10-Q

75

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number: 001-38542

Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	47-3366145
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4000 Shoreline Court, Suite 300

South San Francisco, CA, 94080

(650) 822-5600

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value	KZR	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of August 4, 2020, the registrant had 46,256,284 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	62
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	62
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	62
Item 5.	Other Information	62
Item 6.	Exhibits	63

i

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “potential,” “project,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “should,” “target” or similar expressions, or the negative or plural of these words or expressions. These forward-looking statements include statements concerning the following:   

• statements regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on our operations, research and development, clinical trials and financial position, and its potential effects on the operations of third-party manufacturers, contract research organizations, other service providers, and collaborators with whom we conduct business;

• our plans to develop and commercialize our product candidates;

• the initiation, timing, progress and expected results of our current and future clinical trials and our research and development programs;

• our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;

• our ability to successfully acquire or in-license additional product candidates or other technology on reasonable terms;

• our ability to maintain and establish collaborations or strategic relationships or obtain additional funding;

• the timing and likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval of our current and future product candidates;

• our expectations regarding the potential market size and the rate and degree of market acceptance of such product candidates;

• our ability to fund our working capital requirements and expectations regarding the sufficiency of our capital resources;

• the implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business and product candidates;

• the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights and the duration of our patent rights covering our product candidates;

• developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;

• the scalability and commercial viability of our manufacturing methods and processes;

• our expectations regarding government and third-party payor coverage and reimbursement;

• our ability to compete in the markets for our product candidates;

• the impact of government laws and regulations;

• developments relating to our competitors and our industry; and

• the factors that may impact our financial results.

These statements are only current predictions and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by law, we are under no duty to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this report.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Kezar,” “Kezar Life Sciences,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. and our wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Kezar Life Sciences Australia Pty Ltd.

1

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

KEZAR LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
	(Unaudited)			(Note 2)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,296		$	14,951
Marketable securities		140,175			63,255
Prepaid expenses		1,780			1,878
Other current assets		1,312			1,048
Total current assets		160,563			81,132
Property and equipment, net		3,902			4,282
Operating lease right-of-use asset		3,576			3,817
Other assets		282			282
Total assets	$	168,323		$	89,513
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,007		$	823
Accrued liabilities		3,027			4,218
Operating lease liabilities, current		969			900
Other liabilities, current		42			62
Total current liabilities		5,045			6,003
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent		4,960			5,464
Total liabilities		10,005			11,467
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30,    2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019; 45,826,798 and 19,208,077 shares issued    and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019,    respectively		46			19
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued    and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		262,041			162,505
Accumulated other comprehensive income(loss)		25			(196	)
Accumulated deficit		(103,794	)		(84,282	)
Total stockholders' equity		158,318			78,046
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	168,323		$	89,513

See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements

2

KEZAR LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	7,148		$	6,925		$	14,605		$	12,852
General and administrative		2,705			2,430			5,726			4,812
Total operating expenses		9,853			9,355			20,331			17,664
Loss from operations		(9,853	)		(9,355	)		(20,331	)		(17,664	)
Interest income		353			637			819			1,304
Net loss	$	(9,500	)	$	(8,718	)	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.86	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per common    share, basic and diluted		42,936,991			19,073,830			37,902,294			19,058,263

See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements

3

KEZAR LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Net loss	$	(9,500	)	$	(8,718	)	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		97			(49	)		(20	)		(41	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		50			23			241			88
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		147			(26	)		221			47
Comprehensive loss	$	(9,353	)	$	(8,744	)	$	(19,291	)	$	(16,313	)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements

4

KEZAR LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	COMMON STOCK				ADDITIONAL PAID-IN		ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE			ACCUMULATED			TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS'
	SHARES		AMOUNTS		CAPITAL		INCOME (LOSS)			DEFICIT			EQUITY
Balance at December 31, 2019		19,208,077	$	19	$	162,505	$	(196	)	$	(84,282	)	$	78,046
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants   through underwritten offering, net of offering costs of   $3,447		18,965,385		19	$	53,341		—			—			53,360
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans		3,000		—		3		—			—			3
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued    pursuant to early exercises		—		—		10		—			—			10
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		1,173		—			—			1,173
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		74			—			74
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(10,012	)		(10,012	)
Balance at March 31, 2020		38,176,462	$	38	$	217,032	$	(122	)	$	(94,294	)	$	122,654
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants    through underwritten offering, net of offering costs of $3,087		7,590,909		8		43,655		—			—			43,663
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans		59,427		—		125		—			—			125
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued    pursuant to early exercises		—		—		10		—			—			10
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		1,219		—			—			1,219
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		147			—			147
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(9,500	)		(9,500	)
Balance at June 30, 2020		45,826,798	$	46	$	262,041	$	25		$	(103,794	)	$	158,318
	COMMON STOCK				ADDITIONAL PAID-IN		ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE			ACCUMULATED			TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS'
	SHARES		AMOUNTS		CAPITAL		LOSS			DEFICIT			EQUITY
Balance at December 31, 2018		19,114,421	$	19	$	158,176	$	(203	)	$	(49,195	)	$	108,797
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans		4,000		—		4		—			—			4
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued    pursuant to early exercises		—		—		12		—			—			12
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		901		—			—			901
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		73			—			73
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(7,642	)		(7,642	)
Balance at March 31, 2019		19,118,421	$	19	$	159,093	$	(130	)	$	(56,837	)	$	102,145
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans		14,224		—		180		—			—			180
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued    pursuant to early exercises		—		—		13		—			—			13
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		1,009		—			—			1,009
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—		(26	)		—			(26	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(8,718	)		(8,718	)
Balance at June 30, 2019		19,132,645	$	19	$	160,295	$	(156	)	$	(65,555	)	$	94,603

See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements

5

KEZAR LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		731			628
Stock-based compensation		2,392			1,910
Amortization of premiums and discounts on marketable securities		(183	)		(695	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other long-term assets		(166	)		(440	)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities		(1,219	)		919
Operating lease liabilities		(435	)		(374	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(18,392	)		(14,412	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(110	)		(523	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(143,780	)		(59,255	)
Maturities of marketable securities		67,284			62,896
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(76,606	)		3,118
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock and pre-funded warrants in underwritten     offerings, net of offering costs		97,235			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans		128			184
Net cash provided by financing activities		97,363			184
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(20	)		(41	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,345			(11,151	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period		14,951			24,182
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	$	17,296		$	13,031
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing information:
Reclassification of employee stock liability to equity upon vesting	$	20		$	25
Purchase of property and equipment in accounts payable	$	—		$	23
Unpaid offering costs in accrued liabilities	$	212		$	—

See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements 

6

Kezar Life Sciences, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Description of the Business

Description of Business

Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware in February 2015 and commenced operations in June 2015. The Company is a clinical-stage biotechnology company, discovering and developing novel small molecule therapeutics to treat unmet needs in autoimmunity and cancer. The Company’s principal operations are in South San Francisco, California, and it operates in one segment.

Liquidity

Since commencing operations in mid-2015, substantially all of the Company’s efforts have been focused on research, development, and the advancement of the Company’s lead product candidate, KZR-616. The Company’s ultimate success depends on the outcome of the ongoing research and development activities. The Company has not yet generated product sales and as a result has experienced operating losses since inception and had an accumulated deficit of $103.8 million as of June 30, 2020. The Company expects to incur additional losses in the future to conduct research and development and will need to raise additional capital to fully implement management’s business plan. The Company intends to raise such capital through the issuance of additional equity, and potentially through borrowings, strategic alliances with partner companies and other licensing transactions. However, if such financing is not available at adequate levels, the Company may need to reevaluate its operating plans. Management believes that its existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund the Company’s cash requirements for at least 12 months following the issuance of these financial statements.

In July 2019, the Company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement ^SM (the “ATM Agreement”) with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion through Jefferies, as its sales agent, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. The ATM Agreement was terminated in June 2020. Prior to the termination, the Company did not sell any shares of its common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement. Accordingly, the $50.0 million of securities unsold pursuant to the ATM Agreement became available for issuance on the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-232542).

On February 4, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 18,965,385 shares of its common stock, which includes the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,884,615 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “February Offering”). The public offering price of our common stock was $2.60 per share and the public offering price of each pre-funded warrant was $2.599 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the February offering were approximately $53.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. The Company’s existing stockholder, Morningside Ventures Investments Ltd, together with its affiliate, and certain of the Company’s officers and directors purchased an aggregate of approximately $22.9 million of common stock in the offering.

On June 11, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 7,590,909 shares of its common stock and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “June Offering”). The public offering price of our common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of each pre-funded warrant was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the June Offering were approximately $43.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. In July 2020, the underwriters exercised an option to purchase an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. The Company’s existing stockholder, Equal Talent Investments Limited, an affiliate of Morningside Venture Investments Ltd, and one of the Company’s directors purchased an aggregate of approximately $8.5 million of common stock in the June Offering.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the notes thereto, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 12, 2020 (the “Annual Report”), and there have been no material changes during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

7

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the Company’s accounts and those of its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Kezar Life Sciences Australia Pty Ltd., which is a proprietary company limited by shares. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report.

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying financial information as of June 30, 2020 is unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that our management considers necessary for the fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of our financial condition at the date of the interim balance sheet. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any other interim period. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our Annual Report.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of fixed assets, stock-based compensation, and accrued research and development costs. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific relevant assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

We also anticipate that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on the clinical and pre-clinical development timelines for our clinical and pre-clinical programs.  Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and therefore require the exercise of judgment. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company is not aware of any specific event or circumstance that would require the Company to update its estimates, assumptions and judgments or revise the carrying value of its assets or liabilities. These estimates may change as new events occur and additional information is obtained and are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates and any such differences may be material to the Company’s financial statements.

Significant Risks and Uncertainties

With the global spread of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020, we have implemented business continuity plans designed to address and mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.  The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, our pre-clinical and clinical development and regulatory efforts, our corporate development objectives and the value of and market for our common stock, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing and business closure requirements in the United States, Europe and other countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken globally to contain and treat the disease.  The global economic slowdown, the overall disruption of global healthcare systems and the other risks and uncertainties associated with the pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

In addition, we are subject to other challenges and risks specific to our business and our ability to execute on our strategy, as well as risks and uncertainties common to companies in the biotechnology industry with development operations, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with: obtaining regulatory feedback regarding our product candidates; delays or problems in the supply of our product candidates; loss of single source suppliers or their failure to comply with manufacturing regulations; identifying, acquiring or in-licensing additional technologies or product candidates; clinical development and the inherent uncertainty of clinical success; the challenges of protecting and enhancing our intellectual property rights; and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and results of operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks and uncertainties discussed above.

8

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at fair value.

Marketable Securities

All marketable securities have been classified as “available-for-sale” in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and cash management strategy. Short-term marketable securities mature within one-year from the balance sheet date. Investments in marketable securities are recorded at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses reported within accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit until realized or until a determination is made that an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred. If a credit loss does exist for available-for-sale debt securities and should be recognized, an allowance will be recorded rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion, together with interest on securities, are included in interest income on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Leases

At lease commencement, the Company records a lease liability based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company calculates the present value of lease payments using the discount rate implicit in the lease, unless that rate cannot be readily determined. In that case, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company records a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) lease asset based on the lease liability, adjusted for any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs paid to the lessor prior to the lease commencement date.

After lease commencement, the Company measures its leases as follows: (i) the lease liability based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using the discount rate determined at lease commencement; and (ii) the ROU lease asset based on the remeasured lease liability, adjusted for any unamortized lease incentives received, any unamortized initial direct costs and the cumulative difference between rent expense and amounts paid under the lease agreement. Any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.

The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2020

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) as well as subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The Company adopted the new standard using the modified retrospective approach as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The amendment of ASU No. 2018-13 removes disclosure requirements from Topic 820 in the areas of: (1) the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (2) the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and (3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles found in ASC740, Income Taxes. As part of the simplification, along with other exceptions, it removes the exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation in the event of a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items. The Company early adopted ASU 2019-20 as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

3. Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value. The carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company applies fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are required to be recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. The Company determines the fair value of Level 1 assets using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company reviews trading activity and pricing for Level 2 investments as of each measurement date. Level 2 inputs, which are obtained from various third-party data providers, represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and were derived from observable market data, or, if not directly observable, were derived from or corroborated by other observable market data.

In certain cases, where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs as of June 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as described above (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	17,100	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		75,788		75,788		—		—
Commercial paper		30,906		—		30,906		—
Corporate debt securities		14,056		—		14,056		—
U.S. agency bonds		19,425		—		19,425		—
Total	$	157,275	$	92,888	$	64,387	$	—

	December 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	14,731	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		5,285		—		—
Commercial paper		15,186		—		15,186		—
Corporate debt securities		17,171		—		17,171		—
U.S. agency bonds		25,613		—		25,613		—
Total	$	77,986	$	20,016	$	57,970	$	—

10

4. Available-for-Sale Securities

The following table is a summary of available-for-sale securities recorded in cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	—	$	—		$	17,100
U.S. Treasury securities		75,761		28		(1	)		75,788
Commercial paper		30,791		115		—			30,906
Corporate debt securities		13,965		91		—			14,056
U.S. agency bonds		19,385		40		—			19,425
Total	$	157,002	$	274	$	(1	)	$	157,275

	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	—	$	—		$	14,731
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		1		(1	)		5,285
Commercial paper		15,174		12		—			15,186
Corporate debt securities		17,168		3		—			17,171
U.S. agency bonds		25,597		16		—			25,613
Total	$	77,955	$	32	$	(1	)	$	77,986

As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company has not recognized an allowance for credit losses on any securities in an unrealized loss position.

The following table displays additional information regarding gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security type for available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 consecutive months					Less than 12 consecutive months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)
Total	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)

The Company currently does not intend to sell these securities prior to maturity and does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2020. There were no sales of available-for-sale securities in any of the periods presented.

As of June 30, 2020, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity are shown below (in thousands):

	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities maturing:
In one year or less	$	157,002	$	157,275
Total available-for-sale securities	$	157,002	$	157,275

11

5. Balance Sheet Components

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Leasehold improvements	$	3,268		$	3,268
Furniture, laboratory and office equipment		2,666			2,578
Computer equipment		275			253
Total property and equipment		6,209			6,099
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,307	)		(1,817	)
Property and equipment, net	$	3,902		$	4,282

Depreciation expense was $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Accrued preclinical and research costs	$	759	$	1,687
Accrued clinical costs		825		1,027
Accrued employee-related costs		973		1,293
Accrued professional services		296		53
Other		174		158
Total accrued liabilities	$	3,027	$	4,218

6. Lease

In August 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement to lease 24,357 square feet of combination laboratory and office space in South San Francisco, California. This lease expires in February 2025.

The contractually specified minimum rent and annual rent increases for the operating lease are included in the measurement of the ROU asset and related lease liabilities. Under the lease arrangement, we may be required to pay directly, or reimburse the lessor for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs. Such amounts are generally variable and therefore not included in the measurement of the ROU asset and related lease liability but are instead recognized as variable lease expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations when they are incurred. The operating lease agreement has one option to extend the lease term for a period of five years at the fair market rate at the time of the extension. The option to extend the lease was not recognized as part of the Company’s lease liability and ROU asset as the Company determined the renewal rent costs are uncertain and the option is not reasonably certain to be exercised.

Because the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. The Company recorded lease liabilities and ROU asset for its office lease based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. As of June 30, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term was 4.67 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liability was 10.0%.

12

Information related to the Company’s ROU asset and related lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30, 2020		Six months ended June 30, 2020
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	$	224	$	435
Operating lease costs		275		550
Variable lease costs		81		212
Maturities of lease liabilities as of June 30, 2020 were as follows    for the years ending December 31:
2020			$	752
2021				1,542
2022				1,588
2023				1,635
2024				1,684
Thereafter				282
Total undiscounted lease payments				7,483
Less: imputed interest				(1,554	)
Total lease liabilities			$	5,929
Operating lease liabilities, current				969
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent				4,960
Total operating lease liabilities			$	5,929

7. Pre-Funded Warrants

On February 4, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 18,965,385 shares of its common stock including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,884,615 shares of its common stock. The public offering price of the common stock was $2.60 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $2.599 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $53.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by the Company.

On June 11, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 7,590,909 shares of its common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of its common stock. The public offering price of the common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $43.7 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by the Company.

Each pre-funded warrant entitles the holder to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and expires 20 years from the date of issuance. These warrants were recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity within additional paid-in capital. Per the terms of the warrant agreement, a holder of the outstanding warrant is not entitled to exercise any portion of the pre-funded warrant if, upon exercise of such portion of the warrant, the holder’s ownership of our common stock (together with its affiliates) or the combined voting power of our securities beneficially owned by such holder (together with its affiliates) would exceed 9.99% after giving effect to the exercise (“Maximum Ownership Percentage”). Upon at least 61 days’ prior notice to us by the warrant holder, any warrant holder may increase or decrease the Maximum Ownership Percentage to any other percentage not to exceed 19.99%. As of June 30, 2020, no shares underlying the pre-funded warrants have been exercised.

The following table represents a summary of the pre-funded warrants outstanding as of the date identified.

Issue Date	Classification	Exercise Price		Expiration Date	Number of shares underlying warrants as of June 30, 2020
February 4, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	February 4, 2040		2,884,615
June 11, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	June 11, 2040		909,091
Total Outstanding						3,793,706

8. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Incentive Plans

13

2018 Equity Incentive Plan

In June 2018, the Company’s board of directors adopted and its stockholders approved the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which became effective as of June 20, 2018, at which point no further grants could be made under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) described below. Under the 2018 Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonstatutory stock options (“NSOs”), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. As of June 30, 2020, options to purchase 2,648,968 shares of common stock were outstanding and 1,348,693 shares were available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan.

Initially, subject to adjustment as provided in the 2018 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to stock awards under the 2018 Plan was 4,000,000 shares, which is the sum of (i) 1,600,692 shares plus (ii) the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2015 Plan at the time the 2018 Plan became effective and (iii) the number of shares subject to stock options or other stock awards granted under the 2015 Plan that expire, terminate are forfeited or otherwise not issued, or are withheld to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy a purchase or exercise price of an award (such as upon the expiration or termination of a stock award prior to vesting). The number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the 2018 Plan automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019 and continuing through and including January 1, 2028, by 5% of the total number of shares of capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by the Company’s board of directors prior to such increase. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs under the 2018 Plan is 12,500,000 shares.

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2015 Plan provided for the granting of ISOs and NSOs to employees, directors and consultants at the discretion of its board of directors. The 2015 Plan was terminated as to future awards in June 2018, although it continues to govern the terms of options that remain outstanding under the 2015 Plan.

No additional stock awards will be granted under the 2015 Plan, and all outstanding stock awards granted under the 2015 Plan that are repurchased, forfeited, expire or are cancelled will become available for grant under the 2018 Plan in accordance with its terms.

Options granted under the 2015 Plan expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted under the 2015 Plan vest over periods determined by the Company’s board of directors, generally over four years. The 2015 Plan allows for early exercise of certain options prior to vesting. Upon termination of employment, the unvested shares are subject to repurchase at the original exercise price. As of June 30, 2020 options to purchase 1,829,074 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2015 Plan.

2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In June 2018, the Company’s board of directors adopted and its stockholders approved the 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which became effective as of June 20, 2018. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The number of shares of common stock initially reserved for issuance under the ESPP was 200,000 shares. The ESPP provides for an annual increase on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019 and continuing through and including January 1, 2028, equal to the lesser of (i) 1% of the shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the prior fiscal year or (ii) 375,000 shares, or a lesser number of shares determined by the Company’s board of directors prior to such increase. As of June 30, 2020, 83,083 shares of common stock had been issued under the ESPP and 500,141 shares remained available for future issuance under the ESPP. The price per share of common stock to be paid by an ESPP participant on the applicable purchase date of an offering period shall be equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of a share of common stock on (i) the applicable offering date or (ii) the applicable purchase date. The Company’s board of directors authorized an initial six-month offering period beginning on November 16, 2018 and ending on May 15, 2019. The Company’s board of directors has subsequently authorized additional six-month offering periods, with the most recent offering period beginning on May 16, 2020.

