XML 36 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
Basis of Accounting
Basis of Accounting—The Company prepared the accompanying condensed combined financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). As permitted by the interim reporting rules and regulations set forth by the SEC, the condensed combined financial statements presented exclude certain financial information and footnote disclosures normally included in audited financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of the Company's management, the accompanying unaudited condensed combined financial statements contain all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, necessary to fairly present the accompanying unaudited condensed combined financial statements. These unaudited condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the combined audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in the Company's Registration Statement.
Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates—The preparation of condensed combined financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period in which they are determined to be necessary.

        In preparing the condensed combined financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions regarding:

  • the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts;

    the realization of deferred taxes;

    the measurement of equity-based compensation; and

    other matters that affect the reported amounts and disclosures of contingencies in the financial statements.
Expense Allocations

Expense Allocations—In addition to the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities that are specifically identifiable to the Company, certain expenses have been allocated from the Parent based on the most relevant measure, including relative usage or proportion of the Company's headcount to that of the Parent. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, $2,316 and $2,461, respectively, of occupancy expenses have been allocated to the Company based on the proportion of the Company's headcount to that of the Parent. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, $2,745 and $2,303 respectively, of communication, technology and information services expenses have been allocated to the Company based on a combination of relative usage and the proportion of the Company's headcount to that of the Parent. All other expenses were specifically identifiable to the Company. Management believes the assumptions and allocations underlying the condensed combined financial statements are reasonable, and the allocated amounts are representative of the amounts that would have been recorded in the condensed combined financial statements had the Company operated independent of the Parent for the historical periods presented.

        All intercompany balances and transactions within the Company have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include all short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase.

        As of March 31, 2014, the Company had cash equivalents of $236,970 (December 31, 2013: $260,825) invested primarily in U.S. Treasury Bills and government securities money market funds. Additionally, as of March 31, 2014, the Company had cash of $26,396 (December 31, 2013: $42,199) maintained in U.S. and non-U.S. bank accounts, of which some account balances exceeded the FDIC coverage limit of $250.

Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash—The Company held cash of $799 and $792 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, in restricted collateral accounts deposited in connection with corporate credit card programs.
Receivables

Receivables—The accompanying condensed combined statements of financial condition presents accounts receivable balances net of allowance for doubtful accounts based on the Company's assessment of the collectability of customer accounts.

        The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts that, in management's opinion, provides for an adequate reserve to cover losses that may be incurred. The Company regularly reviews the allowance by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable and recoverable expense balances, and the current economic conditions that may affect a customer's ability to pay such amounts owed to the Company.

        After concluding that a reserved accounts receivable is no longer collectible, the Company will charge-off the receivable. This is determined based on several factors including the age of the accounts receivable and the credit worthiness of the customer. This has the effect of reducing both the gross receivable and the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Deferred Compensation
Deferred Compensation—Deferred compensation costs represent arrangements with certain employees whereby cash payments are subject to a required period of service subsequent to payment by the Company. These amounts are charged to expenses over the period that the employee is required to provide services in order to vest in the payment.
Financial Instruments at Fair Value

Financial Instruments at Fair Value—Fair value is generally based on quoted prices, however if quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on other relevant factors, including dealer price quotations, price activity for equivalent instruments and valuation pricing models. The Company established a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of instrument, the characteristics specific to the instrument and the state of the marketplace (including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants). Financial instruments with readily-available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively-quoted prices in an orderly market will generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

        Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories (from highest to lowest) based on inputs:

  • Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) are available in active markets for identical instruments that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date. The Company, to the extent that it holds such instruments, does not adjust the quoted price for these instruments, even in situations in which the Company holds a large position and a sale could reasonably affect the quoted price.

    Level 2—Pricing inputs are observable for the instruments, either directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as those used in Level 1. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.

    Level 3—Pricing inputs are unobservable for the instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investments. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation by the Company's management.

        In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the instrument.

        For level 3 investments in which pricing inputs are unobservable and limited market activity exists, management's determination of fair value is based on the best information available, may incorporate management's own assumptions and involves a significant degree of judgment.

