UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report                 

For the transition period from                  to                 

Commission file number: 001-38269

FinVolution Group

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Building G1, No. 999 Dangui Road

Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203

The People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Jiayuan Xu, Chief Financial Officer

Phone: +86 21 8030 3200

Email: xujiayuan@xinye.com

Building G1, No. 999 Dangui Road

Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203

The People’s Republic of China

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
American depositary shares (one American depositary share representing five Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.00001 per share)	FINV	New York Stock Exchange
Class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.00001 per share*		New York Stock Exchange

* Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing on the New York Stock Exchange of American depositary shares.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Not Applicable

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

Not Applicable

(Title of Class)

As of December 31, 2020, there were 1,405,164,599 ordinary shares outstanding, consisting of 824,164,599 Class A ordinary shares and 581,000,000 outstanding Class B ordinary shares, both with a par value of US$0.00001 per share.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).     Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒	Non-accelerated filer	☐
				Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards † provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☒

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP  ☒	International Financial Reporting Standards as issued		Other  ☐
	by the International Accounting Standards Board	☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.    Item 17  ☐    Item 18  ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.     Yes    ☐    No  ☐

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION		1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		3
PART I		4
ITEM 1.	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS	4
ITEM 2.	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	4
ITEM 3.	KEY INFORMATION	4
ITEM 4.	INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	59
ITEM 4A.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	102
ITEM 5.	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	102
ITEM 6.	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	123
ITEM 7.	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	135
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	136
ITEM 9.	THE OFFER AND LISTING	138
ITEM 10.	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	138
ITEM 11.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	149
ITEM 12.	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	150
PART II		152
ITEM 13.	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	152
ITEM 14.	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	152
ITEM 15.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	152
ITEM 16A.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	153
ITEM 16B.	CODE OF ETHICS	154
ITEM 16C.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	154
ITEM 16D.	EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	154
ITEM 16E.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	154
ITEM 16F.	CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT	155
ITEM 16G.	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	155
ITEM 16H.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	156
PART III		157
ITEM 17.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	157
ITEM 18.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	157
ITEM 19.	EXHIBITS	157
SIGNATURES		162

i

INTRODUCTION

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires in this annual report on Form 20-F:

• “ADSs” refers to our American depositary shares, each of which represents five Class A ordinary shares;

• amount of “outstanding balance of loans invested by individual investors” at a certain point in time refers to the amount of outstanding balance of loans historically invested by individual investors on our platform. Loans that are delinquent for 180 days or more, are typically considered charged-off and not included in the outstanding balance calculation;

• “average rate of transaction service fees” for a given period is computed by dividing the total amount of transaction service fees we received during the period by the total volume of loans originated on our platform during the same period. For loans funded by individual investors, the transaction service fee was collected from borrowers for our services in matching them with investors and for other services we provided over the loans’ lifecycle. For loans funded by institutional funding partners, the transaction service fee is collected from third party guarantee companies and, if applicable, the institutional funding partners for our services in borrower introduction and preliminary credit assessment, as well as other services we provide over the loans’ lifecycle;

• “China” or the “PRC” refers to the People’s Republic of China, excluding, for the purposes of this annual report only, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan;

• “delinquency rate” refers to the balance of the outstanding principal for loans that were 15 to 29, 30 to 59, 60 to 89, 90 to 119, 120 to 149 and 150 to 179 calendar days past due as of a date as a percentage of the total outstanding balance of principal for the loans on our platform as of such date. Loans that are delinquent for 180 days or more are typically considered charged-off and are not included in the delinquency rate calculation;

• “individual investors” refers to the individual investors who invested through our platform historically. We have ceased facilitating new loans with funding from individual investors on our platform since October 2019;

• “investment transactions” for a given period refers to the total number of investments executed by investors on our platform. An investor’s investment in a loan is counted as one investment transaction;

• number of “unique borrowers” at a certain point in time refers to the cumulative number of borrowers whose loans on our platform had been funded before such point in time;

• number of “unique borrowers” in a given period refers to the total number of borrowers whose loans on our platform were funded during such period;

• “ordinary shares” refers to our Class A and Class B ordinary shares, par value US$0.00001 per share;

• “RMB” and “Renminbi” refer to the legal currency of China;

• “US$,” “U.S. dollars,” “$,” and “dollars” refer to the legal currency of the United States;

• “vintage delinquency rate” refers to (i) the total amount of principal for all the loans in a vintage that become delinquent, less (ii) the total amount of recovered past due principal for all loans in the same vintage, and then divided by (iii) the total amount of initial principal for all loans in such vintage. For purpose of this annual report, loans facilitated during a specified time period are referred to as a vintage. Loans that are delinquent for 180 days or more are included in the calculation of vintage delinquency rate; and

1

• “we,” “us,” “our company,” “our” and “FinVolution” refer to FinVolution Group, its subsidiaries, variable interest entities and their respective subsidiaries, if any.

Our reporting currency is the Renminbi because our business is mainly conducted in China and substantially all of our revenues are denominated in Renminbi. This annual report contains translations of Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at specific rates solely for the convenience of the reader. The conversion of Renminbi into U.S. dollars in this annual report is based on the rate certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Unless otherwise noted, all translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to Renminbi in this annual report were made at RMB6.5250 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate on December 31, 2020 set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. The PRC government imposes control over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign trade. On April 23, 2021, the noon buying rate set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board was RMB 6.4945 to US$1.00.

2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and views of future events. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors,” may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigations Reform Act of 1995.

You can identify some of these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “is/are likely to,” “potential,” “continue” or other similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to:

• our mission and strategies;

• our future business development, financial condition and results of operations;

• the expected growth of the online consumer finance platform market in China;

• our expectations regarding demand for and market acceptance of our products and services;

• our expectations regarding our relationships with institutional funding partners and borrowers;

• competition in our industry;

• general economic and business condition in China and elsewhere; and

• relevant government policies and regulations relating to our industry.

These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may later be found to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. You should thoroughly read this annual report and the documents that we refer to with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from and worse than what we expect. In addition, the rapidly changing nature of the online consumer finance industry results in significant uncertainties for any projections or estimates relating to the growth prospects or future condition of our market. Furthermore, if any one or more of the assumptions underlying the market data are later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based on these assumptions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this annual report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

3

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) data and selected consolidated cash flows data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, and selected consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2019 and 2020 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report beginning on page F-1.

The following selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) data and selected consolidated cash flows data for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 and selected consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our historical results do not necessarily indicate results expected for any future periods. You should read this Selected Financial Data section together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” below.

The following table presents our selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2017			2018(1)			2019			2020(2)
	RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			US$
	(in thousands, except for share, per share and per ADS data)
Selected Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Data:
Operating revenues:
Loan facilitation service fees		911,448			2,843,287			2,919,234			3,310,875			1,908,851			292,544
Post-facilitation service fees		126,823			668,819			922,797			1,200,373			672,981			103,139
Guarantee income		—			—			—			—			3,386,032			518,932
Net interest income (3)		41,789			31,377			256,108			1,106,669			1,113,337			170,626
Other revenue		170,403			491,400			376,915			344,840			481,886			73,852
Changes in expected discretionary payment to IRF investors		—			(107,660	)		68,619			—			—			—
Net revenues		1,250,463			3,927,223			4,543,673			5,962,757			7,563,087			1,159,093
Operating expenses:
Origination and servicing expenses		(349,852	)		(890,160	)		(875,905	)		(1,164,716	)		(1,315,496	)		(201,609	)
Origination and servicing expenses-related party		(38,297	)		(84,362	)		(109,666	)		(43,494	)		(10,104	)		(1,549	)
Sales and marketing expenses		(352,952	)		(788,291	)		(710,754	)		(720,333	)		(482,859	)		(74,001	)

4

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2017			2018(1)			2019			2020(2)
	RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			US$
	(in thousands, except for share, per share and per ADS data)
General and administrative expenses		(123,160	)		(423,795	)		(383,388	)		(435,816	)		(461,116	)		(70,669	)
Research and development expenses		(114,648	)		(164,869	)		(317,965	)		(390,585	)		(370,175	)		(56,732	)
Credit losses for quality assurance commitment		—			—			—			—			(2,007,968	)		(307,735	)
Provision for loan receivable (3)		(34,705	)		(46,586	)		(192,749	)		(299,504	)		(463,175	)		(70,985	)
Provision for accounts receivable and other receivables		—			—			(106,652	)		(261,882	)		(144,661	)		(22,170	)
Total operating expenses		(1,013,614	)		(2,398,063	)		(2,697,079	)		(3,316,330	)		(5,255,554	)		(805,450	)
Other income/(expenses) (4)		312,908			(171,542	)		774,063			210,053			116,469			17,850
Profit before income tax expenses		549,757			1,357,618			2,620,657			2,856,480			2,424,002			371,493
Income tax expense		(48,267	)		(274,711	)		(151,206	)		(481,962	)		(455,421	)		(69,796	)
Net profit		501,490			1,082,907			2,469,451			2,374,518			1,968,581			301,697
Less: Net profit/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest shareholders		—			(76	)		377			1,668			(4,119	)		(631	)
Accretion on Series A, B and C convertible redeemable preferred shares to redemption value		(562,022	)		(3,073,471	)		—			—			—			—
Net (loss)/profit attributable to FinVolution Group’s ordinary shareholders		(60,532	)		(1,990,488	)		2,469,074			2,372,850			1,972,700			302,328
Total comprehensive income attributable to FinVolution Group		440,992			1,182,917			2,512,367			2,384,960			1,897,238			290,763
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in computing net income per share
Basic		665,000,000			779,804,270			1,498,780,165			1,525,814,189			1,477,162,991			1,477,162,991
Diluted		665,000,000			779,804,270			1,599,592,231			1,552,423,060			1,491,325,420			1,491,325,420
Net income/(loss) per share attributable to ordinary shareholders
Net (loss)/income per share – Basic		(0.09	)		(2.55	)		1.65			1.56			1.34			0.20
Net (loss)/income per share – Diluted		(0.09	)		(2.55	)		1.54			1.53			1.32			0.20
Net income/(loss) per ADS (5)
Net (loss)/income per ADS – Basic		(0.46	)		(12.76	)		8.24			7.78			6.68			1.02
Net (loss)/income per ADS – Diluted		(0.46	)		(12.76	)		7.72			7.64			6.61			1.01

(1) On January 1, 2018, we adopted new revenue guidance ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting method under ASC Topic 605.

5

(2) On January 1, 2020, we adopted the ASC Topic 326, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments or “CECL”, using a modified retrospective method with prior periods continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting method. Upon adoption of ASC Topic 326, expected credit losses related to guarantee contracts be recorded separately from and in addition to the stand ready guarantee liability accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 460. The stand ready component of the guarantee contract is recognized systematically as guarantee income when we’re released from the underlying risk.

(3) We historically presented interest income, interest expenses and provision for loans receivable within the financial statement line item “net interest income (expense) and loan provision losses.” In 2019, we reclassified provision for loans receivables amounting RMB299.5 million from “net interest income (expense) and loan provision losses” in operating revenue to “provision for loans receivables” in operating expenses. The amount of provision for loans receivable that has been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation were RMB34.7 million, RMB46.6 million and RMB192.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.

(4) The following table sets forth the breakdown of our other income/(expenses):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2017			2018			2019			2020
	RMB		RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB		US$
	(in thousands)
Other income/(expenses)
Gain from quality assurance		99,961		5,885			510,894			98,405			—		—
Realized gain/(loss) from financial guarantee derivatives		31,999		169,103			(157,244	)		31,444			—		—
Fair value change of financial guarantee derivatives		146,653		(383,061	)		272,057			(56,287	)		—		—
Gain from disposal of subsidiary		20,611		—			—			—			—		—
Other income, net		13,684		36,531			148,356			136,491			116,469		17,850
Total other income/(expenses)		312,908		(171,542	)		774,063			210,053			116,469		17,850

(5) Each ADS represents five Class A ordinary shares.

The following table presents our selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

	As of December 31,
	2016		2017		2018		2019		2020
	RMB		RMB		RMB		RMB		RMB		US$
	(in thousands)
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
Cash and cash equivalents		404,678		1,891,131		1,616,164		2,324,542		2,632,174		403,398
Restricted cash (1)		802,887		2,392,573		3,677,557		3,686,203		3,484,227		533,981
Short-term investments		260,000		1,958,910		1,694,660		114,560		1,970,958		302,063
Quality assurance receivable		286,812		1,152,769		2,064,366		3,649,642		1,121,554		171,886
Investments		2,428		12,234		167,501		952,833		950,515		145,673
Contract assets		—		—		112,103		20,555		—		—
Financial guarantee derivative assets		167,291		—		56,287		—		—		—
Total assets		2,147,291		8,603,663		13,142,467		18,304,456		14,882,185		2,280,795

6

	As of December 31,
	2016			2017		2018		2019		2020
	RMB			RMB		RMB		RMB		RMB		US$
	(in thousands)
Payable to platform customers		421,659			1,113,966		905,034		684,630		103,453		15,855
Quality assurance payable		473,704			2,062,844		3,819,379		4,776,153		—		—
Deferred revenue		162,896			265,094		—		—		—		—
Expected credit losses for quality assurance commitment		—			—		—		—		2,390,501		366,360
Deferred guarantee income		—			—		—		—		1,259,396		193,011
Provision for payment to investor reserve fund investor		—			107,660		—		—		—		—
Contract liabilities		—			—		165,469		55,728		3,447		528
Financial guarantee derivative liabilities		—			215,770		—		—		—		—
Total liabilities		1,375,069			4,921,475		7,156,729		10,292,976		6,451,855		988,790
Total mezzanine equity		1,210,645			—		—		—		—		—
Total shareholders’ equity/(deficit)		(438,423	)		3,682,188		5,985,738		8,011,480		8,430,330		1,292,005

(1) The following table sets forth the breakdown of restricted cash:

	As of December 31,
	2016		2017		2018		2019		2020
	RMB		RMB		RMB		RMB		RMB		US$
	(in thousands)
Restricted cash:
Quality assurance commitment and quality assurance fund		329,549		1,058,617		2,414,449		1,473,749		1,671,785		256,212
Investor reserve funds		51,679		175,215		17,971		41,958		—		—
Cash received from investors and borrowers		421,659		1,113,966		905,034		684,630		103,453		15,854
Cash received via consolidated trust that has not yet been distributed		—		44,775		303,667		799,646		482,285		73,913
Collateral for short-term borrowings		—		—		26,000		251,853		—		—
Escrow accounts		—		—		10,436		44,367		701,673		107,536
Designated accounts for security deposits		—		—		—		390,000		—		—
Cash received from borrower to be distributed to funding partners		—		—		—		—		225,031		34,488
Cash held in capital verification account		—		—		—		—		300,000		45,978
Total restricted cash		802,887		2,392,573		3,677,557		3,686,203		3,484,227		533,981

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-18, which requires us to retrospectively restate the statement of cash flows to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The following table presents our selected restated consolidated cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

7

	As of December 31,
	2016			2017			2018			2019			2020
	RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			RMB			US$
	(in thousands)
Summary Consolidated Cash Flows Data:
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities		1,088,227			3,409,451			1,884,956			(215,522	)		2,206,909			338,224
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities		(684,112	)		(2,450,800	)		(1,447,013	)		(828,219	)		1,041,496			159,616
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities		438,701			2,132,933			530,097			1,749,512			(3,091,279	)		(473,759	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		2,493			(15,445	)		41,977			11,253			(51,470	)		(7,889	)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		845,309			3,076,139			1,010,017			717,024			105,656			16,192
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year		362,256			1,207,565			4,283,704			5,293,721			6,010,745			921,187
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year		1,207,565			4,283,704			5,293,721			6,010,745			6,116,401			937,379

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

We operate in China’s online consumer finance platform market, an emerging and evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.

China’s online consumer finance industry is new and may not develop as expected. The regulatory framework for this industry is also evolving and may remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. China’s online consumer finance industry in general remains at a rather preliminary development stage and may not develop at the anticipated growth rate. It is possible that the PRC laws and regulations may change in ways that do not favor our development. If that happens, there may not be adequate loans facilitated on our platform and our current business model may be negatively affected. As a new industry, there are very few established players whose business models we can follow or build upon. Potential borrowers and institutional funding partners may not be familiar with this new industry and may have difficulty distinguishing our services from those of our competitors. Attracting and retaining borrowers and institutional funding partners is critical to increasing the volume of loans facilitated through our platform. The emerging and evolving online consumer finance market makes it difficult to effectively assess our future prospects. In addition, our business has grown substantially in recent years, but our past growth rates may not be indicative of our future growth.

