usfd-10q_20170401.htm

(Address, including Zip Code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐

	April 1, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,817		$	131,090
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $24,237 and $25,388		1,371,503			1,226,032
Vendor receivables, less allowances of $2,970 and $1,819		153,171			105,542
Inventories—net		1,197,984			1,223,037
Prepaid expenses		87,514			72,650
Assets held for sale		21,039			21,039
Other current assets		10,643			9,781
Total current assets		2,993,671			2,789,171
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—Net		1,789,437			1,767,611
GOODWILL		3,922,360			3,908,484
OTHER INTANGIBLES—Net		369,122			386,881
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS		34,536			34,405
OTHER ASSETS		68,470			57,898
TOTAL ASSETS	$	9,177,596		$	8,944,450
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Bank checks outstanding	$	172,318		$	142,712
Accounts payable		1,473,026			1,294,796
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		367,629			455,815
Current portion of long-term debt		82,234			75,962
Total current liabilities		2,095,207			1,969,285
LONG-TERM DEBT		3,772,270			3,705,751
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES		393,663			380,835
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		342,074			350,929
Total liabilities		6,603,214			6,406,800
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 17)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock, $0.01 par value—600,000 shares authorized; 221,992 and 220,929 issued and outstanding as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		2,220			2,209
Additional paid-in capital		2,800,512			2,791,264
Accumulated deficit		(109,644	)		(136,460	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(118,706	)		(119,363	)
Total shareholders’ equity		2,574,382			2,537,650
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	9,177,596		$	8,944,450

	13-Weeks Ended
	April 1, 2017		April 2, 2016
NET SALES	$	5,788,425	$	5,593,149
COST OF GOODS SOLD		4,797,117		4,633,381
Gross profit		991,308		959,768
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Distribution, selling and administrative costs		912,911		864,314
Restructuring charges		1,873		10,777
Total operating expenses		914,784		875,091
OPERATING INCOME		76,524		84,677
INTEREST EXPENSE — Net		41,886		70,559
Income before income taxes		34,638		14,118
INCOME TAX PROVISION		7,822		807
NET INCOME		26,816		13,311
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME — Net of tax:
Changes in retirement benefit obligations, net of income tax		657		2,633
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	27,473	$	15,944
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic	$	0.12	$	0.08
Diluted	$	0.12	$	0.08
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic		221,364,013		169,121,722
Diluted		226,323,410		171,499,932
DISTRIBUTION DECLARED AND PAID
Distribution declared and paid per share (Note 12)	$	—	$	3.94

	13-Weeks Ended
	April 1, 2017			April 2, 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	26,816		$	13,311
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		107,758			102,808
Gain on disposal of property and equipment		(310	)		(1,306	)
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs		1,282			2,433
Insurance proceeds relating to operating activities		—			2,479
Insurance benefit in net income		—			(7,083	)
Amortization of Senior Notes original issue premium		—			(832	)
Deferred tax provision (benefit)		12,280			(80	)
Share-based compensation expense		3,342			4,786
Provision for doubtful accounts		4,745			3,781
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:
Increase in receivables		(192,731	)		(84,681	)
Decrease (increase) in inventories		35,714			(49,987	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(25,652	)		(4,945	)
Increase in accounts payable and bank checks outstanding		236,980			257,938
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(88,665	)		(101,157	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		121,559			137,465
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of businesses—net of cash		(62,501	)		(38,318	)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment		724			1,923
Purchases of property and equipment		(70,125	)		(36,884	)
Investment in Avero, LLC		—			(7,658	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(131,902	)		(80,937	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from debt borrowings		578,459			538,000
Principal payments on debt and capital leases		(548,041	)		(303,081	)
Cash distribution to shareholders		—			(666,332	)
Contingent consideration paid for business acquisition		(5,000	)		—
Payment for debt financing costs and fees		(426	)		—
Proceeds from employee share purchase plan		3,328			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		7,018			—
Tax withholding payments for net share settled equity awards		(3,966	)		—
Proceeds from common stock sales		—			2,850
Common stock and share-based awards settled		(302	)		(3,659	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		31,070			(432,222	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		20,727			(375,694	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period		131,090			517,802
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	151,817		$	142,108
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)	$	29,590		$	39,839
Income taxes (refunded) paid—net		(39	)		40
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable		15,915			11,379
Capital lease additions		40,840			48,299
Cashless exercise of equity awards		7,149			—
Contingent consideration payable for business acquisitions		—			5,000

US Foods Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to herein as “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” or “US Foods.” US Foods conducts all of its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary US Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “USF”). All of the Company’s indebtedness, as further described in Note 10, Debt, is an obligation of USF. US Foods is controlled by investment funds associated with or designated by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (“CD&R”) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P. (“KKR”). KKR and CD&R are collectively referred to herein as the “Sponsors”.

