S-1/A 1 a2236908zs-1a.htm S-1/A

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2018

Registration No. 333-226958


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 2
to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933



VALERITAS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  3841
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  46-5648907
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

750 Route 202 South, Suite 600
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
(908) 927-9920

(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

John E. Timberlake
Chief Executive Officer
Valeritas Holdings, Inc.
750 Route 202 South, Suite 600
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
(908) 927-9920

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copy to:

Emilio Ragosa
DLA Piper LLP (US)
51 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Suite 120
Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
(973) 520-2550

 

Robert F. Charron, Esq.
Joseph A. Smith, Esq.
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
(212) 370-1300

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.    o

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company ý

Emerging growth company ý

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ý

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

       
 
Title of Each Class of Securities
to be Registered

  Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(1)(2)

  Amount of
Registration Fee(3)

 

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

  $57,500,000   $7,158.75

 

(1)
Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(2)
Includes shares of common stock subject to the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares of common stock.

(3)
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) based on an estimate of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price. $7,158.75 has been previously paid by the Registrant.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

   


Table of Contents

The information contained in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS (Subject to Completion) Dated October 12, 2018

37,593,984 Shares

LOGO

Valeritas Holdings, Inc.

Common Stock

We are offering 37,593,984 shares of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "VLRX." The last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, was $1.33 per share. Based on an assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, the last reported sale price of our common stock on October 11, 2018, we would expect to offer shares of common stock resulting in approximately $50.0 million of gross proceeds.

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements for this prospectus and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 10.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 
  Per share   Total  

Public offering price

  $     $    

Underwriting discounts and commissions(1)

  $     $    

Proceeds, before expenses, to us

  $     $    

(1)
We have also agreed to reimburse the representative of the underwriters for certain expenses. See "Underwriting" for additional information.

We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 5,639,097 shares of our common stock.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or about                , 2018.

Oppenheimer & Co.   BTIG



National Securities Corporation

   

Prospectus dated            , 2018


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

    1  

RISK FACTORS

    10  

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    50  

USE OF PROCEEDS

    52  

DIVIDEND POLICY

    53  

COMMON STOCK PRICE RANGE

    53  

CAPITALIZATION

    54  

DILUTION

    56  

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

    58  

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    60  

BUSINESS

    78  

MANAGEMENT

    113  

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    121  

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

    135  

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

    140  

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

    143  

UNDERWRITING

    147  

LEGAL MATTERS

    155  

EXPERTS

    155  

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

    155  

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    F-1  

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or contained in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in such prospectuses. We are offering to sell shares of our common stock, and seeking offers to buy shares of our common stock, only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock.

Until and including                        , 2018 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell, or trade our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer's obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.

For investors outside of the United States: neither we nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. You are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus.

Valeritas®, V-Go® and our logo are some of our trademarks used in this prospectus. This prospectus also includes trademarks, tradenames, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and tradenames referred to in this prospectus may appear without the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we


Table of Contents

will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and tradenames.


MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS

Certain market and industry data and forecasts included in this prospectus were obtained or based upon independent market research, industry publications and surveys, governmental agencies and publicly available information. Industry surveys, publications and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources, nor have we ascertained the underlying assumptions relied upon therein. Similarly, independent market research and industry forecasts, which we believe to be reliable based upon our management's knowledge of the industry, have not been independently verified. Further, set forth below are certain preliminary revenue and gross profit estimates for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and our expected cash balance at September 30, 2018. These preliminary results represent our estimates only based on currently available information and do not present all necessary information for an understanding of our financial condition as of September 30, 2018 or our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2018. As we complete our quarter-end close process and finalize our third quarter 2018 unaudited financial statements, we will be required to make significant judgments in a number of areas. This financial information has been prepared by and is the responsibility of our management. Our independent registered public accounting firm has not audited, reviewed or performed any procedures with respect to this preliminary data or the accounting treatment thereof and does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. In addition, the forecasts and projections set forth herein are based upon management's good faith judgment and our current business plan. Our business plan may change in the future, and therefore we cannot assure you that these forecasts and projections will not also change. Certain statements below, are forward-looking statements that are subject to considerable risks and uncertainties. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the market or industry data presented herein, our estimates and our ability to achieve these results and goals involve risks and uncertainties, are subject to change, and are highly dependent on a number of variables, including our financial performance in 2018, our ability to raise capital, manage our expenses and reduce our use of cash and the continued adoption of our products and products in development. See sections of this prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information."


Table of Contents

 


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained in other parts of this prospectus. Because it is only a summary, it does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our securities and it is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the more detailed information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the section entitled "Risk Factors" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before deciding to buy our securities. Unless otherwise stated, all references to "us," "our," "we," "Valeritas," the "Company" and similar designations refer to Valeritas Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiary Valeritas, Inc.

Company Overview

We are a commercial-stage medical technology company focused on improving health and simplifying life for people with diabetes by developing and commercializing innovative technologies. Valeritas' flagship product, V-Go® Wearable Insulin Delivery device, is a simple, affordable, all-in-one basal-bolus insulin delivery option for patients with type 2 diabetes that is worn like a patch and can eliminate the need for taking multiple daily shots. V-Go administers a continuous preset basal rate of insulin over 24 hours and it provides discreet on-demand bolus dosing at mealtimes. It is the only basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market today specifically designed keeping in mind the needs of type 2 diabetes patients.

V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery throughout the day and to manage their diabetes with insulin without the need to plan a daily routine around multiple daily injections.

We currently focus on the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes-a pervasive and costly disease that, according to the 2017 National Diabetes Statistics Report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, currently affects 90% to 95% of the approximately 23 million U.S. adults diagnosed with diabetes. The CDC estimates that the combined direct medical and drug costs and indirect lost productivity costs of diabetes in the United States in 2012 were approximately $245 billion annually. We believe the majority of the 12.6 million U.S. adults treating their type 2 diabetes with more than one daily oral anti-diabetic drug, or OAD, or an injectable diabetes medicine can benefit from the innovative approach of V-Go to manage type 2 diabetes.

Our primary market consists of approximately 5.6 million of these patients who currently take insulin, of which up to 4.5 million may not be achieving their target blood glucose goal. This patient population represents a $16.5 billion annual U.S. market when applying the annual wholesale acquisition cost, or WAC, of V-Go to the 4.5 million patients not achieving glycemic control. WAC is the gross price paid by wholesalers and does not take into account fees, discounts, and rebates from us.

Insulin therapies using syringes, pens and programmable insulin pumps are often burdensome to a type 2 diabetes patient's daily routine, which can lead to poor adherence to prescribed insulin regimens and, as a result, ineffective diabetes management. We developed V-Go utilizing our core technology, the h-Patch platform, as a patient-focused solution to address the challenges of traditional insulin therapies. Our h-Patch platform facilitates the simple and effective subcutaneous delivery of injectable medicines to patients across a broad range of therapeutic areas. V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery by releasing a single type of insulin at a continuous preset background, or basal, rate over a 24-hour period and on demand around mealtime, or bolus dosing. We believe V-Go is an attractive management tool for patients with type 2 diabetes

1


Table of Contents

requiring insulin because it only requires a single fill of insulin prior to use and provides comprehensive basal-bolus therapy without the burden and inconvenience associated with multiple daily injections. V-Go is available in three different dosages depending on the patient's needs and is generally cost competitive for both patients and third-party payors when compared to insulin pens or programmable insulin pumps.

V-Go was one of the first insulin delivery devices cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, under its Infusion Pump Improvement Initiative, which established additional device manufacturing requirements designed to foster the development of safer, more effective infusion pumps, and is the only FDA-cleared mechanical basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market in the United States. All other FDA-cleared basal-bolus insulin delivery products currently available in the United States are electronic and are classified as Durable Medical Equipment and, although cleared for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, were designed primarily for patients with type 1 diabetes. As V-Go is a mechanical device, it does not include any electronics, batteries or audible alarms and does not require any recharging or programming, which allows for simple and discreet use. Unlike electronic insulin delivery devices, V-Go is not classified as durable medical equipment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, allowing for potential Medicare reimbursement under Medicare Part D. The Medicare Part D outpatient drug benefit defines V-Go and certain other supplies used for injecting insulin as "drugs," which allows V-Go to be available for coverage by Part D Plans under Medicare Part D. In addition to Medicare, a majority of commercially insured patients are currently covered for V-Go under their insurance plans.

We commenced commercial sales of V-Go in the United States during 2012. During the first half of 2012, we initiated an Early Access Program to provide a limited number of physicians with free V-Go products for patients and began shipments to major wholesalers in anticipation of commercial launch. In the second half of 2012, we began hiring sales representatives in selected U.S. markets. In February 2016, we underwent a reduction-in-force of our sales representatives to focus our resources on prioritized higher-volume territories. At the end of 2017 and 2016, our field-based sales team consisted of 50 and 37 sales representatives, respectively and covered 50 and 37 territories, respectively, primarily within the East, South, Midwest and Southwest regions of the United States. We currently have 50 sales representatives.

When we refer to our financial results in this prospectus for periods prior to the 2016 Merger discussed below, we are referring to the financial results of Valeritas, Inc., the accounting acquirer in the 2016 Merger. Our net loss was $49.3 million and $46.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was $22.5 million and $23.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $473.9 million and $424.2 million, respectively, and was $496.5 million and $448.4 million as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Based on prescription data, we estimate that there were approximately 88,000 and 90,000 prescriptions reported for V-Go filled during both the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Refill prescriptions account for slightly more than two-thirds of our total prescriptions, and generally move in parallel with our patient retention rates, so can be used as a proxy to determine patient retention.

Recent Developments

On October 15, 2018, we announced that, on a preliminary basis, we expect to record revenue for the third quarter ended September 30, 2018 of approximately $6.9 million, up approximately 36% over the third quarter of 2017. We expect gross margin to be approximately 46% for the third quarter as compared to 40% in the third quarter of 2017. Total cash and cash equivalents are expected to be approximately $24 million as of September 30, 2018.

2


Table of Contents

Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section entitled "Risk Factors" immediately following this prospectus summary. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

    we have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future;

    we currently rely on sales of V-Go to generate all of our revenue;

    our ability to maintain and grow our revenue depends both on retaining a high percentage of patients using V-Go and on preserving our relationships with a few significant wholesale customers that account for nearly all of our sales;

    the failure of V-Go to achieve and maintain market acceptance could result in our achieving sales below our expectations and our inability to continue as a going concern;

    the risk that interim results for our clinical trials or third party data used to support our research conclusions may deviate from final clinical trial data, which would negatively impact our business;

    we operate in a very competitive industry and if we fail to compete successfully against our existing or potential competitors, our revenue and operating results may be negatively affected;

    our inability to maintain or expand our sales and marketing infrastructure;

    if important assumptions about the potential market for our products are inaccurate, or if we have failed to understand what people with type 2 diabetes are seeking in a treatment, we may not be able to increase our revenue or achieve profitability;

    manufacturing risks, including risks related to manufacturing in Southern China, damage to facilities or equipment and failure to efficiently increase production to meet demand;

    we depend on a limited number of third-party suppliers for some of the components of V-Go, and the loss of any of these suppliers, or their inability to provide us with an adequate supply of materials, could harm our business;

    undetected errors or defects in V-Go or our future product candidates could harm our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products or expose us to product liability claims;

    if we are unable to secure sufficient patent protection for our proprietary rights in our products and processes, and to adequately maintain and protect our existing and new rights, competitors will be able to compete against us more effectively, and our business will suffer;

    our failure to comply with the applicable governmental regulations to which our product and operations are subject could cause our business to suffer; and

    our management will have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 3, 2016 in connection with the 2016 Merger discussed below. Valeritas, Inc., referred to as Valeritas, was incorporated in the State of Delaware on August 26, 2008. On May 3, 2016, our wholly owned subsidiary, Valeritas Acquisition Corp., a corporation formed in the State of Delaware on May 3, 2016, or Acquisition Sub, merged with and into Valeritas. Pursuant to this transaction, referred to as the 2016 Merger, Valeritas was the surviving

3


Table of Contents

corporation and became our wholly owned subsidiary. All of the outstanding stock of Valeritas was either cancelled or converted into shares of our common stock. Prior to the 2016 Merger, we were Cleaner Yoga Mat, Inc., a corporation formed in the State of Florida and we were previously engaged in the sale of sanitizing solutions for Yoga and Pilates studios as well as conventional gyms of all sizes.

In connection with the 2016 Merger and pursuant to the terms of a Split-Off Agreement and a General Release Agreement, we transferred our pre-2016 Merger assets and liabilities to our pre-2016 Merger majority stockholder, Leisa Swanson, in exchange for the surrender by her and cancellation of 5,060,750 shares of our common stock, referred to as the Split-Off.

As a result of the 2016 Merger and Split-Off, we discontinued our pre-2016 Merger business and acquired the business of Valeritas and going forward will continue the existing business operations of Valeritas as a publicly traded company. Following the 2016 Merger and Split-Off, the shareholders of Valeritas effectively control the combined companies, and, accordingly, Valeritas is deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the 2016 Merger.

In accordance with "reverse merger" or "reverse acquisition" accounting treatment, our historical financial statements as of period ends, and for periods ended, prior to the 2016 Merger have been replaced with the historical financial statements of Valeritas.

Our principal executive offices are located at 750 Route 202 South, Suite 600, Bridgewater, NJ 08807. Our telephone number is +1-908-927-9920. Our website address is www.valeritas.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this prospectus.

This prospectus contains summaries of the material terms of various agreements executed in connection with the transactions described herein. The summaries of these agreements are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by, reference to these agreements, which are filed as exhibits hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

We qualify as an "emerging growth company" as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of relief from some of the reporting requirements and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

    presentation of only two years of audited financial statements, in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with correspondingly reduced "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" disclosure in this prospectus;

    exemption from the auditor attestation requirement on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;

    reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and

    no requirements for non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements.

We may take advantage of these provisions for up to five years or such earlier time that we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenue, have more than $700 million in market value of our capital stock held by non-affiliates or issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period. We may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these reduced burdens. For example, we have taken advantage of the reduced reporting requirements with respect to disclosure regarding

4


Table of Contents

our executive compensation arrangements, have presented only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" disclosure in this prospectus. To the extent that we take advantage of these reduced burdens, the information that we provide stockholders may be different than you might obtain from other public companies in which you hold equity interests.

In addition, under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

5


Table of Contents



The Offering

Common stock offered by us

  37,593,984 shares

Common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering

 

62,293,129 shares

Option to purchase additional shares

 

We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to 5,639,097 additional shares of common stock from us.

Use of proceeds

 

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering will be approximately $45.8 million, or approximately $52.7 million if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, in each case assuming a public offering price of $1.33 per share of common stock and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering (including any net proceeds from the underwriters' exercise of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock) to fund our operations, implement sales and marketing initiatives, expand our U.S. and global commercial organizations, fund our research and development efforts and for general corporate purposes, including general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures and for general working capital purposes. See "Use of Proceeds."

Currently trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market

 

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "VLRX."

Risk factors

 

You should read the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

Directed share program

 

At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to 939,849 shares of common stock, or 2.5% of the shares being offered by this prospectus (excluding the shares of common stock that may be issued upon the underwriters' exercise of their option to purchase additional shares), for sale at the public offering price to our directors, officers employees, and consultants.

6


Table of Contents

 

The number of shares available for sale to the general public, referred to as the general public shares, will be reduced to the extent that these persons purchase all or a portion of the reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as the other shares offered by this prospectus. Likewise, to the extent demand by these persons exceeds the number of shares reserved for sale in the program, and there are remaining shares available for sale to these persons after the general public shares have first been offered for sale to the general public, then such remaining shares may be sold to these persons at the discretion of the underwriters. For further information regarding our directed share program, please see "Underwriting."

The number of shares of our common stock that will be outstanding immediately after this offering is based on 24,699,145 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2018. This calculation excludes:

    2,119,598 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted average exercise price of 9.90 per share;

    10,390 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.60 per share, with such exercise price being subject to reduction in connection with this offering, as discussed further under "Description of Capital Stock-Warrants";

    289,059 shares of common stock available for future grants under our Amended and Restated 2016 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2016 Plan, as of June 30, 2018;

    2,750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock;

    81,773 shares of common stock available for future grants under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of June 30, 2018; and

    7,854 shares of treasury stock.

This calculation also excludes: (i) an additional 5,603,682 shares of our common stock available for future grants under our 2016 Plan as of July 20, 2018, as a result of the approval by our stockholders at our annual meeting on July 20, 2018 of an increase in the shares available for grant under our 2016 Plan and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock available for future grants under our 2018 Inducement Plan, which was approved and adopted by our board of directors on October 11, 2018, contingent upon effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus reflects and assumes:

    no exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares;

    no exercise of outstanding options or warrants after June 30, 2018; and

    no conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock.

7


Table of Contents


Summary Consolidated Financial Data

The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2018 are derived from our interim unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. You should read the selected financial data below in conjunction with the section of this prospectus entitled

8


Table of Contents

"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

   
  Year Ended
December 31,
  Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
  2017   2016   2018   2017  
 

Revenue, net

  $ 20,245   $ 19,550   $ 12,578   $ 9,399  
 

Cost of goods sold

    12,080     12,606     6,589     5,863  
 

Gross margin

    8,165     6,944     5,989     3,536  
 

Operating expense:

                         
 

Research and development          

    7,126     4,842     3,924     3,238  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    42,596     33,481     22,693     21,678  
 

Restructuring

        2,394          
 

Long-lived asset impairment costs

    3,711              
 

Total operating expense

    53,433     40,717     26,617     24,916  
 

Operating loss

    (45,268 )   (33,773 )   (20,628 )   (21,380 )
 

Other income (expense), net:

                         
 

Interest expense, net

    (4,263 )   (12,151 )   (1,878 )   (2,472 )
 

Other expense

    221     (549 )   (28 )   (21 )
 

Other income

    9     106         85  
 

Total other income (expense), net

    (4,033 )   (12,594 )   (1,906 )   (2,408 )
 

Net loss

  $ (49,301 ) $ (46,367 ) $ (22,534 ) $ (23,788 )
 

Preferred stock dividend

  $ (1,711 ) $   $ (1,100 ) $ (597 )
 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

  $ (51,012 ) $ (46,367 ) $ (23,634 ) $ (24,385 )
 

Net loss per share of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

  $ (8.94 ) $ (39.06 ) $ (1.85 ) $ (5.44 )
 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

    5,708,577     1,187,104     12,792,578     4,479,565  


   
  As of June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands,
unaudited)
 
   
  Actual   As adjusted(1)(2)  
 

Balance sheet data:

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 33,044   $ 78,794  
 

Total assets

  $ 52,600   $ 98,350  
 

Total current liabilities

  $ 11,490   $ 11,490  
 

Long-term debt, related parties

  $ 38,025   $ 38,025  
 

Accumulated deficit

  $ (496,476 ) $ (496,476 )
 

Total stockholders' equity

  $ 2,808   $ 48,558  

(1)
As adjusted amounts reflect the sale of 37,593,984 shares of common stock by us in this offering and our receipt of the net proceeds therefrom at an assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018.

(2)
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, total assets, and total stockholders' (deficit) equity on an as adjusted basis by $35 million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, a 1.0 million share increase (decrease) in the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents, total assets, and total stockholders' (deficit) equity by $1.2 assuming the assumed public offering price remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

9


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. Before making an investment in our common stock, you should carefully read all of the information contained in this prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference herein. For a discussion of risk factors that you should carefully consider before deciding to purchase any of our common stock, please review the section entitled "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition, please read "Cautionary note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in this prospectus, where we describe additional uncertainties associated with our business and the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus. Please note that additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may adversely affect our business, operations, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Risks Related to this Offering

If you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of your shares.

The public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock as of June 30, 2018, after giving effect to this offering. Investors purchasing common stock in this offering will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds the book value of our tangible assets after subtracting our liabilities. Based upon an assumed public offering price of $1.33, the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, you will experience immediate dilution of $0.55 per share, representing the difference between our as adjusted net tangible book value per share, after giving effect to this offering and the assumed public offering price. See "Dilution."

Our management will have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and our stockholders will not have the opportunity as part of their investment decisions to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. You may not agree with our decisions, and our use of the proceeds may not yield any return on your investment. Because of the number and variability of factors that will determine our use of the net proceeds from this offering, their ultimate use may vary substantially from their currently intended use. Our failure to apply the net proceeds of this offering effectively could compromise our ability to pursue our growth strategy and we might not be able to yield a significant return, if any, in our investment of these net proceeds. You will not have the opportunity to influence our decisions on how to use our net proceeds from this offering.

Future sales of our common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable for our common stock may cause our stock price to decline.

If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market after the lock-up lapse, the price of our common stock could decline. The perception in the market that these sales may occur could also cause the price of our common stock to decline. Upon completion of this offering, based on the number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2018, we will have 62,293,129 shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no exercise of outstanding options or warrants and treating our convertible preferred stock on an as-converted basis. Of these

10


Table of Contents

shares, approximately 19.4 million shares are, and the 37,593,984 shares sold in this offering will be, freely tradable. An additional 5.3 million shares are subject to a contractual lock-up with the underwriters for this offering for periods of up to 90 days following this offering. These shares can be sold, subject to any applicable volume limitations under federal securities laws, after the earlier of the expiration of, or release from, the lock-up period.

The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for purchasers of our common stock in this offering.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and we expect it to continue to be, volatile. The stock market in general and the market for smaller medical device and pharmaceutical companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your shares of common stock at or above your purchase price in this offering. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

    the success of competitive products or technologies;

    developments related to our existing or any future collaborations;

    regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;

    developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;

    the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

    the level of expenses related to any of our product candidates;

    the results of our efforts to discover, develop, acquire or in-license additional product candidates or products;

    actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;

    variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

    changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

    market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;

    general economic, industry and market conditions; and

    the other factors described in this "Risk Factors" section.

Our principal stockholders own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Upon completion of this offering, assuming a public offering price of $1.33 per share, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, our 5% stockholders and their affiliates will beneficially own an aggregate of 7,685,968 shares, or 12.3% of our outstanding common stock, excluding any shares of common stock that may be purchased in this offering. As a result, these stockholders will have significant influence and may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders may be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership could delay or prevent

11


Table of Contents

any acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire, and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Since our inception in 2006, we have incurred significant net losses. Our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and as a result our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph regarding the same in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may create negative reactions to the price of our common stock and we may have a more difficult time obtaining financing in the future.

As of June 30, 2018, we had $33.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and an accumulated deficit of $496.5 million. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of our capital stock, debt financings and limited sales of V-Go. In April 2018, we completed an underwritten public offering, in which we sold 13,700,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $1.75 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $24 million and net proceeds of approximately $21.8 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated offering expenses. On May 2, 2018, we sold an additional 1,600,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the 30-day option we granted the underwriters in connection with the offering, for net proceeds of approximately $2.6 million. In January 2018, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement, or the First Purchase Agreement, with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, or Aspire Capital, which provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, at our discretion, Aspire Capital would be committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $20.0 million of shares of our common stock over the 30-month term of the First Purchase Agreement. In June 2018, we terminated the First Purchase Agreement and entered into a second common stock purchase agreement, or the Second Purchase Agreement, with Aspire Capital, which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, at our discretion, Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $21.0 million of shares of our common stock over the 30-month term of the Second Purchase Agreement. We sold 1,250,868 shares of common stock to Aspire Capital under the First Purchase Agreement for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million, and as of June 30, 2018, have sold 791,557 shares of common stock to Aspire Capital under the Second Purchase Agreement for net proceeds of approximately $1.1 million Additionally, in January 2018, we entered into an "at-the-market" sales agreement, or the Sales Agreement, with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or FBR, pursuant to which we may sell up a certain amount of shares of our common stock from time to time through FBR, acting as our sales agent, in one or more at-the-market offerings. FBR has the option to decline any sales orders at its discretion. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not sold any shares under the Sales Agreement. Both the Second Purchase Agreement and the Sales Agreement are subject to limitations as described elsewhere in this prospectus, and therefore there are no assurances that we will be able to raise funds from the Second Purchase Agreement or the Sales Agreement. We have devoted substantially all of our resources to the research, development and engineering of our products, the commercial launch of V-Go, the development of a sales and marketing team and the assembly of a management team to lead our business.

To implement our business strategy we need to, among other things, increase sales of our products with our existing sales and marketing infrastructure, fund ongoing research, development and engineering activities, expand our manufacturing capabilities, and obtain regulatory clearance in other markets

12


Table of Contents

outside the United States and European Union, or EU, or approval to commercialize our products currently under development. We expect our expenses to increase significantly as we pursue these objectives. The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of profitability are highly uncertain, especially given that we only recently commercialized V-Go, which makes predicting our sales more difficult. We will need to affect a financing or capital raise in the near term in order to sustain operations and implement our business strategy until we can achieve profitability from operations, if ever. Our inability to affect a financing or capital raise and continued losses from operations could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Any additional operating losses will have an adverse effect on our stockholders' equity/(deficit), and we cannot assure you that we will ever be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

We currently rely on sales of V-Go to generate all of our revenue, and any factors that negatively impact our sales of V-Go would also negatively impact our financial condition and operating results.

V-Go is our only revenue-producing commercial product, which we introduced into the market in the first quarter of 2012. In the near term, we expect to continue to derive all of our revenue from the sale of V-Go. Accordingly, our ability to generate revenue is highly dependent on our ability to market and sell V-Go.

Sales of V-Go may be negatively impacted by many factors, including:

    problems relating to our manufacturing capabilities, including, but not limited to, the destruction, loss, or temporary shutdown of our manufacturing facility;

    failure to become or remain the preferred basal-bolus insulin therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes;

    failure by patients to use V-Go as directed, which could limit its effectiveness and could have an adverse impact on repeat use;

    inadequate coverage and reimbursement or changes in reimbursement rates or policies relating to V-Go or similar products or technologies by third-party payors;

    our inability to enter into contracts with additional third-party payors on a timely basis and on acceptable terms;

    claims that V-Go, or any component thereof, infringes on patent rights or other intellectual property rights of third parties; and

    adverse regulatory or legal actions relating to V-Go or similar products or technologies.

Because we currently rely on V-Go to generate all of our revenue, any factors that negatively impact our sales of V-Go, or that result in sales of V-Go increasing at a lower rate than expected, would also negatively impact our financial condition and operating results.

Our ability to maintain and grow our revenue depends both on retaining a high percentage of patients using V-Go and on preserving our relationships with a few significant wholesale customers that account for nearly all of our sales.

A key to maintaining and growing our revenue is the retention of a high percentage of patients using V-Go, as a significant and increasing proportion of our business is generated through refill prescriptions. Refill prescriptions account for nearly two-thirds of our total prescriptions and since we do not have reliable data regarding retention rates, and because refill prescriptions generally move in parallel with our patient retention rates, we use these as a proxy to determine patient retention rates.

13


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2017, three wholesale customers accounted for approximately 91% of our total product shipments. If demand for V-Go fluctuates as a result of the introduction of competitive products, negative perceptions with respect to the effectiveness of V-Go, changes in reimbursement policies, manufacturing problems, perceived safety issues with our or our competitors' products, the failure to secure regulatory clearance or approvals or for other reasons, our ability to attract and retain customers and ultimately patients could be harmed. The failure to retain a high percentage of patients using V-Go could negatively impact our revenue growth. Furthermore, the loss of any one of our significant wholesale customers or a sustained decrease in demand by any of these wholesale customers could result in a substantial loss of revenue or patients losing convenient access to V-Go, either of which would hurt our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The failure of V-Go to achieve and maintain market acceptance could result in our achieving sales below our expectations.

Our current business strategy is highly dependent on V-Go achieving and maintaining market acceptance. In order for us to sell V-Go to people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin, we must convince them, their caregivers and healthcare providers that V-Go is an attractive alternative to other insulin delivery devices for the treatment of diabetes, including insulin pens and traditional syringes. Market acceptance and adoption of V-Go depends on educating people with diabetes, as well as their caregivers and healthcare providers, as to the distinct features, ease-of-use, positive lifestyle-impact and other perceived benefits of V-Go as compared to competitive products. If we are not successful in convincing existing and potential customers of the benefits of V-Go, or if we are not able to achieve the support of caregivers and healthcare providers for V-Go, our sales may decline or we may fail to increase our sales in line with our anticipated levels.

Achieving and maintaining market acceptance of V-Go could be negatively impacted by many factors, including:

    the failure of V-Go to achieve wide acceptance among people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin, their caregivers, insulin-prescribing healthcare providers, third-party payors and key opinion leaders in the diabetes treatment community;

    lack of availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement for patients and health care providers;

    lack of evidence supporting the safety, ease-of-use or other perceived benefits of V-Go over competitive products or other currently available insulin treatment methods;

    lack of long-term persistency of patients who do start V-Go, as future sales are heavily dependent on patient refills;

    perceived risks associated with the use of V-Go or similar products or technologies generally;

    the introduction of competitive products and the rate of acceptance of those products as compared to V-Go; and

    any negative results of clinical studies relating to V-Go or similar competitive products.

In addition, V-Go may be perceived by people with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin, their caregivers or healthcare providers to be more complicated, only marginally more effective or even less effective than traditional insulin-delivery methods, and people may be unwilling to change their current treatment regimens. Moreover, we believe that healthcare providers tend to be slow to change their medical treatment practices because of perceived liability risks arising from the use of new products and the uncertainty of third-party payor reimbursement. Accordingly, healthcare providers may not recommend V-Go until there is sufficient evidence to convince them to alter the treatment methods they typically

14


Table of Contents

recommend, such as receiving recommendations from prominent healthcare providers or other key opinion leaders in the diabetes treatment community that our products are effective in providing insulin therapy.

If V-Go does not achieve and maintain widespread market acceptance, we may fail to achieve sales at or above our anticipated levels. If our sales do not meet anticipated levels, we may fail to meet our strategic objectives.

We operate in a very competitive industry, and if we fail to compete successfully against our existing or potential competitors, many of whom have greater resources than we have, our revenue and operating results may be negatively affected.

The diabetes market, and especially the market for patients with type 2 diabetes, is intensely competitive, subject to change and highly sensitive to promotional effort, the number of sales force representatives, the introduction of new products or technologies, or other activities of industry and diabetes-related associations and participants. V-Go competes directly with a number of insulin-delivery devices, primarily insulin pens and syringes, but also indirectly with any other currently marketed or future marketed diabetes therapeutic intervention such as oral anti-diabetic medications, other injectable anti-diabetic medications such as glucagon-like peptide-1, or GLP-1, and analogs. We do not consider programmable insulin pumps or programmable insulin patch pumps to be products that compete directly with V-Go, as those products have been primarily designed and marketed for patients with type 1 diabetes. There are a significant number of very large global pharmaceutical companies that promote and sell anti-diabetic products that are aimed to be used either instead of insulin or to deliver insulin using insulin pens or syringes. Many of our existing and potential competitors are major global companies that are either publicly traded companies or divisions or subsidiaries of publicly traded companies that have significant resources available.

These competitors also enjoy several competitive advantages over us, including:

    greater financial and human resources for sales and marketing, managed care and reimbursement, medical affairs and product development;

    established relationships with healthcare providers and third-party payors;

    established reputation and name recognition among healthcare providers and other key opinion leaders in the diabetes treatment community;

    in some cases, an established base of repeat, long-time customers;

    products supported by a large volume of short-term and long-term clinical data;

    larger and more established distribution networks;

    greater ability to cross-sell products or provide incentives to healthcare providers to use their products; and

    more experience in conducting research, development and engineering activities, manufacturing, clinical trials, and obtaining regulatory approval or clearance.

