ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
nada |
||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Title of Each Class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of Each Exchange on which Registered | ||
, without par value, of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited |
Toronto Stock Exchange | |||
4% Consolidated Debenture Stock of Canadian Pacific Railway Company |
BC87 |
London Stock Exchange |
☒ |
Accelerated filer | ☐ | ||||
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
Smaller reporting company | ||||
Emerging growth company |
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED FORM 10-K/A TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PART III | ||||||
Item 10 |
1 | |||||
Item 11 |
8 | |||||
Item 12 |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 51 | ||||
Item 13 |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 52 | ||||
Item 14 |
53 |
PART IV |
||||||
Item 15 |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule | 54 | ||||
Item 16 |
Form 10-K Summary | 54 | ||||
Signatures | 55 |
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors
All of the current directors were elected at the last annual and special meeting of shareholders on April 27, 2022.
The board of directors of the Company (Board) are qualified and experienced, possessing a broad range of skills that facilitate strong oversight of CP’s management and strategy and have agreed to serve on our Board. In 2022, there were four standing committees of the Board. The four committees are: the Audit and Finance Committee, the Corporate Governance Nominating and Social Responsibility Committee (Governance), the Risk and Sustainability Committee, and the Management Resources and Compensation Committee (Compensation).
Share Ownership
All directors are CP shareholders and must meet our director share ownership requirements within five years of joining the Board.
Share ownership listed here is as of March 17, 2023 and includes shares directors beneficially own or control, or hold directly or indirectly. Share ownership includes holdings under the Directors’ Deferred Share Unit (DDSU) plan.
See page 51 for full details on share ownership by our directors.
1
Director Profile Highlights
|
Isabelle Courville Chair
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 60 Director since: May 1, 2013 Residence: Mont-Tremblant, Québec, Canada 2022 voting results: 99.74% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, accounting & financial expertise, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources, transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, sales & marketing, and strategic oversight.
|
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. (2017 to present)
• | Member of the Human Resources Committee and the Governance and Ethics Committee |
Veolia Environnement S.A. (2015 to present)
• | Chair Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee |
• | Member of Accounts and Audit Committee and the Nominations Committee |
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance(1) | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Audit and Finance | 5 of 5 | 100% | ||||
Governance | 6 of 6 | 100% | ||||
Compensation | 3 of 3 | 100% | ||||
Risk and Sustainability | 3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | President of Hydro-Québec Distribution and Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (2007 to 2013) |
• | 20 years of experience in the Canadian telecommunications industry, including President of Bell Canada’s Enterprise Group (2003 to 2006) and President and Chief Executive Officer of Bell Nordiq Group (2002 to 2003) |
PAST PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
• | Laurentian Bank of Canada (2007 to 2019) (Chair of the Board) |
• | Gecina S.A. (2016 to April 2017) |
• | TVA Group (2013 to 2016) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | Institute for Governance of Private and Public Organizations (IGOPP) (2016 to present) (member of Human Resources Committee) |
• | Quebec Institute of Corporate Directors (2013 to present) |
Other Boards - Past
• | Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD) (2013 to 2017) |
EDUCATION
• | Bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics, École Polytechnique de Montréal |
• | Bachelor’s degree in Civil Law, McGill University |
• | Doctorate Honoris Causa, Université de Montréal |
• | Fellow of the Institute of Corporate Directors |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 4,500
DDSUs: 60,383
Meets share ownership requirements
(1) | Ms. Courville is an ex-officio member of all standing committees and may attend committee meetings at her discretion. |
2
The Hon. John Baird, P.C.
| ||
![]() |
Independent Director since: May 14, 2015 Residence: Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2022 voting results: 94.79% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, environmental policy, health & safety, transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, and strategic oversight.
|
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (2020 to present)
• | Chair of Governance and Nomination Committee |
• | Member of Environmental and Sustainability Committee |
Canfor/Canfor Pulp (CPPI) (2016 to present)
• | Chair of the Board |
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Governance (Chair) (1) | 6 of 6 | 100% | ||||
Risk and Sustainability | 3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | Senior Advisor at the law firm of Bennett Jones LLP and Eurasia Group (a geopolitical risk consultancy) (2015 to present) |
• | Member of the International Advisory Board, Barrick Gold Corporation (2015 to present) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | FWD Group Ltd./FWD Ltd. (2015 to present) (member of Risk Committee and Audit Committee) / FWD Group Holdings Ltd. (2022 to present) (Chair of Compensation Committee, member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee) |
• | PineBridge Investments (2015 to present) (member of Audit Committee) |
Other experience
• | Served as Canadian Foreign Minister, Minister of Transport and Infrastructure, Minister of the Environment, and President of the Treasury Board during his three terms as a Member of the Canadian Parliament (2006 to 2015) |
• | Appointed to the Privy Council in 2006 |
• | Former Minister of Community and Social Services and Minister of Energy in Ontario provincial legislature |
• | Senior Advisor to Community Living Ontario, an organization that supports individuals with developmental disabilities |
• | Advisory Council Member, Prince’s Trust Canada, the charitable office of His Majesty King Charles III |
EDUCATION
• | Honours Bachelor of Arts (Political Studies), Queen’s University |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 37,948
Meets share ownership requirements
Keith E. Creel
| ||
![]() |
Not Independent Age: 54 Director since: May 14, 2015 Residence: Wellington, Florida, U.S.A. 2022 voting results: 98.73% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 31, 2017. Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources, transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, sales & marketing and strategic oversight.
|
OVERALL 2021 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | President and Chief Executive Officer of CP (2017 to present) |
• | President and Chief Operating Officer of CP (February 2013 to January 2017) |
• | Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer of Canadian National Railway Company (CN) (2010 to 2013) |
• | Other positions at CN included Executive Vice-President, Operations, Senior Vice-President Eastern Region, Senior Vice-President Western Region, and Vice-President of CN’s Prairie division (2002 to 2010) |
• | Superintendent and general manager at Grand Trunk Western Railroad (1999 to 2002) |
• | Trainmaster and director of corridor operations at Illinois Central Railway prior to its merger with CN in 1999 |
• | Began his railroad career in 1992 as an intermodal ramp manager at Burlington Northern Railway in Birmingham, Alabama |
INDUSTRY RECOGNITIONS
• | Named “2021 CEO of the Year” and “2021 Strategist of the Year” by The Globe and Mail’s Report on Business Magazine |
• | Named “Railroader of the Year” for 2022 & 2021 by Railway Age magazine |
• | Named “Railroad Innovator” for 2014 by Progressive Railroading in recognition of his leadership at CP |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | Representative on Association of American Railroads |
Other experience
• | Commissioned officer in the U.S. Army and served in the Persian Gulf War in Saudi Arabia |
EDUCATION
• | Bachelor of Science in Marketing, Jacksonville State University |
• | Advanced Management Program, Harvard Business School |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares(2): 95,170
DSUs: 163,697
Options(3): 3,296,736
Meets executive share ownership requirements (see page 12)
(1) | Mr. Baird was appointed as Chair of the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Social Responsibility Committee on April 27, 2022. |
(2) | Reflects CP shares in Employee Share Purchase Plan, 401(k) and other personal accounts. |
(3) | Reflects stock options outstanding as of March 17, 2023. |
3
Gillian (Jill) H. Denham
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 62 Director since: September 6, 2016 Residence: Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2022 voting results: 94.66% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, executive compensation/human resources, investment management, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, sales & marketing and strategic oversight.
|
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
Kinaxis Inc. (2016 to present)
• | Chair of Compensation Committee |
• | Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee |
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Audit and Finance | 5 of 5 | 100% | ||||
Compensation | 3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | Vice-Chair, Retail Markets for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) (2001 to 2005) |
• | Previously held senior positions at CIBC Wood Gundy and CIBC, including: Managing Director, Head of Commercial Banking and E-Commerce |
• | President of Merchant Banking/Private Equity and Managing Director, Head responsible for CIBC’s European Operations |
PAST PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
• | National Bank of Canada (2010 to 2020) |
• | IHS Markit Ltd. (2014 to 2016) |
• | Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (2012 to 2016) |
• | Calloway Real Estate Investment Trust (2011 to 2012) |
• | Lifeworks Inc. (2008 to 2022) |
• | Canaccord Genuity (2020 to March 2023) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Past
• | Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) (2015 to 2019) |
• | Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (2007 to 2010) |
EDUCATION
• | Honours Business Administration (HBA) degree, Ivey Business School, Western University |
• | MBA, Harvard Business School |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 27,350
Meets share ownership requirements
Edward R. Hamberger
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 72 Director since: July 15, 2019 Residence: Delray Beach, Florida, U.S.A. 2022 voting results: 98.67% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management and strategic oversight.
|
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Audit and Finance | 5 of 5 | 100% | ||||
Risk and Sustainability | 3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | President and Chief Executive Officer, Association of American Railroads (1998 to 2019) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | Transportation Institute, University of Denver (2002 to present) |
Other Boards - Past
• | Business Advisory Committee, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University (2000 to 2019) |
• | TTCI (Chair of the Board) (1998 to 2019) |
• | Railinc Corporation (1998 to 2019) |
• | Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University (2005 to 2019) |
• | Baker Donelson, Management Committee (1989 to 1998) |
Other experience
• | Served as Assistant Secretary for governmental affairs at the U.S. Department of Transportation (1987 to 1989) |
EDUCATION
• | Juris Doctor, Georgetown University |
• | Master of Science, Foreign Service, Georgetown University |
• | Bachelor of Science, Foreign Service, Georgetown University |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 12,450
Is expected to meet share ownership requirements in 2024.
4
Matthew H. Paull
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 71 Director since: January 26, 2016 Residence: Wilmette, Illinois, U.S.A. 2022 voting results: 97.57% for | |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, accounting & financial expertise, executive compensation/human resources, investment management, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management and strategic oversight.
|
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
Air Products & Chemicals Corporation (2013 to Present)
• | Chair of Audit and Finance Committee |
• | Member of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Executive Committee |
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE |
100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance |
||||||
Board |
11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Compensation (Chair) |
3 of 3 | 100% | ||||
Risk and Sustainability (1) |
2 of 2 | 100% | ||||
Audit and Finance (1) |
2 of 2 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of McDonald’s Corporation (2001 until his retirement in 2008) |
• | Before joining McDonald’s in 1993, was a partner at Ernst & Young where he managed a variety of financial practices during his 18-year career and consulted with many leading multinational corporations |
PAST PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
• | Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (2016 to 2020) (member of Compensation Committee) |
• | Best Buy Co. (2003 to 2013) (Lead independent director and chair of Finance Committee) |
• | WMS Industries Inc. (2012 to 2013) |
• | KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (2010 to 2018) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. (2008 to present) (member of Advisory Board) |
EDUCATION
• | Master’s degree in Accounting, University of Illinois |
• | Bachelor’s degree, University of Illinois |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 15,190
DDSUs: 41,337
Meets share ownership requirements
Jane L. Peverett
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 64 Director since: December 13, 2016 Residence: West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2022 voting results: 98.25% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, accounting & financial expertise, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management and strategic oversight.
|
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
CIBC* (2009 to present)
• | Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee |
• | Member of Audit Committee |
Northwest Natural Gas Company (2007 to present)
• | Chair of Audit Committee |
• | Member of Governance, Organization and Executive Compensation Committee |
Capital Power Corporation (2019 to present)
• | Member of People, Culture and Governance Committee and the Health, Safety and Environment Committee |
*Ms. Peverett is not standing for election at CIBC’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE |
100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance |
||||||
Board |
11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Audit and Finance (Chair) |
5 of 5 | 100% | ||||
Governance |
6 of 6 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | President & Chief Executive Officer of BC Transmission Corporation (electrical transmission) (2005 to 2009) |
• | Vice-President, Corporate Services and Chief Financial Officer of BC Transmission Corporation (2003 to 2005) |
• | President of Union Gas Limited (a natural gas storage, transmission and distribution company) (2002 to 2003) |
• | Other positions at Union Gas Limited: President & Chief Executive Officer (2001 to 2002); Senior Vice-President Sales & Marketing (2000 to 2001) and Chief Financial Officer (1999 to 2000) |
PAST PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD EXPERIENCE
• | Encana Corp. (2003 to 2017) |
• | Postmedia Network Canada Corp. (2013 to 2016) |
• | Hydro One Limited (2015 to 2018) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | CSA Group (2019 to present) (Chair of the Board) |
• | British Columbia Institute of Corporate Directors Advisory Board |
EDUCATION
• | Bachelor of Commerce degree, McMaster University |
• | Master of Business Administration degree, Queen’s University |
• | Certified Management Accountant |
• | A Fellow of the Society of Management Accountants |
• | Holds the ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 28,131
Meets share ownership requirements
(1) | Mr. Paull moved from the Risk and Sustainability committee to the Audit and Finance committee on April 27, 2022. |
5
|
Andrea Robertson
| |||
![]() |
Independent Age: 59 Director since: July 15, 2019 Residence: Calgary, Alberta, Canada 2022 voting results: 99.30% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources, transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, and strategic oversight.
|
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE | 100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance | ||||||
Board | 11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Governance(1) | 2 of 2 | 100% | ||||
Compensation | 3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | President & Chief Executive Officer, Shock Trauma Air Rescue Service (STARS) (2012 to present) |
• | President & Chief Operating Officer, STARS (2011 to 2012) |
• | Chief Nursing and Health Professions Officer, Alberta Health Services (2009 to 2011) |
• | Vice President, Foothills Medical Centre (2008 to 2009) |
• | Vice President, Alberta Children’s Hospital (2008 to 2009) |
• | Vice President, South Health Campus (2005 to 2007) |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | The Calgary Airport Authority (2017 to present) |
• | University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry (2021 to present) |
Other Boards - Past
• | Bow Valley College (2015 to 2018) |
• | United Way (2007 to 2013) |
EDUCATION
• | Executive Leadership, Harvard University |
• | ICD.D Rotman School of Business |
• | Masters in Health-Care Administration, Central Michigan University |
• | Baccalaureate of Nursing, University of Calgary |
• | Executive Fellowship, Wharton University |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 12,429
Is expected to meet share requirements in 2024.