14

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes activity under the Company’s stock option plans and related information (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Number of Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2019		3,107,066		$	7.19		8.2	$	3,151
Options granted		1,389,476		$	3.76
Options exercised		(6,000	)	$	0.90			$	22
Options cancelled		(12,500	)	$	22.85
Outstanding at June 30, 2020		4,478,042		$	6.09		8.3	$	7,229
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2020		1,950,185		$	5.26		7.3	$	4,066

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $2.68 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was $12,000 and $22,000, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of exercise.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized by function was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Research and development	$	518	$	470	$	982	$	917
General and administrative		701		539		1,410		993
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,219	$	1,009	$	2,392	$	1,910

As of June 30, 2020, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost was $11.7 million with an estimated weighted average amortization period of 2.7 years

The fair value of the stock options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following range of assumptions:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Expected term (years)	5.5 - 6.0		5.9		5.0 - 6.0		5.9
Expected volatility	88.1 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.3	%	83.8 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.9	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.4 - 0.5	%	1.9 - 2.4	%	0.4 - 1.6	%	1.9 - 2.6	%
Expected dividend yield	—		—		—		—

9. Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Deferred tax assets generated from the Company’s net operating losses have been fully reserved, as the Company believes it is not more likely than not that the benefit will be realized.

In December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the “PATH Act”) was signed into law, which created several new research and development (“R&D”) tax credit provisions, including allowing qualified small businesses to utilize the R&D credit against the employer’s portion of payroll tax up to a maximum of $250,000 per year. The Company qualified as a small business under the PATH Act for 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company utilized $108,000 and $264,000, respectively, of R&D tax credits as a reduction of payroll expenses to offset its payroll tax liabilities, compared to $79,000 and $172,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. The remaining R&D tax credits available for future payroll tax liabilities have been recorded as deferred tax assets with a full valuation allowance.

15

10. Net Loss Per Share

Net Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share during the periods presented (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(9,500	)	$	(8,718	)	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		42,936,991			19,073,830			37,902,294			19,058,263
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.86	)

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants outstanding during the period, without consideration of common share equivalents. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants and common share equivalents outstanding for the period. The pre-funded warrants are included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per common share as the exercise price is negligible and the pre-funded warrants are fully vested and exercisable. Common share equivalents are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share when their effect is dilutive.

Potential dilutive securities, which include, vested and unvested options to purchase common stock and unvested common stock outstanding that were exercised early have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect is antidilutive. Therefore, the denominator used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per common share is the same in all periods presented.

The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of the diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
Stock options to purchase common stock		4,478,042		2,875,446
Common stock subject to future vesting		19,441		45,287
Total		4,497,483		2,920,733

11. Subsequent Event

In July 2020, the Company issued an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock in the June Offering, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us.

16

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2019 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 12, 2020, or the Annual Report.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company, discovering and developing novel small molecule therapeutics to treat unmet needs in autoimmunity and cancer. Our lead product candidate, KZR-616, a first-in-class selective immunoproteasome inhibitor, has completed testing in healthy volunteers, and we are now leveraging its broad therapeutic potential in Phase 2 clinical trials in severe autoimmune diseases of high unmet need. We are also enrolling the final cohort of patients in the Phase 1b portion of the MISSION trial, a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial in systemic lupus erythematosus, also known as lupus or SLE, and lupus nephritis.

We believe that the immunoproteasome is a validated target for the treatment of a wide variety of autoimmune diseases given the compelling published activity seen with non-selective proteasome inhibitors administered to patients with severe autoimmune diseases. Based on results from our Phase 1a studies in healthy volunteers and the preliminary results from the Phase 1b portion of the MISSION trial, KZR-616 has largely avoided adverse effects associated with currently marketed non-selective proteasome inhibitors, as exhibited in clinical studies conducted by third parties, including side effects which we believe prevent them from being utilized as a chronic treatment in autoimmune disorders. In addition, we have seen encouraging clinical activity and biomarker data in SLE patients and in two of two patients with active lupus nephritis. We intend to develop KZR-616 to address underserved autoimmune diseases. We acquired exclusive worldwide rights to KZR-616 and an accompanying library of similar molecules pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with Onyx Therapeutics, Inc., or Onyx, a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen, Inc., or Amgen, in June 2015, or the Onyx License Agreement. Patent coverage for KZR-616 extends to at least 2034.

Additionally, we are advancing our novel research platform targeting the Sec61 translocon and the protein secretion pathway to discover and develop small molecule therapeutics targeting oncology indications. Our first clinical candidate in this program, KZR-261, has demonstrated broad anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of both solid and hematologic malignancies. KZR-261 is undergoing preclinical studies and manufacturing activities in support of an investigational new drug, or IND, application, which we anticipate submitting to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in the first quarter of 2021 for a Phase 1 clinical trial in solid tumors. We believe this discovery platform has the potential to yield oral small molecule candidates that, if successfully developed and approved, could serve as alternatives to currently marketed biologic therapeutics to act as cytotoxic anti-cancer agents or to block the secretion of novel targets of interest in immuno-oncology or inflammation.

Since the commencement of our operations, we have devoted substantially all our resources to performing research and development activities in support of our product development efforts, hiring personnel, raising capital to support and expand such activities and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have funded our operations to date primarily from the issuance and sale of equity securities. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates and programs. We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception. Our net losses were $35.1 million and $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and we expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. As of June 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $103.8 million. We anticipate that a substantial portion of our capital resources and efforts in the foreseeable future will be focused on discovering new potential therapeutics, completing the necessary development, obtaining regulatory approval and preparing for potential commercialization of our product candidates.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the timing of our planned clinical trials and expenditures on other research and development activities. We expect our expenses will increase substantially over time as we:

• continue the ongoing and planned development of KZR-616 and KZR-261;

• seek to discover and develop additional product candidates;

• initiate preclinical studies and clinical trials for any additional product candidates that we may pursue in the future;

• establish a sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval;

17

• continue to build a portfolio of product candidates through the acquisition or in-license of drugs, product candidates or technologies;

• seek marketing approvals for any current and future product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;

• maintain, protect and expand our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how;

• implement operational, financial and management systems; and

• attract, hire and retain additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel.

Second Quarter and Other Recent Highlights

On June 3, 2020, we provided updated preliminary results from the Phase 1b portion of the MISSION trial of KZR-616. Among patients completing treatment, improvements (decrease in score) were observed across seven measures of disease activity in a majority of patients from baseline to week 13, and improvement in disease activity persisted following the end-of-treatment. Additionally, step-up dosing to 60 mg of KZR-616 improved overall tolerability, including the mitigation of early dose effects of nausea and vomiting. Most treatment emergent adverse events, or TEAEs, have been mild or moderate and were found to occur early in treatment and diminish with later doses. The most common TEAEs were transient injection site reactions. There have been no clinically significant laboratory adverse events observed in the Phase 1b portion of the trial. Two SLE patients with biopsy-proven proliferative lupus nephritis were included in the Phase 1b portion of MISSION.  Following treatment with KZR-616, both patients showed a greater than 50% reduction in proteinuria as measured by urine protein to creatinine ratio, or UPCR, as well as reductions in SLEDAI (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index) and reductions in anti-dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) antibody levels.

On June 11, 2020, we completed an underwritten public offering of 7,590,909 shares of our common stock and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, or the June Offering. The public offering price of our common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $43.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. Our existing stockholder, Equal Talent Investments Limited, an affiliate of Morningside Venture Investments Ltd, and one of our directors purchased an aggregate amount of approximately $8.5 million of common stock in the June Offering. In July 2020, we issued an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us.

Impacts of COVID-19 and Clinical Development Updates

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19, we have placed a priority on the health and safety of our employees and those involved with our clinical trials. In March, we implemented remote working policies for our employees, which have continued through the date of this report. We have been in close communication with the investigators and site staff participating in our clinical trials with KZR-616.  While the situation is still rapidly evolving, the feedback we have received from investigators speaks to different degrees of slowdown in clinical activities depending on the nature of the site and its geographic location. For example, some private specialty clinics have been less impacted than large academic medical centers, most of which have been unable to screen new patients as their resources are focused on care for patients with COVID-19.  As a result of this slowdown, we anticipate delays in our previously anticipated clinical development timelines and data release milestones for KZR-616. The extent of these delays cannot be predicted with confidence at the time of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We have been working closely with all of our clinical sites to assess COVID-19 impacts and to provide them with guidance for patients to safely continue on study. Based upon the updated results from the Phase 1b portion of MISSION and the recent slowdown in recruitment and enrollment activities across our clinical trials due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been actively reviewing and adapting some of our clinical trial plans in order to optimize the development pathway for KZR-616. Based on the positive safety and tolerability, pharmacology, and clinical activity results seen to date with KZR-616, we are focusing our development efforts on subcutaneous once-weekly dosing at 45 mg and 60 mg.

We have amended the clinical trial protocol for the Phase 2 portion of the MISSION clinical trial to expedite the advancement of KZR-616 into the next phase of development. This trial is now open for enrollment under the new amendment. The primary endpoint has been changed from safety and tolerability to an efficacy endpoint of renal response measured by 50% or greater reduction in UPCR at six months, which has been observed to be predictive of long-term outcomes in patients with lupus nephritis. Additionally, the inclusion/exclusion criteria have been expanded to include patients with lupus nephritis with histologic Class III or IV +/- Class V being treated with current standard-of-care regardless of background therapy. The clinical trial is expected to enroll 20 patients and is open-label with a single treatment arm evaluating a 60 mg dose (with first dose of 30 mg) of KZR-616 administered subcutaneously

18

once weekly for 24 weeks. A 12-month extension study is also being planned. Interim data are expected in late 2021. Upon the successful completion of the Phase 2 portion of MISSION, we intend to initiate a robust late-stage randomized placebo-controlled trial in patients with active, proliferative lupus nephritis.

The Phase 2 PRESIDIO trial of KZR-616 in dermatomyositis and polymyositis continues to enroll.  A 12-month open-label extension study is being planned and will be available for patients completing the trial.

The Phase 2 MARINA trial in autoimmune hemolytic anemia, or AIHA, and immune thrombocytopenia, or ITP, has been withdrawn. Despite the strong interest from investigators and the patient community, a combination of COVID-related slowdowns in screening activities and the need to amend the study protocol to reduce high screen failure rates factored into this decision. No new clinical data has informed this decision. We continue to believe that KZR-616 has the potential to be effective in autoimmune cytopenias, such as AIHA and ITP, supported by the likely role of the immunoproteasome in these serious diseases.  Data from the clinical development of KZR-616 in other indications will inform the optimal strategy for the development of this product candidate in these indications.

Our preclinical and manufacturing work with KZR-261 is ongoing, and we remain on track to submit an IND application in the first quarter of 2021.  

We did not apply for the Paycheck Protection Program loan under the CARES Act. Furthermore, because we have utilized our R&D credits against the employer’s portion of payroll tax under the PATH Act, we are not leveraging the employer payroll tax deferral under the CARES Act. As more information around the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic emerges, we will continue to re-evaluate our operating plans and adjust overall expenses as necessary to further extend our cash runway.

Our Pipeline

The following table sets forth the status and initial focus of our lead product candidate and protein secretion program:

 

Financial Operations Overview

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for the development of our product candidates, which include:

• employee-related expenses, which include salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation;

• fees paid to consultants for services directly related to our product development and regulatory effort;

• expenses incurred under agreements with third-party contract organizations, investigative clinical trial sites and consultants that conduct research and development activities on our behalf;

• costs associated with preclinical studies and clinical trials;

19

• costs associated with technology and intellectual property licenses;

• the costs related to production of clinical supplies; and

• facilities and other allocated expenses, which include expenses for rent and other facility related costs and other supplies.

We expense all research and development costs in the periods in which they are incurred. Costs for certain development activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information and data provided to us by our vendors, collaborators and third-party service providers.

We are eligible under the AusIndustry Research and Tax Development Tax Incentive Program to obtain a cash amount from the Australian Taxation Office. The tax incentive is available to us on the basis of specific criteria with which we must comply related to research and development expenditures in Australia. These research and development tax incentives are recognized as contra research and development expense when the right to receive has been attained and funds are considered to be collectible. The amounts are determined based on a cost-reimbursement basis, and the incentive is related to our research and development expenditures and is due to us regardless of whether any Australian tax is owed. Amounts related to the AusIndustry Research and Development Tax Incentive Program are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the incentive will be received, the relevant expenditure has been incurred by our Australian subsidiary, Kezar Life Sciences Australia Pty Ltd, a proprietary company limited by shares, and the amount of the consideration can be reliably measured.

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the respective periods (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Research and development expenses by program:
KZR-616	$	4.0	$	4.5	$	8.9	$	8.6
Protein Secretion		3.1		2.4		5.7		4.3
Total research and development expenses	$	7.1	$	6.9	$	14.6	$	12.9

We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we continue to invest in research and development activities related to the development of our product candidates and our preclinical programs, including advancement into later stages of development. The process of conducting the necessary clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming, and the successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. As a result, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when and to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, allocated facilities costs and other expenses for outside professional services, including legal, human resource, information technology and audit services. Personnel costs consist of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation. We expect to incur additional expenses as we increase the size of our administrative function to support the growth of our business.

Interest Income

Our interest income consists of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

20

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

	Three Months Ended June 30,
(dollars in millions)	2020			2019			$ Change
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	7.1		$	6.9		$	0.2
General and administrative		2.7			2.4			0.3
Total operating expenses		9.8			9.3			0.5
Loss from operations		(9.8	)		(9.3	)		(0.5	)
Interest income		0.3			0.6			(0.3	)
Net loss	$	(9.5	)	$	(8.7	)	$	(0.8	)

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses increased by $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.3 million in preclinical expenses related to the Protein Secretion program and an increase of $0.8 million in personnel expenses due to an increase in headcount and salaries, partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in manufacturing expenses mainly due to the completion of KZR-616 manufacturing in 2019 and a decrease of $0.3 million in supplies and clinical expenses driven by the slowdown in research and clinical activities due to COVID-19. In addition, the Australian Research and Development Tax Incentive credit earned for the three months ended June 30, 2020 decreased by $0.1 million compared to the same period in 2019, which is recorded as a reduction in our research and development expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.2 million in stock-based compensation and an increase of $0.1 million in personnel expenses due to an increase in headcount and salaries.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased by $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease was due to lower interest rates.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollars in millions)	2020			2019			$ Change
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	14.6		$	12.9		$	1.7
General and administrative		5.7			4.8			0.9
Total operating expenses		20.3			17.7			2.6
Loss from operations		(20.3	)		(17.7	)		(2.6	)
Interest income		0.8			1.3			(0.5	)
Net loss	$	(19.5	)	$	(16.4	)	$	(3.1	)

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses increased by $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.5 million in preclinical expenses related to the Protein Secretion program and an increase of $1.6 million in personnel expenses due to an increase in headcount and salaries, partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in manufacturing expenses mainly due to the completion of KZR-616 manufacturing runs in 2019 and a decrease of $0.3 million in supplies driven by the slowdown in research activities from COVID-19. In addition, the Australian Research and Development Tax Incentive credit earned for the six months ended June 30, 2020 decreased by $0.4 million compared to the same period in 2019, which is recorded as a reduction in our research and development expenses.

21

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.4 million in personnel expenses due to an increase in headcount and salaries and an increase of $0.5 million in stock-based compensation.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased by $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease was due to lower interest rates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

On June 11, 2020, we completed the June Offering, whereby we issued and sold in an underwritten public offering 7,590,909 shares of our common stock and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The public offering price of our common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the June Offering were approximately $43.7 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. In July, the underwriters exercised an option to purchase an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us.

On February 4, 2020, we completed an underwritten public offering of 18,965,385 shares of our common stock, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,884,615 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, or the February Offering. The public offering price of our common stock was $2.60 per share and the public offering price of each pre-funded warrant was $2.599 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $53.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us.

Since our inception and through June 30, 2020, we have raised an aggregate of $248.0 million to fund our operations. As of June 30, 2020, we had $17.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and $140.2 million of marketable securities invested in a U.S. Treasury money market fund, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency bonds, commercial paper and corporate debt securities. As of June 30, 2020, our cash equivalents and marketable securities had an average maturity of approximately five months and the longest maturity was eleven months.

We have incurred operating losses and experienced negative operating cash flows since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for at least the foreseeable future. Our net loss was $9.5 million and $19.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, and we had an accumulated deficit of $103.8 million as of June 30, 2020.

In July 2019, we entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement ^SM, or ATM Agreement, with Jefferies LLC, or Jefferies, under which we could offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion through Jefferies, as our sales agent, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. The ATM Agreement was terminated in June 2020. Prior to the termination, we did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement. Accordingly, the $50.0 million of securities unsold pursuant to the ATM Agreement became available for issuance on our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-23542).

We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2020 will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements through at least the next 12 months from the date these financial statements are issued. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

Funding Requirements

Our primary use of cash is to fund operating expenses, primarily research and development expenditures. Cash used to fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the change in our outstanding accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid expenses.

We will require additional financing to fund working capital and pay our obligations. We may pursue financing opportunities through the issuance of debt or equity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in acquiring additional funding at levels sufficient

22

to fund our operations or on terms favorable to us or at all. Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including the following:

• the progress, timing, scope, results and costs of our clinical trials and preclinical studies for our product candidates, including the ability to enroll patients in a timely manner for our clinical trials;

• the costs of obtaining clinical and commercial supplies for KZR-616 and any other product candidates we may identify and develop;

• the cost, timing and outcomes of regulatory approvals;

• the extent to which we may acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies;

• the cost of attracting, hiring and retaining qualified personnel;

• our ability to successfully commercialize any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval; and

• the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights.

Further, our operating plan may change, and we may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements for clinical trials and other research and development expenditures. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our current and anticipated clinical studies.

If we need to raise additional capital to fund our operations, funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to rapidly evolve and has already resulted in a significant disruption of global financial markets.  If the disruption persists and deepens, we could experience an inability to access additional capital, which could in the future negatively affect our operations. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing when needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or suspend one or more of our preclinical studies, clinical trials, research and development programs or commercialization efforts. We may seek to raise any necessary additional capital through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations and other licensing arrangements. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

Cash Flows

The following summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019
(dollars in millions)	(unaudited)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(18.4	)	$	(14.4	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(76.6	)		3.1
Net cash provided by financing activities		97.4			0.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	2.3		$	(11.2	)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, cash used in operating activities was $18.4 million, which consisted of a net loss of $19.5 million and a net change of $1.8 million in our net operating assets and liabilities, adjusted by non-cash charges of $2.9 million. The non-cash charges consisted of $0.7 million for depreciation and amortization and $2.4 million for stock-based compensation expense, offset by $0.2 million of amortization of premium and discounts on marketable securities. The change in our net operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase of $0.2 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a decrease of $0.4 million in operating lease liabilities and a decrease of $1.2 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses due to timing of payments and decreased research and manufacturing expenditures.

23

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, cash used in operating activities was $14.4 million, which consisted of a net loss of $16.4 million, adjusted by non-cash charges of $1.8 million and a net change of $0.1 million in our net operating assets and liabilities. The non-cash charges consisted of $0.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $1.9 million for stock-based compensation expense, offset by $0.7 million of amortization of premium and discounts on marketable securities. The change in our net operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase of $0.4 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and a decrease of $0.4 million in operating lease liabilities, offset by an increase of $0.9 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses due to timing of payments and increased clinical expenditures.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $76.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, primarily relating to the purchases of marketable securities exceeding maturities of such marketable securities. Payments for the purchases of property and equipment were $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily relating to the maturities of marketable securities exceeding purchases of such marketable securities. Payments for the purchases of property and equipment were $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $97.4 million, which consisted of $97.2 million of net proceeds received from the underwritten public offerings and $0.1 million from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our employee equity plans.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million, consisting of proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our employee equity plans.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, there were no material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements and do not have holdings in any variable interest entities.

Critical Accounting Polices and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported expenses incurred during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies from those described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report.

JOBS Act Accounting Election

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

24

In addition, we intend to rely on the other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, as an “emerging growth company” we intend to rely on such exemptions, we are not required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis) and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply until December 31, 2023 or until we no longer meet the requirements of being an emerging growth company, whichever is earlier.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The primary objectives of our investment activities are to ensure liquidity and to preserve capital. The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and in our financial position reflects the potential losses arising from adverse changes in interest rates and concentration of credit risk. We had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $157.5 million as of June 30, 2020, which consisted of bank deposits, highly liquid U.S. Treasury money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency bonds, commercial paper and corporate debt securities. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. As of June 30, 2020, our cash equivalents and marketable securities had an average maturity of approximately five months and the longest maturity was eleven months. Due to the short-term duration and the lower risk profile of our cash equivalents and marketable securities, an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our cash equivalents and marketable securities. We have the ability to hold our cash equivalents and marketable securities until maturity, and we therefore do not expect a change in market interest rates to affect our operating results or cash flows to any significant degree.

Approximately $0.2 million of our cash balance was located in Australia as of June 30, 2020. Our expenses, except those related to our Australian operations, are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. For our operations in Australia, the majority of the expenses are denominated in Australian dollars. To date, we have not had a formal hedging program with respect to foreign currency. A 10% increase or decrease in current exchange rates would not have a material effect on our consolidated financial results.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. 

