XML 32 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company follows the accounting standards for fair value, under which fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. The Company’s fair value measurements are based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, fair value accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1—observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets
Level 2—observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets that are observable either directly or indirectly, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data
Level 3—unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions
Any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy will be recognized at the end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurs. There were no transfers between fair value levels in any of the periods presented below.
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 30, 2019 and December 29, 2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, were as follows:
 
March 30, 2019
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5

 
$

 
$

 
$
5

Interest rate swaps

 
12

 

 
12

 
$
5

 
$
12

 
$

 
$
17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 29, 2018
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

Interest rate swaps

 
19

 

 
19

 
$
1

 
$
19

 
$

 
$
20


There were no significant assets or liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Money Market Funds
Money market funds include highly liquid investments with a maturity of three or fewer months. They are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and are classified under Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, to manage its exposure to interest rate movements in connection with its variable-rate Term Loan Facility (as defined in Note 10, Debt).
On August 1, 2017, USF entered into four-year interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $1.1 billion, reducing to $825 million in the fourth year. These swaps effectively converted approximately half of the principal amount of the Term Loan Facility from a variable to a fixed rate loan. The Company effectively pays an aggregate rate of 3.71% on the notional amount covered by the interest rate swaps, comprised of 1.71% plus a spread of 2.00% (see Note 10, Debt).
The Company records its interest rate swaps in its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, based on projections of cash flows and future interest rates. The determination of fair value includes the consideration of any credit valuation adjustments necessary, giving consideration to the creditworthiness of the respective counterparties or the Company. The following table presents the balance sheet location and fair value of the interest rate swaps at March 30, 2019 and December 29, 2018:
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
March 30, 2019
 
December 29, 2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Other current assets
 
$
7

 
$
8

Interest rate swaps
Other assets
 
$
5

 
$
11

 
Total
 
$
12

 
$
19


Gains and losses on the interest rate swaps are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense during the period in which the hedged transaction affects income. The following table presents the effect of the Company’s interest rate swaps in its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the 13-weeks ended March 30, 2019 and March 31, 2018:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax
 
Location of Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Amount of Gain Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to Income, net of tax
For the 13-weeks ended March 30, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
(4
)
 
Interest expense—net
 
$
(2
)
For the 13-weeks ended March 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
9

 
Interest expense—net
 
$


During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $7 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to income.
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features—The interest swap agreements contain a provision whereby the Company could be declared in default on its hedging obligations if more than $75 million of the Company’s other indebtedness is accelerated. As of March 30, 2019, none of our indebtedness was accelerated.
We review counterparty credit risk and currently are not aware of any facts that indicate our counterparties will not be able to comply with the contractual terms of their agreements.
Other Fair Value Measurements
The carrying value of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, cash overdraft liability, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
The fair value of the Company’s total debt approximated its carrying value of $3.4 billion and $3.5 billion as of March 30, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s 5.875% unsecured Senior Notes due June 15, 2024 (the “Senior Notes”), was $0.6 billion as of March 30, 2019 and December 29, 2018, based upon the closing market prices of the Senior Notes on both dates, and is classified under Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the balance of the Company’s debt is primarily classified under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, with fair value estimated based upon a combination of the cash outflows expected under these debt facilities, interest rates that are currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, and estimates of the Company’s overall credit risk.