For these and other reasons, we may not be able to compete successfully against our current or potential future competitors. If this occurs, we may fail to meet our strategic objectives, and our revenue and operating results could be negatively affected.

15


Table of Contents

Competitive products or other technological breakthroughs for the treatment or prevention of diabetes may render our products obsolete or less desirable.

Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives will depend, among other things, on our ability to develop and commercialize products for the treatment of diabetes, in both specialist and primary care settings, which are easy-to- train and easy-to-use, provide clinical benefits as well as equivalent or improved patient adherence and persistency, receive adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors with reasonable out-of-pocket costs to patients, and are more appealing than available alternatives. Our current competition is primarily with other non-electronic insulin delivery devices such as insulin pens and syringes. There are other U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA,-cleared basal-bolus insulin delivery products, including one that includes a patch component, but these are electronic. These electronic basal-bolus insulin delivery devices and systems are cleared for use by both type 1 and type 2 patients. In addition, there is another mechanical bolus only insulin delivery device developed by Calibra Medical, Inc. that has been cleared by the FDA. This device, previously known as ONETOUCH ViaTM ,or Via. Via has not yet been commercially launched in the U.S., but the company who currently has rights to this technology has stated that they plan to make Via commercially available in the U.S. in 2019. We do not consider Via to be a direct competitor of V-Go by itself, because Via only provides insulin at meal times and does not provide a continuous flow of insulin. Therefore, patients would still be required to take separate basal insulin injection or injections every day. We do, however, believe that the commercial introduction of Via (although it only provides meal time dosing) will help to create additional awareness and acceptance of wearable insulin delivery devices in the U.S. Because V-Go is currently the only available commercial product in the U.S. that can deliver insulin at both a constant basal rate and on demand at meal time, we believe V-Go may benefit from the commercial introduction of Via by capturing a portion of the expanded market for wearable insulin delivery devices for patients with type 2 diabetes that will likely be created by the commercial introduction of Via. There is currently one inhaled insulin on the market, Afrezza®, manufactured by MannKind Corporation, which is also a meal time insulin delivery device. We do not consider Afrezza to be a direct competitor of V-Go for similar reasons as described above with respect to Via, namely because patients would still be required to take separate basal insulin injection or injections every day in order to match the basal-bolus regimen provided by V-Go. In the future, the insulin-delivery methods for patients with type 2 diabetes could change if other non-invasive formulations of insulin are approved and successfully commercialized, such as oral insulin in pill form, additional inhaled insulin or buccal insulin. If longer-acting and safer glucagon-like peptide-1analogs with fewer side effects are approved and successfully commercialized, they could reduce or delay the use of basal-bolus insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, we do not anticipate that these types of medications, if approved and successfully commercialized, would reduce the number of patients with type 2 diabetes already on insulin or on a basal-bolus insulin regimen. In addition, a number of other companies are pursuing new electronic or mechanical insulin-delivery devices, delivery technologies, drugs and other therapies for the treatment and prevention of diabetes that are not currently available on the market. Therefore, we believe that V-Go remains in a class by itself because it is the only purely mechanical, disposable basal and bolus insulin delivery device currently on the market in the U.S., and that there will remain a large population of patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin who can benefit from V-Go both clinically and on a cost-effective basis. However, if we are incorrect about these assumptions, Via, Afrezza, and other bolus only insulin delivery devices currently on the market or in development, or other potential technological breakthroughs in diabetes treatment or prevention, could reduce the potential market for V-Go or render V-Go obsolete altogether, which would significantly reduce our sales and have an adverse impact on our business.

Because of the size of the type 2 diabetes market, we anticipate that companies will continue to dedicate significant resources to developing competitive products, including both drugs and devices. The

16


Table of Contents

frequent introduction of non-insulin drugs, for example, may delay the introduction of insulin to patients that would otherwise be introduced to insulin sooner, and could create market confusion, prevent us from successfully capturing the prescribers' or payors' attention or reduce our ability to capture a sufficient market share to realize our business objectives. In addition, the entry of multiple new products or the loss of market exclusivity on some diabetes drugs, including insulin delivered in pens, may lead some of our competitors to employ pricing strategies that could adversely affect the pricing of our products. If a competitor develops a product that is similar or is perceived to be superior to V-Go, or if a competitor employs strategies that place downward pressure on pricing within our industry, our sales may decline significantly or may not increase in accordance with our expectations.

If we are unable to leverage our current sales and marketing infrastructure, we may fail to increase our sales to meet our anticipated levels.

In order to increase our sales and marketing efforts, we increased our field sales force from 37 individuals to 50 during the year ended December 31, 2017. Generally speaking, each sales professional covers one prioritized territory. While we intend to average 50 field-based sales professionals per year, this number is expected to fluctuate based on voluntary and involuntary turnover. Generally speaking, each sales professional covers one prioritized territory. We currently utilize sales professionals along with an inside sales team to focus on select healthcare providers with the most revenue potential. Our profitability will depend on the success of this new sales model.

Because we began commercialization of V-Go in 2012, and because our current sales force is not deployed in every state or major market in the United States, we have less experience marketing and selling our products, as well as training healthcare providers and new customers on the use of V-Go compared to other type 2 diabetes companies. We derive all of our revenue from the sale of V-Go and we expect that this will continue for the next several years. As a result, our financial condition and operating results are and will continue to be highly dependent on the ability of our sales representatives to adequately promote, market and sell V-Go and the ability of our sales force and other training personnel to successfully train healthcare providers and new customers on the use of V-Go. If our sales and marketing representatives or training personnel fail to achieve their objectives, our sales could decrease or may not increase at levels that are in line with our anticipated levels.

A key element of our business strategy is for our sales and marketing infrastructure to drive adoption of our products. The majority of patients using V-Go are trained to use the device by their healthcare provider who has been trained by our sales force using a "train the trainer" approach. Our sales force trains physicians, physicians' assistants, nurse practitioners and any other staff in a healthcare provider's office who interact with patients, on how V-Go works and how to train their patients to properly use V-Go. We can expect to face challenges in recruiting and hiring top personnel as we manage our sales and marketing infrastructure and work to retain the individuals who make up those networks due to the very competitive diabetes industry. If a sales and marketing representative were to depart and be retained by one of our competitors, we may fail to prevent them from helping competitors solicit business from our existing customers, which could further adversely affect our sales. In addition, if we are not able to maintain a sufficient network of training and customer care personnel, we may not be able to successfully train healthcare providers to train new patients on the use of V-Go, which could delay new sales and harm our reputation.

As we increase our sales and marketing expenditures with respect to existing or planned products, we will need to further expand the reach of our sales and marketing networks. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate skilled sales and marketing representatives with significant industry-specific knowledge in various areas, such as diabetes treatment techniques and technologies, as well as the competitive landscape for our products. Recently hired sales

17


Table of Contents

representatives require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train recent hires adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new hires will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. In addition, the expansion of our sales and marketing personnel will continue to place significant burdens on our management team.

If important assumptions about the potential market for our products are inaccurate, or if we have failed to understand what people with type 2 diabetes are seeking in a treatment, we may not be able to increase our revenue or achieve profitability.

Our business strategy was developed based on a number of important assumptions about the diabetes market in general, and the type 2 diabetes market in particular, any one or more of which may prove to be inaccurate. For example, we believe that the benefits of V-Go as compared to other common insulin delivery devices, such as traditional insulin injection pens, will continue to drive growth in the market for V-Go. In addition, we believe the incidence of diabetes in the United States and worldwide is increasing rapidly. However, each of these trends is uncertain and limited sources exist to obtain reliable market data. The actual incidence of diabetes, and the actual demand for our products or competitive products, could differ materially from our anticipated levels if our assumptions are incorrect. In addition, our strategy of focusing exclusively on patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin may limit our ability to increase sales or achieve profitability, especially if there are any significant clinical breakthroughs or products or drug introductions that significantly delay or reduce the need for insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Manufacturing risks, including risks related to manufacturing in China, may adversely affect our ability to manufacture our products and could reduce our gross margin and our profitability.

Our business strategy depends on our ability to manufacture our current and future products in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis so as to meet consumer demand, while adhering to product quality standards, complying with regulatory requirements and managing manufacturing costs. We are subject to numerous risks relating to our manufacturing capabilities, including:

    quality or reliability defects in product components that we source from third-party suppliers;

    our inability to secure product components in a timely manner, in sufficient quantities or on commercially reasonable terms;

    our failure to increase production of products to meet demand;

    our inability to modify production lines to enable us to efficiently produce future products or implement changes in current products in response to regulatory requirements;

    difficulty identifying and qualifying alternative suppliers for components in a timely manner; and

    potential damage to or destruction of our manufacturing equipment or manufacturing facility.

In addition, we rely on our contract manufacturer in Southern China to manufacture V-Go. As a result, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business in China, including:

    adverse political and economic conditions, particularly those potentially negatively affecting the trade relationship between the United States and China;

    trade protection measures, such as tariff increases, and import and export licensing and control requirements;

    potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

18


Table of Contents

    difficulties associated with the Chinese legal system, including increased costs and uncertainties associated with enforcing contractual obligations in China;

    historically lower protection of intellectual property rights;

    unexpected or unfavorable changes in regulatory requirements;

    changes and volatility in currency exchange rates;

    possible patient or physician preferences for more established pharmaceutical products and medical devices manufactured in the United States; and

    difficulties in managing foreign relationships and operations generally.

These risks are likely to be exacerbated by our limited experience with our current products and manufacturing processes. As demand for our products increases, we will have to invest additional resources to purchase components, hire and train employees, and enhance our manufacturing processes. If we fail to increase our production capacity efficiently, our sales may not increase in line with our forecasts and our operating margins could fluctuate or decline. In addition, although we expect some of our product candidates in development to share product features and components with V-Go, manufacturing of these product candidates may require the modification of our production lines, the hiring of specialized employees, the identification of new suppliers for specific components, or the development of new manufacturing technologies. It may not be possible for us to manufacture these product candidates at a cost or in quantities sufficient to make these product candidates commercially viable. Any of these factors may affect our ability to manufacture our products and could reduce our gross margin and profitability.

We depend on a limited number of third-party suppliers for some of the components of V-Go, and the loss of any of these suppliers, or their inability to provide us with an adequate supply of materials, could harm our business.

We rely on a limited number of third-party suppliers to supply components of V-Go. For our business strategy to be successful, our suppliers must be able to provide us with components and finished products in sufficient quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality control standards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted or unanticipated, could strain the ability of our suppliers to deliver an increasingly large supply of components in a manner that meets these various requirements.

We do not have long-term supply agreements with most of our suppliers and, in many cases, we make our purchases on a purchase order basis. Under most of our supply agreements, we have no obligation to buy any given quantity of products, and our suppliers have no obligation to manufacture for us or sell to us any given quantity of products. As a result, our ability to purchase adequate quantities of the components for our products may be limited. Additionally, our suppliers may encounter problems that limit their ability to manufacture components for us, including financial difficulties or damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities. If we fail to obtain sufficient quantities of high quality components to meet demand on a timely basis, we could lose customer orders, our reputation may be harmed and our business could suffer.

We generally use a small number of suppliers for our product, some parts and components of which are purchased from single-source vendors. Depending on a limited number of suppliers exposes us to risks, including limited control over pricing, availability, quality and delivery schedules. Moreover, due to the recent commercialization of our products and the limited amount of our sales to date, we do not have long-standing relationships with our manufacturers and may not be able to convince suppliers to

19


Table of Contents

continue to make components available to us unless there is demand for such components from their other customers. If any one or more of our suppliers cease to provide us with sufficient quantities of components in a timely manner or on terms acceptable to us, we would have to seek alternative sources of supply. Because of factors such as the proprietary nature of our product, our quality control standards and regulatory requirements, we cannot quickly engage additional or replacement suppliers for some of our critical components. Failure of any of our suppliers to deliver products at the level our business requires would limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may also have difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that meet the requirements of the FDA or other regulatory agencies, and the failure of our suppliers to comply with strictly enforced regulatory requirements could expose us to regulatory action including warning letters, product recalls, termination of distribution, product seizures or civil penalties. It could also require us to cease using the components, seek alternative components or technologies and modify our products to incorporate alternative components or technologies, which could result in a requirement to seek additional regulatory approvals. Any disruption of this nature or increased expenses could harm our commercialization efforts and adversely affect our operating results.

We operate at facilities in three locations, and any disruption at any of these facilities could harm our business.

Our principal offices are located in Bridgewater, New Jersey, and our only manufacturing operations are located at a contract manufacturing facility in Southern China. We also operate a facility in Marlborough, Massachusetts, which we primarily use for research and development. Substantially all of our operations are conducted at these locations, including our manufacturing processes, research, development and engineering activities, customer and technical support and management and administrative functions. In addition, substantially all of our inventory of component supplies and finished goods is held at these locations or held with our distributors.

Vandalism, terrorism or a natural or other disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood, at any of these facilities could damage or destroy our manufacturing equipment or our inventory of component supplies or finished goods, cause substantial delays in our operations, result in the loss of key information and cause us to incur additional expenses. Our contract manufacturing facility in Southern China is our only manufacturing facility, and if damaged or rendered inoperable or inaccessible due to political, social, or economic upheaval or due to natural or other disasters, would make it difficult or impossible for us to manufacture our products for a period of time and may lead to a loss of customers and significant impairment of our financial condition and operating results.

We take precautions to safeguard these facilities, including acquiring insurance, employing back-up generators, adopting health and safety protocols and utilizing off-site storage of computer data. Our insurance may not cover our losses in any particular case. In addition, regardless of the level of insurance coverage, damage to our facilities may harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we do not enhance our product offerings through our research, development and engineering efforts, including the successful commercialization of our pre-fill V-Go, we may fail to effectively compete in our market or become profitable.

In order to increase our sales and market share in the type 2 diabetes market, we must enhance and broaden our product offerings, including by commercializing our pre-fill V-Go, in response to the evolving demands of people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin and healthcare providers and competitive pressures from new technologies and market participants. We may not be successful in

20


Table of Contents

developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, or marketing our product candidates, including our pre-fill V-Go. In addition, notwithstanding our market research efforts, our future products may not be accepted by consumers, their caregivers, healthcare providers or third-party payors who reimburse consumers for our product. The success of any of our product candidates, including our pre-fill V-Go, will depend on numerous factors, including our ability to:

    identify the product features that people with type 2 diabetes, their caregivers and healthcare providers are seeking in an insulin treatment and successfully incorporate those features into our product;

    develop and introduce our product candidates in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner;

    offer products at a price that is competitive with that of other products on the market;

    adequately protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the intellectual property rights of third parties;

    demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates;

    secure adequate financing to fund the research, development, engineering and marketing and sales efforts necessary to commercialize new product offerings; and

    obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for our product candidates.

With respect to our pre-fill V-Go in particular, we anticipate that we will need to seek additional sources of capital to complete its development and commercialization, which we cannot assure you we will be able to procure at reasonable terms, if at all. Any delays in our anticipated product launches may significantly impede our ability to successfully compete in our markets. In particular, such delays could cause customers to delay or forego purchases of our product, or to purchase our competitors' products. Even if we are able to successfully develop proposed product candidates when anticipated, these product candidates, including our pre-fill V-Go, may not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing consumer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.

The safety and efficacy of our products is not supported by long-term clinical data, which could limit sales, and our products could cause unforeseen negative effects.

V-Go, the only product we currently market in the United States, has received pre-market clearance under Section 510(k) of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA. This process is shorter and typically requires the submission of less supporting documentation than other FDA approval processes and does not always require long-term clinical studies. As a result, we currently lack significant published long-term clinical data supporting the safety and efficacy of our products and the benefits they offer that might have been generated in connection with other approval processes. For these reasons, people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin and their healthcare providers may be slower to adopt or recommend our product, we may not have comparative data that our competitors have or are generating and third-party payors may not be willing to provide coverage or reimbursement for our product. Further, future studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with our products is not superior to treatment with competitive products. Such results could slow the adoption of our products and significantly reduce our sales, which could prevent us from achieving our forecasted sales targets or achieving or sustaining profitability. Moreover, if future results and experience indicate that our products cause unexpected or serious complications or other unforeseen negative effects, we could be subject to mandatory product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA clearance or approval, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation.

21


Table of Contents

Undetected errors or defects in V-Go or our future product candidates could harm our reputation, decrease market acceptance of our products or expose us to product liability claims.

V-Go or our future product candidates may contain undetected errors or defects. Disruptions or other performance problems with V-Go or these other product candidates may damage our customers' businesses and could harm our reputation. If that occurs, we may incur significant costs, the attention of our key personnel could be diverted or other significant customer relations problems may arise. We may also be subject to warranty and liability claims for damages related to errors or defects in V-Go or our future product candidates. A material liability claim or other occurrence that harms our reputation or decreases market acceptance of V-Go or these other product candidates could harm our business and operating results.

The sale and use of V-Go or our other product candidates could lead to the filing of product liability claims if someone were to allege that V-Go or one of our product candidates contained a design or manufacturing defect. A product liability claim could result in substantial damages and be costly and time consuming to defend, either of which could materially harm our business or financial condition. While we currently maintain product liability insurance covering claims up to $5 million per incident, we cannot assure you that such insurance would adequately protect our assets from the financial impact of defending a product liability claim. Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, could increase our product liability insurance rates or prevent us from securing insurance coverage in the future.

We may enter into strategic collaborations, in-licensing arrangements or alliances with third parties that may not result in the development of commercially viable products or the generation of significant future revenue.

In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into strategic collaborations, in-licensing arrangements or alliances to develop product candidates and to pursue new markets. Proposing, negotiating and implementing strategic collaborations, in-licensing arrangements or alliances may be a lengthy and complex process. Other companies, including those with substantially greater financial, marketing, sales, technology or other business resources, may compete with us for these opportunities or arrangements. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions or arrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respect to these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, these collaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenue and could be terminated prior to developing any products.

Additionally, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision making authority regarding the transaction or arrangement, which could create the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, and our collaborators may have economic or business interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals. We have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our current collaborators or any future collaborators devote to our collaborators' or our future products. Disputes between us and our collaborators may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and divert the attention of our management. Further, these transactions and arrangements are contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the applicable agreements and, in such event, we may not continue to have rights to the products relating to such transaction or arrangement or may need to purchase such rights at a premium.

22


Table of Contents

We may seek to grow our business through acquisitions of complementary products or technologies, and the failure to manage acquisitions, or the failure to integrate them with our existing business, could impair our ability to execute our business strategies.

From time to time, we may consider opportunities to acquire other products or technologies that may enhance our product platform or technology, expand the breadth of our markets or customer base, or advance our business strategies. Potential acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

    problems assimilating the acquired products or technologies;

    issues maintaining uniform standards, procedures, controls and policies;

    unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions;

    diversion of management's attention from our existing business;

    risks associated with entering new markets in which we have limited or no experience; and

    increased legal and accounting costs relating to the acquisitions or compliance with regulatory matters.

We have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition. We do not know if we will be able to identify acquisitions we deem suitable, whether we will be able to successfully complete any such acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired products or technologies. Our inability to integrate any acquired products or technologies effectively could impair our ability to execute our business strategies.

If there are significant disruptions in our information technology systems, our reputation, financial condition and operating results could be harmed.

The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology systems. We rely on our information technology systems to effectively manage sales and marketing data, accounting and financial functions, inventory management, product development tasks, research, development and engineering data, customer service and technical support functions. Our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, attacks by computer viruses or hackers, power losses, computer system or data network failures, cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased.

The failure of our or our service providers' information technology systems to perform as we anticipate or our failure to effectively implement new information technology systems, could disrupt our operations, which could have a negative impact on our reputation, financial condition and operating results.

Our failure to comply with data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions and significant penalties against us, and adversely impact our operating results.

EU member states and other foreign jurisdictions, including Switzerland, have adopted data protection laws and regulations which impose significant compliance obligations. Moreover, the collection and use of personal health data in the EU, which was formerly governed by the provisions of the EU Data Protection Directive, was replaced with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, in

23


Table of Contents

May 2018. The GDPR, which is wide-ranging in scope, imposes several requirements relating to the consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, the information provided to the individuals, the security and confidentiality of the personal data, data breach notification and the use of third party processors in connection with the processing of personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the EU to the U.S., provides an enforcement authority and imposes large penalties for noncompliance, including the potential for fines of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global revenues of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater. The GDPR requirements apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, including employee information. The recent implementation of the GDPR has increased our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process, including in clinical trials, and we may in the future be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, which could divert management's attention and increase our cost of doing business. In addition, new regulation or legislative actions regarding data privacy and security (together with applicable industry standards) may increase our costs of doing business. In this regard, we expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations and industry standards relating to privacy and data protection in the United States, the EU and other jurisdictions, and we cannot determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business.

If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.

We expect that any potential growth in our business will place a significant strain on our management team and on our financial resources. Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to misallocate management or financial resources, and result in losses or weaknesses in our infrastructure. Additionally, our anticipated growth will increase the demands placed on our suppliers, resulting in an increased need for us to manage our suppliers and monitor for quality assurance. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could impair our ability to achieve our business objectives.

We depend on the knowledge and skills of our senior management and other key employees, and if we are unable to retain and motivate them or recruit additional qualified personnel, our business may suffer.

We have benefited substantially from the leadership and performance of our senior management, as well as other key employees. Our success will depend on our ability to retain our current management and key employees, and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management and key employees in our industry is intense and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our personnel or attract new, qualified personnel. The loss of the services of members of our senior management or key employees could prevent or delay the implementation and completion of our strategic objectives, or divert management's attention to seeking qualified replacements. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our senior management or key employees. Each of our executive officers may terminate employment without notice and without cause or good reason. Our executive officers are subject to non-competition agreements. Accordingly, the adverse effect resulting from the loss of our senior management could be compounded by our inability to prevent them from competing with us.

In addition, the sale of V-Go is logistically complex, requiring us to maintain a highly integrated, extensive sales, marketing and training infrastructure consisting of sales and marketing representatives, training personnel and customer care personnel. We face considerable challenges in recruiting, training, managing, motivating and retaining the members of these teams, including managing geographically dispersed efforts. These challenges are exacerbated by the fact that our strategic plan requires us to rapidly grow our sales, with limited marketing and training infrastructure growth, while generating

24


Table of Contents

increased demand for our product. If we fail to maintain and grow a dedicated team of sales representatives and are unable to retain our sales and marketing, managed care, medical and other personnel, we could fail to take advantage of an opportunity to enhance our brand recognition and grow our revenue.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Capital Requirements

We will have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds from our April 2018 public offering, the First Purchase Agreement and past or future public offerings under the Second Purchase Agreement and the Sales Agreement, if any. We may not use these proceeds effectively, which could affect our results of operations and cause our stock price to decline.

We will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds from our April 2018 public offering, the First Purchase Agreement and past or future public offerings under the Sales Agreement or the Second Purchase Agreement, if any. We intend to use the majority of the net proceeds from our April 2018 public offering, the First Purchase Agreement and past or future public offerings under the Sales Agreement or the Second Purchase Agreement, if any, to continue implementing our sales strategy, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes, which may include funding for the hiring of additional personnel, validation of capital equipment and the costs of operating as a public company. As a result, investors will be relying upon management's judgment with only limited information about our specific intentions for the use of the balance of the net proceeds from our April 2018 public offering, the First Purchase Agreement and past or future public offerings under the Sales Agreement or the Second Purchase Agreement, if any. We may use the net proceeds for purposes that do not yield a significant return or any return at all for our stockholders. In addition, pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from our April 2018 public offering, the First Purchase Agreement and past or future public offerings under the Sales Agreement or the Second Purchase Agreement, if any, in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, and these funds may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

At June 30, 2018, we had $33.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $0.5 million is restricted cash. We do not believe that our cash on hand as of June 30, 2018 will be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements into the second quarter of 2019. The continued growth of our business, including the expansion of our research, development and engineering activities, and our efforts to commercialize our pre-fill V-Go will continue to significantly increase our expenses. In addition, the amount of our future product sales is difficult to predict and actual sales may not be in line with our forecasts. As a result, we will need to raise additional capital in addition to the amounts we could receive under the Second Purchase Agreement and the Sales Agreement, which may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

    the revenue generated by sales of V-Go and any other future product candidates that we may develop and commercialize;

    the costs associated with expanding our sales and marketing infrastructure;

    the expenses we incur in maintaining our manufacturing facility and adding further manufacturing equipment and capacity;

    the cost associated with developing and commercializing our proposed products or technologies, including our pre-fill V-Go;

25


Table of Contents

    the cost of obtaining and maintaining regulatory clearance or approval for our current or future products;

    the cost of ongoing compliance and regulatory requirements;

    expenses we incur in connection with potential litigation or governmental investigations;

    anticipated or unanticipated capital expenditures; and

    unanticipated general and administrative expenses.

If we issue equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through collaborations, licensing, joint ventures, strategic alliances, partnership arrangements or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our potential future products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may not be able to expand our sales and marketing infrastructure, enhance our current products or develop new products, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures, changes in supplier relationships, or unanticipated changes in customer demand. Any of these events could adversely affect our ability to achieve our strategic objectives and impact our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

We began commercial sales of V-Go in the first quarter of 2012. Due to our limited operating history, there has been and there may continue to be meaningful variability in our operating results among quarters, as well as within each quarter. Our operating results, and the variability of these operating results, will be affected by numerous factors, including:

    our ability to increase sales of V-Go and to commercialize and sell our future products, if any, and the number of our products sold in each quarter;

    acceptance of our products by people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin, their caregivers, healthcare providers and third-party payors;

    the pricing of our products and competitive products, the effect of third-party coverage and reimbursement policies, and the amount and level of sales discounts or rebates required to obtain or retain effective third-party payor coverage and reimbursement;

    our ability to establish and grow an effective sales and marketing infrastructure;

    the amount of, and the timing of the payment for, insurance deductibles required to be paid by patients and potential patients under their existing insurance plans;

    interruption in the manufacturing or distribution of our product;

    seasonality and other factors affecting the timing of purchases of our product;

    timing of new product offerings, acquisitions, licenses or other significant events by us or our competitors;

    the ability of our suppliers to timely provide us with an adequate supply of components that meet our requirements;

    regulatory clearance or approvals affecting our products or those of our competitors;

26


Table of Contents

    changes in healthcare rules, coverage and reimbursement under government healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid; and

    the timing of revenue recognition associated with our product sales pursuant to applicable accounting standards.

As a result of our limited operating history, and due to the complexities of the industry in which we operate, it will be difficult for us to forecast demand for our current or future products with any degree of certainty, which means it will be difficult for us to forecast our sales as well as production or inventory requirements. In addition, we will be significantly increasing our operating expenses as we expand our business. Accordingly, we may experience substantial variability in our operating results from quarter to quarter, including unanticipated quarterly losses. If our quarterly or annual operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly or annual fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. We believe that quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

If we experience lower-than-anticipated revenue in any particular quarter, or if we announce that we expect lower revenue or earnings than previously forecasted, the market price of our common stock could decline.

Our revenue is difficult to forecast and is likely to fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to many factors, including many that are outside of our control. Any significant revenue shortfall, lowered revenue or earnings forecast, or failure to meet analysts' expectations could cause the market price of our common stock to decline substantially. Reliance should not be placed on the results of prior periods as an indication of our future performance. Our operating expense levels are based, in significant part, on our expectations of future revenue. If we have a shortfall in revenue or sales in any given quarter, we may not be able to reduce our operating expenses quickly in response. Therefore, any significant shortfall in our revenues could have an immediate material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations for that quarter. In addition, if we fail to manage our business effectively over the long term, we may experience high operating expenses, and our operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could result in a substantial decline in the market price of our common stock.

Forecasting future revenues is difficult, especially when the level of market acceptance of our products is changing rapidly. As a result, it is reasonably likely that our product sales will fluctuate to an extent that may not meet with market expectations and that also may adversely affect our stock price. There are a number of other factors that could cause our financial results to fluctuate unexpectedly, including:

    cost of product sales;

    achievement and timing of research and development milestones;

    collaboration revenues;

    cost and timing of clinical trials, regulatory approvals and product launches;

    "at-risk" generic launches;

    marketing and other expenses;

    manufacturing or supply disruptions;

    unanticipated conversion of our convertible notes; and

27


Table of Contents

    costs associated with the operations of recently-acquired businesses and technologies.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our credit facility with Capital Royalty Group. If we fail to comply with the obligations under our credit facility, the lender may be able to accelerate amounts owed under the facility and may foreclose upon the assets securing our obligations.

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate principal amount of our term loan with Capital Royalty Group, or CRG, and certain of its affiliates, or our Term Loan, was $27.5 million. Borrowings under our credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, including our material intellectual property. Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on numerous factors, including the amount of our cash reserves and our actual and projected financial and operating performance. These amounts and our performance are subject to numerous risks, including the risks in this section, some of which may be beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will maintain a level of cash reserves or cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our existing or future indebtedness. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions, or that these actions would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition, in the event of our breach of the Term Loan, we may be required to repay any outstanding amounts earlier than anticipated. If we fail to comply with our obligations under the Term Loan, the lender would be able to accelerate the required repayment of amounts due and, if they are not repaid, could foreclose upon our assets securing our obligations under the Term Loan. In addition, certain events of default have already occurred under the term loan with CRG in 2015 and we cannot assure you similar future events of default will not occur under the Term Loan. For more information on the Term Loan, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Indebtedness-Senior Secured Debt".

Our Term Loan contains a financial covenant that may limit our operating flexibility.

Our Term Loan contains a restrictive covenant that requires us to maintain an end-of-day balance of $5.0 million in cash or cash equivalents, which may limit our ability to engage in new lines of business, make certain investments, pay dividends, or enter into various transactions. We therefore may not be able to engage in any of the foregoing transactions unless we obtain the consent of the lender or terminate our Term Loan. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that future working capital, borrowings or equity financing will be available to repay or refinance the amounts outstanding under the agreement. For additional information about the Term Loan, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Indebtedness – Senior Secured Debt."

Prolonged negative economic conditions could adversely affect us, our customers and suppliers, which could harm our financial condition.

We are subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in general economic and market conditions. Economic turmoil and uncertainty about future economic conditions could adversely impact our existing and potential customers, the financial ability of health insurers to pay claims, patients' ability or willingness to pay out-of-pocket costs, our ability to obtain financing for our operations on favorable terms, or at all, and our relationships with key suppliers.

28


Table of Contents

The use of our net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credits may be limited.