Initial Public Offering—On June 1, 2016 the Company closed its initial public offering (“IPO”) selling 51,111,111 shares of common stock for a cash offering price of $23.00 per share ($21.9075 per share net of underwriter discounts and commissions and before offering expenses). In June 2016, the net proceeds of the IPO were used to redeem $1,090 million principal of USF’s 8.5% Senior Notes due June 30, 2019, and pay the related $23 million early redemption premium.

Business Description—The Company, through USF, operates in one business segment in which it markets and primarily distributes fresh, frozen and dry food and non-food products to foodservice customers throughout the United States. These customers include independently owned single and multi-unit restaurants, regional concepts, national restaurant chains, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels and motels, country clubs, government and military organizations, colleges and universities, and retail locations.

Basis of Presentation—The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year with all periods ending on a Saturday. When a 53-week fiscal year occurs, the Company reports the additional week in the fourth quarter. Fiscal years 2017 and 2016 are 52-week fiscal years. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of US Foods and USF. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Annual Report”).

The consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items, unless otherwise disclosed) necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be achieved for the full year.

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-07 Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This ASU requires an employer to report the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. It also requires the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. This guidance is effective for fiscal years—and interim periods within those fiscal years—beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This guidance is effective for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The new standard is not expected to materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations,

as the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by a substantial margin based on the fiscal 2016 impairment analysis for goodwill.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which clarifies the presentation of restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending cash balances on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years—and interim periods within those fiscal years—beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard, but does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as restricted cash is not material.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments —Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to use a forward looking, expected loss model to estimate credit losses. It also requires additional disclosure related to credit quality of trade and other receivables, including information related to management’s estimate of credit allowances. This guidance is effective for fiscal years—and interim periods within those fiscal years—beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 840, Leases. This ASU does not significantly impact lessor accounting. The ASU requires lessees to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for almost all leases. Lessees are permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize the asset and liability for leases with a term of twelve months or less. In addition, the ASU expands the disclosure requirements of lease arrangements. Adoption of this guidance will use a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of practical expedients. This guidance is effective for fiscal years—and interim periods within those fiscal years—beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, US Foods expects an increase to assets and liabilities on its balance sheet. The Company is currently evaluating the full effect that adoption will have on its financial position and results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which will be introduced into the FASB’s ASC as Topic 606. Topic 606, as amended, replaces Topic 605, the previous revenue recognition guidance. The new standard’s core principle is for companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration (that is, payment) to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also will result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively (for example, service revenue and contract modifications) and improve guidance for multiple-element arrangements. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The new standard permits two implementation approaches, one requiring full retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years, and one requiring modified retrospective application of the new standard with disclosure of significant changes in the results under the new versus old standards. The Company is finalizing its impact assessment, and believes the impacts are limited to the capitalization of direct and incremental contract acquisition costs, which have not historically been material. Under the current guidance, most of these costs are expensed as incurred. Under the new standard, these costs will be capitalized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized on a systematic basis over the expected contract term. Additionally, enhanced disclosures, including revenue recognition policies to identify performance obligations to customers and significant judgments in measurement and recognition, are required. We will continue our adoption effort by designing and implementing relevant controls to address any new considerations required by ASC 606. The Company will adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, and preliminarily expects to use the full retrospective method. However, our method is subject to change as we finalize our adoption approach for the new standard.

Acquisitions during the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 included (1) certain assets of All American Foods, a broadline distributor, acquired in February; and (2) certain assets of SRA Foods. Inc., a meat processor and distributor acquired in March, for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $62 million.

Acquisitions during fiscal 2016 included (1) the stock of Bay-N-Gulf, Inc., d/b/a Save On Seafood, a seafood processor and distributor, acquired in October; (2) certain assets of Jeraci Food Distributors, Inc., an Italian specialty distributor, acquired in October; (3) the stock of Fresh Unlimited, Inc. d/b/a Freshway Foods, a produce processor, repacker, and distributor, acquired in June; and (4) certain assets of Cara Donna Provisions Co., Inc. and Cara Donna Properties LLC, a broadline distributor, acquired in March. Total consideration consisted of cash of approximately $123 million, plus approximately $8 million for the estimated fair value of contingent consideration. In fiscal 2017, the Company also paid a minor purchase price adjustment related to a 2016 business acquisition.

During fiscal 2017, the Company paid approximately $6 million of contingent consideration related to a 2016 business acquisition, of which, $5 million was included as part of the fair value of the acquisition date assets and liabilities, and is reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in Cash flows from financing activities. As of April 1, 2017, the estimated fair value of contingent consideration remaining for other 2016 business acquisitions is $3 million.

The 2017 and 2016 acquisitions, reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements commencing from the date of acquisition, did not materially affect the Company’s results of operations or financial position and, therefore, pro forma financial information has not been provided. Acquisitions are integrated into the Company’s foodservice distribution network and funded primarily with cash from operations.