You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and challenges we encounter or may encounter in this developing and rapidly evolving industry. These risks and challenges include our ability to, among other things:

• navigate an evolving regulatory environment;

• expand the base of borrowers and institutional funding partners served on our platform;

8

• maintain our credit standards;

• enhance our risk management capabilities;

• improve our operational efficiency;

• continue to scale our technology infrastructure to support the growth of our platform and higher transaction volume;

• broaden our loan product offerings;

• operate without being adversely affected by the negative publicity about the industry in general and our company in particular;

• maintain the security of our platform and the confidentiality of the information provided and utilized across our platform;

• cultivate a vibrant consumer finance ecosystem;

• attract, retain and motivate talented employees; and

• defend ourselves in litigation, and against regulatory, intellectual property, privacy or other claims.

If the market for our platform does not develop as we expect, if we fail to educate potential borrowers and institutional funding partners about the value of our platform and services, or if we fail to address the needs of our target customers, our reputation, business and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.

We change our business model for improvement from time to time, which may not be successful ultimately.

We have ceased facilitating new loans with funding from individual investors on our platform since October 2019 and improve our business model through acquisition of better quality borrowers and transition of our investor base from individual investors to institutional funding partners. As of March 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of loans invested by individual investors on our platform was nil.

In connection with this improvement, our business operations went through considerable changes, such as offering new products and services, adjusting our business process and model, hiring new employees and building up new departments, and collaborating with new business partners. We may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge or loss of efficiency during the transitional period. Additionally, it is uncertain whether these efforts will eventually bring us benefits as we anticipated. If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of this business transformation, our competitive position, business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Even if our business model transformation is implemented successfully as we planned, the actual costs incurred in this process may be substantially higher than we anticipated. There might also be other issues and negative consequences arising from our business transformation such as loss of borrower base, internal control issues, changes in employee structure as well as other unexpected consequences, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition and results of operations.

The laws and regulations governing online consumer finance industry in China are developing and evolving and subject to changes. If our business practices are deemed to violate any existing and future applicable laws, regulations or requirements of local regulatory authorities, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We started our business as an online lending information intermediary. In August 2016, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, together with three other PRC regulatory agencies jointly issued the Interim Measures on Administration of Business Activities of Online Lending Information Intermediaries, or the Interim Measures. The Interim Measures, among other things, defined online lending information intermediaries as financial information intermediary companies that facilitate loans online between persons, including individual, companies and other organizations. The Interim Measures further introduced a record-filing and licensing regime and provided general obligations and certain prohibited activities of the online lending information intermediaries. Pursuant to the Interim Measures, local financial regulatory authorities may conduct onsite inspections or inquiries from time to time and instruct us to rectify our business operations that are deemed not to be in compliance with the Interim Measures.

9

As required by the relevant regulatory authorities and industry associations, we submitted a self-inspection report to Association of Shanghai Internet Financial Industry, or the ASIFI, National Internet Finance Association of China, or the NIFA, and Shanghai financial regulatory authorities in 2018. Shanghai financial regulatory authorities conducted several onsite inspections on Shanghai PPDai Financial Information Service Co., Ltd., or Shanghai PPDai, one of our consolidated subsidiaries, during 2018 to 2020. As of the date of this annual report, we had received the rectification advice from the ASIFI and some initial documentation rectification requirements from the NIFA; however, the feedback from Shanghai financial regulatory authorities are still pending, and we are working closely with relevant authorities for inspection and rectification as requested.

In December 2018, the National Internet Finance Rectification Office and the National Online Lending Rectification Office jointly issued the Guidance on the Classification and Disposal of Risks of Online Lending Information Intermediaries and Risk Prevention, or Circular 175. Circular 175 refers to normal intermediaries as large-scale online lending information intermediaries that are strictly in compliance with relevant laws and regulations and have not demonstrated any high-risk characteristics. Circular 175 reiterates relevant regulatory requirements by providing that normal intermediaries should strictly control and manage the business scale and the number of investors. Circular 175 further tightens the regulation of the industry by requiring institutions other than normal intermediaries, including shell intermediaries with no substantive operations, small-scale intermediaries, intermediaries with high risks, and intermediaries that are unable to repay investors or otherwise unable to operate their businesses, to exit the online lending information intermediary industry.

In November 2019, we noticed that several internet media reported that the National Internet Finance Rectification Office and the National Online Lending Rectification Office jointly issued the Guidance on Pilot Transforming Online Lending Information Intermediaries into Micro Lending Companies, or the Pilot Transforming Guidance, pursuant to which the qualified online lending information intermediaries may apply to be transformed into micro-lending companies, with operations nationwide or in a single province only. In order to be qualified for being transformed into a micro-lending company with nationwide operations, an online lending information intermediary must, among other requirements, (i) have a registered capital of no less than RMB1.0 billion, (ii) have no material violation in the existing and unsettled business, (iii) have good financial conditions, (iv) have a custodian bank system that has handled all transfers of funds between the investors and the borrowers in the past one year, (v) have no material administrative or criminal penalty imposed on it, its controlling shareholders or its principal executives in the past two years, and (vi) have good financial technology capabilities. Furthermore, the companies that have had ceased the online lending information intermediary business are unqualified for being transformed into micro-lending companies. We are unable to verify the authenticity and accuracy of those media reports. If those media reports are authentic and accurate in terms of the content of the Pilot Transforming Guidance and we decide to transform from an online lending information intermediary into a micro-lending company, Shanghai PPDai will have to make adjustments its business operations to comply with the Pilot Transforming Guidance. In addition, even if we were to make adjustments our business operations to comply with the Pilot Transforming Guidance, we could not rule out the possibility that the regulatory authorities would deny our application and Shanghai PPDai could not be transformed into a micro-lending company as expected.

In addition, the 13th National People’s Congress approved the Civil Code of the PRC on May 22, 2020. Upon the effectiveness of the Civil Code of the PRC on January 1, 2021, the PRC Contract Law, the General Provisions of the PRC Civil Law, and the General Principles of the PRC Civil Law had been abolished and replaced, while their provisions are generally incorporated into the Civil Code of the PRC with certain changes and supplements. It remains unclear with respect to the relevant interpretations and implementations of certain provisions of the Civil Code of the PRC and how these provisions of the Civil Code of the PRC will apply to our business operations. For example, pursuant to the Civil Code of the PRC, usurious loans are explicitly banned, but a clear definition or interpretation of “usurious loans” is not provided. We cannot rule out the possibility that certain of our operation activities would be deemed to violate or not fully comply with the Civil Code of the PRC. If that happens, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

10

Due to changes of laws and regulations governing online consumer finance, we have ceased facilitating new loans with funding from individual investors on our platform since October 2019 and improve our business model through acquisition of better quality borrowers and transition of our investor base from individual investors to institutional funding partners. In 2019 and 2020, in order to reduce the outstanding balance of loans invested by the individual investors and improve our business model, we used our quality assurance fund, which was historically set aside as a protection mechanism for the individual investors when borrowers defaulted in principal and interest repayments, to repay the outstanding loans to individual investors who were covered by the quality assurance fund before the respective maturity dates. As of March 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of loans invested by individual investors on our platform was nil. Loans that are delinquent for 180 days or more, are typically considered charged-off and not included in the outstanding balance calculation.

In addition, on January 21, 2013, the State Council promulgated the Stipulations for Regulating Credit Reference, which provides that any person or organization that conducts personal credit reference business without approval of the competent credit reference administrative department of the State Council may be subject to penalties, including cessation of business operations, confiscation of illegal gains, imposing fines from RMB50,000 to RMB500,000, and even criminal liability. On January 11, 2021, the PBOC released the Measures for Regulating Credit Reference (Draft), the 2021 Draft, for public comments, which provides that (i) the credit information includes, but is not limited to, information relating to identity, address, debt, finance, payment and consumption, as well as analysis and appraisal of an individual or a business association prepared based on such information; (ii) services relating to user profiles, user scorings, user ratings and anti-fraud products are deemed as credit reference services, which should be approved by the competent credit reference administrative authority; and (iii) information processors who collaborate with credit reference agencies shall enter into cooperation agreements and file such cooperation agreements with the PBOC or its provincial branches. The 2021 Draft was released for public comments only, and significant uncertainties exist with respect to its enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation. We provide borrower referral and preliminary credit assessment services to our institutional funding partners. We believe that we are positioned as an intermediary and our services are to facilitate loan applications of borrowers on our platform to institutional funding partners, which are not credit reference services. However, we cannot assure you that the regulatory authorities may share the same view as ours. If the preliminary credit assessment services provided by us are deemed by the regulatory authorities as credit reference services or information process activities, we may be required to obtain an approval for individual credit reference business from the competent regulatory authorities or pursue cooperation with the authorized credit reference agencies and filing of the relevant cooperation agreement with the PBOC or its provincial branches. If we cannot obtain the regulatory approval or complete the filing in a timely manner, we may be deemed as violating the applicable laws and regulations of credit reference services and we may be subject to penalties, including cessation of business operations, confiscation of illegal gains, imposing fines from RMB50,000 to RMB500,000, and even criminal liability, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

The laws, regulations, rules and governmental policies are expected to continue to evolve in our industry. We are unable to predict with certainty the impact, if any, that future legislation, judicial interpretations or regulations relating to the online consumer finance industry will have on our business, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that we are not able to fully comply with any new laws or regulations when they are promulgated, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

11

If our practice is deemed to violate any PRC laws and regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

The National Internet Finance Rectification Office and the National Online Lending Rectification Office jointly issued the Notice on Regulating and Rectifying “Cash Loan” Business, or the Circular 141, in December 2017, outlining general requirements on the “cash loan” business conducted by various institutions. The Circular 141 specifies the features of “cash loans” as not relying on consumption scenarios, with no specified use of loan proceeds, unsecured, and no qualification requirement on customers, among others. The Circular 141 also sets forth several general requirements with respect to “cash loan” business, including but without limitation: (i) the aggregated borrowing costs of borrowers charged by institutions in the forms of interest and various fees should be annualized and subject to the limit on interest rate of private lending set forth in the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations issued by the Supreme People’s Court; (ii) all relevant institutions shall follow the “know-your-customer” principle and prudentially assess and determine the borrower’s eligibility, credit limit and cooling-off period; (iii) all relevant institutions shall enhance the internal risk control and prudentially use the “data-driven” risk management model; (iv) all institutions are prohibited from extending any loans to any persons without repayment source or repayment capacity, or loans with no designated use of proceeds; (v) funds from banks cannot be used for “cash loan” or “campus loan”; and (vi) in the case where a financial institution participates in the “cash loan” business, any third parties are not allowed to charge borrowers any interests or fees. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services—Regulations on lending activities.”

According to the Administrative Measures on Supervision of Selling Company of Public Offered Securities Investment Funds, or the Funds Selling Supervision Measures, which was issued by the CSRC and the PBOC and became effective on October 1, 2020, no one may engage in selling promotion, share offering, subscription, redemption of investment funds or providing fund account record checking services or other related activities without filing with the local branches of the CSRC and obtaining the relevant fund selling business qualifications. On January 13, 2021 the PBOC and the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, or the CBIRC, jointly issued the Guidance of Online Personal Deposit Business by Commercial Banks, or the Guidance of Online Deposit, which provides that commercial banks can only carry out online deposit selling on its own websites. Third-party online platforms are prohibited from providing commercial banks any services relating to advertisements, product display, information transmission or purchasing portals. The non-conforming legacy products sold before the publish of the Guidance of Online Deposit may be settled on their relevant maturity dates.

In the operation of our consumer finance platform, borrowers on our platform are required to specify their uses of loan proceeds. To ensure a full compliance with existing laws, regulations, rules and governmental policies relating to the online consumer finance industry, we have implemented various policies and procedures to conduct our business and operations. For instance,

• we entered into a custody account arrangement with China Merchants Bank, whereby funds of borrowers and individual investors were deposited into and settled by custody accounts under its management. The custody account arrangement expired in March 2020. We did not pursue new custody account arrangements with other commercial banks since we have ceased to accept new investments from individual investors from October 2019, and as of March 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of loans invested by individual investors on our platform was nil. In late 2019 and 2020, the funds in the custody accounts of China Merchants Bank had been migrated to a third-party payment system managed by a third-party payment company. This third-party payment company, as opposed to a custodian bank, helped us handle repayment and settlement between borrowers and individual investors for loans historically facilitated by our online lending information intermediary in such transitional period, which may be deemed to be a violation of the requirement that online lending information intermediaries shall set up custody accounts with a qualified bank for the funds of individual investors and borrowers under the Interim Measures and subject us to administrative sanctions, including without limitation, fines, warning letter, rectification order, public notice of criticism, filing the non-compliance conducts with the public credit record system, and other penalties according to the laws and regulations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services—Regulations on online lending information intermediaries”;

• for the loan portfolios funded by our institutional funding partners, such as commercial banks, we discontinued to charge any fees from the borrowers directly. Instead, we started to collect fees mainly from third-party guarantee companies and, if applicable, our institutional funding partners for our services;

• we require the borrowers to select their loan applications one of the specified permissible uses of loan proceeds, such as consumer finance, travelling, medical expenses, house improvements; and

12

• we adopted several measures to identify college students and try to prevent them borrowing money from our platform. However, we cannot assure that those measures are able to identify all college students on our platform.

However, due to the lack of detailed implementation rules and interpretations by the local authorities, we cannot be certain that our past and existing practices would not be deemed to violate any laws, rules and regulations that are applicable to our business. For instance,

• our calculation of the aggregate borrowing cost of the loans on our platform might be challenged by relevant government authorities and be deemed to be incompliant with relevant rules and regulations;

• we display financial products, including deposit products provided by commercial banks and money market funds and mutual funds provided by securities fund selling companies, on our mobile application and WeChat official account. By one click, users could access the selling webpage of the banks and securities fund selling companies. We had ceased to facilitate deposit products provided by commercial banks to our users in December 2020, and we also had ceased to provide channels for our users to purchase securities investment funds in March 2021. However, we may be deemed by the regulatory authorities as engaging in fund selling promotion and providing fund account record checking services without filing with the local branches of the CSRC and obtaining the relevant fund selling business qualifications, which would be deemed as violation to the Funds Selling Supervision Measures. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Wealth Management” for more details; and

• our cooperation with institutional funding partners through one of our variable interest entities and its subsidiaries, Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu, has exposed us to and may continue to expose us to additional regulatory uncertainties. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our cooperation with institutional funding partners may expose us to regulatory uncertainties and we may be required to obtain additional government approval or license due to our cooperation with institutional funding partners” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Regulatory restrictions on institutional funding partners’ acceptance of credit enhancement may adversely affect our business and access to funding.”

Due to the lack of interpretation and implementation rules and the fact that the laws and regulations are rapidly evolving, even if we have implemented above measures, we cannot assure you that we will be in full compliance with existing and future laws and regulations, nor can we assure you that we would not be required by regulatory authorities to make further rectifications to our business in the future. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been subject to any material fines or other penalties under any PRC laws or regulations, including those governing the online consumer finance industry in China. If our practice is deemed to violate any laws, regulations and rules, we may face, among others, regulatory warning, correction order, condemnation, fines and criminal liability. If such situations occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects would be materially and adversely affected.

Our cooperation with institutional funding partners may expose us to regulatory uncertainties and we may be required to obtain additional government approval or license due to our cooperation with institutional funding partners.

Due to the lack of a comprehensive and effective regulatory framework and clear and unambiguous application and interpretation of relevant laws and regulations, our cooperation with institutional funding partners has exposed us to regulatory uncertainties. We carry out our cooperation with institutional funding partners through Shanghai Zihe and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Shanghai Erxu. Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu primarily provide services to our institutional funding partners, such as borrower referral and preliminary credit assessment, and facilitate their participation in our online lending business.