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2020. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting despite the fact that our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 situation on our internal controls to minimize the impact on their design and operating effectiveness.

25

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceeding against us that we believe could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our financial statements and related notes hereto, before deciding to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects or cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements we have made in this report and those we may make from time to time. In these circumstances, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed below will not occur. Such risks may be amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on our business and the global economy.

Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic may cause disruptions to our business.

The novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, causing COVID-19, has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization, and has resulted in worldwide travel and other restrictions to reduce the spread of the disease, including state and local orders across the United States, which, among other things, direct individuals to shelter at their places of residence, direct businesses and governmental agencies to cease non-essential operations at physical locations and prohibit gatherings and non-essential travel. In prioritizing the health and safety of our employees and in response to these public health directives, we implemented a work-from-home policy in March 2020 for all of our employees and ceased all work-related travel. The cumulative effect of the executive orders, the shelter-in-place orders and our work-from-home policy may disrupt our business, the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and other limitations, as well as the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. These and similar, and perhaps more severe, disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.

Shelter-in-place, quarantines and similar government orders related to COVID-19 may adversely impact our business operations, as well as contract research organizations that support our clinical trials and third-party manufacturing facilities. In particular, the contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, which we use to supply our product candidates or materials necessary to manufacture our product candidates are located in the United States and other countries significantly affected by COVID-19.  Should any of these vendors experience disruptions, such as temporary closures or suspension of services, we would likely experience delays in advancing our preclinical studies and clinical trials as a result. Currently, however, we do not expect a material impact on the clinical supply of our product candidates.

The spread of COVID-19 has caused a broad impact globally and may materially affect us economically. While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of, COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, a widespread pandemic could result in significant disruption of global financial markets, reducing our ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect our liquidity. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock. The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve. The extent to which it impacts our business, our clinical development and regulatory efforts will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing requirements and business closures in the United States and other countries, and business disruptions, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease.  Accordingly, we do not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on our business, our clinical and regulatory activities, healthcare systems or the global economy as a whole.  However, these impacts could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

In addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and results of operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks and uncertainties described in this “Risk Factors” section.

The COVID-19 pandemic could negatively affect our ability to enroll and conduct our clinical trials.

Our clinical trials will be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the current demands on our healthcare system relating to COVID-19, we anticipate delays in our previously anticipated clinical development timelines and data release milestones for KZR-616. Clinical site initiation and patient enrollment will be delayed due to prioritizing hospital resources for the treatment of patients

26

with COVID-19. The patients in our clinical trials may not be able to comply with clinical trial protocols if shelter-in-place orders impede travel and mobility or interrupt healthcare services. As a result, we may face delays in meeting our anticipated timelines for our ongoing and planned clinical trials. We may also experience the following adverse impacts:

• delays or difficulties enrolling and retaining patients in our clinical trials;

• delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical site investigators;

• diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials;

• interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others;

• the perceived risk by investigators, patients or institutional review boards, or IRBs, of participating in a clinical trial of KZR-616, a selective immunoproteasome inhibitor, due to the effects of COVID-19 and/or KZR-616 on the immune system;

• limitations in employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people;

• non-compliance or withdrawal of consent by patients due to limitations on travel to clinical trial sites or other reasons; and

• interruptions in clinical drug supply due delays in manufacturing, drug substance or drug product shipments from CMOs to depot centers and from depot centers to clinical trial sites.

For our clinical trials that are being conducted at sites outside the United States, particularly in countries which are experiencing heightened impact from the coronavirus, in addition to the risks listed above, we may also experience the following adverse impacts:

• delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials;

• delays in clinical sites receiving the supplies and materials needed to conduct our clinical trials;

• interruption in global shipping that may affect the transport of clinical trial materials, such as investigational drug product and placebo used in our clinical trials;

• changes in local regulations as part of a response to the coronavirus outbreak which may require us to change the ways in which our clinical trials are conducted, which may result in unexpected costs, or to discontinue the clinical trials altogether; and

• delays in necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or forced furlough of government employees.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Needs

We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Since inception in February 2015, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $35.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $103.8 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. Since inception, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates, as well as to expanding our management team and infrastructure. It could be several years, if ever, before we have a commercialized drug. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

• continue the ongoing and planned development of KZR-616 and KZR-261;

• seek to discover and develop additional product candidates, including preclinical studies and clinical trials for such product candidates;

• maintain, protect and expand our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how;

• seek marketing approvals for KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;

27

• establish a sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval;

• continue to build a portfolio of product candidates through the acquisition or in-license of drugs, product candidates or technologies;

• implement operational, financial, management and compliance systems;

• attract, hire and retain additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel; and

• incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses associated with operating as a public company.

In addition, because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses and when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. Our expenses could increase and profitability could be further delayed if we decide to or are required by regulatory authorities to perform studies or trials in addition to those currently expected or if there are any delays in the initiation, enrollment or completion of any planned or future preclinical studies or clinical trials of our current and future product candidates. Even if we complete the development and regulatory processes necessary to obtain marketing approval, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with launching and commercializing KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates.

Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of the Company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations.

We have a limited operating history and have never generated revenue from product sales, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We are a clinical-stage company founded in February 2015, and our operations to date have been largely focused on raising capital and conducting preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials of KZR-616, as well as research and discovery activities under our protein secretion program. As an organization, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete clinical development, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization of our product candidates. Consequently, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

Our ability to generate revenue from product sales and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone or with any future collaborative partners, to successfully complete the development of and obtain the regulatory approvals necessary to commercialize KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates. We do not anticipate generating revenue from product sales for the next several years, if ever. Our ability to generate revenue from product sales depends heavily on our, or any future collaborators’, success in:

• timely and successfully completing preclinical and clinical development of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates;

• obtaining regulatory approvals for KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates for which we successfully complete clinical trials;

• launching and commercializing any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval by establishing a sales force, marketing and distribution infrastructure or, alternatively, collaborating with a commercialization partner;

• qualifying for and obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement by government and third-party payors for any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval, both in the United States and internationally;

• developing, validating and maintaining commercially viable, sustainable, scalable, reproducible and transferable manufacturing processes for KZR-616, a self-administered dual-chamber system for administering KZR-616 and any future product candidates that are compliant with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP;

• establishing and maintaining supply and manufacturing relationships with third parties that can provide adequate amount and quality of starting materials, drug substance, drug product and drug delivery devices and services to support clinical development, as well as the market demand for KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates, if approved;

• obtaining market acceptance, if and when approved, of KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidate as a viable treatment option by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community;

• effectively addressing any competing technological and market developments;

28

• implementing additional internal systems and infrastructure, as needed;

• negotiating favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter and performing our obligations pursuant to such arrangements;

• maintaining, protecting and expanding our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how; and

• securing appropriate pricing in the United States and internationally.

We expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. We may need to eventually transition from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of undertaking commercial activities. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays and may not be successful in such a transition.

We will require substantial additional capital to finance our operations, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, reduce or terminate certain of our product development programs or other operations.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since our inception. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing and planned activities, particularly as we continue to develop and potentially commercialize our product candidates, in addition to costs associated with the acquisition or in-licensing of any additional product candidates we may pursue. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if the FDA or other regulatory authorities require us to perform clinical and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, we expect to incur significant expenses related to sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.

As of June 30, 2020, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $157.5 million. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2020 will fund our current operating plans through at least the next 12 months from the date the financial statements were issued. However, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or private equity or debt financings, third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or any combination of these approaches. The COVID-19 pandemic has already resulted in a significant disruption of global financial markets.  If the disruption persists and deepens and global economic conditions worsen, we could experience an inability to access additional capital or engage in strategic transactions on terms reasonable to us, or at all.  

In any event, we will require substantial additional capital to develop a delivery system for KZR-616, conduct additional clinical trials, seek regulatory approval and commence commercialization of KZR-616 or any future product candidates. Even if we believe we have sufficient capital for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations. Any additional capital raising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize KZR-616 and any future product candidates.

If we do not raise additional capital in sufficient amounts, or on terms acceptable to us, we may be prevented from pursuing discovery, development and commercialization efforts, which will harm our business, operating results and prospects.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through public or private equity or debt financings, third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements, as well as other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or any combination of these approaches. We do not have any committed external source of funds. In July 2019, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-232542) that allows us to sell up to an aggregate of $150 million of our securities. As of July 31, 2020, we had $44.1 million available under our shelf registration statement. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest may be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder. In addition, we may issue equity or debt securities as consideration for obtaining rights to additional compounds.

Debt and equity financings, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as redeeming our shares, making investments, incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or placing limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could negatively impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise additional capital through future collaborations, strategic

29

alliances or third-party licensing arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

If we are unable to raise additional capital when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our drug development or future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise develop and market ourselves.

We may be required to make significant payments in connection with our license agreement with Onyx Therapeutics, Inc., or Onyx, for KZR-616 and other compounds.

In June 2015, we acquired rights to KZR-616, pursuant to an exclusive license agreement with Onyx, or the Onyx License Agreement. Under the Onyx License Agreement, we are subject to significant obligations, including payment obligations triggered upon achievement of specified milestones and royalties on licensed product sales, as well as other material obligations. We are obligated to pay Onyx milestone payments up to an aggregate of $172.5 million upon the achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestone events. In addition, we are obligated to pay Onyx tiered royalties based on net sales of KZR-616. If these payments become due, we may not have sufficient funds available to meet our obligations and our development efforts may be harmed.

Our ability to use net operating losses and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income may be subject to limitation.

Our net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities because of their limited duration or because of restrictions under U.S. tax law.  Our NOLs generated in tax years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017 are permitted to be carried forward for only 20 years under applicable U.S. tax law.  Our federal NOLs generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017 may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2020 is subject to certain limitations. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act. 

In addition, under Section 382 and Section 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” its ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income may be limited. A Section 382 “ownership change” generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of our stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points (by value) over their lowest ownership percentage over a rolling three-year period. We may have experienced ownership changes in the past and may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of shifts in our stock ownership (some of which are outside our control). As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOLs to offset such taxable income may be subject to limitations. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed.

Consequently, even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to utilize a material portion of our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes, which could have a material adverse effect on cash flow and results of operations.

Changes in tax laws or regulations could materially adversely affect our company.

New tax laws or regulations could be enacted at any time, and existing tax laws or regulations could be interpreted, modified or applied in a manner that is adverse to us, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. For example, legislation enacted in 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or Tax Act, enacted many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws, including changes in corporate tax rates, the utilization of our NOLs and other deferred tax assets, the deductibility of expenses, and the taxation of foreign earnings. Future guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities with respect to the Tax Act may affect us, and certain aspects of the Tax Act could be repealed or modified in future legislation. For example, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, modified certain provisions of the Tax Act.  In addition, it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act, the CARES Act, or any newly enacted federal tax legislation. The impact of changes under the Tax Act, the CARES Act, or future reform legislation could increase our future U.S. tax expense and could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Risks Related to the Development and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

Our future success is substantially dependent on the successful clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates. If we are not able to obtain required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates and our ability to generate revenue will be adversely affected.

The time required to obtain approval or other marketing authorizations by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of

30

clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. We have not obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate, and it is possible that neither our current product candidates, nor any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future, will ever obtain regulatory approval. Neither we nor any future collaborator is permitted to market KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates in the United States or abroad until we receive regulatory approval from the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency.

Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize our product candidates in the United States or abroad, we must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, that such product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses. Results from clinical trials and preclinical studies can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the clinical data for our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. The FDA may also require us to conduct additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials for our product candidates either prior to or post-approval, or it may object to elements of our clinical development program. In addition, the FDA typically refers applications for novel drugs to an advisory committee comprising outside experts. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of the advisory committee, but it considers such recommendation when making its decision.

Of the large number of products in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority approval processes and are commercialized. The lengthy approval or marketing authorization process as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval or marketing authorization to market our product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have invested a significant portion of our time and limited financial and management resources in the development of KZR-616 and our protein secretion platform. Our business is dependent on our ability to successfully complete development of, obtain regulatory approval for, and, if approved, successfully commercialize KZR-616 and KZR-261 in a timely manner. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial drugs or profitable market opportunities.

Even if we eventually complete clinical testing and receive approval of a new drug application, or NDA, or foreign marketing application for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates, the FDA or the comparable foreign regulatory authorities may grant approval or other marketing authorization contingent on the performance of costly additional clinical trials, including post-market clinical trials. The FDA or the comparable foreign regulatory authorities also may approve or authorize for marketing a product candidate for a more limited indication or patient population that we originally request, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not approve or authorize the labeling that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of a product candidate. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approval or other marketing authorization would delay or prevent commercialization of that product candidate and would materially adversely impact our business and prospects.

In addition, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may change their policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations or take other actions, which may prevent or delay approval of our future products under development on a timely basis. Such policy or regulatory changes could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our ability to obtain approvals, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain any marketing authorizations we may have obtained. In addition, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we could also experience delays in the timing of our interactions with regulatory authorities due to absenteeism by governmental employees, inability to conduct planned physical inspections related to regulatory approval, or the diversion of regulatory authority efforts and attention to approval of other therapeutics or other activities related to COVID-19, which could delay anticipated approval decisions and otherwise delay or limit our ability to make planned regulatory submissions or obtain new product approvals.

Even if we receive regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates, we cannot assure you that any such product candidate will be successfully commercialized, widely accepted in the marketplace or more effective than other commercially available alternatives. Furthermore, even if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will still need to develop a commercial organization, establish a commercially viable pricing structure and obtain approval for adequate reimbursement from third-party and government payors. If we are unable to successfully commercialize KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to continue our business.

If we are not successful in developing KZR-616 and KZR-261, or discovering and developing additional product candidates, our ability to expand our pipeline and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

A key element of our strategy is to build a pipeline of product candidates and to progress these product candidates through clinical development for the treatment of autoimmune indications and oncology. We are conducting research and discovery efforts targeting the protein secretion pathway and recently nominated KZR-261 as our first clinical candidate for development in oncology. However, our current and future research programs may fail to yield product candidates with acceptable pharmaceutical properties for clinical development. Even if we are successful in continuing to build our pipeline, the potential product candidates that we identify may not

31

be suitable for clinical development, including as a result of safety, tolerability, efficacy or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be drugs that will receive marketing approval, achieve market acceptance or obtain reimbursements from third-party payors. Efforts to discover and develop new product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, whether or not any product candidates are ultimately identified. If we are unsuccessful in building our pipeline beyond our current product candidates, our ability to generate product revenue would be impaired, which could significantly harm our financial position and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Success in preclinical studies or earlier clinical trials may not be indicative of future clinical trial results, and we cannot assure you that any clinical trials will lead to results sufficient for the necessary regulatory approvals.

Success in preclinical testing and earlier clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate the same results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a product candidate. Preclinical tests and early clinical trials are primarily designed to test safety, to study pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and to understand the side effects of product candidates at various doses and schedules. Success in preclinical studies and earlier clinical trials does not ensure that later efficacy trials will be successful, nor does it predict final results. Our product candidates may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy in clinical development despite positive results in preclinical studies or having successfully advanced through earlier clinical trials.

In addition, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. As an organization, we have limited experience designing clinical trials and may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support regulatory approval. Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials even after achieving promising results in preclinical testing and earlier clinical trials. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are subject to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, we may experience regulatory delays or rejections as a result of many factors, including changes in regulatory policy during the period of our product candidate development. Any such delays could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may encounter substantial delays or difficulties in our clinical trials.

We may not commercialize, market, promote or sell any product candidate without obtaining marketing approval from the FDA or other comparable regulatory authority, and we may never receive such approvals. It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans and will receive regulatory approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products.

Clinical testing is expensive, time consuming and subject to uncertainty. We cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. For example, as a result of the current demands on our healthcare system relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, we anticipate delays in our previously anticipated clinical development timelines and data release milestones for KZR-616. Moreover, once these clinical trials begin, circumstances may arise that could result in suspending or terminating such clinical trials. We may experience numerous unforeseen events that may prevent the timely and successful completion of our clinical trials, or result in the termination of such clinical trials prior to their completion, including:

• allocation of hospital and healthcare resources to focus on care and treatment of patients with COVID-19 and away from conducting clinical trials;

• interruptions in our business as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, such as restrictions on travel and meetings with clinical trial sites and investigators, as well as potential disruptions in our product supply chain;

• failure to recruit suitable patients to participate in a clinical trial, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, and participants may drop out during the course of these trials at a higher rate than we anticipate or fail to return for post-treatment follow-up because of the COVID-19 pandemic;

• delays in reaching a consensus with the FDA and other regulatory authorities on the design of our clinical trials;

• the number of patients required for clinical trials to produce statistically meaningful data may be larger than we anticipate;

• the costs of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;

• regulators or IRBs may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;

32

• the perceived risk by investigators, patients or IRBs of participating in a clinical trial of KZR-616, a selective immunoproteasome inhibitor, due to the effects of COVID-19 and/or KZR-616 on the immune system;

• delays in identifying and recruiting suitable clinical investigators or reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective clinical trial sites;

• clinical trials of our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results;

• imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory authorities as a result of a serious adverse event, concerns with a class of product candidates or after an inspection of our clinical trial operations, trial sites or manufacturing facilities;

• occurrence of serious adverse events associated with the product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits;

• failure to perform our clinical trials in accordance with current Good Clinical Practice, or cGCP, or regulations required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities;

• delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating and shipping stable quantities of our product candidates for our clinical trial sites;

• changes in regulatory requirements and guidance or other unforeseen regulatory developments that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols;

• we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon product development programs; or

• business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, war, terrorism, natural disasters or public health epidemics.

Any inability to timely and successfully complete preclinical and clinical development will increase our costs, slow our development plans and impair our ability to generate revenue from our product candidates. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our product candidates, we may need to conduct additional testing to bridge our modified product candidate to earlier versions. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, or allow our competitors to bring competing drugs to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Additionally, if the results of our clinical trials are inconclusive or if there are safety concerns or serious adverse events associated with our product candidates, we may:

• be delayed in obtaining marketing approval, if at all;

• obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;

• obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings;

• be required to perform additional clinical trials to support approval or be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements;

• have regulatory authorities withdraw, or suspend, their approval of the drug or impose restrictions on its distribution in the form of a modified risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS;

• be subject to the addition of labeling statements, such as warnings or contraindications;

• be sued; or

• experience damage to our reputation.

Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or obtaining marketing approvals. We do not know whether any of our preclinical studies or clinical trials will begin as planned, need to be restructured or be completed on schedule, if at all.

Further, we, the FDA, other comparable regulatory authorities, or an IRB may suspend our clinical trials at any time if it appears that we or our collaborators are failing to conduct a trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, including cGCP, that we are exposing participants to unacceptable health risks, or if the FDA finds deficiencies in our investigational new drug, or IND, applications, or the conduct of these trials. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty the schedule for commencement and completion of future clinical trials. If we experience delays in the commencement or completion of our clinical trials, or if we terminate a clinical trial prior

33

to completion, the commercial prospects of our product candidates could be negatively impacted, and our ability to generate revenues from our product candidates may be delayed.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug designations or exclusivity for our product candidates, which could limit the potential profitability of our product candidates.

Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or if it affects more than 200,000, there is no reasonable expectation that sales of the drug in the United States will be sufficient to offset the costs of developing and making the drug available in the United States. If a drug with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for use in the rare disease or condition for which it was designated, then the sponsor is eligible for a seven-year period of marketing during which the FDA may not approve another sponsor’s marketing application for a drug with the same active moiety and intended for the same use or indication as the approved orphan drug, except in limited circumstances, such as if a subsequent sponsor demonstrates its product is clinically superior. During a sponsor’s orphan drug exclusivity period, however, competitors may receive approval for drugs with different active moieties for the same indication as the approved orphan drug, or for drugs with the same active moiety as the approved orphan drug, but for different indications. Orphan drug exclusivity could block the approval of one of our products for seven years if a competitor obtains approval for a drug with the same active moiety intended for the same indication before we do, unless we are able to demonstrate that grounds for withdrawal of the orphan drug exclusivity exist or that our product is clinically superior. Further, if a designated orphan drug receives marketing approval for an indication broader than the rare disease or condition for which it received orphan drug designation, it may not be entitled to exclusivity. For purposes of small molecule drugs, the FDA defines “same drug” as a drug that contains the same active moiety and is intended for the same use as the drug in question. A designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation.