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations for the 2017 and 2016 business acquisitions as follows (in thousands):

	April 1,			December 31,
	2017			2016
Accounts receivable	$	5,978		$	22,871
Inventories		10,660			9,493
Other current assets		113			732
Property and equipment		13,848			24,119
Goodwill		14,354			32,570
Other intangible assets		21,150			64,130
Accounts payable		(3,508	)		(16,216	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(317	)		(12,173	)
Long-term debt		—			(2,514	)
Cash paid for acquisitions	$	62,278		$	123,012

The Company’s inventories—consisting mainly of food and other foodservice-related products—are primarily considered finished goods. Inventory costs include the purchase price of the product and freight charges to deliver it to the Company’s warehouses, as well as depreciation and labor related to processing facilities and equipment, and are net of certain cash or non-cash considerations received from vendors. The Company assesses the need for valuation allowances for slow-moving, excess and obsolete inventories by estimating the net recoverable value of such goods, based upon inventory category, inventory age, specifically identified items, and overall economic conditions.

The Company records inventories at the lower of cost or market, using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. The base year values of beginning and ending inventories are determined using the inventory price index computation method. This “links” current costs to original costs in the base year when the Company adopted LIFO, or date of acquisition where applicable. At April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the LIFO balance sheet reserves were $126 million and $116 million, respectively. As a result of changes in LIFO reserves, Cost of goods sold increased $10 million and decreased $11 million, for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016, respectively.

Under its accounts receivable financing facility, the Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2012, as amended (the “2012 ABS Facility”), USF sells—on a revolving basis—its eligible receivables to a wholly owned, special purpose, bankruptcy remote subsidiary (the “Receivables Company”). The Receivables Company, in turn, grants a continuing security interest in all of its rights, title and interest in the eligible receivables to the administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders as required under the 2012 ABS Facility. The Company consolidates the Receivables Company and, consequently, the transfer of the receivables is a transaction internal to the Company and the receivables have not been derecognized from the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. On a daily basis, cash from accounts receivable collections is remitted to the Company as additional eligible receivables are sold to the Receivables Company. If, on a weekly settlement basis, there are not sufficient eligible receivables available as collateral, the Company is required to either provide cash collateral or, in lieu of providing cash collateral, it can pay down its borrowings on the 2012 ABS Facility to cover the shortfall. Due to sufficient eligible receivables available as collateral, no cash collateral was held at April 1, 2017 or December 31, 2016. Included in the Company’s accounts receivable balance as April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $1,012 million and $923 million, respectively, of receivables held as collateral in support of the 2012 ABS Facility. See Note 10, Debt for a further description of the 2012 ABS Facility.

The Company classifies its closed facilities as Assets held for sale at the time management commits to a plan to sell the facility, the facility is actively marketed and available for immediate sale, and the sale is expected to be completed within one year. Due to market conditions, certain facilities may be classified as Assets held for sale for more than one year as the Company continues to actively market the facilities at reasonable prices. The Company had $21 million of Assets held for sale at April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to 40 years. Property and equipment under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining terms of the respective lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets. At April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Property and equipment-net included accumulated depreciation of $1,786 million and $1,724 million, respectively. Depreciation expense was $69 million and $65 million for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016, respectively.

Goodwill and Other intangible assets include the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the tangible net assets acquired. Other intangible assets include Customer relationships, Noncompete agreements, and the Brand names and trademarks comprising the Company’s portfolio of exclusive brands and trademarks. Brand names and trademarks are indefinite-lived intangible assets, and accordingly, are not subject to amortization.

Customer relationships and Noncompete agreements are intangible assets with definite lives, and are carried at the acquired fair value less accumulated amortization. Customer relationships and Noncompete agreements are amortized over the estimated useful lives (four to ten years). Amortization expense was $39 million and $38 million for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016, respectively.

	April 1, 2017			December 31, 2016
Goodwill	$	3,922,360		$	3,908,484
Other intangibles—net
Customer relationships—amortizable:
Gross carrying amount	$	1,414,399		$	1,393,799
Accumulated amortization		(1,298,880	)		(1,260,011	)
Net carrying value		115,519			133,788
Noncompete agreements—amortizable:
Gross carrying amount		1,350			800
Accumulated amortization		(547	)		(507	)
Net carrying value		803			293
Brand names and trademarks—not amortizing		252,800			252,800
Total Other intangibles—net	$	369,122		$	386,881

The 2017 increases in Goodwill and the gross carrying amounts of Customer relationships and Noncompete agreements are attributable to the 2017 business acquisitions.

The Company assesses Goodwill and Other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually, or more frequently if events occur that indicate an asset may be impaired. For Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company’s policy is to assess for impairment at the beginning of each fiscal third quarter. For intangible assets with definite lives, the Company assesses impairment only if events occur that indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For Goodwill, the reporting unit used in assessing impairment is the Company’s one business segment as described in Note 18, Business Information. The Company completed its most recent annual impairment assessment for Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of July 3, 2016—the first day of the third quarter of 2016—with no impairments noted.

The Company follows the accounting standards for fair value, whereas fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. The Company’s fair value measurements are based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, fair value accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy will be recognized at the end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurs. There were no transfers between fair value levels in any of the periods presented below.

