10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018

☐   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission file number: 333-202948

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	47-1017473
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

805 W. Duarte Rd. #102.

Arcadia, CA 91007

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(626) 210-0000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

Class	Outstanding at February 11, 2019
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share	64,778,050

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	20
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	21
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	22
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	22
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	22
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	22
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	22
Item 5.	Other Information	22
Item 6.	Exhibits	22
SIGNATURES		23

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	AS OF DECEMBER 31,			AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
	2018			2018
	(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and equivalents	$	93,859		$	103,364
Prepaid expenses		18,145			75,263
Total current assets		112,004			178,627
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses		1,000,000			1,000,000
Property and equipment, net		10,216			10,764
Total non-current assets		1,010,216			1,010,764
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,122,220		$	1,189,391
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other payables	$	4,792		$	9,633
Total current liabilities		4,792			9,633
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 375,000,000 shares            authorized; 64,778,050 shares issued and outstanding		64,778			64,778
Additional paid-in capital		6,949,717			6,949,717
Accumulated deficit		(5,897,067	)		(5,834,737	)
Total stockholders' equity		1,117,428			1,179,758
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,122,220		$	1,189,391

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED) 

	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2018			2017
Revenue	$	516,000		$	-
Cost of revenue		-			-
Gross profit		516,000			-
Operating expenses
General and administrative		134,170			164,069
Consulting expenses		443,701			63,722
Total operating expenses		577,871			227,791
Loss from operations		(61,871	)		(227,791	)
Non-operating expenses
Interest income		3			41,410
Interest expense		-			(52,668	)
Financial expense		(462	)		(340	)
Total non-operating income (expenses), net		(459	)		(11,598	)
Loss before income tax		(62,330	)		(239,389	)
Income tax		-			-
Net loss	$	(62,330	)	$	(239,389	)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding		64,778,050			45,150,000
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (DEFICIT)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

(unaudited)

	Common Stock				Additional		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Paid-in Capital		Deficit			Total
Balance at September 30, 2017		45,150,000	$	45,150	$	47,432	$	(1,614,817	)	$	(1,522,235	)
Net loss		-		-		-		(239,389	)		(239,389	)
Balance at December 31, 2017		45,150,000	$	45,150	$	47,432	$	(1,854,206	)	$	(1,761,624	)
Balance at September 30, 2018		64,778,050	$	64,778	$	6,949,717	$	(5,834,737	)	$	1,179,758
Net loss		-		-		-		(62,330	)		(62,330	)
Balance at December 31, 2018		64,778,050	$	64,778	$	6,949,717	$	(5,897,067	)	$	1,117,428

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2018			2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(62,330	)	$	(239,389	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		548			548
Amortization		57,118			-
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Other payables		(4,841	)		(2,715	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(9,505	)		(241,556	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Collection of note receivable		-			3,925,000
Net cash provided by investing activities		-			3,925,000
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS		(9,505	)		3,683,444
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		103,364			419,093
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	93,859		$	4,102,537
Supplemental cash flow data:
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2018 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Enterprises” or “We”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013.  Enterprises is currently exploring opportunities in the mining industry. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc. (“Processing”) in the State of California. Processing seeks business opportunities in the mining industry and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Processing. 

Enterprises and Processing provide consulting services to mining industry clients to find mine acquisition targets within the parameters set by the clients, in circumstances in which the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Enterprises and Processing include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as the ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Enterprises, or 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company.

In March 2017, Processing acquired 100% ownership of Fuse Trading Limited (“Trading”) for HKD1 (US$0.13). Trading had no operations prior to the acquisition by Processing, and Trading seeks mining-related business opportunities in Asia.

On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The consolidated financial statements (“CFS”) were retroactively restated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented.

On May 3, 2018, the Company incorporated Fuse Technology Inc. (“Technology”) in the State of Nevada.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Technology, which currently has no operations.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The CFS included herein were prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) were omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.

Basis of Consolidation 

The CFS include the accounts of Enterprises and its subsidiaries, Processing, Trading and Technology. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

Cash

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers cash, money market funds, investments in interest bearing demand deposit accounts, time deposits and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. 

7

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change because there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board - Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) for disclosures about fair value (“FV”) of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the FV of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring FV in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about FV measurements. 

Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a FV hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure FV into three broad levels.  The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of FV hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their FVs are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the FV measurement of the instrument.

8

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their FV because of the short maturity of those instruments. 

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.  The Company had no accounts receivable or bad debt allowances at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018.

Property and Equipment 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets and estimated lives as follows:

Computer and office equipment	5 years
Office furniture	7 years
Leasehold decoration and renovation	10 years
Production machinery	10 years
Autos	5 years

Depreciation of property and equipment attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part of inventories, and expensed to cost of goods sold when inventories are sold.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB ASC for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: (a) affiliates of the Company; (b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the FV option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the Company; (e) management of the Company; (f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements.

The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

9

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB ASC to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.

In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes all existing revenue recognition requirements, including most industry-specific guidance. This new standard requires a company to recognize revenues when it transfers goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the company expects to receive for those goods or services. The FASB subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU No. 2014-09 that have the same effective date and transition date: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations; ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing; ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients; and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company adopted these amendments with ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the new revenue standards).

The new revenue standards became effective for the Company on October 1, 2018, and were adopted using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of the new revenue standards as of October 1, 2018 did not change the Company’s revenue recognition as the Company does not have any revenue yet. As the Company will not identify any accounting changes that impacted the amount of reported revenues with respect to its product revenues, no adjustment to retained earnings will be required upon adoption.

Under the new revenue standards, the Company recognizes revenues when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive in exchange for those goods. The Company recognizes revenues following the five step model prescribed under ASU No. 2014-09: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenues when (or as) we satisfy the performance obligation.

Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB ASC, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. 

Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

10

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. 

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-25 of the FASB ASC. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018.  The tax years 2015 - 2017 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. 

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all the potential common shares, warrants and stock options had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options and warrants were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding options and warrants, and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible instruments. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later) and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, outstanding convertible instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later). 

Cash Flows Reporting 

The Company follows paragraph  230-10-45-24 of the FASB ASC for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect Method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB ASC to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB ASC.

11

Software Development Costs

The Company incurs software development costs to develop software programs to be used primarily to meet its internal needs and to market to others. In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software, the Company capitalizes development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, the software will be used to perform the function intended, and the value will be recoverable. In accordance with ASC 985-20-25, costs incurred before product feasibility is established and all design and coding is completed are expensed. Reengineering costs and minor modifications and enhancements that do not significantly improve the overall functionality of the software are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had not completed the preliminary project stage or the design stage, and accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any costs.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its CFS.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its CFS.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are an improvement to U.S. GAAP because they provide guidance for each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the current and potential future diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption does not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s CFS.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption did not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance effective October 1, 2018. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

12

SEC Disclosure Update and Simplification

In August 2018, the SEC issued Securities Act Release No. 33-10532 that amends certain disclosure requirements, including extending to interim periods the annual requirement to disclose changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the new requirements, registrants must now analyze changes in stockholders’ equity, in the form of a reconciliation, for the current and comparative year-to-date interim periods, with subtotals for each interim period. The final rule was effective in November 2018. The Company adopted the final rule and included a reconciliation of the changes in stockholders' equity in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2018.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying CFS were prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying CFS, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $5,897,067 at December 31, 2018, and net loss of $62,330 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offering, or by obtaining loans from banks or others.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds on reasonable terms and conditions, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. 