We intend to pursue orphan drug designation for KZR-616 in orphan autoimmune indications. Obtaining orphan drug designation can be difficult, and we may not be successful in doing so. Even if we were to obtain orphan drug designation for a product candidate, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the drug from the competition of different drugs for the same condition, which could have already been approved or could be approved before or during the exclusivity period. Additionally, after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA could subsequently approve another application for the same drug for the same indication if the FDA concludes that the later drug is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States also may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. The failure to obtain an orphan drug designation for any product candidates we may develop, the inability to maintain that designation for the duration of the applicable period, or the inability to obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity could reduce our ability to make sufficient sales of the applicable product candidate to balance our expenses incurred to develop it, which would have a negative impact on our operational results and financial condition.

KZR-616 is intended to be used with a self-administered dual-chamber system, which may result in additional regulatory and other risks.

Beginning in Phase 2, KZR-616 will be a lyophilized product candidate, meaning it will be freeze-dried and must be reconstituted with water prior to delivery to a patient. While lyophilized products are common in the drug industry, we intend that if approved and commercialized, KZR-616 will be self-administered by patients via a self-administered dual-chamber system. There are several technical challenges we will need to solve related to use of a self-administered dual-chamber system, including whether KZR-616 is amenable to use in such a device and whether it is sufficiently stable to meet regulatory requirements. We may not be able to solve these technical challenges, which would require that patients reconstitute KZR-616 themselves prior to injection. This method for administering KZR-616 could adversely affect market acceptance and make it more difficult to conduct clinical trials of KZR-616. In addition, if we have not successfully developed the self-administered dual-chamber system by the time we commence Phase 3 clinical trials for KZR-616, we may need to seek approval for KZR-616 via a different delivery system, which could require additional bio-equivalence or efficacy clinical trials.

In addition, we will need to enter into an agreement with a contract manufacturing organization, or CMO, to manufacture the self-administered dual-chamber system, and we are aware of only one company that manufactures a self-administered dual-chamber system that has received FDA approval. We may be dependent on the sustained cooperation of a third-party or collaborators to supply the devices; to conduct the studies required for approval or clearance by the applicable regulatory agencies; and to continue to meet the applicable regulatory and other requirements to maintain approval or clearance once it has been received.

We may experience delays in obtaining regulatory approval of KZR-616 with a self-administered dual-chamber system given the increased complexity of the review process when approval of the product and device is sought under a single marketing application. If

34

delivered by a self-administered dual-chamber system, KZR-616 may be regulated as a drug/device combination product. In the United States, each component of a combination product is subject to the requirements established by the FDA for that type of component, whether a drug, biologic or device. The determination whether a combination product requires a single marketing application or two separate marketing applications for each component is made by the FDA on a case-by-case basis. Although a single marketing application is generally sufficient for the approval of a combination product, the FDA may determine that separate marketing applications are necessary. This could significantly increase the resources and time required to bring a particular combination product to market. While we expect KZR-616, along with the self-administered dual-chamber system, to be subject to a single marketing application reviewed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the FDA based on its primary mode of action as a drug, the FDA could disagree.

Failure to successfully develop or supply the device, delays in or failure of the studies conducted by us, our collaborators or third-party providers, or failure by us, our collaborators or the third-party providers to obtain or maintain regulatory approval or clearance of the device could result in increased development costs, delays in or failure to obtain regulatory approval and associated delays in KZR-616 reaching the market. Further, failure to successfully develop or supply the device, or to gain or maintain its approval, could adversely affect future revenue from KZR-616.

Clinical trials are very expensive, time consuming and difficult to design and implement.

Our product candidates will require clinical testing before we are prepared to submit an NDA for regulatory approval. We cannot predict with any certainty if or when we might submit an NDA for regulatory approval for any of our product candidates or whether any such NDA will be approved by the FDA. Human clinical trials are very expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. For instance, the FDA may not agree with our proposed endpoints for any future clinical trial of our product candidates, which may delay the commencement of our clinical trials. In addition, we may not succeed in developing and validating disease-relevant clinical endpoints based on insights regarding biological pathways for the disorders we are studying. The clinical trial process is also time consuming. We estimate that the successful completion of clinical trials of our product candidates will take several years to complete. Furthermore, failure can occur at any stage, and we could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat clinical trials.

Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be delayed, made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside our control.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in our clinical trials is critical to our success. We are developing KZR-616 to address several autoimmune diseases with high degrees of unmet medical need, including lupus nephritis, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, and in the future may evaluate other rare autoimmune indications.  If the actual number of patients with these disorders is smaller than we anticipate, or if these patients are unwilling to participate in a clinical trial, we may encounter difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials, thereby delaying or preventing development and approval of KZR-616 and any future product candidates. For KZR-261, we expect to file an IND application for the treatment of solid tumors in oncology, for which there is substantial competition for participation in clinical trials. Even once enrolled, we may be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to complete any of our trials. Patient enrollment and retention in clinical trials depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the existing body of safety and efficacy data, the number and nature of competing treatments and ongoing clinical trials of competing therapies for the same indication, the proximity of patients to clinical sites and the eligibility criteria for the trial. Because our focus includes rare disorders, there are limited patient pools from which to draw in order to complete our clinical trials in a timely and cost-effective manner. Furthermore, our efforts to build relationships with patient communities may not succeed, which could result in delays in patient enrollment in our clinical trials. In addition, any negative results we may report in clinical trials of our product candidate may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain patients in other clinical trials of that same product candidate. Delays or failures in planned patient enrollment or retention may result in increased costs, program delays or both, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to develop our product candidates or could render further development impossible. For example, the impact of public health epidemics, such as COVID-19 may delay or prevent patients from enrolling or from receiving treatment in accordance with the protocol and the required timelines, which could delay our clinical trials, or prevent us from completing our clinical trials at all. Any inability to timely and successfully complete clinical development will increase our costs, slow our development plans and impair our ability to generate revenue from our product candidates. In addition, we may be reliant on contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and, while we intend to enter into agreements governing their services, we will be limited in our ability to compel their actual performance.

Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences following any potential marketing approval.

During the conduct of clinical trials, patients report changes in their health, including illnesses, injuries and discomforts, to their doctor. Often, it is not possible to determine whether or not the product candidate being studied caused these conditions. Regulatory authorities may draw different conclusions or require additional testing to confirm these determinations, if they occur. In addition, it is

35

possible that as we test our product candidates in larger, longer and more extensive clinical trials, or as use of these product candidates becomes more widespread if they receive regulatory approval, illnesses, injuries, discomforts and other adverse events that were observed in earlier trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in previous trials, will be reported by subjects or patients. Many times, side effects are only detectable after investigational drugs are tested in large-scale pivotal trials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale after approval. If additional clinical experience indicates that KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates has side effects or causes serious or life-threatening side effects, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, or, if the product candidate has received regulatory approval, such approval may be revoked, which would harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

Moreover, if we elect, or are required, to delay, suspend or terminate any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate revenue through their sale may be delayed or eliminated. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

Additionally, if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, the FDA could require us to include a black box warning in our label or adopt a REMS to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks, which may include, among other things, a Medication Guide outlining the risks of the drug for distribution to patients and a communication plan to healthcare practitioners. Furthermore, if we or others identify undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates during development or after obtaining U.S. regulatory approval, several potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

• regulatory authorities may not permit us to initiate our studies or could put them on hold;

• regulatory authorities may not approve, or may withdraw, their approval of the product;

• regulatory authorities may require us to recall the product;

• regulatory authorities may add new limitations for distribution and marketing of the product;

• regulatory authorities may require the addition of warnings in the product label or narrowing of the indication in the product label;

• we may be required to create a Medication Guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients;

• we may be required to change the way the product is administered or modify the product in some other way;

• we may be required to implement a REMS program;

• the FDA may require us to conduct additional clinical trials or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product;

• we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients; and

• our reputation may suffer.

Any of the above events resulting from undesirable side effects or other previously unknown problems could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidate, if approved. In addition, these events could substantially increase the costs of commercializing our product candidates and could significantly harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Interim top-line and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publish interim top-line or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or top-line data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. Preliminary or top-line data may include, for example, data regarding a small percentage of the patients enrolled in a clinical trial, and such preliminary data should not be viewed as an indication, belief or guarantee that other patients enrolled in such clinical trial will achieve similar results or that the preliminary results from such patients will be maintained. As a result, interim and preliminary data may not be statistically significant and should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Differences between preliminary or interim data and final data may cause the trading price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly and could significantly harm our business prospects.

36

We may explore strategic collaborations that may never materialize, or we may be required to relinquish important rights to and control over the development and commercialization of our product candidates to any future collaborators.

Over time, our business strategy may include entering into product development collaborations, including strategic collaborations with major biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. We cannot predict what form such a strategic collaboration might take. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate strategic collaborators, and the negotiation process can be complicated and time consuming. The COVID-19 pandemic could also impact our ability to do in-person due diligence, negotiations and other interactions to identify new development collaboration opportunities. Even if we are successful in our efforts to establish new development collaborations, the terms of such collaborations may not be favorable to us. Entering into future collaborations could subject us to a number of risks, including:

• we may be required to relinquish important rights to and control over the development and commercialization of our product candidates;

• we may be required to undertake the expenditure of substantial operational, financial and management resources;

• we may be required to issue equity securities that would dilute our stockholders’ percentage ownership of our company;

• we may be required to assume substantial actual or contingent liabilities;

• we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that our strategic collaborators devote to the development or commercialization of our product candidates;

• strategic collaborators may select indications or design clinical trials in a way that may be less successful than if we were doing so;

• strategic collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding, terminate a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new version of a product candidate for clinical testing;

• strategic collaborators may not pursue further development and commercialization of products resulting from the strategic collaboration arrangement or may elect to discontinue research and development programs;

• strategic collaborators may not commit adequate resources to the marketing and distribution of our product candidates, limiting our potential revenues from these products;

• disputes may arise between us and our strategic collaborators that result in the delay or termination of the research, development or commercialization of our product candidates or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management’s attention and consumes resources;

• strategic collaborators may experience financial difficulties;

• strategic collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information in a manner that could jeopardize or invalidate our proprietary information or expose us to potential litigation;

• business combinations or significant changes in a strategic collaborator’s business strategy may adversely affect a strategic collaborator’s willingness or ability to complete its obligations under any arrangement;

• strategic collaborators could decide to move forward with a competing product candidate developed either independently or in collaboration with others, including our competitors; and

• strategic collaborators could terminate the arrangement or allow it to expire, which would delay the development and may increase the cost of developing our product candidates.

If the market opportunities for KZR-616 are smaller than we believe they are, our business may suffer.

We currently focus our drug development of KZR-616 on treatments of autoimmune diseases. Our eligible patient population and pricing estimates may differ significantly from the actual market addressable by our product candidates. Our projections of both the number of people who have these disorders, as well as the subset of people with these disorders who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on our beliefs and estimates. These estimates have been derived from a variety of sources, including scientific literature, patient foundations or market research, and may prove to be incorrect. Further, new studies may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these disorders. The number of patients may turn out to be lower than expected. Likewise, the potentially addressable patient population for each of our product candidates may be limited or may not be amenable to treatment with our product candidates, and new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or access. If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we estimate, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

37

We face substantial competition, which may result in others developing or commercializing drugs before or more successfully than us.

The development and commercialization of new drugs is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell drugs or are pursuing the development of product candidates for the treatment of the indications that we are pursuing. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

More established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their greater size, resources and institutional experience. In particular, these companies have greater experience and expertise in securing reimbursement, government contracts and relationships with key opinion leaders, conducting testing and clinical trials, obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals and distribution relationships to market products and marketing approved drugs. These companies also have significantly greater research and marketing capabilities than we do. If we are not able to compete effectively against existing and potential competitors, our business and financial condition may be harmed.

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their drugs before we are able to, which may limit our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates. Our competitors may also develop therapies that are safer, more effective, more widely accepted or less expensive than ours, or may be more successful than we are in manufacturing and marketing their drugs. These advantages could render our product candidates obsolete or non-competitive before we can recover the costs of such product candidates’ development and commercialization.

Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and subject registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Even if our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may fail to achieve market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors or others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

Even if our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may fail to gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If they do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenue and may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including but not limited to:

• the efficacy and potential advantages compared to alternative treatments and therapies;

• the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts;

• the strength of our relationships with patient communities;

• the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments and therapies, including any similar generic treatments;

• our ability to offer such drug for sale at competitive prices;

• the convenience and ease of administration compared to alternative treatments and therapies;

• the willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;

• the strength of marketing and distribution support;

• the availability of third-party coverage and adequate reimbursement;

• the prevalence and severity of any side effects; and

• any restrictions on the use of the drug together with other medications.

Our efforts to educate physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful. Such efforts may require more resources than are typically required due to the complexity and uniqueness of our product candidates. Because we expect sales of our product candidates, if approved, to generate substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future, the failure of our product candidates to find market acceptance would harm our business. In addition, if we enter into a strategic collaboration regarding any of our product candidates,

38

our rights to receive milestone payments and royalties related to such product candidates will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to achieve market acceptance of those product candidates.

Even if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, they will remain subject to ongoing regulatory oversight.

Even if we obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, such approvals will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information. For example, the FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about drug products. In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the product’s approved labeling. Additionally, any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to a REMS, limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 trials, and surveillance to monitor the quality, safety and efficacy of the drug. Such regulatory requirements may differ from country to country depending on where we have received regulatory approval.

In addition, drug manufacturers and their facilities are subject to payment of user fees and continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP requirements and adherence to commitments made in the NDA or foreign marketing application. If we, or a regulatory authority, discover previously unknown problems with a drug, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the drug is manufactured or if a regulatory authority disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of that drug, a regulatory authority may impose restrictions relative to that drug, the manufacturing facility or us, including requesting a recall or requiring withdrawal of the drug from the market or suspension of manufacturing.

If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements following approval of any of our product candidates, a regulatory authority may:

• issue an untitled letter or warning letter asserting that we are in violation of the law;

• seek an injunction or impose administrative, civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines;

• suspend or withdraw regulatory approval;

• suspend any ongoing clinical trials;

• refuse to approve a pending NDA or comparable foreign marketing application or any supplements thereto submitted by us or our partners;

• restrict the marketing or manufacturing of the drug;

• seize or detain the drug or otherwise require the withdrawal of the drug from the market;

• refuse to permit the import or export of product candidates; or

• refuse to allow us to enter into supply contracts, including government contracts.

Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize our product candidates and harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. For example, certain policies of the Trump administration may impact our business and industry. Namely, the Trump administration has taken several executive actions, including the issuance of a number of Executive Orders, that could impose significant burdens on, or otherwise materially delay, the FDA’s ability to engage in routine regulatory and oversight activities such as implementing statutes through rulemaking, issuance of guidance, and review and approval of marketing applications. It is difficult to predict how these executive actions, including the Executive Orders, will be implemented and the extent to which they will affect the FDA’s ability to exercise its regulatory authority. If these executive actions impose constraints on the FDA’s ability to engage in oversight and implementation activities in the normal course, our business may be negatively impacted.

39

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our product candidates, we may not be successful in commercializing such product candidates, if and when they are approved.

To successfully commercialize any product candidate that may result from our development programs, we will need to build out our sales and marketing capabilities, either on our own or with others. The establishment and development of our own commercial team or the establishment of a contract sales force to market any product candidate we may develop will be expensive and time-consuming and could delay any drug launch. Moreover, we cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully develop this capability. We may seek to enter into collaborations with other entities to utilize their established marketing and distribution capabilities, but we may be unable to enter into such agreements on favorable terms, if at all. If any current or future collaborators do not commit sufficient resources to commercialize our product candidates, or we are unable to develop the necessary capabilities on our own, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to sustain our business. We compete with many companies that currently have extensive, experienced and well-funded marketing and sales operations to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel. We will likely also face competition if we seek third parties to assist us with the sales and marketing efforts of our product candidates. Without an internal team or the support of a third party to perform marketing and sales functions, we may be unable to compete successfully against these more established companies.

Even if we obtain and maintain approval for our product candidates from the FDA, we may never obtain approval for our product candidates outside of the United States, which would limit our market opportunities and could harm our business.

Approval of a product candidate in the United States by the FDA does not ensure approval of such product candidate by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. Sales of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates outside of the United States will be subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing clinical trials and marketing approval. Even if the FDA grants marketing approval for a product candidate, comparable foreign regulatory authorities also must approve the manufacturing and marketing of the product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and more onerous than, those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials. In many countries outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that country. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for any product candidates, if approved, is also subject to approval. Obtaining approval for KZR-616 and any future product candidates in the European Union from the European Commission following the opinion of the European Medicines Agency, if we choose to submit a marketing authorization application there, would be a lengthy and expensive process. Even if a product candidate is approved, the FDA or the European Commission, as the case may be, may limit the indications for which the drug may be marketed, require extensive warnings on the drug labeling or require expensive and time-consuming additional clinical trials or reporting as conditions of approval. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of KZR-616 and any future product candidates in certain countries.

Further, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Also, regulatory approval for our product candidates may be withdrawn. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be harmed. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible that we could experience delays in the timing of our interactions with regulatory authorities due to absenteeism by governmental employees, inability to conduct planned physical inspections related to regulatory approval, or the diversion of regulatory authority efforts and attention to approval of other therapeutics or other activities related to COVID-19, which could delay anticipated approval decisions and otherwise delay or limit our ability to make planned regulatory submissions or obtain new product approvals.

We will be required to obtain international regulatory approval to market and sell our product candidates outside of the United States.

We anticipate marketing our product candidates, if approved, outside of the United States. In order to market any of our product candidates outside of the United States, we must obtain separate regulatory approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The requirements for approval differ from country to country and approval in one country, including approval by the FDA in the United States, does not ensure approval by the applicable regulatory authorities in any other country. As a result, we may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. A failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction could have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in other jurisdictions, including approval by the FDA. The failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions could harm our business.

40

If we seek approval to commercialize our product candidates outside of the United States, a variety of risks associated with international operations could harm our business.

If we seek approval of our product candidates outside of the United States, we expect that we will be subject to additional risks in commercialization including:

• different regulatory requirements for approval of therapies in foreign countries;

• reduced protection for intellectual property rights;

• unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;

• economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;

• compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

• foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country;

• foreign reimbursement, pricing and insurance regimes;

• workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;

• production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and

• business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, war, terrorism, natural disasters and public health epidemics.

We have no prior experience in these areas. In addition, there are complex regulatory, tax, labor and other legal requirements imposed by many of the individual countries in and outside of Europe with which we will need to comply. Many biopharmaceutical companies have found the process of marketing their own products in foreign countries to be very challenging.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and could limit commercialization of any product candidate that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in clinical trials, both within and outside of the United States, and may face an even greater risk if we commercialize any product candidate that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that any such product candidates caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

• decreased demand for any product candidate that we may develop;

• loss of revenue;

• substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients;

• significant time and costs to defend the related litigation;

• withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

• increased insurance costs;

• the inability to commercialize any product candidate that we may develop; and

• injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention.

Although we maintain product liability insurance coverage, such insurance may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We anticipate that we will need to increase our insurance coverage each time we commence a clinical trial and if we successfully commercialize any product candidate. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance

Our relationships with customers, physicians, and third-party payors may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws, false claims laws, health information privacy and security laws, and other healthcare laws and regulations. If we are unable to comply, or have not fully complied, with such laws, we could face substantial penalties.

Healthcare providers, including physicians and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our current and future

41

arrangements with healthcare professionals, principal investigators, consultants, customers and third-party payors may subject us to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws and other healthcare laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil and criminal false claims laws and the law commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act and regulations. These laws will impact, among other things, our clinical research, proposed sales, marketing and educational programs. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy laws by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct or may conduct our business. The laws that will affect our operations include, but are not limited to:

• the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, in return for the purchase, recommendation, leasing or furnishing of an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers and others, on the other hand. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;

• federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including, without limitation, the federal civil False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval from Medicare, Medicaid or other government payors that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Federal Anti-Kickback Statute violations and certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, implicate the federal civil False Claims Act;

• the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which created additional federal civil and criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, a person from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme or making false or fraudulent statements to defraud any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private);

• HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and their implementing regulations, impose certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information on health plans, health care clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, known as covered entities, and their respective business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information;

• federal transparency laws, including the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, that require certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to: (i) payments or other “transfers of value” made to physicians, as defined by such law,  and teaching hospitals; and (ii) ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; and

• state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, state laws that require manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures, or drug pricing, state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government and state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives, or that otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; as well as state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws.

It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participating in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Efforts to ensure that our business

42

arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with multiple jurisdictions with different compliance and/or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

Coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates, which could make it difficult for us to sell profitably, if approved.

