usfd-10k_20171230.htm

(Address, including Zip Code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

At June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates was $3,885,925,322 (based on the closing sale price of common stock on such date on the New York Stock Exchange). 215,146,497 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding as February 15, 2018

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Schedule 14A, relating to the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on May 4, 2018 are incorporated by reference in response to Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 30, 2017.

We operate on a 52-53 week fiscal year, with all periods ending on a Saturday. When a 53-week fiscal year occurs, the Company reports the additional week in the fiscal fourth quarter. The fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, January 2, 2016, December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013 are also referred to herein as fiscal years 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s fiscal years 2017, 2016, 2014 and 2013 were 52-week fiscal years. The Company’s fiscal year 2015 was a 53-week fiscal year.

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our liquidity and our possible or assumed future results of operations, including descriptions of our business strategies. These statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “seek,” “will,” “may,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “forecasts,” “mission,” “strive,” “more,” “goal,” or similar expressions. The statements are based on assumptions that we have made, based on our experience in the industry as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we think are appropriate. We believe these judgments are reasonable. However, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.

There are a number of risks, uncertainties, and other important factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. Such risks, uncertainties, and other important factors include, among others, the risks, uncertainties, and factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements in this report might not prove to be accurate, and you should not place undue reliance on them. All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or people acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. All of these statements speak only as of the date made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Comparisons of results between current and prior periods are not intended to express any future trends, or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

US Foods Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to herein as “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company,” or “US Foods”. US Foods conducts all of its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary US Foods, Inc. (“USF”).

We are among America’s great food companies and one of only two foodservice distributors with a national footprint in the United States. Built through organic growth and acquisitions, we trace our roots back over 150 years to a number of heritage companies with rich legacies in food innovation and customer service. These include Monarch Foods (established in 1853), Sexton (1883), PYA (1903), Rykoff (1911) and Kraft Foodservice (1976). US Foodservice was organized as a corporation in Delaware in 1989. In November 2011, we rebranded from “US Foodservice” to “US Foods.”

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is large, fragmented and growing, with total industry sales of approximately $290 billion in 2017 according to Technomic (January 2018), a third-party source for food and foodservice industry data, intelligence and commentary. With net sales of $24 billion in the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017, we are the second largest foodservice distributor in the United States by annual sales, with a 2017 market share of approximately 8%.

Our mission is to be First In Food. We strive to inspire and empower chefs and foodservice operators to bring great food experiences to consumers. This mission is supported by our strategy of Great Food. Made Easy. which centers on providing our customers a broad and innovative offering of high-quality products, as well as a comprehensive suite of industry-leading e-commerce, technology, and business solutions. We operate as one business with standardized business processes, shared systems infrastructure, and an organizational model that optimizes national scale with local execution, allowing us to manage the business as a single operating segment. We have centralized activities where scale matters and our local field structure focuses on customer facing activities. As we say on our trucks, we are Keeping Kitchens Cooking across America.

We supply approximately 250,000 customer locations nationwide. These customer locations include independently owned single and multi-unit restaurants, regional restaurant concepts, national restaurant chains, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels and motels, country clubs, government and military organizations, colleges and universities, and retail locations. We provide approximately 350,000 fresh, frozen, and dry food stock-keeping units, or SKUs, as well as non-food items, sourced from approximately 5,000 suppliers. Approximately 4,000 sales associates manage customer relationships at local, regional, and national levels. They are supported by sophisticated marketing and category management capabilities, as well as a sales support team that includes world-class chefs and restaurant operations consultants. Our extensive network of over 60 distribution facilities and fleet of approximately 6,000 trucks allow us to operate efficiently and provide high levels of customer service. This operating model allows us to leverage our nationwide scale and footprint while executing locally.

While we serve all customer types, our strategy focuses on independent restaurants, small and regional chains, and healthcare and hospitality customers. Among other factors, their expected growth, mix of product and category purchases, and adoption of value-added solutions make them attractive to us.

We offer innovative products and services that help chefs and operators succeed. Our e-commerce tools and mobile solutions make it easier for customers to do business with us. We execute on these elements of our strategy while delivering on the fundamental requirements that are important to all of our customers.

Growth from acquisitions remains an important part of our strategy. In fiscal year 2017, we completed five acquisitions, including three broadline foodservice distributors and two specialty distributors. We believe there remain attractive acquisition opportunities for us that will allow us to grow with our target customer types and generate an attractive return on investment from the synergies we capture from integration.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry has a large number of companies competing in the space, including local, regional, and national distributors. Foodservice distributors typically fall into three categories, representing differences in customer focus, product offering, and supply chain:

A number of adjacent competitors also serve the U.S. foodservice distribution industry, including cash-and-carry retailers, commercial wholesale outlets and warehouse clubs, commercial website outlets, and grocery stores.

There is a high degree of customer overlap, particularly across the broadline, specialized and cash-and-carry categories, as many customers purchase from multiple distributors. Most buying decisions are based on the type of product offered, quality and price, and a distributor’s ability to completely and accurately fill orders and provide timely deliveries. Since switching costs are low, customers can make supplier and distribution channel changes quickly. Existing foodservice competitors can extend their shipping distances and add truck routes and warehouses relatively quickly to serve new markets or customers. Given our mix of products and services, we consider ourselves a broadline distributor.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is comprised of different customer types of varying sizes, growth profiles, and product and service requirements.

In fiscal year 2017, no single customer represented more than 3% of our total customer sales. Sales to our top 50 customers/GPOs represented approximately 43% of our net sales in fiscal year 2017. We have relationships with GPOs that act as agents for their members in negotiating pricing, delivery and other terms. Some customers who are members of GPOs purchase their products directly from us under the terms negotiated by their GPOs. In fiscal year

2017, this accounted for about 25% of our total customer purchases. GPOs primarily focus on healthcare, hospitality, education, government/military and restaurant chains.

We believe that a broad array of value-added solutions offered by foodservice distributors makes customers more effective and efficient and can help foodservice distributors profitably grow their businesses. These services require distributors to invest in their capabilities, resulting in a higher cost-to-serve. When customers benefit from product and service solutions, they purchase a more attractive and profitable mix of items and tend to have stronger commercial relationships and loyalty.

We believe that the customer types that we target, which include independent restaurants, small and regional chains, and healthcare and hospitality customers, have greater growth prospects and/or benefit from the types of value-added solutions we offer to a greater extent than other customer types.

We believe that we have the scale, foresight and agility required to proactively address these trends and, in turn, benefit from higher growth, greater customer retention and improved profitability.

We have a broad assortment of product categories and brands to meet customers’ needs. In many categories, we offer products under a spectrum of private brands, based on price and quality.

The table below presents the sales mix for our principal product categories for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016.