Note 4 – Property and Equipment 

Property and equipment at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Computer equipment	$	1,852		$	1,825
Less accumulated depreciation		(741	)		(648	)
Computer equipment, net		1,111			1,204
Office furniture		12,746			12,746
Less accumulated depreciation		(3,641	)		(3,186	)
Office furniture, net		9,105			9,560
Total property and equipment, net	$	10,216		$	10,764

Depreciation for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $548 and $548, respectively. 

Note 5 – Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent)

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had current prepaid D&O insurance of $894, and current prepaid consulting expenses to Risun Intelligent Technology Co., Limited (“Risun”) of $17,251. 

On August 1, 2018, the Company entered into a Consultant Agreement Service Contract with Risun. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Risun shall provide services to the Company for market research, business strategy, business development and other business advisory services related to the iMetal project. The Company paid Risun the full service fee of $103,508 in August 2018. The service term began on August 1, 2018 and expired by its terms on February 1, 2019. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded the consulting expense to Risun of $51,754, and had $17,251 remaining in prepaid consulting fees.

13

In addition, as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had another prepaid expense of $1,000,000.  On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company extended the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost, and the Agreement was subsequently further extended to July 3, 2018. The consultant provided Processing with market research findings, exploration and advise on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. Processing paid a deposit of $1,325,000 for the consulting fee, of which $325,000 was expensed as a consulting fee based on the agreement, and the remaining $1,000,000 of which would have been refunded to the Company if the Company had not made an investment and/or entered into a business relationship in Mexico. The consulting company found acquisition targets for the Company, and on June 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with a seller for the purchase of five mines located in different areas of Mexico for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. Upon the execution of the MOU, the Company acquired the exclusive right to purchase the mines from the seller, effective until September 30, 2018. The parties have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the $1,000,000 purchase price upon receiving approvals from the Mexican government allowing for the transfer of the mining concession. The transfer request has been submitted to, and is being processed by, the Mexican government, but that processing has been delayed due to elections in Mexico. Following the signing of the MOU, this prepaid item which relates to the acquisition of assets will be part of the asset acquisition cost and, now that an agreement to purchase the mines has been entered into, has been classified as a non-current asset.

Note 6 – Other payables 

As of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had other payables of $4,792 and $9,633, respectively. Other payables mainly consisted of salary and payroll tax payables.

Note 7 – Notes payable (related party)

On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) with one of its major shareholders (“Purchaser”). Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note of $6,869,818 with interest of 6% (the “Original Note”). The Original Note was to mature on December 18, 2018, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Original Note could be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock.  The Original Note was not converted due to the conversion price being higher than the market price of the Company’s common stock at the time of the issuance of the Original Note.

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Purchase Agreement with the major shareholder and Trading (the “Amended Agreement”).  The Amended Agreement amended and restated the Original Agreement.  Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Original Note issued under the Original Agreement was cancelled and Trading issued a Promissory Note to the Purchaser of $6,869,818, with a term of 12 months, renewable for up to an additional 12 months at the Purchaser’s option, with interest of 3% (the “New Note”).  The Purchaser did not have a conversion option under the New Note. The principal amount of the New Note and any unpaid interest accrued thereon may become due and payable immediately upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including but not limited to Trading’s insolvency or the institution of bankruptcy proceedings against Trading. The Amended Agreement was renewed on March 20, 2018 with a new maturity date of July 2, 2018. 

On June 28, 2018, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Trading and the Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company sold to the Purchaser in a private placement 19,628,050 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at $0.35 per Share for $6,869,818 (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchaser paid the Purchase Price through the cancellation of the New Note. There is no gain or loss arising from the note conversion due to the conversion price being the same as the market price and there is no substantial change in the cash flows. The Private Placement was completed pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Company issued the Shares to the Purchaser on July 6, 2018. 

Note 8 – Shareholders’ Equity

Shares Authorized 

Upon formation, the number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company was authorized to issue was 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The CFS were retroactively restated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented. 

14

On July 6, 2018, the Company issued 19,628,050 shares for repayment of the note payable of $6,869,818 (See Note 7 – Notes payable (related party)).

Note 9 – Income Tax

The President of the United States signed into law H.R. 1 (the “Tax Reform Law”). The Tax Reform Law, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, except for certain provisions, resulted in significant changes to existing United States tax law, including various provisions that are expected to impact the Company. The Tax Reform Law reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% effective October 1, 2018 for the Company. The Company will continue to analyze the provisions of the Tax Reform Law to assess the impact on the Company’s CFS.

At December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) for income tax purposes; for federal income tax purposes, the NOL arising in tax years beginning after 2017 may only reduce 80% of a taxpayer’s taxable income, and may be carried forward indefinitely; for California income tax purposes, the entire NOL can be carried forward up to 20 years. The Company has NOL carry-forwards for Federal and California income tax purposes of $5,693,977 and $5,631,644 at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively. No tax benefit was reported with respect to these NOL carry-forwards in the accompanying CFS because the Company believes the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets for the NOL for both federal and California State of approximately $1,589,400 as of December 31, 2018, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a full valuation allowance.

Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 are as follows:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	1,589,400		$	1,571,957
Less valuation allowance		(1,589,400	)		(1,571,957	)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-

Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations

A reconciliation of the consolidated federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018			2017
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate		(21.00	)%		(34.00	)%
Federal income tax rate difference		-	%		19.00	%
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate, net of effect of state income tax deductible to federal income tax		(7.51	)%		(7.51	)%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		28.51	%		22.51	%
Effective income tax rate		0.00	%		0.00	%

Note 10 – Revenue and Major Customer

Enterprises and Processing provide consulting services to mining industry clients to find mine acquisition targets within the parameters set by the clients, in circumstances in which the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Enterprises and Processing include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

Currently the Company has provided three potential mine acquisition opportunities to its clients, with one mine located in Asia and two mines located in North America.  For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded revenue of $516,000 for the services provided.

For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company had one major customer which accounted for 93% of the Company’s total revenue.

15

Note 11 – Commitments

On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company extended the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost, and the Agreement was subsequently further extended to July 3, 2018. The consultant provided Processing with market research findings, exploration and advice on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. The consulting company found acquisition targets for the Company, and on June 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with a seller for the purchase of five mines located in different areas of Mexico for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. Upon the execution of the MOU, the Company acquired the exclusive right to purchase the mines from the seller, effective until September 30, 2018. The parties have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the $1,000,000 purchase price upon receiving approvals from the Mexican government allowing for the transfer of the mining concession. The transfer request has been submitted to, and is being processed by, the Mexican government, but that processing has been delayed due to elections in Mexico. (see Note 5). 

Lease Commitments

Effective January 1, 2017, Processing, as a sublessee, entered into a sublease agreement for office space with a sublessor for a term of two years. The monthly rent was $1,897, and increased to $1,949 starting in January 2018. The lease expired on December 31, 2018.