Investment in Joint Venture
Investment in Joint Venture—The Company accounts for its investment in Moelis Australia Holdings under the equity method of accounting as the Company does not control the entity but jointly controls Moelis Australia Holdings with the Trust. The Company reflects its investment in investment in joint venture on the accompanying condensed combined statements of financial condition. In connection with this investment, the Company acquired a call option to purchase the remaining 50% interest in Moelis Australia Holdings. Also, in connection with the investment, the Company granted a put option enabling the key senior Australian executive to sell his remaining shares in Moelis Australia Holdings back to the Company upon certain defined exit events. The call and the put options are embedded in the equity method investment and have not been separated as embedded derivatives because they do not meet the definition of a derivative given that the investee's shares are not publicly traded. The investment reflects the Company's share of contributions made to, distributions received from, and the equity earnings and losses of, the joint venture. The Company reflects its share of gains and losses of the joint venture in income (loss) from equity method investment in the condensed combined statements of operations.
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements—Equipment consists primarily of office equipment, computer equipment and furniture and fixtures and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated amortization, which is determined using the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets.

        Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the condensed combined statements of financial condition and any gain or loss is reflected in the condensed combined statements of operations.

Revenue and Expense Recognition
Revenue and Expense Recognition—The Company recognizes revenues from providing advisory services when earned. Upfront fees are recognized over the estimated period that the related services are performed. Transaction-related fees are recognized when all services for a transaction have been provided, specified conditions have been met and the transaction closes. Underwriting revenues are recognized when the offering is deemed complete and is presented net of related expenses. Deferred revenues are recorded for fees received that have not yet been earned. Expenses are recorded on the condensed combined statements of operations, net of client reimbursements. Reimbursable expenses billed to clients totaled $2,510 and $1,591 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively.
Equity-based Compensation
Equity-based Compensation—The Company recognizes the cost of partner and non-partner employee services received in exchange for an equity instrument award. The cost is based on its grant-date fair value amortized over the service period required by the award's vesting terms. The measurement of the grant-date fair value requires the Company's Parent to make estimates about its future operating results and the appropriate risk-adjusted discount rates. The methods used to estimate the fair value of equity-based compensation generally include the market approach and the income approach, each of which involve a significant degree of judgment. Under the market approach, fair value is determined with reference to observable valuation measures for comparable companies (e.g., multiplying a key performance metric of the comparable company by a relevant valuation multiple—adjusted for differences between the Company's Parent and the referenced comparable). Under the income approach, fair value is determined by converting future amounts (e.g., cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted) using current expectations about those future amounts. These estimates could change in the future and have a material impact on the estimate of the fair value. The Company recognizes such amounts in compensation and benefits expenses on the accompanying condensed combined statements of operations and as an increase to parent company equity on the accompanying condensed combined statements of financial condition and in the accompanying condensed combined statements of changes in parent company equity. See Note 7 for further discussion.
Income Taxes

Income Taxes—The Company's operating results were included in the Parent's U.S. federal and state income tax returns, as well as the tax filings for non-U.S. jurisdictions. For purposes of the Company's condensed combined financial statements, provision for income taxes and deferred tax balances have been calculated as if the Company completed its tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from the Parent ("Separate Return Method"). The Separate Return Method applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the condensed combined financial statements as if the Company were a separate taxpayer and a stand-alone enterprise from its Parent for the periods presented.

        The Company is comprised of entities that are organized as limited liability companies and limited partnerships. For federal income tax purposes, the Company is a pass-through entity. Accordingly, no federal income taxes are assessed at the Company level. Federal income tax law and regulations require the partners to report their allocable share of the Company's taxable income or loss in their respective tax returns. Certain foreign, state and local tax authorities levy taxes on the Company based on its income.

        The Company will continue to review the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions, which may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on ongoing analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. To the extent that the Company's assessment of the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions changes, such change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. The Company reports income tax-related interest and penalties, if applicable, as a component of income tax expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, no such amounts were recognized.

Foreign Currency Translation
Foreign Currency Translation—Assets and liabilities held in non-U.S. dollar denominated (functional) currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the reporting period. A charge or credit is recorded to other comprehensive income to reflect the translation of these amounts to the extent the non-U.S. currency is designated the functional currency of the subsidiary. Non-functional currency related transaction gains and losses are immediately recorded in the condensed combined statements of operations.