Gordon T. Trafton
| ||
![]() |
Independent Age: 69 Director since: January 1, 2017 Residence: Naperville, Illinois, U.S.A. 2022 voting results: 99.27% for |
DIRECTOR SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS
Brings experience in the following areas: senior executive leadership, accounting & financial literacy, environment, health & safety, executive compensation/human resources, transportation industry knowledge, governance, government/regulatory affairs and legal, risk management, sales & marketing and strategic oversight.
|
OVERALL 2022 ATTENDANCE |
100% | |||||
Meeting Attendance |
||||||
Board |
11 of 11 | 100% | ||||
Governance |
6 of 6 | 100% | ||||
Risk and Sustainability (Chair) |
3 of 3 | 100% |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
• | Consultant, Brigadier Consulting (2014 to 2015) |
• | Consultant, CP (2013) |
• | Special Advisor to the Canadian National Railway (CN) leadership team (2009 to his retirement in 2010) |
• | Senior Vice-President Strategic Acquisitions and Integration, CN (2009 to 2010) |
• | Senior Vice-President, Southern Region, CN (2003 to 2009) |
• | Vice-President, Operations Integration, CN (2001 to 2003) |
• | Vice-President, Transportation and IT Services, Illinois Central Railroad (1999 to 2001) |
• | Held a number of leadership positions with Illinois Central Railroad and Burlington Northern Railroad |
OTHER EXPERIENCE
Other Boards - Current
• | Leeds School of Business Advisory Board, University of Colorado Boulder (2012 to present) |
• | Sacred Cow Consulting, Inc., Advisory Board (2020 to present) |
• | Pacific National (2023 to present) |
EDUCATION
• | Bachelor of Science, Transportation Management from the Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado Boulder |
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Shares: 0
DDSUs: 27,850
Meets share ownership requirements
(1) | Ms. Robertson was appointed a member of the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Social Responsibility Committee on April 27, 2022. |
6
Notes:
Other than as disclosed below, none of the directors is, or has been in the last 10 years:
(a) a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of a company that:
a. was subject to a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the issuer access to any exemptions under securities legislation for over 30 consecutive days, that was issued while the proposed director was acting in that capacity, or
b. was subject to a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the issuer access to an exemption under securities legislation for over 30 consecutive days, that was issued after the proposed director ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in that capacity
(b) a director or executive officer of a company that, while that proposed director was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets,
(c) become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold their assets, or
(d) subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities commission.
Ms. Denham served as a director of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (now Obsidian Energy Ltd.) from June 2012 to June 2016, which was subject to cease trade orders on its securities following the July 2014 announcement of the review of its accounting practices and restatement of certain of its financial statements. Those cease trade orders ended on September 23, 2014.
Ms. Peverett was a director of Postmedia Network Canada Corp. (Postmedia) from April 2013 to January 2016. On October 5, 2016, Postmedia completed a recapitalization transaction under a court-approved plan of arrangement under the CBCA. Approximately US$268.6 million of debt was exchanged for shares that represented approximately 98% of the outstanding shares of Postmedia at that time. Postmedia repaid, extended and amended the terms of its outstanding debt obligations. |
Executive Officers
The information regarding executive officers is included in Part 1 of our 2022 Form 10-K under Information about our Executive Officers, following Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Code of business ethics and business ethics reporting policy
Our code of business ethics (Code), which applies to all employees, sets out our expectations for conduct. It covers confidentiality, protecting our assets, avoiding conflicts of interest, fair dealing with third parties, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, as well as reporting any illegal or unethical behaviour, among other things. The Code applies to everyone at CP and our subsidiaries: directors, officers, employees (unionized and non-unionized) and contractors who do work for us.
Directors, officers and non-union employees must acknowledge every year that they have read, understood and agree to comply with the Code. Since 2021, non-unionized employees have also completed online scenario based training. Certain unionized employees will be provided with online training for the first time in 2023 and all other unionized employees shall be provided with a copy of the Code.
Our Code is public, and it is posted online on our website at investor.cpr.ca under our key governance documents. It is also available to all employees online and on our website at investor.cpr.ca.
We also have a supplemental code of ethics for the CEO and other senior financial officers (including the Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, the Vice-President Capital Markets, Vice-President of Financial Planning and Accounting and the Assistant Vice-President and Controller) which sets out our long-standing principles of conduct for these senior roles. We also have a business ethics reporting policy that outlines the processes CP has established for CP personnel and others to report concerns regarding conduct within CP, including questionable management and/or corporate practices, the potential violation of any applicable law, or a potential violation of the Code.
The latest version of the Code and the business ethics reporting policy is posted on our website at investor.cpr.ca/governance. Only the Board or Governance Committee (Audit and Finance Committee in the case of the CEO and senior financial officers) can waive an aspect of the Code. Any waivers are posted on our website. No waivers were requested or granted in 2022.
Monitoring compliance and updating the Code
The Governance Committee is responsible for periodic reviews of the Code and recommends changes of the Code to the Board. The Governance Committee also discloses any aspects of the Code that have been waived. The Audit and Finance Committee periodically reviews employee compliance with the Code.
7
Corporate Governance
CP has a strong governance culture and we have adopted many leading policies and practices. As a U.S. and Canadian listed company, our corporate governance practices comply with or exceed the practices outlined by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) in National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines and the TSX, the SEC and the NYSE.
We regularly review our policies and practices and make changes as appropriate, so we stay at the forefront of good governance as standards and guidelines continue to evolve in Canada and the United States.
The Board and the Governance Committee are responsible for developing our approach to corporate governance. This includes periodic reviews of the corporate governance principles and guidelines which were established by the Board, as well as the terms of reference for the Board and each of the four Board standing committees.
CP’s corporate governance principles and guidelines are available on our website at investor.cpr.ca/governance.
Audit and Finance Committee
CP’s Audit and Finance Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and NYSE standards and CSA National Instrument 52-110-Audit Committees. The current members of the Audit and Finance Committee are Jane Peverett (Chair), Isabelle Courville, Jill Denham, Edward Hamberger, and Matthew Paull, all of whom are independent. All members of the Audit and Finance Committee are “financially literate” as required by the NYSE and applicable Canadian securities laws. Of the current Audit and Finance Committee members, Ms. Peverett, Ms. Courville and Mr. Paull have been determined to be “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.
If significant corporate governance differences between CP’s corporate governance practices and Item 303A of the NYSE arise, they will be disclosed on our website at investor.cpr.ca/governance.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As a foreign private issuer in the United States, we are deemed to comply with this Item if we provide information required by Items 6.B and 6.E.2 of Form 20-F, with more detailed information provided if otherwise made publicly available or required to be disclosed in Canada. We have provided information required by Items 6.B and 6.E.2 of Form 20-F in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. As a foreign private issuer in the U.S., we are not required to disclose executive compensation according to the requirements of Regulation S-K that apply to U.S. domestic issuers, and we are otherwise not required to adhere to the U.S. requirements relative to certain other proxy disclosures and requirements. Our executive compensation disclosure complies with Canadian requirements, which are, in most respects, substantially similar to the U.S. rules. We generally attempt to comply with the spirit of the U.S. proxy rules when possible and to the extent that they do not conflict, in whole or in part, with required Canadian corporate or securities requirements or disclosure.
All dollar amounts included in this Item 11 are in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise expressly stated to be in U.S. dollars.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
There were no reportable interlocks or insider participation affecting the Company’s Compensation Committee during the year ended December 31, 2022. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or our Management Resources and Compensation Committee.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A with management of the Company and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the information set forth under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
Respectfully submitted,
Management Resources and Compensation Committee
Matthew Paull (Chair)
Isabelle Courville
Jill Denham
Andrea Robertson
8
PART III - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this 10-K/A.
Our executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance, to align management interests with our business strategy and the interests of our shareholders, and to engage and retain our executives. This section of our 10-K/A provides shareholders with descriptions of our compensation programs and 2022 compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), listed below.
2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
Keith E. Creel President and Chief Executive Officer |
Nadeem S. Velani Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |
John K. Brooks Executive Vice-President and Chief Marketing Officer |
Mark A. Redd Executive Vice-President Operations |
Jeffrey J. Ellis Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
|
Where to find it
9
Our approach to executive compensation
Our executive compensation program supports our operations-focused culture, is linked to the critical metrics that drive the achievement of our strategic plan without taking on undue risk, and is designed to create long-term sustainable value for our shareholders. The key elements of our approach to executive compensation include:
• | competitive market pay practices to attract and retain talent |
• | a compensation mix that is incentive-driven with a large portion of total direct compensation that is variable or “at-risk” to support our pay for performance culture |
• | compensation components paying out over multiple performance periods to link to our short- and long-term business strategy |
• | aligning management’s interests with those of our shareholders through equity-based compensation and share ownership requirements |
We have five key foundations designed to focus us on our goal of being the best railroad company in North America:
Compensation mix
Attracting and retaining high performing executives is key to our long-term sustainable growth and success. Built into our compensation pay mix is a significant emphasis on incentive-driven pay where the proportion of at-risk pay increases by level. Executives earn more if we perform well, and less when performance is not as strong. A significant component of executive at-risk pay is equity-based compensation, which links directly to the value of our shares, ensuring alignment with the interest of our shareholders. We also require our executives to own CP equity and our share ownership guidelines increase by executive level (see page 12).
2022 total target direct compensation mix for our NEOs is shown in the graph.
For 2022, 90 percent of our CEO’s total target direct compensation and an average of 79 percent for our other NEOs was at risk. |
|
10
Benchmarking
Our comparator group in 2022 remains unchanged from 2021 and consists of companies we compete with for talent. The group includes our Class I railroad peers as well as 11 capital-intensive Canadian companies. For certain positions within the organization, we apply a heavier weighting to Class I railroad peers; however, we consistently review alignment and compensation practices against our comparator group.
Our 2022 compensation comparator group is as follows:
Class I railroads
|
Capital Intensive Companies in Canada
| |||
BNSF Railway Company |
Barrick Gold Corporation |
Kinross Gold Corporation | ||
Canadian National Railway Company | BCE Inc. | Rogers Communications Inc. | ||
CSX Corporation | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Suncor Energy Inc. | ||
Kansas City Southern | Enbridge Inc. | TC Energy Corporation | ||
Norfolk Southern Corporation | Fortis Inc. | TELUS Corporation | ||
Union Pacific Corporation | Imperial Oil Limited
|
Compensation pays out over time
|
Variable pay includes short- and long-term incentive awards which link to our performance objectives and support our growth strategy.
The Compensation Committee ensures the performance objectives for the incentive plans align with our strategic multi-year plan, which is reviewed and approved by the Board. |
11
Executives are CP shareholders
We require executives and senior management employees to own equity in the Company so they have a stake in our future success. Share ownership requirements are set as a multiple of base salary and increase by level. The ownership requirement must be achieved within five years of the employee being appointed to their position and can be met by holding shares or deferred share units (DSUs). Notional shares in the form of performance share units (PSUs), restricted share units (RSUs), and stock options do not count towards ownership requirements. Once executives have met their initial shareholding requirements, they are required to maintain compliance, which is reported annually to the Compensation Committee. The CEO must maintain the ownership level of six times his base salary for one year after the cessation of employment.
Executives have the opportunity to participate in the Senior Executive’s DSU Plan (see page 43 for further plan details). DSUs must be held for a minimum of six months after the executive leaves the Company. The units are redeemed for cash, with (i) Canadian-resident executives being entitled to elect a date of payment between the date that is six months following their departure from the Company and December 15th of the following calendar year, in compliance with Canadian tax rules; and (ii) U.S. resident executives being paid six months after their departure from the Company, in compliance with U.S. tax regulations.
The table below shows the ownership requirement by executive level, applicable to 103 executives and senior management employees in 2022. In support of our commitment to align executive compensation with shareholder interests and market competitive practices, the Board approved a change in share ownership requirement for the Executive Vice-President level from three times to four times annual base salary in 2021.
Executive Level |
Ownership requirement (as a multiple of base salary) |
Our NEOs are compliant with ownership guidelines:
• Mr. Creel, Mr. Velani, Mr. Redd and Mr. Ellis have achieved their ownership requirements. • Mr. Brooks is expected to meet his ownership requirement within the specified period.
| ||||
CEO
|
6x
|
|||||
Executive Vice-President
|
4x
|
|||||
Senior Vice-President
|
2x
|
|||||
Vice-President
|
1.5 to 2x
|
|||||
Senior management
|
1x
|
Equity ownership (as at December 31, 2022)
Executive |
|
Requirement (as a multiple of salary) |
|
|
Minimum ownership value ($) (1) |
|
|
Shares ($) |
|
|
Deferred share units ($)(2) |
|
|
Total ownership value ($) (3) |
|
|
Total ownership (as a multiple of salary) |
| ||||||
Keith Creel |
6x | 9,751,680 | 9,587,934 | 16,507,476 | 26,095,410 | 16.06x | ||||||||||||||||||
Nadeem Velani(2) |
4x | 3,416,688 | 353,639 | 5,984,379 | 6,338,018 | 7.42x | ||||||||||||||||||
John Brooks |
4x | 3,304,736 | 1,266,885 | 1,702,926 | 2,969,811 | 3.59x | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark Redd(2) |
4x | 3,196,384 | 2,334,627 | 2,187,596 | 4,522,223 | 5.66x | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Ellis |
2x | 1,210,000 | 644,101 | 1,668,229 | 2,312,330 | 3.82x |
(1) | Minimum ownership values for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd have been converted to Canadian dollars using an exchange rate of $1.3544. |
(2) | Includes the 16,969 Performance DSUs (PDSUs) and 3,277 PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, on February 2, 2023, as a result of the 2020 PSU performance factor, and the additional 5,759 and 1,843 matching PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, under the terms of the Senior Executive Deferred Share Plan. See the About deferred compensation section on page 43 for more details. |
(3) | Total ownership values for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd are based on US$74.59, the closing CP share price on the NYSE on December 30, 2022 and have been converted to Canadian dollars using an exchange rate of $1.3544. Values for Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis are based on $100.95, the closing CP share price on the TSX on December 30, 2022. |
12
Compensation governance
Disciplined decision-making process
Executive compensation decisions involve management, the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Board has final approval for setting, amending and adopting any equity compensation plans or awards, subject to applicable shareholder approval requirements. The Compensation Committee also receives advice and support from external consultants from time to time and retained an independent compensation consultant in June 2020, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook), to provide objective analysis and assessment of the Company’s executive compensation program. Management receives advice and support from Willis Towers Watson, and other external consultants to the Company.