Effective April 16, 2018, the Company entered a one-year lease agreement to lease another office in the City of Diamond Bar, California. The monthly rent is approximately $1,500.

Effective December 1, 2018, the Company entered a three-year lease agreement to lease another office in the city of Arcadia, California. The monthly base rent is $2,115 payable on the first day of each month, with a 3% increase each year.

The Company recorded rental expense of $16,815 and $5,690 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018, the future annual minimum lease payments were $31,380; $26,141; and $24,661.

Consulting and Service Agreements

1) On April 1, 2017, the Company entered into a strategist consulting agreement with a consulting company with a term of one year. The compensation to the consulting company is $50,000 per year, payable in equal installments at the end of each month. The agreement was extended to March 31, 2019.

2) On May 4, 2018, the Company entered into a Mineral Mining Interactive Technology and Related Application Software Development Service Contract (the “Contract”) with Prime King Investment Limited (“Prime King”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Prime King is providing services to the Company relating to the development, installation and debugging of a software system called IMETAL. The IMETAL software will allow the Company to operate a platform which we plan to use to facilitate investment in raw metals, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 

IMETAL is committed to building a platform which plans to provide not only institutional clients, but also individual investors, a chance to invest in raw metals, find specialized minerals, and exploit these opportunities, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Prime King shall also provide training to the Company’s staff per the Company’s request as well as maintenance for the Project for one year after the completion of the Project, in each case free of charge.

Under the Contract, the Company shall pay Prime King $3,000,000, of which 50% was paid within 10 days of the execution of the Contract, and the remaining 50% was to be paid within 10 days of the completion of the Project after inspection and approval by the Company. The service was required to be completed in three months, however, on July 17, 2018, the deadline was extended until October 17, 2018, and the Company agreed to extend the deadline further, due to changes in technical requirements requested by the Company. Up to September 30, 2018, the Company paid Prime King $1.50 million, which was recorded as software development costs. The Company did not pay anything to Prime King for the three months ended December 31, 2018. The Company expects the project to be completed by March 31, 2019.

16

3) Effective on April 1, 2018, the Company entered another Consulting & Strategist Agreement with a consulting company in Hong Kong for a term of one year. The consulting services mainly include business strategy and business development advisory for the Company’s potential new ventures in the Far East, mainly in Hong Kong and Russia. The consulting fee is $40,000 per month, payable monthly on or about the first day of each month.

4) Exploratory Drilling Agreement and Related Costs. On April 1, 2018, the Company entered into a contract with an individual owner of a mining concession in Mexico.  The mine is located Mexico, in the state of Sinaloa, Badiraguato municipality, Nocoriba village.  The latitude is 25.2520000 and the longitude is -107.225500. The Company has started drilling in a small area within the concession 10HAAS. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company spent $238,750, which was recorded as consulting expense, and the Company expects to spend an additional $1.56 million on this project. If the project is successful, the Company will receive 3% equity in the mine (which percentage will be paid upon successful completion of exploration and drilling of the mine).

Employment Agreement

The Company currently has an employment agreement with Michael Viotto, the Company’s CFO.  Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, dated August 20, 2018, Mr. Viotto receives annual compensation of $50,000, and the agreement has a term of one year.  Mr. Viotto’s employment agreement includes typical clauses relating to noncompetition, nonsolicitation and indemnification of Mr. Viotto in connection with his service as the Company’s CFO.

17

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

DISCLAIMER REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes in Item I above and with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in this report and those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Enterprises” or “we”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013.  Enterprises is currently an online marketing agency, but is exploring opportunities in the mining industry. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc. (“Processing”) in the State of California. Processing seeks business opportunities in the mining industry and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Processing.  In March 2017, Processing acquired 100% ownership of Fuse Trading Limited (“Trading”) for HKD1 (US$0.13). Trading had no operations prior to the acquisition by Processing, and Trading expects to be engaged in mining-related businesses. On May 3, 2018, the Company incorporated Fuse Technology Inc. (“Technology”) in the State of Nevada.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Technology, which currently has no operations. 

Enterprises and Processing provide consulting services to mining industry clients mine to find the acquisition targets within the parameters set by the clients, in circumstances in which the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Enterprises and Processing include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Enterprises, or 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company.  

On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company extended the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost, and the Agreement was subsequently further extended to July 3, 2018. The consultant provides Processing with market research findings, exploration and advise on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. Processing paid a deposit of $1,325,000 for the consulting fee, of which, $325,000 was expensed as a consulting fee based on the agreement, and the remaining $1,000,000 of which would have been refunded to the Company if the Company had not made an investment and/or entered into a business relationship in Mexico. The consulting company found acquisition targets for the Company, and on June 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with a seller for the purchase of five mines located in different areas of Mexico for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. Upon the execution of the MOU, the Company acquired the exclusive right to purchase the mines from the seller until September 30, 2018. The parties have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the $1,000,000 purchase price upon receiving approvals from the Mexican government allowing for the transfer of the mining concession. The transfer request has been submitted to, and is being processed by, the Mexican government, but that processing has been delayed due to elections in Mexico.

18

Results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 

Revenue 

We have historically generated revenue from sales of our marketing and web development services directly to small and medium-sized businesses. We have acquired customers through direct telemarketing and referrals. We are currently seeking business opportunities in the mining industry and are investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  In addition to our own investment in mining businesses, we also provide consulting services to clients who are mining business investors with potential mine acquisition targets within the specific parameters set by those clients, where the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights. Our services include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

Currently we have provided three potential mine acquisition opportunities to clients, with one mine located in Asia and two mines located in North America.  For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded revenue of $516,000 for the services provided. Our revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $0. Our cost of revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0, resulting in a gross profit of $516,000 and $0 for each of those periods. 

Costs and Expenses

The major components of our expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are outlined in the table below:

	2018		2017		Increase (Decrease)
General and administrative	$	134,170	$	164,069	$	(29,899	)
Consulting fees		443,701		63,722		379,979
Total operating expenses	$	577,871	$	227,791	$	350,080

The increase in our operating costs for the three months ended December 31, 2018, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2017, was mainly due to an increase in consulting fees by $379,979, which was partly offset by a decrease in travel expense by $29,899. The Company entered several consulting agreements for advisory services on business development strategy in the Far East, including in Hong Kong and Russia, and acquisition opportunities in Mexico and North America. The Company also entered a consulting agreement for developing software programs to allow the Company to operate a platform for investment in raw metals. This platform would be used primarily to meet the Company’s internal needs, and may in the future be made available to external users for a fee.

Non-operating expenses, net

Net non-operating expense was $459 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, compared to non-operating expenses of $11,598 for the three months ended December 31, 2017.  The decrease in non-operating expense was mainly due to a decrease in interest expense by $52,668, which was partly offset by a decrease in interest income by $41,407.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The table below provides selected working capital information for the periods indicated: 

	As of			As of
	December 31,			September 30,
	2018			2018
Total current assets	$	112,004		$	178,627
Total current liabilities		(4,792	)		(9,633	)
Working capital (deficiency)	$	107,212		$	168,994

19

Liquidity

During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company reported net loss of $62,330 and $239,389, respectively. 