Market acceptance and sales of any product candidates that we commercialize, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for these drugs and related treatments will be available from third-party payors, including government health administration authorities, managed care organizations and other private health insurers. Third-party payors decide which therapies they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own coverage and reimbursement policies. However, decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any product candidates that we develop will be made on a payor-by-payor basis. One third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a drug does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage, and adequate reimbursement, for the drug. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a therapy does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Each third-party payor determines whether or not it will provide coverage for a therapy, what amount it will pay the manufacturer for the therapy, and on what tier of its formulary it will be placed. The position on a third-party payor’s list of covered drugs, or formulary, generally determines the co-payment that a patient will need to make to obtain the therapy and can strongly influence the adoption of such therapy by patients and physicians. Patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers prescribing such services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Patients are unlikely to use our products unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost of our products.

Third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any drug that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Inadequate coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any drug for which we obtain marketing approval. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize KZR-616 or any future product candidates that we develop.

Healthcare legislative reform measures may have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and continue to be, several legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities, and affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.

Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively the PPACA, was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both the government and private insurers, and significantly impacts the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The PPACA, among other things: (i) addressed a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; (ii) increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; (iii) established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs; (iv) expanded the availability of lower pricing under the 340B drug pricing program by adding new entities to the program; and (v) established a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must now agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.

There remain judicial and Congressional challenges to certain provisions of the PPACA, as well as efforts by the Trump administration to repeal or replace certain aspects of the PPACA. Since January 2017, President Trump has signed Executive Orders and other directives designed to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the PPACA or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the PPACA. Concurrently, Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or repeal and replace all or part of the PPACA. While Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, several bills affecting the implementation of certain taxes under the PPACA have been signed into law. The Tax Act included a provision which repealed, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the PPACA on certain individuals who fail to

43

maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” Further, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the PPACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage and medical device tax and, effective January 1, 2021, also eliminates the health insurer tax.  The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or the BBA, among other things, amended the PPACA, effective January 1, 2019, to close the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” On December 14, 2018, a Texas U.S. District Court Judge ruled that the PPACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress as part of the Tax Act. Additionally, on December 18, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit upheld the District Court ruling that the individual mandate was unconstitutional and remanded the case back to the District Court to determine whether the remaining provisions of the ACA are invalid as well. On March 2, 2020, the United States Supreme Court granted the petitions for writs of certiorari to review this case, and has allotted one hour for oral arguments, which are expected to occur in the fall.  It is unclear how this litigation and other efforts to repeal and replace the PPACA will impact the PPACA and our business. We continue to evaluate the effect that the PPACA and its possible repeal and replacement has on our business.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the PPACA was enacted. These changes include aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year pursuant to the Budget Control Act of 2011, which began in 2013, and due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, including the BBA, will remain in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The CARES Act suspended the 2% Medicare sequester from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and extended the sequester by one year, through 2030. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These new laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could have an adverse effect on customers for our product candidates, if approved, and, accordingly, our financial operations.

Additional changes that may affect our business include the expansion of new programs such as Medicare payment for performance initiatives for physicians under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, which introduced a merit based incentive bonus program for Medicare physicians, also referred to as the Quality Payment Program. In November 2019, CMS issued a final rule finalizing the changes to the Quality Payment Program. At this time, it is unclear how the introduction of the Medicare Quality Payment Program will impact overall physician reimbursement. Also, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which drug manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which have resulted in several Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. At the federal level, the Trump administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 includes a $135 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost generic and biosimilar drugs. On March 10, 2020, the Trump administration sent “principles” for drug pricing to Congress, calling for legislation that would, among other things, cap Medicare Part D beneficiary out-of-pocket pharmacy expenses, provide an option to cap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price increases. In addition, the Trump administration previously released a “Blueprint” to lower drug prices and reduce out of pocket costs of drugs that contains additional proposals to increase drug manufacturer competition, increase the negotiating power of certain federal healthcare programs, incentivize manufacturers to lower the list price of their products, and reduce the out of pocket costs of drug products paid by consumers. On July 24, 2020, the Trump administration announced four executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that attempt to implement several of the administration’s proposals, including a policy that would tie Medicare Part B drug prices to international drug prices; one that directs the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to finalize the Canadian drug importation proposed rule previously issued by HHS and makes other changes allowing for personal importation of drugs from Canada; one that directs HHS to finalize the rulemaking process on modifying the anti-kickback law safe harbors regarding certain discounts for plans, pharmacies, and pharmaceutical benefit managers; and one that reduces costs of insulin and epipens to patients of federally qualified health centers. While some measures may require additional authorization to become effective, Congress and the Trump administration have each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs. At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

We expect that these and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved drug. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private third-party payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our products. It is possible that additional governmental action is taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, on April 18, 2020, CMS announced that PPACA- qualified health plan issuers may suspend activities related to the collection and reporting of quality data that would have otherwise been reported between May and June 2020 given the challenges healthcare providers are facing responding to the COVID-19 virus.

44

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We will rely on third parties to manufacture clinical and commercial supplies of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates.

We do not own or operate facilities for drug manufacturing, testing, storage or distribution. We are dependent on third parties to manufacture the clinical supplies of our product candidates. Any significant delay in the supply of a product candidate or raw material components for an ongoing clinical trial due to the need to replace a third-party CMO could considerably delay the completion of our clinical trials. In particular, our CMOs may experience business interruptions as a result of shelter-in-place orders or other impacts due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which would potentially impact our product supply chains and clinical trials. We are completely dependent on our CMOs for compliance with cGMP for manufacture of both active drug substances and finished drug products, and the quality system regulation, or QSR, applicable to the self-administered dual-chamber system for KZR-616. If our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture active drug substances and finished drug product that conform to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA and other regulatory authorities, we will not be able to secure or maintain regulatory approval for our product candidates. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our CMOs to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. Our ability to audit the facilities of our CMOs and other vendors will be interrupted by COVID-19-related travel restrictions. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our timelines and ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved.

The facilities used by our CMOs to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit an NDA for any of our product candidates. We also expect to rely on third-party manufacturers to supply us with sufficient quantities of our product candidates to be used, if approved, for commercialization.

Our reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured product candidates ourselves, including:

• inability to meet our product specifications and quality requirements consistently;

• delay or inability to procure or expand sufficient manufacturing capacity;

• issues related to scale-up of manufacturing;

• costs and validation of new equipment and facilities required for scale-up;

• our third-party manufacturers may not be able to execute our manufacturing procedures and other logistical support requirements appropriately;

• our third-party manufacturers may fail to comply with cGMP and other inspections by the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities;

• our inability to negotiate manufacturing agreements with third parties under commercially reasonable terms, if at all;

• breach, termination or nonrenewal of manufacturing agreements with third parties in a manner or at a time that is costly or damaging to us;

• reliance on single sources for drug components;

• lack of qualified backup suppliers for those components that are currently purchased from a sole or single source supplier;

• our third-party manufacturers may not devote sufficient resources to our product candidates;

• we may not own, or may have to share, the intellectual property rights to any improvements made by our third-party manufacturers in the manufacturing process for our product candidates;

• operations of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers could be disrupted by conditions unrelated to our business or operations, including the bankruptcy of the manufacturer or supplier; and

• carrier disruptions or increased costs that are beyond our control.

Any of these events could lead to clinical trial delays, failure to obtain regulatory approval or impact our ability to successfully commercialize our current or any future product candidates once approved. Some of these events could be the basis for FDA action, including injunction, request for recall, seizure, or total or partial suspension of production.

45

Our business involves the use of hazardous materials, and we and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers must comply with environmental laws and regulations, which can be expensive and restrict how we do business.

Our research and development activities and our third-party manufacturers’ and suppliers’ activities involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials owned by us, including the components of our product candidates and other hazardous compounds. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are subject to laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. In some cases, these hazardous materials and various wastes resulting from their use are stored at our and our manufacturers’ facilities pending their use and disposal. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination, which could cause an interruption of our commercialization efforts, research and development efforts and business operations, environmental damage resulting in costly clean-up and liabilities under applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party manufacturers for handling and disposing of these materials generally comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee that this is the case or eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In such an event, we may be held liable for any resulting damages and such liability could exceed our resources and state or federal or other applicable authorities may curtail our use of certain materials and/or interrupt our business operations. Furthermore, environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent. We cannot predict the impact of such changes and cannot be certain of our future compliance. We do not currently carry hazardous waste insurance coverage.

We rely on third parties to conduct, supervise and monitor our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and if those third parties perform in an unsatisfactory manner, it may harm our business.

We do not currently have the ability to independently conduct clinical trials. We intend to rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and we expect to have limited influence over their actual performance. We rely upon CROs to monitor and manage data for our clinical programs. We expect to control only certain aspects of our CROs’ activities. Nevertheless, we will be responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.

We and our CROs are required to comply with the good laboratory practices and good clinical practices, or GCP, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities in the form of International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines for any of our product candidates that are in preclinical and clinical development, respectively. The regulatory authorities enforce GCP through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. Although we rely on CROs to conduct GCP-compliant clinical trials, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol and applicable laws and regulations, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If we or our CROs fail to comply with GCP, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. Accordingly, if our CROs fail to comply with these regulations, we may be required to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

Our reliance on third parties to conduct clinical trials results in less direct control over the management of data developed through clinical trials than would be the case if we were relying entirely upon our own staff. Communicating with CROs and other third parties can be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Our CROs and other third parties may experience business interruptions as a result of shelter-in-place orders or other impacts due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, such parties may:

• have staffing difficulties;

• fail to comply with contractual obligations;

• not devote sufficient time and resources to our clinical trials;

• experience regulatory compliance issues; or

• undergo changes in priorities or become financially distressed.

These factors may materially adversely affect the timelines of our clinical trials and may subject us to unexpected cost increases that are beyond our control. If our CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet expected deadlines, fail to comply with regulatory requirements, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for any other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize, the product candidate being developed. As a result, our financial results and commercial prospects would be harmed, our costs could increase, and

46

our ability to generate revenue from the product candidate could be delayed. These CROs may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials or other drug development activities which could compete with recruitment of our clinical trials.

If our relationship with any of these CROs terminates, we may be delayed in entering into new arrangements with alternative CROs or unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Changing CROs during an ongoing clinical trial involves substantial cost, requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can negatively impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we intend to carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

In addition, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA. The FDA may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the trial. The FDA may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of our product candidates.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain adequate protection for our proprietary know-how or obtain and maintain patent protection for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, or if our patents are insufficient to protect our product candidates for an adequate amount of time, we may not be able to compete effectively in our markets.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our development programs and product candidates. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries with respect to KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates. We seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our current and future research programs and product candidates. The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner.

We file patent applications directed to our product candidates in an effort to establish intellectual property positions directed to their compositions of matter as well as uses of these product candidates in the treatment of diseases. Our intellectual property includes patents and patent applications that we own as well as patents and patent applications that we in-license. For example, we have a field-specific exclusive license under the Onyx License Agreement to certain patents and patent applications relating to KZR-616.

We or our licensors have not pursued or maintained, and may not pursue or maintain in the future, patent protection for our product candidates in every country or territory in which we may sell our products, if approved. In addition, we cannot be sure that any of our pending patent applications will issue or that, if issued, they have or will issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, international patent offices or judicial bodies may deny or significantly narrow claims made under our patent applications and our issued patents may be successfully challenged, may be designed around, or may otherwise be of insufficient scope to provide us with protection for our commercial products.

It is possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, patent prosecution is a lengthy process, during which the scope of the claims initially submitted for examination by the USPTO may be significantly narrowed by the time they issue, if issued at all. The claims of our issued patents or patent applications when issued may not cover our current or future product candidates, or even if such patents provide coverage, the coverage obtained may not provide any competitive advantage. The patent applications that we own or in-license may fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our current or any future product candidates in the United States or in other foreign countries. There is no assurance that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue and even if such patents cover our current or any future product candidates, third parties may challenge their validity, enforceability or scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable. Any successful opposition to these patents or any other patents owned by or licensed to us could deprive us of rights necessary for the successful commercialization of any product candidates or companion diagnostic that we may develop. Further, if we encounter delays in clinical trials or regulatory approvals, the period of time during which we could market our product candidates under patent protection would be reduced.  

If the patent applications we hold or have in-licensed with respect to our development programs and product candidates fail to issue, if their breadth or strength of protection is threatened, or if they fail to provide meaningful exclusivity for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any

47

future product candidates, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop and commercialize product candidates and future drugs and threaten our ability to commercialize, future drugs. Any such outcome could have a negative effect on our business.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. For example, European patent law restricts the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more than United States law does. Furthermore, other parties may have developed or may develop technologies that may be related or competitive to our own, and such parties may have filed or may file patent applications, or may have received or may receive patents, claiming inventions that may overlap or conflict with those claimed in our patent applications or issued patents. Publications of discoveries in scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after the initial filing. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions until such publication dates have passed. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or drugs, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and drugs. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to the United States patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and may affect the scope, strength and enforceability of our patent rights or the nature of proceedings that may be brought by or against us related to our patent rights. The Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could harm our business and financial condition.

Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or drugs and compete directly with us without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize drugs without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates.

The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. For example, we may be subject to a third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO challenging the priority of an invention claimed within one of our patents, which submissions may also be made prior to a patent’s issuance, precluding the granting of any of our pending patent applications. An adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and drugs, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and drugs. Moreover, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from the earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent application. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Upon the expiration of patent protection for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates, we may be open to competition from generic versions of such drugs. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting our product candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing drugs similar or identical to ours.

Even if they are unchallenged, our patents may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner. For example, a third-party may develop a competitive drug that is structurally similar to one or more of our product candidates but that has a different composition that falls outside the scope of our patent protection. If the patent protection provided by our patents is not sufficiently broad to impede such competition, or if the breadth, strength or term (including any extensions or adjustments) of protection provided by our patents is successfully challenged, our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

48

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by government patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. In addition, periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other government fees on patents and/or applications will have to be paid to the USPTO and various government patent agencies outside of the United States over the lifetime of our owned and licensed patents and/or applications and any patent rights we may own or license in the future. We rely on our outside counsel or our licensing partners to pay these fees due to non-U.S. patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. government patent agencies require compliance with several procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We employ reputable law firms and other professionals to help us comply, and we are also dependent on our licensors to take the necessary action to comply with these requirements with respect to our licensed intellectual property. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our products or technologies, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products that are the same as or similar to our product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. In many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules. There are situations, however, in which non-compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, potential competitors might be able to enter the market and this circumstance could harm our business.

In addition, if we fail to apply for applicable patent term extensions or adjustments, we will have a more limited time during which we can enforce our granted patents. In addition, if we are responsible for patent prosecution and maintenance of patent rights in-licensed to us, any of the foregoing could expose us to liability to the applicable patent owner.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates such as KZR-616 and KZR-261, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. We expect to seek extensions of patent terms in the United States and, if available, in other countries where we are prosecuting patents. In the United States, the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the normal expiration of the patent, which is limited to the approved indication (or any additional indications approved during the period of extension). However, the applicable authorities, including the FDA and the USPTO in the United States, and any equivalent regulatory authority in other countries, may not agree with our assessment of whether such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions to our patents, or may grant more limited extensions than we request. If this occurs, our competitors may be able to take advantage of our investment in development and clinical trials by referencing our clinical and preclinical data and launch their drug earlier than might otherwise be the case.

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our business.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business. The following examples are illustrative:

• others may be able to make compounds or formulations that are similar to our product candidates but that are not covered by the claims of any patents, should they issue, that we own or control;

• we or any strategic partners might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the issued patents or pending patent applications that we own or control;

• we might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our inventions;

• others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights;

• it is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents;

• issued patents that we own or control may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges;

• our competitors might conduct research and development activities in the United States and other countries that provide a safe harbor from patent infringement claims for certain research and development activities, as well as in countries where

49

we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive drugs for sale in our major commercial markets;

• we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable; and

• the patents of others may prevent us from fully exploiting our product candidates or technologies.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a negative impact on the success of our business.

Our commercial success depends, in part, upon our ability and the ability of our future collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights and intellectual property of third parties. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by extensive and complex litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. We may in the future become party to, or be threatened with, adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates and technology, including interference proceedings, post grant review and inter partes review before the USPTO. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future, regardless of their merit. There is a risk that third parties may choose to engage in litigation with us to enforce or to otherwise assert their patent rights against us. Even if we believe such claims are without merit, a court of competent jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid, enforceable and infringed, which could have a negative impact on our ability to commercialize KZR-616, KZR-261 or any future product candidates. In order to successfully challenge the validity of any such U.S. patent in federal court, we would need to overcome a presumption of validity. As this burden is a high one requiring us to present clear and convincing evidence as to the invalidity of any such U.S. patent claim, there is no assurance that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims of any such U.S. patent. Moreover, given the vast number of patents in our field of technology, we cannot be certain that we do not infringe existing patents or that we will not infringe patents that may be granted in the future. Many companies and research institutions have filed, and continue to file, patent applications related to selective immunoproteasome inhibitors and protein secretion inhibitors. Some of these patent applications have already been allowed or issued, and others may issue in the future. While we may decide to initiate proceedings to challenge the validity of these or other patents in the future, we may be unsuccessful, and courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad could uphold the validity of any such patent. Furthermore, because patent applications can take many years to issue and may be confidential for 18 months or more after filing, and because pending patent claims can be revised before issuance, there may be applications now pending which may later result in issued patents that may be infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of our product candidates. Regardless of when filed, we may fail to identify relevant third party patents or patent applications, or we may incorrectly conclude that a third party patent is invalid or not infringed by our product candidates or activities. If a patent holder believes our product candidate infringes its patent, the patent holder may sue us even if we have received patent protection for our technology. Moreover, we may face patent infringement claims from non-practicing entities that have no relevant drug revenue and against whom our own patent portfolio may thus have no deterrent effect. If a patent infringement suit were threatened or brought against us, we could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the drug or product candidate that is the subject of the actual or threatened suit.

If we are found to infringe a third party’s valid and enforceable intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing, manufacturing and marketing our product candidate(s) and technology. Under any such license, we would most likely be required to pay various types of fees, milestones, royalties or other amounts. Moreover, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and more established companies may also pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment or at all. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of the relevant program or product candidate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Furthermore, even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments. We could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing and commercializing the infringing technology or product candidate. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent or other intellectual property right. We may be required to indemnify collaborators or contractors against such claims. A finding of infringement could prevent us from manufacturing and commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some or all of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation can be expensive and time consuming and would divert management’s

50

attention from our core business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may be subject to claims asserting that our employees, consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their current or former employers or claims asserting ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.

Certain of our employees, consultants or advisors are currently, or were previously, employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants and advisors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that these individuals or we have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such individual’s current or former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

In addition, we may in the future be subject to claims by our former employees or consultants asserting an ownership right in our patents or patent applications, as a result of the work they performed on our behalf. Although it is our policy to require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own, and we cannot be certain that our agreements with such parties will be upheld in the face of a potential challenge or that they will not be breached, for which we may not have an adequate remedy. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property.

Licensing of intellectual property is of critical importance to our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues. If we breach the Onyx License Agreement or any of the other agreements under which we acquired, or will acquire, patent protection for our product candidates, we could lose the ability to continue the development and commercialization of the related product.

The licensing of intellectual property is of critical importance to our business and to our current and future product candidates, and we expect to enter into additional such agreements in the future. In particular, our immunoproteasome program, including KZR-616, is dependent on the Onyx License Agreement. Pursuant to the Onyx License Agreement, Onyx granted us an exclusive license under certain patent rights, and a non-exclusive license to certain know-how, in each case controlled by Onyx, to develop, manufacture and commercialize certain types of compounds, including KZR-616, that are selective inhibitors of the immunoproteasome for any and all uses, other than those related to the diagnosis and/or treatment in humans of cancerous or pre-cancerous diseases and/or conditions, including those related to hematological diseases and/or conditions.

The licensed compounds, including KZR-616, are selective for the immunoproteasome and therefore are not known or believed (based on scientific literature and the Company’s own research and development activities) to have any application in cancer or pre-cancerous conditions. However, notwithstanding these known characteristics of the licensed compounds, Onyx retains all rights under the licensed intellectual property rights that are not granted to the Company, and therefore Onyx retains rights under such intellectual property rights to develop and commercialize the licensed compounds in connection with the diagnosis and/or treatment in humans of cancerous or pre-cancerous diseases and/or conditions, including those related to hematological diseases and/or conditions, and also has the rights to transfer these rights to a third-party. If Onyx or its licensee develops and commercializes any of the licensed compounds in cancer or pre-cancerous indications that are commercially interchangeable with our product candidates, including KZR-616, sales by Onyx or its licensee of such compounds for cancer and pre-cancerous indications could result in the threat of off-label use in our licensed field, potentially diminishing our sales of the applicable licensed compounds in our licensed field.

