XML 50 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

Level 1:Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

 

Level 2:Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

An asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

 

A.

Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

 

B.

Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

 

C.

Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings models).

 

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are measured and disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

Asset /

 

 

 

Valuation

 

 

 

(Liability)

 

Level 3

 

Technique

 

September 30, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

(44,281

)

$

(44,281

)

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

(11,691

)

$

(11,691

)

C

 

 

The following table sets forth a roll forward of the Level 3 measurements:

 

 

 

Contingent
Consideration

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

$

(11,691

)

BioRx acquisition

 

(41,000

)

Changes in fair value

 

1,660

 

Payments

 

6,750

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2015

 

$

(44,281

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities, approximate their estimated fair values due to the relative short-term nature of the amounts. The carrying amount of debt approximates fair value due to variable interest rates at customary terms and rates the Company could obtain in current financing.