If we are not successful in transitioning into the mining business and establishing profitability and positive cash flow, additional capital may be required to maintain ongoing operations. We have explored and are continuing to explore options to provide additional financing to fund future operations as well as other possible courses of action. Such actions may include, but are not limited to, securing lines of credit, sales of debt or equity securities (which may result in dilution to existing shareholders), loans and cash advances from other third parties or banks, and other similar actions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding (if needed), on acceptable terms or at all, through a sale of our common stock, loans from financial institutions, or other third parties, or any of the actions discussed above. If we cannot sustain profitable operations, and additional capital is unavailable, lack of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business viability, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. 

Cash Flows

The table below, for the period indicated, provides selected cash flow information:

	For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2018			For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2017
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(9,505	)	$	(241,556	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		-			3,925,000
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	(9,505	)	$	3,683,444

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash used in operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $9,505 and $241,556, respectively.  The decrease in net cash used in operating activities was mainly due to decreased net loss of $177,059, resulting from increased revenue of $516,000 from the Company’s provision of mine scouting services to clients for the three months ended December 31, 2018. 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities 

Our cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $3,925,000, respectively. The decrease in net cash provided by investing activities was due to the collection of outstanding notes receivable of $3,925,000 in the three months ended December 31, 2017.  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we did not have any financing activities. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the CFS.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, we did not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

20

Item 4. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to material weaknesses as described below.

1.  We do not have an Audit Committee. While we are not legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is of the utmost importance for entity-level control over the Company’s financial statements. Currently, the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of an audit committee.

2.  We did not implement appropriate information technology controls. As of December 31, 2018, the Company was retaining copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors. 

3.   We currently lack sufficient accounting personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience and training in U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements.

4. We have one employee assigned to positions that involve processing financial information, resulting in a lack of segregation of duties so that all journal entries and account reconciliations are reviewed by someone other than the preparer, heightening the risk of error or fraud.

We took certain actions to remediate the material weakness arising from our lack of U.S. GAAP expertise. We have engaged an outside CPA with U.S. GAAP knowledge and experience to supplement our current internal accounting personnel and assist us in the preparation of our financial statements to ensure that our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company’s operations are relatively uncomplicated; the Company had only$516,000 in sales.  The Company maintains adequate policies and procedures for ensuring that receipts and expenditures of Company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and any investing and financing activities are made with both management and Board authorization, and any unauthorized expenses or usage of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  The Company also keeps accounting records for each of the Company’s transactions including expenses, assets purchase, prepayments, notes receivable and payable that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transaction; and for providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements.

We have limited capital resources and have given priority in the use of those resources to the development of our business. As a result, we have not been able to take steps to improve our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2018. However, we continue to evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures on an on-going basis. As our operations grow and become more complex, we intend to hire additional personnel in financial reporting and other areas. However, there can be no assurance of when, if ever, we will be able to remediate the identified material weaknesses. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We may from time to time be party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. As we grow and gain prominence in the marketplace we may become party to an increasing number of litigation matters and claims. The outcome of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and the resolution of these matters could materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description
10.1	Description of Oral Agreement by and between Company and Juan Alberto Medrano Romero.
10.2	Description of Agreement by and between Company and Ken Zhang.
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended*
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended*
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document*
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*

* filed herewith

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.
By:	/s/ Umesh Patel
	Umesh Patel
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	February 11, 2019
By:	/s/ Michael Viotto
	Michael Viotto
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
	February 11, 2019

23

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

ORAL AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

COMPANY AND JUAN ALBERTO MEDRANO ROMERO

Oral Agreement between the Company and Juan Alberto Medrano Romero, as of October, 2018, pursuant to which, upon the Mexican government’s approval of the transfer of the mines, the Company shall pay $1,000,000 to Mr. Medrano Romero in exchange for the five mines listed in the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the Company and Juan Alberto Medrano Romero on June 22, 2018.

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

ORAL AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

COMPANY AND KEN ZHANG

Oral Agreement with email confirmation between the Company and Ken Zhang, as of December 27, 2018, pursuant to which the Company will receive three percent (3%) equity from the mine located in Sinaloa, Mexico upon successful completion of exploration and drilling of the mine, as consideration for the Company’s costs of exploration.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q (CEO) CERTIFICATION

I, Umesh Patel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fuse Enterprises Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2019	By:	/s/ Umesh Patel
		Umesh Patel
		Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q (CFO) CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Viotto, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fuse Enterprises Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2019	By:	/s/ Michael Viotto
		Michael Viotto
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Umesh Patel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2019	/s/ Umesh Patel
	Umesh Patel
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350

FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I, Michael Viotto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2019	/s/ Michael Viotto
	Michael Viotto
	Chief Financial Officer

XML

Document And Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Feb. 11, 2019
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Fuse Enterprises Inc.
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--09-30
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		64,778,050
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0001636051
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2018
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2019
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Small Business	true
Entity Emerging Growth Company	false
Entity Ex Transition Period	false

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and equivalents	$ 93,859	$ 103,364
Prepaid expenses	18,145	75,263
Total current assets	112,004	178,627
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses	1,000,000	1,000,000
Property and equipment, net	10,216	10,764
Total non-current assets	1,010,216	1,010,764
TOTAL ASSETS	1,122,220	1,189,391
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other payables	4,792	9,633
Total current liabilities	4,792	9,633
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 375,000,000 shares authorized; 64,778,050 shares issued and outstanding	64,778	64,778
Additional paid-in capital	6,949,717	6,949,717
Accumulated deficit	(5,897,067)	(5,834,737)
Total stockholders' equity	1,117,428	1,179,758
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 1,122,220	$ 1,189,391

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parentheticals) - $ / shares	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Common stock, par value (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	375,000,000	375,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	64,778,050	64,778,050
Common stock, shares outstanding	64,778,050	64,778,050

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Revenue	$ 516,000	$ 0
Cost of revenue	0	0
Gross profit	516,000	0
Operating expenses
General and administrative	134,170	164,069
Consulting expenses	443,701	63,722
Total operating expenses	577,871	227,791
Loss from operations	(61,871)	(227,791)
Non-operating expenses
Interest income	3	41,410
Interest expense	0	(52,668)
Financial expense	(462)	(340)
Total non-operating income (expenses), net	(459)	(11,598)
Loss before income tax	(62,330)	(239,389)
Income tax	0	0
Net loss	$ (62,330)	$ (239,389)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in Shares)	64,778,050	45,150,000
Basic and diluted net loss per share (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.00	$ (0.01)

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) - USD ($)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Total
Balance at Sep. 30, 2017	$ 45,150	$ 47,432	$ (1,614,817)	$ (1,522,235)
Balance (in Shares) at Sep. 30, 2017	45,150,000
Net loss			(239,389)	(239,389)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2017	$ 45,150	47,432	(1,854,206)	(1,761,624)
Balance (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2017	45,150,000
Balance at Sep. 30, 2018	$ 64,778	6,949,717	(5,834,737)	$ 1,179,758
Balance (in Shares) at Sep. 30, 2018	64,778,050			64,778,050
Net loss			(62,330)	$ (62,330)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2018	$ 64,778	$ 6,949,717	$ (5,897,067)	$ 1,117,428
Balance (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2018	64,778,050			64,778,050

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$ (62,330)	$ (239,389)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation	548	548
Amortization	57,118	0
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Other payables	(4,841)	(2,715)
Net cash used in operating activities	(9,505)	(241,556)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Collection of note receivable	0	3,925,000
Net cash provided by investing activities	0	3,925,000
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS	(9,505)	3,683,444
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD	103,364	419,093
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	93,859	4,102,537
Supplemental cash flow data:
Income tax paid	0	0
Interest paid	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Disclosure Text Block [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Enterprises” or “We”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013.  Enterprises is currently exploring opportunities in the mining industry. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc. (“Processing”) in the State of California. Processing seeks business opportunities in the mining industry and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Processing. 