The Onyx License Agreement may limit or delay our ability to consummate certain transactions, may impact the value of those transactions, or may limit our ability to pursue certain activities. Specifically, under the Onyx License Agreement, Onyx has a right of first negotiation under certain circumstances to obtain a license or a similar transfer of rights, if we are seeking to out-license rights to develop and/or commercialize certain licensed products.

51

Disputes may arise between us and any of these counterparties regarding intellectual property rights that are subject to such agreements, including, but not limited to:

• the scope of rights granted under the agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

• whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the agreement;

• our right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties;

• our diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to our development and commercialization of our product candidates, and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;

• the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners;

• our right to transfer or assign our license; and

• the effects of termination.

These or other disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed, or will license or acquire in the future, may prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current arrangements on acceptable terms or may impair the value of the arrangement to us. Any such dispute could have an adverse effect on our business.

If we fail to meet our obligations under these agreements in any material respect, the counterparty may have the right to terminate the respective agreement. Any uncured, material breach under a license could result in our loss of exclusive rights and may lead to a complete termination of our product development and any commercialization efforts for each of our product candidates. While we would expect to exercise all rights and remedies available to us, including seeking to cure any breach by us, and otherwise seek to preserve our rights under the technology licensed to or acquired by us, we may not be able to do so in a timely manner, at an acceptable cost or at all.

Furthermore, certain provisions in our intellectual property agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could affect the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or affect financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, the patents of our licensors or our other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our patents, the patents of our licensors or our other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file legal claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and is likely to divert significant resources from our core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. The initiation of a claim against a third party may also cause the third party to bring counter claims against us such as claims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement or lack of statutory subject matter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant material information from the USPTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in post-grant proceedings such as ex parte reexaminations, inter partes review, or post-grant review, or oppositions or similar proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with litigation or even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. We cannot be certain that there is or will be no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. For the patents and patent applications that we have licensed, we may have limited or no right to participate in the defense of any licensed patents against challenge by a third party. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of any future patent protection on our current or future product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could harm our business.

We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. Our business could be harmed if in litigation the prevailing party does not offer us a license, and such a license may not be on commercially reasonable terms. Any litigation or other

52

proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights may fail, and even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating or from successfully challenging our intellectual property rights. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Changes in U.S. patent law or the patent law of other countries or jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidates.

The United States has recently enacted and implemented wide ranging patent reform legislation. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that we have licensed or that we might obtain in the future. Similarly, changes in patent law and regulations in other countries or jurisdictions, changes in the governmental bodies that enforce them or changes in how the relevant governmental authority enforces patent laws or regulations may weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that we have licensed or that we may obtain in the future.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world, which could negatively impact our business.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents covering KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we may obtain patent protection but where patent enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued or licensed patents and any future patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing.

Reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Since we rely on third parties to develop and manufacture KZR-616 and KZR-261, and if we collaborate with third parties for the development of our research programs or product candidates, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. We may also conduct collaborative research and development programs that may require us to share trade secrets and proprietary know how. We seek to protect our proprietary information by entering into agreements containing confidentiality obligations and ownership provisions relating to intellectual property prior to disclosing proprietary information or beginning research projects with third party collaborators. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our trade secrets. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, sharing trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, the unauthorized disclosure or use of our confidential information could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our collaborators, advisors, employees, investigators, contractors and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets. Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical know-how or other trade secrets by the parties to these agreements. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our confidential information or proprietary technology and processes. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective. If any of the collaborators, advisors, employees, investigators, contractors and consultants who are parties to these agreements breaches or violates the terms of any of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade secrets as a result. Moreover, if confidential information that is licensed or disclosed to us by our partners, collaborators, or others is inadvertently

53

disclosed or subject to a breach or violation, we may be exposed to liability to the owner of that confidential information. Enforcing a claim that a third-party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets.

Any trademarks we may obtain may be infringed or successfully challenged, resulting in harm to our business.

We expect to rely on trademarks as one means to distinguish any of our product candidates that are approved for marketing from the products of our competitors. We have not yet selected trademarks for KZR-616, KZR-261 and have not yet begun the process of applying to register trademarks for KZR-616, KZR-261 or any other product candidate. Once we select trademarks and apply to register them, our trademark applications may not be approved. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Our competitors may infringe our trademarks, and we may not have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.

In addition, any proprietary name we propose to use with KZR-616, KZR-261 or any other product candidate in the United States must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of the potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable proprietary product name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patent protection for our product candidates, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures of our intellectual property is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be effective. In addition, we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for any such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets.

Moreover, our competitors may independently develop knowledge, methods and know-how equivalent to our trade secrets. Competitors could purchase our products and replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts for technologies on which we do not have patent protection. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.

We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and other confidential information by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. While we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, agreements or security measures may be breached and detecting the disclosure or misappropriation of confidential information and enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated confidential information is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Further, we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our confidential information may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors, in which case we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us.

Risks Related to Our Business Operations, Employee Matters and Managing Growth

We are highly dependent on the services of our Chief Executive Officer, John Fowler, and our President and Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Christopher Kirk, and if we are not able to retain these members of our management team or recruit and retain additional management, clinical and scientific personnel, our business will be harmed.

We are highly dependent on our Chief Executive Officer, John Fowler, and our President and Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Christopher Kirk. Each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time. The loss of the services of either of these persons could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives.

54

Recruiting and retaining other senior executives, qualified scientific and clinical personnel and, if we progress the development of any of our product candidates, commercialization, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel, will be critical to our success. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Additionally, we do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees. Replacing executive officers and key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to successfully develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize our product candidates. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these key personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.

We will need to expand our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth, which could disrupt our operations.

As the clinical development of our product candidates progresses, we also expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of research, drug development, medical affairs, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or data security incidents could result in significant financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us.

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure, including mobile technologies, to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store, process and transmit large amounts of sensitive information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, personal information and other confidential information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of such sensitive information. We have also outsourced elements of our operations (including elements of our information technology infrastructure) to third parties, and as a result, we manage a number of third-party vendors who may or could have access to our computer networks or our confidential information. In addition, many of those third parties in turn subcontract or outsource some of their responsibilities to third parties. While all information technology operations are inherently vulnerable to inadvertent or intentional security breaches, incidents, attacks and exposures, the accessibility and distributed nature of our information technology systems, and the sensitive information stored on those systems, make such systems potentially vulnerable to unintentional or malicious, internal and external attacks on our technology environment. In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have enabled substantially all of our employees to work remotely, which may make us more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Potential vulnerabilities can be exploited from inadvertent or intentional actions of our employees, third-party vendors, business partners, or by malicious third parties. Attacks of this nature are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and others. In addition to the extraction of sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices increases the risk of data security incidents.

Significant disruptions of our, our third-party vendors’ and/or business partners’ information technology systems or other similar data security incidents could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, misappropriation, or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, sensitive information, which could result in financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us. In addition, information technology system disruptions, whether from attacks on our technology environment or from computer viruses, natural disasters, outbreak of regional or global pandemic diseases such as the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.

There is no way of knowing with certainty whether we have experienced any data security incidents that have not been discovered. While we have no reason to believe this to be the case, attackers have become very sophisticated in the way they conceal access to

55

systems, and many companies that have been attacked are not aware that they have been attacked. Any event that leads to unauthorized access, use or disclosure of personal information, including but not limited to personal information regarding our patients or employees, could disrupt our business, harm our reputation, compel us to comply with applicable federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, subject us to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require us to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject us to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to us, and result in significant legal and financial exposure and/or reputational harm. In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us or our vendors or business partners to comply with our privacy, confidentiality or data security-related legal or other obligations to third parties, or any further security incidents or other inappropriate access events that result in the unauthorized access, release or transfer of sensitive information, which could include personally identifiable information, may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation, or public statements against us by advocacy groups or others, and could cause third parties, including clinical sites, regulators or current and potential partners, to lose trust in us or we could be subject to claims by third parties that we have breached our privacy- or confidentiality-related obligations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects. Moreover, data security incidents and other inappropriate access can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying them may lead to increased harm of the type described above. While we have implemented security measures intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, there can be no assurance that such measures will successfully prevent service interruptions or security incidents.

Our employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial partners. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations or the regulations applicable in other jurisdictions, provide accurate information to the FDA and other regulatory authorities, comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and abroad, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Such misconduct also could involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials or interactions with the FDA or other regulatory authorities, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from government investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. Further, because of the work-from-home policies we implemented due to COVID-19, information that is normally protected, including company confidential information, may be less secure. If actions are instituted against us and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could result in significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participating in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic collaborations, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.

From time to time, we may evaluate various acquisitions and strategic collaborations, including licensing or acquiring complementary drugs, intellectual property rights, technologies or businesses, as deemed appropriate to carry out our business plan. Any potential acquisition or strategic partnership may entail numerous risks, including:

• increased operating expenses and cash requirements;

• the assumption of additional indebtedness or contingent liabilities;

• assimilation of operations, intellectual property and drugs of an acquired company, including difficulties associated with integrating new personnel;

• the diversion of our management’s attention from our existing drug programs and initiatives in pursuing such a strategic partnership, merger or acquisition;

• retention of key employees, the loss of key personnel, and uncertainties in our ability to maintain key business relationships;

56

• risks and uncertainties associated with the other party to such a transaction, including the prospects of that party and their existing drugs or product candidates and regulatory approvals; and

• our inability to generate revenue from acquired technology and/or drugs sufficient to meet our objectives in undertaking the acquisition or even to offset the associated acquisition and maintenance costs.

In addition, if we engage in future acquisitions or strategic partnerships, we may issue dilutive securities, assume or incur debt obligations, incur large one-time expenses and acquire intangible assets that could result in significant future amortization expense. Moreover, we may not be able to locate suitable acquisition opportunities, and this inability could impair our ability to grow or obtain access to technology or drugs that may be important to the development of our business.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies, including very recently in connection with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has resulted in decreased stock prices for many companies notwithstanding the lack of a fundamental change in their underlying business models or prospects. Broad market and industry factors, including potentially worsening economic conditions and other adverse effects or developments relating to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the price paid for the shares. In addition to the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section, the market price for our common stock may be influenced by the following:

• the commencement, enrollment or results of our planned or future clinical trials of KZR-616, KZR-261 and any future product candidates;

• the clinical or commercial success of competitive drugs, therapies or technologies;

• regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;

• disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technologies;

• failure or discontinuation of any of our clinical development or research programs;

• the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

• the level of expenses related to our product candidates and clinical development or research programs;

• our ability to discover, develop and broaden our pipeline beyond our current product candidates;

• commencement or termination of collaborations for our research and development programs;

• actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results or development timelines;

• changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if any, that cover our stock;

• our inability to obtain or delays in manufacturing adequate supply for our clinical trials or the inability to do so at acceptable costs;

• significant lawsuits, including patent or stockholder litigation or products liability claims;

• variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

• announcement, expectation or completion of additional financing efforts;

• changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

• market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;

• general economic, political, and market conditions and overall fluctuations in the financial markets in the United States and abroad, including as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; and

• investors’ general perception of us and our business.

57

These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance, which may limit or prevent investors from selling their shares at or above the price paid for the shares and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock.

Some companies that have experienced volatility in the trading price of their shares have been the subject of securities class action litigation. Any lawsuit to which we are a party, with or without merit, may result in an unfavorable judgment. We also may decide to settle lawsuits on unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial damages or fines, damage to our reputation or adverse changes to our business practices. Defending against litigation is costly and time-consuming, and could divert our management’s attention and our resources. Furthermore, during the course of litigation, there could be negative public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, which could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

Our common stock is thinly traded and our stockholders may be unable to sell their shares quickly or at market price.

Although we have had periods of high volume daily trading in our common stock, generally our stock is thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline significantly in the event that a large number of shares of our common stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer that could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price.

Concentration of ownership of our common stock among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

Based upon our shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2020, our executive officers, directors and stockholders who owned more than 5% of our outstanding common stock do, in the aggregate, beneficially own shares representing approximately 44% of our outstanding common stock. If our executive officers, directors and stockholders who owned more than 5% of our outstanding common stock acted together, they may be able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. The concentration of voting power and transfer restrictions could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire or result in the management of our company in ways with which other stockholders disagree.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports, or publish unfavorable research or reports, about our business or our market, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. Equity research analysts may discontinue research coverage of our common stock, and such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We do not have any control over the analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our shares could decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our shares or issue other unfavorable commentary or research about us. If one or more equity research analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our shares could decrease, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume of our common stock to decline.

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.

You should not rely on an investment in our common stock to provide dividend income. We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

58

We have broad discretion in the use of our cash and cash equivalents and may use them in ways in which you do not agree or in ways that do not increase the value of your investment.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of our cash and cash equivalents, and could spend these amounts in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a negative impact on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline and delay the development of our product candidates. Pending their use, we may invest our cash and cash equivalents, in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to such companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” or EGC, as defined in the JOBS Act, and we intend to take advantage of some of the exemptions from reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including:

• not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting;

• not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements;

• reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and

• not being required to hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

We currently take advantage of some or all of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an EGC. We will remain an EGC until the earlier of (i) December 31, 2023, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (iii) the last day of the first fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our share price may be more volatile.

In addition, under Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, EGCs can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not EGCs.

We are also a smaller reporting company as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as (i) our voting and non-voting common stock held by nonaffiliates is less than $250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

We will continue to incur increased costs as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an EGC, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costlier. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.

59

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting, including an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. However, while we remain an EGC and smaller reporting company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that neither we nor our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to conclude within the prescribed timeframe that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our consolidated financial statements.

Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our corporate charter and our bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of us that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions also could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Among other things, these provisions:

• establish a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board are elected at one time;

• allow the authorized number of our directors to be changed only by resolution of our board of directors;

• limit the manner in which stockholders can remove directors from the board;

• establish advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and nominations to our board of directors;

• require that stockholder actions must be affected at a duly called stockholder meeting and prohibit actions by our stockholders by written consent;

• limit who may call stockholder meetings;

• authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to institute a stockholder rights plan, or so-called “poison pill,” that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors; and

• require the approval of the holders of at least 66 ²⁄₃% of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast to amend or repeal certain provisions of our charter or bylaws.

Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock, including transactions that may be in your best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that investors are willing to pay for our stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for the following types of actions or proceedings under Delaware statutory or common law:

• any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;

60

• any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;

• any action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors, officers, employees or agents arising under the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws;

• any action or proceeding to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; and

• any action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors, officers, employees or agents that is governed by the internal-affairs doctrine.

This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provisions. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions and there can be no assurance that the provisions will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions.

These exclusive-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. If a court were to find either exclusive-forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could seriously harm our business.

61

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds from the IPO

On June 25, 2018, we completed our IPO and issued 5,750,000 shares of our common stock at an initial offering price of $15.00 per share (inclusive of 750,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the full exercise of an overallotment option granted to the underwriters in connection with the offering). We received net proceeds from the IPO of approximately $77.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $6.0 million and expenses of approximately $2.6 million. None of the expenses associated with the IPO were paid to directors, officers or persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities, or to their associates. Jefferies LLC and Cowen and Company, LLC acted as lead book-running managers for the IPO. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and William Blair & Company, L.L.C. acted as joint book-running managers.

Shares of our common stock began trading on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 21, 2018. The offer and sale of the shares were registered under the Securities Act on Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-225194), which was declared effective on June 20, 2018.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO as described in our Prospectus. As of June 30, 2020, we have used approximately $59.5 million of the net offering proceeds primarily to advance our product candidates through clinical trial programs and for working capital and general corporate purposes. We invested the remaining funds received in cash equivalents and other marketable securities in accordance with our investment policy.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information.

None

62

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-38542), filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018).
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-38542), filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL Document.
101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibit 101).

* Furnished herewith and not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

63

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ John Fowler
		John Fowler
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ Marc Belsky
		Marc Belsky
		Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

64

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Fowler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ John Fowler
		John Fowler
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc Belsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 6, 2020	By:	/s/ Marc Belsky
		Marc Belsky
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), John Fowler, Chief Executive Officer of Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), and Marc Belsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2020, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 6, 2020

/s/ John Fowler	/s/ Marc Belsky
John Fowler	Marc Belsky
Chief Executive Officer	Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)	(Principal Financial Officer)

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Aug. 04, 2020
Cover [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2020
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2020
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Trading Symbol	KZR
Entity Registrant Name	Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001645666
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Emerging Growth Company	true
Entity Small Business	true
Entity Ex Transition Period	true
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		46,256,284
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Shell Company	false
Entity File Number	001-38542
Entity Tax Identification Number	47-3366145
Entity Address, Address Line One	4000 Shoreline Court
Entity Address, Address Line Two	Suite 300
Entity Address, City or Town	South San Francisco
Entity Address, State or Province	CA
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code	94080
City Area Code	650
Local Phone Number	822-5600
Document Quarterly Report	true
Document Transition Report	false
Entity Interactive Data Current	Yes
Title of 12(b) Security	Common Stock, $0.001 par value
Security Exchange Name	NASDAQ
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code	DE

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 17,296	$ 14,951
Marketable securities	140,175	63,255
Prepaid expenses	1,780	1,878
Other current assets	1,312	1,048
Total current assets	160,563	81,132
Property and equipment, net	3,902	4,282
Operating lease right-of-use asset	3,576	3,817
Other assets	282	282
Total assets	168,323	89,513
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,007	823
Accrued liabilities	3,027	4,218
Operating lease liabilities, current	969	900
Other liabilities, current	42	62
Total current liabilities	5,045	6,003
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent	4,960	5,464
Total liabilities	10,005	11,467
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019; 45,826,798 and 19,208,077 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019, respectively	46	19
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, 2019
Additional paid-in capital	262,041	162,505
Accumulated other comprehensive income(loss)	25	(196)
Accumulated deficit	(103,794)	(84,282)
Total stockholders' equity	158,318	78,046
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 168,323	$ 89,513

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Statement Of Financial Position [Abstract]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	125,000,000	125,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	45,826,798	19,208,077
Common stock, shares outstanding	45,826,798	19,208,077
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$ 7,148	$ 6,925	$ 14,605	$ 12,852
General and administrative	2,705	2,430	5,726	4,812
Total operating expenses	9,853	9,355	20,331	17,664
Loss from operations	(9,853)	(9,355)	(20,331)	(17,664)
Interest income	353	637	819	1,304
Net loss	$ (9,500)	$ (8,718)	$ (19,512)	$ (16,360)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$ (0.22)	$ (0.46)	$ (0.51)	$ (0.86)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per common share, basic and diluted	42,936,991	19,073,830	37,902,294	19,058,263

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Statement Of Income And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (9,500)	$ (8,718)	$ (19,512)	$ (16,360)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	97	(49)	(20)	(41)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities	50	23	241	88
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	147	(26)	221	47
Comprehensive loss	$ (9,353)	$ (8,744)	$ (19,291)	$ (16,313)

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Accumulated Deficit
Balance at Dec. 31, 2018	$ 108,797	$ 19	$ 158,176	$ (203)	$ (49,195)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2018		19,114,421
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans	4		4
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans, shares		4,000
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued pursuant to early exercises	12		12
Stock-based compensation expense	901		901
Other comprehensive income (loss)	73			73
Net loss	(7,642)				(7,642)
Balance at Mar. 31, 2019	102,145	$ 19	159,093	(130)	(56,837)
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2019		19,118,421
Balance at Dec. 31, 2018	108,797	$ 19	158,176	(203)	(49,195)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2018		19,114,421
Other comprehensive income (loss)	47
Net loss	(16,360)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2019	94,603	$ 19	160,295	(156)	(65,555)
Balance, shares at Jun. 30, 2019		19,132,645
Balance at Mar. 31, 2019	102,145	$ 19	159,093	(130)	(56,837)
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2019		19,118,421
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans	180		180
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans, shares		14,224
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued pursuant to early exercises	13		13
Stock-based compensation expense	1,009		1,009
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(26)			(26)
Net loss	(8,718)				(8,718)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2019	94,603	$ 19	160,295	(156)	(65,555)
Balance, shares at Jun. 30, 2019		19,132,645
Balance at Dec. 31, 2019	78,046	$ 19	162,505	(196)	(84,282)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2019		19,208,077
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants through underwritten offering	53,360	$ 19	53,341
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants through underwritten offering, shares		18,965,385
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans	3		3
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans, shares		3,000
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued pursuant to early exercises	10		10
Stock-based compensation expense	1,173		1,173
Other comprehensive income (loss)	74			74
Net loss	(10,012)				(10,012)
Balance at Mar. 31, 2020	122,654	$ 38	217,032	(122)	(94,294)
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2020		38,176,462
Balance at Dec. 31, 2019	78,046	$ 19	162,505	(196)	(84,282)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2019		19,208,077
Other comprehensive income (loss)	221
Net loss	(19,512)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2020	158,318	$ 46	262,041	25	(103,794)
Balance, shares at Jun. 30, 2020		45,826,798
Balance at Mar. 31, 2020	122,654	$ 38	217,032	(122)	(94,294)
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2020		38,176,462
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants through underwritten offering	43,663	$ 8	43,655
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants through underwritten offering, shares		7,590,909
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans	125		125
Issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans, shares		59,427
Vesting related to shares of common stock issued pursuant to early exercises	10		10
Stock-based compensation expense	1,219		1,219
Other comprehensive income (loss)	147			147
Net loss	(9,500)				(9,500)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2020	$ 158,318	$ 46	$ 262,041	$ 25	$ (103,794)
Balance, shares at Jun. 30, 2020		45,826,798

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Mar. 31, 2020
Statement Of Stockholders Equity [Abstract]
Issuance of common stock and pre-funded warrants through underwritten offerings, offering costs	$ 3,087	$ 3,447

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (19,512)	$ (16,360)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	731	628
Stock-based compensation	2,392	1,910
Amortization of premiums and discounts on marketable securities	(183)	(695)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other long-term assets	(166)	(440)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities	(1,219)	919
Operating lease liabilities	(435)	(374)
Net cash used in operating activities	(18,392)	(14,412)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(110)	(523)
Purchases of marketable securities	(143,780)	(59,255)
Maturities of marketable securities	67,284	62,896
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(76,606)	3,118
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock and pre-funded warrants in underwritten offerings, net of offering costs	97,235
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock incentive plans	128	184
Net cash provided by financing activities	97,363	184
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(20)	(41)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	2,345	(11,151)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period	14,951	24,182
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period	17,296	13,031
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing information:
Reclassification of employee stock liability to equity upon vesting	20	25
Purchase of property and equipment in accounts payable		$ 23
Unpaid offering costs in accrued liabilities	$ 212

XML

Organization and Description of the Business

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization and Description of the Business

1. Organization and Description of the Business

Description of Business

Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware in February 2015 and commenced operations in June 2015. The Company is a clinical-stage biotechnology company, discovering and developing novel small molecule therapeutics to treat unmet needs in autoimmunity and cancer. The Company’s principal operations are in South San Francisco, California, and it operates in one segment.