13

The current laws and regulations do not explicitly require any regulatory approval, record-filing, or financial license for the type of business activities conducted by Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu. However, we cannot assure you that the regulatory authorities will hold the same view as ours or the business practice of Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu will be deemed to be in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Given the evolving regulatory environment of the consumer finance industry, the regulatory authorities may issue new regulatory requirements, introducing a new licensing regime to regulate the type of business activities that Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu have been carrying out. If such new regulatory rules are promulgated, we cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain such new license or other regulatory approval in a timely manner, or at all, which would materially and adversely affect our business and our ability to continue our operations. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been subject to any material fines or other penalties under any PRC laws or regulations, including those governing the online consumer finance industry in China. However, if the governmental authorities adopt a stringent regulatory framework on the online consumer finance industry in the future which may subject Shanghai Zihe or any of our PRC subsidiaries to additional requirements, such as paid-up capital requirements, record-filing with the relevant regulators or license requirements, our business may be materially and adversely affected. It can be costly to comply with relevant laws and regulations and if our business practice is deemed to violate any existing or future laws and regulations, we may face injunctions, including orders to cease illegal activities, and may be exposed to other penalties as determined by the relevant government authorities as well.

In addition, Circular 141 further provides that financial institutions cooperating with third parties to engage in lending businesses (i) are not allowed to outsource any core lending business operations, such as credit assessment and risk management, to third parties, (ii) are not allowed to accept any credit enhancement provided by third parties without any license or approval to provide guarantees, including credit enhancement service in the form of a commitment to assume default risks, (iii) should comply with the judicial interpretations by the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC regarding interest rates in private lending regarding the annual borrowing cost charged to a borrower, i.e. interests plus other fees, and (iv) should ensure that third parties do not collect any interests or fees from borrowers. To comply with relevant regulatory requirements, Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu have taken various measures in cooperating with our institutional funding partners. For example, Shanghai Zihe and Shanghai Erxu (i) do not collect service fees directly from the borrowers of the loans recommended to the licensed institutional funding partners; (ii) make sure that the aggregate borrowing cost does not exceed 36%; (iii) involve licensed guarantee companies to provide guarantee to institutional funding partners for certain loans; and (iv) introduce borrowers and provides preliminary credit assessment services, as opposed to core lending business operations, to our institutional funding partners. If a borrower passes our preliminary credit assessment, we will introduce such borrower to our institutional funding partners. Borrower’s loan will be funded directly by our institutional funding partners if they decide to extend loans to such borrower after their independent credit review.

However, other relevant laws and regulations are also expected to continuously evolve in this newly emerging industry in which we operate. It remains uncertain how the regulatory authorities are going to interpret and enforce these rules. We cannot assure you that our existing cooperation with the institutional funding partners will not be deemed to violate Circular 141 or any other applicable laws, rules and regulations. For example, the regulatory environment concerning the online lending information intermediary industry has been tightening. Several provincial regulatory authorities have ordered online lending information intermediaries in those provinces to exit the market. Historically, our institutional funding partners included third-party online lending information intermediaries. These third-party online lending information intermediaries generally matched the borrowers introduced by us with their investors on their platform. We cannot assure you that our cooperation with third-party online lending information intermediaries in the past would not be deemed to be a violation of relevant regulatory requirements in these provinces. Due to such regulatory uncertainties, we have ceased facilitating new loans for the third-party online lending information intermediaries since November 2019.

14

Furthermore, on July 12, 2020 the CBIRC promulgated the Interim Measures for Commercial Banks Doing Online Lending Business, or the Interim Measures for Banks, pursuant to which the banks may collaborate with financing guarantee companies, e-commerce business companies, third-party payment companies and information technology companies in various online lending business processes and activities, including but not limited to client referral, joint loan origination, risk distribution, information technology and loan collection. However, when collaborating with third parties for online lending businesses, the banks are required to independently manage core risk control procedures, such as the credit assessment and contract conclusion, and should be responsible for post-loan managements. Each of the regional banks, which is an important category of our institutional funding partners, should (i) provide online lending services primarily to its local clients, (ii) be prudent to extend loans to borrowers who reside outside its region, and (iii) take appropriate measures to monitor the business operations when serving the clients who are located outside its region. The banks may not accept credit enhancements, in a direct or a disguised form, provided by a third-party partner without financing guarantee license or credit security insurance license. The banks shall adopt appropriate measures to monitor the use of loan proceeds. The banks should evaluate and review the online lending partners they collaborate with at least once a year and terminate the cooperation if any incompetency is identified. Further, on February 19, 2021, the CBIRC further issued the Notice of Further Regulating Online Loan Business of Commercial Banks, also known as Circular 24, which provides that the commercial banks shall independently carry out the risk management of online loans and are forbidden from outsourcing the material procedures of loan management. The outstanding balance of online loans extended by a bank in collaboration with third-party platforms should not exceed 50% of the bank’s total outstanding balance. Where a commercial bank and its joint lending partner jointly contribute funds to issue online loans, the funding contribution percentage of its joint lending partner shall not be less than 30%. Circular 24 further strengthens the requirement that commercial banks are strictly prohibited from outsourcing the material procedures of loan management, and local commercial banks from engaging in an online loan business outside the territory of their registered place. The requirements on the limit of 30% for the joint lending loans and the cross-regional prohibition will take effect on January 1, 2022. The non-conforming legacy loans that extended before the promulgation of Circular 24 may be settled on their relative maturity dates. With certain limited exceptions, the Interim Measures for Banks and Circular 24 apply to the consumer finance companies and trust companies when they conduct online lending business. As our institutional funding partners include commercial banks, consumer finance companies and trust companies, they are required to evaluate and review us as required by the Interim Measures for Banks. If any of our institutional funding partners identifies any incompetency of us in such evaluation and review, it may terminate the cooperation with us and our business and operation results would be adversely and materially affected. Furthermore, we act as an intermediary between institutional funding partners and borrowers, and we cannot assure you that all the institutional funding partners we cooperate with have been and will be in strict compliance with the Interim Measures for Banks and Circular 24.

We have gradually expanded our institutional funding partner base and the volume of loans funded by our institutional funding partners in recent years. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, the volume of the loans funded by institutional funding partners amounted to RMB8.9 billion, RMB51.0 billion and RMB64.1 billion (US$9.8 billion), representing 14.5%, 62.0% and 100.0% of our total loan origination volume, respectively. As our institutional funding partner base will increase and our cooperation with different types of institutional funding partners will expand, the level of regulatory risks and uncertainties we face will be higher than before.

Regulatory restrictions on institutional funding partners’ acceptance of credit enhancement may adversely affect our business and access to funding.

Pursuant to Circular 141, a bank, a trust management company, or a consumer financial company participating in loan facilitation transactions may not accept credit enhancement services and similar services, such as committing to assume default risks, provided by a third party which has not been licensed or approved to provide such services. In addition, pursuant to the Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Financing Guarantee Companies promulgated by the State Council on August 2, 2017, or the Financing Guarantee Rules, any entity operating “financing guarantee business” is required to obtain an approval from the local regulatory authorities. If any entity operates financing guarantee business without such approval, it may be subject to penalties, including termination or suspension of business, fines ranging from RMB500,000 to RMB1,000,000, confiscation of illegal gains if any, and if the violation constitutes a criminal offense, criminal liability shall be imposed in accordance with the law. In October 2019, the CBIRC, together with eight other regulatory agencies jointly promulgated the Supplemental Rules to the Administration of Financing Guarantee Companies, or the Supplements to the Financing Guarantee Rules, which provides that any entity providing client referral or credit assessment services to the lending institutions may not provide financing guarantee services in a direct or a disguised form without the regulatory approval. If any entity operates financing guarantee business without appropriate approval, its business operations will be banned by the regulatory authorities and it will be required to properly settle existing business.

In our collaboration with institutional funding partners, we introduce borrowers to our institutional funding partners and provide our institutional funding partners with our preliminary credit assessment on the creditworthiness of such borrowers. Our institutional funding partners independently review such borrowers’ loan requests and decide whether to extend loans to such borrowers and, if yes, the maximum amount of credit available for such borrowers. To attract and maintain our cooperation with institutional funding partners, we provide quality assurance commitments to them primarily through (i) repurchase of default loans, and (ii) setting aside security deposits with our own funds to ensure that we have enough cash to perform our repurchase obligations if the borrowers introduced by us default. In some cases, we are also required to replenish such security deposits from time to time.

15

In order to reduce our compliance risks under the Circular 141, the Financing Guarantee Rules, and the Supplements to the Financing Guarantee Rules, we have engaged licensed third-party financing guarantee companies or insurance companies to provide financing guarantees or insurances to a majority of the loans funded by our institutional funding partners. If any borrower defaults, a third-party financing guarantee company is obligated to repay the full overdue amount to the corresponding institutional funding partner. After the financing guarantee company repays the full overdue amount, we are obligated to purchase creditor’s right from the third-party guarantee companies at a price equal to the repayment it made to the institutional funding partner. Under certain circumstances, we also provide security deposits through third-party financing guarantee companies for loans funded by certain institutional funding partners as an additional quality assurance commitment. Apart from licensed third-party financing guarantee companies, we also cooperate with third-party insurance companies to provide quality assurance commitments to our institutional funding partners. Under this arrangement, if any borrower introduced by us defaults, our institutional funding partners are able to seek insurance compensations under the insurance policies from third-party insurance companies. In some cases, if the overdue amount exceeds the insurance coverage, the remaining overdue amount will be repaid by the third-party guarantee companies engaged by us.

Despite our efforts to reduce regulatory risks, we cannot assure you that relevant regulatory authorities would not interpret or view the quality assurance commitments we provided to our institutional funding partners as an operation of financing guarantee business in a disguised form without approval. If relevant government authorities take the view that the quality assurance commitments we provided to our institutional funding partners is a provision of financing guarantee in a disguised form without approval, we would be subject to fines and/or other administrative penalties mentioned above. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services.” As a result, our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected. If we do not provide quality assurance commitments to our institutional funding partners due to regulatory restrictions, we may not be able to maintain our institutional funding partner base and our cooperation with third-party guarantee companies, and our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.

We have incorporated three financing guarantee companies, Fujian Zhiyun Financing Guarantee Company, or Fujian Zhiyun, Zhiyun (Tianjin) Financing Guarantee Company, or Tianjin Zhiyun, and Hainan Shenxin Financing Guarantee Company, or Hainan Shenxin, in 2019 and 2020. In some cases, one of our own financing guarantee companies provides financing guarantee services directly to our institutional funding partners for the loans funded by them. Under the Financing Guarantee Regulations, the maximum amount of outstanding guarantee liabilities of a financing guarantee company may not exceed ten times of its net assets. As of March 31, 2021, the net assets of Fujian Zhiyun, Tianjin Zhiyun and Hainan Shenxin were RMB1,329.4 million (US$203.7 million), RMB285.5 million (US$43.8 million) and RMB300.4 million (US$46.0 million), respectively. It is obvious that our own guarantee companies cannot meet the needs of all of our institutional funding partners. We will have to continue to engage properly licensed third-party guarantee companies to provide quality assurance commitments to our institutional funding partners. As a result, the above regulatory risks still exist.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been subject to any administrative penalties due to cooperating with our institutional funding partners.

As the amount of payment we are obligated to pay to third-party guarantee companies depends on the amount of default loans, we are subject to credit risks for those loans extended by our institutional funding partners to our borrowers. If we are unable to accurately assess the creditworthiness of the borrowers on our platform or if we fail to accurately anticipate and manage the delinquency rates of the loans funded by our institutional funding partners, we will not be able to maintain our credit risk exposure within acceptable parameters. If we are unable to effectively collect these delinquent loans, our liquidity, business operations, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

16

We collaborate with third-party trust management companies to set up trusts with other investors to extend loans through these trusts to borrowers introduced by us. We may be deemed to be an illegal financial institution under such trust arrangement, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We collaborate with third-party trust management companies to set up trusts with other investors to extend loans to borrowers introduced by us. Under this trust arrangement, we normally invest in subordinate tranches and other investors invest in senior tranches. The Measures for Banning of Illegal Financial Institutions and Illegal Financial Business Operations, or the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions, promulgated by the State Council on July 13,1998, provides that the establishment of financial institution and the operation of financial business should be subject to the approval of the People’s Bank of China, or the PBOC. Pursuant to the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions, extending loans without the approval of PBOC is deemed as illegal financial business operation and the entity extending loans without the approval of PBOC is deemed as an illegal financial institution. The online consumer finance industry is new and developing rapidly, and the regulatory environment has evolved since the promulgation of the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions. There are uncertainties as to the interpretation of the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions as well as whether such laws and regulations are applicable to us or our business. Although the trust management companies that administrate the trusts have been licensed and approved by the financial regulatory authorities to extend loans and we believe that the trust management companies are the lenders of the loans, we cannot assure you that the financial regulatory authorities will hold the same view as ours. Our investments in the trusts may be deemed to be extending loans to the borrowers and we may be deemed to be a lender under this trust arrangement. As a result of such trust arrangement, we may be deemed to be an illegal financial institution or operating illegal financial business, which may subject us to penalties, including confiscation of illegal gains together with a fine from one time to five times of the illegal gains, or a fine of RMB100,000 to RMB500,000 if there are no illegal gains, and criminal liability if the violation constitutes a criminal offense.

In addition, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme Peoples’ Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, or the MPS, and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Guidance on Several Issues for Illegal Lending Regarding Criminal Case, or the Guidance on Illegal Lending, on July 23, 2019, which provides, among others, that (i) if any entity or individual is engaged in extending loans to the unspecified public individuals consistently for the purpose of profits and without the approval from the regulatory authorities or outside its business scope, which disturbs the stability of financial markets, such entity or individual may face a criminal charge of unfair competition and may be imposed criminal liability in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations; “extending loans to the unspecified public individuals consistently” refers to extending loans to entities and individuals no less than ten times within two years; and (ii) if the actual annual interest rate of the loans extended by such entity or individual exceeds 36%, it would be deemed as an aggravated circumstance when such entity or individual face the abovementioned criminal charge of unfair competition. The Guidance on Illegal Lending is new and does not provide a clear definition to calculate the actual annual interest rate, and it is still unclear how the regulatory authorities will interpret and implement it in the future. We cannot rule out the possibility that regulatory authorities may deem our operation activities under the trust arrangements as unfair competition and impose criminal liability on us. If that happens, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

If we are unable to retain existing borrowers or institutional funding partners or attract new borrowers or institutional funding partners, or if we are unable to maintain or increase the volume of loans facilitated through our platform, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

The volume of loans facilitated through our platform has grown rapidly over the past few years. The total origination amount of loans facilitated through our platform was RMB61.5 billion in 2018, RMB82.2 billion in 2019 and RMB64.1 billion (US$9.8 billion) in 2020. To maintain the high growth momentum of our platform, we must continuously increase the volume of loans by retaining current participants and attracting more users whose financing or investment needs can be met on our platform. If there are insufficient qualified loan requests, institutional funding partners may not be able to deploy their capital or their investors’ capital in a timely or efficient manner and may seek other investment opportunities. If there are insufficient funding commitments, borrowers may not be able to obtain capital through our platform and may turn to other sources for their borrowing needs. If we are unable to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient funding commitments or if borrowers and institutional funding partners do not continue to participate in our platform at the current rates due to any change we may be required to make to the way we conduct our business to ensure compliance with existing or new PRC laws and regulations or due to other business or regulatory reasons, we might not be able to increase our loan transaction volume and revenues as we expect, and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected. Normally the borrowers find us by downloading our mobile applications from application stores or from the pre-installed mobile applications or submitting loan requests on our website. In response to the general regulatory environment, the operators of application stores or mobile application distributing channels may adjust their application exhibition policies or even remove our mobile applications from their application stores or distribution channels, which may materially and adversely affect our ability to engage new borrowers.

17

We have ceased facilitating new loans with funding from the individual investors on our platform since October 2019 and improve our business model through acquisition of better quality borrowers and transition of our investor base from individual investors to institutional funding partners. Currently, our institutional funding partners primarily include commercial banks, private banks, consumer finance companies and trust management companies. Historically, a small portion of the loans on our platform were funded by some third-party online lending information intermediaries. Considering the regulatory uncertainties faced by third-party online lending information intermediaries, we have ceased facilitating new loans for third-party online lending information intermediaries since November 2019. If we are unable to retain our existing institutional funding partners or attract new institutional funding partners, or if regulatory authorities promulgated new laws and regulations to regulate, limit, or even prohibit our collaboration with the institutional funding partners, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. As of December 31, 2020, we had 37 institutional funding partners active on our platform. The loans funded by the institutional funding partners typically have fixed terms from six to twelve months.