Enterprises and Processing provide consulting services to mining industry clients to find mine acquisition targets within the parameters set by the clients, in circumstances in which the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Enterprises and Processing include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as the ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Enterprises, or 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company.

In March 2017, Processing acquired 100% ownership of Fuse Trading Limited (“Trading”) for HKD1 (US$0.13). Trading had no operations prior to the acquisition by Processing, and Trading seeks mining-related business opportunities in Asia.

On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The consolidated financial statements (“CFS”) were retroactively restated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented.

On May 3, 2018, the Company incorporated Fuse Technology Inc. (“Technology”) in the State of Nevada.  Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Technology, which currently has no operations.

XML

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The CFS included herein were prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) were omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.

Basis of Consolidation 

The CFS include the accounts of Enterprises and its subsidiaries, Processing, Trading and Technology. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

Cash

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers cash, money market funds, investments in interest bearing demand deposit accounts, time deposits and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. 

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change because there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board - Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) for disclosures about fair value (“FV”) of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the FV of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring FV in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about FV measurements. 

Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a FV hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure FV into three broad levels.  The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of FV hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their FVs are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the FV measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their FV because of the short maturity of those instruments. 

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.  The Company had no accounts receivable or bad debt allowances at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018.

Property and Equipment 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets and estimated lives as follows:

Computer and office equipment	5 years
Office furniture	7 years
Leasehold decoration and renovation	10 years
Production machinery	10 years
Autos	5 years

Depreciation of property and equipment attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part of inventories, and expensed to cost of goods sold when inventories are sold.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB ASC for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: (a) affiliates of the Company; (b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the FV option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the Company; (e) management of the Company; (f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements.

The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB ASC to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.

In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes all existing revenue recognition requirements, including most industry-specific guidance. This new standard requires a company to recognize revenues when it transfers goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the company expects to receive for those goods or services. The FASB subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU No. 2014-09 that have the same effective date and transition date: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations; ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing; ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients; and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company adopted these amendments with ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the new revenue standards).

The new revenue standards became effective for the Company on October 1, 2018, and were adopted using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of the new revenue standards as of October 1, 2018 did not change the Company’s revenue recognition as the Company does not have any revenue yet. As the Company will not identify any accounting changes that impacted the amount of reported revenues with respect to its product revenues, no adjustment to retained earnings will be required upon adoption.

Under the new revenue standards, the Company recognizes revenues when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive in exchange for those goods. The Company recognizes revenues following the five step model prescribed under ASU No. 2014-09: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenues when (or as) we satisfy the performance obligation.

Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB ASC, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. 

Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. 

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-25 of the FASB ASC. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018.  The tax years 2015 - 2017 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. 

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all the potential common shares, warrants and stock options had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options and warrants were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding options and warrants, and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible instruments. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later) and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, outstanding convertible instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later). 

Cash Flows Reporting 

The Company follows paragraph  230-10-45-24 of the FASB ASC for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect Method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB ASC to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB ASC.

Software Development Costs

The Company incurs software development costs to develop software programs to be used primarily to meet its internal needs and to market to others. In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software, the Company capitalizes development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, the software will be used to perform the function intended, and the value will be recoverable. In accordance with ASC 985-20-25, costs incurred before product feasibility is established and all design and coding is completed are expensed. Reengineering costs and minor modifications and enhancements that do not significantly improve the overall functionality of the software are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had not completed the preliminary project stage or the design stage, and accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any costs.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its CFS.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its CFS.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are an improvement to U.S. GAAP because they provide guidance for each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the current and potential future diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption does not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s CFS.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption did not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance effective October 1, 2018. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

SEC Disclosure Update and Simplification

In August 2018, the SEC issued Securities Act Release No. 33-10532 that amends certain disclosure requirements, including extending to interim periods the annual requirement to disclose changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the new requirements, registrants must now analyze changes in stockholders’ equity, in the form of a reconciliation, for the current and comparative year-to-date interim periods, with subtotals for each interim period. The final rule was effective in November 2018. The Company adopted the final rule and included a reconciliation of the changes in stockholders' equity in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2018.

XML

Note 3 - Going Concern

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Substantial Doubt about Going Concern [Text Block]

Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying CFS were prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying CFS, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $5,897,067 at December 31, 2018, and net loss of $62,330 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offering, or by obtaining loans from banks or others.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds on reasonable terms and conditions, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. 

XML

Note 4 - Property and Equipment

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 4 – Property and Equipment 

Property and equipment at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Computer equipment	$	1,852		$	1,825
Less accumulated depreciation		(741	)		(648	)
Computer equipment, net		1,111			1,204
Office furniture		12,746			12,746
Less accumulated depreciation		(3,641	)		(3,186	)
Office furniture, net		9,105			9,560
Total property and equipment, net	$	10,216		$	10,764

Depreciation for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $548 and $548, respectively. 

XML

Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]

Other Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 5 – Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent)

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had current prepaid D&O insurance of $894, and current prepaid consulting expenses to Risun Intelligent Technology Co., Limited (“Risun”) of $17,251. 

On August 1, 2018, the Company entered into a Consultant Agreement Service Contract with Risun. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Risun shall provide services to the Company for market research, business strategy, business development and other business advisory services related to the iMetal project. The Company paid Risun the full service fee of $103,508 in August 2018. The service term began on August 1, 2018 and expired by its terms on February 1, 2019. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded the consulting expense to Risun of $51,754, and had $17,251 remaining in prepaid consulting fees.

In addition, as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had another prepaid expense of $1,000,000.  On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company extended the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost, and the Agreement was subsequently further extended to July 3, 2018. The consultant provided Processing with market research findings, exploration and advise on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. Processing paid a deposit of $1,325,000 for the consulting fee, of which $325,000 was expensed as a consulting fee based on the agreement, and the remaining $1,000,000 of which would have been refunded to the Company if the Company had not made an investment and/or entered into a business relationship in Mexico. The consulting company found acquisition targets for the Company, and on June 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with a seller for the purchase of five mines located in different areas of Mexico for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. Upon the execution of the MOU, the Company acquired the exclusive right to purchase the mines from the seller, effective until September 30, 2018. The parties have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the $1,000,000 purchase price upon receiving approvals from the Mexican government allowing for the transfer of the mining concession. The transfer request has been submitted to, and is being processed by, the Mexican government, but that processing has been delayed due to elections in Mexico. Following the signing of the MOU, this prepaid item which relates to the acquisition of assets will be part of the asset acquisition cost and, now that an agreement to purchase the mines has been entered into, has been classified as a non-current asset.

