Note 1. Description of Business

The Partnership

8point3 Energy Partners LP (together with its subsidiaries, the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership formed on March 3, 2015 under a master formation agreement by SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”) and First Solar, Inc. (“First Solar” and, together with SunPower, the “Sponsors”) to own, operate and acquire solar energy generation systems. As of February 28, 2017, 8point3 Energy Partners LP owned a controlling non-economic managing member interest in 8point3 Operating Company, LLC (“OpCo”) and a 35.5% limited liability company interest in OpCo, and the Sponsors collectively owned a noncontrolling 64.5% limited liability company interest in OpCo.

The following table provides an overview of the assets that comprise the Portfolio as of February 28, 2017:

Project

Location

Commercial

Operation Date(1)

MW(ac)

(2)

Counterparty

Remaining

Term of

Offtake Agreement

(in years)(3)

Utility

Maryland Solar

Maryland

February 2014

FirstEnergy

Solutions

16.1

Solar Gen 2

California

November 2014

150

San Diego Gas &

Electric

22.7

Lost Hills Blackwell

California

April 2015

City of

Roseville/Pacific

Gas and Electric

26.8(4)

North Star

California

June 2015

Pacific Gas and

Electric

18.3

RPU

California

September 2015

City of Riverside

23.6

Quinto

California

November 2015

108

Southern California

Edison

18.8

Hooper

Colorado

December 2015

Public Service

Company of Colorado

18.8

Kingbird

California

April 2016

Southern California

Public Power Authority(5)

19.2

Henrietta

California

October 2016

102

Pacific Gas and

Electric

19.6

Stateline

California

August 2016

300

Southern California

Edison

19.5

Commercial & Industrial

UC Davis

California

September 2015

University of

California

18.5

Macy's California

California

October 2015

Macy's Corporate

Services

18.7

Macy’s Maryland

Maryland

December 2016

Macy's Corporate

Services

19.8

Kern(6)

California

June 2017

Kern High School District

19.8(7)

Residential Portfolio

U.S. – Various

June 2014

Approx. 5,900

homeowners(8)

15.5(9)

Total

945

(1)

For the Macy’s California Project, the Macy’s Maryland Project, and the Kern Project, COD represents the first date on which all of the solar generation systems within each of the Macy’s California Project, the Macy’s Maryland Project and the Kern Project, respectively, have achieved or are expected to achieve COD. For the Residential Portfolio, COD represents the first date on which all of the residential systems within the Residential Portfolio have achieved COD.

(2)

The MW for the projects in which the Partnership owns less than a 100% interest or in which the Partnership is the lessor under any sale-leaseback financing are shown on a gross basis. Please read Part I, Item 1. “Business—Tax Equity Financing” of our 2016 10-K for a description of our tax equity structures, which such description reflects the Partnership’s ownership on a net basis.

(3)	Remaining term of offtake agreement is measured from the later of February 28, 2017 or the expected COD of the applicable project.

(4)	Remaining term comprised of 1.8 years on a PPA with the City of Roseville, California, followed by a 25-year PPA with PG&E starting in 2019.

(5)	The Kingbird Project is subject to two separate PPAs with member cities of the Southern California Public Power Authority.

(6)

OpCo’s acquisition of the Kern Project is being effectuated in five phases, with the closing of the first phase, reflecting a nameplate capacity of approximately 3 MW, having occurred on January 26, 2016, the closing of the second phase, reflecting a nameplate capacity of approximately 5 MW, having occurred on September 9, 2016, the closing of the third phase, reflecting a nameplate capacity of approximately 5 MW, having occurred on November 30, 2016, the closing of the fourth phase, reflecting a nameplate capacity of approximately 3 MW, having closed on February 24, 2017, and the closing of the Kern Phase 2(c) Assets to occur in the future.

(7)	Remaining term is the weighted average duration of the first four phases of the Kern Project.

(8)	Comprised of the approximately 5,900 solar installations located at homes in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont, that are held by the Residential Portfolio Project Entity and have an aggregate nameplate capacity of 39 MW.

(9)	Remaining term is the weighted average duration of all of the residential leases, in each case measured from February 28, 2017.

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

The direct and indirect contributions of the IPO Project Entities by the Sponsors to OpCo in connection with the IPO resulted in a business combination for accounting purposes with the IPO SunPower Project Entities being considered the acquirer of the interests contributed by First Solar in the IPO First Solar Project Entities. Therefore, the IPO SunPower Project Entities constitute the “Predecessor.” As used herein, the term “IPO Project Entities” refers to:

•

the IPO SunPower Project Entities, including:

•

the Macy’s California Project Entities, which hold the Macy’s California Project;

•

the Quinto Project Entity, which holds the Quinto Project;

•

the RPU Project Entity, which holds the RPU Project;

•

the UC Davis Project Entity, which holds the UC Davis Project; and

•

the Residential Portfolio Project Entity, which holds the Residential Portfolio Project; and

•

the IPO First Solar Project Entities, including:

•

the Lost Hills Blackwell Project, which holds the Lost Hills Project and the Blackwell Project;

•

the Maryland Solar Project Entity, which holds the Maryland Solar Project;

•

the North Star Project Entity, which holds the North Star Project; and

•

the Solar Gen 2 Project Entity, which holds the Solar Gen 2 Project.