Our success is dependent upon our ability to maintain and expand our cooperation with institutional funding partners on reasonable commercial terms. If the governmental authorities further tighten the regulations on the online consumer finance industry, our institutional funding partners would become more selective in choosing partners for referring borrowers and facilitating loans for them. The competition we face would become even more intensely. Our cooperation with institutional funding partners is not on an exclusive basis. If we fail to continuously meet their requirements or needs, our financial institution partners may stop cooperating with us and turn to our competitors, which may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our existing and new products and services do not achieve sufficient market acceptance, our financial results and competitive position will be harmed.

We have devoted significant resources to, and will continue to emphasize on, upgrading and marketing our existing products and services and enhancing their market awareness. We also incur expenses and expend resources upfront to develop, acquire and market new products and services that incorporate additional features, improve functionality or otherwise make our platform more desirable to borrowers and institutional funding partners. New products and services must achieve high levels of market acceptance in order for us to recoup our investment in developing, acquiring and bringing them to market.

Our existing and new products and services could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:

• borrowers may not find terms of our products, such as costs and credit limit, competitive or appealing;

• our failure to predict market demand accurately and provide products and services that meet this demand in a timely fashion;

• borrowers and institutional funding partners using our platform may not like, find useful or agree with, any changes;

• defects, errors or failures on our platform;

• negative publicity about our loan products or our platform’s performance or effectiveness;

• views taken by regulatory authorities that the new products, services or platform changes do not comply with PRC laws, regulations or rules applicable to us; and

• the introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products by our competitors.

If our existing and new products and services do not achieve adequate acceptance in the market, our competitive position, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

18

Our international expansion may expose us to additional risks.

Our business currently primarily focuses on the PRC market. We are currently also expanding our business in the overseas market. In December 2018 and June 2019, we established two subsidiaries in the Philippines, and one of them is authorized to operate as a lending company and the other is authorized to operate as a financing company. In December 2019, we established a subsidiary in Indonesia, which has received a license for Technology and Information Based Financial Lending Institution (peer-to-peer lending license) from the Financial Services Authority of Indonesia. In January 2020, our subsidiary in Singapore received the Capital Markets Services License from the Monetary Authority of Singapore to conduct regulated activities in dealing in capital markets products in Singapore.

Our overseas business operations subject us to additional risks and uncertainties. While our income from international operations is not yet material to our company as a whole, our current or future international expansion may expose us to additional risks, including general economic and political conditions internationally and the changes of global macroeconomic environment. In addition, we will face complex local regulatory environment that we are not familiar with. As a result, we may incur substantial compliance costs to carry out our business operations in the overseas market and still be subject to potential litigations, regulatory proceedings, penalties or incur other costs. As we have very limited experience in operating our business in the overseas market, our products may not be accepted by users in the overseas market, we may be unable to attract a sufficient number of users, fail to anticipate competitive conditions or face difficulties in operating effectively in the overseas market. In addition, trade barriers, such as import and export restrictions, customs duties and other taxes, competition law regimes and other trade restrictions, as well as other risks such as political instability may also expose us to additional risks and uncertainties if we expand our business in the overseas market.

Interest rates of certain of our loan products exceed the statutory interest rate limit and therefore part of the interests is not enforceable through the PRC judicial system.

The all-in borrowing cost, including the interest rate and the total expense paid by the borrower for the borrowing, is highly regulated by the Supreme People’s Court and different regulatory authorities. According to the Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Laws Applicable to Trials of Private Lending Cases issued by the Supreme People’s Court on August 6, 2015, or the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations, in the context of lending activities between individuals, entities or other organizations that are not licensed financial institutions, (i) if the interest rate of a loan exceeds 36% per annum, the exceeding part of the interest rate is invalid and void, and (ii) if the interest rate of a loan exceeds 24% per annum but is no more than 36% per annum, the exceeding part will be treated as natural obligation—valid but not enforceable in the PRC judicial system, while the enforceability of the 24% per annum part will not be affected.

On August 4, 2017, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the Circular of Several Suggestions on Further Strengthening the Judicial Practice Regarding Financial Cases, which provides, among others, that the claim of a borrower under a financial loan agreement to adjust or cut down the part of interest exceeding 24% per annum on the basis that the aggregate amount of interest, compound interest, default interest, liquidated damages and other fees collectively claimed by the lender is overly high should be supported by the PRC courts. For loans facilitated at annual rate between 24% and 36% historically or in the future, if any of such loans become delinquent, we will not be able to enforce part of the interest that exceed 24% through PRC judicial system. As a result, our institutional funding partners may suffer losses, which would damage our reputation and harm our business. Were these to happen, our reputation, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

According to the Notice on Regulating and Rectifying “Cash Loan” Business, or Circular 141, promulgated by the Internet Finance Rectification Office and the Online Lending Rectification Office in December 2017, in the context of “cash loan” business operated by various types of institutions, the aggregated borrowing costs of borrower charged in forms of interests and all kinds of fees should be annualized and subject to the upper limit on interest rate of private lending set forth in the judicial interpretations issued by the Supreme People’s Court. When Circular 141 was promulgated, the then effective upper limit on interest rate of private lending was 24% per annum as judicially protected by the court, while the range of 24% to 36% per annum was deemed as natural obligation and the exceeding part of 36% per annum was deemed as illegal.

On August 20, 2020, the Supreme People’s Court issued the Decision on Amending the Provisions on Several Issues Concerning Laws Applicable to Trials of Private Lending Cases, which is further amended by the Supreme People’s Court on December 29, 2020, or the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment, which amended the upper limit of private lending interest rates under judicial protection. According to the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment, the upper limit of interest rate for one-year private loan would be capped at four times that of the loan prime rate at the time of the establishment of the agreement, or the Quadruple LPR Limit. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services—Regulations on lending activities” for more details. The aforementioned one-year loan prime rate refers to the one-year loan market quoted interest rate issued by the National Bank Interbank Funding Center on the 20th of each month starting from August 20, 2019, and the one-year loan market quoted interest rate issued by the National Bank Interbank Funding Center on April 20, 2021 was 3.85%. Based on the latest Quadruple LPR Limit, the ceiling would be lowered to 15.4% from 24% under the previous judicial interpretation in 2015. We cannot assure you that the one-year loan market quoted interest rate and the Quadruple LPR Limit will not decrease further in the future.

19

According to the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment, (i) in terms of lending activities between individuals, entities or other organizations that are not licensed financial institutions, if the interest rate of a loan exceeds the Quadruple LPR Limit, the exceeding part will not be supported and enforceable in the PRC judicial system; and (ii) the Quadruple LPR Limit does not apply to the disputes arising out of loans funded by financial institutions or its branches which are licensed by financial regulatory authorities.

On January 21, 2021, the Response Letter to the Guangdong High People’s Court Relating to the Inquiry on the Scope of Application of the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment issued by the Supreme People’s Court, or the Supreme Court’s Response Letter, further clarifies that seven types of financial organizations, including micro-loan lending companies and financing guarantee companies, are deemed as financial institutions licensed by the financial administrative authorities, and any disputes arising out of their financial business activities should not apply to the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment. However, as the regulatory authorities have wide discretion in administration, interpretation and enforcement of the laws and regulations, we cannot rule out the possibility that the regulatory authorities may hold different opinions on whether Quadruple LPR Limit applies to the loans funded by financial institutions on our platform. In that case, for loans facilitated at or above the Quadruple LPR limit become delinquent, we may not be able to collect parts of the interest that exceed the Quadruple LPR limit through the PRC judicial enforcement. As a result, our institutional funding partners may suffer losses, which would damage our reputation, results of operations and financial condition. According to the Supreme Court’s Response Letter, we believe that the Quadruple LPR Limit stipulated in the Private Lending Judicial Interpretation Amendment does not apply to the financial institutions. However, we cannot assure you that the regulatory authorities share the same view as ours. Currently, substantially all of our financial institutional partners that we cooperate with for funding new loans origination on our platform are financial institutions licensed by financial regulatory authorities.

On March 31, 2021, the PBOC released its No. 3 announcement in 2021, or the PBOC No. 3 Announcement, which stipulates, among others, that the annual interest rate of a loan should be the annualized form of ratio calculated based on the percentage of all expenses charged from the borrower for the borrowing to the principal actually borrowed by this borrower. The expenses charged from the borrower include the interests and the various expenses directly related to the borrowing. If the loan is repaid in installments, the remaining principal after the deduction of the total repaid principal should be deemed as the actual borrowed principal when calculating the annual interest rate. Compound interest rate and simple interest rate are both allowed to be used to calculate the annual interest rate, provided that if simple interest rate is used, it should be explicitly disclosed to the borrower. The PBOC No. 3 Announcement applies to deposit-taking financial institutions, consumer finance companies, micro-loan lending company, and internet platforms providing loan application services like us. It is our view that the implementation of PBOC No. 3 Announcement is not retrospective.

Before the promulgation of PBOC No. 3 Announcement, no rules or regulations explicitly defined the calculation method for the maximum interest rates permitted by the relevant laws. Historically, we calculated the interest rate of the loans on our platform on a basis of annual percentage rate, or APR. We have certain loans facilitated by our platform with interest rate over 24% per annum. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, the total amount of loans facilitated by our platform with interest rate over 24% was RMB8.1 billion, RMB15.2 billion and RMB8.3 billion (US$1.3 billion), representing 13.2%, 18.5% and 12.9% of the total loan origination volume in the same year. These loans have the terms ranging from one month to 36 months. As of December 31, 2020, of the total outstanding balance of loans with interest rate over 24% per annum, 2.1% was 15 to 89 calendar days past due and 2.2% was 90 to 179 calendar days past due. Upon the promulgation of No. 3 Announcement, we have defined our calculation method of APR as the annual all-in borrowing cost as a percentage of the outstanding principal after deducting all installments that have been repaid. We have explicitly disclosed the calculation method for the interest rate of the loans on our platform on a basis of APR to our borrowers. It is our belief that our calculation is in line with the simple interest rate provided in the PBOC No. 3 Announcement. However, we cannot assure you that our historical or current calculation method for the interest rate would be deemed to be in line with the simple interest rate provided in PBOC No. 3 Announcement. As the PBOC No. 3 Announcement is relatively new, there still exists great uncertainties with respect to its interpretation and application. We will maintain communication with the relevant authorities and closely monitor its enforcement.

20

Our introduction of new products and services may expose us to new challenges and more risks.

In 2020, we started displaying products of third-party online consumer finance partners on our platform, and the borrowers on our platform can submit loan applications and information authorization for these products through our platform. The third-party online consumer finance partners then can assess the borrowers’ creditworthiness and credit limits and match the borrowers with their own institutional funding partners or use their own funds to fund the loans if they are regulatorily competent to do so. We require the third-party online consumer finance partners to fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and the third-party online consumer finance partners should be fully responsible for any of their misconducts. However, as we have very limited control over those third-party online consumer finance partners, we cannot ensure their operations will be in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. If those third-party online consumer finance partners do not comply with any applicable laws and regulations and the borrowers are dissatisfied with their products displayed on our platform, our reputation and operation results could be adversely affected.

We operate in a market where the credit infrastructure is still at an early stage of development.

China’s credit infrastructure is still at an early stage of development. The Credit Reference Center established by the PBOC in 2002 has been the only credit reporting system in China. This centrally managed nationwide credit database operated by the Credit Reference Center only records limited credit information, such as tax payments, civil lawsuits, foreclosure and bankruptcy. Moreover, this credit database is only accessible to banks and a limited number of market players authorized by the Credit Reference Center and does not support sophisticated credit scoring and assessment. In 2015, the PBOC announced that it would open the credit reporting market to private sectors with a view to spurring competition and innovation, but it may be a long-term process to establish a widely-applicable, reliable and sophisticated credit infrastructure in the market we operate. Currently, as an intermediary between institutional funding partners and borrowers, we do not have access to the Credit Reference Center. Our institutional funding partners decide at their own discretion if to check any borrower’s credit status at the Credit Reference Center as they conduct credit assessment independently. In general, the borrowers on our platform give general authorization to the institutional funding partners to check the borrowers’ credit status from and report the borrowers’ defaults to the Credit Reference Center. In February 2018, Baihang Credit Information Co., Ltd., or Baihang, received the first business license in China to provide individual credit information service. Baihang will mainly provide services to internet loan companies, including online lending information intermediaries. We have started data sharing with Baihang. However, Baihang is a newly established company. Whether it can efficiently aggregate data from all different types of online databases with accuracy remains to be proven.

21

We are subject to credit cycle and the risk of deterioration of credit profiles of borrowers.

Our business is subject to credit cycle associated with the volatility of general economy. If economic conditions deteriorate, we may face increased risk of default or delinquency of borrowers, which will result in lower returns or losses. In the event that the creditworthiness of our borrowers deteriorates or we cannot track the deterioration of their creditworthiness, the criteria we use for the analysis of borrower credit profiles may be rendered inaccurate, and our risk management system may be subsequently rendered ineffective. This in turn may lead to higher default rates and adverse impacts on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial positions.

We rely on our proprietary credit-scoring model in assessing the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the risks associated with loans. If our credit-scoring model is flawed or ineffective, or if we otherwise fail or are perceived to fail to manage the default risks of loans facilitated through our platform, our reputation and market share would be materially and adversely affected, which would severely impact our business and results of operations.

Our ability to attract borrowers and institutional funding partners to, and build trust in, our platform is significantly dependent on our ability to effectively evaluate borrowers’ credit profiles and likelihood of default. To conduct this evaluation, we utilize our proprietary credit assessment model, or the Magic Mirror Model, which is built based on massive data collected through various channels, and strengthened by our sophisticated artificial intelligence and advanced machine learning techniques. The Magic Mirror Model categorizes borrowers into different credit ratings according to their risk profiles, based on which our risk pricing system assigns them appropriate interest rates, credit limits and loan durations. However, the Magic Mirror Model may not effectively predict future loan losses. Subject to credit assessment result for each loan application, a borrower is allowed to take out multiple loans at a time on our platform if his or her existing loans are not in default and the total outstanding balance is within the approved credit limit for the type of loan the borrower applies for. Credit limits are set by loan products, and thus a borrower may have a credit limit for each type of loans on our platform. A borrower’s credit limit for a particular type of loan is determined considering a range of factors, including (i) the borrower’s credit level based on his or her Magic Mirror score—borrowers with better Magic Mirror credit scores are generally given higher credit limits, (ii) the borrower’s credit needs, such as the type of loans being applied for, (iii) the borrower’s credit limits and credit performance for other types of loans on our platform, and (iv) overall investment demand from investors. A new Magic Mirror credit score is generated each time a borrower applies for a loan, which may change the borrower’s credit limit for that type of loan. As such, it is possible that borrowers may take out new loans on our platform to pay off their other existing loans facilitated by us or for other purposes. Given the practical difficulty in tracking and controlling the usage of borrowed funds, we are not able to effectively prevent borrowers from “rolling over” their loans on our platform. Although the Magic Mirror Model looks less favorably upon borrowers who have high credit line utilization ratios, it may not be able to timely and accurately adjust down the credit rating assigned to a borrower if such borrower masks his or her deteriorating creditworthiness by refinancing existing loans with new loans on our platform. If we are unable to effectively classify borrowers into the relative risk categories, we may be unable to offer attractive interest rates for borrowers and returns for investors and effectively manage the default risks of loans facilitated through our platform. We continuously refine the algorithms, data processing and machine learning used by the Magic Mirror Model, but if any of these decision-making and scoring systems contain programming or other errors, are ineffective or the data provided by borrowers or third parties are incorrect or stale, our loan pricing and approval process could be negatively affected, resulting in mispriced or misclassified loans or incorrect approvals or denials of loans.

