United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________ to __________
Commission File Number: 0-55170
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Maryland | 38-3920636 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| incorporation or organization) | ||
| 28 West Broadway, Trenton, Illinois | 62293 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
| (618) 224-9228 |
| (Registrant’s telephone number) |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
| Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
| (Title of class) |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
| Large Accelerated Filer ¨ | Accelerated Filer ¨ |
| Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ | Smaller Reporting Company x |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No x
As of June 15, 2015, the Registrant had 949,245 shares of common stock outstanding.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price as of the last day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, as reported by the OTCQB, was approximately $7.6 million.
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
INDEX
| 2 |
This Annual Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of Sugar Creek Financial Corp. (“Sugar Creek Financial” or the “Company”) and Tempo Bank (the “Bank”). These forward-looking statements are generally identified by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects” and similar expressions.
Management’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations of Sugar Creek Financial and its subsidiary include, but are not limited to, the following: interest rate trends; the general economic climate in the market area in which we operate, as well as nationwide; our ability to control costs and expenses; competitive products and pricing; loan delinquency rates; adjustments to the allowance for loan losses based upon regulatory examinations and changes in federal and state legislation and regulation. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
General - Our Business
Sugar Creek Financial Corp.
On April 8, 2014, Sugar Creek Financial Corp. (the “Company” or “Sugar Creek Financial”), the Maryland-chartered holding company for Tempo Bank (the “Bank”), completed the “second step” conversion of the Bank from the mutual holding company to the stock holding company form of organization (the “Conversion”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion and Reorganization. Upon completion of the Conversion, the Company became the holding company for the Bank and 535,127 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company were sold in subscription and community offerings to certain depositors of the Bank and other investors for $7.00 per share. In addition, approximately, 414,118 additional shares of the Company’s common stock (without taking into consideration cash issued in lieu of fractional shares) were issued in exchange for the outstanding shares of common stock of Sugar Creek Financial Corp. (“Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp.”), the former federally-chartered mid-tier holding company for the Bank, held by persons other than Sugar Creek MHC. In the Conversion, each share of common stock of Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp. was converted into the right to receive 1.0453 shares of common stock of Sugar Creek Financial.
Sugar Creek Financial’s primary business activities, apart from owning the shares of Tempo Bank, currently consists of loaning funds to Tempo Bank’s ESOP and investing in deposit accounts at Tempo Bank.
At March 31, 2015, Sugar Creek Financial had consolidated assets of $95.6 million, deposits of $76.3 million and stockholders’ equity of $13.3 million. The Company’s executive offices are located at 28 West Broadway Street, Trenton, Illinois 62293, and its telephone number at that address is (618) 224-9228.
Tempo Bank
Tempo Bank was originally chartered in 1889 as an Illinois state-chartered mutual building and loan association named “Trenton Building and Loan Association.” Tempo Bank converted to a federally chartered savings bank in 1989 and changed its name to “Tempo Bank, A Federal Savings Bank.” Tempo Bank adopted its present name in October 2006. Tempo Bank is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”).
The Bank’s website address is www.tempobank.com. Information on our website should not be considered a part of this Annual Report.
| 3 |
Market Area
We are headquartered in Trenton, Illinois. In addition to our main office, we operate a full-service branch office in Breese, Illinois. Trenton and Breese are located in Clinton County, Illinois, approximately 35 miles east of St. Louis, Missouri. Historically, substantially all of our loans have been made to borrowers who reside within approximately 18 miles of our main office, which includes the communities in Clinton County, eastern St. Clair County and southeastern Madison County.
The communities served by Tempo Bank are economically diverse. The communities in Clinton County and southeastern Madison County are generally rural and have an agriculturally-based economy. St. Clair County, Illinois is immediately due east of St. Louis, Missouri and is home to Scott Air Force Base. The communities that we serve in eastern St. Clair County were once dominated by agriculture. As the St. Louis metropolitan area has expanded in Illinois, the communities in eastern St. Clair County have experienced moderate economic expansion and now consist of a diverse blend of industries, urban centers and significant corporate investment. Although eastern St. Clair County is home to several growing communities, the median household income in St. Clair County as a whole was below the Illinois and national median household incomes in 2014.
Competition
We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the many financial institutions operating in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service companies such as brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. Several large holding companies operate banks in our market area, including Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp and PNC Financial Services Group. These institutions are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources. We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds, mutual funds and other corporate and government securities. At June 30, 2014, which is the most recent date for which data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we held 7.7% of the deposits held by FDIC-insured institutions in Clinton County, Illinois, which was the fourth largest market share out of 12 institutions having office locations within Clinton County.
Our competition for loans comes primarily from financial institutions in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial service companies entering the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
We expect competition to remain intense in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Changes in federal law permit affiliation among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in the financial services industry. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.
Lending Activities
Single-Family Owner and Non-owner Occupied Residential Loans. The largest segment of our loan portfolio is single-family residential loans, which are collateralized by owner occupied and non-owner occupied single-family properties. We offer three types of residential mortgage loans: fixed-rate loans, balloon loans and adjustable-rate loans. We offer fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms of 10, 15, 20, 25 or 30 years and balloon mortgage loans with terms of three, five, 10 or 15 years. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans with interest rates and payments that adjust annually or every three years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate equal to a percentage above the one year U.S. Treasury index. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2.0% per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 6.0% over the initial interest rate of the loan. Our current practice is to retain in our loan portfolio all mortgage loans that we originate.
Borrower demand for adjustable-rate or balloon loans compared to fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, and the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans as compared to the interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate or balloon loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate, balloon and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment. The loan fees, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions.
| 4 |
While single-family residential owner and non-owner occupied real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full either upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans. We do not offer loans with negative amortization and generally do not offer interest-only loans.
We generally do not make high loan-to-value loans (defined as loans with a loan-to-value ratio of 90% or more) without private mortgage insurance. We require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised by a board-approved independent appraiser. We require title insurance on all first mortgage loans. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, and flood insurance is required for loans on properties located in a flood zone.
We adhere to specific underwriting guidelines for our single-family non-owner occupied loans. We consider and review a rental income cash flow analysis of the borrower and consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. We generally require collateral on these loans to be a first mortgage along with an assignment of rents and leases. We periodically monitor the performance and cash flow sufficiency of certain residential rental property borrowers based on a number of factors such as loan performance, loan size, total borrower credit exposure, and risk grade. Our current policy requires us to obtain annual financial statements from residential rental borrowers.
Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Loans. We occasionally offer fixed-rate, balloon and adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate. Our commercial and multi-family real estate loans are generally secured by apartment, retail, restaurant and office/warehouse buildings.
While the terms of our commercial and multi-family real estate loans are set on a case by case basis, generally these loans are balloon loans with terms of three, five, 10 or 15 years. Loans are secured by first mortgages, and amounts generally do not exceed 85% of the property’s appraised value.
As of March 31, 2015, our largest commercial real estate loan had a principal balance of $571,000 and was secured by a medical office building. Our largest multi-family real estate loan had a principal balance of $210,000 and was secured by a 16 unit apartment building. Both of these loans were performing in accordance with their original terms at March 31, 2015.
Land Loans. We also originate fixed-rate loans secured by unimproved land. Our land loans generally have terms of 15 years or less and loan amounts generally do not exceed 85% of the lesser of the appraised value or the purchase price. As of March 31, 2015, our largest land loan had a principal balance of $248,000 and was secured by undeveloped land. This loan was performing in accordance with its original terms at March 31, 2015.
Consumer Loans. Our consumer loans consist primarily of new and used automobile loans and home equity loans. We occasionally make loans secured by deposit accounts.
Our automobile loans have fixed interest rates and generally have terms up to five years for new automobiles and four years for used automobiles. We will generally offer automobile loans with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 90% of the purchase price of the vehicle.
We generally offer home equity loans with a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 89% or less. Home equity loans have fixed interest rates and terms that typically range from one to 15 years.
The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount.
| 5 |
Loan Underwriting Risks
Adjustable-Rate Loans. While we anticipate that adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, an increased monthly mortgage payment required of adjustable-rate loan borrowers in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.
Single-family Non-owner Occupied Residential Loans. Loans secured by residential investment rental properties represent a unique credit risk to us and, as a result, we adhere to specific underwriting guidelines for such loans. Additionally, we have established specific loan portfolio concentration limits for loans secured by residential rental property to prevent excessive credit risk that could result from an elevated concentration of these loans. A primary risk factor in non-owner occupied residential real estate lending is the consistency of rental income of the property. Payments on loans secured by rental properties often depend on the successful operation and management of the properties, as well as, the ability of tenants to pay rent. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse economic conditions and unemployment trends, and may be sensitive to changes in the supply and demand for such properties. We consider and review a rental income cash flow analysis of the borrower and consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. We generally require collateral on these loans to be a first mortgage along with an assignment of rents and leases. We periodically monitor the performance and cash flow sufficiency of certain residential rental property borrowers based on a number of factors such as loan performance, loan size, total borrower credit exposure, and risk grade.
Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Loans and Land Loans. Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in commercial and multi-family real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. Loans secured by undeveloped land generally involve greater risks than residential mortgage lending because land loans are more difficult to evaluate. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, in the event of default and foreclosure, we may be confronted with a property the value of which is insufficient to assure full repayment. As a result, repayment of commercial and multi-family real estate and land loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. In reaching a decision on whether to make a commercial or multi-family real estate loan or a land loan, we consider and review a global cash flow analysis of the borrower and consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability and the value of the underlying property. We have generally required that the properties securing these real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before debt service to debt service) of at least 1.25. An environmental survey or environmental risk assessment is obtained when the possibility exists that hazardous materials may have existed on the site, or the site may have been impacted by adjoining properties that handled hazardous materials.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as motor vehicles. In the latter case, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and a small remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are real estate agents and home builders, existing customers, walk-in traffic, advertising and referrals from customers. We generally originate loans for our portfolio and generally do not purchase or sell loans or participation interests in loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory, underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board of directors and management. The board of directors has granted loan approval authority to certain officers or groups of officers up to prescribed limits, based on the officer’s experience and tenure. All loans over $50,000 must be approved by the loan committee of the board of directors.
| 6 |
Loans to One Borrower. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is limited, by regulation, to generally 15% of our total risk-based capital. At March 31, 2015 our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $1.7 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship had an aggregate principal balance of $1.2 million, secured by single-family owner occupied property, a single-family display home and a medical office building.
Loan Commitments. We issue commitments for fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers. Generally, our loan commitments expire after 60 days. At March 31, 2015, there were $708,000 in outstanding mortgage loan commitments.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, mortgage-backed securities and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a portion of our assets in corporate securities and mutual funds. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLBC”) stock.
At March 31, 2015, our investment portfolio totaled $1.2 million, and consisted solely of our investment in FHLBC stock.
Our investment objectives are to provide and maintain liquidity, to establish an acceptable level of interest rate and credit risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when demand for loans is weak and to generate a favorable return. Our board of directors has the overall responsibility for the investment portfolio, including approval of our investment policy. The board of directors is also responsible for implementation of the investment policy and monitoring our investment performance. Our board of directors reviews the status of our investment portfolio on a monthly basis, or more frequently if warranted.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.
Deposit Accounts. Substantially all of our depositors are residents of Illinois. Deposits are attracted from within our market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including non-interest-bearing NOW accounts, interest-bearing demand accounts (such as NOW and money market accounts), savings accounts and certificates of deposit. In addition to accounts for individuals, we also offer commercial checking accounts designed for the businesses operating in our market area. We do not have any brokered deposits.
Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability to us, and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing weekly. Our deposit pricing strategy has generally been to offer competitive rates and to be in the middle of the market for rates on all types of deposit products.
Borrowings. We utilize advances from the FHLBC to supplement our investable funds. The FHLBC functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLBC and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are generally equivalent to a percentage of an institution’s pledged assets, based upon the FHLBC’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness.
| 7 |
Personnel
As of March 31, 2015, we had eighteen full-time employees and two part-time employees, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Subsidiaries
Sugar Creek Financial’s only subsidiary is Tempo Bank. Tempo Bank does not have any subsidiaries.
Regulation and Supervision
General. Tempo Bank is a federal savings association subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the OCC, as its primary federal regulator, and by the FDIC as the insurer of its deposits. Tempo Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and its deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. Tempo Bank must file reports with the OCC concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals before entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. There are periodic examinations by the OCC to evaluate Tempo Bank’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulatory structure is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of an adequate allowance for loan losses for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OCC, the FDIC or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Sugar Creek Financial and Tempo Bank and their operations.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) made extensive changes to the regulation of Tempo Bank. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision was eliminated and responsibility for the supervision and regulation of federal savings associations such as Tempo Bank was transferred to the OCC on July 21, 2011. The OCC is the agency that is primarily responsible for the regulation and supervision of national banks. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau assumed responsibility for the implementation of the federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations and has authority to impose new requirements. However, institutions of less than $10 billion in assets, such as Tempo Bank, will continue to be examined for compliance with consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations by, and be subject to the enforcement authority of, their prudential regulators.
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are applicable to Tempo Bank and Sugar Creek Financial are described below. This description of statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Tempo Bank and Sugar Creek Financial.
Federal Banking Regulation
Business Activities. The activities of federal savings banks, such as Tempo Bank, are governed by federal laws and regulations. Those laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the business activities in which federal savings banks may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.
Capital Requirements. On July 9, 2013, the OCC approved rules that amended the regulatory capital rules applicable to the Bank. The rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act increase the capital requirements of financial institutions. The rules include new minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which became effective January 1, 2015, and refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Bank are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8% (unchanged from prior rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum capital ratios, and resulting in the following ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.5%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5%; and, a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 6.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and would increase each year until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution will be subject to further limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
| 8 |
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept broker deposits. The OCC is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s degree of undercapitalization. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The OCC could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly and critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary measures.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Tempo Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. Deposit insurance per account owner is currently $250,000. Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned a risk category based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain adjustments specified by FDIC regulations. Institutions deemed less risky pay lower assessments. The FDIC may adjust the scale uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate by more than two basis points from the base scale without notice and comment. No institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.
The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to revise its procedures to base its assessments upon each insured institution’s total assets less tangible equity instead of deposits. The FDIC finalized a rule, effective April 1, 2011, that set the assessment range at 2.5 to 45 basis points of total assets less tangible equity.
