm. In particular, it is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not always be effective. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in the control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021 and, if we fail to remediate such deficiencies (or identify and remediate other material weaknesses) and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, we identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to (i) IT systems change management processes and (ii) IT user identity and access management processes, all of which were originally identified in connection with a structured review of our internal control over financial reporting and procedures initiated by our management more than one year prior to the initial prospectus of our IPO, and the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. We have adopted remediation measures with respect to the material weaknesses identified above, which we expect to be fully implemented within 2022, including hiring experienced key personnel in our technology function, implementing new processes and information technology controls, improving our internal controls to provide additional levels of review, enhancing our documentation practices, implementing new software solutions and increasing our personnel training. We believe these measures, once fully implemented, should adequately remediate the material weaknesses identified above, though as of the date of this annual report we have not been able to complete implementation nor testing of the effectiveness of the remediation measures.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 23 |
| |
We cannot guarantee that the measures we have taken to date and actions we may take in the future will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to our material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or that they will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses. Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our consolidated financial condition or results of operations, which could cause investors to lose confidence in our financial statements, and the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares to decline. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is not required to assess or report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2021. We are only required to provide such a report for the year ending December 31, 2022. At that time, our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, since we are no longer classified as an emerging growth company, in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2022 our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may disagree with our assessment and may issue a report that contains an adverse opinion if, in their evaluation, there are deficiencies that, individually or in combination, result in one or more material weaknesses. Further, in terms of regulations and legislation in Brazil, all Brazilian financial and payment institutions, which includes some of our Brazilian subsidiaries, must maintain internal guidelines and procedures to control their respective financial, operational and information systems, and must comply with all applicable legislation. CMN Resolution No. 4,595 of August 28, 2017 provides that Brazilian financial institutions must implement and maintain a compliance policy compatible with its nature, size, complexity, structure, risk profile and business model. Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 65 of January 26, 2021, provides similar rules for Brazilian payment institutions. In accordance with CMN Resolution No. 2,554 of September 24, 1998, the executive directors of Brazilian financial and payment institutions are responsible for implementing efficient internal control structures that set out control responsibilities and procedures and establish objectives and procedures applicable to all levels of the institution, among other requirements. The executive directors are also responsible for ensuring compliance with all internal procedures. In addition, as a public company, our reporting obligations may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.
We have incurred losses since our inception, and we may not achieve profitability.
We have incurred losses since our inception. We incurred a loss of US$165.3 million, US$171.5 million and US$92.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. We will need to generate and sustain increased revenue levels and decrease proportionate expenses in future periods to achieve profitability. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in the near term as a result of our expected significant investments in our business, including with respect to our employee base; sales and marketing; development of new products, services and features; acquisitions; expansion of infrastructure; expansion of international operations; and general administration, including legal, finance and other compliance expenses related to being a public company. In addition, we intend to expand our customer base, and continue to invest in developing products and services that we believe will improve the experiences of our customers and therefore improve our long-term results of operations. However, customer acquisition could cause us to incur losses in the short term because costs associated with new customers are generally incurred up front, while revenue is uncertain and mostly recognized thereafter as customers make interest payments and utilize our services. Likewise, improvements in products and services have and will continue to cause us to incur significant up-front costs and may not result in the long-term benefits that we expect, which could materially and adversely affect our business. If any of these costs materially rise in the future, our expenses may rise significantly. If we are unable to generate adequate revenue growth and manage our expenses, we may continue to incur losses and may not attain profitability.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 24 |
| |
Our results of operations and operating metrics may fluctuate, which may cause the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs to decline.
Our results of operations may vary significantly and are not necessarily an indication of future performance. These fluctuations may be a result of a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control. In particular, our results of operations and operating metrics are subject to volatility based on consumer spending levels. The electronic payments industry in general depends heavily on the overall level of consumer spending, which may be adversely affected by general or localized economic conditions that impact consumer confidence, consumer spending, consumer discretionary income or changes in consumer purchasing habits. A sustained deterioration in general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, including a rise in unemployment rates (particularly in Latin America) or increases in interest rates, may cause a reduction in overall consumer spending, thereby causing a decline in the number of transactions made by our cardholders or in the average amount spent per transaction, which would adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, our business is affected by customer behavior throughout the year and experiences seasonal fluctuations. We are aware, based on historical information, that months in which certain holidays fall, such as Black Friday and Christmas, generate higher levels of consumption and thus positively benefit our total transaction volume and related revenue. Relatedly, February is a month with lower revenue given fewer calendar days and thus a lower monthly volume of transactions.
In addition to consumer spending levels and seasonality, our results of operations may fluctuate as a result of changes in our ability to attract and retain new customers, increased competition in the markets in which we operate, our ability to expand our operations in new and existing markets, our ability to maintain an adequate growth rate and effectively manage that growth, our ability to keep pace with technological changes in the industries in which we operate, changes in governmental or other regulations affecting our business, harm to our brand or reputation, and other risks described elsewhere in this annual report.
Further, from time to time, we have made and may make decisions that will have a negative effect on our short-term operating results if we believe those decisions will improve our operating results over the long term. These decisions may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, or they may be inconsistent with the expectations of investors and research analysts, either of which could cause the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs to decline.
Real or perceived inaccuracies in our key operating metrics may harm our reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
We track certain key operating metrics such as number of customers, monthly active customers, activity rate, purchase volume, deposits, interest earning portfolio, monthly ARPAC, monthly average cost to serve per customer and our net promoter score, among other metrics, which are not independently verified by any third party. While the metrics presented in this annual report are based on what we believe to be reasonable assumptions and estimates, our internal systems and tools have a number of limitations, and our methodologies for tracking these metrics may change over time. In addition, limitations or errors with respect to how we measure data or with respect to the data that we measure may affect our understanding of certain details of our business, which could affect our long-term strategies. If the internal systems and tools we use to track these metrics understate or overstate performance or contain algorithmic or other technical errors, the key operating metrics we report may not be accurate. If investors do not perceive our operating metrics to be accurate, or if we discover material inaccuracies with respect to these figures, our reputation may be significantly harmed, and our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 25 |
| |
We have a limited operating history with financial results that may not be indicative of future performance, and our revenue growth rate is likely to slow as our business matures.
We were founded in 2013 and began operations in Brazil in 2014, in Mexico in 2019 and in Colombia in 2020. As a result of our limited operating history, our ability to accurately forecast our future results of operations is limited and subject to a number of uncertainties. Our historical revenue growth and other historical results should not be considered indicative of our future performance. In particular, over the long-term, we expect that our revenue growth will slow as our business matures. It is also possible that our revenue growth does not reach the levels we expect, or declines for any number of reasons, including slowing demand for our products, increasing competition, changes to technology, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, increased regulation or our failure, for any reason, to take advantage of growth opportunities. If our assumptions regarding our future revenue growth and other operating and financial results are incorrect or change, our operating and financial results could differ materially from our expectations.
Our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover all claims.
Our insurance policies may not adequately cover all risks to which we are exposed. A significant claim not covered by our insurance, in full or in part, may result in significant expenditures by us. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain insurance policies in the future at reasonable costs or on acceptable terms, which may adversely affect our business and the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
Fraud could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We offer products and services to a large number of customers, and we are responsible for vetting and monitoring these customers and determining whether the transactions we process for them are legitimate. When our products and services are used to process illegitimate transactions and we settle those funds, we are unable to recover them, suffer losses and incur liabilities. These types of illegitimate transactions can also expose us to governmental and regulatory sanctions. The highly automated nature of, and liquidity offered by, our payments services make us a target for illegal or improper uses, including fraudulent or illegal sales of goods or services, money laundering and terrorist financing. Identity thieves and those committing fraud using stolen or fabricated credit card or account numbers, or other deceptive or malicious practices, potentially can steal significant amounts of money from businesses like ours. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud would increase our liability, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 26 |
| |
If we are unable to integrate our products with a variety of operating systems, software applications, platforms and hardware that are developed by others, our solutions may not operate effectively, our products may become less marketable, less competitive or obsolete and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.
Our products must integrate with a variety of network, hardware and software platforms, and we need to continuously modify and enhance our products to adapt to changes in hardware, software, networking, browser and database technologies. In particular, we have developed our technology platform to easily integrate with third-party applications through the interaction of application programming interfaces, or “APIs.” In general, we rely on the fact that the providers of such software systems continue to allow us access to their APIs to enable these integrations. To date, we generally have not relied on long-term written contracts to govern our relationship with these providers. Instead, we are subject to the standard terms and conditions for application developers of such providers, which govern the distribution, operation and fees of such software systems, and which are subject to change by such providers from time to time. Our business could be harmed if any provider of such software or other technologies or systems:
| · | discontinues or limits our access to its APIs; |
| · | modifies its terms of service or other policies, including fees charged to or other restrictions on us or other application developers; |
| · | changes how customer information is accessed by us, our partners or our customers; |
| · | establishes more favorable relationships with one or more of our competitors; or |
| · | develops or otherwise favors its own competitive offerings over ours. |
Although we actively monitor our partners and multi-source venders, we cannot prevent our providers of software or other technologies from changing the features of their APIs, discontinuing their support of such APIs, restricting our access to their APIs or altering the terms governing their use in a manner that is adverse to our business. If our partners or multi-source vendors were to take such actions, our capabilities that depend on such APIs would be impaired until we are able to find a replacement partner or develop an in-house solution, which could significantly diminish the value of our platform and harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, third-party services and products are constantly evolving, and we may not be able to modify our platform to maintain its compatibility with such services and products as they continue to develop, or we may not be able to make such modifications in a timely and cost-effective manner, any of which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If we are unable to operate effectively on mobile platforms, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our future growth and success are dependent in part on our ability to provide a functional, reliable and user-friendly mobile platform to our customers. In particular, as we expand geographically, we will need to provide solutions for customers living in areas with low Internet connectivity, reduced bandwidth and latency issues. Our success will also depend on the interoperability of our offerings with a range of third-party technologies, systems, networks, operating systems and standards, including iOS and Android, and the availability of our mobile apps in app stores and in “super-app” environments.
The success of our mobile app could be harmed by factors outside our control, such as:
| · | actions taken by mobile app distributors; |
| · | unfavorable treatment received by our mobile apps, especially as compared to competing apps, such as the placement of our mobile apps in a mobile app download store; |
| · | increased costs in the distribution and use of our mobile app; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 27 |
| |
| · | changes, bugs or technical issues in mobile operating systems, such as iOS and Android, device manufacturers or mobile carriers that degrade the functionality of our mobile website or mobile apps or give preferential treatment to competitive offerings; |
| · | changes to the terms of service or policies of mobile operating systems, device manufacturers or mobile carriers that reduce or eliminate our ability to distribute applications, limit our ability to target or measure the effectiveness of our applications or impose fees or other changes related to our delivery of our applications; and |
| · | government action limiting the accessibility of our mobile app. |
Further, we are subject to the standard policies and terms of service of third-party operating systems, as well as policies and terms of service of the various application stores that make our application and experiences available to our customers. These policies and terms of service govern the availability, promotion, distribution, content and operation generally of applications and experiences on such operating systems and stores. Each provider of these operating systems and stores has broad discretion to change and interpret its terms of service and policies with respect to our platform and any such changes, which may be driven by many factors, including increased competition, may be unfavorable to us and our customers’ use of our platform. If we were to violate, or an operating system provider or application store believes that we have violated, its terms of service or policies, that operating system provider or application store could limit or discontinue our access to its operating system or store. In some cases, these terms of service or policies may not be clear or our interpretation of the requirements may not align with the interpretation of the operating system provider or application store, which could lead to inconsistent enforcement of these terms of service or policies against us. Any limitation or discontinuation of our access to any third-party platform or application store could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Additionally, in order to deliver a high-quality mobile experience for our customers, it is important that our products and services work well with a range of mobile technologies, products, systems, networks, hardware and standards that we do not control, and that we have good relationships with mobile operating system partners, device manufacturers and mobile carriers. We may not be successful in maintaining or developing relationships with key participants in the mobile ecosystem or in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, products, systems, networks or standards. In the event that it is more difficult for our customers to access and use our mobile platform, or if our customers choose not to access or use our mobile platform on their mobile devices or use mobile products that do not offer access to our mobile platform, our customer growth and engagement could be harmed. The risks associated with our dependency on our mobile application may be exacerbated by the frequency with which customers change or upgrade their devices. In the event customers choose devices that do not already include or support our platform or do not install our mobile apps when they change or upgrade their devices, our customer engagement may be further harmed.
Any acquisition, partnership or joint venture that we make or enter into could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and results of operations.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire, or form partnerships or joint ventures with businesses, technologies, services and products as such opportunities arise. In 2021, these opportunities included Easynvest (investments, June 2021), Juntos (conversational platform, July 2021), Creditas (secured credit, September 2021), SpinPay (checkout solutions, October 2021), Akala (Mexican financial cooperative, December 2021). In January 2022, we also concluded the acquisition of Olivia (AI-based personal finance management). We may enter into other strategic transactions or arrangements in the future. We may not, however, be able to identify appropriate acquisition, partnership or joint venture targets in the future, and our efforts to identify such targets may result in a loss of time and financial resources. In addition, we may not be able to successfully negotiate or finance such future acquisitions, partnerships or joint ventures successfully or on favorable terms, or to effectively integrate acquisitions into our current business, and we may lose customers or personnel as a result of any such strategic transaction (in particular the customers and personnel of an acquired business). The process of integrating an acquired business, technology, service or product into our business may divert management’s attention from our core business, and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and generate unforeseen pressures and strains on our organizational culture. Moreover, we may be unable to realize the expected benefits, synergies or developments that we initially anticipate from such a strategic transaction.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 28 |
| |
Financing an acquisition or other strategic transaction could result in dilution to existing shareholders from issuing equity securities or convertible debt securities, or a weaker balance sheet from using cash or incurring debt, and equity or debt financing may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, in connection with an acquisition, it is possible that the goodwill that has been attributed, or may be attributed, to the target may have to be written down if the valuation assumptions are required to be reassessed as a result of any deterioration in the underlying profitability, asset quality and other relevant matters. There can be no assurance that we will not have to write down the value attributed to goodwill in the future, which would adversely affect our results of operations and net assets.
Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a proposed transaction if we are unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, which may include approval by the Central Bank of Brazil or Brazil’s Administrative Council for Economic Defense (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, or “CADE”), or other applicable regulatory authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we or a potential acquisition target operate. Even if we are able to obtain regulatory approval, such approval could be subject to certain conditions, which could prevent us from competing for certain customers or in certain lines of business. In addition, we may face contingent liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and joint ventures, including, among others, (1) judicial or administrative proceeding or contingencies relating to the company, asset or business acquired, including civil, regulatory, tax, labor, social security, environmental and intellectual property proceedings or contingencies; and (2) financial, reputational and technical issues, including with respect to accounting practices, financial statement disclosures and internal controls, as well as other regulatory or compliance matters, all of which we may not have identified as part of our due diligence process and that may not be sufficiently indemnifiable under the relevant acquisition or joint venture agreement. We cannot guarantee that any acquisition, partnership or joint venture we make will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Substantial and increasingly intense competition within our industry may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
The Latin American market for financial services, and in particular the Brazilian, Mexican and Colombian financial services markets, have become increasingly competitive in recent years. We face significant competition from traditional Brazilian, other Latin American and international banks and other neobanks, payment services providers, investment advisors and brokers, in addition to other new financial technology companies, startups and non-financial companies operating in certain segments of the financial services industry in which we operate. We expect competition to intensify in the future, both as emerging technologies continue to enter the marketplace and as large financial incumbents increasingly seek to innovate the services that they offer that compete with our platform.
Specifically, we face competition in the consumer credit, investment, payments and insurance segments. Our main competitors in the Brazilian consumer credit space include Itaú Unibanco S.A., Banco Bradesco S.A., Banco Santander S.A., Banco Caixa Econômica Federal S.A. and Banco do Brasil S.A. In the Brazilian investment segment, in addition to certain of our competitors in the consumer credit space, our main competitors include Banco BTG Pactual S.A., Banco Inter S.A. and XP Inc. In the Brazilian payments space, in addition to certain of our competitors in the consumer credit and investment spaces, we face competition from MercadoPago.com Representações Ltda., PicPay Serviços S.A., PagSeguro Digital Ltd. and StoneCo Ltd., among others. In addition to existing competition, new competitors may enter the market or existing competitors may offer new or expand existing products or services.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 29 |
| |
Many of our competitors, in particular traditional banks or competitors that are affiliated with traditional banks, have substantially greater financial, operational and marketing resources than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to offer more extensive or enhanced products and services to customers, or offer such products and services at more attractive rates (including more attractive rates on deposits and rates on loans) or on better terms. As a result, we may be forced to increase our deposit rates, or lower the rates we charge for loans or the fees we charge for other services, or devote significant financial resources to our marketing efforts or developing customized products and services that customers demand, in order to maintain and expand our market share. If this were to occur, we would need to enhance cost control to maintain our margins, and if we are unable to control our costs, our margins and results of operations may be adversely affected. In particular, we have relied primarily on low-touch organic methods of customer acquisition, including an unpaid direct referral method. However, this method of customer acquisition may not be as productive as we would like going forward and could put us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors with high-touch customer acquisition models or greater marketing resources. If we are unable to acquire customers through our low-touch organic methods, we may have to increase our marketing investments, or could be unable to grow our revenue and our operating results could be adversely affected.
In addition, certain of our competitors in certain product areas and markets may not be subject to the same regulatory requirements that we are. For example, due to the volume of our payment transactions, we were required to obtain authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil to conduct our business as an issuer of post-paid payment instruments and an issuer of electronic currency, while certain other payment or financial institutions, including certain competitors, can operate without such authorization so long as their payment volume remains below certain thresholds. Further, as a regulated payment institution, our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos is required to comply with a set of regulations that is not applicable to non-regulated payment institutions, including minimum equity capital, minimum net equity, compulsory segregation of customers’ funds maintained in payment accounts, internal controls and cybersecurity requirements, among others. In addition, our subsidiary Nu Financeira, a Brazilian financial institution, has undertaken a commitment before the Central Bank of Brazil to operate with a Basel minimum capital adequacy ratio of 14.0% until 2023, which is a higher capital ratio than those applicable to most other financial institutions operating in Brazil. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview” for more information about capital adequacy and other regulatory requirements applicable to us and our operating subsidiaries. As a result, our competitors who are not subject to similar regulatory requirements may be able to offer products and services at lower costs, which could put pressure on the pricing and terms that we offer and, as a result, our profit margins.
Further, competition in the financial services industry in Brazil and certain other Latin American markets (including Mexico and Colombia) has increased, both as a result of recent consolidations among financial institutions in such markets, adversely affecting the ability of new market entrants to access material amounts of equity capital, and as a consequence of changes in regulations that (i) increased the ability of customers to switch between financial institutions, (ii) enabled financial institutions to access the financial and personal information of customers, and (iii) established rules for an instant payment arrangement. For example, on May 4, 2020, the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil implemented the Open Financial System, or “open banking,” in Brazil to facilitate the new market entrants’ access to the financial markets as well as to encourage competition between financial institutions. In particular, the implementing regulations make available to various participants in the Brazilian financial system data relating to customers (where consented to) and services of financial institutions. If we participate in open banking, we will be required to share standardized data related to our customers, service channels, products and services, which would make it easier for other market participants to compete with us. Mexico and Colombia are likewise in the process of implementing an open banking system. Further implementation of open banking may intensify competition in the industry, as the sharing of information between institutions may make it easier for competitors to offer better credit terms and conditions, enabling customers to move such financial obligations from our platform to other competing platforms, which would adversely affect our interest income and therefore our results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 30 |
| |
In addition, on November 16, 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil launched the instant payment system, or “PIX,” and the Instant Payment System, or “SPI,” which enable electronic fund transfers in real time around the clock. This ecosystem promotes innovation of the existing payment infrastructure. Although the regulations relating the PIX and SPI ecosystems are subject to further developments from time to time, such initiatives may promote greater competition in the industry, and could cause customers to transition away from the solutions we offer, towards PIX or SPI solutions. In particular, PIX is expected to make processing payments faster and less expensive, fostering additional competition and allowing new entrants to join the market, while also serving as a significant source of data that will contribute to the ongoing transformation of the financial industry in Brazil. Such developments could therefore materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to successfully compete, the demand for our platform, products and services could stagnate or substantially decline, and we could fail to retain or grow the number of customers using our platform, which would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our hedging strategy may not be able to prevent losses.
We use a range of strategies and instruments, including entering into derivative and other transactions, to hedge our exposure to market, credit and operational risks. Nevertheless, we may not be able to hedge all risks to which we are exposed, whether partially or in full, and the hedging strategies and instruments on which we rely may not achieve their intended purpose. Any failure in our hedging strategy or in the hedging instruments on which we rely could result in losses to us and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our decision not to hedge our foreign exchange exposure originated by our investments in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico could negatively harm our financial condition and results of operations.
Financial instruments, including derivative instruments, securities and cash and cash equivalents that are substantially composed of securities, represented 59.3% and 65.3% of our total assets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Any realized or unrealized future gains or losses from our investments or hedging strategies could have a significant impact on our income. These gains and losses, which we account for when we sell or assess the fair value of investments in financial instruments, can vary considerably from one period to another. If, for example, we enter into derivatives transactions to protect ourselves against decreases in interest rates and interest rates instead increase, we may incur financial losses. We cannot forecast the amount of gains or losses in any future period, and the variations experienced from one period to another do not necessarily provide a meaningful forward-looking reference point. Gains or losses in our investment portfolio may create volatility in revenue levels, and we may not earn a return on our consolidated investment portfolio, or on a part of the portfolio in the future, and any losses on our securities and derivative financial instruments could materially and adversely affect our income and financial condition. In addition, any decrease in the value of our investment and derivatives portfolios may result in a decrease in our capital ratios, which could impair our ability to engage in lending activity at the levels we currently anticipate.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 31 |
| |
Such derivative transactions also subject us to market, credit and operational risks, including basis risk (the risk of loss associated with variations in the spread between the asset yield and the funding or hedge cost) and credit or default risk (the risk of insolvency or other inability of the counterparty to a particular transaction to perform its obligations thereunder). Further, the execution and performance of these transactions depend on our ability to maintain adequate control and administration systems. Our ability to adequately monitor, analyze and report derivative transactions continues to depend, largely, on our information technology systems. These factors further increase the risks associated with these transactions.
Liquidity and funding risks are inherent in our business. Because our principal sources of funds are short-term deposits, a sudden shortage of funds would heighten our liquidity risk and increase our costs of funding.
Liquidity risk is the risk that we either do not have available sufficient financial resources to meet our obligations as they become due or can secure them only at excessive cost. This risk is inherent in our business and can be heightened by a number of factors, including over-reliance on a particular source of funding, changes in credit ratings or market-wide phenomena such as market dislocation. Constraints in the supply of liquidity, including in interbank lending, can materially and adversely affect the cost of funding our business, and extreme liquidity constraints may affect our current operations, our growth potential and our ability to fulfill regulatory liquidity requirements.
We currently rely primarily on retail deposits as our main source of funding. As of December 31, 2021, we had US$9.7 billion of retail deposits, 96.9% of which were payable on demand, while we had US$11.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents and securities, composed substantially of liquid government bonds. The ongoing availability of funding through retail deposits is sensitive to a variety of factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions, the confidence of retail depositors in the economy, in the financial services industry and in us, the availability and extent of deposit guarantees and competition for deposits between banks or with other products. Any of these factors could significantly increase the amount of retail deposit withdrawals that we experience in a short period of time, thereby reducing our ability to access retail deposit funding on economically appropriate and reasonable terms, or at all, in the future. This would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Increases in our costs of funding would also increase our liquidity risk. Our cost of obtaining funds is directly related to prevailing interest rates and to our credit spreads, with increases in these factors increasing our cost of funding. Credit spread variations are market driven and may be influenced by market perceptions of our creditworthiness. Changes to interest rates and our credit spreads occur continuously and may be unpredictable and highly volatile. Disruption and volatility in the global financial markets could have a material adverse effect on our ability to access capital and liquidity on financial terms acceptable to us, or at all. In the event of a sudden or unexpected shortage of funds in the banking system, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain levels of funding without incurring high funding costs, a reduction in the term of funding instruments or the liquidation of certain assets, which would materially adversely affect our business. Further, if the supply of retail deposits decreases or ceases to become available, we may be forced to raise the rates we pay on deposits, with a view to attracting more customers, and if retail deposits become excessively expensive, we may be forced to sell assets, potentially at depressed prices. The persistence or worsening of these adverse market conditions or an increase in base interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our ability to access liquidity and could increase our cost of funding, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 32 |
| |
Our ability to manage our funding base may also be affected by changes in regulation, including the compulsory reserve requirements applicable to our operating subsidiaries in Brazil. For more information on Brazil’s compulsory reserve requirements, see “—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—Increases in reserve, compulsory deposit, minimum capital and contributions to deposit insurance requirements may have a material adverse effect on us.”
Changes in market and economic conditions could adversely affect our loan portfolio and decrease the demand for our products and services.
The financial markets, and in turn the financial services industry, are affected by many factors, such as U.S. and foreign economic conditions and general trends in business and finance that are beyond our control, which could be adversely affected by changes in the equity or debt marketplaces, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates, the yield curve, financial crises, war, terrorism, natural disasters and other factors that are difficult to predict. A severe or prolonged downturn or periods of market turmoil in the U.S., Brazilian, Mexican, Colombian or international financial markets (or in other foreign markets in the jurisdictions in which we currently or may in the future operate) could materially and adversely affect the liquidity, credit ratings, businesses and financial conditions of our borrowers, which could in turn increase our non-performing loan ratios, impair our loan and other financial assets and result in decreased demand for borrowings in general. Specifically, we have credit exposure to borrowers which have entered or may shortly enter into insolvency or similar proceedings. We may experience material losses from this exposure. In addition, investments may lose value and our investment customers may choose to withdraw assets or transfer them to investments that they perceive to be more secure, which would adversely affect our income and liquidity positions. Any downturn in financial markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under the terms of our indebtedness, which may not be successful.
As of December 31, 2021, we had total indebtedness of US$176.9 million (comprising US$12.0 million in instruments eligible as capital, US$147.2 million in borrowings and financing, US$10.0 million in securitized borrowing and US$7.7 million in lease liabilities). Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to maintain a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay acquisitions and capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. Our ability to restructure or refinance indebtedness will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations.
The terms of existing or future debt instruments may restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. Our existing credit facilities contain restrictive covenants, including customary limitations on the incurrence of certain indebtedness and liens. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and breaches of these covenants could result in a default under our credit facilities and any future financing agreements into which we may enter, which in turn could cause our outstanding indebtedness under our credit facilities and any future financing agreements that we may enter into under these terms to become immediately due and payable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 33 |
| |
In addition, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness. In the absence of sufficient cash flows and capital resources, we would face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information. Any of these circumstances could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.
Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.
As a holding company, our corporate purpose is to invest, as a partner or shareholder, in other companies, consortia or joint ventures in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, where most of our operations are located, and outside of these jurisdictions. Accordingly, our material assets are our direct and indirect equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we are therefore dependent upon the results of operations of and, in turn, the payments, dividends and distributions from, our subsidiaries for funds to pay our operating and other expenses and to pay future cash dividends or distributions, if any, to holders of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs. We may be required to pay taxes on distributions made by our operating subsidiaries to us under the local laws applicable to such subsidiaries. For example, the Brazilian house of representatives recently approved proposed legislation (Projeto de Lei 2,337/21) that anticipates repealing the existing income tax exemption on the distribution of dividends and imposing an assessment of income taxes on the distribution of dividends, and that applicable taxes on the payment of interest on shareholders’ equity may be increased in the future. The proposed legislation has not yet been approved by the Brazilian senate and remains subject to amendment. Any imposition of or increases in the taxation on the distribution of dividends (or similar payments or distributions, such as interest on shareholders’ equity) may adversely affect us.
In addition, the payments, dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries to us for funds to pay future cash dividends or distributions, if any, to holders of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs could be restricted under financing arrangements that we or our subsidiaries may enter into in the future, and such subsidiaries may be required to obtain the approval of lenders to make such payments to us. Furthermore, we may be adversely affected if the governmental authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate impose legal restrictions on dividend distributions by our local subsidiaries, and exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar value of any distributions our subsidiaries make with respect to our equity interests in those subsidiaries.
We rely on the Mastercard payment scheme to process our transactions. If we fail to comply with the applicable requirements of the Mastercard payment scheme, Mastercard could seek to fine us, suspend us or terminate our registration, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on payment schemes to process our transactions, and a significant source of our revenue comes from processing transactions through the Mastercard payment scheme. We must pay a fee for this service, and from time to time, the payment schemes may increase the fees that they charge for each transaction using one of their cards, subject to certain limitations.
Payment networks establish their own rules and standards that allocate liabilities and responsibilities among the payment networks and their participants. These rules and standards, including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, govern a variety of areas, including how consumers and customers may use their cards, the security features of cards, security standards for processing, data protection and information security and allocation of liability for certain acts or omissions, including liability in the event of a data breach. The payment schemes routinely update and modify their requirements; the payment card networks could adopt new operating rules or interpret or reinterpret existing rules that we or our processors might find difficult or even impossible to follow or costly to implement. These changes may be made for any number of reasons, including as a result of changes in the regulatory environment, to maintain or attract new participants or to serve the strategic initiatives of the networks, and may impose additional costs and expenses on or be disadvantageous to us. Such changes may impact our ongoing cost of doing business, and we may not, in every circumstance, be able to pass through such costs to our customers. For example, changes in the payment card network rules regarding chargebacks may affect our ability to dispute chargebacks and the amount of losses we incur from chargebacks. If we fail to make such changes or otherwise resolve the issue with the payment card networks, the networks could disqualify us from processing transactions if satisfactory controls are not maintained, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 34 |
| |
We are subject to audit by the payment networks to ensure compliance with applicable rules and standards, and may be directly liable to the payment card networks for rule violations. If we do not comply with the payment scheme requirements, the payment schemes could seek to fine us, suspend us or terminate our registrations that allow us to process transactions on their schemes, and we could lose our ability to make payments using virtual cards or any other payment form factor enabled by the network. If we are unable to recover amounts relating to fines from or pass through costs to our customers or other associated participants, we would experience a financial loss. The termination of our registration due to failure to comply with the applicable requirements of the Mastercard payment scheme, or any changes in the payment scheme rules that would impair our registration, could require us to stop using the Mastercard payment scheme to process our transactions, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.
In the future, we may need to raise additional capital to fund our expansion (organically or through strategic acquisitions), to develop new or enhanced services or products or to respond to competitive pressures, or to comply with regulatory capital adequacy requirements discussed in “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Other Rules—Corporate Capital and Limits of Exposure.” Such financing may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our expansion, take advantage of acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance services or products or respond to competitive pressures, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, our shareholders will experience dilution and the securities that we issue may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our Class A ordinary shares, and the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs could decline. Any additional funds raised through debt financing will likely require our compliance with restrictive covenants that impose operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make acquisitions, dispose of assets and make restricted payments, among others. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.” In addition, such indebtedness may require us to maintain certain financial ratios. These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain future financings, to withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general, or to otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. A breach of any such covenant would likely result in a default under the applicable agreement, which, if not waived, could result in acceleration of the indebtedness outstanding.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 35 |
| |
The COVID-19 pandemic has materially impacted, and is expected to continue to materially impact, our business, key metrics and results of operations in volatile and unpredictable ways.
Occurrences of epidemics or pandemics, depending on their scale, may cause different degrees of disruption to the regional, state and local economies in which we offer our products and services. While the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia and worldwide will likely continue to adversely impact national and global economies, the full extent of the impact of the pandemic on our business, key metrics and results of operations depends on future developments that are uncertain and unpredictable, including the duration, severity and spread of the pandemic, its impact on capital and financial markets and any new information that may emerge concerning the virus, vaccines or other efforts to control the virus.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have transitioned to an almost fully remote work environment and we may continue to operate on a significantly remote and dispersed basis for the foreseeable future. This remote and dispersed work environment could have a negative impact on the execution of our business plans and operations. For example, if a natural disaster, power outage, connectivity issue, or other event occurred that impacted our employees’ ability to work remotely, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. Further, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we may experience disruptions if our employees or our third-party service providers’ employees become ill and are unable to perform their duties, and our operations, Internet or mobile networks, or the operations of one or more of our third-party service providers, is impacted. The increase in remote working may also result in customer privacy, IT security and fraud vulnerabilities, which, if exploited, could result in significant recovery costs and harm to our reputation. Transitioning to a fully or predominantly remote work environment and providing and maintaining the operational and infrastructure necessary to support a remote work environment also present significant challenges to maintaining our corporate culture, including employee engagement and productivity, both during the immediate pandemic crisis and beyond.
Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantial changes in consumer behavior, restrictions on business and individual activities and high unemployment rates, which have led to reduced economic activity. Extraordinary actions taken by international, federal, state and local public health and governmental authorities to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of COVID-19 in regions throughout the world, such as travel bans, quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders, suspension of interest accrual and similar mandates for many individuals and businesses to substantially restrict daily activities, have caused and may continue to cause a decrease in consumer activity generally.
In addition, we experienced declining Purchase Volume during periods impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic when economic activity declined and when we implemented a more restrictive credit policy due to reduced consumer income and economic uncertainty, reducing purchase volume per customer, and consequently reducing Monthly ARPAC. Specifically, we saw decreases in the purchase volume of our card operations in the first half of 2020, a trend that has progressively reversed since the end of 2020. Moreover, during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw a temporary increase in our delinquency levels, in line with market trends, and by the end of 2020, our levels had improved relative to our own pre-COVID-19 delinquency levels. In 2021, our delinquency rates remained below both our historical averages and average industry levels. However, the COVID-19 pandemic may have a negative impact on our ability to accurately estimate consumers delinquency levels based on internal credit scoring systems. Extraordinary income-substitution policies undertaken by federal, state and local governmental authorities may have masked the true level of consumer income deterioration or behavior in the markets in which we operate. As a result, the effectiveness of our consumer credit models may suffer in the future.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 36 |
| |
We have also seen significant and rapid shifts in the traditional models of banking and commerce as the pandemic has evolved. As of the date of this annual report, we have been and are currently able to deliver substantially all of our services remotely and therefore our operations have not been materially or negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we cannot predict if, and to what extent, our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity will be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the future, including regional or global outbreaks, or by national or international aftershocks of the pandemic once controlled, including a recession, slowdown of the economy or increase in unemployment levels. Further, if the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity in the future, many of the other risks described in this “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” may be heightened.
Risks Relating to Intellectual Property, Privacy and Cybersecurity
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information or our failure or the perception by our customers that we failed to comply with privacy laws or properly address privacy concerns could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
We collect, store, handle, transmit, use and otherwise process certain personal information and other customer data in our business. A significant risk associated with our operations is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. The perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may harm our business and results of operations. We must ensure that all collection, use, storage, dissemination, transfer, disposal and other processing of data for which we are responsible comply with relevant data protection and privacy laws. The protection of our customer, employee and company data is critical to us. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer information, such as credit card and other personal information. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors or other similar events. Any security breach, or any perceived failure involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, as well as any failure or perceived failure to comply with laws, policies, legal obligations or industry standards regarding data privacy and protection, whether by us or our vendors, could damage our reputation, expose us to litigation risk and liability, subject us to negative publicity, disrupt our operations and harm our business. Our security measures may fail to prevent security breaches, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unauthorized disclosure of, improper access to, or destruction or modification of data through cybersecurity breaches, computer viruses or otherwise, or disruptions to our systems or services, could expose us to liability, protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation.
Our business involves the collection, storage, transmission and other processing of customers’ personal data, including names, addresses, identification numbers, account numbers, account balances, loan positions and trading and investment portfolio information. We also have arrangements in place with certain third-party service providers that require us to share certain customer information. Our and such third parties’ ability to protect such personal data and customer information is dependent on our ability to prevent cybersecurity breaches and unauthorized access and disclosure.
An increasing number of organizations, including large customers and businesses, other large technology companies, financial institutions and government institutions have disclosed breaches of their information security systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks, including on portions of their websites, networks or infrastructure, or those of third parties who provide services to them. Information security risks for financial and technology companies such as ours in particular have significantly increased recently, in part because of new technologies, the use of the Internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties. For example, in 2020, we experienced a phishing attack that compromised two Nu employee corporate accounts and resulted in an unauthorized disclosure of an immaterial amount of confidential data (though it did not result in direct financial losses or harm our strategic plans or business operations or legal proceedings). Because of our position in the payments value chain, we believe that we are likely to continue to be a target of such threats and attacks. In addition, due to the size and complexity of our technology platform and services, the amount of personal data and other data that we store and the number of customers, employees and third-party providers with access to personal data and other data, we may be the target of a variety of intentional and inadvertent cybersecurity attacks and other security-related incidents and threats, which could result in a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operation.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 37 |
| |
The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to our systems, our data or our customers’ data, to disable or degrade service, or to sabotage systems are constantly evolving may be difficult to detect quickly and often are not recognized until launched against a target. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities through various means, including, among others, hacking into our systems or those of our customers, partners or vendors, attempting to fraudulently induce our employees, customers, partners, vendors or other users of our systems into disclosing usernames, passwords, payment card information or other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems, or installing malicious software. Certain efforts may be supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even more sophisticated and difficult to detect.
Although we have developed systems and processes that are designed to protect our networks, applications, accounts and the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and customer data and our information technology systems and to prevent data loss and other security breaches, and expect to continue to expend significant additional resources to bolster these protections, these security measures cannot provide absolute security and there can be no assurance that our safety and security measures (and those of our third-party providers) will prevent damage to, or interruption or breach of, our information systems and operations. Our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to cyberattacks or security breaches, and third parties may be able to access our customers’ personal or proprietary information and card data that are stored on or accessible through those systems. In addition to traditional computer “hackers,” malicious code (such as viruses and worms), phishing, ransomware, social engineering attacks, unauthorized access or misuse and denial-of-service attacks, sophisticated criminal networks as well as nation-state and nation-state supported actors now engage in attacks, including advanced persistent threat intrusions. Our security measures may also be breached due to human error, malfeasance, fraud or malice on the part of employees, accidental technological failures, system errors or vulnerabilities, or other irregularities. Further, as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all of our employees are working remotely, which may cause heightened vulnerability to cyberattacks across our business and those of our service providers. In the event our or our third-party providers’ protection efforts are unsuccessful and our systems or solutions are compromised, we could suffer substantial harm.
Our Audit and Risk Committee has oversight responsibilities over cybersecurity risk management and meets at least quarterly with our management to discuss financial and non-financial risks and internal controls, including information security and cybersecurity matters and our cybersecurity program. In particular, our Audit and Risk Committee is involved in the oversight of our cybersecurity policies and procedures and is periodically updated on material cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity issues, if any, by management. Our Audit and Risk Committee also communicates with our independent audit firm regarding their annual audit procedures. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that we can prevent service interruptions or security breaches in our systems or the unauthorized or inadvertent wrongful use or disclosure of confidential information that could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, misappropriation or unauthorized access to or use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, confidential information.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 38 |
| |
Any actual or perceived cybersecurity attacks, security breaches, phishing attacks, ransomware attacks, computer malware, computer viruses, computer hacking attacks, unauthorized access, coding or configuration errors or similar incidents experienced by us or our third-party service providers could interrupt our operations, result in our systems or services being unavailable, result in the loss, compromise corruption or improper disclosure of data or personal data, subject us to regulatory or administrative investigations and orders, litigation, disputes, sanctions, indemnity obligations, damages for contract breach or penalties for violation of applicable laws or regulations, impair our ability to provide our solutions and meet our customers’ requirements, materially harm our reputation and brand, result in significant legal and financial exposure (including customer claims), lead to loss of customer confidence in, or decreased use of, our products and services, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any breaches of network or data security at our customers, partners or third-party service providers (including data center and cloud computing providers) could have similar negative effects. We could be forced to expend significant financial and operational resources in response to a security breach, including repairing system damage, increasing security protection costs by deploying additional personnel and modifying or enhancing our protection technologies, investigating and remediating any information security vulnerabilities and defending against and resolving legal and regulatory claims, all of which could divert resources and the attention of our management and key personnel and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Specifically, because we leverage third-party providers, including cloud, software, data center and other critical technology vendors to deliver our solutions to our customers, we rely heavily on the data security technology practices and policies adopted by these third-party providers. Such third-party providers have access to personal data and other data about our customers and employees, and some of these providers in turn subcontract with other third-party providers. Our ability to monitor our third-party providers’ data security is limited. A vulnerability in a third-party provider’s software or systems, a failure of our third-party providers’ safeguards, policies or procedures, or a breach of a third-party provider’s software or systems could result in the compromise of the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our systems or the data housed in our third-party solutions.
Many jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals, regulatory authorities and others of security breaches involving certain types of data or information technology systems. Security compromises experienced by others in our industry, our customers, our third-party service providers or us may lead to public disclosures and widespread negative publicity. Any security compromise in our industry, whether actual or perceived, could erode customer confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, negatively impact our ability to attract new customers, cause existing customers to elect not to renew or expand their use of our platform, services and products or subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other actions or liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations
Likewise, agreements with certain service providers may require us to notify them in the event of a security breach. Such mandatory disclosures are costly, could lead to negative publicity, may cause our customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures and require us to expend significant capital and other resources to respond to and alleviate problems caused by the actual or perceived security breach. Further, a data security compromise or operational disruption impacting us or one of our critical vendors, or system unavailability or damage due to other circumstances, may give rise to a customer’s right to terminate its contract with us. In these circumstances, it may be difficult or impossible to cure such a breach in order to prevent customers from potentially terminating their contracts with us. Furthermore, although our customer contracts typically include limitations on our potential liability, we cannot guarantee that such limitations of liability would be adequate.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 39 |
| |
Additionally, although we maintain insurance policies covering cyber-attacks, such policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches, and we may not be able to collect fully, if at all, under these policies. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases in or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
For information on the data protection and privacy laws and regulations to which we are subject and the risks associated therewith, see “—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—We are subject to costs and risks associated with enhanced or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to data privacy, security and protection. Developments in these and other laws and regulations could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.”
Claims by others that we infringe their proprietary technology or other rights could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to costly litigation in the event that third parties assert claims that our services or technology infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property or proprietary rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents that could be infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated by our services or technology, and any of these third parties could make a claim of infringement against us. As we face increasing competition and gain an increasingly high profile, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us grows. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for breach of copyright, trademark, license usage or other intellectual property rights. Any claim of infringement, misappropriation or other violation of intellectual property rights by a third party, even those without merit and regardless of the outcome, could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim, distract our management from our business, require us to redesign or cease use of such intellectual property, pay substantial amounts to satisfy judgments or settle claims or lawsuits, pay substantial royalty or licensing fees, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with certain parties with whom we have commercial relationships. The outcome of any allegation is often uncertain. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, any claim of infringement, misappropriation or other violation of intellectual property rights by a third party, even those without merit and regardless of the outcome, may result in a limitation on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims or could prevent us from registering our brands as trademarks. Additionally, in recent years, individuals and groups have been purchasing intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies like ours. Even if we believe that such claims are without merit, defending against such claims is time-consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of the time and attention of our management and employees.
Claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violation also might require us to redesign around such violated services, which may be expensive, time-consuming or infeasible, enter into costly settlement or license agreements, pay costly damage awards (including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent or other intellectual property right), change our brands or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from commercializing, using, marketing or selling the violating technology, products or services or using certain of our brands. We may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 40 |
| |
Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could similarly harm our business. If we are required to make substantial payments or undertake any of the other actions noted above as a result of any intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or violation claims against us, such payments, costs or actions could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, in certain of our agreements with customers and other third parties, we agree to indemnify them for losses related to, among other things, claims by third parties of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violation. From time to time, customers or other third parties have required, and may in the future require, us to indemnify them for such infringement, misappropriation or violation, breach of confidentiality or violation of applicable law, among other things. Although we normally seek to contractually limit our liability with respect to such obligations, some of these indemnity agreements may provide for uncapped liability and some indemnity provisions survive termination or expiration of the applicable agreement. Any legal claims from customers or other third parties could result in substantial liabilities and reputational harm, and could have adverse effects on our relationship with such customers and other third parties. Even if we have an agreement for indemnification against such costs, the indemnifying party, if any, may be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. Any of the foregoing could negatively impact our business, revenue and earnings.
Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand.
We believe the protection of our intellectual property, including our trademarks, patents, copyrights, domain names, trade dress, trade secrets, software and industrial designs, is critical to our success. We rely on, and expect to continue to rely on, a combination of contractual rights in various agreements with our employees, independent contractors, consultants and third parties with whom we have relationships, as well as trademarks and trade secrets in the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia and elsewhere internationally to establish and protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, including technology. Third parties may challenge, invalidate, circumvent, infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or otherwise to provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly redesign efforts, discontinuance of certain service offerings or other competitive harm. Others, including our competitors, may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our services or design around our intellectual property, and in such cases, we could not assert our intellectual property rights against such parties. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that our intellectual property rights will be sufficient to protect against others offering products or services that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business or to prevent unauthorized parties from copying aspects of our technology. For example, it is possible that third parties, including our competitors, may obtain patents that overlap or compete with our technology. If third parties obtain patent protection with respect to such technologies, they may assert that our technology infringes their patents and seek to charge us a licensing fee or otherwise preclude the use of our technology.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 41 |
| |
In addition to registered intellectual property rights such as trademark registrations, we rely on non-registered proprietary information and technology, such as trade secrets, confidential information, know-how and technical information. In order to protect our proprietary information and technology, we rely in part on nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, including our employees, independent contractors, corporate collaborators, advisors and other third parties, which place restrictions on the use and disclosure of this intellectual property. We also enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. We cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or proprietary information or otherwise developed intellectual property for us, including our technology and processes. Individuals not subject to invention assignment agreements may make adverse ownership claims to our current and future intellectual property. Additionally, these agreements may be insufficient or breached, or otherwise fail to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information, intellectual property or technology, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information, intellectual property or technology. As a result, our intellectual property, including trade secrets, may be disclosed or become known to our competitors, which could cause us to lose any competitive advantage resulting from this intellectual property. Additionally, to the extent that our employees, independent contractors or other third parties with whom we do business use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
Further, we may be unable to obtain trademark protection for our technologies and brands, and our existing trademark registrations and applications, and any trademarks that may be used in the future, may not provide us with competitive advantages or distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors. In addition, our trademarks may be contested, circumvented or found to be unenforceable, weak or invalid, and we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing or otherwise violating them.
We may have to litigate to enforce or determine the scope and enforceability of our intellectual property rights, trade secrets and know-how, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not prove successful. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. An adverse outcome in such litigation or proceedings may expose us to a loss of our competitive position, expose us to significant liabilities or require us to seek licenses that may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. Further, we will not be able to protect our intellectual property rights if we are unable to enforce our rights, and effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we offer our products and services. The laws of certain countries where we do business or may do business in the future may not recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition, any changes in, or unexpected interpretations of, intellectual property laws may compromise our ability to enforce our trade secret and intellectual property rights. Failure to obtain or maintain protection of our trade secrets or other proprietary information could harm our competitive position and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Also, because of the rapid pace of technological change in our industry, aspects of our business and our services rely on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties on reasonable terms or at all. See “—Our business and platform depend in part on intellectual property and proprietary rights and technology licensed from or otherwise made available to us by third parties. If we fail to comply with our obligations under license or technology agreements with third parties, we may be required to pay damages and we could lose license rights that are critical to our business.” The loss of intellectual property protection, the inability to obtain third-party intellectual property or delay or refusal by relevant regulatory authorities to approve pending intellectual property registration applications could harm our business and ability to compete.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 42 |
| |
Our use of third-party open source software could negatively affect our ability to offer and sell our solutions and subject us to possible litigation.
Our solutions incorporate and are dependent to some extent on the use and development of third-party open source software, including in Java and Clojure programming language, and we intend to continue our use and development of open source software in the future. Such open source software is generally licensed by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses and is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable. Pursuant to such open source licenses, we may be subject to certain conditions, including requirements that we offer our proprietary software that incorporates open source software for no cost, that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating or using the open source software and that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular open source license. If an author or other third party that uses or distributes such open source software were to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of one or more of these licenses, we could be required to incur significant legal expenses defending against such allegations and could be subject to significant damages, enjoined from the use or sale of our solutions that contained or are dependent upon the open source software and required to comply with the foregoing conditions, which could disrupt the distribution and sale of some of our products and services. Additionally, we could face claims from third parties claiming ownership of, or demanding release of, any open source software or derivative works that we have developed using such software, which could include proprietary source code, or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open source license. These claims could result in litigation and could require us to make our software source code freely available, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage, purchase a costly license (with binding clauses that restrict our ability to commercialize and develop the implicated products or services), or cease offering the implicated products or services unless and until we can re-engineer such source code in a manner that avoids infringement. This reengineering process could require us to expend significant additional research and development resources, and we may not be able to complete the re-engineering process successfully. Litigation could be costly for us to defend, have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change the source code underlying our platform, products and services. The terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by courts, and there is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to provide, or distribute the products or services related to, the open source software subject to those licenses. As there is little or no legal precedent governing the interpretation of many of the terms of certain of these licenses, the potential impact of these terms on our business is uncertain and may result in unanticipated obligations regarding our solutions and technologies.
In addition to risks related to license requirements, use of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties, indemnification or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the quality of the code, controls on the origin or development of the software, or remedies against the licensors. Many of the risks associated with usage of open source software cannot be eliminated and could adversely affect our business. Although we seek to comply with our obligations under the various applicable licenses for open source software, it is possible that we may not be aware of all instances where open source software has been incorporated into our proprietary software or used in connection with our solutions or our corresponding obligations under open source licenses. We do not have open source software usage policies or monitoring procedures in place. We rely on multiple software programmers to design our proprietary software and we cannot be certain that our programmers have not incorporated open source software into our proprietary software that we intend to maintain as confidential or that they will not do so in the future. To the extent that we are required to disclose the source code of certain of our proprietary software developments to third parties, including our competitors, in order to comply with applicable open source license terms, such disclosure could harm our intellectual property position, competitive advantage, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent that we have failed to comply with our obligations under particular licenses for open source software, we may lose the right to continue to use and exploit such open source software in connection with our operations and solutions, which could disrupt and adversely affect our business.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 43 |
| |
Our business and platform depend in part on intellectual property and proprietary rights and technology licensed from or otherwise made available to us by third parties. If we fail to comply with our obligations under license or technology agreements with third parties, we may be required to pay damages and we could lose license rights that are critical to our business.
Our business and platform depend in part on intellectual property and proprietary rights and technology licensed from or otherwise made available to us by third parties and, in the future, we may enter into additional agreements that grant us valuable intellectual property licenses or rights to technology. If we fail to comply with our obligations under license or technology agreements with third parties, we may be required to pay damages and we could lose license rights that are critical to our business.
Our business and our platform rely in part on certain intellectual property, including technologies, data, content and software developed and licensed to us by third parties, and in the future we may enter into additional agreements that provide us with licenses to valuable intellectual property or technology. If we fail to comply with any of the obligations under our license agreements, we may be required to pay damages and the licensor may have the right to terminate the license. Termination by the licensor would cause us to lose valuable rights, and could prevent us from selling our products and services, or inhibit our ability to commercialize future products and services. Our business would suffer if any current or future licenses terminate, if the licensors fail to abide by the terms of the license, if the licensors fail to enforce licensed patents against infringing third parties, if the licensed intellectual property rights are found to be invalid or unenforceable, or if we are unable to enter into necessary licenses on acceptable terms.
In addition, our rights to certain technologies are licensed to us on a non-exclusive basis. The owners of these non-exclusively licensed technologies are therefore free to license them to third parties, including our competitors, on terms that may be superior to those offered to us, which would place us at a competitive disadvantage. Moreover, our licensors may own or control intellectual property that has not been licensed to us and, as a result, we may be subject to claims, regardless of their merit, that we are infringing or otherwise violating the licensor’s rights. In addition, the agreements under which we license intellectual property or technology from third parties are generally complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement.
Further, the licensed components may become obsolete, defective or incompatible with future versions of our services, relationships with the third-party licensors or technology providers may deteriorate, or our agreements with the third-party licensors or technology providers may expire or be terminated. Additionally, some of these licenses or other grants of rights may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable, or at all, or that allow our platform, products and services to remain competitive. Our inability to obtain licenses or rights on favorable terms could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Furthermore, incorporating intellectual property or proprietary rights licensed from or otherwise made available to us by third parties on a non-exclusive basis in our products or services could limit our ability to protect the intellectual property and proprietary rights in our services and our ability to restrict third parties from developing, selling or otherwise providing similar or competitive technology using the same third-party intellectual property or proprietary rights.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 44 |
| |
We seek to have all the necessary licenses and other grants of rights from third parties to use technology and software that we do not own. However, the licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and several more established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater development or commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. Even if such licenses are available, we may be required to pay the licensor substantial royalties based on sales of our products and services. Such royalties are a component of the cost of our products or services and may affect the margins on our products and services. Further, a third party could allege that we are infringing its rights. Our failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights on acceptable terms, or litigation or claims arising out of intellectual property matters, may harm or restrict our business. In addition, we could be found liable for significant monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent or other intellectual property right. Any such litigation or the failure to obtain any necessary licenses or other rights could adversely impact our business, financial position and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation
We are subject to extensive regulation and regulatory and governmental oversight as a digital banking platform and as a payment institution. Compliance with or violation of present or future regulations could be costly, expose us to substantial liability and force us to change our business practices, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.
Because we conduct the majority of our operations in Brazil, we are predominately subject to regulation under Brazilian law and by Brazilian authorities, some of which may be periodically amended or revoked. The Brazilian financial and payment markets and Brazilian financial and payment institutions are subject to extensive regulatory control by the Brazilian government, principally by the Central Bank of Brazil, the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários, or the “CVM”), the Brazilian Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional, or the “CMN”), and the Brazilian stock exchange (B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão, or the “B3”), which, in each case, materially affects our business.
Because certain of our subsidiaries are financial services payment institutions in Brazil, our business is subject to Brazilian laws and regulations relating to electronic payments in Brazil, including Federal Law No. 12,865/13, as well as to financial services, including Federal Law No. 4,595/64 and Federal Law No. 6,385/76 and related rules and regulations issued by the CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil, the CVM and, as a public company in Brazil, the CVM and the B3 with regard to the rules related to foreign issuers. In addition, the activity of one of our subsidiaries as an insurance broker is subject to various laws and regulations in Brazil, such as Federal Law No. 4,595/64, Decree Law No. 73/66 and certain other rules and regulations issued by the National Private Insurance Council (Conselho Nacional de Seguros Privados, or the “CNSP”) and the Brazilian Superintendence of Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados, or the “SUSEP”), among others.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 45 |
| |
The laws, rules, and regulations that govern our business include those relating to deposit-taking, cross-border and domestic money transmission, foreign exchange, payments services (such as payment processing and settlement services), consumer financial protection, tax, anti-money laundering and terrorist financing and rules relating to unclaimed property. Specifically, we are subject to anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions that prohibit, among other things, involvement in transferring the proceeds of criminal or terrorist activities. We could be subject to liability and forced to change our business practices if we were found to be subject to, or in violation of, any laws or regulations impacting our ability to maintain a banking account in the countries where we operate, or if existing or new legislation or regulations applicable to financial institutions in the countries where we maintain a banking account were to result in banks in those countries being unwilling or unable to establish and maintain banking accounts for us. As regulated payment and financial institutions in Brazil, certain of our operating subsidiaries are subject to rules and regulations relating to minimum equity capital, minimum net equity and other regulatory capital requirements and reference equity, compulsory deposits and contributions, internal controls, anti-money laundering, know your customer obligations, sanctions, ombudsman and customer service, internal auditing, cybersecurity and bank secrecy, among others. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview” for a detailed description of the regulatory requirements applicable to us and our operating subsidiaries. In addition, as our business continues to develop and expand, we may become subject to additional rules and regulations, which may limit or change how we conduct our business.
These laws, rules and regulations are enforced by multiple authorities and governing bodies in Brazil, including the Central Bank of Brazil, the CVM and the CMN. In their supervisory roles, the Central Bank of Brazil, the CVM and the CMN seek to maintain the safety and soundness of financial and payment institutions with the aim of strengthening the protection of customers and the financial system. Their continuing supervision of financial and payment institutions is conducted through a variety of regulatory tools, including the collection of information by way of prudential returns, reports obtained from skilled persons, visits to firms and regular meetings with management to discuss issues such as performance, risk management and strategy. As a result, we face increased supervisory scrutiny (resulting in increasing internal compliance costs and supervision fees), and in the event of a breach of our regulatory obligations we are likely to face more stringent scrutiny and potentially significant fines.
Changes in regulations in Brazil and international markets in which we operate may expose us to increased compliance costs and limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities or provide certain products and services. The regulation governing Brazilian payment and financial institutions is continuously evolving, including as a result of political, economic and social events, and the Central Bank of Brazil has reacted actively and extensively to developments in our industry. Specifically, Brazilian regulators frequently update prudential standards in accordance with the recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, in particular with respect to capital and liquidity, which could impose additional significant regulatory burdens on us, including additional and material capital requirements applicable to certain of our subsidiaries’ activities as payment institutions. For instance, as a result of Public Consultation No. 78 of November 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil recently enacted a new framework providing for prudential rules applicable to payment institutions, (such as Nu Pagamentos), increasing the capital and prudential requirements to which we are subject. This framework includes BCB Resolutions No. 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 and 202, all dated March 11, 2022. The new prudential requirements are expected to be enforceable according to an implementation calendar: the new rules would come into force in January 2023, and full implementation would take place in January 2025. As an example, if definitive regulation applicable to type 3 conglomerates - which will be the conglomerate led by Nu Pagamentos - had been in force as of December 31, 2021, Nu Pagamentos conglomerate would have been subject to a minimum regulatory capital of US$448 million (R$2.5 billion) as of December 31, 2021, which would represent an increase of US$97 million (R$541 million) compared to the requirements applicable jointly to Nu Pagamentos and Nu Financeira under current regulations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Other Rules—Corporate Capital Limits of Exposure—Payment Institutions” for more information about potential changes to prudential regulations applicable to payment institutions in Brazil. Our operations could also be adversely affected by changes with respect to restrictions on remittances abroad and other exchange controls as well as by interpretations of the law by courts and agencies in a manner that differs from our legal advisors’ opinions. There can be no assurance that future changes in regulations or in their interpretation or application will not have a material adverse effect on us.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 46 |
| |
The measures of the Central Bank of Brazil and the amendment of existing laws and regulations, or the adoption of new laws or regulations, could adversely affect our ability to provide loans, make investments or render certain financial and payment services. No assurance can be given generally that laws or regulations will be adopted, enforced or interpreted in a manner that will not have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. As some of the Brazilian banking laws and regulations have been recently issued or become effective, the manner in which those laws and related regulations are applied to the operations of financial and payment institutions is still evolving. Moreover, to the extent that these recently adopted regulations are implemented inconsistently in Brazil, we may face higher compliance costs. Furthermore, regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in how to regulate financial and payment institutions, and this discretion, and the regulatory mechanisms available to the regulators, have been increasing during recent years. Regulation may be imposed on an ad hoc basis by governments and regulators (such as caps on interchange fees or interest rates, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations given the importance of consumer credit products to our revenue), and these ad hoc regulations may especially affect financial institutions that may be deemed to be systemically important.
Although we have a compliance program focused on applicable laws, rules and regulations and are continually investing in this program, in the event of non-compliance with laws or regulations, we may nonetheless be subject to fines or other penalties in one or more jurisdictions levied by federal, state or local regulators, as well as those levied by foreign regulators. In addition to fines, penalties for failing to comply with applicable rules and regulations could include significant criminal and civil lawsuits, including against our management and controlling shareholder, disgorgement of profits, forfeiture of significant assets, loss of required licenses or approvals or other enforcement actions, including insolvency proceedings instituted by the Central Bank of Brazil. Any disciplinary or punitive action by our regulators or failure to obtain required operating authorizations could seriously harm our business and results of operations. We could also be required to make changes to our business practices or compliance programs as a result of regulatory scrutiny. In addition, any perceived or actual failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations could have a significant impact on our reputation and could cause us to lose existing customers, prevent us from obtaining new customers, require us to expend significant funds to remedy problems caused by non-compliance and to avert further non-compliance.
We also have operations outside of Brazil, including in Mexico and Colombia, along with information technology and business support operations in Argentina, Germany and the United States. In particular, in Mexico, our products are offered by both a financial institution (subject to the Popular Savings and Credit Law) and a commercial entity. Similar to financial entities in Brazil, financial entities in Mexico are subject to extensive regulation and the oversight of the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria de Valores, or the “CNBV”). Mexican authorities have been reviewing the regulations applicable to financial entities (for example, the enactment of the Fintech Law in 2018) and closely supervise financial technology companies. Changes to these laws and other applicable laws and regulations (for instance, regarding customer onboarding) have been discussed by the Mexican regulators, and could materially affect our operations in Mexico. In Colombia, our credit card product is offered by a commercial entity that is subject to extensive regulation, including those governing consumer protection (namely Law No. 1,480 of 2011, Decree No. 1,074 of 2015 and the Sole Circular of the Industry and Trade Superintendence) and data protection (Law No. 1,581 of 2012). In addition, interest rates in Colombia are capped, as provided in the Colombian Commercial and Criminal Codes. Our activities in Colombia are subject to the supervision of the Industry and Trade Superintendence with regards to consumer relations, data protection and antitrust. Furthermore, the Colombian Financial Regulatory Unit, or the “URF,” intends to propose various changes to financial regulations that may be implemented in the future and affect our Colombian operations. Changes in these and other applicable laws or regulations in the countries in which we operate, or the adoption of new laws and related regulations, may require us to modify our business practices and may have an adverse effect on us.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 47 |
| |
Given the volume, granularity, frequency and scale of regulatory and other reporting requirements, we must maintain a clear data strategy to enable consistent data aggregation, reporting and management. Inadequate management information systems or processes, including those relating to risk data aggregation and risk reporting, could lead to a failure to meet regulatory reporting requirements or other internal or external information demands, and we may face supervisory measures as a result.
Certain ongoing legislative and regulatory initiatives under discussion by the Brazilian Congress, the Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry may result in changes to the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries, which may have an adverse effect on our business and cause us to incur increased compliance costs.
In recent years, the Central Bank of Brazil issued several regulations related to the Brazilian payments market, aiming to increase the use of electronic payments, increase competitiveness in the sector, strengthen governance and risk management practices in the industry, encourage the development of new solutions and the differentiation of products to consumers and promote the increased use of electronic payment means. Such measures include the following regulations enacted by the Central Bank of Brazil: (i) Circular of the Central Bank of Brazil No. 3,887/2018, which establishes that interchange fees on domestic purchase transactions using debit cards (within the meaning of Central Bank of Brazil regulations, which does not include the debit cards linked to prepaid accounts that we currently offer) are subject to a cap of up to 0.8% on debit transactions, and that debit card issuers must maintain a maximum average interchange fee of 0.5%; (ii) Resolution of the Central Bank of Brazil No. 1/2020, which created the instant payment ecosystem; and (iii) Joint Resolution No. 1/2020, which governs the Open Financial System (Open Banking) initiative in Brazil. With regard to interchange fees, the Central Bank of Brazil launched on October 8, 2021 Public Consultation No. 89, or “Public Consultation 89/21,” which proposes to repeal Circular No. 3,887/2018 and impose a cap of 0.5% for interchange fees charged in domestic purchase transactions carried out using debit cards (including the debit cards linked to prepaid accounts that we currently offer).
Moreover, according to the notice to the market we released on March 23, 2022, Mastercard, the settlor of payment schemes of which our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos is a part of, launched on March 22, 2022 the public consultation AN 6229, proposing a reduction in the interchange rate levied on in-situ prepaid card transactions (card present transactions) made by individuals in Brazil, to 0.80%. Interchange fees for other types of transactions for this product would remain at 1.20%. The effectiveness of such a change is subject to comments from market participants, additional reviews by Mastercard, as well as approval by the Central Bank of Brazil. According to Mastercard, this review is a direct consequence of Public Consultation No. 89/21 and meetings held with the Central Bank of Brazil relating to the regulation of interchange fees for debit and prepaid instruments.
If the Central Bank of Brazil were to issue a definitive regulation setting forth such interchange fee cap in the manner proposed under Public Consultation 89/21, and the interchange rate on prepaid card proposed under public consultation AN 6229 were approved our revenue would be negatively impacted. For example, had Public Consultation 89/21 been enacted during the year ended December 31, 2021, our revenue would have been negatively impacted by US$86 million (or R$ 480 million, based on a real/U.S. dollar exchange rate of $5.581). Further, had the changes set forth under public consultation AN 6229 been in place during the year ended December 31, 2021, we believe our revenue would have been reduced by 2.4%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview—Interchange Fees and Public Consultation No. 89/2021” for more information regarding Public Consultation 89/21.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 48 |
| |
In addition to such recently enacted regulations, the Brazilian Congress, Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry are discussing legislative and regulatory initiatives that would modify the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries. For instance, the Brazilian Congress is discussing initiatives regarding the payment cycle in place in the Brazilian payments market. The Central Bank of Brazil has issued a letter in response to a report issued by the Brazilian Congress regarding the payment cycle currently in place in the Brazilian payments market, which presents a technical study of the impact of changes to the Brazilian payment cycle and confirms the Central Bank of Brazil’s decision to promote a gradual and planned shortening of the existing payment cycles. Should these discussions lead the Central Bank of Brazil, as the competent authority over the market, to implement regulatory initiatives to reduce existing payment cycles, this could adversely affect our business, revenue and financial condition. In addition, the Brazilian Congress is considering enacting new legislation that, if signed into law as currently drafted, would limit interest rates, particularly for credit cards facilities (rotativo do cartão) and overdrafts facilities (cheque especial) – the latter, with limits that are more restrictive than those recently imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil.
These discussions are in various phases of development, whether as part of legislative, regulatory or private initiatives in the industry, and the overall impact of any such reform proposals is difficult to estimate. Any such changes in laws, regulations or market practices have the potential to alter the type or volume of the card-based transactions we process and our payment services and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws and regulations and may be subject to sanctions.
We operate in jurisdictions that have a high risk for corruption and we are subject to various anti-corruption, anti- bribery and anti-money laundering laws and regulations, as well as those relating to sanctions, including the Brazilian Federal Law No. 12,846/2013, or the “Clean Company Act,” the Brazilian Federal Law No. 9,613/1998, or the “Brazilian Anti-Money Laundering Law,” the Brazilian Federal Law No. 8,429/1992, or the “Brazilian Public Improbity Law,” the Brazilian Federal Law No. 14,133/2021, and the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the “FCPA,” among others. Each of the Clean Company Act, the Brazilian Anti-Money Laundering Act, the Brazilian Public Improbity Law and the FCPA impose liability against companies who engage in bribery of government officials, either directly or through intermediaries.
Anti-money laundering, anti-bribery, anti-corruption and sanctions laws and regulations to which we are subject require us, among other things, to conduct full customer due diligence (including sanctions and politically exposed person screening) and keep our customer, account and transaction information up to date. We are also required to report suspicious transactions and activity to appropriate law enforcement following full investigation. We have implemented financial crime policies and procedures detailing what is required from those responsible. However, we rely heavily on our employees to assist us by spotting such illegal and improper activities and reporting them, and our employees have varying degrees of experience in recognizing criminal tactics and understanding the level of sophistication of criminal organizations. If we decide to instead outsource any of our customer due diligence, customer screening or anti-financial crime operations, we would remain responsible and accountable for full compliance and any breaches. In addition, we rely upon our relevant counterparties to a large degree to maintain and appropriately apply their own appropriate compliance measures, procedures and internal policies. If we are unable to apply the necessary scrutiny and oversight of employees, third parties to whom we outsource certain tasks and processes or counterparties, we increase the risk of regulatory breach.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 49 |
| |
Financial crime – and the surrounding regulatory landscape – is continually evolving. Our ability to comply with changing applicable legal requirements depends on our ability to improve detection and reporting capabilities and reduce variation in control processes and oversight accountability, which requires proactive and adaptable responses from us and ongoing changes to systems and operational activities. While we maintain policies and procedures aimed at detecting and preventing the use of our platform for money laundering and other financial crime-related activities, emerging technologies, such as cryptocurrencies and blockchain, could limit our ability to track the movement of funds and therefore present a risk to our company. Even known threats can never be fully eliminated, and there will be instances where our platform may be used by other parties to engage in money laundering and other illegal or improper activities. Further, compliance with these laws and regulations requires sophisticated automated systems, which may fail.
Regulators may increase enforcement of or modify our obligations, which may require us to make adjustments to our compliance program, including the procedures we use to verify the identity of our customers and to monitor our transactions. Specifically, regulators regularly reexamine the transaction volume thresholds that we must obtain and any change in such thresholds could result in increased compliance costs. For example, the Central Bank of Brazil enacted new regulations, Circular No. 3,978, which became effective on October 1, 2020 and provides new guidelines with a risk-based approach for anti-money laundering and terrorist financing policies, procedures and controls. Under these guidelines, a regulated institution has the discretion to determine which procedures it will adopt for each customer, based on the internal risk assessment concerning the committing of crimes relating to money laundering and terrorism financing latent in the regulated entity’s business. We may not be able to comply, in a timely manner or at all, with new regulations, or obtain appropriate exemptions from regulatory authorities, and any new requirements or changes to existing requirements could impose significant costs, result in delays to planned product improvements, make it more difficult for new customers to join our platform and reduce the attractiveness of our products and services.
While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our personnel with applicable anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations, either directly or through intermediaries. Violations of – or even accusations of or associations with violations of – anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering or sanctions laws and regulations could result in criminal liability, administrative and civil lawsuits, significant fines and penalties (including being added to “black lists” that would prohibit certain parties from engaging in transactions with us), forfeiture of significant assets and reputational harm. If we are unable to fully comply with applicable laws, regulations and expectations, our regulators and relevant law enforcement agencies have the ability and authority to require a complete review of our business systems, day-to-day supervision by external consultants and ultimately the revocation of licenses necessary to conduct our business. And the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and prospects.
Misconduct of our directors, officers, employees, consultants or third-party service providers could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain customers and subjecting us to legal liability and reputational harm.
Our directors, officers, employees, consultants and third-party service providers could engage in misconduct that adversely affects our business. We are subject to a number of obligations and standards arising from our business and the violation of these obligations and standards by any of our directors, officers, employees, consultants or third-party service providers could adversely affect our customers and us. If our directors, officers, employees, consultants or third-party service providers were to improperly use or disclose confidential information, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial condition or business relationships. Detecting or deterring employee misconduct is not always possible, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. If one of our employees or consultants were to engage in misconduct or were to be accused of such misconduct, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 50 |
| |
In recent years, regulatory authorities across various jurisdictions, including Brazil and the United States, have increasingly focused on enhancing and enforcing anti-bribery laws, such as the Clean Company Act and the FCPA. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our personnel with such laws, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances. Any determination that we have violated the Clean Company Act (which establishes in Brazil the strict administrative and civil liability of legal entities for the practice of harmful acts committed in their interest or benefit against the government, domestic or foreign), the FCPA, or other applicable anti-corruption laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties or material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or the market value of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs.
We are subject to costs and risks associated with enhanced or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to data privacy, security and protection. Developments in these and other laws and regulations could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We operate in a complex regulatory and legal environment that exposes us to compliance and litigation risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. These laws may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political, economic or social events. In addition to the laws and regulations governing our status and operation as a financial and a payment institution (discussed in “—We are subject to extensive regulation and regulatory and governmental oversight as a digital banking platform and as a payment institution. Compliance with or violation of present or future regulations could be costly, expose us to substantial liability and force us to change our business practices, any of which could harm our business and results of operations”), some of the federal, state or local laws and regulations that affect us include those relating to consumer products, product liability or consumer protection; those relating to the manner in which we advertise, market or sell products; labor and employment laws, including wage and hour laws; tax laws or interpretations thereof; bank secrecy laws; data protection and privacy laws and regulations; and securities and exchange laws and regulations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview” for more information. We face significant compliance costs and risk of non-compliance with respect to these existing laws and regulations, which costs and risks could be heightened by changes and developments with respect to such laws and regulations. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to adapt our business, or have sufficient financial resources, to comply with any new regulations, or that we will be able to successfully compete in the context of a shifting regulatory environment.
In particular, data protection and privacy laws are developing rapidly to take into account the changes in cultural and consumer attitudes towards the protection of personal data. In operating our business and providing services and solutions to customers, we collect, use, store, transmit and otherwise process sensitive employee and customer data, including personal data, in and across multiple jurisdictions. We leverage systems and applications that are spread all over the world, requiring us to regularly move data across national borders. As a result, we are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, the EU and around the world, as well as contractual obligations, regarding data privacy, security and protection. In many cases, these laws and regulations apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between or among us, our subsidiaries and other parties with which we have commercial relationships.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 51 |
| |
Personal privacy, information security, and data protection are significant issues globally. The regulatory framework governing the collection, processing, storage, use and sharing of certain information, particularly financial and other personal data, is rapidly evolving and is likely to continue to be subject to uncertainty and varying interpretations. The occurrence of unanticipated events and development of evolving technologies often rapidly drives the adoption of legislation or regulation affecting the use, collection or other processing of data and the manner in which we conduct our business. Although we endeavor to comply with our policies and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with our privacy policies or any applicable privacy, security or data protection, information security or consumer-protection related laws, regulations, orders or industry standards in one or more jurisdictions could expose us to costly litigation, significant awards, fines or judgments, civil and criminal penalties or negative publicity, and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The publication of our privacy policy and other documentation that provide promises and assurances about privacy and security can subject us to potential state and federal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our actual practices, which could, individually or in the aggregate, materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In particular, on August 14, 2018, the President of Brazil approved Law No. 13,709 the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, or the “LGPD”), a comprehensive personal data protection law establishing general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic sectors and contractual relationships. The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data (including personal data of customers, suppliers and employees), and affects all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employees and employers and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical environment. Specifically, the LGPD establishes, among other things, personal data owners’ rights, the legal basis for personal data protection, requirements for obtaining consent from data owners, obligations and requirements related to security incidents, data leaks and data transfers, as well as the creation of the ANPD, for the purposes of monitoring, implementing and supervising compliance with the LGPD in Brazil. The obligations established by the LGPD became effective in September 2020. In the event of non-compliance with the LGPD, we may be subject to administrative penalties, which are applicable since August 2021, including (1) warnings, with the impositions of a deadline for the adoption of corrective measures; (2) a one-time fine of up to 2% (subject to an upper limit of R$50,000,000 per violation) of our gross sales; (3) a daily fine (subject to an upper limit of R$50,000,000); (4) public disclosure of the violation; (5) the restriction of access to the personal data to which the violation relates, until corrective measures are implemented; (6) deletion of the personal data to which the violation relates; (7) partial suspension of the databases to which the violation relates for up to 12 months, until corrective measures are implemented; (8) suspension of the personal data processing activities to which the violation relates for up to 12 months; and (9) partial or full prohibition on personal data processing activities. Moreover, we may be liable for property, moral, individual or collective damages caused by us or by third-party providers or business partners that process personal data for us, and jointly liable for property, moral, individual or collective damages caused by our subsidiaries, due to non-compliance with the obligations established by the LGPD. We cannot guarantee that our LGPD compliance efforts will be deemed appropriate or sufficient by regulatory authorities, courts or other bodies, such as the Brazilian Public Prosecution Office (Ministério Público). Moreover, as the LGPD requires further regulation from the ANPD regarding several aspects of the law, which are yet unknown, we may have difficulty adapting our systems and processes to the new legislation due to the legislation’s complexity. The changes have impacted, and could further adversely impact, our business by increasing our operational and compliance costs.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 52 |
| |
Further, Resolution No. 85 of the Central Bank of Brazil and CMN Resolution No. 4,893 establish requirements for data processing, storage and cloud computing services, respectively, by payment and financial institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil and determine the mandatory implementation of a cybersecurity policy. Payment and financial institutions, including certain of our operating subsidiaries, are required to draw up internal cybersecurity policies, to appoint an officer to be responsible for implementing and overseeing cybersecurity policies, to adopt procedures and controls to prevent and respond to cybersecurity incidents and to include specific mandatory clauses in contracts regarding data processing, storage and cloud computing services. By virtue of the Supplementary Law No. 105 of January 10, 2001, we are also subject to strict secrecy rules on transactions, and are required to preserve the confidential nature of assets and liabilities transactions and of the services provided to our customers. Any additional privacy laws or regulations enacted or approved in Brazil or in other jurisdictions in which we operate could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Internationally, many jurisdictions have established their own data security and privacy legal framework with which we or our customers may need to comply, including, but not limited to, the European Union, or the “EU.” The EU’s privacy, data protection and information security landscape is currently evolving, resulting in possible significant operational costs for internal compliance and risk to our business. Within the EU, the General Data Protection Regulation, or the “GDPR,” which went into effect in May 2018 and contains numerous requirements and changes from previously existing EU law, including more robust, direct obligations on data processors in addition to data controllers, heavier documentation requirements for data protection compliance programs and significant increases in the level of sanctions for non-compliance. In particular, under the GDPR, EU data protection authorities have the power to impose administrative fines for violations of the GDPR of up to a maximum of €20 million (equivalent to US$18 million as of December 31, 2021) or 4% of the data controller’s or data processor’s total worldwide global turnover for the preceding fiscal year, whichever is higher, and violations of the GDPR may also lead to damages claims by data controllers and data subjects. Such penalties are in addition to any civil litigation claims by data controllers, customers and data subjects. Being subject to the GDPR, we may need to take steps to cause our processes to be compliant with applicable portions of the GDPR, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to implement changes in a timely manner or without significant disruption to our business, or that such steps will be effective, and we may face liability under the GDPR. We expect that there will be additional proposed and adopted laws, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which we operate, including in Mexico and Colombia and in jurisdictions into which we may expand in the future.
As we seek to build a trusted and secure consumer platform, and as we expand our customer base and increase the number of transactions we process, we will increasingly be subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of information, including the personally identifiable information of our employees and our customers. These laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied differently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it is possible they will be interpreted and applied in ways that are inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our services and platform capabilities, which would materially and adversely affect our business. Additionally, our customers may be subject to differing privacy laws, rules and legislation, which may mean that they require us to be bound by varying contractual requirements applicable to certain other jurisdictions. Adherence to such contractual requirements may impact our collection, use, processing, storage, sharing and disclosure of various types of information including financial information and other personal data, and may mean we become bound by, or voluntarily comply with, self-regulatory or other industry standards relating to these matters that may further change as laws, rules and regulations evolve. Complying with these requirements and changing our policies and practices may be onerous and costly, and we may not be able to respond quickly or effectively to regulatory, legislative and other developments. These changes may in turn impair our ability to offer our existing or planned features, products and services and increase our cost of doing business. As we expand our customer base, these requirements may vary from customer to customer, further increasing the cost of compliance and doing business. Any additional privacy laws, rules or regulations enacted or approved in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia or in other jurisdictions in which we operate could cause us to incur costs to correct the breaches or failures, expose us to uninsured liability, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny, subject us to lawsuits and result in the imposition of material penalties and fines under state and federal laws or regulations, which could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. Any failure, real or perceived, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any regulatory requirements or orders or other local, state, federal or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations could cause customers to reduce their use of our products and services and could materially and adversely affect our business.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 53 |
| |
Increases in reserve, compulsory deposit, minimum capital and contributions to deposit insurance requirements may have a material adverse effect on us.
The Central Bank of Brazil has periodically changed the level of regulatory reserves and compulsory deposits that payment institutions (such as Nu Pagamentos) and financial institutions (such as Nu Financeira) in Brazil are required to maintain, and has adjusted compulsory allocation requirements to finance government programs and mandated contributions to the deposit insurance program maintained by the Credit Guarantee Fund, or the “FGC,” with these changes continuing to be a potential area of risk as they may increase the reserve and compulsory deposit or allocation and contribution requirements in the future or impose new requirements on us, which as a result could reduce our liquidity to fund our loan portfolio and other investments and, as a result, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compulsory deposits and allocations generally do not yield the same return as other investments and deposits because a portion of compulsory deposits and allocations:
| · | do not bear interest; |
| · | must be held in Brazilian federal government securities; and |
| · | must be used to finance government programs, including a federal housing program and rural sector subsidies. |
In recent years, the CMN and Central Bank of Brazil have also published several rules to implement, update and improve Basel III and associated capital and prudential rules in Brazil. This set of regulations includes a revised definition of capital, capital requirements, capital buffers, credit valuation adjustments, exposures to central counterparties, leverage and liquidity coverage ratios. For instance, Public Hearing No. 78 issued by the Central Bank of Brazil in December 2020 proposes a new set of rules aiming to harmonize the capital and prudential requirements applicable to payment services offered by payment institutions (including those provided by Nu Pagamentos) to those applicable to payment services offered by financial institutions. Moreover, the recent Public Consultation No. 88 issued by the Central Bank of Brazil in July 2021 proposes amendments to Resolution CMN No. 4,193 and Circular of the Central Bank of Brazil No. 3,644 of 2013 to address new recommendations of the Bank for International Settlements dealing with the credit risk of financial instruments, which could be applicable to the Brazilian financial institutions, including Nu Financeira. These proposals, if approved and implemented by the Central Bank of Brazil, may increase the minimum capital requirements applicable to Nu Pagamentos or Nu Financeira, as applicable. However, no assurance can be given that such rules will be adopted, enforced or interpreted in a manner that will not have an adverse effect on us.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 54 |
| |
We are subject to regulatory intervention and antitrust litigation under competition laws.
We are subject to scrutiny from governmental agencies under competition laws in countries in which we operate. Some jurisdictions also provide private rights of action for competitors or consumers to assert claims of anticompetitive conduct pursuant to which companies or governmental agencies may allege that our actions violate antitrust or competition laws, or otherwise constitute unfair competition. Contractual agreements with buyers, sellers or other companies, as well as our unilateral business practices, could give rise to regulatory action or antitrust investigations or litigation. Some regulators may perceive our business to have such significant market power that otherwise uncontroversial business practices could be deemed anticompetitive. Any such claims and investigations, even if they are unfounded, may be expensive to defend, involve negative publicity and substantial diversion of management time and effort, and could result in significant judgments against us and harm to our business.
Requirements associated with being a public company in the United States require significant company resources and management attention.
We are subject to certain reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the other rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. We are also subject to various other regulatory requirements, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage.
New rules and regulations relating to disclosure, financial reporting and controls and corporate governance, which could be adopted by the SEC, the NYSE or other regulatory bodies or exchange entities from time to time, could result in a significant increase in legal, accounting and compliance costs and make certain corporate activities more time-consuming and costly, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These rules and regulations may also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. These obligations will also require substantial attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Given that most of the individuals who now constitute our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies, initially, these new obligations will demand even greater attention. These cost increases and the diversion of management’s attention could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The requirements associated with being a foreign BDR issuer in Brazil will require significant company resources and management attention.
We have issued BDRs on the B3 and, as such, we are a foreign issuer of BDRs in Brazil, as defined by the CVM. As such, we are subject to certain rules, in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to publicly traded companies in Brazil, including rules and regulations issued by the CVM and the B3. Such rules and regulations may increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and may make certain activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a foreign BDR issuer in Brazil, we are required to appoint a legal representative in Brazil, prepare and annually disclose certain forms, such as the Brazilian reference form (formulário de referência), as well as to disclose a Portuguese version of all of the relevant information disclosed by us in the United States, including financial statements, material facts and other filings. Any new rules and regulations related to the disclosure of information, reports, financial controls and corporate governance, which may be adopted by the CVM, B3 or other regulatory or self-regulatory bodies, may result in a significant increase in our costs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Existing and any new obligations will also require substantial attention from our management and may divert our management’s attention away from our business. Such cost increases and the diversion of management’s attention could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 55 |
| |
There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company for the current or any future taxable year, which could subject U.S. investors in our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs to significant adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” we will be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (i) 75% or more of our gross income consists of “passive income,” or (ii) 50% or more of the average value of our assets (generally determined on a quarterly basis) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, “passive income.” Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, certain non-active royalties, and capital gains. Cash is generally a passive asset for these purposes.
Based on proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, or the “1995 Proposed Regulations,” including those which are proposed to be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994 and our current operations, income, assets and certain estimates and projections (such as the relative values of our assets, including goodwill), we do not believe that we were a PFIC for our 2021 taxable year. However, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or the “IRS,” will agree with our conclusion. Among other reasons, whether we were a PFIC in 2021 or be a PFIC in any future taxable year is uncertain because: (i) the 1995 Proposed Regulations may not be finalized in their current form, (ii) PFIC status is determined on an annual basis at the end of each taxable year, and (iii) the composition of our income and assets and the market value of our assets (which may be determined, in part, by reference to the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs, which could be volatile) may vary from time to time. In addition, recently proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, or the “2021 Proposed Regulations,” significantly alter the application of the exception to the PFIC rules for the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business. The application of the 2021 Proposed Regulations is not entirely clear and, if we can no longer rely on the 1995 Proposed Regulations, and the 2021 Proposed Regulations are adopted in their current form, there can be no assurances that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. investor holds Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, we generally would continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to that U.S. investor for all succeeding years during which the U.S. investor holds Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, even if we ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status. Such a U.S. investor may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including (i) the treatment of all or a portion of any gain on disposition as ordinary income, (ii) the application of a deferred interest charge on such gain and the receipt of certain dividends and (iii) compliance with certain reporting requirements. A “mark-to-market” election may be available that will alter the consequences of PFIC status if our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs are regularly traded on a qualified exchange. For further discussion, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 56 |
| |
Changes in tax laws, incentives, benefits and regulations may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in tax laws, regulations, related interpretations and tax accounting standards in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, the Cayman Islands, the United States or any other jurisdiction in which we operate or may in the future operate may result in higher taxation of our business, which may significantly reduce our profits and cash flows from operations. For example, Brazilian Constitutional Amendment No. 102/2019 increased the federal corporate contribution over the net profits of financial institutions from 15% to 20% as of March 1, 2020, and Provisional Measure No. 1,034/2021 increased the same federal corporate contribution from 15% to 20% for the period of July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Our payment processing activities are also subject to a Municipal Tax on Services (Imposto Sobre Serviços, or “ISS”), and any increases in ISS rates would harm our financial results. It is not possible to precisely predict if and how potential changes may affect our business, but one or more states, municipalities or federal governments may seek to challenge the taxation or procedures applied to our transactions, and could impose taxes or additional reporting, record-keeping or indirect tax collection obligations on our business. New taxes could also require us to incur substantial costs to capture data and collect and remit taxes. If such obligations were imposed, the additional costs associated with tax collection, remittance and audit requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
In addition, our net losses may grow if certain tax incentives are not retained or renewed. For example, Brazilian Law No. 11,196 currently grants tax benefits to companies that invest in research and development, which reduces our annual income tax expense. However, we cannot guarantee that such tax benefits will remain in place or that we will continue to qualify for them.
Brazilian government authorities at the federal, state and local levels are considering changes in tax laws to cover budgetary shortfalls resulting from the recent economic downturn in Brazil, including the impact of COVID-19. If enacted, such changes may harm our financial results by increasing our tax burden, increasing our tax compliance costs or otherwise affecting our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The Brazilian government regularly enacts reforms to the tax and other assessment regimes to which we and our customers are subject. Such reforms include changes in tax rates and, occasionally, the enactment of temporary levies, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental purposes. The effects of these changes and any other changes that result from the enactment of additional tax reforms cannot be quantified and there can be no assurance that any such reforms would not have an adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, such changes may produce uncertainty in the financial system, thereby increasing the cost of borrowing and contributing to an increase in our non-performing credit portfolio.
Further, recent Brazilian government initiatives have proposed changes to the Brazilian tax regime that, if enacted, could impact our business. Bill of Law No. 3,887/2020 aims to replace social contributions, or “PIS/COFINS,” with a new Contribution on Goods and Services, or “CBS,” and Bill of Law No. 2,373/2021 seeks to introduce a comprehensive reform of income tax rules, chiefly seeking to revoke the income tax exemption on the distribution of dividends by Brazilian companies, while also introducing new anti-avoidance provisions for a broad variety of transactions within related parties, ending the possibility of deducting expenses corresponding to the payment of interest on equity, extending the minimum term for the amortization of intangibles, and changing the income tax rules related to investments in Brazilian investment funds, among other changes. Specifically, the deductibility of interest on equity will be prohibited, impacting the overall tax burden of our operations in Brazil. Although these laws have not yet been enacted and it is not possible to determine at this time the exact changes that will eventually pass into law, any such changes could have adverse effects on our results and operations, as well as on the taxation applied to the dividends distributed from our Brazilian subsidiaries.
Separately, establishing a provision for income tax expense and filing returns requires us to make judgments and interpretations about the application of inherently complex tax laws, and in particular Brazilian income tax laws, which are subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and relevant governmental taxing authorities. If the judgments, estimates and assumptions we use in preparing our tax returns/obligations are subsequently found to be incorrect, we could become involved in a dispute with the relevant authority, which in Brazil can involve prolonged evaluation periods and litigation before a final resolution is reached, and which introduces further uncertainty and risk with respect to our tax and related liabilities.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 57 |
| |
Litigation, proceedings or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have been, and may in the future be, party to significant legal, arbitration and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business or from extraordinary corporate, tax or regulatory events, involving our employees, customers or suppliers, or environmental, competition, tax or other governmental matters, particularly with respect to civil, tax and labor claims, and in connection with conflicts of interest and lending activities. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such legal matters, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the cases present novel legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in the early stages of investigation or discovery, we cannot state accurately what the eventual outcome of these pending matters will be. The amount of our provisions in respect to these matters may be substantially less than the total amount of the claims asserted against us, and, in light of the uncertainties involved in such claims and proceedings, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the provisions recorded by us. As a result, the outcome of a highly uncertain matter may become material to our operating results. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had provisions for taxes, other legal contingencies and other provisions of US$18.1 million and US$16.5 million, respectively.
Our indemnities and insurance coverage may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in defending ourselves in future proceedings or similar matters under various laws. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any proceeding or investigation significantly exceed our indemnity rights and insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs. Further, even if we adequately defend our case in a proceeding or court action, we may have to set aside significant financial and management resources to settle issues raised by such proceedings, which could adversely affect our business. For more information see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”
Our operations could be adversely affected by labor actions, disputes and other labor-related disruptions in the countries in which we operate.
We are subject to risks under applicable federal, state and municipal labor laws and regulations of the countries in which we operate, including disputes concerning which union applies to particular workers or the activities covered by a particular union, collective bargaining rights and compensation and other benefits, various issues arising from union contracts, potential labor reclassifications, and strikes, among others. Labor laws and regulations are complex, broad in scope and are often vague and differ vastly across states, countries and businesses and may require us to make interpretations of such laws and regulations, which may involve subjective factors or judgments. Further, these laws and regulations are subject to continuing and evolving interpretation by regulatory agencies, administrative law judges and courts. New or different interpretations of existing requirements, new laws or regulations or the enforcement of existing or new laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality, or require us to make changes in our operations, facilities, equipment, personnel, compensation services, or operating expenses to comply with evolving requirements. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to make any such changes in a cost-efficient manner or at all.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 58 |
| |
We are subject to regulatory and administrative inspection, examinations and investigations.
The financial and payments industries face substantial regulatory risks and litigation. Like many firms operating within the financial and payments industries, we are experiencing a difficult regulatory environment across our markets. Increased regulatory oversight of the financial and payments industries generally, new laws and regulations affecting the financial industry and ever-changing regulatory interpretations of existing laws and regulations have made this an increasingly challenging and costly regulatory environment in which to operate. In Brazil specifically, the current regulatory and tax enforcement environment reflects an increased supervisory focus on enforcement, combined with uncertainty about the evolution of the regulatory regime, and may lead to material operational and compliance costs.
We may from time to time be subject to inspections, examinations or investigations by regulatory authorities, which could result in the identification of matters that may require remediation activities or enforcement proceedings by a regulator. The direct and indirect costs of responding to these examinations could be significant, and any examinations, investigations or litigation could result in settlements, awards, injunctions, fines and penalties and could have an adverse effect on our ability to offer some of our products and services.
As the regulatory framework for artificial intelligence and machine learning technology evolves, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
The regulatory framework for artificial intelligence and machine learning technology is evolving and remains uncertain. It is possible that new laws and regulations will be adopted, or existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in new ways, that would affect the operation of our platform and the way in which we use artificial intelligence and machine learning technology, including with respect to fair lending laws. Further, the cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may face restrictions and penalties under the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code.
Brazil has a series of strict consumer protection statutes, collectively known as the Consumer Protection Code (Código de Defesa do Consumidor), that are intended to safeguard consumer interests and that apply to all companies in Brazil that supply products or services to Brazilian consumers. These consumer protection provisions include protection against misleading and deceptive advertising, protection against coercive or unfair business practices and protection in the formation and interpretation of contracts, usually in the form of civil liabilities and administrative penalties for violations. These penalties are often levied by the Brazilian Consumer Protection Agencies (Fundação de Proteção e Defesa do Consumidor, or “PROCONs”), which oversee consumer issues on a district-by-district basis. Companies that operate across Brazil may face penalties from multiple PROCONs, as well as the National Secretariat for Consumers (Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor, or “SENACON”). Companies may settle claims made by consumers via PROCONs by paying compensation for violations directly to consumers and through a mechanism that allows them to adjust their conduct, called a conduct adjustment agreement (Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta, or “TAC”). Brazilian Public Prosecutor Offices may also commence investigations related to consumer rights violations and this TAC mechanism is also available for them. Companies that violate TACs face potential automatic fines. Brazilian Public Prosecutor Offices may also file public civil actions against companies in violation of consumer rights, seeking strict observation of the consumer protection law provisions and compensation for the damages consumers may have suffered. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 4,474 active proceedings with PROCONs and small claims courts relating to consumer rights. To the extent customers file such claims against us in the future, we may face reduced revenue due to refunds and fines for non-compliance that could negatively impact our results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 59 |
| |
We expect that there will be additional proposed and adopted laws, regulations and industry standards concerning consumer protection in the jurisdictions in which we operate and jurisdictions into which we intend to expand in the future, including in Mexico and Colombia and elsewhere in Latin America.
The Cayman Islands Economic Substance Act may affect our operations.
The Cayman Islands has recently enacted the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (As Revised), or the “Cayman Economic Substance Act,” which we are required to comply with as a Cayman Islands company. Our obligations under the Cayman Economic Substance Act include filing annual notifications, which need to state whether we are carrying out any relevant activities and if so, whether we have satisfied economic substance tests to the extent required under the Cayman Economic Substance Act. As it is a new regime, it is anticipated that the Cayman Economic Substance Act will evolve and be subject to further clarification and amendments. We may need to allocate additional resources to keep updated with these developments, and may have to make changes to our operations in order to comply with all requirements under the Cayman Economic Substance Act. Failure to satisfy these requirements may subject us to penalties under the Cayman Economic Substance Act.
Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate
Exchange rate and interest rate instability may have a material adverse effect on the economies of the countries in which we operate and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
The currencies of the countries in which we operate, most notably Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, have experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. In particular, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans and used various exchange rate policies to stabilize the real, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations (during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly), exchange controls, dual exchange rate markets and a floating exchange rate system, which plans and policies have had varying degrees of success. Exchange rate volatility could cause our costs to increase relative to our revenue, given that around 27% of our costs in the year ended December 31, 2021 were directly or indirectly linked to the U.S. dollar, whereas the majority of our revenue was denominated in the real.
Further, given that a majority of the revenue generated by our operations is denominated in reais, any revenue growth that we may experience may not be sufficient to offset adverse exchange rate fluctuations. Although long-term depreciation of the real is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of the real occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate among the real, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. For further information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Exchange Rates.”
Depreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar has created additional inflationary pressures in Brazil, which has led to increases in interest rates, limited Brazilian companies’ access to foreign financial markets and prompted the adoption of recessionary policies by the Brazilian government. Depreciation of the real may also, in the context of an economic slowdown, lead to decreased consumer spending, deflationary pressures and reduced growth of the Brazilian economy as a whole, and thereby harm our asset base, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, depreciation of the real would make our foreign-currency-linked obligations and funding more expensive, negatively affect the market price of our securities portfolios and have similar consequences for our borrowers. Conversely, appreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies would lead to a deterioration of the Brazilian balance of payments, as well as dampen export-driven growth. Depending on the circumstances, either depreciation or appreciation of the real could materially and adversely affect the growth of the Brazilian economy and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 60 |
| |
Disruption or volatility in global financial and credit markets could adversely affect the financial and economic environment in the countries in which we operate, most notably Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations are dependent upon the performance of the economies in which we do business, and Latin American economies in particular. Crises and volatility in the financial markets of countries other than Brazil may affect the global financial markets and the Brazilian economy and may have a negative impact on our operations.
As an example, there have been concerns over conflicts, unrest and terrorist threats in the Middle East, Europe and Africa, which have resulted in volatility in oil and other markets. The United States and China have recently been involved in controversy over trade barriers in China that threatened a trade war between the countries and have implemented or proposed to implement tariffs on certain imported products. Sustained tension between the United States and China over trade policies could significantly undermine the stability of the global economy and financial markets. In 2022, the military conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine is contributing to further increases in the prices of energy, oil and other commodities and to volatility in financial markets globally, as well as a new landscape in relation to international sanctions. It is unclear whether these challenges and uncertainties will be contained or resolved, and what effects they may have on the global political and economic conditions in the long term.