We have registered the trademarks US Foods^®, Food Fanatics^® and Chef’Store^® in connection with our overall US Foods brand strategy and with our retail outlets. We have also registered or applied for trademark protection in the United States in connection with the following brands in our brand portfolio:

Other than these trademarks, we do not believe that trademarks, patents, or copyrights are material to our business.

We purchase from approximately 5,000 individual suppliers, none of which accounted for more than 5% of our aggregate purchases in fiscal year 2017. Our suppliers generally are large corporations selling national brand name and private brand products. Additionally, regional suppliers support targeted geographic initiatives and private label programs requiring regional distribution. We generally negotiate supplier agreements on a centralized basis.

Our business does not fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and as a result, is not considered seasonal.

Our operations and strategic objectives require continuing capital investment, and our resources include cash provided by operations, as well as access to capital from bank borrowings, various types of debt and other financing arrangements. See discussion in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding our liquidity and capital resources.

As a marketer and distributor of food products in the United States, US Foods must comply with various laws and regulations from federal, state and local regulatory agencies. A summary of certain laws and regulations is described below.

We are subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; the Bioterrorism Act; and regulations created by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The FDA regulates manufacturing and holding requirements for foods, specifies the standards of identity for certain foods and prescribes the format and content of certain information that must appear on food product labels.

The published applicable rules under the Food Safety Modernization Act (“FSMA”) significantly expanded our food safety requirements. Among other things, we are required to maintain comprehensive, prevention-based controls across the food supply chain that are both verified and validated, including new standards for maintaining the safety of food during transportation. FSMA further regulates food products imported into the United States and provides the FDA with mandatory recall authority.

For certain product lines, we are also subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, the Country of Origin Labeling Act, and regulations from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). The USDA imposes standards for food safety, product quality and sanitation, including the inspection and labeling of meat and poultry products, and the grading and commercial acceptance of produce shipments from our vendors.

Our Company and products are also subject to state and local regulation. This includes measures such as the licensing of our facilities, enforcement of standards for our products and facilities by state and local health agencies, and regulation of our trade practices in connection with selling products.

Our distribution facilities must be registered with the FDA biennially and are subject to periodic government agency inspections. Our facilities are generally inspected at least annually by federal and/or state authorities. We have a small number of processing facilities for some meat, poultry, seafood and produce products. These units are appropriately registered and inspected by the USDA (meat and poultry) and the FDA (produce and seafood), respectively. We also must establish communication programs to transmit information about the hazards of certain chemicals present in some of the products we distribute.

Our customers include several departments of the federal government, including the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs facilities, as well as certain state and local entities. These customer relationships subject us to additional regulations applicable to government contractors.

For the purchase of products harvested or manufactured outside of the United States, and for the shipment of products to customers located outside of the United States, we are subject to customs laws regarding the import and export of shipments. Our activities, including working with customs brokers and freight forwarders, are subject to regulation by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, part of the Department of Homeland Security.

Because we are organized under the laws of a state in the U.S. and our principal place of business is in the U.S., we are considered a “domestic concern” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA“) and are covered by the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA. The anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA prohibit any domestic concern and any officer, director, employee, or agent, acting on behalf of the domestic concern from paying or authorizing payment of anything of value to (i) influence any act or decision by a foreign official; (ii) induce a foreign official to do or omit to do any act in violation of his/her lawful duty; (iii) secure any improper advantage; or (iv) induce a

foreign official to use his/her influence to assist the payor in obtaining or retaining business, or directing business to another person.

The U.S. Department of Transportation and its agencies, the Surface Transportation Board, the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, regulate our trucking operations through the regulation of operations, safety, insurance and hazardous materials. We must comply with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing and hours of service. Matters such as weight and dimension of equipment also fall under federal and state regulations.

Our operations are also subject to a broad range of federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, as well as zoning and building regulations. Environmental laws and regulations cover a variety of procedures, including appropriately managing wastewater and stormwater; complying with clean air laws, including those governing vehicle emissions; properly handling and disposing of solid and hazardous wastes; protecting against and appropriately investigating and remediating spills and releases; and monitoring and maintaining underground and aboveground storage tanks for diesel fuel and other petroleum products.

The U.S. Department of Labor and its agencies, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs regulate our employment practices and standards for workers. We are also subject to laws that prohibit discrimination in employment based on non-merit categories, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other laws relating to accessibility and the removal of barriers. Our workers’ compensation self-insurance is subject to regulation by the jurisdictions in which we operate.

Our facilities are subject to inspections under the Occupational Safety and Health Act with respect to our compliance with certain manufacturing, health and safety standards to protect our employees from accidents. US Foods is also subject to the National Labor Relations Act, which governs the process for collective bargaining between employers and employees and protects the rights of both employers and employees in the workplace.

As of December 30, 2017, we had 25,355 employees, of which 25,053 were full-time employees. Approximately 4,600 employees were members of local unions associated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and other labor organizations. Approximately one-third of our facilities have employees represented by unions with collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”).

During fiscal year 2017, eight CBAs covering approximately 800 employees were renegotiated. During fiscal 2018, 14 CBAs covering approximately 1,100 employees will be subject to renegotiation. While we have experienced work stoppages in the past, we generally believe we have good relations with both union and non-union employees, and we believe we are a well-regarded employer in the communities in which we operate.

Mr. Satriano has served as Chief Executive Officer and director of US Foods since July 2015. In December 2017, Mr. Satriano was elected Chairman of the Board. From February 2011 until July 2015, Mr. Satriano served as our Chief Merchandising Officer. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Satriano was President of LoyaltyOne Co., a Canadian provider of loyalty marketing and programs, from 2009 to 2011. From 2002 to 2008, he served in a number of leadership positions at Loblaw Companies Limited, including Executive Vice President, Loblaw Brands, and Executive Vice President, Food Segment. Mr. Satriano began his career in strategy consulting, first in Toronto, Canada with The Boston Consulting Group, and then in Milan, Italy with the Monitor Company.

Mr. Locascio has served as Chief Financial Officer since February 2017. Mr. Locascio served the Company as Senior Vice President, Financial Accounting and Analysis from November 2016 to February 2017, Senior Vice President, Operations Finance and Financial Planning from May 2015 to November 2016, and as Senior Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis from May 2013 to May 2015. Mr. Locascio joined US Foods in June 2009 as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Locascio held senior finance roles with United Airlines, a global airline, and public accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP.

Ms. Coleman has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer since February 2017. Ms. Coleman joined US Foods from Sears Holdings Corporation, a retailer, where she served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary after joining in July 2014. Prior to joining Sears, she served as the Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Brunswick Corporation, a manufacturing company, from May 2009 to July 2014.

Mr. Gent has served as Chief Supply Chain Officer since April 2017. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Gent served for over 30 years in a variety of leadership roles with PepsiCo, Inc. From April 2012 to April 2017, he served as Senior Vice President, Supply Chain for PepsiCo Americas Foods—South America, Caribbean and Central America. Mr. Gent also served as Senior Vice President of Logistics for PepsiCo North America, where he led the warehouse delivery network for Quaker, Gatorade and Tropicana as well as the PepsiCo’s Transportation network for North America.