Our net operating loss carryforwards and any future research and development tax credits may expire and not be used. As of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $380.3 million. Our net operating loss carryforwards arising in taxable years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017 will begin expiring in 2028 if we have not used them prior to that time. Net operating loss carryforwards arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 are no longer subject to expiration under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. Additionally, our ability to use any net operating loss and credit carryforwards to offset taxable income or tax, respectively, in the future will be limited under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, respectively, if we have a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% within a three-year period. The completion of our March 2017 public offering, together with private placements and other transactions that have occurred, may trigger, or may have already triggered, such an ownership change. In addition, since we will need to raise substantial additional funding to finance our operations, we may undergo further ownership changes in the future. We have never completed an analysis as to whether such a change of ownership has occurred, but in such an event, we will be limited regarding the amount of net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credits that could be utilized annually in the future to offset taxable income or tax, respectively. Any such annual limitation may significantly reduce the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credits before they expire. In addition, certain states have suspended use of net operating loss carryforwards for certain taxable years, and other states are considering similar measures. As a result, we may incur higher state income tax expense in the future. Depending on our future tax position, continued suspension of our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards in states in which we are subject to income tax could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Intellectual property rights may not provide adequate protection, which may permit third parties to compete against us more effectively.

Our success depends significantly on our ability to maintain and protect our proprietary rights in the technologies and inventions used in or embodied by our product. To protect our proprietary technology, we rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, as well as nondisclosure, confidentiality, and other contractual restrictions in our manufacturing, consulting, employment and other third party agreements. These legal means afford only limited protection, however, and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage.

If we are unable to secure sufficient patent protection for our proprietary rights in our products and processes, and to adequately maintain and protect our existing and new rights, competitors will be able to compete against us more effectively, and our business will suffer.

The process of applying for patent protection itself is time consuming and expensive and we cannot assure you that we have prepared or will be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. In addition, our patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. It is possible that defects of form in the preparation or filing of our patents or patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, for example, with respect to proper priority

29


Table of Contents

claims, inventorship, claim scope or patent term adjustments. Moreover, we cannot assure you that all of our pending patent applications will issue as patents or that, if issued, they will issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. We own numerous issued patents and pending patent applications that relate to insulin-delivery methods and devices. The rights granted to us under our patents, however, including prospective rights sought in our pending patent applications, may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful exclusivity or commercial advantage, and competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop products that provide outcomes comparable to ours without infringing on our intellectual property rights. In addition, we may in the future be subject to claims by our former employees or consultants asserting an ownership right in our patents or patent applications, as a result of the work they performed on our behalf. If any of our patents are challenged, invalidated or legally circumvented by third parties, and if we do not exclusively own other enforceable patents protecting our product, competitors could market products and use processes that are substantially similar to, or superior to, ours, and our business will suffer.

The patent position of medical technology companies is generally highly uncertain. The degree of patent protection we require may be unavailable or severely limited in some cases and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us sufficient exclusivity, or to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:

    we might not have been the first to invent or the first inventor to file patent applications on the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications and issued patents;

    others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies;

    other companies hold patents stating broad claims in the drug delivery device field which, if construed to cover our products and held to be valid and enforceable, could have a material adverse effect on our business;

    any patents we obtain or license from others in the future may not encompass commercially viable products, may not provide us with any competitive advantages or may be challenged by third parties;

    any patents we obtain or license from others in the future may not be valid or enforceable; and

    we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a utility patent typically is 20 years after it is filed. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Without patent protection for our insulin-delivery methods and devices, we may be open to competition from generic versions of such methods and devices.

Changes in patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products and our technologies.

Patent reform legislation may increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art, may affect patent litigation, and switch the U.S. patent system from a "first-to-invent" system to a "first-to-file" system. Under a "first-to-file" system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether another inventor had made the invention earlier. The Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase

30


Table of Contents

the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.

In addition, patent reform legislation may pass in the future that could lead to additional uncertainties and increased costs surrounding the prosecution, enforcement, and defense of our patents and applications.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have made, and will likely continue to make, changes in how the patent laws of the United States are interpreted. Similarly, foreign courts have made, and will likely continue to make, changes in how the patent laws in their respective jurisdictions are interpreted. We cannot predict future changes in the interpretation of patent laws or changes to patent laws that might be enacted into law by United States and foreign legislative bodies. Those changes may materially affect our patents or patent applications and our ability to obtain and enforce or defend additional patent protection in the future.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Moreover, the USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. In addition, periodic maintenance fees on issued patents often must be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies over the lifetime of the patent. While an unintentional lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our products or procedures, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products that are the same as or similar to our products and technologies.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our products and technologies in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries, particularly developing countries, and the breadth of patent claims allowed can be inconsistent. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement on infringing activities is inadequate.

We do not have patent rights in certain foreign countries in which a market may exist in the future. Moreover, in foreign jurisdictions where we do have patent rights, proceedings to enforce such rights could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be

31


Table of Contents

commercially meaningful. Thus, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing and selling in foreign countries products that are the same as or similar to our product.

We may in the future become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

The medical device industry has been characterized by frequent and extensive intellectual property litigation. Our competitors or other patent holders may assert that our products and the methods employed in our products are covered by their patents. For example, other companies hold patents stating broad claims in the drug delivery device field which, if construed to cover our products and held to be valid and enforceable, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Although we believe we have adequate defenses available if faced with any allegations that we infringe third-party patents, it is possible that V-Go could be found to infringe these patents. If our product or methods are found to infringe, we could be prevented from manufacturing or marketing our products.

We do not know whether our competitors or potential competitors have patents, or have applied for, will apply for, or will obtain patents that will prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, have made, use, sell, import or export our products. Competitors may infringe our patents or misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property rights. To stop any such infringement or unauthorized use, litigation may be necessary. Our intellectual property has not been tested in litigation. A court may declare our patents invalid or unenforceable, may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question, or may interpret the claims of our patents narrowly, thereby substantially narrowing the scope of patent protection they afford.

In addition, third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us to challenge the validity or scope of our intellectual property rights, or may allege an ownership right in our patents, as a result of their past employment or consultancy with us. Many of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to defend their intellectual property rights than we can. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property.

Competing products may also be sold in other countries in which our patent coverage might not exist or be as strong. If we lose a foreign patent lawsuit, alleging our infringement of a competitor's patents, we could be prevented from marketing our products in one or more foreign countries.

Litigation related to infringement and other intellectual property claims such as trade secrets, with or without merit, is unpredictable, can be expensive and time-consuming, and can divert management's attention from our core business. If we lose this kind of litigation, a court could require us to pay substantial damages, treble damages, and attorneys' fees, and could prohibit us from using technologies essential to our product, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. If relevant patents are upheld as valid and enforceable and we are found to infringe, we could be prevented from selling our products unless we can obtain licenses to use technology or ideas covered by such patents. We do not know whether any necessary licenses would be available to us on satisfactory terms, if at all. If we cannot obtain these licenses, we could be forced to design around those patents at additional cost or abandon the products altogether. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

32


Table of Contents

We have received an offer to license a patent that has two years of its term remaining and that is alleged to cover our V-Go product. We do not believe the offeror's patent to be valid, infringed, and/or enforceable and therefore we do not view the allegation as having merit. We cannot guarantee that the offeror will not pursue legal remedies to enforce its patent but we intend to defend ourselves vigorously against any allegations of patent infringement, which we believe would be without merit.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.

We could in the future be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers, competitors, or other third parties. Although we endeavor to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may in the future be subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, or that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of a former employer or competitor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management. If our defense to those claims fails, in addition to paying monetary damages, a court could prohibit us from using technologies or features that are essential to our product, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers or other third parties. An inability to incorporate technologies or features that are important or essential to our products may prevent us from selling our product. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Moreover, any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our product.

Our trademarks may be infringed or successfully challenged, resulting in harm to our business.

We rely on our trademarks as one means to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors, and we have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks. The USPTO or foreign trademark offices may deny our trademark applications, however, and even if published or registered, these trademarks may be ineffective in protecting our brand and goodwill and may be successfully opposed or challenged. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of our trademarks. In addition, third parties may use marks that are confusingly similar to our own, which could result in confusion among our customers, thereby weakening the strength of our brand or allowing such third parties to capitalize on our goodwill. In such an event, or if our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our product, which could result in loss of brand recognition and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Our competitors may infringe our trademarks and we may not have adequate resources to enforce our trademark rights in the face of any such infringement.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality or use of our trade secrets, our competitive position may be harmed.

In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements

33


Table of Contents

with parties who have access to them, such as our manufacturers, consultants and vendors, and our former or current employees. We also enter into invention or assignment agreements with our employees. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our trade secrets and other unpatented or unregistered proprietary information. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures of our intellectual property is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be effective. In addition, we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for any such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets.

Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how. Competitors could purchase our products and attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully infringe our intellectual property rights, design around our protected technology or develop their own competitive technologies that fall outside of our intellectual property rights. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If our intellectual property is not adequately protected so as to protect our market against competitors' products and methods, our competitive position could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Legal and Regulatory Environment

Our products and operations are subject to extensive governmental regulation, and failure to comply with applicable requirements could cause our business to suffer.

The medical technology industry is regulated extensively by governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state regulatory agencies. The regulations are very complex, have become more stringent over time, and are subject to rapid change and varying interpretations. Regulatory restrictions or changes could limit our ability to carry on or expand our operations or result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales. The FDA and other U.S. governmental agencies regulate numerous elements of our business, including:

    product design and development;

    pre-clinical and clinical testing and trials;

    product safety;

    establishment registration and product listing;

    labeling and storage;

    marketing, manufacturing, sales and distribution;

    pre-market clearance or approval;

    servicing and post-marketing surveillance, including reporting of deaths or serious injuries and malfunctions that, if they recurred, could lead to death or serious injury;

    advertising and promotion;

    post-market approval studies;

    product import and export; and

    recalls and field-safety corrective actions.

34


Table of Contents

Before we can market or sell a new regulated product or a significant modification to an existing product in the United States, we must obtain either clearance under Section 510(k) of the FDCA, grant of a de novo classification request, or approval of a pre-market approval, or PMA, application from the FDA, unless an exemption from pre-market review applies. In the 510(k) clearance process, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is "substantially equivalent" to a device legally on the market, known as a "predicate" device, with respect to intended use, technology and safety and effectiveness, in order to clear the proposed device for marketing. Clinical data is sometimes required to support substantial equivalence. In the de novo request process, the FDA must determine that general and special controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of a device, which is low to moderate risk and has no predicate. The PMA pathway requires an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device based on extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data. The PMA process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices. Products that are approved through a PMA application generally need FDA approval before they can be modified. Similarly, some modifications made to products cleared through a 510(k) may require a new 510(k). The 510(k) de novo and PMA processes can be expensive and lengthy and require the payment of significant fees, unless an exemption applies. The FDA's 510(k) clearance process usually takes from 3 to 12 months, but may take longer. The FDA's goal is to review a de novo classification request within 150 days, but the process generally takes longer, up to a year or more. The process of obtaining a PMA is much more costly and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process and generally takes from one to three years, or longer, from the time the application is submitted to the FDA until an approval is obtained. The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals to market a medical device can be costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to obtain these clearances or approvals on a timely basis, or at all for our proposed products.

We obtained initial pre-market clearance for V-Go under Section 510(k) of the FDCA in December 2010. If the FDA requires us to go through a lengthier, more rigorous examination for future products or modifications to our existing product than we had expected, our product introductions or modifications could be delayed or canceled, which could cause our sales to decline or to not increase in line with our forecasts. In addition, the FDA may determine that future products will require the more costly, lengthy and uncertain PMA process. Although we do not currently market any devices under PMA, the FDA may demand that we obtain a PMA prior to marketing certain of our future products. Further, even with respect to those future products where a PMA is not required, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the 510(k) clearances with respect to those products.

The FDA can delay, limit or deny clearance or approval of a device for many reasons, including:

    we may not be able to demonstrate that our products are safe and effective for their intended users;

    the data from our clinical trials may be insufficient to support clearance or approval; and

    the manufacturing process or facilities we use may not meet applicable requirements.

In addition, the FDA may change its clearance and approval policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions which may prevent or delay approval or clearance of our products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently cleared products on a timely basis. Any delay in, or failure to obtain or maintain, clearance or approval for our products under development could prevent us from generating revenue from these products and adversely affect our business operations and financial results. Additionally, the FDA and other regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers.

35


Table of Contents

Regulatory enforcement or inquiries, or other increased scrutiny on us, could dissuade some customers from using our products and adversely affect our reputation and the perceived safety and efficacy of our product.

Failure to comply with applicable regulations could jeopardize our ability to sell our products and result in enforcement actions such as fines, civil penalties, injunctions, warning letters, recalls of products, delays in the introduction of products into the market, refusal of the FDA or other regulators to grant future clearances or approvals, and the suspension or withdrawal of existing clearances or approvals by the FDA or other regulators. Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and negatively impact our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.

Furthermore, we may evaluate international expansion opportunities in the future. If we expand our operations outside of the United States, we will become subject to various additional regulatory and legal requirements under the applicable laws and regulations of the international markets we enter. These additional regulatory requirements may involve significant costs and expenditures and, if we are not able to comply with any such requirements, our international expansion and business could be significantly harmed.

Modifications to our products may require new 510(k) clearances or pre-market approvals, or may require us to cease marketing or recall the modified products until clearances are obtained.

Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design, or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, a de novo or PMA. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer's decision. The FDA may not agree with our decisions regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary. We have made modifications to our 510(k) cleared product, and have determined based on our review of the applicable FDA guidance that in certain instances new 510(k) clearances, de novo or pre-market approvals are not required. If the FDA disagrees with our determination and requires us to submit new 510(k) notifications, de novos or PMAs for modifications to our previously cleared or approved products for which we have concluded that new clearances or approvals are unnecessary, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.

If we or our third-party suppliers fail to comply with the FDA's good manufacturing practice regulations or fail to adequately and timely respond to an FDA Form 483, this could impair our ability to market our products in a cost-effective and timely manner and could result in FDA enforcement action.

We and our third-party suppliers are required to comply with the FDA's Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage and shipping of our product. The FDA audits compliance with the QSR and related regulations through periodic announced and unannounced inspections of manufacturing and other facilities. The FDA may conduct these inspections or audits at any time. If, during the inspection, FDA identifies issues which, in FDA's judgment, may constitute violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or FDA's regulations, the FDA inspector may issue an FDA Form 483 listing these observations.

36


Table of Contents

Note that if an entity does not address observations found in an FDA Form 483 to FDA's satisfaction, the FDA could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:

    untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

    customer notifications or repair, replacement, refunds, recall, detention or seizure of our product;

    operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

    refusing or delaying our requests for 510(k) clearance or pre-market approval of new products or modified products;

    withdrawing 510(k) clearances or pre-market approvals that have already been granted;

    refusal to grant export approval for our product; or

    criminal prosecution.

Any of the foregoing actions could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.

Our latest FDA inspection occurred between August 21, 2018 and September 7, 2018 and resulted in an FDA Form 483 issued on September 7, 2018. The FDA Form 483 observations related to our medical device reporting, or MDR, complaint file, design risk analysis, and device history procedures and records. On September 21, 2018, we submitted a timely response to FDA describing how we intend to address the observations listed in the FDA Form 483. After submitting our corrective action plan to FDA, the agency sent us its establishment inspection report, or EIR, on October 3, 2018. As stated in the EIR, FDA concluded that the inspection is closed and the decision to not take regulatory enforcement action is closed. We are completing the corrective actions as communicated to FDA.

A recall of our product, or the discovery of serious safety issues with our product, could have a significant adverse impact on us.

The FDA has the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture or in the event that a product poses an unacceptable risk to health.

Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of an unacceptable risk to health, component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition and operating results, which could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner.

Further, under the FDA's MDR regulations, we are required to report to the FDA any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or in which our products malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury. Repeated product malfunctions may result in a voluntary or involuntary product recall, which could divert managerial and financial resources, impair our ability to manufacture our products in a cost-effective and timely manner and have an adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition and operating results.

Depending on the corrective action we take to redress a product's deficiencies or defects, the FDA may require, or we may decide, that we will need to obtain new approvals or clearances for the device before we may market or distribute the corrected device. Seeking such approvals or clearances may delay our ability to replace the recalled devices in a timely manner. Moreover, if we do not adequately

37


Table of Contents

address problems associated with our devices, we may face additional regulatory enforcement action, including FDA warning letters, product seizure, injunctions, administrative penalties, or civil or criminal fines. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our sales as well as face significant adverse publicity or regulatory consequences, which could harm our business, including our ability to market our products in the future.

Any adverse event involving our products could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or regulatory agency action, which could include inspection, mandatory recall or other enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and may harm our reputation and financial results.

If we are unable to achieve and maintain adequate levels of coverage and reimbursement for V-Go or any future products we may seek to commercialize, their commercial success may be severely hindered.

We have derived all of our revenue from the sale of V-Go in the United States and expect to continue to do so for the next several years. Patients who use V-Go generally rely on third-party payors, including governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and commercial health insurers, health maintenance organizations and other healthcare-related organizations, to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with V-Go. Successful sales of V-Go and any future products depend, therefore, on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors.

Securing coverage for new technologies is challenging and uncertain. Third-party payors render coverage decisions based upon clinical and economic standards that disfavor new products when more established or lower cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently become available. Unless our products demonstrate superior efficacy profiles, it may not qualify for coverage and reimbursement. Even if we obtain coverage for a given product, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate or may require co-payments, deductibles or co-insurance payments that patients find unacceptably high.

Not only are third-party payors, whether governmental or commercial, developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs, in addition, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for medical products, including V-Go, exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for our products can and do differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that requires us to provide economic, scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. Even where favorable coverage and reimbursement status has been attained for V-Go, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future. Moreover, a third-party payor's decision to provide coverage does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be paid. There can be no assurance that our clinical data will allow for satisfactory pricing of V-Go at current levels, and the failure to obtain and maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement for V-Go would materially and adversely affect our business.

V-Go currently is covered and reimbursed under the policies of a number of third-party payors. The Medicare program recognizes V-Go under the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit, and a number of Part D drug plans have placed our products on their pharmacy formularies or otherwise allow for individual consideration. Although V-Go is not covered under Medicare Part B, an outpatient medical benefit that does not recognize disposable insulin delivery devices, other third-party payors may have adopted different coverage policies, classifying a disposable insulin delivery device as a coverable device. Some commercial payors, however, have declined to offer any coverage for V-Go, whether on a pharmacy formulary or as a medical benefit, concluding that the delivery system is experimental or

38


Table of Contents

investigational, or that the current evidence is insufficient. In addition, coverage policies developed by third-party payors generally can be modified or terminated by the third-party payor without cause and with little or no notice to us.

We believe that future coverage and reimbursement will likely be subject to increased restrictions both in the United States and in international markets. Healthcare cost containment initiatives that limit or deny reimbursement for V-Go would also materially and adversely affect our business. If reimbursement is not available or is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to commercialize our products profitably.

We are subject to additional federal, state and foreign laws and regulations relating to our healthcare business; our failure to comply with those laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Although we do not provide healthcare services, submit claims for third-party reimbursement, or receive payments directly from Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors for our product, we are subject to healthcare fraud and abuse regulation and enforcement by federal and state governments, which could significantly impact our business. Healthcare fraud and abuse laws potentially applicable to our operations include:

    the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies to our marketing practices, educational programs, pricing policies and relationships with healthcare providers, by prohibiting, among other things, soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration intended to induce or reward the purchase or recommendation of an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare or Medicaid programs;

    federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, that prohibit, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval to the federal government that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government;

    the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and its implementing regulations, which created federal criminal laws that prohibit, among other things, executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;

    federal "sunshine" requirements imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, on device manufacturers regarding any "transfer of value" made or distributed to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year (or up to an aggregate of $1 million per year for "knowing failures"), for all payments, transfers of value or ownership or investment interests that are not timely, accurately, and completely reported in an annual submission due by the 90th day of each subsequent calendar year;

    federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and

39


Table of Contents

    state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws that may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; state laws that require device and pharmaceutical companies to comply with the industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; and state laws that require drug and device manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians, other healthcare providers and healthcare entities or marketing expenditures.

The risk of our being found in violation of these laws and regulations is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Moreover, recent health care reform legislation has strengthened these laws. For example, the ACA, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them. In addition, the ACA provided that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes. We are unable to predict what additional federal or state legislation or regulatory initiatives may be enacted in the future regarding our business or the healthcare industry in general, or what effect such legislation or regulations may have on us. Federal or state governments may impose additional restrictions or adopt interpretations of existing laws that could have a material adverse effect on us.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under such laws, it is possible that some of our business activities, including without limitation certain of the marketing and distribution programs for V-Go, as well as our relationships with physicians and other health care providers, some of whom recommend, purchase and/or prescribe our product, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from governmental health care programs, individual imprisonment, disgorgement, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, suspension or revocation of certifications or licenses that are required to operate our business, injunctions and other associated remedies, denial or withdrawal of product clearances, private "qui tam" actions brought by individual whistleblowers in the name of the government, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could impair our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

We may be liable if the FDA or other U.S. enforcement agencies determine we have engaged in the off-label promotion of our products or have disseminated false or misleading labeling or promotional materials.

Our promotional materials and training methods must comply with FDA and other applicable laws and regulations, including laws and regulations prohibiting marketing claims that promote the off-label use of our products or that make false or misleading statements. Healthcare providers may use our products off-label, as the FDA does not restrict or regulate a physician's choice of treatment within the practice of medicine. For example, although V-Go is only cleared for insulin delivery in adult patients, a physician might independently choose to use it for insulin delivery in children. FDA also could conclude that a performance claim is misleading if it determines that there are inadequate non-clinical and/or clinical data supporting the claim. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials or

40


Table of Contents

training promote of an off-label use or make false or misleading claims, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions, including the issuance of an untitled letter, a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and criminal penalties. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they determine that our promotional or training materials promote an unapproved use or make false or misleading claims, which could result in significant fines or penalties. Although our policy is to refrain from statements that could be considered off-label promotion of our products or false or misleading, the FDA or another regulatory agency could disagree. Violations of the FDCA may also lead to investigations alleging violations of federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws, as well as state consumer protection laws, which may lead to costly penalties and may adversely impact our business. In addition, the off-label use of our products may increase the risk of product liability claims. Product liability claims are expensive to defend and could result in substantial damage awards against us and harm our reputation.

Legislative or regulatory healthcare reforms may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain reimbursement for our products or regulatory clearance or approval of our future products, and to produce, market and distribute those products after clearance or approval is obtained.

Recent political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes. Both the federal and state governments in the United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass new legislation and regulations designed to contain or reduce the cost of healthcare. Such legislation and regulations may result in decreased reimbursement for our product, which may further exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce the prices charged for our product. This could harm our ability to market our products and generate sales. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our current products and future products. Any new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of our products. Delays in receipt of or failure to receive regulatory clearances or approvals for any future products would negatively impact our long-term business strategy.

In the U.S., there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that restrict or regulate post-approval activities, which may affect our ability to profitably sell V-Go or any other product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.

Such government-adopted reform measures may adversely impact the pricing of healthcare products and services in the United States or internationally and the amount of reimbursement available from third-party payors.

For example, in March 2010, the ACA was signed into law. While the goal of healthcare reform is to expand coverage to more individuals, it also involved increased government price controls, additional regulatory mandates and other measures designed to constrain medical costs. The ACA substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and commercial insurers, encouraged improvements in the quality of healthcare items and services and significantly impacted the medical device industries. The ACA, among other things, established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs and medical devices (discussed in more detail below), required manufacturers to participate in a discount program for certain outpatient drugs under Medicare Part D, and promoted programs that increase the federal government's comparative effectiveness research.

In December 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Pub. Law 115-97), repealing certain aspects of the ACA. Further, on January 20, 2017, the President signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the ACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the ACA that would impose a

41


Table of Contents

fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Congress also could consider subsequent legislation to repeal and replace elements of the ACA that currently remain in place.

In the future there may continue to be additional proposals relating to the reform of the U.S. healthcare system generally, or operation of the Medicare Part D program specifically. Certain of these proposals could limit the prices we are able to charge for our product, or the amount of reimbursement available for our product, and could limit the acceptance and availability of our product.

Our financial performance may be adversely affected by medical device tax provisions in the ACA.

Beginning in 2013 through the end of 2015, the ACA imposed, among other things, an annual excise tax of 2.3% on any entity that manufactures or imports medical devices offered for sale in the United States beginning in 2013. Congress first suspended this tax on December 18, 2015 for two years, for sales of devices during the period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Congress again suspended this tax in January 2018, for sales of devices during the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019. We do not believe that V-Go was subject to this tax based on the retail exemption under applicable Treasury Regulations. However, the guidance regarding this exemption as applied to V-Go is not clear, and the availability of this exemption is subject to interpretation by the IRS, and the IRS may disagree with our analysis. We do not know if this provision will be repealed or if there will be changes to the retail exemption when the suspension of the device tax ends at the end of 2017. The potential financial impact this tax may have on our business is unclear and there can be no assurance that our business and financial results will not be negatively impacted.

Failure to obtain any necessary clearance for the V-Go SIM™(Simple Insulin Management), if required, would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

Commercialization of the V-Go SIM, formerly branded as the V-Go Link, may require FDA clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification submission. The process for submitting and obtaining FDA clearance of a 510(k) can be expensive and lengthy. The FDA's 510(k) clearance process can take several months or longer, and we may not be able to obtain 510(k) clearance for the V-Go SIM on a timely basis, if at all. The FDA's refusal of, or any significant delays in receiving 510(k) clearance of the V-Go SIM, if required, would have an adverse effect on our ability to expand our business.

In order to successfully develop the V-Go Prefill, we will need to secure an insulin supply and/or insulin development partner and will need to obtain regulatory approval to package and sell the insulin in our prefill device, which may require additional nonclinical and/or clinical data to support the use of insulin in our prefill device. This process may be expensive and involves significant regulatory risks. If we are unable to secure an insulin supply or obtain an insulin development partner, or if we are unable to demonstrate the safety and/or effectiveness of the insulin in our prefill device, we will be unable to successfully develop or commercialize the V-Go Prefill.

In order to successfully develop the V-Go Pre-fill, we will need to secure an insulin supply and/or insulin development partner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to secure an insulin supply for the US or any other market. We will also need to obtain FDA regulatory approval to package and sell the insulin in our prefill device. Although we hope to secure an insulin development partner with expertise in drug approval filings, there is a risk that we may not be able to identify or secure such a partner. In that case, we will face additional regulatory challenges, as we do not currently have drug approval filing expertise. If insulin that we gain access to is approved in the markets where we want to introduce V-Go Pre-fill, we, or our development partner, will still need to obtain approval to package

42


Table of Contents

and sell the insulin in our prefill device. If insulin supply that we obtain is not approved in our target market(s), the insulin must first be approved or it may be approved simultaneously for use in our prefill device. In either case, we, or our development partner, will be required to demonstrate the safety and if the insulin is not yet approved, the effectiveness of the insulin, which is regulated as a drug, when packaged and sold in our prefill device, which may require nonclinical and/or clinical data. Obtaining regulatory approval of a drug in a prefill device can be a lengthy, expensive, and uncertain process. Even if we believe that we have sufficient nonclinical and/or clinical data to support the use of insulin in our prefill device, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may disagree that such data are adequate to support approval.

In order to successfully use our h-Patch technology in other drug delivery applications beyond the use of insulin to treat type 2 diabetes, we will need to secure one or more collaboration partners and may need to obtain regulatory approval to sell any such resulting products, which may require additional nonclinical and/or clinical data to support the use of those products. This process may be expensive and involves significant regulatory risks. If we are unable to secure one or more collaboration partners, or if we are unable to demonstrate the safety and/or effectiveness of any such resulting products, we will be unable to successfully use our h-Patch technology in other drug delivery applications beyond the use of insulin to treat type 2 diabetes, and will not realize the potential profits that could be derived from such potential future uses.

In order to successfully use our h-Patch technology in other drug delivery applications beyond the use of insulin to treat type 2 diabetes, we will need to secure one or more collaboration partners. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify other potential drugs that could be combined with our h-Patch technology, or if we are able to identify such drugs, that we will be able to reach an agreement with such third party or parties necessary in order to combine our h-Patch technology with those drugs.

The drug or drugs that we and our collaboration partners combine with our h-Patch technology may not be approved in the markets in which we and our collaboration partners want to introduce such products. If such drugs are not approved in our target market(s), those drugs must first be approved or they may be approved simultaneously for use in combination with our h-Patch technology. In either case, we, or our collaboration partner, will be required to demonstrate the safety and if the drug is not yet approved, the effectiveness of the drug when combined with our h-Patch technology, which may require nonclinical and/or clinical data. Obtaining regulatory approval of a drug in combination with an injection technology can be a lengthy, expensive, and uncertain process. Even if we believe and our collaboration partners agree that we have sufficient nonclinical and/or clinical data to support the use of such drugs in combination with our h-Patch technology, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may disagree that such data are adequate to support approval. If we or our collaboration partners are unable to get such necessary approvals, then we will be unable to successfully expand the use of our h-Patch technology to other potential drug delivery applications, and will not realize the potential profits that could be derived from any such potential future uses.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially.

The quoted price of our common stock has been, and we expect it to continue to be, volatile. The stock market in general and the market for smaller medical device and pharmaceutical companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your

43


Table of Contents

shares of common stock at or above your purchase price. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

    the success of competitive products or technologies;

    developments related to our existing or any future collaborations;

    regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;

    developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;

    the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

    the level of expenses related to any of our product candidates;

    the results of our efforts to discover, develop, acquire or in-license additional product candidates or products;

    actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;

    variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

    changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

    market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;

    general economic, industry and market conditions; and

    the other factors described in this "Risk Factors" section.

Raising additional funds by issuing securities may cause dilution to existing stockholders and raising funds through lending and licensing arrangements may restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.

In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders and the purchasers of our common stock offered hereby. We are authorized to issue an aggregate of 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. We may issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of our common stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the common stock. We expect we will need to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital needs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with these capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price you paid for your stock.

An active trading market for our common stock may not be sustained.

In March 2017, we closed our public offering of common stock, and prior to such time, there was no active, liquid and orderly trading market for shares of our common stock. Although shares of our common stock are listed and trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market, an active trading market for our shares may not be sustained. If an active market for our common stock does not continue, it may be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares without depressing the market price for the shares or sell their shares at or above the prices at which they acquired their shares or sell their shares at the

44


Table of Contents

time they would like to sell. Any inactive trading market for our common stock may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund our operations by selling shares.

If we are not able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq could delist our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including those regarding director independence and independent committee requirements, minimum stockholders' equity, minimum share price, and certain corporate governance requirements. There can be no assurances that we will be able to comply with the applicable listing standards.

On March 7, 2018, we received a written notification from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq, indicating that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market because our stockholder's equity, as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, was below the required minimum of $2.5 million. The notification letter also indicated that, as of March 6, 2018, we did not meet the alternative compliance standards relating to the market value of listed securities of $35 million or net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years.

In accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we submitted a plan to regain compliance to Nasdaq within 45 days of our receipt of the notification letter. On May 11, 2018, we received a letter from Nasdaq which stated that, based on the disclosure in our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2018, filed on May 9, 2018, Nasdaq had determined that we complied with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1). However, if we failed to evidence compliance in our next periodic report, we may be subject to delisting.

Although Nasdaq determined that we were in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), based on the disclosure in our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2018, filed on May 9, 2018, there is no guarantee that we will continue to maintain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) or any other Nasdaq listing rule in the future, which may subject us to delisting.

The ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional stock may prevent or make more difficult certain transactions, including a sale or merger.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with powers, rights and preferences designated by it. Shares of voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase such shares could be issued, to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or otherwise gain control of us. The ability of our Board of Directors to issue such additional shares of preferred stock, with rights and preferences it deems advisable, could discourage an attempt by a party to acquire control of us by tender offer or other means. Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium over the market price for their shares in a tender offer or the temporary increase in market price that such an attempt could cause. Moreover, the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock to persons friendly to our Board of Directors could make it more difficult to remove incumbent managers and directors from office even if such change were to be favorable to stockholders generally.

45


Table of Contents

We are an "emerging growth company", and we cannot be certain whether the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of our first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, which occurred in May 2015; (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion; or (c) in which we are deemed to be a "large accelerated filer," which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may suffer or be more volatile.

Section 102 of the JOBS Act also provides that an "emerging growth company" can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. An "emerging growth company" can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we are choosing to "opt out" of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies.

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

We are a smaller reporting company, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are currently a "smaller reporting company", meaning that we are not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent company that is not a smaller reporting company and have a non-affiliated public float of less than $75 million and annual revenues of less than $50.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. In the event that we are still considered a "smaller reporting company," at such time as we cease being an "emerging growth company," we will be required to provide additional disclosure in our SEC filings. However, similar to an "emerging growth companies", "smaller reporting companies" are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their filings; are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and have certain other decreased disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including, among other things, only being required to provide two years of audited financial statements in annual reports and in a registration statement under the Exchange Act on Form 10. Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our

46


Table of Contents

status as a "smaller reporting company" may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If no or few securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price for our stock would be negatively impacted. In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property or our stock performance, or if our operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Our principal stockholders own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of October 8, 2018, our 5% stockholders and their affiliates beneficially owned an aggregate of 5,185,968 shares, or 20.8% of our currently issued and outstanding common stock, without factoring in any securities that are exchangeable for or convertible into shares of our common stock. As a result, these stockholders will have significant influence and may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders may be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership could delay or prevent any acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire, and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock, and investors may lose the entire amount of their investment.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future.

We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares of common stock. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

Provisions of our charter documents or Delaware law could delay or prevent an acquisition of the company, even if such an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders, which could make it more difficult for you to change management.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempt

47


Table of Contents

by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult to replace or remove our board of directors. These provisions include:

    a classified board of directors so that not all directors are elected at one time;

    a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent;

    no cumulative voting in the election of directors;

    the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director;

    a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called only by the board of directors, the chairperson of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or, in the absence of a chief executive officer, the president;

    an advance notice requirement for stockholder proposals and nominations;

    the authority of our board of directors to issue Preferred Stock with such terms as our board of directors may determine; and

    a requirement of approval of not less than 662/3% of all outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote to amend any bylaws by stockholder action, or to amend specific provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Any failure to maintain effective internal control over our financial reporting could materially adversely affect us.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include in our annual reports on Form 10-K an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, at such time, if any, as we are an "accelerated filer" or a "large accelerated filer," and no longer an "emerging growth company," our independent registered public accounting firm will have to attest to and report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of such internal control over financial reporting. Our management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), or the 2013 Framework. Based on such assessment, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Even though we have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal controls, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, or other regulatory authorities.

48


Table of Contents

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements or insufficient disclosures due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

We could be subject to securities class action litigation.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because biotechnology companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. If we face such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could harm our business.

49


Table of Contents


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, in the sections captioned "Risk Factors", "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations", and "Business". Any and all statements contained in this prospectus or incorporated by reference herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Terms such as "may," "might," "would," "should," "could," "project," "estimate," "pro-forma," "predict," "potential," "strategy," "anticipate," "attempt," "develop," "plan," "help," "believe," "continue," "intend," "expect," "future," and terms of similar import (including the negative of any of the foregoing) may be intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements may contain one or more of these identifying terms. Forward-looking statements in this prospectus may include, without limitation, statements regarding (i) the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans or objectives relating to the development of commercially viable new products, (ii) a projection of income (including income/loss), earnings (including earnings/loss) per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items, (iii) our future financial performance, including any such statement contained in a discussion and analysis of financial condition by management or in the results of operations included pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, and (iv) the assumptions underlying or relating to any statement described in points (i), (ii) or (iii) above.

The forward-looking statements are not meant to predict or guarantee actual results, performance, events or circumstances and may not be realized because they are based upon our current projections, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other influences, many of which we have no control over. Actual results and the timing of certain events and circumstances may differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and uncertainties. Factors that may influence or contribute to the inaccuracy of the forward-looking statements or cause actual results to differ materially from expected or desired results may include, without limitation:

    our history of operating losses and uncertainty regarding our ability to achieve profitability;

    our reliance on V-Go to generate all of our revenue;

    our inability to retain a high percentage of our patient customer base or our significant wholesale customers;

    the failure of V-Go to achieve and maintain market acceptance;

    competitive products and other technological breakthroughs that may render V-Go obsolete or less desirable;

    our inability to maintain or expand our sales and marketing infrastructure;

    our inability to operate in a highly competitive industry and to compete successfully against competitors with greater resources;

    any inaccuracies in our assumptions about the insulin-dependent diabetes market;

    manufacturing risks, including risks related to manufacturing in Southern China, damage to facilities or equipment and failure to efficiently increase production to meet demand;

    our dependence on limited source suppliers and our inability to obtain components for our product;

    our failure to secure or retain adequate coverage or reimbursement for V-Go by third-party payors;

50


Table of Contents

    our inability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology;

    our failure to comply with the applicable governmental regulations to which our product and operations are subject;

    our expectations related to the use of proceeds from this offering; and

    other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the section entitled "Risk Factors" located elsewhere in this prospectus.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because of the risks and uncertainties related to them and to the risk factors. We disclaim any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus to reflect any new information or future events or circumstances or otherwise, except as required by law.

Readers should read this prospectus and the documents we have filed as exhibits to the registration statement and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

51


Table of Contents


USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds from our sale of 37,593,984 shares of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $45.8 million, assuming a public offering price of $1.33 per share, the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares from us is exercised in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will be approximately $52.7 million.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering (including any net proceeds from the underwriters' exercise of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock) to fund our operations, implement sales and marketing initiatives, expand our U.S. and global commercial organizations, fund our research and development efforts and for general corporate purposes, including general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures and general working capital purposes. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend upon numerous factors, including the amount of cash generated by our operations, our cash needs, the rate of adoption of our products by the medical community and efficiency of our product development. We may find it necessary or advisable to use portions of the proceeds from this offering for other purposes.

The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including the factors described under "Risk Factors" located elsewhere in this prospectus. We therefore cannot estimate with certainty the amount of net proceeds to be used for the purposes described above. We may find it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds for other purposes, and we will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds. Pending the uses described above, we plan to invest the net proceeds from this offering in short- and intermediate-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $35.0 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase (decrease) of 1.0 million in the number of shares we are offering would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, by approximately $1.2 million, assuming the assumed public offering price stays the same.

52


Table of Contents


DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Our ability to pay cash dividends is restricted pursuant to the terms of the Term Loan. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Indebtedness."


COMMON STOCK PRICE RANGE

Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market since our public offering in March 2017. From April 18, 2016 to March 23, 2017, our common stock was quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace. Our common stock has, from time to time, traded on a limited, sporadic and volatile basis. The following tables show the high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated. These prices do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions. All below prices give effect to a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of our common stock effective as of March 15, 2017.

   
  Price Ranges  
   
  High   Low  
 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 3.88   $ 2.50  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 4.58   $ 1.19  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 1.88   $ 0.78  
 

Fourth Quarter (through October 11, 2018)

  $ 1.61   $ 1.10  
 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

             
 

First Quarter

  $ 40.00   $ 5.20  
 

Second Quarter

  $ 7.48   $ 4.51  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 7.20   $ 2.90  
 

Fourth Quarter

  $ 6.79   $ 2.00  
 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

             
 

Second Quarter (from April 18, 2016)

  $ 44.00   $ 0.80  
 

Third Quarter

  $ 52.00   $ 40.00  
 

Fourth Quarter

  $ 48.00   $ 22.80  

The closing price of our common stock on October 11, 2018 was $1.33 per share. As of October 11, 2018, we had approximately 46 record holders of our common stock. Because many of our shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of individual stockholders represented by these record holders.

53


Table of Contents


CAPITALIZATION

The following table describes our cash and our capitalization as of June 30, 2018:

    on an actual basis; and

    on an as adjusted basis to also reflect the sale of 37,593,984 shares of common stock by us in this offering and our receipt of the net proceeds therefrom at an assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018.

You should read this capitalization table together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus, and the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section and other financial information included elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus.

The pro forma as adjusted information set forth in the table below is illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

  (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
  Actual   As Adjusted(1)  
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 33,044   $ 78,794  
 

Long-term debt, related parties

  $ 38,025   $ 38,025  
 

Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 2,750,000 shares issued or outstanding, actual and as adjusted

  $ 3   $ 3  
 

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 24,706,999 shares issued and 24,699,145 outstanding, actual;                        shares issued and shares outstanding, as adjusted

  $ 25   $ 62  
 

Treasury stock, at cost; 7,854 shares

  $ (24 ) $ (24 )
 

Additional paid-in capital

  $ 499,280   $ 544,992  
 

Accumulated deficit

  $ (496,476 ) $ (496,476 )
 

Total stockholders'equity

  $ 2,808   $ 48,558  
 

Total capitalization

  $ 40,833   $ 86,583  

(1)
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders' (deficit) equity and total capitalization on an as adjusted basis by $35.0 million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, a 1.0 million share increase (decrease) in the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders' (deficit) equity and total capitalization by $1.2 million assuming the assumed public offering price remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If we do adjust the shares of common stock being offered hereby, while keeping the aggregate offering amount at approximately $45.8 million, then an assumed $1.00 decrease in the offering price from $1.33 per share to $0.33 per share would increase the number of shares offered hereby from 37,593.984 shares to approximately 151.5 million shares. Conversely, an assumed $1.00 increase in the offering price from $1.33 per share to $2.33 per share would decrease the number of shares offered hereby from 37,593,984 shares to approximately 21.5 million shares.

The preceding table excludes:

    2,119,598 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted average exercise price of $9.90 per share;

54


Table of Contents

    10,390 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.60 per share, with such exercise price being subject to reduction in connection with this offering, as discussed further under "Description of Capital Stock-Warrants";

    289,059 shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2016 Plan as of June 30, 2018;

    2,750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock;

    81,773 shares of common stock available for future grants under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of June 30, 2018; and

    7,854 shares of treasury stock.

This calculation also excludes (i) an additional 5,603,682 shares of our common stock available for future grants under our 2016 Plan as of July 20, 2018, as a result of the approval by our stockholders at our annual meeting on July 20, 2018 of an increase in the shares available for grant under our 2016 Plan and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock available for future grants under our 2018 Inducement Plan, which was approved and adopted by our board of directors on October 11, 2018, contingent upon effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

55


Table of Contents


DILUTION

If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering.

As of June 30, 2018, we had a net tangible book value of $2.8 million, or $0.11 per share of common stock. This calculation is based on 24,699,145 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Our historical net tangible book value per share represents total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2018.

After giving further effect to the sale of 37,593,984 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018 and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of June 30, 2018 would have been $48.6 million, or $0.78 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in the as adjusted net tangible book value of $0.67 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $0.55 per share to new investors participating in this offering. We determine dilution by subtracting the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering from the amount of cash that a new investor paid for a share of common stock. The following table illustrates this dilution:

 

Assumed public offering price per share

        $ 1.33  
 

Historical net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2018

  $ 0.11        
 

Increase per share attributable to new investors participating in this offering

    0.67        
 

As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering

          0.78  
 

Dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors

        $ 0.55  

The dilution information above is illustrative only and will change based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018, would increase (decrease) the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering by $0.56 and dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors by $0.44, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would increase our as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering by $0.01 per share and decrease the dilution to new investors by $0.01 per share, and each decrease of 1.0 million shares in the number of shares offered by us would decrease our as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering by $0.01 per share and increase the dilution to new investors by $0.01 per share, in each case, assuming that the assumed public offering price remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses payable by us.

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our common stock in full, the as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering would be $0.82 per share, the increase in the as adjusted net tangible book value would be $0.70 per share and the dilution to new investors would be $0.51 per share, in each case assuming a public offering price of $1.33 per share, which is the last reported sale of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 11, 2018.

56


Table of Contents

The number of shares of our common stock that will be issued and outstanding immediately after this offering as shown above is based on 24,699,145 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2018, and excludes:

    2,119,598 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted average exercise price of $9.90 per share;

    10,390 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2018 with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.60 per share, with such exercise price being subject to reduction in connection with this offering, as discussed further under "Description of Capital Stock-Warrants";

    289,059 shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2016 Plan as of June 30, 2018;

    2,750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock;

    81,773 shares of common stock available for future grants under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of June 30, 2018; and

    7,854 shares of treasury stock.

This calculation also excludes: (i) an additional 5,603,682 shares of our common stock available for future grants under our 2016 Plan as of the date of July 20, 2018, as a result of the approval by our stockholders at our annual meeting on July 20, 2018 of an increase in the shares available for grant under our 2016 Plan and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock available for future grants under our 2018 Inducement Plan, which was approved and adopted by our board of directors on October 11, 2018, contingent upon effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

To the extent that options or warrants are exercised, new options or other securities are issued under our equity compensation plans, or we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, there will be further dilution to investors participating in this offering. In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital because of market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

57


Table of Contents


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth our selected statements of operations and balance sheet data. The selected statements of operations data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, which financial statements have been audited by Friedman LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The Friedman LLP audit report on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes an explanatory paragraph that describes an uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern. We derived our summary statements of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and our summary balance sheet data as of June 30, 2018 from our unaudited interim financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles on the same basis as our audited annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, that are necessary for the fair statement of our financial position as of June 30, 2018 and our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

The following selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in any future period and our interim results for the six months ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2018, or any other period. The selected financial data in this section

58


Table of Contents

are not intended to replace the financial statements and are qualified in their entirety by the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

   
  Year Ended December 31,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
   
  2017   2016   2018   2017  
   
   
   
  (unaudited)
 
   
  (in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                         
 

Revenue, net

  $ 20,245   $ 19,550   $ 12,578   $ 9,399  
 

Cost of goods sold

    12,080     12,606     6,589     5,863  
 

Gross margin

    8,165     6,944     5,989     3,536  
 

Operating expense:

                         
 

Research and development

    7,126     4,842     3,924     3,238  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    42,596     33,481     22,693     21,678  
 

Restructuring costs

        2,394          
 

Long-lived asset impairment costs

    3,711              
 

Total operating expense

    53,433     40,717     26,617     24,916  
 

Operating loss

    (45,268 )   (33,773 )   (20,628 )   (21,380 )
 

Other income (expense), net:

                         
 

Interest expense, net

    (4,263 )   (12,151 )   (1,878 )   (2,472 )
 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

    221     (549 )        
 

Other expense

            (28 )   (21 )
 

Other income

    9     106         85  
 

Total other income (expense), net

    (4,033 )   (12,594 )   (1,906 )   (2,408 )
 

Net loss

  $ (49,301 ) $ (46,367 )   (22,534 )   (23,788 )
 

Preferred Stock dividend

  $ (1,711 ) $   $ (1,100 ) $ (597 )
 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

  $ (51,012 ) $ (46,367 ) $ (23,634 ) $ (24,385 )
 

Net loss per share of common share outstanding – basic and diluted

  $ (8.94 ) $ (39.06 ) $ (1.85 ) $ (5.44 )
 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

    5,708,577     1,187,104     12,792,578     4,479,565  

 

   
  December 31,   June 30,  
  (Dollars in thousands)
  2017   2016   2018   2017  
   
   
   
  (unaudited)
 
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                         
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 25,961   $ 9,866   $ 30,044   $ 42,261  
 

Total assets

  $ 45,089   $ 34,516   $ 52,600   $ 65,016  
 

Total current liabilities

  $ 13,080   $ 11,746   $ 11,490   $ 11,952  
 

Long-term debt, related parties

  $ 36,009   $ 58,978   $ 38,025   $ 34,066  
 

Accumulated deficit

  $ (473,921 ) $ (424,239 ) $ (496,476 ) $ (448,408 )
 

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)

  $ (4,058 ) $ (36,500 ) $ 2,808   $ 18,912  

59


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the section of this prospectus entitled "Selected Financial Data" and our historical financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words "believe," "plan," "intend," "anticipate," "target," "estimate," "expect" and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions ("will," "may," "could," "should," etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those under "Risk Factors" contained elsewhere in this prospectus, that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. See also the "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" set forth at the beginning of this prospectus. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this prospectus.

Overview

We are a commercial-stage medical technology company focused on improving health and simplifying life for people with diabetes by developing and commercializing innovative technologies. Valeritas' flagship product, V-Go® Wearable Insulin Delivery device, is a simple, affordable, all-in-one basal-bolus insulin delivery option for patients with type 2 diabetes that is worn like a patch and can eliminate the need for taking multiple daily shots. V-Go administers a continuous preset basal rate of insulin over 24 hours and it provides discreet on-demand bolus dosing at mealtimes. It is the only basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market today specifically designed keeping in mind the needs of type 2 diabetes patients.

V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery throughout the day and to manage their diabetes with insulin without the need to plan a daily routine around multiple daily injections.

We currently focus on the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes-a pervasive and costly disease that, according to the 2017 National Diabetes Statistics Report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, currently affects 90% to 95% of the approximately 23 million U.S. adults diagnosed with diabetes. The CDC estimates that the combined direct medical and drug costs and indirect lost productivity costs of diabetes in the United States in 2012 were approximately $245 billion annually. We believe the majority of the 12.6 million U.S. adults treating their type 2 diabetes with more than one daily oral anti-diabetic drug, or OAD, or an injectable diabetes medicine can benefit from the innovative approach of V-Go to manage type 2 diabetes.

Our primary market consists of approximately 5.6 million of these patients who currently take insulin, of which up to 4.5 million may not be achieving their target blood glucose goal. This patient population represents a $16.5 billion annual U.S. market when applying the annual wholesale acquisition cost, or WAC, of V-Go to the 4.5 million patients not achieving glycemic control. WAC is the gross price paid by wholesalers and does not take into account fees, discounts, and rebates from us.

Insulin therapies using syringes, pens and programmable insulin pumps are often burdensome to a type 2 diabetes patient's daily routine, which can lead to poor adherence to prescribed insulin regimens and, as a result, ineffective diabetes management. We developed V-Go utilizing our core technology, the h-Patch platform, as a patient-focused solution to address the challenges of traditional insulin

60


Table of Contents

therapies. Our h-Patch platform facilitates the simple and effective subcutaneous delivery of injectable medicines to patients across a broad range of therapeutic areas. V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery by releasing a single type of insulin at a continuous preset background, or basal, rate over a 24-hour period and on demand around mealtime, or bolus dosing. We believe V-Go is an attractive management tool for patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin because it only requires a single fill of insulin prior to use and provides comprehensive basal-bolus therapy without the burden and inconvenience associated with multiple daily injections. V-Go is available in three different dosages depending on the patient's needs and is generally cost competitive for both patients and third-party payors when compared to insulin pens or programmable insulin pumps.

V-Go was one of the first insulin delivery devices cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, under its Infusion Pump Improvement Initiative, which established additional device manufacturing requirements designed to foster the development of safer, more effective infusion pumps, and is the only FDA-cleared mechanical basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market in the United States. All other FDA-cleared basal-bolus insulin delivery products currently available in the United States are electronic and are classified as Durable Medical Equipment and, although cleared for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, were designed primarily for patients with type 1 diabetes. As V-Go is a mechanical device, it does not include any electronics, batteries or audible alarms and does not require any recharging or programming, which allows for simple and discreet use. Unlike electronic insulin delivery devices, V-Go is not classified as durable medical equipment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, allowing for potential Medicare reimbursement under Medicare Part D. The Medicare Part D outpatient drug benefit defines V-Go and certain other supplies used for injecting insulin as "drugs," which allows V-Go to be available for coverage by Part D Plans under Medicare Part D. In addition to Medicare, a majority of commercially insured patients are currently covered for V-Go under their insurance plans.

We commenced commercial sales of V-Go in the United States during 2012. During the first half of 2012, we initiated an Early Access Program to provide a limited number of physicians with free V-Go products for patients and began shipments to major wholesalers in anticipation of commercial launch. In the second half of 2012, we began hiring sales representatives in selected U.S. markets. In February 2016, we underwent a reduction-in-force of our sales representatives to focus our resources on prioritized higher-volume territories. At the end of 2017 and 2016, our field-based sales team consisted of 50 and 37 sales representatives, respectively and covered 50 and 37 territories, respectively, primarily within the East, South, Midwest and Southwest regions of the United States. We currently have 50 sales representatives.

Our net loss was $49.3 million and $46.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was $22.5 million and $23.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $473.9 million and $424.2 million, respectively, and was $496.5 million and $448.4 million as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Based on prescription data, we estimate that there were approximately 88,000 and 90,000 prescriptions reported for V-Go filled during both the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Refill prescriptions account for slightly more than two-thirds of our total prescriptions, and generally move in parallel with our patient retention rates, so can be used as a proxy to determine patient retention.

The following discussion highlights our results of operations and the principal factors that have affected our financial condition as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described, and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the statements of financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis is based on our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and our unaudited financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and

61


Table of Contents

2017, contained elsewhere in this prospectus, which we have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. You should read the discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Corporate Information

We currently operate the existing business of Valeritas as a publicly traded company under the name Valeritas Holdings, Inc. We were incorporated as Cleaner Yoga Mat, Inc. in Florida on May 9, 2014. Pursuant to the 2016 Merger, we discontinued our prior business of engaging in the sale of sanitizing solutions for Yoga and Pilates studios as well as conventional gyms and acquired the business of Valeritas, Inc. a Delaware corporation, referred to as Valeritas or the private company, which is a commercial-stage medical technology company focused on improving health and simplifying life for people with diabetes by developing and commercializing innovative technologies.

On May 3, 2016, our wholly owned subsidiary, Valeritas Acquisition Corp., a corporation formed in the State of Delaware on April 27, 2016, or the Acquisition Sub, merged with and into Valeritas, which we refer to as the 2016 Merger. Valeritas was the surviving corporation in the 2016 Merger and became our wholly owned subsidiary. All of the outstanding stock of Valeritas was converted into shares of our common stock or canceled upon closing of the 2016 Merger.

Also on May 3, 2016, we adopted an amended and restated certificate of incorporation and filed it with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and adopted amended and restated bylaws.

Following the 2016 Merger, the shareholders of Valeritas effectively control the combined companies, and, accordingly, Valeritas is deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the 2016 Merger.

Financial Overview

Revenue

We generate revenue from sales of V-Go to third-party wholesalers and medical supply distributors that take delivery and ownership of V-Go and, in turn, sell it to retail pharmacies or directly to patients with type 2 diabetes. V-Go 30-day packages are sold to wholesalers and distributors at WAC and we report net revenue after taking into consideration sales deductions as described in our financial statements and the related notes thereto. To date, the majority of our revenue is generated in the United States and we view our operations as one operating segment. Financial information is reviewed on a consolidated basis to allow management to make decisions regarding resource allocations and assess performance.

Within the past year, we have expanded our distribution network to include certain international distributors. Although we have entered into distribution agreements with distributors in several international countries, V-Go is currently only available for distribution in Australia and New Zealand. We recently entered into an agreement with an international contract research organization to begin the medical device registration process for V-Go in China, and expect the number of countries in which V-Go is available to increase as we continue to grow and expand our network of international agreements.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin

Cost of goods sold includes raw materials, labor costs, manufacturing overhead expenses and reserves for anticipated scrap and inventory obsolescence.

62


Table of Contents

We currently manufacture V-Go and the EZ Fill accessory in cleanrooms at a contract manufacturing organization, or CMO, in Southern China. We also have a relationship with a separate CMO that performs our final inspection and packaging functions. Any single-source components and suppliers are managed through our global supply chain operation. We continually work with our manufacturing CMO's to refine our manufacturing processes and production lines to improve efficiencies, reduce labor cost and leverage our overhead expenses. These improvements represent the primary drivers in the current year reduction in cost of goods sold per unit.

We expect our overall gross margin, which is calculated as revenue less cost of goods sold for a given period, to fluctuate in future periods as a result of varying manufacturing output as we strive to reduce near-term inventory levels. In the future, planned changes in and improvements to our manufacturing processes and expenses, as well as increases in production volume up to our current capacity are expected to further improve our gross margins.

Research and Development Expense

Our research and development activities primarily consist of activities associated with our core technologies and process engineering as well as research programs associated with products under development. These expenses are primarily related to employee compensation, including salary, fringe benefits, share-based compensation and contract employee expenses.

We expect our research, development and engineering expenses to increase from current levels as we initiate and advance our development projects, including both the V-Go SIM™ (Simple Insulin Management) and V-Go Prefill devices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salary, fringe benefits and share-based compensation for our executive, financial, marketing, sales, business development, regulatory affairs and administrative functions. Other significant expenses include product demonstration samples, trade show expenses, professional fees for our contracted customer support center, external legal counsel, independent auditors and other consultants, insurance, facilities and information technologies expenses. We expect our selling, general and administrative expenses to increase as our business expands.

Additionally, we increased our investment in sales and marketing programs and materials used to drive our capital-efficient marketing initiatives, as well as the volume of sample products provided to patients. This overall growth in commercial spending is part of our strategic plan to expand our business operations.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense), net primarily consists of interest expense and amortization of debt discount associated with our loan agreements with Capital Royalty Group, or CRG, and WCAS Capital Partners IV, L.P., or WCAS. The decrease in interest is expense is due to the restructuring and subsequent conversion of a significant portion of the debt. See "Indebtedness" below for more information.

63


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

The following is a comparison of revenue and expense categories for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

   
  Three Months Ended
June 30,
  Change  
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2018   2017   $   %  
 

Revenue, net

  $ 6,497   $ 4,788     1,709     35.7  
 

Cost of goods sold

    3,405     2,985     420     14.1  
 

Gross margin

    3,092     1,803     1,289     71.5  
 

Operating expense:

                         
 

Research and development

    1,860     1,650     210     12.7  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    11,228     11,231     (3 )    
 

Total operating expense

    13,088     12,881     207     1.6  
 

Operating loss

    (9,996 )   (11,078 )   1,082     (9.8 )
 

Other income (expense), net:

                         
 

Other expense

    (25 )   (35 )   10     (28.6 )
 

Other income

        19     (19 )   (100.0 )
 

Interest expense, net

    (939 )   (888 )   (51 )   5.7  
 

Total other income (expense), net

    (964 )   (904 )   (60 )   6.6  
 

Net loss

  $ (10,960 ) $ (11,982 )   1,022     (8.5 )

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

The following is a comparison of revenue and expense categories for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

   
  Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Change  
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2018   2017   $   %  
 

Revenue, net

  $ 12,578   $ 9,399     3,179     33.8  
 

Cost of goods sold

    6,589     5,863     726     12.4  
 

Gross margin

    5,989     3,536     2,453     69.4  
 

Operating expense:

                         
 

Research and development

    3,924     3,238     686     21.2  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    22,693     21,678     1,015     4.7  
 

Total operating expense

    26,617     24,916     1,701     6.8  
 

Operating loss

    (20,628 )   (21,380 )   752     (3.5 )
 

Other income (expense), net:

                         
 

Other expense

    (28 )   (21 )   (7 )   33.3  
 

Other income

        85     (85 )   (100.0 )
 

Interest expense, net

    (1,878 )   (2,472 )   594     (24.0 )
 

Total other income (expense), net

    (1,906 )   (2,408 )   502     (20.8 )
 

Net loss

  $ (22,534 ) $ (23,788 )   1,254     (5.3 )

64


Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

The following is a comparison of revenue and expense categories for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

   
  Year Ended December 31,   Change  
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2017   2016   $   %  
 

Revenue, net

  $ 20,245   $ 19,550   $ 695     3.6  
 

Costs of goods sold

    12,080     12,606     (526 )   (4.2 )
 

Gross margin

    8,165     6,944     1,221     17.6  
 

Operating expense:

                         
 

Research and development

    7,126     4,842     2,284     47.2  
 

Selling, general and administrative

    42,596     33,481     9,115     27.2  
 

Restructuring costs

        2,394     (2,394 )   (100.0 )
 

Long lived asset impairment costs

    3,711         3,711     100.0  
 

Total operating expense

    53,433     40,717     12,716     31.2  
 

Operating loss

    (45,268 )   (33,773 )   (11,495 )   34.0  
 

Other income (expense), net:

                         
 

Interest expense, net

    (4,263 )   (12,151 )   7,888     (64.9 )
 

Change in fair value of derivatives

    221     (549 )   770     (140.3 )
 

Other income (expense)

    9     106     (97 )   (91.5 )
 

Total other income (expense), net

    (4,033 )   (12,594 )   8,561     (68.0 )
 

Net loss

  $ (49,301 ) $ (46,367 ) $ (2,934 )   6.3  

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

Revenue, net

Revenue was $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $1.7 million or 35.7%. The increase was driven by a 20.2% increase in volume, which was primarily due to our transition in 2017 to a new high-touch and high-service capital-efficient market strategy, which involves our sales force focusing on and servicing a smaller, more targeted number of high insulin volume prescribing physicians. During the second quarter and on a year-over-year basis, total prescriptions grew 10% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, and new prescriptions increased by 14%. In our targeted accounts, total and new prescriptions grew 22% and 18% year-over-year, respectively. In our non-targeted accounts, total prescriptions decreased by 2%, however new prescriptions increased by 8% year-over-year. In addition, the non-targeted prescriptions have stabilized. We also realized a net selling price increase of 15.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017. The net selling price increase was driven by an 8.0% WAC price increase implemented during the second half of 2017 and the benefit of improvements in various sales deductions.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin

Cost of goods sold was $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $0.4 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of goods sold decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2018 to approximately 52.4% from approximately 62.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

65


Table of Contents

Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues, or gross margin, for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was 47.6%, compared to 37.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in our gross margin was due to manufacturing efficiencies, which benefited from a 20.2% increase in unit sales volume and the impact of our 15.5% net selling price increase.

Research and Development Expense

Total research and development expenses was $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $0.2 million. The increase was primarily due to an increased focus on and external expenditures related to the development of our V-Go SIM device. We expect market introduction in the US of the V-Go SIM by the end of the first half of 2019.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $11.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $11.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $0.0 million. The flat amount of expenses was due to the planned increase in field sales headcount in the three months ended June 30, 2017, with no significant changes to field sales headcount since that period.

Other Income (Expense), net

Interest expense was $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of less than $0.1 million. The increase was primarily due to the compounding of interest on the increasing balance of our debt.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

Revenue, net

Revenue was $12.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $9.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $3.2 million or 33.8%. The increase was driven by a 18.1% increase in volume, which was primarily due to our transition in 2017 to a new high-touch and high-service capital-efficient market strategy, which involves our sales force focusing on and servicing a smaller, more targeted number of high insulin volume prescribing physicians. During the first six months ended June 30, 2018 and on a year-over-year basis, total prescriptions grew 8%, and new prescriptions increased by 11%. In our targeted accounts, total and new prescriptions grew 22% and 19% year-over-year, respectively. In our non-targeted accounts, total prescriptions declined by 7% and new prescriptions were flat year-over-year. We also realized a net selling price increase of 15.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. The net selling price increase was driven by an 8.0% WAC price increase implemented during the second half of 2017 and the benefit of improvements in various sales deductions.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin

Cost of goods sold was $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $0.7 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of goods sold decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to approximately 52.4% from approximately 62.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues, or gross margin, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was 47.6%, compared to 37.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in our gross

66


Table of Contents

margin was due to manufacturing efficiencies, which benefited from a 18.1% increase in unit sales volume and the impact of our 15.7% net selling price increase.