The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, were as follows (in thousands):

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Recurring fair value measurements:
Money market funds
Balance at April 1, 2017	$	61,193	$	—	$	—	$	61,193
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	31,600	$	—	$	—	$	31,600
Contingent consideration payable for business acquisitions
Balance at April 1, 2017	$	—	$	—	$	3,375	$	3,375
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	—	$	—	$	9,775	$	9,775

There were no assets or liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Money market funds include highly liquid investments with a maturity of three or fewer months. They are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and are classified under Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

In addition to the $6 million paid in fiscal 2017 discussed in Note 3, Business Acquisitions, contingent consideration may be paid for certain other 2016 business acquisitions in the event certain operating results are achieved, primarily over a one-year period, from the respective dates of such acquisitions. The amounts included in the above table, classified under Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, represent the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration for the respective periods. We estimate the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities based on financial projections of the acquired companies and estimated probability of achievement. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in the estimated amount of contingent payments are included in Distribution, selling and administrative costs in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The carrying value of cash, restricted cash, Accounts receivable, Bank checks outstanding, Accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.

The fair value and carrying value of USF’s total debt approximated $3.9 billion and $3.8 billion as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 fair value of USF’s 5.875% unsecured Senior Notes due June 15, 2024, (the “2016 Senior Notes”), estimated at $0.6 billion, at the end of each period, was classified under

Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, with fair value based upon the closing market price at the end of the reporting period. The fair value of the balance of USF’s debt is primarily classified under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, with fair value estimated based upon a combination of the cash outflows expected under these debt facilities, interest rates that are currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, and estimates of USF’s overall credit risk.

Debt Description	Maturity	Interest rate at April 1, 2017		April 1, 2017			December 31, 2016
ABL Facility	October 20, 2020	3.32	%	$	50,000		$	30,000
2012 ABS Facility	September 30, 2018	2.04			675,000			645,000
Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan (net of $12,612 and $13,318 of unamortized deferred financing costs)	June 27, 2023	3.53			2,170,888			2,175,682
2016 Senior Notes (net of $6,945 and $7,185 of unamortized deferred financing costs)	June 15, 2024	5.88			593,055			592,815
Obligations under capital leases	2018–2025	2.36 - 6.18			332,984			305,544
Other debt	2018–2031	5.75 - 9.00			32,577			32,672
Total debt					3,854,504			3,781,713
Current portion of long-term debt					(82,234	)		(75,962	)
Long-term debt				$	3,772,270		$	3,705,751

At April 1, 2017, $959 million of the total debt was at a fixed rate and $2,896 million was at a floating rate.

Following is a description of each of USF’s debt instruments outstanding as of April 1, 2017:

Revolving Credit Agreement– The Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement, dated October 20, 2015, as amended, is USF’s asset backed senior secured revolving loan facility (the “ABL Facility”) and provides for loans under its two tranches: ABL Tranche A-1 and ABL Tranche A, with its capacity limited by a borrowing base. The maximum borrowing available is $1,300 million with ABL Tranche A-1 at $100 million, and ABL Tranche A at $1,200 million.

As of April 1, 2017, USF had $50 million in outstanding borrowings and had issued letters of credit totaling $370 million under the ABL Facility. Outstanding letters of credit included: (1) $61 million issued to secure USF’s obligations with respect to certain facility leases, (2) $306 million issued in favor of certain commercial insurers securing USF’s obligations with respect to its self-insurance program, and (3) $3 million in letters of credit for other obligations. There was available capacity on the ABL Facility of $878 million at April 1, 2017. As of April 1, 2017, on Tranche A-1 borrowings, USF can periodically elect to pay interest at an alternative base rate (“ABR”), as defined in USF’s credit agreements, plus 1.50% or the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.50%. On Tranche A borrowings, USF can periodically elect to pay interest at ABR plus 0.25% or LIBOR plus 1.25%. The ABL Facility also carries letter of credit fees of 1.125% and an unused commitment fee of 0.125%.

Accounts Receivable Financing Program–Under the 2012 ABS Facility, USF sells—on a revolving basis—its eligible receivables to the Receivables Company. See Note 5, Accounts Receivable Financing Program.

The maximum capacity under the 2012 ABS Facility is $800 million. Borrowings under the 2012 ABS Facility were $675 million at April 1, 2017. USF, at its option, can request additional borrowings up to the maximum commitment, provided sufficient eligible receivables are available as collateral. There was available capacity on the 2012 ABS Facility of $55 million at April 1, 2017 based on eligible receivables as collateral. The portion of the 2012 ABS Facility held by the lenders who fund the 2012 ABS Facility with commercial paper bears interest at the lender’s commercial paper rate, plus any other costs associated with the issuance of commercial paper plus 1.00%, and an unused commitment fee of 0.35%. The portion of the 2012 ABS Facility held by lenders that do not fund the 2012 ABS Facility with commercial paper bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00%, and an unused commitment fee of 0.35%.

Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan Agreement–The Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated June 27, 2016, as amended (the “Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan”), consists of a senior secured term loan with outstanding borrowings of $2,171 million at April 1, 2017, net of $13 million of unamortized deferred financing costs.