For loans funded by our institutional funding partners, the institutional funding partners will review borrowers’ applications and may rely on our preliminary credit assessment we provide to them and then decide if to extend loans to such borrower as well as the credit limit after their independent credit review. If any data provided by borrowers or third parties are incorrect or stale or our preliminary credit assessment service is not effective, our cooperation with institutional funding partners could be negatively affected. In addition, we bear credit risks for a substantial majority of the loans funded by institutional funding partners to borrowers introduced by us. If our ability to provide preliminary credit assessment is not as effective or efficient as expected, our liquidity, financial conditions and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, if a borrower’s financial condition deteriorates after his or her loan application is approved, we may not be able to take measures to prevent such borrower’s default and thereby maintain a reasonably low default rate for loans facilitated through our platform.

22

Credit and other information that we receive from prospective borrowers and third parties about a borrower may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the borrower’s creditworthiness, which may compromise the accuracy of our credit assessment.

For the purpose of credit assessment, we obtain from prospective borrowers and third parties certain information of the prospective borrowers, which may not be complete, accurate or reliable. A credit score assigned to a borrower may not reflect that particular borrower’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate borrower information. Additionally, once we have obtained a borrower’s information, the borrower may subsequently (i) become delinquent in the payment of an outstanding obligation; (ii) default on a pre-existing debt obligation; (iii) take on additional debt; or (iv) sustain other adverse financial events, making the information we have previously obtained inaccurate. To better assess borrowers creditworthiness, we joined the credit and information sharing system set up by the National Internet Finance Association of China. A participant of this sharing system can obtain a borrower’s credit information shared by other participants. However, this sharing system is still at the primary stage of development and there are a limited number of participants and limited amount information in this sharing system. As a result, we cannot determine whether borrowers have outstanding loans through other consumer finance marketplaces not participating in this sharing system at the time they obtain a loan from us. This creates the risk that a borrower may borrow money through our platform in order to pay off loans on other consumer finance marketplaces and vice versa. If a borrower incurs additional debt before fully repaying any loan such borrower takes out on our platform, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her loan and the investor’s ability to receive investment returns associated with such loan. In addition, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, and could result in the financial distress or insolvency of the borrower. To the extent that a borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot repay all of his or her indebtedness, the obligations under the loans will rank pari passu to each other and the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors rather than to investors on our platform.

Such inaccurate or incomplete borrower information could compromise the accuracy of our credit assessment and adversely affect the effectiveness of our risk management, which could in turn harm our reputation, and as a result our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Loss of or failure to maintain relationship with our strategic partners may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We currently rely on a number of strategic partners in various aspects of our business. For example, in terms of user acquisition, we acquire a significant portion of our borrowers through a limited number of online channels from a limited number of our strategic partners. We rely on certain data partners in collecting credit information of borrowers for credit scoring and fraud detections. We anticipate that we will continue to leverage strategic relationships with existing strategic partners to grow our business while pursuing new relationships with additional strategic partners.

Pursuing, establishing and maintaining relationships with strategic partners require significant time and resources as does integrating third-party data and services with our system. Our current agreements with partners generally do not prohibit them from working with our competitors or from offering competing services. Our competitors may be more effective in providing incentives to our partners to favor their products or services, which may in turn reduce the volume of loans facilitated through our platform. Certain types of partners may devote more resources to support their own competing businesses. In addition, these partners may not perform as expected under our agreements with them, and we may have disagreements or disputes with them, which could adversely affect our brand and reputation. If we cannot successfully enter into and maintain effective strategic relationships with strategic partners, our business will be harmed.

In addition, if any of our partners fails to perform properly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to find an alternative in a timely and cost-efficient manner or at all. Any of these occurrences could result in our diminished ability to operate our business, potential liability to borrowers and institutional funding partners, inability to attract borrowers and institutional funding partners, reputational damage, regulatory intervention and financial harm, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

23

We have obligations to verify information relating to borrowers and detecting fraud. If we fail to perform such obligations to meet the requirements of relevant laws and regulations, we may be subject to liabilities.

Our business of connecting institutional funding partners and borrowers constitutes an intermediary service, and our contracts with institutional funding partners and borrowers are intermediation contracts under the Civil Code of the PRC. Under the Civil Code of the PRC, an intermediary that intentionally conceals any material information or provides false information in connection with the conclusion of an intermediation contract, which results in harm to the client’s interests may not claim for any service fee for its intermediary services, and is liable for any damage incurred by the client.

We refer borrowers to our institutional funding partners. The institutional funding partners will review the borrower’s application and our preliminary credit assessment, and then decide if to extend loans to such borrower as well as the credit limit after their independent credit review. Our agreements with these institutional funding partners and borrowers may be deemed as intermediary contracts under the Civil Code of the PRC. Therefore, if we fail to provide material information to institutional funding partners and are found to be at fault, for failure or deemed failure to exercise proper care, to conduct adequate information verification or supervision, we could be subject to liabilities as an intermediary under the Civil Code of the PRC. We leverage a large database of past fraud accounts information and sophisticated rule-based detection technology in detecting fraudulent behaviors. Based on new data collected and fraudulent behaviors detected during our daily business operations, we update our database on a monthly basis. As the laws, regulations, rules and governmental policies governing the online consumer finance industry are relatively new, it is still unclear to what extent online consumer finance platform should exercise care in detecting fraud. Although we believe that as an information intermediary, we should not bear the credit risk for institutional funding partners as long as we take reasonable measures to detect fraudulent behaviors, we cannot assure you that we would not be subject to any liabilities under the current laws, regulations, rules and governmental policies governing the online consumer finance industry if we fail to detect any fraudulent behavior. If that were to occur, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be deemed to use our own fund to finance certain loans and therefore subject us to regulatory risks.

The Interim Measures prohibits online finance information intermediaries from investing in loans using their own funds unless otherwise stipulated by laws and regulations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services—Regulations on online lending information intermediaries.” In 2019 and 2020, in order to reduce the outstanding balance of the loans funded by individual investors on our platform and improve our business model, we used quality assurance fund, which was historically set aside by us as a protection mechanism for the individual investors when the borrowers defaulted in principal and interest repayments, to repay outstanding balance of loans to individual investors on our platform who were protected by the quality assurance fund before the respective maturity dates. After repaying the outstanding balance of those loans, the borrowers continued to repay the remaining installments of principal and interest to our quality assurance fund. Such business practice might be regarded by relevant government authorities as investing in loans using our own funds, and therefore subject us to fines, penalties or other liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

In addition, pursuant to the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions, extending loans without the PBOC’s permission is deemed to be an illegal operation of financial business and the entity extending loans without the PBOC’s permission is deemed to be an illegal financial institution. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services—Regulations on illegal financial institutions and intermediaries.” In connection with our quality assurance commitments provided through third-party financing guarantee companies, we purchase creditors’ rights from third-party financing guarantee companies after these financing guarantee company repay the full overdue amounts to our institutional funding partners. After such purchase of creditors’ rights, the borrowers will continue to repay the remaining installments of principal and interest to us. We cannot rule out the possibility that relevant regulatory authorities may take the view that our such business practice constitutes an illegal operation of financial business without the PBOC’s permission and we may be deemed to be an illegal financial institution. If we were to find to violate the Measures for Illegal Financial Institutions, we would be subject to fines, penalties or other liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

24

Our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our results of operations and market share.

The online consumer finance industry in China is competitive and evolving. We compete with financial products and companies that attract borrowers, investors, and institutional funding partners. We primarily compete with leading online consumer finance companies in China. In addition, with respect to borrowers, we also compete with traditional financial institutions, such as consumer finance business units in commercial banks, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies; with respect to institutional funding partners, our product offerings also compete with other products and asset classes, such as equities, bonds, investment trust products, bank savings accounts, real estate and alternative asset classes.

Our competitors operate with different business models, have different cost structures or participate selectively in different market segments. They may ultimately prove more successful or more adaptable to new regulatory, technological and other developments. Some of our current and potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their platforms. Our competitors may also have more extensive borrower or investor bases, greater brand recognition and brand loyalty and broader partner relationships than us. Additionally, a current or potential competitor may acquire one or more of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one or more of our competitors. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future growth.

In addition, our competitors may be better at developing new products, responding faster to new technologies and undertaking more extensive marketing campaigns. When new competitors seek to enter our target market, or when existing market participants seek to increase their market share, they sometimes undercut the pricing and/or terms prevalent in that market, which could adversely affect our market share or ability to exploit new market opportunities. Also, since the online consumer finance industry in China is relatively new and fast evolving, potential institutional funding partners and borrowers may not fully understand how our platform works and may not be able to fully appreciate the additional customer protections and features that we have invested in and adopted on our platform as compared to others. Our pricing and terms could deteriorate if we fail to act to meet these competitive challenges. Furthermore, to the extent that our competitors are able to offer more attractive terms to our cooperation partners, such cooperation partners may choose to terminate their relationships with us. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation in our industry, the demand for our platform could stagnate or substantially decline, we could experience reduced revenues or our platform could fail to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.

If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-efficient way, our business and results of operations may be harmed.

We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brand effectively is critical to attracting new and retaining existing borrowers and institutional funding partners to our platform. This depends largely on the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and the success of the channels we use to promote our platform. If any of our current marketing channels become less effective, if we are unable to continue to use any of these channels, if the cost of using these channels were to significantly increase or if we are not successful in generating new channels, we may not be able to attract new borrowers and institutional funding partners in a cost-effective manner or convert potential borrowers and institutional funding partners into active borrowers and institutional funding partners on our platform.

Our efforts to build our brand have caused us to incur significant expenses, and it is likely that our future marketing efforts will require us to incur significant additional expenses. These efforts may not result in increased revenues in the immediate future or at all and, even if they do, any increases in revenues may not offset the expenses incurred. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand while incurring substantial expenses, our results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected, which may impair our ability to grow our business.

Any negative publicity with respect to us, the online consumer finance industry in general and our third party partners may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Reputation of our brand is critical to our business and competitiveness. Factors that are vital to our reputation include but are not limited to our ability to:

• maintain the quality and reliability of our platform;

• provide borrowers and institutional funding partners with a superior experience on our platform;

25

• enhance and improve our credit assessment and risk-pricing models;

• effectively manage and resolve borrower and institutional funding partner complaints; and

• effectively protect personal information and privacy of borrowers and institutional funding partners.

Any malicious or negative allegation made by the media or other parties about the foregoing or other aspects of our company, including but not limited to our management, business, compliance with law, financial condition or prospects, whether with merit or not, could severely compromise our reputation and harm our business and operating results.

As the online consumer finance industry is a new industry in China and the regulatory framework for this industry is also evolving, negative publicity about this industry may arise from time to time. Negative publicity about China’s online consumer finance industry in general may also have a negative impact on our reputation, regardless of whether we have engaged in any inappropriate activities. The PRC government has instituted specific rules, including the Interim Measures, Circular 141, the Interim Measures for Banks and its supplement, to develop a more transparent regulatory environment for the online consumer finance industry. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Consumer Finance Services.” Any players in China’s online consumer finance industry who are not in compliance with these regulations may adversely impact the reputation of the industry as a whole. Furthermore, any negative development in, or negative perception of, the online consumer finance industry as a whole, even if factually incorrect or based on isolated incidents, could compromise our image, undermine the trust and credibility we have established and impose a negative impact on our ability to attract new borrowers and institutional funding partners. Negative developments in the online consumer finance industry, such as widespread borrower defaults, fraudulent behavior and/or the closure of other online consumer finance platforms, may also lead to tightened regulatory scrutiny of the sector and limit the scope of permissible business activities that may be conducted by online consumer finance platforms like us. For instance, in 2015, there were a number of reports of business failures of, or accusations of fraud and unfair dealing against, certain companies in the online lending information industry in China. In 2019 and 2020, there were a number of reports of business failures of online lending information intermediary platforms in China, including some reputable ones. Furthermore, several criminal cases were reported to be charged against certain online lending information intermediary platforms. Although the market exits of these companies may result in more healthy and stable development of the online consumer finance industry, to the extent borrowers or institutional funding partners associate our company with these companies, they may be less willing to participate on our platform.

In addition, negative publicity about our partners, outsourced service providers or other counterparties, such as negative publicity about their loan collection practices and any failure by them to adequately protect the information of our borrowers, to comply with applicable laws and regulations or to otherwise meet required quality and service standards could harm our reputation. If any of the foregoing takes place, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Fraudulent activity on our platform could negatively impact our operating results, brand and reputation and cause the use of our loan products and services to decrease.

We are subject to the risk of fraudulent activity both on our platform and associated with borrowers, institutional funding partners and other third parties handling borrower information. Our resources, technologies and fraud detection tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. Significant increases in fraudulent activity could negatively impact our brand and reputation, result in losses suffered by the investors, reduce the volume of loans facilitated through our platform and lead us to take additional steps to reduce fraud risk, which could increase our costs and expenses. High profile fraudulent activity could even lead to regulatory intervention, and may divert our management’s attention and cause us to incur additional expenses and costs. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

26

Our current level of fee rates may decline in the future. Any material reduction in our fee rates could reduce our profitability.

We earn a substantial majority of our revenues from the service fees that we collect from the third-party guarantee companies or our institutional funding partners on the loans facilitated through our online marketplace and the fees that we charge from the borrowers as the guarantee fees. The fee rates may vary from different business models and third-party guarantee companies or institutional funding partners. Any material reduction in our fee rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in interest rates could negatively affect transaction volume facilitated through our platform.

All loans facilitated through our platform are issued with fixed interest rates. We determine the interest rates of the loans on our platform primarily based on the market conditions and the general interest rate environment rather than by referencing to a specific benchmark rate such as LIBOR. The fluctuation of interest rates may affect the demand for loan services on our platform. For example, a decrease in interest rates may cause potential borrowers to seek lower-priced loans from other channels. A high interest rate environment will likely increase the funding costs for our institutional funding partners, which may lead to a higher rate of return required by such institutional funding partners and thereby dampen their desire to fund borrowers on our platform. If we fail to respond to the fluctuations in interest rates in a timely manner and adjust our loan products offering, the potential and existing investors may lose potential interest returns in our platform and products and delay or reduce future loan investments, and the potential and existing borrowers may show less interest in our loan products and marketplace. As a result, fluctuations in the interest rate environment may discourage institutional funding partners and borrowers from participating in our platform, which may adversely affect our business.

We may not be able to obtain additional capital on favorable terms or at all.

We need to make continued investments in facilities, hardware, software, technology systems and to retain talents to remain competitive. Due to the unpredictable nature of the capital markets and our industry, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital on terms favorable to us, or at all, if and when required, especially if we experience disappointing operating results. If adequate capital is not available to us as required, our ability to fund our operations, take advantage of unanticipated opportunities, develop or enhance our infrastructure or respond to competitive pressures could be significantly limited, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we do raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of our shareholders could be significantly diluted. These newly issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing shareholders.

Misconduct, errors and failure to function by our employees and third-party service providers could harm our business and reputation.

We are exposed to many types of operational risks, including the risk of misconduct and errors by our employees and third-party service providers. Our business depends on our employees and third-party service providers to interact with potential borrowers and institutional funding partners, process large numbers of transactions and support the loan collection process, all of which involve the use and disclosure of personal information. We could be materially adversely affected if transactions were redirected, misappropriated or otherwise improperly executed, if personal information was disclosed to unintended recipients or if an operational breakdown or failure in the processing of transactions occurred, whether as a result of human error, purposeful sabotage or fraudulent manipulation of our operations or systems. In addition, the manner in which we store and use certain personal information and interact with borrowers and institutional funding partners through our platform is governed by various PRC laws. It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct or errors by employees or third-party service providers, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses. If any of our employees or third-party service providers take, convert or misuse funds, documents or data or fail to follow protocol when interacting with borrowers and institutional funding partners, we could be liable for damages and subject to regulatory actions and penalties. We could also be perceived to have facilitated or participated in the illegal misappropriation of funds, documents or data, or the failure to follow protocol, and therefore be subject to civil or criminal liability. In addition to our own collecting team, we also use certain third-party service providers for loan collection services. Aggressive practices or misconduct by any of our third-party service providers in the course of collecting loans could damage our reputation.

27

Any failure to comply with any existing or future laws and regulations related to data protection may subject us to civil liabilities, administrative penalties or even criminal penalties.

