10-Q 1 enlc-201663010q.htm 10-Q Document
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
 
x      Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
 
OR
 
o         Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
for the transition period from               to               
 
Commission file number: 001-36336
 
ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
Delaware
 
46-4108528
(State of organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
2501 CEDAR SPRINGS RD.
 
 
DALLAS, TEXAS
 
75201
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
(214) 953-9500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
 
As of July 22, 2016, the Registrant had 180,035,410 common units outstanding.
 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Item
 
Description
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2




ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
(In millions, except unit data)
ASSETS
 

 
 

Current assets:
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
10.2

 
$
18.0

Accounts receivable:
 

 
 

Trade, net of allowance for bad debt of $0.3 and $0.3, respectively
68.5

 
37.5

Accrued revenue and other
295.7

 
268.8

     Related party
72.6

 
110.8

Fair value of derivative assets
5.3

 
16.8

Natural gas and NGLs inventory, prepaid expenses and other
39.6

 
41.8

Total current assets
491.9


493.7

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,941.4 and $1,757.6, respectively
6,160.4

 
5,666.8

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $112.1 and $54.6, respectively
1,666.7

 
689.9

Goodwill
1,541.3

 
2,413.9

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
299.7

 
274.3

Other assets, net
2.3

 
2.7

Total assets
$
10,162.3

 
$
9,541.3

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY
 

 
 

Current liabilities:
 

 
 

Accounts payable and drafts payable
$
46.0

 
$
33.2

Accounts payable to related party
10.4

 
14.8

Accrued gas, NGLs, condensate and crude oil purchases
247.3

 
206.7

Fair value of derivative liabilities
5.8

 
2.9

Installment payable, net of discount of $14.2
235.8

 

Other current liabilities
146.1

 
174.8

Total current liabilities
691.4


432.4

Long-term debt
3,364.1

 
3,066.0

Fair value of derivative liabilities

 
0.1

Asset retirement obligation
13.2

 
12.9

Other long-term liabilities
57.0

 
65.9

Installment payable, net of discount of $39.3
210.7

 

Deferred tax liability
539.1

 
532.1

 
 
 
 
Redeemable non-controlling interest
6.5

 
7.0

 
 
 
 
Members’ equity:
 
 
 
Members' equity (180,035,410 and 164,242,160 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
1,970.2

 
2,285.7

Non-controlling interest
3,310.1

 
3,139.2

Total members' equity
5,280.3

 
5,424.9

Commitment and Contingencies (Note 15)


 


Total liabilities and members’ equity
$
10,162.3


$
9,541.3


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3


ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per unit amounts)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product sales
 
$
738.3

 
$
956.2

 
$
1,326.8

 
$
1,626.9

Product sales - affiliates
 
31.7

 
31.7

 
56.2

 
47.9

Midstream services
 
108.3

 
135.9

 
222.8

 
238.3

Midstream services - affiliates
 
160.6

 
149.5

 
323.2

 
300.5

Gain (loss) on derivative activity
 
(5.7
)
 
1.2

 
(6.1
)
 
1.4

Total revenues
 
1,033.2

 
1,274.5

 
1,922.9

 
2,215.0

Operating costs and expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales (1)
 
732.4

 
968.2

 
1,318.6

 
1,625.6

Operating expenses (2)
 
100.1

 
109.1

 
198.3

 
207.6

General and administrative (3)
 
30.3

 
28.1

 
65.4

 
70.8

Loss on disposition of assets
 
0.3

 

 
0.1

 

Depreciation and amortization
 
124.9

 
97.7

 
246.8

 
189.0

Impairments
 

 

 
873.3

 

Total operating costs and expenses
 
988.0

 
1,203.1

 
2,702.5

 
2,093.0

Operating income (loss)
 
45.2

 
71.4

 
(779.6
)
 
122.0

Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net of interest income
 
(46.5
)
 
(22.6
)
 
(90.5
)
 
(41.7
)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates
 
0.8

 
5.9

 
(1.6
)
 
9.7

Other income (loss)
 
(0.1
)
 
0.1

 

 
0.5

Total other expense
 
(45.8
)
 
(16.6
)
 
(92.1
)
 
(31.5
)
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest and income taxes
 
(0.6
)
 
54.8

 
(871.7
)
 
90.5

Income tax benefit (provision)
 
1.8

 
(10.2
)
 
1.6

 
(20.9
)
Net income (loss)
 
1.2

 
44.6

 
(870.1
)
 
69.6

Net income (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest
 
0.4

 
28.4

 
(413.3
)
 
36.4

Net income (loss) attributable to EnLink Midstream, LLC
 
$
0.8

 
$
16.2

 
$
(456.8
)
 