Mr. Guberman has served as Executive Vice President, Nationally Managed Business, since August 2016 and served as Chief Merchandising Officer from July 2015 to January 2017. Mr. Guberman served the Company as Senior Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing Operations from January 2012 to July 2015 and as Division President from August 2004 through December 2012. Mr. Guberman joined US Foods as part of the Alliant Foodservice acquisition.

Mr. Iacobucci has served as Chief Merchandising Officer since January 2017. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Iacobucci served as Executive Vice President, Merchandising for Ahold USA, Inc., a food retailer, from April 2016 to January 2017. Prior to joining Ahold, he served from February 2012 to November 2015 in several senior roles at Loblaw Companies Limited, a Canadian food retailer, including President, Discount Division.

Mr. Kvasnicka has served as Executive Vice President, Locally-Managed Business and Field Operations since August 2015 and Executive Vice President, Field Operations since September 2016. Mr. Kvasnicka has served the Company as Region President from April 2013 to July 2015, and Division President from October 2011 to March 2013. Mr. Kvasnicka served as Vice President of Sales for the Stock Yards division, President of the Stock Yards division and in various other roles between 2005 and 2011. He was Vice President of Sales for the Minneapolis Division from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Kvasnicka joined US Foods as a part of the Alliant Foodservice acquisition.

Mr. Rickard has served as Executive Vice President, Strategy and Revenue Management since November 2015. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Rickard served from March 2014 to November 2015 as Vice President at Uline Corporation, a distributor of shipping, industrial, and packing materials, and was responsible for identifying, leading and implementing improvement initiatives across all aspects of the organization. From September 1997 to March 2014, Mr. Rickard was a Partner and Managing Director at the Boston Consulting Group.

Mr. Rohland has served as Chief Information Officer since April 2011. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Rohland served in several leadership positions at Citigroup, Inc. from March 2007 until April 2011, including Managing Director of Risk and Program Management. Prior to joining Citigroup, Mr. Rohland was Chief Information Officer for Volvo Car Corporation of Sweden from November 2005 to March 2007 and held a number of leadership positions at Ford Motor Company from November 2003 to November 2005.

Mr. Works has served as Chief Human Resources Officer since February 2018. Mr. Works joined US Foods from Hackensack Meridian Health, an integrated health care network, where he served as Chief Human Resources Officer after joining in July 2017. Prior to joining Hackensack, he served as President - Enterprise of Windstream Holdings, Inc., a voice and data communications provider, from December 2014 to August 2016, Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Windstream from February 2012 to December 2014, and Senior Vice President and President, Talent and Human Capital Services at Sears Holding Corporation, a retailer, from September 2009 to January 2012.

We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our filings with the SEC are available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those filings are also available to the public on, or accessible through, our website for free via the “Investors” section at https://ir.usfoods.com/investors. The information contained on or accessible through our corporate website or any other website that we may maintain is not incorporated by reference herein and is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”).

We are subject to many risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, with respect to our results of operations and cash flows. Some of these risks and uncertainties may cause our financial performance, business or operations to vary, or they may materially or adversely affect our financial performance. These are discussed below. The risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report are not the only ones we face. Others—which are not currently known to us, or that we believe are immaterial—also may adversely affect our financial performance, business or operations.

Our business is a low-margin business, and our profitability is directly affected by cost deflation or inflation, commodity volatility and other factors.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is characterized by relatively high inventory turnover with relatively low profit margins. Volatile commodity costs have a direct impact on our industry. We make a significant portion of our sales at prices that are based on the cost of products we sell, plus a percentage margin. As a result, our profit levels may be negatively affected during periods of product cost deflation, even though our gross profit percentage may remain relatively constant. Prolonged periods of product cost inflation also may reduce our profit margins and earnings, if product cost increases cannot be passed on to customers because they resist paying higher prices. In addition, periods of rapid inflation may have a negative effect on our business. There may be a lag between the time of the price increase and the time at which we are able to pass it along to customers, as well as the impact it may have on discretionary spending by consumers.

Competition in our industry is intense, and we may not be able to compete successfully.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is highly competitive. Our largest competitor has greater financial and other resources than we do. Furthermore, there are a large number of local and regional distributors. These companies often align themselves with other smaller distributors through purchasing cooperatives and marketing groups. The goal is to enhance their geographic reach, private label offerings, overall purchasing power, cost efficiencies, and ability to meet customer distribution requirements. These distributors also rely on local presence as a source of competitive advantage, and they may have lower costs and other competitive advantages due to geographic proximity. Additionally, adjacent competition, such as cash-and-carry operations, commercial wholesale outlets, club stores and grocery stores, continue to serve the commercial foodservice market. We also experience competition from online direct food wholesalers, such as Amazon.com. We generally do not have exclusive service agreements with our customers, and they may switch to other suppliers that offer lower prices, differentiated products, or customer service that is perceived to be superior. The cost of switching suppliers is very low, as are the barriers to entry into the U.S. foodservice distribution industry. We believe most purchasing decisions in the U.S. foodservice distribution industry are based on the quality and price of the product, plus a distributor’s ability to completely and accurately fill orders and provide timely deliveries.

Increased competition has caused the U.S. foodservice distribution industry to change, as distributors seek to lower costs, further increasing pressure on the industry’s profit margins. Heightened competition among our suppliers, significant pricing initiatives or discount programs established by competitors, new entrants, and trends toward vertical integration could create additional competitive pressures that reduce margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on third-party suppliers, and our business may be affected by interruption of supplies or increases in product costs.

We obtain substantially all of our foodservice and related products from third-party suppliers. We typically do not have long-term contracts with suppliers. Although our purchasing volume can provide leverage when dealing with suppliers, they may not provide the foodservice products and supplies we need in the quantities and at the prices requested. We do not control the actual production of most of the products we sell. This means we are also subject to delays caused by interruption in production and increases in product costs based on conditions outside our control. These conditions include work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees of

suppliers; severe weather; crop conditions; product recalls; transportation interruptions; unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs; competitive demands; and natural disasters or other catastrophic events (including, but not limited to, the outbreak of food-borne illnesses in the United States). Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of foodservice and related products because of any of these or other factors could mean that we could not fulfill our obligations to our customers and, as a result, our customers may turn to other distributors.

A change in our relationships with GPOs could negatively affect our relationships with customers, which could reduce our profitability.