Liquidity

Since commencing operations in mid-2015, substantially all of the Company’s efforts have been focused on research, development, and the advancement of the Company’s lead product candidate, KZR-616. The Company’s ultimate success depends on the outcome of the ongoing research and development activities. The Company has not yet generated product sales and as a result has experienced operating losses since inception and had an accumulated deficit of $103.8 million as of June 30, 2020. The Company expects to incur additional losses in the future to conduct research and development and will need to raise additional capital to fully implement management’s business plan. The Company intends to raise such capital through the issuance of additional equity, and potentially through borrowings, strategic alliances with partner companies and other licensing transactions. However, if such financing is not available at adequate levels, the Company may need to reevaluate its operating plans. Management believes that its existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund the Company’s cash requirements for at least 12 months following the issuance of these financial statements.

In July 2019, the Company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement ^SM (the “ATM Agreement”) with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion through Jefferies, as its sales agent, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. The ATM Agreement was terminated in June 2020. Prior to the termination, the Company did not sell any shares of its common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement. Accordingly, the $50.0 million of securities unsold pursuant to the ATM Agreement became available for issuance on the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-232542).

On February 4, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 18,965,385 shares of its common stock, which includes the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,884,615 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “February Offering”). The public offering price of our common stock was $2.60 per share and the public offering price of each pre-funded warrant was $2.599 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the February offering were approximately $53.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. The Company’s existing stockholder, Morningside Ventures Investments Ltd, together with its affiliate, and certain of the Company’s officers and directors purchased an aggregate of approximately $22.9 million of common stock in the offering.

On June 11, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 7,590,909 shares of its common stock and, to certain investors in lieu thereof, pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “June Offering”). The public offering price of our common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of each pre-funded warrant was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the June Offering were approximately $43.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. In July 2020, the underwriters exercised an option to purchase an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us. The Company’s existing stockholder, Equal Talent Investments Limited, an affiliate of Morningside Venture Investments Ltd, and one of the Company’s directors purchased an aggregate of approximately $8.5 million of common stock in the June Offering.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the notes thereto, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 12, 2020 (the “Annual Report”), and there have been no material changes during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the Company’s accounts and those of its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Kezar Life Sciences Australia Pty Ltd., which is a proprietary company limited by shares. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report.

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying financial information as of June 30, 2020 is unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that our management considers necessary for the fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of our financial condition at the date of the interim balance sheet. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any other interim period. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our Annual Report.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of fixed assets, stock-based compensation, and accrued research and development costs. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific relevant assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

We also anticipate that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on the clinical and pre-clinical development timelines for our clinical and pre-clinical programs.  Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and therefore require the exercise of judgment. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company is not aware of any specific event or circumstance that would require the Company to update its estimates, assumptions and judgments or revise the carrying value of its assets or liabilities. These estimates may change as new events occur and additional information is obtained and are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates and any such differences may be material to the Company’s financial statements.

Significant Risks and Uncertainties

With the global spread of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020, we have implemented business continuity plans designed to address and mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.  The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, our pre-clinical and clinical development and regulatory efforts, our corporate development objectives and the value of and market for our common stock, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing and business closure requirements in the United States, Europe and other countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken globally to contain and treat the disease.  The global economic slowdown, the overall disruption of global healthcare systems and the other risks and uncertainties associated with the pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

In addition, we are subject to other challenges and risks specific to our business and our ability to execute on our strategy, as well as risks and uncertainties common to companies in the biotechnology industry with development operations, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with: obtaining regulatory feedback regarding our product candidates; delays or problems in the supply of our product candidates; loss of single source suppliers or their failure to comply with manufacturing regulations; identifying, acquiring or in-licensing additional technologies or product candidates; clinical development and the inherent uncertainty of clinical success; the challenges of protecting and enhancing our intellectual property rights; and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and results of operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks and uncertainties discussed above.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at fair value.

Marketable Securities

All marketable securities have been classified as “available-for-sale” in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and cash management strategy. Short-term marketable securities mature within one-year from the balance sheet date. Investments in marketable securities are recorded at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses reported within accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit until realized or until a determination is made that an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred. If a credit loss does exist for available-for-sale debt securities and should be recognized, an allowance will be recorded rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion, together with interest on securities, are included in interest income on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Leases

At lease commencement, the Company records a lease liability based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company calculates the present value of lease payments using the discount rate implicit in the lease, unless that rate cannot be readily determined. In that case, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company records a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) lease asset based on the lease liability, adjusted for any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs paid to the lessor prior to the lease commencement date.

After lease commencement, the Company measures its leases as follows: (i) the lease liability based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using the discount rate determined at lease commencement; and (ii) the ROU lease asset based on the remeasured lease liability, adjusted for any unamortized lease incentives received, any unamortized initial direct costs and the cumulative difference between rent expense and amounts paid under the lease agreement. Any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.

The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2020

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) as well as subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The Company adopted the new standard using the modified retrospective approach as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The amendment of ASU No. 2018-13 removes disclosure requirements from Topic 820 in the areas of: (1) the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (2) the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and (3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles found in ASC740, Income Taxes. As part of the simplification, along with other exceptions, it removes the exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation in the event of a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items. The Company early adopted ASU 2019-20 as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

3. Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value. The carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company applies fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are required to be recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. The Company determines the fair value of Level 1 assets using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company reviews trading activity and pricing for Level 2 investments as of each measurement date. Level 2 inputs, which are obtained from various third-party data providers, represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and were derived from observable market data, or, if not directly observable, were derived from or corroborated by other observable market data.

In certain cases, where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs as of June 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as described above (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	17,100	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		75,788		75,788		—		—
Commercial paper		30,906		—		30,906		—
Corporate debt securities		14,056		—		14,056		—
U.S. agency bonds		19,425		—		19,425		—
Total	$	157,275	$	92,888	$	64,387	$	—

	December 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	14,731	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		5,285		—		—
Commercial paper		15,186		—		15,186		—
Corporate debt securities		17,171		—		17,171		—
U.S. agency bonds		25,613		—		25,613		—
Total	$	77,986	$	20,016	$	57,970	$	—

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Investments Debt And Equity Securities [Abstract]

Available-for-Sale Securities

4. Available-for-Sale Securities

The following table is a summary of available-for-sale securities recorded in cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	—	$	—		$	17,100
U.S. Treasury securities		75,761		28		(1	)		75,788
Commercial paper		30,791		115		—			30,906
Corporate debt securities		13,965		91		—			14,056
U.S. agency bonds		19,385		40		—			19,425
Total	$	157,002	$	274	$	(1	)	$	157,275

	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	—	$	—		$	14,731
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		1		(1	)		5,285
Commercial paper		15,174		12		—			15,186
Corporate debt securities		17,168		3		—			17,171
U.S. agency bonds		25,597		16		—			25,613
Total	$	77,955	$	32	$	(1	)	$	77,986

As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company has not recognized an allowance for credit losses on any securities in an unrealized loss position.

The following table displays additional information regarding gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security type for available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 consecutive months					Less than 12 consecutive months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)
Total	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)

The Company currently does not intend to sell these securities prior to maturity and does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2020. There were no sales of available-for-sale securities in any of the periods presented.

As of June 30, 2020, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity are shown below (in thousands):

	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities maturing:
In one year or less	$	157,002	$	157,275
Total available-for-sale securities	$	157,002	$	157,275

XML

Balance Sheet Components

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Balance Sheet Components

5. Balance Sheet Components

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Leasehold improvements	$	3,268		$	3,268
Furniture, laboratory and office equipment		2,666			2,578
Computer equipment		275			253
Total property and equipment		6,209			6,099
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,307	)		(1,817	)
Property and equipment, net	$	3,902		$	4,282

Depreciation expense was $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Accrued preclinical and research costs	$	759	$	1,687
Accrued clinical costs		825		1,027
Accrued employee-related costs		973		1,293
Accrued professional services		296		53
Other		174		158
Total accrued liabilities	$	3,027	$	4,218

XML

Lease

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Leases [Abstract]

Lease

6. Lease

In August 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement to lease 24,357 square feet of combination laboratory and office space in South San Francisco, California. This lease expires in February 2025.

The contractually specified minimum rent and annual rent increases for the operating lease are included in the measurement of the ROU asset and related lease liabilities. Under the lease arrangement, we may be required to pay directly, or reimburse the lessor for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs. Such amounts are generally variable and therefore not included in the measurement of the ROU asset and related lease liability but are instead recognized as variable lease expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations when they are incurred. The operating lease agreement has one option to extend the lease term for a period of five years at the fair market rate at the time of the extension. The option to extend the lease was not recognized as part of the Company’s lease liability and ROU asset as the Company determined the renewal rent costs are uncertain and the option is not reasonably certain to be exercised.

Because the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. The Company recorded lease liabilities and ROU asset for its office lease based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. As of June 30, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term was 4.67 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liability was 10.0%.

Information related to the Company’s ROU asset and related lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30, 2020		Six months ended June 30, 2020
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	$	224	$	435
Operating lease costs		275		550
Variable lease costs		81		212
Maturities of lease liabilities as of June 30, 2020 were as follows    for the years ending December 31:
2020			$	752
2021				1,542
2022				1,588
2023				1,635
2024				1,684
Thereafter				282
Total undiscounted lease payments				7,483
Less: imputed interest				(1,554	)
Total lease liabilities			$	5,929
Operating lease liabilities, current				969
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent				4,960
Total operating lease liabilities			$	5,929

XML

Pre-Funded Warrants

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Equity [Abstract]

Pre-Funded Warrants

7. Pre-Funded Warrants

On February 4, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 18,965,385 shares of its common stock including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, and pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,884,615 shares of its common stock. The public offering price of the common stock was $2.60 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $2.599 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $53.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by the Company.

On June 11, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 7,590,909 shares of its common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 909,091 shares of its common stock. The public offering price of the common stock was $5.50 per share and the public offering price of the pre-funded warrants was $5.499 per underlying share. The net proceeds from the public offering were approximately $43.7 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by the Company.

Each pre-funded warrant entitles the holder to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share and expires 20 years from the date of issuance. These warrants were recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity within additional paid-in capital. Per the terms of the warrant agreement, a holder of the outstanding warrant is not entitled to exercise any portion of the pre-funded warrant if, upon exercise of such portion of the warrant, the holder’s ownership of our common stock (together with its affiliates) or the combined voting power of our securities beneficially owned by such holder (together with its affiliates) would exceed 9.99% after giving effect to the exercise (“Maximum Ownership Percentage”). Upon at least 61 days’ prior notice to us by the warrant holder, any warrant holder may increase or decrease the Maximum Ownership Percentage to any other percentage not to exceed 19.99%. As of June 30, 2020, no shares underlying the pre-funded warrants have been exercised.

The following table represents a summary of the pre-funded warrants outstanding as of the date identified.

Issue Date	Classification	Exercise Price		Expiration Date	Number of shares underlying warrants as of June 30, 2020
February 4, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	February 4, 2040		2,884,615
June 11, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	June 11, 2040		909,091
Total Outstanding						3,793,706

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

8. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Incentive Plans

2018 Equity Incentive Plan

In June 2018, the Company’s board of directors adopted and its stockholders approved the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which became effective as of June 20, 2018, at which point no further grants could be made under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) described below. Under the 2018 Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonstatutory stock options (“NSOs”), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. As of June 30, 2020, options to purchase 2,648,968 shares of common stock were outstanding and 1,348,693 shares were available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan.

Initially, subject to adjustment as provided in the 2018 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to stock awards under the 2018 Plan was 4,000,000 shares, which is the sum of (i) 1,600,692 shares plus (ii) the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2015 Plan at the time the 2018 Plan became effective and (iii) the number of shares subject to stock options or other stock awards granted under the 2015 Plan that expire, terminate are forfeited or otherwise not issued, or are withheld to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy a purchase or exercise price of an award (such as upon the expiration or termination of a stock award prior to vesting). The number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the 2018 Plan automatically increases on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019 and continuing through and including January 1, 2028, by 5% of the total number of shares of capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by the Company’s board of directors prior to such increase. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs under the 2018 Plan is 12,500,000 shares.

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2015 Plan provided for the granting of ISOs and NSOs to employees, directors and consultants at the discretion of its board of directors. The 2015 Plan was terminated as to future awards in June 2018, although it continues to govern the terms of options that remain outstanding under the 2015 Plan.

No additional stock awards will be granted under the 2015 Plan, and all outstanding stock awards granted under the 2015 Plan that are repurchased, forfeited, expire or are cancelled will become available for grant under the 2018 Plan in accordance with its terms.

Options granted under the 2015 Plan expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted under the 2015 Plan vest over periods determined by the Company’s board of directors, generally over four years. The 2015 Plan allows for early exercise of certain options prior to vesting. Upon termination of employment, the unvested shares are subject to repurchase at the original exercise price. As of June 30, 2020 options to purchase 1,829,074 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2015 Plan.

2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In June 2018, the Company’s board of directors adopted and its stockholders approved the 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which became effective as of June 20, 2018. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The number of shares of common stock initially reserved for issuance under the ESPP was 200,000 shares. The ESPP provides for an annual increase on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019 and continuing through and including January 1, 2028, equal to the lesser of (i) 1% of the shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the prior fiscal year or (ii) 375,000 shares, or a lesser number of shares determined by the Company’s board of directors prior to such increase. As of June 30, 2020, 83,083 shares of common stock had been issued under the ESPP and 500,141 shares remained available for future issuance under the ESPP. The price per share of common stock to be paid by an ESPP participant on the applicable purchase date of an offering period shall be equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of a share of common stock on (i) the applicable offering date or (ii) the applicable purchase date. The Company’s board of directors authorized an initial six-month offering period beginning on November 16, 2018 and ending on May 15, 2019. The Company’s board of directors has subsequently authorized additional six-month offering periods, with the most recent offering period beginning on May 16, 2020.

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes activity under the Company’s stock option plans and related information (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Number of Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2019		3,107,066		$	7.19		8.2	$	3,151
Options granted		1,389,476		$	3.76
Options exercised		(6,000	)	$	0.90			$	22
Options cancelled		(12,500	)	$	22.85
Outstanding at June 30, 2020		4,478,042		$	6.09		8.3	$	7,229
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2020		1,950,185		$	5.26		7.3	$	4,066

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $2.68 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was $12,000 and $22,000, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of exercise.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized by function was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Research and development	$	518	$	470	$	982	$	917
General and administrative		701		539		1,410		993
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,219	$	1,009	$	2,392	$	1,910

As of June 30, 2020, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost was $11.7 million with an estimated weighted average amortization period of 2.7 years

The fair value of the stock options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following range of assumptions:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Expected term (years)	5.5 - 6.0		5.9		5.0 - 6.0		5.9
Expected volatility	88.1 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.3	%	83.8 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.9	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.4 - 0.5	%	1.9 - 2.4	%	0.4 - 1.6	%	1.9 - 2.6	%
Expected dividend yield	—		—		—		—

XML

Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

9. Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Deferred tax assets generated from the Company’s net operating losses have been fully reserved, as the Company believes it is not more likely than not that the benefit will be realized.

In December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the “PATH Act”) was signed into law, which created several new research and development (“R&D”) tax credit provisions, including allowing qualified small businesses to utilize the R&D credit against the employer’s portion of payroll tax up to a maximum of $250,000 per year. The Company qualified as a small business under the PATH Act for 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company utilized $108,000 and $264,000, respectively, of R&D tax credits as a reduction of payroll expenses to offset its payroll tax liabilities, compared to $79,000 and $172,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. The remaining R&D tax credits available for future payroll tax liabilities have been recorded as deferred tax assets with a full valuation allowance.

XML

Net Loss per Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Net Loss Per Share

10. Net Loss Per Share

Net Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share during the periods presented (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(9,500	)	$	(8,718	)	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		42,936,991			19,073,830			37,902,294			19,058,263
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.86	)

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants outstanding during the period, without consideration of common share equivalents. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, pre-funded warrants and common share equivalents outstanding for the period. The pre-funded warrants are included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per common share as the exercise price is negligible and the pre-funded warrants are fully vested and exercisable. Common share equivalents are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share when their effect is dilutive.

Potential dilutive securities, which include, vested and unvested options to purchase common stock and unvested common stock outstanding that were exercised early have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect is antidilutive. Therefore, the denominator used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per common share is the same in all periods presented.

The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of the diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
Stock options to purchase common stock		4,478,042		2,875,446
Common stock subject to future vesting		19,441		45,287
Total		4,497,483		2,920,733

XML

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Event

11. Subsequent Event

In July 2020, the Company issued an additional 427,707 shares of common stock, pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock in the June Offering, for net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses paid by us.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of presentation and consolidation

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the Company’s accounts and those of its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Kezar Life Sciences Australia Pty Ltd., which is a proprietary company limited by shares. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report.

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying financial information as of June 30, 2020 is unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that our management considers necessary for the fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of our financial condition at the date of the interim balance sheet. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any other interim period. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our Annual Report.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of fixed assets, stock-based compensation, and accrued research and development costs. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific relevant assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

We also anticipate that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on the clinical and pre-clinical development timelines for our clinical and pre-clinical programs.  Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and therefore require the exercise of judgment. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company is not aware of any specific event or circumstance that would require the Company to update its estimates, assumptions and judgments or revise the carrying value of its assets or liabilities. These estimates may change as new events occur and additional information is obtained and are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates and any such differences may be material to the Company’s financial statements.

Significant Risks and Uncertainties

Significant Risks and Uncertainties

With the global spread of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020, we have implemented business continuity plans designed to address and mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.  The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, our pre-clinical and clinical development and regulatory efforts, our corporate development objectives and the value of and market for our common stock, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence at this time, such as the ultimate duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, social distancing and business closure requirements in the United States, Europe and other countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken globally to contain and treat the disease.  The global economic slowdown, the overall disruption of global healthcare systems and the other risks and uncertainties associated with the pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

In addition, we are subject to other challenges and risks specific to our business and our ability to execute on our strategy, as well as risks and uncertainties common to companies in the biotechnology industry with development operations, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with: obtaining regulatory feedback regarding our product candidates; delays or problems in the supply of our product candidates; loss of single source suppliers or their failure to comply with manufacturing regulations; identifying, acquiring or in-licensing additional technologies or product candidates; clinical development and the inherent uncertainty of clinical success; the challenges of protecting and enhancing our intellectual property rights; and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, to the extent the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and results of operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks and uncertainties discussed above.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at fair value.