Volatility and uncertainty in global financial and credit markets have generally led to a decrease in liquidity and an increase in the cost of funding for Brazilian and international issuers and borrowers. Such conditions may adversely affect our ability to access capital and liquidity on financial terms that are acceptable, if at all. If we are unable to access capital and liquidity on financial terms acceptable to us or at all, our financial condition and the results of our operations may be adversely affected. In addition, the economic and market conditions of other countries, including the United States, countries in the European Union and emerging markets, may affect the volume of foreign investments in Brazil. If the level of foreign investment declines, our access to capital may likewise decline, which could negatively affect our business, ability to take advantage of strategic opportunities and, ultimately, the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
Further, the demand for credit and financial services, as well as our customers’ ability to make payments and deposits, is directly impacted by macroeconomic variables, such as economic growth, income, unemployment rates, inflation and fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates. Disruptions and volatility in the global financial markets may have significant consequences in the countries in which we operate, such as volatility in the prices of securities, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Higher uncertainty and volatility may result in a slowdown in the credit market and the economy, which, in turn, could lead to higher unemployment rates and a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Such events may significantly impair our customers’ ability to perform their obligations and increase overdue or non-performing loans, resulting in an increase in the risk associated with our lending activity.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 61 |
| |
Governments have exercised, and continue to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy and the other economies in which we operate. This influence, as well as political and economic conditions in Brazil and the other countries in which we operate, could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
Governments in many of the markets in which we currently, or may in the future, operate, frequently exercise significant influence over their respective economies and occasionally make significant changes in policy and regulations. Government actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases or decreases in interest rates, changes in fiscal policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange rate controls, blocking access to banking accounts, currency devaluations, capital controls and import and export restrictions. We have no control over and cannot predict what measures or policies governments may take in the future. Our business and the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs may be harmed by changes in government policies, as well as general economic factors, including, without limitation:
| · | growth or downturn of the relevant economy; |
| · | interest rates and monetary policies; |
| · | exchange rates and currency fluctuations; |
| · | inflation; |
| · | liquidity of the domestic capital and lending markets; |
| · | import and export controls; |
| · | exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad and payments of dividends; |
| · | modifications to laws and regulations according to political, social and economic interests; |
| · | fiscal policy, monetary policy and changes in tax laws; |
| · | economic, political and social instability, including general strikes and mass demonstrations; |
| · | labor and social security regulations; |
| · | energy and water shortages and rationing; |
| · | public health crises, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; |
| · | commodity prices; and |
| · | other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting the countries in which we operate. |
Uncertainty over whether Brazil and other Latin American governments will implement reforms or changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Latin America, which may have an adverse effect on our activities and consequently our results of operations, and may also adversely affect the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
In particular, Latin America’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the region’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil and other Latin American countries. The recent economic instability in Latin America has contributed to a decline in market confidence in the Latin American economies as well as to a deteriorating political environment.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 62 |
| |
As has been true in the past, the current political and economic environment in Brazil and certain other Latin American countries has and is continuing to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which has historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil and elsewhere in Latin America, which may adversely affect us and our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
Changes made by the Central Bank of Brazil in the basic interest rate could materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our business is conducted primarily in Brazil, where the Monetary Policy Committee of the Central Bank of Brazil, or “COPOM,” sets the target basic interest rate for the Brazilian banking system and makes changes in this rate as an instrument of monetary policy. The basic interest rate is the adjusted average rate of daily financing calculated in the Special System for Settlement and Custody, or “SELIC,” for federal bonds. Variations in the basic interest rate can be harmful to us, causing, among other effects, a reduction in the demand for our credit and investment products, an increase in the cost of raising funds and the risk of default by our customers, all of which could adversely affect us.
Infrastructure and workforce deficiency in Brazil may impact economic growth and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our performance depends on the overall health and growth of the Brazilian economy. Brazilian GDP growth has fluctuated over the past few years, with a contraction of 3.5% in 2015, a contraction of 3.3% in 2016, growth of 1.1% in 2017, growth of 1.1% in 2018, growth of 1.1% in 2019, a contraction of 4.1% in 2020 and growth of 4.6% in 2021. Growth is limited by inadequate infrastructure, including potential energy shortages and deficient transportation, logistics and telecommunication sectors, general strikes, the lack of a qualified labor force and the lack of private and public investments in these areas, which limit productivity and efficiency. Any of these factors could lead to labor market volatility and generally impact income, purchasing power and consumption levels, which could limit growth and ultimately have a material adverse effect on us.
Inflation and certain government measures to curb inflation have historically harmed the economies and capital markets in some of the countries in which we operate, including Brazil, and high levels of inflation in the future could harm our business and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
In the past, high levels of inflation have adversely affected the economies and capital markets of some of the countries in which we operate, particularly Brazil, and have hampered the ability of their governments to create conditions that stimulate or maintain economic growth. Moreover, governmental measures to curb inflation and market speculation about possible future governmental measures have contributed to the negative economic impact of inflation and have created general economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the capital markets. Such measures have at times involved restrictive monetary policies and high interest rates that have limited the availability of credit and economic growth.
For example, according to Brazil’s Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo, or the “IPCA index”), Brazil recorded inflation of 10.1% in 2021, 4.2% in 2020 and 4.3% in 2019. Measures adopted by the Brazilian government to control inflation have included the maintenance of a restrictive monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby limiting the availability of credit and reducing economic growth. Further, COPOM frequently adjusts official interest rates in situations of economic uncertainty to meet the economic goals established by the Brazilian government. On December 8, 2021, it was set at 9.25 and reached 11.75% on March 16, 2022, due to concerns with inflationary pressures. Inflation and certain governmental actions to curb inflation, together with the speculation about governmental measures to be adopted, have materially and adversely affected the Brazilian economy and contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil, heightening volatility in the Brazilian capital markets.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 63 |
| |
Any future measures adopted by the governments of the countries in which we operate, including a reduction in interest rates, intervention in the exchange market or the implementation of mechanisms to adjust or determine the value of the relevant local currency, may trigger inflation, adversely affecting the overall performance of the relevant country’s economy. If Brazil or other Latin American countries in which we operate face significant inflation or deflation, we and our ability to meet our obligations may be adversely affected. These pressures could also affect our access to international financial markets. If Brazil or other Latin American countries in which we operate experience high inflation in the future, we may be unable to adjust the prices we charge our customers in order to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure, which could increase our costs and reduce our operating margins.
Moreover, in the event of increased inflation, governments may choose to significantly increase official interest rates. The increase in interest rates may affect not only the cost of our new borrowings and financing, but also the cost of our current indebtedness, as well as our cash and cash equivalents, securities and lease agreements payable, which are subject to interest rates. Such events would likely materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Any further downgrading of Brazil’s credit rating could depress the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs.
We may be harmed by investors’ perceptions of risks related to Brazil’s sovereign debt credit rating. Rating agencies regularly evaluate Brazil and its sovereign credit ratings, which are based on a number of factors including macroeconomic trends, fiscal and budgetary conditions, indebtedness metrics and the potential for changes in any of these factors. The rating agencies began to review Brazil’s sovereign credit rating in September 2015. Subsequently, the three major rating agencies downgraded Brazil’s investment-grade status:
| · | Standard & Poor’s initially downgraded Brazil’s credit rating from BBB-negative to BB-positive and subsequently downgraded it again from BB-positive to BB, maintaining its negative outlook, citing a worse credit situation since the first downgrade. On January 11, 2018, Standard & Poor’s further downgraded Brazil’s credit rating from BB to BB-stable, which was reaffirmed on December 12, 2021. |
| · | In December 2015, Moody’s placed Brazil’s Baa3’s issue and bond ratings under review for downgrade and subsequently downgraded the issue and bond ratings to below investment grade, at Ba2 with a negative outlook, citing the prospect of a further deterioration in Brazil’s debt indicators, taking into account the low growth environment and the challenging political scenario. On May 25, 2021, Moody’s maintained Brazil’s credit rating at Ba2-stable. |
| · | Fitch downgraded Brazil’s sovereign credit rating to BB-positive with a negative outlook, citing the rapid expansion of the country’s budget deficit and the worse-than-expected recession. In February 2018, Fitch downgraded Brazil’s sovereign credit rating again to BB-negative, citing, among other factors, fiscal deficits, the increasing burden of public debt and an inability to implement reforms that would structurally improve Brazil’s public finances. On December 14, 2021, Fitch reaffirmed Brazil’s credit rating at BB-negative. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 64 |
| |
Brazil’s sovereign credit rating is currently rated below investment grade by the three main credit rating agencies. Consequently, the prices of securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil have been negatively affected. A prolongation or worsening of the current Brazilian recession and continued political uncertainty, among other factors, could lead to further ratings downgrades. Any further downgrade of Brazil’s sovereign credit ratings could heighten investors’ perception of risk and, as a result, cause the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs to decline.
Risks Relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our BDRs
An active trading market for our Class A ordinary shares may not be sustainable. If an active trading market is not maintained, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price paid and you could lose a significant part of your investment.
Although our Class A ordinary shares are listed and traded on NYSE, an active trading market for our shares may not be maintained. If an active market for our Class A ordinary shares is not sustained, you may have difficulty selling any of our Class A ordinary shares that you buy, and may be unable to convert your Class A ordinary shares into BDRs or vice-versa. Investors may purchase Class A ordinary shares on the NYSE to be held in custody for the issue of BDRs in Brazil. See “Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities—C. Securities—Description of Brazilian Depositary Receipts” for more information regarding our BDR program. Further, the market price of our Class A ordinary shares may be materially and adversely affected if an active trading market is not maintained.
The market price of our Class A ordinary shares may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
| · | announcements by us or our competitors of significant developments; |
| · | technological innovations by us or competitors; |
| · | the failure of financial analysts to cover our Class A ordinary shares or changes in financial estimates by analysts; |
| · | changes in financial estimates by financial analysts, or any failure by us to meet or exceed any of these estimates, or changes in the recommendations of any financial analysts that elect to follow our Class A ordinary shares or the shares of our competitors; |
| · | actual or anticipated variations in our operating results; |
| · | future sales of our shares; and |
| · | investor perceptions of us and the industries in which we operate. |
In addition, the stock market in general has experienced substantial price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies affected. These broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our Class A ordinary shares, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of certain companies’ securities, securities class action litigation has been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 65 |
| |
Our founding shareholder and CEO David Vélez Osorno owns 86.2% of our outstanding Class B ordinary shares, which represents 74.9% of the voting power of our issued share capital. This concentration of ownership and voting power may limit your ability to influence corporate matters.
David Vélez Osorno, our founding shareholder and chief executive officer, continues to control our Company through his beneficial ownership of 86.2% of our outstanding Class B ordinary shares, and consequently, 74.9% of the combined voting power of our issued share capital. Our Class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share and our Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share. Our Class B ordinary shares are convertible into an equivalent number of Class A ordinary shares. As a result, so long as David Vélez Osorno beneficially owns 57.6% of the outstanding Class B ordinary shares, even if he beneficially owns significantly less than 50% of our outstanding share capital, he will be able to effectively control our decisions and will be able to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors. David Vélez Osorno will also be able to direct our actions in areas such as business strategy, financing, distributions, acquisitions and dispositions of assets or businesses, and may cause us to make acquisitions that increase the amount of our indebtedness or number of outstanding Class A ordinary shares, sell revenue-generating assets or inhibit change of control transactions that may benefit other shareholders. In addition, we have entered into a Shareholder’s Agreement with David Vélez Osorno pursuant to which we have granted him the right to nominate directors to our board and committees, rights to information, and rights to approve certain of our corporate actions. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Shareholder’s Agreement.” The decisions of David Vélez Osorno on these matters may be contrary to your expectations or preferences, and they may take actions that could be contrary to your interests. For further information regarding shareholdings in our company, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”
We have granted the holders of our Class B ordinary shares preemptive rights to acquire shares that we may sell in the future, which may impair our ability to raise funds.
Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, the holders of our Class B ordinary shares are entitled to preemptive rights to purchase additional ordinary shares in the event that there is an increase in our share capital and additional ordinary shares are issued, upon the same economic terms and at the same price, in order to maintain their proportional ownership interests, which is approximately 25.0% of our outstanding shares. The exercise by holders of our Class B ordinary shares of their preemptive rights may impair our ability to raise funds, or adversely affect the terms on which we are able to raise funds, as we may not be able to offer to new investors the quantity of our shares that they may desire to purchase. For more information see “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Ordinary Shares—Preemptive or Similar Rights.”
Future sales of a substantial number of our Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the price of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs to decline.
The market price of our Class A ordinary shares could decline as a result of substantial sales of our Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant shareholders, a large number of Class A ordinary shares or BDRs becoming available for sale or the perception in the market that such sales could occur. As of December 31, 2021, we have approximately 3,459,743,432 Class A ordinary shares outstanding, including those underlying BDRs (including any BDRs that were offered under the Customer Program), and 1,150,245,114 Class B ordinary shares outstanding. Subject to the lock-up agreements described below, the Class A ordinary shares, as well as the Class A ordinary shares underlying outstanding BDRs, are freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act by persons other than our affiliates within the meaning of Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 66 |
| |
Our shareholders or entities controlled by them or their permitted transferees are, subject to the lock-up agreements described below, able to sell their Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, in the public market from time to time without registering them, subject to certain limitations on the timing, amount and method of those sales imposed by regulations promulgated by the SEC and the CVM, as applicable. If any of our shareholders, the affiliated entities controlled by them or their respective permitted transferees were to sell a large number of their Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, the market price of our Class A ordinary shares may decline significantly. In addition, the perception in the public markets that sales by them might occur may also cause the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares to decline.
We and all of our directors, executive officers and certain other record holders that together represent substantially all of our outstanding ordinary shares and securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares are subject to lock-up agreements with the underwriters of our initial public offering that restrict their ability to transfer such ordinary shares and such securities, including any hedging transactions, during the period ending on the later of (x) the opening of trading on the second trading day immediately following our public release of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and (y) the 181st day after the date of the prospectus of our initial public offering, as further described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Lock-Up and Market Standoff Agreements.”
In addition, holders of the remaining of our outstanding ordinary shares and securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our ordinary shares are subject to market standoff agreements with us that restrict certain transfers of such ordinary shares and such securities during the restricted period. Notwithstanding the terms of such market standoff agreements and lock-up agreements, our insider trading policy prohibits hedging by all of our current directors, officers and employees.
In addition, as further described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Lock-Up and Market Standoff Agreements,” (A) up to 15% of the outstanding Class A ordinary shares, BDRs and securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs (but excluding unvested securities and any securities subject to escrow or holdback and, solely in the case of our employees, contractors and consultants, excluding any securities that were neither issued under one of our equity incentive plans nor held by such person in his or her individual capacity, or collectively, the “Excluded Securities”) held by each Employee Shareholder (as defined in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Lock-Up and Market Standoff Agreements”) may have been sold for a five-trading day period beginning on the commencement of trading on the fourth day on which our Class A ordinary shares are traded on the NYSE, or the “First Release Window”, and (B) up to 25% of the outstanding Class A ordinary shares, BDRs and securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs (but excluding any Excluded Securities) held by each Non-Founder/D&O Shareholder, plus any shares eligible to be sold in the First Release Window held by such person but not sold during such First Release Window, may be sold (in the case of an Employee Shareholder, for a nine-trading day period) beginning on the commencement of trading on the second trading day immediately following our public release of earnings for the year ended December 31, 2021, provided that, in the case of clauses (A) and (B), certain trading prices of our Class A ordinary shares are achieved. As of the date of the filing of this annual report, none of these triggers were met and the First and Second Release Windows did not occur.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 67 |
| |
Upon the expiration of the restricted period described above, certain securities subject to such lock-up and market standoff restrictions will become eligible for sale, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws. Furthermore, we and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC may waive the lock-up agreements and market standoff agreements entered into by our executive officers, directors and record holders of our securities before they expire.
Sales of a substantial number of our Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, including upon expiration of the lock-up agreements, the perception that such sales may occur, or early release of these lock-up periods, could cause the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares to fall or make it more difficult for you to sell your Class A ordinary shares at a time and price that you deem appropriate.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Shareholder’s Agreement contain anti-takeover provisions, and the Central Bank of Brazil imposes certain restrictions and requirements, which may discourage a third-party from acquiring us and adversely affect the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Shareholder’s Agreement contain certain provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company, including provisions that:
| · | authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the shareholders, undesignated preferred shares with terms, rights and preferences determined by our board of directors that may be senior to our Class A ordinary shares; |
| · | institute a staggered board of directors and restrictions on our shareholders to fill a vacancy on the board of directors; |
| · | impose advance notice requirements for shareholder proposals; |
| · | limit our shareholders’ ability to call special meetings; |
| · | require approval from the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon to amend a provision of our Memorandum and Articles of Association; |
| · | condition any change of control of our company on the consent of the holders of a majority of the Class B ordinary shares in issue; and |
| · | provides our founding shareholder, David Vélez Osorno, so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 40% of the voting power of our issued share capital, the ability to designate a majority of the members of our board of directors, as described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Shareholder’s Agreement.” |
These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company. These provisions could also make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take other corporate actions that you desire.
In addition, certain of our subsidiaries are Brazilian financial institutions (including Nu Financeira, Nu DTVM and NuInvest) and certain are Brazilian payment institutions (including Nu Pagamentos), all of which are regulated by the Central Bank of Brazil. Any proposed change of control of a financial or payment institution must be submitted to and conditioned upon approval from the Central Bank of Brazil. Further, if a person that is not the controlling shareholder of such an institution acquires: (i) more than 15% of the total equity capital of a financial institution, directly or indirectly; or (ii) more than 15% of the voting equity capital or more than 10% of the total equity capital of a payment institution, directly or indirectly (in each case, a “Qualified Equity Participation”), any such acquisition must be submitted to the Central Bank of Brazil, which has the right to request documents and information, and can demand that the acquisition be modified or undone in case of any irregularities. This rule also applies to any expansion of a Qualified Equity Participation. Such rules and regulations of the Central Bank of Brazil could likewise discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our financial or payment institution subsidiaries, and could make it difficult for you and other shareholders to cause us to take corporate actions that you desire.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 68 |
| |
Our dual class capital structure means that our shares are not eligible to be included in certain indices. We cannot predict the impact this may have on the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares.
In 2017, FTSE Russell and S&P Dow Jones announced changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares, such as ours, from being added to such indices. FTSE Russell announced plans to require new constituents of its indices to have at least five percent of their voting rights in the hands of public shareholders, whereas S&P Dow Jones announced that companies with multiple share classes, such as ours, will not be eligible for inclusion in the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600, which together make up the S&P Composite 1500. We cannot guarantee that other stock indices will not take a similar approach to FTSE Russell and S&P Dow Jones in the future. Under the announced policies, our dual class capital structure is not eligible for inclusion in either of these indices and, as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track these indices will not invest in our shares. It continues to be somewhat unclear what effect, if any, these policies will have on the valuations of publicly traded companies excluded from the indices, but in certain situations they may depress these valuations compared to those of other similar companies that are included. Exclusion from indices could make our Class A ordinary shares less attractive to investors and, as a result, the market price of our Class A ordinary shares could be adversely affected.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, the price of our Class A ordinary shares and our trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our Class A ordinary shares depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class A ordinary shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our Class A ordinary shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our Class A ordinary shares could decrease, which might cause the price of our Class A ordinary shares and trading volume to decline.
We may not pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors as our board of directors considers relevant. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend. In addition, we are governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands and our Memorandum and Articles of Association, under which there is no minimum mandatory dividend payable to our shareholders and no established periodicity for the distribution of dividends.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 69 |
| |
Pursuant to Brazilian law, we may amend our deposit agreement in respect of the BDRs and the rights of BDR holders by means of an agreement with the BDR Depositary and without the consent of BDR holders.
Pursuant to Brazilian law, we may amend the Deposit Agreement and the rights of BDR by means of an agreement with the BDR Depositary and without the consent of BDR holders. In that case, even if the amendment or change is materially adverse to the rights of BDR holders, it will become effective and the BDR holders will not be able to challenge such amendment.
Holders of our BDRs registered in a nominee account may not be able to exercise voting rights as readily as a shareholder.
Holders of BDRs are not and will not be considered to be holders of our Class A ordinary shares and are not entitled to attend or vote at meetings of our shareholders. We have agreed with the BDR Depositary that upon receipt by the BDR Depositary of notice of any meeting of our shareholders, the BDR Depositary will publish notice of such meeting for the holders of BDRs, requesting instructions by a specified date from the holders of BDRs as to the voting of our Class A ordinary shares represented by their BDRs. In order to direct the voting of any such shares, holders of BDRs must deliver instructions to the BDR Depositary by the specified date. Neither we nor the BDR Depositary can guarantee that you will see the published notice in time to instruct the BDR Depositary as to the voting of our Class A ordinary shares represented by your BDRs and it is possible that you will not have the opportunity to direct the voting of any shares. For more information, see “Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities—C. Securities—Description of Brazilian Depositary Receipts—Deposit Agreement—Voting Rights of BDRs.”
There are no specific rules relating to the delisting of our BDRs from the B3.
We may decide to delist our BDRs from the B3. In such case, we cannot guarantee that we or our founding shareholder will make a public offering for the acquisition of our BDRs or our underlying Class A ordinary shares on terms and conditions that meet the expectations of the BDR holders, who in any case will not be able to prevent us from deregistering from the CVM and delisting our BDRs from the B3.
Holders of BDRs may be subject to additional risks related to holding BDRs rather than Class A ordinary shares.
Because holders of BDRs do not hold their Class A ordinary shares directly, they are subject to the following additional risks, among others:
| · | a holder of BDRs will not be treated as a direct holder of Class A ordinary shares and may not be able to exercise shareholder rights; |
| · | dividends on the Class A ordinary shares represented by the BDRs will be paid to the BDR Depositary, and before the BDR Depositary makes a distribution to a holder on behalf of the BDRs, withholding taxes or other governmental charges, if any, that must be paid, will be deducted; |
| · | we and the BDR Depositary may amend or terminate the Deposit Agreement without the consent of holders of the BDRs in a manner that could prejudice holders of BDRs or that could affect their ability to transfer BDRs, among others; and |
| · | the BDR Depositary may take other actions inconsistent with the best interests of holders of BDRs. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 70 |
| |
As a foreign private issuer, we have different disclosure and other requirements than U.S. domestic registrants.
As a foreign private issuer we may be subject to different disclosure and other requirements than domestic U.S. registrants. For example, as a foreign private issuer, in the United States, we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under the Exchange Act, including the requirements to prepare and issue quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or to file current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events, the proxy rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 14 of the Exchange Act or the insider reporting and short-swing profit rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we intend to rely on exemptions from certain U.S. rules which will permit us to follow Cayman Islands legal requirements rather than certain of the requirements that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants. However, Cayman Islands laws and regulations applicable to Cayman Islands companies do not contain any provisions comparable to the U.S. proxy rules, the U.S. rules relating to the filing of reports on Form 10-Q or 8-K or the U.S. rules relating to liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time.
Furthermore, foreign private issuers are required to file their annual report on Form 20-F within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information, although we will be subject to Cayman Islands laws and regulations having substantially the same effect as Regulation Fair Disclosure. As a result of the above, even though we are required to file reports on Form 6-K disclosing the limited information which we have made or are required to make public pursuant to Cayman Islands law, or are required to distribute to shareholders generally, and that is material to us, you may not receive information of the same type or amount that is required to be disclosed to shareholders of a U.S. company.
Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or within the same time frames as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. We currently prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS. We will not be required to file financial statements prepared in accordance with or reconciled to U.S. GAAP so long as our financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A ordinary shares less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A ordinary shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active and more volatile trading market for our Class A ordinary shares.
We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses.
In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, either (a) more than 50% of the voting power of all our outstanding classes of voting securities (on a combined basis) must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (b)(1) a majority of our executive officers or directors must not be U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets cannot be located in the United States; and (3) our business must be administered principally outside the United States. If we lose this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and NYSE rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than the costs we will incur as a foreign private issuer.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 71 |
| |
As a foreign private issuer, we rely on exemptions from certain NYSE corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. issuers, including the requirement that a majority of an issuer’s directors consist of independent directors. This may afford less protection to holders of our Class A ordinary shares or to holders of our BDRs.
NYSE rules require listed companies to have, among other things, a majority of their board members be independent, and to have independent director oversight of executive compensation, nomination of directors and corporate governance matters. As a foreign private issuer, however, we are permitted to follow, and we do follow, home country practice in lieu of the above requirements. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance—Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law.”
We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.
David Vélez Osorno controls a majority of the voting power of our shares. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE, including (1) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) the requirement that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (3) the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. We rely and intend to continue to rely on some or all of these exemptions. As a result, we do not have a stand-alone nominating and corporate governance committee, and our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee is not required to consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association designate the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands as the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders, and the federal district courts of the United States as the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or any other person, (iii) any action or proceeding arising pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, any provision of the Companies Act, our Memorandum and Articles of Association, or any other provision of applicable law, (iv) any action or proceeding seeking to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our Memorandum and Articles of Association or (v) any action or proceeding as to which the Companies Act confers jurisdiction on the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands shall be the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, in all cases subject to the court having jurisdiction over indispensable parties named as defendants. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association also provide that the federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act. Nothing in our Memorandum and Articles of Association preclude shareholders that assert claims under the Exchange Act from bringing such claims in any court, subject to applicable law. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions. However, shareholders are not deemed to have waived our compliance with U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. These exclusive forum provisions may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable. For example, in December 2018, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware determined that a provision stating that federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act is not enforceable. Although this decision was reversed by the Delaware Supreme Court in March 2020, courts in other states may still find these provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provisions in our Memorandum and Articles of Association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 72 |
| |
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. The rights of our shareholders, including with respect to fiduciary duties and corporate opportunities, may be different from the rights of shareholders governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our Memorandum and Articles of Association and by the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights of shareholders and responsibilities of directors in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In particular, as a matter of Cayman Islands law, directors of a Cayman Islands company owe fiduciary duties to the company and separately a duty of care, diligence and skill to the company. Under Cayman Islands law, directors and officers owe the following fiduciary duties: (1) duty to act in good faith in what the director or officer believes to be in the best interests of the company as a whole; (2) duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which those powers were conferred and not for a collateral purpose; (3) directors should not properly fetter the exercise of future discretion; (4) duty to exercise powers fairly as between different sections of shareholders; (5) duty to exercise independent judgment; and (6) duty not to put themselves in a position in which there is a conflict between their duty to the company and their personal interests. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association have varied this last obligation by providing that a director must disclose the nature and extent of his or her interest in any contract or arrangement, and following such disclosure and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of the NYSE, and unless (x) disqualified by the chairman of the relevant meeting or (y) such interest is material, such director may vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he or she is interested and may be counted in the quorum at the meeting. Conversely, under Delaware corporate law, a director has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders (made up of two components) and the director’s duties prohibit self-dealing by a director and mandate that the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders take precedence over any interest possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance—Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 73 |
| |
Our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests because we are a Cayman Islands exempted company.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Memorandum and Articles of Association, by the Companies Act (as amended) of the Cayman Islands, or the “Companies Act,” and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, which has persuasive, not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a significantly less exhaustive body of securities laws than the United States. In addition, some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fulsome and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands.
Specifically, subject to limited exceptions, under Cayman Islands’ law, a minority shareholder may not bring a derivative action against the board of directors. Class actions are not recognized in the Cayman Islands, but groups of shareholders with identical interests may bring representative proceedings, which are similar. Further, while Cayman Islands law allows a dissenting shareholder to express the shareholder’s view that a court sanctioned reorganization of a Cayman Islands company would not provide fair value for the shareholder’s shares, Cayman Islands statutory law does not specifically provide for shareholder appraisal rights in connection with a court sanctioned reorganization (by way of a scheme of arrangement). This may make it more difficult for you to assess the value of any consideration you may receive in a corporate reorganization (approved by way of a scheme of arrangement) or to require that the acquirer gives you additional consideration if you believe the consideration offered is insufficient. However, the Companies Act does provide a mechanism for a dissenting shareholder in a statutory merger or consolidation to apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands for a determination of the fair value of the dissenter’s shares if it is not possible for the company and the dissenter to agree on the fair value of such shares within the time limits prescribed by the Companies Act.
In addition, shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records and accounts or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders. Our directors have discretion under our Memorandum and Articles of Association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion.
United States civil liabilities and certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, certain of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States, and a substantial portion of the assets of these persons is located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors who are not resident in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States.
Further, it is unclear if original actions predicated on civil liabilities based solely upon U.S. federal securities laws are enforceable in courts outside the United States, including in the Cayman Islands and Brazil. Courts of the Cayman Islands may not, in an original action in the Cayman Islands, recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state of the United States on the grounds that such provisions are penal in nature. Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction if such judgment is final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, provided it is not in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands’ judgment in respect of the same matters, and was not obtained by fraud or in a manner which is contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands. In addition, a Cayman Islands court may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 74 |
| |
Judgments of Brazilian courts to enforce our obligations with respect to our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs may be payable only in reais.
Most of our assets are located in Brazil. If proceedings are brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, we may not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than reais. Under Brazilian exchange control laws, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts denominated in a currency other than reais may only be satisfied in Brazilian currency at the exchange rate, typically as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil, in effect on the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then typically adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations and monetary restatements through the effective payment date. The then-prevailing exchange rate may not afford non-Brazilian investors with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs.
Item 4. Information on the company
| A. | History and Development of the Company |
Corporate Information
We were incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an exempted company with limited liability on February 26, 2016. Our principal executive offices are located at Floor 4, Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman, KY1-9010, Cayman Islands, and our telephone number at this address is +1 345 949 2648. Our website address is www.nubank.com.br. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report, and inclusions of our website address in this annual report are inactive textual references provided only for your informational reference.
Our Nu Journey
We launched Nu to provide a superior offering to Brazilian consumers. When we launched Nu, as is the case today, incumbent banks in Latin America offered similar checking account products, credit limits, interest rates, and annual fees to all customers based on homogenous underwriting methodologies and customer management strategies. We believed that customers in Brazil were paying some of the highest interest rates and fees in the world, and were often ignored and taken for granted, while a large percentage of the generally lowest-income population was simply left out of the banking system. In addition, Brazil has been among the most profitable countries for the financial institutions sector globally, with one of the highest returns on equity. In 2013, our founders saw an opportunity to create a fundamentally different financial services offering that would be fully digital and obsessed with the customer experience, utilizing credit cards as a first product. We sought to help our customers make payments more conveniently, organize their finances better, and improve their use and control of credit.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 75 |
| |
A Nu Journey Begins
2013 to 2017: The Launch of a Nu Approach to the Market – Reaching over 3 million customers
Our journey began in 2013 with a small group of engineers and designers. In 2014, we launched our first product, the Nu Credit Card, a purple Mastercard-branded credit card in Brazil. We were a pioneer in offering credit cards that did not have any annual fees and we designed an end-to-end mobile-first experience to set a new standard for best-in-class customer experience that is completely digital. With this innovation, we provided access to a much broader spectrum of customers—from more affluent card users to those just starting out.
Our strategy was to start with a single product to ensure we delivered a great user experience, delighted our customers, and gained enough insights about the market and our customers to refine and improve our data models. By starting with credit cards, we believe we tackled one of the most challenging (and larger potential) areas of financial services early in our evolution. This has helped us: (i) earn the trust of a large pool of customers by empowering them with differentiated credit solutions that they may have otherwise found to be low quality, expensive, or inaccessible from other providers; (ii) build a large and growing pool of proprietary data on customers’ financial and transactional behavior, and (iii) create a favorable and highly defensible business position in the market from which we seek to expand.
Scaling the Business to Nu 2.0
2017 to 2018: Growing Beyond Credit Cards—Reaching over 6 million customers
In 2017, we launched our fully digital banking account solution, our NuAccount, which offered our customers the ability to make deposits, peer-to-peer transfers, payments free of charge, and withdraw cash across a network of partner ATMs at a nominal fee. We also created a savings feature by paying a fair yield on our customers’ balances at a rate equivalent to 100% of the Brazilian interbank deposit rate. These were revolutionary features when compared to the checking account products incumbent banks offered, where customers had to pay a range of fixed account and transaction fees and received a fraction of the yield that we offered.
In 2018, we launched our complementary debit card, making it available free of charge to any customer with a NuAccount, and made it easy to order through our Nu mobile app.
The introduction of our NuAccount in 2017 and its corresponding debit card in 2018 were important evolutions in our product set and had a noticeable impact across our key business metrics as they allowed us to accelerate our customer growth by serving a much wider spectrum of the population, including lower-income customers who would not have started off with a consumer credit product such as our credit card. Consequently, customers who join us by acquiring only a NuAccount typically generate lower initial revenue than customers who start off with multiple products, such as a credit card and a NuAccount. However, these NuAccount-only customers are highly attractive and strategic to us. First, we often become their primary banking account provider and capture a greater share of their overall financial lives over time, including through the offering of spending, saving, insurance and investment solutions. Second, as we capture more data about these NuAccount-only customers, we progressively feed and optimize our segmentation and credit underwriting models, which often leads to the offer of consumer credit, insurance or third-party products, materially increasing their lifetime value to us, while serving them with our low-cost structure.
We have had over 100 million applications since our inception as potential customers turn to us for our sought-after products. Not all of our applicants become customers right away, as we apply disciplined underwriting procedures or did not have the product most suited for them at that time. As we have increased our product offering, we have stayed connected to our potential clients through our launch of targeted products, and many of them have subsequently represented an important source of customer base growth. We also monitor their profiles to see if they fit our underwriting criteria for products they have previously applied for. Our large applicant pool consequently further improves our ability to continue to scale our customer base.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 76 |
| |
Expanding Our Breadth & Depth to Nu 3.0
2019 to 2021: Expanding to New Products and New Countries—Reaching 53.9 million customers.
In 2019, we launched our personal loan product for people with larger credit needs, allowing our customers to apply, run repayment simulations, check balances, and pay balances ahead of time, in an easy and transparent manner on our mobile app. Later that year we launched our Nu business checking account to help meet the similar needs of the nearly 19 million single entrepreneur-led micro businesses that are estimated as operational in Brazil as of December 31, 2021, according to the Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service, or “SEBRAE.” We had almost 1.4 million SME customers as of December 31, 2021, representing approximately an increase of 250% from approximately 435,000 customers as of December 31, 2020.
In 2019 and 2020, we expanded internationally to Mexico and Colombia, respectively, as we identified customer needs and opportunities in these markets that were similar to those in Brazil. We followed a similar strategy and launched in both countries with our flagship credit card product. In less than two years from the launch of our operations in Mexico in early 2020, we believe we have already become the top credit card issuer in the country, in terms of the number of cards issued during the second half of 2021 based on data for other issuers from the Central Bank of Mexico.
In 2020, we began to expand into insurance brokerage and investments (brokerage and asset management). We launched NuLife, a life insurance product seamlessly integrated and distributed through our mobile app in partnership with Chubb Limited, or “Chubb,” a leading global policy underwriter. NuLife provides basic coverage starting from less than US$2.00 per month for benefits up to approximately US$30,000. We also announced the acquisition of Easynvest, which we believe is the largest direct-to-consumer retail investments platform in Brazil with 6.3 million customers as of December 31, 2021.
In 2021, we closed the acquisition of Easynvest and relaunched Easynvest under the NuInvest brand with curated features to help our customers invest more easily in the financial markets through our mobile app. We also expanded our product set further with the launch of (i) Ultraviolet, our premium metal credit card for more affluent customers, (ii) a new online remittance service in collaboration with Remessa Online Bee Tech Serviços de Tecnologia Ltda., or “Remessa Online”, which joined our marketplace as a strategic partner, (iii) “Buy Now Pay Later” solutions that allow customers to (a) pay their debit purchases over time in up to twelve installments making use of their personal loan credit limits and (b) pay their boletos (banking payment slips) over time in up to twelve installments making use of their credit card limits, in both cases with the flexibility to anticipate future installments at a discount, increasing the purchasing power and financial autonomy of our customers through the Nu app.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 77 |
| |
Of our 53.9 million customers as of December 31, 2021, 1.4 million customers were in Mexico and 114,000 customers were in Colombia.
On December 8, 2021, the registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-260649), relating to our initial public offering was declared effective by the SEC. On November 30, 2021, we commenced our initial public offering, which closed on January 6, 2022. We sold 316,705,853 Class A ordinary shares for an aggregate price of approximately US$2,839 million, which included 48,526,380 in the form of BDRs and 27,555,298 Class A ordinary shares as a result of the partial exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares (greenshoe).
For information regarding our capital expenditures and divestitures, if any, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 78 |
| |
Recent Developments
Syndicated Facility
On April 11, 2022, we announced that we closed a US$650 million credit line via a syndicated facility with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding,Inc., Goldman Sachs International Bank and HSBC México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC to support our internationalization strategy and the growth of local operations in Colombia and Mexico. The money is being raised in local currency. Nu is the guarantor and our subsidiaries Nu Mexico and Nu Colombia S.A. are the borrowers of such operation.
Appointment of New Chief People Officer of Nu
On February 8, 2022, we announced that, as per Written Resolutions of the Directors of the Company dated January 31, 2022, Renee Grace Mauldin Atwood resigned as Officer of the Company. Vitor Guarino Olivier, our former Vice-President of Operations and Platforms, assumed the role as our new Chief People Officer.
Olivia Acquisition
On January 3, 2022, we concluded the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Olivia AI, Inc. and, indirectly, of Olivia AI do Brasil Instituição de Pagamento Ltda. The platform and services provided by Olivia will be integrated with the products and services offered by us. In addition, Olivia's strategic capabilities in data science and its highly specialized team will enable Nu to continue creating and offering new products based on artificial intelligence.
| B. | Business Overview |
Overview
Our Mission and Vision
Our mission is to fight complexity to empower people in their daily lives.
In 2013, we chose to begin our journey by disrupting the financial services market in Latin America, the market value of which reached approximately US$1 trillion as of December 31, 2021. This opportunity includes approximately 650 million people in Latin America according to the World Bank, many of whom we believe are underbanked and deeply unsatisfied with their legacy bank relationships, or completely unbanked.
We are in the early stages of technology companies revolutionizing a broad range of services by putting the customer at the center of their strategies and architecting experiences based on mobile-first and cloud-based models. We believe that new technology-driven companies can capture market share from legacy providers across all industries, expand the size of addressable opportunities and operate with superior economics. We also believe there is a significant opportunity to use the latest technologies and business practices to create new and more user-friendly experiences for individual consumers and SMEs that are simple, intuitive, convenient, low-cost, empowering and human.
As we pursue our mission of empowerment, we are building a company focused on connecting profit to purpose in order to create value for all our stakeholders, and deliver a positive impact on the communities we serve.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 79 |
| |
Welcome to Nu
We believe that Nu is one of the world’s largest digital banking platforms, and one of the leading technology companies in the world, with 53.9 million customers across Brazil, Mexico and Colombia as of December 31, 2021. We are building our business based on four core principles: (1) a highly curated customer-centric culture that permeates everything we do; (2) the prioritization of human-centric design across all of our mobile apps, products, services and interactions to create extraordinary customer experiences; (3) the development of advanced proprietary technologies built from the ground up by some of the best talent from around the world; and (4) the utilization and optimization of data science and powerful proprietary models that support every aspect of our business. We combine these to create a self-reinforcing business model that we believe enables us to serve our ecosystem of customers and partners more effectively as we grow to generate significant impact to our stakeholders and sustainable competitive advantages in the marketplace. Together, these have compounded since our founding to produce:
| · | A Digital Banking Leader – As of December 31, 2021, we had 53.9 million customers, including approximately 31% of the population of Brazil aged 14 and above. We were also ranked as the #1 Bank in Brazil by Forbes for each of the past three years, the #1 Digital Banking App in the World by Pymnts.com in 2021, and Latin America’s Best Bank and Best Digital Bank by Euromoney in 2021. |
| · | One of the Most Loved Companies and Trusted Brands – By delighting our customers, we have created a powerful reputation and a valuable brand that is highly regarded in our markets and around the world. For example, we were listed in 2021 by TIME as one of the 100 Most Influential Companies in the world and by CNBC as one of the Top 50 Disruptors in the world. We were also ranked as the #1 Most Loved Brand in Brazil by eCGlobal in 2021. |
| · | A Powerful and Expanding Ecosystem of Solutions and Services across the Five Financial Seasons – We have developed a growing suite of essential and high engagement financial solutions designed to create superior customer experiences across the Five Financial Seasons of a consumer or SME customer’s journey. These Five Financial Seasons include (1) Spending with our credit and debit cards, QR code-based and PIX instant payment arrangements, WhatsApp Pay and traditional wire transfers; (2) Saving with our Nu personal and business accounts; (3) Investing with our direct-to-consumer NuInvest digital investment platform; (4) Borrowing with our transparent, easy-to-manage credit cards and personal loans with limits that grow over time as users build their credit histories with us; and (5) Protecting with our insurance solutions. We have also broadened our ecosystem by adding products and services from marketplace partners to our platform, such as insurance, mobile phone top-ups, and foreign remittances, as well as collateralized loans, all under the Nu brand and with the same customer experience as with our proprietary products. |
| · | A Highly Engaged and Loyal Customer Base – We have built a strong reputation with our customers for being fair, transparent, trustworthy and high quality. In addition, we have developed a strategy to cultivate our customer relationships to foster new referrals and higher deposit and spending rates. As a result, we (1) acquired approximately 80%-90% of our customers organically on average per year since our inception, either through word-of-mouth or a direct unpaid referral from an existing customer without incurring direct marketing expenses; (2) received a Net Promoter Score, or “NPS,” of 90 in Brazil and 94 in Mexico, which we believe far exceeds incumbent banks and all other major local financial technology companies; and (3) have become the primary banking relationship for over 55% of our active customers who had been with us for more than 12 months as of December 31, 2021. We consider ourselves the primary banking relationship for those of our active customers, who have been with Nu for over a year and had at least 50% of their post-tax monthly income move in or out of their NuAccount in any given month. For more information on how we calculate organic customer growth and primary banking relationships, see “Glossary of Terms.” |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 80 |
| |
| · | Advantaged Unit Economics – We operate with favorable unit economics, as demonstrated by our ability to recover our CAC with cumulative contribution margins in fewer than 12 months on average, while continuing to expand revenue and contribution margins significantly thereafter. We measure our customer acquisition efficiency by comparing the LTV of acquired customers to the CAC of those acquired customers to calculate an “LTV/CAC ratio,” which we estimate to be greater than 30x. We believe these strong economic measurements are supported by our ability to: |
| ● | Acquire customers organically at a low CAC – For the year ended December 31, 2021, our CAC was US$5.4 per customer of which paid marketing accounted for approximately 23%. Based on our internal research and publicly available information, we believe our CAC is one of the lowest across consumer FinTech companies in the world. In addition, we believe our organic customer acquisition model is among the best-in-class as evidenced by the fact that we have acquired approximately 80%-90% of our customers organically on average per year since our inception. |
| ● | Increase Monthly ARPAC – For the three months ended December 31, 2021, our Monthly ARPAC was approximately US$5.6. For customers who were active across our core products, which include our credit card, NuAccount and personal loans, we had Monthly ARPACs in the US$26 to US$39 range for the month of December 2021. We estimate that the monthly average revenue per active retail customer for incumbent banks in Brazil was approximately 10x higher than ours in the first six months of 2021. This calculation assumes an estimated average active customer base for certain incumbent financial institutions that do not report this metric. We estimated the number of active customers at each incumbent financial institution using the median active-to-total customers ratio from Nu and one incumbent bank, which was 63% for the first six months of 2021. Based on this estimate, the incumbents had average Monthly ARPACs of US$38 for the first six months of 2021. |
While we may not reach these levels because the majority of our products have no fees, we believe we can increase our Monthly ARPAC meaningfully over time by (1) capturing greater customer wallet share across our customers’ existing products and (2) cross-selling additional products to existing customers.
| · | Our World-Class Talent – We have assembled one the most international teams in Latin America. Our employees represent over 45 different nationalities and bring experience in scaling some of the largest technology and financial services companies in the world. We believe our culture, mission and commitment to innovation has helped us become a hub of the best engineering talent, not only in the region, but also internationally. |
| · | Compounding Growth at Scale – Though we have incurred a loss of US$165.3 million, US$171.5 million and US$92.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, we have grown our customer base and our revenue at high annual growth rates. As of December 31, 2021, we had 53.9 million customers, which represents an increase of almost 8x from 6.0 million as of December 31, 2018 (or a CAGR of 108%; see the chart below entitled “Total Customers (in Millions, % YoY Growth)” for further information on annual growth rates). Of these 53.9 million customers, approximately 76% were monthly active customers as of December 31, 2021. In the three months ended December 31, 2021, we added an average of 2 million net new customers per month across Brazil, Mexico and Colombia. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 81 |
| |
| · | Regulatory – We are committed to open, collaborative and transparent relationships with public officials as we work to improve how people are served by the financial sector. Over the past several years, Nu has been very active in some of the latest landmark regulations for the financial system in Brazil, such as: Brazil’s real time payment system PIX, open banking, portability of checking accounts, cybersecurity and others. By applying our values to regulatory proposals we believe we can help shape a more competitive landscape for Latin America’s financial sector. Through this process, we believe we have established a positive reputation and an open and collaborative relationship with regulators in the countries in which we operate. |
| · | Nu Impact – We have a strong commitment to advancing ESG efforts, which is reflected in our “growth with a purpose” approach. We believe in shared value co-creation for all our stakeholders, with ESG integration and transparent governance in all of our decision-making processes. We are committed to making a lasting, meaningful and positive social impact on the lives of our customers and the communities we serve. Our business reaches 100% of the municipalities in Brazil in line with our mission to provide financial access and literacy, which we view as crucial to inclusive growth and sustainable development. We estimate that we provided the first credit card or bank account, as of December 31, 2021, to approximately 5.6 million people. With this access, based on internal survey data as of December 31, 2021, more than 67% of our customers say they have gained more financial independence due to the use of our financial services and 80% reported they could overcome unforeseen financial issues as a result of the access to our credit products. Our strong focus on impact allows us to recruit and retain the best talent and diverse teams, helping to ensure that we have the depth of perspectives to design the best human-centered customer experiences. As of December 31, 2021, among our employees in Brazil, 32.9% self-identified as black or brown, 45.2% as women, and 26.6% as LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, two-spirit, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, nonbinary, gender nonconforming and non-heteronormative) and 61.4% of our employees in leadership positions self-identified as from underrepresented groups. |
At Nu, we want to be known not only for the revolution we started, but also for the way we started it.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 82 |
| |
Our Attractive Opportunity
Within Latin America, we currently serve Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, which together accounted for over 60% of the population and 61% of the GDP in the region in 2020 according to the World Bank, and provide a fertile opportunity for our services due to several attractive attributes and market characteristics, including:
| · | Meaningful Pain Points in the Market – Financial services consumers in our markets suffer from real pain points, which gives us a significant opportunity to provide them with solutions. Incumbent banks in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, which on average hold between 70% and 85% of all loans and deposits, charge very high fees and generate outsized profits, based on data from the respective Central Banks. |
| · | Powerful Secular Trends – The Latin American region is benefiting from several positive secular trends that are highly complementary to our business. For example, there is a strong technology adoption trend in the region as illustrated by the 80% smartphone adoption rate projected in 2025 according to GSMA. This trend is fueled not only by the size of the population under 30 years old in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia (44%, 51% and 48% of the total population, respectively), but also a growing middle class, driving some of the highest mobile app usage rates in the world, based on time spent in mobile apps. In 2020, based on publicly available information, Brazil had the fifth highest smartphone usage globally. In terms of global ranking of users for social media apps, Brazil stands at either #2 or #3 in the world for major social apps such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, while Mexico stands at either #5 or #6 across these apps. For those same apps, Brazil has an average of approximately 80 million users per app while Mexico has approximately 38 million users per app, according to eMarketer. The foregoing figures for Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter are as of October 2020, WhatsApp as of August 2020 and TikTok as of April 2021. |
| · | In addition, regulators across the region have been promoting policies designed to foster innovation, instill access and increase competition in the financial services sector. We believe that this represents a significant opportunity to disrupt legacy providers through innovative business models and mobile app-based solutions. |
| · | Significant Penetration Opportunities – Financial services in Latin America still offer a significant penetration opportunity ahead as the electronic payments and consumer credit segments continue to deepen across the region and approach current levels in the United States and the United Kingdom, based on data gathered from the World Bank and the IMF. For example, in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia there is: (1) a large unbanked population consisting of 134 million adults in aggregate; (2) low credit card adoption rates of 27.0%, 9.5% and 13.9%, respectively, compared to 65.6% in the United States and 65.4% in the United Kingdom; (3) limited household debt as a percentage of GDP, at 30.5%, 16.2% and 27.6% in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, respectively, compared to 55% to 85% in developed markets (consisting of the United Kingdom, the United States, Spain, Japan and France), according to data from the IMF and (4) a low credit and debit purchase volume as a percentage of household consumption: 40%, 24% and 15% in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, respectively, compared to 51% in the United States and 62% in the United Kingdom, according to the World Bank as of 2021. This suggests a 2x-to-3x penetration opportunity for financial products in Latin America over the coming decades. |
Our Go-to-Market Approach
We serve a broad customer base of 52.5 million individual consumers and 1.4 million SMEs as of December 31, 2021. Our customer base is well diversified across various demographic measures, such as income, age and geographical dispersion, and relatively in line with the overall segmentation of our markets. Based on our analysis of publicly available data and the general composition of the customers in our industry according to the Oliver Wyman Report, we believe that we serve a larger proportion of younger consumers than incumbent banks. We believe our position creates opportunities to grow with our customers as they accumulate wealth and reach life milestones that expand their financial needs.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 83 |
| |
We go to market, serve and support our customers through an all-digital, cloud-based model that is low-cost and highly efficient without the need for expensive real estate and bank branches. We market and sell our solutions and services online by (1) prioritizing high-quality customer experiences to drive organic word-of-mouth advertising and customer referrals, (2) fostering our social media presence and developing digital content to drive awareness, education and engagement, and (3) making selected investments in marketing and promotional campaigns when returns are attractive to further accelerate customer adoption.
We operate with significant advantages that have helped us grow rapidly. For example, we have increased our Monthly ARPAC by growing our share of wallet and driving the adoption of multiple products, increased our customer retention through our focus on strong customer engagement and satisfaction, and increased our position as the primary banking relationship for our customers. As a result, we have increased the lifetime value of our customer relationships. Our approach has also enabled us to generate operating efficiencies, including a low cost to acquire new customers, a low cost to serve our customers, a low cost of risk, and a low cost of funding.
We earn revenue from two main sources: fees and interest payments. Fees include fees imposed on credit and debit card transactions, payments, loyalty programs, prepaid mobile phone top-ups and distribution of certain financial products and services, such as investments, insurance and remittance products. Interest payments are related to interest charged on revolving and refinanced credit card balances and personal loans, as well as interest earned on deposits, government bonds and other interest-earning instruments. For the year ended December 31, 2021, 38% of our revenue was earned through fee and commission income, which comes mostly from interchange fees and is not directly charged to the customer.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we reported US$1.7 billion in revenue, and US$732.9 million in gross profit, representing year-over-year increases of 130.4% and 124.2%, respectively, versus the year ended December 31, 2020, or a year-over-year increase of 138.0% and 131.6%, respectively, when computed on an FX Neutral basis. In the year ended December 31, 2020, we reported US$737.1 million in revenue, and US$326.9 million in gross profit, representing year-over-year increases of 20.4% and 31.9%, respectively, versus the year ended December 31, 2019, or a year-over-year increase of 59.7% and 74.9%, respectively, versus the year ended December 31, 2019, when computed on an FX Neutral basis. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral revenue and gross profit to the IFRS measures of these metrics can be found under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.”
Our Unique Approach
We are building our business using a unique approach that combines our four core principles to create a self- reinforcing business model that helps us nurture and grow our expanding ecosystem of individual consumers, SMEs and marketplace partners. Our four core principles are described in more detail in the following table.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 84 |
| |
| Core Principle | Description |
|
Customer-Centric Culture We Are Obsessed with Serving Our Customers |
· Since our company was founded, we have intentionally and consistently cultivated a culture that is obsessed with delighting our customers. This culture is central to achieving our mission and we remain vigilant in preserving and nurturing it. The core values of our culture are: · We Want Our Customers to Love Us Fanatically – We design products and deliver experiences that delight customers, empowering them to take control of their financial lives. We tailor customer interactions and communication across all touchpoints from our brand to create an emotional bond with lasting relationships. · We Think and Act Like Owners, Not Renters – We want all our employees to think like owners and treat the business and our customers like their own, which we believe is essential to creating long-term shareholder value, with approximately 76% of our employees owning Nu shares or holding share-based incentive awards as of December 31, 2021. · We Are Hungry and Challenge the Status Quo – We have a culture of nonconformism that seeks to challenge and improve on the status quo. This is the principle that drives our team not to rest on our laurels and to keep pushing for more innovation and growth. · We Pursue Smart Efficiency – We aim to minimize waste in all of its forms to benefit our customers. We believe in using technology to build proprietary systems that give us scalability while making sure we optimize the use of all the constrained resources we have as a company: our people, our time, our attention and our capital, among others. As we gain efficiency, we are able to pass those gains to our customers, continuously working to provide services at lower costs. · We Build Strong and Diverse Teams – We believe that true creativity is bred in diversity in all of its forms, and have assembled a team of exceptional talent from around the world, who contribute their diverse experiences, preferences and perspectives to serve local markets. We appreciate diversity and value the importance of creating an inclusive workplace comparable to the community we serve, which we believe is a key driver of innovation.
|
Form 20-F | 2021 | 85 |
| |
|
Extraordinary Customer Experiences We Focus on Creating Superior Customer Engagement and Experiences |
We aim to deliver simple, easy-to-use products, seamlessly integrated through our Nu mobile application and backed up by our team of Xpeer customer support specialists. This is driven by: · Mobile and Digital First Products – We focus on developing cloud-based mobile applications that provide our customers with a modern digital experience at their fingertips on any device. · Product Simplicity – We offer digital financial services products that are simple, transparent, accessible and easy to use. · Human-Centered Design – We design our solutions around the human perspective and seek to create a high-quality experience that is intuitive for our customers in everything we do. · Seamless Integration – We create a seamless experience by using our Nu mobile app to provide our customers with easy and integrated access to all of our products and services. · Xpeers – We employ a highly trained support team of customer service agents, or “Xpeers,” who use proprietary software and AI-enhanced algorithms to continuously improve the customer experience by leveraging customer interactions to enhance everything we do, while contributing to the product co-creation process. For more information, see “—Our Customer Service and Support.” |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 86 |
| |
|
Advanced Technology We Lead Everything with Technology |
We use advanced technologies and modern tools to deliver a superior experience for our customers in a hyper-scalable and secure environment. We prioritize building our own architecture and investing in engineering talent. The key components of our technology include: · NuCore Technology Platform – All of our products, services and operations are powered by NuCore, our proprietary, cloud-based core banking platform that we designed and built from the ground up. NuCore enables us to centrally manage several key functions, including transaction authorization and processing, core banking, regulatory reporting, business operations, customer services, credit underwriting and fraud prevention. This provides us with greater speed and control to optimize our products and address the needs of the markets in which we operate. It also allows us to innovate on core product features that won’t be immediately accessible to competitors that leverage platforms that are standard in the market today. · Microservices Approach – We use a versatile, decentralized technology architecture to manage and deploy over 500 modular microservices that we have developed. This advanced technology strategy enables us to scale, launch new products, enter new markets, and maintain and evolve our codebase incrementally with decentralized ownership. · Immutable Architecture – We have created an advanced, immutable ledger utilizing the Datomic database technology we developed. This provides us with a highly reliable audit trail and transaction history that we believe provides better accuracy, control, reliability and transparency versus traditional database architectures. As a result, we are able to develop new code more aggressively with 120+ deployments per day on average during the year ended December 31, 2021. · World-Class Software Engineers – We have attracted excellent software engineers from around the world who are drawn to our advanced technology strategies and want to code at a cutting-edge level using Clojure, the advanced programming language that we sponsor following our acquisition of Cognitect, a U.S.-based software consultancy whose founders created the language. We believe we have become a destination for top talent not just in Latin America but increasingly globally. We have over 1,000 developers and engineers organized across 75 agile development squads in six global technology hubs in Brazil, Mexico, Germany, the United States, Argentina and Colombia. |
|
Proprietary Data Science Everything We Do is Driven by Data Science |
We acquire, store and analyze an enormous amount of data that we use to inform our decision-making, reduce risks and improve the customer experience. This provides us with significant advantages and ways to add differentiated value to our customers such as our proprietary NuX credit engine. Our data science strategy consists of: · Proprietary Data – On average, during the year ended December 31, 2021, we collected approximately 9,000 data points on each monthly active customer, which our team, including 120+ data scientists, uses to better understand customers’ behavior, risks and financial needs to better serve them across their lifecycle with Nu. We believe that this proprietary data set is difficult to replicate, provides us unique insights and strengthens our NuX credit engine and machine learning models. · Powerful NuX Credit Engine – Our in-house, proprietary credit underwriting engine learns from customer behavior, enabling us to develop curated credit strategies to offer customers the best product for their specific financial situation. For example, we utilize these capabilities to offer customers with limited credit histories a small credit line to start, which can grow as we learn more about their behavior. · Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning – We utilize a combination of proprietary and best-of-breed machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence tools to continuously improve our underwriting, customer experience, risk management and operations. · Self-Driving Ecosystem – We integrate all data in our Nu Ecosystem to develop a holistic profile of our customers, enabling us to algorithmically recommend products in real time that may meet specific customer needs throughout their financial journey. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 87 |
| |
Our Self-Reinforcing Model
Our self-reinforcing business model, illustrated below, includes seven key elements that we combine to serve our customers more effectively, generate competitive advantages, nurture and grow our ecosystem and create shareholder value.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 88 |
| |
The seven elements of our model include:
| A. | More Customers – Our most significant source of marketing is word-of-mouth recommendations from existing customers, which has resulted in viral organic customer acquisition and very high retention. This leads to: |
B. More Engagement and Scale – Our customers increase their engagement with and usage of our high frequency and essential solutions or adopt new solutions. This leads to:
C. More Data – We gather data from each customer and each transaction. These data compound in value as we grow and drives our artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to improve everything we do. This leads to:
D. Lower Costs – We use our growing data sets to make smarter underwriting decisions, continuously improve customer segmentation and optimize business operations, which can improve efficiencies. This leads to:
E. Attractive Fees and Rates – We use our greater insights, efficiencies and cost savings to offer customers products with attractive fees and rates as we better understand their total risk profile and optimize our own operations. This leads to:
F. Better Products and Experiences – We can also use our greater insights and efficiencies to improve our product design, optimize the customer experience and develop new features. This leads to:
G. A Growing Nu Ecosystem – Our ecosystem includes our 53.9 million customers, composed of individual consumers and SMEs, and a growing number of marketplace partners who we partner with to offer attractive solutions beyond our core capabilities.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 89 |
| |
Our self-reinforcing model and execution have resulted in a large and vibrant community of customers, consisting of (1) individual consumers across all social classes and ages and (2) SMEs including small businesses and entrepreneurs that help fuel the economy. These customers, combined with a growing set of products that they love, a network of third-party vendors and service providers, and a substantial media following, form our large and expanding Nu ecosystem:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 90 |
| |
Our Market
Our Market Opportunity
Latin America is a large and dynamic region, with a total population of 652 million people as of December 31, 2020 and GDP of US$4.5 trillion in 2021 according to the World Bank. We currently operate in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, which collectively account for 60% and 61% of the region’s population and GDP, respectively.
Over time we aim to expand our presence to additional markets in Latin America, as consumers and SMEs have for too long faced a banking system with substantial challenges that create market inefficiencies and opportunities for disruption.
Our SAM includes the retail financial services we currently operate in Brazil, including revenue from:
| · | Retail credit (including payroll personal credit, SME credit, auto loans, unsecured personal credit, credit card revolving, credit card financing, and other), defined as interest income net of funding costs and credit charges; |
| · | Payments, defined as prepaid, debit and credit interchange fees; |
| · | Investments, defined as fees from securities brokerages, private pensions, savings accounts and investment funds; and |
| · | Insurance brokerage, defined as fees from distribution of life and property & casualty, or “P&C” insurance products. |
The revenue potential of the retail financial services amounted to US$99 billion in 2020 and it is projected to grow at a 5% CAGR to US$126 billion by 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. Our revenue of US$1,698 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and US$737 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 accounted for approximately 1.7% and 1% of this SAM, respectively, demonstrating the massive opportunity ahead.
The Near-Term SAM, or “NTSAM,” in addition to Brazil, also includes Mexico and Colombia, countries we recently entered. The retail financial services NTSAM amounted to US$129 billion in 2020 and it is projected to grow at a 7% CAGR to US$177 billion by 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report.
Lastly, our TAM represents the total potential opportunity across all of Latin America, including marketplace revenue, defined as take rate fees derived from e-commerce marketplace gross merchandise volume. The retail financial services and marketplace revenue opportunity amounted to US$186 billion in 2021 and it is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8% to US$269 billion by 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 91 |
| |
According to the Oliver Wyman Report, retail credit for individuals and SME credit accounted for approximately 75% of the revenue pool for retail financial services in 2020, and it is projected to have a CAGR of 6% from 2021 to 2025. This is the segment where we believe we have strong competitive advantages as a result of what we believe to be our superior underwriting capabilities, lower customer acquisition costs and ample funding. The fee portion of this revenue pool, composed of cards, investments, insurance brokerage and marketplace, accounts for 25% of the revenue pool, and it is projected to have a CAGR of 11% from 2021 to 2025.
For more information regarding our market opportunity, see “—Deep Dive on Our Industry Background and Market Opportunity.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 92 |
| |
Industry Background – the Latin American Financial Services Industry is Broken
Consumers and SMEs in Latin America have long faced a banking system with substantial challenges that create attractive opportunities for disruptors, including:
| · | Highly Concentrated Banking Sector with a Lack of Competition – The banking sector in Latin America is highly concentrated, controlled by a small number of incumbent financial institutions in each country. According to the respective Central Banks as of December 2020, the five largest banks in each of Brazil, Mexico and Colombia control between 70% and 85% of all loans, deposits and overall banking revenue in their respective markets, shares that are significantly higher than those of most developed markets. Given its highly concentrated nature, the Latin American banking sector has long suffered from a lack of competition. We believe that this has resulted in less innovation, a more limited selection of products and services, and higher fees than in the more open and competitive markets of the United States and Europe. While this concentration has enabled the large incumbent banks to maintain their status quo, we believe that it also creates a very fertile environment for disruption from new entrants who can use advanced technology, data and customer service to level the playing field. |
| · | High Cost to Serve – The incumbent banks in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia have expansive and expensive branch distribution networks supported by large workforces and legacy systems. For example, as of December, 2020, each of the five incumbents in Brazil are reported to have between 2,000 and 5,000 branches and around 80,000 employees each. We believe this legacy infrastructure has translated into a higher cost to serve, incentivizing incumbents to sell high-margin products while excluding a large segment of the population from the financial system. We estimate that in Brazil, our cost to serve and general and administrative expense per active customer is approximately 85% lower than those of incumbents, based on their publicly available financial statements. Based on this estimate, for the six months ended June 30, 2021, incumbents had an average monthly cost to serve and general and administrative expense per active customer of approximately US$15.7. |
| · | Poor Customer Service and Lack of Trust – We believe that incumbent financial service providers in Latin America have historically provided poor customer service to consumers, given an overall lack of market competition and choices. By contrast, our obsession with customer-centricity aimed at delighting customers has enabled us to achieve and scale with NPS levels of 90 or above in the countries in which we operate, which we believe far exceed not only those of incumbent banks, but also those of other major local financial technology companies. We have been consistently recognized for our customer service, as highlighted by our multiple awards received in recent years, and—based on the latest publicly available information—we have compared very favorably to both incumbents and disruptors and have achieved the fewest customer complaints. The high concentration of the banking sector, historic lack of competition and high cost to serve that characterize the financial services industry in Latin America have led to a pattern of behavior that has resulted in dissatisfied customers. |
| · | Significantly Underpenetrated Market – The Latin American banking sector remains significantly underpenetrated. Among the main reasons for such low levels of financial inclusion are the prohibitively high costs for financial services. According to a study from the IDB, one of the most cited reasons for not having a bank account is that opening and maintaining accounts are too expensive. In Brazil, 30.0% of the 169 million people aged 15 and above did not have a bank account as of 2017, according to the World Bank. In Colombia and Mexico, the unbanked population in 2017 stood at 55.1% and 64.6% of the 40 million and 96 million people aged 15 and above, respectively, according to the World Bank. Together, these three countries account for 134 million unbanked adults, according to the World Bank. Additionally, aggregate household debt in Latin American economies averaged between 5% and 30% of GDP in 2019 according to IMF data, compared to between 55% and 80% in the developed economies of the United States, Western Europe and Japan. Lastly, credit card penetration in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico stood at 27.0%, 13.9% and 9.5% of the population aged 15 and above, respectively, compared to 65.6% in the United States and 65.4% in the United Kingdom, according to World Bank data for 2017. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 93 |
| |
As a result of these dynamics, Latin America is one of the most expensive regions for banking in the world, in terms of both fees and net interest margins, or “NIMs”, with Brazil and Mexico being two of the most expensive countries. In addition, Latin America is one of the most profitable regions for the financial institutions sector, and Brazil and Mexico are among the most profitable countries for the sector globally.
Trends Accelerating Industry Disruption
We believe there is a very fertile environment for disruption from new entrants who can use advanced technology, data and customer service to level the playing field. Financial technology companies such as us have the potential to completely change the landscape in Latin America by offering both low-cost and high-quality financial services to large portions of the region’s adult population, materially increasing overall socioeconomic development and the addressable market of financial services in the region.
We believe that significant challenges and trends seen in Latin American markets have already begun to encourage consumers to increasingly look to digital banking platforms to fulfill their day-to-day banking needs. According to the Oliver Wyman Report, the share of total outstanding retail credit attributable to digital banks and FinTechs in Brazil more than doubled from 2.0% to 4.6% between December 2017 and December 2020, and has tripled to 6% in December 2021, and is projected to rise to 13.0% by 2025. Based on our analysis of available data, during December 2021, there were over 27 million downloads of banking apps in Brazil, of which 66% was attributable to digital banks and FinTechs, compared to 25% for incumbent banks. This mix has consistently been shifting more towards digital banks and FinTechs, with digital banks and FinTechs doubling their share in the last three years.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 94 |
| |
Several factors are driving this shift away from incumbents:
| · | Technological Innovation and Growing Payment Volumes – We believe that technological innovation, including the launch of instant payment solutions such as PIX in Brazil and CoDi in Mexico, will translate to sustained growth in electronic payments volumes. Latin America is expected to have an 80% smartphone adoption rate in 2025 according to GSMA, further facilitating technology inclusion. According to the Oliver Wyman Report, purchase volumes on credit, debit and prepaid cards in Brazil are projected to grow from US$386 billion in 2020 to US$698 billion in 2025 (R$2.0 trillion to R$3.6 trillion, using a fixed exchange ratio of 5.16), representing a CAGR of 13%. In Mexico, expectations for purchase volumes on credit, debit and prepaid cards are also positive and expected to grow from US$128 billion to US$233 billion in 2025, representing a CAGR of 13%. |
| · | Shift from Savings to Higher-Yield Investments – According to the Oliver Wyman Report, between 2018 and 2021, the share of retail investment assets under management by banks decreased from 93% to 81%. In our view, the superior customer experiences and low-cost, open platform distribution models employed by direct-to-consumer independent brokers will continue to gain market share. We also believe that improving levels of financial education combined with middle-class expansion and lower interest rates are contributing to the shift of Brazilian retail investors away from savings products towards higher-yield investments such as equities. |
| · | Favorable Regulatory Environment – Regulators in Latin America are promoting several initiatives to foster financial technology disruption to increase competition and financial inclusion. For example, in 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil rolled out its plan to enable open banking while launching PIX, an instant payment tool. In Mexico, the 2018 Financial Technology Law established the basis for the development of FinTech companies, and in 2019 CoDi, a platform for P2P transactions without commissions, was launched by Banxico. We believe that these regulatory changes will, together, increase efficiency, competition and innovation in the Latin American financial services market while increasing access to financial services. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 95 |
| |
Our Competitive Strengths and Advantages
The strengths generated by our core principles and our self-reinforcing model provide us with powerful competitive advantages that have enabled us to disrupt the legacy models of incumbent providers to become what we believe is one of the largest digital banking platforms in the world. We believe we are positioned favorably to continue to grow our business with attractive economics and expand our addressable market. We believe that our advantages are difficult to replicate and will continue to strengthen as we scale, compounding over time.
We Have Significant Market and Leadership Advantages
Over the past eight years, we believe we have built one of the largest, most influential, and trusted technology companies in the world. This privileged leadership position provides us with several key advantages, including:
| · | One of the Largest Digital Banking Platforms – We believe we have built one of the world’s largest digital banking platforms (based on number of customers), with 53.9 million customers across Brazil, Mexico and Colombia as of December 31, 2021. |
| · | First Mover Advantage – We were the first digital-native banking platform in Latin America and a pioneer in digital financial services globally. We have reached undisputed leadership in digital banking in Brazil in terms of number of customers and have been progressively claiming leadership in other countries in Latin America. In two years from the launch of our operations in Mexico in early 2020, we believe we have already become the top credit card issuer in the country, in terms of the number of cards issued during the second half of 2021 based on data for other issuers from the Central Bank of Mexico, surpassing long-established incumbent players such as Banco Azteca, Santander Mexico, HSBC, BanCoppel and Banamex. We estimate that the monthly average revenue per active retail customer for incumbent banks in Brazil was approximately 10x higher than ours in the first six months of 2021. |
| · | Trusted and Recognized Global Brand – We have created a globally recognized brand and market position across the digital services and technology landscape, which have built trust and product awareness that have helped us rapidly grow our customer base, retain our customers and drive greater product adoption. In 2021 we were named as one of the TIME 100 Most Influential Companies, one of the CNBC Disruptor 50, Latin America’s Best Digital Bank by Euromoney and the #1 Digital Banking App by Pymnts.com. |
| · | World-Class Talent – We have attracted highly talented employees from some of the leading technology and financial services companies around the world who have brought deep expertise and new ideas in technology development, data science, product design, marketing, credit underwriting, business management, corporate strategy and human resources. Our employees are aligned with our mission and have an ownership mentality—approximately 76% of our employees owned Nu shares or held share-based incentive awards as of December 31, 2021. |
We Have Significant Operating and Financial Advantages
Our all-digital and data-driven business model provides us with significant advantages, which have enabled us to scale and operate in a highly efficient manner. These operating advantages include:
| · | Extraordinary Customer Experiences – Our modern and intuitive products provide customers with extraordinary experiences which we believe are superior to both incumbent banks and other digital disruptors. We have NPS levels of 90 or above in the countries in which we operate, which exceeds those of many of the strongest consumer brands in the world. We believe that our reputation for exceptional customer experiences fuels our brand recognition, organic and word-of-mouth-driven growth and strong customer retention. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 96 |
| |
| · | Caring and Effective Customer Support – Our automated self-service support tools and highly trained team of Xpeers provide a superior level of customer service compared to many incumbent banks and financial services companies. We delight and educate our customers by providing them with a differentiated and human level of customer service, which we believe increases their financial literacy, improves their experience and increases their engagement with our platform. |
| · | Proprietary Control and Capabilities from Our Technology Platform – We designed and made a significant investment to build our own cloud-based core banking platform, unlike many other FinTech companies or banks that typically are dependent on third-party core bank systems and credit card processors. Our NuCore platform enables us to centrally manage key functions, including our credit card transaction authorization and processing and core bank account processing, which has enabled us to operate efficiently, roll out new products or features with speed and agility, and expand into and scale in new markets faster and more effectively, facilitating our ramp-up in Mexico and Colombia. |
| · | Low Operating Costs – We operate with a low-cost model across four key areas of our business: |
| ● | Low Cost to Acquire – Given our focus on creating strong customer experiences, we have been able to acquire customers primarily through viral word-of-mouth and direct customer referrals, which has enabled us to acquire customers efficiently without expensive marketing campaigns or incentives. |
| ● | Low Cost to Serve – By operating in a fully digital environment without the need for branches, and by consistently eliminating and simplifying processes, we have been able to serve our customers quickly and efficiently and achieve scale efficiencies that we can pass along to customers and investors. |
| ● | Low Cost of Risk – By leveraging our advanced technology and proprietary data science to better assess and reduce credit risk, we have been able to operate and scale efficiently and offer more competitive pricing to our customers. |
| ● | Low Cost of Funding – Our large and growing base of local currency deposits, originated 100% organically, has enabled us to cover more than our funding needs and extend increasing amounts of credit to our customers, creating a highly resilient, diversified and low-cost funding model that we can scale efficiently. |
| · | Advantaged Unit Economics – The self-reinforcing nature of our business model and our low operating costs have helped us generate strong unit economic performance, with an estimated LTV/CAC ratio of greater than 30x as of December 31, 2021. We believe we benefit from several competitive advantages that include: |
| ● | Increasing Revenue per Customer – Our cohorts show that we have increased our revenue per customer over time. We convert our strong customer experiences and low-and-grow credit underwriting approach into larger volumes and a greater wallet share of our customers’ financial lives, while also successfully cross-selling additional products to our customers. For example, for our monthly cohorts from the first quarter of 2017, our Monthly ARPAC had increased on average by more than 18x by December 31, 2021 versus their initial month. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 97 |
| |
| ● | High Customer Engagement – We believe that our continuous investments in technology and customer service combined with the compounding effects of our business model have resulted in engagement rates closer to those of social networks than digital banking platforms and helped us increase customer engagement over time. This resulted in an activity rate of approximately 76% in December 2021, which demonstrates the high frequency engagement and utility-like capabilities of our solutions. |
| ● | Low Customer Churn – We believe that our high level of customer engagement has contributed to our low customer churn. In the year ended December 31, 2021, we had an average monthly voluntary churn of 0.07% (measured as customers who chose to leave our platform) and involuntary churn of 0.06% (measured as customers who we removed from our platform due to risk or fraud concerns). We expect that voluntary churn will remain low as we continue to deliver an extraordinary customer experience, and become the primary banking account for our customers, and cross-sell to our existing customers to embed ourselves more deeply in their financial lives. |
| · | Effective Underwriting and Pricing – By using our unique data and advanced NuX credit engine, we underwrite customers and manage credit risk more effectively and have lower fraud rates than incumbent banks that have been lending to consumers in our markets for over 100 years. As a result, we had a 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate of 3.5% as of December 31, 2021. This enables us to price our products more competitively while still generating advantaged unit economics. The 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate is defined as the sum of outstanding consumer finance balances with at least one payment past due for 90 days, divided by the total consumer finance balances, excluding balances past due for 360 days or more. |
We Have Significant Strategic Advantages
Our self-reinforcing model also provides us with key strategic advantages that help us differentiate, grow and compete more effectively. These strategic advantages include:
| · | Unique Data – Our model generates proprietary data on millions of individual consumers and SMEs across Latin America, which provides us with unique insights into customer behavior. We feed this data into our artificial intelligence and 60+ machine learning algorithms to improve our underwriting, differentiate our products and services, enhance our customer support, tailor customer experiences and lower our risks. |
| · | Powerful Self-Reinforcing Network Effects – We believe that our model demonstrates distinct self-reinforcing network effects that help compound our growth. For example, as we expand our ecosystem of customers and partners, we generate more data, which enables us to improve our products and services and customer experience. As more existing customers are delighted with their experience, they refer new customers which, in turn, increases the size of our ecosystem. |
| · | Highly Defensible Business Model – We have built a disruptive business with a differentiated model that we believe has a strong competitive position in the market. We believe that it is highly defensible and difficult to replicate given the significant time, expertise and investments required to build our capabilities across multiple countries. |
Our Growth Strategies
Despite our success to date in building what we believe to be one of the largest digital banking platforms in the world, we believe we are in the very early stages of capturing a very large market opportunity to simplify the daily lives of hundreds of millions of consumers and SMEs. We intend to leverage the competitive strengths and advantages of our self-reinforcing model to grow and expand our business and create value for our stakeholders. Our primary growth vectors are:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 98 |
| |
A. Grow Our Nu Ecosystem
We believe that our self-reinforcing model will continue to drive the expansion of our ecosystem, enabling us to reach, engage and grow our base of customers and partners. We intend to grow our Nu Ecosystem by:
| · | Nurturing Our Customer Acquisition Engine – We continue to build our customer acquisition engine by: |
| ● | Growing Our Base of Highly Loyal Customers – Who we believe will continue to refer customers to us. We will continue to create innovative, superior products that tap into latent demand, to offer extraordinary financial solutions to consumers and SMEs who we believe are unserved or underserved by incumbent banks and to foster green-field markets to accelerate customer acquisition. |
| ● | Developing Our Digital Content and Social Media Presence – Creating new digital content for our NuCommunity portal and our millions of mobile app users, and building our social media platforms to foster customer engagement, advocacy and financial education. |
| ● | Tactically Leveraging Marketing Spend – To build a leading consumer brand that is loved and trusted by customers in all markets in which we operate, helping us to expand our ecosystem, attract higher-value customers and raise awareness of our new products and services. Additionally, our subsidiary, Nu Pagamentos, signed an agreement to be an Official South American Supporter of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022TM, which we believe will be viewed by hundreds of millions of consumers across the specific region. |
| · | Increasing Our Share of Customers’ Financial Lives – We believe we will continue to increase our share of customers’ financial lives by: |
| ● | Growing With Our Customers – As our customers accumulate more wealth and reach new life milestones, their need for diversified financial services may increase. We currently serve customers across a wide range of ages, and have a particularly young customer base, with more than 70% of our customers under 40 years old and an average age of 34 as of December 31, 2021, providing us with the opportunity to grow with customers who are in the early stages of their financial journeys. We believe that our youngest customers (20-24 years old) will grow their real income by about 70% in the next ten years. |
| ● | Cross-Selling New Products and Upselling to Higher-Value Products – As we accumulate more data and learn more about our customers, we can suggest new products to fit their needs and optimize their credit limits, increasing our wallet share across customers’ Five Financial Seasons and growing the revenue and profits we generate from each customer. We have also sold customers multiple products at progressively faster rates. For example, our January 2021 customer cohort took approximately three months to reach an average of 3.5 products per active customer, compared to over 12 months for the January 2020 customer cohort. Additionally, we have millions of customers who received access to a NuAccount but have not yet been approved to receive our credit products. As we continue to collect information on these customers and enhance our customer segmentation and credit models, we believe we will increase our approval rates and extend our full product suite to a significant share of these customers, at no marginal customer acquisition cost. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 99 |
| |
| · | Utilizing Partners to Grow Our Marketplace of Offerings – As we identify new areas to address, we may also partner with best-of-breed providers to serve customers in areas where we do not currently have a core product or service. We believe this represents an important growth channel and will enable us to participate in more areas of our customers’ daily lives quickly and efficiently, strengthening our position as their primary financial relationship. For example, we have announced partnerships with Chubb to provide a life insurance product and Remessa Online to provide international remittance solutions, each of which can be originated and managed seamlessly through our Nu mobile app. In addition: |
| ● | Our Partnership with Creditas – In September 2021, we entered into an agreement with Creditas Financial Solutions Ltd. (and/or its affiliates in Latin America), or together, “Creditas,” through which we will distribute certain financial products offered by Creditas to our customers in Latin America. These include affordable retail collateralized loans, such as home and auto equity loans, auto financing, motorcycle financing and payroll loans. The agreement also provides that we will invest up to US$200 million in newly created securitization vehicles that will operate as warehousing facilities for Creditas. In the context of this agreement, we will be granted warrants that provide us with the right to acquire an equity interest equivalent to up to 7.7% of Creditas, on a fully diluted basis, under a pre-agreed valuation. As of December 31, 2021 US$130 million had been invested and the warrants had a fair value of US$19.8 million. We believe that this partnership with Creditas is an important step in complementing our ecosystem and is a testament to our commitment to bringing the best products and solutions available to our customers, irrespective of whether these products and solutions are manufactured by us or our partners. |
| B. | Enhance Our Nu Platform |
We believe that there is a significant opportunity to leverage our advanced technology and proprietary data science to offer additional functionality, solutions and experiences to our customers as we learn more about their behaviors and needs. We intend to improve our Nu Platform by:
| · | Innovating and Developing New Solutions – We are focused on developing and launching new products and features, which could generate additional revenue streams, complement our customers’ experiences and fulfill customers’ wider financial service needs. We launched several products since we started our operations in 2013, including credit and debit cards, a loyalty rewards program, payment accounts for individuals and SMEs, personal loans, PIX and life insurance. In 2020 and 2021, we added an investments offering through the acquisition of NuInvest and new “Buy Now Pay Later” solutions that allow customers to make purchases on their credit and debit card purchases and boletos (banking payment slips) over time in up to twelve installments. We expect to launch further products in the future, including additional credit products, other types of insurance policies, new investment solutions and other fee-driving businesses intended to leverage our large customer base, while constantly developing new code and making improvements to our platform and our solutions, with 120+ code deployments per day on average in the year ended December 31, 2021. For example, we added payment functionality to our NuAccounts, our fully digital banking account solution, in November 2020 by launching new instant payment functionality, which initially included PIX, the new real-time payment system in Brazil, and, in May 2021, we launched WhatsApp Pay capabilities. |
| · | Executing Strategic Acquisitions – Although we are primarily focused on growing our business organically, we may selectively pursue strategic acquisitions that we believe are attractive business opportunities and are aligned with our mission to consolidate or expand into new areas and gain new capabilities quickly and efficiently. For example: |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 100 |
| |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Olivia (U.S. and Brazil) – In November 2021, we entered into an agreement to acquire Olivia, a U.S.-based data company with subsidiaries in Brazil specializing in applying machine learning and artificial intelligence solutions to retail banking. Olivia has a personal finance management application with over 100,000 customers as of November 2021, which we believe will further strengthen our open banking initiatives. The closing of the transaction was in January 2022. |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Spin Pay (Brazil) – In October 2021, we acquired Spin Pay, a Brazilian payments platform that has pioneered the development of instant payments solutions for online and offline merchants via PIX. As of August 31, 2021, Spin Pay had more than 220 merchants on its platform, connected to Spin Pay through commerce-enablement platforms such as VTEX and Shopify Plus, as well as directly through the Spin Pay API. We believe that the expertise and technology of Spin Pay will be instrumental in the development of our broader payments platform in Brazil. |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Juntos (U.S.) – In July 2021, we acquired certain assets of and hired a group of employees from Juntos, a conversational account management platform for two-way messaging customer interaction through mobile interfaces (WhatsApp, SMS and in-app chat), further strengthening our capabilities to foster strong customer engagement and product cross-sell in a hyper-scalable manner. |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Akala (Mexico) - In December 2020, our subsidiary Nu Tecnologia entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the acquisition of 100% of Akala, a financial cooperative association based in Mexico involved in fundraising and providing financial services, inoperative since 2018, but with a valid “SOFIPO” license. The transaction was approved by the Mexican regulatory authorities on August 31, 2021. The closing of the transaction was in September 2021. |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Easynvest (Brazil) – In September 2020, we announced the acquisition of online broker Easynvest. This acquisition enabled us to enter the online investing sector quickly and at scale. We received final regulatory approvals for the deal in May 2021 and closed the transaction in June 2021. Since then, we have rebranded the business as NuInvest and begun the process of integration with our business. |
| ● | Our Acquisition of Cognitect (U.S.) – In July 2020, we announced the acquisition of Cognitect, a U.S.-based consultancy that developed the Clojure programming language and Datomic database, which we leverage for our efficient codebase and immutable database. The acquisition closed in August 2020. |
| · | Making Strategic Minority Investments – We will selectively make strategic minority investments in companies with which we have negotiated commercial agreements or partnerships where we believe we would benefit from strong alignment. We believe these investments can provide us with access to third-party products and capabilities at a faster pace and in a highly capital efficient manner, particularly as we build our marketplace of offerings. |
| · | Making Corporate Venture Investments – We have also assembled an in-house corporate ventures team to evaluate and make minority investments in earlier stage companies where we see long-term strategic value establishing relationships and receiving first-hand insights on new potential geographies, products, technologies and strategies that we might consider entering or using in the future. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 101 |
| |
| ● | Our Investment in Jupiter (India) – In August 2021, we announced a venture investment in Jupiter, an emerging digital banking platform in India with several innovative solutions in development. India is one of the largest emerging markets in the world, and, together with Brazil, has pioneered the broad adoption of a central-bank led QR code-based real-time payments system expected to promote profound changes to how financial services are consumed and distributed. |
C. Expand into New Markets
We believe that our Nu Model also provides us with the capability to expand into new markets and scale quickly and efficiently. For example, we may consider expanding into:
| · | New Geographies – We believe that we are in the early stages of our international expansion. We have leveraged our technology, data science, credit and customer experience approach to continue expanding into new markets, such as Mexico and Colombia. We believe the early results of our international expansion are a testament to the geographical portability of our unique approach. In the future, we may also seek to grow our business by selectively expanding into new international markets where we can provide services to millions of consumers while disrupting the legacy models of traditional financial institutions. |
| · | Case Study – Expansion to Mexico – In two years from the launch of our operations in Mexico in early 2020, we believe we have witnessed the ability of our Nu Model to successfully transcend borders: |
| · | Customer Acquisition and Experience – Our customer base is growing at a rapid rate and, as of December 31, 2021, we had a total of 1.4 million customers, approximately 71% of whom we acquired through unpaid word-of-mouth referrals, and an NPS of 94, which we believe is well above incumbent banks in Mexico. Both the ramp up of our customer base and our NPS in Mexico are ahead compared to where we were in Brazil two years into our journey. |
| · | Consumer Credit Underwriting – We are already in the third generation of our proprietary machine-learning underwriting models, which have meaningfully increased our ability to accept new customers in a country with one of the lowest levels of financial inclusion in the world. We estimate that our first payment default ratio (that is, the percentage of customers that did not pay their first scheduled payment within 10 days of it falling due in relation to the total customers acquired in the period) would drop by over 60%, if approval rates were held constant since the adoption of our first model in the country compared against credit bureaus. On a year-over-year basis, our first payment default rate has dropped to 5.3% in the quarter ended December 31, 2021, from 8.4% in the quarter ended December 31, 2020. The velocity with which we have implemented our proprietary underwriting models in Mexico is also ahead of our experience in Brazil at the same point in the journey. |
| · | Leadership Position – We believe we have already become the top credit card issuer in the country, in terms of the number of cards issued during the second half of 2021, surpassing long-established incumbent players such as Banco Azteca, Santander Mexico, HSBC, BanCoppel and Banamex, based on data for other issuers from the Central Bank of Mexico. |
| · | Adjacent Sectors – We believe there is a significant opportunity to bring the self-reinforcing effects of our model to adjacent sectors where we can disrupt legacy models and provide additional value to our existing and new customers. For example, we believe there are similar opportunities to simplify the daily lives of our customers by disrupting existing models in industries such as e-commerce, healthcare and telecommunications. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 102 |
| |
Of our 53.9 million customers as of December 31, 2021, 1.4 million customers were in Mexico and 114,000 customers were in Colombia.
Our Products and Services
We offer a wide range of products and services for our customers. In Brazil, we offer customers products across the Five Financial Seasons: (1) spending, (2) saving, (3) investing, (4) borrowing, and (5) protecting. All our products are fully digital solutions to help us provide simple, convenient and low-cost services with a great user experience to our customers.
Spending Solutions
Our spending solutions are designed to help customers pay for goods and services in their everyday lives with a customized credit line or instantly through a mobile phone, while collecting loyalty points, rewards and discounts and benefits on applicable transactions. These include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 103 |
| |
Nu Credit and Debit Card
Our core Nu Credit and Debit Card was our first product, launched in 2014. It is a Mastercard-branded international card that is 100% digital-enabled and acts as both a credit and a debit card. Our Nu business debit and credit cards are also similar to the personal cards. The credit function started to be tested with customers in 2021 and we believe it is being received by entrepreneurs with the same enthusiasm as the personal cards.
Features and benefits include:
Ultraviolet Credit and Debit Card
Our premium Ultraviolet Credit and Debit Card was launched in 2021 for our more affluent customers with higher transaction volumes and NuInvest balances, or customers willing to pay a fee of R$49 per month (approximately US$9.0, based on the Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rate on December 31, 2021).
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 104 |
| |
Mobile Payments
Instant payments for NuAccount customers to make and receive transfers, pay bills and make everyday purchases any time through their mobile phone.
Features and benefits include:
Nu Shopping
Our integrated Shopping solution enables customers to purchase goods and services from several of the most well-known e-commerce retailers in Brazil via the Nu mobile app. We launched a beta version to customers in Brazil in November 2021, and plan to roll the Shopping solution out more broadly in 2022.
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 105 |
| |
Saving Solutions
Our savings solutions are designed to help our customers deposit, manage and save their money in interest-earning accounts with complementary debit cards. These include:
Nu Personal Accounts
NuAccounts is our fully digital account solution that supports all personal finance activities, from daily purchases and money transfers to savings.
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 106 |
| |
Nu Business Accounts
Our Nu business accounts are similar to our Nu personal accounts, but designed specifically for our entrepreneur customers and their businesses. This allows our customers to separate their business and personal transactions.
Features and benefits include:
Investing Solutions
Our investing solutions are designed to help our customers invest their money easily and conveniently with access to a growing number of investment products and services. These include:
NuInvest Investment Accounts
NuInvest is our investment product offered direct-to-consumer without the need for third-party brokers. We provide equity, fixed-income, options and ETF products as well as multimarket funds with curated asset allocations based on the customer’s risk profile and financial position in a trustworthy account.
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 107 |
| |
Borrowing Solutions
Our borrowing solutions are designed to provide our customers with unsecured loans that are easy to receive, manage and pay back. Over time we expect our credit products to be a mixture of our own proprietary products as well as those offered by third parties, and to be funded through different sources including securitizations and deposits. These products currently include:
Personal Unsecured Loans
Easy-to-manage fully digital loans for our credit card and digital account customers. Our customers are in control from the pre-loan simulation through loan management.
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 108 |
| |
Buy Now Pay Later
Simple, in-app “buy now pay later” solution for Nu card customers, giving our customers the ability to pay credit and debit purchases and boletos (banking payment slips) over time in up to twelve installments.
Features and benefits include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 109 |
| |
NuPay
A new and disruptive way to pay for online purchases with just a few clicks within the Nubank app, offering a more practical and secure experience.
Features and benefits include:
| ● | Enables customers to pay with their account balances or interest-free installments |
| ● | Expands customers purchasing power and merchant sales through additional limits beyond what is already available through credit card |
| ● | Improves checkout conversion by simplifying the purchase experience and eliminating the need to type credit card information |
| ● | Eliminates the risk of fraud and credit card information leakage once the transaction is securely approved through an authenticated device with PIN confirmation. |
| ● | Simplifies merchants operational processes and reduces working capital needs through D+1 settlement for all purchases |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 110 |
| |
Protecting Solutions
Our NuInsurance protecting solutions are designed to help our customers secure life insurance and funeral benefits easily and at a low cost. These include:
NuLife and NuMobile Insurance Policies
NuLife is our complete life insurance product and NuMobile is our mobile insurance. Both are underwritten by Chubb, that can be customized by our customers based on their needs and budgets.
Features and benefits include:
Our Marketing and Distribution
We have created a member-get-member marketing strategy that leverages our high-quality products and services to delight customers, who may then refer us to their family, friends and peers. Over time, this strategy has enabled us to grow virally and acquire approximately 80%-90% of our customers organically on average per year since our inception, either through word-of-mouth or direct unpaid referrals, without the need for significant marketing expenses. We believe that this low-cost approach allows us to focus resources on improving the customer experience, which further enhances the virtuous cycle of our member-get-member strategy.
In particular, our subsidiary, Nu Pagamentos, signed an agreement to be an Official South American Supporter of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022TM, which we believe will be viewed by hundreds of millions of consumers across the specific region. The FIFA World Cup has historically been one of the biggest sporting events, and we believe that this World Cup in particular will be a special moment for the world to unite and celebrate collectively for the first time since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We anticipate that this will give us significant exposure in the South American region and put us in the spotlight during the matches.
We also employ various social and digital media initiatives to drive greater awareness and support across our ecosystem, foster the development of our online NuCommunity portal and promote our member-get-member strategy. These include:
Influencer Partnerships
We have partnered with Brazilian pop star and influencer Anitta, who is one of the largest and most recognizable musical artists and influencers in Brazil. She has earned five nominations for Latin Grammy awards and over 58 million followers on Instagram as of December 31, 2021. Anitta advises us on the rollout of selected new products, such as our Ultraviolet card for more affluent consumers, which was launched in July, 2021. Anitta also joined our board of directors in June 2021, where we expect she will leverage her broad influence and deep understanding of consumer behavior to support our growth.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 111 |
| |
Proprietary Financial Education Content
We create proprietary educational content that we believe is a highly differentiated and powerful tool to strengthen our brand and awareness, attract new customers, and improve engagement with existing customers. Our diverse content is distributed through multiple digital and social channels, including our blog, which has become a powerful search engine optimization benchmark in Brazil, covering over 240 thousand keywords, from branded topics, such as our products, to financial education, and amassed nearly 72 million unique visitors as of December 31, 2021. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, we had more than 2.3 million monthly subscribers who receive our financial education newsletter. Additionally, we distribute content through InvestNews, our proprietary content channel that offers daily coverage of news and educational content on economics, investments, finance and politics. As of December 31, 2021, the InvestNews channel on YouTube had 340,000 subscribers. Since its inception, the channel has produced more than 2,000 videos and has accumulated over 33 million total views.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 112 |
| |
Social Media
We maintain a strong social media presence across major platforms where we have attracted approximately 10.2 million followers and 296 million impressions (defined as the number of times our posts, stories, videos or live videos were viewed on screen by an account other than our own in any given month. Impressions may include multiple views of our posts, etc. by the same accounts) across all social channels as of December 31, 2021. Our presence spans across Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok and our own NuCommunity portal, as illustrated in the graphics below. We have a leading social media position, with more followers across several social media platforms when compared to both incumbent banks and digital banks, including LinkedIn, Instagram and TikTok, based on our internal analysis of publicly available information.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 113 |
| |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 114 |
| |
Our Proprietary Technology and Data Platform
We use advanced cloud-based technologies and data science tools to deliver a superior experience for our customers in a hyper-scalable and secure environment. We prioritize building our own technology and investing in extraordinary engineering talent to operate and enhance a proprietary technology platform that was purpose-built for our mission. The key components of our technology include:
| · | NuCore Technology Platform – All of our products, services and operations are powered by NuCore, our proprietary, cloud-based core banking platform that we designed and built from the ground up. NuCore enables us to centrally manage several key functions of the business, which provides us with greater speed and control to optimize our products and address the needs of the markets in which we operate. The key functions of NuCore include: |
| ● | Transaction Authorization and Processing – which allows us to efficiently monitor transactions across our ecosystem. |
| ● | Core Banking – which allows us to manage all banking applications and data across our ecosystem. |
| ● | Regulatory Reporting – which allows us to manage regulatory requirements and generate reports for regulators in an automated environment. |
| ● | Business Operations – which automates significant parts of the operations across our business. |
| ● | Credit Underwriting – which supports our proprietary data analytics and credit scoring algorithms necessary to differentiate our credit services from those of the incumbents in the industry. |
| ● | Fraud Prevention – which enhances fraud prevention proactively and automatically, powered by our data analytics, artificial intelligence and proprietary algorithms. |
| · | Experimentation Platform – We leverage an experimentation platform that allows us to quickly test, measure and validate all applications and data models before we deploy in a live environment, which helps us improve decision-making and agility when launching new technology. |
| · | Microservices Approach – We use a versatile, decentralized technology architecture to manage and deploy over 500 modular microservices that we have developed. This advanced technology strategy enables us to scale, launch new products, enter new markets and update our codebase in a fast and highly efficient manner. |
| · | Product Platformization – We designed our technology platform to enable product development and new capability deployment to occur seamlessly across our applications. Our platformization approach enables faster product and market launches. |
| · | Immutable Database – We have created an advanced, immutable ledger, utilizing the Datomic database technology we own, which provides us with a highly reliable audit trail and transaction history that we believe provides better accuracy, control, reliability and transparency when compared to traditional database architectures. |
| · | Cloud-Based Architecture – We employ an architecture and infrastructure that is designed for scalability, efficiency and security. We operate in a fully cloud-based environment, leveraging the latest technologies to optimize our performance and increase capacity as needed, which enables us to manage our growth efficiently and cost-effectively. We have partnered with Amazon Web Services to be our primary third-party cloud infrastructure provider. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 115 |
| |
| · | Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence – Through the utilization of our data analytics and customer insight, we are able to utilize artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to enhance our customer experience and product offerings. As a result of our available customer data, our systems power a self-driving experience where we provide customers with real-time recommendations on products that meet their specific needs throughout their financial journey. |
| · | Operate at Low Marginal Costs – The architecture and various operating advantages of the NuCore Technology Platform enable us to run our business efficiently and with low incremental costs as we scale our business. |
Our Customer Service and Support
We service and support our customers with convenient, caring and high-quality customer service and support teams. We also leverage technology tools to streamline the customer support experience, empowering our customer service agents. Together this combination of human-centric and technologically advanced support has enabled us to achieve an industry-leading NPS. Our customer service and support functions, processes and tools were designed from the bottom-up to embody our strong customer-centric culture, strengthen our relationship with customers and create fanatical customers who will refer Nu to their peers. These teams, technologies and programs include:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 116 |
| |
| · | Xpeers – We have assembled a team of highly trained and passionate customer service agents with a human-focused mentality who we call our Xpeers. Our Xpeers are trained to be subject-matter experts empowered to solve customer questions at first contact, which can be made by chat, email or phone. We utilize our data analytics and artificial intelligence insights to direct customers to the best-suited Xpeer team member, improving resolution times and, we believe, customer satisfaction. We employ a strategy of using internal and external resources for customer support that provides us with the ability to maintain the highest customer service quality alongside our hyper-growth. In the three months ended December 31, 2021, 95% of the calls received were answered in less than 45 seconds and the customer satisfaction rate for the calls exceeded 94%. We measure the customer satisfaction rate as the percentage of customers who rate our customer service as a 4 or a 5 on a scale of 1 to 5. |
| · | WoW Approach – We have developed an approach for our Xpeers that builds stronger human connections and delights our customers with excellent customer service. We call this our WoW Approach. We have a team of over 30 customer excellence professionals to train and manage the WoW Approach across our customer service team. Additionally, we encourage Xpeers to send a gift of their choice to customers when they build a real human connection during a positive customer experience. In the year ended December 31, 2021, we sent more than 26,000 gifts to customers across Brazil. Many customers have posted their positive experiences on social media, which continues to fuel our referral and word-of-mouth customer acquisitions strategy. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 117 |
| |
| · | Shuffle – We have developed a technology platform to support our Xpeers and simplify customer service that we call Shuffle. This platform provides our Xpeers with a robust interface that features a single go-to application for up-to-date information on the customer, interaction history and insights into the likely problem the customer is facing, which enables our Xpeers to address the issue quickly and efficiently. On the backend, Shuffle connects to another proprietary platform called Proximo!, which intelligently tags each customer inquiry with a “reason” and routes these inquiries to the agent with the greatest level of expertise in this area, allowing them to tackle the next most important task in line. This ecosystem helps to maximize first contact resolution and minimize transfers and friction for the customer. As of December 31, 2021, we employed a dedicated team of 42 engineers to build and maintain technology tools for our Xpeers. |
Our Approach to ESG and Sustainability
We have a strong commitment to advancing ESG efforts, which is reflected in four key pillars driving everything we do: (1) ESG integration in our decision-making processes to connect purpose and growth; (2) shared value co-creation through consideration of our stakeholders; (3) commitment to having a lasting, meaningful and positive impact on people’s lives; and (4) having an ethical, transparent and efficient corporate governance. To oversee our ESG strategy and roadmap, we have established a stakeholders’ committee. The main role and responsibility of this committee is to focus on setting bold objectives and assess the impact we have on key stakeholders: customers, employees, investors, regulators and society.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 118 |
| |
We believe that financial inclusion is critical for driving sustainable development. Democratizing access to financial services and literacy is crucial for communities to grow. As such, we believe we have built a strong reputation with regulators and are committed to ethical and transparent relationships with public officials as we work to improve how people are served by financial services companies. The result is reach and access across 100% of Brazil’s municipalities. We estimate that we have provided the first credit card or bank account, as of December 31, 2021, to approximately 5.6 million people in Brazil.