In connection with the IPO, SunPower contributed a nearly 100% interest in each of the IPO SunPower Project Entities to OpCo, subject, in the case of the Quinto Project, the RPU Project, the UC Davis Project and the Macy’s California Project, to the tax equity investor’s right to a varying portion of the cash flows from the projects. In connection with the IPO, First Solar directly contributed to OpCo a 100% interest in the Maryland Solar Project Entity and indirectly contributed to OpCo a 49% economic interest in each of the Lost Hills Blackwell Project, the North Star Project and the Solar Gen 2 Project.

Since November 30, 2015, the partnership completed six acquisitions from our Sponsors, four from SunPower and two from First Solar. Four of the acquisitions are treated as business combinations:

•

the Kern Project Entity, which holds the Kern Project;

•

the Kingbird Project Entities, which holds the Kingbird Project;

•

the Hooper Project Entity, which holds the Hooper Project; and

•

the Macy’s Maryland Project Entity, which holds the Macy’s Maryland Project.

Two of the acquisitions are accounted for as equity method investments:

•

the Henrietta Project Entity, which holds the Henrietta Project. OpCo owns a 49% economic interest in the Henrietta Project Entity; and

•

the Stateline Project Entity, which holds the Stateline Project. OpCo owns a 34% economic interest in the Stateline Project Entity.

Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and include the accounts of the Partnership, and all of its subsidiaries, as appropriate under consolidation accounting guidelines. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates in which the Partnership has less than a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All significant inter-entity accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring items) necessary to state fairly its financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies previously disclosed in Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1—Description of Business” and “—Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the 2016 10-K. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

Management Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the assumptions and methodology underlying allowances for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable and financing receivables; estimates of future cash flows and economic useful lives of property and equipment; the fair value and residual value of leased solar power systems; fair value of financial instruments; fair value of acquired assets and liabilities; valuation of certain accrued liabilities such as accrued system output performance warranty and AROs; and income taxes including the related valuation allowance. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued an update to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. This new guidance becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and is applied prospectively. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued an update which amends the guidance on related parties that are under common control. Specifically, this update requires that a single decision maker consider indirect interests held by related parties under common control on a proportionate basis in a manner consistent with its evaluation of indirect interests held through other related parties. That is, the single decision maker does not consider indirect interests held through related parties as equivalent to direct interests in determining whether it meets the economics criterion to be a primary beneficiary. This new guidance becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued an update which eliminates a prior exception and now requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory, such as property and equipment, when such transfer occurs. This new guidance becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 and shall be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative–effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued an update to the statement of cash flows guidance, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. One identified cash flow issue relates to distributions received from equity method investees whereby the reporting entity should make an accounting policy election to classify distributions received from equity method investees using either the cumulative earnings approach or the nature of the distribution approach. This new guidance becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and is applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Partnership is evaluating the change in accounting policy from the cumulative earnings approach to the nature of the distribution approach and the impact on its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued an update to the equity method investments guidance, which eliminates the requirement that an entity retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting if an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. The update requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. This new guidance will be effective for the Partnership beginning on December 1, 2017 using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an update to the lease accounting guidance, which requires entities to begin recording assets and liabilities arising from substantially all leases on the balance sheet. The new guidance will also require significant additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. This new guidance will be effective for the Partnership beginning on December 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued an update to the standards to require management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and to provide related disclosures. The Partnership adopted the new guidance beginning on December 1, 2016 and the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures is not material.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new revenue recognition standard based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The FASB has issued several updates to the standard which (i) clarify the application of the principal versus agent guidance; (ii) clarify the guidance relating to performance obligations and licensing; and (iii) clarify assessment of the collectability criterion, presentation of sales taxes, measurement date for non-cash consideration and completed contracts at transaction. The new revenue recognition standard, amended by the updates, becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and is to be applied retrospectively using one of two prescribed methods. Early adoption is permitted. The Partnership is currently evaluating and considering the possibility of early adoption of the new standard effective December 1, 2017. The Partnership’s ability to early adopt, potentially using the modified retrospective method, is dependent on process, internal control and system readiness and a complete evaluation of all the disclosures required under the new standard. While the Partnership is continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, it currently believes the impact on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements is not material because over 90% of the Partnership’s total revenue for all periods is comprised of lease revenue, which is substantially unchanged under the new standard.

Other than as described above, there has been no issued accounting guidance not yet adopted by the Partnership that it believes is material or potentially material to its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.