Note 1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

The Partnership

8point3 Energy Partners LP (together with its subsidiaries, the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership formed on March 10, 2015 under a master formation agreement by SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”) and First Solar, Inc. (“First Solar” and, together with SunPower, the “Sponsors”) to own, operate and acquire solar energy generation systems. The Partnership’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) was completed on June 24, 2015. 8point3 General Partner, LLC (the “General Partner”), the Partnership’s general partner, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 8point3 Holding Company, LLC (“Holdings”), an entity owned by SunPower and First Solar. As of February 29, 2016, 8point3 Energy Partners LP owned a controlling non-economic managing member interest in 8point3 Operating Company, LLC (“OpCo”) and a 28.2% limited liability company interest in OpCo, and the Sponsors collectively owned a noncontrolling 71.8% limited liability company interest in OpCo.

The following table provides an overview of the assets that comprise the Partnership’s portfolio (the “Portfolio”):

Remaining

Term of

Commercial

Offtake Agreement

Project

Operation Date(1)

MW(ac)(2)

Counterparty

(in years)(3)

Utility

Maryland Solar

February 2014

First Energy

Solutions

17.1

Solar Gen 2

November 2014

150

San Diego Gas &

Electric

23.7

Lost Hills Blackwell

April 2015

City of

Roseville/Pacific

Gas and Electric

27.8(4)

North Star

June 2015

Pacific Gas and

Electric

19.3

RPU

September 2015

City of Riverside

24.6

Quinto

November 2015

108

Southern California

Edison

19.8

Commercial & Industrial

UC Davis

September 2015

University of

California

19.5

Macy's

October 2015

Macy's Corporate

Services

19.7

Kern Phase 1(a) Assets

August 2016

Kern High School District

20.0

Residential Portfolio

June 2014

Approx. 5,900

homeowners(5)

16.5(6)

Total

435

(1)

For the Macy’s Project and the Kern Phase 1(a) Assets (as defined below), commercial operation date (“COD”) represents the first date on which all of the solar generation systems within each of the Macy’s Project and the Kern Phase 1(a) Assets, respectively, have achieved COD. Please read “—Note 2—Business Combinations—2016 Acquisitions” for further details on the Kern Phase 1(a) Assets. For the Residential Portfolio, COD represents the first date on which all of the residential systems within the Residential Portfolio have achieved COD.

(2)	The megawatts (“MW”) for the projects in which the Partnership owns less than a 100% interest or in which the Partnership is the lessor under any sale-leaseback financing are shown on a gross basis.

(3)	Remaining term of offtake agreement is measured from the later of February 29, 2016 or the COD of the applicable project.

(4)	Remaining term comprised of 2.8 years on a power purchase agreement (“PPA”) with the City of Roseville, California, followed by a 25-year PPA with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”) starting in 2019.

(5)

Comprised of the approximately 5,900 solar installations located at homes in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont, that is held by SunPower Residential I, LLC (the “Residential Portfolio Project Entity”) and has an aggregate nameplate capacity of 39 MW.

(6)	Remaining term is the weighted average duration of all of the residential leases, in each case measured from February 29, 2016.

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

The direct and indirect contributions of the IPO Project Entities (as defined below) by the Sponsors to OpCo in connection with the IPO resulted in a business combination for accounting purposes with the IPO SunPower Project Entities (as defined below) being considered the acquirer of the interests contributed by First Solar in the IPO First Solar Project Entities (as defined below). Therefore, the IPO SunPower Project Entities constitute the “Predecessor.” As used herein, the term “IPO Project Entities” refers to:

the IPO SunPower Project Entities, including:

Solar Star California XXX, LLC and Solar Star California XXX (2), LLC (collectively, the “Macy’s Project Entities”), which hold the Macy’s Project (as defined in the glossary in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Glossary”));

Solar Star California XIII, LLC (the “Quinto Project Entity”), which holds the Quinto Project (as defined in the Glossary);

Solar Star California XXXI, LLC (the “RPU Project Entity”), which holds the RPU Project (as defined in the Glossary);

Solar Star California XXXII, LLC (the “UC Davis Project Entity”), which holds the UC Davis Project (as defined in the Glossary);

the Residential Portfolio Project Entity, which holds the Residential Portfolio Project (as defined in the Glossary); and

the IPO First Solar Project Entities, including:

Lost Hills Solar, LLC (the “Lost Hills Project Entity”), which holds the Lost Hills Project, and Blackwell Solar, LLC (the “Blackwell Project Entity”), which holds the Blackwell Project (the Lost Hills Project and the Blackwell Project, each defined in the Glossary, together constitute the “Lost Hills Blackwell Project”);

Maryland Solar LLC (the “Maryland Solar Project Entity”), which holds the Maryland Solar Project (as defined in the Glossary);

North Star Solar, LLC (the “North Star Project Entity”), which holds the North Star Project (as defined in the Glossary); and

SG2 Imperial Valley, LLC (the “Solar Gen 2 Project Entity”), which holds the Solar Gen 2 Project (as defined in the Glossary).