13
Qualified and experienced 2022 Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for our compensation philosophy, strategy and program design. The Compensation Committee consists of four independent directors. The Compensation Committee has the relevant skills, background and experience to carry out its duties. The table below shows the key skills and experience of each member:
Compensation Committee members also have specific human resources and compensation-related experience, including:
• | direct responsibility for executive compensation matters |
• | membership on human resources committees |
• | compensation plan design, administration, compensation decision-making, risk management and understanding the Board’s role in the oversight of these practices |
• | understanding the principles and practices related to leadership development, talent management, succession planning and employment contracts |
• | engagement with investors on compensation issues |
• | financial literacy, oversight of financial analysis related to compensation plan design and practices |
• | pension benefit oversight, investment management |
• | recruitment of senior executives |
The Compensation Committee has no interlocks or insider participation. None of the members were employed by or had any relationship with CP during 2022 requiring disclosure under Item 404 or Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. You can read about the background and experience of each member in the director profiles beginning on page 2.
Our Compensation Committee members also serve on other standing committees. Mr. Paull and Ms. Denham are members of the Audit and Finance Committee and Ms. Robertson is also a member of the Governance Committee. Ms. Courville, in her capacity as Chair of the Board, is an ex-officio member of all standing committees and may attend committee meetings at her discretion. This cross-membership provides directors with a broader perspective of risk oversight and a deeper understanding of our enterprise risks, ultimately strengthening overall risk management.
14
Independent advice
The Compensation Committee and management retain separate independent executive compensation advisors to provide advice on compensation-related matters and to avoid any conflicts of interest:
Compensation Committee advisor FW Cook |
Management Compensation advisor Willis Towers Watson | |
• Compensation Committee retains FW Cook to act as an independent compensation advisor, attending committee meetings (unless otherwise requested by the Committee Chair) • the Compensation Committee approves all compensation-related fees and work performed by FW Cook |
• management engages Willis Towers Watson to provide market survey data, analysis and advice to management related to compensation matters |
The next table below shows the fees paid to FW Cook and Willis Towers Watson in 2021 and 2022 for compensation advisory services.
2022 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||||
Committee advisor |
Management advisor |
Committee advisor |
Management advisor |
|||||||||||||
Fees
|
FW Cook (1)
|
Willis Towers Watson
|
FW Cook (1)
|
Willis Towers Watson
|
||||||||||||
Executive compensation-related fees |
$ |
119,864 |
|
$ |
57,808 |
|
$ |
226,608 |
|
$ |
88,394 |
| ||||
Other fees(2) |
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
1,161,580 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
1,525,184 |
| ||||
Total fees |
$ |
119,864 |
|
$ |
1,219,388 |
|
$ |
226,608 |
|
$ |
1,613,578 |
|
(1) | FW Cook fees have been converted to Canadian dollars using the average exchange rate for 2022 of $1.3013 |
(2) | In addition to the amounts shown in the table, a one-time fee of $13,500 for Committee advice from an independent consultant was paid in 2022 |
Fees paid
In 2022, $57,808 was paid to Willis Towers Watson for compensation advisory services provided to management. Fees paid to Willis Towers Watson for all services provided to management, including actuarial and pension consulting, were $1,219,388. The total executive compensation fees represent 4.7% percent of the total fees in 2022.
Compensation risk
Effective risk management is integral to achieving our business strategies and to our long-term success. The Board believes that our executive compensation program should not increase our risk profile. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing compensation risk. It reviews the executive compensation program, incentive plan design and our policies and practices to ensure they encourage the right decisions and actions to reward performance and align management interests with shareholder interests.
Incentive plan targets are linked to our corporate objectives and our corporate risk profile. The Compensation Committee believes that our approach to goal setting, establishing performance measures and targets and evaluating performance results helps mitigate risk-taking that could reward poor judgment by executives or have a negative effect on shareholder value.
15
Regular risk review
The Compensation Committee conducts a comprehensive compensation risk review approximately every two years to ensure that we have identified the compensation risks and have appropriate measures in place to mitigate those risks. An independent consultant assists the Compensation Committee with the review, which includes oversight of:
• | the targets for the short-term incentive plan (STIP) and PSU plan, anticipated payout levels and the risks associated with achieving targeted performance |
• | the design of the long-term incentive awards, which reward sustainable financial and operating performance |
• | the compensation program, policies and practices to ensure alignment with our enterprise risk management practices |
The Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson in 2019 to conduct a detailed risk assessment of our compensation plans, programs and practices. The Committee reviewed Willis Towers Watson’s findings and agreed that our compensation policies and programs did not encourage excessive risk-taking that could have material adverse effects on CP. A subsequent risk assessment was expected to be completed in 2021, however in light of the Merger Agreement between CP and KCS, and after consultation with Willis Towers Watson, management determined that a risk assessment would be more pertinent in 2023 when CP and KCS are expected to combine to form a single entity with an unified CPKC compensation philosophy and strategy (which, as disclosed, is expected to occur on April 14, 2023).
Managing compensation risk
Our commitment to risk mitigation of the Company’s executive compensation program is reflected in the following practices and policies:
What we do |
✓ Align pay with performance • Short-term incentive and PSU plans have performance measures that are closely aligned with the business strategy and have rigorous targets • Must achieve a specific threshold of operating income in order for the payout of STIP awards |
✓ Utilize a compensation pay mix of fixed and variable pay elements where a significant portion of compensation is “at-risk” |
✓ Long term incentive plans have overlapping vesting periods to address longer term risks and maintain executives’ exposure to the impacts of their decision–making through unvested equity awards |
✓ Caps on STIP and PSU payouts to avoid excessive risk-taking |
✓ Annual financial statement audit is completed and verified before the Board makes any decision about the STIP payout |
✓ Maintain a clawback policy for senior executive compensation |
✓ Allow senior executives to defer a portion of their annual incentive payout and/or PSU award to DSUs |
✓ DSUs held by the President and CEO, executives, and senior management are not settled for cash until at least six months after leaving the Company |
✓ Maintain meaningful share ownership requirements for executives and senior management |
✓ Voluntarily solicit annual “say-on-pay” vote |
✓ Annually benchmark executive compensation against our compensation comparator group |
We do not |
✗ Guarantee STIP or PSU payouts |
✗ Have an automatic single-trigger vesting of change of control benefits |
✗ Re-price stock options or buyouts of underwater stock options |
✗ Permit hedging of equity holdings |
✗ Permit pledging of equity holdings |
16
Key policies
In addition to CP’s code of business ethics and the business ethics reporting policy, a number of other policies act to mitigate compensation risk. You can read more about our code of business ethics and other policies beginning on page 7.
Clawbacks
Our clawback policy allows the Board to recoup short- and long-term incentive compensation paid to a current or former senior executive if:
• | the incentive compensation received was calculated based on financial results that were subsequently restated or corrected, in whole or in part; and/or |
• | the senior executive engaged in gross negligence, fraud or intentional misconduct that caused or contributed to the need for the restatement or correction, as admitted by the senior executive or as reasonably determined by the Board. |
The Board has sole discretion to determine whether it is in our best interests to pursue reimbursement of all or part of the incentive compensation and these actions would be separate from any actions by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities. We expect to amend our clawback policy going forward as may be required by changes in applicable laws and listing requirements.
Anti-hedging
Our disclosure and insider trading and reporting policy prohibits directors, executive officers and employees from buying financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of equity awards or shares they hold directly or indirectly.
Anti-pledging
Our anti-pledging policy prohibits directors and executive officers from holding any CP securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging the securities as collateral for a loan.
Non-compete and Non-solicitation
We are mindful of the demand for experienced and talented railroaders, particularly those with backgrounds in precision scheduled railroading. To manage near-term retention risk, our long-term incentive award agreements contain non-compete, non-solicitation and other restrictive clauses, including non-disclosure restrictions.
Compensation committee discretion
As part of the Company’s commitment to risk mitigation and corporate governance, the Compensation Committee has developed principles for the use of discretion. Adjustments should not relieve management from the consequences of their decision-making. Adjustments should also neither reward nor penalize management for decisions on discretionary transactions, events outside their control (such as foreign exchange rates and fuel prices that are beyond the assumptions used in the planning process) or transactions outside normal corporate planning and budgeting.
This means that the Compensation Committee can reduce the corporate performance factor for any executive officer, as it deems appropriate, as long as it follows the principles. The Board can also use its discretion to adjust the targets, vesting factors and payouts up or down, following the principles set out by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee did not exercise any discretion for the short-term incentive plan or annual long-term incentive plan in 2022. Please refer to page 28 for details regarding adjustments made by the Compensation Committee for PSU purposes to remove impacts of the KCS acquisition in the calculation of the 2020 PSU performance factor.
17
Compensation program
Total direct compensation consists of salary, short-term incentive and a long-term incentive award. Executives also receive pension benefits and perquisites as part of their overall compensation.
Element | Purpose | Risk mitigating features |
Why it is important | |||
Salary Fixed cash (see page 19) |
• competitive level of fixed pay to reflect scope of responsibilities and market data • reviewed annually |
• benchmarked against our comparator group to ensure market competitiveness |
• attract and retain talent • no automatic or guaranteed increases to promote a performance culture | |||
Short-term incentive Variable cash bonus (see page 19) |
• performance-based incentive to reward achievement of annual corporate and individual objectives to attract and retain highly qualified leaders • established target awards based on level of employee |
• year-end performance is measured against predetermined, approved targets • actual payouts are based on the achievement of corporate and individual objectives • payouts range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of target awards |
• motivate high corporate and individual performance • performance metrics are aligned to the strategic plan and approved annually • align personal objectives with area of responsibility and role in achieving financial, safety and operating results | |||
Deferred compensation Deferred share units (see page 43) |
• encourages share ownership while aligning management interests with growth in shareholder value • executives and senior management can elect to receive their short-term incentive and their annual PSU grant in DSUs if they have not yet met their share ownership requirement • company provides a 25% match of the deferral amount in DSUs, subject to a cap |
• deferral limited to the amount required to meet the executive’s share ownership guidelines • helps retain key executive talent • matching DSUs vest after three years and matching PDSUs vest immediately |
• sustained alignment of executive and shareholder interests because the value of DSUs is tied directly to our share price • cannot be redeemed for cash until a minimum of six months after the executive leaves the Company | |||
Long-term incentive Performance share units (see page 22) |
• equity-based incentive to align with shareholder interests and focuses on three-year performance • accounts for 60% of an executive’s long-term incentive award • vest after three years |
• use predefined market and financial metrics • the number of units that vest is based on a performance factor that is capped • no guarantee of a minimum payout |
• focuses the leadership team on achieving challenging medium-term performance goals • payout based on share price and company performance • attract and retain highly qualified leaders | |||
Long-term incentive Stock options (see page 22) |
• equity-based incentive to align with long-term performance and growth in share price • accounts for 40% of an executive’s long-term incentive award • vests over four years, term is seven years |
• focuses on appreciation in our share price, aligning with shareholder interests • only granted to senior management and executives |
• focuses the leadership team on creating sustainable long-term value | |||
Pension Defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans (see page 42) |
• pension benefit based on pay, age and service and is competitive with the market • supplemental plan for senior management and executives |
• balances risk management of pay packages that have a high percentage of variable pay |
• attract and retain highly qualified leaders | |||
Perquisites Flexible spending account (see page 36) |
• market competitive benefit to support health and well-being |
• capped perquisites for the CEO and executives |
• attract and retain highly qualified leaders |
18
2022 Executive compensation
Salary
We review salaries every year based on the executive’s performance, leadership abilities, responsibilities and experience as well as succession and retention considerations. The Compensation Committee also considers the economic outlook and competitive pay practices of the comparator group before recommending the salary increases for Board approval. The table below outlines base salaries of all NEOs set in U.S. dollars consistent with industry practice.
Executive | 2022 (in USD) |
percent change from 2021 | 2021 (in USD) | |||
Keith Creel | 1,200,000 | 0.5% | 1,193,513 | |||
Nadeem Velani | 660,000 | 3.1% | 640,000 | |||
John Brooks | 610,000 | 5.2% | 580,000 | |||
Mark Redd(1) | 590,000 | 12.4% | 525,000 | |||
Jeffrey Ellis(1) | 475,000 | 11.8% | 425,000 |
(1) | Increases for Mr. Redd and Mr. Ellis were approved to progressively align their tenure, scope of responsibility and performance with the competitive market. |
Short-term incentive plan (STIP)
The short-term incentive award focuses executives on achieving strong annual financial, safety, operational and customer satisfaction results. The table below summarizes the terms of our current short-term incentive plan.