$
33.2

Devon investment interest in net income
 
$

 
$
1.7

 
$

 
$
2.4

EnLink Midstream, LLC interest in net income (loss)
 
$
0.8

 
$
14.5

 
$
(456.8
)
 
$
30.8

Net income (loss) attributable to EnLink Midstream, LLC per unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Basic common unit
 
$
0.01

 
$
0.09

 
$
(2.55
)
 
$
0.19

  Diluted common unit
 
$
0.01

 
$
0.09

 
$
(2.55
)
 
$
0.19

(1)
Includes $49.8 million and $32.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $92.4 million and $39.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of affiliate cost of sales.
(2)
Includes $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of affiliate operating expenses.
(3)
Includes $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 of affiliate general and administrative expenses.







See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Members’ Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
Common Units
 
Non-Controlling Interest
 
 
 
Redeemable Non-controlling Interest (Temporary Equity)
 
 
Units
 
 
Total
 
$
 
(Unaudited)
 
(In millions)
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
2,285.7

 
164.2

 
$
3,139.2

 
$
5,424.9

 
$
7.0

Unit-based compensation
7.7

 

 
7.7

 
15.4

 

Issuance of common units by the Partnership

 

 
52.3

 
52.3

 

Issuance of Preferred Units by the Partnership

 

 
724.1

 
724.1

 

Issuance of common units
214.9

 
15.6

 

 
214.9

 

Conversion of restricted units for common, net of units withheld for taxes
(1.1
)
 
0.2

 

 
(1.1
)
 

Non-controlling partner's impact of conversion of restricted units

 

 
(1.1
)
 
(1.1
)
 

Change in equity due to issuance of units by the Partnership
12.5

 

 
(20.0
)
 
(7.5
)
 

Non-controlling interest distributions

 

 
(186.1
)
 
(186.1
)
 

Non-controlling interest contribution

 

 
5.9

 
5.9

 

Distributions to members
(92.7
)
 

 

 
(92.7
)
 

Distributions to redeemable non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 
(0.5
)
Contributions from Devon to the Partnership

 

 
1.4

 
1.4

 

Net loss
(456.8
)
 

 
(413.3
)
 
(870.1
)
 

Balance, June 30, 2016
$
1,970.2

 
180.0

 
$
3,310.1

 
$
5,280.3

 
$
6.5






















See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 

 
 

Net income (loss)
$
(870.1
)
 
$
69.6

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 
 

Impairments
873.3

 

Depreciation and amortization
246.8

 
189.0

Accretion expense
0.2

 
0.3

Loss on disposition of assets
0.1

 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense
(0.6
)
 
17.8

Non-cash unit-based compensation
15.4

 
21.5

(Gain) loss on derivatives recognized in net income (loss)
6.1

 
(5.0
)
Cash settlements on derivatives
8.3

 
11.3

Amortization of debt issue costs
1.9

 
1.5

Amortization of net (premium) discount on notes
24.3

 
(1.5
)
Redeemable non-controlling interest expense
0.3

 
(3.3
)
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated affiliates

 
10.3

(Income) loss from unconsolidated affiliates
1.6

 
(9.7
)
Changes in assets and liabilities net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, accrued revenue and other
(18.4
)
 
57.3

Natural gas and NGLs inventory, prepaid expenses and other
12.1

 
(26.6
)
Accounts payable, accrued gas and crude oil purchases and other accrued liabilities
2.9

 
(55.5
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
304.2

 
277.0

Cash flows from investing activities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
 

 
 

Additions to property and equipment
(288.2
)
 
(349.2
)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
(791.3
)
 
(324.8
)
Proceeds from sale of property
0.8

 
0.1

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
(41.8
)
 

Distribution from unconsolidated affiliates in excess of earnings
14.8

 
8.9

Net cash used in investing activities
(1,105.7
)
 
(665.0
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 

 
 

Proceeds from borrowings
847.1

 
2,327.4

Payments on borrowings
(549.1
)
 
(1,521.2
)
Payments on capital lease obligations
(2.1
)
 
(1.6
)
Decrease in drafts payable

 
(12.4
)
Debt financing costs
(0.4
)
 
(9.5
)
Mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interest
(4.0
)
 

Conversion of restricted units, net of units withheld for taxes
(1.1
)
 
(2.8
)
Conversion of Partnership's restricted units, net of units withheld for taxes
(1.1
)
 
(2.5
)
Proceeds from issuance of Partnership's common units
52.3

 
4.1

Distributions to non-controlling partners
(186.6
)
 
(175.7
)
Distribution to Members
(92.7
)
 