From a social impact perspective, more than 67% of our customers say they’ve gained more financial independence due to the use of our financial services and 80% reported they could overcome unforeseen financial issues as a result of their access to our credit products. Furthermore, 77% of our customers state we have positively impacted their financial lives. Additionally, we believe we are generating value to our SME customers by providing access to financial services, for the first time, to 46% of them.
Our commitment to having a strong social impact also involves continuously improving the financial literacy of our customers. Since 2018, more than 186 million users have consumed financial education content through our blog channel. As a company committed to connecting profit and purpose, we will continue to challenge ourselves to create as much value as possible for our stakeholders.
We believe our strong focus on impact allows us to recruit and retain the best talent and diverse teams, ensuring that we have the depth of perspectives to design the best human-centered customer experiences. Among our employees in Brazil, as of December 31, 2021, 32.9% self-identified as black or brown, 45.2% as women, 26.6% as LGBTQIA+, and 61.4% of our employees in leadership positions self-identified as from underrepresented groups.
We are also aware of the importance of addressing greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. We committed to being a carbon neutral company and we performed the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions inventory (scope 1, 2 and 3), which was audited by an independent third-party consultancy, and published in accordance with the GHG Protocol.
The way we think about stakeholder impact is illustrated by our Nu Impact (ESG) framework laid out in the chart below.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 119 |
| |
Our Approach to Risk Management
Our approach to risk management is core to our business model and has been designed to reduce friction, onboard unbanked or underbanked customers and drive credit delinquencies below the industry average. We are continuously improving our risk management functions by using data and technology to reduce the risk in our business and improve our credit underwriting engine. There are four components to our risk management approach:
| · | Enterprise Risk Management – We have developed a robust enterprise risk management and governance program that allows us to minimize risks while also delivering customers a frictionless experience. We do this by combining modern risk management systems employed by some of the most sophisticated financial services companies in the world with the latest in data science and machine learning models. |
| · | Low-and-Grow Approach – We employ a low-and-grow credit strategy, in which we typically begin with customers that have no or little available credit information with a very small credit line and slowly extend this credit line over time as we learn more about their behaviors and potential credit risks. This approach allows us to quickly separate the good borrowers from the bad by tracking customer behavior over time. As we collect more data and better understand customers’ financial habits, we extend the credit lines. This iterative approach has enabled us to effectively underwrite and onboard customers with little to no credit history. |
| · | NuX Credit Engine – We use an internally developed credit engine, called NuX, which leverages proprietary and alternative data sources to underwrite and monitor our credit products more effectively and lower fraud rates. Our NuX credit engine, supported by a dedicated team, is self-learning and benefits from increasing scale as we ingest, test, monitor and enhance our credit algorithms over time to manage the risks of our credit portfolio. Our model is robust enough to allow us to underwrite to a large set of customers while maintaining a 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate of 3.5% in Brazil as of December 31, 2021, compared with an industry average 90-day delinquency rate of 5.0% as of the same date. We have successfully operated with a low-risk credit portfolio through some of the most volatile macroeconomic events, including Brazil’s worst recession on record occurring between 2016 and 2018. We believe our NuX credit engine is portable to new markets by leveraging our ability to ingest, analyze and react to credit data in a specific market. For example, in Mexico we have been able to quickly iterate and launch new versions of our underwriting credit engine by collecting more data and incorporating third-party data sources. Compared to making decisions with generic credit bureau scores, the latest version of our credit engine allows us to decrease risk by 60% for a comparable approval rate. This allowed us to triple our approval rate from 17.8% in the quarter ended December 31, 2020 to 44.1% in the quarter ended December 31, 2021. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 120 |
| |
| · | Liquidity Risk Management – Our liquidity risk framework leverages data to capture all contractual cash flows, and over those we apply a stress scenario coherent with the credit models we use in our business, but more severe. In addition, we apply a shock designed to cover operational risk events that may impact our liquidity. The combination of both shocks produces a very severe yet plausible scenario that helps ensure resilience from a liquidity management perspective. |
Our Information Security Initiatives
Our well-trained and dedicated team of cybersecurity professionals hold various global industry certifications, including SysAdmin, Audit, Network, and Security, or “SANS,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, or “NIST,” International Council of E-Commerce Consultants, or “EC-Council,” and Information Systems Audit and Control Association, or “ISACA.” This team monitors our systems and transactions around the clock and works to keep our data and environment secure, while upholding stringent security and compliance policies in line with global best practices, including the ISO27000 standards, NIST standards, MITRE ATT&CK framework, payment card industry, or “PCI,” standards and Open Web Application Security Project, or “OWASP,” best practices. Our security team monitors all employees and third parties who access our platforms and manage tight authentication controls and physical authorization technologies in all our operating environments. We also have adopted safe coding and development practices.
At the heart of this strategic imperative is our commitment to providing secure and protected products and services to our customers. We have invested heavily in building internal capabilities to help ensure that our control systems meet the demands of our hyper-growth plan. We leverage our unique technology stack and engineering capabilities to continuously enhance our security layers. For instance:
| · | Code to Minimize Vulnerabilities – We utilize a less common code language, Clojure, which allows us to operate efficiently while minimizing our exposure to common security vulnerabilities, and have developed Clojure secure code analysis tools. We also update our code frequently, resulting in a constantly evolving environment, which we believe makes our code less vulnerable to exploitation. In the year ended December 31, 2021, we pushed 120+ code deployments per day, on average. |
| · | Continuous Security Testing – We believe in building confidence in our security through practical, continuous and independent testing. We have a public responsible disclosure program and private bug bounty program with HackerOne, an industry leader in crowdsourced security testing. We have conducted penetration tests with a variety of external security partners, and we conducted ethical hacking using our highly skilled in-house offensive security team to further secure our critical internet-facing infrastructure and mobile application. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 121 |
| |
| · | In-Depth Vendor Security and Onboarding – We run in-depth security due diligence and continuously assess vendors and suppliers we bring onboard to help ensure that our security standards are being met. We continuously real-time scan our suppliers to identify vulnerabilities in their public-facing infrastructure that may put us at risk, and we work with them to fix gaps. |
| · | Cybersecurity Intelligence – We have a highly capable in-house threat intelligence team working to track and disrupt cyber criminals before they can launch attacks on us and our customers. We complement this capability with threat intelligence partners who are embedded in the hacker community to identify indicators of risk. |
We complement our multitude of internal controls with additional intelligence from our industry-leading security partners to help ensure we maintain defense-in-depth control design. They provide us with additional support and protection on controls, operations and around-the-clock incident response and recovery.
Deep Dive on Our Industry Background and Market Opportunity
We estimate our total revenue potential opportunity in Latin America based on six key market components.
I. Payments
Digital payment transactions in Latin America are expected to experience strong growth, doubling their share in total transactions from 16% in 2015 to 32% in 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. We believe that this structural shift from cash into digital payment methods is as a result of (i) greater adoption of credit and debit cards, which still remain fairly underpenetrated when compared to other countries, (ii) the rise of instant payment systems such as PIX in Brazil and CoDi in Mexico that have been replacing cash and legacy wire products at an accelerated pace, and (iii) the growth of e-commerce, which significantly accelerated in recent years, particularly after COVID-19 started in early 2020.
Credit and debit card (including pre-paid) purchase volume in Latin America’s top six economies (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile and Peru) is expected to accelerate in growth, going from a 5% compound annual growth rate from 2015 to 2020, to a CAGR of 12% from 2020 to 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. This will result in a total purchase volume of approximately US$1.2 trillion by 2025, more than double the level in 2015.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 122 |
| |
In Brazil, our share of the payment volume market stood at 9.1% in 2021, 5.9% in 2020 and 3.6% in 2019, according to data from ABECS. We expect to continue to gain share in this area as we grow our customer base and as our existing customer cohorts mature. In addition, our debit payment volume has significant potential to grow as we become the primary bank for a greater number of our customers. In Mexico and Colombia, markets where we recently entered, our share in cards is still relatively small despite our strong early success.
Industry revenue from interchange in Latin America is expected to grow from US$9 billion in 2020 to US$15 billion in 2025, at a CAGR of 11%, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. Revenue from interchange in Brazil reached US$5 billion in 2020 and it is expected to reach US$9 billion by 2025 (considering an exchange rate of 5.16), equivalent to a CAGR of 14% during the period. In Mexico, industry revenue from interchange reached US$1 billion in 2020 and it is projected to grow at a 12% CAGR to reach US$2 billion in 2025.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 123 |
| |
Credit cards have historically been offered to the most affluent subset of the population with perks and benefits, while penalizing the least affluent through burdensome annual fees. Our vision is fundamentally different; we want to democratize credit cards as useful tools for our clients to make payments, organize their finances and ultimately progress financially, while educating clients to carefully rely on credit card limits only in times of necessity, all under a superior and 100% digital user experience. In 2021, we again innovated by launching Ultraviolet, our premium credit and debit card for our more affluent customers with higher transaction volume and NuInvest balances, or for any customer willing to pay a fee of R$49 per month (approximately US$9.0, based on the Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rate on December 31, 2021).
Beyond credit cards, the broader payments opportunity ahead of us is significant. Brazilians have quickly added PIX to their daily lives and we have spearheaded this process, establishing ourselves as one of the largest PIX institution in Brazil, with 37.3 million users with PIX aliases as of December 31, 2021. PIX transactions between individuals must be free of charge and therefore do not generate revenues; however, PIX is fostering the inclusion of millions of unbanked Brazilians into the financial system, and our NuAccount is an entry point for them. In addition to adding customers, PIX also leads to greater customer engagement, increasing activation and allowing for future cross-selling. In Mexico, CoDi, a platform for P2P transactions without commissions, was launched in 2019 by Banxico, and is expected to have similar positive impacts on financial inclusion and digitalization in the country.
We also believe there will be an attractive opportunity to offer digital acquiring services to our SME NuAccount customers in the future as we grow our customer base.
II. Retail Credit to Individuals
Retail credit in Latin America is highly underpenetrated relative to developed economies, presenting a strong growth opportunity. According to the IMF, the average household debt to GDP ratio in the top Latin America economies stood at 24%, relative to 84% in the United Kingdom and 75% in the United States.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 124 |
| |
As a result of this low starting level, the credit portfolio balance to individuals in 2020 in Latin America’s top six economies is projected to grow at an 11% CAGR in dollar terms, to reach US$1,385 billion in 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report.
The amount of retail credit provided to individuals in Brazil stood at US$377 billion as of December 31, 2020, with credit cards and personal loans together accounting for 19% of the total amount of retail credit loans outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 125 |
| |
Retail credit provided to individuals is the single largest revenue opportunity within retail financial services in Latin America. According to the Oliver Wyman Report, the revenue pool, measured as interest income minus funding costs and cost of risk, for the region reached US$122 billion in 2020, and it is expected to grow at a 7% CAGR to reach US$171 billion in 2025. The projected growth in certain countries (e.g., Mexico) is driven by an expected increase in credit penetration largely supported by new access to credit by the unbanked population in the region.
In Brazil, the revenue pool estimated by Oliver Wyman reached US$74 billion in 2020, and it is projected to grow to US$85 billion by 2025. The expected growth is driven mainly by an expected expansion in credit penetration (% GDP), which is expected to grow from 20% in 2020 to 26% in 2025.
Brazil Retail Credit Revenue Pool by Product (US$ billion)1
|
2020 |
2025E |
CAGR 20-25E | |
| Mortgages | 5.4 | 2.3 | (16%) |
| Payroll | 11.6 | 15.3 | 6% |
| Auto | 7.0 | 8.1 | 3% |
| Personal Loans | 14.7 | 20.0 | 6% |
| Credit Cards (revolving + installments) | 10.9 | 15.3 | 7% |
| Other | 24.2 | 24.4 | 0% |
| Total | 73.8 | 85.4 | 3% |
| 1 | Source: Oliver Wyman. Solely for the convenience of the reader, Brazilian reais amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the average selling rate for the month of July 2021 of R$5.16 to US$1.00, as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil. |
According to the Oliver Wyman Report, revenue from retail credit provided to individuals in Mexico reached US$9 billion in 2020, and it is expected to grow at a 18% CAGR to reach US$21 billion by 2025. The expected growth is driven mainly by an expected expansion in credit penetration (% GDP), which is projected to grow from 22% in 2020 to 29% in 2025.
In Colombia, the industry revenue from retail credit provided to individuals reached US$7 billion in 2020, and it is expected to grow at a 10% CAGR to reach US$10 billion by 2025. The expected growth is mainly driven by an expected expansion in credit penetration (% GDP), which is projected to grow from 33% in 2020 to 38% in 2025, still significantly below the level seen in developed economies.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 126 |
| |
Incumbent banks in Latin America have typically focused on the most affluent segments of the population. Operating under a cost-to-serve that is multiple times higher than digital banks and relying on legacy underwriting models, incumbents have historically struggled to serve customers from the less affluent segments. We believe this represents a massive opportunity for us to continue to drive significant financial inclusion in the region.
When observing the distribution of retail loan balances by income brackets relative to the number of households in each bracket in Brazil, we see that the retail credit remains concentrated in high income individuals.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 127 |
| |
|
<1x Minimum Wage |
1–2x Minimum Wage |
2–3x Minimum Wage |
3–5x Minimum Wage |
5–10x Minimum Wage |
10–20x Minimum Wage |
>20x Minimum Wage | |
| Monthly Income (R$ / Month) | <1,100 | 1,100-2,200 | 2,200-3,300 | 3,300-5,500 | 5,500-11,000 | 11,000-22,000 | >22,000 |
| 2020 Credit Balance (R$ billion) | 72.9 | 179.5 | 149.1 | 227.4 | 254.2 | 154.7 | 190.1 |
| Number of Households (millions) | 21.7 | 29.0 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.7 |
| Credit Balance per Domicile (R$ thousands) | 3.4 | 6.2 | 20.6 | 31.4 | 70.2 | 53.4 | 262.5 |
Source: Central Bank of Brazil and IBGE
We use an internally developed credit engine, called NuX, which leverages proprietary and alternative data sources to effectively underwrite and monitor our credit products. Our NuX Credit Engine, supported by a dedicated team, is self-learning and benefits from increasing scale as we test, monitor and enhance our credit algorithms. We acquire, store and analyze an enormous amount of data that we use for our decision-making process, to reduce risk and to improve the customer experience. We typically collect more than 11,000 data points per monthly active customer, which we use to better understand their behavior, risks and financial needs, enabling us to develop curated credit strategies to offer customers the best product for their specific financial situation.
By using our unique data and advanced NuXCredit Engine, we underwrite customers and manage credit risk more effectively than incumbent banks. Our 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate, or NPL ratio, as of December 31, 2021 was 3.5%, approximately 29% lower than the Brazilian industry average, according to the Central Bank of Brazil. Our NPL ratios have been consistently lower than the industry across all income segments, but this superiority increases as we move to lower income brackets. For example, in Mexico, we were able to quickly iterate and launch new versions of our credit engine, collecting more data and incorporating third-party data sources. Compared to decision-making with generic scores of the credit department, the latest version of our credit engine allows us to reduce risk by over 60% for a comparable approval rate. This allowed us to triple our approval rate of 17.8% in the quarter ended December 31, 2020 to 44.1% in the quarter ended December 31, 2021.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 128 |
| |
Our underwriting effectiveness in lower income bands allows us to underwrite more customers from lower income segments, helping democratize access to credit while minimizing credit risk.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 129 |
| |
In addition to better underwriting, we also aim to capture a growing share of the retail credit opportunity by leading the industry in terms of innovation, transparency and user experience. Our personal loan product, meant to provide our customers with a more efficient source of financing compared to credit cards, dynamically updates the credit limits we offer as we learn more about our customers and provides them maximum flexibility to simulate, contract and early prepay future installments at a discount, all through our mobile app. It is also part of our strategy to complement our retail credit ecosystem by making specific credit products (provided by white label partners) available to our customers on our app, all under our brand and user experience standards.
We have a significant opportunity to continue to grow our retail credit portfolio, both by providing credit to individuals that already access credit from incumbent banks, as well as by expanding the Brazilian market to include those that still do not have access to credit. Our existing base of 52.4 million individual consumers, as of December 31, 2021, represents only a fraction of the people who have outstanding loans. Our interest-bearing portfolio of credit card and personal loans stood at US$2.0 billion as of December 31, 2021. This was equivalent to approximately 1.1% of the industry balance for credit cards and personal loans and 0.2% of the overall retail credit to individuals.
We also see an attractive opportunity in providing retail loans collateralized by homes or automobiles. We intend to tap into this opportunity by partnering with other providers to allow us to bring to our customers the best solution available in the market. These products, typically not offered by Latin American incumbent banks, enable our customers to efficiently use their assets to obtain financing on attractive terms, as done in developed countries.
III - Credit to SMEs
In Latin America's six largest economies, the credit portfolio of small and medium enterprises, or “SMEs,” stood at US$146 billion as of December 31, 2020 and it is expected to grow at a 4% CAGR to reach US$176 billion in 2025.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 130 |
| |
In Brazil, according to SEBRAE, the country had 16.2 million SMEs, defined as companies with less than US$78,000 in annual revenue, as of 2020. Within this total, micro enterprises (known as MEI), in which the single entrepreneur must not have more than one employee and annual revenue must not exceed US$16,000, accounted for the vast majority, with approximately 11 million. MEIs’ activities are broadly diversified, but for the most part these micro entrepreneurs are active in retail commerce (i.e., apparel, food and others) and retail services (i.e., repair services and others) and therefore look for banking services that are simple, transparent and fairly priced for the day-to-day needs of their businesses.
Our SME NuAccount business account is designed specifically for our customers who run businesses. We provide a business checking account and business debit card, offer unlimited wire transfers and allow customers to issue boletos to receive payments from customers, all free of charge. As of December 31, 2021, our SME NuAccount product had almost 1.4 million SME customers, an increase of 250% from December 31, 2020.
In Mexico, SMEs are generally defined as companies with fewer than 250 employees. According to the INEGI, the Mexican national institute of statistics and geography, there are over 5 million SMEs in Mexico, representing over 50% of GDP and 75% of employment sources. Credit access in Mexico for SMEs is highly limited; according to the latest National Survey on Productivity Competitiveness of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises survey conducted by the INEGI, only 25% of SMEs had access to financing.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 131 |
| |
SMEs represent an important potential revenue opportunity given our superior underwriting capabilities and ability to reach out to customers without previous financing access. Our financial inclusion goals are highly aligned with supporting SMEs, which represent the second-largest revenue pool of our six key market components. Industry revenue from SMEs in Latin America reached US$17 billion in 2020 and it is expected to reach US$18 billion in 2025.
IV –Investments
Revenue from investments in Latin America is expected to accelerate, growing from US$17 billion in 2020 to US$22 billion in 2025, according to the Oliver Wyman Report, and the share of retail investable assets under management outside banks in Brazil has risen from 6% in 2017 to 19% in 2020.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 132 |
| |
In our view, the investments industry in Latin America has started to change. The smartphone allowed new entrants to acquire customers outside the walls of the traditional branch model. The region has also entered into an environment of lower interest rates, in which investors started to seek yields greater than what is available outside traditional fixed income products, historically with a large share of the portfolio of these investors. As a result, retail investors have been transitioning away from incumbent banks to independent investment platforms, such as NuInvest, in search for more investment options and better customer experience. Still, we believe there is significant room for further assets to shift away from banks into investment accounts when compared to other developed countries.
Brazil had 9.2 million active securities accounts in 2020, up from 5.7 million in 2017, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. Retail investable assets amounted to US$620 billion in 2020 (R$3.5 trillion), up 33% in local currency from 2017. Basic savings accounts and private pension funds each accounted for 30% of this total, followed by mutual funds and fixed income with 19% and 17%, respectively. Equities accounted for only 4% of the total.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 133 |
| |
Distribution of Traditional Investment Products for Retail Investors1 2
Breakdown by asset class, in US$ billions unless otherwise stated
|
2017 |
2020 |
2025E |
GACR 17-20 |
GACR 20-25E | |
| Private Pension (3) | 140 | 186 | 270 | 10% | 8% |
| Saving Account | 126 | 186 | 209 | 14% | 2% |
| Fixed Income | 88 | 105 | 140 | 6% | 6% |
| Investment Funds | 102 | 118 | 192 | 5% | 10% |
| Equities | 9 | 25 | 52 | 39% | 16% |
| Total | 465 | 620 | 863 | 10% | 7% |
| 1 | Source: Oliver Wyman. Solely for the convenience of the reader, Brazilian reais amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the average selling rate for the month of July 2021 of R$5.16 to US$1.00, as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil. |
| 2 | Retail only, excluding private. |
| 3 | Including only PGBL, or “Free Generating Benefit Plan,” and VGBL, or “Life Free Benefit Generator,” excluding closed pension funds. |
Industry revenue from retail investment distribution is estimated to have reached US$7 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach US$9 billion by 2025, equivalent to a CAGR of 6% during the period, according to the Oliver Wyman Report. In our understanding, investment platforms traditionally earn rebates from mutual fund managers, brokerage fees from their end customers, financial income from their liquidity and securities portfolio and commissions from the distribution of other third-party products.
Investment platforms have traditionally focused on more affluent customers, serving them through independent financial advisors. Recent technological advances, however, have enabled a direct-to-consumer model to thrive, better suited to the millions of retail investors that cannot be served by independent financial advisors.
In June 2021, we acquired Easynvest (renamed to NuInvest), a leading digital investments platform operating exclusively under the direct to consumer model. As of December 31 2021, NuInvest had approximately 6.3 million customers and US$6 billion in assets under custody (or the fair value of the assets invested through NuInvest). Through NuInvest, we will be able to offer our 53.9 million customers a wide range of investment options beyond deposits, including equities, mutual funds and fixed income product securities and, by doing so, we are able to increase the democratization of investments to all retail investors in Brazil with ample room for growth, as incumbents still account for 81% of total retail assets under management according to total investable assets data.
V - Insurance Brokerage
According to the Oliver Wyman Report, gross written premiums, or “GWP,” in Latin America are projected to grow from US$16 billion in 2020 to US$23 billion in 2025, at a 7% CAGR.
In our view, the retail insurance brokerage segment in Latin America has also been largely dominated by incumbent banks, who in many cases also own the underwriting business and consequently favor their own products. We believe that this segment is also prone for disruption and is likely to experience strong growth.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 134 |
| |
The Brazilian insurance industry had GWP of US$47 billion (R$262 billion) in 2020, according to the Oliver Wyman Report, or US$16 billion excluding health insurance. Despite its size, Brazil remains fairly underpenetrated when compared to other developing and developed economies, both in the life (excluding health) and property & casualty (P&C) insurance segments. GWP from insurance products sold directly to individuals (excluding health) amounted to US$6 billion (R$33 billion) in 2020, according to the Oliver Wyman Report, of which auto represented 64%, with the balance made of personal injuries and illness (13%), property (8%), life (6%) and others (9%). GWP from insurance products sold to commercial clients amounted to US$10 billion (R$56 billion).
In our view, distribution of life insurance products to individuals in Brazil remains concentrated on the bancassurance channel, while distribution of P&C insurance products to individuals in Brazil, remains concentrated on the broker channel.
We believe complexity, lack of transparency and expensive premiums that result from poor underwriting still prevent Latin Americans from consuming more insurance products. Our first insurance product, NuLife, launched in August 2020 (in partnership with Chubb as underwriter), showcases the untapped demand for insurance products. NuLife offers flexible, fully customizable life insurance policies that can be contracted in five simple steps through our app. We had over 500,000 active NuLife policies as of December 31, 2021. Over time we plan to broaden our insurance offering to include other life and P&C products.
VI - E-Commerce Marketplaces
E-commerce marketplaces represents a fast growth segment in Latin America, fueled by the strong momentum of e-commerce, which has been further magnified by the impact of COVID-19. According to the Oliver Wyman Report, e-commerce gross merchandise volume, or “GMV”, from the top six economies in Latin America reached US$51 billion in 2020 and it is projected to grow at a 23% CAGR to reach US$144 billion by 2025.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 135 |
| |
In Brazil, e-commerce GMV accounted for US$17 billion in 2020 and is projected to grow at a 20% CAGR to reach US$42 billion in 2025. In Mexico, e-commerce GMV reached US$18 billion in 2020 and it is expected to grow at a 29% CAGR to reach US$65 billion in 2025. Other key countries in the region such as Argentina, Colombia, Chile and Peru are expected to benefit from the same positive trends and grow at a CAGR of 14%, 14%, 22% and 23%, respectively, between 2020 and 2025.
E-commerce includes both retailers selling online directly to consumers (1PL) as well as vendors selling online to consumers through marketplaces (3PL). According to the Oliver Wyman Report, e-commerce marketplace revenue for the Latin America region reached US$4 billion in 2020 and it is projected to grow at a 37% CAGR to reach US$19 billion in 2025.
According to the Oliver Wyman Report, e-commerce marketplace revenue in Brazil is projected to grow at a 35% CAGR to reach US$7 billion (R$39 billion) in 2025 compared to US$2 billion (R$11 billion) in 2020, supported by the expected growth in overall GMV, the rising share of marketplace volumes within total GMV and an expected increase in the average marketplace take-rate from 11.9% in 2020 to 19.6% in 2025. In addition, financial institutions’ e-commerce marketplace share of total marketplace market revenue is projected to more than double between 2020 and 2025, from 2% to approximately 4%. In Mexico, e-commerce marketplace revenue is projected to grow at a 46% CAGR to reach US$6.4 billion in 2025 compared to US$1 billion in 2020, supported by the expected growth in overall GMV, the rising share of marketplace volumes within total GMV and an expected increase in the average marketplace take-rate from 12% in 2020 to 18% in 2025. In Argentina, Colombia, Chile and Peru, e-commerce marketplace revenue is projected to grow at a CAGR of 33%, 29%, 41%, and 39% respectively between 2020 and 2025 benefiting from positive trends in GMV expansion, marketplace volume shares within GMV and expanding take-rates averaging 18% for these countries.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 136 |
| |
We believe that our base of 53.9 million customers, as of December 31, 2021, makes Nu a desirable destination for retailers and service providers in Brazil who are looking to grow sales. In the near term, we expect a similar result in other geographies such as Mexico and Colombia, where our brand and customer base continues to expand every day. We plan to develop our e-commerce marketplace by carefully adding select strategic partners to our ecosystem, first and foremost as a tool to meet the specific demands of our customers and, as such, reinforce engagement and continue to improve user experience. We currently already have white label partners providing financial solutions such as insurance (Chubb), mobile phone top ups (telcos), and foreign remittances (Remessa Online), all under the Nu brand and with the same customer experience as with our proprietary products. Over time we plan to provide additional services to our customers beyond financial products, such as online shopping.
Revenue by Geography
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the majority of our revenue was derived from Brazil (US$1,285.8 million, compared to US$29.5 million and US$0.8 million in Mexico and Colombia, respectively).
Form 20-F | 2021 | 137 |
| |
Customer Demographics
We believe that our platform both supports customers across the age spectrum and particularly appeals to a younger population. Based on internal research as well as analysis by Oliver Wyman, we believe that we serve a larger proportion of younger consumers than digital banks and incumbent banks. As of December 31, 2021, 59% of our customers were under 35 years old, compared to 30% for traditional banks, as shown in the chart below. In addition, 81% of our customers were under 45 years old as of December 31, 2021, compared to 52% for incumbent banks.
Our young and growing customer base provides us with significant opportunity to grow with our customers who are in the early stages of their financial journeys. For example, our younger customers (20-24 years old) are expected to grow their real income by about 70% over the next ten years (based on a comparison of our younger customers’ income to the income reported by our customers who are between 30-34 years old), and we believe we are well positioned to serve their needs as they accumulate wealth, increase spending and reach life milestones that expand their financial needs.
Our Competitive Landscape
We believe that we are changing the consumption patterns for financial products and services and growing the market, but will continue to face competition from other firms including large legacy financial institutions, large technology companies, and new, smaller financial technology entrants.
We believe that the key competitive factors in our market include:
| · | our culture of customer-centricity; |
| · | product features, quality and functionality; |
| · | operating efficiency; |
| · | engineering, data science and product talent; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 138 |
| |
| · | brand recognition; |
| · | security and trust; |
| · | product and technology platform; and |
| · | regulatory licenses. |
We believe that our ability to innovate quickly further differentiates our platform from our competition. We believe that we compete favorably across all key competitive factors and that we have developed a business model that is difficult to replicate.
Regulatory Overview
Brazil
Our Regulatory Position
Four of our subsidiaries in Brazil, Nu Pagamentos S.A. – Instituição de Pagamento, or “Nu Pagamentos,” Nu Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento, or “Nu Financeira,” Nu Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Ltda., or “Nu DTVM,” and Nu Invest Corretora de Valores S.A., or “NuInvest,” perform activities that are subject to regulation in Brazil enacted by the Central Bank of Brazil, by CMN and/or by CVM, as applicable and have obtained authorizations from the Central Bank of Brazil to operate, as follows:
| · | Nu Pagamentos is authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil to operate as a payment institution in the capacities of (1) issuer of postpaid payment instruments (emissor de instrumento de pagamento pós-pago), (2) issuer of electronic currency (emissor de moeda eletrônica) and (3) payment initiation service provider (iniciador de transação de pagamento); |
| · | Nu Financeira is authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil to operate as a credit, financing and investment entity (sociedade de crédito, financiamento e investimento), carrying out active, passive and ancillary transactions inherent to credit, financing and investment portfolios; |
| · | Nu DTVM is authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil to operate as a securities distributor (distribuidora de títulos e valores mobiliários, or “DTVM”), performing the activities provided in CMN Resolution No. 1,120, of April 4, 1986, as amended, or “Resolution No. 1,120/86”; and |
| · | NuInvest is also authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil to operate as a securities broker (corretora de títulos e valores mobiliários, or “CTVM”), performing the activities provided in CMN Resolution No. 1,655, of October 26, 1989, as amended, or “Resolution No. 1,655/89.” |
In addition, three of our subsidiaries, Nu Asset Management Ltda., or “Nu Asset Management,” NuInvest, Easynvest Gestão de Recursos Ltda., or “Easynvest Asset Management” and Vérios Gestão de Recursos S.A., or “Verios Asset Management” are subject to regulation in Brazil enacted by the CVM and are authorized to provide securities portfolio management services.
One of our subsidiaries, Nu Corretora de Seguros Ltda., or “Easynvest Insurance Broker,” performs activities that are subject to regulation enacted by SUSEP. As required by the applicable regulation, it has obtained authorization to operate from SUSEP as an insurance brokerage firm.
None of our Brazilian subsidiaries is licensed to operate as a bank.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 139 |
| |
Regulatory Environment in Brazil
Our main subsidiaries in Brazil are subject to extensive regulation, such as those applicable to payment institutions (in case of Nu Pagamentos), financial institutions (in the case of Nu Financeira, Nu DTVM and NuInvest), securities and brokers (in the case of Nu DTVM and NuInvest), securities portfolio managers (in the case of Nu Asset Management, Easynvest Asset Management and Verios Asset Management) and insurance brokers (in the case Easynvest Insurance Broker).
We offer various payment, financial and capital markets services; in particular, we conduct activities related to payments, digital accounts, brokerage services, portfolio management and insurance.
Legislation Applicable to the Brazilian Payment System
General
The activities carried out by Nu Pagamentos in Brazil, are subject to Brazilian laws and regulations applicable to payment institutions, particularly Law No. 12,865 of October 9, 2013, or the “Payments Law,” which, in a nutshell, regulates payment institutions and payment schemes that are part of the Brazilian Payment System (the Sistema de Pagamentos Brasileiro, or the “SPB”).
Payment Institutions
A payment institution is defined as the legal entity that participates in one or more payment schemes and is dedicated, exclusively or not, to the execution of remittance of funds, among other activities, as described in Payments Law.
Specifically, based on the Brazilian payment regulations, payment institutions are entities that can be classified into one of the following four categories:
| · | Issuers of electronic currency (prepaid payment instruments): these payment institutions manage prepaid payment accounts, enable the execution of payment transactions using electronic currency held in such prepaid payment accounts, and convert the funds held therein into physical or book-entry currency or vice versa. |
| · | Issuers of post-paid payment instruments (e.g., credit cards): these payment institutions manage payment accounts that enable end-users to make payments on a post-paid basis. |
| · | Acquirers: these payment institutions do not manage payment accounts, but (i) enable merchants to accept payment instruments issued by a payment institution or by a financial institution that participates in the same payment scheme; and (ii) participate in the settlement process of payment transactions as creditor of the issuer of the payment instrument. |
| · | Payment initiation service providers (PISP): these payment institutions render initial payment services whereby they do not (1) manage the payment or checking account from which the payment is executed; nor (2) hold the transferred funds during the rendering of their services. |
Payment institutions that operate in Brazil must comply with many legal and regulatory requirements set forth by CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil, as applicable, which may vary according to certain features of their specific business models and to thresholds defined by the regulation, such as the volume of payment transactions processed and/or the amount of funds held in prepaid payment accounts during the previous twelve months.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 140 |
| |
Therefore, certain payment institutions may not be subject to the full legal and regulatory framework applicable to the payment industry in Brazil such as the ones that only participate in limited-purpose payment schemes or provide services in the scope of programs set up by governmental authorities aimed at granting benefits to individuals due to employment relationships.
CMN and Central Bank of Brazil regulations applicable to payment institutions cover a wide variety of matters, including, but not limited to risk management, governance, anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, cybersecurity, secrecy, ombudsman, internal audit, reporting obligations and governance. In addition, payment institutions must seek approval from the Central Bank of Brazil when appointing managers (including directors, officers and members of certain statutory boards, such as fiscal councils). The regulations applicable to payment institutions also cover “payment accounts” (contas de pagamento), which are the end-user accounts, in registered (i.e., book-entry) form, which are opened with payment institutions that are card issuers of prepaid or post- paid instruments and used for carrying out each payment transaction. Current regulations classify payment accounts into two types:
| · | Prepaid payment accounts: where the intended payment transaction is executed when the funds have been deposited into the payment account in advance; and |
| · | Post-paid payment accounts: where the payment transaction is intended to be performed regardless of funds having been deposited into the payment account in advance. |
In order to provide protection from bankruptcy, Payments Law requires payment institutions that issue electronic currency to segregate the funds deposited in prepaid payment accounts from their own assets. In addition, with respect to prepaid electronic currency, the payment institutions must hold all the funds deposited in the prepaid payment account in certain specified instruments: either (1) in a specific account with the Central Bank of Brazil that does not pay interest; or (2) in federal government bonds registered with the SELIC.
Payment Schemes
According to the Payments Law, a payment scheme, for Brazilian regulatory purposes, is the collection of rules and procedures that governs payment services provided to the public, with direct access by its end-users (i.e., payers and receivers). In addition, such payment services must be accepted by more than one receiver in order to qualify as a payment scheme. The regulations applicable to payment schemes depend on certain features, such as the volume of users and the amount of transactions processed therein:
| · | Payment schemes that exceed certain thresholds are considered part of SPB and are subject to the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the payment industry in Brazil, including the requirement to obtain a license to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil. |
| · | Payment schemes that operate below these thresholds are not considered to form part of the SPB and are therefore not subject to the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the payment industry in Brazil, including the requirement to obtain an authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil, although they are required to report certain operational information to the Central Bank of Brazil on an annual basis. |
| · | Limited-purpose payment schemes are not considered to form part of the SPB and, therefore, are not subject to the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the payment industry in Brazil, including the requirement to obtain authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil. Limited-purpose payment schemes are, for instance, those whose payment orders are: (i) accepted only at the network of merchants that clearly display the same visual identity as that of the issuer, such as franchisees and other merchants licensed to use the issuer’s brand; (ii) intended for payment of specific public utility services, such as public transport and public telecommunications; or (iii) accepted exclusively within a closed-loop payment scheme and for the payment of one type of product or service, of a restricted set of products or services related with a specific activity or market. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 141 |
| |
| · | Certain types of payment schemes have specific exemptions from the requirement to obtain authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil. This applies, for example, to payment schemes set up by governmental authorities, payment schemes set up by certain financial institutions, payment schemes aimed at granting benefits to natural persons due to employment relationships and payment schemes set up by an authorized payment institution. |
Payment Scheme Settlor
A payment scheme is set up and operated by a payment scheme settlor, which is the entity responsible for the payment scheme’s authorization and function. Payment scheme settlors, for Brazilian regulatory purposes, are the legal entities responsible for managing the rules, procedures and the use of the brand associated with a payment scheme. Central Bank of Brazil regulations require that payment scheme settlors must be (i) incorporated in Brazil, (ii) have a corporate purpose compatible with its payments activities; and (iii) have the technical, operational, organizational, administrative and financial capacity to meet their obligations. They must also have clear and effective corporate governance mechanisms that are appropriate for the needs of payment institutions and the end users of payment schemes.
Legislation Applicable to Financial Institutions and Portfolio Managers
General Rules
Law No. 4,595, of December 31, 1964, as amended, or the “Banking Law,” laid out the structure of the Brazilian National Financial System, made up of the CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil, Banco do Brasil S.A., BNDES and other public or private financial institutions.
Law No. 4,728 of July 14, 1965, as amended, or “Law No. 4,728/65,” regulates Brazilian capital markets through setting standards and various other mechanisms. Further, pursuant to Law No. 6,385 of December 7, 1976, as amended, or “Law No. 6,385/76,” the distribution and issuance of securities in the market, trading of securities and settlement and/or clearance of securities transactions all require prior authorization by the CVM.
The financial and capital markets regulatory frameworks in Brazil are further supplemented by the regulation enacted by CMN, CVM and/or the Central Bank of Brazil, as applicable, as well as to self-regulation policies, such as those enacted by various associations, over-the-counter organized markets and securities exchanges, that govern their members and participants, (for example, B3, the Brazilian Association of Financial and Capital Markets Entities, or “ANBIMA,” and the Brazilian Association of Investment Analysts, or “APIMEC”).
The incorporation and operation of financial institutions and other regulated entities that intend to operate in the Brazilian financial and/or capital markets are subject to prior licensing, regulation and oversight from the Central Bank of Brazil. Other corporate events may also require prior authorization from such authorities, for example capital increases, appointment of officers, changes in corporate control, among others, as the case may be. Financial institutions in Brazil can operate under various forms—such as commercial banks, investment banks, credit, financing and investment companies, cooperative banks, leasing companies, securities brokerage companies, securities distributor companies, real estate credit companies, mortgage companies, among others—all of which are regulated by different rules issued by the CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil, and, if such financial institutions participate in capital markets activities, the CVM. In addition, like financial institutions, stock exchanges are also subject to CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil, and the CVM approval and regulation as well in accordance with Law No. 4,728/65.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 142 |
| |
Pursuant to Banking Law, CMN Resolution No. 4,122 of August 2, 2012, as amended, or “CMN Resolution No. 4,122,” financial institutions must seek approval from the Central Bank of Brazil, and, in certain cases, the CVM when appointing managers (including directors, officers and members of certain statutory boards, such as fiscal councils). CMN Resolution No. 4,122 will be replaced as of July 1, 2022 by CMN Resolution No. 4,970, of November 25, 2021, or "CMN Resolution 4,970/21", which aims to modernize and streamline the Central Bank of Brazil licensing processes. For more details on this regulation, see “Item 4. Information on the Company— Business Overview— Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Other Rules—New rules applicable to authorizations and licensing of financial institutions.”
Moreover, according to Law No. 4,728/65, for securities brokerage firms, managers are subject to further restrictions and are prohibited from working for or fulfilling any administrative, advisory, tax or decision-making positions at entities listed on the Brazilian stock exchange. In addition, managers of securities brokerage firms are prohibited from filling managerial functions in other brokerage firms authorized to carry out foreign exchange transactions pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 1,770, of November 28, 1990.
In addition, according to the Banking Law, Brazilian financial institutions have limits to grant loans or cash advances to their managers (officers, directors, and members of advisory boards, as well as their relatives). Such restrictions are set forth in CMN Resolution No. 4,693 of October 29, 2018.
Credit, Financing and Investment Institutions (Consumer Credit Companies)
Credit, financing and investment institutions (sociedades de crédito, financiamento e investimento), such as Nu Financeira (“financeiras” or “SCFI”), are financial institutions part of the national financial system and are subject to regulation by and the oversight of the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil. They were established by the Ordinance of Ministry of Finance No. 309, on November 30, 1959 and are private financial institutions whose basic objective is to carry out financing for the acquisition of goods and services, as well as for working capital. Consumer credit companies must be organized as a corporation (sociedade por ações) and its corporate name must include the expression “Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento” (credit, financing and investment).
An SCFI is not allowed to offer deposit accounts. However, such institutions can raise funds through the acceptance and placement of time deposits with special guarantee from the Credit Guarantee Fund (FGC), known as DPGE (Depósito a Prazo com Garantia Especial do FGC), interbank deposits, bills of exchange, agribusiness bill of credit, known as LCA (Letra de Crédito do Agronegócio), financial bill of exchange, known as LF (Letra Financeira), guaranteed real estate bill, known as LIG (Letra Imobiliária Garantida) and repurchase transaction. More recently, with the enactment of CMN Resolution No. 4,812, of April 30, 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil determined that SCFIs may also raise funds through bank deposit receipts, known as RDB (Recibo de Depósito Bancário) and allowed them to also raise funds through bank deposit certificates, known as CDB (Certificado de Depósito Bancário). Both RDB and CDB are fixed income securities – the main difference between the two securities lies in the fact that the CDB can be traded before maturity, while the RDB is nontransferable and not allowed to be traded.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 143 |
| |
Many credit, financing and investment institutions operate as the financial branch of non-banking economic groups. In our case, Nu Financeira provides financing to our credit card, personal loan to our customers and issues instruments such as RDB, in order to provide funding to our operation.
Securities Brokerage and Distribution Firms
Securities trading in stock exchange markets shall be carried out exclusively by DTVMs, CTVMs (such as Nu DTVM and NuInvest) and certain other authorized institutions. Securities distributors (distribuidoras de títulos e valores mobiliários) are regulated by Resolution No. 1,120/86 and securities brokers (corretoras de títulos e valores mobiliários) are regulated by Resolution No. 1,655/89. With Central Bank of Brazil and CVM’s joint decision No. 17, of March 2, 2009, which authorized distributors to operate directly in the environments and trading systems of organized stock exchange markets, the main difference between securities brokers and securities distributors was extinguished, and such institutions are today allowed to perform practically the same operations.
In this regard, both Resolution No. 1,120/86 and Resolution No. 1,655/89 allow brokerage firms to participate, among others, in the following activities: (1) trading in stock exchanges; (2) managing investment portfolios; and (3) providing custody services. More recently, on November 27, 2020, the CMN issued Resolution No. 4,871, which amended Resolution No. 1,120/86 and Resolution No. 1655/89 in order to allow DTVMs and CTVMs to issue electronic currency and, consequently, offer pre-paid payment accounts to their customers. In addition to Resolution No. 1,120/86, Resolution No. 1,655/89 and Resolution No. 4,871, brokerage firms are subject to regulations from the CVM.
As of May 2, 2022, both Resolutions No. 1,120/86 and 1,655/89 will be repealed and replaced by CMN Resolution No. 5,008, of March 24, 2022, or "CMN Resolution No. 5,008". The new rule consolidates the provisions applicable to DTVMs and CTVMs, which remain in line with the rules currently in force. In addition, specific provisions of other regulations were reflected in CMN Resolution No. 5,008, such as the minimum limits of paid-in capital and equity of CTVMs and DTVMs, originally set forth in CMN Resolution No. 2099, of August 17, 1994.
Under the rules set forth by the Central Bank of Brazil, brokerage firms (such as Nu DTVM and NuInvest) cannot execute transactions that may result in loans, facilities or cash advances to their customers, including through synthetic transactions (such as an assignment of rights), with the exception of margin transactions and other limited transactions.
Moreover, brokerage firms can neither charge commissions in connection with trades during primary distribution, nor purchase real property, except for their own use or as payment under “bad debts” (in which case, the asset must be sold within a year).
Third-Party Asset Management
Nu Asset Management, Easynvest Asset Management and Verios Asset Management are asset managers accredited to operate by, and subject to the rules and oversight of, the CVM, pursuant to Law No. 6,385/76 and CVM Resolution No. 21 of February 25, 2021, as amended, or “CVM Resolution No. 21.”
CVM Resolution No. 21 defines asset/portfolio management activities as professional activities directly or indirectly related to the operation, maintenance and management of securities portfolios, including the investment of funds in the securities market on behalf of customers.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 144 |
| |
CVM Resolution No. 21 provides for two categories of asset managers: (1) trustee administrator and/or (2) portfolio manager. Nu Asset Management, Easynvest Asset Management and Verios Asset Management are registered as portfolio managers. In order to be authorized by the CVM to engage in such activity, legal entities that operate as asset managers must (1) have a registered office in Brazil; (2) have securities portfolio management as a corporate purpose and be duly incorporated and registered with the National Register of Legal Entities – CNPJ; (3) have one or more officers duly certified as asset managers as approved by CVM to take on liability for securities portfolio management, pursuant to CVM Resolution No. 21; (4) appoint an officer responsible for the portfolio management activities, a compliance officer and a risk management officer; (5) be controlled by reputable shareholders (direct and indirect), who have not been convicted of certain crimes detailed in article 3, VI of CVM Resolution No. 21; (5) who is not unable or suspended from occupying a position in financial institutions or other entities authorized to operate by the CVM, the Central Bank of Brazil, SUSEP or PREVIC, and have not been banned from asset management activities by judicial or administrative decisions; (6) put in place and maintain personnel and IT resources appropriate for the size and types of investment portfolio it manages; and (7) execute and provide the applicable forms to the CVM so as to prove its capacity to carry out such activities, pursuant to CVM Resolution No. 21.
Under CVM Resolution No. 21, asset management must, among other requirements, conduct their activities in good faith, with transparency, diligence and loyalty with respect to their customers and perform their duties with the aim of achieving their investment objectives. This same regulation requires asset managers to maintain a website, with extensive current information, including, but not limited to (1) an updated annual filing form (formulário de referência); (2) a code of ethics; (3) rules, procedures and a description of internal controls in order to comply with CVM Resolution No. 21; (4) a risk management policy; (5) a policy of purchase and sale of securities by managers, employees and the company; (6) a pricing manual for assets from the securities portfolios managed by such asset manager, even if the manual has been developed by a third party; and (7) a policy of apportionment and division of orders among the securities portfolios.
Moreover, under CVM Resolution No. 21, asset management firms are forbidden from (1) making public assurances of profitability levels based on the historical performance of portfolio and market indexes; (2) modifying the basic features of the services they provide without following the prior appropriate procedures under the asset management agreement and regulations; (3) making promises as to future results of the portfolio; (4) contracting or granting loans on behalf of their customers, subject to certain exceptions set out in regulation; (5) providing a surety, corporate guarantee, acceptance or becoming a joint obligor in any other form, with respect to the managed assets; (6) neglecting, under any circumstances, customers’ rights and intentions; (7) trading the securities from the portfolios they manage with the purpose of obtaining brokerage revenue or rebates for themselves or third parties; or (8) subject to certain exceptions set out in the regulation, acting as a counterparty, directly or indirectly, to customers.
Insurance Brokerage Firms
Insurance brokerage firms, such as Easynvest Insurance Broker must obtain SUSEP registration and authorization for their operations, pursuant to the rules in force and in accordance with Law No. 4,594 of December 29, 1964, as amended, or “Law No. 4,594/64,” and Decree-Law No. 73/66 (as well as regulation issued by the National Private Insurance Council (Conselho Nacional de Seguros Privados, or “CNSP”) and the Brazilian Superintendence of Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados, or “SUSEP”). The insurance broker, whether an individual or legal entity, is the intermediary legally authorized to solicit and promote insurance contracts accepted by the current legislation, between the insurance companies and individuals or public or private legal entities. Only duly qualified insurance brokers pursuant to Law No. 4,594/64 and applicable SUSEP and CNSP regulation that have executed an insurance tender shall be paid the brokerage fees related to each insurance line, based on the respective tariffs, including in case of adjustment to the issued premium.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 145 |
| |
Under the applicable regulation, insurance brokerage firms such as Easynvest Insurance Broker, are obligated to prove technical certification of all their employees and workers who directly participate in the regulation and settlement of insurance claims, customer service, and direct sales of insurance, capitalization and open supplementary pension products. Such certification shall be provided by an institution of recognized technical capacity, duly accredited by SUSEP.
Insured persons and insurance firms can pursue civil action against insurance brokers for losses incurred as a result of intentional malfeasance or negligence caused by brokerage activity. In case of non-compliance with the regulatory rules, in addition to the legal sanctions, insurance brokers and managers are subject to fines, temporary suspension from the exercise of the profession or registration cancellation.
Main Regulatory Authorities in Brazil
National Financial System
The main regulatory authorities in the Brazilian financial system are CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil and CVM. In addition, most Brazilian securities brokers, securities distributors and asset managers are associated with and subject to the self-regulatory rules issued by ANBIMA.
In addition, trading segments managed by B3 are self-regulated and supervised by BSM – Supervisão de Mercados, or “BSM,” a non-profit organization that forms part of the B3 group.
We present below a summary of the main duties and powers of each regulatory agent, ANBIMA and BSM.
CMN
CMN is the main monetary and financial policy authority in Brazil, responsible for creating financial, credit, budgetary and monetary rules.
The current Brazilian banking and financial institutional system was established by Law No. 4,595 of December 31, 1964, as amended, or the “Banking Law.”
According to Banking Law, the CMN’s main responsibilities are to oversee the regular organization, operation and inspection of entities that are subject to the Banking Law, as well as the enforcement of applicable penalties. In addition, Law No. 4,728/65 delegates to the CMN the power to set general rules for underwriting activities for resale, distribution or intermediation in the placement of securities, including rules governing the minimum regulatory capital of the companies that contemplate the underwriting for resale and distribution of instruments in the market and conditions for registration of the companies or individual firms which contemplate intermediation activities in the distribution of instruments in the market. The CMN has the power to regulate credit transactions involving Brazilian financial institutions and Brazilian currency, supervise the foreign exchange and gold reserves of Brazil, establish saving and investment policies in Brazil and regulate the Brazilian capital markets. The CMN also oversees the activities of the Central Bank of Brazil, the CVM and SUSEP. Other CMN responsibilities include:
| · | coordinating monetary, credit, budget and public debt policies; |
| · | establishing policies on foreign exchange and interest rates; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 146 |
| |
| · | seeking to ensure liquidity and solvency of financial institutions; |
| · | overseeing activities related to the stock exchange markets; |
| · | regulating the structure and operation of financial institutions; |
| · | granting authority to the Central Bank of Brazil to issue currency and establish reserve requirement levels; and |
| · | establishing general guidelines for the banking and financial markets. |
Central Bank of Brazil
The activities of financial institutions are subject to limitations and restrictions. The Central Bank of Brazil is responsible for (1) implementing those CMN policies that are related to monetary, credit and foreign exchange control matters; (2) regulating Brazilian financial institutions in the public and private sectors; and (3) monitoring and regulating foreign investments in Brazil. The President of the Central Bank of Brazil is appointed by the President of Brazil (subject to ratification by the Senate) for an indefinite term.
The Banking Law delegated to the Central Bank of Brazil the responsibility of permanently overseeing companies that directly or indirectly interfere in the financial and capital markets, controlling such companies’ operations in the foreign exchange market through operational proceedings and various modalities, and supervising the relative stability of foreign exchange rates and balance of payments. In addition, Law No. 4,728/65 states that the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil shall exercise their duties related to the financial and capital markets with the purpose of, among other things, facilitating the public’s access to information related to bonds or securities traded in the market and on the companies that issue them, protecting investors against illegal or fraudulent issuances of bonds or securities, preventing fraud and manipulation modalities intended to create artificial conditions of the demand, supply or pricing of bonds or securities distributed in the markets and ensuring the observance of equitable commercial practices by all of those professionals who participate in the intermediation of the distribution or trading of bonds or securities. The Central Bank of Brazil has authority over brokerage firms, financial institutions, companies or individual firms performing underwriting for resale and distribution of bonds or securities, and maintains a record on, and inspects the transactions of, companies or individual firms that carry out intermediation activities in the distribution of bonds or securities, or which conduct, for any purposes, the prospecting of popular savings in the capital market.
Other important responsibilities of the Central Bank of Brazil are as follows:
| · | controlling and approving the organization, operation, transfer of control and corporate reorganization of financial institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil; |
| · | managing the daily flow of foreign capital and derivatives; |
| · | establishing administrative rules and regulation for the registration of foreign investments; |
| · | monitoring remittances of foreign currency; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 147 |
| |
| · | controlling the repatriation of funds (in case of a serious deficit in Brazil’s payment balance, the Central Bank of Brazil may limit remittances of profits and prohibit remittances of capital for a limited period); |
| · | receiving compulsory collections and voluntary deposits in cash from financial institutions; |
| · | executing rediscount transactions and granting loans to banking financial institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil; |
| · | intervening in the financial institutions or placing them under special administrative regimes, and determining their compulsory liquidation; and |
| · | acting as depositary of the gold and foreign currency. |
CVM
The CVM is a federal authority responsible for implementing the CMN’s policies related to the Brazilian capital market and for regulating, developing, controlling and inspecting the securities market.
The main responsibilities of the CVM are the following:
| · | regulating the Brazilian capital markets, in accordance with Brazilian corporation law and securities law; |
| · | setting rules governing the operation of the securities market; |
| · | defining the types of financial institutions that may carry out activities in the securities market, as well as the kinds of transactions that they may perform and services that they may provide in such market; |
| · | controlling and supervising the Brazilian securities market through, among others: |
| · | the approval, suspension and delisting of publicly held companies; |
| · | the authorization of brokerage firms to operate in the securities market and public offering of securities; |
| · | the supervision of the activities of publicly held companies, stock exchange markets, commodities and futures markets, financial investment funds and variable income funds; |
| · | the requirement of full disclosure of relevant events that affect the market, as well as the publication of annual and quarterly reports by publicly held companies; |
| · | the imposition of penalties; and |
| · | permanently supervising the activities and services of the securities market, as well as the dissemination of information related to the market and the amounts traded therein, to market participants. |
The CVM has jurisdiction to regulate and supervise financial investment funds and derivatives markets, a role previously fulfilled by the Central Bank of Brazil. Pursuant to Law No. 10,198 of February 14, 2001, as amended, and Law No. 10,303 of October 31, 2001, the regulation and supervision of both financial mutual funds and variable income funds and of transactions involving derivatives were transferred to the CVM. In compliance with the Brazilian legislation, the CVM is managed by a President and four officers, all of whom are appointed by the President of the Republic (and approved by the Senate). The persons appointed to the CVM shall have strong reputations and be recognized as experts in the capital markets sector. CVM officers are appointed for a single term of office of five years, and one-fifth of the members shall be renewed on an annual basis.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 148 |
| |
Brazilian Payments System
Our activities carried out by Nu Pagamentos are subject to Brazilian laws and regulations relating to payment institutions set forth in Payments Law.
Payments Law gave the Central Bank of Brazil, in accordance with the guidelines set out by the CMN, and the CMN, authority to regulate entities involved in the payments industry. Such authority covers matters such as the operation of these entities, authorization to operate, approval of appointed managers (directors and officers), risk management structures, the opening of payment accounts, and the transfer of funds to and from payment accounts. After the enactment of Payments Law, the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil created a regulatory framework regulating the operation of payment schemes and payment institutions, which are still evolving.
In this regard, the main responsibilities of the Central Bank of Brazil in relation to the Brazilian payment system are the following:
| · | regulate the setup, operation and monitoring of payment institutions and payment schemes; |
| · | authorize the setup of payment schemes; |
| · | to authorize the setup, operation, transfer of control, merger, spin-off and consolidation of payment institutions; |
| · | set up the conditions and authorize the appointment of managers in payment institutions (directors and managers); |
| · | supervise the payment institutions and payments schemes and apply sanctions when due; |
| · | adopt preventive measures with a view to ensuring the soundness, efficiency and ongoing operation of payment schemes and of payment institutions; |
| · | adopt measures aimed at greater competition, financial inclusion and transparency in the provision of payment services; and |
| · | regulate the collection of fees, commissions or other consideration for payment services, including those charged among members of the same payment arrangement. |
Pension and Insurance
SUSEP and CNSP
In Brazil, the regulation of insurance, co-insurance, retrocession, capitalization, supplementary pension schemes and brokerage is carried out by CNSP and SUSEP.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 149 |
| |
SUSEP is an independent agency in charge of implementing and conducting the policies established by CNSP and the supervision of the insurance, co-insurance, retrocession, capitalization, supplementary pension schemes and brokerage. SUSEP neither regulates nor supervises (1) the supplementary pension entities that are regulated by the SPC; and (2) the operators of private healthcare assistance plans, which are regulated by ANS. With the enactment of Supplementary Law No. 126 on January 15, 2007, the CNSP and SUSEP are also responsible for the regulation of the Brazilian reinsurance market.
CNSP is made up of one representative of each one of the following bodies: Ministry of Social Security, the Central Bank of Brazil, Ministry of Economy, Ministry of Justice, the CVM and the superintendent of SUSEP – Private Insurance Authority.
The supplementary insurance and pension sectors in Brazil are subject to overlapping regulations. Decree-Law No. 73 of November 21, 1966, as amended, sought to centralize the legislation and inspection activities in the sector by creating the National Private Insurance System – SNSP, composed of (1) CNSP; (2) SUSEP; (3) insurance companies duly authorized to operate in the private insurance market; (4) the reinsurance companies; and duly qualified and/or registered insurance brokers. CNSP is linked to the Ministry of Economy and its main roles include: establishing the guidelines and rules for the private insurance policy in Brazil; regulating the incorporation, organization, operations, and inspection of insurers, reinsurers, supplementary open pension funds, and capitalization companies, as well as establishing capital thresholds for such entities; establishing the general characteristics of insurance and reinsurance contracts; establishing general guidelines for insurance, reinsurance, supplementary open pension funds, and capitalization operations; establishing general accounting and statistical rules, as well as legal, technical, and investment limits for the operations of insurers, reinsurers, supplementary open pension funds, and capitalization companies; and regulating insurance and reinsurance broker activities and profession.
SUSEP’s main roles include: processing application requests of incorporation, organization, operations, and inspecting insurers, reinsurers, supplementary open pension funds, and capitalization companies; issuing instructions and circular letters in connection with the regulation of insurance, reinsurance, supplementary open pension funds, and capitalization operations, in accordance with CNSP guidelines; setting forth the conditions of insurance plans to be used by the insurer market; approving limits for the operations of supervised companies; authorizing the use and release of assets and amounts given in guaranty for technical provisions and discretionary capital; inspecting and implementing the general accounting and statistical rules set forth by CNSP; inspecting the operations of supervised companies; and conducting the liquidation of supervised companies.
Self-Regulatory Entities
ANBIMA
ANBIMA is a private self-regulatory association of investment banks, asset managers, securities brokers and investment advisers, which, among other responsibilities, establishes rules as well as codes of best practices for the Brazilian capital market, including punitive measures in case of non-compliance with its rules.
BSM
BSM conducts market surveillance by monitoring transactions, orders and trades executed in B3 trading environments, supervises market participants, provides compensation for losses up to a certain threshold and, if necessary, initiates punitive administrative proceedings and enforces sanctions against those who infringe the applicable regulations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 150 |
| |
Working in close collaboration with CVM and the Central Bank of Brazil, BSM acts to ensure that institutions and their professionals comply with market regulations, by:
| · | conducting market surveillance – BSM monitors all orders and trades in B3’s markets in order to identify signs of irregularities; |
| · | auditing – BSM audits all B3 participants to ensure their compliance with the regulations and to identify possible violations of market rules; |
| · | imposing punitive processes and other enforcement actions – when violations of regulations occur, BSM adopts guidance, persuasion or disciplinary measures such as letters of recommendation, letters of censure or administrative sanctioning proceedings, in accordance with the severity of the violation that has been identified; in addition, BSM can, in connection with administrative sanctioning proceedings, apply penalties to or enter into Terms of Commitment (termo de compromisso) with the accused; |
| · | providing compensation for loss – BSM analyzes and adjudicates complaints presented to the Investor Compensation Mechanism (MRP), which awards damages of up to R$120,000 to investors harmed by a B3 participant’s inappropriate activity; and |
| · | facilitating market development – BSM develops education initiatives, rule enhancements and institutional relationships with market participants, regulatory bodies and international organizations. |
APIMEC
APIMEC is a private self-regulatory association authorized by CVM to perform the certification and self-regulation of securities analysts (both individuals and legal entities), establishing rules, procedures and best practices that must be complied with by them in the performance of their activities.
Other Rules
Corporate Capital and Limits of Exposure
Financial Institutions
Financial institutions are subject to an extensive set of rules issued by CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil related to corporate capital, exposure limits and other solvency requirements that follow principles recommended by the Basel Committee, especially in view of the systemic risks associated with the relationship and activity of financial institutions. As such, CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil sought to guarantee the solvency of the National Financial System and mitigate systemic risks.
With this aim, CMN Resolution No. 2,099 of August 17, 1994, as amended, or “CMN Resolution No. 2,099,” established minimum corporate capital and net equity requirements for various types of financial institutions. For instance, the CMN set a minimum capital amount and net equity amount of R$1.5 million for a DTVM and for a CTVM, in the manner operated by Nu DTVM and NuInvest, and R$7.0 million for credit, financing and investment institutions, such as Nu Financeira.
In accordance with the Basel Committee principles, other relevant prudential rules applicable financial institutions are CMN Resolution No. 4,955 and CMN Resolution No. 4,958 both of October 21, 2021 (“CMN Resolution No. 4,955/21” and “CMN Resolution No. 4,958/21”), which consolidated the methodology for determining the reference equity, as well as minimum requirements for Tier I Capital and Core Capital and the ACP (as defined below). The CMN Resolutions No. 4,955/21 and 4,958/21 came into effect on January 3rd, 2022, repealing CMN Resolutions Nos. 4,192 and 4,193/13.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 151 |
| |
The recent rules were enacted in the context of a normative review and consolidation, as a result of the regulation brought under the Economic Freedom Act (Law No. 13,874, of September 20, 2019, and Decree No. 10,178, of December 18, 2019) and provide, among other provisions, a wording improvement, including the elimination of overdue schedules and references to obsolete concepts of required net worth (Patrimônio Líquido Exigido, or “PLE”) and required reference equity (Patrimônio de Referência Exigido, or “PRE”). In addition, the new resolution also included procedural improvements, involving integrated risk management regulation, such as the appointment of a director responsible for the processes and controls relating to the calculation of the amount of risk-weighted assets (RWA), by calculating the minimum requirements and compliance with additional principal capital, and storage and public disclosure of information related to risk management.
According to CMN Resolutions Nos. 4,955/21 and 4,958/21, the capital requirement standards are expressed as ratios of the capital available stated by the Total Capital, composed by the Tier I Capital (which comprises the Common Equity and Additional Tier I Capital) and Tier II Capital, and the risk-weighted assets, or the “RWA.” For purposes of calculating these minimum capital requirements, the total RWA is determined as the sum of the risk-weighted asset amounts for credit, market and operational risks.
The Total Capital, used to monitor the compliance with the operational limits imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil, is the sum of three items:
| · | Common Equity Tier 1: sum of social capital, reserves and retained earnings, less deductions and prudential adjustments. |
| · | Additional Tier 1 Capital: consists of instruments of a perpetual nature that meet certain eligibility requirements. Together with Common Equity Tier I it makes up Tier I Capital. |
| · | Tier 2 Capital: consists of subordinated debt instruments with defined maturity dates that meet certain eligibility requirements. Together with Common Equity Tier I and Additional Tier I Capital, it makes up Total Capital. |
In accordance with applicable Brazilian regulations, we must maintain our Regulatory Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratios above the minimum regulatory requirements established at all times. In connection with its licensing process, Nu Financeira has undertaken the commitment before the Central Bank of Brazil to operate with a Basel Committee minimum capital adequacy ratio of 14.0% until 2023, which is a higher capital ratio than the 11.0% applicable to most other financial institutions operating in Brazil.
Beyond the minimum requirement, the Central Bank of Brazil rules call for Additional Common Equity Tier I Capital, or “ACP,” corresponding to the sum of the components ACP Conservation, ACP Countercyclical and ACP Systemic, which, jointly with the aforementioned requirements, increase capital requirements over time. The amount of each component and the minimum regulatory requirements is provided for in CMN Resolution 4,193.
On October 21, 2021, the CMN issued CMN Resolution No. 4,958, or “CMN Resolution No. 4,958/21,” which aims to consolidate the rules that provide for the minimum requirements of reference equity, tier I and principal capital and on the ACP. CMN Resolution No. 4,958/21 entered into force on January 3, 2022, when it revoked Resolution No. 4,193/13 and other complementary regulations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 152 |
| |
The Central Bank of Brazil divides the financial institutions into five categories of risk, with S1 being the most systemically relevant financial institutions and S5 being the least systemically relevant financial institutions. In this sense, certain of aforementioned capital components are only applicable to financial institutions framed in the S1. For instance, the ACP Systemic is not applicable to any of our subsidiaries operating as financial institutions (namely, Nu DTVM, NuInvest and Nu Financeira), given that such entities are framed in the S4 category, representing a lower systemic risk.
CMN Resolution No. 4,557 of February 23, 2017, or “CMN Resolution No. 4,557,” unifies and expands Brazilian regulation on risk and capital management for financial institutions and other institutions licensed to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil. The rule is also an effort to incorporate recommendations from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision into Brazilian regulation. The rule states that risk management must be conducted through a unified effort by the relevant entity (i.e., not only must risks be analyzed on an individual basis, but financial institutions and other institutions licensed to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil must also control and mitigate adverse effects caused by the interaction of different risks). It also strengthened the rules and requirements related to risk management governance and expanded on the competence requirements and duties of the risk management officer.
The rule sets out different structures for risk and capital management, which are applicable for different risk profiles set out in the applicable regulation. Consequently, less sophisticated financial institutions can have a simpler risk management structure, while institutions with more complexity must follow stricter protocols.
Payment Institutions
As per Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 80, of March 25, 2021, licensed payment institutions are required to comply with minimum paid-in capital of R$2.0 million per category in which they act (in the case of issuers of post-paid payment instruments, issuers of electronic currency and acquirers); with regard to the PISP category, the required amount is reduced to R$1.0 million. In addition, payment institutions that participate exclusively in closed payment schemes as issuers of electronic currency and issuers of post-paid payment instruments must comply with a minimum paid-in capital of R$3.0 million.
Moreover, according to Central Bank of Brazil Circular No. 3,681, of November 4, 2013, as amended, or “Circular No. 3,681/13,” licensed payment institutions also have to comply with the following minimum net equity requirement: (1) for issuers of post-paid payment instruments or acquirers, 2% of the average monthly value of payment transactions carried out by the payment institution over the last 12 months; (2) for issuers of electronic currency, the higher value between 2% of the average monthly value of payment transactions carried out by the payment institution over the last 12 months or the balance of electronic currencies issued by it, as ascertained on a daily basis; and (3) for a PISP, 1% (from November 3, 2020 to December 31, 2022), 1.25% (from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024) and 1.5% (as of January 1, 2025) of the average monthly value of payment transactions initiated by the payment institution over the last 12 months.
In November 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil launched Public Consultation No. 78, or “Public Consultation No. 78,” a set of draft regulations that seek to harmonize the prudential treatment applicable to payment transactions, whether carried out by payment institutions or by financial institutions. It also aims to harmonize the regulatory treatment of exposures arising from related activities conducted by payment institutions with that applicable to the same exposures, when carried out by financial institutions. The proposal suggests the gradual implementation of the new rules, with full adoption in January 2025. In this context, with the issue of a definitive rule by the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil (which has not occurred as of the date of this annual report), certain prudential regulations applicable to financial institutions would also be applicable to payment institutions, and to exposures arising from payment services in general.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 153 |
| |
The current capital obligations will remain in effect until January 1, 2023, when they are expected to be replaced due to the recent publication of a new prudential framework applicable to payment institutions. This framework includes BCB Resolutions No. 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 and 202, all of March 11, 2022, which will enter into force as of January 1, 2023. The new set of rules is the result of Public Consultation No. 78 of November 2020 (“ECP 78/20”), which sought to harmonize the prudential treatment applicable to payment services.
With the new prudential framework in force, prudential conglomerates integrated by at least one institution that performs a payment service will now be classified into one of the following types:
| · | Type 1: prudential conglomerate led by a financial institution; |
| · | Type 2: prudential conglomerate led by a payment institution and not integrated by a financial institution or any other institution authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil subject to t Law No. 10,194/01 or the “Banking Law;” or |
| · | Type 3: prudential conglomerate led by a payment institution and integrated by a financial institution or other institution authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil subject to the Banking Law. |
According to the Central Bank of Brazil, the concept of regulatory capital applicable to payment institutions was modified in order to ensure a greater capacity to absorb unexpected losses. This treatment will consist in deducting from the regulatory capital calculation the assets of the institution that, in situations of financial stress, have little or no value for maintaining the operation of the institution, in addition to considering debt instruments eligible to compose the Tier I and Tier II Reference Equity.
Furthermore, the new rules seek to adjust the minimum capital requirement according to the intrinsic risks of each type of activity (payment or financial activity) for Type 3 conglomerates (which will be the case of the conglomerate led by Nu Pagamentos), recognizing the peculiarities of payment services and their different legal status, and give specific prudential treatment to the risks arising from them. In this context, Payment Services Risk Weighted Assets (RWASP) was created, encompassing the activities of accreditation, issuance of electronic money and payment transaction initiation.
With regard to prudential segmentation, this will now also apply to Type 3 conglomerates - as will be the case for the conglomerate led by Nu Pagamentos. Based on their size and complexity, Type 3 conglomerates will be classified between S2 and S5 and will be required to comply with the prudential rules of the respective segment. As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the conglomerate headed by Nu Pagamentos would fall under S3.
As for Type 2 conglomerates, because they present less complex and less risky, they will be subject to the simplified payments, simplified credit and simplified market tranches. Type 1 conglomerates, on the other hand, will also have the RWASP tranche, with the exception of S1 institutions - in any case, these conglomerates will be subject to specific rules to be issued by the CMN.
The new requirements will be enforceable according to an implementation schedule. The new rules are expected to take effect in January 2023, and full implementation is expected to occur in January 2025. The Central Bank of Brazil expects that this will ensure sufficient time for institutions to adapt their internal controls and adjust their ownership structure.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 154 |
| |
ISimultaneously to Public Consultation No. 78/2020, the Central Bank of Brazil published Public Consultation No. 80, of November 2020 (“Public Consultation 80”), with the objective of introducing recommendations from the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) contained in the document “Basel III: Finalizing post-crisis reforms”, published in December 2017, which provides for proposals for regulatory approaches aimed at promoting and ensuring the stability and resilience of the financial system based on a more robust and granular prudential treatment of the main risk factors. As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, there has been no enactment of a rule arising from Public Consultation 80 but if such subject is regulated, as a result of the new prudential framework applicable to payment institutions, Type 3 conglomerates will have to comply with its provisions.
As mentioned, with the edition of the new prudential rules we will become a Type 3 conglomerate. In this context, the conglomerate led by Nu Pagamentos would have been subject to a minimum regulatory capital of US$448 million (R$ 2.5 billion) as of December 31, 2021, which would represent an increase of US$97 million (R$ 541 million) compared to the requirements applicable jointly to Nu Pagamentos and Nu Financeira under current regulations.
Changes in the Regulation of Credit Cards and Prepaid Payment Accounts
On May 19, 2021, the Central Bank of Brazil issued Resolution No. 96, or “Resolution 96,” which amended and restated the rules relating to the opening of postpaid payment accounts (i.e., those used in products such as credit cards) and prepaid payment accounts, in addition to making the criteria for opening these accounts compatible with the rules applicable to the opening of deposit accounts (checking accounts). The rule came into force on March 1, 2022.
Among other measures, Resolution 96 eliminated the exhaustive list of minimum customer registration information for opening prepaid and postpaid payment accounts; each institution will have discretion in order to determine what information it will require from the customer, depending on its profile. It also provided for new procedures with the goal of facilitating requests for prepaid and postpaid payment accounts to be closed.
In addition, Resolution 96: (i) revises the items that must be included in the invoices for postpaid payment accounts (i.e., credit cards), such as the need to include the total consolidated balance of contracted future obligations, such as installment purchases, credit operations and tariffs; (ii) defined minimum provisions that must be included in the account agreements; and (iii) mandated that the institution sends or makes available to the customer, by physical or electronic means, the credit card and the corresponding invoices, according to the form and channel chosen by the customer (among the options made available by the institution). Resolution 96 will enter into force on March 1, 2022.
Interchange Fees and Public Consultation No. 89/2021
Interchange fees consist of the compensation received by a payment instrument in connection with a processed payment transaction.
In the case of domestic purchase transactions carried out with debit cards (i.e., those issued under payment schemes of deposit accounts), the interchange fee is limited by Central Bank of Brazil Circular No. 3.887/2018, which sets forth the maximum limits of (i) 0.5% for the average interchange fee, weighted by the value of the transactions; and (ii) 0.8% as the maximum amount to be applied in any transaction. Corporate cards and not-present transactions are excluded from the scope of the rule. In addition, the interchange fee for prepaid cards (i.e., those issued under payment schemes of prepaid payment accounts, such as the cards issued by Nu Pagamentos) is not subject to any regulatory limitation.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 155 |
| |
In this context, the Central Bank of Brazil issued, on October 8, 2021, Public Consultation No. 89 proposing to harmonize the rules pertaining to interchange fees applicable to debit cards and prepaid cards. Public Consultation 89/21 proposes a maximum limit of 0.5% to be applied in any domestic purchase transaction with a debit card or prepaid card. In addition, the proposed rule prohibits different maximum terms for making funds available to the receiving end-user involving these two payment instruments—today, such term can vary depending on the agreement between the card issuer and the payment scheme settlor. The limitations of this potential new rule would be applicable in the case of non-present transactions and corporate cards.
The Central Bank of Brazil highlighted that one of the objectives of the consultation is to harmonize rules, costs and procedures associated with payment instruments that are similar with respect to the functioning of the payment service. Up to the date of this annual report, no rules resulting from Public Consultation No. 89/21 have been enacted.
As a direct result of Public Consultation 89/21, on March 22, 2022, Mastercard released the public consultation AN 6229, proposing a reduction in the interchange rate on prepaid card present transactions made by individuals in Brazil to 0.80%. Interchange fees for other types of transactions for this product will remain at 1.20%. The effectiveness of such change is subject to comments by market participants, further revisions by Mastercard and the approval of the Central Bank of Brazil. For more information, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Certain ongoing legislative and regulatory initiatives under discussion by the Brazilian Congress, the Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry may result in changes to the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries, which may have an adverse effect on our business and cause us to incur increased compliance costs.”
Compliance and Internal Controls
All Brazilian financial and payment institutions shall maintain internal guidelines and procedures to control their financial, operational and managerial information systems and shall comply with all the applicable legislation. CMN Resolution No. 4,595 of August 28, 2017, states that Brazilian financial institutions shall implement and maintain a compliance policy compatible with the nature, size, complexity, structure, risk profile and business model of the institution. Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 65 of January 26, 2021 sets forth similar rules for the Brazilian payment institutions.
On November 25, 2021, the CMN also issued Resolution No. 4,968, or "CMN Resolution No. 4,968/21", which repealed, as of January 1, 2022, the previous CMN Resolution No. 2,554, of September 24, 1998, or CMN Resolution No. 2,554/98".
According to CMN, CMN Resolution No. 2,554/98 was issued before the document from the Basel Committee Framework for Internal Control Systems in Banking Organizations, even though its provisions were essentially aligned with the precepts of this international document. In this context, with the enactment of CMN Resolution No. 4,968/21, the CMN deemed appropriate to update and improve certain rules concerning internal control systems, mainly in order to increase compliance with internal standards to the best internationally recognized practices. In particular, it aims to increase compliance with the “Internal Control – Integrated Framework 2013” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In addition, CMN Resolution No. 4,968/21 also sought to enhance the responsibilities attributed to the senior management of financial institutions, especially to the board of directors, as well as to detail the responsibilities of executive officers. Furthermore, CMN Resolution 4,968/21 provides that financial institutions must designate an officer responsible for internal controls matters (who may perform other duties within the institution, as long as there is no conflict of interest). The obligation to appoint this new officer, however, will only come into force on January 1, 2023.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 156 |
| |
Finally, it should be noted that CMN Resolution No. 4,968/21 expressly provides that its provisions do not apply to payment institutions. As of the date of this annual report, no equivalent rules applicable to payment institutions on this matter have been issued by the Central Bank of Brazil.
Insolvency Regimes
Brazilian financial and payment institutions authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil are subject to the resolution regimes that the Central Bank of Brazil may apply, which are set forth in: (1) Brazilian Federal Law No. 6,024/74, which provides for intervention and extrajudicial liquidation; (2) Decree-Law No. 2,321/87, which provides for the temporary special administration regime (regime de administração especial temporária, or “RAET”); and (3) Brazilian Federal Law No. 9,447/97, which provides for the joint and several liability of controlling shareholders and the freezing of their assets, as well as for the liability of independent auditors. The provisions applicable to bankruptcy, set forth in Brazilian Federal Law No. 11,101/05, apply secondarily to the extrajudicial liquidation regime.
The Central Bank of Brazil is responsible for the establishment and monitoring of resolution regimes, also acting on the administrative level in appeals filed against decisions of the board, intervenor or liquidator, or in the authorization of specific acts set forth by law. The Central Bank of Brazil is required to initiate an investigation to find the causes that resulted in the application of the special resolution regime and the liability of management, controlling shareholders, members of the fiscal council and independent auditors.
Intervention
Pursuant to Brazilian Federal Law No. 6,024/74, the Central Bank of Brazil has the power to appoint an intervener to intervene in the operations of or to liquidate any financial or payment institution other than public financial institutions controlled by the Brazilian federal government. An intervention may be ordered at the discretion of the Central Bank of Brazil if any of the following is detected:
| · | due to mismanagement, the institution has suffered losses leaving creditors at risk; |
| · | the institution has consistently violated Brazilian banking laws or regulations; and |
| · | such intervention constitutes a viable alternative to the liquidation of the institution. |
Intervention may also be ordered upon the request of a financial or payment institution’s management, if its respective bylaws so authorize - with an indication of the causes of the request, without prejudice to civil and criminal liability in which the same administrators incur, by the false or malicious indication.
As of the date on which it is ordered, the intervention will automatically: (1) suspend the enforceability of payable obligations; (2) suspend maturity of any previously contracted obligations; and (3) freeze deposits existing on the date on which the intervention is ordered. The intervention period should not exceed six months, which may be extended only once for up to six additional months by the Central Bank of Brazil.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 157 |
| |
The intervention ceases: (1) if interested parties undertake to continue the economic activities of the institution, by presenting the necessary guarantees, as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil, (2) when the situation of the institution is normalized, as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil, or (3) when extra-judicial liquidation or bankruptcy of the entity is ordered.
Extrajudicial Liquidation
The purpose of the extrajudicial liquidation is to withdraw the relevant institution from the Brazilian financial and payment system, primarily in case of irrecoverable insolvency. The extrajudicial liquidation may also apply in cases of severe infractions, among other events pursuant to applicable law.
Under the extrajudicial liquidation regime, the institution’s activities are interrupted, and all obligations are deemed due. Lenders are then submitted to a classification process based on the order of preference set forth by Brazilian Federal Law No. 11,101/05. This regime seeks the liquidation of existing assets to pay lenders.
The liquidator appointed by the Central Bank of Brazil has ample administration and liquidation powers, especially regarding the assessment and rating of credit. The liquidator may appoint and dismiss employees, determine their compensation, grant and terminate powers-of-attorney, propose actions and represent the institution in court or out of court. Under specific circumstances set forth by law, certain acts performed by the liquidator require the authorization of the Central Bank of Brazil, including to complete pending business, pledge or sell assets and file for bankruptcy.
The extrajudicial liquidation ceases: (1) if the interested parties, presenting the required guarantees, proceed with the economic activities of the institution; (2) upon conversion into an ordinary liquidation, conducted by the institution itself, pursuant to private law, without the participation of the Central Bank of Brazil; (3) upon the approval of the final accounts of the liquidator and relevant write-off in the competent public registry; or (4) in case of adjudication of bankruptcy of the institution. Only the liquidator can file for bankruptcy, subject to the authorization of the Central Bank of Brazil. Bankruptcy may be granted if the assets of the institution are not sufficient to cover at least half of the unsecured credit, or in case of grounded evidence of bankruptcy crimes.
Temporary Special Administration Regime, or “RAET”
The RAET is a resolution regime that does not interrupt or suspend the usual activities of institutions. RAET’s main effects include the removal of members of management from office and their replacement by a board or legal entity specialized in the area, with ample management powers.
The Central Bank of Brazil determines the duration of the RAET. Depending on the circumstances of each case, the RAET ceases: (1) if the Brazilian government takes over the control of the institution due to social interest; (2) in the event of conversion, merger, consolidation, spin-off or transfer of the institution’s control; (3) once the institution resumes its usual activities; or (4) upon the adjudication of extrajudicial liquidation of the institution.
The foregoing list of laws and regulations to which we are subject is not exhaustive and the regulatory framework governing our operations changes continuously. Although we do not believe that compliance with future laws and regulations related to the payment processing industry and our business will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, the enactment of new laws and regulations may increasingly affect the operation of our business, directly and indirectly, which could result in substantial regulatory compliance costs, litigation expense, adverse publicity, the loss of revenue and decreased profitability.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 158 |
| |
Repayment of Creditors in a Liquidation or Bankruptcy
Pursuant to the provisions of the Brazilian Federal Law No. 11,101/05, in the event of extrajudicial liquidation or bankruptcy of a financial or payment institution, creditors are paid pursuant to a system of priorities. Pre-petition claims are paid on a pro-rata basis in the following order:
| · | labor claims, capped at an amount equal to 150 times the minimum wages per employee, and claims relating to labor accidents; |
| · | secured claims up to the encumbered asset value; |
| · | tax claims, regardless of their nature and commencement of time, except tax penalties; |
| · | claims with special privileges; |
| · | claims with general privileges; |
| · | unsecured claims; |
| · | contractual fines and pecuniary penalties for breach of administrative or criminal laws, including those of a tax nature; and |
| · | subordinated claims. |
Super-priority and post-petition claims (for example, costs related to the liquidation or bankruptcy procedure), as defined under the Brazilian Federal Law No. 11,101/05, are paid with preference over pre-petition claims.
Anti-Money Laundering
Law No. 9,613 of March 3, 1998, as amended by Law No. 12,683 of July 9, 2012, or the “Anti-Money Laundering Law,” plays a major regulatory role in the oversight of banking and payment activities in Brazil. The Anti-Money Laundering Law sets forth the rules and the penalties to be imposed upon persons engaging in activities that constitute “laundering” or the concealing of property, cash or assets acquired or resulting from any kind of criminal activity. Such regulation further prohibits individuals from using the financial and payment systems for the aforementioned illicit acts.
Pursuant to the Anti-Money Laundering Law, banks, financeiras, securities brokers, securities distributors, asset managers, leasing companies, payment institutions, insurance brokers, among others, must: (1) identify and maintain up-to-date records of their customers; (2) keep up-to-date records of all transactions involving securities, bonds, credit, financial instruments, metals or any asset that if converted into cash exceed the amount set forth by the competent authorities, and which shall be in accordance with the instruction issued by these authorities; (3) adopt AML internal control policies and procedures that are compatible with the size of the company; (4) register and maintain up-to-date records with the appropriate regulatory agency; (5) comply with COAF’s requests and obligations; (6) pay special attention to any transaction that, in light of the provisions set forth by competent authorities, may indicate the existence of a money laundering crime; (7) report all suspicious transactions to COAF; and (8) confirm to the applicable regulatory agency that no offending transactions have occurred.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 159 |
| |
The Brazilian AML law specifies the acts that may constitute a crime and the required measures to prevent such crimes. It also prohibits the concealment or dissimulation of the origin, location, availability, handling or ownership of assets, rights or financial resources directly or indirectly originated from crimes, and subjects the agents of these illegal practices to imprisonment, temporary disqualification from managing enterprises up to 10 years and monetary fines.
Central Bank of Brazil Circular No. 3,978, of January 23, 2020 (which came into force on October 1, 2020, or “Circular 3,978/20”), which amended and restated the provisions relating to the prevention and combat to money laundering, require financial and payment institutions to (1) identify customers; (2) record transactions; (3) monitor events and report them to the Financial Activities Control Council (Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras, or “COAF”); (4) conduct business with politically exposed persons; (5) establish and maintain relationships with financial institutions and foreign correspondents; (6) train employees; and (7) appoint an officer responsible for the implementation and enforcement of these measures.
Circular 3,978/20 adopted a risk-based approach for dealing with money laundering and terrorist financing prevention. The regulated institutions have the discretion to determine which procedures will be adopted for each customer, based on the internal risk assessment concerning the committing of crimes relating to money laundering and terrorism financing latent in their business.
Along the same lines, CVM Resolution No. 50 of August 31, 2021, which came into force on October 1, 2021, establishes, among other obligations, that persons who engage in, on a permanent or occasional basis, as a main or ancillary activity, cumulatively or not, the custody, issuance, distribution, settlement, trade, intermediation, consultancy or management of bonds or securities, and independent audit within the scope of the stock exchange market must adopt rules, procedures and internal controls, also taking a risk-based approach, in accordance with previously and expressly established procedures to confirm the registration information of its customers, keep such information updated and monitor the transactions carried out thereby, so as to prevent the use of the account by third parties and identify the end beneficiaries of the transactions. These entities are also required to establish policies of anti-money laundering, terrorism financing and the financing of the proliferation of mass destruction weapons (PLD/FTP), of internal risk assessment and of internal rules, procedures and controls. Moreover, along the same lines of the provisions of the regulations of the Central Bank of Brazil, such entities shall also identify and closely monitor the business relations maintained with politically exposed persons.
The COAF was created by the Anti-Money Laundering Law and was reviewed and changed in 2020 by Federal Law No. 13,974/2020. COAF’s purpose is to verify, examine, identify and apply administrative penalties to any suspicious or unlawful activities related to money laundering in Brazil, without prejudice to the jurisdiction of other bodies and entities, as well as report suspicious activities to the prosecutors and the police. COAF has a key role in the Brazilian AML and counter-terrorism financing system, and it is legally liable for the coordination of the mechanisms for international cooperation and information exchange.
Recent Developments to the Central Bank of Brazil’s AML Regulation
On July 27, 2021, the Central Bank of Brazil published BCB Resolution No. 119, which provided for specific amendments to Circular No. 3978/20. This regulation came into force on September 1, 2021.
Among the main changes, it is noteworthy that obtaining information about the customer’s place of residence, in the case of a natural person, or the location of the head office or branch, in the case of a legal entity, is now required in the customer qualification procedures. Thus, the need for analysis and validation of the customer’s location information, provided by the customer, should be evaluated by the institution according to the customer’s risk profile and the nature of the business relationship, in view of the risk-based approach.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 160 |
| |
Further, with the goal of making the regulations issued by the Central Bank of Brazil compatible with the regulations issued by the CVM on investment funds and non-resident investors, such CVM regulations were incorporated into Circular No. 3.978/20, as well as the CVM regulations regarding investment clubs, investment funds organized as closed condominiums and certain non-resident investors.
Finally, in the case of operations using cash resources carried out through a cash transport company, the transport company is now considered the holder of the resources and will be identified by registering the tax registration number and the firm or corporate name.
Recent improvements in the regulation of the Central Bank of Brazil to prevent fraud in the provision of payment services
On September 23, 2021, the Central Bank of Brazil issued Resolution BCB No. 142, which set forth measures to be adopted by institutions to prevent fraud in the provision of payment services by financial institutions, other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil and payment institutions that are members of the SPB. According to the resolution, such institutions shall limit to a maximum of R$1,000 per deposit account or prepaid payment, the provision of payment services for the period from 8:00 pm to 6:00 am. Such limit may be changed at the customer’s request, formalized in the channels of electronic service; however, the institution must establish a minimum period of 24 hours for the effecting the increase.
Subject to the schedule provided for in the resolution, institutions must implement: (i) procedures intended for the evaluation of the customer prior to the offer of anticipation service of the settlement of receivables on the same date as the transaction under a payment arrangement of which participate; and (ii) daily records of the occurrences of fraud or attempted fraud in the provision payment services, including the corrective measures adopted. Based on these records, institutions must prepare a monthly report consolidating the occurrences and measures preventive and corrective measures adopted. This report should be forwarded to the audit and risk committees, the internal audit, the Executive Board and the Board of Administration, if any.
Politically Exposed Persons
Pursuant to Circular 3,978/20 and CVM Resolution No. 50, payment and financial institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil or the CVM are required to obtain sufficient information from their customers to identify any Politically Exposed Persons from their customer base and monitor their transactions accordingly.
In general terms, Circular 3,978/20 and CVM Resolution No. 50 define Politically Exposed Persons as any government agent who in the last five years have held or is holding, in Brazil or in foreign territories, relevant government positions, jobs or public office, as well as their representatives, family members and other closely related persons. Article 27 of Circular 3,978/20 and Article 1 of Annex A of CVM Resolution No. 50 specifically list which government agents and persons fall under the definition of Politically Exposed Persons. This list must always be considered by financial and payment institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil or the CVM.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 161 |
| |
Circular 3,978/20 and CVM Resolution No. 50 establish that the internal procedures developed and implemented by the payment and financial institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil or the CVM, subject to such regulation must be structured to enable the identification of Politically Exposed Persons and the origin of the funds for such customers’ transactions.
Transactions with Affiliates
The Banking Law (paragraph 4, article 34), as amended by Law No. 13,506 of November 13, 2017, or “Law No. 13,506,” restricts financial institutions from conducting credit transactions with related parties. Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 4,693 of October 29, 2018, or “CMN Resolution No. 4,693,” the following persons are considered related parties of a financial institution for the purpose of such restriction:
A. its controlling shareholders (individuals or legal entities), pursuant to Article 116 of Law No. 6,404/76;
B. its officers and members of statutory or contractual bodies;
C. spouses, partners and blood relatives up to the second degree of individuals specified in items A and B above;
D. its individual shareholders with stakes equal to or greater than 15% in its capital; and
E. its legal entities:
| (i) | with stakes equal to or greater than 15% in the financial institutions’ corporate capital; |
| (ii) | in which capital, directly or indirectly, the financial institution holds stakes equal to or greater than 15%; |
| (iii) | in which the financial institution holds effective operational control or relevance in the deliberations, regardless of the equity interest held; and |
| (iv) | with a common officer or board member in relation to the financial institution. |
Notwithstanding the general restrictions, the following credit transactions with related parties are allowed: (1) transactions carried out under market-compatible conditions, without additional benefits or privileges when compared to transactions executed with other customers of the same profile of the respective institutions; (2) transactions performed with companies controlled by the Federal Government, in the case of federal public financial institutions; (3) credit transactions whose counterparty is a financial institution that is part of the same prudential conglomerate, provided that they contain a contractual subordination clause, subject to the provisions of item V of art. 10 of the Banking Law, in the case of banking financial institutions; (4) interbank deposits; (5) obligations assumed between related parties as a result of liability imposed on clearinghouse participants or providers of clearing and settlement services authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil or by the CVM; and (6) other cases authorized by CMN Resolution No. 4,693.
According to CMN Resolution No. 4,693, as of April 1, 2019, all financial institutions must adopt internal policies regulating transactions with related parties.
Brazilian Law No. 7,492 enacted on June 16, 1986, which regulates crimes against the Brazilian National Financial System, criminalized the extension of credit by a financial institution to related parties in the cases not allowed by the Banking Law and CMN Resolution No. 4,693.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 162 |
| |
Punitive Sanctions
Legal violations under Brazilian payments, banking and/or securities laws may lead to administrative, civil and criminal liability. Offenders may be prosecuted under all three legal theories separately, before different courts and regulatory authorities, and face different sanctions with respect to the same legal offense.
Law No. 13,506, Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 131 of August 20, 2021, and CVM Instruction No. 607 of June 18, 2019, regulate administrative sanctioning proceedings as well as the various penalties, consent orders, injunctive measures, fines and administrative settlements imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil and the CVM.
Law No. 13,506 is noteworthy, as it:
A. sets fines imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil of up to R$2 billion or 0.5% of the entity’s revenue, arising from services and financial products provided in the year prior to the violation;
B. limits fines imposed by the CVM to the greater of the following amounts: R$50 million, twice the value of the irregular transaction, three times the amount of the economic gain improperly obtained or loss improperly avoided, or twice the damage caused by the irregular conduct. Repeat offenders may be subject to treble the amounts above;
C. provides for the suspension, disqualification and prohibition from engaging in certain activities or transactions in the banking or securities market for a period of up to 20 years;
D. temporarily bans offending individuals from serving in any managerial capacity for financial institutions;
E. imposes coercive or precautionary fines of up to R$100,000 per day, subject to a maximum period of 30 days in punitive fines;
F. defines the scope of the Central Bank of Brazil’s regulatory authority;
G. prohibits the offending institutions themselves from participating in the markets;
H. provides for a penalty of “public admonition” in place of “warning”, imposed by the Central Bank of Brazil;
I. empowers the Central Bank of Brazil to enter into cease-and-desist commitments;
J. empowers the Central Bank of Brazil and the CVM to enter into administrative agreements;
K. provides the CVM with the authority to ban the accused from contracting with official Brazilian financial institutions and participating in public bidding processes for a period of up to five years; and
L. redefines related party transactions.
Penalties may be aggregated, and are calculated based on the following factors:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 163 |
| |
A. gains obtained or attempted to be gained by the offender;
B. economic capability to comply;
C. severity of the offense;
D. actual losses;
E. any recurrence of the offense; and
F. the offender’s cooperativeness with the investigation.
Law No. 7,492 provides a legal framework to hold controlling shareholders, officers and managers of a financial institution criminally liable. The regime under Law No. 7,492 also covers interventionists, liquidators and real estate managers, in the context of interventions, extrajudicial liquidation or bankruptcy, respectively. Those found criminally liable under Law No. 7,492 will be subject to detention and/or pecuniary fines.
Law No. 6,385 also imposes imprisonment and/or fines for banking or securities infractions.
Internal Auditing
CMN Resolution No. 4,879 of December 23, 2020 (applicable to financial institutions) and Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 93, of May 6, 2021 (applicable to payment institutions) provide for rules governing internal audits at financial institutions and others authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil. Pursuant to such rules, financial and payment institutions must implement and maintain internal audit functions compatible with the nature, size, complexity, structure, risk profile and business model of the respective institution. Such activity must be the responsibility of a specific department in the institution or institutions that are part of its financial conglomerate, directly subordinated to the board of directors or, if one does not exist, the board of executive officers; or (ii) an independent auditor provided that such independent auditor is not in charge of auditing the institution’s financial statements or any other activity that may create a conflict of interest.
Independent Auditors and Audit Committee
Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 4,910 of May 27, 2021 as amended, (CMN Resolution No. 4,910,”) all financial institutions must be audited by independent auditors. The financial institutions may only hire independent auditors registered with the CVM and certified as experts in banking analysis by the Central Bank of Brazil. After such auditors have issued opinions auditing the financial statement of a certain financial institution for up to five complete and consecutive years, the Auditor’s team including managers, supervisors or any members with managerial positions, must be replaced. The Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 130, of August 20, 2021, which entered into force on January 1, 2022, or Resolution No. 130, applicable to payment institutions, also contains provisions in this regard.
CMN Resolution No. 4,910 and Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 130 respectively require financial institutions (and other institutions licensed to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil) and payment institutions to implement an individual audit committee or an unified audit committee for its conglomerate, as the case may be, if they (1) are registered as a publicly-held company; (2) are leaders of a prudential conglomerate classified in Segment 1 (S1), Segment 2 (S2) or Segment 3 (S3), according to specific regulations; or (3) meet the criteria set forth in the specific regulation to be classified as S1, S2 and S3.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 164 |
| |
In turn, Resolution No. 130 determines that an audit committee must be formed by payment institutions that: (1) are registered as publicly held companies; (2) are leaders of a prudential conglomerate that meets the criteria provided for in the specific regulations for classification in the S1, S2 or S3 prudential category; or (3) meet the criteria provided for in the specific regulation for classification in the S1, S2 or S3 prudential category.
