Commitment and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2023

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Noncancellable Purchase Obligations

The Company has contractual commitments for services with third-parties related to its cloud services platform and other infrastructure services. These commitments are non-cancellable and expire within one to five years. There were no material contractual commitments that were entered into during fiscal year 2023 that were outside the ordinary course of business.

The following table sets forth contractual commitments as of June 30, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):


	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
	2023		2022
Contractual purchase obligations	$	1,788,740	$	152,935
Obligations for leases that have not yet commenced	919,333		956,118
Total purchase obligation	$	2,708,073	$	1,109,053

Maturities of purchase obligations as of June 30, 2023 were as follows (in thousands):


	Other contractual commitments		Leases not commenced		Total
Fiscal Year:
2024	$	364,326	$	—	$	364,326
2025	406,108		—		406,108
2026	458,234		—		458,234
2027	419,572		34,434		454,006
2028	140,500		47,290		187,790
Thereafter	—		837,609		837,609
Total commitments	$	1,788,740	$	919,333	$	2,708,073

Please refer to Note 11, “Leases,” for discussion of a lease commitment that the Company has entered but the lease has not yet commenced.

Legal Proceedings

On February 3, 2023, a putative securities class action (the “Putative Class Action”) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, captioned City of Hollywood Firefighters’ Pension Fund vs. Atlassian Corporation, Case No. 3:23-cv-00519, naming the Company and certain of its officers as defendants. The lawsuit is purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s securities between August 5, 2022 and November 3, 2022 (the “Class Period”). The complaint alleges claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, based on allegedly false and misleading statements about the Company’s business and prospects during the Class Period. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. On May 15, 2023, the Court appointed City of Hollywood Firefighters’ Pension Fund and Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System as co-lead plaintiffs (the “Plaintiffs”) in the Putative Class Action and approved their selection of lead counsel. The Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on July 14, 2023, which alleges the same claims against the same defendants for the same Class Period as the original complaint. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint is due by September 8, 2023. The defendants intend to deny the allegations of wrongdoing and vigorously defend against the claims in this lawsuit.

In March and April 2023, two stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against the members of the Company’s board of directors and certain of its officers, captioned Silva v. Cannon-Brookes, Case No. 1:23-cv-00283; and Keane v. Cannon-Brookes, Case No. 1:23-cv-00399. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. These stockholder derivative lawsuits are based largely on the same allegations as the Putative Class Action, including allegations relating to the Company’s disclosures during the Class Period as well as, in certain instances, alleged insider trading. The lawsuits purport to assert claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste, unjust enrichment, and violations of 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief on the Company’s behalf. The court has consolidated these cases and stayed them pending resolution of any motion to dismiss in the Putative Class Action. In August 2023, a third stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware asserting substantially the same claims as the previously filed derivative lawsuits discussed above, captioned Azzawi v. Cannon-Brookes, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00884. The defendants intend to seek to have this case consolidated and stayed with the previously filed stockholder derivative lawsuits.

In addition to the matters discussed above, from time to time, the Company is party to litigation and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. While the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of pending legal matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, the results of any litigation or other legal proceedings are uncertain and as such the resolution of such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is both probable that it will incur the loss and when it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss or range of loss. For the periods presented, the Company has not recorded any liabilities as a result of the litigation or other legal proceedings in its consolidated financial statements.

Indemnification Provisions

The Company’s agreements include provisions indemnifying customers against intellectual property and other third-party claims. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors, executive officers and certain other officers that will require the Company to, among other things, indemnify these individuals for certain liabilities that may arise as a result of their affiliation with the Company. For the periods presented, the Company has not incurred any costs as a result of such indemnification obligations and has not recorded any liabilities related to such obligations in the consolidated financial statements.