Research and Development Expense

Total research and development expenses was $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $0.7 million. The increase was primarily due to an increased focus on and external expenditures related to the development of our V-Go SIM device. We expect market introduction in the US of the V-Go SIM during the first half of 2019.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $21.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $1.0 million. The increase was driven primarily by a planned increase in field sales headcount, which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Other Income (Expense), net

Interest expense was $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, a decrease of $0.6 million. The decrease was primarily due to the restructuring of our $50.0 million term loan with CRG, or the Term Loan, and the $5.0 million note payable with WCAS, or the WCAS Note, in March, 2017. In connection with our March 2017 public offering, $25.0 million of the Term Loan and $2.5 million of the WCAS Note were converted into 2,500,000 and 250,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, respectively.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Revenue, net

Our revenue increased by 3.6% to $20.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 from $19.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. Because of our high touch and higher service sales and marketing model, we generated full year total prescription growth of 13.4% in our targeted accounts in 2017 vs. 2016. In addition, we realized sequential and year-over year total prescription growth in these accounts in every quarter of 2017. This growth was partially offset by an expected decline in 2017 of total prescriptions in our non-targeted accounts by 18.3% when compared to the same period in 2016. Although we are seeing important signs of stabilization in these territories, particularly in the second half of 2017, the overall total volume of V-Go's prescribed and sold to patients during the year ended December 31, 2017 remained relatively flat, decreasing by 1.0% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This volume reduction was offset by an increase of 4.6% in average net prices realized during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This net price increase was primarily the result of an 8.0% WAC price increase implemented in both the fourth quarter of 2016 and during the third quarter of 2017.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin

Our cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $12.1 million on revenue of approximately $20.2 million, as compared to approximately $12.6 million in cost of goods sold on revenue of approximately $19.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. As a percentage of revenue, cost of goods sold decreased during the year ended December 31, 2017 to approximately 59.7% from approximately 64.5% during the year ended December 31, 2016. A portion of the $0.5 million or 4.2% decreased in cost of goods sold was due to the slight (1.0%) decrease in

67


Table of Contents

sales volume, with the remaining driven by the manufacturing process improvements described under the section "Financial Overview – Costs of Goods Sold and Gross Margin" above.

Our gross margin, for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 40.3%, compared to 35.5% during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in our gross margin was due to manufacturing efficiencies, overhead cost reductions, implementation of more cost-effective processes in our product development and the impact of our net price increase.

Research and Development Expense

Total research and development expenses increased by $2.3 million, or 47.2%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to 2016. This increase is primarily due to increases in spending related to the initiation of our development projects, including the V-Go Link, V-Go Prefill and studies to qualify the V-Go for regular insulin.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $9.1 million or 27.2% in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. This increase was driven primarily by the impact of a change in our sales and marketing strategy during the year ended December 31, 2017, which increased our field sales force and increased labor costs by $6.0 million. Additionally, our advertising expenses increased by $0.8 million from 2016 to 2017. The remaining increases were attributed to our planned increase our sales and marketing programs and customer services used to assist with our marketing initiatives and other professional services.

Other Income (Expense), net

Interest expense decreased by 64.9% during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was attributable to a restructuring of our Term Loan with CRG and the note payable with WCAS. On March 28, 2017, $25.0 million and $2.5 million of the Term Loan and WCAS Note, respectively, were converted to preferred shares upon completion of our public offering in March 2017. The debt conversion resulted in a lower principal balance and lower interest rates in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared with the year ended December 31, 2016 and an interest expense decrease of $7.9 million. The restructured interest rate decreased from 11% to 10% on the other note payable in 2017.

The decrease in fair value of derivatives of $0.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared with the increase in fair value of $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 is primarily caused by fluctuations in period end valuations of our derivative liabilities. Specifically, the decrease occurring in 2017 is primarily attributed to the decrease in the stock price. The warrants are accounted as a derivative liability at fair value as the warrant exercise price is subject to adjustment upon additional issuances of equity securities at a price per share lower than the exercise price of the warrants.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are subject to a number of risks similar to those of early stage commercial companies, including dependence on key individuals, the difficulties inherent in the development of a commercial market, the potential need to obtain additional capital necessary to fund the development of our products, and competition from larger companies. We expect that our sales performance and the level of selling and marketing efforts, as well as the status of each of our new product development programs, will significantly impact our cash requirements.

68


Table of Contents

We have evaluated whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued. We have incurred losses each year since inception and have experienced negative cash flows from operations in each year since inception. As of June 30, 2018, we had $33.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and an accumulated deficit of $496.5 million. Our restructured Term Loan includes a liquidity covenant whereby we must maintain a cash balance of at least $2.0 million. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We completed a public offering on April 26, 2018, as a result of which we received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $21.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $1.8 million and offering expenses of approximately $0.4 million. On May 2, 2018, the underwriters in the public offering exercised a portion of their 30-day option to purchase additional shares of our common stock, as a result of which we received additional net proceeds of approximately $2.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts of $0.2 million.

In January 2018, as a component of management's plan to secure additional financing, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement, or the First Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, or Aspire Capital for the sale of up to $20.0 million of our common stock (see "Equity Transactions" below) The First Purchase Agreement provided that we could sell an aggregate of up to 1,375,868 shares of our common stock to Aspire Capital, (which represented 19.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock on the date we entered into the First Purchase Agreement) without shareholder approval. Pursuant to the First Purchase Agreement, we sold 1,250,868 shares for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million. The First Purchase Agreement was terminated in June 2018.

In January 2018, we entered into an At the Market Issuance Sales Agreement, or the Sales Agreement with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or FBR with respect to an at the market offering program, under which we may, from time to time in our sole discretion, issue and sell through FBR, acting as agent, shares of our common stock, or the Placement Shares. FBR has the option to decline any sales orders at its discretion. The issuance and sale, if any, of the Placement Shares by us under the Agreement will be made pursuant to a prospectus supplement to our registration statement on Form S-3, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on October 4, 2017, and declared effective by the SEC on December 15, 2017, for the sale of up to $2.8 million of shares of our common stock. As of the date of this prospectus we have not sold any shares pursuant to the Sales Agreement.

In June 2018, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement, or the Second Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, for the sale of up to $21.0 million of our common stock (see "Equity Transactions" below). The Second Purchase Agreement provides that we may sell an aggregate of up to 4,726,383 shares of our common stock (which represents 19.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock on the date we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement), without shareholder approval. As of June 30, 2018, we have sold 791,557 shares of common stock under the Second Purchase Agreement for net proceeds of approximately $1.1 million.

There is uncertainty regarding the utilization of financing associated from the Sales Agreement and the Second Purchase Agreement, but based on our current business plan assumptions, we believe that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our current operations into the second quarter of 2019.

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including those regarding director independence and independent committee requirements, minimum stockholders' equity, minimum share price, and certain corporate governance requirements. There can be no assurances that we will be able to comply with the applicable listing standards.

69


Table of Contents

We continue to pursue additional sources of financing to fund our operations. However, we can provide no assurance that additional financing will be consummated on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to effect a sufficient financing or capital raise, there would be a material adverse effect on us. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared with the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the inability of us to continue as a going concern.

In March 2018, we received a written notification from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq, indicating that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market because our stockholder's equity, as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, was below the required minimum of $2.5 million. The notification letter also indicated that, as of March 6, 2018, we did not meet the alternative compliance standards relating to the market value of listed securities of $35 million or net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years.

In accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we submitted a plan to regain compliance to Nasdaq within 45 days of our receipt of the notification letter. In May 2018, we received a letter from Nasdaq which stated that, based on the disclosure in our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2018, filed on May 9, 2018, Nasdaq had determined that we complied with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1). However, if we failed to evidence compliance in our next periodic report, we may be subject to delisting.

Although Nasdaq determined that we were in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), based on the disclosure in our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2018, filed on May 9, 2018, there is no guarantee that we will continue to maintain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) or any other Nasdaq listing rule in the future, which may subject us to delisting.

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows during the periods indicated:

   
  Year Ended
December 31,
  Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2017   2016   2018   2017  
 

Net cash provided by (used in):

                         
 

Operating activities

  $ (31,970 ) $ (29,661 ) $ (19,737 ) $ (16,314 )
 

Investing activities

    (692 )   (39 )   (813 )   (42 )
 

Financing activities

    48,757     36,777     27,633     48,751  
 

Total

  $ 16,095   $ 7,0777   $ 7,083   $ 32,395  

Operating Activities

The increase in net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily associated with the increase in our field sales force, more timely payment of accounts payable and the increase in accounts receivable from growing revenue.

The increase in net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily associated with increased overhead and services related to both our research and development efforts and sales initiatives, partially offset by higher product revenue and lower cost of goods sold as a result of manufacturing efficiencies.

70


Table of Contents

Investing Activities

The net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily related to purchases of capital equipment for our production lines. The use of cash in 2017 was related to augmenting the already existing production lines and corresponding capacity with our CMO built during prior years. Additionally, in 2017, we sold some of our property and equipment as a result of the change in our overall operational strategy and plan.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was primarily related to purchases of capital equipment for our production lines. The use of cash in 2017 and 2016 was related to augmenting the already existing production lines and corresponding capacity with our CMO built during prior years. Additionally, in both 2017 and 2016, we sold some of our property and equipment as a result of the change our overall operational strategy and plan. We do not expect to have significant investing activity in the next 12 months.

Financing Activities

The net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was the result of a public offering executed in April, 2018, execution of sales of common stock under the First Purchase Agreement and the Second Purchase Agreement, and proceeds from our Employee Stock Purchase Program. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was the result of gross proceeds from our March 2017 public offering, which raised net proceeds of $48.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was the result of gross proceeds from our common stock financing rounds. The financing round in 2017 raised gross proceeds of $48.8 million, net of any offering costs, compared with the 2016 round, which raised $25.4 million, exercise of Series AB warrants of $7.4 million, and issuances of Series AB Preferred Stock of $5.8 million less any offering costs.

Indebtedness

Senior Secured Debt

In May, 2013, we entered into a $50.0 million term loan with CRG, or the Term Loan, which is structured as a senior secured loan with a six-year term. The Term Loan is secured by substantially all of our assets, including our material intellectual property. Due to certain events of default in 2015, we entered into a series of forbearance agreements in 2015 and 2016 with CRG. The initial forbearance agreement was entered into on May 18, 2015 and has subsequently been amended five times. The forbearance agreements, as amended, but no longer in effect today, contained a number of terms and conditions in exchange for CRG's agreement to forbear.

Concurrently with the closing of the 2016 Merger we restructured our Term Loan. The provisions of the restructured Term Loan require quarterly interest payments during the term of the loan, which were set to commence on June 30, 2018, but have been adjusted to commence on June 30, 2019. The amended repayment of principal on amounts borrowed under the Term Loan is scheduled to be completed on March 31, 2022. We may, in our discretion, repay the revised loan in whole or in part without any penalty or prepayment fees.

In February 2017, we entered into an agreement with CRG to, among other things, reduce the amount required by the liquidity covenant in the Term Loan, which had originally required us to maintain a cash balance greater than $5.0 million, to $2.0 million. Additionally, in accordance with an agreement

71


Table of Contents

we entered into with CRG and WCAS in February 2017, an aggregate of $27.5 million of our then-outstanding debt held by CRG and WCAS was converted upon the closing of our March 2017 public offering into 2,750,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, at a conversion price of $10.00 per share, which was the per share public offering price of our common stock in the March 2017 public offering.

WCAS Note

In 2011, we issued a $5.0 million note payable to WCAS, which we refer to as the WCAS Note. Amounts due under the WCAS Note originally bore interest at 10% per annum, payable semi-annually. The note was amended in 2013 to bear interest at 12% per annum, with all interest accruing as compounded payment-in-kind, or PIK interest, which was added to the aggregate principal amount of the loan semi-annually. The then outstanding principal amount of the note, including accrued PIK interest, is due in full in September 2021, and may be paid off at any time without penalty. Concurrently with the closing of the 2016 Merger, we restructured the WCAS Note. For more information, see Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Equity Transactions

In March 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering, in which we sold 5,250,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $10.00 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $52 million and net proceeds of approximately $48.8 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses.

In January 2018, we entered into the First Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, for the sale of up to $20 million of our common stock. Pursuant to the First Purchase Agreement, we could sell up to an aggregate of 1,375,868 shares of common stock (which represents 19.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock on the date we entered into the First Purchase Agreement) without stockholder approval. The First Purchase Agreement permitted us to sell additional shares of common stock above the 19.99% limit provided that (i) we obtained stockholder approval or (ii) stockholder approval had not been obtained and at any time the 1,375,868 share limitation was reached and at all times thereafter the average price paid for all shares issued under the First Purchase Agreement, including 125,000 shares of common stock we issued to Aspire Capital as consideration for entering into the First Purchase Agreement was equal to or greater than $3.02, which was the consolidated closing bid price of our common stock on the date we entered into the First Purchase Agreement for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million. In addition to these restrictions, we were prohibited from selling shares to Aspire Capital under the First Purchase Agreement at a price less than $1.00 per share. All shares of common stock sold to Aspire Capital under the First Purchase Agreement were registered on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-222454), which was declared effective by the SEC on February 12, 2018. The First Purchase Agreement was terminated in June 2018 at the time we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital (as described below).

In January 2018, we entered into the Sales Agreement with FBR with respect to an at-the-market offering program, under which we may, from time to time, issue and sell through FBR, as sales agent, the Placement Shares. FBR has the option to decline any sales orders at its discretion. The issuance and sale, if any, of the Placement Shares by us under the Sales Agreement will be made pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated January 26, 2018 to our Shelf Registration Statement, for the sale of up to approximately $2.8 million of shares of our common stock. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not sold any shares under the Sales Agreement.

72


Table of Contents

In April 2018, we completed an underwritten public offering, in which we sold 13,700,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $1.75 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $24 million and net proceeds of approximately $21.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $1.8 million and offering expenses of $0.4 million. On May 2, 2018, we sold an additional 1,600,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the 30-day option we granted the underwriters in connection with the offering, for net proceeds of approximately $2.6 million. Therefore, the total net proceeds from this underwritten public offering was $24.4 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

In June 2018, we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, pursuant to which, we have the right, in our sole discretion, to present Aspire Capital with a purchase notice, directing Aspire Capital (as principal) to purchase up to 150,000 shares of our common stock per business day, in an aggregate amount of up to $21.0 million of our common stock over the term of the Second Purchase Agreement at a per share price equal to the lesser of the lowest sale price of our common stock on the purchase date; or the arithmetic average of the three lowest closing sale prices for our common stock during the ten consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the purchase date. We may sell an aggregate of 4,726,383 shares of our common stock (which represents 19.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock on the date we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement) without stockholder approval. We may sell additional shares of our common stock above the 19.99% limit provided that (i) we obtain stockholder approval or (ii) shareholder approval has not been obtained at any time the 4,726,383 share limitation is reached and at all times thereafter the average price paid for all shares issued under the Second Purchase Agreement, including the 263,852 shares of common stock issued to Aspire Capital as consideration for entering into the Second Purchase Agreement, or the Commitment Shares, and the 791,557 shares purchased on the date of the agreement, or the Initial Purchase Shares, is equal to or greater than $1.62, which was the consolidated closing bid price of our common stock on the date we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement. In addition to these restrictions, we are prohibited from selling shares to Aspire Capital under the Second Purchase Agreement at a price per share less than $1.00. We have registered the sale of up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the Second Purchase Agreement, including the Commitment Shares and the Initial Purchase Shares, on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-226018), which was declared effective by the SEC on July 16, 2018. As of June 30, 2018, we have sold 791,557 to Aspire Capital under the Second Purchase Agreement, including the Initial Purchase Shares, for net proceeds of approximately $1.1 million. The First Purchase Agreement was terminated in June 2018 at the time we entered into the Second Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital.

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017:

   
  Payment Due by Period  
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  Total   Less than
1 Year
  1 to 3
Years
  3 to 5
Years
  More than
5 Years
 
 

Purchase commitments(1)

    7,699     7,699              
 

Operating lease obligations(2)

    2,772     453     1,057     873     389  
 

Senior secured debt(3)

    32,929         5,505     27,424      
 

Other Note Payable(4)

    3,205             3,205      
 

Total

    46,605     8,152     6,562     31,502     389  

(1)
Represents purchase commitments with suppliers for raw materials and finished goods.

73


Table of Contents

(2)
Represents operating lease commitments for office and research and development space in Marlborough, Massachusetts and Bridgewater, New Jersey and office equipment.

(3)
Represents Term Loan agreement with CRG for $25.0 million, including accrued interest through December 31, 2017.

(4)
Represents a $2.5 million Other Note Payable to WCAS, including accrued interest through December 31, 2017.

Related Party Transactions

We transact business with certain parties related to us, primarily with key stakeholders with the intent of managing working capital through additional debt or equity financing.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 CRG and WCAS converted their respective debt balances of $25.0 million and $2.5 million to 2,500,000 and 250,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, respectively. At the time of the debt restructuring, $0.1 million of remaining debt issuance costs was extinguished and recorded against equity because CRG and WCAS are also two of our stockholders. Concurrent with the debt conversion, we capitalized a de minimis amount of issuance costs. CRG also purchased 4,000,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40.0 million in the March 2017 public offering.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

This management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. These items are monitored and analyzed by us for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results for the period in which they become known. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we believe that the following accounting policies are critical to the process of making significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

Revenue Recognition

Under ASC 606, we recognize revenue when our customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To perform revenue recognition for arrangements within the scope of ASC 606, we perform the following five steps:

    (i)
    identification of the promised goods or services in the contract;

    (ii)
    determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract;

    (iii)
    measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration;

74


Table of Contents

    (iv)
    allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and

    (v)
    recognition of revenue when (or as) we satisfy each performance obligation. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASC 606.

Revenue from product sales is recorded net of adjustments for managed care rebates, wholesale distributions fees, cash discounts, and prompt pay discounts, all of which are established at the time of sale. In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates regarding the amounts earned or to be claimed on the related product sales, including the following:

    managed care rebates, which are based on the estimated end user payor mix and related contractual rebates; and

    distribution fees and prompt pay discounts, which are recorded based on specified payment terms, and which vary by customer.

We believe our estimates related to managed care rebates distribution fees and prompt pay discounts do not have a higher degree of estimation complexity or uncertainty as the related amounts are settled within a relatively short period of time.

In connection with our adoption of ASC 606, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to reduce retained earnings by a de minimis amount. This adjustment reflected the acceleration of $1.6 million in revenues, net, $0.3 million in distribution fees and managed care rebates and $0.5 million in costs of revenue associated with the deferred revenue and related costs at December 31, 2017 as well as a reserve for returns of approximately $0.8 million. The reported results for 2018 reflect the application of ASC 606 guidance, while the reported results for 2017 were prepared under the guidance of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, which is also referred to herein as "previous guidance".

Return Reserve

We record allowances for product returns as a reduction of revenue at the time product sales are recorded. Several factors are considered in determining whether an allowance for product returns is required, including the customers' return rights and our historical experience with returns and the amount of product sales in the distribution channel not consumed by patients and subject to return. We rely on historical return rates to estimate returns. In the future, if any of these factors and/or the history of product returns change, adjustments to the allowance for product returns may be required.

Inventories

Inventories consists of raw materials, work in process and finished goods, which are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined on a first in, first out, or FIFO, basis and includes material costs, labor and applicable overhead. We perform a review regarding our excess or obsolete inventory and write down any inventory that has no alternative uses to its net realizable value. Economic conditions, customer demand and changes in purchasing and distribution can affect the carrying value of inventory. As circumstances warrant, we record lower of cost and net realizable value inventory adjustments. In some instances, these adjustments can have a material effect on the financial results of an annual or interim period. In order to determine such adjustments, we evaluate the age, inventory turns and estimated fair value of product inventory by stage of completion and record an adjustment if estimated market value is below cost.

75


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets, on an ongoing basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our impairment review process is based upon an estimate of future undiscounted cash flow. Factors we consider that could trigger an impairment review include the following:

    significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results,

    significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business

    significant negative industry or economic trends

    significant technological changes, which would render equipment and manufacturing processes obsolete

Recoverability of assets that will continue to be used in our operations is measured by comparing the carrying value to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. Future undiscounted cash flows include estimates of future revenues, driven by market growth rates, and estimated future costs. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we performed further analyses of the year-to-date results of operations, compared them with earlier projections and determined that revenues and cash flows from operations were lower than the previously planned amounts. Based on comparison of results of operations in 2017 with projections, we revised our long term projections of future cash flows which triggered an impairment review. This impairment review resulted in a $3.7 million impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2017. There was no impairment charges recorded during 2016.

There were a de minimis amount of charges recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and no charges recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Share-Based Compensation

The fair value of stock options on the date of grant is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on key assumptions such as the fair value of common stock, expected volatility and expected term. Previously, we used a peer group of companies to calculate volatility in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In 2018, we began to use a blended rate, which included our company and the peer group of companies to calculate volatility. Compensation cost for restricted stock awards issued to employees is measured using the grant date fair value of the award, adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures. Our estimates of these important assumptions are primarily based on third-party valuations, historical data, peer company data and our judgment regarding future trends and other factors.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not engage in any "off-balance sheet arrangements" (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2018, respectively.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of fluctuations in interest rates and inflation.

76


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to financial market risks in the ordinary course of our business. Our cash and cash equivalents include cash in readily available checking and money market accounts, as well as certificates of deposit. These securities are not dependent on interest rate fluctuations that may cause the principal amount of these assets to fluctuate. Additionally, the interest rate on our outstanding indebtedness is fixed and is therefore not subject to changes in market interest rates.

Inflation Risk

Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor and pricing of contracts. We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, or for the three months or six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

77


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Overview

We are a commercial-stage medical technology company focused on improving health and simplifying life for people with diabetes by developing and commercializing innovative technologies. Valeritas' flagship product, V-Go® Wearable Insulin Delivery device, is a simple, affordable, all-in-one basal-bolus insulin delivery option for patients with type 2 diabetes that is worn like a patch and can eliminate the need for taking multiple daily shots. V-Go administers a continuous preset basal rate of insulin over 24 hours and it provides discreet on-demand bolus dosing at mealtimes. It is the only basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market today specifically designed keeping in mind the needs of type 2 diabetes patients.

V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery throughout the day and to manage their diabetes with insulin without the need to plan a daily routine around multiple daily injections.

We currently focus on the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes-a pervasive and costly disease that, according to the 2017 National Diabetes Statistics Report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, currently affects 90% to 95% of the approximately 23 million U.S. adults diagnosed with diabetes. The CDC estimates that the combined direct medical and drug costs and indirect lost productivity costs of diabetes in the United States in 2012 were approximately $245 billion annually. We believe the majority of the 12.6 million U.S. adults treating their type 2 diabetes with more than one daily oral anti-diabetic drug, or OAD, or an injectable diabetes medicine can benefit from the innovative approach of V-Go to manage type 2 diabetes.

Our primary market consists of approximately 5.6 million of these patients who currently take insulin, of which up to 4.5 million may not be achieving their target blood glucose goal. This patient population represents a $16.5 billion annual U.S. market when applying the annual wholesale acquisition cost, or WAC, of V-Go to the 4.5 million patients not achieving glycemic control. WAC is the gross price paid by wholesalers and does not take into account fees, discounts, and rebates from us.

Insulin therapies using syringes, pens and programmable insulin pumps are often burdensome to a type 2 diabetes patient's daily routine, which can lead to poor adherence to prescribed insulin regimens and, as a result, ineffective diabetes management. We developed V-Go utilizing our core technology, the h-Patch platform, as a patient-focused solution to address the challenges of traditional insulin therapies. Our h-Patch platform facilitates the simple and effective subcutaneous delivery of injectable medicines to patients across a broad range of therapeutic areas. V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery by releasing a single type of insulin at a continuous preset background, or basal, rate over a 24-hour period and on demand around mealtime, or bolus dosing. We believe V-Go is an attractive management tool for patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin because it only requires a single fill of insulin prior to use and provides comprehensive basal-bolus therapy without the burden and inconvenience associated with multiple daily injections. V-Go is available in three different dosages depending on the patient's needs and is generally cost competitive for both patients and third-party payors when compared to insulin pens or programmable insulin pumps.

V-Go was one of the first insulin delivery devices cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, under its Infusion Pump Improvement Initiative, which established additional device manufacturing requirements designed to foster the development of safer, more effective infusion pumps, and is the only FDA-cleared mechanical basal-bolus insulin delivery device on the market in the United States. All other FDA-cleared basal-bolus insulin delivery products currently available in the

78


Table of Contents

United States are electronic and are classified as Durable Medical Equipment and, although cleared for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, were designed primarily for patients with type 1 diabetes. As V-Go is a mechanical device, it does not include any electronics, batteries or audible alarms and does not require any recharging or programming, which allows for simple and discreet use. Unlike electronic insulin delivery devices, V-Go is not classified as durable medical equipment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, allowing for potential Medicare reimbursement under Medicare Part D. The Medicare Part D outpatient drug benefit defines V-Go and certain other supplies used for injecting insulin as "drugs," which allows V-Go to be available for coverage by Part D Plans under Medicare Part D. In addition to Medicare, a majority of commercially insured patients are currently covered for V-Go under their insurance plans.

We commenced commercial sales of V-Go in the United States during 2012. During the first half of 2012, we initiated an Early Access Program to provide a limited number of physicians with free V-Go products for patients and began shipments to major wholesalers in anticipation of commercial launch. In the second half of 2012, we began hiring sales representatives in selected U.S. markets. In February 2016, we underwent a reduction-in-force of our sales representatives to focus our resources on prioritized higher-volume territories. At the end of 2017 and 2016, our field-based sales team consisted of 50 and 37 sales representatives, respectively and covered 50 and 37 territories, respectively, primarily within the East, South, Midwest and Southwest regions of the United States. We currently have 50 sales representatives.

Our net loss was $49.3 million and $46.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was $22.5 million and $23.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $473.9 million and $424.2 million, respectively, and was $496.5 million and $448.4 million as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Based on prescription data, we estimate that there were approximately 88,000 and 90,000 prescriptions reported for V-Go filled during both the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Refill prescriptions account for slightly more than two-thirds of our total prescriptions, and generally move in parallel with our patient retention rates, so can be used as a proxy to determine patient retention.

Market Opportunity

Diabetes is a chronic, life-threatening disease and was reported in 2014 to impact an estimated 422 million people worldwide and is characterized by the body's inability to properly metabolize glucose. Management of glucose is regulated by insulin, a hormone that allows cells in the body to absorb glucose from blood and convert it into energy. In people without diabetes, the body releases small amounts of insulin regularly over 24 hours and additional amounts of insulin when eating meals. Diabetes is classified into two main types. Type 1 diabetes is caused by an autoimmune response in which the body attacks and destroys the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas. As a result, the pancreas can no longer produce insulin, requiring patients to administer daily insulin injections to survive. Type 2 diabetes, the more prevalent form of the disease, occurs when either the body does not produce enough insulin to regulate the amount of glucose in the blood or cells become resistant to insulin and are unable to use it effectively. Type 1 diabetes is frequently diagnosed during childhood or adolescence, and the onset of type 2 diabetes generally occurs in adulthood, but its incidence is growing among the younger population primarily due to the increasing incidence of childhood obesity. In addition, other factors commonly thought to be contributing to the prevalence and growth of type 2 diabetes include aging populations, sedentary lifestyles, worsening diets and increased adult obesity.

In 2017, the CDC estimated that 30.3 million people or 9.4% of the population in the United States have diabetes while only 23.1 million people have been formally diagnosed with the disease by a medical professional based on data from 2015. The percentage of adults with diabetes increased with

79


Table of Contents

age, reaching a high of 25.2% among those aged 65 years or older. The CDC further estimates that 84.1 million Americans over the age of 18 had "pre-diabetes," in 2015, which means a higher than normal blood glucose level that, without intervention, is likely to result in type 2 diabetes within 10 years. In 2015, an additional 1.5 million individuals in the United States were diagnosed with diabetes, according to the CDC. More than half of these new cases were among adults aged 45 to 64 years. The CDC estimated the total cost burden of diagnosed diabetes of both types in the United States in 2012 to be $245 billion annually, which includes direct medical costs of $176 billion. Current diabetes forecasts report the prevalence of diabetes will increase by 54% to more than 54.9 million Americans between 2015 and 2030; and total annual medical and societal costs related to diabetes will increase 53% to more than $622 billion by 2030.

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease. Data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study suggest that individuals with type 2 diabetes lose on average approximately 50% of the function of their beta cells, the cells that produce insulin, prior to diagnosis. If not closely monitored and properly treated, diabetes can lead to serious medical complications. According to the CDC, diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure, non-traumatic lower limb amputations and new cases of blindness in the United States. The prevalence of other chronic disorders commonly occurring in patients with type 2 diabetes, including high blood pressure and high cholesterol, can significantly impact a patient's lifestyle given the various daily treatment regimens often used to treat these conditions. Diabetes has a significant impact on overall patient mortality; according to the CDC, the risk for death among people with diabetes is approximately one and a half that of similarly aged people without diabetes.

A hemoglobin A1C test, which measures a patient's trailing three-month average blood glucose level, or A1C level, is a key indicator of how well a patient is controlling his or her diabetes. Specifically, the A1C test measures the percentage of a patient's hemoglobin, a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen that is coated with sugar. A higher A1C level correlates with poorer blood sugar control and an increased risk of diabetes complications. The American Diabetes Association, or ADA, recommends an A1C goal of no more than 7% for most patients.

Once type 2 diabetes has been diagnosed, physicians and patients often first seek to manage the disease through meal planning and physical activity before progressing to medications designed to manage A1C levels. Patients often begin medical treatment with a once-daily OAD. If OAD monotherapy does not achieve or maintain the A1C target, combination therapy is recommended, which can include additional oral agents, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or once-daily, or basal, insulin. If basal insulin has been appropriately titrated and glucose levels remain elevated, advancement to an insulin regimen including additional mealtime insulin, or bolus dosing, is a recommended option. Generally, the introduction of insulin occurs within 10 years of diagnosis.

The following diagram depicts an illustrative treatment progression of a typical patient with type 2 diabetes, as well as the number of patients currently in each category according to the 2014 U.S. Roper Diabetes Patient Market Study.

80


Table of Contents


Illustrative type 2 Diabetes Treatment Progression

GRAPHIC

As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 12.6 million patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States, of which approximately 5.6 million patients were prescribed insulin. Our near-term target market consists of the up to 4.5 million patients in this group who may not be achieving the recommended target blood glucose goal (A1C <7%). Of these patients, nearly 3.0 million have an A1C greater than or equal to 8%. In addition, of the remaining approximately 7.0 million U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes who do not inject insulin, we believe those who are treating their diabetes with more than one OAD per day and/or an injectable GLP-1 diabetes medicine other than insulin can also benefit from the innovative approach of V-Go to manage type 2 diabetes.