XML

Note 6 - Other payables

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]

Accounts Payable, Accrued Liabilities, and Other Liabilities Disclosure, Current [Text Block]

Note 6 – Other payables 

As of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had other payables of $4,792 and $9,633, respectively. Other payables mainly consisted of salary and payroll tax payables.

XML

Note 7 - Notes payable (related party)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 7 – Notes payable (related party)

On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) with one of its major shareholders (“Purchaser”). Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note of $6,869,818 with interest of 6% (the “Original Note”). The Original Note was to mature on December 18, 2018, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Original Note could be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock.  The Original Note was not converted due to the conversion price being higher than the market price of the Company’s common stock at the time of the issuance of the Original Note.

On March 20, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Purchase Agreement with the major shareholder and Trading (the “Amended Agreement”).  The Amended Agreement amended and restated the Original Agreement.  Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Original Note issued under the Original Agreement was cancelled and Trading issued a Promissory Note to the Purchaser of $6,869,818, with a term of 12 months, renewable for up to an additional 12 months at the Purchaser’s option, with interest of 3% (the “New Note”).  The Purchaser did not have a conversion option under the New Note. The principal amount of the New Note and any unpaid interest accrued thereon may become due and payable immediately upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including but not limited to Trading’s insolvency or the institution of bankruptcy proceedings against Trading. The Amended Agreement was renewed on March 20, 2018 with a new maturity date of July 2, 2018. 

On June 28, 2018, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Trading and the Purchaser, pursuant to which the Company sold to the Purchaser in a private placement 19,628,050 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at $0.35 per Share for $6,869,818 (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchaser paid the Purchase Price through the cancellation of the New Note. There is no gain or loss arising from the note conversion due to the conversion price being the same as the market price and there is no substantial change in the cash flows. The Private Placement was completed pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Company issued the Shares to the Purchaser on July 6, 2018. 

XML

Note 8 - Stockholders' Equity

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity Note Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 8 – Shareholders’ Equity

Shares Authorized 

Upon formation, the number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company was authorized to issue was 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. On May 26, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the State of Nevada to (i) increase its authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 and (ii) effect a corresponding 5-for-1 forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”).  The CFS were retroactively restated to reflect the Stock Split for the periods presented. 

On July 6, 2018, the Company issued 19,628,050 shares for repayment of the note payable of $6,869,818 (See Note 7 – Notes payable (related party)).

XML

Note 9 - Income Tax

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 9 – Income Tax

The President of the United States signed into law H.R. 1 (the “Tax Reform Law”). The Tax Reform Law, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, except for certain provisions, resulted in significant changes to existing United States tax law, including various provisions that are expected to impact the Company. The Tax Reform Law reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% effective October 1, 2018 for the Company. The Company will continue to analyze the provisions of the Tax Reform Law to assess the impact on the Company’s CFS.

At December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) for income tax purposes; for federal income tax purposes, the NOL arising in tax years beginning after 2017 may only reduce 80% of a taxpayer’s taxable income, and may be carried forward indefinitely; for California income tax purposes, the entire NOL can be carried forward up to 20 years. The Company has NOL carry-forwards for Federal and California income tax purposes of $5,693,977 and $5,631,644 at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively. No tax benefit was reported with respect to these NOL carry-forwards in the accompanying CFS because the Company believes the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets for the NOL for both federal and California State of approximately $1,589,400 as of December 31, 2018, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a full valuation allowance.

Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 are as follows:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	1,589,400		$	1,571,957
Less valuation allowance		(1,589,400	)		(1,571,957	)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-

Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations

A reconciliation of the consolidated federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018			2017
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate		(21.00	)%		(34.00	)%
Federal income tax rate difference		-	%		19.00	%
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate, net of effect of state income tax deductible to federal income tax		(7.51	)%		(7.51	)%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		28.51	%		22.51	%
Effective income tax rate		0.00	%		0.00	%

XML

Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Text Block]

Note 10 – Revenue and Major Customer

Enterprises and Processing provide consulting services to mining industry clients to find mine acquisition targets within the parameters set by the clients, in circumstances in which the mine owner is considering selling its mining rights.  The services of Enterprises and Processing include due diligence on the potential mine seller and the mine, such as ownership of the mine and whether the mine meets all operation requirements and/or is currently in operation.

Currently the Company has provided three potential mine acquisition opportunities to its clients, with one mine located in Asia and two mines located in North America.  For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded revenue of $516,000 for the services provided.

For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company had one major customer which accounted for 93% of the Company’s total revenue.

XML

Note 11 - Commitments

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]

Commitments Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 11 – Commitments

On January 4, 2017, Processing entered into a Consulting and Strategist Agreement with a consulting company for a six-month term.  On July 3, 2017, the Company and the consulting company extended the Consulting and Strategist Agreement until January 3, 2018 at no additional cost, and the Agreement was subsequently further extended to July 3, 2018. The consultant provided Processing with market research findings, exploration and advice on business development opportunities in certain countries, and other general business advisory services. The consulting company found acquisition targets for the Company, and on June 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with a seller for the purchase of five mines located in different areas of Mexico for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. Upon the execution of the MOU, the Company acquired the exclusive right to purchase the mines from the seller, effective until September 30, 2018. The parties have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the $1,000,000 purchase price upon receiving approvals from the Mexican government allowing for the transfer of the mining concession. The transfer request has been submitted to, and is being processed by, the Mexican government, but that processing has been delayed due to elections in Mexico. (see Note 5). 

Lease Commitments

Effective January 1, 2017, Processing, as a sublessee, entered into a sublease agreement for office space with a sublessor for a term of two years. The monthly rent was $1,897, and increased to $1,949 starting in January 2018. The lease expired on December 31, 2018.

Effective April 16, 2018, the Company entered a one-year lease agreement to lease another office in the City of Diamond Bar, California. The monthly rent is approximately $1,500.

Effective December 1, 2018, the Company entered a three-year lease agreement to lease another office in the city of Arcadia, California. The monthly base rent is $2,115 payable on the first day of each month, with a 3% increase each year.

The Company recorded rental expense of $16,815 and $5,690 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018, the future annual minimum lease payments were $31,380; $26,141; and $24,661.

Consulting and Service Agreements

1) On April 1, 2017, the Company entered into a strategist consulting agreement with a consulting company with a term of one year. The compensation to the consulting company is $50,000 per year, payable in equal installments at the end of each month. The agreement was extended to March 31, 2019.

2) On May 4, 2018, the Company entered into a Mineral Mining Interactive Technology and Related Application Software Development Service Contract (the “Contract”) with Prime King Investment Limited (“Prime King”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, Prime King is providing services to the Company relating to the development, installation and debugging of a software system called IMETAL. The IMETAL software will allow the Company to operate a platform which we plan to use to facilitate investment in raw metals, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 

IMETAL is committed to building a platform which plans to provide not only institutional clients, but also individual investors, a chance to invest in raw metals, find specialized minerals, and exploit these opportunities, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Prime King shall also provide training to the Company’s staff per the Company’s request as well as maintenance for the Project for one year after the completion of the Project, in each case free of charge.