On February 17, 2017, the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan was further amended, whereby the interest rate spread was reduced 25 basis points and fixed at ABR plus 1.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%, with a LIBOR floor of 0.75%, based on USF’s periodic election. USF determined the terms of the February 17, 2017 amendment were not substantially different from the previous terms of the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan, for continuing lenders, and therefore substantially

all of transaction was accounted for as a debt modification. The Company recorded the $0.4 million of third party costs related to the February 17, 2017 amendment, and a write-off of $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs related to non-continuing lenders, in interest expense. Unamortized deferred financing costs of $13 million were carried forward and will be amortized through June 27, 2023, the maturity date of the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan.

Principal repayments of $5.5 million are payable quarterly with the balance due at maturity. The debt may require mandatory repayments if certain assets are sold, as defined in the agreement. The interest rate for all borrowings was 3.53%— LIBOR of 0.78% plus 2.75%— at April 1, 2017.

2016 Senior Notes–The 2016 Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2016 Senior Notes”), with outstanding principal of $593 million at April 1, 2017, net of $7 million of unamortized deferred financing costs, bear interest at 5.875%. On or after June 15, 2019, this debt is redeemable, at USF’s option, in whole or in part at a price of 102.938% of the remaining principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. On or after June 15, 2020 and June 15, 2021, the optional redemption price for the debt declines to 101.469% and 100.0%, respectively, of the remaining principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. Prior to June 15, 2019, up to 40% of the debt may be redeemed with the aggregate proceeds from equity offerings, as defined in the Indenture, dated June 27, 2016, as supplemented, at a redemption premium of 105.875%.

Other Debt–Obligations under capital leases of $333 million at April 1, 2017, consist of amounts due for transportation equipment and building leases. Other debt of $33 million at April 1, 2017 consists primarily of various state industrial revenue bonds. To obtain certain tax incentives related to the construction of a new distribution facility, USF and a wholly owned subsidiary entered into an industrial revenue bond agreement with a state in January 2015, for the issuance of a maximum of $40 million in taxable demand revenue bonds (the “TRBs”). The TRBs are self-funded as USF’s wholly owned subsidiary purchases the TRBs, and the state loans the proceeds back to USF. The TRBs, which mature January 1, 2030, can be prepaid without penalty one year after issuance. Interest on the TRBs and the loan is 6.25%. At April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $22 million has been drawn on TRBs resulting in $22 million being recognized as a long-term asset and a corresponding long-term liability in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Substantially all of USF’s assets are pledged under the various debt agreements. Debt under the 2012 ABS Facility is secured by certain designated receivables and, in certain circumstances, by restricted cash. The ABL Facility is secured by certain other designated receivables not pledged under the 2012 ABS Facility, inventories and tractors and trailers owned by USF. Additionally, the ABL Facility has a third priority interest in the assets pledged under the 2012 ABS Facility and a second priority interest in the assets pledged under the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan. USF’s obligations under the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan are secured by all of the capital stock of its subsidiaries, each of the direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries –as defined in the agreements– and are secured by substantially all assets of USF and its subsidiaries not pledged under the 2012 ABS Facility or the ABL Facility. Additionally, the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan has a second priority interest in the assets pledged under the ABL Facility and the 2012 ABS facility.

USF’s credit facilities, loan agreements and indentures contain customary covenants. These include, among other things, covenants that restrict USF’s ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends, or engage in mergers or consolidations. As of April 1, 2017, USF had $515 million of restricted payment capacity under these covenants, and approximately $2,060 million of its net assets were restricted after taking into consideration the net deferred tax assets and intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.

Certain debt agreements also contain customary events of default. Those include, without limitation, the failure to pay interest or principal when it is due under the agreements, cross default provisions, the failure of representations and warranties contained in the agreements to be true, and certain insolvency events. If a default event occurs and continues, the principal amounts outstanding—together with all accrued unpaid interest and other amounts owed—may be declared immediately due and payable by the lenders. Were such an event to occur, USF would be forced to seek new financing that may not be on as favorable terms as its current facilities. USF’s ability to refinance its indebtedness on favorable terms—or at all—is directly affected by the current economic and financial conditions. In addition, USF’s ability to incur secured indebtedness (which may enable it to achieve more favorable terms than the incurrence of unsecured indebtedness) depends in part on the value of its assets. This, in turn, relies on the strength of its cash flows, results of operations, economic and market conditions, and other factors.

The following table summarizes the changes in the restructuring liabilities for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 (in thousands):

The Company periodically closes or consolidates distribution facilities and implements initiatives in its ongoing efforts to reduce costs and improve operating effectiveness. In connection with these activities, the Company may incur various costs including multiemployer pension withdrawal liabilities, severance and other employee separation costs.

During the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017, the Company incurred a net charge of $2 million for Severance and Related Costs associated with its efforts to streamline its corporate back office organization and centralize replenishment activities.

During the 13-weeks ended April 2, 2016, the Company incurred a net charge of $8 million associated with its efforts to streamline its field organization model and close the Baltimore, Maryland distribution facility. The Company also recorded $3 million of costs related to a lease termination settlement.