We believe we compete primarily with insulin injections by either insulin pens or insulin syringes. We do not consider insulin pumps as competition because these are electronic devices that are replaced every two to four years based on medical necessity, which we consider common industry practice; have annual medical deductibles and require monthly medical co-insurance due to their classification as durable medical equipment; and, although cleared for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, are designed primarily for patients with type 1 diabetes.

Therapeutic Challenges and Limitations of Current Insulin Delivery Mechanisms

Multiple studies indicate that, when taken as prescribed, a basal-bolus insulin regimen is a very effective means for lowering blood glucose levels of patients with type 2 diabetes because it most closely mimics the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery throughout the day:

    basal insulin provides approximately 50% of the daily insulin requirement-insulin is released regularly over 24 hours to control blood glucose-however, this nearly constant rate of insulin release is inadequate to treat post-mealtime glucose excursions (the change in blood glucose concentration from before to after a meal); and

    bolus insulin provides the remaining, approximately 50%, of the daily insulin requirement and is released in response to food intake or a meal to control post-mealtime hyperglycemia-the exaggerated rise in blood glucose following a meal.

Patient adherence and compliance with basal-bolus insulin therapy using syringes and/or pens has proven difficult because these therapies require the use of various forms of insulin, including long- and short-acting insulin preparations, and due to the inconvenience to patients, who need to plan a routine around multiple daily injections.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, a study of patients with type 1 diabetes conducted by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or NIDDK, the results of which were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 1993, indicated that conventional insulin

81


Table of Contents

therapy, defined as one or two insulin injections per day without changing the insulin dose in response to blood glucose levels, is less effective in achieving recommended blood glucose levels over time than intensive insulin therapy in which a patient administers three or more insulin injections per day with varying doses depending upon blood glucose levels. Additionally, the Treating to Target in type 2 Diabetes study of 708 men and women with suboptimal A1C levels published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2009, found that by three years or study end, 81.6% of patients initiated on a basal insulin-based regimen required the addition of mealtime insulin three times daily. Sixty-three percent of patients in this basal insulin-based subgroup achieved the A1C goal of less than 7% by study end. We believe the outcomes of these studies confirm that an important factor of any insulin therapy is its ability to mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery.

Challenges Associated with type 2 Diabetes Management

Regardless of the type of insulin therapy, many patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin fail to reach their A1C goal. Adding mealtime insulin to a basal-only regimen can help, but patient adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen is often a challenge. In a database analysis of 27,897 adult patients prescribed insulin in the United States, the results of which were published in the journal ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research in 2013, only 20.4% of patients had reached the ADA's recommended A1C goal of less than 7%. Similarly poor results were observed across each patient group in the study regardless of whether they were prescribed basal-only insulin, basal-bolus insulin or a combination of both long-acting and fast-acting insulin.

Patient non-adherence to prescribed insulin therapy is often an important contributing factor in a patient's failure to achieve target A1C goals. In a 2012 survey of 1,250 physicians who treat patients with diabetes and 1,530 insulin-treated patients (180 with type 1 diabetes and 1,350 with type 2 diabetes) published in Diabetic Medicine, patients reported insulin omission/non-adherence an average of 3.3 days per month. Additionally, 72.5% of physicians in the study reported that a typical patient did not take his or her insulin as prescribed, with an average of 4.3 days per month of non-compliance with a basal insulin regimen and 5.7 days per month of noncompliance with mealtime administration of insulin. Common reasons cited by patients for failing to comply with a prescribed treatment regimen include the burden of multiple daily injections, the potential embarrassment about injecting medication around family and friends or in public, and interference with the patient's daily activities and resulting loss of freedom. Similarly, in the 2011 US Roper Diabetes Patient Market Study, or the 2011 Roper Study, of 2,104 patients with diabetes, of which 692 were on insulin, 72% of respondents who had been prescribed to take three or more insulin injections per day did not inject themselves when they were away from home. Failure to comply with prescribed insulin therapy, particularly mealtime insulin therapy, reduces the overall efficacy of insulin treatment in managing type 2 diabetes.

Limitations of Current Insulin Therapy

OADs are the first line of diabetic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes, along with diet and lifestyle changes. However, given that type 2 diabetes is progressive in nature and that the effectiveness of oral agents and other therapies may decline over time, patients are typically prescribed insulin therapy within 10 years of diagnosis. Depending on the progression of diabetes, there are four primary types of insulin therapy prescribed today for patients with type 2 diabetes that seek to control or manage their blood glucose levels:

    a once-daily dose of basal insulin, typically a long-acting insulin such as Levemir® or Lantus®;

    a twice-daily injection regimen comprised of either a daily injection of long-acting basal insulin in addition to a dose of insulin, typically a short- or fast-acting insulin, such as Humalog®, Apidra® or

82


Table of Contents

      NovoLog®, with the largest meal or two injections of premixed insulin, which combines long-acting and fast-acting formulations within a single insulin dose;

    intensive therapy requiring multiple daily injections, or MDI, with syringes or preloaded insulin pens; and

    continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using programmable insulin pumps.

We believe conventional insulin therapy is among the least expensive insulin-based diabetes treatments and is typically initiated with a once-daily dose of a long-acting insulin. MDI intensive therapy with syringes can be effective and less costly than other therapies. MDI intensive therapy with insulin pens offers a more convenient alternative to syringes but can be more expensive. In addition, programmable insulin pumps offer an effective means of implementing intensive diabetes management with the goal of achieving near-normal blood glucose levels. However, we believe that patient concerns with lifestyle factors, ease of use, convenience and high costs have limited overall adherence to insulin regimens, resulting in a significant number of patients with type 2 diabetes failing to meet their A1C goals with MDI or the use of programmable insulin pumps.

We believe, based on customer feedback and experience, that the current insulin therapies described below present the following advantages and limitations for patients with type 2 diabetes.

·    Basal Insulin

Description:    A once-daily dose of long-acting insulin (such as Lantus® and Levemir®) at bedtime or in the morning, although some patients require two injections (morning and bedtime).

Advantages

 

Limitations/Challenges

Easiest to train, learn and correctly administer insulin as injections and can be performed at home

 

Insulin absorption can have variability from day to day or between different patients such that insulin is not released over the entire intended delivery period

Least costly analog insulin therapy, which uses genetically altered (or chemically altered) human insulin designed to release injected insulin to more closely mimic human insulin, for patients with most favorable reimbursement coverage

 

Basal insulin addresses fasting and pre-mealtime glucose levels only, no impact on mealtime glucose excursions

Lowest risk for patient dosing error

 

Most patients eventually need mealtime insulin to achieve their A1C goal

 

·    Basal Insulin + 1 or Premixed Insulin

Description:    Considered a transition regimen towards MDI or intensive therapy typically consisting of a twice-daily injection regimen of either: (i) a daily injection of long-acting insulin (such as Lantus® and Levemir ®) at bedtime (basal) plus an injection of fast acting insulin (such as Humalog® and

83


Table of Contents

NovoLog®), before the day's largest meal, or basal + 1; or (ii) premixed insulin injections before breakfast and dinner.

Advantages

 

Limitations/Challenges

Basal +1 and Premix

 

Basal +1 and Premix

Compared to basal only insulin regimens, provides insulin for at least one, or in the case of premix, two of the patient's meals

 

No insulin coverage for at least one meal each day, or in the case of Basal+1, two meals each day

Premix

 

Basal +1

Injections can normally be performed at home

 

Additional patient co-pay for additional dose of mealtime insulin

Single type of insulin used in a single device

 

Potential for dosing error increased with two types of insulin

 

Premix

 

Patients typically use more insulin, may be at increased risk of hypoglycemia and may gain more weight

 

Requires planning activities and eating around the timing of injections and absorption of insulin

 

·    Multiple Daily Injections – MDI (Intensive Therapy)

Description:    A once- or twice-daily injection of long-acting insulin at bedtime or in the morning (basal rate) plus an injection of fast-acting insulin before meals and, if appropriate, with snacks (bolus dose).

Advantages

 

Limitations/Challenges

With strict adherence, can closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin release

 

Frequent injections (usually at least four per day)

Allows insulin dosing based on the requirements of individual meals

 

Requires training around two different types of insulin and the need to carry two types of insulin or insulin pens

Lower cost with favorable reimbursement coverage compared to programmable insulin pumps

 

Potential for dosing error increased with two types of insulin

Easier to teach, learn and correctly administer compared to programmable insulin pumps

 

Requires significant planning of meals and other activities

 

Injections often administered outside the home creating adherence challenges especially around meals

 

Requires two patient co-pays

84


Table of Contents

·    Programmable Insulin Pumps

Description:    A wearable electronic insulin pump filled with a fast-acting insulin that delivers a continuous dose of insulin (basal rate) and the ability to deliver insulin with meals or snacks (bolus dose), based upon programmable settings and patient input. Most pumps require an infusion set to deliver the insulin in addition to the pump.

Advantages

 

Limitations/Challenges

When used properly, can most closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin release

 

Most complicated to teach, learn and correctly administer and normally requires a proactive and adherent patient

Customized basal and bolus insulin doses

 

Bothersome to wear and least discreet alternative

Eliminates the need for daily needle injections

 

Most significant risk of dosing errors due to the wide range of programmable functions and features

 

Highest up-front and maintenance cost

 

Reimbursement coverage for patients with type 2 diabetes significantly less accessible than for injections

Given the reasons cited by patients for non-adherence to and the limitations of currently prescribed insulin therapy, we believe simplicity of insulin delivery contributes to adherence with therapy. In turn, when patients more fully comply with their prescribed treatment regimen, we believe that insulin therapy will be more effective. While insulin syringes, insulin pens and programmable insulin pumps are capable of facilitating basal-bolus therapy, we believe these methods of administration generally lack the simplicity of operation and lifestyle adaptability desired by patients with type 2 diabetes. We believe that, in general, programmable insulin pump therapies tend to have more advantages for type 1 patients who may require varying basal rates over a 24-hour period or more complex bolus dosing regimens. These complexities are generally not encountered by patients with type 2 diabetes.

The following diagram demonstrates the benefits of V-Go as compared to other currently available insulin therapies in terms of simplicity of use and ability to mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery. We estimate that more than 95% of patients with type 2 diabetes are prescribed a

85


Table of Contents

regimen that relies on an insulin pen device or insulin syringe to deliver insulin including basal, basal + 1, premix and intensive therapy or multiple daily injection regimens.

GRAPHIC

We believe V-Go is appealing to healthcare providers and patients because it combines the benefits of physiologic basal-bolus therapy with the convenience of a once-daily injection using just one type of insulin and a smaller amount of it compared to conventional injection (i.e. syringes or pens). Our internal studies indicate that these characteristics help support patient compliance with basal-bolus regimens, thereby improving glycemic control (lowers A1c). We also believe V-Go is an attractive option because it is discreet and simple to operate, yet mimics the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery without the inconvenience associated with syringes and pens or the complexities associated with programmable pumps.

Our Solution

Simple, Discreet and Effective type 2 Diabetes Management

V-Go fills a critical need of patients with type 2 diabetes who, we believe, desire and benefit from an easy-to-use, more discreet, basal-bolus insulin regimen. As depicted in the following image, V-Go is designed to be worn on the skin under clothing and measures just 2.4 inches wide by 1.3 inches long by 0.5 inches thick (excluding the adhesive component), weighing approximately one ounce when filled with insulin.

GRAPHIC

Specifically Designed for Patients with type 2 Diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed intensive insulin therapy report the burden of multiple injections, embarrassment of injection and interference with daily activities as key factors for non-compliance with insulin therapy. Unlike programmable insulin pumps, V-Go is a 24 hour,

86


Table of Contents

disposable mechanical device that operates without electronics, batteries, infusion sets or programming and with fewer injections then using insulin syringes or pens. In the 2011 Roper Study, 72% of patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed basal-bolus injectable insulin regimens reported not taking injections away from home, making it difficult for many of them to remain in compliance with their prescribed therapy. V-Go was designed to facilitate basal-bolus therapy compliance by removing the complexity and stigma of insulin injections in patients with type 2 diabetes. In patients we surveyed prior to starting V-Go and again 30 days after being on V-Go, 53% of patients found V-Go very convenient compared to only 10% reporting their prior therapy was very convenient. In this same survey, 64% of patients felt their quality of life, based on how they felt physically or mentally, was generally good to excellent compared to only 35% prior to V-Go.

The following diagram demonstrates the basal and bolus functions of V-Go. The bolus operation can be completed through the patient's clothing.

GRAPHIC

Simple, Effective and Innovative Approach to Insulin-Based Diabetes Management

V-Go utilizes our proprietary h-Patch drug delivery technology to enable patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery by delivering a single type of insulin at a predictable and continuous preset basal rate over a 24-hour period and providing convenient and discreet on-demand bolus dosing at mealtimes. We believe V-Go is a simple and effective approach to insulin therapy and facilitates patient adherence to basal-bolus insulin regimens, which leads to better patient results. In a series of clinical studies examining patients with diabetes using V-Go, clinically relevant reductions in A1C levels were observed after switching to or initiating V-Go therapy, as well as reductions in the prescribed total daily insulin dose. These findings are summarized in the following figure and are described in more detail under "— Extensive Clinical Evidence Demonstrating Results." As with all research, study design limitations should be considered when interpreting the results and whether or not the results can be applied to a general population. Refer to the full findings in the referenced public disclosure for additional information.

87


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

V-GoAL=randomized controlled trial. SIMPLE=multicenter prospective observational study. VALIDATE 1= multicenter retrospective study. EVIDENT= retrospective study. IMPROVE= multicenter retrospective study. JONES= The Jones Center for Diabetes & Endocrine Wellness, retrospective study. KAISER= multicenter internal evaluation of V-Go. UMASS=University of Massachusetts, retrospective study. MOTIV=retrospective pilot study. ENABLE=multicenter retrospective study.

User-Friendly Design

In addition to its small size and dosage versatility, V-Go offers many additional user-friendly features designed to treat and improve the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin, including:

    using a single fast-acting insulin, such as Humalog® or NovoLog®, rather than a combination of multiple types or premixed insulin;

    not requiring patients to carry syringes, pens or other supplies for mealtime bolus dosing;

    offering the convenience of pressing buttons for on-demand bolus dosing through clothing;

    allowing patients to easily maintain their daily routines and activities, including showering, exercising and sleeping;

    only requiring application of a new V-Go every 24 hours, which offers patients the flexibility to selectively choose an application site that best suits the day's activities; and

    not burdening patients with the complexities associated with learning to use an electronic device or programming a pump.

Cost Effective for Payor and Patient Alike

V-Go is generally a cost competitive option for payors and patients when compared to insulin pens, which is the delivery method prescribed for a majority of all insulin therapies and approximately 66% of newly prescribed basal and mealtime insulin therapies. V-Go is available at retail and mail order pharmacies and is covered by Medicare as well as commercial insurance plans covering a majority of patients. As a result, out-of-pocket costs for covered patients using V-Go are generally equivalent to what they would pay if taking basal-bolus injections with insulin pens or syringes. We believe that, from

88


Table of Contents

a payor's perspective, using V-Go for insulin delivery will generally be associated with an equal or lower cost, net of rebates and co-pays, to treat a patient compared to the cost of using multiple daily injections to deliver basal-bolus insulin therapy. This opinion is supported by a recent retrospective analysis by Raval, et al using medical and pharmacy claims from HealthCore Integrated Research Database to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes for V-Go compared to standard multiple daily injection insulin therapy for treating type 2 diabetes. With similar baseline number of insulin Rx fills and insulin TDD, V-Go users had fewer insulin Rx fills (p<0.001), and a 21% decline in insulin TDD (p<0.001), as compared to MDI users, during the last 6 months of follow-up. Also, with similar baseline diabetes-related medication costs, V-Go users experienced a lower increase in diabetes-related medication costs ($1287, p=0.012), as compared to MDI users, during the last 6 months of follow-up.

Moreover, insulin delivery with V-Go is significantly less expensive, especially in the first year, than treatment with programmable insulin pumps. This cost difference in the first year is attributed to the programmable durable medical equipment component associated with electronic insulin pumps that are not needed for V-Go. This durable medical equipment component can have initial costs for the pump and supplies of approximately $5,000 per device. In addition, daily consumables such as tubing and insertion sets are required for electronic pump therapy and not on V-Go.

Another consideration is out-of-pocket costs for patients with different diabetes regimens. Pharmacy formularies are separated into multiple tiers, of which Tier 2 and Tier 3 are most applicable to the V-Go. Tier 1 products are the lowest cost tier of prescription products, which mainly consists of generic drugs; Tier 2 products are generally preferred brand name products, for which co-pays are more than Tier 1; and Tier 3 consists mainly of non-preferred brand name products, which are more expensive than Tier 2. We believe that patient costs can be neutral when switching from basal-bolus insulin pen therapy to V-Go therapy. As every payor and every employer plan within a payor has their own co-pay structure, we reached this conclusion by utilizing national averages provided by a national employer health benefits survey conducted in 2014 by Kaiser Permanente to make comparisons. We estimated co-pays for insulin pens and pen needles to be $73 per month, which assumes national Tier 2 co-pay equal to $31 for each pen box and $11 for pen needles. The V-Go co-pay can be $31 for Tier 2 or $53 for Tier 3 for a month supply, depending on which formulary Tier it is assigned to. Insulin vials for V-Go would be similar to insulin pens at $31 per month. Therefore, expected monthly co-pay for V-Go can be $62 when in Tier 2 or $84 when in Tier 3, which is essentially cost neutral to patients.

Comprehensive Customer Support

The majority of patients using V-Go are trained to use the device by their healthcare provider or a Certified Diabetes Educator, or CDE, who has been trained by our sales force using a "train the trainer" approach. Our sales force has the ability to train patients directly and also trains physicians, physicians' assistants, nurse practitioners, CDEs and any other staff in a healthcare provider's office, who are responsible for training their patients to properly use V-Go. Additionally, we provide a starter kit for new V-Go patients, which contains all the materials a patient needs to deliver basal-bolus insulin therapy with V-Go. We also offer supplemental training support and resources when healthcare providers or patients need additional V-Go training assistance, including online resources such as a learning management system and online videos.

Our V-Go Customer Care Center, or VCC, is a live customer care center operating 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The VCC provides broad-based V-Go operational assistance to healthcare providers, patients, caregivers and pharmacists. Every patient is encouraged to call the VCC in order to opt-in for support and, once a patient does opt- in, a VCC staff-member proactively contacts the patient at various times to provide additional patient support and promote proper use of V-Go. VCC representatives can also train patients on the operational aspects of V-Go either via phone or video. The VCC also offers a reimbursement support service to answer patients' reimbursement-related questions.

89


Table of Contents

Extensive Clinical Evidence Demonstrating Results

The V-Go solution to type 2 diabetes management is focused both on A1C management and on providing patients the requisite support to achieve their goal of improved health. We and others have conducted several studies, analyses and research surveys to evaluate the role of V-Go in A1C management. These studies include prospective studies, user preference studies, retrospective analyses of diabetic patient's electronic medical records and patient and physician surveys. The results of these studies and analyses are described below.

V-GoAL: A Randomized Prospective Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Compare the Real-World Use of V-Go in Type 2 Diabetes Patients to Standard Treatment Optimization

In collaboration with HealthCore Inc., we conducted a randomized, observational, prospective trial to assess the effectiveness of V-Go compared with standard treatment optimization, or STO in adult patients with T2DM treated with insulin with or without concomitant anti-hyperglycemic medications in the United States in a real-world, community-based practice setting. Participating clinics were randomized to enroll patients to insulin delivery with V-Go or to optimize standard of care for up to 4 months. Patients in the V-Go group discontinued all other insulin therapy and patients in the STO group could add and/or change diabetes-related therapy to improve treatment. The primary endpoint was change in A1C from baseline to the end of study.

The analysis population consisted of 169 V-Go patients and 246 STO patients from 52 clinical sites. Baseline A1C ranged from 7.9% to 14.2% with a mean A1C of 9.9% in the V-Go group and 9.3% in the STO group. The mean insulin total daily dose or TDD at baseline was not significantly different between groups (V-Go 71 units/day vs STO of 72 units/day). Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in A1C from baseline with those in the V-Go group demonstrating significantly greater A1C reductions when compared to STO (V-Go=0.95% vs. STO=0.46%).

SIMPLE Study: A Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate Effectiveness of V-Go Across Multiple Centers

We conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial of 89 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of V-Go for patients with diabetes in a real-world setting. Findings from this study have been presented in past years at the American Diabetes Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Annual Scientific Congresses. The primary objective was to compare changes of average glycemic control as measured by A1C from baseline to the end of V-Go use. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were administering one or more insulin injections per day and not meeting target A1C control of less than 7% were included in the study. The patient types included in this trial were:

    Basal:  Patients receiving once or twice daily injections of an intermediate- or long-acting insulin regardless of oral anti-diabetes medication use (26 patients).

    Premix:  Patients receiving one to three daily injections of premix insulin regardless of oral anti-diabetes medication use (13 patients).

    MDI:  Patients receiving any insulin therapy with three or more insulin injections a day regardless of oral anti-diabetes medication use (47 patients).

    Other:  Patients receiving OADs only and patients receiving OADs plus non-insulin injectable (3 patients).

A1C levels in the overall population (n=89) decreased from 8.8% at baseline to 8.1% at month three, representing a statistically significant reduction of 0.7% with a p-value less than 0.0001. A1C levels were not available for two of the 89 patients at 3 months, therefore the statistical analysis is based on repeated measures for 87 patients.

90


Table of Contents

When classifying the data by subgroups, both the basal and MDI subgroups demonstrated statistically significant A1C reductions from baseline (basal –0.76%, p=0.0003; Premix –0.66%, p=0.3006; MDI –0.66%, p=0.0002). In addition to the significant improvements in blood glucose, the average daily dose of insulin across all patients was also reduced by 18% (62.4 to 51.0 units, p=0.001) from baseline. A small but statistically significant decrease in body weight (–0.71 lbs., p<0.0001) was observed, although not clinically meaningful given the baseline weight of the patient population. Overall, the incidence of hypoglycemia after three months of V-Go use was low, with 90% of patients reporting no hypoglycemia.

VALIDATE 1: Use of the V-Go Insulin Delivery Device in Patients with Sub-optimally Controlled Diabetes Mellitus

A study was initiated by Lajara et al. in 2014 to evaluate the effect of switching patients with sub-optimally controlled diabetes to V-Go. The study was conducted as a retrospective review of the EMR database for Diabetes America, a specialized diabetes comprehensive care clinic setting which includes 13 centers located across major metropolitan areas of Texas. Patients were prescribed V-Go by health care providers as part of their standard clinical practice with the goal of improving A1C levels. The primary endpoint was change in A1C from baseline. Secondary endpoints included change in insulin dose, body weight, and hypoglycemic events.

The mean time from start of V-Go to the first follow-up visit was 13.87 ± 6.14 weeks and the mean time to the second follow-up visit was 26.86 ± 8.96 weeks. Results will therefore be presented for 14-week and 27-week visits. Of 245 eligible patients based on inclusion criteria, 204 were included in the analysis population.

The distribution of A1C values for the study population was compared to baseline for each follow-up A1C time point in the figure below. On V-Go, the A1C distribution curve has narrowed and progressively shifted to the left, representing a reduction in variability and lower A1C values. We did not commission Diabetes Centers of America to conduct this study.

Change in A1C Distribution: Improved A1C across the Entire Population

GRAPHIC

Change in A1C distribution. A1C data are arithmetic means at baseline (week 0) compared to first recorded A1C on V-Go (14 week mean) and second recorded A1C on V-Go (27 week mean). Curves

91


Table of Contents

represent the A1C distribution of patients for each time point based on available data. These results were published in a peer reviewed journal, Diabetes Therapy in 2015.

EVIDENT: Clinical and Economic Considerations based on Persistency with a Novel Insulin Delivery Device vs Conventional Insulin Delivery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

In 2016, Everitt et al. conducted a retrospective analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of persistent use (>150 days) of V-Go to resumed persistent use of conventional insulin delivery (CID) in patients discontinuing V-Go after short-term use. EMR were used to identify patients based on predetermined criteria. Insulin TDD, A1C, self-monitored glucose or SMBG logs, all concomitant diabetes medications and weight were collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Data analysis was conducted for all patients and was stratified based on persistent use of V-Go or persistent use of CID in those that discontinued V-Go. There were no significant differences in persistency time between groups, with V-Go patients averaging a little over 8 months and CID patients nearly 7.5 months.

Persistent use of V-Go resulted in a significantly greater reduction in A1C (–1.42 vs –0.20; p=0.003) with significantly less prescribed insulin (difference of 17.39 u/day; p=0.003) and resulted in a lower change in therapy cost. Persistency with V-Go proved more cost-effective compared to persistent CID use as the incremental cost impact to the pharmacy budget was $695.61 less per 1% change in A1C. We provided an educational grant to the lead study author to conduct this retrospective analysis.

IMPROVE: Clinical Benefits Over Time Associated with V-Go

In 2015, we provided an educational grant to a large specialty clinical practice in Northeast Florida to conduct a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact on glycemic control of switching to V-Go for patients with diabetes that were sub-optimally controlled. 103 patients were evaluated across four follow-up visits when an A1C result was recorded. Duration of V-Go use was approximately two, six, ten and fourteen months for the first, second, third and fourth follow-up visits. The baseline A1C was 9.8%. Statistically significant A1C reductions from baseline were seen at each of the four follow-up office visits. After six months of V-Go use, a reduction in A1C of 1.7% (p<0.001) was observed and sustained at 14 months. For the 80 patients previously administering insulin at baseline, a substantial reduction in total daily insulin from baseline was also observed at all follow-up visits. Insulin was reduced from 84 to 67 units/day (p<0.05) in these 80 patients after fourteen months of V-Go use. There was no reported change in the incidence of hypoglycemia compared to baseline. These results were published in a peer reviewed journal, Advances in Therapy in May 2018. We did not commission NEFEDA to conduct this study.

Jones: The Jones Center for Diabetes & Endocrine Wellness Clinical Evaluation

A retrospective clinical analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical experience with V-Go in 91 patients treated at the Jones Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Wellness, a specialized diabetes care clinic. Using electronic medical records, clinical data was collected at V-Go initiation and up to one year of follow-up. Prior to V-Go initiation, 39.6% of patients were prescribed only insulin and 58.2% were prescribed combination therapy that included insulin. Of the 86 patients with type 2 diabetes, 69 patients, or 80%, had at least one follow-up visit. Mean baseline A1C in this group was 9.1% at baseline and 8.3% at follow-up for an average improvement in A1C of 0.8% (not tested for statistical significance). The mean total daily dose of insulin at baseline was 76 units and decreased to 61 units, a 20% (not tested for statistical significance) reduction, on V-Go. These results were also published and presented in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. We did not commission the Jones Center to conduct this study.

92


Table of Contents

Kaiser: Short-Term Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness.

A three month pragmatic evaluation was conducted across multiple clinics within the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Group. The purpose was to determine if switching to V-Go insulin delivery device resulted in improved A1C control in patients with T2DM poorly controlled on prior regimens. Each participating clinician initiated and intensified therapy based on standard clinical practice. V-Go devices were provided by the manufacturer for the 3 month study. Changes in A1C and insulin TDD as well as percentage of patients achieving A1C £ 9.0% were assessed.

Out of 85 patients initiated on V-Go, 60 completed the evaluation with a baseline mean A1C of 9.8% and insulin total daily dose of 72 units/day (range 30 to 200 units/day). Prior to initiating V-Go, 60% of patients were poorly controlled defined by A1C values > 9.0%.. After 3 months of insulin delivery with V-Go, significant mean reductions in A1C (–1.3%; p<0.0001) and TDD (–34 units/day; p<0.0001) were observed Achievement of A1C £ 9.0% increased from 40% before V-Go to 78% on V-Go (p<0.0001.

UMASS: The University of Massachusetts Clinical Evaluation

In 2013, researchers at the University of Massachusetts examined 21 patients with type 2 diabetes who lacked glycemic control and switched from MDI therapy to V-Go. The clinical evaluation observed that, after 88 days of V-Go use, based on data from 14 of the 21 patients observed, A1C levels decreased from 10.7% to 8.3% (p<0.001) and total daily doses of insulin decreased by 46% from 119 units to 64 units (p=0.01). These results were also published and presented at the 73rd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association in June 2013. We did not commission nor sponsor this study.

MOTIV: Retrospective Proof-of Concept Study Evaluating Optimization and Titration of Dosing with V-Go

A retrospective proof-of-concept analysis based on data from EMR was conducted by Mehta et al. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a physician-directed insulin titration algorithm in patients prescribed V-Go who were diagnosed with T2DM and ³ 21 years old. Primary endpoints were achievement of A1C targets (<7.5%) and prevalence of hypoglycemia.

Of the 24 patients screened, 15 patients met eligibility requirements and were evaluated after 4 months of V-Go use. Patients kept daily four-point (fasting and 2 hour postprandial breakfast, lunch, and dinner) SMBG profiles which were used for weekly titration decisions. Based on the algorithm, bolus up-titration was recommended weekly when 2 hour postprandial averages exceeded 170 mg/dl and down-titrated when 2 hour postprandial averages were below 100 mg/dl. Basal rates were adjusted if needed following the optimization of bolus dosing for all meals.

A majority of the insulin titration occurred over the first three weeks with bolus up-titration occurring in 73% of patients (from 18 to 33 total bolus units/day) at week one. V-Go basal dose was increased in 5 patients and decreased in 1 patient by month one.

The A1C target of <7.5% was achieved in 67% of patients after switching to V-Go for 4 months. A mean significant A1C reduction of –1.6% (8.7 to 7.1%; p<0.001) was observed despite a significant decrease in the mean insulin TDD (144 to 60 U/day; p=0.002). No change in weight from baseline was observed. Incidence of hypoglycemia decreased from 23% of patients at baseline to 7% of patients by month four. We did not commission nor sponsor this study.

93


Table of Contents

ENABLE: Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Effectiveness of V-Go

Hundal et al. conducted a retrospective multi-state analysis to evaluate the clinical benefits of switching patients from insulin delivery via insulin pens/syringes to V-Go. Electronic medical records across 9 specialty diabetes centers were used to identify patients and evaluate change in A1C and TDD. Patients (N=283) were evaluated after a mean of 3 and 7 months of V-Go use.

A significant reduction in A1C of 1.0% (p<0.0001) from a baseline of 9.2% after 3 months of V-Go use was observed and sustained at 7 months. Insulin total daily dose was reduced by 17 units/day and 14 units/day (p<0.0001) from a baseline of 76 units/day at 3 and 7 months, respectively.

Clinical Evidence Summaries

Across these multiple peer-reviewed and published clinical trials, analyses and surveys using both prospective and retrospective study designs, switching patients who had suboptimal glycemic control to V-Go for insulin delivery resulted in statistically significant improvements in A1C, with A1C reductions ranging from 0.7% to 2.4%, depending on the patient population. Moreover, across this body of evidence, switching patients who had suboptimal glycemic control to V-Go for insulin delivery resulted in with less insulin being used. Daily insulin dose reductions ranged from 7% to 46%, depending on the study and influenced by the amount of insulin patients were prescribed prior to using V-Go. Currently, clinical evidence in support of V-Go has been disclosed across 12 publications and 56 presentations and represents clinical experience in > 1500 patients with diabetes.