Ombudsman
Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 4,860 and Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 28, both issued on October 23, 2020, financial and payment institutions, respectively, must (i) create an ombudsman department (individually for the institution or unified for its conglomerate) compatible with the nature and complexity of the institutions’ products, services, activities, processes and systems to establish an independent communication channel with their customers; and (ii) appoint individuals as an ombudsman and an ombudsman officer (who can also be the ombudsman himself).
The following are the ombudsman department’s main responsibilities: (1) receiving, recording, instructing, analyzing and providing formal and adequate attention to claims from customers and users of the institution’s products and services; (2) providing clarification regarding the status of a claim and information as to when a response is expected to be given; (3) sending a final answer within the applicable deadline; (4) keeping the board of directors or, if one does not exist, the board of executive officers, informed of the problems and shortcomings detected in the performance of its duties and the results of the actions taken by the institution’s officers to resolve them; and (5) preparing and sending, to the internal audit department, to the audit committee (if one exists), and to the board of directors (or if one does not exist, to the board of executive officers), a semiannual quantitative and qualitative report on the ombudsman department’s activities and its performance.
Whistleblowing and Hotline
Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 4,859, of October 23, 2020, financial institutions and other institutions licensed to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil are required to have a whistleblower hotline (canal de denúncias), through which their employees, customers, contractors, users and/or suppliers may anonymously report situations involving potential illicit activities of any nature related to the institution’s activities. Accordingly, financial institutions are required to appoint a responsible department for forwarding all reported events to the appropriate departments for further handling. This department is also required to prepare reports semi-annually detailing, at least, the following information relating to each reported event: (1) number of reported events and their nature; (2) the departments that handled them; and (3) the average timeframe and relevant measures adopted to solve them. Such reports must be (1) approved by the board of directors of the institution or, if one does not exist, the institution’s board of executive officers; and (2) made available to the Central Bank of Brazil for at least 5 years.
Foreign Investment in Brazilian Financial Institutions
According to Decree No. 10,029, of September 26, 2019, and Central Bank of Brazil Circular No. 3,977, of January 22, 2020, the execution of direct or indirect foreign investments in voting or non-voting equity interest in Brazilian financial institutions by any individual or legal entity, regardless of the nationality, requires prior approval of the Central Bank of Brazil. Until the enactment of such rules, the execution of such investments was subject to the enactment of a specific presidential decree on a case-by-case basis.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 165 |
| |
Corporate Interest Held by Financial Institutions in Other Legal Entities
Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 2,723, of May 31, 2000, as amended, financial institutions may only, directly or indirectly, hold equity interest in other legal entities (incorporated locally or offshore) that supplement or subsidize their activities, provided that they obtain prior authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil and that the invested entity does not hold, directly or indirectly, equity of the referred financial institution. However, this requirement does not apply to (1) equity interests typically held in the investment portfolios of investment banks, development banks, development agencies (agências de fomento) and multiservice banks with investment or development portfolios; and (2) temporary equity interests not registered as permanent assets and not subject to consolidation by the financial institution.
Change of Corporate Control and Qualified Equity Interest
Pursuant to the provisions of CMN Resolution No. 4,122 (for financial institutions, such as Nu Financeira, Nu DTVM and NuInvest) and the provisions of Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 81, of March 24, 2021 (for payment institutions, such as Nu Pagamentos), (“BCB Resolution 81/21”) the change, transfer or modification of the control of financial or payment institutions authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil must be submitted to the prior approval of the Central Bank of Brazil in accordance with the above mentioned regulations and such change, transfer or modification shall only be effected after such approval is duly obtained.
In addition, pursuant to the above mentioned rules, if an individual or legal entity acquires, directly or indirectly, a qualified equity interest (i.e., 15% or more of the total equity interest of a financial institution, or 15% or more of the voting equity interest or 10% or more of the total equity interest of a payment institution) or expands qualified equity interest previously acquired, such acquisitions shall be notified to the Central Bank of Brazil, which has the right to request documents and information, as well as order that the acquisition be regularized or undone in case of any irregularities.
New rules applicable to the authorizations and licensing of financial institutions
On November 25, 2021, CMN Resolution No. 4,970, or CMN Resolution No. 4,970/21 was issued, with the objective of modernizing and rationalizing the authorization processes within the sphere of the Central Bank of Brazil and which will enter into force on July 1, 2022.
In general, CMN Resolution No. 4,970/21 consolidates previously scattered rules into a single rule and standardizes the requirements for authorizations in relation to all regulated species. Furthermore, the rule authorizes the Central Bank of Brazil to adopt an approach based on the complexity of each segment and each license, so that the regulator may adopt procedures that are proportional to the risks of each segment.
Among other aspects, CMN Resolution No. 4,970/21 is aligned with BCB Resolution No. 81/21 (applicable to payment institutions) with regard to the definition of "qualified equity interest". According to the rule, the holder of a qualified interest will be the individual or legal entity that, while not being the controlling shareholder, holds: (1) direct equity equivalent to 15% (fifteen percent) or more of the voting capital of the institution; (2) direct equity equivalent to 10% (ten percent) or more of the total capital of the institution, when such capital does not consist entirely of voting capital; (3) control of a legal entity holding the equity provided in items (1) or (2); or (4) equity in the capital of a controlling legal entity of the institution, in the percentage provided in items (1) or (2).
Furthermore, CMN Resolution No. 4,970/21 clarifies the concepts of "controlling shareholder" and "controlling group", including situations in which the control cannot be identified only by the minimum percentages of corporate interest (i.e., majority of the voting capital of a joint stock company or 75% (seventy-five percent) of the capital stock of a limited liability company), but by the effective exercise of attributions, such as (1) the ownership of rights that ensure the majority of votes in corporate decisions and the power to elect the majority of the managers; or (2) the effective conduction of corporate business.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 166 |
| |
The situations in which the Central Bank of Brazil may shelve, without examining the merits, or reject an authorization request were also consolidated. There is also the possibility for the Central Bank of Brazil to review the authorization decision, based on the public interest, if there is a forgery or omission in the statements and documents, or circumstances prior to the decision that may affect the assessment of compliance with the applicable requirements.
Open Banking
According to CMN and Central Bank of Brazil Joint Resolution No. 1, of May 4, 2020, Open Banking is the standardized sharing of data, products and services by financial institutions, payment institutions and other institutions licensed to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil, at their customers’ discretion, through the opening and integration of their systems. Therefore, Open Banking is considered by the Central Bank of Brazil as an important tool for innovation in the financial and payments markets, and is expected to make such sectors more efficient, inclusive and competitive.
Open Banking is under gradual legal, operational and technological development and implementation in Brazil, according to certain stages defined by the Central Bank of Brazil that are expected to last until September 2022. Consequently, some of the applicable requirements and standards that will need to be complied with by Open Banking participants are still under discussion and preparation by a self-regulatory body created specifically for this purpose, as well as by the Central Bank of Brazil itself.
Instant Payment System
In 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil launched Pix, a payment system that allows real-time payments and transfers.
The main goals of the Central Bank of Brazil with Pix are to foster innovation and differentiated services that meet the needs of end-users, as well as expand and simplify the payment methods available, since less personal information is needed in order to materialize a payment or transfer. In this context, the Pix is an open ecosystem that various types of payment service providers can join.
On August 12, 2020, the Central Bank of Brazil published Resolution No. 1, which sets out implementation procedures and participation criteria for the Brazilian Instant Payments System (Sistema de Pagamentos Instantâneos, or “SPI”), and the Pix. This arrangement requires that all financial and payment institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil and which have more than 500,000 active customer accounts (including checking, savings and payment accounts) will mandatorily participate in the SPI and in the Pix.
Law No. 14,268/21
On December 30, 2021, Law No. 14.286, or "New Foreign Exchange Law", was published and is expected to become effective one year after such publication. Such law encompasses provisions regarding Brazilian capital abroad and foreign capital in the country.
The main purpose of the New Foreign Exchange Law is to provide for the liberalization of the Brazilian FX market, which faces a lot of regulatory complexity, as well as certain inconsistencies, modernize the system and enhance innovation and competition.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 167 |
| |
According to the Central Bank of Brazil, the new legislation has a positive impact on the attraction of foreign capital, both for investment in the financial and capital markets and for direct investment, including long-term investments and investments in infrastructure projects and concessions. In addition to greater international insertion, the New Foreign Exchange Law contributes to the greater international use of the Brazilian Real, facilitating the use of the domestic currency in international financial operations, such as the permission for the entry and remittance of payment orders in Brazilian Reais from Brazilian Reais denominated accounts of foreign institutions held in banks in the country.
The new legislation also consolidates more than 40 legal provisions that began to be issued about 100 years ago, which totaled more than 400 articles (many with archaic language). The new legislation is concise, with 29 articles and updated language, which we expect to bring a higher level of legal certainty. Additionally, the New Foreign Exchange Law stimulates the reduction of operational and legal structures of the participants of the foreign exchange market, with more efficient transactions and information sharing.
Brazilian financial institutions will also be allowed, in accordance with article 15 of the New Foreign Exchange Law, to allocate, invest and use the funds they raise, in Brazil and abroad, to carry out credit and financing transactions, both in Brazil and abroad. For this purpose, the regulatory and prudential requirements established by the CMN and by the Central Bank of Brazil must be observed.
Finally, there are changes in the scope of the rules for transactions carried out by individuals, such as the permission to trade foreign currency between individuals on an occasional, non-professional basis, with a limit of up to US$ 500. Currently, this type of operation is forbidden. It was also extended to US$ 10,000, or its equivalent in other currencies, the limit at which travelers entering or leaving Brazil must declare when carrying cash.
E-Commerce, Data Protection and Taxes
In addition to regulations affecting digital payment schemes, we are also subject to laws relating to Internet activities, e-commerce and data protection, as well as tax laws and other regulations applicable to Brazilian companies generally. Internet activities in Brazil are regulated by Brazilian Federal Law No. 12,965/14, as amended, known as the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, which embodies a substantial set of rights of Internet users, and obligations relating to Internet service providers. This law exempts intermediary platforms from liability for user-generated content in certain cases. On the other hand, this law provides for penalties (including fines) in case of non-compliance.
The laws and regulations applicable to the Brazilian digital payments industry and to the offering of financial services are subject to ongoing interpretation and change, and our digital payments business may become subject to regulation by other authorities. For further information on the risks relating to the regulation of business, please see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—We are subject to extensive regulation and regulatory and governmental oversight as a digital banking platform and as a payment institution. Compliance with or violation of present or future regulations could be costly, expose us to substantial liability and force us to change our business practices, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.”
Consumer Protection Laws
We are subject to several laws and regulations designed to protect consumer rights—most importantly, Brazilian Federal Law No. 8,078/90, as amended, (Código de Defesa do Consumidor, or the “Consumer Protection Code”), which sets forth the legal principles and requirements applicable to consumer relations in Brazil. This law regulates, among other things, commercial practices, product and service liability, strict liability of the supplier of products or services, reversal of the burden of proof to the benefit of consumers as the hypo sufficient party, the joint and several liability of all companies within the supply chain, abuse of rights in contractual clauses, advertising and information on products and services offered to the public. The Consumer Protection Code further establishes the consumers’ rights to access and modify personal information collected about them and stored in private databases. These consumer protection laws could result in substantial compliance costs.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 168 |
| |
Customer and User Relations
On October 18, 2021, the Central Bank of Brazil published Resolution BCB No. 155, or “Resolution BCB 155,” which sets forth rules and procedures regarding the relationship with customers and users of products and services by payment institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil. The new resolution became effective on October 1, 2022.
Resolution BCB 155 establishes new rules mainly with the objective of ensuring a fair and equitable treatment at all stages of the relationship with provider institutions of financial services and payments, as well as a convergence of the providers interests with those of their consumers. The resolution is in line with existing rules for financial institutions, which were recently consolidated in CMN Resolution No. 4,949, which came into force on March 1, 2022.
Pursuant to Resolution BCB 155, payment institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil will also draft and implement an institutional policy for their relationship with customers. This new policy should consolidate guidelines, strategic objectives and organizational values so that its activities are guided by ethical principles, accountability, transparency and diligence. Furthermore, Resolution BCB 155 provides that payment institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil shall appoint to said regulator the director responsible for compliance with the obligations provided for in Resolution BCB 155.
Finally, Resolution BCB 155 sets forth other obligations on payment institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil, such as observing transparency and suitability rules, which are aligned with the requirements already foreseen for financial institutions.
Data Privacy and Protection
With regard to the compliance with data protection regulations, besides the Brazilian Federal Constitution, we are subject to the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, the Consumer Protection Code, Bank Secrecy Law and the Brazilian Federal Law No. 13.709 of August 14, 2018, called the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, or the “LGPD”). We are also subject to intellectual property rules, and to tax laws and related obligations such as the rules governing the sharing of customer information with tax and financial authorities. It is unclear whether the tax and regulatory authorities would seek to obtain information regarding our customers. Any such request could come into conflict with the data protection rules, which could create risks for our business.
The Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet establishes principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil, including regulation about data privacy for Internet users.
In September 2020, the LGPD was entered into force, and its administrative sanctions provisions became effective in August 2021 under the Brazilian Federal Law No. 14,010/20. The LGPD establishes detailed rules to be observed in the maintenance and processing of personal data and provides, among other measures, rights to the data subjects, cases in which the processing of personal data is allowed, obligations and requirements relating to security incidents involving personal data and the transfer and sharing of personal data.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 169 |
| |
The LGPD further establishes penalties for non-compliance with its provisions, ranging from a warning and exclusion of personal data processed in an irregular way to fines or the prohibition from processing personal data. The LGPD also authorizes the creation of the ANPD, an authority that oversees compliance with the rules on data protection. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Intellectual Property, Privacy and Cybersecurity—Unauthorized disclosure of, improper access to, or destruction or modification of data through cybersecurity breaches, computer viruses or otherwise, or disruptions to our systems or services, could expose us to liability, protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation.”
Any additional privacy laws or regulations enacted or approved in Brazil or in other jurisdictions in which we operate could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Bank Secrecy
Brazilian financial and payment institutions are subject to bank secrecy rules, pursuant to Supplementary Law No. 105, of January 10, 2001, and CMN Resolution No. 4,282, of November 4, 2013. Such institutions are required to maintain the secrecy of their active and passive transactions and services provided, except for certain events, including, but not limited to: (1) disclosure of confidential information upon the express consent of the interested parties or when requested by judicial authorities; (2) exchange of information between financial institutions for recording purposes; (3) remittance of record information to credit protection agencies related to drawers of bad checks and borrowers in default; (4) communication of criminal or administrative offenses to competent authorities; and (5) if they are responsible for withholding and paying contributions, remittance of information to the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office required to identify taxpayers and global amounts involved in their transactions.
Cyber Security
Under CMN Resolution No. 4,893, of February 26, 2021, and Central Bank of Brazil Resolution No. 85, of April 8, 2021, financial and payment institutions, respectively, must comply with cybersecurity requirements set forth therein applicable to the engagement of data processing and storage, and cloud computing service providers in Brazil and offshore, as well as implement policies, and accident response and action plans.
Environmental Regulation
CMN Resolution No. 4,327, of April 25, 2014, or “CMN Resolution No. 4,327,” currently provides for minimum requirements for social and environmental responsibility policies to be implemented by financial institutions and other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil. Thus, social and environmental risks and data on financial losses associated with social and environmental damage must be evaluated. The Central Bank of Brazil is responsible for overseeing the implementation of this regulation.
Pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 4,327, financial conglomerates are allowed to set up a single social and environmental responsibility policy for all institutions participating in such conglomerates. Furthermore, the establishment and implementation of said policy must take into account the nature of the institution and the complexity of its activities and financial services and products.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 170 |
| |
CMN Resolution No. 4,327/14 was repealed by CMN Resolution No. 4,945/21, with effectiveness from July 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022, especially to include provisions regarding the climate. See "—ESG aspects in financial institutions."
Environmental Accountability
Pursuant to article 225, paragraph 3 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution, any individual or legal entity that causes damage to the environment, directly or indirectly, such as financial institutions, will be subject to administrative and criminal sanctions, without prejudice to the obligation to repair damages caused in the civil sphere. Such provisions are regulated at the federal level by three rules: (i) Federal Law No. 6,938, of August 31, 1981, or the National Environmental Policy; (ii) the Environmental Crimes Law and (iii) Federal Decree No. 6,514, of July 22, 2008 (administrative sanctions to the environment).
The National Environmental Policy establishes the general framework and guidelines for environmental protection, as well as important concepts, such as the definitions of “pollution” and “indirect polluter” and the establishment of objective civil liability for the repair of environmental damage in the civil sphere. Financial institutions may be classified as indirect polluters and, therefore, subject to the three spheres of responsibility.
Environmental responsibility can occur in three different and independent spheres: (i) administrative; (ii) civil; and (iii) criminal. With regard to administrative liability, any action or omission that results in the violation of a rule for the preservation of the environment resulting from fault or intent, regardless of the actual occurrence of environmental damage, is considered an environmental administrative infraction. Administrative infractions are punished with: warning; simple fine in the amount of up to R$50 million; daily fine; partial or total suspension of activities; restriction of rights; and embargo among others.
In the civil sphere, environmental damages imply strict and joint liability. This means that the obligation to repair the degradation caused may affect everyone involved, directly or indirectly, regardless of the agents’ attestation of fault, just by demonstrating the causal link, and one of the agents may fully answer for the environmental damage. In this scenario, if more than one company has contributed to damage to the environment, or the damage has been committed by a service provider or supplier, the one with the greatest financial ability to do so may be required to remediate or pay compensation, with later, right of recourse against the other companies involved. There is no provision in Brazilian legislation for a cap or limitation on the amount to be set as compensation for environmental damage, which will be proportional to the damage caused. In addition, according to the consolidated position of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court, claims for reparation or compensation for environmental damage are not subject to a statute of limitations.
Additionally, the Environmental Crimes Law provides for the possibility of disregarding the legal personality, in relation to the legal entity causing the environmental infringement, whenever this is an obstacle to the reimbursement of damages caused to the environment. As a result, when third parties are hired to carry out any intervention in the operations, there is no exemption from liability for any environmental damage caused by these third parties.
Criminal liability for environmental crimes is subjective, which means that the offender will only be penalized if he or she acts with intent or guilt. The Environmental Crimes Law provides for the accountability of all those who, in any way, participate in the practice of crimes against the environment, each being penalized to the extent of their guilt. Such law also provides for liability in the criminal sphere for both individuals and legal entities, characterized if the offense is committed: (i) by decision of its legal obligations and requirements relating to security incidents involving personal data and the transfer and sharing of personal data.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 171 |
| |
The liability of the legal entity does not exclude that of individuals, plaintiffs, co-authors or participants, which extends the liability of such acts to members of legal entities that participated in such decisions or omitted to do so, when they could avoid the damages arising therefrom.
ESG Aspects in Financial Institutions
On September 15, 2021, as a result of Public Consultation Nos. 85 and 86 of April 2021, the CMN and the Central Bank of Brazil published resolutions that aim to improve disclosure, management and governance of social, environmental and climate risks by financial institutions, in line with the "Sustainability" pillar of the "BC# Agenda".
CMN Resolution No. 4,943 amended CMN Resolution No. 4,557/17 on the risk and capital management framework and disclosure policy of institutions regulated by the Central Bank of Brazil. It did so to, among other relevant provisions, highlight and distinguish social, environmental and climate risks as requiring identification, measurement, assessment, monitoring, reporting, control and mitigation within the risk management framework of financial institutions. The new rule defines such risks, bringing new and modern concepts to the sector, such as the inclusion of the two main components of climate risks - the physical and the transition - already recognized in international standards on the subject. The emphasis given by the standard to the inclusion of mechanisms to identify and monitor social, environmental and climate risks incurred by the financial institution resulting not only from its products, services and activities, but also from the activities performed by its counterparts, controlled entities, suppliers and outsourced service providers of the institution, providing a new supply chain vision to the issues it addresses. The adoption of a governance structure and criteria for this management and its continuous monitoring are also detailed in the resolution, in line with market trends.
Similar provisions were also inserted in the simplified continuous risk management structure referring to the Simplified Reference Equity (PRS5) by the new CMN Resolution No. 4,944, which amends CMN Resolution No. 4,606.
CMN Resolution No. 4,945 replaces CMN Resolution No. 4,327/2014, on the Socio-environmental Responsibility Policy (PRSA). The new standard includes the climate aspect, to require financial institutions (segments S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5) to prepare and implement a Social, Environmental and Climate Responsibility Policy (PRSAC). Financial institutions are now expressly required to consider the impacts, strategic objectives and business opportunities related to social, environmental and climate aspects. There was also a reduction in the PRSA review period, from five to three years.
BCB Resolution No. 139 of September 15, 2021 regulates the preparation of the Report on Social, Environmental and Climate Risks and Opportunities (GRSAC Report) by financial institutions in Segments 1 (S1), 2 (S2), 3 (S3) and 4 (S4). This Resolution seeks to address the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) at the national regulatory level. The GRSAC Report must be disclosed annually with a base date of December 31, observing a maximum period of 90 days counted as of December 31 and must be made available on the financial institution's website for a period of five years.
Finally, to allow financial institutions to adapt their practices and policies to the new provisions, CMN Resolution No. 4,943/2021 and article 16 of CMN Resolution No. 4,945/2021 (which repeals CMN Resolution No. 4,327/2014) will come into force on July 1, 2022, while CMN Resolution No. 4,944/2021, the other provisions of CMN Resolution No. 4,945/2021 and BCB Resolution No. 139/2021 will come into force on December 1, 2022. BCB Resolution No. 140/2021, which deals specifically with rural credit, came into force on October 1, 2021.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 172 |
| |
Registration of BDRs with the CVM
The rules enacted by CMN, the Central Bank of Brazil and CVM require that the depositary file the relevant BDR program with the CVM and the Central Bank of Brazil for purposes of enabling remittances of funds to and from Brazil in connection with the offer and sale of BDRs in Brazil, the sale of the underlying shares offshore and the payment of dividends and other distributions to holders of the BDRs. These rules further require that any such remittances be registered with the Central Bank of Brazil by the engaged custodian on behalf of the depositary. The remittance of funds offshore in connection with the offer and sale of the BDRs in Brazil is limited to the proceeds from the sale of such BDRs in a Brazilian market regulated by the CVM, net of commissions and other related expenses.
As a general rule, the BDRs may be redeemed for the purposes of selling the underlying shares offshore. The proceeds from any such sale may not be used for other investments outside Brazil and must be repatriated within seven days from the date in which the BDRs are redeemed. Foreign investors purchasing BDRs pursuant to the provisions of CMN Resolution No. 4,373 are not subject to such a repatriation requirement, but must record any such redemption with the Central Bank of Brazil. Dividends and other distributions made to Brazilian residents in connection with the BDRs must be repatriated, but may be applied to the acquisition of additional underlying shares. Individuals domiciled in Brazil and non-financial institutions, investment funds and other investment companies incorporated in Brazil may purchase shares issued offshore by sponsors of BDR programs in Brazil for purposes of depositing such shares with the relevant custodian and request the issuance of BDRs in Brazil. The depositary is responsible for maintaining and updating the registration of the BDR program with the Central Bank of Brazil, including the flow of funds in connection with redemptions and payments of dividends and other distributions.
In connection with our registration as a publicly-held company and the listing of our BDRs in Brazil, we will have to comply with certain disclosure requirements. As a result, we are required to file with the CVM: (i) on an annual basis, a reference form (formulário de referência) in Portuguese by the fourth month of each year, which summarizes our financial, legal and operating information; (ii) quarterly financial information with 45 days after the end of each quarter; and (iii) on an ongoing basis, reports disclosing limited information on call notices and minutes of general meetings as well as material facts and notices to the market, as required by applicable rules.
Other Countries
We also have operations outside of Brazil, including in Mexico and Colombia, along with information technology and business support operations in Argentina, Germany and the United States. In particular, in Mexico, our products are offered by both a financial institution (subject to the Popular Savings and Credit Law) and a commercial entity. Similar to financial entities in Brazil, financial entities in Mexico are subject to extensive regulation and the oversight of the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria de Valores, or the “CNBV”). Mexican authorities have been reviewing the regulations applicable to financial entities (and enacted the Fintech Law in 2018) and closely supervise financial technology companies.
Furthermore, on December 10, 2020, our subsidiary Nu Tecnologia entered into a purchase agreement for the acquisition of 100% of Akala, a Mexico-based financial cooperative association engaged in fundraising and financial services, inoperative since 2018 but with a valid “SOFIPO” license. The main characteristic of a SOFIPO-type license is to enable institutions to take deposits from customers, while having fewer assets and lower capital requirements compared to banks. On December 18, 2020, we submitted a change of control request with respect to Akala to the CNBV, and in September 2021, the acquisition closed.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 173 |
| |
In Colombia, our credit card product is offered by a commercial entity that is subject to extensive regulation, including those governing consumer protection (namely Law No. 1,480 of 2011, Decree No. 1,074 of 2015 and the Sole Circular of the Industry and Trade Superintendence) and data protection (Law No. 1,581 of 2012). In addition, interest rates in Colombia are capped, as provided in the Colombian Commercial and Criminal Codes. Our activities in Colombia are subject to the supervision of the Industry and Trade Superintendence with regards to consumer relations, data protection and antitrust. Furthermore, the Colombian Financial Regulatory Unit, URF, has proposed various changes to financial regulations that may be implemented in the future and affect our Colombian operations.
In the EU, on account of our employees based in Germany, we are subject to the GDPR, as described in greater detail in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—We are subject to costs and risks associated with enhanced or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to data privacy, security and protection. Developments in these and other laws and regulations could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.”
For more information regarding the laws and regulations applicable to our business, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation.”
C. Organizational Structure
Our group is currently composed of 41 entities, including Nu Holdings Ltd. and our 40 subsidiaries, 21 of which are incorporated in Brazil, and the remainder of which are incorporated in other countries. None of our subsidiaries is licensed to operate as a bank. Our significant subsidiaries and a summary of their operations are as follows:
Nu Pagamentos S.A. – Instituição de Pagamento, or “Nu Pagamentos”
Nu Pagamentos, our 100%-owned indirect subsidiary organized in Brazil, is primarily engaged in the issuance and administration of credit cards and payment transfers through prepaid accounts. Nu Pagamentos is a regulated payment institution under Brazilian law authorized to operate in such capacity by the Central Bank of Brazil.
Nu Financeira S.A. – SCFI, or “Nu Financeira”
Nu Financeira, our 100%-owned indirect subsidiary organized in Brazil, launched in February 2019 and offers personal loans as its main product. Nu Financeira is a regulated financial institution under Brazilian law authorized to operate in such capacity by the Central Bank of Brazil.
Nu BN Servicios México, S.A. de CV, or “Nu Servicios”
Nu Servicios, our 99.9%-owned indirect subsidiary organized in Mexico, is engaged in the issuance and administration of credit cards. Nu Servicios operates as a regulated financial institution under the oversight of the CNBV.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 174 |
| |
Nu Colombia S.A., or “Nu Colombia”
Nu Colombia, our 100%-owned indirect subsidiary organized in Colombia, launched in September 2020 with operations related to credit cards. Nu Colombia is a regulated commercial entity operating subject to the supervision of the Colombian Superintendence of Industry and Commerce, or “SIC,” a public authority and a technical agency attached to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Tourism of Colombia.
Nu Invest Corretora de Valores S.A, or “Nu Invest”
Nu Invest, our 100%-owned indirect subsidiary organized in Brazil, is engaged in digital investment platform Nu Invest operates as a regulated broker dealer under the oversight of the Central Bank of Brazil.
A simplified organizational chart showing our corporate structure is set forth below.
| 1. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Brazil consist of Nu Pagamentos S.A. – Instituição de Pagamento, Nu Financeira S.A. – SCFI, Nu Asset Management Ltda., Nu Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliarios Ltda., Nu Produtos Ltda., the Easynvest Companies, Internet – Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multiestratégia, Nu Plataformas – Intermediação de Negocios e Serviços Ltda., Nu Crypto Ltda., Instituto Nu, Fundo de Investimento em Direitos Creditórios NU, Nu Fundo de Investimento Renda Fixa, Fundo de Investimento Ostrum Soberano Renda Fixa Referenciado DI and Nu Fundo de Investimentos em Ações,Spin Pay Serviços de Pagamentos Ltda., Olivia AI, Inc., Olivia AI do Brasil Participações Ltda. and Olivia AI do Brasil - Instituição de Pagamento Ltda. |
| 2. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Colombia consist of Nu Colombia S.A. |
| 3. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Mexico consist of Nu BN México, S.A. de C.V., Nu BN Servicios México, S.A. de C.V., Nu BN Tecnologia, S.A. de C.V and Nu México Financiera, S.A. de C.V., SOFIPO. |
| 4. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Argentina consist of Nu Argentina S.A. |
| 5. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Germany consist of Nu Finanztechnologie GmbH. |
| 6. | Nu subsidiaries organized in Uruguay consist of Nu Tecnologia S.A. and NUPLAT, S.A. |
| 7. | Nu subsidiaries organized in the United States consist of Nu 1-B, LLC, Nu 2-B, LLC, Nu 3-B, LLC, Nu 1-A, LLC, Nu 2-A, LLC, Nu 3-A, LLC, Nu Payments, LLC, Nu MX LLC and Cognitect, Inc. |
| 8. | Other Nu subsidiaries consist of Nu Cayman Ltd., organized in the Cayman Islands. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 175 |
| |
For more details about our organization structure please refer to see “Item 4. History and development of the company” and note 3 – Basis of consolidation to our consolidated financial statements.
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of trademark, domain names and trade secret laws, as well as employee and third-party nondisclosure, confidentiality and other types of contractual arrangements to establish, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, including with respect to our proprietary rights related to our products and services. In addition, we license technology from third parties.
As of December 31, 2021, we did not own any Brazil-issued patents or copyrights. However, we filed a patent application on May 10, 2021 for the ultraviolet card feature before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or "USPTO," and the Patent Cooperation Treaty system, which was granted by the USPTO on January 25, 2022. Also, we own a number of trademarks including Nu, NUBANK and its variations, and other valuable trademarks and designs covering various brands, products and services, including the credit card, the account, insurance and other services provided by Nu. We also own a number of domain names registered in Brazil, including “nubank.com.br” and “nu.com.br”, and abroad such as “nu.com.mx” and “nu.com.co”.
As of December 31, 2021, our application to register the trademark “Nu” in the United States is pending approval by the relevant authority. We have already obtained registration in class 36 in the United States for the trademark “NUBANK”.
Moreover, as of the date of this annual report, we own the “Datomic” software, which was developed internally by Cognitect. “Datomic” is a database management operating system for domain-specific transactional data, which was also developed using Java and Clojure programming language, which is open source. We use “Datomic” for various purposes that range from storing registration data to storing metadata. We also own the software for the “App Nubank” mobile application, which is used by our customers to access our services, and was developed internally by us.
Properties
Our operational headquarters are located in the city of São Paulo, state of São Paulo, Brazil, which includes the majority of our product development, sales, marketing, and business operations. Our principal executive offices consist of approximately 111,912 square feet of space under a lease that expires in September 2023. We also have leased offices in several other locations, including offshore in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Germany and the United States, and believe our facilities are sufficient for our current needs. The table below sets forth additional information regarding our offices in each country:
|
Name |
Location |
Type |
Ownership |
Size(in sq. feet) |
| HQ1 | São Paulo, Brazil | Office | Leased | 111,912 |
| HQ2 | São Paulo, Brazil | Office | Leased | 58,364 |
| HQ3 | São Paulo, Brazil | Warehouse | Leased | 4,299 |
| HQ5 Coworking | São Paulo, Brazil | Office | Leased | 39,826 |
| NuInvest | São Paulo, Brazil | Office | Leased | 36,189 |
| Spin Pay Campinas Coworking | Sao Paulo, Brazil | Office | Leased | 582,00 |
| Salvador | Salvador, Brazil | Office | Leased | 25,407 |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 176 |
| |
| Mexico – Main Office | CDMX, Mexico | Office | Subleased | 16,211 |
| Mexico – SPEI 1 Coworking | CDMX, Mexico | Office | Leased | 258 |
| Mexico – SPEI 2 Coworking | Querétaro, Mexico | Office | Leased | 108 |
| Spaces 80 Coworking | Bogota, Colombia | Office | Leased | 1,658 |
| HIT Coworking | Buenos Aires, Argentina | Office | Leased | 539 |
| Knotel Coworking | Berlin, Germany | Office | Leased | 5,705 |
| Cognitect | Durham, USA | Office | Leased | 3,778 |
| Tyson | Washington, D.C. USA | Coworking | Leased | 538 |
| Total | 307,340 |
As of December 31, 2021, we had a services agreement with a data center service provider for the provision of data services to us from its data centers in São Paulo, Brazil, and different locations in the United States. We believe that our facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as presently conducted, however, we periodically review our facility requirements and may acquire new space to meet the needs of our business or consolidate and dispose of facilities that are no longer required.
Item 4A. Unresolved staff comments
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 177 |
| |
Item 5. Operating and financial review and prospects
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this annual report.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 178 |
| |
A. Operating Results
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following tables set forth, for the periods and as of the dates indicated, our selected consolidated financial data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report.
The selected statements of financial position as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the selected statements of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report, prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.
Statement of Profit or Loss Data
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 | |
| (in US$ millions, except amounts per share) | |||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments | 1,046.7 | 382.9 | 337.9 |
| Fee and commission income |
651.3 |
354.2 |
274.2 |
| Total revenue |
1,698.0 |
737.1 |
612.1 |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (367.4) | (113.9) | (109.7) |
| Transactional expenses | (117.1) | (126.8) | (79.3) |
| Credit loss allowance expenses |
(480.6) |
(169.5) |
(175.2) |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided |
(965.1) |
(410.2) |
(364.2) |
| Gross profit |
732.9 |
326.9 |
247.9 |
| Operating Expenses | |||
| Customer support and operations | (190.5) | (124.0) | (115.6) |
| General and administrative expenses | (628.9) | (266.0) | (199.9) |
| Marketing expenses | (79.6) | (19.4) | (41.8) |
| Other income (expenses) |
(4.1) |
(9.5) |
(19.9) |
| Total operating expenses |
(903.1) |
(418.9) |
(377.2) |
| Finance costs – results with convertible instruments |
— |
(101.2) |
— |
| Loss before income taxes |
(170.2) |
(193.2) |
(129.3) |
| Income Taxes | |||
| Current taxes | (219.8) | (22.3) | (3.6) |
| Deferred taxes |
224.7 |
44.0 |
40.4 |
| Total income taxes |
4.9 |
21.7 |
36.8 |
| Loss for the year |
(165.3) |
(171.5) |
(92.5) |
| Loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
(165.0) |
(171.5) | (92.5) |
| Loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (0.3) | — | — |
| Loss Per Share | |||
| Loss per share – Basic and Diluted (US$) | (0.10) | (0.13) | (0.08) |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 179 |
| |
Statement of Financial Position Data
|
2021 |
2020 | |
|
(in US$ millions) | ||
| Assets | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,705.7 | 2,343.8 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss |
918.4 |
4,378.2 |
| Securities | 816.0 | 4,287.3 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 101.3 | 0.1 |
| Collateral for credit card operations | 1.1 | 90.8 |
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income |
8,163.4 |
— |
| Securities | 8,163.4 | — |
| Financial assets at amortized cost |
6,932.5 |
3,150.0 |
| Compulsory deposits at central banks | 938.7 | 43.5 |
| Credit card receivables | 4,780.5 | 2,908.9 |
| Loans to customers | 1,194.8 | 174.7 |
| Interbank transactions | — | — |
| Other financial assets at amortized cost | 18.5 | 22.9 |
| Other assets | 283.3 | 123.5 |
| Deferred tax assets | 360.8 | 125.1 |
| Right-of-use assets | 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14.1 | 9.9 |
| Intangible assets | 72.3 | 12.4 |
| Goodwill |
401.9 |
0.8 |
| Total assets |
19,858.8 |
10,154.4 |
| Liabilities | ||
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss |
102.4 |
90.8 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 87.3 | 75.3 |
| Instruments eligible as capital | 12.1 | 15.5 |
| Repurchase agreements | 3.0 | — |
| Financial liabilities at amortized cost |
14,706.7 |
9,421.8 |
| Deposits | 9,667.3 | 5,584.9 |
| Payables to credit card network | 4,882.2 | 3,331.3 |
| Borrowings and financing | 147.2 | 97.5 |
| Securitized borrowings | 10.0 | 79.7 |
| Senior preferred shares | — | 328.4 |
| Salaries, allowances and social security contributions | 97.9 | 25.8 |
| Tax liabilities | 241.2 | 30.8 |
| Lease liabilities | 7.6 | 12.0 |
| Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings | 18.1 | 16.5 |
| Deferred income | 30.7 | 26.0 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 29.3 | 8.7 |
| Other liabilities |
182.3 |
83.9 |
| Total liabilities |
15,416.2 |
9,716.3 |
| Equity | ||
| Share capital | 0.1 | — |
| Share premium reserve | 4,678.6 | 638.0 |
| Accumulated gains (losses) | (128.4) | (102.4) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(109.2) |
(97.5) |
| Equity attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
4,441.1 |
438.1 |
| Equity attributable to non-controlling interest |
1.5 |
— |
| Total equity |
4,442.6 |
438.1 |
| Total liabilities and equity |
19,858.8 |
10,154.4 |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 180 |
| |
Overview
Our Mission and Vision
Our mission is to fight complexity to empower people in their daily lives.
In 2013, we chose to begin our journey by disrupting the financial services market in Latin America, the market value of which we estimate reached approximately US$1 trillion in 2021. This opportunity includes approximately 650 million people in Latin America according to the World Bank, many of whom we believe are underbanked and deeply unsatisfied with their legacy bank relationships, or completely unbanked.
We are in the early stages of technology companies revolutionizing a broad range of services by putting the customer at the center of their strategies and architecting experiences based on mobile-first and cloud-based models. We believe that new technology-driven companies can capture market share from legacy providers across all industries, expand the size of addressable opportunities and operate with superior economics. We also believe there is a significant opportunity to use the latest technologies and business practices to create new and more user-friendly experiences for individual consumers and SMEs that are simple, intuitive, convenient, low-cost, empowering and human.
As we pursue our mission of empowerment, we are building a company focused on connecting profit to purpose in order to create value for all our stakeholders and deliver a positive impact on the communities we serve.
Welcome to Nu
We believe that Nu is one of the world’s largest digital banking platforms, and one of the leading technology companies in the world, with 53.9 million customers across Brazil, Mexico and Colombia as of December 31, 2021. We are building our business based on four core principles: (1) a highly curated customer-centric culture that permeates everything we do; (2) the prioritization of human-centric design across all of our mobile apps, products, services and interactions to create extraordinary customer experiences; (3) the development of advanced proprietary technologies built from the ground up by some of the best talent from around the world; and (4) the utilization and optimization of data science and powerful proprietary models that support every aspect of our business. We combine these to create a self-reinforcing business model that we believe enables us to serve our ecosystem of customers and partners more effectively as we grow, to generate significant impact to our stakeholders and sustainable competitive advantages in the marketplace.
We have developed a growing suite of essential and high engagement financial solutions designed to create superior customer experiences across the Five Financial Seasons of a consumer or SME customer’s journey. These include (1) spending with our credit and debit cards, QR code-based and PIX instant payment arrangements, WhatsApp Pay and traditional wire transfers; (2) saving with our Nu personal and business accounts; (3) investing with our direct-to-consumer NuInvest digital investment platform; (4) borrowing with our transparent, easy-to-manage credit cards and personal loans with limits that grow over time as users build their credit histories with us; and (5) protecting with our insurance solutions. We have also broadened our ecosystem by adding products and services from marketplace partners to our platform, such as mobile phone top-ups, foreign remittances and secured loan products, all under the Nu brand and with the same customer experience as with our proprietary products.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 181 |
| |
As of December 31, 2021, we served a broad customer base of 52.5 million individual consumers and almost 1.4 million small and medium-sized enterprises, or “SMEs.” Our customer base is well diversified across various demographic measures, such as income, age and geographical dispersion, and relatively in line with the overall adult populations of our markets, although we believe our customers are generally younger than those of incumbent financial institutions. Based on internal research as well as an analysis by Oliver Wyman, as of October, 2021, 59% of our customers were under 35 years old, compared to 30% for traditional banks. In addition, 80% of our customers were under 45 years old, compared to 52% for incumbent banks. Our young and growing customer base provides us with significant opportunities to grow with our customers who are in the early stages of their financial journeys. For example, our younger customers (ages 20-24 years old) are expected to grow their real income by about 70% over the next ten years (based on a comparison of our younger customers’ income to the income reported by our customers who are between 30-34 years old), and we believe we are well positioned to serve their needs as they accumulate wealth, increase spending and reach life milestones that expand their financial needs.
In the year ended December 31, 2021, we reported total revenue of US$1.7 billion, an increase of 130.4% compared to US$737.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 (or an increase of 138.0% compared to US$713.3 million on an FX Neutral basis). In the year ended December 31, 2021, we reported gross profit of US$732.9 million, an increase of 124.2% compared to US$326.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 (or an increase of 131.6%, compared to US$316.4 million on an FX Neutral basis).
In the year ended December 31, 2020, we reported total revenue of US$737.1 million (or US$713.3 million on an FX Neutral basis), an increase of 20.4% compared to US$612.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 (or an increase of 59.7% compared to US$446.7 million on an FX Neutral basis). In the year ended December 31, 2020, we reported gross profit of US$326.9 million (or US$316.4 million on an FX Neutral basis), an increase of 31.9% compared to US$247.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 (or an increase of 74.9%, compared to US$180.9 million on an FX Neutral basis). For more information, see “—Key Business Metrics” and “—Results of Operations.”
Our Self-Reinforcing Model
We have reinvented how to attract, serve and retain retail banking customers digitally. We believe in the use of data and technology to create a fundamentally different cost structure, which then enables us to offer a superior customer experience irrespective of income or social class, while at the same time benefiting from strong unit economics.
Our model benefits from low costs across four dimensions:
Low Cost to Acquire—We acquired approximately 80%-90% of our customers organically on average per year since our inception, either through word-of-mouth or a direct unpaid referral from an existing customer without incurring direct marketing expenses. As a result, our customer acquisition costs are low. Our CAC for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$5.4 per customer (of which paid marketing accounted for approximately 23%), compared to US$3.8 per customer for the year ended December 31, 2020 (of which paid marketing accounted for approximately 20%), all on an FX Neutral basis. Based on our internal research and publicly available information, we believe our CAC is one of the lowest across consumer FinTech companies in the world. Our CAC includes: printing and shipping of a card, credit data costs (primarily consisting of credit bureau costs) and paid marketing.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 182 |
| |
Low Cost to Serve—Our all-digital, cloud-based platform is low cost, highly efficient and scalable. As a result, we estimate that our cost to serve and general and administrative expense per active customer is approximately 85% lower than those of incumbent financial institutions in Brazil, based on their publicly available financial statements. These institutions are burdened by their large physical branch networks and high employee to customer ratios. In Brazil, incumbent banks had, on average, one employee per 1,000 customers (according to publicly available data), one-twelfth of our ratio of customers per employee, which was one employee per approximately 12,000 customers as of December 31, 2020.
Low Cost of Risk—As we have scaled, we have leveraged our growing pool of proprietary data and our NuX credit engine to underwrite customers more effectively, lower fraud rates and lower our overall cost of risk. Credit limits are optimized at a consumer level using our credit underwriting engine that balances the expected marginal revenue and expected marginal loss associated with incremental limits, including the undrawn portion of credit lines, under a worsening economic scenario. In addition, we pursue a “low and grow” strategy with credit limits: we grant lower limits to new customers who we assess as higher risk and then increase those limits selectively based on a positive usage and repayment track record. As of December 31, 2021, we had a 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate of 3.5%, which is defined as the sum of outstanding credit balances with at least one payment past due for 90 days, divided by the total credit balance, excluding balances past due for 360 days, approximately 29% lower than the Brazilian industry average of 5.0%, according to a report issued by the Central Bank of Brazil. As illustrated below, in the first half of 2020, the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw a temporary increase in our delinquency levels, in line with market trends. By the end of 2020, also in line with market trends, our levels had improved relative to our own pre-COVID-19 delinquency levels, driven primarily by COVID-19 related government assistance to consumers and increased consumer saving rates. For additional information on portfolio risk quality distribution and ECL movements, see Notes 13 and 14 to our annual consolidated financial statements.
Low Cost of Funding—As a result of the trust our customers have in us and our growing relevance in our customers’ primary banking relationship we have amassed a large and growing pool of customer deposits since the introduction of our NuAccount in 2017, which has supported our funding needs and reduced our funding costs over time. As of December 31, 2021, we had US$9.7 billion of deposits, all of which were acquired directly, without the use of third-party brokers or intermediaries. For more information on our definition and measurement of primary banking relationship, see “—Factors Affecting Our Performance—Our ability to increase transactions and expand revenue from existing customers.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 183 |
| |
We earn revenue from two main sources:
Interest Income and Gains (Losses) on Financial Instruments—We earn interest income from the interest that we charge on revolving and refinanced credit card balances and personal loans, as well as the interest we earn on our cash. We invest our cash primarily in government bonds that have been highly liquid, and we recognize gains or losses related to fair value changes in these instruments. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments represented 61.6% and 51.9% of total revenue, respectively. The size of our interest bearing portfolio was US$2.0 billion as of December 31, 2021 and US$0.5 billion as of December 31, 2020, and we earned US$1.05 billion of interest income and gains (losses) of financial instruments for the year ended December 31, 2021 and US$0.38 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Fees and Commission Income—Our fees and commission income are closely correlated to the usage of our products. The majority of our fee-based revenue comes from interchange fees which we earn when our customers make purchases using our cards in credit or debit purchases. These fees are set by Mastercard and paid by the merchants who accept our cards. As a result, our customers do not pay these fees, and we are able to offer a core credit card with no annual fees. Fees earned on credit card purchases are higher than those earned on debit purchases and both vary across the geographies we operate in. In addition, we earn revenue from customer subscriptions to our loyalty programs, late payment fees, prepaid mobile phone top-ups, and commissions from our partners for the distribution of certain financial products and services such as investments (brokerage and asset management), insurance and international remittance. For the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, fee and commission income represented 38.4% and 48.1% of total revenue, respectively. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—Certain ongoing legislative and regulatory initiatives under discussion by the Brazilian Congress, the Central Bank of Brazil and the broader payments industry may result in changes to the regulatory framework of the Brazilian payments and financial industries, which may have an adverse effect on our business and cause us to incur increased compliance costs” for a discussion of potential regulatory changes that, if enacted, could cap the interchange fees that we earn and negatively impact our revenue.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 184 |
| |
Our Advantaged Unit Economics
The self-reinforcing nature of our business model and our low operating costs have helped us generate strong unit economic performance, which we believe provides us with several competitive advantages that include: (1) increasing revenue per customer; (2) high customer engagement; and (3) low customer churn.
The chart below measures the cumulative contribution margin per customer for our customers in Brazil less the customer acquisition costs to acquire those customers across quarterly cohorts from the first quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2021. We define contribution margin as the sum of revenue from our credit card, personal lending and NuAccount products, less variable expenses (consisting of interest and other financial expenses, transactional expenses and credit loss allowance expenses) directly associated with this revenue. Our customer acquisition costs consist of printing and shipping of cards, credit data costs (primarily consisting of credit bureau costs) and paid marketing. We look at this data all on a per customer level based on the number of customers acquired in the initial quarter and use this number of customers throughout the period of analysis. To calculate the amounts included in the chart below on an FX Neutral basis, we apply the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 (R$5.396 to US$1.00) throughout, so as to present these amounts as they would have been had exchange rates remained stable over all periods presented.
Our cohorts highlight that we have been able to recover our customer acquisition costs in fewer than 12 months on average, and that we have been able to continue to expand contribution margin from our cohorts over time as our customers stay and grow with us. This ability to keep growing contribution margin from our customers leads to significant LTV and combined with our low CAC has resulted in a strong LTV/CAC ratio. We estimate our LTV/CAC ratio to be greater than 30x. We intend to continue to invest in acquiring new customers and growing our existing customer base with our advantaged unit economics.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 185 |
| |
Key Business Metrics
The following table sets forth our key business metrics as of and for the periods indicated. We review these key business metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate business plans, and make strategic decisions. In addition, these additional business metrics are presented to assist investors to better understand our business and how it operates.
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 | |
| Customers Metrics | |||
| Number of customers (in millions)(1) | 53.9 | 33.3 | 20.1 |
| Number of customers growth(1) | 62% | 66% | 234% |
| Monthly active customers (in millions)(2) | 41.1 | 21.8 | 12.1 |
| Activity rate(3) | 76% | 66% | 61% |
| Customer Activity Metrics | |||
| Purchase volume (in US$ billions)(4) | 43.8 | 22.5 | 17.1 |
| Purchase volume growth (%)(4) | 95% | 32% | 78% |
| Monthly average revenue per active customer (in US$)(5) | 4.5 | 3.6 | 5.9 |
| Monthly average cost to serve per active customer (in US$)(6) | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| FX Neutral | |||
| Purchase volume (in US$ billions)(4) | 43.8 | 21.7 | 12.5 |
| Purchase volume growth (%)(4) | 102% | 74% | 99% |
| Monthly average revenue per active customer (in US$)(5) | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.3 |
| Monthly average cost to serve per active customer (in US$)(6) | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Customer Balances | |||
| Deposits (in US$ billions) | 9.7 | 5.6 | 2.7 |
| Deposits growth (%)(8) | 73% | 107% | 350% |
| Interest-earning portfolio (in US$ billions)(7) | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Interest-earning portfolio growth (%)(7) | 317% | 21% | 91% |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 186 |
| |
| FX Neutral | |||
| Deposits (in US$ billions)(8) | 9.7 | 5.2 | 1.9 |
| Deposits growth (%)(8) | 87% | 174% | 375% |
| Interest-earning portfolio (in US$ billions)(7) | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Interest-earning portfolio growth (%)(7) | 343% | 59% | 190% |
| Company Financial Metrics | |||
| Revenue (in US$ millions) | 1,698.0 | 737.1 | 612.1 |
| Revenue growth (%)(11) | 130% | 20% | 92% |
| Gross profit (in US$ millions) | 732.9 | 326.9 | 247.9 |
| Gross profit margin (%) | 43.2% | 44.3% | 40.4% |
| Credit loss allowance expenses / credit portfolio (%)(9) | 7.3% | 5.1% | 5.7% |
| Loss (in US$ millions) | (165.3) | (171.5) | (92.5) |
| Adjusted Net Income (Loss) (in US$ millions)(10) | 6.6 | (26.8) | (74.2) |
| FX Neutral | |||
| Revenue (in US$ millions)(11) | 1,698.0 | 713.3 | 446.7 |
| Revenue growth (%)(11) | 138% | 60% | 106% |
| Gross profit (in US$ millions)(12) | 732.9 | 316.4 | 180.9 |
| Gross profit margin (%) | 43.2% | 44.3% | 40.5% |
| Loss (in US$ million)(13) | (165.3) | (166.0) | (67.5) |
| Adjusted Net Income (Loss) (in US$ millions)(10) | 6.6 | (26.0) | (54.1) |
| (1) | Customer is defined as an individual or SME that has opened an account with us and does not include any such individuals or SMEs that have been charged-off or blocked or that voluntarily closed their account. The number of customers as of December 31, 2021 does not include the 0.6 million that were unique to the Easynvest Companies. |
| (2) | Monthly active customers are defined as all customers that have generated revenue in the last 30 calendar days, for a given measurement date. |
| (3) | Activity rate is defined as active customers divided by the total number of customers as of a specific date. |
| (4) | Purchase volume is defined as the total value of transactions that are authorized through our credit and debit cards only; it does not include other payment methods that we offer such as PIX, a payment system that allows real-time payments and transfers launched by the Central Bank of Brazil, WhatsApp payments or traditional wire transfers. Purchase volume and purchase volume growth are presented on an FX Neutral basis to eliminate the effect of foreign exchange, or “FX” volatility between the comparison periods, allowing management and investors to evaluate our financial performance despite variations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. |
| (5) | Monthly average revenue per active customer, or “Monthly ARPAC” is defined as the average monthly revenue (total revenue divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period). Monthly ARPAC is also presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. |
| (6) | Monthly average cost to serve per active customer is defined as the monthly average of the sum of transactional expenses and customer support and operations expenses (sum of these expenses in the period divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period). Monthly average cost to serve per active customer is also presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. |
| (7) | Interest-earning portfolio consists of receivables from credit card operations on which we are accruing interest and loans to customers, in each case prior to ECL allowance, as of the period end date. Interest-earning portfolio and interest-earning portfolio growth are presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral Interest-earning portfolio to the IFRS measure of this metric can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 187 |
| |
| (8) | Deposits and deposits growth are presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral Deposits to the IFRS measure of this metric can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
| (9) | Credit loss allowance expenses / credit portfolio is defined as credit loss allowance expenses, divided by the sum of receivables from credit card operations (current, installments and revolving) and loans to customers, in each case gross of ECL allowance, as of the period end date. |
| (10) | Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is defined as profit (loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent company, adjusted for expenses related to share-based compensation, allocated tax effects on share-based compensation, expenses related to the customer program (NuSócios), allocated tax effects on customer program (NuSócios) and finance costs related to results with convertible instruments for the year. Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is also presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and our FX Neutral Adjusted Net Income (Loss) to their most directly comparable IFRS measures of income (loss) can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
| (11) | Revenue and revenue growth are presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information – Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral Revenue to the IFRS measure of this metric can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
| (12) | Gross profit is presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral gross profit to the IFRS measure of this metric can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
| (13) | Loss is presented on an FX Neutral basis. See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures” for additional information. A reconciliation of our FX Neutral loss to the IFRS measure of this metric can be found below under “—Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations.” |
Customers
Our total number of customers is an important measure of the reach and adoption of our products. We define our customers as individuals and SMEs that have opened accounts with us and do not include any such individuals or SMEs that have been charged-off or blocked or voluntarily closed their account. The number of customers as of December 31, 2021 does not include the 0.6 million customers that were unique to the Easynvest Companies.
We reached 53.9 million customers as of December 31, 2021, an increase of 62% compared to 33.3 million customers as of December 31, 2020, resulting in a net addition of 20.6 million customers over the 12-month period, demonstrating the strength of our self-reinforcing model.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 188 |
| |
Monthly Active Customers and Activity Rate
We assess customer engagement and adoption by measuring our number of monthly active customers and their implied activity rate. We define a monthly active customer as any customer that has generated revenue in the last 30 calendar days of the measurement date, and we define activity rate as monthly active customers divided by the total number of customers as of a specific date. Our monthly active customers drive the vast majority of our revenue. However, customers that are non-active can and often do still use our products, though less frequently, and do contribute to our revenue. Non-active customers can also become active from period to period. For more information on our customer engagement ratio, see “—Factors Affecting Our Performance—Our ability to attract and retain monthly active customers.”
We reached 41.1 million monthly active customers as of December 31, 2021, an increase of 88% compared to 33.3 million monthly active customers as of December 31, 2020. Our activity rates as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were 76% and 66%, respectively. The growth in the activity rate was driven by the introduction of additional products and the continued increase in the adoption of digital banking in the countries where we operate. Our activity rate is also affected by the mix of customers with our credit card product versus other products such as debit cards. Our credit card customers have consistently had higher activity rates given the expansionary nature of credit card expenditures, while our debit card customers in contrast have lower activity rates. When we introduced our debit card product in late 2018, this led to faster growth in the total number of customers compared to monthly active customers in 2019, while lowering our activity rate as such customers tend to have lower activity than credit card customers. Since then, our activity rate has increased as our customers have tended to use us more frequently across multiple products.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 189 |
| |
Purchase Volume, or “PV”
We measure PV to assess the volume of transactions that take place on our card-based products. We earn interchange fees on our PV, which we define as the total value of transactions that are authorized through our credit and debit cards only; it does not include other payment methods that we offer such as PIX, a payment system that allows real-time payments and transfers launched by the Central Bank of Brazil, WhatsApp payments or traditional wire transfers from which we do not earn fees.
PV reached US$43.8 billion in the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of 95% compared to US$22.5 billion in the year ended December 31, 2020 (or increase of 102% compared to US$21.7 billion on an FX Neutral basis). For the year ended December 31, 2021, total interchange revenue was US$471.5 million, equivalent to 1.1% of PV over the year ended December 31, 2021.
PV grew faster than interchange revenue over the year ended December 31, 2021, driven primarily by a greater amount of debit card volume, which has a lower interchange rate than credit cards. Debit card volume increased more than credit card volume due to an increase in NuAccounts, an increase in debit card activations for existing NuAccounts, and an increase in our overall promotion of our debit card product.
Our cohorts have generally increased their PV over time as our customers become more familiar with our products, bring more of their spend to our products, grow their wealth and benefit from larger credit lines from us. This can be seen when looking at the monthly average PV across our cohorts. In line with market trends, nearly all cohorts showed declining PV during periods of the COVID-19 pandemic where economic activity declined and when we reduced initial credit limits for new customers due to economic uncertainty. However, as economic activity rebounded, PV across cohorts has also increased in December 2021 compared to December 2020.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 190 |
| |
Monthly Average Revenue Per Active Customer, or “Monthly ARPAC” (in US$)
We monitor Monthly ARPAC to track the value we generate on a customer level across all our monthly active customers in a given period. We define Monthly ARPAC as the average monthly revenue (total revenue divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period).
Monthly ARPAC was US$4.5 for the year ended December 31, 2021. In comparison, Monthly ARPAC was US$3.6 for the year ended December 31, 2020. In comparison and on an FX Neutral basis, our Monthly ARPAC was US$3.5 for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Monthly ARPAC has declined as our customer base has grown substantially in the past three years, increasing the relevance of newly added customers in our base. These new customers typically have smaller credit lines with us, lower initial purchase volumes, lower interchange fees associated with their debit card volume and therefore lower initial Monthly ARPAC. In addition, in response to COVID-19, we lowered the initial credit limits applicable to our credit card product for new customers, reducing PV per monthly active customer, and consequently reducing Monthly ARPAC. However, as economic activity rebounded, PV across cohorts has increased, which has accounted for, in part, an increase in Monthly ARPAC.
Over time, we have seen increased Monthly ARPAC from our monthly active customers across all our cohorts, as shown below. As we gather more data on our customers, we increase their credit limits based on performance, which enables us to increase our share of existing customer spending. Furthermore, our customers adopt more of our products over time, allowing us to generate more revenue from their activity.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 191 |
| |
The above chart shows Monthly ARPAC for each quarterly cohort starting in the first quarter of 2017 on an FX Neutral basis. The introduction of our NuAccount in 2017 and its corresponding debit card in 2018 were important evolutions in our product set and had a noticeable impact across our key business metrics as they allowed us to accelerate our customer growth by serving a much wider spectrum of the population, including lower-income customers who would not have started off with a consumer credit product such as our credit card. Consequently, customers who join us by acquiring only a NuAccount typically generate lower initial revenue than customers who start off with multiple products, such as a credit card and a NuAccount. To calculate the amounts included in the chart above on an FX Neutral basis, we apply the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 (R$5.396 to US$1.00) throughout, so as to present these amounts as they would have been had exchange rates remained stable over all periods presented.
Our Monthly ARPAC has reached over US$15 between the fourth and fifth years for our quarterly cohorts in their most recent months shown above. Our cohorts have generally had increasing Monthly ARPAC over time, with nearly all cohorts having declined Monthly ARPAC during periods impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic where economic activity declined and when we reduced initial credit limits for new customers due to economic uncertainty. However, Monthly ARPAC has subsequently rebounded as economic activity has increased.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 192 |
| |
The above chart displays Monthly ARPAC for first quarter customer cohorts starting in 2017, for those customers active across our Credit Card, NuAccount and Personal Loans products as of December 31, 2021. The first quarter cohorts for 2017 to 2020 have Monthly ARPAC in the US$26 to over US$39 range for the month of December 2021. Our Monthly ARPAC for customers in these cohorts has increased substantially in the last several months as we started to offer these customers access to our personal loans product in June 2020. Customers with personal loans accounted for 5.5% of our active customer base as of December 31, 2021. As we roll out our offering of consumer credit products, we expect an increasing proportion of our customers to adopt these products going forward.
Monthly Average Cost to Serve Per Active Customer (in US$)
We compare our monthly average cost to serve per active customer to our Monthly ARPAC to assess our customer economics in a given period. We define monthly average cost to serve per active customer as the monthly average of the sum of transactional expenses and customer support and operations expenses (sum of these expenses in the period divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured, and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period).
Our monthly average cost to serve per active customer on both an actual and an FX Neutral basis was US$0.8 for the year ended December 31, 2021. In comparison, our monthly average cost to serve per active customer was US$1.2 and US$1.9 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. On an FX Neutral basis, our monthly average cost to serve per active customer was US$1.2 and US$1.4 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our improvement in this metric was driven by continued economies of scale as we leveraged our highly scalable tech platform and continue to benefit from our investments in data and infrastructure.
Deposits
Form 20-F | 2021 | 193 |
| |
We track our deposits to assess the trust our customers place in us and because deposits are an important source of funding for our credit products. We define deposits as money held by our individual customers and our SME customers in our NuAccounts. Our deposit balance is currently from our Brazilian customer base, and as we roll more products in Mexico and Colombia we expect to capture deposits in these countries as well.
Deposits increased to US$9.7 billion as of December 31, 2021, an increase of 73.2% compared to US$5.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 (or an increase of 86.5% compared to US$5.2 billion as of December 31, 2020 on an FX Neutral basis), as we grew our customer base and existing customers concentrated more of their deposits with us. We believe our deposits are highly diversified as they come entirely from our Brazilian retail customer base. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 57% of our total customers in Brazil had deposits with us. Figures shown in the chart below are on an FX Neutral basis.
Our deposit base has also proved to be highly resilient, as shown in the graph above, growing steadily over time, independent of the interest rate environment.
Interest-Earning Portfolio
We generate interest income from our interest-earning portfolio and interest on corporate cash, which we invest primarily in government bonds. We define our interest-earning portfolio as revolving and refinanced credit card balances and personal loans. Our interest-earning portfolio consists of loans to customers and receivables from credit card operations on which we are accruing interest, gross of ECL allowance, as of the period end date.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 194 |
| |
In Brazil, consumers may elect to pay their monthly credit card balances in part (revolve) or in total, or to move their credit card balances (fully or partially) into a pre-approved installment plan. Customers may revolve for a maximum of two months, after which any revolved balances must be transferred to an installment plan. Both revolving and installment plan credit card balances are interest-earning assets for us. Current credit card balances (inside their normal billing cycle) are not interest-earning assets for us.
We are seeing a significant increase in personal loans driven by customer demand and as more customers become eligible for our personal loan product. Credit card balances are also rising, driven by an increase in PV, primarily as a result of the overall progressive recovery of PV levels as the economic effects arising from COVID-19 gradually subside and we add new customers.
As of December 31, 2021, our interest-earning portfolio (including credit card receivables and personal loans) increased to US$2,040.2 million, an increase of 317% compared to US$488.7 million as of December 31, 2020 (or an increase of 343% compared to US$455.7 million as of December 31, 2020, on an FX Neutral basis).
As of December 31, 2020, our interest-earning portfolio increased to US$488.7 million, an increase of 21% compared to US$404.7 million as of December 31, 2019 (or an increase to US$455.7 million, being an increase of 56% compared to US$292.5 million as of December 31, 2019, on an FX Neutral basis).
Factors Affecting Our Performance
Our ability to attract and retain monthly active customers
Our customers are the foundation of our business. We are focused on growing and retaining our customer base. We expect continued growth in monthly active customers driven by the high-quality experiences that we provide when they use our products, the result of which we believe is high affinity with our brand. Our existing customers are core to our marketing as word-of-mouth virality drives a large portion of new customers to us. Approximately 80%-90% of our customers were acquired organically on average per year since our inception either through word-of-mouth or direct unpaid referrals. This has reduced the need for us to incur significant marketing expenses.
Growth in our monthly active customer base is driven by (i) new customers (individual or SME business accounts); (ii) increases in the number of products per customer to give customers more reasons to be active (see “—New products and adoption”); (iii) high-quality customer service as measured by our strong NPS; and (iv) understanding our less active customers so we can optimize our product offerings including providing them with higher credit limits.
Our net churn has remained relatively low and has decreased over time, averaging 0.1% per month in 2021. In 2020, it averaged 0.52% per month. We define net churn as the (i) sum of (a) customers who choose to cancel their accounts with us (voluntary churn) and (b) customers whose accounts are canceled proactively by us (involuntary churn) (ii) minus revivals, all divided by the number of customers as of the end of the respective period. We consider as revivals customers whose accounts were not valid in the previous month mainly due to fraud and delinquency, but to whom access was restored once the respective issue was addressed.
We believe that our recurring investments in technology and customer service combined with the compounding effects of our self-reinforcing model have resulted in high engagement rates for our active customers. We calculate customer engagement as the ratio of daily active customers (defined here as the number of Brazilian customers that within the day either opened our app or performed a card transaction) to monthly active customers (defined here as the number of Brazilian customers that within a trailing 28- day window either opened our app or performed a card transaction). In December 2021, the 28-day average of this ratio was 49.9%, an increase of 8.0 percentage points compared to 41.9% in December 2020. We believe this showcases engagement similar to leading social network platforms. This social network-like engagement combined with our FinTech monetization is one of the foundations of our powerful self-reinforcing model. The chart below shows the evolution of our customer engagement for the periods presented.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 195 |
| |
Our ability to increase transactions and expand revenue from existing customers
Our existing customers drive a significant portion of our growth, and we expect them to continue to drive more transactions and more PV as they grow their wealth, we get a greater share of their spend, we offer them higher credit lines, and as they increase adoption of our various products. Our existing customers have historically increased the number of transactions with us as evidenced by the number of transactions in a month per monthly active customer across our quarterly customer cohorts starting in the first quarter of 2017, shown in the chart below. There is a consistent increase over time, except for a reduction across our cohorts during periods impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic where economic activity declined. Our cohorts for PV and Monthly ARPAC show the same expansionary trend for both, as shown in “—Key Business Metrics.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 196 |
| |
Our goal is for Nu to become our customers’ primary banking account, and our customers are increasingly choosing Nu as their primary banking relationship as they become more comfortable with our products and user experience, increasing their usage of our products. We have become the primary banking relationship for over 55% of our active customers who had been with us for more than 12 months as of December 31, 2021. We define a primary banking relationship as a relationship in which an active customer has at least 50% of their monthly post-tax income (excluding transfers to self) moved in or out of their NuAccount in any given month. We measured the percentage of primary banking relationships for cohorts released in January 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021.
Based on our analysis, we believe that (i) within each cohort, at least 40% of active customers have a primary banking relationship with Nu and (ii) each cohort reached the 40% threshold at progressively faster rates. For example, our January 2019 cohort reached the 40% threshold in 19 months, while our January 2020 cohort reached this threshold in 9 months and our January 2021 cohort reached it in 5 months, as illustrated in the following chart.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 197 |
| |
We also measure the expansion from our existing customers by observing the total revenue generated by a cohort of customers over time. The below table shows the growth in total revenue generated by a customer cohort in the last twelve months (LTM) ended December 31, 2021, compared to the revenue generated in that cohort’s initial year. Each cohort represents customers who first joined Nu in a given year and revenue is indexed to the total revenue generated in that year from the cohort. For example, the 2017 cohort includes all customers who joined Nu between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017. This table shows that every cohort exhibits a net expansion in revenue from their initial year, with older cohorts expanding the most over multiple years. We look at this measure as a way to track the expansion, net of any churn, in our annual cohorts over time. We believe that even for our older cohorts, there are multiple expansion opportunities remaining.
New products and adoption
We are focused on developing and launching new products and features, which could generate additional revenue streams, complement our customers’ experiences, and fulfill customers’ wider financial service needs. We launched several products since we started our operations in 2013, including credit and debit cards, a loyalty rewards program, payment accounts for individuals and SMEs, personal loans, PIX, and life insurance. We also added investments through the acquisition of NuInvest and new “Buy Now Pay Later” solutions that allow customers to pay overtime in up to twelve installments on their credit and debit card purchases and boletos (banking payment slips). We expect to launch further products in the future, including additional credit products, other types of insurance policies, new investment solutions and other fee-driving businesses intended to leverage our large customer base. We have seen strong adoption of our new products over the past few years as evidenced across our cohorts. We expect our new products to provide additional avenues to acquire new customers as well as cross-sell within our existing customers as we continue to expect increased adoption of new products on a per customer basis.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 198 |
| |
The above chart shows the number of products per monthly active customer for each quarterly cohort starting in the first quarter of 2017. We define products per customer as the number of products used by active Brazilian customers divided by the total number of active Brazilian customers within that month. Our earliest cohorts, despite starting out with a single product, have adopted multiple new products as these have been introduced and have approximately three products as of December 31, 2021. Our latest cohorts are also starting out with close to three products in the first few months alone.
Continuing our international expansion
We believe that we are in the early stages of our international expansion. We will continue to rely on our technology, data science, and credit and customer experience approach to continue expanding into new markets. In 2019 and 2020, we expanded internationally to Mexico and Colombia, respectively, because we identified customer needs and opportunities in these markets that were similar to those in Brazil. We followed a similar strategy and launched our operations in both countries with our flagship credit card product. As we enter new markets, and begin to attract new customers and build scale, our near-term ARPAC may decrease and our cost of risk may increase due to ECL as we acquire new customers, negatively impacting our operating margins.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 199 |
| |
Rapid growth of our consumer credit business and associated credit loss provisioning
As we continue to expand and enhance our credit offerings, we have seen PV grow significantly. Our customer-centric approach and mission to democratize access to financial services have helped us gain market share in a sector that was traditionally dominated by a handful of incumbents for decades. As a result, our market share of Brazilian credit card purchase volume PV has risen steadily each year. In 2021 we represented 10.0% of credit card purchase volume, in 2020 we represented 8.1% and in 2019, we represented 5.5% of credit card purchase volume, according to data from ABECS.
Our credit provisioning model is an expected credit loss model, consistent with the IFRS 9 standard, and front-loads credit loss recognition by provisioning for future expected credit losses, or “ECL,” as soon as a credit limit is granted or loan is extended. While we make these loan loss provisions at the time of loan initiation, we expect to generate revenue and credit losses from these credit card and personal loan customers over time, which negatively impacts our gross profit and gross profit margin in any period where we are adding customers.
Economies of scale resulting from our technological platform
Cloud-based platform enables scalability and agility. Our systems are designed to accommodate an ever-growing pool of customers and a range of products. Being 100% cloud-based and having built our core platform from the ground up, our systems are highly scalable and we believe that there are opportunities to drive further efficiency. As we add each incremental product to our platform, we benefit from the existing data and infrastructure, providing a source of operating leverage, as evidenced by a decreasing trend in our monthly average cost to serve per active customer.
Risk management
Our risk management frameworks are heavily based on data and machine learning and these models are continuously enhanced over time. As we increase our customer base and collect more data on the behavior of our customers, our models become better trained to identify and stratify our customers according to their risk, improving our decision-making. In addition, we constantly test our hypotheses using A/B testing in smaller samples of our customer base. As a result, we have improved our risk metrics year after year, as evidenced by our 90-day consumer finance delinquency rate being lower than the industry average across the Brazilian credit card market.
Regulation
As a tech company focused on the financial services sector in the countries we operate, we must comply with the laws and policies set by the central banks and other governmental institutions. Regulatory change might positively or negatively impact our revenue, credit provision policies and capital and liquidity requirements, among others. There are ongoing discussions to update the current methodology to calculate risk-weighted assets in Brazil, which could positively impact our capital requirements going forward. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—We are subject to extensive regulation and regulatory and governmental oversight as a digital banking platform and as a payment institution. Compliance with or violation of present or future regulations could be costly, expose us to substantial liability and force us to change our business practices, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 200 |
| |
Seasonality
Our business is affected by customer behavior throughout the year and demonstrates seasonality effects. Historically, we benefit from higher PV and related revenue in the fourth quarter of the year due to the holiday season. However, our high historical growth has masked this seasonality in the past, and this may become more pronounced in the future. Adverse events that occur during those periods could have a disproportionate effect on our results of operations for the entire year. As a result of seasonality fluctuations caused by these and other factors, comparisons of our results of operations across different periods may not be accurate indicators of our future performance. As we diversify our business across product lines, we believe our seasonality may be reduced.
COVID-19 impact
By the end of 2019, the COVID-19 virus was detected in Wuhan, China, quickly spread to countries all around the world, and was subsequently recognized by the World Health Organization as a pandemic. The effects of this pandemic were felt in Latin America beginning in early 2020. To contain the spread of the virus governments enacted several policies limiting the social interaction and commercial activity of the population, including but not limited to, lockdown periods, reduced business hours, cancellation of large events and festivities, travel bans for passengers from selected countries, among others.
While countries are still advancing on the immunization of their populations, it is still too early to assess when this pandemic and its effects will end. However, we observed that our business was able to keep our strong growth momentum, especially in regards to:
| · | Growth – we continued to increase our number of accounts consistently, partially driven by new customers from new demographics, as well as new customers wanting to receive governmental aid through our savings accounts and avoid the need to go to physical bank branches; |
| · | PV – we observed an aggregate debit card purchase volume increase in the period, partially due to growth in the number of accounts but also the wider adoption of cashless ways to make purchases. However, due to decreased economic activity, there was a negative impact on purchase volume per customer; |
| · | Credit performance – while we saw initial credit deterioration during the early days of COVID-19, we saw a fast recovery, with lower 90-day delinquency rate of our portfolio as of December 31, 2021 compared to those as of June 30, 2020, the peak of the pandemic; and |
| · | Deposits – we served as an important link between government aid and the population, which significantly increased our deposits balance. |
Macroeconomic environment
Our results of operations are subject to political and economic factors and their respective effects on the availability of funding resources, disposable income, employment rates and average wages. They are also affected by levels of consumer spending, interest rates and the expansion or retraction of consumer credit in the countries we operate, each of which impacts the number and overall value of payment transactions. For instance, lower interest rates tend to lower our funding costs, and lower levels of unemployment combined with economic growth tends to increase PV. On the other hand, the depreciation in 2021 and 2020 of local currencies in Latin America has negatively impacted our results which are reported in U.S. dollars.
Within Latin America and the Caribbean, we currently serve Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, which countries accounted for over 60% of the population and 64% of the GDP in the region in 2021 according to the World Bank and the IMF (April 2021 report). These countries had populations of 213 million, 130 million and 51 million, respectively, and recorded US$1.5 trillion, US$1.2 trillion and US$300 billion, respectively, GDP in 2021 (measured in current U.S. dollars). In the past years, important industries have consolidated their presence in the region and acquired scale, the most notable being financial services, retail, manufacturing, transportation and communication, construction, agribusiness and mining. In most Latin American countries, an increasingly large proportion of the population is experiencing material gains in purchasing power and is being provided with augmented credit facilities, a trend that can be observed even with short-term episodes of economic downturn. Consumer patterns are therefore shifting towards more sophisticated products and services, a phenomenon that calls for enhanced business infrastructure, upgraded human capital and improved real estate facilities, among other requirements, to meet these demands.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 201 |
| |
Currently, the majority of our operations are located in Brazil, and we expanded our operations internationally to Mexico and Colombia in 2019 and 2020, respectively, because we believed they were very attractive markets that had some of the same characteristics and opportunities as those we had identified in Brazil.
We believe that Latin America has a large and vibrant consumer market. However, the recent economic instability in Latin America has contributed to a decline in market confidence in the economy as well as to a deteriorating political environment, and weak macroeconomic conditions are expected to continue through 2022, especially as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The following table shows data for real GDP, inflation and interest rates in Brazil and the U.S. dollar/real exchange rate at the dates and for the periods indicated, as well as GDP and unemployment rates for Mexico and Colombia:
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 | |
| (in percentages, except as otherwise indicated) | |||
| Brazil | |||
| Real growth (contraction) in gross domestic product | 17.8 | 23.1 | 7.3 |
| Inflation (IGP-M)(1) | 10.1 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Inflation (IPCA)(2) | 4.4 | 2.8 | 5.9 |
| CDI interest rate (average)(3) | 5.581 | 5.197 | 4.031 |
| Period-end exchange rate – R$ per US$ 1.00(4) | 5.396 | 5.158 | 3.946 |
| Average exchange rate – R$ per US$ 1.00(4) | 7.4 | (22.4) | (3.9) |
| Appreciation (depreciation) of the real vs. the U.S. dollar in the period(5) | 11.1 | 13.9 | 11.0 |
| Unemployment rate(6) | |||
| Colombia | |||
| Real growth (contraction) in gross domestic product | 10.6 | (6.8) | 3.2 |
| Unemployment rate | 11.1 | 13.1 | 9.5 |
| Mexico | |||
| Real growth (contraction) in gross domestic product | 4.8 | (8.5) | (0.2) |
| Unemployment rate | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Sources: FGV, IBGE, IPEA, Central Bank of Brazil, Bloomberg, DANE – Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, INEGI – Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática and the Colombian Central Bank.
| (1) | Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index measured by FGV. |
| (2) | Inflation (IPCA) is a broad consumer price index measured by the IBGE. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 202 |
| |
| (3) | The CDI Rate, which is the interest rate, is an average of interbank overnight rates (certificado de depósito interbancário) in Brazil (measured as a daily average for the period). |
| (4) | Period-end exchange rate as of the last business day as reported by the Central Bank (PTAX). Average of the selling exchange rate of each business day of the period as reported by the Central Bank (PTAX). |
| (5) | Comparing the U.S. dollars to reais (US$/R$) closing selling exchange rate as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil at the end of the period’s last day with the day immediately prior to the first day of the period discussed. |
| (6) | Average unemployment rate for the period as measured by the IBGE. |
Interest rates
Interest rates affect our ability to generate revenue. Although higher interest rates can lead to reductions in private consumption, negatively impacting fees and commission income including the interchange fees that we earn, they can also positively correlate with interest income, positively impacting our results.
Inflation
Inflation impacts our obligations to certain suppliers, such as office leasing, as costs are indexed to inflation rates. However, a significant part of our revenue is naturally hedged against inflation, since our interchange fees also tend to fluctuate in nominal terms according to inflation, even if we continue to apply the same percentage. When merchants adjust their prices for inflation, the purchasing power of consumers may be reduced, which may adversely affect some of our revenue streams if it results in a reduction in the number and volume of transactions.
Currency fluctuations
Our operations are conducted primarily in Brazilian reais (R$), which is the local currency in Brazil, but our presentation currency is U.S. dollars (US$). We also convert other currencies related to the countries in which we operate to U.S. dollars. This generates additional volatility in our financial statements. In the last few years, the real has significantly depreciated in comparison to the U.S. dollar, which has adversely affected our results of operations in U.S. dollars terms.
Acquisitions and new lines of business and other developments
| · | On January 3, 2022, we completed the acquisition of Olivia's, a US-based data company with subsidiaries in Brazil specializing in applying machine learning and artificial intelligence solutions to retail banking. Olivia has a personal finance management mobile device application with over 100,000 customers as of November 2021, which we believe will further strengthen our open banking initiatives. The total contractual acquisition price corresponds to US$72.0 million consisting of cash consideration of US$12.2 million and share consideration estimated in US$59.7 million that could be issued as consideration for post-combination services, in the next 3 years, rendered to Nu by the former shareholders and employees who became employees following the closing. |
| · | In October 2021, we acquired Spin Pay, a Brazilian payments platform that has pioneered the development of instant payments solutions for online and offline merchants via PIX. As of August 31, 2021, Spin Pay had more than 220 merchants on its platform, connected to Spin Pay through commerce-enablement platforms such as VTEX and Shopify Plus, as well as directly through the Spin Pay API. We believe that the expertise and technology of Spin Pay will be instrumental in the development of our broader payment’s platform in Brazil. The total price was US$13.8 million, partially settled on the acquisition date and the remainder to be settled on the first and second anniversary of the acquisition date. In connection with Spin Pay's acquisition, we issued 830,490 Class A ordinary shares (equivalent to US$6.3 million) upon closing of the transaction in October 2021, and could issue an aggregate of up to 1,796,826 shares on the first and second anniversaries of closing, and as consideration for post-combination services rendered to Nu by the former shareholders who became employees following the closing, which is considered as compensation and not a component of the purchase consideration transferred. In addition, Nu may issue a certain number of shares equivalent to US$17.9 million upon the achievement of certain milestones and services rendered by certain employees. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 203 |
| |
| · | On September 10, 2020, our subsidiary Nu Financeira entered into an investment agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the Easynvest Companies investment platform, including Nu Invest Corretora de Valores S.A., or “NuInvest,” a leading direct-to-consumer digital investment platform in Brazil with 1.6 million customers. We closed this transaction on June 1, 2021, when control over the entities was transferred after obtaining approval for the acquisition by the CADE on October 27, 2020 and the Central Bank of Brazil on May 4, 2021. In 1999, the Easynvest Companies pioneered the offering of online access to the stock exchange in Brazil, and in 2016 it was the first company to provide access through a mobile app to the fixed-income market. On Easynvest Companies’ 100% digital platform, individual investors have access to a complete range of investments, including government bonds, private securities and investment funds, in addition to buying and selling stocks, options and futures. The company also provides financial education content through several digital channels. The aggregate purchase price was composed of US$451.5 million in cash, a portion of which was used by the former Easynvest shareholders to purchase 7.9 million of our Series F-2 preferred shares. |
| · | On July 23, 2020, we announced the acquisition of Cognitect, Inc., or “Cognitect,” the U.S.-based software consultancy firm behind the Clojure programming language and the Datomic database. The purchase price was US$10.4 million paid in cash on the acquisition date. This transaction closed on August 4, 2020. As part of the related purchase agreement, we have also agreed to a contingent cash consideration of US$4 million and contingent share consideration of Class A ordinary shares payable in equal installments over a five-year period, commencing in August 2021, contingent on Cognitect’s former shareholders and employees continuing to provide services to us. |
| · | Within the context of our initial public offering, to reward the trust and loyalty of our customers, we implemented an incentive and reward program, referred to commercially as “NuSócios” and in our registration statement on Form F-1, not incorporated by reference herein (File no. 333-260649 on SEC), as the “Customer Program,” that resulted in the delivery by one of our affiliates of sufficient funds for the subscription and payment of one BDR in the Brazilian offering to each Customer allocated in the Customer Program that expressly agreed to participate in the Customer Program. Customers who participated in the Customer Program received sufficient funds for the subscription and payment of one BDR each, which was equivalent to a total of approximately R$63.2 million (US$11.2 million), which corresponds to the number of customers that opted-in to the Customer Program multiplied by the initial public offering price per BDR. |
Non-IFRS Financial Measures and Reconciliations
This annual report presents our Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and certain FX Neutral measures and their respective reconciliations for the convenience of investors, which are non-IFRS financial measures. A non-IFRS financial measure is generally defined as a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flow that purports to measure financial performance but excludes or includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable IFRS measure. For further information on why our management chooses to use these non-IFRS financial measures and on the limits of using these non-IFRS financial measures, please see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures.” The FX Neutral measures for Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and certain key business metrics were calculated to present what such measures in preceding periods/years would have been had exchange rates remained stable from these preceding periods/years until the date of our most recent financial information, as detailed below.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 204 |
| |
The FX Neutral measures for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were calculated by multiplying the as reported amounts of Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and the key business metrics for such years by the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (R$5.240, R$3.952 and R$3.681, to US$1.00, respectively), and using such results to re-translate the corresponding amounts back to U.S. dollars by dividing them by the average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 (R$5.415 to US$1.00), so as to present what certain of our statement of profit and loss amounts and key business metrics would have been had exchange rates remained stable from these past periods/years until the year ended December 31, 2021.
The average Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates were calculated as the average of the month-end rates for each month in the years 2021, 2020 2019 and 2018, as reported by Bloomberg.
|
As reported |
FX Neutral measures | |||||||||
|
For the years ended December 31, |
Percentage |
For the years ended December 31, |
Percentage | |||||||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021/2020 |
2020/2019 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021/2020 |
2020/2019 | |
| Adjusted Net Income (Loss) (in US$ millions) | ||||||||||
| Profit (loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
(165.0) |
(171.5) | (92.5) |
(3.8)% |
85.4% |
(165.0) |
(166.0) | (67.5) |
(0.6)% |
145.9% |
| Share-based compensation |
225.4 |
56.3 | 18.5 |
300.4% |
204.3% |
225.4 |
54.5 | 13.5 |
313.6% |
303.7% |
| Allocated tax effects on share-based compensation(1) |
(60.0) |
(12.8) | (0.2) |
368.8% |
n.m. |
(60.0) |
(12.4) | (0.1) |
383.6% |
n.m. |
| Customer program ("NuSócios") |
11.2 |
— | — |
n.m. |
n.m. |
11.2 |
— | — |
n.m. |
n.m. |
| Allocated tax effects on customer program |
(5.0) |
— | — |
n.m. |
n.m. |
(5.0) |
— | — |
n.m. |
n.m. |
| Finance costs - results with convertible instruments |
— |
101.2 |
— |
(100)% |
n.m. |
— |
97.9 |
0.0 |
(100)% |
n.m. |
| Adjusted Net Income (Loss) for the year |
6.6 |
(26.8) |
(74.2) |
(124.6)% |
(63.9)% |
6.6 |
(26.0) |
(54.1) |
(125.4)% |
(51.9)% |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 205 |
| |
| Other Key Business Metrics | ||||||||||
| Purchase volume (in US$ billions) |
43.8 |
22.5 | 17.1 |
94.8% |
31.5% |
43.8 |
21.7 | 12.5 |
101.3% |
74.4% |
| Monthly average revenue per active customer (in US$) |
4.5 |
3.6 | 5.9 |
24.3% |
(39.0)% |
4.5 |
3.5 | 4.3 |
28.5% |
(19.1)% |
| Monthly average cost to serve per active customer (in US$) |
0.8 |
1.2 | 1.9 |
(33.9)% |
(34.8)% |
0.8 |
1.2 | 1.4 |
(31.7)% |
(13.6)% |
| Revenue (in US$ millions) |
1,698.0 |
737.1 | 612.1 |
130.4% |
20.4% |
1,698.0 |
713.3 | 452.2 |
138.0% |
59.7% |
| Gross Profit (in US$ millions) |
732.9 |
326.9 | 247.9 |
124.4% |
31.9% |
732.9 |
316.3 | 183.1 |
131.6% |
74.9% |
n.m. = not meaningful.
| (1) | Represents the tax effects of pre-tax items excluded from Adjusted Net Income (Loss). The tax effects of pre-tax items excluded from Adjusted Net Income (Loss) are computed using the statutory rate related to each jurisdiction that was impacted by the adjustment, after taking into account the effects of permanent and temporary tax differences. |
FX Neutral measures for deposits and interest-earning portfolio presented in this document were calculated by multiplying the as reported amounts as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 by the spot Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates as of these dates (R$5.199, R$4.030 and R$3.875 to US$1.00, respectively), and using such results to re-translate the corresponding amounts back to U.S. dollars by dividing them by using the spot rate as of December 31, 2021 (R$5.576 to US$1.00) so as to present what these amounts would have been had exchange rates been the same as those on December 31, 2021. The Brazilian reais/U.S. dollars exchange rates were calculated using rates as of such dates as reported by Bloomberg.
|
As reported |
FX Neutral measures | |||||||||
|
As of December 31, |
Percentage change (%) |
As of December 31, |
Percentage change (%) | |||||||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021/2020 |
2020/2019 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021/2020 |
2020/2019 | |
| Deposits (in US$ billions) |
9.7 |
5.6 | 2.7 |
73.1% |
107.4% |
9.7 |
5.2 | 1.9 |
86.5% |
173.7% |
| Interest-earning portfolio (in US$ billions) |
2.0 |
0.5 | 0.4 |
317.5% |
20.7% |
2.0 |
0.5 | 0.3 |
347.7% |
55.8% |
Description of Principal Line Items
The following is a summary of the principal line items comprising our consolidated statements of profit or loss.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 206 |
| |
Total revenue
Our total revenue consists of the sum of our interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments and fee and commission income, as detailed below:
Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments
Our interest and other financial income consists of interest income on loans, credit card operations (revolving and refinanced credit card balances and personal loans); our cash and other assets at amortized cost are calculated using the effective interest method, which allocates interest, and direct and incremental fees and costs over the expected lives of the assets. For the revolving balances, interest is calculated from the due date of the credit card bill that was not fully paid.
Gains (losses) on financial instruments consists of the fair value gains and losses from financial instruments. The income arises from both the sale and purchase of financial assets and from changes in fair value caused by movements in interest, equity prices, and other market variables, as well as the interest accrual on the fixed and floating rate securities.
Fee and commission income
The majority of our fee and commission income comes from interchange fees we earn from purchases made using the credit and debit cards we issue to customers. We also earn revenue from our premium subscription product (NuRewards), late fees, recharge fees for mobile phones, insurance brokerage commission, and more.
| · | Interchange fees. Represents fees to authorize and provide settlement on credit and debit card transactions processed through the Mastercard network and are determined as a percentage of the total payment processed. Interchange fees, net of rewards revenue, are recognized and measured upon recognition of the transaction with the interchange network, when the performance obligation is considered satisfied. The interchange rates agreed with Mastercard are fixed and depend on the segment of each merchant. Interchange income is withheld from the amount to be paid to third parties. |
| · | NuRewards revenue. Comprises revenue related to the NuRewards subscription fee and the related interchange fee, initially apportioned in accordance with the relative stand-alone selling prices of the performance obligation assumed. It is recorded in the statement of profit or loss when the performance obligation is satisfied, which is when the reward points are redeemed by the customers. |
| · | Late fees. Comprises fees charged when credit card bills are not paid by the due date by the relevant customer. |
| · | Recharge fees. Comprises the selling price of prepaid telephone credits to customers, net of acquisition costs. |
| · | Other fee and commission income. Mainly consists of: (i) brokerage commission income from third-party life insurance providers for sales made through our app, (ii) commission income from the issuance of boletos (banking payment slips), which is a printable document issued by merchants that is used to make payments in Brazil, and (iii) fee income for cash withdrawals. |
| · | Customer Program (NuSócios) represents the costs relating to the incentive and reward program for 7,557,679 customers that expressly agreed to participate in our Customer Program. The total amount of expenses of the program was US$11.2 million, based on R$8.36 price per BDR. Nu recognized the costs associated with the Customer Program arising from funding the subscription and payment of the BDRs for the customers who participated in the Customer Program as a reduction in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2021. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 207 |
| |
Fee and commission income is shown net of Brazilian federal income taxes. For more information on our revenue recognition policies, see note 4 of our audited consolidated financial statements.
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided consists of the sum of our interest and other financial expenses, transactional expenses and credit loss allowance expenses, as detailed below:
Interest and other financial expenses
Interest and other financial expenses include: (i) interest expense accrued on deposits; and (ii) interest expense relating to interest on our financial instruments.
Transactional expenses
Transactional expenses include the costs related to data processing, payment scheme license fees, losses from chargeback relating to our credit and debit card transactions, expenses relating to our rewards program in order to fulfill the use of the points by customers, and other costs related to the connection to the payment systems in the countries that we operate. For further information on these costs, see note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The most relevant transactional expenses are:
| · | Banking payment slip costs, which comprise costs of the issuance of boletos (banking payment slips) by banks; |
| · | NuRewards expenses, which comprise the costs incurred to fulfill the redemption of rewards points by our customers; |
| · | Credit and debit card network costs, which are costs related to our payment scheme license, i.e., a fee paid to Mastercard to enable communications between network participants, access to specific reports, expenses related to projects involving the development of new functions, operational fixed fees, fees related to chargeback restatements and royalties; and |
| · | Other transaction expenses, which are mainly related to financial services expenses such as fees over financial transactions, expenses with clearinghouses and operational losses such as chargebacks. Losses from chargebacks consist of transactions credited back or refunded to the cardholder in the event of a billing dispute between a cardholder and the other participant in the credit transaction process is resolved in favor of the customer. Chargebacks may occur due to a variety of factors, such as a claim by the cardholder or cases of fraud. If we are unable to collect chargebacks or refunds from other participants, or if they refuse to or are unable to reimburse us for chargebacks or refunds due to closure, bankruptcy, or other circumstances, we bear the loss for the amounts paid to the cardholder. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 208 |
| |
Credit loss allowance expenses
Credit loss allowance expenses include losses associated with our credit card transactions and loans receivable from our customers. We expect our credit losses to fluctuate depending on many factors, including transaction volume and credit limits, macroeconomic conditions, the impact of regulatory changes, and the credit quality of credit card and loans receivable. Additionally, credit losses also include reversals of provisions and recoveries, where the customer pays us after the write-off of the receivable.
Gross profit
Gross profit consists of our total revenue minus total cost of financial and transactional services provided.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses are segregated into customer support and operations, general and administrative expenses, marketing expenses and other income (expenses).
Customer support and operations
Customer support and operations are represented by all the expenses incurred in our process of providing services to our customers, including :
| · | Infrastructure and data processing costs include technology, software, and other related costs, primarily related to the cloud infrastructure used by us and other software used in providing services to our customers. These costs associated exclusively with customers’ transactions are presented as “customer support and operations.” Infrastructure and data processing costs also include costs associated with credit and debit card fees paid to Mastercard on a quarterly basis based on the number of active cards; |
| · | Credit analysis and collection costs include fees paid to the credit bureaus and costs related to collection agencies. The credit analysis costs that are not associated with the initial credit analysis of an applicant are presented as “customer support and operations;” |
| · | Customer services costs primarily include our costs associated with customer services provided by service providers. The costs that are not exclusively related to the acquisition of new customers are presented as “customer support and operations;” |
| · | Salaries and associated benefits expenses for customer services squads not associated with the acquisition of new customers are presented as “customer support and operations” and |
| · | Credit and debit card issuance costs include printing, packing, shipping costs and other costs. Costs related to the first card of a customer are initially recorded as “deferred expenses” assets included in “other assets” and then amortized. The amortization related to the first card of the customer is presented as “general and administrative expenses” and the remaining costs, including the ones related to subsequent cards, are presented as “customer support and operations.” |
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses represent the amounts that we spend on research and development, certain back-office activities, indirect relations with our customers and overhead. These amounts consist of infrastructure and data-processing costs, credit analysis and collection costs, customer services, salaries and associated benefits, and credit and debit card issuance costs as explained in the customer and support operations description above. It also includes share-based compensation, specialized services expenses and other personnel costs, as follows:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 209 |
| |
| · | Share-based compensation corresponds to the cost of our share-based programs and awards issued; |
| · | Specialized services expenses comprise miscellaneous costs from service providers; and |
| · | Other personnel costs are related to expenses related to medical assistance, meal benefit, life insurance, transportation and other benefits provided to all employees, excluding the part allocated as customer support and operations, as stated above. |
In particular, the expenses to be recognized as a result of the 2020 Contingent Share Awards and 2021 Contingent Share Awards are expected to significantly increase our share-based compensation expenses for the foreseeable future. Total expenses for 2021 Contingent Share Awards was determined to be US$422.6 million and the expense will be recognized over a period of 7.5 after the time of approval, which occurred after its approval in November 22, 2021. We recognized approximately US$28.7 million of these expenses in the year ended December 31, 2021.
Marketing expenses
Marketing expenses relate to the production and distribution of our marketing and advertising campaigns on media, online advertising, the positioning of our products on internet search platforms and expenses incurred in relation to trade marketing at events. It also contains salaries and benefits to employees dedicated exclusively to these activities.
Other income (expenses)
Other income (expenses) primarily consists of other income/expenses not classified in the foregoing categories of operating expenses.
Finance costs – results with convertible instruments
Finance costs – results with convertible instruments, relate to interest expense and fair value changes in embedded derivatives relating to the issuance of senior preferred shares on June 18, 2020. In particular, the change in fair value reflects the appreciation of our shares since the issuance of the senior preferred shares. On May 20, 2021, each senior preferred share was converted into one Series F-1 preferred share. For more information, see “Senior preferred shares,” note 23 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Income taxes
Current income taxes comprise the income tax payable on profits based on the applicable tax law in each jurisdiction and is recognized as an expense in the period in which taxable profits arise. There is no taxation in the Cayman Islands on the income earned by us, and, as such, there is no tax impact at a consolidated level.
Our subsidiaries are subject to different income tax regimes and statutory rates. The table presents the statutory income tax rates in percentages for the main countries in which we operate:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 210 |
| |
|
Statutory income tax rates |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Brazil(1) | 45% | 40% | 40% |
| Colombia | 31% | 32% | 33% |
| Mexico | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| (1) | Comprises Brazilian Social Contribution tax (Contribuição Social sobre Lucro Líquido – CSLL) and Brazilian Income Tax (Imposto de Renda Pessoa Jurídica – IRPJ). In March 2021, the Social Contribution tax rate in Brazil increased 5 percentage points, thus the combined income tax rate was increased from 40% to 45% and was effective from July 1 to December 31, 2021 and mainly impacted Nu Pagamentos and Nu Financeira. |
Deferred income tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on income tax losses available to carry forward and on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts at the reporting date. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all temporary taxable differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which the assets may be utilized as they reverse.
