XML 24 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3—Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
The assets’ or liabilities’ fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s financial instruments that are carried at fair value mainly consist of Level 1 assets and Level 3 liabilities. Level 1 assets include highly liquid bank deposits and money market funds, which were not material at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. Level 3 liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis relate to the 2017 and 2016 Placement Warrants, as described in Note 9. Placement warrant liabilities are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Generally, increases (decreases) in the fair value of the underlying stock, volatility and estimated term would result in a directionally similar impact to the fair value of the warrants (see Note 9). During the three months ended March 31, 2022, no warrants were exercised. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, warrants to purchase 113,161 shares of common stock were exercised and the aggregate fair value upon exercise of $0.3 million was reclassified from liabilities to additional paid-in-capital.
The gains and losses from re-measurement of Level 3 financial liabilities are recorded as part of other (expense) income, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded a gain of $2.8 million and a loss of $0.9 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the 2017 and 2016 Placement Warrants. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 in any periods presented.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
At March 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
2017 Placement Warrants Liability$— $— $2,957 $2,957 
2016 Placement Warrants Liability— — 1,008 1,008 
Total$— $— $3,965 $3,965 
At December 31, 2021
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
2017 Placement Warrants Liability$— $— $5,030 $5,030 
2016 Placement Warrants Liability— — 1,765 1,765 
Total$— $— $6,795 $6,795 
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
Fair value, beginning of period$6,795 $4,864 
Change in fair value of Level 3 financial liabilities(2,830)947 
Fair value of 2016 Placement Warrants at exercise— (2)
Fair value of 2017 Placement Warrants at exercise— (325)
Fair value, end of period$3,965 $5,484