Our Current and Future Products

We believe our technologies represent a fundamentally different approach to basal-bolus insulin delivery. To facilitate therapy compliance, we have sought to eliminate the need for complex electronics and software by utilizing mechanical technology that delivers prescribed dosages of insulin and other injectable drugs with great accuracy without any electronics, batteries, recharging or programming.

V-Go Wearable Insulin Delivery Device

V-Go is a wearable insulin delivery device for basal-bolus therapy that deploys our innovative proprietary h-Patch technology. Unlike programmable insulin pumps, V-Go is a small, discreet, daily-disposable insulin delivery device that operates without electronics, batteries, infusion sets or programming. V-Go measures just 2.4 inches wide by 1.3 inches long by 0.5 inches thick and weighs approximately one ounce when filled with insulin.

V-Go enables patients to closely mimic the body's normal physiologic pattern of insulin delivery by delivering a single type of insulin at a continuous preset basal rate over a 24-hour period and also providing for on-demand bolus dosing at mealtimes, without the need for electronics or programming. A patient adheres V-Go to his or her skin and presses a button that inserts a small needle that commences a continuous preset basal rate of insulin. At mealtimes, a patient can discreetly press the bolus ready and bolus delivery buttons to deliver insulin on-demand at meals.

Each day prior to applying V-Go, a patient fills it with insulin using a filling accessory known as EZ Fill, which is included with each monthly supply of V-Go. V-Go uses a single type of fast-acting insulin, such as Humalog® or NovoLog®, and is available in a preset basal rate to continuously deliver 20, 30 or 40 units of insulin in one 24-hour period (0.83, 1.25 or 1.67 units per hour, respectively) and on-demand bolus dosing in two unit increments (up to 36 units per 24-hour time period). Our proprietary Floating Needle is deployed with the press of a button after V-Go is applied to the skin making the connection between the insulin reservoir and the patient's tissue. The Floating Needle then pivots with the body's natural movements, allowing for maximum comfort. After 24 hours of use, a

94


Table of Contents

patient presses a button that retracts the needle and then removes V-Go from the skin, discards V-Go in regular trash and replaces it with a new insulin-filled V-Go for the next 24 hours. The EZ fill device makes the filling process simple and does not require calculations, measuring or needles. The use of the EZ fill device can also prevent accidental needle sticks that occur with pen needles or syringes.

h-Patch Controlled Delivery Technology Platform

Our proprietary hydraulic h-Patch drug delivery core technology, which is a critical component of V-Go, facilitates the simple and effective delivery of injectable medicines to patients across a broad range of therapeutic areas. The deployment of our h-Patch technology results in a device specifically designed for patients with type 2 diabetes who, we believe, do not require complex and costly programmable insulin pumps generally designed to meet the needs of type 1 patients.

The hydraulic approach of our h-Patch technology can be used to deliver constant basal or on-demand bolus dosing of any drug than can be delivered subcutaneously. We believe it combines the user advantages of transdermal patches with the accuracy and flexibility of conventional electronic pumps. Once activated, our h-Patch device places a custom-formulated viscous fluid under pressure, which is separately compartmentalized and therefore designed not to come into contact with the active drug. Once pressurized, the fluid is forced through a flow restrictor that is designed to control the flow rate. After passing through the flow restrictor, the viscous fluid couples with and moves a piston in a cartridge that contains active drug. The viscous fluid continually pushes the piston, dispensing the drug at the prescribed preset basal rate through a needle into the patient's subcutaneous tissue. Bolus delivery on demand is similarly driven by viscous fluid dispensed from a separate side chamber, which allows a patient to dispense active drug in two unit increments through a user-activated bolus button. Our h-Patch basal drug delivery technology results in a simple, yet innovative, device that operates without complex controls or an infusion set.

The operation of our h-Patch technology is depicted in the graphic below:

GRAPHIC

We will continue to explore the use of our h-Patch technology in other drug delivery applications beyond the use of insulin to treat type 2 diabetes. We believe it has the potential to improve the utility of a variety of drugs that require frequent and cumbersome dosing regimens.

95


Table of Contents

Next-Generation V-Go: V-Go Prefill & V-Go Link.

We are developing a next-generation, single-use disposable V-Go device that will feature a separate prefilled insulin cartridge that can be snapped by the patient into V-Go. While the current V-Go simplifies the use of insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes, we believe that a pre-filled V-Go will make insulin therapy even simpler by eliminating the device-filling process by the patient and the need for EZ fill refrigeration, which we expect could further promote adoption by patients with type 2 diabetes. Additionally, we believe V-Go Prefill could lower the number of co-pays because the insulin and V-Go would be packaged together, generate revenue from the sale of insulin and extend the patent life to 2032. A pre-filled V-Go would also enable V-Go usage for other injectable therapeutic drugs beyond insulin that are used by patients who could benefit from simple, convenient and continuous drug delivery. Currently, the V-Go Prefill is in the design-development stage, with a focus on ease of customer use and optimization of manufacturing efficiency.

We are in the later stages of developing V-Go Link, which we intend to feature one-way communication to glucose meters and smart devices such as phones and tablets through RF/Bluetooth technology. We intend V-Go Link to provide real-time tracking information of basal and bolus dosing utilization, allowing patients and their healthcare professionals to have a deeper understanding of their current dosing habits. We believe access to this technology could increase patient adherence and could be used as a diagnostic tool to make treatment adjustments.

Our Strategy

Our long term goal is to significantly expand and further penetrate the type 2 diabetes market and become a leading provider of simple-to-use insulin delivery devices designed for basal-bolus insulin therapy.

In 2016, we made a significant adjustment in our commercialization strategy by shifting from aggressively expanding sales representative headcount to focusing on fewer high-volume insulin prescribers and on maximizing our sales and marketing infrastructure's frequency of interactions and contact points and methods with high-prescribing physicians. We estimate our current sales force structure can directly focus on approximately 1,000 prescribers. This restructuring reduced our monthly cash burn rate significantly and resulted in a business plan that is more capital efficient. Specifically, in February 2016, we reduced headcount and expenses and reduced the number of sales territories staffed by field sales professionals to 28 while at the same time increasing the level of resources in each of these prioritized markets to drive demand.

We have learned that, in the competitive type 2 diabetes market, those prescribers of diabetes products who had more contacts with our sales representatives and marketing programs, both directly and indirectly, remember and prescribe V-Go to more patients, and more appropriate patients, and we believe that, under our prior sales and marketing model, we had diluted our resources across too many sales territories. By focusing on fewer and prioritized markets, while increasing the contacts each healthcare professional has through supplemental inside sales team, an inside peer to peer clinical sales team and through other marketing resources, we can be more competitive in those markets.

96


Table of Contents

Our short-term business strategies include the following:

GRAPHIC

We intend to continue to focus the majority of our resources towards the prioritized markets through the use of sales professionals, inside sales, peer-to-peer programs, targeted direct-to-patient promotions, customer care and additional multi-channel promotional services. Some examples of multi-channel promotion include direct mail, search engine optimization, peer-to-peer email, and other forms of advertising. We intend to optimize our customer acquisition, conversion and retention programs by focusing all our resources. We believe this should allow us to significantly increase our promotional efforts on a per-territory basis, which will allow us to grow these markets. In addition, we plan to improve on and leverage our patient programs such as V-Go life, patient forums, enhanced starter kits and in-office material and promotion, such as context media to empower patients to ask for V-Go as an option for their diabetes treatment.

We intend to continue to drive V-Go sales growth by:

    Leveraging the clinical and economic data that has been published in the last year, including several recent manuscripts, with healthcare professionals and payors. We believe this new data will help more prescribers see the value and understand the benefits or V-Go across a wider spectrum of patients.

    Expanding third-party reimbursement for V-Go in the United States. We intend to expand patient coverage of V-Go by commercial insurance plans as a pharmacy benefit rather than a medical benefit. We believe that more than 70% of the approximate 158 million commercially insured lives in the United States and 60% of the approximate 43.5 million lives insured by Medicare Part D cover V-Go. In addition, TRICARE, a health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System, covers V-Go as a pharmacy benefit and some State Medicaid plans cover V-Go as a pharmacy or medical benefit. We also offer reimbursement support services to assist patients in gaining access to V-Go throughout the reimbursement process.

    Pursing our new business model. We intend to increase use and grow V-Go share by initially targeting approximately 20 to 30 doctors per sales representative and increasing to approximately 50 potential targets over time. We will either add new territories or split existing territories when adding new sales reps. We will expand our direct sales reach to approximately 300 additional prescribers so that we can provide the same higher level of inside sales and promotion as we

97


Table of Contents

      provide our current prioritized markets. We believe we can grow these markets more quickly than our territories have grown in the past, since they will have significantly more support with our new strategy.

Our long-term business strategies include the following.

    Continue to expand our U.S. sales force in a capital efficient and disciplined manner utilizing our new business model. In April 2017, we expanded our total field-based sales force to a total of 50 sales territories. We intend to eventually establish a national sales force, internally or through other means, such as contract sales organization, co-promotion or other strategic relationships to ensure we can reach all the very high volume prescribers or explore other means to increase the number of prescribers we can reach.

    Continue to explore international expansion. We intend to continue exploring international expansion through strategic collaborations, in-licensing arrangements or alliances outside the United States which not only would provide a revenue stream, but would also increase our production volume thereby improving our gross margins in the United States.

    Capture Improved Economics Through the Commercialization of V-Go Prefill. We are developing and intend to commercialize our V-Go Prefill product, if it is approved by the FDA, which we believe would offer patients an even more simplified user experience, thereby increasing our target market to include patients with type 2 diabetes not currently on insulin. In addition, we expect to have additional opportunities to generate revenue through the sale of insulin in connection with V-Go Prefill. We believe a prefilled option would also lay the foundation for using our proprietary h-Patch technology with other injectable therapies where patients could benefit from simple, convenient and continuous drug delivery.

    Advance our V-Go Link next generation technology, which will feature one-way communication to smart devices such as phones and tablets through RF/Bluetooth technology. V-Go Link will provide real-time tracking information of basal and bolus dosing utilization, allowing patients and their healthcare professionals to have a deeper understanding of their current dosing habits.

    Advance our Proprietary h-patch Drug Delivery Technologies into Other Therapeutic Areas. We have built a significant portfolio of proprietary technologies, designed to simply and effectively deliver injectable medicines to patients across a broad range of therapeutic areas. We intend to continue to advance these technologies, either by working with third parties to incorporate them into existing commercial products or by licensing the rights to them to third parties for further development and commercialization.

    Leverage Our Scalable Manufacturing Operations to Increase Gross Margin. We intend to leverage our scalable and flexible manufacturing infrastructure and related operational efficiencies to increase our gross margin by reducing our product costs. We believe the existing production lines of our contract manufacturer, or CMO, will have the ability to meet our current and expected near-term V-Go demand. Our CMO also has the ability to replicate additional production lines within its current facility footprint. In addition, we believe that due to shared product design features with V-Go, our production processes are readily adaptable to the manufacture of new products, including a prefilled V-Go.

Based on our current plan, we believe we can achieve operating cash flow breakeven during 2022, excluding the payment of secured debt, with senior debt maturing in 2022 (assuming the gross proceeds raised in this offering). We anticipate we will achieve 50% gross margins in the fourth quarter of 2018 and 70% gross margins at operating cash flow breakeven, and we believe we have a path to potentially reach 80% gross margin with additional sales volume. Our current plan also anticipates growing to

98


Table of Contents

approximately 75 sales representatives by 2019, and assumes each sales representative will produce approximately $1.2 million in revenue per year by 2022.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

Currently, our sales team covers 50 territories primarily within the East, South, and Midwest regions of the United States. We also have a team of inside sales representatives to take incoming calls from interested healthcare professionals as well as a targeted list of V-Go prescribers around the country. To date, we have focused our sales and marketing efforts in the regions where we have the greatest reimbursement coverage for patients. According to Symphony Health Solutions, there are approximately 16,000 high-volume insulin prescribers in the United States, generating 40% of all U.S. annual insulin prescriptions. Our sales representatives call on approximately 1,000 of these targeted, high-volume insulin prescribers, which include endocrinologists and primary care physicians. Our sales team has been supplemented by our V-Go Customer Care Center that provides support to customers and healthcare providers.

V-Go is distributed primarily through retail pharmacies and, to a lesser extent, medical supply companies. Similar to a pharmaceutical company, our overall distribution strategy focuses on making V-Go available at retail and mail-order pharmacies. We have adopted this strategy because patients with type 2 diabetes frequently visit their local retail pharmacies to fill other prescriptions prescribed for their other chronic conditions. We have distribution agreements with all of the national and many regional wholesalers, as well as with important medical supply companies. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the wholesale distributors McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation represented 38.3%, 24.6% and 28.0%, respectively, of our total product shipments. Our agreements with our distributors allow a patient whose insurance covers V-Go as either a pharmacy benefit or a medical benefit to be able to fill his or her V-Go prescription conveniently. Our agreements with each of Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation are each on a one-year continuous renewal basis unless otherwise terminated by either party. Our agreement with McKesson Corporation has an indefinite term unless otherwise terminated by either party.

A patient using V-Go requires two separate prescriptions, one for V-Go itself and one for fast-acting insulin, such as Humalog® or NovoLog®, in vials. As V-Go is only available by prescription, we believe that educating physicians and other healthcare providers regarding the benefits of V-Go is an important step in promoting its patient acceptance. In addition to calling on healthcare providers, our marketing initiatives include presentations and product demonstrations at local, regional and national tradeshows, including ADA Scientific Sessions and the American Association of Diabetes Educators Annual Meeting.

Reimbursement

In contrast to all other basal-bolus insulin delivery devices currently on the market in the United States, V-Go is not classified as a durable medical device, thereby allowing for potential Medicare reimbursement under Medicare Part D. As a result, a patient with Medicare, whose Medicare Part D Plan chooses to cover V-Go, can fill his or her V-Go prescription at a retail pharmacy that participates in the plan. Even for those Medicare patients whose Medicare Part D Plan elects not to cover V-Go on formulary, those patients may still get V-Go at the pharmacy if the patient's Medicare Part D Plan determines that other products currently on formulary are not medically appropriate upon the patient making an appeal to the patient's Medicare Part D Plan regarding V-Go coverage. In addition to the 60% of patients insured by Medicare Part D who have V-Go covered under their plans, a majority of commercially insured patients currently are covered for V-Go under their plans as either a pharmacy

99


Table of Contents

benefit or a medical benefit. For the year ended December 31, 2017, over 90% of our V-Go prescriptions were filled by retail or mail order pharmacies with the remainder filled by medical supply companies.

Manufacturing and Quality Assurance

We currently manufacture V-Go and EZ Fill in clean rooms at our CMO in Southern China in accordance with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP. Our CMO uses Valeritas-owned custom-designed, semi-automated manufacturing equipment and production lines to meet our quality requirements. Separate CMOs in Southern China perform release testing, sterilization, inspection and packaging functions.

V-Go is produced on flexible semi-automated production lines. In 2017, our CMO operated single-shifts in two manufacturing lines producing approximately 3.2 million V-Go units. Each line has the capacity to run two shifts per day. We have two additional lines outfitted at our CMO on standby — with a combined theoretical annual capacity of 7.9 million V-Go Units — that can be quickly brought on-line as demand increases. We believe these production lines will have the ability to meet our current and expected near-term V-Go demand in the U.S. as well as for any distributor outside of the U.S. We also believe our CMO has the ability to scale production even further by replicating these production lines within its current facility. We also believe that, due to shared product design features, our production processes are readily adaptable to new products, including a pre-fill V-Go.

V-Go is packaged with one EZ Fill accessory per 30 V-Go devices. Due to its lower-volume requirements, one manufacturing line is dedicated to EZ Fill production, with a second line on standby.

Both V-Go and its insulin filling accessory, EZ Fill, are assembled from components that are manufactured to our specifications. Each completed device is tested to ensure compliance with our engineering and quality assurance specifications. A series of automated inspection checks, including x-ray assessments and lot-released testing, are also conducted throughout the manufacturing process to verify proper assembly and functionality. When mechanical components are sourced from outside vendors, those vendors must meet our detailed qualification and process control requirements. We maintain a team of product and process engineers, supply chain and quality personnel who provide product and production line support for V-Go and EZ-Fill. We also employ a full-time employee based in China.

We have received ISO 13485 certification of our quality system from BSI Group, a Notified Body to the International Standards Organization, or ISO. This certification process requires satisfaction of design control requirements. The processes utilized in the manufacturing and testing of our devices have been verified and validated to the extent required by the FDA and other regulatory bodies. As a medical device manufacturer, our manufacturing facilities and the facilities of our sterilization and other critical suppliers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies. We believe that our manufacturing and quality systems are robust and ensure high product quality. To date, we have had no product recalls.

Some of the parts and components of V-Go and EZ Fill are purchased from sole-source vendors, and we manage any single-source components and suppliers through our global supply chain operation. We believe that, if necessary, alternative sources of supply would, in most cases, be available in a relatively short period of time and on commercially reasonable terms.

100


Table of Contents

Research, Development and Engineering

Our research, development and engineering staff has significant experience in developing insulin-delivery systems and are focused on the continuous improvement and support of current product, as well as our products in development. We have a staff of experienced engineers specializing in mechanical engineering, material science and fluid mechanics. Because we do not incorporate electronics or software into our devices, our development and engineering teams are able to focus on these other technical areas. We utilize design and analysis tools to accelerate design times and reduce development risk. Through frequent usability testing, we seek to ensure that our product not only functions properly, but also meets patient needs and desires with respect to an insulin-delivery device, while at the same time reducing our development and commercialization risks.

We spent $7.1 million on research, development and engineering activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Intellectual Property

From our inception, we have understood that the strength of our competitive position will depend substantially upon our ability to obtain and enforce intellectual property rights protecting our technology, and we have developed what we consider to be a strong intellectual property portfolio, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how. We continue to actively pursue a broad array of intellectual property protection in the United States, and in significant markets elsewhere in North America, as well as in Europe, Australia and Asia, including China. We believe our intellectual property portfolio effectively protects the products we currently market and we are actively building our intellectual property portfolio to protect our next-generation products, as well as additional drug delivery technologies for those products.

As more fully described below, our patents and patent applications are primarily directed to our h-Patch technology or aspects thereof including the commercialized V-Go, a hydraulically driven ambulatory insulin delivery device.

In addition to patent protection, we rely on materials and manufacturing trade secrets, and careful monitoring of our proprietary information to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection.

We plan to continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio by filing patent applications directed to novel drug delivery systems and methods of their use.

Patents

As of February 15, 2018, we owned 26 U.S. and 80 international issued or allowed patents and 9 U.S. and 49 international patents pending directed to various features of our commercial V-Go device and our proprietary h-Patch drug delivery technology. These patents are directed to the hydraulic drive for a basal-bolus delivery device as well as many of the other features of the h-Patch technology.

The following is a summary of our current and pending patents:

    U.S. Patent Nos. 7,530,968, 8,070,726, 9,072,828, 9,125,983, and 9,511,187 are directed to the hydraulically driven pump system having basal and bolus fluid delivery. These patents are expected to expire in 2024. Foreign counterparts to these patents have been granted in Australia, Canada and Japan. We have applications pending in Australia, Japan and in Europe. One U.S. continuation application is pending.

101


Table of Contents

    U.S. Patent Nos. 6,939,324, 7,481,792, 8,858,511, 8,992,478 and 9,636,451 are directed to the Floating Needle and bolus button configuration. These patents are expected to expire in 2022. Four Canadian counterparts to these patents have been granted and the European counterpart has been granted and validated in Germany, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Two patent applications are pending in Europe. One U.S. continuation application is pending.

    U.S. Patent 9,101,706 is directed to an ambulatory fluid delivery device in which transitioning the needle from the storage position to the armed position transitions the piston from the locked position to the released position and thermally coupling the hydraulic chamber to the patient. This patent is expected to expire in 2031. The Australian, Canadian, Chinese, Japanese, Hong Kong, Israel and Singapore counterparts to this patent application have been granted. Patent applications are pending in Australia, Canada, China, Europe, India, Japan and Korea. One U.S. continuation application is pending.

    U.S. Patent Nos. 8,667,996, 9,376,224 and 9,833,383 are directed to the closed looped filling configuration of the EZ Fill device. These patents are expected to expire in October 2032. The Canadian, Chinese, Japanese and Korean counterparts to this patent have been granted and the European counterpart has been granted and validated in Germany, Spain, France, the United Kingdom and Italy. Patent applications are pending in Europe, Hong Kong, India, and Japan. We have one application allowed in Japan.

    U.S. Design Patent Nos. D667946, D687948 and D706415 are directed to the ornamental appearance of the EZ Fill device and are expected to expire in September 2026, August 2027 and June 2028, respectively. A Chinese counterpart to these patents has been granted.

    U.S. Patent Nos. 8,740,847 and 9,795,735 are directed to a fluid delivery device having a pre-filled cartridge. These patents are expected to expire in March 2032. Australian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Singapore counterparts to these patents have been granted. Patent applications are pending in Australia, Canada, China, Europe, India and Japan, and an Israel application is allowed. One U.S. continuation application is pending.

    U.S. Patent Nos. 7,914,499, 8,361,053, 8,821,443, and 9,687,599 are directed to fluid delivery devices having two or more fluid delivery reservoirs covering both composition and methods. These patents expire in March 2027. Foreign counterparts to these patents have been granted in Australia, Canada, China, Europe (with validations in Germany, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy), Korea, Japan, Russia and Singapore. We also have counterpart patent applications pending in Australia, Europe, and India, and an Israel application is allowed. One U.S. continuation application is pending.

    We own 8 U.S. and 2 international issued patents for needle-free injection systems related to aspects of the Mini-Ject technology.

    We own 10 U.S. and 5 international issued patents and have 9 patents pending in the area of microneedle design, fabrication and drug delivery related to aspects of the Micro-Trans technology.

Trademarks

We believe we have protected our trademarks, including our trademark of V-Go and V-Go Link, through applications in all major markets worldwide as well as the United States. Our trademark portfolio consists of 16 registered trademarks, six of which are registered in the United States, including our V-Go logo. We also have nine trademark applications pending registration in several major markets outside the United States.

102


Table of Contents

Trade Secrets and Know-How

We rely, in some circumstances, on trade secrets and know-how to protect our proprietary manufacturing processes and materials critical to our product. We seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our trade secrets and know-how in part by limiting the employees and third parties who have access to certain information and requiring employees and third parties to execute confidentiality and invention assignment agreements, under which they are bound to assign to us inventions made during the term of their employment. These agreements further require employees to represent that they have no existing obligations and hold no interest that conflicts with any of their obligations under their agreements with us. We also generally require consultants, independent contractors and other third parties to sign agreements providing that any inventions that relate to our business are owned by us, and prohibiting them from disclosing or using our proprietary information except as may be authorized by us.

Competition

The medical technology and biopharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. Competition in the diabetes market is particularly intense, due largely to the fact that products designed to treat diabetes currently compete with both traditional and new products. We compete with these products based on efficacy, price, reimbursement, ease of use and healthcare provider education.

Within the diabetes market, V-Go is cleared by the FDA for adult patients who require insulin, with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, although we position V-Go to compete primarily in the market for adult patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin, particularly as part of a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Our primary competitors in the basal-bolus insulin therapy market are manufacturers of insulin and insulin pens, such as Novo Nordisk, Sanofi S.A. and Eli Lilly and Company.

In addition to basal-bolus insulin therapy, glucagon-like peptide-1, or GLP-1, analog injection products are another potential competitor to V-Go. GLP-1 analog injection products are used in combination with OADs or basal insulin injection. Some physicians, when faced with a patient who is unable to reach or maintain glucose levels at his or her goal with OADs, will add a GLP-1 through twice-daily, once-daily or once-weekly injections. As a result, we also compete with pharmaceutical manufacturers of GLP-1 analog injection products, such as AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk and GlaxoSmithKline plc. In addition, we may compete with inhaled insulin products for bolus therapy, which have been recently introduced to the market.

There is another mechanical bolus only insulin delivery device that has been approved by the FDA, ONETOUCH ViaTM. We do not consider this a direct competitor of V-Go, because this product only provides insulin at meal times and does not provide a continuous flow of insulin. Therefore, patients would still be required to take separate basal insulin injection or injections every day. This product has not yet been commercially launched in the U.S. and it is uncertain if and when it will be launched.

In the area of basal-bolus device competition, we do not consider programmable insulin pumps to be products that compete directly with V-Go, as those products, although cleared for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, have been primarily designed and marketed for patients with type 1 diabetes. We believe that the simple and discreet design and interface of V-Go more directly addresses the needs of patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes, for example, are often taking many drugs for multiple diseases, including medications to treat high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol, and, as a result, they desire a simple to use and discreet method to deliver their insulin. We are not aware of any other single-use disposable, mechanical (which means the device does not include any

103


Table of Contents

electronics, batteries or audible alarms and does not require any recharging or programming), basal-bolus insulin delivery devices currently marketed or in development at this time.

Government Regulation

V-Go, our first commercialized product, received 510(k) clearance by the FDA in December 2010. Our product and our operations are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other federal and state authorities in the United States, as well as comparable authorities in foreign jurisdictions. Our product is subject to regulation as a medical device in the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and related regulations enforced by the FDA. The FDA regulates, among other things, the development, design, non-clinical and clinical research, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, packaging, storage, installation, servicing, recordkeeping, premarket clearance or approval, import, export, adverse event reporting, advertising, promotion, marketing and distribution of medical devices to ensure that medical devices distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses and otherwise meet the requirements of the FDCA.

FDA Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements

Unless an exemption applies, each medical device commercially distributed in the United States requires either FDA clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification submission, granting of a de novo classification request, or approval of a premarket approval application, or PMA. Under the FDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes-Class I, Class II or Class III- depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device. Class I includes devices with the lowest risk to the patient and are subject to the FDA's general controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the Quality System Regulation, or QSR, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Class II devices are moderate risk devices and are subject to the FDA's general controls, and special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. These special controls can include performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries and FDA guidance documents. Devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risks, such as life sustaining, life supporting, and some implantable devices, are placed in Class III. In addition, novel devices that have not been previously classified by FDA are considered Class III by default.

While most Class I devices are exempt from FDA premarket review, manufacturers of most Class II devices are required to submit to the FDA a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FDCA requesting permission to commercially distribute the device. The FDA's permission to commercially distribute a device subject to a 510(k) premarket notification is generally known as 510(k) clearance. Devices that have been formally classified by FDA as Class III require approval of a PMA, which is the most burdensome type of medical device premarket submission. For a device that is Class III by default (because it is a novel device that was not previously classified and has no predicate), the device manufacturer may request that FDA reclassify the device to Class II or Class I via a de novo request.

Our currently marketed products are Class II devices subject to 510(k) clearance.

510(k) Marketing Clearance

To obtain 510(k) clearance, a premarket notification submission must be submitted to the FDA demonstrating that the proposed device is "substantially equivalent" to a predicate device. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval, i.e., a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device) and for which a PMA is not required, a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I (e.g., via the de novo classification process), or a device that was previously cleared through the 510(k) process. The FDA's 510(k) review

104


Table of Contents

process usually takes from three to six months, but may take longer. The FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.

If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device, it will grant 510(k) clearance to market the device.

After a device receives 510(k) marketing clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change or modification in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) marketing clearance or, depending on the modification, a de novo request or PMA approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a 510(k), de novo or a PMA in the first instance, but the FDA can review that decision and disagree with a manufacturer's determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer's determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or request the recall of the modified device until FDA has cleared or approved a 510(k), de novo or PMA for the change. Also, in these circumstances, we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties. We have made and plan to continue to make additional product enhancements to our 510(k)-cleared products. We cannot be assured that the FDA would agree with any of our decisions to not submit 510(k) premarket notifications or other premarket submissions for these modified devices.

V-Go is one of the first insulin delivery devices to be cleared under the FDA's Infusion Pump Improvement Initiative, which established additional device manufacturing requirements designed to foster the development of safer, more effective infusion pumps. The FDA launched this initiative in 2010 to support the benefits of external infusion pumps while minimizing the risks associated with these devices. As part of the initiative, FDA issued guidance requesting the inclusion of additional information in premarket submissions for infusion pumps beyond what has traditionally been provided, including detailed engineering information, a comprehensive discussion of steps taken to mitigate risks and additional design validation testing specific to the environment in which the device is intended to be used.

De Novo Pathway

A novel device that is Class III by default may be eligible for down-classification to Class II or Class I via a de novo request. This pathway also is available for devices or device modifications (e.g., new intended use or significant changes in technology) that FDA determines are not substantially equivalent due to the lack of a predicate device. For a de novo request, the manufacturer must demonstrate that the safety and effectiveness of the device can be assured by general controls (for Class I) or general and special controls (for Class II). Although FDA's user fee goal for the review of a de novo is 150 days, the actual review time for de novo requests varies significantly and can be up to a year or longer. Once a de novo has been granted for a particular device type, follow on devices may be cleared through the 510(k) process.

PMA Approval Pathway

Class III devices require PMA approval before they can be marketed. The PMA process is more demanding than the 510(k) process. In a PMA the manufacturer must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective, and the PMA must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and human clinical trials. The PMA must also contain, among other things, a full description of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities and controls used for manufacturing, and proposed labeling. Following receipt of a PMA, the FDA determines whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If FDA accepts the application for review, it has 180 days under the FDCA to complete its review of the PMA, although in practice, the FDA's review often takes significantly longer, and can take up to several years. An advisory panel of

105


Table of Contents

experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The FDA may or may not accept the panel's recommendation. In addition, the FDA will generally conduct a pre-approval inspection of the applicant or its third-party manufacturers' or suppliers' manufacturing facility or facilities to ensure compliance with the QSR. The FDA will approve the new device for commercial distribution if it determines that the data and information in the PMA constitute valid scientific evidence and that there is reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended use(s). The FDA may approve a PMA with post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution, and collection of long-term follow-up data from patients in the clinical trial that supported PMA approval or requirements to conduct additional clinical trials post-approval. The FDA may condition PMA approval on some form of post-market surveillance when deemed necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and efficacy data for the device in a larger population or for a longer period of use. In such cases, the manufacturer might be required to follow certain patient groups for a number of years and to make periodic reports to the FDA on the clinical status of those patients. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval can result in material adverse enforcement action, including withdrawal of the approval.

Certain changes to an approved device, such as changes in manufacturing facilities, methods, or quality control procedures, or changes in the design performance specifications, that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, require submission of a PMA supplement. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel. Certain other changes to an approved device require the submission of a new PMA, such as when the design change causes a different intended use, mode of operation, and technical basis of operation, or when the design change is so significant that a new generation of the device will be developed, and the data that were submitted with the original PMA are not applicable for the change in demonstrating a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Our product is not currently subject to PMA requirements. However, we may in the future develop devices that will require the submission of a PMA.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are almost always required to support a PMA and are sometimes required to support a de novo or 510(k) submission. All clinical investigations of devices to determine safety and effectiveness must be conducted in accordance with the FDA's investigational device exemption, or IDE, regulations which govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify an array of recordkeeping, informed consent, reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. If the device presents a "significant risk," to human health, as defined by the FDA, the FDA requires the device sponsor to submit an IDE application to the FDA, which must be approved prior to commencing human clinical trials. A significant risk device is one that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety or welfare of a patient and either is implanted, used in supporting or sustaining human life, substantially important in diagnosing, curing, mitigating or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health, or otherwise presents a potential for serious risk to a subject. An IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory test results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. The IDE will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless the FDA notifies us that the investigation may not begin. If the FDA determines that there are deficiencies or other concerns with an IDE for which it requires modification, the FDA may permit a clinical trial to proceed under a conditional approval.