Purpose |
• performance-based incentive to achieve predefined annual corporate and individual performance goals that are tied directly to our strategy and operational objectives
| |
Term |
• measure performance over a one-year period
| |
Payout |
• corporate performance is assessed against financial, safety and operational measures • individual performance is assessed based on individual performance objectives • awards are pro-rated for eligibility in calendar performance year and can range from 0 to 200 percent of base salary • cash awards are paid out in February following the performance year
| |
Restrictions |
• must meet minimum level of corporate and individual performance • must achieve corporate operating income hurdle for any payout on individual or corporate performance to occur • performance modifier for each metric is capped at 2x target for exceptional performance • actual award is capped at a maximum of 200 percent of target to limit payout and excessive risk-taking
|
We calculate each STIP award by multiplying the executive base salary by their short-term incentive target as well as the corporate and individual performance factors as shown below:
For executives, the STIP target is weighted at 75 percent for corporate results and 25 percent for individual performance, whereas most other employees have greater emphasis placed on individual and departmental goals with their corporate and individual performance weighted at 50 percent each. This is based on our view that the annual bonus should be tied to overall corporate performance and the areas of our business that each employee can influence directly.
19
The corporate performance factor consists of financial, operating and safety measures of varying weights that total 100 percent. The year end result of each measure is assessed against predefined targets that are set at the beginning of the year (see page 21 for a complete review of the targets and results for the 2022 STIP).
The individual performance factor is based on the executive’s performance against annual objectives and additional predefined quantitative and qualitative goals that reflect the strategic and operational priorities critical to each executive’s role.
The table below outlines the target STIP opportunities for our NEOs:
Our STIP target is based on a
Our 2022 market review resulted |
STIP target as a percent of base salary | |||||||||
Executive | Minimum | Target | Maximum | |||||||
Keith Creel | 0% | 125% | 250% | |||||||
Nadeem Velani | 0% | 100% | 200% | |||||||
John Brooks | 0% | 100% | 200% | |||||||
Mark Redd | 0% | 100% | 200% | |||||||
Jeffrey Ellis | 0% | 80% | 160% |
2022 STIP awards
The table below shows the calculation of the STIP awarded to each NEO based on the 2022 corporate and individual performance factors. The salaries of Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd have been converted to Canadian dollars using an average exchange rate of $1.3013 for 2022.
(1) | Neither Mr. Creel nor the other NEOs elected to defer a portion of their 2022 STIP award to DSUs. |
Assessing individual performance
Individual performance objectives are set at the start of every financial year. The Compensation Committee sets the individual performance factor for the CEO. The CEO reviews the performance of his direct reports against their objectives, and recommends their individual performance factors to the Compensation Committee. The individual performance factor ranges from 0 to 200 percent. The individual performance factor for the CEO cannot exceed the STIP corporate performance factor and accordingly Mr. Creel’s performance factor was capped at 29 percent. This ensures the payout factor for the CEO aligns with the Company’s overall performance. For Mr. Velani, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Redd and Mr. Ellis, their individual performance factor for 2022 was 100 percent.
See the profiles beginning on page 29 to read about each executive’s individual performance highlights in 2022.
20
Assessing corporate performance
In 2022 CP achieved its lowest ever and industry leading Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) train accident frequency ratio of 0.93, a 15 percent improvement from 2021. Our 2022 FRA-reportable personal injury frequency ratio of 1.01 was the second best ever result in this category. Additionally, the Company continued to progress its merger application to combine with KCS to create the first single-line haul rail network connecting the U.S., Mexico and Canada. However, due to a softer than anticipated volume environment as well as weather and labour disruptions, CP’s financial results did not meet targets for the 2022 STIP award. In 2022, CP’s adjusted operating ratio(1) was 61.4 percent, an increase of 380 basis point from 2021, while adjusted operating income(1) decreased from $3,461 million in 2021 to $3,403 million.
Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, the corporate performance factor for our 2022 STIP award reflects financial measures falling short of our annual target objectives and resulted in a payout of 29 percent.
2022 STIP scorecard results
The table below shows the 2022 scorecard and results. The targets were set with stretch goals to motivate strong performance and create shareholder value as we continue to focus on our multi-year plan and remain a leader in safety. The Board sets a corporate hurdle for operating income at $2 billion. There is no payout if we do not achieve that corporate hurdle. If we achieve the hurdle but corporate performance is below threshold for all measures, then only the individual performance factor is used to calculate the awards. Corporate results between 50 and 200 percent of target are interpolated.
Performance measure (Weighting)
|
Why the measure is important
|
Threshold (50%)
|
Target (100%)
|
Maximum (200%)
|
2022 Result
|
2022 Result
|
Score
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Financial measures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STIP Operating ratio (35%) Operating expenses divided by total
|
Continues our focus on driving down costs while focusing on growth strategy |
57.6% | 57.3% | 57.0% | 61.4%(1) | 58.7%(2) | 0% | |||||||||||||||||||
STIP Operating income (35%)
($ millions) Total revenues less total operating expenses based on an
|
Highlights the importance of revenue growth to our corporate strategy |
3,410 | 3,490 | 3,565 | 3,403(1) | 3,334(2) | 0% | |||||||||||||||||||
Safety measures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FRA Train Accident Frequency (10%) Number of FRA-reportable train
|
CP has long been an industry leader in rail safety and we are more focused on it than ever, committed to protecting our people, our communities, our environment and our customers’ goods
|
1.10 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 200% | |||||||||||||||||||
FRA Personal Injury Frequency (10%) Number of FRA-reportable injuries
|
As the safety of our employees is our top priority, we introduced FRA Personal Injury as an additional safety metric under our STIP beginning 2020
|
1.05 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 90% | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating measure
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trip Plan Compliance (10%) Calculated as the number of |
Trip plan compliance is a detailed schedule of performance and the core of CP’s product offering. It balances between customer needs and what we are capable of delivering safely
It is critical to the service we provide customers and to our growth strategy
|
75% | 80% | 85% | 64% | 64% | 0% | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate performance factor |
|
29%
|
|
(1) | Adjusted operating ratio and Adjusted operating income are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
(2) | The Compensation Committee may adjust the results for unusual or non-recurring items that are outside our normal business and do not accurately reflect our ongoing operating results or business trends and affect the comparability of our financial performance year over year. Results used under the STIP could therefore differ from our reported GAAP results. Significant items that were adjusted so that they do not impact, either favourably or unfavourably, the assumptions made when the STIP targets were planned include: foreign exchange rates, fuel price and land sales, all of which were adjusted to reflect the original assumptions made in our 2022 budget. |
21
Long-term incentive plan (LTIP)
Our long-term incentive awards focus executives on medium- and longer-term performance to create sustainable shareholder value.
The table below summarizes the terms of our current long-term incentive plans.
Performance share units (60%)
|
Stock options (40%)
| |||||
Purpose | • notional share units to align compensation with medium-term financial and market objectives
|
• equity-based compensation to align executives with long-term performance of our shares and business
| ||||
Term | • three years
|
• seven years
| ||||
Vesting | • the number of units that vest is based on performance over a three-year period
• cliff vest at the end of three years to the extent performance vesting conditions are met and Board approves
|
• vest 25% annually over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date | ||||
Payout | • paid out in cash based on units vested and the average closing share price for the 30 trading days prior to the end of the performance period on the TSX or NYSE
• may be paid out in shares at the discretion of the CEO
• accumulates quarterly dividends
• no guarantee of a minimum payout
• if performance is exceptional on all measures the Board may approve a payout of up to 249%
|
• right to buy Company shares at a specified price after vesting
• does not attract dividends
• only have value if our share price increases above the exercise price
| ||||
Restrictions | • must achieve threshold performance level on a measure otherwise the payout factor for that measure is zero and a portion of the award is not paid out
|
• no exercises can be made during a blackout period
• financial assistance is not provided to facilitate the purchase of shares under the stock option plan
| ||||
Assignment | • not permitted other than by operation of law |
• options will continue to vest and expire on the scheduled expiry date if the holder’s employment ends due to permanent disability. If an option holder dies, the options will expire 12 months following the date of death and may be exercised by the holder’s estate.
• can only be assigned to the holder’s family trust, holding corporation or retirement trust, or a legal representative of a holder’s estate or a person who acquires the holder’s rights by bequest or inheritance
| ||||
Termination Provisions
|
||||||
Resignation | • all units forfeited |
• 30 days to exercise any vested options; unvested options are forfeited
| ||||
Retirement | • units continue to vest providing the unit holder meets the retirement age and service requirements and has a minimum participation period of six months during a performance period
|
• options continue to vest and expire on the earlier of five years from retirement or the original expiry date | ||||
Termination without Cause | • pro-rated to termination date with payout based on actual performance as long as unit holder has a minimum of six months of service in the performance period
|
• six months to exercise vested options; unvested options continue to vest for six months following termination date
| ||||
Termination with Cause | • all units forfeited |
• all options forfeited | ||||
Change of Control | • if a PSU unit holder is terminated without cause following a change of control, PSUs credited prior to the change of control vest as of the termination date, and PSUs credited after the change of control are forfeited
|
• if the optionholder is terminated without cause following a change of control, then all options vest immediately(1) |
(1) | Stock options have a double trigger clause requiring a change of control and the option holder to be terminated without cause. |
Stock options and PSUs are approved and granted to NEOs and eligible employees annually after the fourth quarter financial statement blackout period, and after the Compensation Committee has reviewed the year-end financial results.
Grants are also made during the year for special situations such as retention or new hires. Special grants can include PSUs, stock options, RSUs or DSUs. These grants to employees, excluding the executives reporting to the CEO, are made following CEO approval on the first Tuesday of the month, when there is no blackout in effect. If the Company is in a blackout period, the grant is made after the blackout has been lifted.
In addition, the CEO, the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Compensation Committee have authority to grant options to certain employees based on defined parameters, such as the position of the employee and the expected value of the option award. In 2022, the Compensation Committee authorized a pool of 250,000 options for allocation by the CEO, who granted 25,492 options to seven employees below executive officer level for retention and to recognize performance.
22
2022 Long-term incentive awards
To determine the appropriate value of long-term incentive grants provided to the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers the practices of our comparator group and internal factors, including executive retention, dilutive impact and long-term value creation.
The table below shows the 2022 long-term incentives awards for the NEOs:
Executive | 2022 long-term incentive award (grant value) ($)(1) |
Grant price |
Allocation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Performance share units
|
Stock options
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
($)
|
(#)
|
($)
|
(#)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Keith Creel (2),(3) |
11,616,154 | US$ | 71.40 (NYSE) | 6,960,936 | 74,919 | 4,655,218 | 208,107 | |||||||||||||||||
Nadeem Velani |
3,194,126 | $90.94 (TSX) | 1,878,184 | 20,653 | 1,315,942 | 64,255 | ||||||||||||||||||
John Brooks (1),(3) |
2,818,037 | US$ | 71.40 (NYSE) | 1,648,366 | 17,741 | 1,169,671 | 52,289 | |||||||||||||||||
Mark Redd (1),(3) |
2,498,469 | US$ | 71.40 (NYSE) | 1,461,426 | 15,729 | 1,037,043 | 46,360 | |||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Ellis |
1,606,731 | $90.94 (TSX) | 944,776 | 10,389 | 661,955 | 32,322 |
(1) | See the Summary compensation table on page 35 for details on how we calculate the grant date fair values of the PSUs and stock options. Both were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd, this represents the annual long-term incentive target award value, excluding DSUs granted in 2022. |
(2) | As per the terms of Mr. Creel’s employment agreement amendment dated March 21, 2021, Mr. Creel’s 2022 LTIP target grant value was reduced by US$2.1 million (C$2.8 million) in consideration for the special upfront stock option grant Mr. Creel received on March 27, 2021. This is the first of four planned reductions to Mr. Creel’s annual LTIP award in each year of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 for a total aggregate reduction of US$8.4 million. See Employment agreements on page 37 for more details. |
(3) | The grant value of the awards based on the NYSE trading price has been converted to Canadian dollars using a 2022 average exchange rate of $1.3013. |
Performance share units (PSUs)
PSUs focus executives on achieving medium-term goals within a three-year performance period. The Board sets performance measures, thresholds and targets at the beginning of the performance period.
2022 PSU awards
The close of the KCS transaction into voting trust on December 14, 2021 marked a significant milestone for CP. The impacts of the accelerated timing of the trust closing made it necessary for us to re-evaluate how to most effectively align our 2022 compensation plans with performance as well as to retain and motivate our talented railroaders during this transformative time. After careful consideration and review, the Board decided that because of the KCS transaction it was prudent to make changes to the PSU plan design for the 2022 grant. To further strengthen the link between pay and performance, the Board approved two performance metric changes. For the performance period covering January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024, a three year cumulative free cash flow metric with an adjusted net debt(1) to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization)(1) modifier (maximum of up to 1.5x) to incentivize deleveraging of the balance sheet following the KCS transaction was introduced. This replaced adjusted return on invested capital (ROIC)(1) as the KCS transaction-related impacts such as timing uncertainty and purchase accounting implications make goal setting and measuring ROIC performance challenging. The Board ensured continued rigour in target setting with this near-term change to our financial metric.
In addition, our relative TSR on the NYSE will be compared to constituents of the S&P 500 Industrials index. This replaced our previous Class I railroad TSR peer group, which consisted of five publicly-listed Class I railroads. This was reduced to four companies following KCS’ delisting from NYSE in connection with the closing of KCS into voting trust, which is too small for meaningful evaluation of relative TSR performance. All weightings and payout factor ranges from the prior year’s design have remained the same.
(1) | Free cash, Adjusted net debt, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted ROIC are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
23
The performance period for the 2022 PSU awards is January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. Performance will be assessed against the measures in the table below.
