Recent Accounting Pronouncements	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	NOTE 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Cloud Computing Arrangements. In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, aligning the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs for internal-use software. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and does not expect it to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses changing the way credit losses on accounts receivable are estimated. Under current U.S. GAAP, credit losses on trade accounts receivable are recognized once it is probable that such losses will occur. Under this new guidance, the Company will be required to estimate credit losses based on the expected amount of future collections which may result in earlier recognition of allowance for doubtful accounts. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and will be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and does not expect it to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02) in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. The new guidance requires a lessee to recognize a liability to make lease payments (the “lease liability”) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on the balance sheet. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of 2019 utilizing the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the first quarter of 2019 and did not recast the comparative periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption. The Company elected the ‘package of practical expedients’ and did not reassess its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company also elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify and did not recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities for those leases. The Company’s lease agreements are principally related to real estate. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of operating lease assets of $18.2 million and $35.0 million in operating lease liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The difference between the operating lease assets and the operating lease liabilities is primarily due to a lease incentive received in 2017 related to the 300 South Riverside Lease in Chicago, Illinois. There was no material impact to its Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For further information, see Note 11 (Leases).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

NOTE 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Cloud Computing Arrangements. In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, aligning the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs for internal-use software. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and does not expect it to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses changing the way credit losses on accounts receivable are estimated. Under current U.S. GAAP, credit losses on trade accounts receivable are recognized once it is probable that such losses will occur. Under this new guidance, the Company will be required to estimate credit losses based on the expected amount of future collections which may result in earlier recognition of allowance for doubtful accounts. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and will be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating this new guidance and does not expect it to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02) in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. The new guidance requires a lessee to recognize a liability to make lease payments (the “lease liability”) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on the balance sheet. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of 2019 utilizing the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the first quarter of 2019 and did not recast the comparative periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption. The Company elected the ‘package of practical expedients’ and did not reassess its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company also elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify and did not recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities for those leases. The Company’s lease agreements are principally related to real estate. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of operating lease assets of $18.2 million and $35.0 million in operating lease liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The difference between the operating lease assets and the operating lease liabilities is primarily due to a lease incentive received in 2017 related to the 300 South Riverside Lease in Chicago, Illinois. There was no material impact to its Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For further information, see Note 11 (Leases).