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Tempo Bank. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Loans to One Borrower. Federal law provides that savings associations are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Generally, subject to certain exceptions, a savings association may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Federal law requires savings associations to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test, a savings association is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (ii) intangibles, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities but also including education, credit card and small business loans) in at least nine months out of each 12-month period.
A savings association that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to certain operating restrictions and the Dodd-Frank Act also specifies that failing the qualified thrift lender test is a violation of law that could result in an enforcement action and dividend limitations. As of March 31, 2015, Tempo Bank maintained 96.6% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, met the qualified thrift lender test.
Limitation on Capital Distributions. Federal regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a savings association, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the OCC is required before any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under OCC regulations (i.e., generally, examination and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the OCC. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide 30 days prior written notice to, and receive the nonobjection of, the Federal Reserve Board of the capital distribution if, like Tempo Bank, it is a subsidiary of a holding company, as well as an informational notice filing to the OCC. If Tempo Bank’s capital ever fell below its regulatory requirements or the OCC notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, its ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the OCC could prohibit a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the OCC determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
| 9 |
Community Reinvestment Act. All federal savings associations have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. An institution’s failure to satisfactorily comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could result in denials of regulatory applications. Responsibility for administering the Community Reinvestment Act, unlike other fair lending laws, is not being transferred to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Tempo Bank received an “outstanding” Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recently completed examination.
Transactions with Related Parties. Federal law limits Tempo Bank’s authority to engage in transactions with “affiliates” (e.g., any entity that controls or is under common control with Tempo Bank, including Sugar Creek Financial). The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings association. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings association’s capital and surplus. Certain transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type specified by federal law. The purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. Transactions with affiliates must generally be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings associations are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings association may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits loans by Sugar Creek Financial to its executive officers and directors. However, the law contains a specific exception for loans by a depository institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking laws. Under such laws, Tempo Bank’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such persons control, is limited. The laws limit both the individual and aggregate amount of loans that Tempo Bank may make to insiders based, in part, on Tempo Bank’s capital level and requires that certain board approval procedures be followed. Such loans are required to be made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an exception for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to all employees of the institution and does not give preference to insiders over other employees. Loans to executive officers are subject to additional limitations based on the type of loan involved.
Enforcement. The OCC currently has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations and has authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including shareholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to institution of receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1.0 million per day in especially egregious cases. The FDIC has the authority to recommend to the OCC that enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings association. If action is not taken by the OCC, the FDIC has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. Tempo Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. Tempo Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. Tempo Bank was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock at March 31, 2015 of $1.2 million.
| 10 |
Reserve Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings associations to maintain non-interest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). For 2014, the regulations provided that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $89.0 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $89.0 million. The first $13.3 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually and, for 2015, require a 3% ratio on net transaction accounts up to and including $103.6 million, a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $103.6 million and an exemption for the first otherwise reservable balances of $14.5 million. Tempo Bank complies with the foregoing requirements. In October 2008, the Federal Reserve Board began paying interest on certain reserve balances.
Other Regulations
Tempo Bank’s operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, including the:
| · | Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; |
| · | Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves; |
| · | Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit; |
| · | Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies; |
| · | Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and |
| · | rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws. |
The operations of Tempo Bank also are subject to laws such as the:
| · | Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; |
| · | Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services; and |
| · | Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check. |
Holding Company Regulation
General. As a savings and loan holding company, Sugar Creek Financial is subject to Federal Reserve Board regulations, examinations, supervision, reporting requirements and regulations regarding its activities. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to Tempo Bank.
Pursuant to federal law and regulations and policy, a savings and loan holding company such as Sugar Creek Financial may generally engage in the activities permitted for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act and certain other activities that have been authorized for savings and loan holding companies by regulation.
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company from, directly or indirectly or through one or more subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association, or savings and loan holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board or from acquiring or retaining, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary holding company or savings association. A savings and loan holding company is also prohibited from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized by federal law or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings associations, the Federal Reserve Board must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
| 11 |
The Federal Reserve Board is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings associations in more than one state, except: (i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and (ii) the acquisition of a savings association in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings association specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Capital Requirements. Savings and loan holding companies historically have not been subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements. However, in July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board approved a new rule that implements the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule established consolidated capital requirements for many savings and loan holding companies, including Sugar Creek Financial. See “Regulation and Supervision-Federal Banking Regulation-Capital Requirements.”
In May 2015, the Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule which exempts certain savings and loan holding companies that have total consolidated assets of less than $1 billion from the consolidated capital requirements. Sugar Creek Financial qualifies for this exemption.
Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act also extends the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must promulgate regulations implementing the “source of strength” policy that holding companies act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.
Dividends and Stock Repurchases. The Federal Reserve Board has the power to prohibit dividends by savings and loan holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which also applies to savings and loan holding companies and which expresses the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Under the prompt corrective action regulations, the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized.”
Federal Reserve Board policy also provides that a holding company should inform the Federal Reserve Board supervisory staff prior to redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the holding company is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase or redemption would result in a net reduction, as of the end of a quarter, in the amount of such equity instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of the quarter in which the redemption or repurchase occurred.
Acquisitions. Under the Federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings association. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the company or institution, unless the Federal Reserve Board has found that the acquisition will not result in a change of control. Under the Change in Control Act, the Federal Reserve Board generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
Emerging Growth Company Status. The JOBS Act, which was enacted in April 2012, has made numerous changes to the federal securities laws to facilitate access to capital markets. Under the JOBS Act, a company with total annual gross revenues of less than $1.0 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year qualifies as an “emerging growth company.” Sugar Creek Financial qualifies as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act.
| 12 |
An “emerging growth company” may choose not to hold stockholder votes to approve annual executive compensation (more frequently referred to as “say-on-pay” votes) or executive compensation payable in connection with a merger (more frequently referred to as “say-on-golden parachute” votes). An emerging growth company also is not subject to the requirement that its auditors attest to the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting, and can provide scaled disclosure regarding executive compensation; however, Sugar Creek Financial also is not be subject to the auditor attestation requirement or additional executive compensation disclosure so long as it remains a “smaller reporting company” under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally less than $75 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates). Finally, an emerging growth company may elect to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company, but must make such election when the company is first required to file a registration statement. Such an election is irrevocable during the period a company is an emerging growth company. Sugar Creek Financial has elected to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company.
A company loses emerging growth company status on the earlier of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year of the company during which it had total annual gross revenues of $1.0 billion or more; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the company pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933; (iii) the date on which such company has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; or (iv) the date on which such company is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally, at least $700 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates).
Federal and State Taxation
Federal Income Taxation
General. We report our income on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly our reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. Our federal income tax returns have been either audited or closed under the statute of limitations through tax year 2011. For its 2015 fiscal year, Sugar Creek Financial’s maximum federal income tax rate was 34.0%.
Sugar Creek Financial and Tempo Bank have entered into a tax allocation agreement. Because Sugar Creek Financial owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Tempo Bank, Sugar Creek Financial and Tempo Bank are members of an affiliated group within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, of which group Sugar Creek Financial is the common parent corporation. As a result of this affiliation, Tempo Bank may be included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with Sugar Creek Financial and, if a decision to file a consolidated tax return is made, the parties agree to compensate each other for their individual share of the consolidated tax liability and/or any tax benefits provided by them in the filing of the consolidated federal income tax return.
Bad Debt Reserves. For fiscal years beginning before 1996, thrift institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income for annual additions to their bad debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans, generally secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the experience method. The reserve for nonqualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the reserve method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning after 1995 and required savings institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves.
Distributions. If Tempo Bank makes “non-dividend distributions” to Sugar Creek Financial, the distributions will be considered to have been made from Tempo Bank’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of its reserves as of March 31, 1988, to the extent of the “non-dividend distributions,” and then from Tempo Bank’s supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent of those reserves, and an amount based on the amount distributed, but not more than the amount of those reserves, will be included in Tempo Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of Tempo Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of Tempo Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included in Tempo Bank’s taxable income.
| 13 |
The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend distribution is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Therefore, if Tempo Bank makes a non-dividend distribution to Sugar Creek Financial, approximately one and one-half times the amount of the distribution not in excess of the amount of the reserves would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate income tax rate. Tempo Bank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.
State Income Taxation
For the year ended March 31, 2015, Sugar Creek Financial is subject to the Illinois’ Corporate Income Tax at the rate of 6.6% and a 2.5% personal property tax replacement income tax on their base income. The base income is calculated by taking the federal taxable income and adding back certain items (e.g., state, municipal, and other interest income excluded from federal taxable income) and subtracting others (e.g., interest income from U.S. Treasury obligations). Our state income tax returns have been either audited or closed under the statute of limitations through tax year 2011.
A return of recessionary conditions could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Although the U.S. economy has emerged from the severe recession that occurred in 2008 and 2009, economic growth has been slow and uneven, and unemployment levels remain high. Recovery by many businesses has been impaired by lower consumer spending. A return to prolonged deteriorating economic conditions could significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Further declines in real estate values and sales volumes and continued elevated unemployment levels may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies, increases in our non-performing and criticized and classified assets and a decline in demand for our products and services. These events may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Reduction in problem assets has been slow, and the process has been exacerbated by the condition of some of the properties securing non-performing loans, the lengthy foreclosure process in Illinois, and extended workout plans with certain borrowers. As we work through the resolution of these assets, continued economic problems may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity, and financial condition.
Adverse conditions in the local economy or real estate market could hurt our profits.
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate in Clinton County, southwestern Madison County and eastern St. Clair County. As a result, our success depends to a large degree on the general economic conditions in those areas that comprise our market. In particular, the economy of eastern St. Clair County and the surrounding communities is heavily dependent on Scott Air Force Base, which employs over 10,000 military and civilian personnel. In addition, several defense contractors are currently located in communities near Scott Air Force Base. As a result, a downturn in the local economy, particularly resulting from defense budget cuts or the downsizing or closing of Scott Air Force Base, could cause significant increases in nonperforming loans, which would hurt our earnings. We have no reason to believe that Scott Air Force Base might be downsized or closed. In addition, significant decline in real estate values in our market would mean that the collateral for many of our loans would provide less security. As a result, we would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans because our ability to fully recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral would be diminished. Our local economy may affect our future growth possibilities and operations in our primary market area. Our future growth opportunities depend on the growth and stability of our regional economy and our ability to expand in our market area. Our market has experienced a significant downturn in recent years in which we have seen falling home prices, rising foreclosures and an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies. Continued adverse conditions in our local economy may limit funds available for deposit and may negatively affect demand for loans, both of which could have an impact on our profitability.
| 14 |
Our allowance for loan losses may be inadequate, which could hurt our earnings.
When borrowers default and do not repay the loans that we make to them, we may lose money. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover probable losses in the loan portfolio at the statement of financial condition date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impacted loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. If our estimates and judgments regarding such matters prove to be incorrect, our allowance for loan losses might not be sufficient, and additional loan loss provisions might need to be made. Depending on the amount of such loan loss provisions, the adverse impact on our earnings could be material. We might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require substantial provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.
In addition, bank regulators may require us to make a provision for loan losses or otherwise recognize further loan charge-offs following their periodic review of our loan portfolio, our underwriting procedures, and our loan loss allowance. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by such regulatory authorities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies—Allowance for Loan Losses” for a discussion of the procedures we follow in establishing our loan loss allowance.
Our emphasis on single-family mortgage lending exposes us to increased credit risks.
Single-family residential mortgage lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. The decline in residential real estate values as a result of the downturn in our local housing market has reduced the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans. Declines in real estate values could cause some of our residential mortgages to be inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss if we seek to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral.
Our non-owner-occupied real estate loans may expose us to increased credit risk.
At March 31, 2015, $8.2 million, or 11.8% of our single-family loans and 10.8% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of loans secured by non-owner-occupied residential properties. Loans secured by non-owner-occupied properties generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than loans secured by owner-occupied properties because repayment of such loans depend primarily on the tenant’s continuing ability to pay rent to the property owner, who is our borrower, or, if the property owner is unable to find a tenant, the property owner’s ability to repay the loan without the benefit of a rental income stream. In addition, the physical condition of non-owner-occupied properties is often below that of owner-occupied properties due to lax property maintenance standards, which has a negative impact on the value of the collateral properties. Furthermore, some of our non-owner-occupied residential loan borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with Tempo Bank which may expose us to a greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to an owner-occupied residential mortgage loan. As a result of these credit risks, we adhere to specific underwriting guidelines for non-owner occupied real estate loans. See “Our Business—Loan Underwriting Risks—Single-Family Non-owner Occupied Residential Loans.”
If our foreclosed real estate is not properly valued or if our reserves are insufficient, our earnings could be reduced.
We obtain updated valuations in the form of appraisals and broker price opinions when a loan has been foreclosed and the property taken in as foreclosed real estate and at certain other times during the holding period of the asset. Our net book value in the loan at the time of foreclosure and thereafter is compared to the updated fair value of the foreclosed property less estimated selling costs (fair value). A charge-off is recorded for any excess in the asset’s net book value over its fair value less estimated selling costs. If our valuation process is incorrect, or if property values decline, the fair value of our foreclosed real estate may not be sufficient to recover our carrying value in such assets, resulting in the need for additional charge-offs. In addition, bank regulators periodically review our foreclosed real estate and may require us to recognize further charge-offs. Significant charge-offs to our foreclosed real estate could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
| 15 |
Historically low interest rates may adversely affect our net interest income and profitability.
During the past several years it has been the policy of the Federal Reserve Board to maintain interest rates at historically low levels through its targeted federal funds rate and purchases of mortgage-backed securities. Historically, our interest-bearing liabilities have repriced or matured more quickly than our interest-earning assets. As a result, rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities have decreased more quickly than the rates we pay on the loans we have originated. Consequently, our interest rate spreads increased in the short term. However, our ability to reduce our interest expense is now highly limited while the average yields on our interest-earning assets may continue to decrease. Accordingly, our interest rate spreads and our net interest income may decrease, which would adversely affect our profitability.
Changes in interest rates may hurt our earnings and asset value.
Like other financial institutions, we are subject to interest rate risk. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income by affecting the difference between the weighted-average yield earned on our interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, or interest rate spread, and the average life of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in interest rates also can affect: (1) the ability to originate loans; (2) the value of our interest-earning assets and our ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets; (3) the ability to obtain and retain deposits in competition with other available investment alternatives; and (4) the ability of our borrowers to repay adjustable or variable rate loans. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including government monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. Although we believe that the estimated maturities of our interest-earning assets currently are well balanced in relation to the estimated maturities of our interest-bearing liabilities, our profitability could be adversely affected as a result of changes in interest rates.