No single customer represented more than 3% of our total net sales in fiscal year 2017. However, some of our customers purchase their products under arrangements with GPOs. GPOs act as agents on behalf of their members by negotiating pricing, delivery, and other terms with us. Our customers who are members of GPOs purchase products directly from us on the terms negotiated by their GPO. GPOs use the combined purchasing power of their members to lower the prices paid by their members, and we have experienced some pricing pressure from customers who associate with GPOs. Approximately 25% of our net sales in fiscal year 2017 were made by customers under terms negotiated by GPOs. To the extent our customers, for example, independent restaurants who do not typically negotiate directly with GPOs, are able to independently negotiate competitive pricing or become members of GPOs, we may be forced to lower our prices so they will remain customers, which would negatively affect operating margins. In addition, if we are unable to maintain our relationships with GPOs, or if GPOs are able to negotiate more favorable terms for their members with our competitors, we could lose some or all of that business. This could adversely affect our future operating profits.

Our relationships with our customers, including key long-term customers and GPOs, may be materially diminished or terminated.

Most of our customers buy from us pursuant to individual purchase orders, and we often do not enter into long-term agreements with these customers. Because such customers are not obligated to continue purchasing products from us, we cannot be assured that the volume and/or number of our customers’ purchase orders will remain constant or increase or that we will be able to maintain our existing customer base. Significant decreases in the volume and/or number of our customers’ purchase orders or our inability to retain or grow our current customer base may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We have long-standing relationships with a number of our customers and GPOs, many of whom could unilaterally terminate their relationship with us or materially reduce the amount of business they conduct with us at any time. Market competition, customer requirements, customer financial condition and customer consolidation through mergers or acquisitions also could adversely affect our ability to continue or expand these relationships. There is no guarantee that we will be able to retain or renew existing agreements, maintain relationships with any of our customers or GPOs on acceptable terms or at all or collect amounts owed to us from insolvent customers. Our customer and GPO agreements are generally terminable upon advance written notice (typically ranging from 30 days to six months) by either us or the customer or GPO, which provides our customers or GPOs with the opportunity to renegotiate their contracts with us or to award more business to our competitors. The loss of one or more of our major customers or GPOs could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we fail to increase or maintain our sales to independent restaurant customers, our profitability may suffer.

Our most profitable customers are independent restaurants. We tend to work closely with these customers, providing them access to our customer value added tools and as a result are able to earn a higher operating margin on sales to them. Our ability to continue to gain market share of independent restaurant customers is critical to achieving increased operating profits. Changes in the buying practices of independent restaurant customers, including their ability to require us to sell to them at discounted rates, or decreases in our sales to this type of customer could have a material negative impact on our profitability.

Historically, a portion of our growth has come through acquisitions. If we are unable to integrate acquired businesses successfully or realize anticipated economic, operational, and other benefits and synergies in a timely manner, our profitability may decrease. Integrating acquired businesses may be more difficult in a region or market in which we have limited expertise. A significant expansion of our business and operations, in terms of geography or magnitude, could strain our administrative and/or operational resources. Significant acquisitions may also require incurring additional debt. This could increase our interest expense and make it difficult for us to get favorable financing for other acquisitions or capital investments in the future.

We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect from our cost savings initiatives.

We may not be able to realize some or all of our expected cost savings in the future. A variety of factors could cause us not to realize some of the expected cost savings. These include, among others, delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost savings initiatives, lack of sustainability in cost savings over time, and unexpected costs associated with operating our business. All of these factors could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition, including by failing to offset any decreases in our profitability.

The high cost of fuel can negatively affect consumer confidence and discretionary spending. This may reduce the frequency and amount spent by consumers for food prepared away from home. The high cost of fuel can also increase the price we pay for products, as well as the costs we incur to deliver products to our customers. These factors, in turn, negatively affect our sales, margins, operating expenses, and operating results. Additionally, from time to time, we enter into forward purchase commitments for some of our fuel requirements at prices equal to the then-current market price. If fuel prices decrease significantly, these forward purchases may prove ineffective and result in us paying higher than market costs for part of our fuel.

An economic downturn, or other factors affecting consumer confidence, could reduce the amount of food prepared and consumed away from home, which could harm our business.

The U.S. foodservice market is sensitive to national and regional economic conditions. In the past, an uneven level of general U.S. economic activity, uncertainty in the financial markets, and slow job growth has affected consumer confidence and discretionary spending. A renewed decline in economic activity, other factors affecting consumer confidence, and the frequency and amount spent by consumers for food prepared away from home may reduce our sales and operating results in the future. There can be no assurance that one or more of these factors will not reduce future operating results.

We may be subject to or affected by liability claims related to products we distribute.

As any seller of food, we may be exposed to liability claims in the event that the products we sell cause injury or illness. We believe we have sufficient primary or excess umbrella liability insurance to cover product liability claims. However, our current insurance may not continue to be available at a reasonable cost or, if available, may not be adequate to cover all of our liabilities. We generally seek contractual indemnification and insurance coverage from parties supplying products to us. However, this indemnification or insurance coverage is limited, as a practical matter, by the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party and the insured limits of our suppliers’ insurance coverage. If we and our suppliers do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification available, the liability related to defective products could adversely affect our results of operations.

Any negative media exposure or other event that harms our reputation could hurt our business.

Maintaining a good reputation is critical to our business, particularly in selling our private label products. Any event that damages our reputation, justified or not, could quickly affect our revenues and profits. This includes adverse publicity about the quality, safety or integrity of our products. Reports, whether or not they are true, of food-borne illnesses (such as e. coli, avian flu, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, hepatitis A, trichinosis or salmonella) and injuries caused by food tampering could severely injure our reputation. If patrons of our national chain and

regional restaurant customers become ill from food-borne illnesses, the customers could be forced to temporarily close restaurant locations and our sales would correspondingly decrease. In addition, instances of food-borne illnesses or food tampering or other health concerns, even those unrelated to our products, can result in negative publicity about the U.S. foodservice distribution industry and dramatically reduce our sales.

We face risks related to labor relations and the availability of qualified labor.

As of December 30, 2017, we had 25,355 employees, of which approximately 4,600 were members of local unions associated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and other labor organizations. Our failure to effectively renegotiate any CBAs could result in work stoppages. We may, from time to time, be subject to increased efforts to subject us to multi-location labor disputes, as individual labor agreements expire or labor disputes arise. This would place us at greater risk of being unable to continue to operate one or more facilities, delaying deliveries, possibly causing customers to seek alternative suppliers, or otherwise being materially adversely affected by labor disputes. From time to time, when there are labor related issues at a facility represented by a local union, sympathy strikes occur at other facilities that are represented by other local unions. While we believe we have generally satisfactory relationships with our employees, including the unions that represent some of our employees, a work stoppage due to our failure to renegotiate union contracts or for other reasons could have a significant negative effect on us.

Further, potential changes in labor legislation and case law could result in currently non-union portions of our workforce, such as our warehouse and delivery personnel, being subjected to greater organized labor influence. Should additional portions of our workforce be subject to CBAs, this could result in increased costs of doing business as we may be subject to mandatory, binding arbitration or labor scheduling, costs and standards, which may reduce our operating flexibility.