The regulatory framework on data collection, using, storage, and processing is relatively new and rapidly evolving, and some of them are ambiguous. In recent years, the PRC governmental authorities have strengthened the regulation of data collection, using, storage, and processing, especially for the personal data crawled from internet websites. The Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT, the MPS, and the State Administration for Market Regulation, or the SAMR, jointly promulgated the Notice on Rectification of Illegal Collection of Personal Information on Application, or the Notice on Illegal Collection on January 23, 2019, which requires application operators to strictly comply with the Cyber Security Law of the PRC and strengthens the personal information protection. Application operators should, among others, (i) clearly state the authorized purpose, methods and scope of the collection and usage of personal information, and obtain the consent of users for collecting and processing such users’ personal information, and (ii) establish appropriate user information protection systems with remedial measures. To further implement and interpret the Notice on Illegal Collection, the Measures on Identifying Illegality of Personal Information Collection Conducts on Application was promulgated on November 28, 2019. In July 2020, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress released the Data Security Law (Draft) for public comments, which requires data processing intermediaries to identify the source of data, review the identifications of data providers and users, and maintain the transaction records. Transaction of data with illegal source may result in different penalties, including but not limited to order for rectification, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, and revocation of business license or other relevant licenses. On March 22, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration Office of China, or the CAC, the MIIT, the MPS, and the SAMR jointly promulgated the Regulations on the Scope of Necessary Personal Information Collected by the Frequently Used Mobile Applications, or the Scope of Necessary Personal Information, which will come into effect on May 1, 2021, which provides, among others, that: (i) the application operators may not refuse to provide fundamental function services to the users for reason that such users refuse to provide the personal information out of the scope of necessity; (ii) the fundamental function service of online lending applications is to facilitate loans provided to the users online for use of personal consumption and business operation; and (iii) the necessary personal information includes the borrower’s mobile phone number, name, bank account, as well as type, number and valid period of its identity card. The different governmental authorities, including the MIIT, have been inspecting various mobile applications on the market on the enforcement of data protection and may continue to do so in the future, even with more stringent scrutiny. If the authorities deem our mobile applications as violating laws and regulations related to data protection, they may order us to make rectifications. And if they are not satisfied with our rectification, they may further order removal of our mobile applications from the relevant mobile application store, which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business depends on our employees and third-party service providers to interact with potential borrowers and institutional funding partners, process large numbers of transactions and support the loan collection process, all of which involve the use and disclosure of personal information. Compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations is a rigorous and time-intensive process. We have established a comprehensive administrative mechanism and standardized employee training system for stringent information security management, and we have received both the APP Security Certification and the APP Information Security Certification with level 3 rating, the highest rating level in security evaluation standard, from China National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center. We have also been deploying innovative technologies to promote user data protection. For example, we launched a Smart Finance Institute in 2018 for research and development in the field of artificial intelligence that can be applied in various aspects of financial services. In addition, we are also a member of the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee and Mobile Application (APP) Security Committee, maintaining up to date knowledge and compliant regarding the latest cyber-security regulatory requirements. For the purpose of credit assessment, we also collaborate with third-party data providers to obtain the borrowers’ credit and behavior data, with general consents from the borrowers. Although we require the third-party data providers guarantee that the data provided to us is lawfully collected and legally authorized and their collaboration with us will not violate any applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that the third-party data providers would strictly comply with the applicable laws and regulation during their process of data collection, using, storage, and processing. If any of our third-party data providers fails to comply with applicable data protection laws and regulations, our reputation could suffer and we could become subject to regulatory intervention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our ability to collect delinquent loans is impaired, our business and results of operations might be materially and adversely affected.

We primarily rely on our in-house collection team to handle the collection of delinquent loans. We also engage certain third-party collection service providers to assist us with payment collection. If our or third party agencies’ primary collection methods, such as phone calls, text messages, legal letters and legal proceedings, are not as effective as they were and we fail to respond quickly and improve our collection methods, our delinquent loan collection rate may decrease and our investors may suffer loss. In addition, we bear credit risks for a substantial majority of the loans funded by our institutional funding partners to borrowers introduced by us. If our ability to collect delinquent loans is not as effective or efficient as expected, our liquidity, financial conditions and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

28

Moreover, according to the Circular 141, delinquent loans shall not be collected by means of violence, intimidation, insult, defamation, or harassment. Any violation of the Circular 141 may result in penalties, including but not limited to suspension of operation, orders to make rectification, condemnation, revocation of license, be ordered to cease business operations, and even criminal liabilities. If the collection methods we use in collecting delinquent loans are viewed by the borrowers or regulatory authorities as harassments, threats or other illegal conducts, we may be subject to lawsuits initiated by the borrowers or prohibited by the regulatory authorities from using certain collection methods. If this were to happen and we fail to adopt alternative collection methods in a timely manner or the alternative collection methods are proven not effective, we might not be able to maintain our delinquent loan collection rate and the investors’ confidence in our platform may be negatively affected. Furthermore, the MPS promulgated the Guidance on Several Issues for Soft Violence Regarding Criminal Case, or the Guidance on Soft Violence, on April 9, 2019, which provides that, among others, harassments by means of internet or telecommunication to disturb people’s normal life, work, production, business, and social order may be deemed as soft violence, which may be subject to criminal liabilities. In 2019, several public security authorities in different provinces took actions against some loan collection outsourcing companies, and even criminal cases were reported to be charged against some of them. We have established strict implementation policies to ensure that our collection personnel and third-party collection service providers do not engage in aggressive practices. However, our in-house collection team is large and we cannot assure each of them would strictly comply with our policies. Furthermore, we have no direct control over the management of third-party collection service providers. If any practices by our in-house collection team members or our third-party collection service providers were deemed by the governmental authorities as aggressive collection or soft violence, our reputation and business would be materially and adversely affected. If any of the foregoing takes place and impairs our ability to collect delinquent loans, the transaction volumes on our platform will decrease and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. On August 31, 2020, the MIIT published the Administrative Provisions for Text Message and Voice Call Service (Draft) for public comments, which provides that no organization is allowed to send commercial text messages or make commercial calls to users without explicit consents of users, and the organization should no longer send messages or make calls to users if explicitly required by users. In case of violation, the relevant governmental authorities may impose penalties, including orders for rectifications, public warnings, fines from RMB10,000 to 30,000, revocation of telecommunication licenses and cessation of phone number resources.

Cyber-attacks, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins or similar disruptions of us or of a third party could result in disclosure or misuse of confidential information and misappropriation of funds of our borrowers and institutional funding partners, subject us to liabilities, cause reputational harm and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Our platform collects, stores and processes certain personal and other sensitive data from our borrowers and institutional funding partners. The massive data that we have processed and stored makes us or third-party service providers who host our servers a target and potentially vulnerable to cyber-attacks, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins or similar disruptions. While we have taken steps to protect the confidential information that we have access to and put in place internal reporting procedures relating to cybersecurity incidents, our security measures could be breached. As of the date of this annual report, we have not experienced any material cyber security incidents. However, we cannot assure you that our security measures will not be breached in the future. Because techniques used to sabotage or obtain unauthorized access to systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access to our platform could cause confidential borrower and institutional funding partner information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. As personally identifiable and other confidential information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous domestic and international jurisdictions. For example, in China, the Administrative Measures for the Security of the International Network of Computer Information Network issued in December 1997 and amended in January 2011 requires us to report any data or security breaches to the local offices of the MPS within 24 hours of any such breach. Also, the Data Security Law (Draft) requires that the following systems relating to data or data security should be established: a data classification management system based on importance of data, a risk assessment system, a monitoring and early warning system, and an emergency disposal system.

The Cyber Security Law of the PRC requires us to take immediate remedial measures when we discover that our products or services are subject to risks, such as security defects or bugs. Such remedial measures include, informing our borrowers and institutional funding partners of the specific risks and reporting such risks to the relevant competent departments. Any inability to protect confidential information of our borrowers and institutional funding partners could result in additional cost and liability for us, damage our reputation, inhibit the use of our platform and harm our business.

29

We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity and operational risks relating to the third parties upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including, among others, third-party online payment service providers who manage accounts for certain borrower and institutional funding partner funds. As a result of increasing consolidation and interdependence of technology systems, a technology failure, cyber-attack or other information or security breach that significantly compromises the systems of one entity could have a material impact on its counterparties. Although our agreements with third-party payment service providers provide that each party is responsible for the cybersecurity of its own systems, any cyber-attack, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins or similar disruptions of such third-party payment service providers could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to serve our users, and could even result in misappropriation of funds of our borrowers and institutional funding partners. If that were to occur, both we and third-party payment service providers could be held liable to borrowers and institutional funding partners who suffer losses from the misappropriation.

Security breaches or unauthorized access to confidential information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, or if design flaws in our technology infrastructure are exposed and exploited, our relationships with borrowers and institutional funding partners could be severely damaged, we could incur significant liability and our business and operations could be adversely affected.

Any failure by our institutional funding partners or third-party service providers to comply with applicable anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws and regulations could damage our reputation.

If any of our institutional funding partners fails to comply with applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, it could become subject to regulatory intervention or sanction and its business may be adversely effected, which could further have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business financial condition and results of operations.

Currently, we rely on our third-party service providers, in particular payment companies and custodian bank, that handle the transfer of funds between borrowers and lenders, to have their own appropriate anti-money laundering policies and procedures. The payment companies are subject to anti-money laundering obligations under applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations and are regulated in that respect by the PBOC. If any of our third-party service providers fails to comply with applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, our reputation could suffer and we could become subject to regulatory intervention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Interim Measures have imposed on us the obligation of anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing. The Custodian Guidelines also requires online lending information intermediaries to highlight the anti-money laundering obligation in the agreement with commercial banks acting as custodian banks. Online lending information intermediaries are obligated to cooperate with custodian banks to fulfill the anti-money laundering obligations. In October 2018, the PBOC, the CBIRC, and the CSRC, jointly issued the Anti-money Laundering and Anti-terrorism Financing Administrative Measures for Internet Finance Institution, or Anti-money Laundering and Anti-terrorism Measures, providing that internet finance institutions are obliged to accept the anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing inspection conducted by the PBOC and its branches. The Anti-money Laundering and Anti-terrorism Measures also authorized the establishment of the internet finance anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing monitor platform, or the Monitor Platform, by the National Internet Finance Association, or NIFA under the instruction of PBOC and other financial governmental authorities to improve the online monitoring mechanism and information sharing between the institutions. To comply with the Anti-money Laundering and Anti-terrorism Measures, we are formulating policies and procedures, including internal controls and “know-your-customer” procedures and accessing the Monitor Platform. We cannot assure you that we will be able to establish and maintain effective anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing policies and procedures to protect our platform from being exploited for money laundering or terrorism financing purposes or that such policies and procedures, if adopted, will be deemed to be in compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws and regulations, including the Interim Measures.

30

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.

We are subject to reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The SEC, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As we are no longer an emerging growth company, we are subject to the requirement that an independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) through (c) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020. Our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCooper Zhong Tian LLP, also attested and reported our internal control over financial reporting. See the attestation report on page F-2 issued by our independent registered public accounting firm for further details. However, if we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

Our operations depend on the performance of the internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China.

Almost all access to the internet in China is maintained through state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the MIIT. We primarily rely on a limited number of telecommunication service providers to provide us with data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines and internet data centers to host our servers. We have limited access to alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet infrastructure or the fixed telecommunications networks provided by telecommunication service providers. With the expansion of our business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our platform. We cannot assure you that the internet infrastructure and the fixed telecommunications networks in China will be able to support the demands associated with the continued growth in internet usage.

In addition, we have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunication service providers. If the prices we pay for telecommunications and internet services rise significantly, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Furthermore, if internet access fees or other charges to internet users increase, our user traffic may decline and our business may be harmed.

Any significant disruption in service on our platform, in our computer systems or third party service providers’ systems, including events beyond our control, could prevent us from processing or posting loans on our platform, reduce the attractiveness of our platform and result in a loss of borrowers or investors.

In the event of a platform outage and physical data loss, our ability to perform our servicing obligations, process loan applications or make funds available on our platform would be materially and adversely affected. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our platform and our underlying network infrastructure are critical to our operations, customer service, reputation and our ability to retain existing and attract new borrowers and institutional funding partners. Much of our system hardware is hosted in a leased facility located in Shanghai that is operated by our IT staff. We also maintain a real-time backup system in the same facility and a remote backup system at a separate facility also located in Shanghai. Our operations depend on our ability to protect our systems against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues, environmental conditions, computer viruses or attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events. If there is a lapse in service or damage to our leased facilities in Shanghai, we could experience interruptions and delays in our service and may incur additional expense in arranging new facilities.

31

Any interruptions or delays in our service, whether as a result of third-party or our error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm our relationships with our borrowers and institutional funding partners and our reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that we may incur. Our disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and we may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage. These factors could prevent us from processing or posting payments on loans, damage our brand and reputation, divert our employees’ attention, subject us to liability and cause borrowers and institutional funding partners to abandon our platform, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our platform and internal systems rely on software that is highly technical, and if it contains undetected errors, our business could be adversely affected.

Our platform and internal systems rely on software that is highly technical and complex. In addition, our platform and internal systems depend on the ability of such software to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of data. The software on which we rely has contained, and may now or in the future contain, undetected errors or bugs. Some errors may only be discovered after the code has been released for external or internal use. Errors or other design defects within the software on which we rely may result in a negative experience for borrowers and institutional funding partners using our platform, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, result in errors or compromise our ability to protect borrower or investor data or our intellectual property. Any errors, bugs or defects discovered in the software on which we rely could result in harm to our reputation, loss of borrowers or investors or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to prevent others from unauthorized use of our intellectual property, which could harm our business and competitive position.

We regard our trademarks, domain names, know-how, proprietary technologies and similar intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on a combination of intellectual property laws and contractual arrangements, including confidentiality, invention assignment and non-compete agreements with our employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. See also “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Intellectual Property.” Despite these measures, any of our intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or misappropriated, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages. In addition, because of the rapid pace of technological change in our industry, parts of our business rely on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties on reasonable terms, or at all.

It is often difficult to maintain and enforce intellectual property rights in China. Statutory laws and regulations are subject to judicial interpretation and enforcement and may not be applied consistently due to the lack of clear guidance on statutory interpretation. Confidentiality, invention assignment and non-compete agreements may be breached by counterparties, and there may not be adequate remedies available to us for any such breach. Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights or to enforce our contractual rights in China. Preventing any unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and costly and the steps we take may be inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual property. In the event that we resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, such litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our managerial and financial resources. We can provide no assurance that we will prevail in such litigation. In addition, our trade secrets may be leaked or otherwise become available to, or be independently discovered by, our competitors. To the extent that our employees or consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related know-how and inventions. Any failure in protecting or enforcing our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

32

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and operations.

We cannot be certain that our operations or any aspects of our business do not or will not infringe upon or otherwise violate trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. We may be from time to time in the future subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, there may be third-party trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights that are infringed by our products, services or other aspects of our business without our awareness. Holders of such intellectual property rights may seek to enforce such intellectual property rights against us in China, the United States or other jurisdictions. If any third-party infringement claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert management’s time and other resources from our business and operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their merits.

Additionally, the application and interpretation of China’s intellectual property right laws and the procedures and standards for granting trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights in China are still evolving and are uncertain, and we cannot assure you that PRC courts or regulatory authorities would agree with our analysis. If we were found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be subject to liability for our infringement activities or may be prohibited from using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing fees or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We may be held liable for information or content displayed on, retrieved from or linked to our mobile applications, which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

In addition to our website, we also offer consumer finance products through our mobile applications, which are regulated by the Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet Applications Information Services, or the APP Provisions, promulgated by the CAC on June 28, 2016 and effective on August 1, 2016. According to the APP Provisions, the providers of mobile applications shall not create, copy, publish or distribute information and content that is prohibited by laws and regulations. We have implemented internal control procedures screening the information and content on our mobile applications to ensure their compliance with the APP Provisions. However, we cannot assure that all the information or content displayed on, retrieved from or linked to our mobile applications complies with the requirements of the APP Provisions at all times. If our mobile applications were found to be violating the APP Provisions, we may be subject to administrative penalties, including warning, service suspension or removal of our mobile applications from the relevant mobile application store, which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We may from time to time be subject to claims, controversies, lawsuits and legal proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and reputation.