Strong competition within our market area could hurt our profits and slow growth.
We face intense competition in making loans, attracting deposits and hiring and retaining experienced employees. This competition has made it more difficult for us to make new loans and attract deposits. Price competition for loans and deposits sometimes results in us charging lower interest rates on our loans and paying higher interest rates on our deposits, which reduces our net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult and costly to attract and retain qualified employees. Many of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
Our small size makes it more difficult for us to compete.
Our small asset size makes it more difficult to compete with other financial institutions which are generally larger and can more easily afford to invest in the marketing and technologies needed to attract and retain customers. Because our principal source of income is the net interest income we earn on our loans and investments after deducting interest paid on deposits and other sources of funds, our ability to generate the revenues needed to cover our expenses and finance such investments is limited by the size of our loan and investment portfolios. Accordingly, we are not always able to offer new products and services as quickly as our competitors. Our lower earnings also make it more difficult to offer competitive salaries and benefits. In addition, our smaller customer base makes it difficult to generate meaningful non-interest income. Finally, as a smaller institution, we are disproportionately affected by the continually increasing costs of compliance with new banking and other regulations.
We depend upon the services of key executives and we could be harmed by the loss of their services.
We rely heavily on our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Stroh, Jr., and on our President and Chief Operating Officer, Frank J. Eversman. The loss of either or both individuals could have a material adverse impact on our operations because, as a small company, we have fewer management-level personnel that have the experience and expertise to readily replace these individuals. Changes in key personnel and their responsibilities may be disruptive to our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We have entered into employment agreements with each of these executive officers but do not have key man life insurance on these executives.
| 16 |
Regulation of the financial services industry is undergoing major changes, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
The Dodd-Frank Act has created a significant shift in the way financial institutions operate. The Dodd-Frank Act restructured the regulation of depository institutions by merging the Office of Thrift Supervision, which previously regulated Tempo Bank, into the Office of the OCC, and assigning the regulation of savings and loan holding companies, including Sugar Creek Financial, to the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to administer consumer protection and fair lending laws, a function that was formerly performed by the depository institution regulators. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking regulators have adopted new consolidated capital requirements that will limit our ability to borrow at the holding company level and invest the proceeds from such borrowings as capital in Tempo Bank that could be leveraged to support additional growth. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various other provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008 and 2009. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations may not be known for years until final regulations implementing the statute are adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our operations, particularly through increased regulatory burden and compliance costs. Any future legislative changes could have a material impact on our profitability, the value of assets held for investment or the value of collateral for loans. Future legislative changes could also require changes to business practices or force us to discontinue businesses and potentially expose us to additional costs, liabilities, enforcement action and reputational risk.
As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and recent rulemaking, we have become subject to more stringent capital requirements.
On July 9, 2013, the OCC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised, effective January 1, 2015, their risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. See “Business – Regulation and Supervision – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Requirements.” The application of more stringent capital requirements for Tempo Bank may, among other things, result in lower returns on invested capital, require the raising of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Furthermore, the imposition of liquidity requirements in connection with the implementation of Basel III could result in our having to lengthen the term of our funding, restructure our business models, and/or increase our holdings of liquid assets. Implementation of changes to asset risk weightings for risk based capital calculations, items included or deducted in calculating regulatory capital and/or additional capital conservation buffers could result in management modifying its business strategy, and could limit our ability to make distributions, including paying out dividends or buying back shares. Specifically, beginning in 2016, Tempo Bank’s ability to pay dividends will be limited if Tempo Bank does not have the capital conservation buffer required by the new capital rules, which may limit our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, our primary federal regulators, and by the FDIC, as insurer of our deposits. Such regulation and supervision governs the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of Tempo Bank rather than for holders of Sugar Creek Financial common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.
Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security or operational integrity of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan, and other systems. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
| 17 |
The cost of additional finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls in order to satisfy our public company reporting requirements have increased our expenses.
The obligations of being a public reporting company require significant expenditures and place additional demands on our management team. We have made, and will continue to make, changes to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a stand-alone public company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations as a public company. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price. In addition, we may need to hire additional compliance, accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical knowledge, and we may not be able to do so in a timely fashion. As a result, we may need to rely on outside consultants to provide these services for us until qualified personnel are hired. These obligations have increased our operating expenses and could divert our management’s attention from our operations.
We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we decide to take advantage of certain exemptions from reporting requirements that are available to emerging growth companies, our common stock could be less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012. We are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure about our executive compensation and omission of compensation discussion and analysis disclosure, and an exemption from the requirement of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation. We also are not subject to certain requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including the requirement that an independent registered public accounting firm attest to our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. If we take advantage of any of these exemptions, some investors may find our common stock less attractive, which could hurt our stock price. In addition, we have elected to use the extended transition period to delay adoption of new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until such standards are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards. See “Business – Regulation and Supervision – Holding Company Regulation – Emerging Growth Company Status.”
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
We conduct our business through our main office in Trenton, Illinois and our branch office in Breese, Illinois, both of which we own. The net book value of our land, buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment was $1.2 million as of March 31, 2015.
Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, except as disclosed in Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
| 18 |
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities
| (a) | Market Information, Holders and Dividend Information. Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol ”SUGR.” The approximate number of holders of record Sugar Creek Financial common stock as of March 31, 2015 was 176. Certain shares of Sugar Creek Financial are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number. |
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the common stock as reported on the OTCQB and the dividends paid on the common stock for each full quarterly period during the past two fiscal years.
| Quarter Ended: | High | Low | Dividends | |||||||||
| March 31, 2015 | $ | 10.90 | $ | 9.40 | $ | - | ||||||
| December 31, 2014 | 9.68 | 9.35 | - | |||||||||
| September 30, 2014 | 9.45 | 9.20 | - | |||||||||
| June 30, 2014 | 9.43 | 8.60 | - | |||||||||
| March 31, 2014 | $ | 9.75 | $ | 8.60 | $ | - | ||||||
| December 31, 2013 | 10.49 | 5.80 | - | |||||||||
| September 30, 2013 | 6.50 | 5.70 | 0.10 | |||||||||
| June 30, 2013 | 5.70 | 5.50 | - | |||||||||
Maryland law generally permits Sugar Creek Financial to pay dividends on its common stock unless, after giving effect to the dividend, Sugar Creek Financial would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of its business or its total assets would be less than its total liabilities.
| (b) | Sales of Unregistered Securities. Not applicable. |
| (c) | Use of Proceeds. Not Applicable. |
| (d) | Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.” |
| (e) | Stock Repurchases. Not Applicable. |
| (f) | Stock Performance Graph. Not required for smaller reporting companies. |
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
| 19 |
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
This section is intended to help potential investors understand the financial performance of Sugar Creek Financial through a discussion of the factors affecting our consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2015 and 2014 and our consolidated results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that appear at page F-1.
Overview
Our principal business is to acquire deposits from individuals and businesses in the communities surrounding our offices and to use these deposits to fund loans. We focus on providing our products and services to two segments of customers: individuals and small businesses.
Income. Our primary source of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Changes in levels of interest rates affect our net interest income.
A secondary source of income is non-interest income, which is revenue that we receive from providing products and services. The majority of our non-interest income generally comes from service charges on deposit accounts, and to a lesser extent, loan service charges.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances for losses on loans on a monthly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Expenses. The noninterest expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and benefits expenses, occupancy expenses, equipment and data processing expenses, FDIC premiums, costs from operation of foreclosed real estate, professional and regulatory fees and other miscellaneous expenses, including legal and accounting fees and expenses of our securities filings, stockholder communications and meetings.
Our largest noninterest expense is compensation and benefits, which consist primarily of salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits, including employee stock ownership plan allocations.
Critical Accounting Policies
In the preparation of our financial statements, we have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our significant accounting policies are described in note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates under different conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying values of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
The recently enacted JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we may delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. If we choose to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
| 20 |
Allowance for Loan Losses. We consider the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to operations. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impacted loans; value of collateral; and determination of qualitative loss factors to be applied to the various segments of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Management reviews the level of the allowance at least monthly. The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired, for which the carrying value of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows, or loans otherwise adversely classified. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on the historical loan loss experience for the last three years, including adjustments to historical loss experience, maintained to cover uncertainties that affect the Bank’s estimate of probable losses for each loan type. The adjustments to historical loss experience are based on evaluation of several factors, including changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in collection, charge-off and recovery practices; changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in the volume and severity of nonperforming loans; the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; and changes in current, national and local economic and business conditions. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. In addition, the OCC, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would adversely affect earnings. See notes 1 and 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Balance Sheet Analysis
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $72,000 to $16.7 million at March 31, 2015 from $16.6 million at March 31, 2014 due to normal fluctuations.
Loans. The largest segment of our loan portfolio is single-family owner occupied residential real estate loans. At March 31, 2015, single-family owner occupied residential real estate loans totaled $61.3 million, compared to $58.1 million of total loans at March 31, 2014. Increases in single-family owner occupied residential real estate loans are the result of our continued emphasis on this type of lending and improving economic conditions in the local and regional area.
Single-family non-owner occupied residential real estate loans, the second largest segment of our loan portfolio, totaled $8.2 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $8.4 million of total loans, at March 31, 2014. Decreases in this segment were a result of repayments.
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans totaled $3.6 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $3.8 million at March 31, 2014. Reductions in these loan segments were a result of repayments by borrowers largely as a result of the competitive environment for financing these types of mortgage loans.
Land loan balances totaled $1.2 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $1.6 million at March 31, 2014. Decreases in this loan segment were a result of repayments by borrowers.
Consumer loan balances totaled $1.6 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $1.9 million at March 31, 2014. Decreases in this segment were primarily due to the repayment of a loan secured by a certificate of deposit and, to a lesser extent, repayments on other consumer loans.
| 21 |
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
Table 1: Loan Portfolio Analysis
| At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 61,255 | 80.82 | % | $ | 58,116 | 78.77 | % | ||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 8,163 | 10.77 | 8,437 | 11.43 | ||||||||||||
| Multi-family | 721 | 0.95 | 783 | 1.06 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 2,879 | 3.80 | 2,981 | 4.04 | ||||||||||||
| Land | 1,213 | 1.60 | 1,554 | 2.11 | ||||||||||||
| Total real estate loans | 74,231 | 97.94 | 71,871 | 97.41 | ||||||||||||
| Consumer loans: | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | 1,562 | 2.06 | 1,912 | 2.59 | ||||||||||||
| Total loans | 75,793 | 100.00 | % | 73,783 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance for losses | (242 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net deferred loan fees | (87 | ) | (92 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Loans, net | $ | 75,464 | $ | 73,387 | ||||||||||||
At March 31, 2015, fixed-rate loans, balloon loans and adjustable-rate loans totaled $39.7 million, $36.1 million and $32,000, respectively.
Loan originations for the year ended March 31, 2015 totaled $13.4 million, down $1.8 million from $15.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2014.
Principal payment and prepayment cash flows from the loan portfolio for the year ended March 31, 2015 totaled $11.4 million, down $3.4 million from $14.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2014.
Tempo Bank uses the principal payment and prepayment cash flows to calculate a ratio that indicates the volume of loan portfolio turnover. It is determined by dividing total principal payments and prepayments during the period being measured by the gross loan portfolio balance at the beginning of the period. For the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the turnover ratio was 15.5% and 20.2%, respectively.
The following table illustrates the projected contractual principal cash flows for all loans with any remaining balance being placed into the appropriate periods based on the timing of the payment cash flows for fixed and balloon rate loans, and next repricing period for all variable rate loans. Additional prepayment projections are not included in these projections and would significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. The amounts shown below exclude net deferred loan fees and deferred income.
| 22 |
Table 2: Loan Portfolio Contractual Cash Flows
| More than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
| One year | One to | Five to | Over | |||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) | or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten years | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Single-family real estate loans | $ | 4,236 | $ | 18,975 | $ | 27,240 | $ | 18,967 | $ | 69,418 | ||||||||||
| Multi-family | 95 | 420 | 190 | 16 | $ | 721 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 2,879 | - | - | - | $ | 2,879 | ||||||||||||||
| Land | 143 | 560 | 437 | 73 | $ | 1,213 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 565 | 856 | 141 | - | $ | 1,562 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Loans | $ | 7,918 | $ | 20,811 | $ | 28,008 | $ | 19,056 | $ | 75,793 | ||||||||||
| Contractual cash flows due after one year: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate loans (including balloon loans) | $ | 20,810 | $ | 28,008 | $ | 19,056 | $ | 67,874 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustable-rate loans | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 20,811 | $ | 28,008 | $ | 19,056 | $ | 67,875 | ||||||||||||
Investments. At March 31, 2015, our investment portfolio totaled $1.2 million and consisted solely of our investment in the FHLBC stock. Our investment in FHLBC stock was unchanged from March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2015, $570,000 of our investment in FHLBC stock consisted of excess or voluntary stock.
We had no investments that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2015, except for our investment in FHLBC.
Premises and Equipment, Net. At March 31, 2015, premises and equipment, net, totaled $1.2 million, an increase of $53,000 from $1.1 million at March 31, 2014. The increase was due to capital improvements to the office buildings and computer systems, net of depreciation expense.
Other Assets. Other assets totaled $332,000 at March 31, 2015, a decrease of $438,000 from March 31, 2014. The decrease over the period was due to the offset of deferred conversion costs against proceeds from sale of common stock and the timing of prepaid items.
Deposits. Our deposit base is comprised of noninterest-bearing NOW accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. We consider our deposit accounts other than certificates of deposit to be core deposits. Deposits decreased $1.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2015 as core deposits decreased $4.3 million and certificates of deposit increased $2.8 million. The decrease in deposits during the year ended March 31, 2015 was a result of the utilization of funds for the purchase of common stock in the conversion offering. At March 31, 2015 and 2014, we had no brokered deposits.