We are subject to a wide range of labor costs. Because our labor costs are, as a percentage of net sales, higher than many other industries, even if we are able to renegotiate CBAs and avoid work stoppages, we may be significantly harmed by labor cost increases. In addition, labor is a significant cost of many of our customers in the U.S. food-away-from-home industry. Any increase in their labor costs, including any increases in costs as a result of increases in minimum wage requirements, could reduce the profitability of our customers and reduce demand for our products.

Additionally, we risk a shortage of qualified labor. Recruiting and retention efforts, and actions to increase productivity, may not be successful, and we could encounter a shortage of qualified labor in the future. Such a shortage could potentially increase labor costs, reduce profitability and/or decrease our ability to effectively serve customers.

If our competitors implement a lower cost structure, they may be able to offer reduced prices to customers. We may be unable to adjust our cost structure to compete profitably.

Over the last several decades, the food retail industry has undergone a significant change. Companies such as Wal-Mart and Costco have developed a lower cost structure, so they can provide their customers with an everyday low-cost product offering. In addition, commercial wholesale outlets, such as Restaurant Depot, offer an additional low-cost option in the markets they serve. As a large-scale U.S. foodservice distributor, we have similar strategies to remain competitive in the marketplace by reducing our cost structure. However, to the extent more of our competitors adopt an everyday low price strategy, we would potentially be pressured to offer lower prices to our customers. That would require us to achieve additional cost savings to offset these reductions. We may be unable to change our cost structure and pricing practices rapidly enough to successfully compete in that environment.

Our business is subject to significant environmental, health and safety regulation. Failure to comply with such regulations could adversely affect our operating costs.

Our operations face a broad range of federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment or health and safety. These laws govern numerous issues, including discharges to air, soil and water; the handling and disposal of hazardous substances; the investigation and remediation of contamination resulting from the release of petroleum products and other hazardous substances; employee health and safety; and fleet safety. In the course of our operations, we operate and maintain vehicle fleets, use and dispose of hazardous

substances, and store fuel in on-site aboveground and underground storage tanks. At several current and former facilities, we are investigating and remediating known or suspected contamination from historical releases of fuel and other hazardous substances. Although the known or suspected contamination at these facilities is not currently the subject of any administrative or judicial proceeding, we cannot provide assurance that we will not be the subject of administrative or judicial proceedings in the future for contamination related to releases of fuel or other hazardous substances. Further, we cannot be sure that compliance with, or liability under, existing or future environmental, health and safety laws, such as those related to remediation obligations, will not adversely affect our future operating results.

Some jurisdictions in which we operate have laws that affect the composition and operation of truck fleets, such as limits on diesel emissions and engine idling. A number of our facilities have ammonia or freon-based refrigeration systems, which could cause injury or environmental damage if accidentally released. In addition, many of our distribution centers have propane and battery powered forklifts. Proposed or recently enacted legal requirements, such as those requiring the phase-out of certain ozone-depleting substances, and proposals for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, may require us to upgrade or replace equipment, or may increase our transportation or other operating costs.

If we fail to comply with requirements imposed by applicable law or other governmental regulations, we could become subject to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations that could significantly and adversely affect our business.

We are subject to governmental regulation at the federal, state, and local levels in many areas of our business, including food holding and processing, trade, anticorruption, transportation, employment, and other areas of safety and compliance. Failing to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in a number of adverse situations. These could include administrative, civil, or criminal penalties or fines; mandatory or voluntary product recalls; warning letters; cease and desist orders against operations that are not in compliance; closing facilities or operations; the loss, revocation, or modification of any existing licenses, permits, registrations, or approvals; and the failure to get additional licenses, permits, registrations, or approvals in new jurisdictions where we intend to do business. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. These laws and regulations may change in the future, and we may incur material costs to comply with them, or to comply with any required product recalls as a result of such changes. A more detailed discussion of some of the laws and regulations that we are subject to can be found in “Business—Government Regulation.”

Additionally, due to contracts we have with governmental entities, state governmental agencies have, from time to time, conducted audits of our pricing practices as part of investigations of providers of services under governmental contracts, or otherwise. We also receive requests for information from governmental agencies in connection with these audits.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations or encounter disagreements with respect to our contracts subject to governmental regulation, including those referred to above, we may be subject to investigations, criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, prohibitions, seizures or debarments from contracting with the government. The cost of compliance or the consequences of non-compliance, including debarments, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, governmental entities may make changes in the regulatory frameworks within which we operate that may require us to incur substantial increases in costs in order to comply with such laws and regulations.

We rely heavily on technology, and any disruption in existing technology or delay in implementing new technology could adversely affect our business.

Our ability to control costs and maximize profits, as well as to serve customers most effectively, depends on the reliability of our information technology systems and related data entry processes in our transaction intensive business. We rely on software and other information technology to manage significant aspects of our business, such as purchases, order processing, warehouse/inventory management, truck loading and logistics and optimization of storage space. Any disruption to this information technology could negatively affect our customer service, decrease the volume of our business, and result in increased costs. We have invested and continue to invest in technology

security initiatives, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans. However, these measures cannot fully insulate us from technology disruption that could impair operations and profits.

Information technology evolves rapidly. To compete effectively, we are required to integrate new technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner. If competitors implement new technologies before we do, allowing them to provide lower priced or enhanced services of superior quality compared to those we provide, our operations and profits could be affected.

A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could negatively affect our business and our relationships with customers.

We rely upon information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information, to process online credit card payments, and to manage or support virtually all of our business processes and activities. We also use mobile devices, social networking and other online activities to connect with our employees, suppliers, business partners and our customers. These uses give rise to cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft, online platform hijacking that could redirect online credit card payments to another credit card processing website, and inadvertent or unauthorized release of information. Our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and intellectual property, including customers’ and suppliers’ personal information, private information about employees, and financial and strategic information about us and our business partners. Further, we are also expanding and improving our information technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence and corresponding increase in exposure to cybersecurity risk. Additionally, while we have implemented measures to prevent security breaches and cyber incidents, our preventative measures and incident response efforts may not be entirely effective. The theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our information technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result in business disruption, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of customers, potential liability, and competitive disadvantage.

Our retirement benefits could give rise to significant expenses and liabilities in the future.

We sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Pension and postretirement obligations give rise to costs that are dependent on various assumptions including those discussed in Note 17, Retirement Plans, to our consolidated financial statements. In addition to the plans we sponsor, we also participate in various “multiemployer” pension plans administered by labor unions representing some of our employees. We make periodic contributions to these plans to allow them to meet their pension benefit obligations to their participants. In the event that we withdraw from participating in one of these plans, then-applicable law could require us to make additional withdrawal liability payments to the plan, and we would have to reflect such liabilities on our balance sheet. Our withdrawal liability for any multiemployer plan would depend on the extent of the plan’s funding of vested benefits.