We review the carrying amount of deferred tax assets at each reporting date and reduce it to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred and current tax assets and liabilities are only offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and where there is both the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
As a consequence of the current and deferred income taxes and the value of the permanent differences compared to the loss before income taxes, the effective tax rate of our consolidated operations fluctuates over time according to the portion of our total net income that was generated in each of these entities.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2020
The following table sets forth our statement of profit or loss data for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2021 |
2020 | ||
| (in US$ millions, except percentages) | |||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments | 1,046.7 | 382.9 | 173.4% |
| Fee and commission income |
651.3 |
354.2 |
83.9% |
| Total revenue |
1,698.0 |
737.1 |
130.4% |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (367.4) | (113.9) | 222.6% |
| Transactional expenses | (117.1) | (126.8) | (7.6)% |
| Credit loss allowance expenses |
(480.6) |
(169.5) |
183.5% |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided |
(965.1) |
(410.2) |
135.3% |
| Gross profit |
732.9 |
326.9 |
124.2% |
| Operating Expenses | |||
| Customer support and operations | (190.5) | (124.0) | 53.6% |
| General and administrative expenses | (628.9) | (266.0) | 136.4% |
| Marketing expenses | (79.6) | (19.4) | 310.3% |
| Other income (expenses) |
(4.1) |
(9.5) |
(56.8)% |
| Total operating expenses | (903.1) | (418.9) | 115.6% |
| Finance costs – result with convertible instruments |
- |
(101.2) |
n.m. |
| Loss before income taxes | (170.2) | (193.2) | (11.9)% |
| Income Taxes | |||
| Current taxes | (219.8) | (22.3) | 885.7% |
| Deferred taxes |
224.7 |
44.0 |
410.7% |
| Total income taxes |
4.9 |
21.7 |
(77.4)% |
| Loss for the year | (165.3) | (171.5) | (3.6)% |
n.m. = not meaningful.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 211 |
| |
Total revenue
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$1,698.0 million, an increase of US$960.9 million, or 130.4%, from US$737.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to a significant growth in 2021 in our revenue related to interchange fees, as well interest income from our lending operations and gains on financial instruments reflecting an increase in securities acquired with cash from deposits and from the IPO, as detailed below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2021 |
2020 | ||
| Interest income – credit card | 375.1 | 217.5 | 72.5% |
| Interest income – lending | 292.7 | 38.9 | 652.4% |
| Interest income – other assets at amortized cost | 66.2 | 37.8 | 75.1% |
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value |
312.7 |
88.7 |
252.5% |
| Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments | 1,046.7 | 382.9 | 173.4% |
| Interchange fees | 471.5 | 254.3 | 85.4% |
| Recharge fees | 48.4 | 15.3 | 216.3% |
| Rewards revenue | 26.9 | 23.5 | 14.5% |
| Late fees | 50.0 | 31.2 | 60.3% |
| Other fee and commission income | 65.7 | 29.9 | 119.7% |
| Customer program ("NuSócios") |
(11.2) |
- |
n.m. |
| Total fee and commission income |
651.3 |
354.2 |
83.9% |
| Total revenue | 1,698.0 | 737.1 | 130.4% |
n.m. = not meaningful.
Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments. Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$1,046.7 million, an increase of US$663.8 million, or 173.4%, from US$382.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to: (i) an increase in interest income from our loan portfolio (a US$253.8 million, or 652.4%, increase in interest income – lending) and credit card receivables (a US$157.6 million, or 72.5%, increase in interest income – credit card) reflecting the growth of our customer base of 62% in the period, reaching 53.9 million customers in 2021 compared to 33.3 million customers in 2020, and (ii) an increase in interest income – other assets at amortized costs of US$28.4 million, or an increase of 75.1% and interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value of US$224.0 million, or an increase of 252.5% both primarily attributable to the combined increase in the CDI rate in 2021 (the CDI rate was an average of 4.5% compared to an average of 2.8% in 2020) and the increase in financial assets, including both those measured at fair value through profit or loss and those measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, in the amount of US$4.7 billion when comparing December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2020, acquired mainly with proceeds from our IPO and from the increase in deposits in 2021.
Total fee and commission income. Total fee and commission income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$651.3 million, an increase of US$297.1 million, or 83.9%, from US$354.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to: (i) an increase of US$217.2 million or 85.4% in our interchange fees arising from the increased purchase volume with our credit and debit cards resulting from an increase in the number of clients previously mentioned, (ii) an increase of US$33.1 million or 216.3% in revenue resulting from recharge fees from the sale of mobile phone recharge credits also due to the growth of our customer base in 2021, (iii) an increase of US$35.8 million or 119.7% increase in other fee and commission income as a result of greater purchase volume of credit card and debit card transactions as well as new products in the period which caused (a) an increase in debit card withdrawals by our customers, (b) an increase in commissions from our insurance brokerage which reached more than 500,000 active contracts, (c) an increase in fees from bank slip and other financial processing costs. The increase was partially offset by the recognition of a US$11.2 million expense related to our customer program (NuSócios) which represents the fair value of shares (or BDRs) allocated to the 7.5 million customers that joined the program.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 212 |
| |
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$965.1 million, an increase of US$554.9 million, or 135.3%, from US$410.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as detailed below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2021 |
2020 | ||
| Interest expense on deposits | (317.5) | (87.3) | 263.7% |
| Other interest and similar expenses |
(49.9) |
(26.6) |
87.6% |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (367.4) | (113.9) | 222.6% |
| Bank slip costs | (36.1) | (46.5) | (22.4)% |
| Rewards expenses | (36.9) | (29.6) | 24.7% |
| Credit and debit card network costs | (22.7) | (25.0) | (9.2)% |
| Other transactional expenses |
(21.4) |
(25.7) |
(16.7)% |
| Total transactional expenses | (117.1) | (126.8) | (7.6)% |
| Credit loss allowance expenses |
(480.6) |
(169.5) |
183.5% |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided | (965.1) | (410.2) | 135.3% |
Interest and other financial expenses. Interest and other financial expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$367.4 million, an increase of US$253.5 million, or 222.6%, from US$113.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to (i) an increase of US$230.2 million or 263.7% increase in interest expenses on deposits due to the combined increase in the CDI rate in 2021 (the CDI rate was an average of 4.5% compared to an average of 2.8% in 2020) and an increase in the volume of deposits of US$4.0 billion, or 73.1% as of December 31, 2021, and (ii) an increase of US$23.3 million or 87.6% in other interest and similar expenses mainly due the increase in discounts due to renegotiations given to our customers following the growth of our customer base and the purchase volume.
Transactional expenses. Transactional expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$117.1 million, a decrease of US$9.7 million, or 7.6%, from US$126.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to (i) a decrease of US$10.4 million or 22.4% in bank slip costs ("boletos") which reflects the increase in the use of PIX and our own boletos process for payments of our credit card bills and other transactions; (ii) a decrease of US$2.3 million or 9.2% in our credit and debit card network costs reflecting the lower fees charged on the credit card processing due to contract renegotiations. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of US$7.3 million or 24.7% in the rewards expenses following the growth of our customer base and the purchase volume.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 213 |
| |
Credit loss allowance expenses. Credit loss allowance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$480.6 million, an increase of US$311.1 million, or 183.5%, from US$169.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, and it was comprised of an increase in allowance expenses for credit card transaction of US$146.5 million or 102.7% and an increase in allowance expenses for loan to customers of US$164.6 million or 611.9%. The increase from credit card transactions reflects the growth on the purchase volume and the credit card balances to US$5.2 billion as of December 31, 2021 from US$3.1 billion as of December 31, 2020, or an increase of US$2.1 billion or 65.5% and the increase in receivables classified as high risk in levels 2 and 3 as of December 31 2021 compared to as of December 31, 2020. The increase from loan to customers reflects mainly the increase in the loan portfolio to US$1.4 billion as of December 31, 2021 from US$0.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, or an increase of US$1.2 billion. Our more restrictive credit policy implemented in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the positive impact of the Brazilian government’s economic support policies contributed to compensate for some of the potential increase in ECL allowance due to the growth of the purchase transaction and in the credit card and loan receivables. The total ECL allowance for credit cards and loans recorded in the statements of financial position were 8.0% of the total receivable balance of credit cards and loans as of December 31, 2021, compared to 5.5% as of December 31, 2020.
Gross Profit
As a result of the foregoing, our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$732.9 million, an increase of US$406.0 million, or 124.2%, compared to US$326.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our gross margin (gross profit divided by total revenue) remained relatively stable reaching 43.2% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 44.3% for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$903.1 million, an increase of US$484.2 million, or 115.6%, from US$418.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Operating expenses represented 53.2% of our total revenue in 2021, compared to 56.8% in 2020. The main changes leading to the increase in operating expenses in the period are explained below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||
|
2021 |
2020 |
Variation (%) | |
| Customer support and operations | (190.5) | (124.0) | 53.6% |
| General and administrative expenses | (628.9) | (266.0) | 136.4% |
| Marketing expenses | (79.6) | (19.4) | 310.3% |
| Other income (expenses) |
(4.1) |
(9.5) |
(56.8)% |
| Total operating expenses | (903.1) | (418.9) | 115.6% |
Customer support and operations. Customer support and operations expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$190.5 million, an increase of US$66.5 million, or 53.6%, from US$124.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to an increase of (i) US$25.2 million in infrastructure and data processing costs, (ii) US$12.3 million in credit analysis and collection costs, (iii) US$14.0 million in customer services, each of them driven by the increase of purchase volume in 2021 when compared to 2020, and (iv) US$7.6 million in credit and debit card issuance costs, as a result of the increase in the number of customers in 2021. The increase in the number of customers and the purchase volume were higher proportionally compared to the increase in these expenses because of efficiency gains in data processing and our foreign exchange hedging strategy for these expenses. Salaries and associated benefits increased US$6.0 million or 43.2% reflecting the increase in the number of employees in the period allocated to customer support and operations.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 214 |
| |
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$628.9 million, an increase of US$362.9 million, or 136.4%, from US$266.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to (i) an increase of US$90.6 million in salaries and associated benefits primarily attributed to growth in employee headcount of 107% and annual salary increase, (ii) an increase of US$169.2 million in share-based compensation attributed to growth in employee headcount and the increase in the provision for social wages expenses from share-based compensation due to the share appreciation in 2021, and the recognition of the expenses relating to the 2020 and 2021 contingent share awards, granted on August 2020 and November 2021, respectively, and (iii) an increase of US$34.7 million in infrastructure and data processing costs not related to customer transactions.
Marketing expenses. Marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$79.6 million, an increase of US$60.2 million, or 310.3%, from US$19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the marketing expenses associated with our IPO (approximately US$2.2 million) and advertising campaigns in 2021 which did not occur in 2020 due to the due decrease in general expending as a result of COVID-19 pandemic.
Other income (expenses). Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2021 were an expense of US$4.1 million, a decrease of US$5.4 million, or 56.8%, from an expense of US$9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributable to the net effect of an increase of US$10.0 million in foreign exchange losses on transactions indexed to other currencies and the gain of US$19.5 million on the revaluation of our investment in Jupiter, an emerging digital banking platform in India.
Finance costs – result with convertible instruments
Finance costs – In the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not record finance costs in connection with the results of convertible instruments due to the conversion of our senior preferred shares in May 2021. Results with convertible instruments for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$101.2 million, which refers to the interest expense and fair value losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative conversion feature of our senior preferred shares. For more information, see note 23 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Loss before income taxes
As a result of the foregoing, loss before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$170.2 million, a decrease of US$23.0 million, or 11.9%, from US$193.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Income taxes
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2021 were a tax benefit of US$4.9 million, a decrease of US$16.8 million, or 77.4%, from a tax benefit of US$21.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The effective income tax rates were 2.8% and 11.2% in the years 2021 and 2020, respectively, which reflects an increase in current income tax rates due to non-deductible expenses being higher proportionally to the loss before income tax in 2021, compared to 2020, especially due to the expenses related to the senior preferred shares embedded derivative recorded in 2020.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 215 |
| |
Loss for the year
As a result of the foregoing, loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 was US$165.3 million, a decrease of US$6.2 million, or 3.6%, from US$171.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2019
The following table sets forth our statement of profit or loss data for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2020 |
2019 | ||
| (in US$ millions, except percentages) | |||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments | 382.9 | 337.9 | 13.3% |
| Fee and commission income |
354.2 |
274.2 |
29.2% |
| Total revenue |
737.1 |
612.1 |
20.4% |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (113.9) | (109.7) | 3.9% |
| Transactional expenses | (126.8) | (79.3) | 59.9% |
| Credit loss allowance expenses | (169.5) | (175.2) | (3.3)% |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided |
(410.2) |
(364.2) |
12.6% |
| Gross profit |
326.9 |
247.9 |
31.9% |
| Operating Expenses | |||
| Customer support and operations | (124.0) | (115.6) | 7.3% |
| General and administrative expenses | (266.0) | (199.9) | 33.1% |
| Marketing expenses | (19.4) | (41.8) | (53.6)% |
| Other income (expenses) |
(9.5) |
(19.9) |
(52.3)% |
| Total operating expenses | (418.9) | (377.2) | 11.1% |
| Finance costs – result with convertible instruments |
(101.2) |
— |
n.m. |
| Loss before income taxes |
(193.2) |
(129.3) |
49.4% |
| Income Taxes | |||
| Current taxes | (22.3) | (3.6) | n.m. |
| Deferred taxes | 44.0 | 40.3 | 9.2% |
| Total income taxes |
21.7 |
36.8 |
(41.0)% |
| Loss for the year |
(171.5) |
(92.5) |
85.4% |
n.m. = not meaningful.
Total revenue
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$737.1 million, an increase of US$125.0 million, or 20.4%, from US$612.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to significant growth in 2020 in our revenue related to interchange fees, as well as the fees from the sale of mobile phone recharge credits and gains on financial instruments reflecting an increase in securities acquired with cash from deposits, as detailed below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2020 |
2019 | ||
| Interest income – credit card | 217.5 | 214.6 | 1.4% |
| Interest income – lending | 38.9 | 8.6 | 352.3% |
| Interest income – other assets at amortized cost | 37.8 | 56.8 | (33.5)% |
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value |
88.7 |
57.9 |
53.1% |
| Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments |
382.9 |
337.9 |
13.3% |
| Interchange fees | 254.3 | 203.9 | 24.7% |
| Recharge gains | 15.3 | 0.4 | n.m. |
| Rewards revenue | 23.5 | 21.0 | 11.9% |
| Late fees | 31.2 | 27.8 | 12.2% |
| Other fee and commission income |
29.9 |
21.1 |
41.7% |
| Total fee and commission income |
354.2 |
274.2 |
29.2% |
| Total revenue |
737.1 |
612.1 |
20.4% |
n.m. = not meaningful.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 216 |
| |
Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments. Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$382.9 million, an increase of US$45.0 million, or 13.3%, from US$337.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to: (i) an increase in interest income from our loan portfolio (a US$30.3 million, or 352.3%, increase in interest income – lending) and credit card receivables (a US$2.9 million, or 1.4%, increase in interest income – credit card) reflecting the growth of our customer base of 64% in the period, reaching 33.3 million customers in 2020 compared to 19.8 million customers in 2019, partially offset by a decrease of US$19.0 million in interest income from short-term investments (interest income – other assets at amortized costs); and (ii) gains on financial instruments (interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value) for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$88.7 million, an increase of US$30.8 million, or 53.3%, from US$57.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to the increase of US$49.2 million from financial instruments recorded at fair value reflecting an increase in securities acquired with cash from deposits. This increase was partially offset by losses incurred mainly in derivatives transactions.
Total fee and commission income. Total fee and commission income for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$354.2 million, an increase of US$80.0 million, or 29.2%, from US$274.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to an increase of US$50.4 million or 24.7% in our interchange fees arising from the increased volume of transactions with our credit and debit cards, as well as an increase of US$14.9 million in revenue resulting from recharge fees from the sale of mobile phone recharge credits, in each case due to the growth of our customer base in 2020. The increase in fee and commission income for the year ended December 31, 2020 was also affected in part by an US$8.8 million increase in other fee and commission income as a result of an increase in debit card withdrawals by our customers and an increase in bank slip and other financial processing costs as a result of our growing customer base, as well as a US$2.5 million and US$3.3 million increase in rewards revenue and late fees, respectively, in each case related to the greater volume of credit and debit card transactions in the period.
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided
Total cost of financial and transactional services provided for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$410.2 million, an increase of US$46.0 million, or 12.6%, from US$364.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as detailed below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Variation (%) | ||
|
2020 |
2019 | ||
| Interest expense on deposits | (87.2) | (81.1) | 7.5% |
| Other interest and similar expenses |
(26.7) |
(28.6) |
(6.6)% |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (113.9) | (109.7) | 3.8% |
| Bank slip costs | (46.5) | (31.5) | 47.6% |
| Rewards expenses | (29.6) | (21.5) | 37.7% |
| Credit and debit card network costs | (25.0) | (14.7) | 70.1% |
| Other transactional expenses |
(25.7) |
(11.6) |
121.6% |
| Total transactional expenses | (126.8) | (79.3) | 59.9% |
| Credit loss allowance expenses |
(169.5) |
(175.2) |
(3.3)% |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided |
(410.2) |
(364.2) |
12.6% |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 217 |
| |
Interest and other financial expenses. Interest and other financial expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$113.9 million, an increase of US$4.2 million, or 3.8%, from US$109.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to a US$6.1 million or 7.5% increase in interest expenses on deposits due to an increase in the volume of deposits of US$2.8 billion, or 107.3%, when compared to December 31, 2020, which was partially offset by the decrease in the CDI Rate in the period, from 5.9% in 2019 to 2.8% in 2020, and partially offset by a decrease of US$1.9 million or 6.6% in other interest and similar expenses.
Transactional expenses. Transactional expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$126.8 million, an increase of US$47.5 million, or 59.9%, from US$79.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to the growth of our customer base in 2020, including increases in boletos (an increase of US$15 million or 47.6%), rewards expenses (an increase of US$8.1 million or 37.7%), credit and debit card network costs (an increase of US$10.3 million or 70.1%) and other transactional expenses, including operational losses (an increase of US$14.1 million or 121.6%).
Credit loss allowance expenses. Credit loss allowance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$169.5 million, a decrease of US$5.7 million, or 3.3%, from US$175.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, mainly attributable to (i) our more restrictive credit policy implemented in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) the positive impact of the Brazilian government’s economic support policies, which contributed to compensate the anticipated increase in ECL allowance due to the growth in the credit card and loan receivables in 2020. The total ECL allowance for credit cards and loans recorded in the statements of financial position decreased by 0.7 percentage points, to 5.5% of the total receivable balance of credit cards and loans as of December 31, 2020, from 6.2% as of December 31, 2019.
Gross Profit
As a result of the foregoing, our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$326.9 million, an increase of US$79.0 million, or 31.9%, compared to US$247.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our gross margin (gross profit divided by total revenue) increased 3.8% to 44.3% for the year ended December 31, 2020, from 40.5% for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$418.9 million, an increase of US$41.7 million, or 11%, from US$377.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Operating expenses represented 56% of our total revenue in 2020, compared to 60% in 2019. The main changes leading to the increase in operating expenses in the period are explained below.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||
|
2020 |
2019 |
Variation (%) | |
| Customer support and operations | (124.0) | (115.6) | 7.3% |
| General and administrative expenses | (266.0) | (199.9) | 33.1% |
| Marketing expenses | (19.4) | (41.8) | (53.6)% |
| Other income (expenses) |
(9.5) |
(19.9) |
(52.3)% |
| Total operating expenses | (418.9) | (377.2) | 11.1% |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 218 |
| |
Customer support and operations. Customer support and operations expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$124.0 million, an increase of US$8.4 million, or 7.3%, from US$115.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to an increase of (i) US$10.2 million in credit analysis and collection costs and (ii) US$13.0 million in customer services, in each case as a result of the increase in the number of customers in 2020. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in infrastructure and data-processing costs reflecting efficiency gains in data processing and our foreign exchange hedging strategy for these expenses.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$266.0 million, an increase of US$66.1 million, or 33.1%, from US$199.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to (i) an increase of US$35.2 million in salaries and associated benefits, and (ii) an increase of US$37.8 million in share-based compensation, both primarily attributed to growth in employee headcount of 26%, in 2020 compared to the prior year, and the social wages expenses due to the share appreciation; partially offset by a US$24.1 million decrease in credit and debit card issuance costs due to decreased printing and shipping expenses and a reduction in the number of debit cards sent relative to the increase in our number of new customers.
Marketing expenses. Marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$19.4 million, a decrease of US$22.4 million, or 53.6%, from US$41.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the decrease in marketing campaigns due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Other income (expenses). Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2020 were an expense of US$9.5 million, a decrease of US$10.4 million, or 52.3%, from an expense of US$19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributable to a decrease in Brazilian social contribution deductions from revenue (Social Integration Program – PIS and Social Security Program – COFINS).
Finance costs – result with convertible instruments
Finance costs – result with convertible instruments for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$101.2 million, which refers to the interest expense in the amount of US$28.4 million and fair value losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative conversion feature of our senior preferred shares in the amount of US$72.5 million, reflecting the expected valuation of our company as a result of our Series G preferred financing round in January 2021. The change in fair value reflects the appreciation of our shares since the issuance of our senior preferred shares. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not record finance costs in connection with the results of convertible instruments. For more information, see note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Loss before income taxes
As a result of the foregoing, loss before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$193.2 million, an increase of US$63.9 million, or 49.4%, from US$129.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 219 |
| |
Income taxes
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020 were a tax benefit of US$21.7 million, a decrease of US$15.1 million, or 41%, from a tax benefit of US$36.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The effective income tax rates were 11.2% and 28.4% in the years 2020 and 2019, respectively, which reflects an increase in current income tax rates due to non-deductible expenses being higher proportionally to the loss before income tax in 2020, compared to 2019, offset by the addition of expenses related to the senior preferred shares embedded derivative.
Loss for the year
As a result of the foregoing, loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 was US$171.5 million, an increase of US$79.0 million, or 85.4%, from US$92.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth certain of our financial information for the periods indicated:
|
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||
|
December 31, 2021 |
September 30, 2021 |
June
30, |
March 31, 2021 |
December 31, 2020 |
September 30, 2020 | |
| (in US$ millions) | ||||||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments |
439.5 |
295.0 | 184.9 | 127.3 | 89.7 | 70.1 |
| Fee and commission income |
196.4 |
185.9 |
151.2 |
117.7 |
112.9 |
85.9 |
| Total revenue |
635.9 |
480.9 |
336.1 |
245.1 |
202.6 |
156.1 |
| Interest and other financial expenses | (177.0) | (101.4) | (57.2) | (31.7) | (31.4) | (24.0) |
| Transactional expenses | (32.4) | (28.6) | (29.8) | (26.3) | (39.1) | (31.9) |
| Credit loss allowance expenses |
(199.6) |
(127.0) |
(82.7) |
(71.3) |
(55.6) |
(32.9) |
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided |
(409.0) |
(257.0) |
(169.7) |
(129.4) |
(126.1) |
(88.8) |
| Gross profit |
226.9 |
223.9 |
166.4 |
115.7 |
76.5 |
67.3 |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||
| Customer support and operations | (65.8) | (51.6) | (40.1) | (32.1) | (28.5) | (28.9) |
| General and administrative expenses | (224.2) | (166.5) | (122.3) | (115.8) | (81.6) | (56.8) |
| Marketing expenses | (34.5) | (25.6) | (14.7) | (4.9) | (7.9) | (4.1) |
| Other income (expenses) |
9.1 |
(2.0) |
5.0 |
(16.2) |
16.0 |
(2.1) |
| Total operating expenses |
(315.4) |
(245.7) |
(172.9) |
(169.0) |
(102.0) |
(91.9) |
| Finance costs – results with convertible instruments |
— |
— |
— |
— |
(88.0) |
(13.2) |
| Profit (loss) before income taxes | (88.5) | (21.8) | (6.5) | (53.4) | (113.5) | (37.8) |
| INCOME TAXES | ||||||
| Current taxes | (69.7) | (66.4) | (52.2) | (31.4) | (13.2) | (0.2) |
| Deferred taxes |
92.0 |
53.8 |
43.6 |
35.4 |
19.9 |
5.5 |
| Total income taxes |
22.3 |
(12.6) |
(8.7) |
3.9 |
6.7 |
5.3 |
| Loss for the period | (66.2) | (34.4) | (15.2) | (49.5) | (106.8) | (32.6) |
Exchange Rates
While we maintain our books and records in U.S. dollars, the presentation currency for our financial statements and also our functional currency, as a holding company, our material assets are our direct and indirect equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we are therefore dependent upon the results of operations of our subsidiaries, which are denominated primarily in the local currencies of the Latin American countries in which we operate, and as such our consolidated results of operations may be affected by changes in the local exchange rates to the U.S. dollar. We have significant operations in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia. The exchange rates discussed in this section have been obtained from each country’s central bank. However, in most cases, for consolidation purposes, we use a foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rate provided by Bloomberg that differs slightly from that reported by the aforementioned central banks. For more information, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate—Exchange rate and interest rate instability may have a material adverse effect on the economies of the countries in which we operate and the price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Financial Statements.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 220 |
| |
Brazil
The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer of reais by any person or legal entity, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.
The real depreciated against the U.S. dollar from mid-2011 to early 2016, and again from early 2018 to 2020. In particular, during 2015, due to the poor economic conditions in Brazil, including as a result of political instability, the real depreciated at a rate that was much higher than in previous years, and a similar trend occurred during 2018 and 2019. Overall in 2015, the real depreciated 47.0%, reaching R$3.905 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2015. In 2016, the real fluctuated significantly, appreciating 16.5% to R$3.259 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2016. In 2017, the real depreciated 1.5% against the U.S. dollar, ending the year at an exchange rate of R$3.307 per US$1.00. In 2018, the real depreciated 17.1% against the U.S. dollar, ending the year at an exchange rate of R$3.874 per US$1.00 mainly due to lower interest rates in Brazil as well as uncertainty regarding the results of the Brazilian presidential elections, which were held in October 2018. In 2019, the real depreciated 4.0% against the U.S. dollar. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Central Bank of Brazil was R$5.197 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2020, which reflected a 22.4% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during 2020. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Central Bank of Brazil was R$5.581 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2021, which reflected a 7.4% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar since December 31, 2020. There can be no assurance that the real will not depreciate or appreciate further against the U.S. dollar.
The Central Bank of Brazil has previously intervened in the foreign exchange market to attempt to control instability in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank of Brazil or the Brazilian government will continue to allow the real to float freely or to what extent it will intervene in the exchange rate market by re-implementing a currency band system or otherwise. The real may depreciate or appreciate substantially against the U.S. dollar in the future. Furthermore, Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are serious reasons to foresee a serious imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. We cannot guarantee that the Brazilian government will not place restrictions on remittances of foreign capital abroad in the future.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end exchange rates for the purchase of U.S. dollars expressed in Brazilian reais per U.S. dollar. The average rate is calculated by using the average of reported exchange rates by the Central Bank of Brazil on each business day during a monthly period and on the last day of each month during an annual period, as applicable. As of December 31, 2021, the exchange rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil was R$5.581 per US$1.00.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 221 |
| |
|
Year |
Year-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| 2017 | 3.307 | 3.193 | 3.051 | 3.381 |
| 2018 | 3.875 | 3.656 | 3.139 | 4.188 |
| 2019 | 4.031 | 3.946 | 3.651 | 4.259 |
| 2020 | 5.197 | 5.158 | 4.021 | 5.937 |
| 2021 | 5.581 | 5.396 | 4.921 | 5.840 |
Source: Central Bank of Brazil.
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
|
Month |
Period-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| October 2021 | 5.643 | 5.540 | 5.391 | 5.712 |
| November 2021 | 5.620 | 5.557 | 5.417 | 5.669 |
| December 2021 | 5.581 | 5.651 | 5.556 | 5.737 |
| January 2022 | 5.357 | 5.534 | 5.357 | 5.704 |
| February 2022 | 5.139 | 5.197 | 5.014 | 5.328 |
| March 2022 | 4.738 | 4.968 | 4.738 | 5.135 |
| April 2022 (through April 19, 2022) | 4.666 | 4.686 | 4.618 | 4.751 |
Source: Central Bank of Brazil.
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
Mexico
For the last few years, the Mexican government has maintained a policy of nonintervention in the foreign exchange markets, other than conducting periodic auctions for the purchase of U.S. dollars, and has not had in effect any exchange controls (although these controls have existed and have been in effect in the past). We cannot guarantee that the Mexican government will maintain its current policies with regard to the Mexican peso or that the Mexican peso will not further depreciate or appreciate significantly in the future.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end free-market exchange rates for the purchase of U.S. dollars, expressed in nominal Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar, as reported by the Central Bank of Mexico in the Federal Official Gazette. All amounts are stated in Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar. The annual and interim average rates reflect the average of month-end rates, and monthly average rates reflect the average of daily rates.
|
Year |
Year-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| 2017 | 19.935 | 18.929 | 17.494 | 21.908 |
| 2018 | 19.683 | 19.238 | 17.979 | 20.716 |
| 2019 | 18.845 | 19.262 | 18.772 | 20.125 |
| 2020 | 19.949 | 21.496 | 18.571 | 25.119 |
| 2021 | 20.738 | 20.282 | 19.579 | 21.819 |
Source: Central Bank of Mexico.
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 222 |
| |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
|
Month |
Period-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| October 2021 | 20.530 | 20.463 | 20.184 | 20.802 |
| November 2021 | 21.445 | 20.900 | 20.283 | 21.819 |
| December 2021 | 20.467 | 20.892 | 20.467 | 21.418 |
| January 2022 | 20.635 | 20.498 | 20.300 | 20.733 |
| February 2022 | 20.426 | 20.450 | 20.244 | 20.733 |
| March 2022 | 19.911 | 20.556 | 19.863 | 21.378 |
| April 2022 (through April 19, 2022) | 20.045 | 19.951 | 19.744 | 20.161 |
Source: Central Bank of Mexico.
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
Colombia
The Colombian government and the Colombian Central Bank have considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions that relate to the Colombian economy and, consequently, to affect the operations and financial performance of businesses. The Colombian government and the Colombian Central Bank may seek to implement additional measures aimed at controlling further fluctuation of the Colombian peso against other currencies and fostering domestic price stability. The Colombian Central Bank and the Colombian Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, or “MHCP”) have in the past adopted a set of measures intended to tighten monetary policy and control the fluctuation of the Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar. Colombia has a free market for foreign exchange, and the Colombian government allows the Colombian peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar. There can be no assurance that the Colombian government will maintain its current policies with regard to the Colombian peso or that the Colombian peso will not depreciate or appreciate significantly in the future.
The Colombian Central Bank establishes the parameters that must be observed in order to calculate the Representative Market Rate (Tasa Representativa del Mercado); then, the Colombian Financial Superintendency (Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia, or “SFC”) proceeds to compute and certify the Representative Market Rate based on the weighted averages of the buy/sell foreign exchange rates quoted daily by certain financial institutions for the purchase and sale of foreign currency.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end exchange rates for the purchase of U.S. dollars expressed in Colombian pesos per U.S. dollar as certified by the SFC. The rates shown below are in nominal Colombian pesos and have not been restated in constant currency units. The average rate is calculated by using the average of reported exchange rates by the Colombian Central Bank on each business day during a monthly period and on the last day of each month during an annual period, as applicable.
|
Year |
Year-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| 2017 | 2,984.00 | 2,951.32 | 2,837.90 | 3,092.65 |
| 2018 | 3,249.75 | 2,956.43 | 2,705.34 | 3,289.69 |
| 2019 | 3,277.14 | 3,281.09 | 3,072.01 | 3,522.48 |
| 2020 | 3,432.50 | 3,693.36 | 3,253.89 | 4,153.91 |
| 2021 | 3,981.16 | 3,743.09 | 3,420.78 | 4,023.68 |
Source: Colombian Central Bank.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 223 |
| |
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the year. |
|
Month |
Period-end |
Average1 |
Low2 |
High3 |
| October 2021 | 3,766.10 | 3,772.62 | 3,725.75 | 3,812.77 |
| November 2021 | 4,010.98 | 3,902.90 | 3,778.69 | 4,010.98 |
| December 2021 | 3,981.16 | 3,963.13 | 3,886.87 | 4,023.68 |
| January 2022 | 3,982.60 | 3,999.62 | 3,944.04 | 4,084.11 |
| February 2022 | 3,910.64 | 3,935.84 | 3,910.64 | 3,965.41 |
| March 2022 | 3,748.15 | 3,807.17 | 3,746.43 | 3,910.28 |
| April 2022 (through April 19, 2022) | 3,721.31 | 3,750.55 | 3,706.95 | 3,777.41 |
Source: Colombian Central Bank.
| 1. | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 2. | Represents the minimum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
| 3. | Represents the maximum of the exchange rates on the closing of each business day during the month. |
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had US$2,705.7 million and US$2,343.8 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. We believe that our current available cash and cash equivalents and the projected cash flows from our operating activities will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements and capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business for the next 12 months and beyond. The following table shows the generation and use of cash for the periods indicated:
|
For the year ended December 31, | |||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 | |
| (in US$ millions) | |||
| Cash flows (used in) / generated from operating activities | (2,924.3) | 974.5 | 276.1 |
| Cash flow (used in) / generated from investing activities | (154.2) | (16.3) | (4.7) |
| Cash flow (used in) / generated from financing activities | 3,336.0 | 240.1 | 611.2 |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 257.5 | 1,198.4 | 882.7 |
| Cash and cash equivalents – end of the year | 2,705.7 | 2,343.8 | 1,246.6 |
Our cash and cash equivalents include reverse repurchase agreements, short-term investments, banking account balances, securities and other cash and cash equivalents. The reverse repurchase agreements substantially have one-day maturities and have an immaterial risk of change in value. Short-term investments and securities are highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and with an immaterial risk of change in value. For more information, see note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2020
Operating activities. Our net cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, were US$2,924.3 million, an increase in use of US$3,898.8 million from US$974.5 million net cash flows generated from operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2020. Our loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, was US$165.3 million, a decrease of US$6.2 million from US$171.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$293.5 million, compared to US$103.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly as a result of (i) an increase in credit allowance provision to US$503.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to US$187.8 million in the year ended December 31 2020, (ii) an increase in deferred income taxes to US$224.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to US$44.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 (iii) the fair value gains recorded regarding warrants and Jupiter investment for the year ended December 31, 2021 in the total amount of US$39.3 million which did not occur in the year ended December 31, 2020, and (iv) an increase in share-based compensation expenses to US$157.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to US$35.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities were principally affected by an increase in securities, credit card receivables and loans to customers compensated by higher volume of deposits and an increase in payables to a credit card network.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 224 |
| |
Investing activities. Our net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$154.2 million, an increase of US$137.9 million, from US$16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the acquisition of Easynvest and Spin Pay, as detailed in note 1c. of our audited financial statements elsewhere in this annual report.
Financing activities. Our net cash flows generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were US$3,336.0 million, an increase of US$3,095.9 million from US$240.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in the cash generated resulted primarily from the capital increase that occurred in the year ended December 31, 2021, corresponding to the new "Series G'' and “Series G-1” investment round as well as our IPO in December 2021.
As a result of the foregoing, cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021 were US$2,705.7 million, an increase of US$361.9 million, from US$2,343.8 million as of December 31, 2020.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating activities. Our net cash flows generated from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$974.5 million, an increase of US$698.4 million from US$276.1 million net cash flows generated from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our loss for the year ended December 31, 2020, was US$171.5 million, an increase of US$79.0 million from a loss of US$92.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2019. The adjustments to reconcile loss for the year to cash generated from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$103.4 million, a decrease of US$8.1 million from US$111.5 million in 2019, primarily as a result of changes in the fair value of financial instruments increasing to US$48.4 million in 2020, from US$1.8 million in 2019. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities were principally affected by a US$782.5 million increase in deposits, which were primarily used to invest in securities (corresponding to a US$319.3 million increase in securities in 2020), with the remaining cash received from deposits being recorded as cash and cash equivalents. Our credit and debit card activities in the year ended December 31, 2020 also contributed to the changes in net cash flows used in operating activities in the period, corresponding to a US$944.3 million decrease in credit card receivables and a US$1,052.8 million increase in payables to credit card networks.
Investing activities. Our net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$16.3 million, an increase of US$11.6 million, from US$4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the acquisition of Cognitect.
Financing activities. Our net cash flows generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were US$240.1 million, a decrease of US$371.1 million from US$611.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in the cash generated can be explained by the lower proceeds from securitized borrowing and borrowings and financing in 2020 compared to 2019, as deposits from our customers became an important source of cash for our activities. Further, there was a decrease in proceeds from equity financing activities with our investors, which are reflected as capital increase, explained by the issuance of senior preferred shares in the year ended December 31, 2020 of US$300.0 million and the capital increase of US$400.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 225 |
| |
As a result of the foregoing, cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020 were US$2,343.8 million, an increase of US$1,097.2 million, from US$1,246.5 million as of December 31, 2019.
Indebtedness
As of December 31, 2021, our indebtedness was composed of US$12.1 million in instruments eligible as capital, US$147.2 million in borrowings and financing, US$10.0 million in securitized borrowing and US$7.6 million in lease liabilities. The following is a description of our material indebtedness as of December 31, 2021:
Instruments eligible as capital
In June 2019, our subsidiary Nu Financeira issued a subordinated financial letter in the amount equivalent to US$18.8 million, which qualified as Tier 2 capital upon approval of the Central Bank of Brazil in September 2019. The subordinated financial letter bears a fixed interest rate per annum of 12.8%, is callable at the option of the issuer in June 2024, and the principal amount thereunder is payable upon maturity in June 2029. For more information, see note 17 of our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Borrowings and financing
Borrowings and financing are composed of borrowings denominated in reais issued by our subsidiaries in Brazil, generally indexed to the Brazilian CDI rate; and in Mexican Pesos by our Mexican subsidiary, Nu BN Servicios México, S.A. de C.V., or “Nu Servicios,” generally indexed to the Mexican Interbanking Equilibrium Interest Rate, or the “Mexican TIIE.” For more information, see note 20 of our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
On July 7, 2020, our Mexican subsidiary Nu Servicios entered into a term loan credit facility with Bank of America Mexico, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, with interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Mexican TIIE + 1.40% and maturing on July 7, 2023. This term loan credit facility is guaranteed by us and our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos. As of December 31, 2021, US$10.0 million was outstanding under this credit facility.
On November 6, 2020, our Mexican subsidiary Nu Servicios entered into a term loan credit facility with J.P. Morgan México SA, Institución de Banca Múltiple, J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero, with interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Mexican TIIE + 1.45% and maturing on November 4, 2022. This term loan credit facility is guaranteed by us and our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos. As of December 31, 2021, US$10.0 million was outstanding under this credit facility.
On January 25, 2021, our Mexican subsidiary Nu Servicios entered into a term loan credit facility with Goldman Sachs International Bank, with interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Mexican TIIE + 1.18% and maturing on January 25, 2024. This term loan credit facility is guaranteed by us and our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos. As of December 31, 2021, US$25.0 million was outstanding under this credit facility.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 226 |
| |
On June 8, 2021, our Mexican subsidiary Nu Servicios entered into a term loan credit facility with Bank of America México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, with interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Mexican TIIE + 1.40% and maturing on July 7, 2023. This term loan credit facility is guaranteed by us and our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos. As of December 31, 2021, US$20.0 million was outstanding under this credit facility.
On July 23, 2021, our Mexican subsidiary Nu Servicios entered into a term loan credit facility with J.P. Morgan México SA, Institución de Banca Múltiple, J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero, with interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Mexican TIIE + 1.00% and maturing on July 19, 2024. This term loan credit facility is guaranteed by us and our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos. As of December 31, 2021, US$70.0 million was outstanding under this credit facility.
On April 11, 2022, we entered into a US$650 million credit line via a syndicated credit facility with with Citigroup Global Markets Inc.. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding,Inc., Goldman Sachs International Bank and HSBC México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC to support our internationalization strategy and the growth of local operations in Colombia and Mexico. The money is being raised in local currency. Nu is the guarantor and our subsidiaries Nu Mexico and Nu Colombia S.A. are the borrowers of such operation.
Securitized borrowings
Securitized borrowings correspond to senior quotas issued by FIDC Nu, which accrue interest at a rate per annum of the CDI Rate + 30% for the 1st series, CDI Rate + 4% for the 2nd series and CDI Rate + 1.1% for the 3rd series. We fully settled the notes of the 1st series in December 2020 and the notes of the 2nd series in 2021. The principal amount under the senior quotas is payable upon maturity in February 2022 for the 3rd series. Our subsidiary Nu Pagamentos is the holder of the subordinated quotas under the senior notes. The underlying assets of the FIDC correspond to credit card receivables and we expect the volume of securitized borrowings based on receivables from the Brazilian operations to decrease over the next couple years.
Lease liabilities
Lease liabilities correspond to lease agreements for certain items in our operations, primarily in connection with leasing office space under agreements that are generally indexed to reais or Mexican Pesos, as applicable.
Senior preferred shares
On June 18, 2020, we issued senior preferred shares in the amount of US$300.0 million. Our senior preferred shares are considered a financial instrument with convertible features deemed embedded derivatives. As of March 31, 2021, US$342.4 million was recorded as principal of the host debt instrument at amortized cost and US$58.4 million was recorded as a derivative. On May 20, 2021, each senior preferred share was converted into one Series F-1 preferred share, with the total issuance of 16,795,799 shares at the request of the holders. The conversion consisted of a reclassification of the amount recognized as a derivative and recognized as liability into share capital and share premium reserve in the total amount of US$0.4 million. At the date of conversion, the total fair value of the senior preferred shares, which consisted of the fair value of derivative and of the liability, were determined to be equivalent to their values as of March 31, 2021. As a result, there was no effect on the consolidated statement of profit or loss as a result of the conversion. For more information, see note 23 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 227 |
| |
Capital Expenditures
In the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we made capital expenditures (defined as cash payments to acquire property, plant and equipment or intangible assets) of US$28.4 million, US$8.0 million and US$4.7 million, respectively.
These capital expenditures mainly included expenditures related to the upgrade and development of our IT systems, software and infrastructure, facilities, machinery and equipment, furniture and fittings and leasehold improvements.
We expect to increase our capital expenditures to support the growth in our business and operations in the countries in which we operate, including Brazil, Mexico and Colombia. We expect to meet our capital expenditure needs for the foreseeable future from our operating cash flow, our existing cash and cash equivalents, and with the net proceeds of this offering. Our future capital requirements will depend on several factors, including our growth rate, the expansion of our research and development efforts, employee headcount, marketing and sales activities, the introduction of new features to our existing products and the continued market acceptance of our products.
Material Cash Commitments
As of December 31, 2021, we had loan commitments to acquire receivables, most of them related to the credit card network process, having credit risk related to the Company or to other participants of the network. The total commitment was R$1.90 billion (equivalent to US$341 million) of which only R$ 18.2 million (equivalent to US$3.3 million) had not been used at that date.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021:
|
Payments Due By Period as of December 31, 2021 | |||
|
Less than 1 year |
Over 1 year |
Total | |
| (in US$ millions) | |||
| Instruments eligible as capital | - | 44.7 | 44.7 |
| Deposits(1) | |||
| Banking deposit receipt (Recibo de Depósito Bancário – RDB) | 7,813.9 | 47.6 | 7,861.5 |
| Banking deposit receipt (Recibo de Depósito Bancário Vinculado – RDB-V) | 31.6 | - | 31.6 |
| Time deposits | 20.4 | - | 20.4 |
| Borrowings and financing | 54.5 | 107.0 | 161.5 |
| Securitized borrowings |
10.1 |
- |
10.1 |
| Total |
7,930.5 |
199.3 |
8,129.8 |
| (1) | Gross nominal outflows for deposits were calculated considering the exchange rate of R$5.576 to US$1.00, the commercial purchase rate for U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2021 as reported by Bloomberg and the projected Brazilian CDI Rate as reported on the B3’s website, for the deposits. |
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020:
|
Payments Due By Period as of December 31, 2020 | |||
|
Less than 1 year |
Over 1 year |
Total | |
| (in US$ millions) | |||
| Instruments eligible as capital | — | 15.5 | 15.5 |
| Deposits(1) | |||
| Banking deposit receipt (Recibo de Depósito Bancário – RDB) | 4,415.9 | 29.8 | 4,445.7 |
| Banking deposit receipt (Recibo de Depósito Bancário Vinculado – RDB-V) | 90.4 | — | 90.4 |
| Time deposits | — | 19.5 | 19.5 |
| Borrowings and financing | 67.6 | 29.9 | 97.5 |
| Securitized borrowings | 69.0 | 10.7 | 79.7 |
| Senior preferred shares(2) |
— |
910.4 |
910.4 |
| Total |
4,642.9 |
1,015.8 |
5,658.7 |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 228 |
| |
| (1) | Gross nominal outflows for deposits were calculated considering the exchange rate of R$5.197 to US$1.00, the commercial purchase rate for U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2020 as reported by Bloomberg and the projected Brazilian CDI Rate as reported on the B3’s website, for the deposits. |
| (2) | For senior preferred shares, the calculation considers the payments in December 2026 when it is either converted into equity as per holder request or becomes an instrument similar to a perpetual bond. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—D. Property, Plants and Equipment—Intellectual Property.”
D. Trend Information
For a discussion of trend information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Overview—Our Attractive Opportunity Key—Powerful Secular Trends”; “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Market—Industry Background—the Latin American Financial Services Industry is Broken” and “—A. Operating Results.”
E. Critical Accounting Estimates
Not applicable.
Item 6. Directors, senior management and employees
A. Directors and Senior Management
We are managed by our board of directors and by our senior management, pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Cayman Islands Companies Act (as revised).
Board of Directors
As of December 31, 2021, our board of directors is composed of nine members. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that each director holds office until the next annual general meeting following the annual general meeting at which such director was elected. None of our board members have contracts that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that from and after the date on which David Vélez Osorno (together with his affiliates), our founding shareholder, no longer beneficially owns more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of all of our issued shares having the right to receive notice of and vote at our annual general meetings, or the classifying date, the directors shall be divided into three classes designated Class I, Class II, and Class III. Each director shall serve for a term ended on the date of the third annual general shareholders meeting following the annual general shareholders meeting at which such director was elected, provided that directors initially designated as Class I directors will serve for a term ended on the date of the first annual general shareholders meeting following the classifying date, directors initially designated as Class II directors shall serve for a term ended on the second annual general shareholders meeting following the classifying date, and directors initially designated as Class III directors shall serve for a term ended on the date of the third annual general shareholders meeting following the classifying date. The directors nominated by our founding shareholder shall be allocated to the longest duration classes unless otherwise determined by our founding shareholder. The members of our board of directors to be in place upon consummation of this offering will hold office until our next annual general meeting.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 229 |
| |
Our directors do not have a retirement age requirement under our Memorandum and Articles of Association. The following table presents the names of the current members of our board of directors.
| Name | Age | Position(s) |
| David Vélez Osorno | 40 | Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(3) |
| Douglas Mauro Leone | 64 | Director(2)* |
| Anita Sands | 45 | Director(1)* |
| Daniel Krepel Goldberg | 46 | Director(3)* |
| Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía | 68 | Director(2)(3)* |
| Jacqueline Dawn Reses | 52 | Director(1)(2)* |
| Larissa de Macedo Machado (Anitta) | 29 | Director(3) |
| Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres | 60 | Director(1)* |
| Muhtar Ahmet Kent | 69 | Director* |
| (1) | Member of the Audit and Risk Committee. |
| (2) | Member of the Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee. |
| (3) | Member of the Stakeholders’ Committee. |
| * | Independent Director |
The following is a brief summary of the business experience of our directors. Unless otherwise indicated, the current business address for our directors is Rua Capote Valente, 39 – Pinheiros, São Paulo, Brazil.
David Vélez Osorno is our Founder, the chairman of our board of directors and our chief executive officer. He has also been a member of our Stakeholders’ Committee since July 2021. Before founding Nu in 2013, David was a partner at Sequoia Capital between January 2011 and March 2013, in charge of the firm’s Latin American investments group. Before Sequoia, David worked in investment banking and growth equity at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and General Atlantic. He holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Management Science and Engineering and a Master’s in Business Administration, both from Stanford University.
Douglas Mauro Leone is a member of our board of directors, a position he has held since 2016. He has also been a member of our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee since July 2021. As Managing Partner of Sequoia Capital since 1996 and Global Managing Partner since 2012, Doug has partnered with companies including RingCentral and ServiceNow. He began his career in tech at Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, and Prime Computer, before joining Sequoia Capital in 1988. He holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University, a Master’s of Science in Industrial Engineering from Columbia University, and a Master’s of Science in Management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 230 |
| |
Anita Mary Sands is a member of our board of directors, a position she has held since October 2020. She has also been a member of our Audit and Risk Committee since June 2021. Dr. Sands has served on the board of directors of ServiceNow, Inc. since July 2014 and on the board of directors of SVF Investment Corp. since January 2021. From April 2012 to September 2013, Dr. Sands served as group managing director, head of change leadership and a member of the wealth management Americas executive committee of UBS Financial Services, a global financial services firm. Prior to that, from April 2010 to April 2012, Dr. Sands was group managing director and chief operating officer of UBS Wealth Management Americas at UBS Financial Services, and from October 2009 to April 2010, Dr. Sands was a transformation consultant at UBS Wealth Management Americas. Prior to joining UBS Financial Services, Dr. Sands was managing director, head of transformation management at Citigroup N.A. 's global operations and technology organization. Dr. Sands also held several leadership positions with RBC Financial Group and the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC). Dr. Sands holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Physics and Applied Mathematics and a Doctoral Degree in Atomic and Molecular Physics, both from The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, and a Master’s of Science in Public Policy and Management from Carnegie Mellon University. She served as the James Wei Visiting Professor in Entrepreneurship at Princeton University in 2021.
Daniel Krepel Goldberg is a member of our board of directors, a position he has held since April 2021. He has also been a member of our Stakeholders’ Committee since July 2021. He is currently managing partner and CIO at Lumina Capital Management and formerly was a partner and head of Latin America at Farallon Capital Management, position he held from August 2011 to December 2021. He was the president of Morgan Stanley in Brazil from April 2010 to August 2011. Between January 2003 and December 2006, he headed the Economic Law Secretariat of the Ministry of Justice, a former body of the Brazilian antitrust and consumer protection system. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree and a Doctoral Degree in Law from the University of São Paulo. In addition, he received a Master of Laws from Harvard Law School.
Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía is a member of our board of directors, a position he has held since April 2021. He has also been a member of our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee and of our Stakeholders’ Committee since July 2021. He joined us after his 15-year tenure as the President of the Inter-American Development Bank Group from October 2005 to September 2020, and has served as a Managing Director at Allen & Co. (an underwriter participating in this offering) since February 2021. He has also served as Colombia’s Ambassador to the United States for seven years from October 1998 to June 2005. He had a distinguished career in business and government. As Minister of Economic Development between July 1992 and January 1994, he was head of the Instituto de Fomento Industrial, Colombia’s public sector holding company. In the private sector he was the executive producer of TV Hoy. He holds a Degree in Business Administration and Economics from Florida Atlantic University and a Master’s in Business Administration from the Thunderbird School of Global Management. In 1990, Harvard University awarded him a Neiman Fellowship for his achievements in the field of journalism.
Jacqueline Dawn Reses is a member of our board of directors, a position she has held since March 2021. She has also been the Chair of our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee since July 2021 and a member of our Audit and Risk Committee since June 2021. She is the chief executive officer of Post House Capital and most recently served as executive chair of Square Financial Services LLC and capital lead at Block Inc., a publicly traded financial services company which provides services to small businesses and consumers, from October 2015 to October 2020. From February 2016 to July 2018, she also served as people lead at Block, Inc. From September 2012 to October 2015, she served as chief development officer of Yahoo! Inc. Prior to Yahoo, she led the U.S. media group as a partner at Apax Partners Worldwide LLP, which she joined in 2001. She also serves on the board of directors of Affirm, Endeavor, Taskus and Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd. Jackie is also the chairperson of the Economic Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. She previously served on the board of directors of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Social Capital Hedosophia Holding Corp., Contextlogic (Executive Chair) and Social Capital Hedosophia Holding Corp III. She holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Economics with honors from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 231 |
| |
Larissa de Macedo Machado (Anitta) is a member of our board of directors, a position she has held since June 2021. She has also been a member of our Stakeholders’ Committee since July 2021. She has been a well-known contemporary pop artist since 2012 and is currently the Brazilian woman with the most followers on Instagram (over 60 million) and maintains an active social media presence, having been ranked as one of the most influential celebrities by Billboard and one of the 100 most influential and creative people in the world by VOGUE. She is a five-time winner of the Best Brazilian Act on the MTV Europe Music Awards, and was the first Brazilian artist to win the Best Latin American Act award. In 2017, she was ranked as one of the most influential celebrities in social media according to Billboard. As a businesswoman, she manages her own career and production company and gathers numerous advertising contracts and partnerships with international brands. She holds a degree in pre-college administration from Instituto Superior de Educação do Rio de Janeiro (ISERJ/FAETEC).
Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres is a member of our board of directors and also the chairman of our Audit and Risk Committee, positions he has held since June 2021 and July 2021, respectively. As a financial expert, he served in PricewaterhouseCoopers Brazil as audit partner for nearly ten years until 2003 and then served as senior executive and chief financial officer at Bunge Brasil S.A. from 2003 to 2007, Unibanco S.A., Itaú Unibanco Holdings S.A. between 2007 and 2014 and HSBC Brasil S.A. (HSBC LatAm) between 2014 and 2016. He has also served as a board member in Alupar Investimentos S.A. since December 2016 and Via Varejo S.A. (Via S.A.) since September 2019, both listed companies in Brazil. He has been the chairman of the audit committee and designated financial expert at B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão since April 2018 and a member of the compensation committee of Qualicorp Consultoria e Corretora de Seguros S.A. since 2019. He holds a Bachelor’s in Business Administration from Fundação Getulio Vargas and a Bachelor’s in Accounting from Fundação FAPEI, both in Brazil. He also holds a Brazilian registered accountant certification (Brazilian CPA) and has also attended several extension programs in strategy, finance, human resources and governance at Harvard University, Princeton University, University of Western Ontario, Fundação Getulio Vargas and Fundação Dom Cabral.
Muhtar Ahmet Kent is a member of our board of directors, a position he has held since October 2021. Mr. Muhtar Kent is the retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Coca-Cola Company, a multinational beverage corporation. Mr. Kent joined The Coca-Cola Company in 1978; in 2006, he became President and Chief Operating Officer and in 2008 was elevated to President and Chief Executive Officer. From 2009 to 2017, Mr. Kent also served as The Coca-Cola Company’s Chairman. He retired from The Coca-Cola Company in 2019. Mr. Kent currently serves on the boards of 3M Co., a multinational conglomerate, Special Olympics International, the Cambridge China Development Trust and Emory University, and is Chairman of the Advisory Board of Cass Business School at London City University. Mr. Kent previously served as the Chairman of the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum and as a member of its Chairman’s Community. Mr. Kent holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from the University of Hull in England and a Master of Science degree in Administrative Sciences from Cass Business School at the City University London.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 232 |
| |
Executive Officers
Our executive officers are responsible for the management and representation of our company.
On February 8, 2022, we announced that, as per Written Resolutions of the Directors of the Company dated on January 31, 2022, Renee Grace Mauldin Atwood resigned as Officer of the Company. Vitor Guarino Olivier, our former Vice-President of Operations and Platforms, assumed the role as our new Chief People Officer.
The following table lists our current executive officers:
| Name | Age | Position(s) |
| David Vélez Osorno | 40 | Founder and Chief Executive Officer(1) |
| Guilherme Marques do Lago | 43 | Chief Financial Officer |
| Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira | 39 | Co-Founder & Brazil CEO(1) |
| Youssef Lahrech | 48 | Chief Operating Officer |
| Jagpreet Singh Duggal | 48 | Chief Product Officer |
| Henrique Camossa Saldanha Fragelli | 45 | Chief Risk Officer |
| Matt Swann | 51 | Chief Technology Officer |
| Vitor Guarino Olivier | 32 | Chief People Officer |
| (1) | Member of the Stakeholders’ Committee. |
The following is a brief summary of the business experience of our executive officers. Unless otherwise indicated, the current business address for our executive officers is Rua Capote Valente, 39 – Pinheiros, São Paulo, Brazil.
David Vélez Osorno. See “—Board of Directors.”
Guilherme Marques do Lago is our Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since February 2021, and served as our vice president of finance from March 2019 to February 2021. From April 2006 to March 2019, he served in various positions at the Credit Suisse Group AG, including as managing director in its investment banking group. He also previously worked at McKinsey & Company from 2005 to 2006. He holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Industrial Engineering from Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo and a Master’s in Business Administration from the Harvard Business School.
Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira is our Co-Founder & Brazil CEO, a position she has held since February 2021. She has also been the chair of our Stakeholders’ Committee since July 2021. As one of our co-founders, she has already held several functions and currently has a global role leading functions like marketing, communications, ESG, legal and public policy. Cristina began her career in strategic consulting, working at BCG (Boston Consulting Group) and before founding Nu in 2013, worked for several years at Itaú Unibanco S.A. with products and marketing in consumer credit and cards. She was the first woman to be featured visibly pregnant on the cover of a Brazilian business magazine. She was also the only Brazilian to be featured on the 2020 edition of Fortune’s Most Powerful Women International and on Fortune 40 under 40, which recognizes the young leaders who are transforming the world of business. She holds an Engineering Bachelor’s degree and a Master’s degree from Universidade de São Paulo (USP), and also an MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.
Youssef Lahrech is our Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since 2020. He runs our credit card, lending, and investments businesses in Brazil, as well as our international businesses in Mexico and Colombia. In addition, he is responsible for operations, analytics, credit, and data science. Before joining us in 2020, he spent 19 years at Capital One helping build and grow businesses in Canada and the United States, serving in a number of roles involving product, analytics, risk, and technology. He holds a degree in Mathematics from the Ecole Polytechnique and a degree in Engineering from the École des Ponts ParisTech, both in France, as well as a Master’s in Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 233 |
| |
Jagpreet Singh Duggal is our Chief Product Officer, a position he has held since 2020. Prior to joining us, he worked at several companies, including as a director of product management at Facebook from May 2018 to January 2020, senior vice president at Quantcast Corporation from June 2011 to March 2018 and head of strategy for the Google Display business and product leader for Google Brand advertising from 2006 to 2011. He holds a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering from Yale University.
Henrique Camossa Saldanha Fragelli is our Chief Risk Officer, a position he has held since 2018. He is responsible for our risk analysis and compliance. He is in charge of all our risk and compliance related activities, including credit risk, market and liquidity risk, stress testing, model risk, operational and IT risk, regulatory compliance, ethics, and anti-money laundering teams. Before joining us in 2018, he was the global head of traded portfolio analytics at HSBC Bank PLC, based in London, from August 2015 to June 2018 and the head of traded risk analytics for Latin America at HSBC Brasil S.A. from July 2013 to August 2015. He also worked at WestLB as a risk director, based in London, from April 2012 to July 2013 and for LCH.Clearnet from October 2007 to April 2012. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Universidade de São Paulo and a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the École des Hautes Études Commerciales de Paris (HEC Paris).
Matt Swann is our Chief Technology Officer, a position he has held since April 2021. From November 2018 to March 2021, he served as chief technology officer of Booking.com B.V. (Booking.com). From September 2017 to November 2018, he served as the chief technology officer of Stubhub, Inc. (Stubhub.com). From February 2015 to September 2017, he served as the chief information officer of the consumer division at Citibank N.A. From February 2006 to February 2015, he served as the vice president of global payments at Amazon.com, Inc. He currently serves on the board of directors at Payfare Inc. He holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Computer and Information Sciences from Arizona State University.
Vitor Guarino Olivier is our Chief People Officer, a position he has held since January 2022. From December 2019 to January 2022, he served as our vice-president of operations and platforms. From March 2019 to March 2020, he served as our vice president of consumers. From August 2016 to March 2019, he served as the general manager of our digital account products. From April 2014 to August 2016, he led our core financial services engineering team. Prior to joining us, he held positions in wealth management, credit, and foreign exchange at Banco BTG Pactual S.A. from August 2011 to March 2014. He holds a degree in Computer Science and Economics from Duke University.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.
Shareholder's Agreement
On November 29, 2021, we entered into a shareholder’s agreement, or the “Shareholder’s Agreement,” with our founding shareholder.
Among other things, the Shareholder’s Agreement provides our founding shareholder with the right to nominate a certain number of directors based on the aggregate voting power of the issued share capital held by our founding shareholder and his affiliates, so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 5% of the voting power of our issued share capital. The Shareholder’s Agreement provides that, subject to compliance with applicable law and NYSE rules, for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 40% of the voting power of our issued share capital, our founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate up to five nominees to our board of directors (or if the size of our board of directors is increased, a majority of the members of our board of directors); for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own at least 25% of the voting power of our issued share capital, our founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate up to three nominees to our board of directors (or if the size of our board of directors is increased, one-third of the members of our board of directors); and for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own at least 5% of the voting power of our issued share capital, our founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate one nominee to our board of directors (or if the size of our board of directors is increased, 10% of the members of our board of directors).
Form 20-F | 2021 | 234 |
| |
In addition, the Shareholder’s Agreement provides that for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own at least 5% of the voting power of our issued share capital, our founding shareholder will have the right to designate its pro rata share of the total number of members of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee of our board of directors that is equal to the proportion that the number of directors designated by our founding shareholder bears to the total number of directors on our board, except to the extent that such membership would violate applicable law or NYSE rules. The rights granted to our founding shareholder to designate directors pursuant to the Shareholder’s Agreement are additive to and not intended to limit in any way the rights that our founding shareholder or any of his affiliates may have to nominate, elect or remove our directors under our Memorandum and Articles of Association or laws of the Cayman Islands.
The Shareholder’s Agreement also provides that for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 10% of the voting power of our issued share capital, we will agree not to take, or permit our subsidiaries to take, certain actions without the prior written approval of David Vélez Osorno, including incurring indebtedness in excess of our net equity value on a consolidated basis, entering into transactions with our officers, directors or other affiliates (excluding our founding shareholder), making material changes to the strategic direction or scope of our business, adopting a shareholders’ rights plan, paying or declaring any dividend or distribution on our shares, entering into a merger, consolidation, reorganization or other business combination or a transaction or series of transactions that would result in a change of control, any liquidation, dissolution, receivership, commencement of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding, authorizing or issuing any share capital or any security convertible, exchangeable or exercisable for any share capital (subject to specified exceptions), acquiring or disposing of assets the aggregate consideration or fair value or which exceeds 20% of our net equity value on the date of the transaction, or determining the annual compensation of any of our officers and directors (excluding our founding shareholder).
The Shareholder’s Agreement also provides our founding shareholder with access to our books and records and financial and operating data with respect to our business, and affords our founding shareholder certain consultation rights with our senior management with respect to our business and financial results, so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 5% of the voting power of our issued share capital.
Lock-Up and Market Standoff Agreements
We agreed that we will not (1) offer, pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right, or warrant to purchase or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to any of our ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, or (2) enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers all or a portion of the economic consequences associated with the ownership of any ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, or any such other securities (regardless of whether any of these transactions are to be settled by the delivery of ordinary shares, BDRs or such other securities, in cash or otherwise), or (3) publicly disclose the intention to take any of the actions restricted by clause (1) or (2) above, in each case without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC during the period ended on the earlier of (x) the date of our public release of earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 and (y) the 181st day after the date of the prospectus of our initial public offering, other than our Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, with certain other exceptions described in the prospectus of our initial public offering.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 235 |
| |
Our directors, our executive officers, and holders of substantially all of our share capital and securities convertible into our shares have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters of our initial public offering pursuant to which each of these persons or entities, with limited exceptions described in the “Underwriting” section of the prospectus for our initial public offering, during the period ended on the later of (x) the opening of trading on the second trading day immediately following our public release of earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 and (y) the 181st day after the date of our initial public offering (such period, the “restricted period”), may not, without the prior written consent of us and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC:
(i) offer, pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs, or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs (including, without limitation, ordinary shares, BDRs or such other securities which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by such directors, executive officers, and shareholders in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and securities which may be issued upon exercise of a share option or warrant);
(ii) enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of ordinary shares, BDRs or such other securities, whether any such transaction described in clause (i) or (ii) above is to be settled by delivery of Class A ordinary shares, BDRs or such other securities, in cash or otherwise;
(iii) make any demand for, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any ordinary shares, BDRs or such other securities; or
(iv) publicly disclose the intention to take any of the actions restricted by clause (i) or (ii) above.
In addition holders of the remainder of our share capital and securities convertible into or exchangeable for our shares have entered into market standoff agreements with us under which they have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, during the restricted period, they will not, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, dispose of, or enter into any swap with respect to, any ordinary shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for ordinary shares, including in the form of BDRs.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Form 20-F | 2021 | 236 |
| |
(A) up to 15% of the outstanding Class A ordinary shares, BDRs and other securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs (but excluding any Excluded Securities) held by each of our current employees (but excluding former employees, current executive officers and directors, our founders, and any other existing non-employee investors) (the “Employee Shareholders”) may be sold during the First Release Window; provided that the last reported closing price of our Class A ordinary shares on the NYSE for each trading day beginning on the first trading day on which our Class A ordinary shares are traded on the NYSE and ending on the trading day immediately prior to the first day of the First Release Window is at least 15% greater than the initial public offering price per share; and
(B) up to 25% of the outstanding Class A ordinary shares, BDRs and other securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs (but excluding any Excluded Securities) held by each Employee Shareholder, former employee and any other existing investor (but excluding current executive officers and directors and our founders) (the “Non-Founder/D&O Shareholders”), plus any First Release Window-eligible shares not sold during the First Release Window, may be sold during the Second Release Window; provided that each of (a) the average of the last reported closing price of our Class A ordinary shares on the NYSE for the 10-trading day period ended on and including the date on which we publicly release our earnings for the year ended December 31, 2021 and (2) the closing price of our Class A ordinary shares on the first full trading day immediately following the date of such earnings release is at least 25% greater than the initial public offering price per share.
The term “founders” means David Vélez Osorno, Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira and Adam Edward Wible. Upon the expiration of the restricted period, substantially all of the securities subject to such transfer restrictions will become eligible for sale, subject to the limitations discussed above.
| B. | Compensation |
Compensation of Directors and Officers
Under Cayman Islands law, we are not required to disclose compensation paid to our senior management on an individual basis and we have not otherwise publicly disclosed this information elsewhere.
Our executive officers, directors and management receive fixed and variable compensation. They also receive benefits in line with market practice in Brazil and the countries in which we operate. The fixed component of their compensation is set on market terms and adjusted annually.
The variable component consists primarily of awards of shares, which are awarded under our share options long-term incentive program, as discussed below. For a description of our aggregate compensation expenses and the equity incentive plans available to senior management, see “—Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Executive Compensation.”
Employment Agreements
We intend to enter into, either directly or through our operating subsidiaries, services agreements with each of the executive officers listed in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Executive Officers” above.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 237 |
| |
Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance
We understand that directors and officers liability insurance is a crucial component of attracting and retaining our directors and officers. We currently hold a directors and officers liability policy to cover losses and damages to third parties for acts related to the exercise of duties by our directors and officers, up to a maximum guarantee limit of R$120 million. The net premium value of the policy was R$0.6 million and the policy matures on June 1, 2022.
As a public company, we intend to obtain a new directors and officers liability insurance policy for acts carried out by our directors and executive officers in the course of their duties to us. This coverage may not be available to us in the future at a reasonable rate, may not cover all potential claims for indemnification and may not be adequate to indemnify our directors and officers for all liability that may be imposed.
| C. | Executive Compensation |
Directors and Key Management Compensation
Other than the tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan in which certain executive officers located in the United States participate, we currently do not set aside any amounts related to pension, retirement or other similar benefits. The aggregate compensation, including that paid by our controlled companies, of our directors and other key management personnel for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were US$34.4 million, US$9.0 million and US$10.5 million, respectively.
Management compensation includes the compensation of remunerated members of our Board of Directors, which increased from one person in 2020 to seven in 2021, and of Executive Officers, which increased from one person in 2020 to nine persons in 2021.
However, certain executive officers and members of our board of directors hold executive positions in companies controlled by us, and may receive a portion of their reported compensation directly from such controlled companies, in accordance with the activities they perform.
Compensation Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve the following objectives:
| · | Attract and retain the most talented and dedicated executive officers whose knowledge, and skill set are critical to the successful execution of our business strategy; |
| · | Ensure our executive officers are compensated in a manner consistent with competitive practices of other leading growth companies of a similar size and stage of development; |
| · | Reward our executive officers for their performance and motivate them to achieve our long-term strategic goals in a manner that is aligned with the interests of our shareholders; and |
| · | Reinforce our leadership principles and cultural values, which promote empowering and having our customers come first, pursuing the highest performance, taking responsibility for our commitments and growing efficiently. |
Compensation Composition
The total compensation package for our executive officers consists of a mix of fixed compensation and share-based compensation. We believe such a structure is well-placed for maximizing shareholder value while, at the same time, attracting, motivating and retaining high-quality executive officers.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 238 |
| |
| · | Fixed Compensation. Our executive officers receive a fixed base salary, which is paid based on the services provided, and intended to compensate each officer according to the scope of his or her duties. |
| · | Share-Based Compensation. We maintain a long-term incentive plan, which provides for awards of options and RSUs. We believe that it is important for the majority of our executive officers’ compensation to be delivered in the form of share-based compensation, creating greater alignment of the interests of key employees with those of shareholders and allowing us and our subsidiaries to attract and retain key employees. |
Salaries and benefits provided are established in accordance with our compensation strategy. This fixed portion of compensation seeks to recognize the value of each of the executive officer positions and contribute to the retention of our management team, which provides greater stability and quality in our activities.
In addition, we believe that our share-based compensation drives further retention of key executives and ensures alignment between their interests and those of our shareholders. Share-based compensation is also defined based on market research and on the compensation strategy adopted. For more information on the ownership of our shares by our directors and officers, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”
In the payment of variable compensation to our executives, we consider the following: (i) individual performance; (ii) the performance of the business unit; (iii) our performance as a whole; and (iv) the importance of certain performance to our long-term goals and objectives. Our management team members are evaluated based on the achievement of our goals, consisting of specific objectives and indicators, in accordance with our current strategy.
There is currently no compensation or benefits linked to the occurrence of a particular corporate transaction.
Board of Directors
In the year ended December 31 2019, the members of our board of directors did not receive any compensation due to the director’s service as director, either because they are representatives of investors, or because they exercise executive functions in companies controlled by us and, therefore, receive their compensation from the companies controlled by us.
Starting in the year 2020, we started engaging paid independent board members who receive compensation made up of a mix of cash and share-based compensation. We did not proportion compensation for our directors in any specific ratio between cash and equity, but note that all paid directors received compensation that was primarily weighted towards equity compensation as a means of creating greater alignment to our long-term goals and the interests of our shareholders.
In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted a director compensation policy, which governs compensation paid to our existing non-employee directors as follows:
| · | A fixed board membership annual equity retainer; and |
| · | Each non-employee director that serves as either the chairperson or a member of one of our board committees is expected to receive an additional amount in connection with such committee participation or chair position. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 239 |
| |
Compensation Tables
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the proportion of each element in the total compensation paid by Nu Holdings Ltd. and its controlled companies was as follows:
|
Type of Compensation |
Executive Officers(1) |
Board of Directors |
| Fixed compensation | 4% | 13% |
| Share-based compensation |
96% |
87% |
| Total |
100% |
100% |
(1) Our executive officers received fixed compensation from our controlled companies.
The maximum, minimum and average aggregate compensation paid us to members of our board of directors and our executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are presented below:
|
Executive Officers As of and for the year ended |
Board of Directors As of and for the year ended | |||||
|
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 | |
| (in US$ million) | ||||||
| Maximum | 29.1 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | — |
| Minimum | 29.1 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | — |
| Average | 8.9 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | — |
Note: Maximum and minimum compensation reflect members of our board of directors and our executive officers that were members for the full year. For 2021, this includes only one board of director member and one executive officer.
| D. | Employee Benefit and Share Plans |
Bonus or Profit-Sharing Plan
We currently do not provide benefits under any bonus or profit-sharing plan.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 240 |
| |
Nu Holdings Ltd. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan
Our board of directors, at a meeting held on January 30, 2020, approved the Nu Holdings Ltd. Omnibus Incentive Plan, as most recently amended on August 30, 2021, which establishes the general rules and conditions for granting options and RSUs.
Purpose. The Omnibus Incentive Plan aims to increase our capacity to attract and retain employees, consultants and management, and to motivate such individuals to serve us and to expend maximum effort to improve our commercial results and earnings by providing these individuals with an opportunity to acquire and increase their equity interest in us.
Eligibility. Any of our or any of our affiliates’ employees, officers, non-employee directors or consultants is eligible to receive awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Administration. Without limitation, our board of directors will have full and final authority, subject to the other terms and conditions of the Omnibus Incentive Plan, to (1) designate participants, (2) determine the type or types of awards to be made to a participant, (3) determine the number of shares to be subject to an award, (4) establish the terms and conditions of each award (including the option price, the nature and duration of any restriction or condition (or provision for lapse thereof) relating to the vesting, exercise, transfer or forfeiture of an award, (5) prescribe the form of each award agreement and (6) amend, modify or supplement the terms and conditions of any outstanding award, including the authority to effectuate the purposes of the Omnibus Incentive Plan, to modify awards to foreign nationals or individuals who are employed outside of Brazil or the United States or to recognize differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Our board of directors delegated to our chief executive officer all of their authority under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, including, without limitation, their authority to make awards under such plan.
Authorized Shares. The total number of shares authorized for issuance under our equity incentive plans (including the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the SOP, as defined below) is 933,760,320. As of December 31, 2021, 262,865,669 were available for issuance, and there were 215,757,100 options and 59,638,539 RSUs granted and outstanding, vested and unvested, under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the SOP.
It is intended that the maximum number of Class A ordinary shares available for issuance pursuant to equity incentive awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the SOP, together, will not exceed 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares, on a fully diluted basis at any given time. Our board of directors may adjust the number of Class A ordinary shares available for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the SOP from time to time at its discretion.
Awards. The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides for the grant of options and RSUs.
Options:
| · | Price. The exercise price of each option is set by the board of directors (or our chief executive officer as applicable) and stated in each award agreement. The exercise price of each option for U.S. taxpayers (except with respect to substitute awards) will be at least the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. For non-U.S. taxpayers the exercise price will be determined by our board in its sole discretion. In no event will the exercise price of an option be less than the par value of a share. |
| · | Term. The options expire after a maximum period of ten (10) years from the grant date, or on the date established in the respective award agreement. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 241 |
| |
| · | Vesting. Each option will become exercisable as the board of directors (or our chief executive officer as applicable) determines and as set forth in the applicable award agreement. |
| · | Exercise Method. The options are exercised by their holders through delivery of an exercise notice to us establishing the number of options with respect to which the option is being exercised, accompanied by full payment of the option price. |
| · | Rights of Holders of the Options. Except as otherwise stated in an award agreement, option holders will not have any shareholder rights (e.g., the right to receive cash payments, dividends or distributions attributable to the shares underlying the option or voting rights to shares underlying the option) until the options have been exercised and the respective shares delivered. |
RSUs:
| · | Restrictions. At the time of grant, our board of directors (or our chief executive officer as applicable) may establish a period of restriction or any other additional restrictions, including the satisfaction of performance goals applicable to RSUs. RSUs cannot and may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during the restricted period or before the satisfaction of any other applicable restrictions. |
| · | Settlement of RSUs. The RSUs may be settled in cash or shares, as determined and specified in the award agreement. |
| · | Voting Rights and Dividends. Unless otherwise specified in the award agreement, the holders of RSUs do not have rights as shareholders, including any voting rights or rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, until the RSUs have been settled and the respective shares delivered. |
| · | Creditor’s Rights. Holders of RSUs will have no other rights beyond those of a general creditor of ours or our affiliates. |
| · | Delivery of Shares. Shares will be delivered to holders of RSUs after the end of the restricted period and after any other terms and conditions set forth in the award agreement have been satisfied. |
Termination of Service. In the event of a termination of service, any RSUs that are not vested are automatically cancelled, without payment of consideration and any unvested options will be automatically forfeited.
Change in Control. In the event of a change in control, the awards shall be treated in accordance with the transaction agreement and, if not specified, the board of directors has the discretion to continue, assume, substitute, cancel, suspend exercise (in order to allow the transaction to close) or accelerate, in whole or in part, the awards.
Term. The Omnibus Incentive Plan shall be in full force and effect for a period of ten (10) years and shall automatically terminate thereafter.
Adjustments. If (1) the number of outstanding shares is increased or decreased or the shares are changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of our shares or other securities on account of any recapitalization, reclassification, share split, reverse split, combination of shares, exchange of shares, share dividend or other distribution payable in Class A ordinary shares or other increase or decrease in such shares effected without receipt of consideration by us or (2) there occurs any spin-off, split-up, extraordinary cash dividend or other distribution of assets by us, (i) the number and kinds of shares for which grants of awards may be made, (ii) the number and kinds of shares for which outstanding awards may be exercised or settled and (iii) the performance goals relating to outstanding awards will be equitably adjusted by us; provided that any such adjustment will comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, in the event of any such increase or decrease in the number of outstanding shares or other transaction described in clause (2) above, the number and kind of shares for which awards are outstanding and the option price per share of outstanding options will be equitably adjusted.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 242 |
| |
Company Rights. Shares acquired through the exercise of options are subject to a right of first refusal for our benefit, repurchase rights for our benefit, a tag-along right and a drag-along right. However, these rights will cease immediately before the initial public offering of the Company.
Amendment; Termination. The board of directors may, at any time and from time to time, amend, suspend or terminate the Omnibus Incentive Plan as to any awards that have not been made. An amendment to the Omnibus Incentive Plan will be contingent on shareholder approval to the extent stated by the board of directors, required by applicable law or required by applicable securities exchange listing requirements. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Omnibus Incentive Plan may materially impair the rights or obligations of a participant without the participant’s consent. The repricing of awards is expressly prohibited without shareholder approval.
Nu Holdings Ltd. Share Option Plan, or “SOP”
Our SOP was originally adopted by our board of directors and shareholders in October 2016 and was most recently amended on August 30, 2021.
Purpose. The purpose of the SOP is to encourage our key executives, professionals and other persons or legal entities performing bona fide services for us or any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries to invest in us, to promote their commitment to our results and the expansion of its business in the long term, by providing such individuals with the opportunity to acquire our shares.
Administration. The SOP is administered by our board of directors, provided that our chief executive officer has authority to manage grants constituting one percent (1%) or less of our then outstanding share capital. Our board of directors (or our chief executive officer, as applicable) will have full authority to take all necessary and adequate measures for the administration of the SOP.
Authorized Shares. There are 933,760,320 shares authorized for issuance under our equity incentive plans (including the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the SOP). While there are awards outstanding under the SOP, we do not intend to make future awards under the SOP. Any outstanding awards under the SOP that expire or are canceled shall again be available for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Eligibility. Our key executives, professionals and other persons or legal entities performing bona fide services for us or any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the SOP.
Awards. The SOP provides for the grant of options.
Options. Options allow the participant to subscribe for a certain number of our shares. Unless otherwise set forth in an award agreement, the options will have a vesting period of five (5) years with (i) 20% of the award vesting after the first anniversary of the grant date and (ii) the remaining 80% vesting in equal monthly installments over forty-eight (48) months. Options may be exercised within ten (10) years after grant. The price per share shall be the price determined by the board of directors.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 243 |
| |
Lock-Up. In connection with any underwritten public offering of our shares, a participant may not directly or indirectly, sell, make any short sale of, loan, hypothecate, pledge, offer, grant or sell any awards for a maximum of 180 days following the offering without consent of the underwriter. This restriction shall terminate two years after our initial public offering.
Change in Control. In the event of a change in control, the awards shall be treated in accordance with the transaction agreement and, if not specified, the board of directors has the discretion to continue, assume, substitute, cancel, suspend exercise (in order to allow the transaction to close) or accelerate, in whole or in part, the awards.
Termination of Employment. If the participant is terminated, such participant has 180 days to exercise his or her options. If the participant is terminated due to death or disability, he or she has six (6) months and twelve (12) months to exercise the participant’s options, respectively.
Amendment. Any amendment to the SOP is subject to the approval of our board of directors, who may amend the SOP Plan at any time and for any reason.
Term. The SOP shall be in force and effect for a period of twenty (20) years.
Company Rights. The options were subject to a right of first refusal for our benefit, a tag-along right and a drag-along right. However, these rights ceased immediately before our initial public offering.
| E. | Contingent Share Awards |
2020 Contingent Share Awards
On July 5, 2021, our board of directors approved the issuance to Rua California Ltd., an entity holding more than 10% of our share capital and that is controlled by David Vélez Osorno, our founder and chief executive officer, of the following, under the previously granted 2020 contingent share awards, or the “2020 Contingent Share Awards”: (i) upon the closing of a primary issuance, secondary sale or liquidation event in which the aggregate value of the consideration to be paid is at least US$100,000,000 and at least one participant is neither us nor an affiliate of Rua California Ltd. or Mr. Vélez, or an “Award Applicable Transaction,” involving a pre-money valuation of us equal to or greater than US$20,000,000,000 but less than US$30,000,000,000, or the “2020 Award First Milestone,” a number of Class A ordinary shares equal to 0.5% of the total number of ordinary shares in issue (on an as-converted, fully diluted basis) calculated immediately after the closing of such Award Applicable Transaction and the issuance of such shares to Rua California Ltd., and (ii) upon the closing of an Award Applicable Transaction involving a pre-money valuation of us equal to or greater than US$30,000,000,000, or the “2020 Award Second Milestone,” a number of Class A ordinary shares such that the total number of Class A ordinary shares issued pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) would equal 1% of the total number of ordinary shares in issue (on an as-converted, fully diluted basis) calculated immediately after the closing of such Award Applicable Transaction and the issuance of such shares to Rua California Ltd., provided that, for each of the 2020 Award First Milestone and the 2020 Award Second Milestone, Mr. Vélez must remain a director, officer, employee or consultant of ours through the achievement of the applicable milestone. The 2020 Award First Milestone was achieved upon the closing of our Series G preferred financing round, and the 2020 Award Second Milestone was achieved upon the closing of our Series G-1 preferred financing round. Accordingly, we issued 45,580,962 Class A ordinary shares on July 5, 2021 (after giving effect to the Share Split), as a result of the achievement of the 2020 Award First Milestone and the 2020 Award Second Milestone under the 2020 Contingent Share Awards.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 244 |
| |
2021 Contingent Share Awards
The 2021 Contingent Share Awards (as detailed and defined below) serve to align Mr. Vélez’s interests with those of our shareholders by creating a strong and visible link between Mr. Vélez’s incentives and our long-term performance and impact. The 2021 Contingent Share Awards agreement establishes challenging long-term milestones for Nu, and establishes that Mr. Vélez will receive no variable compensation or cash or equity bonus if these milestones are not achieved.
The 2021 Contingent Share Awards account for nearly 100% of Mr. Vélez’s total compensation in the form of performance-based, long-term equity incentive awards. Our board of directors and our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee engaged with a compensation consultant to understand the best market practices in determining the structure of Mr. Vélez’s equity incentive awards in a manner that supports our overall strategy and company goals.
In determining the awards, our board of directors took into consideration Mr. Vélez’s unparalleled leadership since the inception of Nu, his past and expected future contributions to us and our board of directors’ desire to provide meaningful incentives to achieve our ambitious company goals. Having these ambitious goals in place is crucial to continuing to retain Mr. Vélez to lead Nu over the coming years, and will help us focus on continuing to build revolutionary products that improve the lives of millions of customers.
On November 22, 2021, we granted to Rua California Ltd., an entity holding more than 10% of our share capital and that is controlled by Mr. Vélez, the right under the 2021 contingent share awards, or the “2021 Contingent Share Awards,” and together with the 2020 Contingent Share Awards, the “Contingent Share Awards” to be issued (i) upon the earlier of (x) the closing of an Award Applicable Transaction that occurs before an initial public offering of our Class A ordinary shares and involves a pre-money valuation of us of equal to or greater than US$18.69 per share but less than US$35.30 per share, or (y) following an initial public offering of our Class A ordinary shares, the first instance in which the volume-weighted average price per Class A ordinary share is equal to or greater than US$18.69 per share but less than US$35.30 per share for a period of 60 consecutive trading days on the principal stock exchange on which our Class A ordinary shares are listed or quoted, or the “2021 Award First Milestone,” a number of Class A ordinary shares equal to 1% of the total number of ordinary shares in issue (on an as-converted, fully diluted basis) calculated immediately after the occurrence of the 2021 Award First Milestone and the issuance of such shares to Rua California Ltd., and (ii) upon the earlier of (x) the closing of an Award Applicable Transaction that occurs before an initial public offering of our Class A ordinary shares and involves a pre-money valuation of us of equal to or greater than US$35.30 per share, or (y) following an initial public offering of our Class A ordinary shares, the first instance in which the volume-weighted average price per Class A ordinary share is equal to or greater than US$35.30 per share for a period of 60 consecutive trading days on the principal stock exchange on which our Class A ordinary shares are listed or quoted, the “2021 Award Second Milestone,” a number of Class A ordinary shares equal to 1% of the total number of ordinary shares in issue (on an as-converted, fully diluted basis) calculated immediately after the occurrence of the 2021 Award Second Milestone and the issuance of such shares to Rua California Ltd., provided that, for each of the 2021 Award First Milestone and the 2021 Award Second Milestone, Mr. Vélez must (x) remain a director, officer, employee or consultant of ours or one of our affiliates (A) through the achievement of the applicable milestone and (B) for at least five years following the date of the grant thereunder, and (y) Rua California Ltd. must remain owned and controlled by Mr. Vélez (provided that (1) the conditions in clause (x) will not apply if Mr. Vélez’s relationship is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Vélez for good reason (as such terms are defined in the 2021 Contingent Share Award) prior to such applicable milestone or such date, as applicable, (2) the condition in clause (x)(B) will be waived upon Mr. Vélez’s death or disability with respect to any milestone that was achieved prior to his death or disability, and (3) the condition in clause (y) will be waived upon Mr. Vélez’s death). Prior to this offering, neither the 2021 Award First Milestone nor the 2021 Award Second Milestone has been achieved.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 245 |
| |
Mr. Vélez has committed to donate all shares resulting from the 2021 Contingent Share Awards to his family’s philanthropic platform that he and his wife have established to help improve the opportunities for Latin America’s most vulnerable and disadvantaged children and young adults. In August 2021, Mr. Vélez and his wife signed The Giving Pledge, a program created by Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett, and entered into a public giving commitment pledging to donate the majority of their wealth to this same platform.
We will determine the fair value of the 2021 Contingent Share Awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which uses multiple input variables to determine the probability of satisfying the market conditions requirements. The fair value of the 2021 Contingent Share Awards is not subject to change based on future market conditions and will be recognized as share-based compensation expenses over the period between the grant date and the greater of (i) the requisite service period (five years) or (ii) when the market condition requirements are expected to be satisfied, or the “recognition period.” The recognition period is not expected to be subsequently revised, and the related expenses will be recorded irrespective of whether the applicable market conditions are satisfied.
The expenses to be recognized as a result of the 2021 Contingent Share Awards are expected to increase our share- based compensation expenses in the future. The total fair value of the 2021 Contingent Share Awards was determined to be US$422.6 million and the expenses will be recognized over a period of 7.5 years since its issuance.
| F. | Board Practices |
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has established an Audit and Risk Committee, a Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee and a Stakeholders’ Committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our board of directors is described below. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our board of directors.
Audit and Risk Committee
Our Audit and Risk Committee consists of Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres, Anita Sands and Jacqueline Dawn Reses, with Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres serving as chairperson. Our board of directors has determined that Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres, Anita Sands and Jacqueline Dawn Reses meet the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our Audit and Risk committee also meets the financial literacy and sophistication requirements of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. The duties and responsibilities of our Audit and Risk Committee include:
| · | appointing and overseeing the work and compensation of any accounting firm engaged for the purposes of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing audit, review or attest services for us, including our independent registered public accounting firm; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 246 |
| |
| · | pre-approving the audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | discussing the scope and results of the audit with our independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end results of operations; |
| · | resolving any disagreements between management and our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | evaluating the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | overseeing our internal audit function; |
| · | reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our financial statements and public disclosures of our financial information; |
| · | reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; |
| · | establishing procedures for complaints regarding accounting, internal controls or audit matters; |
| · | reviewing and monitoring our risk management policies and procedures; |
| · | advising our board of directors regarding the systematic review of our risk exposure to economic sectors, geographic areas and risk types; |
| · | overseeing our cybersecurity risk management, and discussing with management our cybersecurity program; and |
| · | reviewing related-party transactions. |
Our Audit and Risk Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE.
Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee
Our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee consists of Jacqueline Dawn Reses, Douglas Mauro Leone and Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía, with Jacqueline Dawn Reses serving as chairperson. The duties and responsibilities of our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee include:
| · | approving or making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the compensation of our executive officers and key service providers; |
| · | reviewing and approving the compensation of the members of our board of directors; |
| · | reviewing our management succession planning; |
| · | reviewing and evaluating our executive compensation and benefits policies; |
| · | reviewing and approving grants of equity compensation awards to our executive officers; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 247 |
| |
| · | reviewing and discussing with our executive officers and other members of management, outside counsel and compensation consultants our public disclosures regarding our compensation policies, programs and practices for executive officers; |
| · | reviewing our programs and practices related to human capital management metrics; |
| · | reviewing our leadership development process for senior management; and |
| · | reviewing and assessing our workforce inclusion and diversity and the administration of compensation programs in a nondiscriminatory manner. |
Our Leadership Development, Diversity and Compensation Committee operates under a written charter which satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE, subject to certain exemptions under the rules thereof for foreign private issuers and controlled companies.
Stakeholders’ Committee
Our Stakeholders’ Committee consists of Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira, David Vélez Osorno, Daniel Krepel Goldberg, Larissa de Macedo Machado and Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía, with Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira, one of our executive officers, serving as chairperson. The Stakeholders’ Committee takes into consideration and monitors our key stakeholders’ interests and provides insights and recommendations to our board of directors intended to create long-term value for shareholders and other key stakeholders. The Stakeholders’ Committee’s main duties and responsibilities are:
| · | overseeing our relationships and notable interactions with key stakeholders, as identified by our board of directors from time to time; |
| · | engaging with our senior management with regard to our strategies on environmental, social and governance policies and programs and other matters of import to our key stakeholders, as determined by our board of directors from time to time; |
| · | reviewing the initiatives and metrics we use to measure our progress towards such strategies, policies, programs and other matters of import, and evaluating our progress towards the same; |
| · | advising our board of directors and senior management regarding matters and initiatives that may affect our key stakeholders’ interests; and |
| · | reviewing our list of key stakeholders and related strategies, policies, programs and other matters of import from time to time, and recommending any changes to our board of directors as the Stakeholders’ Committee deems appropriate. |
Controlled Company Exception
As of date of this annual report, David Vélez Osorno beneficially owns 86.2% of our Class B ordinary shares, representing 74.9% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the NYSE corporate governance rules. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power in the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 248 |
| |
As a “controlled company,” we may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance standards, including the requirements (1) that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors; and (2) that our board of directors have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. For so long as we qualify as a controlled company, we may take advantage of these exemptions. Accordingly, our shareholders may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of these corporate governance requirements. In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company” and our ordinary shares continue to be listed on the NYSE, we will be required to comply with the corporate governance standards within the applicable transition periods.
Code of Conduct and Whistleblower Policy
Our board of directors has adopted a code of conduct and a whistleblower policy that apply to all of our employees, interns and service providers, as well as our officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our code of conduct is currently posted on the investor relations website: www.investors.nu.
We intend to disclose any amendments to our code of conduct and our whistleblower policy, or waivers of their requirements, on our website or in public filings under the Exchange Act. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be a part of this annual report.
| G. | Employees |
As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we had 6,068, 2,929 and 2,452 employees, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 all of our employees were based in our offices in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, the United States and Germany.
The table below breaks down our full-time personnel by function as of December 31, 2021:
|
Function |
Number of employees |
% of Total |
| Technology | 1,250 | 20.6% |
| Sales and Marketing | 700 | 11.5% |
| Customer Support | 2,224 | 36.7% |
| General and Administrative |
1,894 |
31.2% |
| Total |
6,068 |
100% |
Our employees in Brazil are affiliated with the unions of independent sales agents and of consulting, information, research and accounting firms for the geographic area in which they render services. We believe we have a constructive relationship with these unions, as we have never experienced strikes, work stoppages or disputes leading to any form of downtime.
| H. | Share Ownership |
The shares and any outstanding shares beneficially owned by our directors and officers and/or entities affiliated with these individuals are disclosed in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 249 |
| |
Item 7. Major shareholders and related-party transactions
A. Major Shareholders
The following table and accompanying footnotes present information relating to the beneficial ownership of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares as of December 31, 2021 by:
| · | each person, or affiliated persons, known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of each class of our outstanding voting shares; and |
| · | each of our directors and executive officers, individually. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 250 |
| |
The number of ordinary shares beneficially owned by each entity, person, executive officer or director is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares over which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power as well as any shares that the individual has the right to acquire on or before March 1, 2022, which is 60 days after December 31, 2021, through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. These shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those options, warrants or rights for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. In addition, we have included shares subject to RSUs for which the service-based vesting condition has been satisfied or would be satisfied within 60 days of December 31, 2021 in the calculation of shares to be beneficially owned by the person holding the RSUs for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, we believe that each shareholder identified in the table below possesses sole voting and investment power over all the Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares shown as beneficially owned by the shareholder in the table.
The percentages of beneficial ownership in the table below are calculated on the basis of the following numbers of shares outstanding: 3,487,298,730 Class A ordinary shares and 1,150,245,114 Class B ordinary shares, which already includes 27,555,298 Class A ordinary shares issued and sold pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of the over-allotment option in connection with the IPO.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Nu Holdings Ltd., Floor 4, Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman, KY1-9010, Cayman Islands.
| Shares Beneficially Owned | % of Total Voting Power1 | ||||
| Class A | Class B | ||||
| Shares | % | Shares | % | ||
| Executive Officers and Directors | |||||
| David Vélez Osorno2 | — | — | 992,000,922 | 86.2% | 74.9% |
| Douglas Mauro Leone3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Anita Sands | — | — | — | — | — |
| Daniel Krepel Goldberg | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jacqueline Dawn Reses | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 251 |
| |
| Larissa de Macedo Machado (Anitta) | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres | — | — | — | — | — |
| Muhtar Kent | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira4 | 4,355,089 | 0.1% | 122,491,644 | 10.6% | 9.3% |
| Guilherme Marques do Lago | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Youssef Lahrech | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Jagpreet Singh Duggal | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Henrique Camossa Saldanha Fragelli | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| Matt Swann | — | — | — | — | — |
| Vitor Guarino Olivier | (*) | (*) | — | — | (*) |
| 5% Shareholders | |||||
| Rua California Ltd.2 | — | — | 992,000,922 | 86.2% | 74.9% |
| Entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital5 | 748,540,200 | 21.5% | — | — | 2.8% |
| Entities affiliated with DST6 | 415,539,300 | 11.9% | — | — | 1.6% |
| Entities affiliated with Tencent7 | 281,732,604 | 8.1% | — | — | 1.1% |
| Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IX. L.P.8 | 262,481,658 | 7.5% | — | — | 1.0% |
| * | Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of our ordinary shares. |
| (1) | Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, as a single class. Holders of our Class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share, whereas holders of our Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share. For more information about the voting rights of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, see “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association” |
| (2) | Consists of 990,500,922 shares held of record by Rua California Ltd. and 1,500,000 shares held of record by Mariel Lorena Reyes Milk, the wife of Mr. Vélez. David Vélez Osorno may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Rua California Ltd. and Mariel Lorena Reyes Milk. |
| (3) | Excludes the shares listed in footnote 5 below held of record by entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital. Mr. Leone disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the SCGF VI Funds and the SC USV XIV Funds in footnote 5 below. The address for Mr. Leone is 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 101, Menlo Park, California 94025. |
| (4) | Consists of (i) 4,355,089 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira, (ii) 2,301,444 Class B ordinary shares held of record by Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira and (iii) 120,190,200 Class B ordinary shares held of record by CHJZ Investments Ltd. Cristina Helena Zingaretti Junqueira may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the shares held by CHJZ Investments Ltd. |
| (5) | Consists of (i) 140,061,192 Class A ordinary shares held of record by SC USG VI DE Investments, L.L.C., or “USG VI” and (ii) 415,384,896 Class A ordinary shares held of record by SC USV XIV DE Investments, L.L.C., or “USV XIV;” (iii) 193,094,112 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Sequoia Grove II, LLC. SC US (TTGP), Ltd. is (i) the general partner of SC U.S. Growth VI Management, L.P., which is the general partner of each of Sequoia Capital U.S. Growth Fund VI, L.P. and Sequoia Capital U.S. Growth VI Principals Fund, L.P., collectively, the “SCGF VI Funds,” which together own 100% of the membership interests in USG VI; and (ii) the general partner of SC U.S. Venture XIV Management, L.P., which is the general partner of each of Sequoia Capital U.S. Venture Fund XIV, L.P., Sequoia Capital U.S. Venture Partners Fund XIV, L.P. and Sequoia Capital U.S. Venture Partners Fund XIV (Q), L.P., collectively, the “SC USV XIV Funds,” which together own 100% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Sequoia Capital USV XIV Holdco, Ltd., which is the sole member of USV XIV. As a result, SC US (TTGP), Ltd. may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by USG VI and USV XIV. The directors and stockholders of SC US (TTGP), Ltd. who exercise voting and investment discretion with respect to the SCGF VI Funds and the SC USV XIV Funds include Douglas Mauro Leone, one of our directors. Sequoia Grove Manager, LLC is the manager of Sequoia Grove II, LLC. The directors and stockholders of Sequoia Grove Manager, LLC who exercise voting and investment discretion with respect to Sequoia Grove II, LLC include Douglas Mauro Leone, one of our directors. Mr. Leone disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held USG VI and USV XIV. The address for each of the Sequoia Capital entities identified in this footnote is 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 101, Menlo Park, California 94025. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 252 |
| |
| (6) | Consists of (i) 329,494,500 Class A ordinary shares held of record by DST-NB Investments Limited., or “DST-NB;” (ii) 34,958,700 Class A ordinary shares held of record by DST Investments XVIII, L.P., or “DST XVIII;” (iii) 33,104,550 Class A ordinary shares held of record by DST-NB Investment VI Limited or “DST VI;” and (iv) 17,981,550 Class A ordinary shares held of record by DST Co-Invest-NB Investment Limited, or “DST Co-Invest,” and collectively with DST- NB, DST XVIII and DST VI, the “DST Global Limited Partnerships.” The DST Global Limited Partnerships are each controlled by their respective general partner, DST Managers V Limited or DST Managers VI Limited, or collectively, the “DST Global General Partners.” The DST Global General Partners, as applicable, hold ultimate voting and investment power over the shares held by the DST Global Limited Partnerships. Despoina Zinonos is the President of each of the DST Global General Partners. The address for each of the DST Global Limited Partnerships is c/o Trident Trust Company (Cayman) Limited, One Capital Place, PO Box 847, Grand Cayman, KY1-1103, Cayman Islands. |
| (7) | Consists of (i) 272,913,684 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Tencent Cloud Europe B.V., or “Tencent Cloud”; and (ii) 8,818,920 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Silver Alternative Holding Limited., or “Silver.” Tencent Holdings Limited may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over 272,913,684 Class A Ordinary Shares held of record by Tencent Cloud Europe B.V., a company incorporated in the Netherlands beneficially owned and controlled by Tencent Holdings Limited through Aceville Pte. Ltd., a company incorporated in Singapore wholly owned by TCH Delta Limited. TCH Delta Limited is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands wholly owned by Tencent Holdings Limited. Tencent Holdings Limited may also be deemed to have beneficial ownership over 8,818,920 Class A Ordinary Shares held of record by Silver Alternative Holding Limited, a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands controlled by Tencent Holdings Limited. The registered address for Tencent Cloud is Gustav Mahlerplein 2, 1082MA Amsterdam, the Netherlands and the registered address for Silver is PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. |
| (8) | Consists of 250,481,658 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IX, L.P., an affiliate of Tiger Global Management, LLC., and 12,000,000 Class A ordinary shares held of record by Tiger Global Management, LLC. Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IX, L.P. is controlled by Chase Coleman and Scott Shleifer. The business address for each person and entity named in this footnote is c/o Tiger Global Management, LLC., 9 West 57th Street, 35th Floor, New York, New York 10019. |
The holders of our Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares have identical rights, except that (1) holders of Class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share, whereas holders of our Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share; (2) holders of Class B ordinary shares have certain conversion rights; (3) holders of Class B ordinary shares are entitled to preemptive rights in the event that there is an increase in our share capital or additional ordinary shares are issued in order to maintain their proportional ownership interest; and (4) holders of Class B ordinary shares have certain consent rights. For more information see “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
B. Related-Party Transactions
Equity Financings
Series G-1 Preferred Share Financing
On June 11, 2021, we sold an aggregate of 60,016,854 Series G-1 preferred shares (giving effect to the Share Split) at a purchase price of US$6.6648 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of US$400,000,008.54. The following table summarizes purchases of our Series G-1 preferred shares by related parties:
|
Shareholder |
Shares of Series G-1 Preferred Shares (5) |
Total Purchase Price (US$) |
| Sands Point Consulting LLC(1) | 40,014 | 266,685.10 |
| Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía(2) | 40,008 | 266,645.11 |
| Post House Capital LLC(3) | 200,058 | 1,333,345.50 |
| Alejandro Moreno Mejía(4) | 40,008 | 266,645.11 |
| (1) | Sands Point Consulting, LLC is controlled by Anita Sands, a member of our board of directors. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 253 |
| |
| (2) | Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía is a member of our board of directors. |
| (3) | Post House Capital LLC is controlled by Jacqueline Dawn Reses, a member of our board of directors. |
| (4) | Alejandro Moreno Mejía is a family member of Luis Alberto Moreno Mejía, a member of our board of directors. |
| (5) | Reflects the Share Split. |
Series G Preferred Share Financing
On January 27, 2021, we sold an aggregate of 70,552,224 Series G preferred shares at a purchase price of US$5.6696 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of US$399,999,973. Of these Series G preferred shares, 6,134,976 were purchased by SCGE Fund, LP, a related party, for a total purchase price of US$34,782,859.93.
