XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

Goodwill

Goodwill has an estimated indefinite life and is not amortized; rather, it is reviewed for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

Our annual goodwill impairment review occurs during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. We performed our 2016 evaluation on October 31, 2016, as further described in our 2016 Form 10-K. Our qualitative assessment did not identify sufficient indicators of impairment to require a Step 1 evaluation.

In interim periods between annual goodwill reviews, we also evaluate qualitative factors that could cause us to believe our estimated fair value of our single reporting unit may be lower than the carrying value and trigger a Step 1 test including, but not limited to (i) macroeconomic conditions, (ii) industry and market considerations, (iii) our overall financial performance including an analysis of our current and projected cash flows, revenue and earnings, (iv) a sustained decrease in share price and (v) other relevant entity-specific events including changes in strategy, partners, or litigation.

We did not identify any qualitative factors that would trigger a Step 1 test during the three months ended March 31, 2017. As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, we adopted ASU 2017-04 during the first quarter of 2017, thus changing our policy with regard to goodwill impairment testing. Following the adoption, we will perform a one-step test for goodwill impairment. The discussion below of our goodwill impairment testing during the first quarter of 2016 was performed using a two-step method under our previous policy.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, our common stock traded between $8.48 and $12.32, or an average common stock price of $10.33, compared to an average common stock price of $19.51 and $14.73 during the three month periods ended September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2015, respectively. A sustained decline in our common stock price and the resulting impact on our market capitalization is one of several qualitative factors we consider each quarter when evaluating whether events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that a potential goodwill impairment exists. We concluded that the decline in common stock price observed during the first quarter of 2016 did represent a sustained decline and, as such, we performed a Step 1 impairment test of our goodwill as of March 31, 2016.

Step 1 Results

To determine the implied fair value for our single reporting unit, we used both a market multiple valuation approach (“market approach”) and a discounted cash flow valuation approach (“income approach”).  In determining the estimated fair value, we considered the level of our Class A common stock price and assumptions that we believed market participants would make in valuing our reporting unit, including a control premium, as well as discounted cash flow calculations of management’s estimates of future financial performance and management’s long-term plans.  This analysis also required us to make judgments about revenues, expenses, fixed asset and working capital requirements, the timing of exchanges of our Class B common shares, capital market assumptions and discount rates.

In our March 31, 2016, Step 1 test, our most sensitive assumption for purposes of the market approach was our estimate of the control premium, and the most sensitive assumption related to the income approach, other than our cash flows, was the discount rate. As of March 31, 2016, our single reporting unit failed the Step 1 analysis as we determined that its implied fair value was less than its carrying value based on the weighting of the fair values determined under both the market and income approaches. As fair value was less than carrying value, we performed a Step 2 test to determine the implied fair value of our goodwill.

Step 2 Results

In our March 31, 2016, Step 2 test, the fair value of all assets and liabilities were estimated, including our tangible assets (corporate trade name, customer relationships and technology) for the purpose of deriving an estimate of the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill was then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill resulting in an impairment charge of $160.6 million on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The impairment was driven primarily by the sustained decline in our share price as our estimates of our future cash flows and the control premium have remained consistent, combined with an increase in the discount rate period over period. As noted above, our determination of fair value used a weighting of the fair values determined under both the market and income approaches, with the market approach driving the significant reduction in overall firm value and related impairment of goodwill.

The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands):
 
For the Three
 
 
 
 
 
Months
 
 
For the Year
 
 
 
Ended
 
 
Ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Balance as of beginning-of-period
 
$
626,569

 
 
$
608,903

 
Goodwill Acquired (1)
 
—

 
 
178,266

 
Measurement period adjustments (2)
 
635

 
 
—

 
Goodwill Impairment
 
—

 
 
(160,600
)
 
Balance as of end-of-period
 
$
627,204

 
 
$
626,569

 

(1) Represents goodwill acquired as a result of the Passport, Valence Health and Aldera transactions, as discussed in Note 4.
(2) Represents measurement period adjustments related to Valence Health and Aldera, as discussed in Note 4.

Intangible Assets, Net

As part of the Offering Reorganization, intangible assets of $169.0 million were recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recorded additional intangible assets of $108.3 million related to our acquisitions in 2016, as discussed in Note 4.

Details of our intangible assets (in thousands) are presented below:

 
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
 
Weighted-
 
 
 
 
Average
 
Gross
 
 
 
Net
 
Remaining
Carrying
Accumulated
Carrying
  
Useful Life
Amount
Amortization
Value
Corporate trade name
 
18.2
 
$
19,000

 
$
1,741

 
$
17,259

Customer relationships
 
21.2
 
203,500

 
11,341

 
192,159

Technology
 
4.9
 
50,500

 
9,828

 
40,672

Below market lease, net
 
9.0
 
4,323

 
247

 
4,076

Total
 
 
 
$
277,323

 
$
23,157

 
$
254,166


 
 
As of December 31, 2016
  
 
Weighted-
 
 
 
 
Average
 
Gross
 
 
 
Net
 
Remaining
Carrying
Accumulated
Carrying
 
Useful Life
Amount
Amortization
Value
Corporate trade name
 
18.4
 
$
19,000

 
$
1,505

 
$
17,495

Customer relationships
 
21.5
 
203,500

 
9,018

 
194,482

Technology
 
5.2
 
50,500

 
7,753

 
42,747

Below market lease, net
 
9.4
 
4,323

 
124

 
4,199

Total
 
 
 
$
277,323

 
$
18,400

 
$
258,923



Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $4.8 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment if circumstances indicate the Company may not be able to recover the asset’s carrying value. As discussed above, during the first quarter of 2016, our single reporting unit failed the Step 1 test for goodwill impairment, thus triggering an impairment analysis of the carrying value of our intangible asset group.  In conjunction with the impairment testing of the carrying value of our goodwill, we performed an analysis to determine whether the carrying amount of our intangible asset group was recoverable.  We performed a Step 1 test, which required management to compare the total undiscounted future cash flows of the intangible asset group to the current carrying amount.  The total undiscounted cash flows included only the future cash flows that are directly associated with and that were expected to arise as a result of the use and eventual disposal of the asset group.  Based on our Step 1 test, we concluded the carrying amount of our intangible asset group was recoverable given the pre-tax, undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the intangible asset group.