2022 PSU performance measures
|
Why the measure is important
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Stretch
|
Exceptional
|
Weighting
|
||||||||
Three-year cumulative Free Cash Flow (FCF)(1)
FCF calculated as cash from operating activities less cash used in investing activities, adjusted for changes in cash and cash equivalents balances |
Incents strong cash flow generation and disciplined capital reinvestment to support the Company’s growth strategy and in turn generate shareholder value | 50.0% | 100.0% | 140.0% | 180% | |||||||||
$8,755 | $9,155 | $9,355 | $9,555 | |||||||||||
Adjusted Net Debt(1) to Adjusted EBITDA(1) Ratio target of 2.5
Measures financial leverage and the ability to pay off debt; calculated as adjusted net debt divided by adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) |
Modifier incentive for management to efficiently pay down debt in order to meet the Company’s commitment to return to its long-term target leverage following KCS acquisition and maintain strong investment grade credit rating |
x1.125 | x1.250 | x1.375 | x1.500 | 70% | ||||||||
9/30/2024 | 6/30/2024 | 3/31/2024 | 12/31/2023 | |||||||||||
FCF x Adj. Net Debt to Adj. EBITDA Payout |
56% |
125% |
193% |
270% |
||||||||||
Total shareholder return (TSR)
Measured over three years. The percentile ranking of CP’s TSX Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) relative to the companies that make up the S&P/TSX 60 |
Compares our TSR on the TSX to the broader S&P/TSX 60 to reflect our performance relative to the Canadian market
Aligns long-term incentive compensation with long-term shareholder interests |
50% | 100% | 200% | n/a | 15% | ||||||||
25th percentile | 50th percentile | 75th percentile | n/a | |||||||||||
Total shareholder return (TSR)
Measured over three years. The percentile ranking of CP’s TSX CAGR relative to the companies that make up the S&P 500 Industrials Index |
Compares our TSR on the NYSE relative to a group of large U.S. industrial companies with similar macroeconomic exposure
Aligns long-term incentive compensation with long-term shareholder interests |
25th percentile | 50th percentile | 75th percentile | n/a | 15% | ||||||||
Potential maximum payout |
249% |
(1) | Free cash, Adjusted net debt and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
At the end of the three-year performance period, the starting point for determining relative TSR will be the 10-day average closing share price on the appropriate index prior to January 1, 2022 and the ending point will be the 10-day average closing share price on the appropriate index prior to January 1, 2025. TSR is adjusted over the period to reflect dividends paid. Awards will be interpolated if results fall between threshold and exceptional. If results are below the threshold level for any of the performance measures, units for that specific measure will not be paid out.
New for 2023 PSU awards
After thoughtful consideration, with our shareholders in mind, the Board has approved changes for the 2023 PSU plan design to further strengthen the link between pay and performance for CP executives and employees. For the performance period covering January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025, the adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA modifier(1) introduced for the 2022 PSU design will be removed as management is on track to return to target leverage. Additionally, we have challenged the Company with an exceptional target for the remaining FCF(1) and relative TSR performance measures to payout up to 250 percent. Lastly, we have increased the total weighting of relative TSR from 30 percent to 40 percent to place greater emphasis on shareholder value return as we contemplate integration with KCS. The financial measure will correspondingly decrease by 10 percent from 70 percent to 60 percent.
(1) | Free cash, Adjusted net debt and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
24
Stock options
Stock options focus executives on long-term performance. The Management Stock Option Incentive Plan was introduced in October 2001. Stock options granted before 2017 expire 10 years from the date of grant and generally vest 25 percent each year over four years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Options awarded on or after January 1, 2017 have a seven-year term and vest 25 percent each year over four years beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant. The grant price is the closing price of our shares on the TSX, if the option is granted in Canadian dollars or the NYSE, if the option is granted in United States dollars, on the applicable grant date. Options only have value for the holder if our current share price increases above the grant price before the expiry of the option.
For all grants, if the expiry date falls within a blackout period, the expiry date will be extended to 10 business days following the last date of the blackout period. If a further blackout period is imposed before the end of the extension, the term will be extended another 10 days after the end of the additional blackout period.
Options may be granted by the Board, the Compensation Committee, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Board or the Chair of the Compensation Committee, as the case may be, as administrator of the option plan, as determined from time to time (the Administrator), to any officer, employee or consultant of CP or any subsidiary, including a family trust, personal holding corporation and retirement trust (together, Eligible Persons).
The exercise price of shares subject to an option will be determined or ratified by the Administrator and will not be less than the market price of the shares at the date on which an option is granted, calculated as the closing price of a board lot of the shares on the TSX (if the option is granted in Canadian dollars) or on the NYSE (if the option is granted in United States dollars) on (i) the last trading day preceding the grant date, if the option is granted before the close of trading on the grant date or (ii) the grant date, if the option is granted after the close of trading on the grant date. The exercise price may also be as permitted or required by the TSX or NYSE, as applicable.
CP is also entitled to issue share appreciation rights (SARs) pursuant to the terms of the option plan to Eligible Persons at the same time as the grant of an option.
SARs, if granted, will have the following terms (or such other terms as are consistent with the related options):
a. | the number of SARs to be granted shall, in the sole discretion of the Administrator, be: |
i. | one SAR for every two optioned shares, or |
ii. | one SAR for each optioned share; |
b. | the reference price for a SAR will be same as the exercise price of the related option; |
c. | SARs may be exercise from time to time by an optionholder as follows: |
i. | on and after the second anniversary of the grant date, as to 50% of the SARs or any part thereof; |
ii. | on and after the third anniversary of the grant date, as to the remaining 50% of the SARs or any part thereof; |
d. | exercise of SARs will result in a reduction in the number of option shares on the basis of one optioned share for each exercised SAR; and |
e. | exercise of an option will result in a reduction in the number of SARs on the basis of: |
i. | one SAR for each optioned share purchased in excess of 50% of the number of optioned shares, where one SAR was granted for every two optioned shares; and |
ii. | one SAR for each optioned share purchased, where one SAR was granted for each optioned share. |
f. | The expiry date of a SAR will be ten years after the grant date. |
CP did not grant any SARs in 2022 and as of December 31, 2022, CP does not have any SARs outstanding.
25
About the stock option plan
The table below sets out the limits for issuing options under the plan:
As a percent of the number of shares outstanding | ||
Maximum number of shares that, together with any other share compensation arrangement, may be reserved for issuance to insiders as options | 10%
| |
Maximum number of shares that may be issued under the option plan and any other share compensation arrangements to insiders in a one-year period | 10%
| |
Maximum number of shares that may be issued under the option plan and any other share compensation arrangements to any insider in a one-year period | 5%
| |
As a percent of the number of shares outstanding at the time the shares were reserved
| ||
Maximum number of shares that may be reserved for issuance to any person as options | 5%
|
We measure dilution by determining the number of options available for issuance and the number of options outstanding as a percentage of outstanding shares. Our dilution at the end of 2022 was 3.2 percent. Notwithstanding the limits noted above, the dilution level, measured by the number of options available for issuance as a percentage of outstanding shares continues to be capped, at the discretion of the Board, at 7 percent.
The table below shows the burn rate for the last three fiscal years, calculated by dividing the number of stock options granted in the fiscal year by the weighted average number of outstanding shares for the year.
as at December 31 | 2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||||||
Number of options granted |
1,086,200 | 1,346,358 | 839,108 | |||||||||
Weighted number of shares outstanding |
677,193,050 | 679,709,375 | 929,976,385 | |||||||||
Burn rate |
0.16% | 0.20% | 0.09% |
The table below shows the options outstanding and available for grant from the Stock Option Plan as at December 31, 2022.
Number of options/shares | Percent of outstanding shares | |||||||
Options outstanding (as at December 31, 2022) |
7,353,133 | 0.79% | ||||||
Options available to grant (as at December 31, 2022) |
22,511,317 | 2.42% | ||||||
Shares issued on exercise of options in 2022 |
840,303 | 0.09% | ||||||
Options granted in 2022 |
839,108 | 0.09% |
Since the launch of the stock option plan in October 2001, a total of 110,393,210 shares have been available for issuance under the plan and 80,528,760 shares have been issued through the exercise of options as at December 31, 2022. The last share pool increase to the Management Stock Option Incentive Plan was an increase of 20,000,000 shares reserved for issuance thereunder, approved at the annual meeting of shareholders of CP held on April 27, 2022.
26
Making changes to the stock option plan
The Board can make the following changes to the stock option plan without shareholder approval:
• | changes to clarify information or to correct an error or omission |
• | changes of an administrative or a housekeeping nature |
• | changes to eligibility to participate in the stock option plan |
• | terms, conditions and mechanics of granting stock option awards |
• | changes to vesting, exercise, early expiry or cancellation |
• | amendments that are designed to comply with the law or regulatory requirements |
The Board must receive shareholder approval to make other changes, including the following, among other things:
• | an increase to the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the plan |
• | a decrease in the exercise price |
• | a grant of options in exchange for, or related to, options being cancelled or surrendered |
The Board has made two amendments to the stock option plan since it was introduced in 2001:
• | on February 28, 2012, the stock option plan was amended so that a change of control would not trigger accelerated vesting of options held by a participant, unless the person is terminated without cause or constructively dismissed; and |
• | on November 19, 2015, the stock option plan was amended to provide net stock settlement as a method of exercise, which allows an option holder to exercise options without the need for us to sell the securities on the open market, resulting in less dilution. |
27
Payout of 2020 PSU award
On December 31, 2022, the 2020 PSU grant for the performance period of January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022 vested and was paid out on February 16, 2023. The NEOs and all other eligible employees received an overall performance payout factor of 180 percent on the award. The table below shows the difference between the actual payout value and the target grant value for each NEO.
(1) | The grant value for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd was converted to Canadian dollars using an exchange rate of $1.3415 for 2020. The target grant value represents PSUs only. For Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, the target grant values excludes the value of the PSUs deferred to PDSUs. |
(2) | Reflects the 30-day average closing share price prior to December 31, 2022 on the TSX ($105.97) and NYSE (US$78.32) when both markets were open. |
(3) | The PSU payout value for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd was converted using a 2022 year-end exchange rate of $1.3544. |
(4) | Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd elected to defer a portion of their 2020 PSU award to PDSUs. The PSU value reflects the cash payout for the PSUs that were not deferred. Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd received an additional 16,969 and 3,277 PDSUs as a result of the 2020 PSU performance factor, and a further 5,759 and 1,843 matching PDSUs, respectively, on February 2, 2023. See About deferred compensation section on page 43 for more details. |
How we calculated the 2020 PSU performance factor
The payout value has been calculated in accordance with the terms of the PSU plan and the 2020 award agreement. This includes provisions for adjustments to adjusted ROIC(1) results for PSU purposes to remove the impacts of the KCS acquisition in 2021 and 2022 in order to more accurately reflect the operating performance of CP’s core business from 2020-2022.
PSU performance measures
|
Threshold (50%)
|
Target
|
Maximum (200%)
|
PSU
|
Weighting
|
PSU
| ||||||||||||||||
3-Year Average Adjusted ROIC(1)
|
|
15.3%
|
|
|
16.0%
|
|
|
16.7%
|
|
|
16.5%
|
|
|
70%
|
|
171.4%
| ||||||
TSR to S&P/TSX 60 Index(2)
|
|
25th percentile
|
|
|
50th percentile
|
|
|
75th percentile
|
|
|
78th percentile
|
|
|
15%
|
|
200%
| ||||||
TSR to Class I railroads(2)
|
|
4th
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
15%
|
|
200%
| ||||||
PSU performance factor
|
180%
|
(1) | Adjusted ROIC is a non-GAAP measure. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
(2) | TSR performance was rated against companies in the respective indices at the beginning and end of performance periods in accordance with the terms of the PSU plan and the 2020 award agreement. |
28
Keith E. Creel
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
![]() |
Mr. Creel has been President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since his appointment on January 31, 2017. He joined CP in February 2013 as President and Chief Operating Officer (COO). Prior to joining CP, Mr. Creel had a very successful operating career that began in 1992 at Burlington Northern as a management trainee in operations, which later led to his appointment to EVP and COO at Canadian National Railway in 2010. Mr. Creel obtained a Bachelor of Science in Marketing from Jacksonville State University and completed the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School. He served as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army and is a Persian Gulf War veteran.
Mr. Creel has been recognized for his leadership within and beyond the railroad industry throughout his career. In 2014, he was named as Railroad Innovator by Progressive Railroading, in recognition for his outstanding achievement in the railroad industry. Furthermore, Mr. Creel was recognized by The Globe and Mail’s Report of Business magazine as their | |
CEO of the Year and Strategist of the Year in 2021 for orchestrating the biggest merger and acquisition deal of the year. Railway Age magazine also named Mr. Creel as co-Railroader of the Year and was part of Institutional Investor magazine’s All-Canada Executive team in 2022. |
Accomplishments in 2022
Our revenue increased 10 percent to $8.8 billion from $8.0 billion in 2021. The operating ratio increased by 230 basis points to 62.2 percent from 59.9 percent last year. Adjusted operating ratio(1) was 61.4 percent, a 380 basis point increase from 57.6 percent in 2021. Reported diluted earnings per share (EPS) was $3.77, a 10 percent decrease from last year and core adjusted diluted EPS(1), excluding significant items and KCS purchase accounting, was $3.77, unchanged from last year.
For the 17th consecutive year CP has operated the safest railway in North America with a remarkable 15 percent reduction in our FRA-reportable train accident ratio from 1.10 in 2021 to a new all-time record low of 0.93. These industry leading records have been made possible due to our continued investment in technology including broken rail detection, train inspection portals, and advanced information architectures which enables innovative data analytics and machine learning to warn of impending failures, allowing for proactive actions to be taken. We also continue to make personal safety a priority and finished 2022 with a FRA-reportable personal injury ratio of 1.01.
Our journey to being Sustainably Driven has continued to progress in 2022. Recognizing that we are not alone in the journey to reduce our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, we have shared insights and experiences with external stakeholders in order to add further value to CP’s climate programs and support collaboration and innovation that will benefit the broader transportation industry. In 2022, we were proud to launch a web-based carbon emissions calculator for our customers to provide greater insight into the carbon footprint of their freight rail transportation services. CP also continued to advance our hydrogen locomotive program in 2022 with initiatives such as conducting mainline testing, which included the first revenue service trials for the world’s first hydrogen line-haul railway locomotive and developing hydrogen fueling locations in Calgary and Edmonton.