Series F Preferred Share Financing
On July 31, 2019, we sold an aggregate of 161,240,100 shares of our Series F preferred shares (giving effect to the Share Split and the 25-for-1 forward share split that occurred on December 30, 2019) at a purchase price of US$2.4808 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of US$400,001,107.79. The following table summarizes purchases of our Series F preferred shares by related parties:
|
Shareholder |
Shares of Series F Preferred Shares (1) |
Total Purchase Price (US$) |
| SC USV XIV DE Investments, L.L.C. | 402,900 | 999,505.99 |
| SC USG VI DE Investments, LLC | 1,209,300 | 3,000,006.45 |
| DST-NB Investments VI Limited | 12,093,000 | 30,000,064.48 |
| (1) | Reflects the Share Split and the 25-for-1 forward share split that occurred on December 30, 2019. |
Series E Preferred Share Financing
On February 15, 2018, we sold an aggregate of 258,704,250 shares of our Series E preferred shares (giving effect to the Share Split and the 25-for-1 forward share split that occurred on December 30, 2019) at a purchase price of US$0.5839 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of US$151,065,517.64. The following table summarizes purchases of our Series E preferred shares by related parties:
|
Shareholder |
Shares of Series E Preferred Shares (1) |
Total Purchase Price (US$) |
| DST-NB Investments Limited | 77,876,550 | 45,474,557.68 |
| DST-NB Investments XVIII, L.P. | 32,386,350 | 18,911,404.54 |
| DST Co-Invest-NB Investment Limited | 16,658,400 | 9,727,361.72 |
| (1) | Reflects the Share Split and the 25-for-1 forward share split that occurred on December 30, 2019. |
Marketing Agreement with Rodamoinho Produtora de Eventos Ltda.
Rodamoinho Produtora de Eventos Ltda., or “Rodamoinho,” is controlled by one of our directors, Larissa de Macedo Machado (Anitta). On June 30, 2021, we entered into a marketing agreement with Rodamoinho for a term of five years, pursuant to which we agreed to pay a total of R$35,950,617 in exchange for Rodamoinho providing us certain marketing and publicity services. We will satisfy a portion of this payment by the issuance of RSUs.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 254 |
| |
Investors’ Rights Agreement
We are party to a registration rights agreement, dated as of November 18, 2021, which provides, among other things, that certain holders of our share capital have the right to demand that we file a registration statement or request that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we are otherwise filing. See “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Registration Rights” for additional information regarding the registration rights.
Contingent Share Awards
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Contingent Share Awards” for more information.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association contain provisions that limit the liability of our directors, agents and officers for monetary damages for any liability incurred by them as a result of any act or failure to act in carrying out their functions other than such liability (if any) that they may incur (i) arising from their own fraud, willful default or dishonesty, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or (iii) for any transaction from which such person derived any improper benefit.
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association by our shareholders will not adversely affect any right or protection of any of our directors, agents or officers existing at the time of, or increase the liability of any such director, agent or officer with respect to any acts or omissions of such director, agent or officer occurring prior to, such repeal or modification.
In addition, our Memorandum and Articles of Association contain provisions that indemnify each of our directors, agents or officers out of our assets against any liability incurred by them as a result of any act or failure to act in carrying out their functions other than such liability (if any) that they may incur (i) arising from their own fraud, willful default or dishonesty, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or (iii) for any transaction from which such person derived any improper benefit.
Further, we have entered into or will enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that may be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. These indemnification agreements require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and executive officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service. These indemnification agreements also require us to advance all expenses incurred by the directors and executive officers in investigating or defending any such action, suit or proceeding. We believe that these agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions that are included or are expected to be included in our Memorandum and Articles of Association and in indemnification agreements that we have entered into or will enter into with our directors and executive officers may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and executive officers for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and executive officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other shareholders. Further, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and executive officers as required by these indemnification provisions. At present, we are not aware of any pending litigation or proceeding involving any person who is or was one of our directors, officers, employees or other agents or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 255 |
| |
We obtained insurance policies under which, subject to the limitations of the policies, coverage is provided to our directors and executive officers against loss arising from claims made by reason of breach of fiduciary duty or other wrongful acts as a director or executive officer, including claims relating to public securities matters, and to us with respect to payments that may be made by us to these directors and executive officers pursuant to our indemnification obligations or otherwise as a matter of law.
Certain of our non-employee directors may, through their relationships with their employers, be insured or indemnified against certain liabilities incurred in their capacity as members of our board of directors.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Related-Party Transactions Policy
In October 2021, we entered into a related party transaction policy, which requires certain related party transactions to be approved by our board of directors or a designated committee thereof, including our Audit and Risk Committee.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 256 |
| |
Item 8. Financial information
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Financial Statements
See “Item 18. Financial Statements,” which contains our audited financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Dividend and Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our share capital. Nu has not adopted a dividend policy with respect to future declarations and payment of dividends. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on a number of factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Certain Legal Requirements Related to Dividends
Under the Companies Act and our Memorandum and Articles of Association, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either its distributable reserves (retained and current profit) or share premium account, but a dividend may not be paid if the company is, or the dividend would result in the company being, unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. According to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, dividends can be declared and paid out of funds lawfully available to us, which includes share premium. Dividends, if any, would be paid in proportion to the number of ordinary shares a shareholder holds. For further information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Cayman Islands Tax Considerations.”
Additionally, please refer to “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.” Our ability to pay dividends is directly related to positive and distributable net results from our subsidiaries. We depend on dividend distributions by our subsidiaries, and we may be adversely affected if the performance of our subsidiaries is not positive. If, for any legal reasons due to new laws or bilateral agreements between countries, they are unable to pay dividends to Cayman Islands companies, or if a Cayman Islands company becomes incapable of receiving them, we may not be able to make any dividend payments in the future.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 257 |
| |
Our Brazilian subsidiaries that are incorporated as a Brazilian corporation (sociedade anônima) are required under Federal Law No. 6,404 dated December 15, 1976, as amended, to distribute a mandatory minimum dividend to shareholders each year, which cannot be lower than a given percentage established in the relevant corporation’s bylaws of its profit for the prior year, which percentage will be considered to be 25% in case nothing is said in the bylaws, after 5% of the profits are directed to a legal reserve, unless such distribution is suspended by a decision of such subsidiary’s shareholders at its annual shareholders’ meeting based on a report by its board of directors that such distribution would be incompatible with its financial condition at that time. Our Brazilian subsidiaries that are incorporated as a Brazilian limited liability company (sociedade limitada) may also have specific mandatory dividend payment rules pursuant to their bylaws. In addition, if for any legal reasons due to new laws or bilateral agreements between countries, our Brazilian subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends to Cayman Islands companies, or if a Cayman Islands company becomes incapable of receiving them, we may not be able to make any dividend payments in the future.
Our Colombian and Mexican subsidiaries may also face restrictions on their ability to pay dividends under applicable local laws.
Legal Proceedings
We are, and may be, from time to time, involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, can be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources.
We are subject to a number of judicial and administrative proceedings, including civil, labor and tax law and social security claims and other proceedings, which we believe are common and incidental to business operations in general. We recognize provisions for legal proceedings in our financial statements, when we are advised by independent outside counsel that (1) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (2) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The assessment of the likelihood of loss includes analysis by outside counsel of available evidence, the hierarchy of laws, available case law, recent court rulings and their relevance in the legal system. Our provisions for probable losses arising from these matters are estimated and periodically adjusted by management. In making these adjustments our management relies on the opinions of our external legal advisors.
On October 14, 2021, Getnet Adquirência e Serviços para Meios de Pagamento S.A., or “Getnet,” filed a lawsuit against our Brazilian subsidiary Nu Pagamentos and Mastercard Brasil Soluções de Pagamento Ltda., or “Mastercard Brasil,” seeking a reduction of the interchange fees charged on the value of sale and purchase transactions carried out on Getnet point of sale devices using Nu Pagamentos debit cards, to a maximum fee of either 0.5% or 0.8%. Getnet’s claim alleges that as a result of its economic dependence on Mastercard as a payment scheme settlor, it does not have the ability to freely cease from contracting with Nu Pagamentos. In addition, Getnet’s claim alleges damages estimated at R$64 million resulting from the higher interchange fees that currently apply as compared to the reduced fees sought by it. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been served with notice of the suit. On October 18, 2021, the trial court judge dismissed Getnet’s relief request for a preliminary injunction, ruling that the matter required further evidentiary support and an opportunity for the defendants to present a defense. We estimate the likelihood of loss in this proceeding as remote.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 258 |
| |
As of December 31, 2021, we have provisions recorded in our consolidated financial statements in connection with legal proceedings for which we believe a loss is probable in accordance with accounting rules, in an aggregate amount of US$18.1 million, and have made judicial deposits in an aggregate amount of US$17.5 million. However, legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. If one or more cases were to result in a judgment against us in any reporting period for amounts that exceeded our management’s expectations, the impact on our results of operations or financial condition for that reporting period could be material. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters and Litigation—Litigation, proceedings or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
For further information, see note 21 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
B. Significant Changes
None.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 259 |
| |
Item 9. The offer and listing
A. Offering and Listing Details
Not applicable.
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
On January 6, 2022, we completed our global offering. Our Class A ordinary shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NU” and our BDRs on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (B3 S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão) under the symbol “NUBR33”.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 260 |
| |
Item 10. Additional information
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
Our shareholders adopted the Memorandum and Articles of Association included as Exhibit 3.1 to this annual report.
Share Capital
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association authorize two classes of ordinary shares: Class A ordinary shares, which are entitled to one vote per share, and Class B ordinary shares, which are entitled to 20 votes per share and to maintain a proportional ownership interest in the event that additional Class A ordinary shares are issued. Any holder of Class B ordinary shares may convert his or her shares at any time into Class A ordinary shares on a share-for-share basis. The rights of the two classes of ordinary shares are otherwise identical, except as described below. See “—Anti-Takeover Provisions in our Memorandum and Articles of Association—Two Classes of Ordinary Shares.”
As of the date of this annual report, our authorized share capital is US$324,022.94, consisting of 48,603,441,210 shares of par value US$0.000006666666667 each, and we have 3,459,743,432 Class A ordinary shares (including Class A ordinary shares underlying the BDRs), and 1,150,245,114 Class B ordinary shares issued and outstanding. The remaining authorized but unissued shares are presently undesignated and may be issued by our board of directors as ordinary shares of any class or as shares with preferred, deferred or other special rights or restrictions.
Treasury Shares
At the date of this annual report, we have no shares in treasury.
Issuance of Shares
Except as expressly provided in our Memorandum and Articles of Association, our board of directors has general and unconditional authority to allot, grant options over, offer or otherwise deal with or dispose of any unissued shares in the company’s capital without the approval of our shareholders (whether forming part of the original or any increased share capital), either at a premium or at par, with or without preferred, deferred or other special rights or restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise and to such persons, on such terms and conditions, and at such times as the directors may decide, but so that no share shall be issued at a discount, except in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that at any time that there are Class A ordinary shares in issue, additional Class B ordinary shares may only be issued pursuant to (1) a share split, subdivision of shares or similar transaction or where a dividend or other distribution is paid by the issue of shares or rights to acquire shares or following capitalization of profits; (2) a merger, consolidation, or other business combination involving the issuance of Class B ordinary shares as full or partial consideration; or (3) an issuance of Class A ordinary shares, whereby holders of the Class B ordinary shares are entitled to purchase a number of Class B ordinary shares that would allow them to maintain their proportional ownership interest in the company (following an offer by us to each holder of Class B ordinary shares to issue to such holder, upon the same economic terms, such number of Class B ordinary shares as would allow such holder to maintain its proportional ownership interest in the company pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association). In light of: (a) the above provisions; and (b) the 20-to-1 voting ratio between our Class B ordinary shares and Class A ordinary shares, holders of our Class B ordinary shares will in many situations continue to maintain control of all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentration of ownership and voting power will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future. For more information see “—Ordinary Shares—Preemptive or Similar Rights.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 261 |
| |
Ordinary Shares
Dividend Rights
Subject to preferences that may apply to any preferred shares outstanding at the time, the holders of our ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends out of funds legally available if our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to issue dividends and then only at the times and in the amounts legally available therefor that our board of directors may determine. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information. Dividend and Dividend Policy” for additional information.
Voting Rights
The holder of a Class B ordinary share is entitled, in respect of such share, to 20 votes per share, whereas the holder of a Class A ordinary share is entitled, in respect of such share, to one vote per share. The holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares vote together as a single class on all matters (including the election of directors) submitted to a vote of shareholders, except as provided below and as otherwise required by law.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide as follows regarding the respective rights of holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares:
(1) class consents from the holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, as applicable, shall be required for any variation to the rights attached to their respective class of shares, however, the directors may treat the two classes of shares as forming one class if they consider that both such classes would be affected in the same way by the proposal;
(2) the rights conferred on holders of Class A ordinary shares shall not be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further Class B ordinary shares and vice versa; and
(3) the rights attaching to the Class A ordinary shares and the Class B ordinary shares shall not be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of shares with preferred or other rights, including, without limitation, shares with enhanced or weighted voting rights.
As set forth in our Memorandum and Articles of Association, the holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, respectively, do not have the right to vote separately if the number of authorized shares of such class is increased or decreased. Rather, the number of authorized Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares of such class then outstanding) by both classes voting together by way of an “ordinary resolution,” which is defined in our Memorandum and Articles of Association as being a resolution (1) of a duly constituted general meeting passed by a simple majority of the votes cast by, or on behalf of, the shareholders entitled to vote present in person or by proxy and voting at the meeting; or (2) approved in writing by all of the shareholders entitled to vote at a general meeting in one or more instruments each signed by one or more of the shareholders and the effective date of the resolution so adopted shall be the date on which the instrument, or the last of such instruments, if more than one, is executed.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 262 |
| |
We have not provided for cumulative voting for the election of directors in our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Conversion Rights
Each outstanding Class B ordinary share is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one Class A ordinary share, and each Class B ordinary share will convert automatically into one Class A ordinary share at the election of the holder(s) of a majority of the Class B ordinary shares. In addition, each Class B ordinary share will convert automatically into one Class A ordinary share upon any transfer, whether or not for value, except for certain transfers described in our Memorandum and Articles of Association, including transfers to affiliates of a holder, one or more trustees of a trust established for the benefit of a holder or their affiliates, partnerships, corporations and other entities owned or controlled by a holder or their affiliates, and an organization that is exempt from taxation under Section 501(3)(c) of the Code or to an organization that is exempt from taxation in Brazil under Sections 184, 377 or 378 of the 2018 Internal Tax Regulations and that is controlled, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, by a holder. Furthermore, each Class B ordinary share will convert automatically into one Class A ordinary share and no Class B ordinary shares will be issued thereafter if, on the record date for any shareholders meeting, the aggregate voting power of Class B ordinary shares then outstanding is less than 10% of the aggregate voting power of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares outstanding.
Preemptive or Similar Rights
Our Class A ordinary shares are not entitled to preemptive rights, and are not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions.
The Class B ordinary shares are entitled to maintain a proportional ownership interest in the event that additional Class A ordinary shares are issued. As such, except for certain exceptions, including the issuance of Class A ordinary shares in furtherance of this offering, if we issue Class A ordinary shares, we must first make an offer to each holder of Class B ordinary shares to issue to such holder on the same economic terms such number of Class B ordinary shares as would allow such holder to maintain its proportional ownership interest in the company. This right to maintain a proportional ownership interest may be waived by the holders of a majority of the Class B ordinary shares.
Right to Receive Liquidation Distributions
If we become subject to a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the assets legally available for distribution to our shareholders would be distributable ratably among the holders of our ordinary shares and any participating preferred shares outstanding at that time, subject to prior satisfaction of all outstanding debt and liabilities and the preferential rights of and the payment of liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding shares of preferred shares.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 263 |
| |
Preferred Shares
Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, our board of directors has the authority, subject to limitations prescribed by Cayman Islands law, to issue preferred shares in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, and rights of the shares of each series and any of its qualifications, limitations, or restrictions, in each case without further vote or action by our shareholders. Our board of directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of any series of preferred shares, but not below the number of shares of that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by our shareholders. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred shares with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares. The issuance of preferred shares, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company and might adversely affect the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares. We have no current plan to issue any preferred shares and had no preferred shares outstanding since our initial public offering.
Equal Status
Except as expressly provided in our Memorandum and Articles of Association, Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares have the same rights and privileges and rank equally, share proportionally and are identical in all respects as to all matters. In the event of any statutory amalgamation, merger, consolidation, arrangement or other reorganization involving us and requiring the approval of our shareholders entitled to vote thereon, as well as a short- form merger or consolidation that does not require a resolution of our shareholders, the holders of Class A ordinary shares shall have the right to receive, or the right to elect to receive, the same form of consideration as the holders of Class B ordinary shares, and the holders of Class A ordinary shares shall have the right to receive, or the right to elect to receive, at least the same amount of consideration on a per share basis as the holders of Class B ordinary shares, in each case solely with respect to economic rights. In the event of any (1) tender or exchange offer to acquire any Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares by any third party pursuant to an agreement to which we are a party, or (2) tender or exchange offer by us to acquire any Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares, the holders of Class A ordinary shares shall have the right to receive, or the right to elect to receive, the same form of consideration as the holders of Class B ordinary shares, and the holders of Class A ordinary shares shall have the right to receive, or the right to elect to receive, at least the same amount of consideration on a per share basis as the holders of Class B ordinary shares, in each case solely with respect to economic rights.
Options
As of December 31, 2021, we had outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 143,889,439 Class A ordinary shares, with a weighted-average exercise price of approximately US$0.50 per share, under our equity compensation plans.
Contingent Shares
As of December 31, 2021, we also had certain contingent shares issuable as Class A ordinary shares as described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation—Executive Compensation—Contingent Share Awards.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 264 |
| |
RSUs
As of December 31, 2021, we had outstanding 80,924,937 Class A ordinary shares subject to RSUs under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. Our outstanding RSUs will generally vest upon the satisfaction of a time-based condition. For the majority of our outstanding RSUs under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the time-based condition will be satisfied upon completion of three years from the vesting commencement date, and the balance will vest in 12 successive equal quarterly installments, subject to continued service through each such vesting date. Grants issued to new employees have a cliff period of one year, which requires them to stay at least for one year if they want to exercise any options.
Registration Rights
Certain holders of our management shares, preferred shares and ordinary shares who are parties to our registration rights agreement are entitled to certain rights under such agreement with respect to the registration of their shares under the Securities Act. In connection with our initial public offering, each shareholder that has registration rights agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of any securities without the prior written consent of us and the underwriters for a period ended on the later of the 181st day after the date of the prospectus of such public offering and the opening of trading on the second trading day following our public release of earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, subject to certain terms and conditions. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Lock-Up and Market Standoff Agreements” for additional information regarding such restrictions.
The registration rights set forth in the registration rights agreement will expire on the earlier of (i) five years following the completion of our initial public offering, (ii) with respect to any particular shareholder, when such shareholder holds 1% or less of our outstanding ordinary shares and is able to sell all of its registrable securities pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act during any 90-day period and (iii) immediately prior to our change of control, liquidation, dissolution or winding up. We will pay the registration expenses (other than underwriting discounts and commissions) of the holders of the shares registered pursuant to the registrations described below.
Demand Registration Rights
Based on the number of our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021, the holders of up to 4,122,940,042 Class A ordinary shares will be entitled to certain demand registration rights. At any time beginning six months after the effective date of our initial public offering (i.e. December 8, 2021), the holders of at least a majority of these shares then outstanding can request that we register the offer and sale of their shares. Such request for registration must cover securities, the anticipated aggregate public offering price of which is at least US$50,000,000. In an underwritten offering, the managing underwriter, if any, has the right, subject to specified conditions, to limit the number of shares such holders may include. We are obligated to effect only two such registrations. If we determine that it would be seriously detrimental to us and our shareholders to effect such a demand registration, we have the right to defer such registration, not more than once in any 12-month period, for a period of up to 90 days.
Piggyback Registration Rights
If we propose to register the offer and sale of Class A ordinary shares under the Securities Act, in connection with the public offering of such Class A ordinary shares the holders of up 3,093,003,286 to Class A ordinary shares will be entitled to certain “piggyback” registration rights allowing the holders to include their shares in such registration, subject to certain marketing and other limitations. As a result, whenever we propose to file a registration statement under the Securities Act, other than with respect to (i) a registration in which the only Class A ordinary shares being registered are Class A ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of debt securities that are also being registered; (ii) a registration related to any employee benefit plan or a corporate reorganization or other transaction covered by Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act; or (iii) a registration on any registration form which does not include substantially the same information as would be required to be included in a registration statement covering the public offering of our Class A ordinary shares, the holders of these shares are entitled to notice of the registration and have the right, subject to certain limitations, to include their shares in the registration.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 265 |
| |
F-3 Registration Rights
Based on the number of our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021, the holders of up to 4,122,940,042 of the Class A ordinary shares will be entitled to certain Form F-3 registration rights. The holders of at least a majority of these shares then outstanding may make a written request that we register the offer and sale of their shares on a registration statement on Form F-3 if we are eligible to file a registration statement on Form F-3 so long as the request covers securities the anticipated aggregate public offering price of which, before payment of underwriting discounts and commissions, is at least US$5,000,000. These shareholders may make an unlimited number of requests for registration on Form F-3; however, we will not be required to effect a registration on Form F-3 if we have effected one such registration within the 12-month period preceding the date of the request. Additionally, if we determine that it would be seriously detrimental to us and our shareholders to effect such a registration, we have the right to defer such registration, not more than once in any 12-month period, for a period of up to 90 days.
Record Dates
For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at any general meeting of shareholders or any adjournment thereof, or shareholders entitled to receive dividend or other distribution payments, or in order to make a determination of shareholders for any other purpose, our board of directors may set a record date which shall not exceed forty (40) clear days prior to the date where the determination will be made.
General Meetings of Shareholders
As a condition of admission to a shareholders’ meeting, a shareholder must be duly registered as such at the applicable record date for that meeting and, in order to vote, all calls or installments then payable by such shareholder to us in respect of the shares that such shareholder holds must have been paid.
Subject to any special rights or restrictions as to voting then attached to any shares, at any general meeting every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy (or, in the case of a shareholder being a corporation, by its duly authorized representative not being himself or herself a shareholder entitled to vote) shall have one vote per Class A ordinary share and 20 votes per Class B ordinary share.
As a Cayman Islands exempted company, we are not obliged by the Companies Act to call annual general meetings; however, our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that in each year the company will hold an annual general meeting of shareholders. For the annual general meeting of shareholders the agenda will include, among other things, the presentation of the annual accounts and the report of the directors (if any). In addition, the agenda for an annual general meeting of shareholders will only include such items as have been included therein by the board of directors.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 266 |
| |
Also, we may, but are not required to (unless required by the laws of the Cayman Islands), hold other extraordinary general meetings during the year. Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders may be held where the directors so decide.
The Companies Act provides shareholders a limited right to request a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting in default of a company’s memorandum and articles of association. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s memorandum and articles of association. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that for so long as our founding shareholder controls a majority of the voting power of the shares of the Company, a general meeting of shareholders may be convened on the requisition of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our shares. However, if our founding shareholder controls less than a majority of the voting power of our shares, no shareholder shall have the power to requisition a meeting of shareholders. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide no other right to put any proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings.
Subject to regulatory requirements, the annual general meeting must be called by at least 21 days’ (and not less than 15 clear business days’) notice and any extraordinary general meeting by at least 14 days’ (and not less than 10 clear business days’) notice prior to the relevant shareholders meeting and convened by a notice discussed below. Alternatively, upon the prior consent of all holders entitled to receive notice, with regard to the annual general meeting, and the holders of 75% in par value of the shares entitled to attend and vote at an extraordinary general meeting, that meeting may be convened by a shorter notice and in a manner deemed appropriate by those holders.
We will give notice of each general meeting of shareholders by publication on our website and in any other manner that may be required in order to comply with Cayman Islands law, NYSE and SEC requirements. The holders of registered shares may be given notice of a shareholders’ meeting by means of letters sent to the addresses of those shareholders as registered in our shareholders’ register, or, subject to certain statutory requirements, by electronic means.
Holders whose shares are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, which we expect will be the case for all holders of Class A ordinary shares, will not be a shareholder or member of the company and must rely on the procedures of DTC regarding notice of shareholders’ meetings and the exercise of rights of a holder of the Class A ordinary shares.
A quorum for a general meeting consists of any one or more persons holding or representing by proxy not less than a majority of the aggregate shares in issue and entitled to vote upon the business to be transacted. If a quorum is not present within half an hour from the time appointed for the meeting to commence or if during such a meeting a quorum ceases to be present, a second meeting may be called as the Directors may determine, and if at the second meeting a quorum is not present within half an hour from the time appointed for the meeting to commence, the shareholders present shall be a quorum.
A resolution put to a vote at a general meeting shall be decided on a poll. Generally speaking, an ordinary resolution to be passed by the shareholders at a general meeting requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by, or on behalf of, the shareholders entitled to vote, present in person or by proxy and voting at the meeting and a special resolution requires the affirmative vote on a poll of no less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting. Both ordinary resolutions and special resolutions may also be passed by a unanimous written resolution signed by all of our shareholders, as permitted by the Companies Act and our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 267 |
| |
Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, general meetings of shareholders are to be chaired by the chairman of our board of directors or in his absence the vice-chairman of the board of directors. If the chairman or vice-chairman of our board of directors is absent, the directors present at the meeting shall appoint one of them to be chairman of the general meeting. If neither the chairman nor another director is present at the general meeting within 30 minutes after the time appointed for holding the meeting, then such meeting shall be adjourned for a one-week period and shall be held in the following week on the same day at the same time and place. If at the adjournment of the meeting the chairman or in his absence the vice-chairman (if any) or in their absence a director is not willing to act as chairman, or if no director is present within thirty (30) minutes after the time appointed for holding the meeting, then such meeting shall be canceled. The order of business at each meeting shall be determined by the chairman of the meeting, and he or she shall have the right and authority to prescribe such rules, regulations and procedures and to do all such acts and things as are necessary or desirable for the proper conduct of the meeting, including, without limitation, the establishment of procedures for the maintenance of order and safety, limitations on the time allotted to questions or comments on our affairs, restrictions on entry to such meeting after the time prescribed for the commencement thereof, and the opening and closing of the polls.
Changes to Capital
Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, we may from time to time by ordinary resolution:
| · | increase our share capital by such sum, to be divided into shares of such amount, as the resolution shall prescribe; |
| · | consolidate and divide all or any of our share capital into shares of a larger amount than its existing shares; |
| · | convert all or any of our paid-up shares into stock and reconvert that stock into paid-up shares of any denomination; |
| · | subdivide our existing shares or any of them into shares of a smaller amount, provided that in the subdivision the proportion between the amount paid and the amount, if any, unpaid on each reduced share shall be the same as it was in the case of the share from which the reduced share is derived; or |
| · | cancel any shares which, at the date of the passing of the resolution, have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person and diminish the amount of its share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled. |
Our shareholders may by special resolution, subject to confirmation by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands on an application by us for an order confirming such reduction, reduce its share capital or any capital redemption reserve in any manner permitted by law.
In addition, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act and our Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Shareholder’s Agreement, we may:
| · | issue shares on terms that they are to be redeemed or are liable to be redeemed; |
| · | purchase its own shares (including any redeemable shares); and |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 268 |
| |
| · | make a payment in respect of the redemption or purchase of its own shares in any manner authorized by the |
| · | Companies Act, including out of our own capital. |
Transfer of Shares
Subject to any applicable restrictions set forth in the Memorandum and Articles of Association and the Shareholder’s Agreement, any shareholder of Nu may transfer all or any of his or her ordinary shares by an instrument of transfer in the usual or common form or in the form prescribed by the NYSE or any other form approved by our board of directors.
Our Class A ordinary shares are traded on the NYSE in book-entry form and may be transferred in accordance with our Memorandum and Articles of Association and the NYSE’s rules and regulations.
However, our board of directors may, in its absolute discretion, decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share which is either not fully paid up to a person of whom it does not approve or is issued under any share incentive scheme for employees which contains a transfer restriction that is still applicable to such ordinary share. The board of directors may also decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share unless:
| · | the instrument of transfer is lodged with us, accompanied by the certificate (if any) for the ordinary shares to which it relates and such other evidence as our board of directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer; |
| · | the instrument of transfer is in respect of only one class of shares; |
| · | the instrument of transfer is properly stamped, if required; |
| · | the ordinary shares transferred are free of any lien in favor of us; and |
| · | in the case of a transfer to joint holders, the transfer is not to more than four joint holders. |
If the directors refuse to register a transfer they are required, within two months after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged, to send to the transferee notice of such refusal.
Share Repurchase
The Companies Act and our Memorandum and Articles of Association permit us to purchase our own shares, subject to certain restrictions. Our board of directors may only exercise this power on behalf of Nu, subject to the Companies Act and our Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Shareholder’s Agreement and any applicable requirements imposed from time to time by SEC, the NYSE or by any recognized stock exchange on which our shares are listed.
Dividends and Capitalization of Profits
We have not adopted a dividend policy with respect to payments of any future dividends. Subject to the Companies Act and general principles of Cayman Islands law, our shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends (including interim dividends) to be paid to shareholders but no dividend shall be declared in excess of the amount recommended by the board of directors. The board of directors may also declare dividends. Dividends may be declared and paid out of funds lawfully available to us. Except as otherwise provided by the rights attached to shares and our Memorandum and Articles of Association, all dividends shall be paid in proportion to the number of Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares a shareholder holds at the date the dividend is declared (or such other date as may be set as a record date); but, (1) if any share is issued on terms providing that it shall rank for dividend as from a particular date, that share shall rank for dividend accordingly and (2) where we have shares in issue which are not fully paid up (as to par value), we may pay dividends in proportion to the amounts paid up on each share.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 269 |
| |
The holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares shall be entitled to share equally in any dividends that may be declared in respect of our ordinary shares from time to time. In the event that a dividend is paid in the form of Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares, or rights to acquire Class A ordinary shares or Class B ordinary shares, (1) the holders of Class A ordinary shares shall receive Class A ordinary shares, or rights to acquire Class A ordinary shares, as the case may be and (2) the holders of Class B ordinary shares shall receive Class B ordinary shares, or rights to acquire Class B ordinary shares, as the case may be.
Appointment, Disqualification and Removal of Directors
We are managed by our board of directors. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that the board of directors will be composed of such a number of directors as a majority of directors in office may determine, being up to nine directors on the date of adoption of our Memorandum and Articles of Association. There are no provisions relating to retirement of directors upon reaching any age limit.
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that directors shall be elected by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders, which requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast on the resolution by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, at a quorate general meeting of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for so long as our founding shareholder owns at least 5% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital, our founding shareholder shall be entitled to nominate a certain number of designees to the board for a specific term, as set out in our Memorandum and Articles of Association. In particular, our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, subject to compliance with applicable law and NYSE rules, for so long as our founding shareholder and his affiliates beneficially own shares constituting at least 40% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital, the founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate up to five nominees to our board of directors (or if the size of the board of directors is increased, a majority of the members of the board of directors); for so long as our founding shareholder and its affiliates beneficially own at least 25% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital, the founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate up to three nominees to our board of directors (or if the size of the board of directors is increased, one-third of the members of the board of directors); and for so long as our founding shareholder and its affiliates beneficially own at least 5% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital, our founding shareholder shall be entitled to designate one nominee to our board of directors (or if the size of the board of directors is increased, 10% of the members of the board of directors). The founding shareholder may in like manner remove such director(s) appointed by him and appoint replacement director(s).
Each director shall be appointed for a one-year term, unless they resign or their office is vacated earlier, provided, however, that such term shall be extended beyond one year in the event that no successor has been appointed (in which case such term shall be extended to the date on which such successor has been appointed).
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that from and after the date on which the founding shareholder (together with his affiliates) no longer beneficially owns more than 50% of our outstanding voting power, or the classifying date, the directors shall be divided into three classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. Each director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual general shareholders meeting following the annual general shareholders meeting at which such director was elected as subject to the provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association. The founding directors shall be allocated to the longest duration classes unless otherwise determined by the founding shareholder.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 270 |
| |
Grounds for Removing a Director
A director may be removed with or without cause by ordinary resolution, and a director nominated by our founding shareholder may be removed by our founding shareholder at any time with or without cause by notice to us. The notice of the general meeting must contain a statement of the intention to remove the director and must be served on the director not less than ten calendar days before the meeting. The director is entitled to attend the meeting and be heard on the motion for his removal.
The office of a director will be vacated automatically if he or she (1) becomes prohibited by law from being a director; (2) becomes bankrupt or makes an arrangement or composition with his creditors; (3) dies or is in the opinion of all his co-directors, incapable by reason of mental disorder of discharging his duties as director; (4) resigns his office by notice to us; or (5) has for more than six months been absent without permission of the directors from meetings of the board of directors held during that period, and the remaining directors resolve that his or her office be vacated.
Proceedings of the Board of Directors
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that our business is to be managed and conducted by the board of directors. The quorum necessary for the board meeting shall be a simple majority of the directors then in office, and business at any meeting shall be decided by a majority of votes. In the case of an equality of votes, the chairman shall not have a casting vote.
Subject to the provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association, the members of the board of directors may regulate its proceedings as they determine is appropriate. Board meetings shall be held at least once every calendar quarter and shall take place at such place as the directors may determine.
Subject to the provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association, to any directions given by ordinary resolution of the shareholders and the listing rules of the NYSE, the board of directors may from time to time at its discretion exercise all powers of Nu, including, subject to the Companies Act, the power to issue debentures, bonds and other securities of the company, whether outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of our company or of any third party.
Inspection of Books and Records
Holders of our ordinary shares will have no general right under Cayman Islands law to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or corporate records. However, the board of directors may determine from time to time whether and to what extent our accounting records and books shall be open to inspection by shareholders who are not members of the board of directors. Notwithstanding the above, our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide shareholders with the right to receive annual financial statements. Such right to receive annual financial statements may be satisfied by publishing the same on the company’s website or filing such annual reports as we are required to file with the SEC.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 271 |
| |
Register of Shareholders
Our Class A ordinary shares offered are held through DTC, and DTC or Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, will be recorded in the shareholders’ register as the holder of our Class A ordinary shares. Under Cayman Islands law, we must keep a register of shareholders that includes:
| · | the names and addresses of the shareholders, a statement of the shares held by each member, and of the amount paid or agreed to be considered as paid, on the shares of each member; |
| · | the date on which the name of any person was entered on the register as a member; and |
| · | the date on which any person ceased to be a member. |
Under Cayman Islands law, our register of shareholders is prima facie evidence of the matters set out therein (i.e., the register of shareholders will raise a presumption of fact on the matters referred to above unless rebutted) and a shareholder registered in the register of shareholders is deemed as a matter of Cayman Islands law to have prima facie legal title to the shares as set against his or her name in the register of shareholders. The shareholders recorded in the register of shareholders should be deemed to have legal title to the shares set against their name.
If the name of any person is incorrectly entered in or omitted from the register of shareholders, or if there is any default or unnecessary delay in entering on the register the fact of any person having ceased to be a shareholder of Nu, the person or member aggrieved (or any shareholder of ours, or Nu itself) may apply to the Cayman Islands Grand Court for an order that the register be rectified, and the Court may either refuse such application or it may, if satisfied of the justice of the case, make an order for the rectification of the register.
Anti-Takeover Provisions in Our Memorandum and Articles of Association
Some provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or management that shareholders may consider favorable. In particular, our capital structure concentrates ownership of voting rights in the hands of our founding shareholder, as our controlling shareholder. These provisions, which are summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with the board of directors. However, these provisions could also have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of the Class A ordinary shares that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that shareholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Two Classes of Ordinary Shares
Our Class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share, while the Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share. Since our co-founders own all of the Class B ordinary shares, our co-founders currently have the ability to elect a majority of the directors and to determine the outcome of most matters submitted for a vote of shareholders, with our founding shareholder as the controlling shareholder. This concentrated voting control could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover, or other change of control transaction that other shareholders may view as beneficial.
So long as our co-founders have the ability to determine the outcome of most matters submitted to a vote of shareholders as well as the overall management and direction of Nu, third parties may be deterred in their willingness to make an unsolicited merger, takeover, or other change of control proposal, or to engage in a proxy contest for the election of directors. As a result, the fact that we have two classes of ordinary shares may have the effect of depriving you as a holder of Class A ordinary shares of an opportunity to sell your Class A ordinary shares at a premium over prevailing market prices and make it more difficult to replace our directors and management.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 272 |
| |
Preferred Shares
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide our board of directors with wide powers to issue additional shares, and one or more classes or series of preferred shares, with or without preferred, deferred or other rights or restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise and to such persons, at such times and on such other terms as the board of directors may determine, to the extent authorized but unissued. The issuance of additional shares may be used as an anti-takeover device without further action on the part of our shareholders. Such issuance may further dilute the voting power of existing holders of Class A ordinary shares.
Despite the anti-takeover provisions described above, under Cayman Islands law, our board of directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, for what they believe in good faith to be in our best interests.
Requisitioning General Meetings
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, for so long as our founding shareholder controls a majority of the voting power of our shares, a general meeting of shareholders may be convened on the requisition of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our shares. However, if our founding shareholder controls less than a majority of the voting power of our shares, no shareholder shall have the power to requisition a meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, our shareholders will have limited rights to requisition and convene general meetings of shareholders.
Consent over a Change of Control
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that for so long as David Vélez Osorno and his affiliates beneficially own shares accounting for at least 10% of the voting power of our issued share capital, we will not take, or permit our subsidiaries to take, certain actions without the prior written approval of a majority of the Class B ordinary shares in issue, including entering into a merger, consolidation, reorganization or other business combination or a transaction or series of transactions that would result in a change of control.
Staggered Board
Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, from and after the date that David Vélez Osorno and his affiliates no longer beneficially own more than 50% of the voting power of our issued share capital, we shall cause our board of directors to be divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. This classification of our board of directors could have the effect of increasing the length of time necessary to change the composition of a majority of the board of directors. In general, at least two annual meetings of shareholders will be necessary for shareholders to effect a change in a majority of the members of the board of directors.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 273 |
| |
Exclusive Forum
Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, unless we consent to a different forum, (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or any other person, (iii) any action or proceeding arising pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation or remedy under, any provision of the Companies Act, our Memorandum and Articles of Association, or any other provision of applicable law, (iv) any action or proceeding seeking to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our Memorandum and Articles of Association or (v) any action or proceeding as to which the Companies Act confers jurisdiction on the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may only be brought before the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, in all cases subject to the court having jurisdiction over indispensable parties named as defendants. In addition, any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act may only be brought before the federal district courts of the United States. Nothing in our Memorandum and Articles of Association will preclude shareholders that assert claims under the Exchange Act from bringing such claims in any court, subject to applicable law.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to these exclusive forum provisions. However, shareholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with claims arising under federal securities laws or otherwise, a court could find the exclusive forum provision contained in our Memorandum and Articles of Association to be inapplicable or unenforceable.
Rights of Non-Resident or Foreign Shareholders
There are no limitations imposed by our Memorandum and Articles of Association on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares. In addition, there are no provisions in our Memorandum and Articles of Association governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Class A ordinary shares is Computershare Trust Company, N.A.. The transfer agent and registrar’s address is 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021-1011.
C. Material Contracts
We are party to certain material license agreements with Mastercard in connection with our activities as an issuer of Mastercard credit products.
Our License Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2014, between Mastercard International Incorporated, or “Mastercard,” and EO2 Soluções de Pagamento S.A., sets forth the general terms and conditions under which Mastercard has granted to us a non-exclusive license to use certain trade names, trademarks, service marks and logotypes in Brazil in connection with our issuance of credit products, subject to Mastercard’s standard terms (as amended from time to time). No consideration is due to Mastercard under this agreement.
Our License Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2019, between Mastercard and Nu Bn Mexico Sociedad Anonima de Capital Variable, or “Nu Servicios,” sets forth the general terms and conditions under which Mastercard has granted to us a nonexclusive license to use certain trade names, trademarks, service marks and logotypes in Mexico in connection with our issuance of credit products, subject to Mastercard’s standard terms (as amended from time to time). No consideration is due to Mastercard under this agreement.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 274 |
| |
Our License Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2019, between Mastercard and Nu Argentina S.A. sets forth the general terms and conditions under which Mastercard has granted to us a nonexclusive license to use certain trade names, trademarks, service marks and logotypes in Argentina in connection with our issuance of credit products, subject to Mastercard’s standard terms (as amended from time to time). No consideration is due to Mastercard under this agreement.
Our License Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2020 and as amended from time to time, between Mastercard and Nu Pagamentos, sets forth the general terms and conditions under which Mastercard has granted to us a nonexclusive license to use certain trade names, trademarks, service marks and logotypes in Colombia in connection with our issuance of credit products, subject to Mastercard’s standard terms (as amended from time to time). No consideration is due to Mastercard under this agreement.
In addition, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party Transactions—B. Related-Party Transactions.”
Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report on Form 20-F (including the Exhibits), we are not currently, and have not been in the last two years, party to any material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.
D. Exchange Controls
There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in effect in the Cayman Islands.
E. Taxation
The following summary contains a description of certain Cayman Islands, U.S. and Brazilian federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs. It does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, is not applicable to all categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules, and does not address all of the Cayman Islands, U.S. and Brazilian federal income tax considerations applicable to any particular holder. The summary is based upon the tax laws of the Cayman Islands and regulations thereunder, upon the tax laws of the United States and regulations thereunder and upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder as of the date hereof, which are subject to change.
Prospective purchasers of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs should consult their own tax advisors about the particular Cayman Islands, U.S. and Brazilian federal, state, local and other tax consequences to them of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Class A ordinary shares.
Cayman Islands Tax Considerations
The Cayman Islands laws currently levy no taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and there is no taxation in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty or withholding tax applicable to us or to any holder of Class A ordinary shares. There are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied by the government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties which may be applicable on instruments executed in, or after execution brought within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. No stamp duty is payable in the Cayman Islands on transfers of shares of Cayman Islands companies except those which hold interests in land in the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is not party to any double tax treaties which are applicable to any payments made by or to our company. There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 275 |
| |
As a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability, we are entitled, upon application, to receive an undertaking as to tax concessions pursuant to Section 6 of the Tax Concessions Act (as revised). On September 9, 2019, we received this undertaking which provides that, for a period of 20 years from the date of issue of the undertaking, no law thereafter enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any taxes to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciation will apply to us or our operations.
Payments of dividends and capital in respect of our Class A ordinary shares will not be subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands and no withholding will be required under Cayman Islands law on the payment of a dividend or capital to any holder of our Class A ordinary shares, nor will gains derived from the disposal of our Class A ordinary shares be subject to Cayman Islands income or corporation tax.
There is no income tax treaty or convention currently in effect between the United States and the Cayman Islands.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following summary describes the material U.S. federal income tax considerations to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of owning and disposing of Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs. This discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder that holds Class A ordinary shares or BDRs as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, it does not describe all of the tax considerations that may be relevant in light of a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including alternative minimum tax considerations, the potential application of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the “Code,” known as the Medicare contribution tax and tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such as:
| · | certain financial institutions; |
| · | insurance companies; |
| · | real estate investment trusts or regulated investment companies; |
| · | dealers or traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting; |
| · | persons holding Class A ordinary shares or BDRs as part of a straddle, wash sale, hedging transaction, conversion transaction or other integrated transaction or entering into a constructive sale with respect to Class A ordinary shares or BDRs; |
| · | persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar; |
| · | persons that are subject to the “applicable financial statement” rules under Section 451(b) of the Code; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 276 |
| |
| · | tax-exempt entities, including an “individual retirement account,” or Roth IRA; |
| · | persons holding Class A ordinary shares or BDRs that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of our shares (by vote or value); |
| · | persons owning Class A ordinary shares or BDRs in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States; or |
| · | entities or arrangements classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding Class A ordinary shares or BDRs and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors as to the particular U.S. federal income tax considerations of owning and disposing of the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs.
This discussion is based on the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions, and final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof, any of which is subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect.
A “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Class A ordinary shares or BDRs that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
| · | a citizen or individual resident of the United States; |
| · | a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or |
| · | an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source. |
In general, a U.S. Holder that owns BDRs will be treated as the owner of the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by those BDRs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a U.S. Holder exchanges BDRs for the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by those BDRs.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of owning and disposing of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs in their particular circumstances.
Except where otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that we are not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” as described below.
Taxation of Distributions
Any distributions paid on our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, other than certain pro rata distributions of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, we expect that distributions will generally be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion in “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to certain noncorporate U.S. Holders are taxable at rates applicable to long-term capital gains. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. The NYSE, on which the Class A ordinary shares are listed, is an established securities market in the United States and we anticipate that our Class A ordinary shares should qualify as readily tradable, although there can be no assurances in this regard. Because the BDRs are not listed on a United States stock exchange, it is not entirely clear whether distributions on BDRs will be treated as “qualified dividend income” and therefore taxable to certain noncorporate U.S. holders at favorable rates applicable to long-term capital gains. Accordingly, noncorporate U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisers regarding the taxation of dividends paid on our BDRs.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 277 |
| |
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced tax rate on dividends in their particular circumstances. The amount of any dividend will generally be treated as foreign-source dividend income to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of the U.S. Holder’s or, in the case of BDRs, the depositary’s receipt of the dividend.
Sale or Other Disposition of Class A Ordinary Shares or BDRs
Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain or loss realized on the sale or other disposition of Class A ordinary shares or BDRs will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if a U.S. Holder has held the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs for more than one year. Long-term capital gains of individuals and other noncorporate U.S. Holders are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The amount of the gain or loss will equal the difference between a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or other disposition of BDRs, a U.S. Holder’s amount realized will include the gross amount of proceeds of the sale or disposition before the deduction of the Brazilian tax. See “—Brazilian Tax Considerations” for a description of when a disposition may be subject to taxation by Brazil. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to various limitations.
Foreign Tax Credits
Because a U.S. Holder’s gains from the sale or exchange of BDRs will generally be treated as U.S.-source income, certain generally applicable limitations may preclude a U.S. Holder from claiming a credit for all or a portion of the foreign taxes imposed on any such gains. In addition, recently issued Treasury regulations, which apply to foreign taxes paid or accrued in taxable years beginning on or after December 28, 2021, generally will preclude U.S. Holders from claiming a foreign tax credit with respect to any tax imposed on gains from the disposition of shares by a jurisdiction, such as Brazil, that does not have an applicable income tax treaty with the United States, although such taxes may be applied to reduce the amount realized by the U.S. Holder on the disposition.
Subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law, a U.S. Holder may, at its election, deduct otherwise creditable taxes in computing taxable income in lieu of claiming a credit. An election to deduct creditable foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all such foreign taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year.
The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and, therefore, U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding the creditability or deductibility of any Brazilian tax in their particular circumstances (including any applicable limitations).
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
Under the Code, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (i) 75% or more of our gross income consists of “passive income,” or (ii) 50% or more of the average value of our assets (generally determined on a quarterly basis) consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, “passive income.” We will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the assets and earning our proportionate share of the income of any other corporation where we own, directly or indirectly, more than 25% (by value) of the corporation’s stock. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, certain non-active royalties, and capital gains.
The application of the PFIC rules to banks is unclear under present U.S. federal income tax law. Banks generally derive a substantial part of their income from assets that are interest bearing or that otherwise could be considered passive under the PFIC rules. The IRS recently issued the 2021 Proposed Regulations, and previously issued a notice in 1989 (Notice 89-81, or the “Notice”) and the 1995 Proposed Regulations, that exclude from passive income any income derived in the active conduct of a banking business by a qualifying foreign bank (the “active bank exception”). The 2021 Proposed Regulations are proposed to be effective for taxable years of shareholders beginning on or after the date such regulations are finalized (but can electively be applied earlier), while the 1995 Proposed Regulations are proposed to be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994 and provide that taxpayers may apply the 1995 Proposed Regulations to a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1986, provided the 1995 Proposed Regulations are consistently applied to that taxable year and all subsequent taxable years.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 278 |
| |
The 2021 Proposed Regulations, the Notice, and the 1995 Proposed Regulations each have different requirements for qualifying as a foreign bank, and for determining the banking income that may be excluded from passive income under the active bank exception, but the preamble to the 2021 Proposed Regulations authorizes taxpayers to rely upon the Notice or the 1995 Proposed Regulations to determine whether income of a foreign bank may be treated as non-passive. Under both the 2021 Proposed Regulations and the 1995 Proposed Regulations, a qualifying foreign bank must be licensed in the country of its incorporation to do business as a bank and must also carry on one or more specified activities, including regularly receiving bank deposits from unrelated customers in the course of its banking business. While the 2021 Proposed Regulations are silent on this matter, under both the Notice and 1995 Proposed Regulations, loans made in the ordinary course of a banking business are not treated as passive assets.
Based on the 1995 Proposed Regulations, including those which are proposed to be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994 and our current operations, income, assets and certain estimates and projections (such as the relative values of our assets, including goodwill), we do not believe that we were a PFIC for our 2021 taxable year. However, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion. Among other reasons, whether we were a PFIC in 2021 or will be a PFIC in any future taxable year is uncertain because: (i) the 1995 Proposed Regulations may not be finalized in their current form, (ii) PFIC status is determined on an annual basis at the end of each taxable year, and (iii) the composition of our income and assets and the market value of our assets (which may be determined, in part, by reference to the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and BDRs, which could be volatile) may vary from time to time. The application of the 2021 Proposed Regulations is not entirely clear and, if we can no longer rely on the 1995 Proposed Regulations, and the 2021 Proposed Regulations are adopted in their current form, there can be no assurances that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. If we are a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, we would generally continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such holder for all succeeding years during which such holder holds Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, even if we ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status.
If we were a PFIC for any taxable year and any of our subsidiaries or other companies in which we owned or were treated as owning equity interests were also a PFIC (any such entity, a “Lower-tier PFIC”), a U.S. Holder would be deemed to own a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of each Lower-tier PFIC and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax according to the rules described in the subsequent paragraph on (i) certain distributions to us by a Lower-tier PFIC and (ii) our disposition of shares of Lower-tier PFICs, in each case as if such holder held such shares directly, even though such holder may not have received the proceeds of those distributions or dispositions.
If we were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, absent making certain elections (as described below), such holder would generally be subject to adverse tax consequences. Generally, gain recognized upon a disposition (including, under certain circumstances, a pledge) of the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs by such U.S. Holder would be allocated ratably over such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for that taxable year for individuals or corporations, as applicable, and an interest charge would be imposed on the resulting tax liability. Further, to the extent any distribution in respect of our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs exceeded 125% of the average of the annual distributions on Class A ordinary shares or BDRs received by the U.S. Holder during the preceding three years or its holding period, whichever was shorter, that distribution would be subject to taxation in the same manner as gain, described immediately above.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 279 |
| |
Alternatively, if we were a PFIC and if the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs were “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange,” a U.S. Holder would be eligible to make a mark-to-market election that would result in tax treatment different from the general tax treatment for PFICs described above. The Class A ordinary shares and BDRs would be treated as “regularly traded” if more than a de minimis quantity of the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, as applicable, were traded on a qualified exchange (i) for the 2021 taxable year, on at least 1/6 of the days remaining in the quarter in which the initial public offering occurred, and (ii) for any other calendar year on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. The NYSE, on which the Class A ordinary shares are listed, is a qualified exchange for this purpose. A non-U.S. exchange is a “qualified exchange” if it is regulated by a governmental authority in the jurisdiction in which the exchange is located and with respect to which certain other requirements are met. The Internal Revenue Service has not identified specific non-U.S. exchanges that are “qualified” for this purpose. Although we expect that the B3, on which our BDRs are listed, would constitute a qualified exchange, there can be no assurance in this regard or as to whether the mark-to-market election would otherwise be available with respect to the BDRs. Once made, the election cannot be revoked without the consent of the IRS unless the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, if applicable, cease to be marketable.
If a U.S. Holder makes the mark-to-market election (assuming such election is available with respect to the BDRs), such holder will generally recognize as ordinary income any excess of the fair market value of such holder’s Class A ordinary shares or BDRs at the end of each taxable year over their adjusted tax basis, and will recognize an ordinary loss in respect of any excess of the adjusted tax basis of the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of income previously included as a result of the mark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the election, such holder’s tax basis in their Class A ordinary shares or BDRs will be adjusted to reflect these income or loss amounts. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of Class A ordinary shares or BDRs in a year when we are a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income and any loss will be treated as an ordinary loss (but only to the extent of the net amount of income previously included as a result of the mark-to-market election). This election will not apply to any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Accordingly, a U.S. Holder may continue to be subject to tax under the PFIC excess distribution regime with respect to any Lower-tier PFICs notwithstanding a mark-to-market election for the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs.
We do not intend to prepare or provide the information necessary for a U.S. Holder to make a qualified electing fund election.
In addition, if we were a PFIC for the taxable year in which we paid a dividend or for the prior taxable year, the favorable tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains discussed above with respect to dividends paid to non-corporate U.S. Holders would not apply.
If a U.S. Holder owns Class A ordinary shares or BDRs during any year in which we are a PFIC, such holder must generally file annual reports containing such information as the U.S. Treasury may require on IRS Form 8621 (or any successor form) with respect to us, generally with such holder’s federal income tax return for that year. A failure to file one or more of these forms as required may toll the running of the statute of limitations in respect of each of the U.S. Holder’s taxable years for which such form is required to be filed. As a result, the taxable years with respect to which the U.S. Holder fails to file the form may remain open to assessment by the IRS indefinitely, until the form is filed.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 280 |
| |
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of the PFIC rules, including whether the elections discussed above would be available and, if so, what the consequences of the alternative treatments would be in their particular circumstances.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding, unless (i) the U.S. Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that the U.S. Holder is not subject to backup withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to the U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Information with Respect to Foreign Financial Assets
Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals (and certain entities) may be required to report information on their U.S. federal income tax returns relating to an interest in our Class A ordinary shares or BDRs, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for Class A ordinary shares or BDRs held in accounts maintained by certain U.S. financial institutions). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this requirement on their ownership and disposition of the Class A ordinary shares or BDRs.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
The following summary contains a description of certain Brazilian tax considerations relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of BDRs and our shares by an investor that is not domiciled or resident in Brazil for Brazilian tax purposes, each a Non-Resident Holder.
The following is a general discussion and, therefore, it does not specifically address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a Non-Resident Holder’s decision to acquire BDRs and our shares and it is not applicable to all categories of Non-Resident Holders, some of which may be subject to special tax rules not specifically addressed herein. This summary also does not address any tax consequences under the tax laws of any state or municipality of Brazil. The present description is based upon the tax laws of Brazil, in effect as of the date of this offering memorandum, which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect and to differing interpretations. Any change in the applicable Brazilian laws and regulations may impact the consequences described below.
The tax consequences described below do not take into account tax treaties entered into by Brazil and other countries. Prospective purchasers of BDRs and our shares are advised to consult their own tax advisors with respect to an investment in BDRs and our shares in light of their particular circumstances.
Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions
According to Law No 9,430, dated December 27, 1996, as amended, a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction is a country or location that (i) does not impose taxation on income, (ii) imposes income tax at a rate lower than 20%, or (iii) imposes restrictions on the disclosure of shareholding composition or investment ownership.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 281 |
| |
Additionally, on June 24, 2008, Law No. 11,727 introduced the concept of a “privileged tax regime,” in connection with transactions subject to Brazilian transfer pricing rules and also applicable to thin capitalization/cross-border interest deductibility rules, which is broader than the concept of a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Law 11,727, a jurisdiction will be considered a Privileged Tax Regime if it (i) does not tax income or taxes it at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17.0% provided that the requirements set forth in Normative Ruling No. 1,530 dated December 19, 2014 and Ordinance No. 488 are met; (ii) grants tax benefits to non-resident entities or individuals (a) without the requirement that they carry out substantial economic activity in the country or dependency or (b) contingent on the non-exercise of substantial economic activity in the country or dependency; (iii) does not tax or that taxes income generated abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17.0% provided that the requirements set forth in Normative Ruling No. 1,530 and Ordinance No. 488 are met; or (iv) does not provide access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of assets and rights or economic transactions carried out.
On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian tax authorities issued Ordinance No. 488, which decreased these minimum thresholds from 20% to 17% for specific cases. Under Ordinance No. 488, the 17% threshold applies only to countries and regimes aligned with international standards of fiscal transparency, in accordance with rules to be established by the Brazilian tax authorities. The Ordinance No. 488 has lowered the threshold rate, Normative Ruling No. 1,037, which identifies the countries considered to be Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions and the locations considered as Privileged Tax Regimes, has not been amended to reflect the 17% threshold.
In addition, on June 4, 2010, the Brazilian Tax Authorities enacted Normative Ruling No. 1,037, as amended, listing (i) the countries and jurisdictions considered as Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions and (ii) the locations considered Privileged Tax Regimes. Normative Ruling No. 1,037 has not been amended thus far to reflect the threshold changes previously mentioned.
Although, we believe that the best interpretation of Law No. 11,727/08 to be that the new concept of “privileged tax regime” would be applicable solely for purposes of transfer pricing and thin capitalization rules. However, we are unable to ascertain whether or not the privileged tax regime concept will be extended to the concept of Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction, though the Brazilian tax authorities appear to agree with our position, in view of the provisions introduced by Normative Ruling No. 1,037, dated as of June 4, 2010, as amended, which presents two different lists (Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions-taking into account the non-transparency rules-and privileged tax regimes).
Notwithstanding the above, we recommend that you consult your own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the implementation of Law No. 11,727, Normative Ruling No. 1,037 and of any related Brazilian tax law or regulation concerning Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions or “privileged tax regimes.”
Income Tax
Dividends
Dividends arising from BDRs and our shares and paid by us should not be subject to taxation in Brazil when paid in favor of a Non-Resident Holder.
There is an ongoing public political discussion in Brazil in relation to reform in its tax system regarding income tax that may have implications for the levy of Brazilian withholding or other tax on the payment of dividends. The implementation of such tax reform, however, will require modifications in law through a bill of law voted by the Brazilian National Congress. Nevertheless, we are aware that there are certain bills of law that seek to revoke the income tax exemption on dividends – these bills of law are still pending analysis and approval from specific committees of the National Congress before being put to vote. Thus, there can be no assurance that the current tax exemption on dividends distributed by Brazilian companies will continue in the future. In any case, any potential taxation being imposed upon dividends would become effective only in the year following the enactment of the relevant law.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 282 |
| |
Interest on Shareholders’ Equity
Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, allows a Brazilian corporation, such as us, to make distributions to shareholders of interest on shareholders’ equity as an alternative to carrying out dividends distributions and to treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax and social contribution on net profits provided that the limits described below are observed.
For tax purposes, this interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the Brazilian long-term interest rate, or “TJLP,” as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil from time to time, and the amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:
| · | 50% of net profits (after deduction of social contribution on net profits before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on net equity) for the period in respect to which the payment is made; or |
| · | 50% of the sum of retained profits and profit reserves as of the year date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made. |
Payments of interest on net equity to a Non-Resident Holder are subject to WHT at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Resident Holder is domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction, as detailed below.
Payments of interest on equity to a Non-Resident Holder may be included, at their net value, as part of any minimum mandatory dividend. In accordance with applicable law, to the extent payments of interest on shareholders’ equity are so included, the corporation is required to distribute to shareholders an amount sufficient to ensure that the net amount received by them, in respect to interest on shareholders’ equity, after payment of the applicable Brazilian WHT plus the amount of declared dividends is at least equal to the amount of the minimum mandatory dividend.
Distributions of interest on shareholders’ equity to Non-Resident Holders may be converted into U.S. dollars and remitted outside Brazil, subject to applicable exchange controls, to the extent that the investment is registered with the Central Bank of Brazil.
We cannot guarantee that the Brazilian federal government will not increase the WHT on interest on shareholders’ equity in the future or eliminate the interest on shareholders’ equity altogether.
Assurance cannot be given that our board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of income should be made by means of interest on equity instead of dividends.
Capital Gains
According to Law No. 10,833, dated December 29, 2003, or “Law No. 10,833/03,” gains realized on the sale or other disposition of assets located in Brazil are generally subject to income tax in Brazil, regardless of whether the sale or disposition is made by the Non-Resident Holder to a resident or person domiciled in Brazil or to another non-resident.
BDRs are assets registered in Brazil, and may fall within the definition of assets located in Brazil for purposes of Law No. 10,833/03, although there may be different interpretations of the matter. Given the lack of precedent on the matter and in light of the general and unclear scope of regulations dealing with the subject, we cannot predict which position will ultimately prevail in the courts of Brazil. Our shares should not be treated as assets located in Brazil and therefore, their disposal should not generate income tax in Brazil.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 283 |
| |
For purposes of Brazilian taxation, the income tax rules on gains related to disposition of assets located in Brazil, such as BDRs, vary depending on the domicile of the Non-Resident Holder, the form by which such Non-Resident Holder holds its investment and/or how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
As a general rule, capital gains realized on the disposition of assets located in Brazil are equal to the difference between the amount in reais realized on the sale or exchange of the assets and their acquisition cost, without any correction for inflation. In this sense, note that there is an ongoing discussion on whether the capital gains should be calculated in reais or in the foreign currency at which the investment was originally carried out Capital gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder on a sale or disposition of BDRs carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange, which includes transactions carried out on the organized over-the-counter, or “OTC market,” are:
| · | exempt from income tax when the Non-Resident Holder (1) has performed its investment in Brazil pursuant to the rules of CMN Resolution No. 4,373/14 of the Brazilian National Monetary Council, or a “4,373 Holder;” and (2) is not resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction; |
| · | subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in the case of gains realized by (A) a Non-Resident Holder that (1) is not a 4,373 Holder and (2) is not resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction; or (B) a Non-Resident Holder that (1) is a 4,373 Holder and (2) is resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction; or |
| · | subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in the case of gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder that (1) is not a 4,373 Holder, and (2) is resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction. |
As of January 1, 2017 capital gains arising on disposals of BDRs carried out outside a Brazilian stock exchange may be subject to progressive rates varying from 15% up to 22.5% (or 25% if the Non-Resident Holder is located in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction). While such potential increase is not applicable to transactions carried out within the Brazilian stock exchange, there could be different interpretations on whether or not such rules would be applicable to a Non-Resident Holder in non-organized OTC market transactions.
Therefore, capital gains assessed on a sale or disposition of BDRs that is not carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange or the organized OTC market are, subject to the discussion in the prior paragraph, currently subject to: (1) income tax at a rate of 15% up to 22.5% when realized by any Non-Resident Holder that is not resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction; and (2) income tax at a rate of 25% when realized by a Non-Resident
Holder resident or domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction. If these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non-organized OTC market with an intermediary, a withholding income tax of 0.005% on the sale value will also apply and can be used to offset the income tax due on the capital gain.
In the case of a redemption of shares by us, as well as on the withdrawal of BDRs in exchange for our shares, the positive difference between the amount received (or the market price of our shares received) by the Non-Resident Holder and the acquisition cost of the corresponding BDRs disposed of will be treated as capital gain derived from a transaction of BDRs carried out outside a Brazilian stock exchange and is therefore subject to income tax at a rate of 15% or up to 25%, as described above.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 284 |
| |
Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions, or “IOF/FX”
The conversion of reais into foreign currency and the conversion of foreign currency into reais may be subject to the IOF/FX. The rate of IOF/FX applicable to inflow and outflow transactions for the investment/divestment in BDRs is currently zero. The Brazilian government is permitted to increase the rate of the IOF/FX at any time, up to 25% of the amount of the foreign exchange transaction. However, any increase in rates may only apply to transactions carried out after the date of the increase in rate and not retroactively.
Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and Securities, or “IOF/Bonds”
Brazilian law imposes a tax on transactions involving bonds and securities IOF/Bonds, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange. The rate of IOF/Bonds applicable to transactions involving us is currently zero. The Brazilian government is permitted to increase such rate at any time up to 1.5% per day, but only in respect of future transactions.
Other Brazilian Taxes
There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of BDRs by a Non-Resident Holder, except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by certain states of Brazil on gifts or bequests by non-resident individuals or entities to individuals or entities domiciled or residing within such states. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of BDRs.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F and reports on Form 6-K. You may inspect and copy the reports and other information to be filed with the SEC at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of the materials may be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website at http://www.sec.gov, from which you can electronically access this annual report and the registration statement of which it forms a part and its materials.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 285 |
| |
Item 11. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
We are exposed to different risks arising from our activities. Our risk monitoring adapts as new risks and threats emerge. Our main market risk factors are interest rate risk and exchange rate risk of our activities in Brazil, where our main operations are located.
We define market risk as the risk of losses arising from movements in market prices, including the risks related to interest rates, equities, foreign exchange rates and commodities. Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book, or IRRBB, refers to the current or prospective risk to our capital and earnings arising from adverse movements in interest rates that can affect our banking book positions.
We have a market risk and IRRBB control and management structure, independent from the business units, which is responsible for the processes and tools to measure, monitor, control and report the market risk and IRRBB, and which continuously verifies adherence with approved policies and limits.
Management of market risk and IRRBB is based on metrics that are reported to our Assets and Liabilities Management, or “ALM,” technical forum and to our risk committee. Our management team is authorized to use financial instruments as outlined in our internal policies to hedge market risk and IRRBB exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk arises from our daily activities: credit card, personal loans, cash management and sources of funding. This risk is mitigated with our use of derivative instruments (interest rate risk swaps and futures). There is no material interest rate risk in currencies other than Brazilian reais.
The tables below show the sensitivities in the fair values of the financial instruments (assets, liabilities and derivatives), in two different scenarios: a standardized one, with a 1 bp (0.01% p.y.) shock, another with a 465 bps (4.65% p.y.) shock in the Brazilian risk-free interest curve and 304 bps (3.04% p.y.) shock in the IPCA cupon curve. These shocks were calculated using the 90% percentile of the distribution of annual returns of the one year tenor of the curves, considering a five year window. Such shocks are applied throughout the interest rate term structure (parallel shocks in all vertices of the interest curve).
Financial instruments have their fair values calculated under current conditions and also in each one of the two scenarios described. The sensitivity value is the difference between the fair value in each scenario and the fair value under normal market conditions. Positive values represent gains and negative values represent losses at fair values. For credit cards, fair value is calculated considering assets (receivables) and liabilities (payables), discounting expected cash flows (contractual cash flows minus expected defaults) to present values by applicable interest rates.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 286 |
| |
The sensitivity analyses as of December 31, 2021 are set forth below:
Sensitivities to 1 bp (0.01%) Shocks - Brazilian risk-free interest curve
|
Tenor |
Credit Card |
Lending |
Sov. Bonds |
Derivatives |
Debt Instruments |
Instruments eligible to capital |
Corporate Bonds |
Total |
| (in US$ thousands) | ||||||||
| 0 to 6 Months | (1) | (15) | — | 15 | — | — | — | (1) |
| 7 Months to 12 Months | (1) | (23) | — | 25 | — | — | — | 1 |
| 1 year to 2 years | — | (21) | — | 24 | — | — | — | 3 |
| 2 years to 3 years | — | — | (3) | — | — | 4 | — | 1 |
| 3 years to 4 years | — | — | (25) | 25 | — | — | — | — |
| 4 years to 5 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| More than 5 Years |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| Total | (2) | (59) | (28) | 89 | — | 4 | — | 4 |
Sensitivities to 465 bps (4.65%) shocks - Brazilian risk-free interest curve
|
Tenor |
Credit Card |
Lending |
Sov. Bonds |
Derivatives |
Debt Instruments |
Instruments eligible to capital |
Corporate Bonds |
Total |
| (in US$ thousands) | ||||||||
| 0 to 6 Months | (468) | (6,972) | (39) | 7,076 | 58 | — | 1 | (344) |
| 7 Months to 12 Months | (562) | (10,239) | — | 11,219 | — | — | (39) | 379 |
| 1 year to 2 years | (59) | (9,116) | (1) | 10,751 | — | — | (14) | 1,561 |
| 2 years to 3 years | (2) | (215) | (1,345) | 265 | — | 1,614 | — | 317 |
| 3 years to 4 years | — | (50) | (10,465) | 10,609 | — | — | (5) | 89 |
| 4 years to 5 years | — | (1) | (3) | 66 | — | — | (61) | 1 |
| More than 5 Years |
— |
— |
(41) |
(227) |
— |
— |
(8) |
(276) |
| Total | (1,091) | (26,593) | (11,894) | 39,759 | 58 | 1,614 | (126) | 1,727 |
Sensitivities to 1 bp (0.01%) Shocks - IPCA coupon curve
|
Tenor |
Credit Card |
Lending |
Sov. Bonds |
Derivatives |
Debt Instruments |
Instruments eligible to capital |
Corporate Bonds |
Total |
| (in US$ thousands) | ||||||||
| 0 to 6 Months | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 Months to 12 Months | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 year to 2 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 years to 3 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 years to 4 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 years to 5 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| More than 5 Years |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
(2) |
(2) |
| Total | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2) | (2) |
Sensitivities to 304 bp (3.04%) Shocks - IPCA coupon curve
Form 20-F | 2021 | 287 |
| |
|
Tenor |
Credit Card |
Lending |
Sov. Bonds |
Derivatives |
Debt Instruments |
Instruments eligible to capital |
Corporate Bonds |
Total |
| (in US$ thousands) | ||||||||
| 0 to 6 Months | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 Months to 12 Months | — | — | — | — | — | — | (11) | (11) |
| 1 year to 2 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | (19) | (19) |
| 2 years to 3 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | (10) | (10) |
| 3 years to 4 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | (27) | (27) |
| 4 years to 5 years | — | — | — | — | — | — | (89) | (89) |
| More than 5 Years |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
(375) |
(375) |
| Total | — | — | — | — | — | — | (531) | (531) |
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of our subsidiaries is generally the currency of the country in which they are located. As of December 31, 2021 none of the entities in our corporate structure had significant financial instruments in a currency other than their respective functional currencies.
We decided not to hedge our foreign exchange exposure originated by our investments in Brazil, Colombia and México. As a result, our financial statements may present significant gains or losses in other comprehensive income due to translation of the financial statements of the subsidiaries due to the relevance of these operations compared to our own operations.
The table below shows possible impacts on the value of these investments. It considers a shock of 33.6% in the U.S. dollar/Brazilian reais exchange rate. This shock was calculated using the 90th percentile of the distribution of annual returns, considering a five year window. For other exchange rates, a 10% standardized shock was used. The 10% shock was used as a standardized shock.
|
Net Equity | ||||
|
Subsidiary |
Country |
As of December 31, 2021 |
Shock |
Increase / (decrease) |
|
(in US$ thousands) |
(in percentage) |
(in US$ thousands) | ||
| Nu Servicios | Mexico | 20,153 | 10.0 | 2,015 |
| Nu BN Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (1) | Mexico | 5 | 10.0 | 1 |
| Nu Tecnologia | Mexico | 2,236 | 10.0 | 224 |
| Akala | Mexico | 4,481 | 10.0 | 448 |
| Nu Finaztechnologie | Germany | (1,857) | 10.0 | (186) |
| Nu Colombia | Colombia | 43,694 | 10.0 | 4,369 |
| Nu Argentina | Argentina | (2,558) | 10.0 | (256) |
| Nu Tecnologia | Uruguay | (60) | 10.0 | (6) |
| Nuplat | Uruguay | (10) | 10.0 | (1) |
| FIP – Brazil | Brazil |
756,653 |
33.6 |
254,236 |
| Total | 822,737 | 260,844 | ||
| (1) | Formerly Nu BN México, S.A. de C.V., SOFOM. Name change effective August 26, 2021. |
The major foreign exchange exposure is originated by our investments in the Brazilian subsidiaries, presented above as FIP – Brazil. Our Brazilian subsidiaries have operating costs in Brazilian reais, U.S. dollars and in Euros. The costs incurred in reais are not hedged by the subsidiaries nor by Nu Holdings. However, certain costs in other currencies, e.g. U.S. dollars and Euros, or intercompany loans in U.S. dollars are hedged by our Brazilian subsidiaries with futures contracts, traded on the B3 exchange, at the beginning of each fiscal year, based on the then-existing projections of these costs, or when there is new exposure. Hedge transactions are unwound as costs and loans are paid, and recalibrated when our internal cost projections change. As a result, the financial statements of the subsidiaries have minor exposures to foreign exchange rates compared to their functional currencies after taking effect of the hedge transactions.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 288 |
| |
Credit Risk
We define credit risk mainly, as:
| · | Counterparty risk: the possibility of failure to meet contractual obligations related to the settlement of transactions with financial assets, which also includes derivative financial instruments; |
| · | The possibility of losses associated with the failure of a signatory to loan operations to meet the financial obligations under the contractually agreed terms; |
| · | The possibility of depreciation or reduction in financial instruments expected earnings due to observed credit quality deterioration of a signatory to loan operations; and |
| · | The possibility of incurring any recovery cost related to the credit quality deterioration of a loan signatory or counterparty, such as disbursement to honor warranties, co-obligations and credit commitments or any forbearance cost of a financial instrument. |
Our credit management structure is independent from the business units and provides processes and tools to measure, monitor, control and report the credit risk from all products, continuously verifying their adherence to the approved policies and risk appetite structure. Our credit risk management also assesses and monitors the impacts of potential changes in the economic environment in our credit portfolio to ensure that it is resilient to economic downturns.
We believe that our credit decision-making complies with our governance standards, as decisions are taken and approved according to their size and credit risk profile. Credit decisions approvals take place in committees, technical forums, and the designated decision forums, with the involvement of the first and second lines of defense. For the decision-making process, information arising from historical performance is presented and discussed using predictive models that analyze and score existing and potential customers based on their profitability and credit risk profile.
We use customers’ internal information, statistical models, external data, and other quantitative analyses to determine the risk profile of each customer in the portfolio. The information collected is used to manage the portfolio credit risk and to measure expected credit losses with periodical assessment of changes in the provision amounts. For more information on our methodology to measure credit allowances, see note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Regarding past due customers, their payment behavior is continuously tracked and monitored in order to improve policies and approaches to collect debt. Our collection strategies and policies depend on customer profiles and model scores and they aim to maximize the recovery amounts.
We also have limits for exposure to counterparty credit risk in cash or cash equivalents assets, aligned with our risk appetite statement. These limits are based on ratings from external rating agencies. Only part of the cash can be invested in assets with credit risk exposures. Exposures to issuers rated worse than AA+ on a local scale are not allowed.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 289 |
| |
Liquidity Risk
We define liquidity risk as the possibility that we will not be able to meet our current and future financial obligations when they fall due. There is a liquidity risk management and control structure in place, independent from the business units, which is responsible for the processes, assessments, monitoring, controlling, and reporting of liquidity risk, continuously verifying the adherence with the approved policies and limits structure.
Liquidity risk is monitored to ensure that we have sufficient high-quality liquid assets to withstand severe stress scenarios and also an adequate funding profile in terms of tenor, type, and counterparties.
The Contingency Funding Plan describes possible management actions that should be taken in the case of a deterioration of the liquidity indicators.
Operational Risk
We define operational risk as the possibility of losses resulting from external events or failure, weakness or inadequacy of internal processes, people, or systems. It includes legal risk associated with the lack or deficiency in contracts, our failure to comply with applicable legal provisions and indemnities for damages to third parties arising from our activities.
We have an operational risk and internal controls structure, which is responsible for the identification and assessment of operational risks, as well as the evaluation of the design and effectiveness of our internal controls structure. This structure is also responsible for the preparation and periodic testing of our business continuity plan and for coordinating the risk assessment in new product launches and significant changes in existing processes.
As part of our first line of defense and within our risk management process, each business area has mechanisms for identifying, measuring, evaluating, monitoring, and reporting operational risk events, as well as disseminating the control culture to other collaborators internally. Material risk assessments are presented to our operational risk and internal controls technical forum, as well as to our risk committee. Applicable improvement recommendations are expected to become action plans including deadlines and responsibilities. Our first line of defense teams have the main responsibility for the development and implementation of controls to mitigate operational risks.
Information Technology Risk
We define information technology, or “IT,” risk as the undesirable effects arising from a range of potential threats to our information technology infrastructure, including cybersecurity (occurrence of information security incidents), incidents management (ineffective incidents/problem management process, impact on service levels, costs and customer dissatisfaction), data management (lack of compliance with data privacy laws or gaps in data management governance or data leakage issues), among others.
As we operate in a challenging cyber threat environment, we continuously invest in controls and technologies to defend against these threats. IT risks, including cybersecurity risks, are one of our priorities. Thus, we have a dedicated IT risk structure, which is part of the second line of defense. This team is independent from IT-related areas, including engineering, IT Operations, and information security.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 290 |
| |
Our IT risk team is responsible for identifying, assessing, measuring, monitoring, controlling, and reporting IT risks based on risk appetite levels approved by our board of directors. We assess our risk exposure to threats and their potential impacts on our business and our customers on an ongoing basis. We strive to improve our IT and cybersecurity features and controls, as well as, ensuring that our employees and third-party contributors remain aware of prevention measures and also know how to report incidents, given that people are a key component of our security strategy.
The results of our IT risk and controls assessments are regularly discussed at our IT risk technical forum, as well as presented to our risk committee. Applicable improvement recommendations are expected to become action plans including deadlines and responsibilities.
Capital Management
The purpose of capital management is to estimate and monitor our capital requirements based on our growth projections, risk exposure and tolerance levels, market movements and other relevant information, considering both regulatory requirements and our capital risk tolerance levels. Also, our capital management structure is responsible for identifying sources of capital, designing and submitting for approval our capital plans, as well as tracking the regulatory capital ratios across our regulated entities.
At the executive level, our ALM, or “Asset Liability Management,” technical forum is responsible for approving risk assessment and capital calculation methodologies, as well as reviewing, monitoring, and recommending capital- related action plans to our risk committee.
Regulatory Capital
Nu Pagamentos and Nu Financeira, our 100%-owned indirect subsidiaries organized in Brazil, are regulated and authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil.
Nu Pagamentos
As a regulated payment institution, Nu Pagamentos is required to comply with the capital requirements set forth in Central Bank Circular No. 3,681/13. The minimum capital required from payment institutions is equivalent to 2.0% of the higher of (i) the average monthly payment volume over the last 12 months and (ii) the balance of electronic currencies. As of December 31, 2021, the adjusted shareholders’ equity of Nu Pagamentos of US$570 million (R$3.2 billion) was equivalent to 22.9% of the average monthly payment volume from the preceding 12 months (which was higher than the balance of electronic currencies) and significantly higher than the regulatory minimum of 2.0%.
Nu Financeira Financial Conglomerate
As a regulated financial institution, Nu Financeira, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, or collectively the “Nu Financeira Financial Conglomerate,” are required to comply with the capital requirements set by CMN Resolution No. 4,193/13, as amended. The minimum capital adequacy ratio required from financial institutions in Brazil (total capital ratio, or “TCR”) is typically equivalent to up to 10.5% of their total risk-weighted assets, or “RWAs.” However, as part of its response to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Central Bank of Brazil temporarily reduced the TCR: as of December 31, 2021, the minimum capital adequacy ratio was 10%. However, it is expected to return to 10.5% in the first half of 2022.
Notwithstanding the minimum capital adequacy ratio provided under CMN Resolution No. 4,193/13, upon being granted its financial institution license in 2018, Nu Financeira undertook a commitment to operate with a higher Basel Committee minimum capital adequacy ratio of 14.0% during its first five years of operations (i.e., until 2023). As of December 31, 2021, the capital position of the Nu Financeira Financial Conglomerate was US$485 million (R$2.7 billion), equivalent to a TCR of 22.6%, significantly higher than its commitment of 14.0%.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 291 |
| |
Managerial Capital Ratios
In addition to complying with the minimum capital requirements of the different jurisdictions in which we operate, we also aim to maintain a significant balance of cash at Nu Holdings, a balance that we may potentially use to capitalize any of our subsidiaries, if and when needed. As such, for managerial purposes, we consider the cash that we have at Nu Holdings as part of our managerial regulatory capital.
The combined minimum capital requirement for Nu Pagamentos and the Nu Financeira Financial Conglomerate was equivalent to approximately US$351 million (R$2.0 billion) as of December 31, 2021. Our managerial regulatory capital, including (i) the capital position we had at the level of our regulated entities of approximately plus our cash position at Nu Holdings amounted to a capital position of approximately US$3.6 billion (R$20 billion) as of December 31, 2021. This managerial capital base was equivalent to approximately 10x of our minimum required capital.
If both Nu Pagamentos and the Nu Financeira Financial Conglomerate were subject to the capital requirements set by CMN Resolution No. 4,193/13, as amended, our managerial capital adequacy ratio would have been 51.4% as of December 31, 2021 after taking into account the managerial capital base, which includes the capital positions of the regulated entities in Brazil and our cash position at Nu Holdings Ltd.
For additional information regarding the capital requirements to which we are subject under Central Bank Circular No. 3,681/13 and CMN Resolution No. 4,193/13, as amended, see “Item 4. Information on the Company— B. Business Overview— Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Other Rules—Corporate Capital and Limits of Exposure.”
Item 12. Description of securities other than equity securities
A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities
Description of Brazilian Depositary Receipts
The rights of holders of BDRs are set forth in a deposit agreement between us and Banco Bradesco S.A., as depositary of the BDR Program.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 292 |
| |
There are differences between holding BDRs and holding Class A ordinary shares.
General
Each BDR represents 1/6th of a Class A ordinary share issued by us, maintained in custody by the custodian in the offices of Bank of New York Mellon at One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286. The BDR Depositary’s office at which the BDRs are managed is located at Cidade de Deus, Yellow Building, 2nd Floor, Vila Yara, Osasco, Brazil, Zip Code 06029-900.
A BDR holder will not be treated as one of our Class A ordinary shareholders and, as a result may not have any Class A ordinary shareholder rights.
The rights of our Class A ordinary shareholders are governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands and the provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association. See “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.” The rights of holders of BDRs are governed by the laws and regulations of Brazil, as well as the provisions of the deposit agreement.
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the deposit agreement. Because it is a summary, it does not contain all the information that may be important to you. For more complete information, you should read:
| · | the rules and regulations applicable to BDRs, particularly CMN Resolution No. 3,568/08, CVM Instructions No. 332 and 480, as amended, and the Central Bank of Brazil Circular No. 3,691/13, as amended; and |
| · | the deposit agreement, copies of which are available for review upon request. |
Deposit Agreement
Scope
The Deposit Agreement governs the relationship between us and the BDR Depositary with respect to the issuance, cancellation and registration, in Brazil, of the BDRs representing Class A ordinary shares issued by us and held by the custodian. The Deposit Agreement also governs the actions of the BDR Depositary with respect to the management of the BDR program and the services to be performed by the BDR Depositary for holders of BDRs.
BDR Registry Book; Ownership and Trading of BDRs
Pursuant to the deposit agreement, the BDRs may be issued and canceled, as the case may be, by means of entries in the BDR registry book, which will be kept by the BDR Depositary. The BDR registry book will record the total number of BDRs issued in the name of the Central Depositary of the B3, the fiduciary holder of the BDRs. The BDRs will be held and blocked in a custody account with the Central Depositary of the B3 and held for trading on the B3.
Therefore, neither over-the-counter transfers of the BDRs, nor transfers of the BDRs conducted in any private transaction market other than the B3, nor in a clearinghouse other than the Central Depositary of the B3, are admitted. Any transfer of BDRs (including transfers made by U.S. persons) will be conducted through broker-dealers or institutions authorized to operate on the B3.
Ownership of the BDRs is determined by entry of the beneficial holder’s name in the records of the Central Depositary of the B3, and evidenced by the custodial account statement issued by the Central Depositary of the B3. The Central Depositary of the B3 will inform the names of the BDRs holders to the BDR Depositary.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 293 |
| |
The BDR Depositary has advised us that holders of BDRs are not generally entitled to inspect the BDR Depositary’s transfer books or list of holders of BDRs, due to certain secrecy obligations under Brazilian law.
Issuance and Cancellation of BDRs
The BDR Depositary will issue the BDRs in Brazil after confirmation by the custodian that a corresponding number of our Class A ordinary shares were deposited with the custodian, and after confirmation that all fees and taxes due in connection with this service were duly paid, as set forth in the deposit agreement.
As a result, an investor may at any time give instructions to a broker-dealer to purchase Class A ordinary shares on the NYSE, to be further deposited with the custodian in order to allow the BDR Depositary to issue BDRs.
In order to effect the financial settlement of the acquisition of our Class A ordinary shares on the NYSE with the intention of adhering to the BDR program, an investor must execute a foreign exchange agreement in conformity with the BDR program certificate registered with the Central Bank of Brazil and the broker certificate evidencing the purchase of our Class A ordinary shares abroad.
Holders of BDRs may at any time request the cancellation of all or a portion of their BDRs by (a) instructing a broker- dealer operating in Brazil to cancel the BDRs with the BDR Depositary and (b) delivering evidence that all fees and taxes due in connection with this service were duly paid, as set forth in the deposit agreement. Brazilian investors will be required to send the proceeds of any cancellation of BDRs back to Brazil within seven days of the cancellation date. Non-Brazilian investors that are registered in Brazil as portfolio investors under CMN Resolution No. 4,373 do not need to send the proceeds of any sale of Class A ordinary shares into Brazil. In any event, the transaction must be recorded in the Central Bank of Brazil system.
For a brief description of the rules and regulations of the Central Bank of Brazil regarding such matters, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Registration of BDRs with the CVM.”
Issuance of BDRs without Underlying Class A ordinary shares
In no event may the BDR Depositary issue BDRs without confirmation by the custodian that a corresponding number of Class A ordinary shares were deposited with the custodian.
Restrictions on BDRs
Holders of BDRs may only exercise their rights indirectly through the BDR Depositary. Holders of BDRs may also face other difficulties in exercising their rights, as voting rights granted to shares and, indirectly, to BDRs, must be exercised by holders of BDRs through the BDR Depositary, which will instruct the Custodian accordingly. Although the mechanisms related to notices of shareholders’ meetings and voting instructions provided in the Deposit Agreement are intended to provide sufficient time for the exercise of these rights, there can be no assurance that these mechanisms will allow holders of BDRs to effectively exercise voting rights, particularly in the event that notice of a shareholders’ meeting or voting instruction does not timely reach BDR holders for reasons that are beyond our control and beyond the control of the BDR Depositary. Holders of BDRs are not entitled to physically attend our shareholders’ meetings.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 294 |
| |
Dividends and Other Cash Distributions
It is our present intention to retain any earnings for use in our business operations and, accordingly, we do not anticipate the board of directors declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future. However, in the event of any future dividend, the BDR Depositary will distribute any dividends or other cash distributions paid by us to our shareholders, including the holders of BDRs. Such dividends will be paid to the BDR Depositary, which will convert this dividend or distribution into Brazilian reais by means of a foreign exchange transaction entered into with an authorized exchange agent, and distribute the net amount received to the holders of BDRs entitled to it, in proportion to the number of BDRs held by them; provided, however, that in the event that we or the BDR Depositary are required to withhold a portion of the dividend or other cash distribution on account of taxes, the amount distributed to holders of BDRs will be reduced accordingly. The BDR Depositary will distribute only the amount that may be distributed without allocating to any BDR holder a fraction of a centavo by rounding to the next lower whole centavo. No interest or other remuneration will be payable by us or any other remuneration for the period between the date on which the dividends and other cash distributions are paid abroad and the date on which the funds are credited to BDR holders in Brazil.
Subject to our corporate acts, in the event that any assignment of any Class A ordinary shares to a BDR holder occurs, the BDR Depositary will convert automatically, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, into BDRs subject to the terms and conditions of the Deposit Agreement, registering them in the name of the right holder in proportion to the number of BDRs held by the respective right holder.
However, subject to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, in case of attribution of a fraction of BDRs to one or more holders of BDRs, the BDR Depositary will sell the amount of Class A ordinary shares received representing the sum of the fractional shares allotted, and distribute the net amount received.
Whenever the BDR Depositary receives distributions other than those previously provided for, it shall distribute them to the holders of eligible BDRs in proportion to the number of BDRs respectively held by them, in accordance with applicable law. If, in the opinion of the BDR Depositary, such distribution cannot be executed proportionately, the BDR Depositary may choose any method it deems equitable and feasible for the purpose of executing such distribution.
No interest or other remuneration shall be payable by us for the period between the date on which dividends and other cash distributions are paid abroad and the date on which the funds are credited to the holders of BDRs in Brazil. Before making a distribution, any withholding taxes that must be paid under applicable law will be deducted.
Share Distributions
In the event of distributions of our Class A ordinary shares or a share split or reverse share split, the BDR Depositary will issue new BDRs corresponding to such new Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian and will credit them to the account of the Central Depositary of the B3. The Central Depositary of the B3, in turn, will credit new BDRs to the beneficiary holders recorded in its books. The BDR Depositary will distribute only whole BDRs. If any fractions of BDRs result and are insufficient to purchase a whole BDR, the BDR Depositary will use its best efforts to add such fractions and sell them in an auction on the B3, and the proceeds of the sale will be credited to BDR holders, proportionally with its holdings recorded in the books of the Central Depositary of the B3.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 295 |
| |
Other Distributions
The BDR Depositary will use its best efforts to distribute to BDR holders any other distribution paid in connection with Class A ordinary shares and deposited with the custodian.
The BDR Depositary is not required to make available to any BDR holder any distribution that it determines is unlawful or impractical. We have no obligation to register BDRs, Class A ordinary shares, rights or other securities under Brazilian law. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of BDRs, Class A ordinary shares, rights or other securities to BDR holders. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on our Class A ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you.
Pre-Emptive Rights
If we offer holders of our Class A ordinary shares any rights to subscribe for additional shares or any other rights, the same rights will be offered to BDR holders through the BDR Depositary, which will exercise these rights directly or indirectly, in the name of the BDR holders that have instructed the BDR Depositary to do so. The BDR holder is free to exercise or negotiate such rights, subject to applicable law.
Changes Affecting Deposited Class A Ordinary Shares
| If we do any of the following: | Then the following will apply: |
| Effect a split of Class A ordinary shares. | Each BDR will automatically reflect its equal value of the new deposited Class A ordinary shares. |
| Effect a reverse split of Class A ordinary shares. | The BDR Depositary will effect an immediate cancellation of the BDRs required to reflect the new amount of our Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian. |
|
Recapitalize, amalgamate, reorganize, merge, consolidate, sell all or substantially all of our assets or take any similar action.
|
The BDR Depositary will effect an immediate cancellation of the BDRs required to reflect the new amount of our Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian. |
Voting Rights of BDRs
A BDR holder has the right to instruct the BDR Depositary to vote the amount of our Class A ordinary shares represented by such BDRs. See “Item 10—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.” However, a BDR holder may not know about a meeting sufficiently in advance to instruct the BDR Depositary to exercise its voting rights with respect to our Class A ordinary shares held by the custodian. After receiving such call notice, the BDR Depositary shall, within a short period of time, send a communication to the holders of BDRs, at the addresses they maintain with the BDR Depositary and/ or registered with B3 and the respective brokers or custody agents, which shall contain (a) the information contained in the notice received by the BDR Depositary, and (b) a statement that the holders of BDRs shall be entitled to send their voting instruction to the BDR Depositary until 5 (five) business days before the date of the meetings, by filling out a voting instruction according to the model to be forwarded together with the communication mentioned above. The voting instruction may be delivered via facsimile, mail or in person, at an address to be indicated by the BDR Depositary in the respective notice, within the period mentioned above.
The BDR Depositary, upon receiving such instructions in due time, will tabulate and forward the information to the custodian. The custodian, upon receipt of the information, will vote or appoint a proxy to vote at the shareholders meeting, in accordance with the voting instructions received from the BDR Depositary.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 296 |
| |
For instructions to be valid, the BDR Depositary must receive them on or before the date specified in the notice to you. The BDR Depositary will, to the extent practical and subject to Cayman Islands law and the provisions of our Memorandum and Articles of Association, vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares or other deposited securities as you instruct. If the BDR Depositary does not receive voting instructions from all BDR holders by the stipulated date, the BDR Depositary will exercise the voting right considering only the instructions received by BDR holders that have manifested themselves within the stipulated period.
The BDR Depositary will use its best efforts to vote or attempt to vote our Class A ordinary shares held by the custodian only if you have sent voting instructions and your instructions have been timely received. If we timely request the BDR Depositary to solicit your voting instructions but the BDR Depositary does not receive voting instructions from you by the specified date, it will not exercise the voting rights related to the Class A ordinary shares that it holds on your behalf.
We cannot ensure that you will receive voting materials in time to allow you to timely deliver your voting instructions to the BDR Depositary. In addition, the BDR Depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to vote and you may not have any recourse if your Class A ordinary shares are not voted as you requested. In addition, your ability to bring an action against us may be limited.
The voting rights of BDR holders will be different from the voting rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, as BDRs will be composed of fractions of shares. Thus, the voting right associated with a BDR will be proportional to the fraction of shares underlying each BDR.
Cancellation of Registration before the CVM
We may cancel registration with the CVM for the trading of BDRs on the B3. If we elect to do so, we must immediately inform the BDR Depositary of this request and follow the procedures to discontinue the BDR program as set forth in the Issuer’s Manual of the B3.
Depositary Fees
The BDR Depositary has advised that holders of BDRs will be subject to the following fees: (a) for issuance or cancellation of BDRs, a fee of R$0.10 per BDR issued or cancelled will be paid to the BDR Depositary, (b) in respect of any dividend declared and paid by us, no fees will be paid to the BDR Depositary, (c) in respect of other cash distribution made by us, no fees will be paid to the BDR Depositary, and (d) in respect of a transfer of ownership of BDRs out of the stock exchange (by over-the-counter transfer process, causa mortis, court permit, donation and others), a fixed fee of R$50.00 will be paid to the BDR Depositary. The BDR Depositary has further advised us that the foregoing fees relating to issuance or cancellation of BDRs will be payable by the investor through a brokerage house, and that the dividends and distributions will be discounted by the amount of the fee at the time that such dividend or distribution is paid.