On January 31, 2017, the Company completed a secondary offering of 41,400,000 shares of its common stock held by investment funds associated with the Sponsors. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the offering. In accordance with terms of the registration rights agreement with the Sponsors, the Company incurred approximately $2 million of expenses in connection with the secondary offering, approximately half of which was incurred in 2016. Underwriting discounts and commissions were paid by the selling shareholders. As a result of the secondary offering, each Sponsor’s ownership interest in the Company’s common stock was reduced to approximately 28.34% as of January 31, 2017.

In connection with the February 2017 amendment of the Amended and Restated 2016 Term Loan, KKR Capital Markets LLC, an affiliate of KKR, received a de minimis fee for services rendered. Investment funds or accounts managed or advised by an affiliate of KKR held less than 2% of the Company’s outstanding debt as of April 1, 2017.

The Company was previously a party to consulting agreements with each of the Sponsors pursuant to which each Sponsor provided the Company with ongoing consulting and management advisory services and received fees and reimbursement of related out of pocket expenses. On June 1, 2016, the agreements with each of the Sponsors were terminated for an aggregate termination fee of $31 million. For the13-week period ended April 2, 2016, the Company recorded $3 million in fees and expenses in Distribution, selling and administrative costs in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

On January 8, 2016, the Company paid a $666 million, or $3.94 per share, one-time special cash distribution to its shareholders of record as of January 4, 2016, of which $657 million was paid to the Sponsors. The distribution was funded with cash on hand and approximately $314 million of additional borrowings under USF’s credit facilities. The Company has no current plans to pay future dividends, and has never paid dividends on its common stock, other than the January 2016 one-time cash distribution. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors, and could be limited by USF debt covenants.

The Company has defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans for its employees, and provides certain health care benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents. The components of net periodic benefit (credits) costs for pension and other postretirement benefits, for Company sponsored plans, are provided below (in thousands):

	13-Weeks Ended
	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	April 1, 2017			April 2, 2016			April 1, 2017			April 2, 2016
Components of Net periodic benefit (credits) costs
Service cost	$	506		$	966		$	10		$	9
Interest cost		10,138			9,817			72			74
Expected return on plan assets		(11,964	)		(12,221	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		35			39			1			2
Amortization of net loss (gain)		1,051			1,860			(13	)		(18	)
Settlements		—			750			—			—
Net periodic benefit (credits) costs	$	(234	)	$	1,211		$	70		$	67

The Company contributed $10 million to its defined benefit and other postretirement plans during both 13-week periods ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016. The Company expects to contribute a total of $36 million to the Company-sponsored pension plans and other postretirement plans in fiscal year 2017.

The Company’s employees are eligible to participate in a Company sponsored defined contribution 401(k) Plan which provides for Company matching on the participant’s contributions of up to 100% of the first 3% of participant’s compensation and 50% of the next 2% of a participant’s compensation, for a maximum Company matching contribution of 4%. The Company’s contributions to this plan were $12 million for both 13-week periods ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016.

The Company also contributes to numerous multiemployer pension plans under the terms of certain of its collective bargaining agreements that cover its union-represented employees. The Company does not administer these multiemployer pension plans. The Company’s contributions to these plans were $9 million and $8 million for the 13-week periods ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016, respectively.

The Company computes earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which requires that non-vested restricted stock containing non-forfeitable dividend rights should be treated as participating securities pursuant to the two-class method. Under the two-class method, net income is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the period for common stock and participating securities. The remaining undistributed earnings are then allocated to common stock and participating securities as if all of the net income for the period had been distributed. The amounts of distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities for the 13-week period ended April 2, 2016 were insignificant and did not materially impact the calculation of basic or diluted EPS. There was no unvested restricted stock that remained outstanding at April 1, 2017.

Basic EPS is computed by dividing Net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, which includes vested restricted shares, vested restricted stock units, and non-vested restricted shares outstanding for the year.

Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock, plus the effect of potentially dilutive securities. Stock options, unvested restricted shares, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plan deferrals are considered potentially dilutive securities.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

The following table presents changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the periods presented (in thousands):

	13-Weeks Ended
	April 1, 2017			April 2, 2016
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
Defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans:
Balance at beginning of period⁽¹⁾	$	(119,363	)	$	(74,378	)
Reclassification adjustments:
Amortization of prior service cost		36			41
Amortization of net loss		1,038			1,842
Settlements		-			750
Total before income tax^{(2) (3)}		1,074			2,633
Income tax provision⁽⁴⁾		417			—
Current period comprehensive income, net of tax		657			2,633
Balance at end of period⁽¹⁾	$	(118,706	)	$	(71,745	)

The determination of the Company’s overall effective tax rate requires the use of estimates. The effective tax rate reflects the income earned and taxed in various United States federal and state jurisdictions based on enacted tax law, permanent differences between book and tax items, tax credits and the Company’s change in relative income in each jurisdiction.