106


Table of Contents

In addition, the clinical trial must be approved by, and conducted under the oversight of, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, for each clinical site. The IRB is responsible for the initial and continuing review of the trial, and may pose additional requirements for the conduct of the trial. If an IDE application is approved by the FDA and one or more IRBs, human clinical trials may begin at a specific number of investigational sites with a specific number of patients, as approved by the FDA. If the device presents a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for the trial by one or more IRBs without separate approval from the FDA, but must still certain IDE requirements, such as monitoring the investigation, ensuring that the investigators obtain informed consent, and labeling and record-keeping requirements. An IDE supplement must be submitted to, and approved by, the FDA before a sponsor or investigator may make a change to the investigational plan.

During a clinical trial, the sponsor is required to comply with applicable FDA requirements, and the clinical investigators are also subject to FDA's regulations. Both must comply with good clinical practice requirements, or GCPs, which among other things requires that informed consent be obtained from each research subject, that the investigational plan and study protocol be followed, that the disposition of the investigational device be controlled, and that reporting and recordkeeping requirements are followed. Additionally, after a trial begins, we, the FDA or the IRB could suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to study subjects outweigh the anticipated benefits. Even if a clinical trial is completed, there can be no assurance that the data generated during a clinical trial will meet the safety and effectiveness endpoints or otherwise produce results that will lead the FDA to grant marketing clearance or approval.

Post-Market Regulation

After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous and pervasive regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:

    establishment registration and device listing with the FDA;

    Quality System Regulation, or QSR, requirements, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the design and manufacturing process;

    labeling regulations and requirements related to promotional activities, including FDA prohibitions against the promotion of investigational products, or "off-label" uses of cleared or approved products;

    clearance or approval of product modifications to 510(k)-cleared devices that could significantly affect safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices;

    medical device reporting requirements, which require that a manufacturer report to the FDA if a device it markets may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned and the device or a similar device that it markets would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if the malfunction were to recur;

    correction, removal and recall reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health;

    the FDA's mandatory recall authority, whereby the agency can order device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations; and

107


Table of Contents

    post-market surveillance activities and regulations, which apply when deemed by the FDA to be necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device.

Our manufacturing processes are required to comply with the applicable portions of the QSR, which cover the methods and the facilities and controls for the design, manufacture, testing, production, processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, distribution, installation and servicing of finished devices intended for human use. The QSR also requires, among other things, maintenance of a device master file, device history file, and complaint files. As a manufacturer, we and our third-party manufacturers are subject to periodic scheduled or unscheduled inspections by the FDA. Our failure to maintain compliance with the QSR requirements could result in the shut-down of, or restrictions on, our manufacturing operations and the recall or seizure of our product. The discovery of previously unknown problems with our product, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of increasing severity or frequency, whether resulting from the use of the device within the scope of its clearance or off-label by a physician in the practice of medicine, could result in restrictions on the device, including the removal of the product from the market or voluntary or mandatory device recalls. The FDA has broad enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:

    warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

    recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our product;

    operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

    refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;

    withdrawing 510(k) clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted;

    refusal to grant export approvals for our product; or

    criminal prosecution.

U.S. Anti-Kickback, False Claims and Other Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Laws

We are also subject to healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and the states and foreign governments and authorities in the locations in which we conduct our business. These other agencies include, without limitation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, other divisions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice and individual U.S. Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, as well as state and local governments. Such agencies enforce a variety of laws which include, without limitation, state and federal anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, data privacy and security, and physician sunshine laws and regulations.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any good, facility, item or service reimbursable, in whole or part by Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term "remuneration" has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including cash, improper discounts, and free or reduced price items and services. Among other things, the Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other. Although there are a number of statutory

108


Table of Contents

exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all of its facts and circumstances. Several courts have interpreted the statute's intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, the Anti-Kickback Statute has been violated. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, collectively the Affordable Care Act, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate, in order to have committed a violation.

The federal civil False Claims Act prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to or approval by the federal government or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. A claim includes "any request or demand" for money or property presented to the U.S. government. In addition, the Affordable Care Act codified case law that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. Several pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under the federal civil False Claims Act for, among other things, allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies' marketing of products for unapproved, and thus non-covered, uses. In addition, the federal civil monetary penalties statute imposes penalties against any person or entity that, among other things, is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.

The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to its amendment of the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Affordable Care Act also broadened the reach of certain criminal healthcare fraud statutes created under HIPAA by amending the intent requirement such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.

Also, many states have similar fraud and abuse statutes or regulations that may be broader in scope and may apply regardless of payor, in addition to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs.

There has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians and other healthcare providers. The Affordable Care Act imposed, among other things, new annual reporting requirements for covered manufacturers for certain payments and "transfers of value" provided to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Failure to submit timely, accurately and completely the required information for all payments, transfers of value and ownership or investment interests may

109


Table of Contents

result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year and up to an aggregate of $1 million per year for "knowing failures." Covered manufacturers were required to report detailed payment data for the first reporting period (August 1, 2013-December 31, 2013) under this law and submit legal attestation to the completeness and accuracy of such data by June 30, 2014. Thereafter, covered manufacturers must submit reports by the 90th day of each subsequent calendar year. In addition, certain states require implementation of commercial compliance programs and compliance with the pharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, impose restrictions on marketing practices, and/or tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration or items of value provided to physicians and other healthcare professionals and entities.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the health regulatory laws described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including potentially significant criminal, civil and/or administrative penalties, damages, fines, individual imprisonment, disgorgement, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

Healthcare Reform

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry is cost containment. The federal government and state legislatures have attempted to control healthcare costs in part by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular drug products, including implementing price controls, restrictions on coverage and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. By way of example, the Affordable Care Act contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products.

In January 2017, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate passed legislation, which, if signed into law by the new administration, would repeal certain aspects of the ACA. Further, on January 20, 2017, the new administration signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the ACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the ACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Congress also could consider subsequent legislation to replace elements of the ACA that are repealed.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. On August 2, 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend to Congress proposals in spending reductions. The Joint Select Committee did not recommend and Congress did not enact legislation to reduce the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, triggering the legislation's automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will remain in effect through 2027 unless additional Congressional action is taken. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product or additional pricing pressures.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Sales of our product depend, in significant part, on the extent to which our product is covered and reimbursed by third-party payors, such as government healthcare programs, including, without limitation, Medicare Part D plans, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. Patients who use V-Go generally rely on these third-party payors to pay for all or part of the costs of

110


Table of Contents

our product. The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices of drug products have been a focus in this effort. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for drug products and medical services, examining the medical necessity, reviewing the cost effectiveness, and questioning the safety and efficacy of such products and services. If these third-party payors do not consider our product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover our product or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our product at a profit. In addition, the U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have continued implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit our net revenue and results.

Currently, a number of third-party payors have coverage policies that permit coverage for V-Go, either under the pharmacy or medical benefit. For example, a majority of Medicare Part D plans make coverage for our product available under the outpatient prescription drug benefit. A number of private payors and Medicaid programs also permit coverage for V-Go under the pharmacy benefit. The process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a drug product typically is separate from the process for establishing the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors, including, without limitation, Medicare Part D plans, may limit coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. Continued placement on formularies is therefore critical for reimbursement. A decision by a third-party payor not to cover our product could reduce physician utilization of our product. Moreover, a third-party payor's decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development, sales and marketing. Additionally, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly from payor to payor. One third-party payor's decision to cover a particular drug product or service does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the medical product or service, or will provide coverage at an adequate reimbursement rate. As a result, the coverage determination process will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our product to each payor separately and will continue to be a time-consuming process.

V-Go currently is not covered under Medicare Part B because V-Go is a disposable insulin dispensing device, which is not a recognized Part B benefit. In addition, some private third-party payors have determined that there is insufficient data for coverage and concluded that V-Go is investigational or experimental. Those payors may determine at a future date that our product, including V-Go, will be covered and because coverage and reimbursement varies significantly from payor to payor, the process to obtain favorable recognition is time-consuming.

We currently have contracts establishing reimbursement for V-Go with national and regional third-party payors in the United States. While we anticipate entering into additional contracts with third-party payors, we cannot guarantee that we will succeed in doing so or that the reimbursement contracts we are able to negotiate will enable us to sell our product on a profitable basis. In addition, contracts with third-party payors generally can be modified or terminated by the third-party payor without cause and with little or no notice to us. Moreover, compliance with the administrative procedures or requirements of third-party payors may result in delays in processing approvals by those third-party payors for customers to obtain coverage for V-Go. Failure to secure or retain adequate coverage or reimbursement for V-Go by third-party payors, or delays in processing approvals by those payors, could

111


Table of Contents

result in the loss of sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Employees

As of June 30, 2018, we had 115 full-time employees including 22 in our manufacturing, quality, compliance and research organization, 83 in our commercial organization and 10 in general and administrative functions.

Properties

Our corporate headquarters are located in Bridgewater, New Jersey, where we currently lease approximately 7,146 square feet of office space under a lease that expires on June 30, 2023. We also occupy space in an office building in Marlborough, Massachusetts, where we currently lease approximately 15,171 square feet of space for offices, lab and pilot facilities and process and engineering under a lease that expires on February 15, 2024.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings; but from time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.

Available Information

We make available on our website (http://www.valeritas.com), or through a link posted on our website, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, reports filed pursuant to Section 16 and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site that contains these reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov).

We also make available on our website, in a printable format, the charters for our Board of Directors committees, including the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in addition to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Bylaws, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy, Related Party Transactions Policy and Compensation Recovery Policy. Our website is not incorporated into or a part of this prospectus.

112


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

Below are the names of and certain information regarding our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus:

  Name   Age   Position
 

John E. Timberlake

  54  

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

 

Erick J. Lucera

  50  

Chief Financial Officer

 

Mark Conley

  57  

Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer

 

Geoffrey Jenkins

  67  

Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Operations and Research & Development

 

Matthew Nguyen

  48  

Chief Commercial Officer

 

Joseph Saldanha

  53  

Chief Business Officer

 

Joe Mandato, D.M. 

  74  

Director

 

Luke Düster

  43  

Director

 

Katherine D. Crothall, Ph.D. 

  69  

Director

 

Rodney Altman, M.D. 

  55  

Director

 

Peter Devlin

  50  

Director, Chair

 

Brian K. Roberts

  47  

Director

Executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at its pleasure.

The principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years for our executive officers and directors is as follows:

John E. Timberlake has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of our Board of Directors since February 2016, prior to which he served as President and Chief Commercial Officer since August 2008. Before becoming Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Commercial Officer, Mr. Timberlake was a General Manager with our company from September 2006 to August 2008. Prior to joining Valeritas, Mr. Timberlake held positions of increasing responsibility from 1991 to 2006 at Sanofi-Aventis (now Sanofi), with his last role as Vice President of Diabetes Marketing, where he was responsible for the diabetes franchise, including the brands Lantus, Apidra and Amaryl. Prior to Sanofi, Mr. Timberlake was a manager with Deloitte & Touche LLP, from 1986 to 1991, and was both a Certified Management Accountant and a Certified Public Accountant. He earned a B.S. in Accounting at Northwest Missouri State University, an M.S. in Management from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from NEOMA Business School (f/k/a E.S.C. Rouen) in France. Mr. Timberlake is qualified to serve as a director because of his role with us, and his extensive operational knowledge of, and executive level management experience in, the biopharmaceutical and medical technology industries.

Erick J. Lucera has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2016. Since August 2017 Mr. Lucera has served as a member of the board of directors as chairman of the audit committee of AIT Therapeutics. From April 2015 to August 2016, Mr. Lucera served as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Viventia Bio Inc., a late-stage oncology company. From December 2012 to April 2015, he served as Vice President, Corporate Development at Aratana Therapeutics, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on companion animals. He served as Vice President, Corporate Development at Sunshine Heart, Inc. a medical device company from March 2012 to December 2012. Mr. Lucera served as Vice President, Healthcare Analyst at Eaton Vance Management, a global asset manager, from February 2008 to November 2011. Mr. Lucera also held various positions at Intrepid Capital Partners, Independence Investment Associates, LLC and Price Waterhouse & Co. from 1990 to 2008. Mr. Lucera earned a C.P.H. from Harvard University in 2001, an

113


Table of Contents

M.S.F. from Boston College in 1999, an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1995 and a Bachelor's Degree in Accounting from The University of Delaware in 1990. Mr. Lucera currently holds a CFA designation. Mr. Lucera previously held CMA and CPA designations, both of which are expired.

Mark Conley has served as our Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer since February 2016, prior to which he served as our Director of Financial Planning & Analysis since joining Valeritas in August 2012. Mr. Conley was Global Finance Director of the radiation instrumentation business at Thermo Fisher Scientific from 2007 to 2012. In addition, he served at Iron Mountain, Inc. as Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis from 2005 to June 2007 and Division Controller from 1998 to 2004, as Chief Financial Officer and Controller at HoltraChem Group from 1996 to 1998 and in successive financial leadership roles including Operations Controller at Haemonetics Corporation from 1991 to 1996. Mr. Conley earned a B.S. in Accounting from Oklahoma State University, an M.B.A. from Bryant College, and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Geoffrey Jenkins has served as our Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Operations and Research & Development since he joined Valeritas in April 2009. Mr. Jenkins was Vice President of Worldwide Operations for Inverness Medical, a healthcare technology company, from 2005 to 2009. From 2000 to 2005, he was President and Founding Partner of UV-Solutions, LLC, a healthcare technology company, and from 1997 to 1999 he was Chief Operating Officer of MDI Instruments, Inc., a healthcare technology company. Mr. Jenkins was also Corporate Vice President of Operations of MediSense, Inc. from 1991 to 1997. Prior to becoming Corporate Vice President of Operations, he held various other positions in Operations and Engineering Management with MediSense from 1984 to 1991. Mr. Jenkins earned a B.A. and a B.S. from Clarkson University.

Matthew Nguyen has served as our Chief Commercial Officer since December 2016. Mr. Nguyen served as our Sr. Vice President, Commercial from February 2016 to December 2016 and as our Vice President for Integrated Healthcare Management since joining Valeritas in September 2006. Mr. Nguyen was a New Business Development Director for Janssen, LP, a division of Johnson & Johnson, from 2005 to 2006. He served as head of health economics research for metabolism, new product marketing, and head of analytics and commercial effectiveness for the CNS business unit at Sanofi from 2000 to 2005. Mr. Nguyen earned a B.S. in Pharmacy and a Doctor of Pharmacy from the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science. He also completed a Fellowship in Health Economics and Outcomes Research in conjunction with Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. and earned an M.B.A. from Rutgers University in New Jersey.

Joseph Saldanha has served as our Chief Business Officer since January 2018. From April 2016 to July 2017, Mr. Saldanha served as Vice President, Marketing and Business Development of MannKind Corporation. From January 2012 to May 2015, Mr. Saldanha was the General Manager, JULPHAR Diabetes for Gulf Pharmaceutical Industries. Mr. Saldanha has also worked on the Aventis-Pfizer partnership for Exubera and for Sanofi and its predecessors from 2001 to 2008, launching Actonel for osteoporosis in the U.S., and for Lantus in international markets from Paris. Prior to that, from 2008 to 2010, Mr. Saldanha worked in business development at Johnson and Johnson Diabetes, where he helped bring both LifeScan for self-monitoring blood glucose and Animas for insulin pumps to the market. Mr. Saldanha also worked in the United Arab Emirates in a general management role with responsibility for insulin API, diabetes orals and injectables, and distribution of Dexcom CGM for the Middle-Eastern markets from 2012 to 2015. Mr. Saldanha earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Drexel University and a Master of Science degree from the University of Pennsylvania, both in Philadelphia.

Joe Mandato, D.M. has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2016. Since March 2003, Dr. Mandato has served as a managing director of DeNovo Ventures, a venture capital firm focused on life sciences. Prior to DeNovo Ventures, Dr. Mandato held top leadership positions at

114


Table of Contents

Ioptex, Confer Software, Gynecare and Origin Medsystems. Dr. Mandato also served as a member of the Board of Directors of AxoGen Corporation from February 2006 until its merger with and into AxoGen, Inc. in September 2011, and then served on the Board of AxoGen, Inc. until September 2016. Dr. Mandato served as a member of the Board of Directors of Hansen Medical, Inc. from August 2006 until February 2012. Dr. Mandato received a doctorate in management from Case Western Reserve University, and now serves on its Board of Trustees. Dr. Mandato also holds the Carlo Rossi Chair in Entrepreneurship and Management at the University of San Francisco, is a Lecturer at Stanford University and has served as a Fellow in the Harvard University Advanced Leadership Initiative. Additionally, Dr. Mandato currently serves on the boards of both the Embrace Global and Save the Children organizations. Dr. Mandato is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive work in the healthcare industry and his venture capital experience.

Luke Düster has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2016. Since 2009, Mr. Düster served as managing director at Capital Royalty Group, a healthcare-focused investment firm. Mr. Düster was at Harris Williams & Co., an investment firm, from 2004 to 2009, where he served as Vice President. Mr. Düster also held investment banking roles at the Wallach Company, a regional investment banking boutique, from 2000 to 2002, and at the Nord Companies, a healthcare advisory firm, from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Düster received his B.S. summa cum laude from the University of Colorado at Boulder and an M.B.A. with honors from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Düster is qualified to serve as a director because of his significant experience working with companies backed by private equity investors, particularly in the healthcare industry, as well as his experience with healthcare investing.

Katherine D. Crothall, Ph.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2016. Since 2010, Dr. Crothall has served as President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Aspire Bariatrics, a company committed to providing safe and effective treatments for obesity to patients worldwide. Dr. Crothall was a Principal at Liberty Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, from 2006 until November 2010. Dr. Crothall was Founder, President and CEO of Animas Corporation, a manufacturer of insulin infusion pumps, from its inception to its acquisition by Johnson & Johnson Corporation in 2006. Dr. Crothall was also the Founder, President and CEO of two other medical device companies, Luxar Corporation, which was sold to ESC Medical, and Laakmann Electro-Optics, which was sold to Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Crothall continued running Laakmann Electro-Optics for five years post-acquisition. Dr. Crothall received her B.S. from the University of Pennsylvania and her Ph.D. from the University of Southern California, both in Electrical Engineering. She holds over twenty patents and is the recipient of the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award and the Greater Philadelphia Raymond Rafferty Entrepreneurial Excellence Award. Dr. Crothall is a director of Adhezion BioMedical and Xanitos, Inc. She also sits on the Board of Overseers of the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Crothall is qualified to serve as a director because of her extensive clinical and business experience, specifically in the healthcare industry.

Rodney Altman, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2016. Since June 2016, Dr. Altman has been a member of the board of directors of Milestone Pharmaceuticals and Thrasos Pharmaceuticals in his capacity as an advisor to Business Development Bank of Canada. Since 2011, he has been an Advisor and beginning in March 2016 he has been a Managing Director at Spindletop Capital, a private equity and venture capital firm. Prior to joining Spindletop Capital, he was Regional Medical Director at TeamHealth, an American hospital staffing firm. Dr. Altman was a senior partner at a venture capital firm, CMEA Capital, LLC, from 2006 to 2011, where he built and managed the firm's medical device practice. Dr. Altman has also held investing roles at other venture funds including Aphelion Capital, LLC, Piper Jaffray Ventures, and TVM Techno Venture Management. Dr. Altman received his medical degree from McGill University and an M.B.A. with

115


Table of Contents

honors from the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business. Dr. Altman is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive clinical and venture capital experience.

Peter Devlin has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2016. Since September 2014, Mr. Devlin has served as a consultant for various life sciences and investment companies. From August 2009 to September 2014, Mr. Devlin was the Chief Commercial Officer at Insulet Corporation, a tubeless insulin pump technology company. Mr. Devlin held several leadership roles at Abbott Laboratories, Inc. From February 2008 to July 2009, he served as Divisional Vice President of Abbott's Global Strategic Marketing in the diabetes care unit, prior to which he served as General Manager, Hospital & Government in the diabetes care unit from December 2006 to February 2008, and prior to which he served as Director of Abbott's Canadian diabetes unit from September 2003 to December 2006. Mr. Devlin received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Massachusetts. Mr. Devlin is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive business experience in the field of diabetes.

Brian K. Roberts has served as a member of our board of directors and as chairman of the audit committee since July 2016. Mr. Roberts currently serves as chief financial officer of Tarveda Therapeutics and serves as a member of the board of directors and audit chairman of ViewRay. Most recently he served as the chief operating and financial officer of Avedro, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company leading the organization through FDA approval, manufacturing readiness and commercial launch of its lead combination drug and medical device product. Prior to Avedro, he served as CFO for Insulet Corporation, a tubeless insulin pump technology company. Under his supervision, Insulet grew from approximately $30 million to nearly $300 million in revenue, achieved operating profitability and increased its market capitalization to over $2 billion. Previously, Mr. Roberts served as CFO for Jingle Networks, a leader in mobile voice-ad services that was acquired by Marchex, and as CFO for Digitas, which was sold for $1.3 billion to Publicis Groupe. He holds a Bachelor of Science in accounting and finance from Boston College, is a certified public accountant, and served as an auditor with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Roberts is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive business experience and financial and accounting insight.

Board Composition

Our business and affairs are organized under the direction of our board of directors, which currently consists of 7 members. The primary responsibility of our board of directors is to provide oversight, strategic guidance, counseling, and direction to our management team. Our board of directors meets on a regular basis and additionally as required. One of our directors was elected to serve on our board of directors pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and among Valeritas and certain of Valeritas' stockholders. Pursuant to the voting agreement, Mr. Düster was selected to serve on our board of directors as designated by Capital Royalty Partners II L.P. or its affiliates.

A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the board of directors for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. However, any action required or permitted to be taken by the board of directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the board of directors individually or collectively consent in writing to the action.

Director Independence

Under the listing requirements and rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq, independent directors must compose a majority of a listed company's board of directors within a one-year period following the completion of its initial public offering. In addition, applicable Nasdaq rules require that,

116


Table of Contents

subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company's audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees must be independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq rules. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Our board of directors undertook a review of the independence of each director and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director and the association of our directors with the holders of more than 5% of our common stock.

As a result of this review, our board of directors determined that all of our directors, other than Mr. Timberlake and Mr. Düster qualify as "independent" directors within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules. Nasdaq rules require that a majority of the board of directors and each member of our audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. We believe we are compliant with these independence requirements. As required under applicable Nasdaq rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee: accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries. Each of Brian K. Roberts, Dr. Rodney D. Altman and Peter J. Devlin qualify as an independent director pursuant to Rule 10A-3.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. The board of directors does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the board of directors as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our board of directors that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, and our audit committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. In December 2016, we established a nominating and corporate governance committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance practices, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire board is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

117


Table of Contents

Classified Board of Directors

In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered, three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

    the Class I directors are Brian K. Roberts, Joe Mandato, D.M. and Katherine Crothall, Ph.D., and their terms will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held during the year 2020;

    the Class II directors are Peter Devlin and Rodney Altman, M.D., and their terms will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held during the year 2021; and

    the Class III directors are Luke Düster and John E. Timberlake, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held during the year 2019.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors. The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control of our company. Our directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding voting stock entitled to vote in the election of directors.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

    any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

    any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

    being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

    being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Audit Committee

The members of our audit committee are Brian K. Roberts, Dr. Rodney D. Altman and Peter J. Devlin and Mr. Roberts serves as the chair. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of our audit committee satisfies Nasdaq and SEC independence requirements and that Mr. Roberts qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations. In making this determination, our board has considered the formal education and nature and scope of his previous experience. Our audit committee met seven times during the year ended December 31, 2017.

118


Table of Contents

Among other matters, the audit committee is responsible for:

    appointing our independent registered public accounting firm;

    evaluating our independent registered public accounting firm's qualifications, independence and performance;

    determining the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm;

    reviewing and approving the scope of the annual audit and the audit fee;

    discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the results of the annual audit and the review of our quarterly financial statements;

    approving the retention of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform any proposed permissible non-audit services;

    monitoring the rotation of partners of our independent registered public accounting firm on our engagement team as required by law;

    reviewing our financial statements and our management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations to be included in our annual and quarterly reports to be filed with the SEC;

    reviewing our critical accounting policies and estimates; and

    annually reviewing the audit committee charter and the committee's performance.

The audit committee operates pursuant to a charter adopted by our board of directors that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available under the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.valeritas.com. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or the listing standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at or available through our website, and you should not consider it to be a part of this filing.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

    any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

119


Table of Contents

    any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

    unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or

    any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we are obligated to advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his, her or its actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him, her or it under Delaware law.

In addition to the indemnification required in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors. These agreements provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers and certain other reasonable expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with any action or proceeding brought against them by reason of the fact that they are or were our agents. We believe that these provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. This description of the limitation of liability and indemnification provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, of our amended and restated bylaws and of our indemnification agreements is qualified in its entirety by reference to these documents, each of which is attached as an exhibit to this prospectus.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and our stockholders. A stockholder's investment may be harmed to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors, officers or employees as to which indemnification is being sought, nor are we aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director, officer or employee.

120


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

From our inception to the date of this prospectus, no compensation was paid to our sole named executive officer, Leisa Swanson, who served as our principal executive officer. On May 3, 2016, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization with Valeritas Acquisition Corp., and Valeritas, Inc., or the 2016 Merger, pursuant to which Valeritas Acquisition Corp. merged with and into Valeritas, Inc., with Valeritas, Inc. surviving the 2016 Merger as our wholly owned subsidiary. All salary payments earned by Ms. Swanson prior to the consummation of the 2016 Merger were waived and, as such, we have no liability for such payments subsequent to the 2016 Merger. Ms. Swanson resigned as our sole officer and director effective as of May 3, 2016 in connection with the 2016 Merger.

Our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers, which we refer to as our NEOs, for the year ended December 31, 2017 were:

    John E. Timberlake, Chief Executive Officer;

    Geoffrey Jenkins, Executive Vice President, Manufacturing Operations & R&D;

    Erick Lucera, Chief Financial Officer; and

    Matthew Nguyen, Chief Commercial Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. All amounts reflect compensation received from Valeritas. No figures referenced in this section have been adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio after consummation of the 2016 Merger.

 
Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary
($)
  Option
Awards(3)
($)
  Stock
Awards(3)
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(4)
($)
  All Other
Compensation(5)
($)
  Total
($)
 
 

John E. Timberlake(2)

    2017     414,577     1,335,000         174,900     5,400     1,929,877  
 

Chief Executive Officer and President

    2016     389,268     1,049,823     441,500     194,634     5,200     2,080,425  
 

Erick Lucera(6)

    2017     276,250     525,456         86,328     5,400     893,434  
 

Chief Financial Officer

    2016     85,000     368,430         29,750     1,200     484,380  
 

Geoffrey Jenkins(7)

    2017     242,287     961,200         90,858     28,846     1,323,191  
 

Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Operations and R&D

    2016     367,937     546,061     250,000     128,778     19,046     1,311,822  
 

Matthew Nguyen

    2017     302,269     580,280         85,013     5,400     972,962  
 

Chief Commercial Officer

    2016     281,976     315,373     130,000     102,639     48,200     878,188  
 

Former Executive Officer

                                           
 

Kristine Peterson(1)

    2017     277,315                     277,315  
 

    2016     491,090                 1,387     492,477  

(1)
Resigned as Chief Executive Officer on February 22, 2016. Received monthly salary through August 2017. No other compensation was paid during 2017.

121


Table of Contents

(2)
Appointed as Chief Executive Officer on February 22, 2016. Mr. Timberlake retained his title as President and Chief Commercial Officer until December 2016 when he was replaced by Mr. Nguyen as Chief Commercial Officer.

(3)
Represents the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options and restricted stock granted during the indicated year computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.

(4)
Represents amounts earned for the indicated year under our annual performance bonus program. For additional information, see "Annual Performance Bonuses" below.

(5)
Represents company matching contributions to 401(k) plan accounts and discretionary bonus payments.

(6)
Appointed as Chief Financial Officer on August 29, 2016.

(7)
Represents actual amounts paid. Base salary is presented on a FTE basis in the narrative disclosure below.

Narrative Explanation of Certain Aspects of the Summary Compensation Table

The primary elements of compensation for the named executive officers are base salary, cash bonuses and long-term equity-based compensation awards. The named executive officers also participate in employee benefit plans and programs that are offered to other full-time employees on the same basis.

Base Salaries

The named executive officers receive a base salary to compensate them for the satisfactory performance of services rendered to our company. The base salary payable to each named executive officer is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive's skill set, experience, role and responsibilities. Base salaries for the named executive officers have generally been set at levels deemed necessary to attract and retain individuals with superior talent and were originally established in each named executive officer's employment agreement.

In February 2016, Valeritas' Compensation Committee reviewed the annual salaries of the named executive officers and approved a 3% increase for Mr. Jenkins on his base salary and a 5% increase for Mr. Timberlake, effective February 24, 2016. Following the increases, the new base salary for Geoffrey Jenkins was $393,593 and for John E. Timberlake was $392,141.

In August 2016, Mr. Lucera was hired as our Chief Financial Officer with a starting base salary of $260,000. In December 2016, Mr. Nguyen was promoted to the position of Chief Commercial Officer with a starting base salary of $287,000.

In February 2017, our compensation committee reviewed the annual salaries of the named executive officers and approved a 3% increase for Mr. Jenkins on his base salary, a 6% increase for Mr. Lucera, a 5% increase for Mr. Nguyen and a 5% increase for Mr. Timberlake, effective February 27, 2017. Following the increases, the new base salary for Mr. Jenkins was $380,750, for Mr. Lucera was $275,000, for Mr. Nguyen was $300,000 and for Mr. Timberlake was $412,000.

In February 2018, our compensation committee reviewed the annual salaries of the named executive officers with the advice of the compensation committee's consultant and recommended to the board of directors, and the board of directors subsequently approved, a 3.0% increase for Mr. Jenkins on his base salary, a 12.7% increase for Mr. Lucera, a 4.7% increase for Mr. Nguyen and a 9.2% increase for Mr. Timberlake, effective February 19, 2018. Following the increases, the new base salary for Mr. Jenkins was $392,102, for Mr. Lucera was $310,000, for Mr. Nguyen was $314,000 and for Mr. Timberlake was $450,000.

The 2016, 2017 and 2018 increases in base salary were made in recognition of our named executive officers' individual performance and contributions to company performance in those years and as a result of comparing the compensation paid to our named executive officers with the compensation paid

122


Table of Contents

to other executive officers within our company's peer group who have similar titles and perform similar roles to our named executive officers.

Annual Performance Bonuses

We offer our named executive officers the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses that are intended to compensate them for achieving short-term company and individual performance goals. Our compensation committee establishes the target bonuses of our named executive officers, which are evaluated from time to time.

Each named executive officer's target annual bonus is