(79.3
)
Contributions from Devon
1.4

 
28.8

Distributions to Devon for net assets acquired

 
(171.0
)
Proceeds from issuance of Partnership Preferred Units
724.1

 

Contributions by non-controlling interest
5.9

 
7.3

Net cash provided by financing activities
793.7

 
391.6

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(7.8
)

3.6

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
18.0

 
68.4

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
10.2

 
$
72.0

Cash paid for interest
$
67.8

 
$
44.4

Cash paid (refund) for income taxes
$
(5.8
)
 
$
13.4







See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2016
(Unaudited) 
(1) General
In this report, the terms “Company” or “Registrant” as well as the terms “ENLC,” “our,” “we,” and “us,” or like terms, are sometimes used as references to EnLink Midstream, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries. References in this report to “EnLink Midstream Partners, LP,” the “Partnership,” “ENLK” or like terms refer to EnLink Midstream Partners, LP itself or EnLink Midstream Partners, LP together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including EnLink Midstream Operating, LP and EnLink Oklahoma Gas Processing, LP (formerly known as EnLink TOM Holdings, LP) and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, “EnLink Oklahoma T.O.”). EnLink Oklahoma T.O. is sometimes used to refer to EnLink Oklahoma Gas Processing, LP itself or EnLink Oklahoma Gas Processing, LP together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
(a)Organization of Business
EnLink Midstream, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed in October 2013. The Company’s common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ENLC.”
Our assets consist of equity interests in the Partnership and EnLink Oklahoma T.O. The Partnership is a publicly traded limited partnership engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas and natural gas liquids, or NGLs, condensate and crude oil, as well as providing crude oil, condensate and brine services to producers. EnLink Oklahoma T.O. is a partnership held by us and the Partnership and is engaged in the gathering and processing of natural gas. As of June 30, 2016, our interests in the Partnership and EnLink Oklahoma T.O. consist of the following:
88,528,451 common units representing an aggregate 23.0% limited partner interest in the Partnership;
100.0% ownership interest in EnLink Midstream Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership (the “General Partner”), which owns a 0.4% general partner interest and all of the incentive distribution rights in the Partnership; and
16% limited partner interest in EnLink Oklahoma T.O.
(b) Nature of Business
The Partnership primarily focuses on providing midstream energy services, including gathering, transmission, processing, fractionation, brine services and marketing to producers of natural gas, natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), crude oil and condensate. The Partnership connects the wells of producers in its market areas to its gathering systems, processes natural gas to remove NGLs, fractionates NGLs into purity products and markets those products for a fee, transports natural gas and ultimately provides natural gas to a variety of markets. The Partnership purchases natural gas from natural gas producers and other supply sources and sells that natural gas to utilities, industrial consumers, other marketers and pipelines. The Partnership operates processing plants that process gas transported to the plants by major interstate pipelines or from its own gathering systems under a variety of fee-based arrangements. The Partnership provides a variety of crude oil and condensate services, which include crude oil and condensate gathering and transmission via pipelines, barges, rail and trucks, condensate stabilization and brine disposal. The Partnership also has crude oil and condensate terminal facilities that provide access for crude oil and condensate producers to premium markets. The Partnership's gas gathering systems consist of networks of pipelines that collect natural gas from points near producing wells and transport it to larger pipelines for further transmission. The Partnership's transmission pipelines primarily receive natural gas from its gathering systems and from third party gathering and transmission systems and deliver natural gas to industrial end-users, utilities and other pipelines. The Partnership also has transmission lines that transport NGLs from east Texas and from our south Louisiana processing plants to its fractionators in south Louisiana. The Partnership's crude oil and condensate gathering and transmission systems consist of trucking facilities, pipelines, rail and barge facilities that, in exchange for a fee, transport oil from a producer site to an end user. The Partnership's processing plants remove NGLs and CO2 from a natural gas stream and its fractionators separate the NGLs into separate NGL products, including ethane, propane, iso-butane, normal butane and natural gasoline.
(c) Consolidation of the Partnership
In January 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. This ASU provides additional guidance to reporting entities in evaluating whether certain legal entities, such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations and securitization structures, should be consolidated.  Due to ENLC’s ownership of the General Partner, the Partnership is considered a variable interest entity as the limited partners lack the ability to exercise kick-out rights over the General Partner and do not have substantive participating rights. Further, ENLC, including the consideration of the Incentive Distribution Rights, is considered the primary beneficiary as it has the power to