In the ordinary course of our renegotiation of CBAs with labor unions that maintain these plans, we could decide to discontinue participation in a plan. In that event, we could face a withdrawal liability. We could also be treated as withdrawing from participation in one of these plans, if the number of our employees participating in these plans is reduced to a certain degree over certain periods of time. Such reductions in the number of employees participating in these plans could occur as a result of changes in our business operations, such as facility closures or consolidations. Some multiemployer plans, including ones in which we participate, are reported to have significant underfunded liabilities. Such underfunding could increase the size of our potential withdrawal liability. For a detailed description of our retirement plans, see Note 17, Retirement Plans, to our consolidated financial statements.

Extreme weather conditions and natural disasters may interrupt our business, or our customers’ businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Some of our facilities and our customers’ facilities are located in areas that may be subject to extreme, and occasionally prolonged, weather conditions, including, but not limited to, hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, and extreme cold. Extreme weather conditions may interrupt our operations or reduce the number of consumers who visit our customers’ facilities in such areas. Furthermore, such extreme weather conditions may interrupt or impede

access to our customers’ facilities, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Adverse judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we are or may be involved in the normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business.

In the normal course of our business, we are involved in various legal proceedings. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely to us or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or ability to operate our business. Additionally, we could become the subject of future claims by third parties, including our employees, suppliers, customers, our investors, or regulators. Any significant adverse judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to operate our business.

Changes in consumer eating habits could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Changes in consumer eating habits (such as a decline in consuming food away from home, a decline in portion sizes, or a shift in preferences toward restaurants that are not our customers) could reduce demand for our products. Consumer eating habits could be affected by a number of factors, including changes in attitudes regarding diet and health or new information regarding the health effects of consuming certain foods. There is a growing consumer preference for sustainable, organic and locally grown products. Changing consumer eating habits also occur due to generational shifts. Millennials, the largest demographic group in the U.S. in terms of spend, seek new and different as well as more ethnic menu options and menu innovation. Millennials also value diversity. If consumer eating habits change significantly, we may be required to modify or discontinue sales of certain items in our product portfolio, and we may experience higher costs associated with the implementation of those changes. Changing consumer eating habits may reduce the frequency with which consumers purchase meals outside of the home. Additionally, changes in consumer eating habits may result in the enactment or amendment of laws and regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our food products, or laws and regulations requiring us to disclose the nutritional content of our food products. Compliance with these laws and regulations, as well as others regarding the ingredients and nutritional content of our food products, may be costly and time-consuming. If we are not able to effectively respond to changes in consumer health perceptions or resulting new laws or regulations or to adapt our menu offerings to trends in eating habits, our business and results of operations could suffer.

We rely on trademarks, trade secrets, and other forms of intellectual property protections; however, these protections may not be adequate.

We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws in the United States. We have applied in the United States and in certain other countries for registration of a limited number of trademarks, some of which have been registered or issued. We cannot guarantee that our applications will be approved by the applicable governmental authorities, or that third parties will not seek to oppose or otherwise challenge our registrations or applications. We also rely on unregistered proprietary rights, including common law trademark protection. However, third parties may use trademarks identical or confusingly similar to ours, or independently develop trade secrets or know-how similar or equivalent to ours. If our proprietary information is divulged to third parties, including our competitors, or our intellectual property rights are otherwise misappropriated or infringed, our competitive position could be harmed.

Our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may cause us to incur unexpected costs or potentially prevent us from selling our products.

We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe intellectual property rights of others. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights of third parties by us or our customers in connection with their use of our products. Any such claims, whether or not meritorious, could result in costly litigation and divert the efforts of our management and personnel. Moreover, should we be found liable for infringement, we may be required to enter into licensing agreements (if available on acceptable terms or at all) or to pay damages and to cease making or selling

certain products. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products.

We have substantial debt, which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to raise additional capital or obtain financing in the future, react to changes in our business, and make payments on our debt.

As of December 30, 2017, we had $3,757 million of indebtedness, net of $16 million of unamortized deferred financing costs.

Our substantial debt could have important consequences to us, including the following:

Despite our substantial indebtedness levels, we may be able to incur substantially more debt, including secured debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of significant qualifications and exceptions and, under certain circumstances, the amount of indebtedness that could be incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business.

Our credit facilities and indenture contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to do the following:

In addition, if borrowing availability under the Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement, dated October 20, 2015, as amended, USF’s asset backed senior secured revolving loan facility (the “ABL Facility”), plus the amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held by us, falls below a specified threshold of $118 million on any three consecutive business days, the borrowers under such facility, which are our subsidiaries, are required to comply with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0. In addition, if our borrowing availability under the ABL Facility falls below $130 million on any two consecutive business days or, solely with respect to the ABL Facility, certain cash management covenants or borrowing base delivery requirements are breached, or a payment default or bankruptcy event occurs, additional reporting responsibilities are triggered under the ABL Facility and USF’s accounts receivable financing facility dated as of August 27, 2012, as amended (the “2012 ABS Facility”).

Our ability to comply with these provisions in future periods will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, as discussed under “Risks Related to Our Business and Industry,” above. Our ability to comply with these provisions in future periods will also depend substantially on the pricing of our products, our success at implementing cost reduction initiatives and our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy.

The restrictions under the terms of our credit facilities and indenture may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business, and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements or that we will be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our credit facilities and indenture may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under our credit facilities and indenture that would permit the applicable lenders or note holders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we are unable to repay debt, lenders having secured obligations could proceed against the collateral securing the debt. In any such case, we may be unable to borrow under and may not be able to repay the amounts due under our credit facilities. This could have serious consequences to our financial condition and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to pay interest and principal on our debt facilities and our ability to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under our debt facilities, depends on our financial and operating performance. This, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be beyond our control, as described under “Risks Related to our Business and Industry,” above.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, raise additional equity capital or restructure our debt. However, there is no assurance that such alternative measures may be successful and, as a result, we may not be able to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. Our credit facilities and indenture restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions. As a result, we cannot assure you we will be able to consummate those sales,

or, if we do, what the timing of the sales will be or whether the proceeds that we realize will be adequate to meet the debt service obligations when due.

The 2012 ABS and the ABL Facilities mature in 2020. The amended and restated senior secured term loan, (the “Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan”) will mature in 2023. The 5.875% unsecured senior notes (the “2016 Senior Notes”) will mature in 2024. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, particularly due to our substantial level of indebtedness and the debt incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements governing our debt, as well as prevailing market conditions.

An increase in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could reduce our profitability.

After considering interest rate swaps that fixed the interest rate on $1.1 billion of principal of our Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan, approximately 46% of the principal amount of our debt bears interest at variable rates as of December 30, 2017. As a result, an increase in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. The impact of such an increase would be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial indebtedness.