Table 3: Deposits
| At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest bearing NOW accounts | 3,718 | 4.87 | % | 6,832 | 8.78 | % | ||||||||||
| NOW accounts | 6,741 | 8.83 | 6,314 | 8.12 | ||||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 14,197 | 18.61 | 13,875 | 17.83 | ||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 16,384 | 21.48 | 18,351 | 23.59 | ||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 35,251 | 46.21 | 32,429 | 41.68 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 76,291 | 100.00 | % | $ | 77,801 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
| 23 |
Table 4: Time Deposit Maturities of $100,000 or more
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Maturity Period | ||||||||
| Three months or less | $ | 566 | $ | 738 | ||||
| Over three through six months | 1,641 | 1,098 | ||||||
| Over six through twelve months | 2,116 | 1,284 | ||||||
| Over twelve months | 7,518 | 6,158 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 11,841 | $ | 9,278 | ||||
Borrowings. Occasionally, we utilize FHLBC advances to supplement our supply of funds for loans. Borrowings were unchanged for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. During the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no new advances or repayments made. In the table below, the weighted average interest rate during the year is based on the weighted average balances determined on a monthly basis. At March 31, 2015, the entire $5.0 million advance matures on February 13, 2017.
Table 5: Borrowings
| At and For the | ||||||||
| Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during the period: | ||||||||
| FHLB advances | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||
| Average amount outstanding during the period: | ||||||||
| FHLB advances | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
| Weighted average interest rate during the period: | ||||||||
| FHLB advances | 4.71 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||
| Balance outstanding at end of period: | ||||||||
| FHLB advances | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
| Weighted average interest rate at end of period: | ||||||||
| FHLB advances | 4.71 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||
Stockholder’s Equity. Stockholder’s equity increased due to equity raised in the second step conversion of $2.6 million, earnings of $210,000 for the year ended March 31, 2015, and amortization of ESOP awards of $59,000.
| 24 |
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
Table 6: Statements of Earnings Summary
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended March 31, (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 2,644 | $ | 2,750 | $ | (106 | ) | (3.86 | )% | |||||||
| Provision for loan losses | 62 | 63 | (1 | ) | (1.59 | ) | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 131 | 165 | (34 | ) | (20.61 | ) | ||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | (2,477 | ) | (2,312 | ) | (165 | ) | 7.14 | |||||||||
| Income taxes | (150 | ) | (259 | ) | 109 | (42.08 | ) | |||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210 | $ | 407 | $ | (197 | ) | (48.47 | )% | |||||||
| Return on average stockholders' equity | 1.65 | % | 3.97 | % | ||||||||||||
| Return on average assets | 0.23 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||||
| Average stockholders' equity | $ | 12,736 | $ | 10,242 | ||||||||||||
| Average assets | 93,264 | 89,430 | ||||||||||||||
Total Interest Income. Total interest income decreased due to a lower loan yield earned on the loan portfolio. The yield decreased as a result of lower market interest rates.
Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased primarily due to higher certificate of deposit balances which are offered at higher market interest rates.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $106,000 as a result of lower yields on the loan portfolio and higher deposit rates offered on certificates of deposit. Deposit interest expense increased by $10,000 while interest income from the loan portfolio decreased by $96,000. As a result, the interest rate spread decreased to 2.90% for the year ended March 31, 2015 from 3.13% for the year ended March 31, 2014 and the net interest margin similarly decreased to 3.03% at March 31, 2015 from 3.24% at March 31, 2014.
Table 7: Analysis of Net Interest Income
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended March 31, (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Components of net interest income | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 3,312 | $ | 3,414 | $ | (102 | ) | (2.99 | )% | |||||||
| Stock in FHLB of Chicago | 6 | 4 | $ | 2 | 50.00 | |||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 23 | 19 | 4 | 21.05 | ||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 3,341 | 3,437 | (96 | ) | (2.79 | ) | ||||||||||
| Deposits | (458 | ) | (448 | ) | (10 | ) | 2.23 | |||||||||
| Borrowings | (239 | ) | (239 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||
| Total interest expense | (697 | ) | (687 | ) | (10 | ) | 1.46 | |||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 2,644 | $ | 2,750 | $ | (106 | ) | (3.84 | )% | |||||||
| 25 |
Table 8: Average yields and rates paid
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended March 31, (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets | 3.82 | % | 4.05 | % | (0.23 | )% | (5.68 | )% | ||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.00 | - | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread | 2.90 | 3.13 | (0.23 | ) | (7.35 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 3.03 | 3.24 | (0.21 | ) | (6.48 | ) | ||||||||||
| Average balances | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 74,462 | $ | 73,938 | $ | 524 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||
| Stock in FHLB of Chicago | 1,165 | 1,165 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 11,722 | 9,692 | 2,030 | 20.95 | ||||||||||||
| Deposits | 70,487 | 69,780 | 707 | 1.01 | ||||||||||||
| Borrowings | 5,000 | 5,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Provision (Credit) for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was a credit of $62,000 for the year ended March 31, 2015, compared to a credit to the provision for loan losses of $63,000 for the year ended March 31, 2014. The credit to the provision for loan losses resulted from the reduction in the historical loss experience ratio, which is derived over a period of three years.
The allowance for loan losses was $242,000, or 0.32% of total loans outstanding as of March 31, 2015, as compared with $304,000, or 0.41% of total loans outstanding as of March 31, 2014. A breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category is presented under “Risk Management – Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income decreased $34,000 for the fiscal year 2015. Decreases in service charge income on deposit accounts and other service fee income contributed to the decline.
Table 9: Noninterest Income Summary
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended March 31, (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Loan service charges | $ | 24 | $ | 25 | $ | (1 | ) | (0.04 | )% | |||||||
| Service charges on deposit accounts | 94 | 121 | (27 | ) | (22.31 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other | 13 | 19 | (6 | ) | (31.58 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 131 | $ | 165 | $ | (34 | ) | (20.61 | )% | |||||||
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $165,000 for fiscal 2015 from $2.3 million for fiscal 2014 primarily as a result of higher costs of operations of foreclosed real estate, increases in equipment and data processing expense and other noninterest expense.
Operations from foreclosed real estate increased due to a higher level of sales activity and resulting losses in fiscal 2015. Equipment and data processing increased primarily as a result of the installation and configuration of new computer systems and imaging services provided by an outside vendor. Other noninterest expense increased due primarily to public company reporting expenses.
| 26 |
| Table 10: Noninterest Expense Summary | ||||||||||||||||
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended March 31, (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | (Decrease) | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 1,332 | $ | 1,307 | $ | 25 | 1.91 | % | ||||||||
| Occupancy expense | 140 | 129 | 11 | 8.53 | ||||||||||||
| Advertising | 54 | 33 | 21 | 63.64 | ||||||||||||
| Equipment and data processing | 395 | 353 | 42 | 11.90 | ||||||||||||
| FDIC premium expense | 47 | 64 | (17 | ) | (26.56 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operations of foreclosed real estate, net | 85 | 36 | 49 | 136.11 | ||||||||||||
| Professional and regulatory fees | 141 | 169 | (28 | ) | (16.57 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other | 283 | 221 | 62 | 28.05 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,477 | $ | 2,312 | $ | 165 | 7.14 | % | ||||||||
Income Taxes. Income taxes were $150,000 for 2015, reflecting an effective tax rate of 41.6%, compared to $259,000 for 2014, reflecting an effective tax rate of 38.9%. Income taxes decreased due primarily to lower pre-tax earnings for 2015.
Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the years indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities. For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using month-end balances, and nonaccrual loans are included in average balances only. Management does not believe that use of month-end balances instead of daily balances has caused any material differences in the information presented. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans and are insignificant. None of the income reflected in the following table is tax-exempt income.
| 27 |
Table 11: Average Balance Table
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | and | Yield/ | Average | and | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Dividends | Cost | Balance | Dividends | Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 74,462 | $ | 3,312 | 4.45 | % | $ | 73,938 | $ | 3,414 | 4.62 | % | ||||||||||||
| FHLBC Stock | 1,165 | 6 | 0.52 | 1,165 | 4 | 0.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 11,722 | 23 | 0.20 | 9,692 | 19 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 87,349 | 3,341 | 3.82 | 84,795 | 3,437 | 4.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets | 5,915 | 4,635 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 93,264 | 89,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOW accounts | $ | 6,340 | $ | 10 | 0.16 | % | $ | 5,791 | $ | 8 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Savings accounts | 13,730 | 34 | 0.25 | 13,701 | 35 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 17,448 | 82 | 0.47 | 17,266 | 81 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 32,969 | 332 | 1.01 | 33,022 | 324 | 0.98 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 70,487 | 458 | 0.65 | 69,780 | 448 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
| FHLBC advances | 5,000 | 239 | 4.78 | 5,000 | 239 | 4.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other borrowings | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 75,487 | $ | 697 | 0.92 | $ | 74,780 | $ | 687 | 0.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing NOW accounts | 4,059 | 3,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 982 | 815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 80,528 | 79,188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | 12,736 | 10,242 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 93,264 | $ | 89,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 2,644 | $ | 2,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread | 2.90 | % | 3.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 3.03 | % | 3.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | 115.71 | % | 113.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 |
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionally to the volume and rate changes.
Table 12: Net Interest Income - Changes Due to Rate and Volume
Year Ended March 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2014
| Increase | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in Thousands) | Volume | Rate | (Decrease) | |||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 24 | $ | (126 | ) | $ | (102 | ) | ||||
| Taxable investment securities | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Nontaxable investment securities | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Other-interest earning assets | 4 | - | 4 | |||||||||
| FHLBC stock | - | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28 | (124 | ) | (96 | ) | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | - | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
| Money market | 1 | - | 1 | |||||||||
| NOW accounts | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | (2 | ) | 10 | 8 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | - | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
| Other borrowings | - | - | - | |||||||||
| FHLBC advances | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | - | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
| Change in net interest income | $ | 28 | $ | (134 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | ||||
Risk Management
Overview. Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we face are operational risks, liquidity risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, data processing errors, and technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status, including contacting the borrower by letter and phone at regular intervals. When the borrower is in default, we may commence collection proceedings. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure. Generally, when a consumer loan becomes 90 days past due, we institute collection proceedings and attempt to repossess any personal property that secures the loan. Management informs the board of directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 90 days, all loans in foreclosure and repossessed property that we own.
| 29 |
Analysis of Nonperforming and Classified Assets. We consider foreclosed real estate, repossessed assets, non-accrual loans and accruing troubled debt restructurings to be nonperforming assets. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days delinquent at which time the accrual of interest ceases and the allowance for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged against operations. Typically, payments received on a nonaccrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan. There were no changes in our nonaccrual loan policy for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.
Troubled debt restructurings are loans where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When property is acquired it is recorded at fair market value at the date of foreclosure less estimated selling costs. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Table 13: Nonperforming Assets
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Nonaccrual loans: | ||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 263 | $ | - | ||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 32 | - | ||||||
| Multi-family | 128 | - | ||||||
| Commercial | - | - | ||||||
| Land | - | - | ||||||
| Consumer | - | - | ||||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | 423 | - | ||||||
| Accruing troubled debt restructurings: | ||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | 947 | 966 | ||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 207 | 212 | ||||||
| Total accruing troubled-debt restructurings | 1,154 | 1,178 | ||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | 1,577 | 1,178 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate - residential | 434 | 755 | ||||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 2,011 | $ | 1,933 | ||||
| Total nonperforming loans to total loans | 2.08 | % | 1.60 | % | ||||
| Total nonperforming loans to total assets | 1.65 | 1.25 | ||||||
| Total nonperforming assets to total assets | 2.10 | 2.05 | ||||||
There were no troubled debt restructurings included in the nonaccrual loan category at any of the dates presented.
| 30 |
Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2015 consisted of two loans secured by single-family, owner occupied properties, two loans secured by single-family, non-owner occupied properties and one multi-family property loan. While there was an increase in nonaccrual loans from 2014, the level of nonaccrual loans continues to be masked by a state, regional and local economy beleaguered by slower economic recovery, job layoffs, divorce and health issues that impact our borrowers.
Accruing troubled debt restructurings decreased $24,000 to $1.2 million at March 31, 2015 from $1.2 million at March 31, 2014 as payments continue to be made under the terms of the modified agreements. Troubled debt restructurings consist of two loans secured by single-family, owner occupied properties and two loans secured by a single-family, non-owner occupied property.
We did not have any accruing loans past due 90 days or more at the dates presented above. Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended March 31, 2015 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $9,000. Income related to nonaccrual loans included in interest income for the year ended March 31, 2015 was $6,000.
At March 31, 2015, there were no other loans known to management which caused management to have serious concerns as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and may result in disclosure as nonaccrual, 90 days past due or impaired.
Foreclosed real estate decreased to $434,000 at March 31, 2015 from $755,000 at March 31, 2014 due to the sale of two single-family dwellings. As a result of the sales, $69,000 was charged to operations of foreclosed real estate.
Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the OCC has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss.
Table 14: Classified Assets
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Special mention assets | $ | - | $ | 446 | ||||
| Substandard assets | 2,011 | 1,721 | ||||||
| Doubtful assets | - | - | ||||||
| Loss assets | - | - | ||||||
| Total classified assets | $ | 2,011 | $ | 2,167 | ||||
Special mention assets at March 31, 2014 included three loans secured by single- family non-owner occupied properties.
Substandard assets at March 31, 2015 included four loans secured by single- family owner occupied properties, four loans secured by single- family, non-owner occupied properties, one multi- family property loan, and two foreclosed properties secured by single- family residences.
Substandard assets at March 31, 2014 included two loans secured by single- family owner occupied properties, two loans secured by a single- family, non-owner occupied property and three foreclosed properties secured by single- family residences.
| 31 |
For information regarding Tempo Bank’s loan portfolio aging analysis please refer to the table contained in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The frequency we evaluate the need for loan loss allowances is on a monthly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired, for which the carrying value of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows, or loans otherwise adversely classified. Appraisals are performed by a list of independent, certified appraisers to obtain fair values on non-homogenous loans secured by real estate. The appraisals are generally obtained when market conditions change and at a time a loan becomes impaired. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on the historical loan loss experience for the last three years, including adjustments to historical loss experience, maintained to cover uncertainties that affect the Company’s estimate of probable losses for each loan type. The adjustments to historical loss experience are based on evaluation of several factors, including changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in collection, charge-off and recovery practices; changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in the volume and severity of nonperforming loans; the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; and changes in current, national and local economic and business conditions.
