INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2022
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS	5. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS On July 15, 2020, we acquired, from a subsidiary of Industrial Property Trust (“IPT”), interests in two joint venture partnerships, the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP (the “BTC I Partnership”) and the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP (the “BTC II Partnership” and, together with the BTC I Partnership, the “BTC Partnerships”). The BTC Partnerships were formed with third party investors for purposes of investing in industrial properties located in certain major U.S. distribution markets. On June 15, 2021, we, through two of our subsidiaries, entered into a transaction (the “BTC I Partnership Transaction”) with our joint venture partners in the BTC I Partnership, QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “QR Limited Partner”) and Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC (the “BTC I SLP”). The BTC I SLP is indirectly owned by the Chairman of our board of directors. Pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Transaction, we, along with the QR Limited Partner and the BTC I SLP, agreed to split the real property portfolio of the BTC I Partnership in an equitable manner, such that following the split, we and the QR Limited Partner (together with certain of our affiliates), each own a 100% interest in approximately half of the portfolio of the BTC I Partnership (excluding one property that was distributed to the BTC I SLP). As a result of this transaction, we have a 100% interest in 22 buildings that were previously part of the BTC I Partnership (the “Build-To-Core Logistics Portfolio”). We and the BTC I SLP have no further interest in the BTC I Partnership as a result of the BTC I Partnership Transaction. The total cost of these properties to us was $876.7 million, which includes the cost of our minority joint venture interest in the BTC I Partnership and our incremental additional investment of approximately $580 million, exclusive of transaction costs, to effect the split of the BTC I Portfolio. Immediately prior to February 15, 2022, we, through a subsidiary, owned an 12.0% minority interest in the BTC II Partnership, as general partner and as a limited partner. In addition, the QR Limited Partner, owned a 78.5% limited partner interest. In addition, the BTC II SLP, an entity in which the Chairman of the board of directors holds an interest, owned a 7.8% special limited partner interest in the BTC II Partnership. An entity in which three of our affiliated directors and each of our executive officers own an interest (the “BCG Limited Partner”) owned a 1.7% interest in the BTC II Partnership. Similar to the BTC I Partnership Transaction, the BTC II Partnership Agreement (as defined below) provided procedures whereby the partners may split the real property portfolio in an equitable manner, such that certain partners will own a 100% interest in certain of the properties as a result of the split. On February 15, 2022, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC II Partnership (the “BTC II Partnership Agreement”), we, along with the other joint venture partners in the BTC II Partnership, entered into a transaction to split the majority of the properties in the BTC II Portfolio amongst the joint venture partners, other than the BCG Limited Partner, whose respective interest in such properties was redeemed for $24.9 million (the “BTC II Partnership Transaction”). As a result of the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we own a 100% interest in 11 properties and the BTC II SLP owns a 100% interest in seven properties that were previously part of the BTC II Portfolio and the QR Limited Partner owns a 100% interest in the remaining 14 properties that were part of the BTC II Partnership Transaction. The aggregate cost of these properties to us was $359.2 million. The incremental additional cash investment to effect the split of the BTC II Portfolio was $259.5 million as of September 30, 2022. Concurrently with the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we and the joint venture partners formed a new joint venture partnership (the “BTC II B Partnership”), through which we co-own five properties that were part of the original BTC II Portfolio and were not part of the BTC II Partnership Transaction. The partners own the same relative interests in the BTC II B Partnership as they did in the BTC II Partnership prior to the incentive fee distribution that was settled in the fourth quarter of 2021, such that we own an 8.0% interest as general partner and as a limited partner, the BTC II SLP owns a special limited partner interest, the BCG Limited Partner owns a 2.0% limited partner interest and the QR Limited Partner owns a 90.0% limited partner interest. We have elected the cost accumulation and allocation model to account for the BTC I Partnership Transaction and the BTC II Partnership Transaction, which allocates the cost of the acquisition at the carrying amount of the previously held interests, along with the incremental consideration paid and transaction costs incurred based on relative fair values. We have reported our investments in the BTC Partnerships and the BTC II B Partnership under the equity method on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, because with respect to the BTC Partnerships, for the periods prior to the BTC I Partnership Transaction and the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we had the ability to exercise significant influence but did not have control over the partnerships. Similarly, with respect to the BTC II B Partnership, we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not have control of the partnership. As of September 30, 2022, we had an 8.0% interest in the BTC II B Partnership, which includes five properties, with a book value of our investment in the BTC II B Partnership of $19.5 million, which includes $5.3 million of outside basis difference. The outside basis difference originated from the difference between the contributions we made for the minority ownership interest in the joint venture partnership, which was based on fair value, and the book value of our share of the underlying net assets and liabilities for the BTC II B Partnership.