Our stock price may change significantly, and you may not be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.

The stock market routinely experiences periods of large or extreme volatility. In some instances, this volatility is unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies.

The trading price of our common stock may be adversely affected due to a number of factors such as those listed in “Risks Related to Our Business and Industry” and the following, most of which we cannot control:

In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.

Because we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We have no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The declaration, amount, and payment of any future dividends on shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition, and results of operations, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax, and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us, and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants of our existing debt agreements and may be limited by covenants of any future indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.

Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer, or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt, or other change of control transaction that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders.

These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us, even if the third-party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of our stockholders. As a result, our stockholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and certain provisions of our amended and restated bylaws may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management. These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation includes provisions limiting the personal liability of our directors for breaches of fiduciary duty under the DGCL.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions permitted under the DGCL relating to the liability of directors. These provisions eliminate a director’s personal liability to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL for monetary damages resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty, except in circumstances involving:

The principal effect of the limitation on liability provision is that a stockholder will be unable to prosecute an action for monetary damages against a director unless the stockholder can demonstrate a basis for liability for which indemnification is not available under the DGCL. These provisions, however, should not limit or eliminate our rights or any stockholder’s rights to seek non-monetary relief, such as an injunction or rescission, in the event of a breach of a director’s fiduciary duty. These provisions will not alter a director’s liability under federal securities laws. The inclusion of this provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may discourage or deter stockholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against directors for a breach of their fiduciary duties, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise have benefited us and our stockholders.

As of January 31, 2018, we maintained 81 primary operating facilities, including 65 distribution centers and other supporting facilities. About 76% were owned and 24% were leased. Our real estate includes general corporate facilities in Rosemont, Illinois and Tempe, Arizona, both of which are leased. Our properties also include a number of local sales offices, truck “drop-sites”, and vacant land not included in the count above. In addition, there is a minimal amount of surplus owned or leased property not included in the count above. Leases on these facilities expire at various dates from 2018 to 2028, although certain of these leases include options for renewal.

The following table lists our operating facilities, by state, and their aggregate square footage. The table reflects our material operating facilities, including distribution centers that may contain multiple locations or buildings and other supporting facilities. It does not include retail sales locations, Chef’Stores, or US Foods Culinary Equipment & Supply outlet locations. It also does not include closed locations, vacant properties or ancillary use owned and leased properties, such as temporary storage, remote sales offices or parking lots. In addition, the table shows the square footage of our leased Rosemont headquarters and Tempe shared services center locations:

Location	Number of Facilities		Square Feet
Alabama		2		438,804
Arizona		2		317,071
Arkansas		1		135,009
California		5		1,314,847
Colorado		1		314,883
Connecticut		1		239,899
Florida		5		1,194,226
Georgia		2		691,017
Illinois		3		528,295
Indiana		1		233,784
Iowa		2		185,510
Kansas		1		350,859
Louisiana		1		69,304
Michigan		1		276,003
Minnesota		3		414,963
Mississippi		1		287,356
Missouri		3		602,947
Nebraska		2		246,430
Nevada		4		840,519
New Hampshire		1		533,237
New Jersey		3		1,073,375
New Mexico		1		133,486
New York		3		388,683
North Carolina		3		954,736
North Dakota		2		221,314
Ohio		3		501,894
Oklahoma		1		308,307
Pennsylvania		6		1,179,319
Rhode Island		1		64,410
South Carolina		2		1,134,399
South Dakota		1		47,400
Tennessee		2		602,270
Texas		4		963,732
Utah		1		267,180
Virginia		2		629,318
Washington		1		216,500
West Virginia		1		220,537
Wisconsin		2		354,127
Total		81		18,475,950
	Owned			14,023,379	76	%
	Leased			4,452,571	24	%
Headquarters: Rosemont, Illinois				329,564
Shared Services Center: Tempe, Arizona				133,225

From time to time, we may be party to litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. Management does not believe there is any pending litigation that, separately or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

On November 9, 2017, we were notified by the U.S. Environment Protection Agency (the “EPA”) that potential violations of the Section 112(r)(7) Risk Management Program regulation found at 40 CFR Part 68 were allegedly committed at our Fairburn, GA facility. On December 6, 2017, we notified the EPA of our intent to settle the alleged potential violations and pay a final penalty of $107,961. As of December 30, 2017, the parties had not negotiated and executed a Consent Agreement and Final Order.

Our common stock began trading publicly on the NYSE under the symbol “USFD” as of May 26, 2016. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. As of February 15, 2018, there were 23,855 holders of record of our common stock. This stockholder figure does not include a substantially greater number of holders whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. The following table sets forth the high and low intra-day sale prices per share for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for the period indicated:

We have no current plans to pay future dividends on our common stock, and we have never paid any dividends on our common stock other than a one-time special cash distribution of $666 million made in January 2016 to our stockholders, of which $657 million was paid to the Sponsors.

The declaration, amount, and payment of any future dividends on shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may take into account the factors discussed under “Our stock price may change significantly, and you may not be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result,” above. Because we are a holding company and have no direct operations, we will only be able to pay dividends from funds we receive from our subsidiaries. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants in our existing subsidiary debt agreements and may be further limited by the agreements governing other indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur in the future. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Indebtedness.”

The selected historical consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, and the related selected balance sheet data as of fiscal years ending in 2017 and 2016, have been derived from our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected historical consolidated statement of operations data for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 and the selected balance sheet data as of fiscal years ended 2015, 2014, and 2013, have been derived from our consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

The following tables set forth our selected financial data for the periods and as of the dates indicated:

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
	(In millions, except for per share data)*
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	24,147		$	22,919		$	23,127		$	23,020		$	22,297
Cost of goods sold		19,930			18,866			19,114			19,222			18,474
Gross profit		4,218			4,053			4,013			3,798			3,823
Operating expenses:
Distribution, selling and administrative costs		3,644			3,586			3,650			3,546			3,494
Restructuring (benefit) charges and tangible asset impairments		(1	)		53			173			—			8
Total operating expenses		3,644			3,639			3,823			3,546			3,502
Operating income		574			414			190			252			321
Acquisition termination fees—net		—			—			288			—			—
Interest expense—net		170			229			285			289			306
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			54			—			—			42
Income (loss) before income taxes		404			131			193			(37	)		(27	)
Income tax (benefit) provision		(40	)		(79	)		25			36			30
Net income (loss)	$	444		$	210		$	168		$	(73	)	$	(57	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	2.00		$	1.05		$	0.99		$	(0.43	)	$	(0.34	)
Diluted^(a)	$	1.97		$	1.03		$	0.98		$	(0.43	)	$	(0.34	)
Weighted-average number of shares used in per share amounts:
Basic		222.4			200.1			169.6			169.5			169.6
Diluted^(a)		225.7			204.0			171.1			169.5			169.6
Other Data:
Cash flows—operating activities	$	748		$	556		$	555		$	402		$	322
Cash flows—investing activities		(356	)		(762	)		(271	)		(118	)		(187	)
Cash flows—financing activities		(405	)		(180	)		(110	)		(120	)		(197	)
Capital expenditures		221			164			187			147			191
EBITDA^(b)		952			782			876			664			667
Adjusted EBITDA^(b)		1,058			972			875			866			845
Adjusted net income^(b)		312			321			154			126			111
Free cash flow^(b)		527			392			368			255			131

Free cash flow is defined as cash flows provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. Free cash flow is used by management as a supplemental measure of our liquidity. For additional information see “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” below.