We identify loans that may need to be charged off as a loss by reviewing all delinquent loans, classified loans and other loans that management may have concerns about collectibility. For individually reviewed loans, the borrower’s inability to make payments under the terms of the loan or a shortfall in collateral value would result in us charging off the loan or the portion of the loan that was impaired.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
Table 15: Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
| At March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Loans in Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Loans in Category to Total Loans | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 162 | 80.82 | % | $ | 209 | 78.77 | % | ||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 33 | 10.77 | 52 | 11.43 | ||||||||||||
| Multi-family | 2 | 0.95 | 2 | 1.06 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 6 | 3.80 | 9 | 4.04 | ||||||||||||
| Land | 3 | 1.60 | 5 | 2.11 | ||||||||||||
| Consumer | 3 | 2.06 | 5 | 2.59 | ||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 33 | - | 22 | - | ||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 242 | 100.00 | % | $ | 304 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. In addition, the OCC, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses and may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
| 32 |
Table 16: Analysis of Loan Loss Experience
| Analysis of Loan Loss Experience | At March 31, | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Allowance at beginning of period | $ | 304 | $ | 383 | ||||
| Provision for (credit to) loan losses | (62 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||
| Charge-offs: | ||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | - | (14 | ) | |||||
| Consumer loans | - | (2 | ) | |||||
| Total charge-offs | - | (16 | ) | |||||
| Recoveries: | ||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | - | - | ||||||
| Total recoveries | - | - | ||||||
| Net charge-offs | - | (16 | ) | |||||
| Allowance at end of period | $ | 242 | $ | 304 | ||||
| Allowance to nonperforming loans | 15.35 | % | 25.81 | % | ||||
| Allowance to total loans | 0.32 | 0.41 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding | - | 0.02 | ||||||
The net charge-offs for the fiscal year 2014 relate primarily to one large single-family owner-occupied loan, and to a lesser extent, one consumer loan. There were no net charge-offs for fiscal year 2015.
The allowance to nonperforming loans ratio at March 31, 2015 decreased due to an increase in nonperforming loans to $1.6 million at March 31, 2015 from $1.2 million at March 31, 2014, as nonaccrual loans increased to $423,000 at March 31, 2015.
Interest Rate Risk Management. Our earnings and the market value of our assets and liabilities are subject to fluctuations caused by changes in the level of interest rates. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Our strategy for managing interest rate risk emphasizes originating balloon loans or loans with adjustable interest rates and core deposit products.
We have an Asset/Liability Management Committee to coordinate all aspects involving asset/liability management. The committee establishes and monitors the volume, maturities, pricing and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources to provide results that are consistent with liquidity, growth, risk limits and profitability goals.
| 33 |
We use a net market value methodology provided by an outside consulting firm to review our level of interest rate risk. This methodology measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 50 to 300 basis point increase or 50 to 100 basis point decreases in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table presents the change in the net portfolio value of the Bank at March 31, 2015 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates based on our assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.
Table 17: NPV Analysis
| At March 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Portfolio Value | Net Portfolio Value as % of | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Portfolio Value of Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
| Basis Point ("bp") | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||
| Change in Rates | $ Amount | $ Change | % Change | NPV Ratio | Change | |||||||||||||||
| 300bp | $ | 12,926 | $ | (5,916 | ) | (31.40 | )% | 14.33 | % | (454 | )bp | |||||||||
| 200 | 14,783 | (4,059 | ) | (21.54 | ) | 15.81 | (306 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 100 | 16,576 | (2,266 | ) | (12.03 | ) | 17.11 | (176 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 50 | 18,801 | (41 | ) | (0.22 | ) | 19.10 | 23 | |||||||||||||
| 0 | 18,842 | - | - | 18.87 | - | |||||||||||||||
| -50 | 18,569 | (273 | ) | (1.45 | ) | 18.37 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
| -100 | 18,008 | (834 | ) | (4.43 | ) | 17.64 | (123 | ) | ||||||||||||
We use certain assumptions in assessing our interest rate risk. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and borrowings from the FHLBC. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets depend on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At March 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents totaled $16.7 million. In addition, at March 31, 2015, we had the ability to borrow an additional $42.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank. At March 31, 2015, we had $5.0 million of advances outstanding with a single maturity due in February 2017.
In addition, an unsecured open line credit of $2.0 million exists with Quad City Bank and Trust, Davenport, Iowa. The establishment of this credit line is in conjunction with the Bank’s liquidity and contingency funding plans.
| 34 |
A significant use of our liquidity is the funding of loan originations. At March 31, 2015, we had fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments of $708,000. Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Another significant use of our liquidity is the funding of deposit withdrawals. Certificates of deposit due within one year of March 31, 2015 totaled $17.1 million, or 48.5% of certificates of deposit. The large percentage of certificates of deposit that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds for long periods in an extended low interest rate environment. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before March 31, 2016. We believe, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activity is the origination of loans. Our primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts and FHLBC advances. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to be competitive. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates on certain deposit products to attract deposits.
Sugar Creek Financial is a separate legal entity from Tempo Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, Sugar Creek Financial is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its shareholders. Sugar Creek Financial’s liquidity may depend, in part, upon its receipt of dividends from Tempo Bank because Sugar Creek Financial has no source of income other than earnings from the investment of the net proceeds from its initial public offering. The amount of dividends that Tempo Bank may declare and pay to Sugar Creek Financial in any calendar year, without the receipt of prior approval from the Federal Reserve but with prior notice to the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, cannot exceed net income for that year to date plus retained net income (as defined) for the preceding two calendar years. At March 31, 2015, Sugar Creek Financial had liquid assets of $1.3 million.
Capital Management. Tempo Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the OCC, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At March 31, 2015, Tempo Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements. Tempo Bank is considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See note 10 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Supervision and Regulation—Federal Banking—Regulation Capital Requirements.”
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. For information about our loan commitments, see note 11 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 1 (l) – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Price
Our financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increase cost of operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than the effects of inflation.
| 35 |
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Interest Rate Risk Management.”
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Audited consolidated financial statements for Sugar Creek Financial are included in this Annual report beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2015. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
(b) Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of March 31, 2015, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, based on those criteria.
| 36 |
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
None.
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Code of Ethics
Sugar Creek Financial has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to Sugar Creek Financial’s principal executive officer and financial officer and all other employees and directors. The Code of Ethics is available by writing Sugar Creek Financial Corp., 28 West Broadway, P.O. Box 59, Trenton, IL 62293, Attention Corporate Secretary.
Information concerning directors and executive officers of Sugar Creek Financial is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors.”
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Executive Compensation.”
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information concerning security ownership of certain owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Stock Ownership.”
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Information concerning certain relationships, transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Corporate Governance – Director Independence.”
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal II – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The documents filed as a part of this Form 10-K are:
| 37 |
| (A) | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; | |
| (B) | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and 2014; | |
| (C) | Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014; | |
| (D) | Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014; | |
| (E) | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014; and | |
| (F) | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| (a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules |
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or has been included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
| (a)(3) | Exhibits |
| 3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement to Articles of Incorporation of Sugar Creek Financial Corp.(1) | |
| 3.2 | Bylaws of Sugar Creek Financial Corp.(2) | |
| 4.0 | Form of Common Stock Certificates of Sugar Creek Financial Corp.(2) | |
| 10.1 | Employment Agreement between Sugar Creek Financial Corp. and Robert J. Stroh, Jr. (3) | |
| 10.2 | Employment Agreement between Tempo Bank and Robert J. Stroh, Jr. (3) | |
| 10.3 | Employment Agreement between Sugar Creek Financial Corp. and Francis J. Eversman. (3) | |
| 10.4 | Employment Agreement between Tempo Bank and Francis J. Eversman. (3) | |
| 21.0 | Subsidiaries of Sugar Creek Financial Corp.(4) | |
| 23.0 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
| 31.0 | Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.0 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 101.0 | The following materials from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference into this document from the exhibits filed with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2013. | |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference into this document from the exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-192700), and amendments thereto. | |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference into this document from the exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 30, 2014. | |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to Part I of this Form 10-K − “Business―Subsidiaries.” |
| 38 |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of
Sugar Creek Financial Corp.
***
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information either is not applicable or is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
| F-1 |
MICHAEL TROKEY & COMPANY, P.C.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
10411 CLAYTON ROAD
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63131
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sugar Creek Financial Corp.
Trenton, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sugar Creek Financial Corp., (“Company”) as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sugar Creek Financial Corp. as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
St. Louis, Missouri
|
 |
| F-2 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 3,596,926 | $ | 4,013,453 | ||||
| Federal funds sold | 11,580,000 | 8,860,000 | ||||||
| FHLB daily investment account | 1,543,082 | 3,774,375 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 16,720,008 | 16,647,828 | ||||||
| Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago ("FHLBC") | 1,165,513 | 1,165,513 | ||||||
| Loans receivable, net of allowance for losses of $242,103 and $304,103 | 75,463,746 | 73,386,855 | ||||||
| Premises and equipment, net | 1,198,459 | 1,145,346 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate | 434,367 | 754,704 | ||||||
| Accrued interest receivable on loans | 257,576 | 241,411 | ||||||
| Other assets | 331,950 | 770,149 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 95,571,619 | $ | 94,111,806 | ||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 76,290,961 | $ | 77,800,822 | ||||
| Accrued interest payable on deposits | 50,070 | 38,371 | ||||||
| Advances from FHLBC | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | ||||||
| Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance | 428,485 | 370,091 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 297,680 | 301,922 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liability | 220,108 | 200,108 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 82,287,304 | 83,711,314 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | - | - | ||||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 14,000,000 shares authorized; 949,245 and 906,879 shares issued | 9,492 | 9,069 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 6,124,848 | 3,288,508 | ||||||
| Treasury stock, at cost, 11,852 shares at March 31, 2014 | - | (85,638 | ) | |||||
| Common stock acquired by Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") | (432,527 | ) | (183,670 | ) | ||||
| Retained earnings - substantially restricted | 7,582,502 | 7,372,223 | ||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 13,284,315 | 10,400,492 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 95,571,619 | $ | 94,111,806 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F-3 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 3,312,583 | $ | 3,414,591 | ||||
| Stock in FHLBC | 5,828 | 3,496 | ||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 23,004 | 19,577 | ||||||
| Total interest income | 3,341,415 | 3,437,664 | ||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||
| Deposits | 458,591 | 448,575 | ||||||
| Advances from FHLBC | 238,771 | 238,771 | ||||||
| Total interest expense | 697,362 | 687,346 | ||||||
| Net interest income | 2,644,053 | 2,750,318 | ||||||
| Provision for (credit to) loan losses | (62,000 | ) | (62,958 | ) | ||||
| Net interest income after provision for (credit to) loan losses | 2,706,053 | 2,813,276 | ||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||
| Loan service charges | 24,293 | 25,161 | ||||||
| Service charges on deposit accounts | 94,123 | 121,045 | ||||||
| Other | 13,039 | 18,970 | ||||||
| Total noninterest income | 131,455 | 165,176 | ||||||
| Noninterest expense: | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | 1,331,995 | 1,307,148 | ||||||
| Occupancy expense | 140,118 | 128,888 | ||||||
| Advertising | 53,726 | 33,109 | ||||||
| Equipment and data processing | 395,208 | 352,729 | ||||||
| FDIC premium expense | 47,260 | 64,521 | ||||||
| Operations of foreclosed real estate, net | 85,458 | 35,946 | ||||||
| Professional and regulatory fees | 140,505 | 169,377 | ||||||
| Other | 283,431 | 220,541 | ||||||
| Total noninterest expense | 2,477,701 | 2,312,259 | ||||||
| Earnings before income tax expense | 359,807 | 666,193 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 149,528 | 259,278 | ||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 406,915 | ||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | ||||
| Dividends per share | $ | - | $ | 0.10 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F-4 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
| Common | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common | Paid-in | Treasury | Acquired | Retained | Stockholders' | |||||||||||||||||||
| Stock | Capital | Stock | by ESOP | Earnings | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2013 | $ | 9,069 | $ | 3,285,387 | $ | (82,907 | ) | $ | (207,369 | ) | $ | 7,052,678 | $ | 10,056,858 | ||||||||||
| Net earnings | - | - | - | - | 406,915 | 406,915 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends, $.10 per share | - | - | - | - | (87,370 | ) | (87,370 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of common stock | - | - | (2,731 | ) | - | - | (2,731 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of ESOP award | - | (7,104 | ) | - | 23,699 | - | 16,595 | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity incentive plan expense | - | 10,225 | - | - | - | 10,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2014 | 9,069 | 3,288,508 | (85,638 | ) | (183,670 | ) | 7,372,223 | 10,400,492 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | - | - | - | - | 210,279 | 210,279 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock retired pursuant to reorganization | - | (85,638 | ) | 85,638 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of ESOP awards | - | 8,456 | - | 50,813 | - | 59,269 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cancellation of Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp. shares | (9,069 | ) | 9,069 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from stock offering | 9,492 | 2,904,453 | - | (299,670 | ) | - | 2,614,275 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2015 | $ | 9,492 | $ | 6,124,848 | $ | - | $ | (432,527 | ) | $ | 7,582,502 | $ | 13,284,315 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F-5 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 406,915 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 93,212 | 84,509 | ||||||
| Provision for (credit to) loan losses | (62,000 | ) | (62,958 | ) | ||||
| Provision for losses on foreclosed real estste | 68,712 | 15,000 | ||||||
| ESOP expense | 59,269 | 16,595 | ||||||
| Equity incentive plan expense | - | 10,225 | ||||||
| Amortization of deferred loan fees, net | (15,949 | ) | (24,182 | ) | ||||
| (Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable | (16,165 | ) | 16,762 | |||||
| Decrease (increase) in other assets | 438,199 | (495,992 | ) | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in: | ||||||||
| Accrued interest payable on deposits | 11,699 | (3,750 | ) | |||||
| Other liabilities | (4,242 | ) | (34,365 | ) | ||||
| Accrued income taxes | - | (162,877 | ) | |||||
| Deferred tax liability | 20,000 | 71,243 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | 803,014 | (162,875 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Net increase in loans receivable | (2,101,051 | ) | (817,181 | ) | ||||
| Purchase of premises and equipment | (146,325 | ) | (226,229 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from sale of (additions to) foreclosed real estate | 353,734 | (31,234 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used for investing activities | (1,893,642 | ) | (1,074,644 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in deposits | (1,509,861 | ) | 3,527,149 | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance | 58,394 | (3,094 | ) | |||||
| Cash dividends paid | - | (87,370 | ) | |||||
| Repurchase of common stock | - | (2,731 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from sale of common stock | 2,614,275 | - | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,162,808 | 3,433,954 | ||||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 72,180 | 2,196,435 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 16,647,828 | 14,451,393 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 16,720,008 | $ | 16,647,828 | ||||
| Supplemental disclosures - cash paid: | ||||||||
| Interest on deposits and advances from FHLBC | $ | 685,662 | $ | 691,096 | ||||
| Federal and state income taxes | 58,000 | 310,263 | ||||||
| Noncash transactions: | ||||||||
| Real estate acquired in settlement of loans | 152,109 | 414,190 | ||||||
| Financing of foreclosed real estate | 50,000 | - | ||||||
| Retirement of treasury stock | $ | 85,638 | $ | - | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
| F-6 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
At March 31, 2015 and 2014 and
For the Years Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the officially recognized source of authoritative accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) to be applied to nongovernmental entities. Revision of the ASC is accomplished by issuance of an Auditing Standards Update (“ASU”).
