XML 22 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.3
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2024
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
5. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate Reconciliations
The reconciliations of the effective tax rate for the periods were:
SuccessorPredecessor
Three Months Ended September 30, 2024Three Months Ended September 30, 2023Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024May 18 through September 30, 2023January 1 through May 17, 2023
Income (loss) before income taxes$179 $(92)$1,137 $(42)$677 
Income tax benefit (expense)(11)16 (192)(3)(212)
Effective tax rate
6.1 %17.4 %16.9 %(7.1 %)31.3 %
Federal income tax statutory tax rate21 %21 %21 %21 %21 %
Income tax benefit (expense) computed at the federal income tax statutory tax rate(38)19 (239)(143)
Income tax increase (decrease) due to:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(5)(34)(34)
Change in valuation allowance29 (12)63 (10)129 
Production tax credits16 — 34 — — 
Other permanent differences(3)10 — (16)
Nuclear decommissioning trust taxes(10)(26)(3)(9)
Reorganization adjustments— — — — (138)
Other— — — — (1)
Income tax benefit (expense)$(11)$16 $(192)$(3)$(212)
Valuation Allowance
Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether it is more likely than not that sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of existing deferred tax assets. The assessment of future taxable income includes the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and results of recent operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024 (Successor), Talen recognized a $63 million tax benefit for the reduction in federal and state valuation allowances, primarily related to year-to-date divestitures and year-to-date income which increase the amount of tax attributes that can be utilized. See Note 17 for information on divestitures. At each period, management will continue to assess the available positive and negative evidence to determine the need for a valuation allowance. We believe that there is a reasonable possibility that within the next 12 months, sufficient positive evidence may become available to allow us to reach a conclusion that a significant portion of the valuation allowance may no longer be needed.