XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of long-lived assets). Fair value, as defined under GAAP, is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents, rent and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.
Derivative instruments: The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The valuation of these instruments is determined using a proprietary model that utilizes observable inputs. As such, the Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model uses the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are estimated using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit risks to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.
Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
The following were the face values, carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s notes payable as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, which carrying amounts generally do not approximate the fair values (in thousands):
June 30, 2020December 31, 2019
Face ValueCarrying AmountFair ValueFace ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable
$94,831  $94,403  $93,339  $118,481  $117,861  $119,196  

Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. The actual value could be materially different from the Company’s estimate of value.
As of June 30, 2020, the Company measured the following derivative instruments at fair value (in thousands):
  Fair Value Measurements Using
 Total        Quoted Prices in Active Markets 
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Recurring Basis:
Liability derivative - interest rate swaps$(3,084) $—  $(3,084) $—  
During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company measured the following asset(s) at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
  Fair Value Measurements Using
 Total        Quoted Prices in Active Markets 
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Nonrecurring Basis:
Impaired real estate (1)
$37,100  $—  $—  $37,100  
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture (1)
$528  $—  $—  $528  
_____________________
(1) Amount represents the fair value for a real estate asset or investment in unconsolidated joint venture impacted by an impairment charge during the six months ended June 30, 2020, as of the date that the fair value measurement was made. The carrying value for the real estate asset or investment in unconsolidated joint venture may have subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value reflected due to activity that has occurred since the measurement date.
During the six months ended June 30, 2020, one of the Company’s real estate properties was measured at its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach. The significant unobservable inputs the Company used in measuring the estimated fair value of this property include a discount rate of 7.50% and a terminal cap rate of 6.25%. See Note 3, “Real Estate Held for Investment - Impairment of Real Estate” for further discussion on the impaired real estate property. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company measured its investment in unconsolidated joint venture to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach. The significant unobservable inputs the Company used in measuring the estimated fair value of the underlying property of the investment include a discount rate of 10.00% and a terminal cap rate of 6.75%. See Note 6, “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture” for further discussion.