On April 8, 2014, Sugar Creek Financial Corp. (the “Company”), the Maryland-chartered holding company for Tempo Bank (the “Bank”), completed the “second step” conversion of the Bank from the mutual holding company to the stock holding company form of organization (the “Conversion”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion and Reorganization. Upon completion of the Conversion, the Company became the holding company for the Bank and 535,127 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company were sold in subscription and community offerings to certain depositors of the Bank and other investors for $7.00 per share. In addition, approximately, 414,118 additional shares of the Company’s common stock (without taking into consideration cash issued in lieu of fractional shares) were issued in exchange for the outstanding shares of common stock of Sugar Creek Financial Corp. (“Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp.”), the former federally-chartered mid-tier holding company for the Bank, held by persons other than Sugar Creek MHC. In the Conversion, each share of common stock of Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp. was converted into the right to receive 1.0453 shares of common stock.
The significant accounting policies which the Company and Bank follow in preparing and presenting the Company’s consolidated financial statements are:
a. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tempo Bank. The Company’s principal business is the business of the Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
b. For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and the FHLBC daily investment account, all with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains cash in correspondent bank accounts which at times exceed federally insured limits. The Company’s management monitors the balances in these accounts and periodically assesses the financial condition of the correspondent banks. Interest-bearing funds in cash and cash equivalents were $13,123,082 and $12,634,375 at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
c. Stock in FHLBC is recorded at cost, which represents redemption value. The Bank is required by law to own stock in the FHLBC and at March 31, 2015 had $569,613 of FHLBC stock, which is in excess of the amount required as a condition of membership or for borrowings from the FHLBC.
FHLBC stock is evaluated for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 942-325-35, “Financial Services-Depository and Lending-Investments-Other.” Determination of whether the FHLBC stock is impaired Is based on the assessment of the ultimate recoverability of cost rather than by recognizing declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of costs is influenced by the significance of the decline in net assets compared to the capital of the FHLBC and the length of time this situation has persisted; the ability of the FHLBC to make payments required by law or regulation and operating performance; the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on member institutions and customer base and the liquidity of the FHLBC. Management believes that no impairment charge on FHLBC stock is necessary at March 31, 2015.
| F-7 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
d. Loans receivable, net, are carried at unpaid principal balances, less allowance for losses, deferred income, net deferred loan fees and loans in process. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the interest method.
The Bank considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement on a timely basis. The types of loans for which impairment is measured under FASB ASC 310-10-35, “Receivables,” include nonaccrual income property loans, large nonaccrual single-family loans and troubled debt restructurings, where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. A loan classified as a troubled debt restructuring will generally retain such classification until paid in full. However, a troubled debt restructuring that is performing with its modified terms for a sustained period of one year and yields a market rate of interest at the time of the restructuring is removed from such classification.
Allowance for losses is available to absorb losses incurred on loans receivable and represents additions charged to expense, less net charge-offs. Loans are charged-off in the period deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are recorded when received. The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired, for which the carrying value of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows, or loans otherwise adversely classified. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on the historical loan loss experience for the last three years, including adjustments to historical loss experience, maintained to cover uncertainties that affect the Bank’s estimate of probable losses for each loan type. The adjustments to historical loss experience are based on evaluation of several factors, including changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in collection, charge-off and recovery practices; changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in the volume and severity of nonperforming loans; the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; and changes in current, national and local economic and business conditions. Management believes that all known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio that are probable and reasonable to estimate have been recorded as of each balance sheet date.
e. Premises and equipment, net, are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated lives are fifteen to forty years for the office buildings and improvements and three to ten years for furniture and equipment.
f. Foreclosed real estate held for sale is carried at fair value less estimated selling costs. Costs relating to improvement of foreclosed real estate are capitalized. Income and expenses from operations of foreclosed real estate and provision for losses are included in noninterest expense.
g. Interest on loans receivable is accrued as earned. Interest on loans receivable deemed uncollectible is excluded from income until collected. When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, accrued interest is reversed against current income. Subsequent collection of interest on nonaccrual loans is recorded as income when received or applied to reduce the loan balance. Accrual of interest is resumed on previously classified nonaccrual loans, when there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest.
h. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the net change in the deferred tax assets and liabilities.
| F-8 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to tax positions in income tax expense.
i. The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet committed to be released, is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. For ESOP shares committed to be released, the Bank recognizes compensation expense equal to the average fair value of the shares committed to be released during the period in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718-40-30, “Compensation-Stock Compensation-Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” To the extent that the fair value of the ESOP shares differs from the cost of such shares, the difference is charged or credited to stockholders’ equity as additional paid-in capital.
Compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of awards at the grant date and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, defined as the vesting period.
j. Earnings per share (“EPS”) are based upon the weighted-average shares outstanding. ESOP shares, which have been committed to be released, are considered outstanding. Unvested restricted stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are treated as participating securities and are included in the EPS computation using the two-class method. Prior period EPS data is adjusted retrospectively.
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 406,915 | ||||
| Less dividends paid: | ||||||||
| Common stock | - | 87,016 | ||||||
| Participating securities | - | 354 | ||||||
| Undistributed earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 319,545 | ||||
| Weighted-average basic and diluted shares and participating securities outstanding | 889,902 | 875,776 | ||||||
| Distributed earnings per share | $ | - | $ | 0.10 | ||||
| Undistributed earnings per share | 0.24 | 0.36 | ||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | ||||
k. The Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued. The Company recognizes in the financial statements the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial statement preparation process. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through June 26, 2015 and noted no subsequent events requiring financial statement recognition or disclosure.
| F-9 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
l. The following paragraphs summarize recent accounting pronouncements:
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-04, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditor (Subtopic 310-40).” The provisions of ASU 2014-04 require reclassification of a residential real estate loan to foreclosed real estate upon obtaining legal title to the property, which could occur either through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure. The existence of the borrower’s right of redemption will not prevent the lender from reclassifying a loan to foreclosed real estate once the lender obtains legal title to the property.
Entities are required to disclose the amount of foreclosed residential real estate and such loans in the process of foreclosure on an interim and annual basis. The provisions of ASU 2014-04 were early adopted, effective January 1, 2015, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Risks and Uncertainties
The Bank is a community oriented financial institution that provides traditional financial services within the areas it serves. The Bank is engaged primarily in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using these funds to originate primarily one- to four-family residential mortgage loans located in the Clinton, St. Clair, Madison and Bond County, Illinois area. Further, operations of the Bank are managed and financial performance is evaluated on an institution-wide basis. As a result, all of the Bank’s operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet dates and income and expenses for the periods covered. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions.
The Bank's operations are affected by interest rate risk, credit risk, market risk and regulations by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). The Bank is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more rapidly, or on a different basis, than its interest-earning assets. The Bank uses a net market value methodology provided by an outside consulting firm to measure its interest rate risk exposure and potential decline in the net portfolio value of the Bank. Net portfolio value is the present value of expected net cash flows from the Bank's assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. Credit risk is the risk of default on the Bank's loan portfolio that results from inability or unwillingness of borrowers to make contractually required payments. Market risk reflects changes in the value of collateral underlying loans receivable and the valuation of real estate held by the Bank.
The Bank is subject to periodic examination by the OCC that may require the Bank to record increases in the allowances based on their evaluation of available information. There can be no assurance that the OCC will not require further increases to the allowances.
| F-10 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
(3) Loans Receivable, Net
Loans receivable, net are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 61,255,147 | $ | 58,115,912 | ||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 8,162,534 | 8,437,076 | ||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | 721,130 | 782,917 | ||||||
| Commercial | 2,878,651 | 2,980,571 | ||||||
| Land | 1,212,874 | 1,553,915 | ||||||
| Consumer loans | 1,562,398 | 1,912,416 | ||||||
| 75,792,734 | 73,782,807 | |||||||
| Allowance for losses | (242,103 | ) | (304,103 | ) | ||||
| Deferred loan fees, net | (86,885 | ) | (91,849 | ) | ||||
| Total loans | $ | 75,463,746 | $ | 73,386,855 | ||||
The weighted-average rate on loans was 4.36% and 4.50% at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Balloon and adjustable-rate loans in the loan portfolio amounted to $36,219,383 and $32,927,614 at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
There were no real estate construction loans at March 31, 2015 or 2014.
The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:
Single-family, owner occupied
Single-family, owner occupied loans are underwritten based on the applicant’s employment and credit history and the appraised value of the property. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas, such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
Single-family, non-owner occupied
Single-family, non-owner occupied loans carry greater inherent risks than single-family, owner occupied loans, since the repayment ability of the borrower is reliant on the success of the income generated from the property.
Multi-family, 5 or more units
Multi-family real estate loans are typically secured by apartment complexes.
| F-11 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate loans are secured primarily by office buildings and various income-producing properties. Commercial real estate loans are underwritten based on the economic viability of the property and creditworthiness of the borrower, with emphasis given to projected cash flows as a percentage of debt service requirements. These loans carry significant credit risks as they involve larger balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Repayment of loans secured by income-producing properties generally depends on the successful operation of the real estate project and may be subject to a greater extent to adverse market conditions and the general economy.
Land
Land loans are secured by unimproved land with terms of fifteen years or less and loan amounts that do not exceed 85% of the lesser of the appraised value or the purchase price. Loans secured by unimproved land generally involve greater risks than residential mortgage lending because land loans are more difficult to evaluate and the marketability of the underlying property may also be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment or adverse conditions in the real estate market or economy.
Consumer
Consumer loans include automobile, signature and other consumer loans. Potential credit risks include rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles, which could adversely affect the value of the collateral.
The following presents by portfolio segment, the activity in allowance for loan losses for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| Allowance for Loan Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Provision for | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | Losses | Charge-offs | Recoveries | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 209,010 | $ | (46,607 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 162,403 | |||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 52,576 | (19,370 | ) | - | - | 33,206 | ||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | 2,356 | (856 | ) | - | - | 1,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 8,971 | (2,985 | ) | - | - | 5,986 | ||||||||||||||
| Land | 4,677 | (2,156 | ) | - | - | 2,521 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | 4,420 | (1,466 | ) | - | - | 2,954 | ||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 22,093 | 11,440 | - | - | 33,533 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 304,103 | $ | (62,000 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 242,103 | ||||||||||
| F-12 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| Allowance for Loan Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Provision for | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | Losses | Charge-offs | Recoveries | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 287,934 | $ | (64,920 | ) | $ | (14,004 | ) | $ | - | $ | 209,010 | ||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 30,865 | 21,711 | - | - | 52,576 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | 3,036 | (680 | ) | - | - | 2,356 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 12,793 | (3,822 | ) | - | - | 8,971 | ||||||||||||||
| Land | 4,841 | (164 | ) | - | - | 4,677 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | 4,627 | 1,831 | (2,038 | ) | - | 4,420 | ||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 39,007 | (16,914 | ) | - | - | 22,093 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 383,103 | $ | (62,958 | ) | $ | (16,042 | ) | $ | - | $ | 304,103 | |||||||||
The following presents by portfolio segment, the recorded investment in loans and impairment method at March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| Allowance for Loan Losses | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually | Collectively | Individually | Collectively | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluated | Evaluated | Evaluated | Evaluated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| for Impairment | for Impairment | Total | for Impairment | for Impairment | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 37,000 | $ | 125,403 | $ | 162,403 | $ | 1,209,527 | $ | 60,045,620 | $ | 61,255,147 | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 16,665 | 16,541 | 33,206 | 239,842 | 7,922,692 | 8,162,534 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | 1,500 | 1,500 | 127,623 | 593,507 | 721,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | 5,986 | 5,986 | - | 2,878,651 | 2,878,651 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Land | - | 2,521 | 2,521 | - | 1,212,874 | 1,212,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | 2,954 | 2,954 | - | 1,562,398 | 1,562,398 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | - | 33,533 | 33,533 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 53,665 | $ | 188,438 | $ | 242,103 | $ | 1,576,992 | $ | 74,215,742 | $ | 75,792,734 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for Loan Losses | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually | Collectively | Individually | Collectively | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluated | Evaluated | Evaluated | Evaluated | |||||||||||||||||||||
| for Impairment | for Impairment | Total | for Impairment | for Impairment | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 37,000 | $ | 172,010 | $ | 209,010 | $ | 966,027 | $ | 57,149,885 | $ | 58,115,912 | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 28,525 | 24,051 | 52,576 | 446,293 | 7,990,783 | 8,437,076 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | 2,356 | 2,356 | - | 782,917 | 782,917 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | 8,971 | 8,971 | - | 2,980,571 | 2,980,571 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Land | - | 4,677 | 4,677 | - | 1,553,915 | 1,553,915 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | 4,420 | 4,420 | - | 1,912,416 | 1,912,416 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | - | 22,093 | 22,093 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 65,525 | $ | 238,578 | $ | 304,103 | $ | 1,412,320 | $ | 72,370,487 | $ | 73,782,807 | |||||||||||||
A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.
| F-13 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The following presents impaired loans and allocated valuation allowances based upon class levels and average recorded investment:
| Impaired Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
| With | With no | Unpaid | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||
| Allowance | Allowance | Principal | for | |||||||||||||||||
| for Losses | for Losses | Total | Balance | Losses | ||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 946,720 | $ | 262,807 | $ | 1,209,527 | $ | 1,209,527 | $ | 37,000 | ||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 207,636 | 32,206 | 239,842 | 239,842 | 16,665 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | 127,623 | 127,623 | 127,623 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,154,356 | $ | 422,636 | $ | 1,576,992 | $ | 1,576,992 | $ | 53,665 | |||||||||||
The average recorded investment on impaired loans for the year ended March 31, 2015 included: single-family, owner occupied of $1,219,813, single-family, non-owner occupied of $227,375 and multi-family of $53,176.
| Impaired Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
| With | With no | Unpaid | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||
| Allowance | Allowance | Principal | for | |||||||||||||||||
| for Losses | for Losses | Total | Balance | Losses | ||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 966,027 | $ | - | $ | 966,027 | $ | 966,027 | $ | 37,000 | ||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 446,293 | - | 446,293 | 446,293 | 28,525 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,412,320 | $ | - | $ | 1,412,320 | $ | 1,412,320 | $ | 65,525 | |||||||||||
The average recorded investment on impaired loans for the year ended March 31, 2014 included: single-family, owner occupied of $979,146 and single-family non-owner occupied of $37,191.
| F-14 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The following presents nonperforming loans based upon class level at March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| Nonperforming Loans | ||||||||||||||||
| Past Due 90 | Accruing | |||||||||||||||
| Days and More | Troubled Debt | |||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | Still Accruing | Restructurings | Total | |||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 262,807 | $ | - | $ | 946,720 | $ | 1,209,527 | ||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 32,206 | - | 207,636 | 239,842 | ||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | 127,623 | - | - | 127,623 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 422,636 | $ | - | $ | 1,154,356 | $ | 1,576,992 | |||||||||
| Nonperforming Loans | ||||||||||||||||
| Past Due 90 | Accruing | |||||||||||||||
| Days and More | Troubled Debt | |||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual | Still Accruing | Restructurings | Total | |||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 966,027 | $ | 966,027 | ||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | - | - | 212,104 | 212,104 | ||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,178,131 | $ | 1,178,131 | |||||||||
For the year ended March 31, 2015, gross interest income that would have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms was $9,404. Interest income recognized on such loans for the year ended March 31, 2015 was $5,989.