Under the Contract, the Company shall pay Prime King $3,000,000, of which 50% was paid within 10 days of the execution of the Contract, and the remaining 50% was to be paid within 10 days of the completion of the Project after inspection and approval by the Company. The service was required to be completed in three months, however, on July 17, 2018, the deadline was extended until October 17, 2018, and the Company agreed to extend the deadline further, due to changes in technical requirements requested by the Company. Up to September 30, 2018, the Company paid Prime King $1.50 million, which was recorded as software development costs. The Company did not pay anything to Prime King for the three months ended December 31, 2018. The Company expects the project to be completed by March 31, 2019.

3) Effective on April 1, 2018, the Company entered another Consulting & Strategist Agreement with a consulting company in Hong Kong for a term of one year. The consulting services mainly include business strategy and business development advisory for the Company’s potential new ventures in the Far East, mainly in Hong Kong and Russia. The consulting fee is $40,000 per month, payable monthly on or about the first day of each month.

4) Exploratory Drilling Agreement and Related Costs. On April 1, 2018, the Company entered into a contract with an individual owner of a mining concession in Mexico.  The mine is located Mexico, in the state of Sinaloa, Badiraguato municipality, Nocoriba village.  The latitude is 25.2520000 and the longitude is -107.225500. The Company has started drilling in a small area within the concession 10HAAS. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company spent $238,750, which was recorded as consulting expense, and the Company expects to spend an additional $1.56 million on this project. If the project is successful, the Company will receive 3% equity in the mine (which percentage will be paid upon successful completion of exploration and drilling of the mine).

Employment Agreement

The Company currently has an employment agreement with Michael Viotto, the Company’s CFO.  Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, dated August 20, 2018, Mr. Viotto receives annual compensation of $50,000, and the agreement has a term of one year.  Mr. Viotto’s employment agreement includes typical clauses relating to noncompetition, nonsolicitation and indemnification of Mr. Viotto in connection with his service as the Company’s CFO.

XML

Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The CFS included herein were prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) were omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Consolidation 

The CFS include the accounts of Enterprises and its subsidiaries, Processing, Trading and Technology. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers cash, money market funds, investments in interest bearing demand deposit accounts, time deposits and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change because there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board - Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) for disclosures about fair value (“FV”) of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the FV of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring FV in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about FV measurements. 

Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a FV hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure FV into three broad levels.  The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of FV hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their FVs are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The FV hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the FV measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their FV because of the short maturity of those instruments. 

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.  The Company had no accounts receivable or bad debt allowances at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Property and Equipment 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets and estimated lives as follows:

Computer and office equipment	5 years
Office furniture	7 years
Leasehold decoration and renovation	10 years
Production machinery	10 years
Autos	5 years

Depreciation of property and equipment attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part of inventories, and expensed to cost of goods sold when inventories are sold.

Related Parties, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB ASC for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: (a) affiliates of the Company; (b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the FV option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the Company; (e) management of the Company; (f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements.

The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB ASC to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.

In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes all existing revenue recognition requirements, including most industry-specific guidance. This new standard requires a company to recognize revenues when it transfers goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the company expects to receive for those goods or services. The FASB subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU No. 2014-09 that have the same effective date and transition date: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations; ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing; ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients; and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company adopted these amendments with ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the new revenue standards).

The new revenue standards became effective for the Company on October 1, 2018, and were adopted using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of the new revenue standards as of October 1, 2018 did not change the Company’s revenue recognition as the Company does not have any revenue yet. As the Company will not identify any accounting changes that impacted the amount of reported revenues with respect to its product revenues, no adjustment to retained earnings will be required upon adoption.

Under the new revenue standards, the Company recognizes revenues when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive in exchange for those goods. The Company recognizes revenues following the five step model prescribed under ASU No. 2014-09: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenues when (or as) we satisfy the performance obligation.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB ASC, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. 

Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Income Tax Uncertainties, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-25 of the FASB ASC. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018.  The tax years 2015 - 2017 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all the potential common shares, warrants and stock options had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options and warrants were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding options and warrants, and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible instruments. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later) and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, outstanding convertible instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later).

Cash Flow, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash Flows Reporting 

The Company follows paragraph  230-10-45-24 of the FASB ASC for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect Method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB ASC to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB ASC.

Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Software Development Costs

The Company incurs software development costs to develop software programs to be used primarily to meet its internal needs and to market to others. In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software, the Company capitalizes development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, the software will be used to perform the function intended, and the value will be recoverable. In accordance with ASC 985-20-25, costs incurred before product feasibility is established and all design and coding is completed are expensed. Reengineering costs and minor modifications and enhancements that do not significantly improve the overall functionality of the software are expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had not completed the preliminary project stage or the design stage, and accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any costs.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its CFS.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its CFS.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are an improvement to U.S. GAAP because they provide guidance for each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the current and potential future diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption does not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s CFS.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance retrospectively to each period presented. The adoption did not have any material effect on the Company’s CFS.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the guidance effective October 1, 2018. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

SEC Disclosure Update and Simplification

In August 2018, the SEC issued Securities Act Release No. 33-10532 that amends certain disclosure requirements, including extending to interim periods the annual requirement to disclose changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the new requirements, registrants must now analyze changes in stockholders’ equity, in the form of a reconciliation, for the current and comparative year-to-date interim periods, with subtotals for each interim period. The final rule was effective in November 2018. The Company adopted the final rule and included a reconciliation of the changes in stockholders' equity in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2018.

XML

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Estimated Useful Lives [Member]

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables) [Line Items]

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets and estimated lives as follows:

Computer and office equipment	5 years
Office furniture	7 years
Leasehold decoration and renovation	10 years
Production machinery	10 years
Autos	5 years

XML

Note 4 - Property and Equipment (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Property, Plant and Equipment [Member]

Note 4 - Property and Equipment (Tables) [Line Items]

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

Property and equipment at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Computer equipment	$	1,852		$	1,825
Less accumulated depreciation		(741	)		(648	)
Computer equipment, net		1,111			1,204
Office furniture		12,746			12,746
Less accumulated depreciation		(3,641	)		(3,186	)
Office furniture, net		9,105			9,560
Total property and equipment, net	$	10,216		$	10,764

XML

Note 9 - Income Tax (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities [Table Text Block]

Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 are as follows:

	December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018
Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$	1,589,400		$	1,571,957
Less valuation allowance		(1,589,400	)		(1,571,957	)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation [Table Text Block]

A reconciliation of the consolidated federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018			2017
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate		(21.00	)%		(34.00	)%
Federal income tax rate difference		-	%		19.00	%
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate, net of effect of state income tax deductible to federal income tax		(7.51	)%		(7.51	)%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		28.51	%		22.51	%
Effective income tax rate		0.00	%		0.00	%

XML

Note 1 - Organization and Operations (Details) - USD ($)	Nov. 28, 2016	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	May 26, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Note 1 - Organization and Operations (Details) [Line Items]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	5,500,000
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage	60.91%
Stock Issued During Period, Value, New Issues (in Dollars)	$ 55,000
Common Stock, Shares Authorized		375,000,000	375,000,000	375,000,000	375,000,000	75,000,000
Fuse Trading Limited ("Trading") [Member]
Note 1 - Organization and Operations (Details) [Line Items]
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage						100.00%
Share Price (in Dollars per share)						$ 0.13