Marketable Securities

Marketable Securities

All marketable securities have been classified as “available-for-sale” in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and cash management strategy. Short-term marketable securities mature within one-year from the balance sheet date. Investments in marketable securities are recorded at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses reported within accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit until realized or until a determination is made that an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred. If a credit loss does exist for available-for-sale debt securities and should be recognized, an allowance will be recorded rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion, together with interest on securities, are included in interest income on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Leases

Leases

At lease commencement, the Company records a lease liability based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company calculates the present value of lease payments using the discount rate implicit in the lease, unless that rate cannot be readily determined. In that case, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments over the expected lease term. The Company records a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) lease asset based on the lease liability, adjusted for any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs paid to the lessor prior to the lease commencement date.

After lease commencement, the Company measures its leases as follows: (i) the lease liability based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using the discount rate determined at lease commencement; and (ii) the ROU lease asset based on the remeasured lease liability, adjusted for any unamortized lease incentives received, any unamortized initial direct costs and the cumulative difference between rent expense and amounts paid under the lease agreement. Any lease incentives received and any initial direct costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.

The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2020

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2020

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) as well as subsequent amendments to the initial guidance under ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 (collectively Topic 326). Topic 326 requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The Company adopted the new standard using the modified retrospective approach as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The amendment of ASU No. 2018-13 removes disclosure requirements from Topic 820 in the areas of: (1) the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (2) the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and (3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles found in ASC740, Income Taxes. As part of the simplification, along with other exceptions, it removes the exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation in the event of a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items. The Company early adopted ASU 2019-20 as of January 1, 2020 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value. The carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company applies fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are required to be recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. The Company determines the fair value of Level 1 assets using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company reviews trading activity and pricing for Level 2 investments as of each measurement date. Level 2 inputs, which are obtained from various third-party data providers, represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and were derived from observable market data, or, if not directly observable, were derived from or corroborated by other observable market data.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Summary of Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as described above (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	17,100	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		75,788		75,788		—		—
Commercial paper		30,906		—		30,906		—
Corporate debt securities		14,056		—		14,056		—
U.S. agency bonds		19,425		—		19,425		—
Total	$	157,275	$	92,888	$	64,387	$	—

	December 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets:
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	14,731	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		5,285		—		—
Commercial paper		15,186		—		15,186		—
Corporate debt securities		17,171		—		17,171		—
U.S. agency bonds		25,613		—		25,613		—
Total	$	77,986	$	20,016	$	57,970	$	—

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Investments Debt And Equity Securities [Abstract]

Summary of Available-For-Sale Securities Recorded in Cash and Cash Equivalents or Marketable Securities

The following table is a summary of available-for-sale securities recorded in cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	17,100	$	—	$	—		$	17,100
U.S. Treasury securities		75,761		28		(1	)		75,788
Commercial paper		30,791		115		—			30,906
Corporate debt securities		13,965		91		—			14,056
U.S. agency bonds		19,385		40		—			19,425
Total	$	157,002	$	274	$	(1	)	$	157,275

	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Financial Assets
Money market funds	$	14,731	$	—	$	—		$	14,731
U.S. Treasury securities		5,285		1		(1	)		5,285
Commercial paper		15,174		12		—			15,186
Corporate debt securities		17,168		3		—			17,171
U.S. agency bonds		25,597		16		—			25,613
Total	$	77,955	$	32	$	(1	)	$	77,986

Summary of Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value by Major Security Type for Available-For-Sale Securities in Unrealized Loss Position

The following table displays additional information regarding gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security type for available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 consecutive months					Less than 12 consecutive months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)
Total	$	8,117	$	(1	)	$	4,535	$	(1	)

Summary of Amortized Cost and Estimated Fair Value of Available-for-sale Securities by Contractual Maturity

As of June 30, 2020, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity are shown below (in thousands):

	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities maturing:
In one year or less	$	157,002	$	157,275
Total available-for-sale securities	$	157,002	$	157,275

XML

Balance Sheet Components (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Leasehold improvements	$	3,268		$	3,268
Furniture, laboratory and office equipment		2,666			2,578
Computer equipment		275			253
Total property and equipment		6,209			6,099
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,307	)		(1,817	)
Property and equipment, net	$	3,902		$	4,282

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Accrued preclinical and research costs	$	759	$	1,687
Accrued clinical costs		825		1,027
Accrued employee-related costs		973		1,293
Accrued professional services		296		53
Other		174		158
Total accrued liabilities	$	3,027	$	4,218

XML

Lease (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Leases [Abstract]

Details of Right-of-Use Assets and Lease Liabilities

Information related to the Company’s ROU asset and related lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30, 2020		Six months ended June 30, 2020
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	$	224	$	435
Operating lease costs		275		550
Variable lease costs		81		212
Maturities of lease liabilities as of June 30, 2020 were as follows    for the years ending December 31:
2020			$	752
2021				1,542
2022				1,588
2023				1,635
2024				1,684
Thereafter				282
Total undiscounted lease payments				7,483
Less: imputed interest				(1,554	)
Total lease liabilities			$	5,929
Operating lease liabilities, current				969
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent				4,960
Total operating lease liabilities			$	5,929

XML

Pre-Funded Warrants (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Equity [Abstract]

Summary of Pre-Funded Warrants Outstanding

The following table represents a summary of the pre-funded warrants outstanding as of the date identified.

Issue Date	Classification	Exercise Price		Expiration Date	Number of shares underlying warrants as of June 30, 2020
February 4, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	February 4, 2040		2,884,615
June 11, 2020	Equity	$	0.001	June 11, 2040		909,091
Total Outstanding						3,793,706

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Summary of Activity under Stock Option Plans and Related Information

The following table summarizes activity under the Company’s stock option plans and related information (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Number of Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2019		3,107,066		$	7.19		8.2	$	3,151
Options granted		1,389,476		$	3.76
Options exercised		(6,000	)	$	0.90			$	22
Options cancelled		(12,500	)	$	22.85
Outstanding at June 30, 2020		4,478,042		$	6.09		8.3	$	7,229
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2020		1,950,185		$	5.26		7.3	$	4,066

Stock-Based Compensation Expense Recognized

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized by function was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Research and development	$	518	$	470	$	982	$	917
General and administrative		701		539		1,410		993
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,219	$	1,009	$	2,392	$	1,910

Fair Value of Employee Stock Options Granted is Calculated Using Black Scholes Option Pricing Model with Range of Assumptions

The fair value of the stock options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following range of assumptions:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Expected term (years)	5.5 - 6.0		5.9		5.0 - 6.0		5.9
Expected volatility	88.1 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.3	%	83.8 - 90.8	%	78.7 - 81.9	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.4 - 0.5	%	1.9 - 2.4	%	0.4 - 1.6	%	1.9 - 2.6	%
Expected dividend yield	—		—		—		—

XML

Net Loss per Share (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Calculation of Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share during the periods presented (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(9,500	)	$	(8,718	)	$	(19,512	)	$	(16,360	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		42,936,991			19,073,830			37,902,294			19,058,263
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.86	)

Anti-dilutive Outstanding Shares of Common Stock Equivalents Excluded from Computation of Diluted Net Loss per Share

The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of the diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
Stock options to purchase common stock		4,478,042		2,875,446
Common stock subject to future vesting		19,441		45,287
Total		4,497,483		2,920,733

XML

Organization and Description of the Business - Additional Information (Details)				1 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 11, 2020 USD ($) $ / shares shares	May 31, 2020 USD ($) shares	Feb. 04, 2020 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Jul. 31, 2020 USD ($) shares	Jul. 31, 2019 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2020 USD ($) Segment $ / shares shares	Dec. 31, 2019 USD ($)
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Number of operating segments | Segment						1
Accumulated deficit						$ 103,794,000	$ 84,282,000
Pre funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock | shares	909,091		2,884,615			3,793,706
Pre funded warrants exercise price | $ / shares	$ 0.001		$ 0.001			$ 0.001
Underwritten Public Offering
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock | shares	7,590,909		18,965,385
Pre funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock | shares	909,091		2,884,615
Pre funded warrants exercise price | $ / shares	$ 0.001		$ 0.001
Common stock, shares issued, price per share | $ / shares	5.50		2.60
Warrant issue price per share | $ / shares	$ 5.499		$ 2.599
Net proceeds from the public offering	$ 43,700,000		$ 53,400,000
Underwritten Public Offering | Subsequent Event
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock | shares				427,707
Net proceeds from the public offering				$ 2,200,000
Underwritten Public Offering | Existing Stockholder, Morningside Ventures and certain officers and directors
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Net proceeds from the public offering			$ 22,900,000
Underwritten Public Offering | Existing Stockholder, Equal Talent Investments Limited, and one of the Directors
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Net proceeds from the public offering	$ 8,500,000
ATM Agreement | Jefferies, LLC
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock | shares		0
Securities unsold and available for issuance		$ 50,000,000.0
Minimum
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Sufficient cash and cash equivalents available period term						12 months
Maximum | ATM Agreement | Jefferies, LLC
Organization And Description Of Business [Line Items]
Common stock aggregate offering price					$ 50,000,000.0

XML

Fair Value Measurements - Summary of Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis (Details) - Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	$ 157,275	$ 77,986
Level 1
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	92,888	20,016
Level 2
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	64,387	57,970
Money Market Funds
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	17,100	14,731
Money Market Funds | Level 1
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	17,100	14,731
U.S. Treasury Securities
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	75,788	5,285
U.S. Treasury Securities | Level 1
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	75,788	5,285
Commercial paper
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	30,906	15,186
Commercial paper | Level 2
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	30,906	15,186
Corporate debt securities
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	14,056	17,171
Corporate debt securities | Level 2
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	14,056	17,171
U.S. agency bonds
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	19,425	25,613
U.S. agency bonds | Level 2
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Financial Assets	$ 19,425	$ 25,613

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities - Summary of Available-For-Sale Securities Recorded in Cash and Cash Equivalents or Marketable Securities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	$ 157,002
Fair Value	157,275
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	157,002	$ 77,955
Unrealized Gains	274	32
Unrealized Losses	(1)	(1)
Fair Value	157,275	77,986
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | Money Market Funds
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	17,100	14,731
Fair Value	17,100	14,731
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | U.S. Treasury Securities
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	75,761	5,285
Unrealized Gains	28	1
Unrealized Losses	(1)	(1)
Fair Value	75,788	5,285
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | Commercial paper
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	30,791	15,174
Unrealized Gains	115	12
Fair Value	30,906	15,186
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | Corporate debt securities
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	13,965	17,168
Unrealized Gains	91	3
Fair Value	14,056	17,171
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | U.S. agency bonds
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Amortized Cost	19,385	25,597
Unrealized Gains	40	16
Fair Value	$ 19,425	$ 25,613

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Investments Debt And Equity Securities [Abstract]
Allowance for credit losses on securities in unrealized loss position	$ 0	$ 0
Sale of available-for-sale securities	$ 0

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities - Summary of Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value by Major Security Type for Available-For-Sale Securities in Unrealized Loss Position (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Fair Value	$ 8,117	$ 4,535
Unrealized Losses	(1)	(1)
U.S. Treasury Securities
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Fair Value	8,117	4,535
Unrealized Losses	$ (1)	$ (1)

XML

Available-for-Sale Securities - Summary of Amortized Cost and Estimated Fair Value of Available-for-sale Securities by Contractual Maturity (Details) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020 USD ($)
Available-for-sale securities maturing, Amortized Cost
In one year or less, Amortized Cost	$ 157,002
Amortized Cost	157,002
Available-for-sale securities maturing, Estimated Fair Value:
In one year or less, Estimated Fair Value	157,275
Total available-for-sale securities, Estimated Fair Value	$ 157,275

XML

Balance Sheet Components - Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]
Total property and equipment	$ 6,209	$ 6,099
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(2,307)	(1,817)
Property and equipment, net	3,902	4,282
Leasehold Improvements
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]
Total property and equipment	3,268	3,268
Furniture, Laboratory and Office Equipment
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]
Total property and equipment	2,666	2,578
Computer Equipment
Property Plant And Equipment [Line Items]
Total property and equipment	$ 275	$ 253

XML

Balance Sheet Components - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Depreciation expense	$ 0.3	$ 0.2	$ 0.5	$ 0.4

XML

Balance Sheet Components - Accrued Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Accrued preclinical and research costs	$ 759	$ 1,687
Accrued clinical costs	825	1,027
Accrued employee-related costs	973	1,293
Accrued professional services	296	53
Other	174	158
Total accrued liabilities	$ 3,027	$ 4,218

XML

Lease - Additional Information (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020 ft²
Operating lease existence of option to extend [true false]	true
Operating lease, option to extend	The operating lease agreement has one option to extend the lease term for a period of five years at the fair market rate at the time of the extension.
Operating lease, renewal term	5 years
Weighted average remaining lease term	4 years 8 months 1 day
Operating lease liability, weighted average discount rate	10.00%
South San Francisco, California [Member]
Area of lease	24,357
Lease expiration date	Feb. 28, 2025

XML

Lease - Details of Right-of-Use Assets and Lease Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Dec. 31, 2019
Lessee Disclosure [Abstract]
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	$ 224	$ 435	$ 374
Operating lease costs	275	550
Variable lease costs	81	212
2020	752	752
2021	1,542	1,542
2022	1,588	1,588
2023	1,635	1,635
2024	1,684	1,684
Thereafter	282	282
Total undiscounted lease payments	7,483	7,483
Less: imputed interest	(1,554)	(1,554)
Total lease liabilities	5,929	5,929
Operating lease liabilities, current	969	969		$ 900
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent	4,960	4,960		$ 5,464
Total operating lease liabilities	$ 5,929	$ 5,929

XML

Pre-Funded Warrants - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	Jun. 11, 2020	Feb. 04, 2020	Jun. 30, 2020
Class Of Warrant Or Right [Line Items]
Pre funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock	909,091	2,884,615	3,793,706
Pre funded warrants exercise price	$ 0.001	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Maximum ownership percentage, not to exceed upon exercise of warrants			9.99%
Maximum ownership percentage, increase or decrease upon prior notice			19.99%
Pre-funded warrants exercised			0
Underwritten Public Offering
Class Of Warrant Or Right [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock	7,590,909	18,965,385
Pre funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock	909,091	2,884,615
Common stock, shares issued, price per share	$ 5.50	$ 2.60
Warrant issue price per share	$ 5.499	$ 2.599
Net proceeds from the public offering	$ 43.7	$ 53.4
Pre funded warrants exercise price	$ 0.001	$ 0.001

XML

Pre-Funded Warrants - Summary of Pre-Funded Warrants Outstanding (Details) - $ / shares	Jun. 11, 2020	Feb. 04, 2020	Jun. 30, 2020
Equity [Abstract]
Issue Date	Jun. 11, 2020	Feb. 04, 2020
Exercise Price	$ 0.001	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Expiration Date	Jun. 11, 2040	Feb. 04, 2040
Number of shares underlying warrants	909,091	2,884,615	3,793,706

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019	Jun. 30, 2018
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock options shares outstanding	4,478,042	4,478,042	3,107,066
Common stock, shares issued	45,826,798	45,826,798	19,208,077
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options		$ 22,000
Employee options
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized stock-based compensation cost	$ 11,700,000	$ 11,700,000
Estimated weighted average amortization period		2 years 8 months 12 days
2018 Equity Incentive Plan
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares available for future issuance	1,348,693	1,348,693
Number of shares will increase automatically through every year on specified date		--01-01
Number of shares increase automatically continuing through maximum period		beginning on January 1, 2019 and continuing through and including January 1, 2028
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted		$ 2.68
2018 Equity Incentive Plan | Common Stock
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Maximum number of shares authorized available for issuance				1,600,692
Increase in number of shares reserved for issuance as percentage of total number of shares of capital stock outstanding on last date of preceding calendar year		5.00%
2018 Equity Incentive Plan | Maximum | Common Stock
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Maximum number of shares authorized available for issuance				4,000,000
2018 Equity Incentive Plan | Employee options
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock options shares outstanding	2,648,968	2,648,968
2018 Equity Incentive Plan | Incentive Stock Options | Maximum | Common Stock
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Maximum number of shares issued upon exercise of incentive stock options	12,500,000	12,500,000
2015 Equity Incentive Plan
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period		4 years
Options to purchase of common stock outstanding	1,829,074	1,829,074
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercised stock options	$ 12,000	$ 22,000
2015 Equity Incentive Plan | Maximum
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Options granted expiry period		10 years
2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Common Stock
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares available for future issuance	500,141	500,141		200,000
Common stock, shares issued	83,083	83,083
Authorized an offering beginning period		Nov. 16, 2018
Authorized an offering ending period		May 15, 2019
Authorized an additional offering beginning period		May 16, 2020
2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Maximum | Common Stock
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Percentage of annual increase in number of common stock shares		1.00%
Annual increase in number of common stock shares		375,000
Option price per share of common stock at fair market value		85.00%

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Summary of Activity under Stock Option Plans and Related Information (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Dec. 31, 2019 USD ($) $ / shares shares
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]
Number of options outstanding, Outstanding, Beginning balance | shares	3,107,066
Number of options outstanding, Options granted | shares	1,389,476
Number of options outstanding, Options exercised | shares	(6,000)
Number of options outstanding, Options cancelled | shares	(12,500)
Number of options outstanding, Outstanding, Ending balance | shares	4,478,042	3,107,066
Number of options outstanding, options vested and exercisable | shares	1,950,185
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, Beginning balance | $ / shares	$ 7.19
Weighted average exercise price, Options granted | $ / shares	3.76
Weighted average exercise price, Options exercised | $ / shares	0.90
Weighted average exercise price, Options cancelled | $ / shares	22.85
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, Ending balance | $ / shares	6.09	$ 7.19
Weighted average exercise price, options vested and exercisable | $ / shares	$ 5.26
Weighted average remaining contractual term, (Years) Outstanding, Beginning balance	8 years 3 months 18 days	8 years 2 months 12 days
Weighted average remaining contractual term, (Years) options vested and exercisable	7 years 3 months 18 days
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, Beginning balance | $	$ 3,151
Aggregate intrinsic value, Options exercised | $	22
Aggregate intrinsic value, Outstanding, Ending balance | $	7,229	$ 3,151
Aggregate intrinsic value, options vested and exercisable | $	$ 4,066

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Stock-Based Compensation Expense Recognized (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Employee Service Share Based Compensation Allocation Of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	$ 1,219	$ 1,009	$ 2,392	$ 1,910
Research and Development Expense
Employee Service Share Based Compensation Allocation Of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	518	470	982	917
General and Administrative Expense
Employee Service Share Based Compensation Allocation Of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	$ 701	$ 539	$ 1,410	$ 993

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Fair Value of Stock Options Granted is Calculated Using Black Scholes Option Pricing Model with Range of Assumptions (Details)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term (years)		5 years 10 months 24 days		5 years 10 months 24 days
Expected volatility, Minimum	88.10%	78.70%	83.80%	78.70%
Expected volatility, Maximum	90.80%	81.30%	90.80%	81.90%
Risk-free interest rate, Minimum	0.40%	1.90%	0.40%	1.90%
Risk-free interest rate, Maximum	0.50%	2.40%	1.60%	2.60%
Minimum
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term (years)	5 years 6 months		5 years
Maximum
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term (years)	6 years		6 years

XML

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Provision for income taxes		$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Research and development tax credit utilized as reduction of payroll expenses		$ 108,000	$ 79,000	$ 264,000	$ 172,000
Research and development tax credit utilized against employer's portion of payroll tax	$ 250,000

XML

Net Loss Per Share - Calculation of Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Mar. 31, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Mar. 31, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Numerator:
Net loss	$ (9,500)	$ (10,012)	$ (8,718)	$ (7,642)	$ (19,512)	$ (16,360)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding	42,936,991		19,073,830		37,902,294	19,058,263
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$ (0.22)		$ (0.46)		$ (0.51)	$ (0.86)

XML

Net Loss Per Share - Anti-dilutive Outstanding Shares of Common Stock Equivalents Excluded from Computation of Diluted Net Loss per Share (Details) - shares	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019	Jun. 30, 2020	Jun. 30, 2019
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted net loss per share	4,497,483	2,920,733	4,497,483	2,920,733
Stock Options to Purchase Common Stock
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted net loss per share	4,478,042	2,875,446	4,478,042	2,875,446
Common stock subject to future vesting [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded From Computation Of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted net loss per share	19,441	45,287	19,441	45,287

XML

Subsequent Event - Additional Information (Details) - Underwritten Public Offering - USD ($) $ in Millions			1 Months Ended
	Jun. 11, 2020	Feb. 04, 2020	Jul. 31, 2020
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock	7,590,909	18,965,385
Net proceeds from the public offering	$ 43.7	$ 53.4
Subsequent Event
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Issuance of common stock			427,707
Net proceeds from the public offering			$ 2.2