We provide EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted net income as supplemental measures to GAAP regarding our operational performance. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of certain items and, therefore, have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP.

We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide meaningful supplemental information about our operating performance because they exclude amounts that we do not consider part of our core operating results when assessing our performance. Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA include restructuring (benefit) charges and tangible asset impairments, loss on extinguishment of debt, Sponsor fees, share-based compensation expense, the non-cash impact of LIFO reserve adjustments, pension settlements, business transformation costs (costs associated with the redesign of systems and processes), Acquisition related costs, Acquisition termination fees—net, and other items as specified in our debt agreements.

We believe that Adjusted net income is a useful measure of operating performance for both management and investors because it excludes items that are not reflective of our core operating performance and provides an additional view of our operating performance including depreciation, amortization, interest expense, and income taxes on a consistent basis from period to period. Adjusted net income is net income (loss) excluding such items as restructuring (benefit) charges and tangible asset impairments, loss on extinguishment of debt, Sponsor fees, share-based compensation expense, the non-cash impact of LIFO reserve adjustments, pension settlements, business transformation costs (costs associated with redesign of systems and process), and other items, and adjusted for the tax effect of the exclusions and discrete tax items. We believe that Adjusted net income is used by investors, analysts and other interested parties to facilitate period-over-period comparisons and provides additional clarity as to how factors and trends impact our operating performance.

Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures (a) to evaluate our historical and prospective financial performance as well as our performance relative to our competitors as they assist in highlighting trends, (b) to set internal sales targets and spending budgets, (c) to measure operational profitability and the accuracy of forecasting, (d) to assess financial discipline over operational expenditures, and (e) as an important factor in determining variable compensation for management and employees. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are also used in connection with certain covenants and restricted activities under our debt agreements. We also believe these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry.

We use free cash flow to review the liquidity of our operations. We measure free cash flow as cash flows provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We believe that free cash flow is a useful financial metric

to assess our ability to pursue business opportunities and investments. Free cash flow is not a measure of our liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows provided by operating activities.

We caution readers that amounts presented in accordance with our definitions of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, and free cash flow may not be the same as similar measures used by other companies. Not all companies and analysts calculate EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income or free cash flow in the same manner. We compensate for these limitations by using these non-GAAP financial measures as supplements to GAAP financial measures and by presenting the reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures.

The following table reconciles EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income and free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP financial performance and liquidity measures for the periods indicated:

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015		2014			2013
	(In millions)*
Net income (loss)	$	444		$	210		$	168	$	(73	)	$	(57	)
Interest expense—net		170			229			285		289			306
Income tax (benefit) provision		(40	)		(79	)		25		36			30
Depreciation and amortization expense		378			421			399		412			388
EBITDA		952			782			876		664			667
Adjustments:
Sponsor fees⁽¹⁾		—		36				10		10			10
Restructuring (benefit) charges and tangible asset impairments⁽²⁾		(1	)	53				173		—			8
Share-based compensation expense⁽³⁾


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

			Page No.
PART I.

	Item 1.	Business	2

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10

	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	21

	Item 2.	Properties	21

	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	23

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

PART II

	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	24

	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	26

	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30

	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	44

	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	46

	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	93

	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	93

	Item 9B.	Other Information	96

PART III

	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	97

	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	97

	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	97

	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	97

	Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	97

PART IV

	Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	98

	Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	103
	Signatures		104


Our Best-Quality Brands – Distinction and Superior Taste
•Chef’s Line^®	•Rykoff Sexton^®
•Metro Deli^®	•Stock Yards^®


Brands You Can Trust for Quality, Performance and Value
•Cattleman’s Selection^®	•Harbor Banks^®	•Monogram^®	•Rituals^®
•Cross Valley Farms^®	•Hilltop Hearth^®	•Monogram^® Clean Force^®	•Roseli^®
•Devonshire^®	•Molly’s Kitchen^®	•Optimax^®	•Superior^®
•del Pasado^™	•Monarch^®	•Pacific Jade^®	•Thirster^®
•Glenview Farms^®	•Harvest Value^®	•Patuxent Farms^®	•Valu+Plus^®

	Fiscal Years
	2017			2016			2015
Meats and seafood		36	%		36	%		36	%
Dry grocery products		18	%		18	%		18	%
Refrigerated and frozen grocery products		16	%		16	%		15	%
Dairy		10	%		10	%		11	%
Equipment, disposables and supplies		9	%		9	%		9	%
Beverage products		6	%		6	%		6	%
Produce		5	%		5	%		5	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%

Name	Age		Position
Pietro Satriano		55		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Dirk J. Locascio		46		Chief Financial Officer
Kristin M. Coleman		49		Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
Ty Gent		58		Chief Supply Chain Officer
Steven Guberman		53		Executive Vice President, Nationally Managed Business
Andrew Iacobucci		51		Chief Merchandising Officer
Jay A. Kvasnicka		50		Executive Vice President, Locally-Managed Business and Field Operations
David Rickard		47		Executive Vice President, Strategy and Revenue Management
Keith D. Rohland		50		Chief Information Officer
David Works		50		Chief Human Resources Officer

	Stock Price
	High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016:
Second Quarter ended July 2, 2016 (from May 26, 2016)	$	25.64	$	22.51
Third Quarter ended October 1, 2016	$	25.83	$	22.90
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016	$	27.79	$	22.19
Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2017:
First Quarter ended April 1, 2017	$	28.14	$	25.50
Second Quarter ended July 1, 2017	$	30.73	$	25.93
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2017	$	28.79	$	26.37
Fourth Quarter ended December 30, 2017	$	32.10	$	25.43

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased			Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
10/1 - 11/4		—			—		—		—
11/5 - 12/2		—			—		—		—
12/3 - 12/30		10,000,000	(1)	$	28.00		—		—
Total		10,000,000		$	28.00		—		—

	As of Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015		2014		2013
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	119	$	131	$	518	$	344	$	180
Total assets		9,037		8,944		9,239		9,023		9,138
Total debt		3,757		3,782		4,745		4,714		4,722
Total shareholders’ equity		2,751		2,538		1,873		1,622		1,844