XML 25 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3—Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
The assets’ or liabilities’ fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s financial instruments that are carried at fair value mainly consist of Level 1 assets and Level 3 liabilities. Level 1 assets include highly liquid bank deposits and money market funds, which were not material at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Level 3 liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis relate to the 2017 and 2016 Placement Warrants, as described in Note 9. Placement warrant liabilities are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Generally, increases (decreases) in the fair value of the underlying stock, volatility and estimated term would result in a directionally similar impact to the fair value of the warrants (see Note 9). During the three months ended March 31, 2023, and 2022, no warrants were exercised.
The gains and losses from re-measurement of Level 3 financial liabilities are recorded as part of other (expense) income, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded a gain of $1.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the 2017 and 2016 Placement Warrants. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 in any periods presented.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
At March 31, 2023
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
2017 Placement Warrants Liability$— $— $1,718 $1,718 
2016 Placement Warrants Liability— — 516 516 
Total$— $— $2,234 $2,234 
At December 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
2017 Placement Warrants Liability$— $— $3,127 $3,127 
2016 Placement Warrants Liability— — 1,051 1,051 
Total$— $— $4,178 $4,178 
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31,
20232022
Fair value, beginning of period$4,178 $6,795 
Change in fair value of Level 3 financial liabilities(1,944)(2,830)
Fair value of 2016 Placement Warrants at exercise— — 
Fair value of 2017 Placement Warrants at exercise— — 
Fair value, end of period$2,234 $3,965 
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities
The Company’s non-financial instruments, which primarily consist of intangible assets, right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, and property and equipment, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are reported at carrying value. These assets are subject to fair value adjustments when events or changes in circumstances indicate a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the asset. Impairment charges are recorded to reduce the carrying amount of the assets to their fair value.
During 2022, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.5 million on its ROU asset for one of the Mountain View, California office spaces and $0.3 million on the related furniture and fixtures to reduce the carrying value to their estimated fair value in connection with the sublease discussed in Note 6.
The fair value of ROU asset and related furniture and fixtures was determined based on Level 3 measurements. Inputs to this fair value measurement included a valuation model that measures the present value of remaining lease payments less estimated sublease income at a discount rate that captures the risk associated with the future cash flows.