We may from time to time become subject to or involved in various claims, controversies, lawsuits, and legal proceedings. For example, we once received a claim from an individual asserting that he has an equity ownership in us pursuant to an alleged agreement, dated February 27, 2008, concerning Shanghai Daifeng, our then-operating entity, which involved, among other things, a contemplated sale of 27% of beneficial ownership of Shanghai Daifeng to an investor represented by the individual for US$189,000. The alleged agreement was not executed by Shanghai Daifeng and was never implemented. The contemplated sale never took place. We believe the claim is without merit.

However, claims, lawsuits, and litigations are subject to inherent uncertainties, and we are uncertain whether the foregoing claim would develop into a lawsuit. Lawsuits and litigations may cause us to incur defense costs, utilize a significant portion of our resources and divert management’s attention from our day-to-day operations, any of which could harm our business. Any settlements or judgments against us could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, negative publicity regarding claims or judgments made against us may damage our reputation and may result in material adverse impact on us.

From time to time we may evaluate and potentially consummate strategic investments or acquisitions, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial results.

We may evaluate and consider strategic investments, combinations, acquisitions or alliances to further increase the value of our platform and better serve borrowers and institutional funding partners. These transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations if consummated. If we are able to identify an appropriate business opportunity, we may not be able to successfully consummate the transaction and, even if we do consummate such a transaction, we may be unable to obtain the benefits or avoid the difficulties and risks of such transaction.

33

Strategic investments or acquisitions will involve risks commonly encountered in business relationships, including:

• difficulties in assimilating and integrating the operations, personnel, systems, data, technologies, rights, platforms, products and services of the acquired business;

• inability of the acquired technologies, products or businesses to achieve expected levels of revenue, profitability, productivity or other benefits;

• difficulties in retaining, training, motivating and integrating key personnel;

• diversion of management’s time and resources from our daily operations;

• difficulties in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies within the combined organizations;

• difficulties in retaining relationships with customers, employees and suppliers of the acquired business;

• risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no prior experience;

• regulatory risks, including remaining in good standing with existing regulatory bodies or receiving any necessary pre-closing or post-closing approvals, as well as being subject to new regulators with oversight over an acquired business;

• assumption of contractual obligations that contain terms that are not beneficial to us, require us to license or waive intellectual property rights or increase our risk for liability;

• failure to successfully further develop the acquired technology;

• liability for activities of the acquired business before the acquisition, including intellectual property infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities and other known and unknown liabilities;

• potential disruptions to our ongoing businesses; and

• unexpected costs and unknown risks and liabilities associated with strategic investments or acquisitions.

We may not make any investments or acquisitions, or any future investments or acquisitions may not be successful, may not benefit our business strategy, may not generate sufficient revenues to offset the associated acquisition costs or may not otherwise result in the intended benefits. In addition, we cannot assure you that any future investment in or acquisition of new businesses or technology will lead to the successful development of new or enhanced loan products and services or that any new or enhanced loan products and services, if developed, will achieve market acceptance or prove to be profitable.

Our business depends on the continued efforts of our senior management. If one or more of our key executives were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business may be severely disrupted.

Our business operations depend on the continued services of our senior management, particularly the executive officers named in this annual report. While we have provided different incentives to our management, we cannot assure you that we can continue to retain their services. If one or more of our key executives were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to replace them easily or at all, our future growth may be constrained, our business may be severely disrupted and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we may incur additional expenses to recruit, train and retain qualified personnel. In addition, although we have entered into confidentiality and non-competition agreements with our management, there is no assurance that any member of our management team will not join our competitors or form a competing business. If any dispute arises between our current or former officers and us, we may have to incur substantial costs and expenses in order to enforce such agreements in China or we may be unable to enforce them at all.

34

Competition for employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the qualified and skilled employees needed to support our business.

We believe our success depends on the efforts and talent of our employees, including risk management, software engineering, financial and marketing personnel. Our future success depends on our continued ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain qualified and skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled technical, risk management and financial personnel is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Some of the companies with which we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.

In addition, we invest significant time and expenses in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur significant expenses in hiring and training new employees, and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrowers and institutional funding partners could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect to our business.

Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The economy in China has experienced increases in inflation and labor costs in recent years. As a result, average wages in the PRC are expected to continue to increase. In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pension, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to control our labor costs or pass on these increased labor costs to our users by increasing the fees of our services, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We are subject to changing law and regulations regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of non-compliance.

We are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and the various regulatory authorities in China and the Cayman Islands, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.

If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our business.

We believe that a critical component of our success is our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encourages teamwork and cultivates creativity. As we develop the infrastructure of a public company and continue to grow, we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could negatively impact our future success, including our ability to attract and retain employees, encourage innovation and teamwork and effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives.

35

We do not have any business insurance coverage.

Insurance companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of insurance products as insurance companies in more developed economies. Currently, we do not have any business liability or disruption insurance to cover our operations. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any uninsured business disruptions may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We face risks related to COVID-19 outbreaks, other health epidemics and outbreaks and natural disasters, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

We are vulnerable to natural disasters and other calamities. Fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, war, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events may give rise to server interruptions, breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability to provide products and services on our platform.

Our business has been adversely affected by the effects of COVID-19 outbreaks. In early 2020, in response to intensifying efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19, the Chinese government took a number of actions, which included extending the Chinese New Year holiday, quarantining and otherwise treating individuals in China who had contracted the COVID-19, asking China residents to remain at home and to avoid gathering in public, and other actions. The COVID-19 had also resulted in temporary closure of many corporate offices, retail stores, and manufacturing facilities and factories across China. In response to the pandemic, we made remote working arrangements and suspended business travels to ensure the safety and health of our employees. All of the above measures reduced our business operation capacity, impaired our ability to collect delinquent loans, and negatively affected our operating results. The outbreak of COVID-19 also caused an increase in default of the loans on our platform as the extension of the Chinese New Year holiday and suspension of business activities across various sectors are likely to hurt income of the borrowers on our platform. As a result, the provision for loans receivable, accounts receivable and quality assurance payable increased which negatively impacted our earnings in the first half of 2020. Also, as a result of the sharp slowdown in consumption activities and the increase in default by borrowers on our platform, our loan volume also experienced a decline in the first half of 2020 compared to the first half of 2019 and the fourth quarter of 2019 due to our adoption of a more prudent approach in facilitating new loans.

In addition, normal economic life throughout China was sharply curtailed during the outbreak of COVID-19 and opportunities for discretionary consumption were extremely limited. Our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic harms the Chinese economy in general. As the pandemic erupts in countries and regions other than China in which we operate, these countries and regions would be affected by some or all or the above risks and resulting losses.

While many of the restrictions on movement within China have been relaxed as of the date of this annual report, there is great uncertainty as to the future progress of the disease, especially the duration and severity of COVID-19 and the long-term impacts on China’s economy and our industry. Although China has been gradually recovering from the outbreak of COVID-19 and our business operations have also experienced a recovery, but uncertainties still persists which might affect the results of our operations in the future.

In addition, our business could also be adversely affected by the effects of Ebola virus disease, Zika virus disease, H1N1 flu, H7N9 flu, avian flu, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or other epidemic, since it could require our employees to be quarantined and/or our offices to be disinfected or even temporarily closed.

Our headquarters are located in Shanghai, where most of our directors and management and a large majority of our employees currently reside. In addition, most of our system hardware and back-up systems are hosted in leased facilities located in Shanghai. Consequently, we are highly susceptible to factors adversely affecting Shanghai. If any of the abovementioned natural disasters, health epidemics or other outbreaks were to occur in Shanghai, our operation may experience material disruptions, such as temporary closure of our offices and suspension of services, disruption of communications between our headquarters and overseas operations, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

36

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

If the PRC government deems that the contractual arrangements in relation to our consolidated variable interest entities do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.

Foreign ownership of internet-based businesses, such as distribution of online information, is subject to restrictions under current PRC laws and regulations. For example, foreign investors are generally not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunication service provider and any such foreign investor must have experience in providing value-added telecommunications services overseas and maintain a good track record in accordance with the Guidance Catalog of Industries for Foreign Investment promulgated in 2007, as amended several times during 2011 to 2019 and further amended by Special Administrative Measures for the Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) in 2020, and other applicable laws and regulations. PRC regulations impose sanctions for engaging in commercial internet information services, which is a sub-set of value-added telecommunication business, without a value-added telecommunication service license for internet content provider, or the ICP License, and sanctions for engaging in the operation of online data processing and transaction processing, which is another sub-set of value-added telecommunication business, without a value-added telecommunication service license for online data processing and transaction processing, or the ODPTP License. These sanctions include rectification orders and warnings from the PRC communication administrations, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, and suspension or termination of operating of the websites and mobile applications in question.

We are a Cayman Islands company and our PRC subsidiaries are considered foreign invested enterprises. Before the Interim Measures was published in August 2016, there was no clear official guidance or interpretation from the PRC government as to whether online consumer finance service was a type of value-added telecommunication services and whether its provider should be subject to value-added telecommunication regulations. However, we believe the online consumer finance services offered through our online platform constitute a type of value-added telecommunication services that foreign ownership and investment is restricted and therefore we should operate our online platform through a variable interest entity to ensure compliance with the relevant PRC laws and regulations. We have entered into the following four separate sets of contractual arrangements: (i) among Shanghai Guangjian, Shanghai Shanghu (with respect to the business operation agreement and the exclusive technology consulting and service agreement only), Beijing Paipairongxin, Shanghai PPDai (with respect to the exclusive technology consulting and service agreement only), a subsidiary of Beijing Paipairongxin, and the shareholders of Beijing Paipairongxin to conduct our online lending information intermediary business in the past; (ii) among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Zihe and the shareholders of Shanghai Zihe to provide services to our institutional funding partners; (iii) among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Nianqiao and the shareholders of Shanghai Nianqiao to provide technological and outsourcing services to clients; (iv) among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Ledao and the shareholders of Shanghai Ledao for new business we plan to operate in the future; and (v) among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Yougao and the shareholders of Shanghai Yougao for expanding our borrower base in China. For a detailed description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” As a result of these contractual arrangements, we have obtained control over Beijing Paipairongxin, Shanghai Zihe, Shanghai Nianqiao, Shanghai Ledao, Shanghai Yougao and their subsidiaries and consolidate their operating results in our financial statements under U.S. GAAP. Shanghai PPDai has been operating our online lending information intermediary business, including, among others, operations of our www.ppdai.com website since its incorporation. Shanghai PPDai had made applications for value-added telecommunication business license with the relevant local telecommunication regulatory authority before the Interim Measures was promulgated. Due to the lack of detailed rules regulating the online consumer finance service and clarification of the nature of this innovative business model, the local telecommunication regulatory authority had tentatively put our applications on hold.

37

After the Interim Measures came into force, based on our communications with local telecommunication regulatory authorities, online lending information intermediaries such as us should apply for value-added telecommunication business license. However, according to the Interim Measures, an online lending information platform may initiate its application for value-added telecommunication business license only after it completes the required filing with local financial regulatory authority. In June 2017, Shanghai Financial Service Office issued a consultation draft of Implementation Measures on the Business Management of Online Lending Information Intermediaries in Shanghai. Such consultation draft sketched a proposed record-filing procedures, however, such consultation draft currently is still not formally promulgated yet and local financial regulatory authority has yet to accept the filing application for the online lending information intermediaries. As a result, we are currently unable to make the necessary filing or apply for the value-added telecommunication business license for Shanghai PPDai.

We have ceased facilitating new loans with funding from individual investors on our platform since October 2019 and improve the business model through the acquisition of better quality borrowers and transition of our investor base from individual investors to institutional funding partners. However, the interpretation of laws and regulations in the context of online consumer finance industry still remains uncertain, and it is unclear whether the online consumer finance service providers like Shanghai Zihe and its subsidiary are required to obtain the ICP License or the ODPTP License, or any other kind of value-added telecommunication service licenses, or the VATS Licenses. Although certain of our PRC subsidiaries have obtained the ICP License or the ODPTP License, it is still uncertain if they are the appropriate licenses for operating online consumer finance business as required by the regulatory authorities. The regulatory regime of online consumer finance industry evolves rapidly. The regulatory authorities in the future may explicitly require any of our VIEs or subsidiaries of our VIEs to obtain additional ICP Licenses, ODPTP Licenses, or issue new laws to institute a new kind of VATS License. We cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain the additional ICP License, the ODPTP License, or any new VATS License on a timely manner, or at all, which would subject us to the sanctions and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects.

In the opinion of our PRC counsel, Jingtian & Gongcheng Law Firm (Shanghai), our current ownership structure, the ownership structure of Shanghai Guangjian, Shanghai Shanghu, Beijing Paipairongxin and its subsidiaries, the ownership structure of Shanghai Manyin and Shanghai Zihe, the ownership structure of Shanghai Manyin and Shanghai Nianqiao, the ownership structure of Shanghai Manyin and Shanghai Ledao, the contractual arrangements among Shanghai Guangjian, Shanghai Shanghu (with respect to the business operation agreement and the exclusive technology consulting and service agreement only), Beijing Paipairongxin, Shanghai PPDai (with respect to the exclusive technology consulting and service agreement only) and the shareholders of Beijing Paipairongxin, the contractual arrangements among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Zihe and the shareholders of Shanghai Zihe, the contractual arrangements among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Nianqiao and the shareholders of Shanghai Nianqiao, the contractual arrangements among Shanghai Manyin, Shanghai Ledao and the shareholders of Shanghai Ledao, and the contractual arrangements among Shanghai Manyin, Chengdu Yougao and the shareholders of Chengdu Yougao are not in violation of existing PRC laws, regulations and rules; and these contractual arrangements are valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms and applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect.

However, Jingtian & Gongcheng Law Firm (Shanghai) has also advised us that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future PRC laws and regulations and there can be no assurance that the PRC government will ultimately take a view that is consistent with the opinion of our PRC counsel. For example, on March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress enacted the Foreign Investment Law of the PRC, or the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since it is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign investment” refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition contains a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. On December 26, 2019, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Regulations on the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020. However, the Implementation Regulations on the Foreign Investment Law still does not explicitly define whether contractual arrangement would be deemed as a form of foreign investment. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under the PRC laws and regulations. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

38

We rely on contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entities for a significant portion of our business operations, and such contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entities, namely, Beijing Paipairongxin, Shanghai Zihe, Shanghai Nianqiao, Shanghai Ledao and Chengdu Yougao, to operate our online consumer finance platform business, including the operation of www.ppdai.com website and the provision of services to institutional funding partners, as well as certain other complementary businesses. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with control over our consolidated variable interest entities. For example, consolidated variable interest entities and shareholders of consolidated variable interest entities as well as other parties to the contractual arrangements may fail to fulfill their contractual obligations to us, such as failure to maintain our website and use the domain names and trademarks in a manner as stipulated in the contractual arrangements, or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests.

If we had direct ownership of our consolidated variable interest entities, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of our consolidated variable interest entities, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance of obligations under the contractual arrangements by our consolidated variable interest entities, shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities, and other parties to the contractual arrangements to exercise control over our consolidated variable interest entities. The shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities may not act in the best interests of our company or may not perform their obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate our business through the contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entities. Although we have the right to replace any shareholder of our consolidated variable interest entities under the contractual arrangements, if any of these shareholders are uncooperative or any dispute relating to these contracts remains unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC laws and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings, the outcome of which will be subject to uncertainties. See “—Any failure by our consolidated variable interest entities, shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities or other parties to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material adverse effect on our business.” Therefore, our contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entities and shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities may not be as effective in ensuring our control over the relevant portion of our business operations as direct ownership would be.

Any failure by our consolidated variable interest entities, shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities or other parties to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have entered into a series of contractual arrangements with our consolidated variable interest entities and shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities as well as other parties. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” If our consolidated variable interest entities fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC laws, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure you will be effective under PRC laws. For example, if the shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities were to refuse to transfer their equity interests in our consolidated variable interest entities to us or our designee when we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if they were otherwise to act in bad faith toward us, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations.

