XML 35 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill by business line for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Plans

    

Retail

    

Consolidated

Balance as of January 1, 2015

 

$

49,944

 

$

11,109

 

$

61,053

Acquisitions

 

 

 —

 

 

51,887

 

 

51,887

Balance as of December 31, 2015

 

 

49,944

 

 

62,996

 

 

112,940

Acquisitions

 

 

 —

 

 

40,165

 

 

40,165

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

49,944

 

$

103,161

 

$

153,105

 

Finite‑lived intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following at December 31, (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

Gross membership and customer lists

 

$

9,485

 

$

6,712

Less: accumulated amortization

 

 

(6,099)

 

 

(5,060)

Intangible assets, net

 

$

3,386

 

$

1,652

 

Amortization expense of finite-lived intangibles for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $1.0 million, $0.8 million, and $0.8 million, respectively. The aggregate future five‑year amortization of finite‑lived intangibles at December 31, 2016, was as follows (in thousands:)

 

 

 

 

 

2017

    

$

1,084

 

2018

 

 

709

 

2019

 

 

689

 

2020

 

 

486

 

2021

 

 

194

 

Thereafter

 

 

224

 

 

 

$

3,386

 

 

The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite‑lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis as of the beginning of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company’s goodwill or indefinite‑lived intangible assets might be impaired. The Company assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then it is required to perform the first step of a two‑step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the Company is required to perform the second step of the two‑step goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss based on qualitative assessments. The Company determined that the fair value of its reporting units was greater than its carrying value.