There were no new troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs“) during the year ended March 31, 2015.
| F-15 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The following presents a summary of TDRs during the year ended March 31, 2014:
| Pre-modification | Post-modification | |||||||||||
| Outstanding | Outstanding | |||||||||||
| Number of | Recorded | Recorded | ||||||||||
| Contracts | Investment | Investment | ||||||||||
| Year Ended March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | 1 | $ | 499,223 | $ | 503,272 | |||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 2 | 190,866 | 212,104 | |||||||||
| 3 | $ | 690,089 | $ | 715,376 | ||||||||
After restructuring, the single-family non-owner occupied TDRs were in default during and at the year ended March 31, 2014.
The following presents a summary of troubled debt restructurings at March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| Number of | Recorded | Number of | Recorded | |||||||||||||
| Contracts | Investment | Contracts | Investment | |||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | 2 | $ | 946,720 | 2 | $ | 966,027 | ||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 2 | 207,636 | 2 | 212,104 | ||||||||||||
| 4 | $ | 1,154,356 | 4 | $ | 1,178,131 | |||||||||||
At March 31, 2015, the recorded investment in single- family real estate loans that are in the process of foreclosure according to the local jurisdiction requirements was $204,003.
The following presents the Bank's loan portfolio aging analysis as of March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| Days Past Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-59 | 60-89 | 90 or more | Current | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 1,032,922 | $ | 41,745 | $ | 262,807 | $ | 59,917,673 | $ | 61,255,147 | ||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | - | 186,457 | 32,206 | 7,943,871 | 8,162,534 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | - | 127,623 | 593,507 | 721,130 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | 2,878,651 | 2,878,651 | |||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | 1,212,874 | 1,212,874 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | 26,221 | 3,944 | - | 1,532,233 | 1,562,398 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,059,143 | $ | 232,146 | $ | 422,636 | $ | 74,078,809 | $ | 75,792,734 | |||||||||||
| F-16 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| Days Past Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-59 | 60-89 | 90 or more | Current | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | 808,034 | $ | 277,663 | $ | - | $ | 57,030,215 | $ | 58,115,912 | ||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | - | 212,104 | - | 8,224,972 | 8,437,076 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | - | - | 782,917 | 782,917 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | 2,980,571 | 2,980,571 | |||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | 1,553,915 | 1,553,915 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | 20,223 | - | 1,892,193 | 1,912,416 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 808,034 | $ | 509,990 | $ | - | $ | 72,464,783 | $ | 73,782,807 | |||||||||||
The Bank classifies loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Generally, smaller dollar consumer loans are excluded from this grading process and are reflected in the Pass category. The delinquency trends of these consumer loans are monitored on a homogeneous basis.
The Bank uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
The Pass asset quality rating encompasses assets that have performed as expected. With the exception of some smaller consumer and residential loans, these assets do not have delinquency. Loans assigned this rating include loans to borrowers possessing solid credit quality with acceptable risk.
The Special Mention asset quality rating encompasses assets that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. This grade is intended to include loans to borrowers whose credit quality has clearly deteriorated and where risk of further decline is possible unless active measures are taken to correct the situation.
The Substandard asset quality rating encompasses assets that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any; assets having a well-defined weakness based upon objective evidence; assets characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected; or the possibility that liquidation will not be timely. Loans categorized in this grade possess a well-defined credit weakness and the likelihood of repayment from the primary source is uncertain. Significant financial deterioration has occurred and very close attention is warranted to ensure the full repayment without loss. Collateral coverage may be marginal.
Doubtful asset quality rating encompasses assets that have all of the weaknesses of those classified as substandard. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.
The Loss asset quality rating encompasses assets that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. A loss classification does not mean that an asset has no recovery or salvage value; instead, it means that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off or reserving all or a portion of a basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be realized in the future.
| F-17 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The following presents the credit risk profile for the Bank's loan portfolio based upon rating category at March 31, 2015 and 2014:
| Credit Quality Indicator-Credit Risk Profile by Grade or Classification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Special | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Pass | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | - | $ | 1,209,527 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 60,045,620 | $ | 61,255,147 | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | - | 239,842 | - | - | 7,922,692 | 8,162,534 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | 127,623 | - | - | 593,507 | 721,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | 2,878,651 | 2,878,651 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | 1,212,874 | 1,212,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | 1,562,398 | 1,562,398 | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | - | $ | 1,576,992 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 74,215,742 | $ | 75,792,734 | |||||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator-Credit Risk Profile by Grade or Classification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Special | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Pass | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Single-family, owner occupied | $ | - | $ | 966,027 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 57,149,885 | $ | 58,115,912 | ||||||||||||
| Single-family, non-owner occupied | 446,293 | - | - | - | 7,990,783 | 8,437,076 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family, 5 or more units | - | - | - | - | 782,917 | 782,917 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | - | - | - | - | 2,980,571 | 2,980,571 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Land | - | - | - | - | 1,553,915 | 1,553,915 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | - | - | - | - | 1,912,416 | 1,912,416 | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 446,293 | $ | 966,027 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 72,370,487 | $ | 73,782,807 | |||||||||||||
Following is a summary of activity for loans to directors, executive officers and associates of such persons:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 3,248,771 | $ | 3,810,461 | ||||
| Additions | 595,995 | 568,998 | ||||||
| Repayments | (669,076 | ) | (1,130,688 | ) | ||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | 3,175,690 | $ | 3,248,771 | ||||
These loans were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons.
| F-18 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| (4) | Premises and Equipment, Net |
Premises and equipment, net, are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 349,032 | $ | 349,032 | ||||
| Land for possible future branch location | 152,263 | 152,263 | ||||||
| Office buildings and improvements | 1,613,203 | 1,507,409 | ||||||
| Furniture and equipment | 790,164 | 749,634 | ||||||
| 2,904,662 | 2,758,338 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | 1,706,203 | 1,612,992 | ||||||
| $ | 1,198,459 | $ | 1,145,346 | |||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $93,212 and $84,509, respectively.
| (5) | Foreclosed Real Estate |
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Foreclosed real estate - residential | $ | 434,367 | $ | 754,704 | ||||
Activity in foreclosed real estate is summarized as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 754,704 | $ | 324,280 | ||||
| Loans to foreclosed real estate | 152,109 | 414,190 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate to loans | (50,000 | ) | - | |||||
| Provision for losses | (68,712 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
| (Proceeds from sale) additions, net | (353,734 | ) | 31,234 | |||||
| Ending balance | $ | 434,367 | $ | 754,704 | ||||
| F-19 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| (6) | Deposits |
Deposits are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| Description and Weighted-average Rate | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Non-interest bearing NOW accounts | $ | 3,717,893 | $ | 6,831,968 | ||||
| NOW accounts, .16% and .15% | 6,740,640 | 6,313,783 | ||||||
| Savings accounts, .25% and .25% | 14,196,652 | 13,874,460 | ||||||
| Money market accounts, .47% and .47% | 16,384,582 | 18,351,396 | ||||||
| Total transaction accounts | 41,039,767 | 45,371,607 | ||||||
| Certificates: | ||||||||
| 0.01 - 1.00% | 13,145,671 | 16,949,056 | ||||||
| 1.01 - 2.00% | 21,623,726 | 13,404,510 | ||||||
| 2.01 - 3.00% | 481,797 | 2,043,235 | ||||||
| 3.01 - 4.00% | - | 32,414 | ||||||
| Total certificates, 1.16% and .96% | 35,251,194 | 32,429,215 | ||||||
| Total deposits, .69% and .57% | $ | 76,290,961 | $ | 77,800,822 | ||||
The aggregate amount of certificates in denominations of $250,000 or more at March 31, 2015 and 2014 were $1,750,856 and $1,749,413, respectively.
There were no brokered deposits at March 31, 2015 or 2014.
Certificate maturities are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| First year | $ | 17,089,555 | $ | 17,029,828 | ||||
| Second year | 5,406,160 | 6,659,469 | ||||||
| Third year | 5,990,269 | 4,733,826 | ||||||
| Fourth year | 2,990,837 | 846,686 | ||||||
| Fifth year | 3,774,373 | 3,159,406 | ||||||
| $ | 35,251,194 | $ | 32,429,215 | |||||
| F-20 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Interest expense on deposits is summarized as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| NOW accounts | $ | 10,117 | $ | 8,256 | ||||
| Savings accounts | 34,277 | 35,695 | ||||||
| Money market accounts | 81,983 | 80,745 | ||||||
| Certificates | 332,214 | 323,879 | ||||||
| $ | 458,591 | $ | 448,575 | |||||
| (7) | Advances from FHLBC |
Advances from FHLBC are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||||||
| Final Maturity Date | Interest Rate | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
| February 13, 2017 | 4.71 | % | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,000,000 | ||||||
At March 31, 2015, advances were secured by FHLBC stock and single-family residential mortgage loans with a collateral loan value totaling $47.0 million. At March 31, 2015, the Bank had remaining credit available under the FHLBC advance program of $42.0 million.
In addition, a $2.0 million unused open line advance exists with Quad City Bank and Trust in Davenport, Iowa.
| (8) | Income Taxes |
Retained earnings at March 31, 2015 and 2014 includes $888,000 representing tax bad debt deductions for which no provision for federal income tax has been made. If these tax bad debt reserves are used for other than loan losses, the amount used will be subject to Federal income taxes at the then prevailing corporate rate.
The provision for income taxes differs from the Federal statutory corporate tax rate of 34% as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Federal statutory income tax rate | 34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | ||||
| Increases (decreases) in tax rate: | ||||||||
| State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit | 6.2 | 6.1 | ||||||
| Other, net | 1.4 | (1.2 | ) | |||||
| Tax rate | 41.6 | % | 38.9 | % | ||||
| F-21 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The components of the net deferred tax liability are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| FHLB stock dividends | $ | 99,636 | $ | 99,636 | ||||
| Tax over book depreciation | 150,920 | 159,620 | ||||||
| Accrued income and expense | 90,760 | 79,812 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 341,316 | 339,068 | ||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Allowance for losses on loans | (94,420 | ) | (118,600 | ) | ||||
| Book over tax ESOP expense | (24,417 | ) | (20,360 | ) | ||||
| Other | (2,371 | ) | - | |||||
| Total deferred tax assets | (121,208 | ) | (138,960 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax liability | $ | 220,108 | $ | 200,108 | ||||
Income taxes are summarized as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Current: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | 100,855 | $ | 138,110 | ||||
| State | 28,673 | 49,925 | ||||||
| 129,528 | 188,035 | |||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||
| Federal | 15,000 | 61,583 | ||||||
| State | 5,000 | 9,660 | ||||||
| 20,000 | 71,243 | |||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 149,528 | $ | 259,278 | ||||
The Company is subject to U.S. Federal income taxes and State of Illinois income taxes. Tax years ending March 31, 2012 through March 31, 2015 remain open to examination by these jurisdictions. At March 31, 2015, there was no accrual for uncertain tax positions or related interest.
| (9) | Employee Benefits |
Multiemployer Plan
The Bank participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (“Pentegra DB Plan”), which covers substantially all employees. The Pentegra DB Plan operates as a multiemployer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. The Pentegra DB Plan’s Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the Plan Number is 333. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan. The Pentegra DB Plan is a simple plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 413 (c) and, as a result, all of the assets stand behind all of the liabilities. Accordingly, under the Pentegra DB Plan contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to participants of other participating employers.
| F-22 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013 (the two most recent plan year ends), the Pentegra DB Plan was 110.66% and 100.19% funded. The Bank’s contributions during the plan years ending June 30, 2014 and 2013 represented less than 5% of the total contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan. During the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank’s cash contributions made to the Pentegra DB Plan were $150,028 and $224,056, respectively.
Since this is a multiemployer plan, the plan’s administrators are unable to determine the actuarial present value of benefits attributable to the Bank’s participants. The Bank had a pension asset of $375,949 and $6,583 at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Pension expense was $130,949 and $189,601 for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Defined Contribution Plan
The Bank has a defined contribution plan which covers substantially all employees. Participants may contribute up to 20% of salary, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The Bank matches the employee contribution, up to 4% of salary and employees are fully vested in such contributions at all times. Participants are fully vested in the Bank’s contributions after four years of service. Plan expense was $27,855 and $26,635 for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
The Bank has an ESOP for the benefit of employees who meet eligibility requirements as defined in the ESOP. Eligible employees in the ESOP are those who also participated in the Bank’s defined contribution plan as of April 3, 2007 and employees hired thereafter which complete at least 1000 hours of service during the plan year, which begins January 1. Participant benefits become fully vested upon completion of 3 years of service; participants will be 0% vested prior to that time. The Bank makes annual contributions equal to the ESOP's debt service, less dividends on unallocated and allocated (if any) shares used to repay the loan. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are charged to retained earnings. The ESOP shares are pledged as collateral on the loan. As the loan is repaid, shares are released from collateral and allocated to participating employees, based on the proportion of loan principal and interest repaid and compensation of the participants.