39

All the agreements under our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC laws and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in China. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC laws and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC laws. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC laws, rulings by arbitrators are final and parties cannot appeal arbitration results in court unless such rulings are revoked or determined unenforceable by a competent court. If the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delay. In the event that we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over our consolidated variable interest entities and their respective subsidiaries, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to us.”

The shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The equity interests of our consolidated variable interest entities are held by Mr. Jun Zhang, Mr. Tiezheng Li, Mr. Honghui Hu and Mr. Shaofeng Gu, our co-founders and shareholders, as well as a few of their family relatives and our employees. Their interests in our consolidated variable interest entities may differ from the interests of our company as a whole. These shareholders may breach, or cause our consolidated variable interest entities to breach, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and our variable interest entity, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to effectively control our consolidated variable interest entity and its subsidiaries and receive economic benefits from them. For example, the shareholders of Beijing Paipairongxin, one of our consolidated variable interest entities, may be able to cause our agreements with Beijing Paipairongxin and Shanghai PPDai, a major subsidiary of Beijing Paipairongxin, to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise, any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company, except that we could exercise our purchase option under the option agreement with these shareholders to request them to transfer all of their equity interests in our consolidated variable interest entities to a PRC entity or individual designated by us, to the extent permitted by PRC laws. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and the shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in the disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

40

Contractual arrangements in relation to our consolidated variable interest entities may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or our consolidated variable interest entities owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the price of our ADSs.

Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. The PRC enterprise income tax law requires every enterprise in China to submit its annual enterprise income tax return together with a report on transactions with its related parties to the relevant tax authorities. The tax authorities may impose reasonable adjustments on taxation if they have identified any related party transactions that are inconsistent with arm’s length principles. We may face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements among our consolidated variable interest entities, shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities and us as well as other parties were not entered into on an arm’s length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, regulations and rules, and adjust our consolidated variable interest entities’ income in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by our consolidated variable interest entities for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase their tax liabilities without reducing our tax expenses. In addition, if we request the shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities to transfer their equity interests in our consolidated variable interest entities at nominal or no value pursuant to these contractual arrangements, such transfer could be viewed as a gift and subject us to PRC income tax. Furthermore, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on our consolidated variable interest entities for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if our consolidated variable interest entities’ tax liabilities increase or if they are required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by our consolidated variable interest entities that are material to the operation of our business if the entity goes bankrupt or becomes subject to a dissolution or liquidation proceeding.

Our consolidated variable interest entities hold certain assets that are material to the operation of our business, including, among others, intellectual properties, hardware and software. Under the contractual arrangements, our consolidated variable interest entities may not, and the shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities may not cause them to, in any manner, sell, transfer, mortgage or dispose of their assets or their legal or beneficial interests in the business without our prior consent. However, in the event that the shareholders of our consolidated variable interest entities breach the these contractual arrangements and voluntarily liquidate our consolidated variable interest entities, or our consolidated variable interest entities declare bankruptcy and all or part of their assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, or are otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may be unable to continue some or all of our business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our consolidated variable interest entities undergo a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, independent third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of these assets, thereby hindering our ability to operate our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

Changes in China’s economic, political or social conditions or government policies could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Substantially all of our operations are located in China. Accordingly, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic and social conditions in China generally and by continued economic growth in China as a whole.

The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. Although the Chinese government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China is still owned by the government. In addition, the Chinese government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The Chinese government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy, and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth over the past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The Chinese government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. The growth rate of the Chinese economy has gradually slowed since 2010, and the impact of COVID-19 on the Chinese economy in 2020 was severe. Any prolonged slowdown in the Chinese economy may reduce the demand for our products and services and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

41

A severe or prolonged downturn in the Chinese or global economy could reduce the demand for consumer loans and investments, which could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The COVID-19 had a severe and negative impact on the Chinese and the global economy in 2020. Whether this will lead to a prolonged downturn in the economy is still unknown. Even before the outbreak of COVID-19, the global macroeconomic environment was facing numerous challenges. The growth rate of the Chinese economy had already been slowing since 2010. There is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies which had been adopted by the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China, even before 2020. Unrest, terrorist threats and the potential for war in the Middle East and elsewhere may increase market volatility across the globe. There have also been concerns about the relationship between China and other countries, including the surrounding Asian countries, which may potentially have economic effects. In particular, there is significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and China with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global economic conditions, as well as changes in domestic economic and political policies and the expected or perceived overall economic growth rate in China. Any severe or prolonged slowdown in the global or Chinese economy may reduce the demand for consumer loans and investments, and materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to us.

The PRC legal system is based on written statutes and prior court decisions have limited value as precedents. Since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.

In particular, PRC laws and regulations concerning the online consumer finance industry are developing and evolving. Although we have taken measures to comply with the laws and regulations that are applicable to our business operations, including the regulatory principles raised by the CBRC, and avoid conducting any non-compliant activities under the applicable laws and regulations, such as illegal fund-raising, forming capital pool or providing guarantee to investors, the PRC government authority may promulgate new laws and regulations regulating the online consumer finance industry in the future. We cannot assure you that our practice would not be deemed to violate any new PRC laws or regulations relating to online consumer finance. Moreover, developments in the online consumer finance industry may lead to changes in PRC laws, regulations and policies or in the interpretation and application of existing laws, regulations and policies that may limit or restrict online consumer finance platforms like us, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operations.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation of internet-related businesses and companies, and any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The PRC government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations.

42

We only have contractual control over our website and mobile applications. We do not directly own the website nor mobile applications due to the restriction of foreign investment in businesses providing value-added telecommunication services in China, including internet information provision services. This may significantly disrupt our business, subject us to sanctions, compromise enforceability of related contractual arrangements, or have other harmful effects on us.

The evolving PRC regulatory system for the internet industry may lead to the establishment of new regulatory agencies. For example, in May 2011, the State Council announced the establishment of a new department, the CAC, (with the involvement of the State Council Information Office, the MIIT, and the MPS). The primary role of this new agency is to facilitate the policy-making and legislative development in this field, to direct and coordinate with the relevant departments in connection with online content administration and to deal with cross-ministry regulatory matters in relation to the internet industry.

Our online marketplace, operated by Shanghai PPDai, a subsidiary of Beijing Paipairongxin, one of our variable interest entities, may be deemed to be providing commercial internet information services, which would require Shanghai PPDai to obtain certain value-added telecommunications business license. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Internet Companies—Regulations on value-added telecommunication services.” Furthermore, it is uncertain if Beijing Paipairongxin, Shanghai Zihe and their subsidiaries will be required to obtain a separate operating license with respect to our mobile applications in addition to the value-added telecommunications business license.

The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the internet industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in China, including our business. We cannot assure you that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for conducting our business in China or will be able to maintain our existing licenses or obtain new ones. If the PRC government considers that we were operating without the proper approvals, licenses or permits or promulgates new laws and regulations that require additional approvals or licenses or imposes additional restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has the power, among other things, to levy fines, confiscate our income, revoke our business licenses, and require us to discontinue our relevant business or impose restrictions on the affected portion of our business. Any of these actions by the PRC government may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We are a holding company, and we rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require our PRC subsidiaries to adjust its taxable income under the contractual arrangements it currently has in place with Beijing Paipairongxin and its shareholders and Shanghai PPDai (with respect to the exclusive technology consulting and service agreement only), Shanghai Zihe, Shanghai Nianqiao, Shanghai Ledao, Chengdu Yougao and their respective shareholders in a manner that would materially and adversely affect their ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—Contractual arrangements in relation to our consolidated variable interest entities may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or our consolidated variable interest entities owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the price of our ADSs.” Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries, as wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China, may pay dividends only out of their respective accumulated after-tax profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such funds reaches 50% of its registered capital. At its discretion, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends.

43

In response to the persistent capital outflow and RMB’s depreciation against U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the PBOC and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures over recent months, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. For instance, the PBOC issued the Circular on Further Clarification of Relevant Matters Relating to Offshore RMB Loans Provided by Domestic Enterprises, or the PBOC Circular 306, on November 22, 2016, which provides that offshore RMB loans provided by a domestic enterprise to offshore enterprises that it holds equity interests in shall not exceed 30% of such equity interests. The PBOC Circular 306 may constrain our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to provide offshore loans to us. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries’ dividends and other distributions may be subjected to tighter scrutiny in the future. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business. See also “—If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.”

PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement to make loans to or make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Any funds we transfer to our PRC subsidiaries, either as a shareholder loan or as an increase in registered capital, are subject to approval by or registration with relevant governmental authorities in China. According to the relevant PRC regulations on foreign-invested enterprises in China, capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries are subject to the requirement of making necessary filings in the Foreign Investment Comprehensive Management Information System, or FICMIS, and registration with other governmental authorities in China. In addition, (i) any foreign loan procured by our PRC subsidiaries is required to be registered with SAFE, or its local branches, and (ii) each of our PRC subsidiaries may not procure loans which exceed the difference between its registered capital and its total investment amount as recorded in FICMIS. Any medium or long term loan to be provided by us to a variable interest entity of our company must be recorded and registered by the National Development and Reform Committee and SAFE or its local branches. We may not complete such recording or registrations on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future capital contributions or foreign loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such recording or registration, our ability to use the proceeds of our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement and to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

In 2008, SAFE promulgated the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 142, which used to regulate the conversion by foreign-invested enterprises of foreign currency into Renminbi by restricting the usage of converted Renminbi. On March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19. SAFE Circular 19 took effect as of June 1, 2015 and superseded SAFE Circular 142 on the same date. SAFE Circular 19 launched a nationwide reform of the administration of the settlement of the foreign exchange capitals of foreign-invested enterprises and allows foreign-invested enterprises to settle their foreign exchange capital at their discretion, but continues to prohibit foreign-invested enterprises from using the Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange capitals for expenditures beyond their business scopes. On June 9, 2016, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming and Standardizing the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account Foreign Exchange, or SAFE Circular 16. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 continue to prohibit foreign-invested enterprises from, among other things, using RMB fund converted from its foreign exchange capitals for expenditure beyond its business scope, investment and financing (except for security investment or guarantee products issued by bank), providing loans to non-affiliated enterprises or constructing or purchasing real estate not for self-use.

44

On October 23, 2019, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Promoting the Convenience of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or SAFE Circular 28. SAFE Circular 28 provides that non-investment foreign-invested entities may use foreign exchange capital or Renminbi funds converted from the foreign exchange capital to make equity investments, provided that such investments should comply with the Negative List and other relevant PRC laws and regulations. On April 10, 2020, SAFE issued the Notice on Optimizing Foreign Exchange Administration to Support the Development of Foreign-related Business, or SAFE Circular 8. SAFE Circular 8 provides that on the premise of ensuring the true and compliant use of funds and compliance with the existing regulations on use of income under the capital account, enterprises which satisfy the criteria are allowed to use income under the capital account, such as capital funds, foreign debt and overseas listing for domestic payment, without prior provision of proof materials for veracity to the bank for each transaction. However, there are substantial uncertainties of the further implementation of SAFE Circular 28 and SAFE Circular 8. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer to and use in China the proceeds we receive from our offshore financing activities, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, is based on rates set by the PBOC. The Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. We cannot assure you that Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.

Any significant appreciation or depreciation of Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our revenues, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ADSs in U.S. dollars. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive into Renminbi to pay our operating expenses, appreciation of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the RMB amount we would receive from the conversion. Conversely, a significant depreciation of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar may significantly reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent of our earnings, which in turn could adversely affect the price of our ADSs.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. In 2020, we did not enter into hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Risk” for more details. While we may decide to enter into more hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our net revenues effectively and affect the price of our ADSs.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our net revenues in RMB. Under our current corporate structure, our company in the Cayman Islands relies on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, such as profit distributions and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Therefore, our PRC subsidiaries are able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to us without prior approval from SAFE, subject to the condition that the remittance of such dividends outside of the PRC complies with certain procedures under PRC foreign exchange regulation, such as the overseas investment registrations by the beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents. But approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies.

In light of the flood of capital outflows of China in 2016 due to the weakening RMB, the PRC government has imposed more restrictive foreign exchange policies and stepped up scrutiny of major outbound capital movement. More restrictions and substantial vetting process are put in place by SAFE to regulate cross-border transactions falling under the capital account. The PRC government may at its discretion further restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of our ADSs.

45

Failure to make adequate contributions to various employee benefit plans and withhold individual income tax on employees’ salaries as required by PRC regulations may subject us to penalties.

Companies operating in China are required to participate in various government sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain social insurance, housing funds and other welfare-oriented payment obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of our employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time at locations where we operate our businesses. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been implemented consistently by the local governments in China given the different levels of economic development in different locations. Companies operating in China are also required to withhold individual income tax on employees’ salaries based on the actual salary of each employee upon payment. We have not made adequate employee benefit payments for some employees. The General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council of the PRC issued the Reform Plan of the State Tax and Local Tax Collection Administration System, or the Tax Reform Plan, on July 20, 2018, which provides that commencing from January 1, 2019, tax authorities would be responsible for the collection of social insurance contributions. The effect of the Tax Reform Plan is still uncertain. With respect to the underpaid employee benefits, we may be required to make supplemental contributions for these plans as well as pay late fees and fines. With respect to the underwithheld individual income tax, we may be required to make up sufficient withholding and pay late fees and fines. If we are subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee benefits and underwithheld individual income tax, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, and some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that the MOC be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law requires that the MOC shall be notified in advance of any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are triggered. In addition, the security review rules issued by the MOC that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOC, and the rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement. In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOC or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC residents may limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase their registered capital or distribute profits to us or otherwise expose us or our PRC resident beneficial owners to liability and penalties under PRC law.

SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to PRC Resident’s Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, in July 2014 that requires PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing. In addition, such PRC residents or entities must update their SAFE registrations when the offshore special purpose vehicle undergoes material events relating to any change of basic information (including change of such PRC residents or entities, name and operation term), increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, or mergers or divisions.

SAFE Circular 37 is issued to replace the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents Engaging in Financing and Roundtrip Investments through Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 75.

46

If our shareholders who are PRC residents or entities do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, our PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE registration described above could result in liability under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.

Mr. Jun Zhang, Mr. Tiezheng Li, Mr. Honghui Hu, and Mr. Shaofeng Gu who directly or indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands holding company and who are known to us as being PRC residents have completed the foreign exchange registrations in accordance with SAFE Circular 75 then in effect and have updated their registrations in accordance with SAFE Circular 37. They are now in the process of updating their registration required in connection with our recent corporate restructuring. Ms. Wei Luo, who indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands holding company and previously known to us to be a mainland China resident, has changed her citizenship to Hong Kong. Ms. Wei Luo registered in accordance with SAFE Circular 75 previously and now is seeking to update the registration in accordance with SAFE Circular 37.

However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company, nor can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with the requirements of SAFE Circular 37. As a result, we cannot assure you that all of our shareholders or beneficial owners who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in the future make or obtain any applicable registrations or approvals required by, SAFE Circular 37. Failure by such shareholders or beneficial owners to comply with SAFE Circular 37, or failure by us to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiaries, could subject us to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Any failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock incentive plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in stock incentive plans in overseas non-publicly-listed companies may submit applications to SAFE or its local branches for the foreign exchange registration with respect to offshore special purpose vehicles. In the meantime, our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens, subject to limited exceptions, and who have been granted stock options by us, may follow the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company, promulgated by SAFE in 2012, or 2012 SAFE Notices. Pursuant to 2012 SAFE Notices, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year who participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company, subject to a few exceptions, are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiaries of such overseas listed company, and complete certain other procedures. In addition, an overseas entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests. We and our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year and who have been granted stock options are subject to these regulations. Failure to complete the SAFE registrations may subject them to fines and legal sanctions, and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries and limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC law. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange—Regulations on employee stock incentive plans of overseas publicly-listed company.” The State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, has issued certain circulars concerning employee stock options and restricted shares. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options or are granted restricted shares will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiaries have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options or restricted shares with relevant tax authorities and to withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their share options. If our employees fail to pay or we fail to withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and regulations, we may face sanctions imposed by the tax authorities or other PRC governmental authorities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange—Regulations on employee stock incentive plans of overseas publicly-listed company.”