XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Note 4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, establishes a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the observability of inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair values. This hierarchy establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the assessment date

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, a derivative liability, our outstanding notes and other debt, and accounts, interest and dividends payable.

The following table summarizes the fair value of our financial instruments at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

(Thousands)

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets

(Level 1)

 

Prices with Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

Prices with Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 

At September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior secured notes - 6.00%, due April 15, 2023

 

$

569,250

 

$

-

 

$

569,250

 

$

-

 

Senior unsecured notes - 8.25%, due October 15, 2023

 

 

1,159,950

 

 

-

 

 

1,159,950

 

 

-

 

Senior secured term loan B - variable rate, due October 24, 2022

 

 

2,121,280

 

 

-

 

 

2,121,280

 

 

-

 

Senior secured revolving credit facility, variable rate, due April 24, 2020

 

 

200,000

 

 

-

 

 

200,000

 

 

-

 

Derivative liability

 

 

68,758

 

 

-

 

 

68,758

 

 

-

 

Contingent consideration

 

 

98,600

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

98,600

 

Total

 

$

4,217,838

 

$

-

 

$

4,119,238

 

$

98,600

 

 

(Thousands)

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets

(Level 1)

 

Prices with Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

Prices with Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 

At December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior secured notes - 6.00%, due April 15, 2023

 

$

376,000

 

$

-

 

$

376,000

 

$

-

 

Senior unsecured notes - 8.25%, due October 15, 2023

 

 

937,950

 

 

-

 

 

937,950

 

 

-

 

Senior secured term loan B - variable rate, due October 24, 2022

 

 

1,986,198

 

 

-

 

 

1,986,198

 

 

-

 

Derivative liability

 

 

5,427

 

 

-

 

 

5,427

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

3,305,575

 

$

-

 

$

3,305,575

 

$

-

 

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, and accounts, interest and dividends payable approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

The total principal balance of our Notes and other debt was $3.97 billion at September 30, 2016, with a fair value of $4.05 billion. The estimated fair value of our Notes and other debt was based on available external pricing data and current market rates for similar debt instruments, among other factors, which are classified as Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. Derivative liabilities are carried at fair value. See Note 6. The fair value of an interest rate swap is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows using observable, quoted LIBOR swap rates for the full term of the swap and also incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both CS&L’s own non-performance risk and non-performance risk of the respective counterparties. The Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative liabilities fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however the associated credit valuation adjustments utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of September 30, 2016, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall value of the derivatives. As such, the Company classifies its derivative liabilities valuation in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

As part of the acquisition of Tower Cloud on August 31, 2016, we may be obligated to pay contingent consideration upon achievement of certain defined operational and financial milestones; therefore, we recorded the estimated fair value of future contingent consideration of $98.6 million as of August 31, 2016. The fair value of the contingent consideration as of August 31, 2016, was determined using a discounted cash flow model and probability adjusted estimates of the future earnings and is classified as Level 3. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration will be recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income in the period in which the change occurs. There was no change in the fair value of the contingent consideration as of September 30, 2016.

The following is a roll forward of our liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3):

(Thousands)

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

Transfers into Level 3

 

 

Gain/(Loss) included in earnings

 

 

Settlements

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

-

 

 

$

98,600

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

98,600