XML 411 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]    
Fair Value Measurements

Note 9: Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, including related current portions, were as follows:

 

     June 30, 2014  
            Hierarchy Level  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
     (in millions)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $     291       $       $ 291       $   

Restricted cash equivalents

     94                 94           

Timeshare financing receivables

     988                         990   

Liabilities:

           

Long-term debt(1)

      11,235         59          1,598          9,862   

Non-recourse debt(2)

     698                         701   

Interest rate swaps

     5                 5           

 

     December 31, 2013  
            Hierarchy Level  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
     (in millions)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 309       $       $ 309       $   

Restricted cash equivalents

     107                 107           

Timeshare financing receivables

     994                         996   

Interest rate swaps

     10                 10           

Liabilities:

           

Long-term debt(1)

      11,682         57          1,560          10,358   

Non-recourse debt(2)

     672                         670   

 

(1)  Excludes capital lease obligations with a carrying value of $82 million and $73 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(2)  Represents the Securitized Timeshare Debt and the Timeshare Facility.

We believe the carrying amounts of our current financial assets and liabilities and other financing receivables approximated fair value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Our estimates of the fair values were determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methods. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the estimated fair values. Proper classification of fair value measurements within the valuation hierarchy is considered each reporting period. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents primarily consisted of short-term interest-bearing money market funds with maturities of less than 90 days, time deposits and commercial paper. The estimated fair values were based on available market pricing information of similar financial instruments.

The estimated fair values of our timeshare financing receivables were based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value. An increase in the discount rates would result in a decrease in the fair values.

We measure our interest rate swaps at fair value, which were estimated using an income approach. The primary inputs into our fair value estimate include interest rates and yield curves based on observable market inputs of similar instruments.

The estimated fair values of our Level 1 long-term debt were based on prices in active debt markets. The estimated fair values of our Level 2 long-term debt were based on bid prices in a non-active debt market. The estimated fair values of our Level 3 fixed-rate long-term debt were estimated based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The primary sensitivity in these estimates is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value. An increase in the discount rates would result in a decrease in the fair values. The carrying amounts of our Level 3 variable-rate long-term debt and non-recourse debt approximated fair value as the interest rates under the loan agreements approximated current market rates. The estimated fair values of our Level 3 fixed-rate non-recourse debt were primarily based on indicative quotes received for similar issuances.

No financial or nonfinancial assets were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2014.

Note 17: Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, which included related current portions, were as follows:

 

     December 31, 2013  
            Hierarchy Level  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
     (in millions)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 309       $  —       $ 309       $   

Restricted cash equivalents

     107                 107           

Timeshare financing receivables

     994                         996   

Interest rate swaps

     10                 10           

Liabilities:

           

Long-term debt(1)(3)

      11,682          57          1,560          10,358   

Non-recourse debt(2)(3)

     672                         670   

 

     December 31, 2012  
            Hierarchy Level  
     Carrying
Amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
     (in millions)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 561       $  —       $  561       $   

Restricted cash equivalents

     322                 322           

Timeshare financing receivables

     984                         987   

Liabilities:

           

Long-term debt(1)(3)

      15,492         152                  15,716   

 

(1) Excludes capital lease obligations with a carrying value of $73 million and $83 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(2) Represents the Securitized Timeshare Debt and the Timeshare Facility.
(3) Includes current maturities.

We believe the carrying amounts of our current financial assets and liabilities and other financing receivables approximated fair value as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. Our estimates of the fair values were determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methods. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the estimated fair value. Proper classification of fair value measurements within the valuation hierarchy is considered each reporting period. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents primarily comprise short-term interest-bearing money market funds with maturities of less than 90 days, time deposits and commercial paper. The estimated fair values were based on available market pricing information of similar financial instruments.

The estimated fair value of our timeshare financing receivables were based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The primary sensitivity in these estimates is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value. An increase in the discount rate would result in a decrease in the fair value.

We measure our interest rate swaps at fair value which were estimated using an income approach. The primary inputs into our fair value estimate include interest rates and yield curves based on observable market inputs of similar instruments.

 

The estimated fair value of our Level 1 long-term debt was based on prices in active debt markets. The estimated fair value of our Level 2 long-term debt was based on bid prices in a non-active debt market. The estimated fair values of our Level 3 fixed-rate long-term debt were estimated based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The primary sensitivity in these estimates is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value. An increase in the discount rate would result in a decrease in the fair value. The estimated fair values of our Level 3 fixed-rate non-recourse debt were primarily based on indicative quotes received for similar issuances.

As of December 31, 2013, the carrying amounts of certain of our Level 3 variable-rate long-term debt and non-recourse debt approximated fair value as the interest rates under the loan agreements approximated current market rates. As of December 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of our Level 3 variable-rate long-term debt was based on estimates of market spreads when quoted market values did not exist, on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same maturities or quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. In determining the current market rate for the fixed rate debt, a market spread was added to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with similar maturity dates. The primary sensitivity in these estimates is based on the selection of appropriate market spreads. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value. An increase in the market spread would result in a decrease in the fair value.

No financial or nonfinancial assets were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2013. The estimated fair values of our financial and nonfinancial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment losses were as follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2012      2011  
     Fair Value(1)      Impairment
Losses
     Fair Value(1)      Impairment
Losses
 
     (in millions)  

Property and equipment, net

   $    24       $    53       $ 5       $ 20   

Investments in affiliates

     29         20          205          141   

 

(1)  Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, property and equipment, net with a carrying value of $77 million and $25 million before impairment, respectively, was reduced to its estimated fair value, resulting in impairment losses of $53 million and $20 million, respectively. Using estimates of undiscounted net cash flows, we concluded that the carrying values of the assets were not fully recoverable. We estimated the fair value of the assets using discounted cash flow analyses, with estimated stabilized growth rates ranging from 2 percent to 3 percent, a discounted cash flow term of 10 years, terminal capitalization rates ranging from 8 percent to 9 percent and discount rates ranging from 9 percent to 12 percent. The discount and terminal capitalization rates used for the fair value of the assets reflect the risk profile of the individual markets where the assets are located, and are not necessarily indicative of our hotel portfolio as a whole.

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, investments in affiliates with a carrying value of $49 million and $346 million before impairment, respectively, were reduced to their estimated fair value, resulting in impairment losses of $20 million and $141 million, respectively, related to our investments in entities that own or lease hotels. We estimated the fair value of the investments using discounted cash flow analyses, with estimated stabilized growth rates ranging from 3 percent to 7 percent, a discounted cash flow term of 10 years, terminal capitalization rates ranging from 8 percent to 12 percent and discount rates ranging from 10 percent to 22 percent. The discount and terminal capitalization rates used for the fair value of our investments reflect the risk profile of the individual markets where the assets subject to our investment are located, and are not necessarily indicative of our investment portfolio as a whole.