XML

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) - Property, Plant and Equipment	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018
Computer Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Life	5 years
Office Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Life	7 years
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Life	10 years
Machinery and Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Life	10 years
Vehicles [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Life	5 years

XML

Note 3 - Going Concern (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)	$ (5,897,067)		$ (5,834,737)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent	$ (62,330)	$ (239,389)

XML

Note 4 - Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
Depreciation	$ 548	$ 548

XML

Note 4 - Property and Equipment (Details) - Property, Plant and Equipment - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property and equipment, net	$ 10,216	$ 10,764
Computer Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Gross	1,852	1,825
Less accumulated depreciation	(741)	(648)
Property and equipment, net	1,111	1,204
Furniture and Fixtures [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Gross	12,746	12,746
Less accumulated depreciation	(3,641)	(3,186)
Property and equipment, net	$ 9,105	$ 9,560

XML

Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent) (Details)			12 Months Ended
	Jun. 22, 2018 USD ($)	Jan. 04, 2017 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2018 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Aug. 01, 2018 USD ($)
Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent) (Details) [Line Items]
Prepaid Expense, Current			$ 1,000,000		$ 1,000,000
Prepaid Expense, Noncurrent			1,000,000		1,000,000
Number of Mines Under MOU	5
Prepaid D&O Insurance [Member]
Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent) (Details) [Line Items]
Prepaid Expense, Current					894
Consulting Agreement Service Contract [Member]
Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent) (Details) [Line Items]
Prepaid Expense, Current					$ 17,251
Deposit Assets						$ 103,508
Increase (Decrease) in Prepaid Expense			(51,754)
Consulting and Strategist Agreement [Member]
Note 5 - Prepaid expenses (current and noncurrent) (Details) [Line Items]
Deposit Assets		$ 1,325,000
Increase (Decrease) in Prepaid Expense				$ (325,000)
Contract, Term		6 months
Prepaid Expense, Noncurrent			$ 1,000,000
Number of Mines Under MOU	5
Mine Purchase Price	$ 1,000,000

XML

Note 6 - Other payables (Details) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]
Other Liabilities, Current	$ 4,792	$ 9,633

XML

Note 7 - Notes payable (related party) (Details) - Convertible Debt [Member] - USD ($)	Jul. 06, 2018	Jun. 28, 2018	Mar. 20, 2017	Dec. 19, 2016
Note 7 - Notes payable (related party) (Details) [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Face Amount			$ 6,869,818	$ 6,869,818
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage			3.00%	6.00%
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Conversion Price		$ 0.35		$ 1.50
Debt Instrument, Term			12 months
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description			renewable for up to an additional 12 months at the Purchaser’s option
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Shares Issued	19,628,050	19,628,050
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share		$ 0.001
Debt Conversion, Original Debt, Amount	$ 6,869,818	$ 6,869,818

XML

Note 8 - Stockholders' Equity (Details) - USD ($)	Jul. 06, 2018	Jun. 28, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	May 26, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
Note 8 - Stockholders' Equity (Details) [Line Items]
Common Stock, Shares Authorized			375,000,000	375,000,000	375,000,000	375,000,000	75,000,000
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)			$ 0.001	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Convertible Debt [Member]
Note 8 - Stockholders' Equity (Details) [Line Items]
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)		$ 0.001
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Shares Issued	19,628,050	19,628,050
Debt Conversion, Original Debt, Amount (in Dollars)	$ 6,869,818	$ 6,869,818

XML

Note 9 - Income Tax (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 26, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	21.00%	21.00%	34.00%
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$ 5,693,977		$ 5,631,644
Deferred Tax Assets, Net	$ 1,589,400

XML

Note 9 - Income Tax (Details) - Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities [Abstract]
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$ 1,589,400	$ 1,571,957
Less valuation allowance	(1,589,400)	(1,571,957)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Note 9 - Income Tax (Details) - Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 26, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018
Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation [Abstract]
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate	(21.00%)	(21.00%)	(34.00%)
Federal income tax rate difference	0.00%		19.00%
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate, net of effect of state income tax deductible to federal income tax	(7.51%)		(7.51%)
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards	28.51%		22.51%
Effective income tax rate	0.00%		0.00%

XML

Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Mines	3
Revenues (in Dollars)	$ 516,000	$ 0
Asia [Member]
Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Mines	1
North America [Member]
Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Mines	2
Customer Concentration Risk [Member] | Sales Revenue, Net [Member]
Note 10 - Revenue and Major Customer (Details) [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	93.00%

XML

Note 11 - Commitments (Details)									3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 01, 2018 USD ($)	Aug. 20, 2018 USD ($)	Jun. 22, 2018 USD ($)	May 04, 2018	Apr. 16, 2018 USD ($)	Apr. 01, 2018 USD ($)	Apr. 01, 2017 USD ($)	Jan. 01, 2017	Dec. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Mines Under MOU			5
Payments to Acquire Mining Assets			$ 1,000,000
Operating Leases, Rent Expense									$ 16,815	$ 5,690
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Next Twelve Months									31,380		$ 31,380
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years									26,141		26,141
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Three Years									$ 24,661		24,661
Employment Agreement, Annual Compensation		$ 50,000
Employment Agreement, Term		1 year
Strategic Consulting Agreement [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Contract, Term							1 year
Contract, Annual Fee							$ 50,000
Mineral Mining Interactive Technology and Related Application Software Development Service Contract [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Contract, Term				1 year
Research, Development and Computer Software, Activity Description				<p style="font-family:'Times New Roman', Times, serif;font-size:10pt;margin:0pt;text-align:justify;">Under the Contract, the Company shall pay Prime King $3,000,000, of which 50% was paid within 10 days of the execution of the Contract, and the remaining 50% was to be paid within 10 days of the completion of the Project after inspection and approval by the Company. The service was required to be completed in three months, however, on July 17, 2018, the deadline was extended until October 17, 2018, and the Company agreed to extend the deadline further, due to changes in technical requirements requested by the Company. Up to September 30, 2018, the Company paid Prime King $1.50 million, which was recorded as software development costs. The Company did not pay anything to Prime King for the three months ended December 31, 2018. The Company expects the project to be completed by March 31, 2019.</p><p style="font-family:'Times New Roman', Times, serif;font-size:10pt;margin:0pt;text-align:justify;"> </p>
Payments to Develop Software												$ 1,500,000
Consulting and Strategist Agreement [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Contract, Term						1 year
Contract, Monthly Fee						$ 40,000
Exploratory Drilling Agreement and Related Costs [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Costs Incurred, Exploration Costs												$ 238,750
Exploratory Dirlling, Estimated Project Cost						$ 1,560,000
Portion of Net Profit from Minining Operations						3.00%
Sublease of Office Space [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Lessee, Operating Lease, Term of Contract								2 years
Operating Leases, Rent Expense, Minimum Rentals											$ 1,949		$ 1,897
Lease Expiration Date								Dec. 31, 2018
Lease of Office Space [Member] | City of Diamond Bar, California [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Operating Leases, Rent Expense, Minimum Rentals					$ 1,500
Lease of Office Space [Member] | Arcadia, California [Member]
Note 11 - Commitments (Details) [Line Items]
Operating Leases, Rent Expense, Minimum Rentals	$ 2,115
Lessee, Operating Lease, Description	3% increase each year