CP is proud to be recognized as a global leader for our commitment to operating sustainably by being included in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index (DJSI World) for the first time and in the North America Index (DJSI North America) for the third consecutive year. CP’s membership in the DJSI index reflects a long-term organizational commitment to continuous improvement and transparent disclosure of the company’s sustainability performance. CP was also recognized as a global leader for our actions on climate change by being named to CDP’s exclusive A-list for the second consecutive year, placing the company in the CDP leadership group of companies leading action on climate change globally. We continue to enhance the company’s sustainability disclosure by voluntarily including reporting that is aligned with the recommendations from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), allowing our stakeholders to understand CP’s climate-related risks and opportunities so that they can be integrated into business and investment decisions. We also became the first freight rail company in North America to participate in the United Nations (UN) Global Compact, a voluntary global corporate sustainability initiative.
In a year of changing conditions and challenges, in order to support the broader economy and prepare for our proposed combination, we executed one of the largest hiring plans and capital investment programs in our company’s history. Our hiring strategy was multi-faceted, leveraging data analytics to support targeted advertisements, interdepartmental collaboration, hiring events, and community networking. We feel a great deal of CP pride delivering on our hiring strategy. We are also proud to be named one of Alberta’s Top Employers for the third year in a row and for the first time as one of Canada’s Top 100 Employers in early 2023.
(1) | Adjusted operating ratio and Core adjusted diluted EPS are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
29
Throughout 2022, Mr. Creel has continued to lead and champion the expansion of CP’s network capacity and infrastructure to provide more service options for our customers. These initiatives include but are not limited to, building on our existing partnership with Hapag-Lloyd for an additional service call at Port Saint John to further unlock the port’s potential for CP customers and the North American supply chain. We have also entered in a multi-year agreement with CMA CGM Group to be their primary rail provider in Canada, servicing the ports of Vancouver, Montreal and Saint John. By envisioning the future needs of the agricultural sector with a $600 million multi-year investment, spanning from 2018 to 2022, in high-capacity hopper cars (8,500-foot High Efficiency Product (HEP) model) enabled us to break the all-time monthly record for transporting Canadian grain and grain products by moving 3.14 million metric tonnes (MMT) in October 2022.
Under Mr. Creel’s leadership, the company has been steadfast in planning KCS integration projects in preparation for the historic combination with KCS. Throughout 2022, teams have been progressing the vital work needed to safely and efficiently operate the combined company. Our Integration Management Office has been diligent in identifying the new processes and practices for the new CPKC company. In addition, a CEO-led Integration Steering Committee has been established with a regular meeting cadence providing strategic oversight with clear deliverables and project plans to ensure a seamless and successful transition for employees, customers and other stakeholders.
2022 Compensation
|
At CP, the STIP individual performance factor for the CEO cannot exceed the corporate performance factor. This ensures the payout factor for the CEO aligns with the Company’s overall performance.
Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy for Mr. Creel, his STIP award for 2022 is directly linked to CP’s corporate performance factor of 29%.
| |||
2023 Compensation
The Compensation Committee, with guidance and advice from FW Cook, conducted a comprehensive review of Mr. Creel’s compensation in conjunction with competitive market information as well as corporate and individual performance. Based on the findings of this review, the Committee adjusted Mr. Creel’s 2023 base salary and short-term and long-term incentive targets for a total target direct compensation increase of US$1.387 million (C$1.8 million). As per the terms of Mr. Creel’s employment agreement amendment dated March 21, 2021, the 2023 LTIP target grant value will be reduced by US$2.1 million (C$2.8 million) in consideration for the special upfront stock option grant Mr. Creel received on March 27, 2021. See Employment agreements on page 37 for more details.
30
Realized and realizable pay
The value of Mr. Creel’s incentive compensation is based on our performance over the period and, for the long-term incentive, our share price when the awards vest. The graph below shows the three-year average of Mr. Creel’s granted and realized and realizable pay from 2020 to 2022.
|
Summary compensation table. Reflects average of salary earned, actual cash bonus and long-term incentives granted as disclosed in the Summary compensation table on page 35
Realized and realizable. Reflects average of salary earned, actual cash bonus, the value of long-term incentive awards that have vested or been exercised and the estimated current value of unvested long-term incentive awards granted from 2020 to 2022 • the value of vested 2020 PSUs paid in February 2023 was calculated using the 30-day average trading price of our shares prior to December 31, 2022 of US$78.32 on the NYSE with a performance multiplier of 180 percent and includes reinvested dividends up to the payment date • the value of unvested 2021 and 2022 PSUs are based on the closing price of our shares on December 30, 2022 of US$74.59 on the NYSE with a performance multiplier of 100 percent and includes reinvested dividends • the value of unvested/unexercised stock options is based on the closing price of our shares on December 30, 2022 of US$74.59 on the NYSE • the values for salary earned and actual cash bonus are as disclosed in the Summary compensation table on page 35 • the value of any realized and realizable PSUs and stock options have been converted into Canadian dollars using the 2022 year-end exchange rate of $1.3544
|
Pay linked to shareholder value
The table below shows Mr. Creel’s total direct compensation in Canadian dollars in each of the last three years, compared to its realized and realizable value as at December 31, 2022. We also compare the realized and realizable value of $100 awarded in total direct compensation to Mr. Creel in each year to the value of $100 invested in shares on the first trading day of the period, assuming reinvestment of dividends, to show a meaningful comparison of shareholder value.
|
Compensation awarded ($) |
Realized and realizable value of compensation as at |
Value of $100 | |||||||||||||||||
Keith Creel | Shareholder | |||||||||||||||||||
Year | ($) | Period | ($) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||
2020 |
16,026,481 | 32,117,366 | Jan 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2022 | 200 | 156 | |||||||||||||||
2021(1) |
25,883,203 | 16,939,310 | Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2022 | 65 | 116 | |||||||||||||||
2022(2) |
13,743,780 | 10,639,834 | Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 | 77 | 112 |
(1) | Compensation awarded in 2021 is higher than 2020 and 2022 as a result of the special upfront grant of stock options in March 2021 and has normalized in 2022. |
(2) | As per the terms of Mr. Creel’s employment agreement amendment dated March 21, 2021, Mr. Creel’s 2022 LTIP target grant value was reduced by US$2.1 million (C$2.8 million) in consideration for the special upfront stock option grant Mr. Creel received on March 27, 2021. This is the first of four planned reductions to Mr. Creel’s annual LTIP award in each year of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 for a total aggregate reduction of US$8.4 million. See Employment agreements on page 37 for more details. |
Mr. Creel’s compensation awarded values are as disclosed in the Summary compensation table. Mr. Creel’s realized and realizable value for salary earned and actual bonus received have been converted to Canadian dollars using the following average exchange rates: $1.3415 for 2020, $1.2535 for 2021 and $1.3013 for 2022. The value of any realized and realizable long-term incentive is converted into Canadian dollars using the 2022 year-end exchange rate of $1.3544.
31
Nadeem S. Velani | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |
![]() |
Mr. Velani has been Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer since October 17, 2017. Mr. Velani joined CP in March 2013 after spending approximately 15 years with CN where he held a variety of leadership positions in financial planning, sales and marketing, investor relations and the Office of the President and CEO. Mr. Velani obtained a Bachelor of Economics from Western University and an MBA in Finance/International Business from McGill. He is a graduate of the Harvard Business School completing the Advanced Management Program in 2022.
Mr. Velani is a key member of the CP senior management team responsible for the long-term strategic direction of the Company. Responsibilities include financial planning, investor relations, reporting and accounting systems, as well as pension plan management, tax, treasury and internal audit functions. He is the co-chair of CP’s Diversity and Leadership Development Steering Committee, championing company-wide leadership programs and diversity initiatives. Mr. Velani was named to Institutional Investor’s All-Canada Executive Team as Top CFO in capital goods/ industrials sector and recognized for Best Investor Relations by Senior Management team (large cap) at IR Magazine Awards – Canada for 2022. |
2022 Performance highlights:
• Revenue increased by 10 percent to $8.8 billion from $8.0 billion in 2021. Reported diluted EPS was $3.77, a 10 percent decrease from last year while core adjusted diluted EPS(1), excluding significant items and KCS purchase accounting, was $3.77, unchanged from last year. Share price significantly outperformed SP500, TSX60 and Class I peers.
• Provided strong oversight of CP’s capital structure, including the repayment of $1.6 billion in debt. An important step in ensuring CP returns to its target leverage of 2.5x adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA(1).
• Successfully on-boarded new external auditors.
• Ensured the disciplined deployment of $1.55 billion in capital investment focusing CP on investments that enhanced the safety, fluidity and capacity of our network.
• Leadership development through Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program, followed by field-based training through CP’s in-house “Railroad MBA” program to gain further operations knowledge while qualifying as a conductor in January 2023.
• Ongoing champion for the company’s sustainability strategy. In 2022, we were named to CDP A-list as well as DJSI World and DJSI North America Indices.
• Progressed integration planning objectives and projects for the company’s financial functions. |
2022 Compensation:
|
John K. Brooks | Executive Vice-President and Chief Marketing Officer |
![]() |
Mr. Brooks has been Executive Vice-President and Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) since February 14, 2019. Mr. Brooks started his railroading career with Union Pacific and later helped start I&M Rail Link, LLC, which was purchased by the Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad (DM&E) in 2002. When CP acquired the DM&E in 2007, Mr. Brooks was Vice-President of Marketing.
With more than 28 years in the railroading business, Mr. Brooks has held senior responsibilities in all lines of business, including coal, chemicals, merchandise products, grain and intermodal. He is responsible for strengthening relationships with existing customers, generating new opportunities for growth, enhancing the value of the Company’s service offerings and developing strategies to optimize CP’s business. |
2022 Performance highlights: • Delivered record revenues in 2022, increasing by 10 percent from 2021. We also had a record year in potash revenue and volumes.
• Active engagement with our industry partners in 2022 resulted in a new multi-year agreement with CMA CGM Group, where CP will be their primary rail provider in Canada. Access to the Port of Vancouver and Port of Montreal, combined with our strategic connection to Port Saint John via New Brunswick Southern Railway, will enable CP to move the majority of CMA CGM’s freight from Canadian ports to key Canadian and US Midwest inland markets.
• Established new premium intermodal service at Port of Saint John, a key contributor to the company’s 13 percent increase in intermodal volume growth in 2022.
• Established long-term partnership with Ford Motor Company which strengthens our relationship and develops new supply chain solutions, including the utilization of our new Chicago auto compound and the reopening of our Edmonton auto compound in January 2023.
• Worked closely with grain supply chain partners to implement infrastructure and capacity investments to improve efficiency in the grain supply chain including the receipt of the final installment of the 5,900 new high-capacity hopper cars. |
2022 Compensation:
|
(1) | Adjusted operating ratio, Core adjusted diluted EPS and Adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled on pages 66-77 of CP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
32
Mark A. Redd | Executive Vice-President Operations |
![]() |
Mr. Redd has been Executive Vice-President Operations since September 1, 2019. He joined CP in October 2013 as General Manager Operations U.S. West and has held various leadership positions. In February 2017, he became Senior Vice-President Operations Western Region. Mr. Redd began his railroading career at Midsouth Rail in Jackson, Mississippi, and then moved to KCS as a locomotive engineer and progressed to Vice-President Transportation. He is also a former Chairman of the operating board for the Port Terminal Railroad Association in Houston, Texas. Mr. Redd holds a Bachelor and Master of Science in Management from University of Phoenix and Executive MBA from the University of Missouri – Kansas City.
Mr. Redd leads the 24/7 operations of our network, which includes responsibility for network transportation, operations, mechanical, engineering, procurement, operations technology and labour relations. He is the co-chair of our Diversity and Leadership Development Steering Committee, actively supporting the development of a diverse and inclusive operations team. Mr. Redd was proudly named CP’s 2016 Railroader of the Year. |
2022 Performance highlights:
• Accelerated our grain service after a robust harvest arrived earlier than expected to break the all-time monthly record for transporting Canadian grain and grain products by moving 3.14 million metric tonnes (MMT) in October 2022.
• Hired and trained over 1,600 conductors in 2022 to support growing business needs by using a multi-faceted strategy that included leveraging data analytics to support targeted advertisements, interdepartmental collaboration, hiring events, and community networking.
• Achieved record train length and weights, which is a culmination of work and planning by our talented railroaders.
• Progressed CP’s pursuit to be the safest railway in North America with a remarkable 15 percent reduction in our FRA-reportable train accident frequency ratio from 1.10 in 2021 to a record low of 0.93 in 2022.
• Continued focus on personal safety with our second best ever FRA-reportable personal injury ratio of 1.01, supported by our Home Safe program.
• Advanced integration planning with the team hard at work to prepare to bring CPKC together. |
2022 Compensation:
|
Jeffrey J. Ellis | Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary |
![]() |
Mr. Ellis has been Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since November 23, 2015. Prior to joining CP in 2015, Mr. Ellis was the U.S. General Counsel at BMO Financial Group. Before joining BMO in 2006, Mr. Ellis was in private practice in Ontario. He holds a BA and MA from the University of Toronto, JD and LLM degrees from Osgoode Hall Law School as well as an MBA from Western University. Mr. Ellis is a member of the bars of New York, Illinois, Ontario and Alberta and is fluent in French.
Mr. Ellis is accountable for the overall strategic leadership, and performance of the legal, corporate secretarial, communications and government relations functions at CP. Mr. Ellis’ responsibilities include litigation management, regulatory, contracts, commercial matters and advising on risk management as well as providing strategic support to CP’s senior management and the Board of Directors. As Chair of CP’s Indigenous Diversity Council, he champions an inclusive workplace. Mr. Ellis was an Executive Committee member for Legal Leaders for Diversity and Inclusion from 2018-2022 and is a Board member of the Railway Association of Canada. |
2022 Performance highlights:
• Since closing KCS into the voting trust on December 14, 2021, Mr. Ellis and his team continue to play a key role in integration planning of the historic combination of CP and KCS.