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2022

Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS

5. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS

On July 15, 2020, we acquired, from a subsidiary of Industrial Property Trust (“IPT”), interests in two joint venture partnerships, the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP (the “BTC I Partnership”) and the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP (the “BTC II Partnership” and, together with the BTC I Partnership, the “BTC Partnerships”). The BTC Partnerships were formed with third party investors for purposes of investing in industrial properties located in certain major U.S. distribution markets.

On June 15, 2021, we, through two of our subsidiaries, entered into a transaction (the “BTC I Partnership Transaction”) with our joint venture partners in the BTC I Partnership, QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “QR Limited Partner”) and Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC (the “BTC I SLP”). The BTC I SLP is indirectly owned by the Chairman of our board of directors. Pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Transaction, we, along with the QR Limited Partner and the BTC I SLP, agreed to split the real property portfolio of the BTC I Partnership in an equitable manner, such that following the split, we and the QR Limited Partner (together with certain of our affiliates), each own a 100% interest in approximately half of the portfolio of the BTC I Partnership (excluding one property that was distributed to the BTC I SLP). As a result of this transaction, we have a 100% interest in 22 buildings that were previously part of the BTC I Partnership (the “Build-To-Core Logistics Portfolio”). We and the BTC I SLP have no further interest in the BTC I Partnership as a result of the BTC I Partnership Transaction. The total cost of these properties to us was $876.7 million, which includes the cost of our minority joint venture interest in the BTC I Partnership and our incremental additional investment of

approximately $580 million, exclusive of transaction costs, to effect the split of the BTC I Portfolio.

Immediately prior to February 15, 2022, we, through a subsidiary, owned an 12.0% minority interest in the BTC II Partnership, as general partner and as a limited partner. In addition, the QR Limited Partner, owned a 78.5% limited partner interest. In addition, the BTC II SLP, an entity in which the Chairman of the board of directors holds an interest, owned a 7.8% special limited partner interest in the BTC II Partnership. An entity in which three of our affiliated directors and each of our executive officers own an interest (the “BCG Limited Partner”) owned a 1.7% interest in the BTC II Partnership. Similar to the BTC I Partnership Transaction, the BTC II Partnership Agreement (as defined below) provided procedures whereby the partners may split the real property portfolio in an equitable manner, such that certain partners will own a 100% interest in certain of the properties as a result of the split.

On February 15, 2022, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC II Partnership (the “BTC II Partnership Agreement”), we, along with the other joint venture partners in the BTC II Partnership, entered into a transaction to split the majority of the properties in the BTC II Portfolio amongst the joint venture partners, other than the BCG Limited Partner, whose respective interest in such properties was redeemed for $24.9 million (the “BTC II Partnership Transaction”). As a result of the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we own a 100% interest in 11 properties and the BTC II SLP owns a 100% interest in seven properties that were previously part of the BTC II Portfolio and the QR Limited Partner owns a 100% interest in the remaining 14 properties that were part of the BTC II Partnership Transaction. The aggregate cost of these properties to us was $359.2 million. The incremental additional cash investment to effect the split of the BTC II Portfolio was $259.5 million as of September 30, 2022.

Concurrently with the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we and the joint venture partners formed a new joint venture partnership (the “BTC II B Partnership”), through which we co-own five properties that were part of the original BTC II Portfolio and were not part of the BTC II Partnership Transaction. The partners own the same relative interests in the BTC II B Partnership as they did in the BTC II Partnership prior to the incentive fee distribution that was settled in the fourth quarter of 2021, such that we own an 8.0% interest as general partner and as a limited partner, the BTC II SLP owns a special limited partner interest, the BCG Limited Partner owns a 2.0% limited partner interest and the QR Limited Partner owns a 90.0% limited partner interest.

We have elected the cost accumulation and allocation model to account for the BTC I Partnership Transaction and the BTC II Partnership Transaction, which allocates the cost of the acquisition at the carrying amount of the previously held interests, along with the incremental consideration paid and transaction costs incurred based on relative fair values.

We have reported our investments in the BTC Partnerships and the BTC II B Partnership under the equity method on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, because with respect to the BTC Partnerships, for the periods prior to the BTC I Partnership Transaction and the BTC II Partnership Transaction, we had the ability to exercise significant influence but did not have control over the partnerships. Similarly, with respect to the BTC II B Partnership, we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not have control of the partnership.

As of September 30, 2022, we had an 8.0% interest in the BTC II B Partnership, which includes five properties, with a book value of our investment in the BTC II B Partnership of $19.5 million, which includes $5.3 million of outside basis difference. The outside basis difference originated from the difference between the contributions we made for the minority ownership interest in the joint venture partnership, which was based on fair value, and the book value of our share of the underlying net assets and liabilities for the BTC II B Partnership.