The Company estimated its annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year and applied the annual effective tax rate to the results of the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016 for purposes of determining its year-to-date tax provision.

The Company released the valuation allowance against its federal net deferred tax assets and certain of its state net deferred tax assets in the 13-weeks ended October 1, 2016, as the Company determined it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would be realized. The Company maintained a valuation allowance on certain state net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards expected to expire unutilized as a result of insufficient forecasted taxable income in the carryforward period, or the utilization of which are subject to limitation. The decision to release the valuation allowance during the 13-weeks ended October 1, 2016 was made after management considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, including but not limited to, historical operating results, cumulative income in recent years, forecasted earnings, and a reduction of uncertainty regarding forecasted earnings as a result of developments in certain customer and strategic initiatives.

The effective tax rate for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 of 23% varied from the 35% federal statutory rate, primarily as a result of state income taxes and the recognition of various discrete tax items. The discrete tax items included a tax benefit of $6

million, primarily related to excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation. The effective tax rate for the 13-weeks ended April 2, 2016 of 6% varied from the 35% federal statutory rate, primarily as a result of a $6 million decrease in the valuation allowance. The decrease in the valuation allowance during the 13-weeks ended April 2, 2016, was primarily related to a reduction of net deferred tax assets resulting from the estimated ordinary income used to determine the estimated annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year.

Purchase Commitments—The Company enters into purchase orders with vendors and other parties in the ordinary course of business, and has a limited number of purchase contracts with certain vendors that require it to buy a predetermined volume of products. As of April 1, 2017, the Company had $843 million of purchase orders and purchase contract commitments, of which $767 million and $76 million pertain to products to be purchased in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, respectively, and are not recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

To minimize fuel cost risk, the Company enters into forward purchase commitments for a portion of its projected diesel fuel requirements. At April 1, 2017, the Company had diesel fuel forward purchase commitments totaling $89 million through June 2018 ($56 million in 2017 and $33 million in 2018). Additionally, as of April 1, 2017, the Company had electricity forward purchase commitments totaling $5 million through December 2018. The Company does not measure its forward purchase commitments for fuel and electricity at fair value, as the amounts under contract meet the physical delivery criteria in the normal purchase exception under GAAP guidance.

Legal Proceedings —The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business. These legal proceedings—whether pending, threatened or unasserted, if decided adversely to or settled by the Company—may result in liabilities material to its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company recognized provisions with respect to the proceedings where appropriate. These are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. It is possible that the Company could be required to make expenditures, in excess of the established provisions, in amounts that cannot be reasonably estimated. However, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is the Company’s policy to expense attorney fees as incurred.

The Company’s consolidated results represents its one business segment based on how the Company’s chief operating decision maker—the Chief Executive Officer—views the business for purposes of evaluating performance and making operating decisions.

The Company markets and primarily distributes fresh, frozen and dry food and non-food products to foodservice customers throughout the United States. The Company uses a centralized management structure, and its strategies and initiatives are implemented and executed consistently across the organization to maximize value to the organization as a whole. The Company uses shared resources for sales, procurement, and general and administrative activities across each of its distribution centers and operations. The Company’s distribution centers form a single network to reach its customers; it is common for a single customer to make purchases from several different distribution centers. Capital projects—whether for cost savings or generating incremental revenue—are evaluated based on estimated economic returns to the organization as a whole—e.g. net present value, return on investment.

On April 28, 2017, the Company acquired FirstClass Foods-Trojan, Inc., d/b/a FirstClass Foods, a meat processor and distributor, with annual sales of approximately $55 million. This acquisition, funded primarily with cash flows from operations, helps strengthen our capabilities in the center-of-the-plate category.

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our liquidity and our possible or assumed future results of operations, including descriptions of our business strategies. These statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “seek,” “will,” “may,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “forecasts,” “mission,” “strive,” “more,” “goal,” or similar expressions. The statements are based on assumptions that we have made, based on our experience in the industry as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we think are appropriate. We believe these judgments are reasonable. However, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.

Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report include, among others:

For a detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see Part I, Item 1A— “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Annual Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are based only on information currently available to us and speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking or cautionary statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of events, unanticipated or otherwise, or changes in future operating results over time or otherwise. Comparisons of results between current and prior periods are not intended to express any future trends, or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2016 Annual Report. This discussion of our results includes certain financial measures that are not required by—or presented in accordance with—accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We believe these non-GAAP measures provide meaningful supplemental information about our operating performance, because they exclude amounts that our management and board of directors do not consider part of core operating results when assessing our performance and underlying trends. More information on the rationale for these measures is discussed in the Non-GAAP Reconciliations below.

We operate on a 52-53 week fiscal year with all periods ending on a Saturday. When a 53-week fiscal year occurs, we report the additional week in the fourth quarter. Fiscal years 2017 and 2016 are 52-week fiscal years.

With Net sales of $23 billion in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we are the second largest foodservice distributor in the United States with a 2016 market share of approximately 8%. The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is large, fragmented and growing, with total industry sales of approximately $280 billion in 2016.