Reports and Other Communications
The BDR Depositary will make available to you for inspection any reports and communications from us or made available by us at its principal executive office. The BDR Depositary will also, upon our written request, send to registered holders of BDRs copies of such reports and communications furnished by us under the deposit agreement.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 297 |
| |
Any such reports or communications furnished by us to the BDR Depositary will be furnished in Portuguese when so required under any Brazilian legislation.
Amendment and Termination of the Deposit Agreement
Pursuant to Brazilian law, we may agree with the BDR Depositary to amend the deposit agreement and the rights granted by the BDRs for any reason and without a BDR holder’s consent. If such an amendment prejudices an important right of BDR holders, it will become effective only after 30 days from the time that the BDR Depositary notifies the BDR holder in writing of such amendment. At the time an amendment becomes effective, the BDR holder is considered, by continuing to hold its BDRs, to agree to the amendment and to be bound by the new terms of the deposit agreement and the rights granted by the BDRs.
The Deposit Agreement is signed for an indefinite period, and it is certain that, until the 18th month counted from the date of its respective signature, the Deposit Agreement cannot be terminated by any of the parties. After this minimum term has elapsed, the contract signed with the BDR Depositary will be valid for an indefinite period, and can be terminated at any time, by either party, without right to compensation or indemnity, upon notification from the interested party to the other party, with at least 180 days in advance, counted from the receipt of the communication by the other party.
Liability of Owner for Taxes
You will be responsible for any taxes or other governmental charges payable on your BDRs or on our Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
Limitations on Obligations and Liability to Holders of BDRs
The deposit agreement expressly limits our obligations and the obligations of the BDR Depositary, as well as our liability and the liability of the BDR Depositary. We and the BDR Depositary:
| · | are obligated only to take the actions specifically set forth in the deposit agreement without negligence or bad faith; |
| · | are not liable if either of us is prevented or delayed by law or by circumstances beyond our control from performing our obligations under the deposit agreement; |
| · | are not liable if either of us exercises discretion permitted under the deposit agreement; and |
| · | may rely upon any documents we believe in good faith to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party. |
Neither we nor the BDR Depositary will be liable for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote any of our Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian, or for the manner any vote is cast or the effect of any such vote, provided that any action or non-action is in good faith. The BDR Depositary has no obligation to become involved in a lawsuit or other proceeding related to the BDRs or the deposit agreement on your behalf or on behalf of any other person.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 298 |
| |
In the deposit agreement, we and the BDR Depositary agree to indemnify each other under certain circumstances.
Requirements for Depositary Services
Before the BDR Depositary delivers or registers transfers of BDRs, makes a distribution on BDRs or permits withdrawal of our Class A ordinary shares, the BDR Depositary may require:
| · | payment of share transfer or other taxes or other governmental charges and transfer or registration fees charged by third parties for the transfer of any Class A ordinary shares or other deposited securities; |
| · | production of satisfactory proof of citizenship or residence, exchange control approval or other information it deems necessary or proper; and |
| · | compliance with regulations it may establish, from time to time, consistent with the agreement, including presentation of transfer documents. |
The BDR Depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of BDRs generally when the books of the BDR Depositary are closed or at any time if the BDR Depositary believes it advisable to do so.
General
We agree to: (a) fulfill all obligations imposed by CVM Instruction No. 332/00, CVM Instruction No. 480/09 and other applicable regulations; (b) disclose, in Brazil, any information required by the CVM regulation applicable to non-Brazilian issuers; and (c) cooperate with the BDR Depositary to simultaneously disclose, in Brazil, information we provide in our country of organization and in the jurisdictions in which our securities are traded.
Except as otherwise provided in the applicable rules and regulations, including the rules and regulations of the CVM regarding registration of a BDR program (see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulatory Overview—Brazil—Registration of BDRs with the CVM”), neither we nor the BDR Depositary will have any liability or responsibility whatsoever or otherwise for any action or failure to act by any owner or holder of BDRs relating to the owner’s or holder’s obligations under any applicable Brazilian law or regulation relating to foreign investment in Brazil in respect of a withdrawal or sale of Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian, including, without limitation, (i) any failure to comply with a requirement to register the investment pursuant to the terms of any applicable Brazilian law or regulation prior to such withdrawal, or (ii) any failure to report foreign exchange transactions to the Central Bank of Brazil, as the case may be. Each owner or holder of BDRs will be responsible for the report of any false information relating to foreign exchange transactions to the BDR Depositary, the CVM or the Central Bank of Brazil in connection with deposits or withdrawals of Class A ordinary shares deposited with the custodian.
Service Requests to the BDR Depositary
Any request for services provided for in the deposit agreement to be performed by the BDR Depositary may be made to any of the BDR Depositary’s branches, or by telephone at +55 11-3684-4522.
D. American Depositary Shares
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 299 |
| |
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies
A. Defaults
No matters to report.
B. Arrears and Delinquencies
No matters to report.
Item 14. Material modifications to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds
A. Material Modifications to Instruments
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 300 |
| |
B. Material Modifications to Rights
Not applicable.
C. Withdrawal or Substitution of Assets
Not applicable.
D. Change in Trustees or Paying Agents
Not applicable.
E. Use of Proceeds
The following “Use of Proceeds” information relates to our registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-260649) declared effective by the SEC on December 8, 2021, for our initial public offering, pursuant to which we offered a total of 289,150,555 Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of Brazilian Depositary Receipts, or “BDRs,” each representing 1/6th of a Class A ordinary share, in a global offering consisting of (1) an international offering and (2) a concurrent Brazilian offering. The initial public offering price per Class A ordinary share was US$9.00, which is equivalent to R$8.36 per BDR considering that each BDR represents 1/6th of a Class A ordinary share, based on the December 8, 2021 exchange rate of R$5.5779 to US$1.00 published by the Central Bank of Brazil. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. acted as the representatives of the underwriters in our initial public offering.
In connection with the international offering, we have granted a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 28,571,429 Class A ordinary shares at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions.
The offering began on November 30, 2021 and was completed on January 6, 2022.
We sold 316,705,853 Class A ordinary shares, including in the form of 48,526,380 BDRs, including 27,555,298 Class A ordinary shares as a result of the partial exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, for an aggregate price of approximately US$2,839 million.
The total expenses incurred in connection with our initial public offering were approximately US$61.7 million, including underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately US$47.5 million and other expenses of approximately US$14.2 million. None of the fees and expenses were directly or indirectly paid to the directors, officers of our company or their associates, persons owning 10% or more of our ordinary shares, or our affiliates.
After deducting the total expenses, we received net proceeds of approximately US$2.6 billion from our initial public offering.. We still intend to use the remaining proceeds from our initial public offering in the manner disclosed in our registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-260649).
Form 20-F | 2021 | 301 |
| |
Item 15. Controls and procedures
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of December 31, 2021, due to the material weaknesses disclosed in Item 3.D of this annual report on Form 20-F under the caption “We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021 and, if we fail to remediate such deficiencies (or identify and remediate other material weaknesses) and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.”
Form 20-F | 2021 | 302 |
| |
Additionally, management has been continuously improving its internal control environment as described in Item 15.D of this annual report on Form 20-F.
B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This annual report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.
C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This annual report does not include a report of auditor’s regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.
D. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As reported in the prospectus of our initial public offering, in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, our management identified three material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to (i) IT systems change management processes, (ii) IT user identity and access management processes and (iii) financial reporting closing processes. We have taken certain remediation steps to address the material weaknesses and improve our internal control over financial reporting. Our management and our board of directors take the control and integrity of our financial statements seriously and believe that the remediation steps already taken, as described below, are essential to maintaining a strong internal controls environment.
As part of our changes in internal control over financial reporting, as of the date of this annual report for the year ended December 31, 2021, we have implemented a remediation plan with respect to the material weaknesses indicated in item (iii) financial reporting closing processes through enhancements in our internal controls and implementation of formal controls with evidencing the review in accordance with our established governance, which include: the implementation of new processes and procedures, including additional levels of review to improve our internal controls procedures, implementation of new software solutions, training our staff and enhanced our documentation.
These measures in connection with the material weaknesses indicated in item (iii) were implemented and evaluated by management during 2021 and as of December 31, 2021, management has completed the remediation activities for the financial reporting closing processes and has performed testing to evaluate the design and operating effectiveness of the controls. As a result, we concluded that we have remediated the previously reported material weakness related to the financial reporting closing process.
The other two material weaknesses, as described in items (i) and (ii) above, remain as of December 31, 2021. We have determined a remediation plan in connection with such material weaknesses, which we expect to be implemented within 2022 and includes hiring additional experienced key personnel in our financial reporting and technology functions, implementation of new processes and procedures, improvement of our internal controls to provide additional levels of review, enhancement our documentation practices, implementation of new software solutions and increase of our personnel training. These measures are under implementation and their effectiveness will be evaluated by management during 2022.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 303 |
| |
We cannot guarantee that the measures we have taken to date and actions we may take in the future will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to our material weaknesses or that they will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses. For additional information, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Certain Risks Relating to our Business—We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021 and, if we fail to remediate such deficiencies (or identify and remediate other material weaknesses) and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.”
Item 16. [Reserved.]
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our board of directors has determined that Rogério Paulo Calderón Peres is an audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by the SEC, and he meets the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Conduct and a Whistleblower Policy that apply to all of our employees, interns and service providers, as well as our officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Code of Conduct is currently posted on the investor relations website (www.investors.nu).
Our Code of Conduct is designed to prevent misconduct and to promote: (i) honest and ethical conduct, including addressing real or perceived conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (ii) transparent and fair experience and results for our clients and the markets in which we operate; (iii) complete, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file or submit to government authorities and regulatory bodies (including, but not limited to, the Central Bank and the CVM) and in other public communications that we make; (iv) compliance with applicable government laws, rules and regulations; and (v) responsibility for adhering to the Code of Conduct.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 304 |
| |
Our Global Whistleblower Policy was developed as a complement to the Code of Conduct in order to (i) provide guidelines regarding the whistleblower channel, under the Ethics Program; (ii) encourage the prompt reporting of any suspected violation; (iii) undertake to investigate any good faith report of violations; and (iv) inform our employees, directors, independent directors, apprentices, interns, officers and interested parties about their right to report.
Also, we have adopted a Disclosure Policy, Corporate Governance Policy, Insider Trading Policy and ESG Policy that apply to all of our employees, officers and directors and posted the full text of such policies on the governance section of our website, www.investidores.nu/en/.
We intend to disclose future amendments to our policies on our website or in public filings. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be a part of this annual report on Form 20-F.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by our independent registered public accounting firm during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Our independent registered public accounting firm was KPMG Auditores Independentes Ltda. ("KPMG") for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
|
2021 |
2020 | |
| (US$) | ||
| Audit fees | 663,089 | 271,511 |
| Audit-related fees | 322,264 | 2,234 |
| Tax fees | 5,911 | 10,113 |
| All other fees |
15,119 |
15,049 |
| Total |
1,036,383 |
298,907 |
Audit Fees
Audit fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual combined financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. It includes the audit of our financial statements, interim reviews and other services that generally only the independent accountant reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees are fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported under the previous category. These services would include, among others: accounting consultations and audits in connection with acquisitions, internal control reviews, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 305 |
| |
Tax Fees
Tax fees are fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees
There were no other fees in 2021 or 2020.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
In accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules issued by the SEC, we introduced a procedure for the review and pre-approval of any services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The procedure requires that all proposed engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm for audit and permitted non-audit services are submitted for pre-approval of the Audit and Risk Committee.
Our Audit and Risk Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Non-Audit Services is posted on the governance section of our website, www.investidores.nu/en/. We intend to disclose future amendments to our policy, on our website or in public filings. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be a part of this annual report on Form 20-F.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance—Foreign Private Issuer Status.”
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
None.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
Foreign Private Issuer Status
NYSE listing rules include certain accommodations in the corporate governance requirements that allow foreign private issuers, such as us, to follow “home country” corporate governance practices in lieu of the otherwise applicable corporate governance standards of the NYSE, except that we are required (a) to have an audit committee or audit board that meets certain requirements, pursuant to an exemption available to foreign private issuers; (b) to provide prompt certification by our chief executive officer of any material noncompliance with any corporate governance rules; and (c) to provide a brief description of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE corporate governance practices required to be followed by U.S. listed companies.
We currently follow Cayman Islands corporate governance practices in lieu of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE in respect of the following:
| · | the majority independent director requirement under Section 303A.01 of the NYSE listing rules; |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 306 |
| |
| · | the requirement under Section 303A.05 of the NYSE listing rules that a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors governed by a compensation committee charter oversee executive compensation; |
| · | the requirement under Section 303A.04 of the NYSE listing rules that director nominees be selected or recommended for selection by either a majority of the independent directors or a nominations committee composed solely of independent directors; |
| · | the requirement under Section 303A.08 of the NYSE listing rules that a listed issuer obtain shareholder approval when it establishes or materially amends a share option or purchase plan or other arrangement pursuant to which shares may be acquired by officers, directors, employees or consultants; |
| · | the requirement under Section 312.03 of the NYSE listing rules that a listed issuer obtain shareholder approval prior to issuing or selling securities (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common or ordinary shares) that equal 20% or more of the issuer’s outstanding common or ordinary shares or voting power prior to such issuance or sale; and |
| · | the requirement under Section 303A.03 of the NYSE listing rules that the independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings with only the independent directors present. |
Cayman Islands law does not impose a requirement that the board consist of a majority of independent directors or that such independent directors meet regularly without other members present. Nor does Cayman Islands law impose specific requirements on the establishment of a compensation committee or nominating committee or nominating process.
Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law
The Companies Act was modeled originally on similar laws in England and Wales but does not follow subsequent statutory enactments in England and Wales. In addition, the Companies Act differs from laws applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Act applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.
Cayman Islands Company Law
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated with limited liability. We were incorporated as Nu Holdings Ltd. on February 26, 2016, subject to the Cayman Companies Act. Certain provisions of Cayman Islands company law are set out below but this section does not purport to contain all applicable qualifications and exceptions or to be a complete review of all matters of the Cayman Companies Act and taxation, which may differ from equivalent provisions in jurisdictions with which interested parties may be more familiar.
Protection of Non-controlling Shareholders and Shareholders’ Suits
The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may, on the application of shareholders holding not less than one fifth of our shares in issue, appoint an inspector to examine our affairs and report thereon in a manner as the Grand Court shall direct.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 307 |
| |
Subject to the provisions of the Cayman Companies Act, any shareholder may petition the Grand Court which may make a winding-up order, if the court is of the opinion that this winding up is just and equitable.
Notwithstanding the U.S. securities laws and regulations that are applicable to us, general corporate claims against us by our shareholders must, as a general rule, be based on the general laws of contract or tort applicable in the Cayman Islands or their individual rights as shareholders as established by our Memorandum and Articles of Association.
The Cayman Islands courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law precedents, which permit a minority shareholder to commence a representative action against us, or derivative actions in our name, to challenge (1) an act which is ultra vires or illegal, (2) an act which constitutes a fraud against the minority and the wrongdoers themselves control us, and (3) an irregularity in the passing of a resolution that requires a qualified (or special) majority.
Exempted Company
We are an exempted company with limited liability under the Cayman Companies Act. The Cayman Companies Act distinguishes between ordinary resident companies and exempted companies. Where the proposed activities of a company are to be carried out mainly outside of the Cayman Islands, the registrant can apply for registration as an exempted company. The requirements for an exempted company are essentially the same as for an ordinary company except for the exemptions and privileges listed below:
| · | an exempted company does not have to file an annual return of its shareholders with the Registrar of Companies; |
| · | an exempted company’s register of shareholders is not open to inspection; |
| · | an exempted company does not have to hold an annual general meeting; |
| · | an exempted company may obtain an undertaking against the imposition of any future taxation (such undertakings are usually given for 20 years in the first instance); |
| · | an exempted company may register by way of continuation in another jurisdiction and be deregistered in the Cayman Islands; |
| · | an exempted company may register as a limited duration company; |
| · | an exempted company may register as a segregated portfolio company; and |
| · | an exempted company may register as a special economic zone company. |
We are subject to reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act, as applicable to foreign private issuers.
“Limited liability” means that the liability of each shareholder is limited to the amount unpaid by the shareholder on the shares of the company (except in exceptional circumstances, such as involving fraud, the establishment of an agency relationship or an illegal or improper purpose or other circumstances in which a court may be prepared to pierce or lift the corporate veil).
Form 20-F | 2021 | 308 |
| |
Company Operations
An exempted company such as us must conduct its operations mainly outside the Cayman Islands. An exempted company is also required to file an annual return each year with the Registrar of Companies of the Cayman Islands and pay a fee which is based on the amount of its authorized share capital.
Share Capital
Under Cayman Companies Act, a Cayman Islands company may issue ordinary, preference or redeemable shares or any combination thereof. Where a company issues shares at a premium, whether for cash or otherwise, a sum equal to the aggregate amount or value of the premiums on those shares shall be transferred to an account, to be called the share premium account. At the option of a company, these provisions may not apply to premiums on shares of that company allotted pursuant to any arrangements in consideration of the acquisition or cancellation of shares in any other company and issued at a premium. The share premium account may be applied by the company subject to the provisions, if any, of its memorandum and articles of association, in such manner as the company may from time to time determine including, but without limitation, the following:
| · | paying distributions or dividends to members; |
| · | paying up unissued shares of the company to be issued to members as fully paid bonus shares; |
| · | any manner provided in section 37 of the Cayman Companies Act; |
| · | writing off the preliminary expenses of the company; and |
| · | writing off the expenses of, or the commission paid or discount allowed on, any issue of shares or debentures of the company. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no distribution or dividend may be paid to members out of the share premium account unless, immediately following the date on which the distribution or dividend is proposed to be paid, the company will be able to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
Subject to confirmation by the court, a company limited by shares or a company limited by guarantee and having a share capital may, if authorized to do so by its articles of association, by special resolution reduce its share capital in any way.
Financial Assistance to Purchase Shares of a Company or its Holding Company
There are no statutory prohibitions in the Cayman Islands on the granting of financial assistance by a company to another person for the purchase of, or subscription for, its own, its holding company’s or a subsidiary’s shares. Therefore, a company may provide financial assistance provided the directors of the company, when proposing to grant such financial assistance, discharge their duties of care and act in good faith, for a proper purpose and in the interests of the company. Such assistance should be on an arm’s-length basis.
Purchase of Shares and Warrants by a Company and its Subsidiaries
A company limited by shares or a company limited by guarantee and having a share capital may, if so authorized by its articles of association, issue shares which are to be redeemed or are liable to be redeemed at the option of the company or a member and, for the avoidance of doubt, it shall be lawful for the rights attaching to any shares to be varied, subject to the provisions of the company’s articles of association, so as to provide that such shares are to be or are liable to be so redeemed. In addition, such a company may, if authorized to do so by its articles of association, purchase its own shares, including any redeemable shares; an ordinary resolution of the company approving the manner and terms of the purchase will be required if the articles of association do not authorize the manner and terms of such purchase. A company may not redeem or purchase its shares unless they are fully paid. Furthermore, a company may not redeem or purchase any of its shares if, as a result of the redemption or purchase, there would no longer be any issued shares of the company other than shares held as treasury shares. In addition, a payment out of capital by a company for the redemption or purchase of its own shares is not lawful unless, immediately following the date on which the payment is proposed to be made, the company shall be able to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 309 |
| |
Shares that have been purchased or redeemed by a company or surrendered to the company shall not be treated as canceled but shall be classified as treasury shares if held in compliance with the requirements of Section 37A(1) of the Cayman Companies Act. Any such shares shall continue to be classified as treasury shares until such shares are either canceled or transferred pursuant to the Cayman Companies Act.
A Cayman Islands company may be able to purchase its own warrants subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the relevant warrant instrument or certificate. Thus there is no requirement under Cayman Islands law that a company’s memorandum or articles of association contain a specific provision enabling such purchases. The directors of a company may under the general power contained in its memorandum of association be able to buy, sell and deal in personal property of all kinds.
A subsidiary may hold shares in its holding company and, in certain circumstances, may acquire such shares.
Dividends and Distributions
Subject to a cash-flow solvency test, as prescribed in the Cayman Companies Act, and the provisions, if any, of the company’s memorandum and articles of association, a company may pay dividends and distributions out of its share premium account. In addition, based upon English case law which is likely to be persuasive in the Cayman Islands, dividends may be paid out of profits.
For so long as a company holds treasury shares, no dividend may be declared or paid, and no other distribution (whether in cash or otherwise) of the company’s assets (including any distribution of assets to members on a winding up) may be made, in respect of a treasury share.
Disposal of Assets
There are no specific restrictions on the power of directors to dispose of assets of a company, however, the directors are expected to exercise certain duties of care, diligence and skill to the standard that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances, in addition to fiduciary duties to act in good faith, for proper purpose and in the best interests of the company under English common law (which the Cayman Islands courts will ordinarily follow).
Accounting and Auditing Requirements
A company must cause proper records of accounts to be kept with respect to: (i) all sums of money received and expended by it; (ii) all sales and purchases of goods by it; and (iii) its assets and liabilities.
Proper books of account shall not be deemed to be kept if there are not kept such books as are necessary to give a true and fair view of the state of the company’s affairs and to explain its transactions.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 310 |
| |
If a company keeps its books of account at any place other than at its registered office or any other place within the Cayman Islands, it shall, upon service of an order or notice by the Tax Information Authority pursuant to the Tax Information Authority Law (Revised) of the Cayman Islands, make available, in electronic form or any other medium, at its registered office copies of its books of account, or any part or parts thereof, as are specified in such order or notice.
Exchange Control
There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in effect in the Cayman Islands.
Stamp Duty on Transfers
No stamp duty is payable in the Cayman Islands on transfers of shares of Cayman Islands companies save for those which hold interests in land in the Cayman Islands.
Inspection of Corporate Records
The members of a company have no general right to inspect or obtain copies of the register of members or corporate records of the company. They will, however, have such rights as may be set out in the company’s articles of association.
Register of Members
A Cayman Islands exempted company may maintain its principal register of members and any branch registers in any country or territory, whether within or outside the Cayman Islands, as the company may determine from time to time. There is no requirement for an exempted company to make any returns of members to the Registrar of Companies in the Cayman Islands. The names and addresses of the members are, accordingly, not a matter of public record and are not available for public inspection. However, an exempted company shall make available at its registered office, in electronic form or any other medium, such register of members, including any branch register of member, as may be required of it upon service of an order or notice by the Tax Information Authority pursuant to the Tax Information Authority Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands.
Register of Directors and Officers
Pursuant to the Cayman Companies Act, a company is required to maintain at its registered office a register of directors, alternate directors and officers which is not available for inspection by the public. A copy of such register must be filed with the Registrar of Companies in the Cayman Islands and any change must be notified to the Registrar within 30 days of any change in such directors or officers, including a change of the name of such directors or officers.
Winding Up
A Cayman Islands company may be wound up by: (i) an order of the court; (ii) voluntarily by its members; or (iii) under the supervision of the court.
The court has authority to order winding up in a number of specified circumstances including where, in the opinion of the court, it is just and equitable that such company be so wound up.
A voluntary winding up of a company (other than a limited duration company, for which specific rules apply) occurs where the company resolves by special resolution that it be wound up voluntarily or where the company in general meeting resolves that it be wound up voluntarily because it is unable to pay its debt as they fall due. In the case of a voluntary winding up, the company is obliged to cease to carry on its business from the commencement of its winding up except so far as it may be beneficial for its winding up. Upon appointment of a voluntary liquidator, all the powers of the directors cease, except so far as the company in general meeting or the liquidator sanctions their continuance.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 311 |
| |
In the case of a members’ voluntary winding up of a company, one or more liquidators are appointed for the purpose of winding up the affairs of the company and distributing its assets.
As soon as the affairs of a company are fully wound up, the liquidator must make a report and an account of the winding up, showing how the winding up has been conducted and the property of the company disposed of, and call a general meeting of the company for the purposes of laying before it the account and giving an explanation of that account.
When a resolution has been passed by a company to wind up voluntarily, the liquidator or any contributory or creditor may apply to the court for an order for the continuation of the winding up under the supervision of the court, on the grounds that: (i) the company is or is likely to become insolvent; or (ii) the supervision of the court will facilitate a more effective, economic or expeditious liquidation of the company in the interests of the contributories and creditors. A supervision order takes effect for all purposes as if it was an order that the company be wound up by the court except that a commenced voluntary winding up and the prior actions of the voluntary liquidator shall be valid and binding upon the company and its official liquidator.
For the purpose of conducting the proceedings in winding up a company and assisting the court, one or more persons may be appointed to be called an official liquidator(s). The court may appoint to such office such person or persons, either provisionally or otherwise, as it thinks fit, and if more than one person is appointed to such office, the court shall declare whether any act required or authorized to be done by the official liquidator is to be done by all or any one or more of such persons. The court may also determine whether any and what security is to be given by an official liquidator on his or her appointment; if no official liquidator is appointed, or during any vacancy in such office, all the property of the company shall be in the custody of the court.
Reconstructions
Reconstructions and amalgamations may be approved by a majority in number representing 75% in value of the members or creditors, depending on the circumstances, as are present at a meeting called for such purpose and thereafter sanctioned by the courts. While a dissenting member has the right to express to the court his or her view that the transaction for which approval is being sought would not provide the members with a fair value for their shares, the courts are unlikely to disapprove the transaction on that ground alone in the absence of evidence of fraud or bad faith on behalf of management, and if the transaction were approved and consummated the dissenting member would have no rights comparable to the appraisal rights (that is, the right to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of their shares) ordinarily available, for example, to dissenting members of a United States corporation.
The Cayman Islands Economic Substance Law
The Cayman Islands enacted the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (As Revised), or the “Cayman Economic Substance Act” together with related Guidance Notes and Regulations. We are required to comply with the economic substance requirements and file annual reports in the Cayman Islands as to whether or not they are carrying out such relevant activities and if they are, they must satisfy an economic substance test.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 312 |
| |
Takeovers
Where an offer is made by a company for the shares of another company and, within four months of the offer, the holders of not less than 90% of the shares which are the subject of the offer accept, the offeror may, at any time within two months after the expiration of that four-month period, by notice require the dissenting members to transfer their shares on the terms of the offer. A dissenting member may apply to the Cayman Islands courts within one month of the notice objecting to the transfer. The burden is on the dissenting member to show that the court should exercise its discretion, which it will be unlikely to do unless there is evidence of fraud or bad faith or collusion as between the offeror and the holders of the shares who have accepted the offer as a means of unfairly forcing out minority members.
Mergers and Similar Arrangements
The Companies Act permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies.
For these purposes, (a) ”merger” means the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company and (b) a “consolidation” means the combination of two or more constituent companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property and liabilities of such companies in the consolidated company. In order to effect such a merger or consolidation, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation, which must then be authorized by (a) a special resolution of the shareholders of each constituent company; and (b) such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of association. The plan must be approved by the directors of each constituent company and filed with the Registrar of Companies together with a declaration: (1) as to the solvency of the consolidated or surviving company; (2) that the merger or consolidation is bona fide and not intended to defraud unsecured creditors of the constituent companies; (3) that no petition or other similar proceeding has been filed and remains outstanding and no order or resolution to wind up the company in any jurisdiction; (4) that no receiver, trustee, administrator or similar person has been appointed in any jurisdiction and is acting in respect of the constituent company, its affairs or property; (5) that no scheme, order, compromise or similar arrangement has been entered into or made in any jurisdiction with creditors; (6) that a list of the assets and liabilities of each constituent company; (7) that the non-surviving constituent company has retired from any fiduciary office held or will do so; (8) that the constituent company has complied with any requirements under the regulatory laws, where relevant; and (9) that an undertaking that a copy of the certificate of merger or consolidation will be given to the members and creditors of each constituent company and published in the Cayman Islands Gazette.
Dissenting shareholders have the right to be paid the fair value of their shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, may be determined by the Cayman Islands’ court) if they follow the required procedures, subject to certain exceptions. Court approval is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
In addition, there are statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement in question is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting or meetings convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder would have the right to express to the court the view that the transaction should not be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it satisfies itself that:
Form 20-F | 2021 | 313 |
| |
| · | the company is not proposing to act illegally or ultra vires and the statutory provisions as to majority vote have been complied with; |
| · | the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question; |
| · | the arrangement is such that may be reasonably approved by an intelligent and honest man of that class acting in respect of his interest; and |
| · | the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Act or that would amount to a “fraud on the minority.” |
When a takeover offer is made and accepted by holders of 90.0% in value of the shares affected within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection may be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If the arrangement and reconstruction are thus approved, any dissenting shareholders would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which might otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of U.S. corporations and allow such dissenting shareholders to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of their shares.
Shareholders’ Suits
Class actions are not recognized in the Cayman Islands, but groups of shareholders with identical interests may bring representative proceedings, which are similar. However, a class action suit could nonetheless be brought in a U.S. court pursuant to an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws and regulations.
In principle, we would normally be the proper plaintiff and as a general rule, while a derivative action may be initiated by a minority shareholder on behalf of our company in a Cayman Islands court, such shareholder will not be able to continue those proceedings without the permission of a Grand Court judge, who will only allow the action to continue if the shareholder can demonstrate that we have a good case against the defendant, and that it is proper for the shareholder to continue the action rather than our board of directors. Examples of circumstances in which derivative actions would be permitted to continue are where:
| · | a company is acting or proposing to act illegally or beyond the scope of its authority; |
| · | the act complained of, although not beyond the scope of its authority, could be effected duly if authorized by more than a simple majority vote that has not been obtained; and |
| · | those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.” |
Corporate Governance
Cayman Islands law restricts transactions between a company and its directors unless there are provisions in the articles of association which provide a mechanism to alleviate possible conflicts of interest. Additionally, Cayman Islands law imposes on directors’ duties of care and skill and fiduciary duties to the companies which they serve. Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, a director must disclose the nature and extent of his interest in any contract or arrangement, and, subject to certain exceptions, a director may not vote or be counted in the quorum on any resolution of the board in respect of any contract or arrangement or proposal in which he or she or any of his or her close associates have a material interest. Following such disclosure, and subject to the foregoing sentence and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of the NYSE, and unless disqualified by the chairman of the relevant meeting, the interested director may vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he or she is interested. The interested director shall be counted in the quorum at such meeting and the resolution may be passed by a majority of the directors present at the meeting.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 314 |
| |
Subject to the foregoing and our Memorandum and Articles of Association, our directors may exercise all the powers of Nu to vote compensation to themselves or any member of their body in the absence of an independent quorum.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain NYSE corporate governance rules, subject to certain requirements. We currently rely, and will continue to rely, on the foreign private issuer exemption with respect to the following rules:
| · | Section 303A.04, which requires that a company have a nominations committee composed solely of “independent directors” as defined by NYSE. As allowed by the laws of the Cayman Islands, we do not have a nominations committee nor do we have any current intention to establish one. |
| · | Section 303A.05, which requires that compensation for our executive officers and selection of our director nominees be determined by a majority of independent directors. As allowed by the laws of the Cayman Islands, we do not have a nomination and corporate governance committee nor do we have any current intention to establish one. |
| · | Section 312.03, which requires an issuer to obtain shareholder approval prior to an issuance of securities (in certain circumstances) in connection with certain events, including: (i) the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company; (ii) equity-based compensation of officers, directors, employees or consultants; (iii) a change of control; and (iv) private placements. Cayman Islands law does not require shareholder approval prior to an issuance of securities to the extent the securities are authorized. |
Borrowing Powers
Our directors may exercise all the powers of Nu to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and assets (present and future) and uncalled capital or any part thereof and to issue debentures, debenture shares, mortgages, bonds and other such securities whether outright or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of Nu or any third party. Such powers may be varied by a special resolution of shareholders (requiring a two-thirds majority vote of those shareholders attending and voting at a quorate meeting).
Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers and Limitation of Liability
The Companies Act does not limit the extent to which a company’s articles of association may provide for indemnification of directors and officers, except to the extent that it may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that we shall indemnify and hold harmless our directors and officers against all actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred or sustained by such directors or officers, other than by reason of such person’s dishonesty, willful default or fraud, in or about the conduct of our company’s business or affairs (including as a result of any mistake of judgment) or in the execution or discharge of his duties, powers, authorities or discretions, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by such director or officer in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil, criminal or other proceedings concerning us or our affairs in any court whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere. This standard of conduct is generally the same as permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law for a Delaware corporation.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 315 |
| |
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling us under the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Directors’ Fiduciary Duties
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director of a Cayman Islands company is in the position of a fiduciary with respect to the company. Accordingly, directors owe fiduciary duties to their companies to act bona fide in what they consider to be the best interests of the company, to exercise their powers for the purposes for which they are conferred and not to place themselves in a position where there is a conflict between their personal interests and their duty to the company. Accordingly, a director owes a company a duty not to make a profit based on his or her position as director (unless the company permits him or her to do so) and a duty not to put himself or herself in a position where the interests of the company conflict with his or her personal interests or his or her duty to a third party.
However, this obligation may be varied by the company’s articles of association, which may permit a director to vote on a matter in which he has a personal interests provided that he has disclosed the nature of his interest to the board of directors. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that a director must disclose the nature and extent of his or her interest in any contract or arrangement, and, subject to certain exceptions, a director may not vote or be counted in the quorum on any resolution of the board in respect of any contract or arrangement or proposal in which he or she or any of his or her close associates have a material interest. Following such disclosure, and subject to the foregoing sentence and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of the NYSE, and unless disqualified by the chairman of the relevant meeting, such director may vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he or she is interested and may be counted in the quorum at the meeting.
A director of a Cayman Islands company also owes to the company duties to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his functions and to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence, which has both objective and subjective elements. Recent Cayman Islands case law confirmed that directors must exercise the care, skill and diligence that would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person having the general knowledge, skill and experience reasonably to be expected of a person acting as a director. Additionally, a director must exercise the knowledge, skill and experience which he or she actually possesses.
A general notice may be given to the board of directors to the effect that (1) the director is a member or officer of a specified company or firm and is to be regarded as interested in any contract or arrangement which may after the date of the notice be made with that company or firm; or (2) he or she is to be regarded as interested in any contract or arrangement which may after the date of the notice to the board of directors be made with a specified person who is connected with him or her, which will be deemed sufficient declaration of interest. This notice shall specify the nature of the interest in question. Following the disclosure being made pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of the NYSE, and unless disqualified by the chairman of the relevant meeting, a director may vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he or she is interested and may be counted in the quorum at the meeting.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 316 |
| |
In comparison, under Delaware corporate law, a director of a Delaware corporation has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders. This duty has two components: the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires that a director act in good faith, with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances. Under this duty, a director must inform himself or herself of, and disclose to shareholders, all material information reasonably available regarding a significant transaction. The duty of loyalty requires that a director act in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. He or she must not use his or her corporate position for personal gain or advantage. This duty prohibits self-dealing by a director and mandates that the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders take precedence over any interests possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally. In general, actions of a director are presumed to have been made on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. However, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence of a breach of one of the fiduciary duties. Should such evidence be presented concerning a transaction by a director, a director must prove the procedural fairness of the transaction, and that the transaction was of fair value to the corporation.
Shareholder Proposals
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a shareholder has the right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders, provided it complies with the notice provisions in the governing documents. The Delaware General Corporation Law does not provide shareholders an express right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders, but Delaware corporations generally afford shareholders an opportunity to make proposals and nominations provided that they comply with the notice provisions in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws. A special meeting may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the governing documents, but shareholders may be precluded from calling special meetings.
The Companies Act provides shareholders with only limited rights to requisition a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s articles of association. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, for so long as our founding shareholder controls a majority of the voting power of our shares, a general meeting of shareholders may be convened on the requisition of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our shares and, upon such requisition, the board will convene an extraordinary general meeting and put the resolutions so requisitioned to a vote at such meeting. However, if our founding shareholder controls less than a majority of the voting power of our shares, no shareholder shall have the power to requisition a meeting of shareholders. Our Memorandum and Articles of Association provide no other right to put any proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings.
Cumulative Voting
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, cumulative voting for elections of directors is not permitted unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation specifically provides for it. Cumulative voting potentially facilitates the representation of minority shareholders on a board of directors since it permits the minority shareholder to cast all the votes to which the shareholder is entitled on a single director, which increases the shareholder’s voting power with respect to electing such director. As permitted under Cayman Islands law, our Memorandum and Articles of Association do not provide for cumulative voting. As a result, our shareholders are not afforded any less protections or rights on this issue than shareholders of a Delaware corporation.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 317 |
| |
Removal of Directors
The office of a director shall be vacated automatically if, among other things, he or she (1) becomes prohibited by law from being a director; (2) becomes bankrupt or makes an arrangement or composition with his creditors; (3) dies or is in the opinion of all his co-directors, incapable by reason of mental disorder of discharging his duties as director; (4) resigns his office by notice to us; or (5) has for more than six months been absent without permission of the directors from meetings of the board of directors held during that period, and the remaining directors resolve that his/her office be vacated.
Transaction with Interested Shareholders
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that; unless the corporation has specifically elected not to be governed by this statute, it is prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with an “interested shareholder” for three years following the date that this person becomes an interested shareholder. An interested shareholder generally is a person or a group who or which owns or owned 15% or more of the target’s outstanding voting shares or who or which is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and owned 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares within the past three years. This has the effect of limiting the ability of a potential acquirer to make a two-tiered bid for the target in which all shareholders would not be treated equally. The statute does not apply if, among other things, prior to the date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder. This encourages any potential acquirer of a Delaware corporation to negotiate the terms of any acquisition transaction with the target’s board of directors.
Cayman Islands law has no comparable statute. As a result, we cannot avail ourselves of the types of protections afforded by the Delaware business combination statute. However, although Cayman Islands law does not regulate transactions between a company and its significant shareholders, it does provide that the board of directors owe duties to ensure that these transactions are entered into bona fide in the best interests of the company and for a proper corporate purpose and, as noted above, a transaction may be subject to challenge if it has the effect of constituting a fraud on the minority shareholders.
Dissolution; Winding Up
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve, dissolution must be approved by shareholders holding 100% of the total voting power of the corporation. If the dissolution is initiated by the board of directors it may be approved by a simple majority of the corporation’s outstanding shares. Delaware law allows a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority voting requirement in connection with dissolutions initiated by the board. Under Cayman Islands law, a company may be wound up by either an order of the courts of the Cayman Islands or by a special resolution of its members or, if the company resolves by ordinary resolution that it be wound up because it is unable to pay its debts as they fall due. The court has authority to order winding up in a number of specified circumstances including where it is, in the opinion of the court, just and equitable to do so.
Under the Companies Act, we may be dissolved, liquidated or wound up by a special resolution of shareholders (requiring a two-thirds majority vote of those shareholders attending and voting at a quorate meeting). Our Memorandum and Articles of Association also give our board of directors authority to petition the Cayman Islands Court to wind up Nu.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 318 |
| |
Variation of Rights of Shares
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may vary the rights of a class of shares with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of that class, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under our Memorandum and Articles of Association, if the share capital is divided into more than one class of shares, the rights attached to any class may only be varied with the written consent of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of that class or the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
Also, except with respect to share capital (as described above), alterations to our Memorandum and Articles of Association may only be made by special resolution of shareholders (requiring a two-thirds majority vote of those shareholders attending and voting at a quorate meeting).
Amendment of Governing Documents
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation’s certificate of incorporation may be amended only if adopted and declared advisable by the board of directors and approved by a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, and the bylaws may be amended with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and may, if so provided in the certificate of incorporation, also be amended by the board of directors. Under Cayman Islands law, our Memorandum and Articles of Association generally (and save for certain amendments to share capital described in this section) may only be amended by special resolution of shareholders (requiring a two-thirds majority vote of those shareholders attending and voting at a quorate meeting).
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 16I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 319 |
| |
PART III
Item 17. Financial statements
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of this item.
Item 18. Financial statements
Financial Statements are filed as part of this annual report. See pages F-1 to F-105 to this annual report.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 320 |
| |
Item 19. Exhibits
The following documents are filed as part of this annual report:
|
Exhibit No. |
Exhibit |
| 2.1* | Description of Securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 321 |
| |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 322 |
| |
| 12.1* | Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| 12.2* | Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer. |
| 13.1* | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer. |
| 13.2* | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer. |
| 21.1* | List of subsidiaries. |
| 23.1* | Consent of KPMG Auditores Independentes Ltda. |
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document. |
| 101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| 101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| 101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| 101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| 101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| ** | Previously filed. |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 323 |
| |
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The following is a glossary of certain industry and other defined terms used in this annual report:
“activity rate” is defined as monthly active customers divided by the total number of customers as of a specific date.
“ANBIMA” means the Brazilian Association of Financial and Capital Markets Entities (Associação Brasileira das Entidades dos Mercados Financeiro e de Capitais).
“Boleto” (banking payment slips) means a printable document issued by merchants and used to make payments in Brazil.
“Brazil” means the Federative Republic of Brazil.
“Brazilian government” means the federal government of Brazil.
“B3” means B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão, the Brazilian Stock Exchange.
“CAC” means customer acquisition costs and consists of the following expenses: printing and shipping of a card, credit data costs (primarily consisting of credit bureau costs) and paid marketing.
“CAGR” means the compound annual growth rate, measured as the annualized average rate of growth between given dates, assuming growth takes place at an exponentially compounded rate.
“CDI Rate” means the Brazilian interbank deposit (certificado de deposito interbancário) rate, which is an average of interbank overnight deposit interest rates in Brazil.
“Central Bank of Brazil” means the Brazilian Central Bank (Banco Central do Brasil).
“Colombian pesos” or “COL$” means Colombian pesos, the official currency of the Republic of Colombia.
“CMN” means the Brazilian National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional).
“CNBV” means the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria de Valores).
"consumer finance" is the combination of Credicard Card and Lending Businesses
“contribution margin” means the sum of revenue from our credit card, personal lending and NuAccount products, less variable expenses (consisting of interest and other financial expenses, transactional expenses and credit loss allowance expenses) directly associated with this revenue.
“COPOM” means the Brazilian Monetary Policy Committee (Comitê de Política Monetária do Banco Central).
“cost of risk” is defined as the sum of change in loan loss provisions, credit losses and gross recoveries divided by total receivables.
“credit loss allowance expenses / credit portfolio” is defined as credit loss allowance expenses, divided by the sum of receivables from credit card operations (current, installments and revolving) and loans to customers, in each case gross of ECL allowance, as of the period end date.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 324 |
| |
“customer” is defined as an individual or SME that has opened an account with us and does not include any such individuals or SMEs that have been charged off or blocked or voluntarily closed their account. The number of customers as of December 31, 2021 does not include the 0.6 million that were unique to the Easynvest Companies.
“CVM” means the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários).
“debit card” means a payment card that allows the cardholder to immediately access funds electronically from the cardholder’s account when making a purchase.
“ECL” or “ECL Allowance” means the expected credit losses on our credit operations, including loans and credit cards.
“ESG” means Environmental, Social and Governance.
“EUR” or “€” means the Euro, the official currency of the European Union.
“first payment default” means when the first scheduled payment by a customer remains unpaid as of the 10th day after it becomes due.
“founding shareholder” refers to our founding shareholder and chief executive officer, David Vélez Osorno.
“FX Neutral” measures refer to certain measures prepared and presented in this annual report to eliminate the effect of foreign exchange, or “FX,” volatility between the comparison periods, allowing management and investors to evaluate our financial performance despite variations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. For additional information, see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Special Note Regarding Non-IFRS Financial Measures—FX Neutral Measures.”
“IASB” means the International Accounting Standards Board.
“IFRS” means the International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the IASB.
“interest-earning portfolio” consists of receivables from credit card operations on which we are accruing interest and loans to customers, in each case gross of ECL allowance, as of the period end date.
“Lifetime value” or “LTV” is the estimated lifetime value of our customers. This is based on the present value of estimated contribution margin generated by a customer during the lifetime of a customer’s relationship with our business. We calculate LTV based on the following key assumptions: (1) 12% per annum as the discount rate applied to the projected stream of contribution margin generated by a customer; (2) estimated lifetime capped at 10 years; and (3) growth and churn estimates based on historical analysis across our cohorts and estimated inflation rates.
“LTV/CAC” means the ratio of lifetime value to customer acquisition costs and is calculated as the lifetime value divided by our customer acquisition costs. We use this metric to assess return on marketing spend and other costs to onboard new customers.
“Mexican pesos” or “MEX$” means Mexican pesos, the official currency of the United Mexican States.
“monthly active customers” is defined as all customers that have generated revenue in the last 30 calendar days, for a given measurement period.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 325 |
| |
“monthly average cost to serve per active customer” is defined as the monthly average of the sum of transactional expenses and customer support and operations expenses (sum of these expenses in the period divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured, and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period).
“monthly average revenue per active customer” or “Monthly ARPAC” is defined as the average monthly revenue (total revenue divided by the number of months in the period) divided by the average number of individual active customers during the period (average number of individual active customers is defined as the average of the number of monthly active customers at the beginning of the period measured, and the number of monthly active customers at the end of the period).
“Net promoter score,” or “NPS,” measures the willingness of customers to recommend our products and services. See
“Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Calculation of Net Promoter Score.”
“NuAccount” means the Nu bank account we offer to our individual and SME customers; “Personal NuAccount” means the Nu personal bank account we offer to our individual customers; and “SME NuAccount” means the Nu business bank account we offer to our SME customers.
“organic customer growth” is calculated as new customers acquired without incurring direct paid marketing expenses. An organic customer is one who comes to our website or app without clicking on an advertisement link. This includes both customers who directly come to our website or app, or who were referred to us by an existing customer. An inorganic customer is one who comes to our website or app through a paid channel or campaign (e.g., by clicking on an online advertisement).
“PIX” means the instant payment system launched by the Central Bank of Brazil in 2020 that allows real-time payments and transfers.
“primary bank” or “primary banking relationship” refers to our relationship with those of our customers who had at least 50% of their post-tax monthly income move in or out of their NuAccount in any given month. We calculate the percent of customers with a primary banking relationship as active customers with a primary banking relationship as a percentage of total active customers that have been with us for more than 12 months.
“Purchase volume,” or “PV,” is defined as the total value of transactions that are authorized through our credit and debit cards only; it does not include other payment methods that we offer such as PIX, WhatsApp payments or traditional wire transfers.
“real,” “reais” or “R$” means the Brazilian real, the official currency of Brazil.
“SELIC” means the Brazilian Special Clearance and Custody System (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia).
“SELIC rate” means the Brazilian interest rate established by the SELIC.
“Shareholder’s Agreement” means the shareholder’s agreement entered into and among David Vélez Osorno, Rua California Ltd., and Nu.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 326 |
| |
“SIC” means the Colombian Superintendence of Industry and Commerce, a public authority and technical agency attached to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Tourism of Colombia.
“SMEs” means small and medium enterprises.
“squads” is the term used to refer to Nu teams that work within the same scope of operations, e.g., Controllership Squad, FP&A Squad.
“SUSEP” means the Brazilian Superintendence of Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados).
“U.S. dollar,” “U.S. dollars” or “US$” means U.S. dollars, the official currency of the United States.
Form 20-F | 2021 | 327 |
| |
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| Nu Holding Ltd. | |
| April 20, 2022 | |
| By: | /s/ David Vélez Osorno |
| Name: | David Vélez Osorno |
| Title: | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| By: | /s/ Guilherme Marques do Lago |
| Name: | Guilherme Marques do Lago |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 328 |
| |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page | |
| Consolidated Financial Statements—Nu Holding Ltd. | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID |
F-3 |
| Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 e 2019 | F-6 |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2021 and 2020 | F-8 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income or Loss for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 | F-7 |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 | F-10 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 | F-13 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 | F-15 |
Form 20-F | 2021 | 329 |
Contents
| Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss | F-6 |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income or Loss | F-7 |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Position | F-8 |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity | F-10 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-13 |
F-2
Rua Verbo Divino, 1400, 1º - 4º andar
04711-904 - São Paulo/SP – Brasil
Telephone + 55 (11) 3940-1500
www.kpmg.com.br
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Nu Holdings Ltd.
Cayman Islands
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Nu Holdings and subsidiaries (“ Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F-3
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for expected credit losses
As discussed in notes 4, 5, 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an allowance for expected credit losses (ECL) related to amounts receivable from credit cards and loans to customers of US$ 588,215 thousand as of December 31, 2021. The Company recognizes a lifetime ECL for those contracts that have experienced a significant increase in credit risk (SICR) subsequent to recognition or are credit impaired (stage 2 and stage 3, respectively), and a twelve-month ECL for all other contracts (stage 1). To calculate ECL the Company segregates the portfolio of amounts receivable from credit cards and loans to customers on the basis of shared credit risk characteristics determined by internal scoring models and uses estimates of the probability of default (PD), the loss given default (LGD) and the exposure at default (EAD), as well as consideration of the current macroeconomic environment and the impact of changes in future macroeconomic scenarios, including market expectations of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the future two-year period.
We have identified the assessment of the allowance for ECL related to amounts receivable from credit cards and loans to customers as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required to evaluate the ECL estimate as it involved significant measurement uncertainties, as a result of the complexity of the models and the subjectivity of the assumptions, specifically: (i) the overall ECL methodology, including the methods and models used to estimate the PDs, EADs and LGDs and their related assumptions as well as the selection of the GDP assumption incorporated into the calculation; and (ii) the identification of a SICR (stage 2) and exposures that are credit impaired (stage 3).
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls related to the Company’s ECL process, including controls related to the models, assumptions and methodology noted above. We involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
● evaluating the overall ECL methodology
● assessing the models and modelling techniques by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use
● recalculating the Company’s estimates of PD, EAD and LGD using the Company’s historical data and forward-looking information
● evaluating the reasonableness of the GDP assumption through regression analysis and historical correlation
● testing the accuracy of the allocation to stages in accordance with the Company’s criteria for a selection of amounts receivable from credit cards and loans to customers through independent reperformance of the allocation.
F-4
Valuation of identifiable intangible assets
As described in notes 1(c) and 4(c) to the consolidated financial statements the Company acquired certain companies that were part of the Easynvest investment platform (Easynvest) on June 1, 2021. The accounting for business combinations requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized at fair value. In allocating the purchase price, the Company recognized technology and customer relationship intangible assets of US$ 7,900 thousand and US$ 34,600 thousand, respectively.
We identified the assessment of the fair value measurement of the technology and customer relationship intangible assets acquired in the Easynvest acquisition as a critical audit matter. Specifically, subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the methodology selected by the Company and significant assumptions used in the valuation models, including the discount rate and future growth. Future growth assumptions included the projected growth rate and the expectation of long-term inflation. Changes in these assumptions could have had a significant impact on the fair value of the technology and customer relationship intangible assets.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls related to the Company’s acquisition accounting process, including a control related to methodology selection and the significant assumptions noted above. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
● evaluating the methodology used to estimate the fair values, by comparing it to generally accepted valuation practices
● evaluating the Company’s discount rate by comparing it against a discount rate that was independently developed using publicly-available market data for comparable entities
● assessing the Company’s projected growth rate by comparing it for consistency with management’s documented strategy for the Easynvest operations as well as internally-prepared budgets
● evaluating the Company’s inflation projection by comparing it to market information.
/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes Ltda. |
||
| KPMG Auditores Independentes Ltda. |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.
São
Paulo, Brazil
April 20, 2022
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except earnings per share)
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments | 6 | |||||||
| Fee and commission income | 6 | |||||||
| Total revenue | ||||||||
| Interest and other financial expenses | 6 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Transactional expenses | 6 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Credit loss allowance expenses | 7 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Total cost of financial and transactional services provided | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Gross profit | ||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||
| Customer support and operations | 8 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 8 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Marketing expenses | 8 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Other income (expenses) | 8 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Total operating expenses | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Results with convertible instruments | ( |
|||||||
| Loss before income taxes | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Income taxes | ||||||||
| Current taxes | 26 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Deferred taxes | 26 | |||||||
| Total income taxes | ||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Loss attributable to non-controlling interests | ( |
|||||||
| Loss per share – Basic and Diluted | 9 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Weighted average number of outstanding shares – Basic and Diluted (in thousands of shares) | 9 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income or Loss
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Other comprehensive income or loss: | ||||||||
| Effective portion of changes in fair value | ||||||||
| Changes in fair value reclassified to profit or loss | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Cash flow hedge | 16 | |||||||
| Changes in fair value | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | ( |
|||||||
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | ||||||||
| Currency translation on foreign entities | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Total other comprehensive income or loss that may be reclassified to profit or loss subsequently | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Changes in fair value - own credit adjustment | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Total other comprehensive income or loss that will not be reclassified to profit or loss subsequently | 17 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Total comprehensive loss for the year | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Total comprehensive loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Total comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests | ( |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 11 | |||||
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| Securities | 12 | |||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 16 | |||||
| Collateral for credit card operations | 19 | |||||
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Securities | 12 | |||||
| Financial assets at amortized cost | ||||||
| Compulsory and other deposits at central banks | ||||||
| Credit card receivables | 13 | |||||
| Loans to customers | 14 | |||||
| Other financial assets at amortized cost | ||||||
| Other assets | 15 | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | 26 | |||||
| Right-of-use assets | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | ||||||
| Intangible assets | 1 | |||||
| Goodwill | 1 | |||||
| Total assets |
F-8
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 16 | |||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | 17 | |||||
| Repurchase agreements | ||||||
| Financial liabilities at amortized cost | ||||||
| Deposits | 18 | |||||
| Payables to credit card network | 19 | |||||
| Borrowings and financing | 20 | |||||
| Securitized borrowings | 20 | |||||
| Senior preferred shares | 23 | |||||
| Salaries, allowances and social security contributions | ||||||
| Tax liabilities | ||||||
| Lease liabilities | ||||||
| Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings | 21 | |||||
| Deferred income | 22 | |||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 26 | |||||
| Other liabilities | ||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||
| Equity | ||||||
| Share capital | 27 | |||||
| Share premium reserve | 27 | |||||
| Accumulated gain (losses) | 27 | ( |
( | |||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 27 | ( |
( | |||
| Equity attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ||||||
| Equity attributable to non-controlling interests | ||||||
| Total equity | ||||||
| Total liabilities and equity |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||
|
Share capital |
Share premium reserve |
Accumulated gains (losses) | Translation reserve | Cash flow hedge reserve | Own credit revaluation reserve | Total equity | ||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2018 | ( |
( |
||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Absorption of accumulated losses by share premium reserve | ( |
|||||||||||||
| Share-based payments granted | ||||||||||||||
| Stock options exercised | ||||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Capital increase (Series F) | ||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedge | ||||||||||||||
| Currency translation on foreign entities | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Own credit adjustment | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2019 | ( |
( |
||||||||||||
F-10
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||
|
Share capital |
Share premium reserve |
Accumulated gains (losses) | Translation reserve | Cash flow hedge reserve | Own credit revaluation reserve | Total equity | ||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2019 | ( |
( |
||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation granted, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | ||||||||||||||
| Stock options exercised | ||||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedge | ||||||||||||||
| Currency translation on foreign entities | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Own credit adjustment | ( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2020 | ( |
( |
( |
|||||||||||
F-11
| Attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share capital |
Share premium reserve |
Accumulated gains (losses) | Translation reserve | Cash flow hedge reserve |
Financial Assets at FVTOCI |
Own credit revaluation reserve | Total | Total non- controlling interests | Total equity | |||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2020 | ( |
( |
( |
|||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation granted, net of shares withheld for employee taxes (note 10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock options exercised | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued on business acquisition (note 1 (c)) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred shares - Series F-1 (note 27) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred shares - Series G (note 27) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred shares - Series G-1 (note 27) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares under the customer program and IPO (note 1(a)) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions costs from IPO (note 1(a)) | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased (note 27) | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||||||
| Increase in non-controlling interests | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax (note 27) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedge | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial assets at FVTOCI | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency translation on foreign entities | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||||||
| Own credit adjustment | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2021 | ( |
( |
( |
|||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-12
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
| Reconciliation of profit (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 8 | |||||||
| Credit loss allowance expenses | 7 | |||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 26 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Customer Program | 1 (a) | |||||||
| Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings | 21 | |||||||
| Losses (gains) on other investments | 16/12 | ( |
||||||
| Losses (gains) on financial instruments | ||||||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||||
| Share-based payments granted | ||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Securities | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Compulsory deposits and others at central banks | ( |
( |
||||||
| Credit card receivables | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Loans to customers | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Interbank transactions | ( | |||||||
| Other assets | ( |
( | ||||||
| Deposits | ||||||||
| Payables to credit card network | ||||||||
| Deferred income | ||||||||
| Other liabilities | ||||||||
| Interest paid | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Income tax paid | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Interest received | ||||||||
| Cash flows (used in) generated from operating activities | ( |
|||||||
F-13
| Note | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
| Acquisition of fixed assets | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Acquisition of intangible assets | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired | 1 (c) | ( |
( |
|||||
| Equity instrument | ( |
|||||||
| Cash flow (used in) generated from investing activities | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
| Proceeds from senior preferred shares | 23 | |||||||
| Proceeds from securitized borrowings | ||||||||
| Issuance of preferred shares | 27 | |||||||
| Issuance of shares under IPO | 1 (a) | |||||||
| Transactions costs from IPO | 1 (a) | ( |
||||||
| Payments of securitized borrowings | 20 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Proceeds from borrowings and financing | 20 | |||||||
| Payments of borrowings and financing | 20 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Proceeds from debt instruments eligible as capital | ||||||||
| Lease payments | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Exercise of stock options | 27 | |||||||
| Shares repurchased | 27 | ( |
( |
( | ||||
| Cash flows (used in) generated from financing activities | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of the year | 11 | |||||||
| Foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | ( |
( | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - end of the year | 11 | |||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-14
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1. Operations
Nu Holdings Ltd. ("Company" or "Nu Holdings") was incorporated as an exempted Company under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands on February 26, 2016. The address of the Company's registered office is Willow House, 4th floor, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman - Cayman Islands. Nu Holdings has no operating activities.
The Company’s shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol “NU” and its Brazilian Depositary Receipts ("BDRs") are traded on B3 - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão ("B3"), the Brazilian stock exchange, under the symbol "NUBR33". The Company holds investments in several operating entities and, as of December 31, 2021, its significant subsidiaries are:
| ● | Nu Pagamentos S.A - Instituição de Pagamento (“Nu Pagamentos”) is an indirect subsidiary domiciled in Brazil. Nu Pagamentos is engaged in the issuance and administration of credit cards and payment transfers through a prepaid account, as well as participation in other companies as partner or shareholder. Nu Pagamentos has as its primary products (i) a Mastercard international credit card (issued in Brazil where it allows payments for purchases to be made in monthly installments), fully managed through a smartphone app, and (ii) “NuConta”, a 100% digital smartphone app, maintenance-free prepaid account, which also includes features of a traditional bank account such as: electronic and peer-to-peer transfers, bill payments, withdrawals through the “24 Hours” ATM network, instant payments, prepaid credit for mobile top ups and prepaid cards similar in functionality to debit cards. |
| ● | Nu Financeira S.A. – SCFI (“Nu Financeira”) is an indirect subsidiary also domiciled in Brazil, with personal loans and retail deposits as its main products. Nu Financeira offers customers in Brazil the possibility to obtain loans that can be customized in relation to amounts, terms and conditions, number of installments, and transparent disclosure of any charges involved in the transaction, fully managed through the above-mentioned smartphone app. Loan issuance, repayment, and prepayments are available 24/7 through the “NuConta'' account, directly in the app. Nu Financeira also grants credit to Nu Pagamentos credit card holders, due to overdue invoices, bill installments and revolving credit, among others. |
| ● | Nu BN Servicios México, S.A. de CV (“Nu Servicios”) is an indirect subsidiary domiciled in Mexico. Nu Servicios is engaged in the issuance and administration of credit cards. It commenced operations in the Mexican market in August 2019 and officially launched in March 2020. The credit card has similar characteristics to that of the Brazilian operation: an international credit card, with no annual fee, under the Mastercard banner, 100% managed by a digital app on a smartphone. |
| ● | Nu Colombia S.A. (“Nu Colombia”) is an indirect subsidiary domiciled in Colombia, with operations related to credit cards, which was launched in September 2020. |
| ● | Nu Invest Corretora de Valores S.A. ("Nu Invest") is an indirect subsidiary acquired in June 2021, domiciled in Brazil, and is an independent digital investment broker dealer. |
The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to in these consolidated financial statements as the “Group” or "Nu”.
F-15
The business plan of Nu provides for the continued growth of its Brazilian, Mexican, and Colombian operations, not only related to existing businesses, such as credit cards, personal loans, investments, and insurance, but also complemented by the launch of new products. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements were prepared based on the assumption of the Group continuing as a going concern, considering that recent losses are principally due to the expenses incurred to deliver upon the Group’s rapid growth, in accordance with its business plan.
The Company’s Board authorized the issuance of these consolidated financial statements on April 20, 2022.
a) Initial Public Offering ("IPO")
On December 9, 2021, Nu Holdings completed its IPO, offering of newly issued class A ordinary shares, including in the form of Brazilian Depositary Receipts or "BDRs", each representing one-sixth of a class A ordinary share ("Brazilian offering"). The initial offering consisted of (1) an international offering listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “NU” and (2) a Brazilian offering on São Paulo Stock Exchange ("B3 - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão") under the symbol "NUBR33". The initial offering price per class A common share was US$, which was equivalent to R$ per BDR after taking into consideration the class A ordinary share to BDR ratio.
Within the context of the Brazilian offering,
Nu implemented an incentive and reward program, referred to commercially as “NuSócios” or “Customer Program”,
through which the subsidiary Nu Pagamentos provided sufficient funds to cover the subscription and payment of one BDR in the Brazilian
offering to each customer that participated in the Customer Program.
As a result, Nu Holdings had gross proceeds from the IPO of US$. Additionally, the Company incurred US$ in offering expenses, of which US$ were recognized in equity as transaction costs.
b) Acquisition activities pending completion
i) Olivia
On November 2, 2021, Nu Holdings signed a stock purchase agreement (SPA) to purchase all the shares of Olivia AI do Brasil Participações Ltda. ("Olivia Participações"), Olivia AI do Brasil Instituição de Pagamento Ltda. ("Olivia Pagamentos") and Olivia AI Inc. ("Olivia Inc") - together referred to as "Olivia" in these consolidated financial statements. In 2016 Olivia launched an artificial intelligence ("AI") solution that helps individuals manage their money. The AI works by integrating the user's various bank accounts and applying data analysis of both the expenses and income of its users, in order to indicate suggestions for financial planning. Nu believes that Olivia's AI will further strengthen the Group's open banking initiatives. The transaction qualifies as a business combination and will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. On December 31, 2021, certain closing conditions of the acquisition were still pending, such as the liquidation, and, therefore, there are no impacts on these consolidated financial statements. Additional information is disclosed in note 32, subsequent events.
F-16
c) Acquisition activities completed during the year - 2021
i) Easynvest's acquisition
On June 1, 2021, the acquisition of
| ● | Nu Participações Financeiras S.A ("Nu Participações Financeiras") - formerly “Easynvest Holding Financeira”; |
| ● | Nu Invest Corretora de Valores S.A ("Nu Invest") formerly “Easynvest TCV"; |
| ● | Nu Participações S.A. ("Nu Participações") - formerly “Easynvest Participações"; |
| ● | Nu Corretora de Seguros Ltda. ("Nu Corretora de Seguros") - formerly “Easynvest Corretora"; |
| ● | Easynvest Gestão de Recursos Ltda. (“Easynvest Gestão”); and |
| ● | Vérios Gestão de Recursos S.A. (“Vérios”). |
On December 31, 2021, Nu Participações Financeiras was merged into Nu Invest.
Purchase consideration at acquisition date
Net identifiable assets acquired, and liabilities assumed
The Company has concluded the identification of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the allocation of the purchase price to these assets and liabilities, as well as the measurement of goodwill. The purchase price allocation, including the allocation to the intangible assets and goodwill is shown below.
Identifiable intangible assets will be amortized for a period of months to years, according to their useful life defined based on the expected future economic benefits generated by the asset. The goodwill does not have defined useful life and will have its recoverability tested at least annually.
The goodwill from Easynvest’s acquisition
relates to future benefits expected to be realized through a number of strategies such as (a) diversification and increase in revenues
by offering other products to customers, such as investment funds and equity and debt investment alternatives, as well as broker accounts;
(b) the ability to bring forward the offering of these products as compared to developing the platform In house, and (c) the absorption
of skilled workforce. These benefits have not been recognized separately from goodwill because they do not meet the definition of identifiable
intangible assets. The total amount of goodwill that was expected to be deductible for tax purposes in Brazil was US$
F-17
| Fair value recognized on acquisition | ||
| Net Identifiable assets and liabilities | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||
| Securities | ||
| Intangible assets | ||
| Other assets | ||
| Liabilities | ( | |
| Total identifiable net assets at fair value | ||
| Goodwill arising on acquisition | ||
| Purchased consideration transferred | ||
| Equity consideration | ||
| Cash consideration |
The
additional intangible assets recognized, and the allocation of the purchase price were technology (US$
In addition to the preferred shares issued as part of the business combination, certain Easynvest's employees may receive up to 159,981 Nu Holdings' shares which are being accounted as equity-settled based compensation due to vesting and forfeiture clauses.
Net cash outflow on acquisition
| Consideration paid in cash | ||
| (-) Cash and cash equivalent balances acquired | ( | |
| Net cash outflow |
Impact of the acquisition on the results of the Group
Easynvest contributed US$
F-18
ii) Akala
In
December 2020, the subsidiary Nu BN Tecnologia, S.A de CV (“Nu Tecnologia”) announced the acquisition of
iii) Spin Pay
On August 29, 2021, Nu announced the acquisition of all the shares of Spin Pay Serviços de Pagamentos Ltda. ("Spin Pay"), a Brazilian payment platform that pioneered the development of instant payments solutions for online and offline merchants via the Brazilian Instant Payment System ("PIX"). As of August 31, 2021, Spin Pay had more than 220 merchants on its platform, connected to Spin Pay through commerce-enablement platforms, as well as directly through the Spin Pay API. On October 13, 2021, the acquisition was closed upon the completion of all conditions established in the share purchase agreement and the monetary consideration was paid. As a result, from that date, Spin Pay was consolidated by the Company in these consolidated financial statements.
Purchase consideration at acquisition date
The
total purchase price was US$
Net identifiable assets acquired, and liabilities assumed
Control over the entity was transferred to Nu in October 2021. The Company has concluded the identification of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the allocation of the purchase price to these assets and liabilities except for the measurement of the fair value of the intangible assets and, therefore, the measurement of goodwill. The purchase price allocation, including the preliminary allocation to the intangible assets and goodwill is shown below.
Identifiable intangible assets will be amortized for a period of to years, according to their useful life defined based on the expected future economic benefits generated by the asset. The goodwill does not have a defined useful life and will have its recoverability tested at least annually.
The goodwill from Spin Pay’s acquisition relates to future benefits expected to be realized through a number of strategies, such as diversification and increase in revenues due to PIX-related payment services such as
F-19
transaction financing, promotional platform
and checkout solutions and the absorption of skilled workforce. These benefits have not been recognized separately from goodwill because
they do not meet the definition of identifiable intangible assets. The total amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible for
tax purposes in Brazil is US$
| Fair value recognized on acquisition | ||
| Net Identifiable assets and liabilities | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||
| Intangible assets | ||
| Other assets | ||
| Liabilities | ( | |
| Total identifiable net assets at fair value | ||
| Goodwill arising on acquisition | ||
| Purchased consideration transferred | ||
| Equity consideration | ||
| Cash consideration |
The additional intangible assets recognized
and the allocation of the purchase price were intellectual property (US$
The
following were the main assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Net cash outflow on acquisition
| Consideration paid in cash | ||
| (-) Cash and cash equivalent balances acquired | ( | |
| Net cash outflow |
Impact of the acquisition on the results of the Group
Spin Pay contributed US$
The aggregate of the Easynvest and Spin Pay
acquisitions contributed to approximately US$17,812 of revenue and US$11,076 of loss in the period between the acquisition’s dates
and the reporting date. Considering if the acquisitions had been completed on January 1, 2021, the Group would have reported total revenue
of approximately US$
d) Acquisition activities completed during the year - 2020
i) Acquisition of Cognitect, Inc
On August 4, 2020, Nu Holdings acquired
F-20
both of which were already used by Nu. Cognitect licenses Datomic for customers and provides consulting services related to Datomic and Clojure. Nu’s intention was to add the knowledge of Cognitect developers to its team to foster technology and efficiency.
Purchase consideration at acquisition date
As part of the purchase agreement, a contingent cash and a contingent share consideration has been agreed to be paid over years in equal installments, dependent upon the former Cognitect’s shareholders’ and employees continuing to provide services to the Company, which were then considered as compensation for post-combination services and not a component of the purchase consideration transferred. The value attributable to each of the thousand shares is USD10.71 and corresponds to the estimated fair value of the ordinary share at the date of the acquisition. The fair value of the shares was calculated using methodologies similar to the share-based payment. Further, there is also an escrow deposit which will be released on the 5th anniversary of the acquisition.
The difference between the amount paid and the net assets acquired at fair value resulted in the recognition of goodwill.
Net identifiable assets acquired, and liabilities assumed
The fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities as at the date of acquisition were:
| Fair value recognized on acquisition | ||
| Identifiable assets and liabilities | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||
| Software | ||
| Customer relationship | ||
| Other assets (liabilities) | ( | |
| Total identifiable net assets at fair value | ||
| Goodwill arising on acquisition | ||
| Total consideration | ||
| Purchase consideration transferred |
Contingent liabilities have not been recorded due to the acquisition.
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized for a period of to years, according to the useful life defined based on the expected future economic benefits generated by the asset. The goodwill does not have defined useful life and will have its recoverability tested at least annually.
If the business combination had taken place at the beginning of the year of 2020, the Group’s revenue and loss for the year would not have been materially impacted.
F-21
e) Reconciliation of intangible assets and goodwill shown in the consolidated statements of financial position
| Intangible assets from Easynvest's acquisition | ||
| Intangible assets from Spin Pay's acquisition | ||
| Other intangible assets | ||
| Total intangible assets |
| Goodwill from Easynvest's acquisition | ||
| Goodwill from Cognitect's acquisition | ||
| Goodwill from Spin Pay's acquisition | ||
| Goodwill from Akala's acquisition | ||
| Total goodwill |
f) COVID-19
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments worldwide have taken measures related to social distancing, quarantine and travel restrictions affecting the population of these countries, including those where Nu operates. While countries are still advancing on the immunization of their populations, it is still not possible to assess when this pandemic and its effects will end. However, the Group observed:
| ● | Growth – Nu continued to increase the number of accounts, partially driven by new customers, including new customers wanting to receive the governmental aid through Nu's savings accounts; |
| ● | Credit performance – while Nu saw initial credit deterioration during the early days of COVID-19, this trend reversed in the subsequent months and the credit risk converged to levels equal to or below those observed before the pandemic crisis; and |
| ● | Deposits – Nu served as a link between the government aid and the population, which was a factor behind the increase in the deposits balance. |
As a result of the above-mentioned factors which continue to remain in flux, Nu continues to analyze the effects of the pandemic on its operations, estimates and judgements, as well as on the application of accounting policies related to allowance for credit losses. Details of the impacts of the pandemic on the credit loss allowance are described in notes 13 and 14, as well as in note 28.
In addition, since the beginning of the pandemic and to protect the health and safety of Nu’s employees, all the Group’s employees have been working remotely. Despite this challenging situation, Nu continued to grow the business and increased its headcount.
2. Statement of compliance
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
F-22
a) Functional currency and foreign currency translation
i) Nu Holding's functional and presentation currency
Nu Holdings does not have any direct customers and its main direct activities are (i) investing in the operating entities in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, as well as in other countries, (ii) financing, either equity or debt; and (iii) the payment of certain general and administrative expenses. As a result, these are considered its primary and secondary activities and all of them are substantially based on US Dollars (“US$”), which was selected as the functional and presentation currency of Nu Holdings.
ii) Subsidiary's functional currency
For each subsidiary of the Group, the Company determines the currency that best reflects the economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that entity (“functional currency”). Items included in the financial statements of each subsidiary are measured using that functional currency. The functional currency of the Brazilian operating entities is the Brazilian Real, the Mexican entities is the Mexican Peso, and the Colombian entity is the Colombian Pesos.
iii) Translation of transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions and balances are translated in two consecutive stages:
| ● | Foreign currency transactions are translated to the subsidiaries’ functional currency at the exchange rates at the date of the transactions; and the exchange differences arising on the translation of foreign currency balances to the functional currency are recognized under “Other income (expenses)” in the consolidated statements of profit or loss. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Revenues and expenses are translated using a monthly average exchange rate. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. |
| ● | The financial statements of the subsidiaries held in functional currencies that are not US$ (foreign subsidiaries) are translated into US$, and the exchange differences arising from the translation to US$ of the financial statements denominated in functional currencies other than the US$ is recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income or loss ("OCI") as an item that may be reclassified to profit or loss within “currency translation on foreign entities”. |
The main criteria applied to the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries to US$ are as follows:
| ● | assets and liabilities are converted into US$ at the exchange rate at the reporting date; |
| ● | equity is translated into US$ at historical cost; |
| ● | revenues and expenses are translated using a monthly average exchange rate. When applying this criterion, the Group considers whether there have been significant changes in the exchange rates in the reporting period which, in view of their materiality with respect to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, would make it necessary to use the exchange rates at the transaction date rather than the aforementioned average exchange rates; and |
F-23
| ● | statements of cash flow items are translated into US$ using the monthly average exchange rate unless significant variances occur, when the rate of the transaction date is used instead. |
b) New or revised accounting pronouncements
Adopted in 2021
The following new or revised standards have been issued by IASB and were effective for the year covered by these consolidated financial statements. They had no impact on these consolidated financial statements.
| ● | Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions (Amendment to IFRS 16) |
| ● | Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – Phase 2 (Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16) |
| ● | New issuance: IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation – Accounting for Warrants that are Initially Classified as Liabilities |
| ● | Proposed amendments to IAS 21: Lack of Exchangeability |
c) Other new standards and interpretations not yet effective
| ● | Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2) |
| ● | Definition of Accounting Estimates (Amendments to IAS 8) |
| ● | Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction (Amendments to IAS 12) |
| ● | Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-Current (Amendments to IAS1) |
| ● | Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards |
| ● | Amendments to IFRS 3 - Definition of a Business |
| ● | Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 – Definition of Material |
| ● | Amendments to IAS 37 - Onerous Contracts — Cost of Fulfilling a Contract |
| ● | Amendments to IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment — Proceeds before Intended Use |
Management does not expect the adoption of the standards and interpretations described above to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
3. Basis of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounting balances of Nu Holdings and all those subsidiaries over which the Company exercises control, direct or indirectly. Control is achieved where the Company has (i) power over the investee; (ii) is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and (iii) can use its power to affect its profits.
The Company re-assesses whether it maintains control of an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three above mentioned elements of control. The consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Company obtains control over it and ceases when the Company loses control over it. Assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the reporting
F-24
period are included in the consolidated statements of profit or loss from the date the Company gains control until the date the Company ceases to control the subsidiary.
The financial information of the subsidiaries was prepared in the same period as the Company and applied consistent accounting policies.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are fully consolidated with those of the Company. Accordingly, all balances, transactions and any unrealized income and expenses arising between consolidated entities are eliminated on the consolidation, except for foreign-currency gain and losses on translation of intercompany loans. Profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income or loss are attributed to the shareholders of the parent company and to the non-controlling interest.
These consolidated financial statements include the subsidiaries listed below:
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| Entity | Control | Principal activities | Functional currency | Country | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | ||||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
F-25
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - | |||||||||||||
| - | - |
In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company consolidated the following entities in which the Group’s companies hold a substantial interest or the entirety of the interests and are therefore exposed to, or have rights, to variable returns and have the ability to affect those returns through power over the entity:
| Name of the entity | Country | |
The interest owned by other investors in these entities are presented as non-controlling interests in these consolidated financial statements.
Nu Pagamentos, Nu Financeira, Nu DTVM and Nu Invest, Brazilian subsidiaries, are regulated by the Brazilian Central Bank (“BACEN”) and Nu Mexico Financiera, a Mexican subsidiary, is regulated by both the Mexican Central Bank ("BANXICO") and Mexican National Baking and Stock Commission (“CNBV”), and as such, there are some regulatory requirements that restrict the ability of the Group to access and transfer assets freely to or from these entities within the Group and to settle liabilities of the Group. FIDC Nu also have specific restrictions, as described on note 20.
4. Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies described below have been applied consistently through the years presented in these consolidated financial statements.
a) Financial instruments
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets and liabilities are initially recognized when the Group becomes a party to the contractual terms of the instrument. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets and liabilities at initial recognition and measures a financial asset or financial liability at its fair value plus or minus, in the case of a financial asset or financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL"), transaction costs that are incremental and directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of the financial asset or financial liability. Transaction costs of financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss are expensed in profit or loss. Immediately after initial recognition, an expected credit loss ("ECL") allowance is
F-26
recognized for financial assets measured at amortized cost and investments in debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"), if any.
There were no defaults or breaches in any financial liability during 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Classification and subsequent measurement
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as FVTPL where there is a requirement to do so or where they are otherwise designated at FVTPL on initial recognition. Financial assets and financial liabilities which are required to be held at FVTPL include:
| ● | Financial assets and financial liabilities held for trading; |
| ● | Debt instruments that do not have solely payments of principal and interest ("SPPI") characteristics. Otherwise, such instruments must be measured at amortized cost or FVTOCI; and |
| ● | Equity instruments that have not been designated as held at FVTOCI. |
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are derivatives or if they are acquired or incurred mainly for the purpose of selling or being repurchased in the near-term, or form part of a portfolio of financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of short-term profit-taking.
In certain circumstances, other financial assets and financial liabilities are designated at FVTPL where this results in the more relevant information. This may arise because it significantly reduces a measurement inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains or losses on them on a different basis, where the assets and liabilities are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis or, in the case of financial liabilities, where it contains one or more embedded derivatives which are not closely related to the host contract.
The classification and measurement requirements for financial asset debt and equity instruments and financial liabilities are set out below.
Financial assets - debt instruments
Debt instruments are those instruments that meet the definition of financial liability from the issuer's perspective, such as loans and government and corporate bonds.
The classification criteria and subsequent measurement for financial assets depends on the business model for their management and the characteristics of their contractual flows. The business models refer to the way in which the Group manages its financial assets to generate cash flows. In this definition, the following factors are taken into consideration, among others:
| ● | How key management assess and report on the performance of the business model and the financial assets held in the business model; |
| ● | The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held in the business model) and, specifically, the way in which these risks are managed; and |
| ● | The frequency and volume of sales in previous years, as well as expectations of future sales. |
Depending on these factors, the asset can be measured at amortized cost, at fair value with changes in other comprehensive income, or at fair value with changes through profit or loss.
F-27
Business model: The business model reflects how the Group manages the assets to generate cash flows and, specifically, whether the Group’s objective is solely to (i) collect the contractual cash flows from the assets or (ii) is to collect both the contractual cash flows and cash flows arising from the sale of the assets. If neither of these is applicable, such as where the financial assets are held for trading purposes, then the financial assets are classified as part of an "other” business model and measured at FVTPL. To assess business models, the Group considers risks that affect the performance of the business model; how the managers of the business are compensated; and how the performance of the business model is assessed and reported to Management.
When a financial asset is subject to business models (i) and (ii), the application of the SPPI test is required, as explained below.
Solely Payments of Principal and Interest – SPPI test: Where the business model is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows or to collect contractual cash flows and sell, the Group assesses whether the assets’ cash flows represent SPPI. In making this assessment, the Group considers whether the contractual cash flows are consistent with a basic lending arrangement (i.e., interest includes only consideration for the time value of money, credit risk, other basic lending risks, and a profit margin that is consistent with a basic lending arrangement). Where the contractual terms introduce exposure to risk or volatility that is inconsistent with a basic lending arrangement, the related asset is classified and measured at FVTPL. Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are SPPI.
Based on these factors, the Group classifies its instruments into one of the following measurement categories.
Amortized cost:
Financial assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows where those cash flows represent SPPI, and that are not designated at FVTPL, are measured at amortized cost. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted by any ECL recognized and measured. Interest income from these financial assets is included in the statement of profit or loss using the effective interest rate method. When estimates of future cash flows are revised, the carrying amount of the respective financial assets or financial liabilities is adjusted to reflect the new estimate discounted using the original effective interest rate. Any changes are recognized in the statement of profit or loss.
FVTOCI:
Financial assets that are both held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent SPPI, and for sale, depending on the Company's best interests, which are not designated at FVTPL, are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income ("FVTOCI"). The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted by any ECL recognized and measured. Interest income from these financial assets is included in the statement of comprehensive income or loss using the effective interest rate method.
FVTPL:
Financial assets that do not meet the criteria for amortized cost or FVTOCI are measured at FVTPL. A gain or loss on a debt instrument that is subsequently measured at FVTPL, including any debt instruments designated at fair value, is recognized in profit or loss, and presented in the statement of profit or loss in the period in which it arises.
F-28
The Group reclassifies financial assets when and only when its business model for managing those assets changes. The reclassification takes place from the start of the first period following the change. As a result of the growth of Nu's activities, with a higher volume of deposits and related investment in financial assets, in 2021 the Group began to hold financial assets in a held-to-collect-and-sell business model which resulted in their classification as FVTOCI. Except for this addition, for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, no other changes have occurred.
Classification of financial assets for presentation purposes
Financial assets are classified by nature into the following items in the consolidated statements of financial position:
| ● | Cash and cash equivalents; |
| ● | Securities; |
| ● | Collateral for credit card operations; |
| ● | Derivative financial instruments; |
| ● | Compulsory deposits at central banks; |
| ● | Credit card receivables and loans to customers; |
| ● | Other financial assets at amortized cost. |
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are initially classified into the various categories used for management and measurement purposes, unless they have to be presented as liabilities associated with non-current assets held for sale or they relate to hedging derivatives or changes in the fair value of hedged items in portfolio hedges of interest rate risk, which are reported separately.
Financial liabilities are included for measurement purposes in one of the following categories:
| ● | Financial liabilities held for trading (at FVTPL): this category includes financial liabilities incurred for the purpose of generating a profit in the near term from fluctuations in their prices and financial derivatives not designated as hedging instruments. |
| ● | Financial liabilities designated at FVTPL: financial liabilities are included in this category when they provide more relevant information, either because this eliminates or significantly reduces recognition or measurement inconsistencies (accounting mismatches) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains or losses on them on different bases, or because a group of financial liabilities or financial assets and liabilities is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy, and information about the group is provided on that basis to the Group’s key management personnel. Liabilities may only be included in this category on the date when they are incurred or originated. This classification is applied to derivatives, financial liabilities held for trading, and other financial liabilities designated as such at initial recognition. The Group has designated the instruments eligible as capital as fair value through profit or loss at its initial recognition. Gains or losses on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss are presented partially in other comprehensive income (the amount of change in the fair value of the financial liability that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability) and partially in profit or loss (the remaining amount of change in the fair value of the liability). |
F-29
| ● | Financial liabilities at amortized cost: financial liabilities, irrespective of their instrumentation and maturity, not included in any of the above-mentioned categories which arise from the ordinary borrowing activities carried on by financial institutions. |
Convertible instruments
Convertible instruments, which corresponded to the Company’s senior preferred shares, are separated into the financial liability and equity components based on the terms of the contract. On issuance of the convertible instrument, the fair values of the financial liability components are determined based on their characteristics, using a market rate for an equivalent non-convertible instrument for the contractual obligation to deliver cash and valuation models to the convertible embedded derivative into a variable number of shares. The financial liability due to the obligation to deliver cash is classified as a financial liability measured at amortized cost (net of transaction costs) until it is extinguished on conversion or redemption; and the convertible embedded derivative is measured at fair value and presented as “Derivative financial instruments” in the consolidated statements of financial position. No gain or loss arises from initially recognizing the components of the convertible instrument separately.
On conversion of convertible instruments, the Company derecognizes both the liability and derivative components and recognizes them as equity, without any effect in the statement of profit or loss. The expenses relating to the measurement of the financial liability components are presented as "Results with convertible instruments" in the statement of profit or loss. As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have any outstanding convertible instruments.
Classification of financial liabilities for presentation purposes
Financial liabilities are classified by nature into the following items in the consolidated statements of financial position:
| ● | Derivative financial instruments; |
| ● | Instruments eligible as capital; |
| ● | Deposits, |
| ● | Payables to credit card network; |
| ● | Borrowings and financing, and securitized borrowings; |
| ● | Senior preferred shares. |
Credit loss allowance of financial assets
The Group calculates an expected credit loss ("ECL") for its financial assets. This way, ECLs should account for forecast elements such as undrawn limits and macroeconomic conditions that might affect the Group’s receivables.
The Group calculates different provisions for the financial instruments classified into:
| ● | Stage 1 - no significant increase in credit risk (“SICR”); |
| ● | Stage 2 - significant increase in credit risk subsequent to recognition; and |
F-30
| ● | Stage 3 - credit impaired. |
Based on these concepts, Nu’s approach was to calculate ECL through the probability of default ("PD"), exposure at default ("EAD") and loss given default ("LGD") methodology.
Definitions of stages
Stage 1 definition – no significant increase in credit risk
All receivables not classified in stages 2 and 3.
Stage 2 definition – significant increase in credit risk subsequent to recognition
The Group utilizes two guidelines for determining stage 2:
| (i) | absolute criteria: the financial asset is more than 30 (thirty) days in arrears; or |
| (ii) | relative criteria: in addition to the absolute criteria, the Group analyzes monthly the evolution of the risk of each financial instrument, comparing the current behavior score attributed to a given client with the one given in the moment of recognition of the financial asset. The behavior score considers credit behavior variables, such as delinquency in other products and market data about the client. |
The Group has also assumed a cure period for stage 2, where all receivables in arrears between 30 and 89 days at least once in the last six months are classified as stage 2.
Stage 3 definition – credit impaired
Stage 3 definition follows the definition of default:
| (i) | The financial asset is more than 90 (ninety) days in arrears; or |
| (ii) | There are indicatives that the financial asset will not be fully paid without a collateral or financial guarantee being triggered. |
Indication that an obligation will not be fully paid includes forbearance of financial instruments that implies advantages being granted to the counterparty following deterioration in the credit quality of the counterparty.
A probation period is also considered: customers that were more than 90 days in arrears at the last six months are also classified as stage 3.
Lifetime definition
The maximum period over which expected credit losses shall be measured is the maximum contractual period over which the entity is exposed to credit risk. For loan commitments, this is the maximum contractual period over which an entity has a present contractual obligation to extend credit. Thus, for the lending product, the lifetime is straightforward, being equal to the number of months for the remaining loan installments to be defaulted on.
However, the credit card includes both a loan and an undrawn commitment component and does not have a fixed term or repayment structure. Thus, the period over which to measure expected credit losses are based on historical information and experience about the length of time for related default to occur on similar financial instruments following a significant increase in credit risk.
F-31
Therefore, a study was conducted for the stage 2 credit cards portfolio tracking over a time period to measure how long it takes for the cumulative default rate to stabilize, understanding this as the moment the entity is not expected to be exposed to credit risk.
Forward-looking – macroeconomic scenarios
The Group calculates the ECL considering the current macroeconomic environment and changes in future macroeconomic scenarios. The macroeconomic forecasts are based on market expectations for Brazilian Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) for the next two years as disclosed by the Brazilian Central Bank. These forecasts are constantly monitored by the Group.
The Group also builds pessimistic and optimistic scenarios, which are based on the variance of future market expectations. The scenarios weighting depends on the Group’s expectations regarding the likelihood of each scenario to happen. The weighting is reviewed whenever there is a substantial change in the economic environment that causes different macroeconomics outlooks’ expectation.
The probability of occurrence and their severity are factored into the estimation of the ECL final number. This methodology allows a timelier response to changes in local or global macroeconomic trends.
Measuring ECL
The final ECL was calculated using the following parameters:
| ● | PD: it is the likelihood that a receivable will reach default in a time window. For stage 1 customers, PDs are calculated for the next 12-month period, while for stage 2, its calculation is done through the lifetime of the instrument. For stage 3, PD is considered to be 100% since the credit has already defaulted. |
| ● | EAD: the discounted balance that, in the event of a default, a customer is expected to have. For revolving facilities, it is a function of the customer’s current limit (total credit exposure) and the expected limit utilization percentage at the moment of default. The expected limit utilization is driven by different customer behavior. In contrast the EAD of a personal loan product is the expected balance value at default after considering the installments payments behavior. |
| ● | LGD: the percentage expected not to be recovered from a defaulted balance. This ratio represents the present value of the expected losses divided by the defaulted balances. |
| ● | Discount rate: it is the average effective interest rate calculated using historical data. |
The parameters mentioned above are segmented in homogeneous risk groups, determined by internal scoring models, relying on, among others, customer behavioral information, internal and external, including delinquency and credit utilization.
Governance around ECL
The Group’s Credit Risk Team has developed the current ECL method. Monthly results are monitored and discussed in appropriate forums involving credit businesses and finance teams.
The Group assesses the performance of ECL estimations through the following methods:
| ● | Back testing: running the model at prior reference dates allows the Group to evaluate how the model’s predictions have paired with actual data. |
F-32
| ● | Coverage duration: while back testing, the Group analyzes how many months it is covered for losses while provisioning the ECL. |
Post-Model Adjustments
Limitations in the Group's provisions model may be identified, and in these circumstances, Management might suggest appropriate adjustments to the Group's provisions by applying post-model adjustments.
Presentation of allowance for ECL in the consolidated statement of financial position
Loss allowances for ECL are presented in the consolidated statement of financial position as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets. Any excess of the loss allowance over the gross amount is presented as a provision in “Other liabilities”.
Write-off
The Group directly reduces the gross carrying amount of a financial asset when it has no reasonable expectation of recovering it in its entirety or a portion thereof. For unsecured loans, a write-off is made when all internal avenues of collecting the debt have been exhausted, and the debt is handed over to external collection agencies or it has no reasonable expectation of recovering. Significant portion of the write-offs of credit card receivables and loans to customers are done when the client is twelve months in arrears, and all balances are written-off are subject to enforcement activity. Contact is made with customers with the aim of achieving a realistic and sustainable repayment arrangement.
Recoveries
Recoveries of credit losses are registered as an income and offset against credit losses. Recoveries of credit losses are classified in the consolidated statements of profit or loss as “Credit loss allowance expenses”.
Modifications of financial assets
The factors used by the Group to determine whether there is a substantial modification of a contract are: evaluation if there is a renegotiation that is not part of the original contractual terms, change to contractual cash flows and significant extensions of the term of the transaction due to the debtor's financial constraint and significant changes to the interest rate, among others.
The major modifications in the Company’s financial assets correspond to changes in contractual cash flows when credit card receivables, current or revolving, are modified to receivables in installments or changes in the installments profile in loans to customers. These modifications occur as a result of commercial restructuring activity or due to the credit risk of the borrower, an assessment must be performed to determine whether the terms of the new agreement are substantially different from the terms of the existing agreement. This assessment considers both the change in cash flows arising from the modified terms as well as the change in overall instrument risk profile.
Where terms are substantially different, the existing receivable will be derecognized and a new one will be recognized at fair value, with any difference in valuation recognized immediately within the statement of profit or loss, subject to observability criteria. Where terms are not substantially different, the receivables carrying value will be adjusted to reflect the present value of modified cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate, with any resulting gain or loss recognized immediately within the statement of profit or loss.
For ECL purposes, any modification that implies a forbearance will be recognized as stage 3. A forbearance implies advantages being granted to the counterparty as a result of deterioration in the credit quality of the
F-33
counterparty. For this definition, the following are considered advantages (i) any material discounts applied to the current obligation and (ii) changes in prices that do not represent the customer credit risk profile.
Derivative financial instruments
Derivatives are contracts or agreements whose value is derived from one or more underlying indexes or asset values inherent in the contract or agreement, which require little or no initial net investment and are settled at a future date. Transactions are undertaken in interest rate, cross-currency, and other index related swaps and forwards.
Derivatives are held for risk management purposes and are classified as held for trading unless they are designated as being in a hedge accounting relationship. Derivatives are recognized initially at cost (on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into) and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. Fair values of exchange-traded derivatives are obtained from quoted market prices. Fair values of over-the-counter derivatives are estimated using valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow and option pricing models.
All derivatives are carried as assets when their fair value is positive and as liabilities when their fair value is negative, except where netting is permitted. The method of recognizing fair value gains and losses depends on whether derivatives are held for trading or are designated as hedging instruments and, if the latter, the nature of the risks being hedged. Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of derivatives held for trading are recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and included within “Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments”.
Hedge accounting
The Group applies hedge accounting to represent the economic effects of its risk management strategies. At the time a financial instrument is designated as a hedge (i.e., at the inception of the hedge), the Group formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument(s) and hedged item(s), its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes the identification of each hedging instrument and the respective hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value attributable to the hedged risk is to be assessed. Accordingly, the Group formally assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging derivatives have been and will be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged risk during the period that the hedge is designated.
A hedge is usually regarded as highly effective if, at inception and throughout its life, the Group can expect, and actual results indicate, that changes in the fair value or cash flow of the hedged items are effectively offset by changes in the fair value or cash flow of the hedging instrument. If, at any point, it is concluded that it is no longer highly effective in achieving its documented objective, hedge accounting is discontinued.
Where derivatives are held for risk management purposes, and when transactions meet the required criteria for documentation and hedge effectiveness, the derivatives may be designated as either: (i) hedges of the change in fair value of recognized assets or liabilities or firm commitments (fair value hedges); (ii) hedges of the variability in highly probable future cash flows attributable to a recognized asset or liability, or a forecast transaction (cash flow hedges); or (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (net investment hedges). The Group applies cash flow hedge accounting in the subsidiary Nu Pagamentos that is exposed to foreign currency risk (dollar and euro) on forecast transactions, as described below.
(i) Cash flow hedge accounting - The effective portion of changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income or loss in the cash flow hedge reserve. The gain or
F-34
loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the statement of profit or loss. Amounts accumulated in equity are reclassified to the statement of profit or loss in the periods in which the hedged item affects profit or loss. When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized in the statement of profit or loss when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in the statement of profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the statement of profit or loss. The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on forecast transactions, mainly expenses related to the cost of services and administrative expenses.
Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
Financial asset and liability balances, including derivatives, are offset (i.e., reported in the statements of financial position at their net amount) only if the Group entities have a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts and intend either to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The Group has not offset financial assets or liabilities.
b) Fair value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. This hierarchy is based on the markets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. The fair value measurement of a financial asset or liability is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
| ● | Level 1: Valuation is based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| ● | Level 2: Valuation is based on observable market-based inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
| ● | Level 3: Valuation is generated from techniques that use significant assumptions, not observable in the market. Valuation techniques include pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques. |
The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value.
Valuation techniques include net present value and discounted cash flow models, comparison with similar instruments for which observable market prices exist, Black-Scholes pricing model and other valuation models. Assumptions and inputs used in valuation techniques include risk-free and benchmark interest rates, credit spreads and other inputs used in estimating discount rates. The availability of observable market prices and model inputs reduces the need for management judgment and estimation and also reduces the uncertainty associated with determining fair values.
F-35
Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value.
Significant judgment may be required to determine whether certain financial instruments measured at fair value are classified as Level 2 or Level 3. In making this determination, the Group considers all available information that market participants use to measure the fair value of the financial instrument, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness, and Group’s understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used. Based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each instrument or instrument category, judgments are made regarding the significance of the Level 3 inputs to the instruments’ fair value measurement in its entirety. If Level 3 inputs are considered significant, the instrument is classified as Level 3. The process for determining fair value using unobservable inputs is generally more subjective and involves a high degree of management judgment and assumptions.
The Group has in place controls to ensure that the fair value measurements are appropriate and reliable, including review and approval of new transaction types, price verification, and review of valuation judgments, methods, models, process controls, and results.
The financial instruments measured at fair value at the reporting date by the level in the fair value hierarchy are disclosed in note 25.
c) Accounting for acquisitions
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, which is measured at acquisition date at fair value, and the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Company elects whether to measure the non-controlling interests in the acquiree at fair value, if any, or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.
The Company determines that it has acquired a business when the acquired set of activities and assets include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The acquired process is considered substantive if it is critical to the ability to continue producing outputs, and the inputs acquired include an organized workforce with the necessary skills, knowledge, or experience to perform that process or it significantly contributes to the ability to continue producing outputs and is considered unique or scarce or cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay in the ability to continue producing outputs.
When the Company acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances, and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration classified as equity is not re-measured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
F-36
d) Revenue recognition
Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments
Interest income on loans, credit card operations (revolving and interest-bearing installment transactions) and short-term investments are calculated using the effective interest method, which allocates interest, and direct and incremental fees and costs over the expected lives of the assets. For the revolving balances, the interest is calculated from the due date of the credit card bill that was not fully paid. Gains (losses) on financial instruments comprises the changes in fair value recognized in the statement of profit or loss.
Fee and commission income
Fee and commission income are shown net of federal revenue taxes.
| i) | Interchange fees |
Interchange fees income represents fees to authorize and provide settlement on credit and debit card transactions processed through the Mastercard networks and are determined as a percentage of the total payment processed. Interchange fees, net of Rewards revenues, are recognized and measured upon recognition of the transaction with the interchange networks, when performance obligation is considered satisfied. The interchange rates agreed with Mastercard are fixed and it depends on the segment of each merchant. The interchange income is withheld from the amount to be paid to Mastercard.
| ii) | Rewards revenues |
It comprises revenues related to the Nu’s Rewards subscription fee and the related interchange fee, initially apportioned in accordance with the relative stand-alone selling prices of the performance obligation assumed, as described below in item “Deferred income”. It is recorded in the income statement when the performance obligation is satisfied, which is when the reward points are redeemed by the customers.
| iii) | Recharge fees |
Recharge fees are recognized at the date the customers acquire the right to the telecom services and comprises the selling price of telecom prepaid cards to customers, net of its acquisition costs.
e) Expense recognition
Expenses are recorded in the statement of profit or loss under the accrual method, regardless of receipt or payment.
| f) | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include (i) bank deposits in local institutions and abroad and highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities up to 90 days, convertible into a known amount of cash, subject to insignificant risk of change in value and used for cash management of short-term commitments and not for investment and financing purposes; and (ii) balances with central banks which are part of the Group’s liquidity management activities.
g) Credit card receivables
Credit card receivables are reported at their amortized cost, net of the credit card ECL allowance.