In connection with the IPO, SunPower contributed a nearly 100% interest in each of the IPO SunPower Project Entities to OpCo, subject, in the case of the Quinto Project, the RPU Project, the UC Davis Project and the Macy’s Project, to the tax equity investor’s right to a varying portion of the cash flows from the projects. In connection with the IPO, First Solar directly contributed to OpCo a 100% interest in the Maryland Solar Project Entity and indirectly contributed to OpCo a 49% economic interest in each of the Lost Hills Blackwell Project, the North Star Project and the Solar Gen 2 Project.

On January 26, 2016, OpCo entered into a Purchase, Sale and Contribution Agreement (the “Kern Purchase Agreement”) with SunPower pursuant to which OpCo agreed to purchase an interest in the Kern Project, as further described below in Note 2. Effective January 26, 2016, a subsidiary of OpCo acquired from SunPower all of the class B limited liability company interests of SunPower Commercial II Class B, LLC (the “Kern Class B Partnership”). Kern High School District Solar (2), LLC (the “Kern Project Entity”) is an indirect subsidiary of the Kern Class B Partnership, and OpCo holds a controlling interest in the Kern Class B Partnership effective January 26, 2016; therefore, OpCo consolidates this less-than-wholly-owned entity. Please read “—Note 2—Business Combinations—2016 Acquisitions” for further details.

The Partnership’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), and include the accounts of the Partnership, and all of its subsidiaries, as appropriate under consolidation accounting guidelines. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates in which the Partnership has less than a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All significant inter-entity accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring items) necessary to state fairly its financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies previously disclosed in “Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the 2015 10-K. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

Fiscal Years

On June 24, 2015, in connection with the closing of the IPO, the Partnership amended the Partnership Agreement to include a change in the fiscal year to November 30. The first quarter of the Partnership’s fiscal 2016 includes the period from December 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016, consistent with the Partnership’s November 30 fiscal year end. The Predecessor had a 52-to-53 week fiscal year that ended on the Sunday closest to December 31. The corresponding first quarter of fiscal 2015 includes the Predecessor’s period from December 29, 2014 to March 29, 2015 and is comprised of 13 weeks.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements cover the period from December 1, 2015 through February 29, 2016, representing the entire three-month period of the Partnership’s first quarter of fiscal 2016. The prior year’s comparable three-month period is reported on the basis of the previous first quarter of fiscal 2015 of the Predecessor and, as a result of the change in the Partnership’s fiscal year end, the quarterly periods of its newly adopted fiscal year do not coincide with the historical quarterly periods previously reported by its Predecessor. Financial information for the three months ended February 28, 2015 has not been included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the following reasons: (i) the three months ended March 29, 2015 provide as meaningful a comparison to the three months ended February 29, 2016 as would the three months ended February 28, 2015; (ii) the Partnership believes that there are no significant factors, seasonal or otherwise, that would impact the comparability of information if the results for the three months ended February 28, 2015 were presented in lieu of results for the three months ended March 29, 2015; and (iii) it was not practicable or cost justified to prepare this information.

Management Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the assumptions and methodology underlying the allocations of expenses incurred on the Predecessor’s behalf that were recorded in the Predecessor’s condensed carve-out financial statements, as well as: allowances for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable and financing receivables; estimates for future cash flows and economic useful lives of property and equipment; the fair value and residual value of leased solar energy systems; fair value of financial instruments; fair value of acquired assets and liabilities; valuation of certain accrued liabilities such as accrued warranty and asset retirement obligation(“ARO”); and income taxes including the related valuation allowance. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an update to the lease accounting guidance, which requires entities to begin recording assets and liabilities arising from substantially all leases on the balance sheet. The new guidance will also require significant additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. This new guidance will be effective for the Partnership beginning on December 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In November 2015, the FASB issued an update which requires entities that present a classified balance sheet to classify all deferred taxes as noncurrent assets or noncurrent liabilities. The new guidance is effective for the Partnership beginning on December 1, 2017. Early adoption of this standard is permitted. The Partnership is evaluating the potential impact of this standard on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In September 2015, the FASB issued an update to the business combination standards to eliminate the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer must recognize measurement-period adjustments during the period in which it determines the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The Partnership adopted the standard effective January 1, 2016 and the adoption of this standard did not impact the Partnership's results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In April 2015, the FASB issued an update to the standards for the presentation of debt issuance costs to reduce complexity in accounting standards and to align with International Financial Reporting Standards. The updated standard requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability. U.S. GAAP previously required debt issuance costs to be reflected as an asset on the Partnership’s balance sheet. The Partnership elected to early adopt the updated accounting standard, effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2015. There was no reclassification required as there was no debt issuance cost that was recorded as an asset in the prior periods.

In February 2015, the FASB issued a new standard which modifies existing consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. The Partnership adopted the standard effective January 1, 2016 and the adoption of this standard did not impact the Partnership's results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new revenue recognition standard based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of this standard for all entities by one year. The new revenue recognition standard becomes effective for the Partnership in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and is to be applied retrospectively using one of two prescribed methods. The Partnership is evaluating the application method and impact on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.