XML 200 R88.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.4
MD&A - Risk management and control - Market Risk (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Entity [Table]  
Disclosure of detailed information about management value-at-risk [text block]
Management value
 
-at-risk (1-day,
 
95% confidence, 5 years
 
of historical data)
 
of our business
 
divisions and Group
Functions by general
 
market risk type
1
For the year ended
 
31.12.22
USD m
Equity
Interest
rates
Credit
spreads
Foreign
exchange
Commodities
Min.
2
8
4
2
2
Max.
17
18
9
11
7
Average
6
10
5
3
3
31.12.22
6
10
4
3
3
Total management VaR,
 
Group
6
18
11
9
Average (per business division and risk
 
type)
Global Wealth Management
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
Personal & Corporate Banking
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asset Management
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Investment Bank
6
17
10
8
6
9
5
3
3
Group Functions
3
5
4
5
1
4
3
1
0
Diversification effect
2,3
(5)
(5)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(1)
0
For the year ended
 
31.12.21
USD m
Equity
Interest
rates
Credit
spreads
Foreign
exchange
Commodities
Min.
1
7
5
1
2
Max.
35
13
11
9
5
Average
7
9
7
3
3
31.12.21
8
11
7
6
3
Total management VaR,
 
Group
4
36
11
12
Average (per business division and risk type)
Global Wealth Management
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
0
0
Personal & Corporate Banking
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asset Management
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Investment Bank
3
36
11
11
7
9
7
3
3
Group Functions
4
8
5
4
0
4
4
1
0
Diversification effect
2,3
(6)
(5)
0
(5)
(5)
(1)
0
1 Statistics at individual
 
levels may not be
 
summed to deduce
 
the corresponding aggregate
 
figures. The
 
minima and maxima for
 
each level
 
may well occur on different
 
days, and likewise,
 
the VaR for each
 
business
line or risk type, being driven by the extreme
 
loss tail of the corresponding distribution
 
of simulated profits and losses for that business line
 
or risk type, may well
 
be driven by different days in the historical time series,
rendering invalid the simple
 
summation of figures to arrive
 
at the aggregate total.
 
2 Difference between the sum
 
of the standalone VaR for
 
the business divisions and
 
Group Functions and
 
the VaR for the Group
 
as
a whole.
 
3 As the minima and
 
maxima for different business
 
divisions and Group
 
Functions occur on different
 
days, it is not meaningful to
 
calculate a portfolio
 
diversification effect.
UBS AG  
Entity [Table]  
Disclosure of detailed information about management value-at-risk [text block]
Management value
 
-at-risk (1-day,
 
95% confidence, 5 years
 
of historical data)
 
of our business
 
divisions and Group
Functions by general
 
market risk type
1
For the year ended
 
31.12.22
USD m
Equity
Interest
rates
Credit
spreads
Foreign
exchange
Commodities
Min.
2
8
4
2
2
Max.
17
18
9
11
7
Average
6
10
5
3
3
31.12.22
6
10
4
3
3
Total management VaR,
 
Group
6
18
11
9
Average (per business division and risk
 
type)
Global Wealth Management
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
Personal & Corporate Banking
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asset Management
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Investment Bank
6
17
10
8
6
9
5
3
3
Group Functions
3
5
4
5
1
4
3
1
0
Diversification effect
2,3
(5)
(5)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(1)
0
For the year ended
 
31.12.21
USD m
Equity
Interest
rates
Credit
spreads
Foreign
exchange
Commodities
Min.
1
7
5
1
2
Max.
35
13
11
9
5
Average
7
9
7
3
3
31.12.21
8
11
7
6
3
Total management VaR,
 
Group
4
36
11
12
Average (per business division and risk type)
Global Wealth Management
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
0
0
Personal & Corporate Banking
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asset Management
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Investment Bank
3
36
11
11
7
9
7
3
3
Group Functions
4
8
5
4
0
4
4
1
0
Diversification effect
2,3
(6)
(5)
0
(5)
(5)
(1)
0
1 Statistics at individual
 
levels may not be
 
summed to deduce
 
the corresponding aggregate
 
figures. The
 
minima and maxima for
 
each level
 
may well occur on different
 
days, and likewise,
 
the VaR for each
 
business
line or risk type, being driven by the extreme
 
loss tail of the corresponding distribution
 
of simulated profits and losses for that business line
 
or risk type, may well
 
be driven by different days in the historical time series,
rendering invalid the simple
 
summation of figures to arrive
 
at the aggregate total.
 
2 Difference between the sum
 
of the standalone VaR for
 
the business divisions and
 
Group Functions and
 
the VaR for the Group
 
as
a whole.
 
3 As the minima and
 
maxima for different business
 
divisions and Group
 
Functions occur on different
 
days, it is not meaningful to
 
calculate a portfolio
 
diversification effect.