XML 33 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Preparation

Basis of Preparation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, in the United States and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, regarding interim financial reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted, and accordingly the balance sheet as of December 31, 2018, has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as our annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial information. The results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019, or for any other interim period or for any other future year. We operate in one reportable segment.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Basis of Consolidation

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of costs and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience when available and on various factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies

There have been no significant changes to the accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in Note 2 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, except as noted below.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

We adopted Accounting Standards Update, or ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019 using the alternative modified retrospective approach provided in ASU No. 2018-11, Lease (Topic 841): Targeted Improvements. In doing so, we have continued to apply Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC 840 in the comparative periods and recognized the cumulative effect of applying Topic 842 to retained earnings on January 1, 2019. We elected a package of practical expedients for leases that commenced prior to January 1, 2019, which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease assessment for: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct costs capitalization for any existing leases. We have also elected a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, not to separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with that lease component as a single lease component. We have made an accounting policy election to not apply the recognition requirements to leases with a lease term of 12 months or less. We have recognized those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.

 

Adoption of this standard has resulted in the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets of $11.7 million and lease liabilities of $13.1 million as of June 30, 2019. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated statement of operations or our consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

We adopted ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718), as of January 1, 2019, which amends ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation”. The ASU simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under the ASU, most of the guidance on such payments to non-employees would be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. Upon adoption of this standard, share-based awards issued to non-employees are measured at the grant date and are not subject to remeasurement. We have elected to continue to use the contractual term as the estimated expected term. The adoption of ASU No. 2018-07 did not have a material impact on our financial statements and is expected to reduce the volatility in stock-based compensation expense for non-employees recognized from period to period.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Under the new guidance, entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, or valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. However, public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and related changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018-13 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 modifies the other-than-temporary impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires an estimate of expected credit losses when the fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Fair Value Measurements

We define fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

Our valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. We classify these inputs into the following hierarchy:

 

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date;

 

Level 2—Inputs are observable, unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities; and

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities that are supported by little or no market data.