• Worked closely with the Integration Management Office to progress the vital work needed to safely and efficiently operate the combined company.
• Instrumental in providing the legal strategy for the CP team’s presentation to the Surface Transportation Board in the fall of 2022.
• Responsible for securing additional regulatory approvals for the KCS transaction, including approvals in Mexico and the United States.
• CP legal team was recognized by Financial Times at the 2022 Innovative Lawyers Awards North America in the award category for In-House Legal Team: Innovation in Commercial and Strategic Advice.
|
2022 Compensation:
|
33
Share performance
The graph below shows the total shareholder return of $100 invested in CP shares compared to the two major market indices over the last five years ending December 31, 2022 assuming reinvestment of dividends. The graph also shows the total compensation awarded to our NEOs for each of the past five years.
The graph shows CP shares have outperformed the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the S&P 500 index since 2018 while our NEOs’ total compensation has directly aligned with the increasing value provided to our shareholders in recent years. We have delivered significant shareholder value as our cumulative total return for the five-year period ending December 31, 2022 was 130 percent on the TSX and 114 percent on the NYSE.
The total compensation value for NEOs as disclosed in the Summary compensation table is 0.3 percent of our total revenues of $8.8 billion for 2022.
at December 31 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
|||||||||||||||
CP TSR (C$) |
|
107 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
198 |
|
|
206 |
|
|
230 |
| |||||
CP TSR (US$) |
|
98 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
196 |
|
|
205 |
|
|
214 |
| |||||
S&P/TSX Composite Index (C$) |
|
91 |
|
|
112 |
|
|
118 |
|
|
148 |
|
|
139 |
| |||||
S&P 500 Index (US$) |
|
96 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
149 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
157 |
| |||||
TDC ($ thousands) |
|
22,210 |
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
31,855 |
|
|
41,754 |
|
|
28,917 |
|
Note:
• | Total direct compensation (TDC) is the total compensation of the NEOs (excluding pension), as reported in the summary compensation table in prior years. |
• | We used the following to calculate total direct compensation in the table above: |
• | 2022, 2021 and 2020: Keith Creel, Nadeem Velani, John Brooks, Mark Redd and Jeffrey Ellis |
• | 2019: Keith Creel, Nadeem Velani, John Brooks, Laird Pitz and Mark Redd |
• | 2018: Keith Creel, Nadeem Velani, Robert Johnson, Laird Pitz and John Brooks |
• | Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Pitz, Mr. Redd and Mr. Johnson were paid in U.S. dollars and their amounts have been converted using the following average exchange rates: $1.3013 for 2022, $1.2535 for 2021, $1.3415 for 2020, $1.3269 for 2019 and $1.2957 for 2018. |
34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DETAILS
Summary compensation table
The table below shows annual compensation in Canadian dollars for our five NEOs for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd are paid in U.S. dollars and their compensation has been converted to Canadian dollars using the average exchange rates for the year: $1.3013 for 2022, $1.2535 for 2021 and $1.3415 for 2020. Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis are paid in Canadian dollars.
Executive and principal
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Share-based ($)(2)
|
Option-based ($)(3)
|
Non-equity plan ($)(4)
|
Pension ($)(5)
|
All other ($)(6)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keith E. Creel |
2022 | 1,561,560 | 6,960,936 | 4,655,218 | 566,066 | 499,916 | 279,850 | 14,523,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief |
2021 | 1,496,068 | 7,138,547 | 14,910,982 | 2,337,606 | 608,541 | 237,237 | 26,728,981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer |
2020 | 1,601,097 | 6,826,446 | 4,156,579 | 3,442,359 | 546,767 | 242,948 | 16,816,196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nadeem S. Velani |
2022 | 833,193 | 1,878,184 | 1,315,942 | 399,325 | 232,289 | 69,608 | 4,728,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice-President |
2021 | 806,821 | 1,684,658 | 997,455 | 1,102,552 | 248,433 | 53,715 | 4,893,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
2020 | 790,366 | 1,818,076 | 1,157,441 | 1,263,452 | 226,331 | 66,336 | 5,322,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
John K. Brooks |
2022 | 788,913 | 1,712,572 | 1,169,671 | 371,098 | 289,889 | 96,199 | 4,428,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice-President |
2021 | 722,525 | 1,566,074 | 920,156 | 999,666 | 534,527 | 90,248 | 4,833,196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Marketing Officer |
2020 | 735,100 | 1,548,288 | 942,743 | 1,149,741 | 557,101 | 83,767 | 5,016,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Redd |
2022 | 757,194 | 1,513,731 | 1,037,043 | 358,931 | 137,801 | 100,518 | 3,905,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice-President |
2021 | 645,748 | 1,444,831 | 1,010,560 | 814,384 | 104,262 | 89,381 | 4,109,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
2020 | 595,081 | 1,155,272 | 693,849 | 827,327 | 93,038 | 79,781 | 3,444,348 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Ellis |
2022 | 596,571 | 944,776 | 661,955 | 226,270 | 157,656 | 61,385 | 2,648,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Legal Officer |
2021 | 554,274 | 947,383 | 514,607 | 616,166 | 143,932 | 51,938 | 2,828,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Corporate Secretary |
2020 | 520,967 | 954,825 | 520,534 | 638,004 | 125,011 | 44,457 | 2,803,798 |
(1) | Salary. Represents salary earned in the year. Mr. Velani’s salary is set in U.S. dollars and was paid in Canadian dollars based on an exchange rate of 1.2779 in 2022. |
(2) | Share-based awards. Includes PSUs and DSUs awards, where applicable. PSUs were granted on January 31, 2022. The grant date accounting fair value is $90.94 for grants on the TSX and US$71.40 for grants on the NYSE and are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: Compensation - Stock Compensation. See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 22: Stock-based compensation in our Annual Report on form 10-K filed with the SEC and securities regulatory authorities in Canada on February 24, 2023 for more details. |
To calculate the number of PSUs our NEOs receive, we use the Willis Towers Watson binomial lattice model and the 30-day average closing share price on the TSX or the NYSE prior to the grant date. |
Willis Towers Watson Expected Life Binomial Valuation
| ||
Assumptions |
TSX / NYSE | |
Term |
3 years | |
Vesting Schedule |
3 year cliff | |
Payout Range % (threshold-target-max) |
50 - 100 - 270 | |
Risk of Forfeiture |
5% | |
PSU Value (as a % of grant price) |
84% |
Using this valuation model, the grant date expected fair value on January 31, 2022 was $76.39 on the TSX and US$59.98 on the NYSE, based on the above assumptions. |
Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd amounts include the value of DSUs granted on January 31, 2022. See the About deferred compensation section on page 43 for more details. |
Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd amounts exclude the 16,969 PDSUs and 3,277 PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, on February 2, 2023, as a result of the 2020 PSU performance factor, and the additional 5,759 and 1,843 matching PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, under the terms of the Senior Executive Deferred Share Plan. See the Payout of 2020 PSU award on page 28 and the About deferred compensation section on page 43 for more details. |
35
(3) | Option-based awards. The grant date fair value of stock option awards granted to each NEO has been calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: Compensation – Stock Compensation. We used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (with reference to the shares underlying the options). Stock options awarded as part of the annual program were granted on January 31, 2022. The grant date accounting fair value of the awards shown in the Summary compensation table with reference to the TSX and NYSE are $20.48 and US$17.19, respectively. See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 22: Stock-based compensation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and securities regulatory authorities in Canada on February 24, 2023 for more details. |
To calculate the number of options, we use Willis Towers Watson’s expected life binomial methodology and the 30-day average closing share price on the TSX or the NYSE prior to the grant date. |
The grant price on January 31, 2022 is $90.94 on the TSX and US$71.40 on the NYSE. Using the binomial valuation model, the grant date expected fair value was $16.37 on the TSX and US$13.57 on the NYSE. The assumptions are below: |
|
Willis Towers Watson Expected Life Binomial Valuation | |||||||
Assumptions | NYSE | TSX | ||||||
Option Term |
7 years | 7 years | ||||||
Vesting Schedule |
4 year pro-rated | 4 year pro-rated | ||||||
Expected Life |
4.75 years | 4.75 years | ||||||
Dividend Yield (1-year historical) |
0.86% | 0.86% | ||||||
Volatility (3-year daily) |
24.8% | 24.0% | ||||||
Risk-free Rate (yield curve) |
0.25% - 0.75% | 0.1% - 0.6% | ||||||
Risk of Forfeiture |
5% | 5% | ||||||
Stock Option Value (as a % of grant price) |
19% | 18% |
Mr. Creel’s 2021 amount includes a special upfront grant on March 27, 2021 in relation to amendments to his executive employment agreement made on March 21, 2021 to retain him until at least year 2026. The grant date fair value of this grant is US$16.24 on the NYSE and is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: Compensation - Stock Compensation. In consideration of this special upfront grant, CP and Mr. Creel agreed to amend his current employment agreement to reduce the value of the annual long-term incentive plan award Mr. Creel is entitled to receive by US$2.1 million in each year of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 (an aggregate of $8.4 million). See Employment agreements on page 37 for more details. |
Mr. Redd’s 2021 amount also includes the incremental fair value of $247,071 (US$197,105) to reflect the discretion approved by Board for his July 20, 2018 PSOs granted when he was not an NEO. The incremental fair value is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: Compensation - Stock Compensation and reflects the fair value of incremental options allowed to vest due to exercise of positive discretion as calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at the modification date. |
(4) | Non-equity annual incentive. Cash bonus earned under our short-term incentive plan for 2022 and paid in February 2023. |
(5) | Pension. Mr. Creel, Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis participate in the Canadian defined contribution plan (DC plan) and in the defined contribution supplemental plan (DC SERP). Mr. Creel and Mr. Redd participate in the U.S. defined contribution plan and the U.S. supplemental executive retirement plan. Mr. Brooks participates in the CP Pension Plan for U.S. Management Employees. See Retirement plans on page 42 for more details. |
(6) | All other compensation. The NEOs receive certain benefits and perquisites which are competitive with our comparator group. The table below shows the breakdown of all other compensation for 2022. The values in the table have been converted to Canadian dollars using the 2022 average exchange rate of $1.3013. |
Perquisites | Other compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive |
Personal ($)(a) |
Auto benefits ($)(b) |
Housing allowance ($)(c) |
Financial and tax planning ($)(d) |
Additional medical ($)(e) |
Club benefits ($)(f) |
401(k) match ($)(g) |
Employer share purchase plan match ($)(h) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keith Creel |
151,069 | 28,631 | 3,652 | 26,026 | - | 32,533 | 7,027 | 30,912 | 279,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nadeem Velani |
- | 40,416 | - | - | 1,495 | 11,200 | - | 16,497 | 69,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Brooks |
- | 40,636 | - | 12,883 | 2,405 | 14,575 | 10,080 | 15,620 | 96,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Redd |
- | 46,161 | - | 12,883 | - | 14,575 | 11,907 | 14,992 | 100,518 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Ellis |
- | 38,373 | - | - | - | 11,200 | - | 11,812 | 61,385 |
(a) | Calculated by multiplying the variable cost per air hour by the number of hours used for travel and includes costs for fuel, maintenance, landing fees and other miscellaneous costs. The year over year increase to this amount is primarily due to higher fuel prices in 2022. As Mr. Creel is required to travel frequently for business, CP prefers he uses our corporate aircraft within North America to ensure his safety, security and ability to immediately travel across CP’s network. As an executive of a Calgary-based company, enabling the CEO to visit his family in the United States is an important retention tool. Non-corporate use of the corporate aircraft has been limited to family visits. |
36
(b) | Reflects the cost of a company-leased vehicle and reimbursement of related operating costs. A taxable reimbursement of auto benefits is provided for executives with vehicles that meets a CFCR (Combined Fuel Consumption Ratio from the Canadian federal government) of 11.8L per 100KM or less. |
(c) | Reflects total costs pro-rated for the days Mr. Creel is in Calgary to provide reasonable accommodation. |
(d) | Reflects the cost of executive financial counselling provided for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd. Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis did not use the company provided service. |
(e) | Under the U.S. medical benefits plan, available to all U.S. employees, the majority of the cost of a medical examination is covered by the plan. Only incremental costs for the executive medical are paid for by CP. In Canada, executive medicals are not covered under the group benefit plan. |
(f) | Included in the perquisites program available to all senior executives is a value of $11,200 in their respective home currency. Value of CEO’s club membership of $32,533 reflects the Canadian dollar conversion of US$25,000. |
(g) | Reflects matching company contributions to the 401(k) plan for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd. |
(h) | Company contributions to the Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP). Our NEOs participate in the ESPP on the same terms and using the same formulas as other participants. See page 41 to read more about the ESPP. |
Employment agreements
Except for Mr. Creel and Mr. Ellis, employment agreements for executive officers are set out in a standard offer letter template. The letters contain the standard terms, which include an annual salary, participation in the short and long-term incentive plans as approved annually by the Compensation Committee, participation in the benefit plans or programs generally available to management employees and perquisites. As of the date of this 10-K/A, all of our NEOs have a two-year non-compete, non-solicitation agreement tied to their CP employment.
Mr. Creel’s employment agreement includes:
• | reasonable living accommodation in Calgary |
• | use of the corporate aircraft for business commuting and family visits within North America |
• | non-disclosure, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants |
• | severance provisions as described on page 45 |
• | reimbursement for club memberships of up to US$25,000 annually |
• | reimbursement for financial services of up to US$20,000 annually |
On March 21, 2021, in connection with the announcement of the merger with KCS, CP entered into a stock option agreement and amendment to Mr. Creel’s executive employment agreement with the intent to retain him until at least year 2026. If Mr. Creel voluntarily resigns or retires prior to January 31, 2026 any PSUs granted after March 1, 2021 will not be deemed retirement-eligible as previously provided in the PSU plan and his prior employment agreement. The 517,385 options granted to Mr. Creel in connection with these amendments to his executive employment agreement will expire on March 27, 2028 and will be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. In consideration of the Award, CP and Mr. Creel agreed to amend his current employment agreement to reduce the value of the annual long-term incentive plan award Mr. Creel is entitled to receive by US$2.1 million in each year of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 (an aggregate of $8.4 million).