The ESOP was originally established with the purchase of 35,549 shares of common stock in the offering completed in April 2007 using the proceeds of a loan from the former mid-tier Old Sugar Creek Financial Corp. The Bank has been making annual payments of principal and interest over a term of fifteen years at a rate of 8.25%. On April 18, 2014 as part of a 2nd step stock offering, the allocated and unallocated shares from this ESOP were exchanged for shares of the Company at an exchange rate of 1.0453 to 1. This resulted in the addition of 1,583 shares (724 shares allocated and 859 shares unallocated).
The ESOP has a second loan from the Company to fund the purchase of 42,810 shares of common stock in connection with the 2nd step conversion completed on April 18, 2014 under which the Bank makes principal and interest payments over a term of fifteen years at a rate of 3.25%. Both loans are secured by the shares of stock either exchanged or purchased as part of the offering. Shares of the Company’s stock purchased by the ESOP were deposited in the original trust and are being held until released for allocation to participants. Following this 2nd step purchase, the ESOP trust holds shares in the amount of 79,342.
| F-23 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
ESOP shares are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s compensation, as defined in the ESOP to the total compensation of all eligible participants. As the unearned shares are released from the trust, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the fair value of the ESOP shares during the periods in which they become committed to be released. To the extent the fair value of the ESOP shares released differs from the cost of the shares, such amount is charged to or credited to equity as additional paid-in capital. For the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized $59,269 and $16,595, respectively, in compensation expense related to the ESOP.
ESOP shares are summarized as follows:
| At March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Allocated | 22,045 | 15,990 | ||||||
| Committed-to-be-allocated | 1,332 | 593 | ||||||
| Unallocated | 55,965 | 18,366 | ||||||
| Total ESOP Shares | 79,342 | 34,949 | ||||||
| Fair value of unallocated shares | $ | 587,633 | $ | 157,948 | ||||
Equity Incentive Plan
In November 2007 stockholders approved the Sugar Creek Financial Corp. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, the Company may grant to employees, officers and directors up to 62,211 shares of common stock, including 44,437 shares for stock options and 17,774 shares of restricted stock. In July 2008, the Board of Directors granted 17,774 shares of restricted stock to officers and directors of the Company. Shares of common stock to fund these awards were repurchased in the open market at an average price of $8.10. At July 25, 2013, the restricted stock awards were fully vested.
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock award expense under the Plan is as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||
| March 31, | ||||
| 2014 | ||||
| Pre-tax | $ | 10,225 | ||
| After-tax | 6,053 | |||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.01 | ||
There was no restricted stock award expense for the year ended March 31, 2015.
| F-24 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| (10) | Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital |
The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend, if the effect of such dividends would be to cause the capital of the Bank to be reduced below the aggregate amount required by federal law or regulation. The Company may pay a dividend, if and when declared by its Board of Directors. Any repurchases of the Company’s common stock will be conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
The Company (effective January 1, 2015) and Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements of the Company and Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines, the Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications of the Company and Bank are also subject to quantitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors. At March 31, 2015, the Company and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements.
On July 9, 2013, the OCC approved rules that amended the regulatory capital rules applicable to the Company and Bank. The rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act increase the capital requirements of financial institutions. The rules include new minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which became effective January 1, 2015, and refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Company and Bank are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8% (unchanged from prior rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum capital ratios, and resulting in the following ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.5%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5%; and, a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 6.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and would increase each year until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution will be subject to further limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
The Company and Bank is also subject to the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. At March 31, 2015, the most recent notification from the regulatory agencies categorized the Company and Bank as well capitalized. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, common equity Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the aforementioned notifications that management believes have changed the category of the Company and Bank.
| F-25 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios at March 31, 2015 are as follows:
| Minimum Required | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| for Capital | to be "Well | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual | Adequacy | Capitalized" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 13,526 | 28.8 | % | $ | 3,763 | 8.0 | % | $ | 4,704 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 13,284 | 28.2 | % | $ | 2,823 | 6.0 | % | $ | 3,763 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital to risk- weighted assets | $ | 13,284 | 28.2 | % | $ | 2,117 | 4.5 | % | $ | 3,058 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to total assets | $ | 13,284 | 14.1 | % | $ | 3,760 | 4.0 | % | $ | 4,699 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios at March 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
| Minimum Required | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| for Capital | to be "Well | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual | Adequacy | Capitalized" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2015: | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 11,672 | 24.9 | % | $ | 3,757 | 8.0 | % | $ | 4,696 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 11,430 | 24.3 | % | $ | 2,818 | 6.0 | % | $ | 3,757 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital to risk- weighted assets | $ | 11,430 | 24.3 | % | $ | 2,113 | 4.5 | % | $ | 3,052 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to total assets | $ | 11,430 | 12.2 | % | $ | 3,756 | 4.0 | % | $ | 4,695 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| F-26 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| Minimum Required | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| for Capital | to be "Well | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual | Adequacy | Capitalized" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2014: | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 10,276 | 22.3 | % | $ | 3,687 | 8.0 | % | $ | 4,608 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | $ | 9,972 | 21.6 | % | $ | 1,843 | 4.0 | % | $ | 2,765 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to total assets | $ | 9,972 | 10.6 | % | $ | 3,764 | 4.0 | % | $ | 4,705 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| (11) | Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk |
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments typically include commitments to originate mortgage loans. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.
The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower is represented by the contractual amount and related accrued interest receivable of those instruments.
The Company minimizes this risk by evaluating each borrower’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Generally, collateral held by the Company consists of a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s property. There were loan commitments to originate fixed-rate mortgage loans totaling $708,200 and carrying fixed rates ranging from 3.125% to 4.125% at March 31, 2015.
| (12) | Contingencies |
In August 2011, the Bank, and three other banks, were named defendants in an Amended Complaint filed in the Circuit Court for St. Clair County, Illinois in a case entitled McKay, et. al. v Huelsmann, et. al., No. 11-L-89. The Plaintiffs are elderly investors who lost money to the defendant Huelsmann in a fraudulent investment scheme. None of the Plaintiffs were customers of the Bank. The Amended Complaint, which seeks compensatory and punitive damages, alleges various causes of action against the defendant banks including negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act. The factual and legal allegations against the banks are highly questionable and all Motions to Dismiss have been denied by the Court. The case has proceeded slowly and is still in the discovery stage.
The Bank has insurance for coverage against this type of claim but it is provided by an insurance carrier that is now in liquidation. The liquidation has involved the Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund and while the Guaranty Fund may ultimately provide some indemnification, the Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this matter.
| F-27 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| (13) | Concentration of Credit Risk |
The Bank originates loans to the general public, which includes military personnel and civilian employees of Scott Air Force Base, located in Belleville, Illinois. This concentration of credit risk could unfavorably impact the level of credit risk of the Bank should events occur, such as employment curtailments, temporary layoffs or other events. Management believes that the secured nature of the majority of these loans partially mitigates this risk based upon current economic conditions.
| (14) | Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities (the “inputs”) into three broad levels.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs in which little, if any, market activity exists, requiring entities to develop their own assumptions and data.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in market areas that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Valuation Techniques
Available for sale securities are carried at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For debt securities, the Bank obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, live trading levels, trade execution data, cash flows, market consensus prepayment speeds, market spreads, credit information and the U.S. Treasury yield curve. At March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have any available for sale securities.
Impaired loans are carried at fair value utilizing Level 3 inputs, consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral (collateral method) adjusted for selling costs (unobservable input) and discounted cash flow analysis. See note 3.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2015 and 2014 include impaired loans of $1,576,992, and $1,412,320, respectively, utilizing Level 3 inputs. The impaired loans are collateral dependent.
| F-28 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for losses on impaired loans including troubled debt restructurings:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 65,525 | $ | 108,363 | ||||
| Loan charge-offs | - | (14,004 | ) | |||||
| Loan recoveries | - | - | ||||||
| Provision for (credit to) loan losses | (11,860 | ) | (28,834 | ) | ||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | 53,665 | $ | 65,525 | ||||
Nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include foreclosed real estate which amounted to $434,367 and $754,704 at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at fair value utilizing Level 2 units based on observable market data less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values shown below:
. Cash and cash equivalents are valued at their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity of the instruments.
. Stock in FHLB of Chicago is valued at cost, which represents historical redemption value and approximates fair value.
. Fair values for the loan portfolio, certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLBC are computed using an analysis which considers the amount and timing of all future cash flows of the underlying instruments discounted at current market rates.
. Fair values of non-maturing deposits, such as checking, NOW, savings and money market deposit accounts are computed using an analysis which uses decay rates to estimate the amount and timing of all future cash flows of the underlying instruments, which are discounted at current market rates.
. The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate fair value.
Off-balance sheet assets include the commitments to extend credit for which fair values were estimated based on interest rates and fees currently charged to enter into similar transactions. As a result of the short-term nature of the outstanding commitments, the fair values of fees on those commitments approximate the amount collected and the Company has not assigned a value to such instruments for purpose of this disclosure.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 categorizations and into or out of Level 3 categorization for the years presented.
The carrying amount, fair value and the financial hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments are summarized in the following table. Fair values of financial instruments have been estimated by the Company based upon available market information with the assistance of an independent consultant.
| F-29 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying | Fair | Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-trading instruments and nonderivatives: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 16,720,008 | $ | 16,720,008 | $ | 16,720,008 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
| Stock in FHLB of Chicago | 1,165,513 | 1,165,513 | - | 1,165,513 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net | 75,463,746 | 79,924,031 | - | 78,347,039 | 1,576,992 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest receivable on loans | 257,576 | 257,576 | - | 257,576 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Deposits | 76,290,961 | 72,906,558 | - | 72,906,558 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest on deposits | 50,070 | 50,070 | - | 50,070 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Advances from FHLB of Chicago | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,353,750 | $ | - | $ | 5,353,750 | $ | - | ||||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying | Fair | Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-trading instruments and nonderivatives: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 16,647,828 | $ | 16,647,828 | $ | 16,647,828 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
| Stock in FHLB of Chicago | 1,165,513 | 1,165,513 | - | 1,165,513 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net | 73,386,855 | 76,404,679 | - | 74,992,359 | 1,412,320 | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest receivable on loans | 241,411 | 241,411 | - | 241,411 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Deposits | 77,800,822 | 71,176,039 | - | 71,176,039 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest on deposits | 38,371 | 38,371 | - | 38,371 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Advances from FHLB of Chicago | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,498,149 | $ | - | $ | 5,498,149 | $ | - | ||||||||||
| F-30 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
| (15) | Parent Company Only Financial Statements |
The following parent only balance sheets, statements of earnings and statements of cash flows for Sugar Creek Financial Corp. should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
Balance Sheets
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,279,610 | $ | 183,527 | ||||
| Investment in Bank | 11,429,668 | 9,972,129 | ||||||
| ESOP note receivable | 494,685 | 235,873 | ||||||
| Accrued interest receivable | 6,596 | 4,799 | ||||||
| Other assets | 82,396 | 17,184 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 13,292,955 | $ | 10,413,512 | ||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||
| Other liabilities | $ | 8,640 | $ | 13,020 | ||||
| Common stock | 9,492 | 9,069 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 6,124,848 | 3,288,508 | ||||||
| Treasury stock | - | (85,638 | ) | |||||
| Common stock acquired by ESOP | (432,527 | ) | (183,670 | ) | ||||
| Retained earnings - substantially restricted | 7,582,502 | 7,372,223 | ||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 13,284,315 | 10,400,492 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 13,292,955 | $ | 10,413,512 | ||||
| F-31 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Statements of Earnings
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Interest income on ESOP note receivable | $ | 27,628 | $ | 20,682 | ||||
| Interest income - MMDA with Bank | 4,347 | 746 | ||||||
| Total interest income | 31,975 | 21,428 | ||||||
| Dividend from Bank | - | 129,500 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | - | - | ||||||
| Noninterest expense | (82,333 | ) | (25,206 | ) | ||||
| (Loss) earnings before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of Bank | (50,358 | ) | 125,722 | |||||
| Income tax benefit | 19,931 | 1,451 | ||||||
| Net (loss) earnings before equity in undistributed earnings of Bank | (30,427 | ) | 127,173 | |||||
| Equity in undistributed earnings of Bank | 240,706 | 279,742 | ||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 406,915 | ||||
| F-32 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 210,279 | $ | 406,915 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash used for operating activities: | ||||||||
| Equity in undistributed earnings of Bank | (240,706 | ) | (279,742 | ) | ||||
| (Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable | (1,797 | ) | 411 | |||||
| Increase in other assets | (65,212 | ) | (17,184 | ) | ||||
| (Decrease) increase in other liabilities | (4,380 | ) | 12,113 | |||||
| Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities | (101,816 | ) | 122,513 | |||||
| Cash flow from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Capital contribution to Bank | (1,457,234 | ) | - | |||||
| Repayment of ESOP loan | 40,858 | 20,270 | ||||||
| Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities | (1,416,376 | ) | 20,270 | |||||
| Cash flow from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of common stock | 2,614,275 | - | ||||||
| Cash dividends paid | - | (87,370 | ) | |||||
| Repurchase of common stock | - | (2,731 | ) | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | 2,614,275 | (90,101 | ) | |||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,096,083 | 52,682 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 183,527 | 130,845 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 1,279,610 | $ | 183,527 | ||||
| F-33 |
SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| SUGAR CREEK FINANCIAL CORP. | ||
| Date: June 26, 2015 | /s/ Robert J. Stroh, Jr. | |
| Robert J. Stroh, Jr. | ||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Name | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Robert J. Stroh, Jr. | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Robert J. Stroh, Jr. | Financial Officer (principal executive officer and | |||
| principal financial officer) | ||||
| /s/ Francis J. Eversman | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Francis J. Eversman | ||||
| /s/ Timothy W. Deien | Director | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Timothy W. Deien | ||||
| /s/ Timothy P. Fleming | Director | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Timothy P. Fleming | ||||
| /s/ Daniel S. Reilly | Director | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Daniel S. Reilly | ||||
| /s/ Gary R. Schwend | Director | June 26, 2015 | ||
| Gary R. Schwend |
| 39 |