XML 483 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Provisions and contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Other Provisions, Contingent Liabilities And Contingent Assets [Abstract]  
Provisions and contingencies Provisions and contingencies
(in thousands of USD)
Onerous contractTotal
Balance at January 1, 20201,769 1,769 
Provisions used during the year(388)(388)
Balance at December 31, 20201,381 1,381 
Non-current1,154 1,154 
Current227 227 
Total1,381 1,381 
Balance at January 1, 20211,381 1,381 
Provisions used during the year(227)(227)
Balance at December 31, 20211,154 1,154 
Non-current892 892 
Current262 262 
Total1,154 1,154 

In 2004, Gener8 Maritime Subsidiary II Inc. entered into a non-cancellable lease for office space. This lease started on December 1, 2004 and would have expired on September 30, 2020. On July 14, 2015 this lease was extended for an additional five years until September 30, 2025. The facilities have been sub-let starting on December 1, 2018 for the remaining lease term, but changes in market conditions have meant that the rental income is lower than the rental expense. The obligation for the future payments, net of expected rental income, has been provided for.

The Group is currently involved in a litigation. Provisions related to legal and arbitration proceedings are recorded in accordance with the accounting policy as described in Note 1.17. The claim has been submitted on January 15, 2021 by Unicredit Bank in London with the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. The claim relates to an alleged misdelivery of 101,809 metric tons of low sulphur fuel oil that was transported by the Suezmax vessel, Sienna. The charterer, Gulf Petrochem FZC, a company of GP Global, instructed the vessel to discharge the cargo at Sohar without presentation of the bill of lading but against a letter of indemnification issued by the charterer as is customary practice in the crude oil shipping industry. Unicredit bank, who had financed the cargo for an amount of $26,367,200 and allegedly had become the holder of the bill of lading, was not repaid in accordance with the financing arrangements agreed with Gulf Petrochem FZC. As alleged holder of the bill of lading, Unicredit Bank is now claiming that amount of $26,367,200 together with interest from Euronav NV. The GP Global group is currently under a restructuring plan and any recourse under the letter of indemnity issued by Gulf Petrochem FZC is therefore doubtful. Management believes that it has followed well established standard working practices and that it has valid defense arguments. Based on an external legal advice, management believes that it has strong arguments that the risk of an outflow is less than probable and therefore no provision is recognized. The court proceedings are in early stage.

Furthermore, the Group is involved in a number of disputes in connection with its day-to-day activities, both as claimant and defendant. Such disputes and the associated expenses of legal representation are covered by insurance. Moreover, they are not of a magnitude that lies outside the ordinary, and their scope is not of such a nature that they could jeopardize the Group's financial position.