Chargebacks refer to the amounts disputed by clients generally due to fraud transactions on the Mastercard network process. Losses are recorded based on the estimated amount expected to be reduced from the
F-37
Group’s client’s receivables when the event impacting the client occurred on activities that the Company is responsible for on the referred network.
h) Loans to customers
Loans to customers are related to Nu’s lending products. The personal loans can be paid in 1 to 48 installments, depending on the conditions agreed on Nu’s app. Loans are reported at their amortized cost, which is the outstanding principal balance, adjusted for any unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs, unamortized premiums and discounts, and charge-offs. Loans are reported net of the estimated uncollectible amount (loan ECL allowance).
i) Leasing
The Group as a lessee
For any new contracts entered on or after January 1, 2019, the Group considers whether a contract is, or contains a lease. A lease is defined as “a contract, or part of a contract, which conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration”. To apply this definition, the Group assesses whether the contract meets three criteria, which are whether:
| ● | the contract contains an identified asset, which is either explicitly identified in the contract or implicitly specified by being identified at the time the asset is made available to the Group; |
| ● | the Group has the right to obtain all of the economic benefits from use of the identified asset throughout the period of use substantially, considering its rights within the defined scope of the contract; and |
| ● | the Group has the right to direct the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use. The Group assesses whether it has the right to direct ‘how and for what purpose’ the asset is used throughout the period of use. |
Measurement and recognition of leases as a lessee
At the lease commencement date, the Group recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet. The right-of-use asset is measured at cost, which is made up of the initial measurement of the lease liability, any initial direct costs incurred by the Group, an estimate of any costs to dismantle and remove the asset at the end of the lease, and any lease payments made in advance of the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received).
The Group depreciates the right-of-use assets on a straight-line basis from the lease commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The Group also assesses the right-of-use asset for impairment when such indicators exist.
At the commencement date, the Group measures the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments unpaid at that date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease if that rate is readily available or the Group’s incremental borrowing rate.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability are made up of fixed payments (including in substance fixed), variable payments based on an index or rate, amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, and payments arising from options reasonably certain to be exercised.
F-38
Subsequent to initial measurement, the liability will be reduced for payments made and increased for interest. It is re-measured to reflect any reassessment or modification, or if there are changes on in-substance fixed payments.
When the lease liability is re-measured, the corresponding adjustment is reflected in the right-of-use asset, or profit and loss if the right-of-use asset is already reduced to zero.
The Group has elected to account for short-term leases and leases of low-value assets using the practical expedients. Instead of recognizing a right-of-use asset and lease liability, the payments in relation to these are recognized as an expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
j) Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Property, plant, and equipment are measured at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset and are depreciated from the date they are available for use. Depreciation is calculated to amortize the cost of items of fixed assets less their estimated residual values using the linear method based on the useful economic life of the items and is reviewed annually and adjusted prospectively if appropriate.
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Intangible assets, including software and other assets, are recognized if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or if they are capable of being separated or divided from the Group and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives and are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets.
Directly attributable expenditures related to internally generated intangible assets, mainly software systems, are capitalized from the date on which the entity is able to demonstrate, among others, its technical feasibility, intention to complete, ability to use and can demonstrate probable future economic benefits.
Expenditures for improvements in third-party real estate are amortized over the term of the property lease.
The useful life of fixed and intangible assets items are as follows:
| Furniture and other office equipment | ||
| Computer equipment | ||
| Software |
Intangible assets arising from business combinations have specific useful lives, determined during purchase price allocation procedures.
k) Goodwill
Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognized for any non-controlling interests and any previous interest held over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the fair value of the net assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate consideration transferred, the Company re-assesses whether it has correctly identified all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and reviews the procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognized at the acquisition date. If the reassessment still results in an excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, then the gain is recognized in profit or loss.
F-39
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if adverse circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. These indicators could include a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price, a decline in expected future cash flows, significant disposition activity, a significant adverse change in the economic or business environment, and the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group, among others.
l) Impairment of non-financial assets
At each reporting date, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances dictate, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with a defined useful life are assessed for indicators of impairment. If indications are present, these assets are subject to an impairment review.
The carrying values of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets should be written down by the amount of any impairment and the loss is recognized in the statement of profit or loss in the period in which it occurs. A previously recognized impairment loss relating to property, plant and equipment may be reversed in part or in full when a change in circumstances leads to a change in the estimates used to determine the property, plant, and equipment recoverable amount. The carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment will only be increased up to the amount that would have been had the original impairment not been recognized.
For the years ended on December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, no adjustment to the recoverable amount for non-financial assets was recorded on the financial statements.
m) Other assets
Other assets include the amount of assets not recorded in other items, including prepaid expenses and deferred expenses. Deferred expenses are mostly related to certain issuance costs incurred on the credit and debit card operations, as embossing and shipping costs, among others. Card issuance costs are amortized over the card's expected life, adjusted for any cancellations.
n) Deposits
Corresponds to:
| a) | amounts deposited by customers mainly in: |
| (i) | “NuConta”, the prepaid account. Nu is required to invest the amounts received in government securities; and |
| (ii) | Bank Receipt of Deposits ("RDB") and Linked Bank Receipt of Deposits (“RDB-V”). The amounts deposited by customers in these modalities can be used as a financing source for the Group’s operation and may or may not be invested in government securities. |
| b) | time deposits; and |
| c) | other deposits. |
For those deposits, the interest expense is recognized using the effective interest rate method.
o) Payables to credit card network
Payables to credit card network correspond to financial liabilities recognized at amortized cost to be paid through clearing houses to the credit card brand Mastercard and to other clearing houses that are also part of the credit card network.
F-40
p) Borrowings and financing
Correspond to borrowings obtained with third parties that are initially recognized at cost and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate.
q) Deferred income
Primarily comprises revenues related to the Rewards which is initially apportioned, from the interchange and reward fees charged to customers, in accordance with the relative stand-alone selling prices of the performance obligation assumed. The revenues apportioned are recorded as deferred income until it is recorded in the income statement when the performance obligation is satisfied. Deferred income also contains amounts related to the rewards fees which are paid annually by customers until they are earned by the Company and are included on the Rewards revenue apportion calculation.
The Group evaluates the deferred income amount and the assumptions based on developments in redemption patterns, changes to the terms and conditions of the rewards program and other factors.
r) Provisions and contingent assets and liabilities
Provisions are accounted to cover present obligations at the reporting date arising from past events which could give rise to a loss for the Group, which is considered probable to occur and certain as to its nature but uncertain as to its amount and/or timing.
Contingent liabilities are possible obligations that arise from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events not wholly within the control of the Group. Contingent liabilities also include possible obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries for which it is not probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle them and, therefore, the Group does not recognize a liability. Instead, the Group disclose in the financial statements the contingent liability, unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.
Contingent assets are possible assets that arise from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events not wholly within the control of the Group. Contingent assets are not recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position or in the consolidated statement of profit or loss, but rather are disclosed in the notes, provided that it is probable that these assets will give rise to an increase in resources embodying economic benefits.
These consolidated financial statements include all the material provisions with respect to which it is considered that it is probable to occur and to be settled. Provisions are quantified on the basis of the best information available on the consequences of the event giving rise to them and are reviewed and adjusted at each reporting period and are fully or partially reversed when such obligations cease to exist or are reduced.
s) Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain court and administrative proceedings arising from the ordinary course of their operations. Those proceedings are classified according to their likelihood of loss as:
| ● | Probable: liabilities are recognized on the consolidated statements of financial position as “provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings”; |
| ● | Possible: disclosed in the financial statements, but for which no provision is recognized; and |
F-41
| ● | Remote: require neither provision nor disclosure on the financial statements. |
The amount of court escrow deposits is adjusted in accordance with current legislation.
t) Other liabilities
Other liabilities include the balances of any other liabilities not included in other categories.
Share premium is the difference between the fair value of the consideration receivable for the issue of shares and the nominal value of the shares. The share premium account can only be used for limited purposes.
The Group maintains a long-term incentive plan, structured through grants of stock options (“SOPs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and awards linked to market conditions ("Awards"). The objective is to provide to the Group's employees the opportunity to become shareholders of the Company, creating greater alignment of the interests of key employees with those of shareholders and allowing the Group to attract and retain key employees. These share-based payments are classified as equity-settled share-based payment transactions.
Share-based payments expenses are recorded based on the fair value at the grant date. Following the IPO, the fair value is determined based on the publicly traded price, and before that date, it was estimated using different valuation models. Significant judgment is required when determining the inputs into the fair value model. The fair values of SOPs, RSUs and Awards granted are recognized as an expense over the period in which they vest for SOP and RSUs or expected to vest for Awards. The vesting requirements are basically related to the passage of time for SOPs and RSUs and market conditions and passage of time for Awards. The Group recognizes the expenses considering the individual vesting tranches of the SOPs and RSUs.
The Group revises its estimate of the number of SOPs and RSUs that will vest based on the historical experience at each reporting period. The Group recognizes the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the statement of profit or loss and the accumulated loss reserve in equity. The Awards' expected vesting period is not subsequently revised, and the expenses are recorded irrespective of whether that market condition is satisfied.
w) Short-term employee benefits
Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are incurred as an expense as the corresponding service is provided. The liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid for the short-term if there is a present legal or constructive obligation to pay and if the amount can be estimated reliably.
x) Income taxes, including deferred taxes
Income tax payable on profits, based on the applicable tax law in each jurisdiction, is recognized as an expense in the period in which profits arise. The tax expense represents the sum of the income tax currently payable and deferred income tax.
Nu Holdings is incorporated in the Cayman Islands which does not impose corporate income taxes or tax capital gains. In Brazil, the country in which the Group's most significant subsidiaries operate, income tax is comprised of IRPJ (income tax for companies) and CSLL (social contribution on profits), with rates as shown below.
F-42
| Tax | Rate (2021) | Rate (2020/2019) |
| Income tax - IRPJ | ||
| Social contribution - CSLL |
Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the statement of profit or loss because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Current tax liability for the current or prior period is measured at the amount expected to be paid to the tax authorities. The Group considers whether it is probable that a taxation authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment. If the Group considers probable that the taxation authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment, the Group determines the taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits or tax rates consistently with the tax treatment used or planned to be used in its income tax filings. When the Group concludes that it is not probable that the taxation authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment, the effect of uncertainty is reflected in determining the related taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits or tax rates using either of the following methods:
| ● | the most likely amount - the single most likely amount in a range of possible outcomes or |
| ● | the expected value - the sum of the probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible outcomes. |
Deferred income tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on income tax losses available to carry forward and on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. It is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all temporary taxable differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which the assets may be utilized as they reverse.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled, or the asset is realized based on rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the statement of profit or loss, except when it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
The Group reviews the carrying amount of deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date and reduces it to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax relating to fair value re-measurements of financial instruments accounted for at FVTOCI and cash flow hedging instruments is charged or credited directly to other comprehensive income and is subsequently recognized in the statement of profit or loss when the deferred fair value gain or loss is recognized in the statement of profit or loss.
Deferred and current tax assets and liabilities are only offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and where there is both the legal right and the intention to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
F-43
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year, excluding treasury shares.
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after-income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares, and the weighted average number of additional ordinary shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.
5. Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions
Use of estimates and judgments
The preparation of financial statements requires judgments, estimates, and assumptions from management that affect the application of accounting policies, and reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Actual results may diverge from these estimates; and estimates and assumptions are reviewed continuously. Revisions to the estimates are recognized prospectively.
a) Credit losses on financial instruments
The Group recognizes a loss allowance for expected credit losses on credit cards and loans receivables that represents management’s best estimate of allowance as of each reporting date.
Management performs an analysis of the credit card and loan amounts to determine if credit losses have occurred and to assess the adequacy of the allowance based on historical and current trends as well as other factors affecting credit losses.
Key areas of judgment
The critical judgments made by management in applying the expected credit losses allowance methodology are:
| a) | Definition of default; |
| b) | Forward-looking information used to the projection of macroeconomic scenarios; |
| c) | Probability weights of future scenarios; |
| d) | Definition of significant increase in credit risk and lifetime; and |
| e) | Look-back period, used for parameters estimation (probability of default - PD, exposure at default - EAD and loss given default - LGD). |
Sensitivity analysis
On December 31, 2021, the probability weighted
ECL allowance totaled US$
F-44
| Upside | Base case | Downside | ||||
| Credit card and lending ECL |
The table below discloses the forecast used in each scenario for the Brazilian ECL allowance:
| Upside | Base case | Downside | ||||
| 2021- Brazilian GDP growth | - |
Post-model adjustments
Throughout most of the 2020 and 2021 years, the Brazilian Government responses to COVID-19 pandemic, including the "Emergency Aid", changed the Group's portfolio behavior, reducing delinquency and improving other risk indicators. The Group's management believed this to be a temporary effect and concluded it was necessary to add a post-model adjustment on its ECL methodology.
The post-model adjustment continues to be applied, but at a lower level when compared with December 31, 2020.The COVID-19 impacts that motivated the post-model adjustment can be seen in detail in notes 13 (f) and 14 (f), which describes the pandemic impacts in both credit card and lending portfolios.
| Modeled ECL | Post-model Adjustments | Total ECL | |||
| Credit card | |||||
| Personal loan | |||||
| Total |
As of December 31, 2021, post-model adjustments amounted to US$10,972.
b) Share-based payments
The Group measures the costs of transactions with employees eligible to share-based remuneration based on the fair value of the ordinary share on the grant date. Following the IPO, the fair value is determined based on the publicly traded price. Prior to the IPO, estimating the fair value of share-based payment transactions required determining the most appropriate valuation model to the ordinary share, options and other awards issued linked to the ordinary shares, which depended on the terms and conditions of each grant. The valuation of the ordinary shares considered one or a combination of a discounted cash flow model ("CFM") and a reverse option pricing model ("OPM") and was based substantially on the previous preferred share price transactions. The estimate of the share-based payment cost also requires determining other significant inputs to the models to value the SOPs, RSUs and Awards, including the expected term, volatility and dividend yield for the Black-Scholes model applied to the SOPs, achievement of the market conditions to the Awards, and discount rates.
Key areas of judgment
Before the IPO date, the fair values of the SOPs, RSUs and Awards took into account, among other things, contract terms and observable market data, which included a number of factors and judgments from management, as disclosed in note 10. In exercising this judgment, a variety of tools were used including
F-45
proxy observable data, historical data, and extrapolation techniques. Extrapolation techniques consider behavioral characteristics of equity markets that had been observed over time, and for which there was a strong case to support an expectation of a continuing trend in the future. Estimates were calibrated to observable market prices when they become available.
The Group believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants. Nevertheless, the use of different valuation methods or assumptions, including imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs, to determine the fair value of the SOPs, RSUs and Awards could result in different estimates of fair value.
c) Goodwill impairment analysis
For the purposes of impairment testing, the investment activities were the cash-generating unit ("CGU") in which Easynvest’s goodwill was allocated. For the year ended on December 31, 2021, no adjustment to the recoverable amount for the goodwill was recorded on the financial statements because the recoverable amounts of this CGU were determined to be higher than its carrying amount.
The recoverable amounts for the CGU have been calculated based on their value in use, determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be generated from the continuing use of the CGUs’ assets and their ultimate disposal.
Key areas of judgment
The key assumptions used in the calculation of value in use were as follows. The values assigned to the key assumptions represent management’s assessment of future trends in the relevant sector and have been based on historical data from both external and internal sources.
| ● | Discount rate: |
| ● | Terminal value growth rate: |
| ● | Budgeted average growth rate for the next five year for undiscounted gross profit of |
The discount rate used was the cost of equity for business in Brazil as defined by management. Five years of cash flow projections were included in the discounted cash flow model. A long-term growth rate was used to extrapolate the cash flows beyond the five-year period. The growth rate into perpetuity has been determined as the currently expected long term inflation rate for Brazil.
Budgeted profit before taxes, depreciation and amortization was based on expectations of future outcomes considering past experience, adjusted for the anticipated revenue growth. Revenue growth was projected considering the average growth levels experienced over the past five years and the estimated growth for the next five years.
The key assumptions described above may change as economic and market conditions change. The Group estimates that reasonably possible changes in these assumptions would not cause the recoverable amount of the CGU to decline below the carrying amount.
d) Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings
The Group and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits and administrative proceedings. Provisions are recognized for all cases representing reasonably estimated probable losses. The assessment of the
F-46
likelihood of loss considers available evidence, the hierarchy of laws, former court decisions, and their legal significance, as well as the legal counsel’s opinion.
The provision mainly represents management’s best estimate of the Group’s future liability in respect of civil and labor complaints. Significant judgment by management is required in determining appropriate assumptions, which include the level of complaints expected to be received, of those, the number that will be upheld, and redressed (reflecting legal and regulatory responsibilities, including the determination of liability and the effect of the time bar). The complexity of such matters often requires the input of specialist professional advice in making assessments to produce estimates.
The amount that is recognized as a provision can also be susceptible to the assumptions made in calculating it. This gives rise to a broad range of potential outcomes that require judgment in determining an appropriate provision level. The Group believes its valuation methods of contingent liabilities are appropriate and consistent through the periods. Management believes that, due to the current quantity of claims and the total amount involved, if different assumptions were used no material impact on the provision would occur.
e) Fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of financial instruments, that can include derivatives that are not traded in active markets and convertible embedded derivatives, is calculated by the Group by using valuation techniques based on assumptions that consider market information and conditions.
The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value.
Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value. Management’s significant judgment may be required to determine whether certain financial instruments measured at fair value are classified as Level 2 or Level 3. For this determination, the Group considers all available information that market participants use to measure the fair value of the financial instrument, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness, and the understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used.
Based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each instrument or instrument category, judgments are made regarding the significance of the Level 3 inputs to the instruments’ fair value measurement in its entirety. If Level 3 inputs are considered significant, the instrument is classified as Level 3. The process for determining fair value using unobservable inputs is generally more subjective and involves a high degree of management judgment and assumptions.
More information about the significant unobservable inputs and other information are disclosed in note 25.
F-47
6. Income and related expenses
a) Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Interest income – credit card | ||||||
| Interest income - lending | ||||||
| Interest income – other assets at amortized cost | ||||||
| Interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments at fair value | ||||||
| Financial assets at fair value | ||||||
| Other | ( | |||||
| Total interest income and gains (losses) on financial instruments |
The interest income presented above from credit card, lending and other assets at amortized cost represents interest revenue calculated using the effective interest method. Financial assets at fair value comprises interest and the fair value changes on financial assets at fair value.
b) Fee and commission income
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Interchange fees | ||||||
| Recharge fees | ||||||
| Rewards revenue | ||||||
| Late fees | ||||||
| Other fee and commission income | ||||||
| Customer Program ("NuSócios") (note 1(a)) | ( |
|||||
| Total fee and commission income |
Fee and commission income are presented by fee types that reflect the nature of the services offered by the Group. Recharge fees comprises the selling price of telecom prepaid credits to customers, net of its acquisition costs.
c) Interest and other financial expenses
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Interest expense on deposits | ||||||
| Other interest and similar expenses | ||||||
| Interest and other financial expenses |
F-48
d) Transactional expenses
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Bank slip costs | ||||||
| Rewards expenses | ||||||
| Credit and debit card network costs | ||||||
| Other transactional expenses | ||||||
| Total transactional expenses |
Transactional expenses comprise all the costs that are directly attributable to the payment network cycle. Payment network cycle costs include amounts related to data processing, payment scheme license fees, losses from chargeback relating to the credit and debit card transactions, costs relating to rewards program to fulfill the use of the points by customers, and other costs related to the connection to the payment.
Credit and debit card network costs are related to the payment programs license, which is a variable fee paid to Mastercard and other card programs to enable communications between network participants, access to specific reports, expenses related to projects involving the development of new functions, operational fixed fees, fees related to chargeback restatements and royalties.
7. Credit loss allowance expenses
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Additions | ||||||
| Reversals | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Net increase of loss allowance (note 13) | ||||||
| Recovery | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Credit card receivables | ||||||
| Additions | ||||||
| Reversals | ( |
( |
||||
| Net increase of loss allowance (note 14) | ||||||
| Recovery | ( |
( |
||||
| Loans to customers | ||||||
| Total |
F-49
8. Operating expenses
| 2021 | ||||||||||
| Customer support and operations | General and administrative expenses | Marketing expenses | Other income (expenses) | Total | ||||||
| Infrastructure and data processing costs | ||||||||||
| Credit analysis and collection costs | ||||||||||
| Customer services | ||||||||||
| Salaries and associated benefits | ||||||||||
| Credit and debit card issuance costs | ||||||||||
| Share-based compensation (note 10) | ||||||||||
| Specialized services expenses | ||||||||||
| Other personnel costs | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||
| Marketing expenses | ||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||
| Customer support and operations | General and administrative expenses | Marketing expenses | Other income (expenses) | Total | ||||||
| Infrastructure and data processing costs | ||||||||||
| Credit analysis and collection costs | ||||||||||
| Customer services | ||||||||||
| Salaries and associated benefits | ||||||||||
| Credit and debit card issuance costs | ||||||||||
| Share-based compensation (note 10) | ||||||||||
| Specialized services expenses | ||||||||||
| Other personnel costs | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||
| Marketing expenses | ||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
F-50
| 2019 | ||||||||||
| Customer support and operations | General and administrative expenses | Marketing expenses | Other income (expenses) | Total | ||||||
| Infrastructure and data processing costs | ||||||||||
| Credit analysis and collection costs | ||||||||||
| Customer services | ||||||||||
| Salaries and associated benefits | ||||||||||
| Credit and debit card issuance costs | ||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | ||||||||||
| Specialized services expenses | ||||||||||
| Other personnel costs | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||
| Marketing expenses | ||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
Infrastructure and data processing costs include technology, non-capitalized software costs, and other related costs, primarily related to the cloud infrastructure used by the Group and other software used in the service of the customers. These costs associated exclusively with customer’s transactions are presented as “Customer support and operations” and the remaining costs as “General and Administrative expenses”. The software costs related to developing new modules are recognized as intangible assets.
Credit analysis and collection costs include fees paid to the credit bureaus and costs related to collection agencies. The credit analysis costs associated with the initial credit analysis of an applicant is presented as “General and administrative expenses” and the remaining is presented as “Customer support and operations".
Customer services primarily include costs with customer services provided by service providers. These costs exclusively related to acquisition of new clients are presented as “General and administrative expenses” and all others are presented as “Customer support and operations”.
Salaries and associated benefit expenses for customer services employees not associated with the acquisition of new clients is presented as “Customer support and operations” and salaries and associated benefit expenses for marketing employees is presented as “Marketing expenses”. All activities from other employees and the activities related to acquisition of new clients performed by customer service employees is presented as “General and administrative expenses”.
Credit and debit card issuance costs include printing, packing, shipping costs and other costs. Costs related to the first issued card to a customer are initially recorded as a “Deferred expenses” asset included in “Other assets” and then amortized. The amortization related to the first card of the customer is presented as “General and administrative expenses” and the remaining costs, including the ones related to subsequent cards, are presented as “Customer support and operations”.
F-51
9. Earnings (loss) per share
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Total weighted average of ordinary outstanding shares – basic and diluted (in thousands of shares) | ||||||
| Loss per share – basic and diluted (US$) | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Antidilutive instruments not considered in the weighted number of shares (in thousands of shares) |
The Company has instruments that will become ordinary shares upon the exercise, vesting, conversion, or upon the satisfaction of specific conditions related to business combinations. These instruments were considered antidilutive because they would decrease the loss per share. These antidilutive instruments were not included in the weighted number of shares for the diluted earnings per share and they comprise SOPs, RSUs, and Awards described in note 10, preferred and contingent shares described in note 27 and the senior preferred shares described in note 23. The number of shares for all periods presented were adjusted to reflect the 6-for-1 forward share split approved on August 30, 2021 (note 27).
The Group’s employee incentives include share settled awards in the form of stock, offering employees the opportunity to purchase ordinary shares by exercising options (Stock Options – “SOPs”), receiving ordinary shares (Restricted Stock Units – “RSUs”) upon vesting, and receiving shares upon the achievement of market conditions and passage of time ("Awards").
The cost of the employee services received in respect of the SOPs and RSUs granted is recognized in the statement of profit or loss over the period that employee provides services and according to the vesting conditions. The Group has also issued Awards in 2020 and 2021 that grant shares upon the achievement of market conditions related to the valuation of the Company, and the passage of time for the Awards issued in 2021. RSUs incentive was implemented in 2020 and is expected to be the main incentive going forward.
At the end of 2016, the subsidiary Nu Pagamentos transferred its SOP plan to its indirect parent company, Nu Holdings, which became the issuer of the SOPs to all its subsidiaries under the program. The strike price of the options was determined in R$ until the transfer of the plan to Nu Holdings and thereafter in US$, accompanying the functional currency of the issuer. The plan was initially approved by the Board of Directors of Nu Pagamentos in July 2013. On January 30, 2020, Nu Holdings approved its Omnibus Incentive Plan which included the issuance of RSUs.
SOPs and RSUs are issued as part of the performance cycle and as a signing bonus. Over time, SOPs and RSUs have been issued with different vesting periods. Once vested, the options can be exercised up to 10 years after the grant date.
The overall cost of the grants is calculated using the number of SOPs and RSUs expected to vest and their fair values at the date of the grant. The number of SOPs and RSUs expected to vest considers the likelihood that service conditions included in the terms of the awards will be met and it is based on historical forfeiture. Failure to meet the vesting condition is treated as a forfeiture, resulting in ceasing the recognition of the expense.
F-52
The fair value of SOPs granted is determined based on a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model considers the exercise price of the option, the share price at the grant date, the expected term, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of the share, and other relevant factors. The expected term of the SOPs is calculated based on the mid-point between the weighted-average time to vesting and the contractual maturity because the Group does not have significant historical post-vesting activity. The expected terms for SOPs with vesting periods of 4 and 5 years are 6.25 and 6.50 years, respectively.
The terms and conditions of the RSUs plans require the Group to withhold shares from the settlement to its employees to settle the employee’s tax obligation. Accordingly, the Group settles the transaction on a net basis by withholding the number of shares with a fair value equal to the monetary value of the employee’s tax obligation and issues the remaining shares to the employee on the vesting date. The employee’s tax obligation associated with the RSUs is calculated substantially based on the expected employee's personal tax rate and the fair value of the shares on the vesting date. In addition, for the countries where the Group is required to pay taxes and social wages charges, the Group recognizes expenses related to corporate taxes and social wages on the applicable awards, calculated mainly by applying the taxes rates to the fair value of the ordinary shares at the reporting dates, and presents them as "Share-based compensation" within "General and administrative expenses" in the consolidated statements of profit or loss.
On July 5, 2021, the Company issued class A ordinary shares pursuant to the achievement of market conditions determined on the Awards granted in 2020. The Awards granted on November 22, 2021, still outstanding, require certain service conditions from the Group's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and determine that after 5 years following their grant, a number of class A ordinary shares equivalent to 1% of the total number of shares (on an as-converted, fully diluted basis and calculated immediately after the occurrence of the market conditions described herein) will be issued if the volume-weighted average price per class A ordinary share for a period of 60 consecutive trading days is (a) equal to or greater than US$18.69, and (b) is equal or greater than US$35.30 per share. As a result, the Company may issue up to 2% of the number of shares on a fully diluted basis; and the price per share will be adjusted in the event of any share splits, share dividends, combinations, subdivisions, recapitalizations, or others.
The fair value of the Awards was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Monte Carlo model considers the expected time until the market condition is satisfied, the share price at the grant date, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of the share, and other relevant factors. The vesting period reflects the estimate of the length to when the Company reaches the valuation determined by the market condition and will not be subsequently revised. The expenses will be recorded during the vesting period irrespective of whether that market condition is satisfied.
The expected life of the SOPs was calculated as described above and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility was calculated, up to 2018, based on a hypothetical peer-leveraged volatility based on available data reflecting small-cap Brazilian companies through the Ishares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF ("EWZS”) due to available peers having short trading histories, and after 2019, on a leverage-adjusted peer-based volatility. The volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the life of the stock options or to the Award over the expected time until the market condition is satisfied is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome.
Before the IPO date, the share price used as an input to the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo models and for the RSUs was calculated using one or a combination of a discounted cash flow model ("CFM") and an option pricing model ("OPM") based substantially on the previous preferred share price transactions. The dividend was determined to be zero because the Company does not expect to pay it in the foreseeable future, and the holders of SOPs, RSUs and Awards do not have rights to dividends. The Company applied a discount for the
F-53
lack of marketability, calculated based on a Finnerty model, to the results of the models to reflect the lack of publicly or active market for selling the shares. After the IPO date, the fair value of RSUs granted is determined based on the publicly traded price.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries hedge the risks related to share-based payments derived from the increase in expenses due to the issuance of new grants or appreciation of the share value of the Company.
There were no changes to the terms and conditions of the SOPs, RSUs and Awards after the grant date.
The changes in the number of SOPs and RSUs are as follows. WAEP is the weighted average exercise price and WAGDFV is the weighted average fair value at the grant date.
| SOPs | 2021 | WAEP (US$) | 2020 | WAEP (US$) | 2019 | WAEP (US$) | |||||
| Outstanding on January 1 | |||||||||||
| Granted during the year | |||||||||||
| Exercised during the year | ( |
( |
( |
||||||||
| Forfeited during the year | ( |
( |
( |
||||||||
| Balances before 6-for-1 forward share split | |||||||||||
| Issuance due to 25-for-1 forward share split | 23 | ||||||||||
| Issuance of options due to 6-for-1 forward split (note 27) | |||||||||||
| Outstanding on December 31 | |||||||||||
| Exercisable on December 31 |
| RSUs | 2021 | WAGDFV (US$) | 2020 | WAGDFV (US$) | |||
| Outstanding on January 1 | |||||||
| Granted during the year | |||||||
| Vested during the year | ( |
( |
|||||
| Forfeited during the year | ( |
( |
|||||
| Balances before 6-for-1 forward share split | |||||||
| Issuance of RSUs due to 6-for-1 forward split (note 27) | |||||||
| Outstanding on December 31 |
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| US$ | US$ | US$ | |||
| Share-based payments granted, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | |||||
| Share-based compensation expenses | |||||
| Liability provision for taxes presented as salaries, allowances and social security contributions |
F-54
The following table presents additional information relating to the SOP characteristics and the valuation model:
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year (US$)* | |||||
| Weighted average share fair value of options granted during the year (US$)* | |||||
| Exercised price of options granted during the year (US$)* | to | to | |||
| Expected volatility of options issued during the year (%) | |||||
| Risk–free interest rate p.y. (%) | |||||
| Weighted average share price of options exercised during the year (US$)* | |||||
| Range of exercise prices remaining at year end (US$) | |||||
| Zero to US$ 3.0 | |||||
| US$ 3.1 to US$ 6.0 | - | - | |||
| US$ 6.1 to US$ 10.0 | - | ||||
| US$ 10.1 to US$ 50.0 | - | ||||
| US$ 50.1 to US$ 100.0 | - | - | |||
| US$ 100.1 and above | - | - | |||
| Total cash to be received upon exercise of SOPs outstanding at year end | |||||
| Vested | |||||
| Unvested | |||||
| Weighted remaining contractual life (in years) |
(*) After the 6-for-1 forward share split.
The following table presents additional information relating to the RSUs and Awards characteristics and the valuation model:
| 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Most relevant vesting periods for the grants outstanding | |||
| 3 years | |||
| 5 years | |||
| Volatility (%) | |||
| Discount for the lack of marketability (%) | |||
| Risk free interest rate (%) | |||
| Awards vesting period |
11. Cash and cash equivalents
| 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Reverse repurchase agreement in foreign currency | |||
| Short-term investments | |||
| Bank balances | |||
| Other cash and cash equivalents | |||
| Total |
F-55
Cash and cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash needs and includes deposits with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three-months or less and with an immaterial risk of change in value.
The reverse repurchase agreements and short-term investments are mainly in Brazilian Reais, and its average rate of remuneration as of December 31, 2021, and 2020 is substantially 98.7% and 100% of the Brazilian CDI rate, respectively, which is set daily and represents the average rate at which Brazilian banks were willing to borrow/lend to each other for one day.
12. Securities
a) Financial instruments at FVTPL
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Breakdown by maturity | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial instruments at FVTPL | Yield | Maturity | Cost | Fair Value | No maturity | Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Fair Value | ||||||||
| Government bonds | ||||||||||||||||
| Brazil (i) | ~ |
- | ||||||||||||||
| Total government bonds | - | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||||||||||
| Bill of credit (LC) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| Certificate of bank deposits (CDB) |
4.6% - 13.0% p.a. IPCA+ 0.8% - 7.5% |
- | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate and agribusiness letter of credit (CRIs/CRAs) |
IPCA+ 4.6197% - 5.50% |
- | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds and debentures | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| Equity instrument (iii) | n/a | n/a | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| Investment funds (ii) | n/a | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Stocks issued by public-held company | n/a | n/a | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| Total corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||||||||||
| Total financial instruments at FVTPL | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Amounts in | Amounts in | |||||||
| Financial instruments at FVTPL | Original Currency | US$ | Original Currency | US$ | ||||
| Currency: | ||||||||
| Brazilian reais | ||||||||
| American dollars | - | - | ||||||
| Indian rupee | - | - | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||
| i) | Includes US$17,296 (US$1,534,858 on 12/31/2020) held by the subsidiaries for regulatory purposes, as required by the Brazilian Central Bank. It also includes Brazilian government securities margins pledged by the Group for transactions on the Brazilian stock exchange in the amount of US$116,254 (US$112,412 on 12/31/2020). Government bonds are mainly composed of Financial Treasury Bills ("LFTs"), National Treasury Bills ("LTNs") and National Treasury Notes ("NTNs"), classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy, as described in note 25.
As described in note 4, the Group began holding financial assets in a held-to-collect -and -sell business model during 2021; therefore, part of Brazilian government bonds is classified as FVTOCI and are shown in the tables below. |
F-56
| (ii) |
| (iii) |
b) Financial instruments at FVTOCI
| 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Maturities | ||||||||||||||
| Financial instruments at FVTOCI | Yield | Maturity | Cost | Fair Value | No maturity | Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months | |||||||
| Government bonds | ||||||||||||||
| Brazil (i) | ~ |
- | ||||||||||||
| United States | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Colombia | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Total government bonds | - | |||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||||||||
| Debentures | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Investment funds | n/a | - | - | |||||||||||
| Time deposit | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Total corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||||||||
| Total financial instruments at FVTOCI | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||
| Amounts in | ||||
| Financial instruments at FVTOCI | Original Currency | US$ | ||
| Currency: | ||||
| Brazilian reais | ||||
| American dollars | ||||
| Total | ||||
F-57
| (i) |
13. Credit card receivables
a) Composition of receivables
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Receivables - current (i) | ||||
| Receivables - installments (i) | ||||
| Receivables - revolving (ii) | ||||
| Total receivables | ||||
| Credit card ECL allowance | ||||
| Presented as deduction of receivables | ( |
( | ||
| Presented as "Other liabilities" | ( |
( | ||
| Total credit card ECL allowance | ( |
( | ||
| Receivables, net | ||||
| Total receivables presented as assets |
| (i) |
| (ii) |
F-58
b) Breakdown by maturity
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||
| Installments overdue by: | ||||||||
| <= 30 days | ||||||||
| 30 < 60 days | ||||||||
| 60 < 90 days | ||||||||
| > 90 days | ||||||||
| Total overdue installments | ||||||||
| Installments not overdue due in: | ||||||||
| <= 30 days | ||||||||
| 30 < 60 days | ||||||||
| > 60 days | ||||||||
| Total not overdue installments | ||||||||
| Total | ||||||||
Overdue installments consist mainly of revolving balances, and not overdue installments consist mainly of future bill installments ("parcelado").
c) Credit loss allowance - by stages and stage 2 triggers
As of December 31, 2021, the credit card ECL allowance totaled US$390,679 (US$217,542 on December 31, 2020). The provision is provided by a model estimation, consistently applied, which is sensitive to the methods, assumptions, and risk parameters underlying its calculation.
The amount that the credit loss allowance represents in comparison to the Group’s gross receivables coverage ratio is also monitored, to anticipate trends that could indicate credit risk increases. This metric is considered a key risk indicator. It is monitored across multiple committees, supporting the decision-making process and is discussed in the primary credit forums along with the Group.
All receivables are classified through stages, as described in note 4(a).
Distribution within the stages as of December 31, 2021, showed a lower concentration in stage 1 portfolio, increasing the concentration in the riskier stages when compared to December 31, 2020, indicating the portfolio risk is returning to pre-COVID-19 levels (see item (f) about COVID-19 impacts) with the majority of the Group's credit card portfolio being classified as stage 1, followed by stages 2 and 3, respectively.
| 2021 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio (%) | ||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Absolute Trigger (Days Late) | ||||||||||
| Relative Trigger (PD deterioration) | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
F-59
| 2020 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio (%) | ||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Absolute Trigger (Days Late) | ||||||||||
| Relative Trigger (PD deterioration) | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, most of the stage 2 exposure arose from contracts that had a significant increase in their probabilities of default (PDs). Stage 2 exposure concentration is higher on December 31, 2021, compared with December 31, 2020, following the movements of risk observed in the portfolio as described in item (f) Credit loss allowance - COVID-19 impacts.
d) Credit loss allowance - by credit quality vs. stages
| 2021 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio (%) | ||||||
| Strong (PD < 5%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Satisfactory (5% <= PD <= 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Higher Risk (PD > 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
F-60
| 2020 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio (%) | ||||||
| Strong (PD < 5%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Satisfactory (5% <= PD <= 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Higher Risk (PD > 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
The credit quality classification is grouped in three categories based on its probability of default (PD) at the reporting date, as shown in the table below:
| Stage 1 and 2 | Stage3 | ||||
| Default grade | Probability of default | Credit quality description | Probability of default | Credit quality description | |
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
Although a deterioration can be observed in the credit quality distribution, explained mainly by aforementioned risk normalization following the initial impacts of COVID-19, there is still a significant concentration of receivables at stage 1 based on credit quality. Receivables with satisfactory risk are distributed between stages 1 and 2, mostly at stage 1.
Defaulted assets (stage 3) are classified as higher risk, which also accounts for a large proportion of stage 2 exposure. Stage 1 receivables classified as higher risk are those customers with low credit risk scores.
e) Credit loss allowance - changes
The following tables show the reconciliations from the opening to the closing balance of the credit loss allowance by stages of the financial instruments.
F-61
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Net drawdowns, repayments, net remeasurement and movements due to exposure and risk changes | ( |
|||||||
| Changes to models used in calculation (b) | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Net drawdowns, repayments, net remeasurement and movements due to exposure and risk changes | ( |
|||||||
| Changes to models used in calculation (b) | ( |
|||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
F-62
| 2019 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Net drawdowns, repayments, net remeasurement and movements due to exposure and risk changes | ( |
|||||||
| Changes to models used in calculation (b) | ( |
( |
( | |||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
| (a) |
| (b) |
The following tables present changes in the gross carrying amount of the credit card portfolio to help explain their effects to the changes in the loss allowance for the same portfolio as discussed above. “Net change of gross carrying amount” includes acquisitions, payments, and interest accruals.
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net change of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
F-63
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net change of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net change of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
f) Credit loss allowance - COVID-19 impacts
Throughout the 2020 and 2021 years, Brazilian government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the "Emergency Aid", changed the portfolio credit behavior, reducing delinquency and improving other risk indicators at year end.
In 2021, the effects of the pandemic in Brazil improved as more segments of the population had access to the vaccine in turn, allowing some level of normalization of the economic activity, especially in the second half of the year. In parallel, the Brazilian Government ended the "Emergency Aid" program in December 2021, which had been paid since April 2021 at lower levels in comparison with 2020.
As a consequence of the improving economic activity and lower government stimulus, the portfolio had started to show some signs of risk increasing, reverting to pre-COVID-19 levels, leading to a concentration of 72.8% of the portfolio classified as strong (PD < 5%) segment as of December 31, 2021, compared with 81.0% on December 31, 2020.
Although the “Emergency Aid” ended, the Government strengthened the pre-pandemic existing welfare programs, enlarging not only the number of families assisted, but also ensuring higher values guaranteed to be paid, at least, until the end of 2022.
The Group expects that a more positive scenario arises both from the improvement in the health crisis and new government welfare programs, but there is still uncertainty about the Group’s risk indicator trends, due to new COVID-19 variants and subsequent changes in the welfare and "Emergency Aid" programs post 2022
F-64
elections. Given this scenario, the post-model adjustment continues to be applied, but at a lower level when compared with December 31, 2020. The total amount of the post-model adjustment for December 31, 2021, was US$9,043 (US$48,809 as of December 31, 2020), as shown in note 5(a).
The Group continues to monitor the macro economic trends and the government responses to it and its effects on Nu’s customer behavior.
14. Loans to customers
a) Breakdown of receivables
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Lending to individuals | ||||
| Loan ECL allowance | ( |
( | ||
| Total |
b) Breakdown by maturity
The following table shows loans to customers by maturity on December 31, 2021, and 2020, considering each installment individually.
| 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Installments overdue | Installments not overdue | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| <60 days | >60 days | Total | % |
Due in less than 1 year |
% |
Due between 1 and 5 years |
% | Total | |||||||||||||
| Installment loans to individuals | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1,155,760 | 84% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Of which: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed interest rate | 1,155,760 | 84% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Installments overdue | Installments not overdue |
% | |||||||||||||||||||
| <60 days | >60 days | Total | % |
Due in less than 1 year |
% |
Due between 1 and 5 years |
% | Total | |||||||||||||
| Installment loans to individuals | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 170,077 | 85% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Of which: | 3% | 170,077 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed interest rate | 170,077 | 85% | |||||||||||||||||||
F-65
c) Credit loss allowance - by stages and stage 2 triggers
The tables below show the credit loss allowance by stages as of December 31, 2021, and 2020.
| 2021 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio | ||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Absolute Trigger (Days Late) | ||||||||||
| Relative Trigger (PD deterioration) | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio | ||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Absolute Trigger (Days Late) | ||||||||||
| Relative Trigger (PD deterioration) | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
The lending product experienced significant growth throughout 2021. In addition, as the loan portfolio matures, the distribution in the riskier stages increases.
d) Credit loss allowance - by credit quality vs stages
| 2021 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio | ||||||
| Strong (PD < 5%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Satisfactory (5% <= PD <= 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Higher Risk (PD > 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
F-66
| 2020 | ||||||||||
| Gross Exposures | % | Loss Allowance | % | Coverage Ratio | ||||||
| Strong (PD < 5%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Satisfactory (5% <= PD <= 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Higher Risk (PD > 20%) | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | ||||||||||
| Stage 2 | ||||||||||
| Stage 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
Most of the credit quality of this portfolio is classified as satisfactory, followed by strong and higher risk loans. Receivables with satisfactory and strong risk have a high distribution of stage 1.
Origination continues to grow with the gross carrying amount increasing by 593% in comparison to December 31, 2020.
Credit quality classification is grouped in three categories based on the probability of default (PD) at the reporting date, as shown in the table below:
| Stage 1 and 2 | Stage3 | ||||
| Default grade | Probability of default | Credit quality description | Probability of default | Credit quality description | |
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
e) Credit loss allowance - changes
The following tables show reconciliations from the opening to the closing balance of the provision for credit losses by the stages of the financial instruments.
F-67
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Net drawdowns, repayments, net remeasurement and movements due to exposure and risk changes | ( |
( | ||||||
| Changes to models used in calculation (b) | ( |
|||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Net drawdowns, repayments, net remeasurement and movements due to exposure and risk changes | ( |
|||||||
| Changes to models used in calculation (b) | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Loss allowance at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Net increase of loss allowance | ||||||||
| New originations (a) | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ||||||||
| Loss allowance at end of the year | ||||||||
| (a) |
F-68
| (b) |
The following tables further explains changes in the gross carrying amount of the loan portfolio to help explain the changes in the loss allowance for the same portfolio as discussed above. “Net increase of gross carrying amount” includes the principal issuances net of payments or interest recognized net of payment.
Schedule of Net increase of gross carrying amount includes the principal issuances net of payments or interest recognized net of payment
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1 | ( |
|||||||
| Transfers to Stage 3 | ( |
( |
||||||
| Transfers from Stage 3 | ( |
|||||||
| Write-offs | ( |
( | ||||||
| Net increase of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||
| Gross carrying amount at beginning of year | ||||||||
| Net increase of gross carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Gross carrying amount at end of the year | ||||||||
f) Credit loss allowance - COVID-19 impacts
Similar to the credit card portfolio (note 13(f)), the Group expects that a more positive scenario arises both from the improvement in the health crisis and new Government welfare programs, but there is still uncertainty about the Group’s risk indicator trends, due to new COVID-19 variants and subsequent changes in the welfare and "Emergency Aid" programs post 2022 elections. Given this scenario, the post-model adjustment continues to be applied, but at a lower level when compared with December 31, 2020. The total amount of
F-69
the post-model adjustment for December
31, 2021, was US$
The Group continues to monitor the macro economic environment and its effects on changes in Nu’s personal loan customer behavior.
15. Other assets
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Deferred expenses (i) | ||||
| Taxes recoverable | ||||
| Advances to suppliers and employees | ||||
| Prepaid expenses | ||||
| Judicial deposits (note 21) | ||||
| Other assets | ||||
| Total |
| (i) |
16. Derivative financial instruments
The Group executes transactions with derivative financial instruments, which are intended to meet its own needs to reduce its exposure to market, currency and interest-rate risks. The derivatives are classified as at fair value through profit or loss, except those in cash flow hedge accounting strategies, for which the effective portion of gains or losses on derivatives is recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss). The management of these risks is conducted through determining limits, and the establishment of operating strategies. The derivative contracts are considered level 1, 2 or 3 in the fair value hierarchy and are used to hedge exposures, but hedge accounting is adopted only for forecast transactions related to the cloud infrastructure and certain software licenses used by Nu.
| 2021 | ||||||
| Fair values | ||||||
| Notional amount | Assets | Liabilities | ||||
| Derivatives classified as fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ( | |||||
| Currency exchange rate contracts - Future | ( | |||||
| Forward contracts | ( | |||||
| Warrants (i) | ||||||
| Derivatives held for hedging | ||||||
| Designated as cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ( | |||||
| Interest rate contracts - Swap | ( | |||||
| Total | ( | |||||
F-70
| 2020 | ||||||
| Fair values | ||||||
| Notional amount | Assets | Liabilities | ||||
| Derivatives classified as fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ( | |||||
| Currency exchange rate contracts - Future | ( | |||||
| Interest rate contracts - Swap | - | |||||
| Derivatives held for hedging | ||||||
| Designated as cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | - | ( | ||||
| Embedded derivatives in convertible instruments | - | - | ( | |||
| Total | ( | |||||
Futures contracts are traded on the B3, having B3 as the counterparty.
Swap contracts are settled on a daily basis and are traded over the counter with financial institutions as counterparties. The total value of margins pledged by the Group in transactions on the stock exchange was exhibited in note 12.
Nu Servicios entered into deliverable forward contracts to hedge intercompany loans with Nu MX in US dollars.
(i) Warrants
In September 2021, Nu entered into an agreement with Creditas Financial Solutions Ltd. (and/or its affiliates in Latin America, or together, “Creditas”) through which Nu will distribute certain financial products offered by Creditas to its customers in Latin America. These include affordable retail collateralized loans, such as home and auto equity loans, auto financing, motorcycle financing and payroll loans.
The agreement also provides that Nu will
invest up to US$200,000 in Creditas’ securitization vehicles, becoming the holder of the senior quotas of the fund. Nu was granted
warrants that provide the right to acquire an equity interest equivalent to up to
As of December 31, 2021, the warrants fair
value amounts to US$
Breakdown by maturity
The table below shows the breakdown by maturity of the notional amounts:
F-71
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Up to 3 months | 3 to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | |||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Forward contracts | ||||||||
| Warrants | ||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Swap | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Total | ||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Up to 3 months | 3 to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | |||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Total | ||||||||
The table below shows the breakdown by maturity of the fair value amounts:
F-72
| 2021 | ||||||
| Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | ||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||
| Forward contracts | ||||||
| Warrants | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ( |
( | ||||
| Interest rate contracts - Swap | ( |
( | ||||
| Forward contracts | ( |
( | ||||
| Total | ( |
|||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | ||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ||||||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Swap | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Interest rate contracts - Future | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Exchange rate contracts - Future | ( |
( | ||||
| Total | ( |
( |
( | |||
Analysis of derivatives designated as hedges
Hedges of foreign currency risk
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on forecast transaction expenses, primarily related to the cloud infrastructure and certain software licenses used by Nu. The Group managed its exposures to the variability in cash flows of foreign currency forecast transactions to movements in foreign exchange rates by entering foreign exchange contracts (exchange futures). These instruments are entered into to match the cash flow profile of the estimated forecast transaction. They are exchange traded and settled on a daily basis.
The Group applies hedge accounting to the forecast transactions related to its main cloud infrastructure contract. The effectiveness is assessed monthly by analyzing the critical terms. The critical terms of the hedging instrument and the amount of the forecasted hedged transactions are significantly the same. Derivatives are generally rolled over monthly. They are expected to occur in the same fiscal month as the maturity date of the hedging instrument. Therefore, the hedge is expected to be effective. Subsequent assessments of effectiveness are performed by verifying and documenting whether the critical terms of the hedging instrument and forecasted hedged transaction have changed during the year in review and whether it remains probable. If there are no such changes in critical terms, the Group will continue to conclude that the hedging relationship is effective.
F-73
Sources of ineffectiveness are differences in the amount and timing of forecast and actual payment of expenses.
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||
| Fair value change recognized in OCI during the year | ||||||
| Total amount reclassified from cash flow hedge reserve to income statement during the year | ( |
( |
( | |||
| to "Customer support and operation" | ( |
( |
( | |||
| to "General and administrative expenses" | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
|||||
| Deferred income taxes | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Balance at end of the year |
The material future transactions that are the object of the hedge are:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Up to 3 months | 3 to 12 months | Total | Total | |||||
| Expected foreign currency transactions | ||||||||
| Total | ||||||||
17. Instruments eligible as capital
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | ||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | ||||
| Total |
In June 2019, the subsidiary Nu Financeira
issued a subordinated financial note in the amount equivalent to US$
The Group designated the instruments eligible
as capital at fair value through profit or loss at its initial recognition. The losses of fair value changes arising from its own credit
risk in the amount of US$
F-74
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | - | |||||
| New issuances | - | - | ||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||
| Fair value changes | ( |
( |
||||
| Own credit transferred to OCI | ||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Balance at end of the year |
18. Financial liabilities at amortized cost – deposits
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Deposits by customers (i) | ||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB) | ||||
| Deposits in electronic money | ||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB-V) | ||||
| Time deposit (ii) | ||||
| Other deposits | - | |||
| Total |
| (i) |
In September 2020, Nu Financeira launched
a new investment option – a RDB with scheduled redemption. Such modality differs from the common RDB, as it has redemption terms
from to months and remuneration between
Deposits in electronic money include "NuConta" deposits as well as “Conta NuInvest" amounts, the latter corresponding to on-demand deposits of the Groups’ investment brokerage clients. Those deposits are required by BACEN to be invested in Brazilian government bonds.
| (ii) | In July 2020, the subsidiary Nu Financeira issued a time deposit instrument (“DPGE”),
also with a special guarantee from FGC, in the amount of R$ |
F-75
Breakdown by maturity
| 2021 | ||||||
| Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | ||||
| Deposits by customers | ||||||
| Deposits in electronic money | ||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB) | ||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB-V) | ||||||
| Time deposit | ||||||
| Other deposits | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | ||||
| Deposits by customers | ||||||
| Deposits in electronic money | - | |||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB) | ||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB-V) | - | |||||
| Time deposit | - | |||||
| Total | ||||||
19. Financial liabilities at amortized cost – payables to credit card network
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Payables to credit card network (i) | ||||
| Payables to clearing houses | ||||
| Total |
| (i) |
| Payables to credit card network | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Up to 30 days | ||||
| 30 to 90 days | ||||
| More than 90 days | ||||
| Total |
Collateral for credit card operations
As of December 31, 2021, the Group had US$
F-76
characteristics. The average remuneration
rate of those deposits was
20. Financial liabilities at amortized cost – borrowing, financing and securitized borrowings
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Borrowings sand financing | ||||
| Securitized borrowings | ||||
| Total |
a) Borrowings and financings
Borrowings and financings maturities are as follows:
| 2021 | ||||||||
| Up to 3 months | 3 to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | |||||
| Borrowings and financings | ||||||||
| Bills of exchange (ii) | - | |||||||
| Term loan credit facility (iii) | ||||||||
| Total borrowings and financings | ||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Up to 3 months | 3 to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | |||||
| Borrowings and financings | ||||||||
| Financial letter (i) | - | - | ||||||
| Bills of exchange (ii) | ||||||||
| Term loan credit facility (iii) | - | |||||||
| Total borrowings and financings | ||||||||
| (i) |
| (ii) |
| (iii) |
| a) |
| b) |
F-77
| c) |
Changes to borrowings and financings are as follows:
| 2021 | ||||||||
|
Financial letter |
Bills of exchange |
Term loan credit facility | Total | |||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||||
| New borrowings | - | - | ||||||
| Payments – principal | ( |
( |
- | ( | ||||
| Payments – interest | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Balance at end of the year | - | |||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||
|
Financial letter |
Bank credit bill |
Bills of exchange |
Term loan credit facility | Total | ||||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | - | |||||||||
| New borrowings | - | - | - | |||||||
| Payments – principal | ( |
( |
( |
- | ( | |||||
| Payments – interest | ( |
( |
( |
- | ( | |||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
(4,982) | ( | ||||||
| Balance at end of the year | - | |||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||
|
Financial letter |
Bank credit bill |
Bills of exchange |
Total | |||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | - | |||||||
| New borrowings | ||||||||
| Payments – principal | - | ( |
- | ( | ||||
| Payments – interest | - | ( |
- | ( | ||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||
| Balance at end of the year | ||||||||
Guarantees
The Company, together with its subsidiary Nu Pagamentos, are guarantors to the abovementioned loan agreements between Nu Servicios and BofA, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, as well as to the deliverable forward contracts described on note 16. The total amount of the guarantees is US$171,000 as of December 31, 2021.
F-78
b) Securitized borrowings
Securitized borrowings maturities are as follows:
| 2021 | ||||
|
Until 3 months |
Total | |||
| Securitized borrowings | ||||
| 3rd series | ||||
| Total securitized borrowings | ||||
| 2020 | ||||||||
|
Until 3 months |
3-12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | |||||
| Securitized borrowings | ||||||||
| 2nd series | - | |||||||
| 3rd series | ||||||||
| Total securitized borrowings | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2021, FIDC Nu had receivables
in the amount equivalent to US$
Changes to securitized borrowings are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||
| New borrowings | ||||||
| Interest accrued | ||||||
| Payments – principal | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Payments – interest | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Balance at end of the year |
21. Provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Tax risks | ||||
| Civil risks | ||||
| Labor risks | ||||
| Total |
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits and administrative proceedings arising from the ordinary course of operations, involving tax, civil and labor matters. Such matters are being discussed at the
F-79
administrative and judicial levels, which, when applicable, are supported by judicial deposits. The provisions for probable losses arising from these matters are estimated and periodically adjusted by management, supported by external legal advisors’ opinion. There is significant uncertainty relating to the timing of any cash outflow for civil and labor risk.
a) Provision
Regarding tax risks, a provision in the amount
of US$
Civil lawsuits are mainly related to credit
card operations. Based on management’s assessment and inputs from Nu’s external legal advisors, the Group has provisioned
US$
b) Changes
Changes to provision for lawsuits and administrative proceedings are as follows:
| 2021 | ||||||
| Tax | Civil | Labor | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||
| Additions | ||||||
| Payments / Reversals | ( |
|||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Balance at end of the year | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| Tax | Civil | Labor | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||
| Additions | ||||||
| Payments / Reversals | ( |
( | ||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Balance at end of the year | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| Tax | Civil | Labor | ||||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||||
| Additions | ||||||
| Payments / Reversals | ( |
|||||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates (OCI) | ( |
( |
||||
| Balance at end of the year | ||||||
F-80
c) Contingencies
The Group is a party to civil and labor lawsuits,
involving risks classified by management and the legal advisors as possible losses, totaling approximately US$
d) Judicial deposits
As of December 31, 2021, the total amount
of judicial deposits shown as “Other assets” (note 15) is US$
22. Deferred income
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Deferred revenue from points | ||||
| Deferred annual fee | ||||
| Other deferred income | ||||
| Total |
Deferred revenue from points and deferred annual fee are related to the Group’s reward program for its credit card customers, called "Rewards". The program consists of accumulating points according to the use of the credit card in the ratio of R$ (one Brazilian real, equivalent to US$ as of December 31, 2021) equal to 1 point. The number of points generated may be higher for transactions with some partner companies or for transactions that meet Nu pre-conditions. The points do not expire, and there is no limit on the number of Rewards an eligible card member can earn.
The redemption of the points occurs when the customers use them in various expense categories, such as air tickets, hotels, transportation services, and music.
Nu uses financial models to estimate the redemption rates of rewards earned to date by current card members, and, therefore, the estimated financial value of the points, based on historical redemption trends, current enrollee redemption behavior, among others. The estimated financial value is recorded in the income statement when the performance obligation is satisfied, which is when the reward points are redeemed.
Deferred annual fees comprises amounts related to the rewards fees which are paid annually by customers until they are earned.
On June 18, 2020, the Company concluded the issuance of senior preferred shares in the amount of US$. The senior preferred shares were considered a host financial instrument with convertible features that were considered embedded derivatives. The financial liability components were the contractual obligation to deliver cash and the convertible embedded derivative into a variable number of shares.
F-81
initial public offering or liquidation event into a fixed number of ordinary shares or variable number of shares due to down-round features.
Upon the exercise of the redeemable option in cash by the Company, the holders of the senior preferred shares could request the conversion of the senior preferred shares into a fixed or variable number of preferred shares prior to the redemption. On May 20, 2021, each senior preferred share was converted into 1 Series F-1 preferred share, with the total issuance of shares at the request of the holders. The conversion consisted of a reclassification of the amount recognized as a derivative and recognized as liability into share capital and share premium reserve in the total amount of US$.
The fair value of the convertible embedded derivative was measured using methodology consistent with the share price valuation described on share-based payments (note 10).
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Balance at beginning of the year | ||||
| New issuances | ||||
| Deferred expenses | ( | |||
| Interest accrued | ||||
| Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative conversion feature | ( |
|||
| Expenses with convertible instruments | ||||
| Conversion of senior preferred shares and embedded derivative into equity | ( |
|||
| Balance at end of the year | ||||
| Host debt instrument at amortized cost | ||||
| Embedded derivative at fair value |
24. Related parties
In the ordinary course of business, the Group may have issued credit cards or loans to Nu’s executive directors, board members, key employees and close family members. Those transactions, as well as the deposits, occur on similar terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions to unrelated persons and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability.
As described in note 3, "Basis of consolidation", all subsidiaries are consolidated in these financial statements. Therefore, related party balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from inter-company transactions, are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The exchange differences arising from intercompany loans between entities of the group with different functional currencies are shown as “Other income (expenses)” in the statement of profit or loss.
a) Transactions with other related parties
| 2021 | ||||
| Assets/ (Liabilities) | Revenues (expenses) | |||
| Others | ( | |||
On June 30, 2021, the Group entered into a service and naming rights agreement with Rodamoinho Produtora de Eventos Ltda., owned by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, on
F-82
January 27, 2021, the Group made payments for training and workshops provided by Reprograma, a philanthropic project managed by a family member of the Company’s controlling shareholder.
b) Management compensation
There are no post-employment benefits, such as pensions and other retirement benefits. The remuneration of the directors and other key management personnel of the Company is set out in aggregate below.
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Consolidated statements of income or loss | ||||||
| Fixed and variable compensation |
Management compensation includes the compensation of remunerated members of the Board of Directors, which increased from one person in 2020 and 2019 to seven in 2021, and of Executive Officers, which increased from one person in 2020 and 2019 to nine in 2021.
25. Fair value measurement
The main valuation techniques employed in internal models to measure the fair value of the financial instruments on December 31, 2021, and 2020 are set out below. The principal inputs into these models are derived from observable market data. The Group did not make any material changes to the valuation techniques and internal models it used in those periods.
a) Fair value of financial instruments carried at amortized cost
The following tables show the fair value of the financial instruments carried at amortized cost on December 31, 2021, and 2020.
| 2021 | ||||||
| Book value |
Fair value - Level 2 |
Fair value - Level 3 | ||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Compulsory deposits at central banks | ||||||
| Credit card receivables | ||||||
| Loans to customers | ||||||
| Other financial assets at amortized cost | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits in electronic money | ||||||
| RDB and RDB-V | ||||||
| Time deposit | ||||||
| Payables to credit card network | ||||||
| Borrowings and financing | ||||||
| Securitized borrowings | ||||||
| Total | ||||||
F-83
| 2020 | ||||||
| Book value |
Fair value - Level 2 |
Fair value - Level 3 | ||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Compulsory deposits at central banks | - | |||||
| Credit card receivables | - | |||||
| Loans to customers | - | |||||
| Interbank transactions | - | - | - | |||
| Other financial assets at amortized cost | - | |||||
| Total | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits in electronic money | - | |||||
| RDB and RDB-V | - | |||||
| Time deposit | - | |||||
| Payables to credit card network | - | |||||
| Borrowings and financing | - | |||||
| Securitized borrowings | - | |||||
| Total | - | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term deposits, bank balances and reverse repurchase agreements, among others. For cash and cash equivalents, interbank transactions, other financial assets at amortized cost, borrowings and financing and securitized borrowings, the carrying amount is deemed to be a reasonable approximation of the fair value.
The valuation approach to specific categories of financial instruments is described below.
i) Fair value models and inputs
Credit card: Credit card receivables and payables to credit card network’s fair values are calculated using the discounted cash flow method. Fair values are determined by discounting the contractual cash flows by the interest rate curve. For payables, cash flows are also discounted by the Group's own credit spread. For receivables, fair values exclude expected losses. The Group used the rate of recovery of late payments as an input that is not directly observable and was estimated using the Group's internal databases.
Loans to customers: Fair value is estimated based on groups of clients with similar risk profiles, using valuation models. The fair value of a loan is determined by discounting the contractual cash flows by the interest rate curve and net interest spread. The Group used the rate of recovery of late payments as an input that is not directly observable and was estimated using the Group's internal databases.
Deposits: Most deposit liabilities are payable on demand and therefore can be deemed short-term in nature with the fair value equal to the carrying value.
Equity instrument: For the fair value of the equity instrument, the Group used contractual conditions, as input that are not directly observable.
F-84
b) Fair value of financial instruments measured at fair value
The following table shows a summary of the fair values, as of December 31, 2021, and 2020, of the financial assets and liabilities indicated below, classified on the basis of the various measurement methods used by the Group to determine their fair value:
| 2021 | ||||||||
|
Published price quotations in active markets (Level 1) |
Internal Models (Level 2) |
Internal Models (Level 3) |
Total | |||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Government bonds | ||||||||
| Brazil | ||||||||
| United States | ||||||||
| Colombia | ||||||||
| Corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||
| Certificate of bank deposits (CDB) | ||||||||
| Investment funds | ||||||||
| Time deposit | ||||||||
| Bill of credit (LC) | ||||||||
| Real estate and agribusiness letter of credit (CRIs/CRAs) | ||||||||
| Debentures | ||||||||
| Stocks issued by public-held company | ||||||||
| Equity instrument | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Collateral for credit card operations | ||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | ||||||||
| Repurchase agreements | ||||||||
F-85
| 2020 | ||||||||
|
Published price quotations in active markets (Level 1) |
Internal Models (Level 2) |
Internal Models (Level 3) |
Total | |||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Government bonds | ||||||||
| Brazil | ||||||||
| Mexico | - | - | - | - | ||||
| Corporate bonds and other instruments | ||||||||
| Investment funds | - | - | ||||||
| Bill of credit (LC) | - | - | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | - | |||||||
| Collateral for credit card operations | - | - | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Embedded derivatives in convertible instruments and other derivatives | - | |||||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | - | - | ||||||
i) Fair value models and inputs
Securities: The securities with high liquidity and quoted prices in the active market are classified as level 1. As a result, all the Government Bonds are included in level 1 as they are traded in active markets. Fair values are the quoted prices on the secondary market, published by the Brazilian Association of Financial and Capital Market Entities (“Anbima”). Corporate bonds and investment fund quotas, whose valuation is based on observable data, such as interest rates and yield curves, supported by the market, are classified as level 2.
Derivatives: Derivatives traded on stock exchanges are classified in level 1 of the hierarchy. Derivatives traded on the Brazilian stock exchange are fair valued using B3 quotations. Interest rate OTC Swaps are valued by discounting future expected cash flows to present values using interest rate curves based on interest rate futures and are classified as level 2. The embedded derivative conversion feature from the senior preferred share, was calculated based on methodologies for the share price described in note 10. The options related to the warrant from Creditas Partnership are fair valued using a Black-Scholes model and are classified as level 3.
Instruments eligible as capital: If the instrument has an active market, prices quoted in this market are used. Otherwise, valuation techniques are used, such as discounted cash flows, where cash flows are discounted by a risk-free rate and a credit spread. Instruments eligible as capital were designated at fair value through profit or loss in the initial recognition (fair value option).
c) Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are reported regularly throughout the year. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, there were no transfers of financial instruments between levels 1 and 2 or between levels 2 and 3.
F-86
26. Income tax
Current and deferred tax are determined for all transactions that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements using the provisions of the current tax laws. The current income tax expense or benefit represents the estimated taxes to be paid or refunded, respectively, for the current period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. They are measured using the tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the temporary tax differences are expected to reverse.
a) Income tax reconciliation
The tax on the Group's pre-tax profit differs
from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities. In
March 2021, the Social Contribution tax rate in Brazil increased 5 percentage points, thus the combined income tax rate increased from
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Net loss before income tax | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Tax rate (i) | ||||||
| Income tax | ||||||
| Permanent additions/exclusions | ||||||
| Share-based payments | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Customers gifts | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Operational losses and others | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Changes in income tax rate | ( |
( | ||||
| Other expenses from Nu Holdings not subject to taxation | ( |
( |
||||
| Effect of different tax rates - subsidiaries | ( |
( |
||||
| Results with convertible instruments | ( |
|||||
| Other non-deductible expenses | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Income tax for the year | ||||||
| Current tax expense | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Deferred tax benefit | ||||||
| Income tax in the statement of profit or loss | ||||||
| Deferred tax recognized in OCI | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Income tax for the year | ||||||
| Effective tax rate | - |
- |
- |
| (i) |
F-87
b) Deferred income taxes
The following tables present significant components of the Group’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, and the changes for the years then ended. The accounting records of deferred tax assets on income tax losses and/or social contribution loss carryforwards, as well as those arising from timing differences, are based on technical feasibility studies which consider the expected generation of future taxable income, considering the history of profitability for each subsidiary individually. The Group has no time limit for use of the deferred tax assets, but the use of the deferred tax asset related to tax loss and negative basis of social contribution is limited to 30% of taxable profit per year for the Brazilian entities.
| Reflected in the statement of profit or loss | 12/31/2020 | Business combination | Constitution | Realization |
Foreign exchange |
12/31/2021 | ||||||
| Provisions for credit losses | ( |
( |
||||||||||
| Provision PIS/COFINS - Financial Revenue | - | - | - | ( |
||||||||
| Other provisions | ( |
( |
||||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | - | |||||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets on temporary differences | ( |
( |
||||||||||
| Tax loss and negative basis of social contribution | ( |
( |
||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | ( |
( |
||||||||||
| Futures settlement market | - | - | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | ( |
- | ( | |||||||||
| Others | - | - | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ( |
- | ( |
( |
( | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities | ( |
( |
| 12/31/2020 | Constitution | 12/31/2021 | ||||
| Reflected in equity, in other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Fair value changes - cash flow hedge | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Fair value instruments at FVTOCI | - | ( |
( | |||
| Total | ( |
( |
( |
| Reflected in the statement of profit or loss | 12/31/2019 | Constitution | Realization |
Foreign exchange |
12/31/2020 | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Provision PIS/COFINS - Financial Revenue | - | ( |
||||||||
| Other provisions | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets on temporary differences | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Tax loss and negative basis of social contribution | ( |
|||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | ( |
( |
- | ( |
( | |||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ( |
( |
- | ( |
( | |||||
| Deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities | ( |
( |
F-88
| 12/31/2019 | Constitution | 12/31/2020 | ||||
| Reflected in equity, in other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Fair value changes - cash flow hedge | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Total | ( |
( |
( |
| Reflected in the statement of profit or loss | 12/31/2018 | Constitution | Realization |
Foreign exchange |
12/31/2019 | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Provision PIS/COFINS - Financial Revenue | - | ( |
||||||||
| Other provisions | - | ( |
||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets on temporary differences | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Tax loss and negative basis of social contribution | - | ( |
( |
|||||||
| Deferred tax assets | ( |
( |
||||||||
| Fair value changes - financial instruments | ( |
( |
- | ( | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ( |
( |
- | ( | ||||||
| Deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities | ( |
( |
| 12/31/2018 | Constitution | 12/31/2019 | ||||
| Reflected in equity, in other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Fair value changes - cash flow hedge | - | ( |
( | |||
| Total | - | ( |
(1) |
27. Equity
F-89
| Shares authorized and fully issued | Ordinary shares | Preferred shares | Senior preferred shares | Management shares |
Class A Ordinary shares |
Class B Ordinary shares |
Total | Total after 6-for-1 forward share split | ||||||||
| Total as of December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| SOPs exercised and RUSs vested | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares withheld for employees' taxes | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||
| Capital increase (Series F-1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total as of December 31, 2020 |
| SOPs exercised and RUSs vested | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares withheld for employees' taxes (note 10) | ( |
( |
( |
( | ||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||
| Capital increase (Series G) | ||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of senior preferred shares (Series F-1) | ( |
|||||||||||||||
| Issuance of preferred shares due to Easynvest business combination | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital increase (Series G-1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of ordinary shares in class A shares | ( |
|||||||||||||||
| Conversion of class A shares in class B shares | ( |
|||||||||||||||
| Awards issued | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Class A shares - Cognitect acquisition | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Class A shares - Spin Pay acquisition | ||||||||||||||||
| Subtotal balances before the 6-for-1 forward share split | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares due to the 6-for-1 forward share split | ||||||||||||||||
| Subtotal balances after the 6-for-1 forward share split | ||||||||||||||||
| Preferred shares converted into Class A shares | ( |
|||||||||||||||
| Cancelation of management shares | ( |
( |
( | |||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares under the customer program | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares under the IPO | ||||||||||||||||
| Movements due to the IPO | ( |
( |
||||||||||||||
| Total as of December 31, 2021 |
F-90
| Shares authorized and unissued |
Class A Ordinary shares |
Class B Ordinary shares |
Total | Total after 6-for-1 forward share split | ||||
| Business combination - contingent share consideration | ||||||||
| Reserved for the share-based payments | ||||||||
| Reserved for the issuance of the Award | ||||||||
| Shares authorized which may be issued Class A or Class B | ||||||||
| Shares authorized and unissued as of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||
| Shares authorized issued | ||||||||
At the Meeting of Shareholders held on August 30, 2021, the 6-for-1 forward share split of the Company’s shares was approved.
a) Share events
On May 29, 2021, each issued and unissued authorized ordinary share was converted into one class A ordinary share, and 770,625,008 class B ordinary shares (4,623,750,048 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) were created. The rights of the holders of class A ordinary shares and class B ordinary shares are identical, except that (1) holders of class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share, whereas holders of class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share; (2) holders of class B ordinary shares have certain conversion rights into class A ordinary shares; (3) holders of class B ordinary shares are entitled to preemptive rights in the event that additional class A ordinary shares are issued to maintain their proportional ownership interest; and (4) class B ordinary shares shall not be listed on any stock exchange and will not be publicly traded.
In June 2021, 184,110,692 class A ordinary shares (1,104,664,152 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) were converted into class B ordinary shares.
In July 2021, Nu Holdings issued 7,596,827 class A ordinary shares (45,580,962 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) pursuant to the achievement of market conditions on the Awards described in note 10, and on July 21, 2021, they were converted into class B ordinary shares
In August 2021, Nu Holdings issued 107,489 class A ordinary shares (644,934 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) due to compensation for post combination services agreed upon for the acquisition of Cognitect in 2020.
In October 2021, Nu Holdings issued 138,415 class A ordinary shares (830,490 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) due to compensation for post combination services agreed upon for the acquisition of Spin Pay, which occurred in 2021.
On December 9, 2021, as a result of the completion of the IPO described in note 1(a), 289,150,555 new Class A common shares were issued, which amount includes Class A ordinary shares offered in the form of BDRs and the 3,436,269 Class A ordinary shares underlying BDRs reserved for issuance under the Customer Program or "NuSócios".
F-91
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has ordinary shares authorized and unissued relating to commitments from acquisitions of entities, the issuance due to the share-based payment plans (note 10) and authorized for future issuance without determined nature and which could be class A or B ordinary shares.
b) Share capital and share premium reserve
All share classes of the Company had a nominal
par value of US$
Share premium reserve relates to amounts contributed by shareholders over the par value at the issuance of shares.
c) Issuance of shares
| Date | Capital and share premium reserve | |
| 6/18/2020 - Series F-1 | ||
| 1/27/2021 - Series G | ||
| 6/4/2021 - Series G-1 | ||
| Customer program and IPO (note 1(a)) | ||
| Total presented as equity |
In January 2021, Nu Holdings completed the preferred shares issuance – Series G – in the amount of US$400,000. As a result of the transaction, 11,758,704 Series G preferred shares (70,552,224 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) were issued and 7,466,778 ordinary shares (44,800,668 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) were made available for issuance for the Company’s share-based compensation program.
As described in note 23, on May 20, 2021, the senior preferred shares related to Series F-1 were fully converted into equity, with the total issuance of 16,795,799 shares (100,774,794 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) at the request of the holders. The conversion consisted of a reclassification of the amount recognized as a derivative and as liability into share capital and share premium reserve in the total amount of US$400,915.
In June 2021, Nu Holdings completed the preferred shares issuance Series G-1 – in the amount of US$400,000. As a result of the transaction, 10,002,809 Series G-1 preferred shares (60,016,854 after the 6-for-1 forward share split) were issued.
d) Accumulated losses
The accumulated losses include the share-based payment reserve amount, as shown in the table below.
As described in note 10, the Group's share-based payments include incentives in the form of SOPs, RSUs and Awards. Further, the Company can use the reserve to absorb accumulated losses.
F-92
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Accumulated losses | ( |
( | ||
| Share-based payments reserve | ||||
| Total attributable to shareholders of the parent company | ( |
( | ||
| Accumulated losses attributable to non-controlling interests | ( |
|||
| Total accumulated losses | ( |
( |
Shares may be repurchased from former employees when they leave the Group or withheld because of RSUs plans to settle the employee’s tax obligation. These shares repurchased or withheld are canceled and cannot be reissued or subscribed. During year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, the following shares were repurchased (after the 6-for-1 forward share split):
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Quantity of shares repurchased | ||||
| Total value of shares repurchased | ||||
| Quantity of shares withheld - RSU | ||||
| Total value of shares withheld - RSU |
f) Accumulated other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income includes the amounts, net of the related tax effect, of the adjustments to assets and liabilities recognized in equity through the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Other comprehensive income that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss is related to cash flow hedges that qualify as effective hedges and currency translation that represents the cumulative gains and losses on the retranslation of the Group’s investment in foreign operations. These amounts will remain under this heading until they are recognized in the consolidated statement of profit or loss in the periods in which the hedged items affect it.
The own credit reserve reflects the cumulative own credit gains and losses on financial liabilities designated at fair value. Amounts in the own credit reserve are not reclassified to profit or loss in future periods.
The accumulated balances are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Cash flow hedge effects, net of deferred taxes | ||||||
| Currency translation on foreign entities | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Changes in fair value - financial instruments at FVTOCI, net of deferred taxes | ||||||
| Own credit adjustment effects | ( |
( |
( | |||
| Total | ( |
( |
( |
F-93
28. Management of financial risks, financial instruments, and other risks
a) Overview
The Group prioritizes risks that could have a material impact on its strategic objectives, including regulatory risks. To efficiently manage and mitigate these risks, the risk management structure conducts risk identification and assessment to prioritize the risks that are key to pursue potential opportunities and/or that may prevent value from being created or that may compromise existing value, with the possibility of having impacts on results, capital, liquidity, customer relationship and reputation.
Risks that are actively monitored include:
Credit Risk;
Liquidity Risk;
Market Risk and Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB);
Operational Risk / Information Technology (IT) Risk;
Compliance Risk; and
Reputational Risk.
b) Risk Management Structure
The Group's risk management structure considers the size and complexity of its business, which allows the monitoring and control of the risks to which it is exposed.
The risk management process permeates the entire Group, across the countries where Nu has operations, in line with the guidelines of management and executives, who, through committees and other internal meetings, define strategic objectives, including risk appetite. In addition, the capital control and management units provide support through risk and capital monitoring and analysis processes.
The Group considers a risk appetite statement (“RAS”) to be an essential tool to support risk management and decision making. Therefore, its development is aligned with the business plan, strategy development and capital. Nu has defined a RAS that prioritizes the main risks and, for each of these, qualitative statements and quantitative metrics expressed in relation to gains, capital, risk measures, liquidity and other relevant measures have been implemented, as appropriate.
Nu's risk management structure allows inherent and residual risks to be properly identified, measured, evaluated, monitored, reported, controlled and mitigated to support the development of its activities. Thus, Nu has adopted a model which consists of three lines of defense, as follows:
| ● | First line of defense (risk owner accountability): business functions or activities that generate exposure to risks, whose managers perform risk management in accordance with policies, limits and other conditions defined and approved by the Board of Directors. The first line of defense must have the means to identify, measure, address and report the risks assumed. |
| ● | Second line of defense (review and challenge): consists of the areas of Risk Management, Internal Controls and Compliance. It ensures an effective control of risks and that these are managed according to the defined appetite level. Responsible for proposing risk management policies, developing models, methodologies, as well as for evaluating and supervising the first line of defense. |
F-94
| ● | Third line of defense (risk assurance): composed of Internal Audit, is responsible for periodically independently evaluating whether policies, methods and procedures are adequate, in addition to verifying their effective implementation. |
Another important element of the risk management framework is the structure of Technical Forums and Committees. These governance bodies were designed and implemented to monitor and make decisions on aspects associated with the Group's management and control. Nu has implemented this structure both at a Global and a country-level perspective, as described below.
Global risk-related Governance body:
| ● | Audit and Risk Committee: its main duties are to evaluate the performance and progress of the work of the Internal Audit, the independent audit, as well as the respective reports related to the internal control systems, to follow the recommendations made by the internal and independent auditors to management, to review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements and unaudited quarterly financial statements, to assist the Board of Directors in the performance of its risk management and control functions, and monitoring the level of risk exposure according to the RAS. It consists of at least three members and meets at least quarterly. |
Country-level risk-related Governance bodies:
Each of the countries where the Group has operations established a structure of governance based on the relevant regulatory requirements and composed of the following elements. Depending on the nature of the subject to be managed, some Committees and meetings can be grouped to cover more than one country.
| ● | Risk Committee: its objective is to assist the country's executive officers in the performance of the entity’s risk management and control functions, monitoring the level of risk exposure according to risk appetite. It also aims to adopt strategies, policies and measures aimed at disseminating a culture of internal controls and risk mitigation. |
| ● | Credit Committee: its objective is to review and supervise credit strategies and their impacts on the subsidiary's results, and to review the credit strategies in light of the macroeconomic environment and risk information related to the credit market and competitors. |
| ● | Audit Committee: its main duties are to evaluate the performance and progress of the work of the Internal Audit function, the independent auditors, and the respective reports related to the internal control systems, to follow the recommendations made by internal and independent auditors to management, and to review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements and unaudited quarterly financial statements. |
| ● | Technical Forums: regular meetings to discuss and propose recommendations to the country-level Risk Committee. Depending on the materiality in each of the countries, each topic listed below can have its own Technical Forum, with the participation of executives from associated areas: accounting and tax, operational risk and internal controls, asset and liability management ("ALM") / capital, information technology risks ("IT"), Compliance, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering ("AML"), stress tests, product review and credit provisions. Each Technical Forum has its own charter, establishing the scope of work, voting members and other working model attributes. |
F-95
c) Risks actively monitored
The Group is exposed to different risks arising from its activities. Risk monitoring adapts as new risks and threats emerge. Currently, the Group is focused on the following risks:
| ● | Credit Risk |
The Group credit risk management structure is independent from the business units and provides processes and tools to measure, monitor, control and report the credit risk from all products, continuously verifying their adherence to the approved policies and risk appetite structure. Credit risk management also assesses and monitors the impacts of potential changes in the economic environment on the Group credit portfolio to ensure that it is resilient to economic downturns.
Nu's credit decision-making leverages a tiered review process based on materiality and impact of credit decisions. The decision tiers are classified in small, medium or large, related to their size and estimated impact. Each tier goes through a governance framework in accordance with the defined classification level, whereby larger decisions have a higher diligence level. Credit decision approvals take place in committees, technical forums, and the designated decision forums, with the involvement of the first and second lines of defense, depending on the governance framework. For the decision-making process, information arising from historical performance is presented and discussed using predictive models that analyze and score existing and potential customers based on their profitability and credit risk profile.
The Group uses customers’ internal information, statistical models, and other quantitative analyses to determine the risk profile of each customer in the portfolio. The information collected is used to manage the portfolio credit risk and to measure expected credit losses with periodical assessment of changes in the provision amounts.
Regarding past due customers, their behavior is continuously tracked and monitored to improve policies and approaches to collect debt. The collection strategies and policies of the Group depend on customer profiles and model scores, and they aim to maximize the recovery amounts.
The Group also has limits for exposure to counterparty credit risk in cash or cash equivalents assets, aligned with its RAS. These limits are based on ratings from external rating agencies. Only part of the cash can be invested in assets with credit risk exposures.
The Group’s outstanding balance of financial assets is shown in the table below:
F-96
| Financial assets | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||
| Securities | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||
| Collateral for credit card operations | ||||
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | ||||
| Securities | ||||
| Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | ||||
| Compulsory deposits at central banks | ||||
| Credit card receivables | ||||
| Loans to customers | ||||
| Other financial assets at amortized cost | ||||
| Financial assets at amortized cost | ||||
| Total |
| ● | Liquidity Risk |
Liquidity risk is monitored to ensure that the Group will have sufficient high-quality liquid assets to withstand severe stress scenarios together with an adequate funding profile in terms of tenor, type, and counterparties.
The Group has a Contingency Funding Plan that describes possible management actions that should be taken in the case of a deterioration of the liquidity indicators.
Primary sources of funding - by maturity
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Funding Sources | Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | % | Up to 12 months |
Over 12 months |
Total | % | ||||||||
| Deposits by customers | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB) | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB-V) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposit | ||||||||||||||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | ||||||||||||||||
| Senior preferred shares | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||
Maturities of financial liabilities
The tables below summarize the Group’s
financial liabilities into groups based on their contractual maturities:
F-97
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Financial liabilities | Carrying amount | Gross nominal outflow (1) | Up to 1 month | 1 to 3 months | 3-12 months | Over 12 months | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||||||
| Instruments eligible as capital | ||||||||||||
| Repurchase agreements | ||||||||||||
| Deposits in electronic money (*) | ||||||||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB) | ||||||||||||
| Bank receipt of deposits (RDB-V) | ||||||||||||
| Time deposit | ||||||||||||
| Other deposits | ||||||||||||
| Payables to credit card network | ||||||||||||
| Borrowings and financing | ||||||||||||
| Securitized borrowings | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| (*) |
| (1) |
Market Risk and Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB)
There is a market risk and IRRBB control and management structure, independent from the business units, which is responsible for the processes and tools to measure, monitor, control and report the market risk and IRRBB, continuously verifying the adherence with the approved policies and limit’s structure.
Management of market risk and IRRBB is based on metrics that are reported to the Asset & Liability Management and Capital ("ALM") Technical Forum and to the country-level Risk Committee. Management is authorized to use financial instruments as outlined in the Group's internal policies to hedge market risk & IRRBB exposures.
Management of market risk and interest rate risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) is based on the following metrics:
| ● | Interest Rate Sensitivity (DV01): impact on the market value of cash flows, when submitted to a one basis point increase in the current annual interest rates or index rate; |
| ● | Value at Risk (VaR): maximum market value loss for a holding period with a confidence level; and |
| ● | FX exposures, considering all financial positions that bring FX risk and operational expenses in other currencies. |
F-98
Although the risk related to the changes in the fair value of its shares and its effects on share-based compensation and the embedded derivative conversion feature from the senior preferred share is observed, the Group does not hedge these risks because it considers this impracticable due to its nature and to the lack of instruments in the market. The risk arising from share-based payments is derived from the increase in expenses due to the issuance of new grants or appreciation of the share value of the Company. The risk arising from the embedded derivative conversion features affected the statement of profit or loss until the conversion when the entity derecognized the liability component and recognized it as equity. As a result, the total effect on changes in equity during the life of the convertible instrument was zero as no cash was paid.
The table below presents the VaR for the entities in Brazil, calculated using a confidence level of 95% and a holding period of 1 day, by a historical simulation approach, with a 5-year window.
| VaR | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Group | ||||
| Nu Financeira | ||||
| Nu Pagamentos |
The financial positions directly held by Nu Holdings in the US are composed of demand deposits accounts (US$1,283,624), short term (less than 1 year) treasury bills (US$749,459), short-term time deposits (US$751,005), and a portfolio mainly composed of treasury bills and short-term high grade corporate bonds (US$198,852). This portfolio has a VaR (95% of confidence level, 1 day holding period) of US$128.
Currency risk
The consolidated financial statements may present volatility due to the Group’s operations in foreign currencies, such as Brazilian real and Mexican and Colombian pesos. At the Nu Holdings level, there is no net investment hedge for the investments in other countries.
As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, none of the entities of the Group had significant financial instruments in a currency other than their respective functional currencies.
In Brazil, Nu faces currency risks, mainly due to operational costs linked to its operations activities to mitigate foreign exchange risk, the Group hedges the expected costs in US$ and EUR in Nu Pagamentos, which has the Brazilian real as its functional currency. Derivatives instruments (dollar and euro future contracts, traded in B3) are used for carrying out these hedging activities, which are supervised by the Asset & Liability Management and Capital (ALM) Forum. Residual exposures are monitored, considering the costs (objects of hedge) and the derivatives (instruments of hedge). The currency risk in Nu Financeira is not hedged because it is deemed as not relevant.
Interest rate risk
The following analysis
is the Group's sensitivity of the mark to market fair value to an increase of 1 basis point (“bp”) (DV01) in the Brazilian
risk-free curve, IPCA coupon curve, assuming a parallel shift and a constant financial position:
F-99
| Curve | Brazilian Risk-Free Curve | IPCA coupon | ||||||
| DV01 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Group | ( |
( | ||||||
| Nu Financeira (1) | ( |
( |
( |
|||||
| Nu Pagamentos | ( | |||||||
| (1) |
The interest rate risk in subsidiaries other than Nu Pagamentos and Nu Financeira are deemed not relevant as of December 31, 2021, and 2020.
To maintain DV01 sensitivities within defined limits, interest rate futures, traded in B3, and swaps derivatives are used to hedge interest rate risk.
With respect to sensitivity to US risk-free interest rate, treasury bills held directly by Nu Holdings have a DV01 of US$36.8, and Time Deposits have DV01 of US$19.2.
| ● | Operational risk |
There is an operational risk and internal control’s structure, which is responsible for the identification and assessment of operational risks, as well as the evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the internal controls structure. This structure is also responsible for the preparation and periodic testing of the business continuity plan and to coordinate the risk assessment in new product launches and significant changes in the existing processes.
Within the governance of the risk management process, mechanisms for identifying, measuring, evaluating, monitoring, and reporting operational risk events are presented to each business area (first line of defense), as well as disseminating the control culture to other team members internally. The main results from the risk assessments are presented to the Operational Risk and Internal Controls Technical Forum and to the Risk Committee. Applicable improvement recommendations result in action plans with planned deadlines and responsibilities.
Information Technology ("IT") risk
As the Group operates in a challenging cyber threat environment, it continuously invests in controls and technologies to defend against these threats. Information Technology risks, including cyber risk, is a priority area for Nu and therefore the Group has a dedicated IT Risk structure, which is part of the second line of defense. This team is independent from IT related areas, including Engineering, IT Operations, and Information Security.
IT Risk is responsible for identifying, assessing, measuring, monitoring, controlling, and reporting Information Technology risks in relation to risk appetite levels approved by the country-level Risk Committee. The Group continually assesses Nu's potential risk exposure to threats and their potential impacts on the business and customers. The Group continues to improve its IT and cybersecurity features and controls, also considering that people are a key component of the security strategy, ensuring that the employees and third-party contributors remain aware of prevention measures and know how to report incidents.
F-100
The results of the IT risk and controls assessments are regularly discussed at the IT Risk Technical Forum and presented to the country-level Risk Committee. Applicable improvement recommendations result in action plans with planned deadlines and responsibilities.
| ● | Compliance |
As the Group operates in a highly regulated environment, a Compliance program was established within the second line of defense. The Compliance team has resources dedicated to the Ethics Program, Regulatory Compliance as well as to Anti Money Laundering Program and Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
The Ethics Program sets the minimum conduct standards for the organization, including Code of Conduct, Compliance Policies, Training, and Awareness Campaigns, as well as an independent Whistleblower Channel.
The Regulatory Compliance team is focused on overseeing the regulatory adherence of the organization. Main activities involve regulatory tracking and managing the regulatory adherence, assessment of new products and features, advisory, Compliance testing as well as centralizing the relationship with regulators regarding requests of information and exams.
Nu's Anti Money Laundering Program represents the global framework and guidelines for AML/CTF and is the basis for the AML team's strategic planning.
The Program is structured in three levels - strategic, tactical and operational - and it's composed of 7 pillars (strategic level): Enterprise Risk Assessment; Policies and Procedures; Communication and Training; Know Your Customer (KYC); Due Diligence (KYE, KYS, KYP and KYB); MSAC - Monitoring, Selection, Analysis and Communication (SAR); and Effectiveness Assessment Program.
| ● | Reputational Risk |
The Group understands that the materialization of other risks can negatively impact its reputation, as they are intrinsically connected. Undesirable events in different risk dimensions such as business continuity, cyber security, ethics and integrity, social media negative activity, among others, can damage Nu's reputation.
Therefore, the Group has teams and processes in place dedicated to overseeing external communication and for crisis management, which are key elements in identifying and mitigating reputational events, as well as to gain long-term insight to better prevent or respond to future events.
29. Capital management
The purpose of capital management is to ensure the capital adequacy for Nu's operation through control and monitoring of the capital position, to evaluate the capital necessity according to the risk taken and strategic aim of the organization and to establish a capital planning process in accordance with future requirements of regulatory capital, based on the Group's growth projections, risk exposure, market movements and other relevant information. Also, the capital management structure is responsible for identifying sources of capital, for writing and submitting the capital plan and capital contingent plan for approval.
At the executive level, the ALM Technical Forum is responsible for approving risk assessment and capital calculation methodologies, as well as reviewing, monitoring, and recommending capital-related action plans to the Risk Committee.
F-101
a) Minimum capital requirements
The Group must comply with two different regulatory capital requirements in Brazil: one for the Financial Conglomerate, led by Nu Financeira and composed of Nu Financeira along with Nu DTVM and Nu Invest, and the other applicable to Nu Pagamentos:
| ● | Financial Conglomerate: minimum level of capital, considering the minimum requirements for financial institutions according to Brazilian Federal Monetary Council (“CMN”) Resolution 4,193/13. |
| ● | Nu Pagamentos: minimum level of capital, considering the minimum requirements for payment institutions, according to Circular BACEN 3,681/13. |
In September 2021, Nu acquired Nu Mexico Financiera, S.A. de C.V., S.F.P., formerly AKALA, S.A. DE C.V., (“Akala”), a Mexican Financial Cooperative Association ("SOFIPO") and regulated by CNBV (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores). The regulatory capital requirements for this entity are defined by the NICAP metric (“nivel de capitalización”) set by CNBV, which is comparable to the Basel Ratio methodology.
Nu implemented a capital management structure aiming at maintaining a higher level of capital than the minimum regulatory requirements. Additionally, the Group has commenced operations in Colombia and will comply with local rules as soon as regulatory requirements are applicable in this jurisdiction.
b) Composition of capital
i) Financial conglomerate in Brazil
The regulatory capital used to monitor the compliance of a financial conglomerate with the Basel operating limits imposed by Brazilian Central Bank, is the sum of two items, as follows:
| ● | Tier I Capital: the sum of Common Equity Tier I, which consists of paid in capital, capital, reserves and retained earnings, less deductions, and prudential adjustments and the Additional Tier I, which consists of subordinated debt instruments without a defined maturity that meet eligibility requirements. It is important to note that the Financial Conglomerate does not hold any debt eligible to Additional Tier I on the date of these consolidated financial statements. |
| ● | Tier II Capital: consists of subordinated debt instruments with defined maturity dates that meet eligibility requirements. Together with the Common Equity Tier I it composes the Total Capital. |
The table below shows the calculation of
the capital ratios and their minimum requirement for the Financial Conglomerate, required by the current regulation in Brazil. Notwithstanding
the minimum capital adequacy ratio provided under CMN Resolution No. 4,193/13, upon being granted its financial institution license in
2018, Nu Financeira undertook a commitment to operate with a higher Basel Committee minimum capital adequacy ratio of
F-102
| Financial Conglomerate | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Regulatory Capital | ||||
| Tier I | ||||
| Common Equity | ||||
| Tier II | ||||
| Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) | ||||
| Credit Risk (RWA CPAD) | ||||
| Market Risk (RWA MPAD) | ||||
| Operational Risk (RWA OPAD) | ||||
| Capital Required | ||||
| Margin | ||||
| Basel Ratio | ||||
| RBAN - Capital Required | ||||
| Margin considering RBAN |
ii) Nu Pagamentos
Nu Pagamentos’ capital management aims to determine the capital needed for its growth and to plan additional sources of capital, to permanently maintain equity in amounts higher than the requirements defined by Brazilian Central Bank.
The subsidiary permanently maintains its
shareholders' equity adjusted by the income accounts in an amount corresponding to, at least, the highest amount between i)
The table below shows the calculation of the capital ratio and its minimum requirement for Nu Pagamentos, required by the current regulation in Brazil.
| Nu Pagamentos | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Adjusted Equity | ||||
| Max Amount | ||||
| Monthly average of payment transactions | ||||
| Balance of electronic currencies | ||||
| Capital Requirement Ratio |
iii) Nu Mexico Financiera
Nu Mexico Financiera’s capital management aims to determine the capital needed for its growth and to plan additional sources of capital, to permanently maintain its Regulatory Capital higher than the requirements defined by CNBV.
In December 2021, its Regulatory Capital
position was equivalent to US$
F-103
30. Segment information
In reviewing the operational performance of the Group and allocating resources, the Chief Operating Decision Maker of the Group (“CODM”), who is the Group’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), reviews the consolidated statement of profit or loss and comprehensive income or loss.
The CODM considers the whole Group as a single operating and reportable segment, monitoring operations, making decisions on fund allocation, and evaluating performance. The CODM reviews relevant financial data on a combined basis for all subsidiaries.
The Group’s income, results, and assets for this reportable segment can be determined by reference to the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income or loss, as well as the consolidated statements of financial position.
a) Information about products and services
The information about products and services are disclosed in note 6.
b) Information about geographical area
The table below shows the revenue and non-current assets per geographical area:
| Revenue (a) | Non-current assets (b) | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Brazil | ||||||||||
| Mexico | ||||||||||
| Colombia | ||||||||||
| Cayman Islands | ||||||||||
| Germany | ||||||||||
| Argentina | ||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| (a) |
| (b) |
The Group had no single customer that represented
10% or more of the Group's revenues in the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
F-104
31. Non-cash transactions
| 2021 | |
| Easynvest acquisition - share consideration (note 1(c)) | |
| Conversion of senior preferred shares into equity (note 23) | |
| Spin Pay acquisition - share consideration (note 1(c)) |
32. Subsequent events
a) Acquisition – Olivia
Olivia's acquisition was completed on January 3, 2022, when the control over the entities was transferred to Nu upon the completion of all conditions established on the share purchase agreement and the liquidation of the first part of the acquisition contractual price.
The total contractual acquisition price corresponds
to US$ subject to certain adjustments described in the SPA, consisting of cash consideration of US$
The transaction qualifies as a business combination and will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. As a result of limited access to Olivia’s information required to prepare initial accounting, together with the limited time since the acquisition date and the effort required to conform Olivia’s financial statements to the Company's practices and policies, the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete at the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. As a result, the Company is unable to provide the amounts recognized as of the acquisition date for the major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, pre-acquisition contingencies and goodwill.
b) Green Shoe
On January 6, 2022, Nu Holdings issued an additional 27,555,298 ordinary class A shares due to the over-allotment option ("Green Shoe") exercised by the underwriters. As a result, Nu Holdings received additional net proceeds of US$and incurred in costs of US$, recognized as equity.
c) Syndicated credit facility
In April 2022, the Group obtained a US$
F-105