Our mission is to be First in Food. We strive to inspire and empower chefs and foodservice operators to bring great food experiences to consumers. This mission is supported by our strategy of Great Food. Made Easy. This strategy centers on providing a broad and innovative offering of high-quality products to our customers, as well as a comprehensive suite of industry-leading e-commerce, technology and business solutions.

We have significant scale and an efficient operating model. We supply approximately 250,000 customer locations nationwide. These customer locations include independently owned single and multi-unit restaurants, regional restaurant concepts, national restaurant chains, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels and motels, country clubs, government and military organizations, colleges and universities, and retail locations. We provide approximately 350,000 fresh, frozen, and dry food stock-keeping units, or SKUs, as well as non-food items, sourced from approximately 5,000 suppliers. Our more than 4,000 sales associates manage customer relationships at local, regional, and national levels. They are supported by sophisticated marketing and category management capabilities, as well as a sales support team that includes world-class chefs and restaurant operations consultants. Our extensive network of over 60 distribution facilities and fleet of approximately 6,000 trucks allow us to operate efficiently and provide high levels of customer service.

Our consolidated case volume in the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 increased 4.3%. We experienced organic independent restaurant case growth and growth with other strategic customer types, as well as growth due to acquisitions. Net sales increased $195 million, or 3.5%, year over year. The case growth and related increase in Net sales, was partially offset by year over year deflation and product mix shifts.

Gross profit increased $31 million or 3.2% to $991 million in the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017. As a percentage of Net sales gross profit was 17.1%, down 0.1% from 17.2% in the prior year. Margin expansion initiatives were offset by the adverse impact of the year over year last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) reserve change.

Total operating expenses increased $40 million or 4.6% to $915 million in the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017, primarily due to increased wages and distribution costs driven by volume and inflation, as well as other employee-related costs and higher self-insurance expenses. These increases were partially offset by lower restructuring charges due to the completion of several initiatives in 2016.

In late 2016, we launched two new initiatives, including centralization of certain field procurement and replenishment activities, and a corporate and administrative cost reduction program. The corporate and administrative cost reduction program focused on streamlining the organization, through creating greater spans of control and expanded use of business shared services. We expect the procurement actions to be completed during 2017, with realization of benefits in product costs and logistics savings resulting from more effective management of procurement and replenishment activities. We expect the savings from the corporate and administrative cost reduction programs to be realized over the next 12 – 18 months.

With favorable trends in consumer confidence and the unemployment rate, we expect positive industry growth in 2017. General economic trends and conditions, including demographic changes, inflation, deflation, consumer confidence, and disposable income, coupled with changing tastes and preferences, influence the amount that consumers spend on food-away-from-home, which can affect our customers and in turn our sales. On balance, we believe that these general trends will support positive real growth in food-away-from-home consumption and the growth of foodservice industry sales, particularly in our target customer types. We expect competitive pressures to remain high and moderation of deflation in 2017. Given that a large portion of our business is based on markups over cost, sudden inflation or prolonged deflation can negatively impact our sales and gross profit. We expect sales to our independent restaurant customers, which generally have higher margins, to continue to be an increasing proportion of our sales mix. Favorable customer mix, additional volume from acquisitions, as well as other merchandising initiatives, have previously contributed to our ability to expand our margins during the deflationary environment. Additionally, we believe our investments in a common technology platform, efficient transactional and operational model, e-commerce and analytic tools that support our team-based selling approach, coupled with merchandising and product innovation, have enabled us to leverage our costs, maintain our sales, and differentiate ourselves from our competitors.

We will remain focused on executing our growth strategies, adding value for and differentiating ourselves with our customers, and driving continued operational improvement in the business.

The following table presents selected historical results of operations of our business for the periods indicated:

	13-Weeks Ended
	April 1, 2017			April 2, 2016
	(In millions)*
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	5,788		$	5,593
Cost of goods sold		4,797			4,633
Gross profit		991			960
Operating expenses:
Distribution, selling and administrative costs		913			864
Restructuring charges		2			11
Total operating expenses		915			875
Operating income		77			85
Interest expense—net		42			71
Income before income taxes		35			14
Income tax provision		8			1
Net income	$	27		$	13
Percentage of Net Sales:
Gross profit		17.1	%		17.2	%
Distribution, selling and administrative costs		15.8	%		15.4	%
Operating expenses		15.8	%		15.6	%
Operating income		1.3	%		1.5	%
Net income		0.5	%		0.2	%
Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾		3.7	%		3.6	%
Other Data:
Cash flows—operating activities	$	122		$	137

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

		Page No.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016	1
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016	2
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 13-weeks ended April 1, 2017 and April 2, 2016	3
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26

Part II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	28
Signatures		29

	Severance and Related Costs			Facility Closing Costs		Total
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	22,596		$	865	$	23,461
Current period charges		2,265			—		2,265
Change in estimate		(392	)		—		(392	)
Payments and usage—net of accretion		(10,617	)		29		(10,588	)
Balance at April 1, 2017	$	13,852		$	894	$	14,746