XML 29 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.0.1
Restructuring and Long-Lived Asset Impairment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Restructuring and Long-Lived Asset Impairment  
Restructuring and Long-Lived Asset Impairment

5. Restructuring and Long-Lived Asset Impairment

Restructuring

On September 3, 2019, the board of directors of CWH approved a plan to strategically shift its business away from locations where the Company does not have the ability or where it is not feasible to sell and/or service RVs at a sufficient capacity (the “Outdoor Lifestyle Locations”). Of the Outdoor Lifestyle Locations in the RV and Outdoor Retail segment operating at September 3, 2019, the Company has closed or divested 39 Outdoor Lifestyle Locations, three distribution centers, and 20 specialty retail locations relating to the 2019 Strategic Shift. One of the aforementioned closed distribution centers was reopened during the three months ended June 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had completed the store closures and divestitures relating to the 2019 Strategic Shift. As part of the 2019 Strategic Shift, the Company evaluated the impact on its supporting infrastructure and operations, which included rationalizing inventory levels and composition, closing certain distribution centers, and realigning other resources. The Company had a reduction of headcount and labor costs for those locations that were closed or divested and the Company incurred material charges associated with the activities contemplated under the 2019 Strategic Shift.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company completed its analysis of its retail product offerings that are not RV-related. The information available at the inception of the 2019 Strategic Shift relating to these product categories was incomplete based on the relative immaturity of the locations offering these products and was further delayed by the impact of COVID-19 on consumer buying behavior (see Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — COVID-19). During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded $15.0 million of incremental reserve charges relating to product categories that are not RV-related.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company has effectively finalized its 2019 Strategic Shift as it relates to closing locations, one-time termination benefits, and incremental reserve charges. The remaining potential ongoing charges under the 2019 Strategic Shift relate to lease termination costs and other associated costs relating to the leases of previously closed locations under the 2019 Strategic Shift. The process of identifying subtenants and negotiating lease terminations has been delayed in part due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and is expected to continue. The timing of these negotiations will vary as both subleases and terminations are contingent on landlord approvals.

The Company currently estimates the total restructuring costs associated with the 2019 Strategic Shift to be in the range of $111.6 million to $134.6 million. The breakdown of the estimated restructuring costs are as follows:

one-time employee termination benefits relating to retail store or distribution center closures/divestitures of $1.2 million, all of which was incurred through December 31, 2020;
lease termination costs of $18.0 million to $34.0 million, of which $13.5 million has been incurred through December 31, 2021;
incremental inventory reserve charges of $57.4 million, all of which was incurred through December 31, 2021; and
other associated costs of $35.0 million to $42.0 million, of which $31.8 million has been incurred through December 31, 2021.

Through December 31, 2021, the Company has incurred $31.8 million of such other associated costs primarily representing labor, lease, and other operating expenses incurred during the post-close wind-down period for the locations related to the 2019 Strategic Shift. The additional amount of $3.2 million to $10.2 million represents similar costs that may be incurred through the year ending December 31, 2022 for locations that continue in a wind-down period, primarily comprised of lease costs accounted for under ASC 842, Leases, prior to lease termination. The Company intends to negotiate terminations of these leases where prudent and pursue

sublease arrangements for the remaining leases. Lease costs may continue to be incurred after December 31, 2022 on these leases if the Company is unable to terminate the leases under acceptable terms or offset the lease costs through sublease arrangements. The foregoing lease termination cost estimate represents the expected cash payments to terminate certain leases, but does not include the gain or loss from derecognition of the related operating lease assets and liabilities, which is dependent on the particular leases that will be terminated.

The following table details the costs incurred associated with the 2019 Strategic Shift (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2021

    

2020

    

2019

Restructuring costs:

One-time termination benefits(1)

$

$

231

$

1,008

Lease termination costs(2)

1,431

4,432

55

Incremental inventory reserve charges(3)

15,017

543

41,894

Other associated costs(4)

10,684

16,835

4,321

Total restructuring costs

$

27,132

$

22,041

$

47,278

(1)These costs incurred in 2020 were primarily included in costs applicable to revenues – products, service and other in the consolidated statements of operations. These costs incurred in 2019 were primarily included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
(2)These costs were included in lease termination charges in the consolidated statements of operations. This reflects termination fees paid, net of any gain from derecognition of the related operating lease assets and liabilities.
(3)These costs were included in costs applicable to revenue – products, service and other in the consolidated statements of operations.
(4)Other associated costs primarily represent labor, lease, and other operating expenses incurred during the post-close wind-down period for the locations related to the 2019 Strategic Shift. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, costs of approximately $0 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were included in costs applicable to revenue – products, service and other, and $10.7 million, $16.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The following table details changes in the restructuring accrual associated with the 2019 Strategic Shift (in thousands):

    

One-time

    

Lease

    

Other

    

    

Termination

    

Termination

    

Associated

    

    

Benefits

    

Costs (1)

    

Costs

    

Total

Balance at June 30, 2019

$

$

$

$

Charged to expense

1,008

1,350

4,321

6,679

Paid or otherwise settled

(286)

(1,350)

(4,036)

(5,672)

Balance at December 31, 2019

722

285

1,007

Charged to expense

231

10,532

16,835

27,598

Paid or otherwise settled

(953)

(10,532)

(16,346)

(27,831)

Balance at December 31, 2020

774

774

Charged to expense

1,650

10,684

12,334

Paid or otherwise settled

(1,650)

(10,532)

(12,182)

Balance at December 31, 2021

$

$

$

926

$

926

(1)Lease termination costs excludes the $1.3 million, $6.1 million and $0.2 million of gains from the derecognition of the operating lease assets and liabilities relating to the terminated leases as part of the 2019 Strategic Shift for the six months ended December 31, 2019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

The Company evaluated the requirements of ASC No. 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations relative to the 2019 Strategic Shift and determined that discontinued operations treatment is not applicable. Accordingly, the results of operations of the locations impacted by the 2019 Strategic Shift are reported as part of continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company had indicators of impairment of the long-lived assets for certain of its locations. For locations that failed the recoverability test based on an analysis of undiscounted cash flows, the Company estimated the fair value of the locations based on a discounted cash flow analysis. After performing the long-lived asset impairment test for these locations, the Company determined that certain locations within the RV and Outdoor Retail segment had long-lived assets that were impaired. The long-lived asset impairment charge, subject to limitations described below, was calculated as the amount that the carrying value of the locations exceeded the estimated fair value. The calculated long-lived asset impairment charge was allocated to each of the categories of long-lived assets at each location pro rata based on the long-lived assets’ carrying values, except that individual assets cannot be impaired below their individual fair values when that fair value can be determined without undue cost and effort. For most of these locations, the operating lease right-of-use assets and furniture and equipment were written down to their individual fair values and the remaining impairment charge was allocated to the remaining long-lived assets up to the fair value estimated on these assets based on liquidation value estimates.

The following table details long-lived asset impairment charges by type of long-lived asset (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2021

    

2020

    

2019

Long-lived asset impairment charges:

Leasehold improvements

$

721

$

2,374

$

20,766

Furniture and equipment

196

2,588

28,602

Buildings

1,461

Operating lease right-of-use assets

2,127

5,930

16,902

Total long-lived asset impairment charges

3,044

12,353

66,270

Less: portion unrelated to 2019 Strategic Shift

(1,645)

(64)

(8,832)

2019 Strategic Shift long-lived asset impairment charges

$

1,399

$

12,289

$

57,438

Long-lived asset impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 related primarily to the result of updating impairment test assumptions after identifying indicators of impairment at previously closed stores in certain markets.