Mr. Ellis’ employment agreement includes a severance package for a termination without cause as described on page 45 and a non-compete, non-solicitation agreement.
37
Incentive plan awards
Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards
The table below shows all vested and unvested equity incentive awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2022. See Long-term incentive plan beginning on page 22 for more information about our stock option and share-based awards.
|
|
Option-based awards(1) |
|
Share-based awards(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive | Grant date | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) |
Option exercise price ($) |
Option expiration |
Value of ($) (1) |
Grant type |
Number of shares or units of shares that (#) |
Market or payout value of share-based have not vested ($) |
Market or payout value of vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keith Creel(3) |
31-Jan-14 | 199,500 | 33.77 | 31-Jan-24 | 13,402,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24-Jul-14 | 239,700 | 42.06 | 24-Jul-24 | 14,115,933 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-16 | 276,250 | 23.36 | 22-Jan-26 | 19,167,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20-Jan-17 | 35,838 | 30.20 | 20-Jan-24 | 2,154,646 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-Feb-17 | 79,376 | 30.23 | 1-Feb-24 | 4,769,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-Feb-17 | 749,797 | 30.23 | 1-Feb-24 | 45,048,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-18 | 215,740 | 37.17 | 22-Jan-25 | 10,934,059 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25-Jan-19 | 271,010 | 41.06 | 25-Jan-26 | 12,307,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | 287,160 | 53.16 | 31-Jan-27 | 8,334,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | 237,145 | 67.24 | 29-Jan-28 | 2,360,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27-Mar-21 | 517,385 | 71.64 | 27-Mar-28 | 2,067,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | 208,107 | 71.40 | 31-Jan-29 | 899,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6-Feb-13 | DSU | 16,507,476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | PSU | 18,739,151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | PSU | 85,897 | 8,677,694 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | PSU | 75,359 | 7,613,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
3,317,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,561,823 |
|
|
|
161,256 | 16,290,769 | 35,246,627 | |||||||||||||||||||
Nadeem Velani |
23-Jan-15 | 1,000 | 43.76 | 23-Jan-25 | 57,190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-16 | 14,635 | 33.15 | 22-Jan-26 | 992,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-18 | 66,300 | 46.33 | 22-Jan-25 | 3,621,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25-Jan-19 | 81,565 | 54.30 | 25-Jan-26 | 3,805,007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | 87,275 | 70.31 | 31-Jan-27 | 2,674,106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | 57,790 | 85.93 | 29-Jan-28 | 868,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | 64,255 | 90.94 | 31-Jan-29 | 643,193 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26-Feb-14 | DSU | 350,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19-Feb-15 | DSU | 177,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24-Feb-17 | DSU | 321,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Feb-19 | DSU | 699,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | DSU | 4,436,210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | PSU | 1,011,142 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | PSU | 19,884 | 2,007,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | PSU | 20,774 | 2,097,132 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
372,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,661,061 |
|
|
|
40,658 | 4,104,376 | 6,995,521 |
38
|
|
Option-based awards(1) |
|
Share-based awards(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive | Grant date | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) |
Option exercise price ($) |
Option expiration |
Value of ($) (1) |
Grant type |
Number of shares or units of shares that (#) |
Market or payout value of share-based have not vested ($) |
Market or payout value of vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Brooks |
23-Jan-15 | 6,530 | 35.18 | 23-Jan-25 | 348,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-16 | 21,700 | 23.36 | 22-Jan-26 | 1,505,674 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-18 | 20,975 | 37.17 | 22-Jan-25 | 1,063,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25-Jan-19 | 37,420 | 41.06 | 25-Jan-26 | 1,699,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14-Feb-19 | 14,845 | 40.40 | 14-Feb-26 | 687,426 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | 65,130 | 53.16 | 31-Jan-27 | 1,890,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | 49,835 | 67.24 | 29-Jan-28 | 496,099 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | 52,289 | 71.40 | 31-Jan-29 | 225,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6-Sep-12 | DSU | 522,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Feb-19 | DSU | 429,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | DSU | 792 | 79,981 | 319,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | DSU | 695 | 70,220 | 280,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | PSU | 4,250,091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | PSU | 18,053 | 1,823,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | PSU | 17,845 | 1,802,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
268,724 | 7,916,456 | 37,385 | 3,776,750 | 5,802,816 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Redd |
25-Jan-19 | 19,980 | 41.06 | 25-Jan-26 | 907,352 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-Sep-19 | 6,485 | 46.95 | 3-Sep-26 | 242,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | 47,935 | 53.16 | 31-Jan-27 | 1,391,303 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | 41,350 | 67.24 | 29-Jan-28 | 411,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | 46,360 | 71.40 | 31-Jan-29 | 200,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19-Feb-15 | DSU | 226,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Feb-19 | DSU | 363,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | DSU | 224 | 22,661 | 1,021,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | DSU | 1,726 | 174,352 | 92,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | DSU | 566 | 57,205 | 228,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | PSU | 2,346,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | PSU | 13,484 | 1,362,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | PSU | 15,821 | 1,598,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
162,110 | 3,153,358 | 31,821 | 3,214,739 | 4,279,676 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey Ellis |
22-Jan-16 | 6,485 | 33.15 | 22-Jan-26 | 439,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20-Jan-17 | 17,150 | 40.30 | 20-Jan-24 | 1,040,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-18 | 21,255 | 46.33 | 22-Jan-25 | 1,160,948 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25-Jan-19 | 36,535 | 54.30 | 25-Jan-26 | 1,704,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | 39,250 | 70.31 | 31-Jan-27 | 1,202,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | 29,815 | 85.93 | 29-Jan-28 | 447,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | 32,322 | 90.94 | 31-Jan-29 | 323,543 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22-Jan-16 | DSU | 194,669 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | DSU | 1,996 | 201,537 | 806,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | DSU | 923 | 93,175 | 372,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-20 | PSU | 2,274,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29-Jan-21 | PSU | 10,259 | 1,035,617 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-Jan-22 | PSU | 10,450 | 1,054,912 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
182,812 | 6,319,121 | 23,628 | 2,385,241 | 3,648,043 |
(1) | Option-based awards. Regular options granted before 2017 vest 25 percent each year for four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire 10 years from the grant date. Grants made in 2017 and onwards have the same vesting schedule and expire seven years from the grant date. All exercise prices for grants received prior to 2015 are in Canadian dollars. With respect to Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd, exercise prices for option awards that were granted in 2015 and later are in U.S. dollars. All of Mr. Velani’s and Mr. Ellis’ exercise prices are in Canadian dollars. |
39
Value of unexercised in-the-money options. For stock options granted to NEOs in Canadian dollars, the value of unexercised in-the-money options at 2022 year-end is based on $100.95, the closing share price on the TSX on December 30, 2022. For NEOs with U.S. dollar stock option grants, the value of unexercised in-the-money options at 2022 year-end is based on US$74.59, the closing share price on the NYSE on December 30, 2022. |
(2) | Share-based awards. Values include reinvested dividends. The unvested 2021 and 2022 PSU values are based on a payout at target (100 percent). For Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis, the value of unvested PSUs and DSUs is based on $100.95, the closing share price on the TSX on December 30, 2022. For Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd, the value of unvested PSUs and DSUs is based on US$74.59 our closing share price on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, converted to Canadian dollars using a year-end exchange rate of $1.3544. |
The vested 2020 PSU values are based on an overall performance factor of 180 percent and a payout price of $105.97 and US$78.32 on the TSX and NYSE, respectively (see Payout of 2020 PSU award on page 28 for more details). Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd elected to defer a portion of their January 31, 2020 PSU award to PDSUs and received an additional 16,969 and 3,277 PDSUs, on February 2, 2023, respectively as a result of the overall 2020 PSU performance factor of 180 percent and a further 5,759 and 1,843 matching PDSUs, respectively, under the terms of the Senior Executive Deferred Share Plan on February 2, 2023. Value of the vested 2020 PDSUs are included in the table above. See the About deferred compensation section on page 43 for more details. |
Vested and unvested DSU awards are deferred and cannot be redeemed until the NEO leaves the Company. |
(3) | Mr. Creel was awarded an upfront PSO grant on February 1, 2017 when he became CEO on January 31, 2017. These PSOs vested on February 1, 2022 based on our five-year TSR relative to two equally weighted measures: the S&P/TSX Capped Industrial Index and the S&P 1500 Road and Rail Index. The threshold for vesting is for CP’s TSR being at or above the 60th percentile relative to each index at the end of the performance period on January 31, 2022. CP’s TSR performance relative to the S&P/TSX Capped Industrial and S&P 1500 Road and Rail indices both exceeded the 60th percentile, vesting 100 percent of the grant. |
On March 27, 2021, Mr. Creel was awarded a special stock option grant in conjunction with amendments to his executive employment agreement made on March 21, 2021. See Employment agreements on page 37 for more details. |
Incentive plan awards – value vested or earned during the year
The table below shows the amount of incentive compensation that vested or was earned in 2022.
Executive
|
Option-based awards - value vested during the year ($)(1) |
Share-based awards - value vested during the year ($)(2) |
Non-equity incentive plan compensation - value earned during the year ($) |
|||||||||
Keith Creel |
55,464,666 | 18,739,151 | 566,066 | |||||||||
Nadeem Velani |
2,086,873 | 5,572,386 | 399,325 | |||||||||
John Brooks |
1,219,921 | 4,326,565 | 371,098 | |||||||||
Mark Redd |
826,581 | 3,342,295 | 358,931 | |||||||||
Jeffrey Ellis |
841,506 | 2,274,526 | 226,270 |
(1) | Option-based awards—value vested during the year. Includes the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options were exercised on the date of vest. It is calculated as the difference between the closing price (on each of the stock option vest dates in 2022) and the exercise price, converted to Canadian dollars where applicable using the exchange rate on the vest date. |
(2) | Share-based awards—value vested during the year. Includes DSUs that have vested during the year and are valued as of the vest date and converted to Canadian dollars where applicable. Also includes, the payout value of the 2020 PSUs and the value of 2020 PDSUs (including the 16,969 and 3,277 PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, on February 2, 2023 as a result of the 2020 PSU performance factor, and a further 5,759 and 1,843 matching PDSUs credited to Mr. Velani and Mr. Redd, respectively, on February 2, 2023, under the terms of the Senior Executive Deferred Share Unit Plan), which vested at 180 percent on December 31, 2022. The 2020 PSU value for Mr. Creel, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Redd have been converted to Canadian dollars using the year-end exchange rate of $1.3544. See Payout of 2020 PSU award on page 28 and the Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards on page 38 for more details. |
40
Option exercises and vested stock awards
The table below shows the options exercised and sold by the NEOs in 2022.
Executive
|
Number of options exercised and sold
|
Option exercise price ($)
|
Value realized ($)(1)
|
|||||||||
Keith Creel(2) |
6,517 | US$30.20 | 423,878 | |||||||||
|
150,762 | US$30.23 | 9,787,236 | |||||||||
John Brooks |
13,050 | US$30.20 | 871,434 | |||||||||
6,000 | US$35.18 | 358,683 | ||||||||||
Mark Redd |
4,665 | US$30.20 | 286,274 | |||||||||
6,900 | 33.23 | 455,820 | ||||||||||
6,280 | US$35.18 | 345,622 | ||||||||||
20,075 | US$37.17 | 1,054,301 | ||||||||||
|
19,800 | US$38.99 | 990,809 |
(1) | Based on the market price of shares less the option exercise price on the date of exercise; converted to Canadian dollars using a year-end exchange rate of $1.3544 for exercises on the NYSE. |
(2) | Mr. Creel’s exercises are for options, which are scheduled to expire in January, February and July of 2024, and are being exercised and sold in accordance with the automatic securities disposition plans he established on August 2, 2022. |
Equity compensation plan information
The table below shows the securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans at December 31, 2022. These include the issuance of securities upon exercise of options outstanding under the stock option plan and the director stock option plan.
The table also shows the remaining number of shares available for issuance and includes 1,700,000 shares under the director stock option plan. On July 21, 2003, the Board suspended any additional grants of options under the director stock option plan and there are no outstanding options under that plan.
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
7,353,133 | 61.69 | 22,511,317 | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
- | - | - | |||||||||
Total |
7,353,133 | 61.69 | 22,511,317 |
See page 25 to read more about the stock option plan. You can also read about the two equity compensation plans in our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, available on our website (investor.cpr.ca/financials), and on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov).
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
CP’s ESPP is available to all employees and provides the opportunity to purchase shares on the open market through payroll deductions which aligns employees’ interests with those of shareholders. Employees may contribute between one percent and ten percent of their base salary to the ESPP every pay period. CP provides a 33 percent match on the first six percent of non-unionized and specified unionized employees’ contributions which vest at the end of the four consecutive quarters. Employees must remain participants of the ESPP at the time of vesting in order to receive the CP match.
In 2022, approximately 56 percent of our employees participated in the ESPP.
41
Retirement plans
Canadian pension plans
Mr. Creel, Mr. Velani and Mr. Ellis participated in our DC plan in 2022.
Participants contribute between 4 and 6 percent of their earnings depending on their age and years of service, and the Company contributes between 4 and 8 percent of earnings on a participant’s base salary and annual bonus. For eligible executives, CP contributes an additional 6 percent contribution on base salary and annual bonus. Total contributions are limited to the maximum allowed under the Income Tax Act (Canada) ($30,780 for 2022).
Defined contribution plan
Executive |
Accumulated value at start of year ($) |
Compensatory ($) |
Accumulated value at year end ($) |
|||||||||
Keith Creel |