7

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

direct the activities that most significantly impact the Partnership’s economic performance. The adoption of this standard has no impact on our consolidated financial statements as we will continue to consolidate the Partnership.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, are unaudited and do not include all the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
During the first half of 2015, the Partnership acquired assets from Devon through drop down transactions. Due to our control of the Partnership through our ownership and control of the General Partner and Devon's control of us through its ownership of our managing member, the acquisition from Devon was considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, the Company was required to recast its historical financial statements to include the activities of such assets from the date that these entities were under common control. The condensed consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the assets from Devon have been prepared from Devon's historical cost-basis accounts for the acquired assets and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the Partnership had owned the acquired assets during the periods reported. Net income attributable to the assets acquired from Devon for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition is allocated to “Devon investment interest in net income” on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, we adopted ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Topic 835): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability and requires retrospective application.  The application of this new accounting guidance resulted in the reclassification of $23.8 million of debt issuance costs from “Other Assets, Net” to “Long-term debt” in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.
In January 2016, we adopted ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes on a prospective basis. This new standard required that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In January 2016, we adopted ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust the financial statements for measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”), which will update ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2016-12 clarifies certain core recognition principles including collectability, sales tax presentation, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition and disclosures no longer required if the full retrospective transition method is adopted. ASU 2016-12 has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”). First, the new standard will require all of the tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement (or expiration) to be recorded through the income statement, and is required to be applied prospectively. Second, the new standard also allows entities to withhold taxes of an amount up to the employees’ maximum individual tax rate in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in liability classification of the award, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. Third, under the ASU, forfeitures can be estimated, as currently required, or recognized when they occur. If elected, the change to recognize forfeitures when they occur must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this standard to materially impact our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

8

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) - Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASU 2016-02”). Lessees will need to recognize virtually all of their leases on the balance sheet, by recording a right-of-use asset and lease liability. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. Existing sale-leaseback guidance is replaced with a new model applicable to both lessees and lessors. Additional revisions have been made to embedded leases, reassessment requirements, and lease term assessments including variable lease payment, discount rate, and lease incentives. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective transition. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 will replace existing revenue recognition requirements in GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Partnership expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard will also require significantly expanded disclosures regarding the qualitative and quantitative information of the Partnership's nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
(3) Acquisitions
Matador Acquisition
On October 1, 2015, the Partnership acquired 100% of the voting equity interests in a subsidiary of Matador Resources Company (“Matador”), which has gathering and processing assets operations in the Delaware Basin, for approximately $141.3 million. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method.
The following table presents the fair value of the identified assets received and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The purchase price allocation has been prepared on a preliminary basis pending receipt of a final valuation report and is subject to change.
Purchase Price Allocation (in millions):
 
 
Assets acquired:
 
 
Current assets
 
$
1.1

Property, plant and equipment
 
35.5

Intangibles
 
98.8

Goodwill
 
9.8

Liabilities assumed:
 
 
Current liabilities
 
(3.9
)
Total identifiable net assets
 
$
141.3

The Partnership recognized intangible assets related to customer relationships. The acquired intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated customer life of approximately 15 years. Goodwill recognized from the acquisition primarily relates to the value created from additional growth opportunities and greater operating leverage in the Permian Basin. All such goodwill is allocated to the Partnership's Texas segment and is non-deductible for tax purposes.
Deadwood Acquisition
Prior to November 2015, the Partnership co-owned the Deadwood natural gas processing plant with a subsidiary of Apache Corporation (“Apache”). On November 16, 2015, the Partnership acquired Apache's 50% ownership interest in the Deadwood natural gas processing facility for approximately $40.1 million, all of which is considered property, plant and equipment. The final working capital settlement paid to Apache was approximately $1.5 million. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method.

9

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Tall Oak Acquisition
On January 7, 2016, we and the Partnership acquired a 16% and 84% voting interest, respectively, in EnLink Oklahoma T.O. for approximately $1.4 billion. The first installment of $1.02 billion for the acquisition was paid at closing. The final installment of $500.0 million is due by the Partnership no later than the first anniversary of the closing date with the option to defer $250.0 million of the final installment up to 24 months following the closing date. The Partnership's installment payables are valued net of discount within the total purchase price.
The first installment consisted of approximately $1.02 billion and was funded by (a) approximately $784.2 million in cash paid by the Partnership, the majority of which was derived from the proceeds from the issuance of Preferred Units, and (b) 15,564,009 common units representing limited liability company interests in ENLC issued directly by us and approximately $22.2 million in cash paid by us. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method.
The following table presents the consideration we paid and the fair value of the identified assets received and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The purchase price allocation has been prepared on a preliminary basis pending receipt of a final valuation report and is subject to change.
Consideration (in millions):
 
 
Cash
 
$
806.4

Issuance of common units
 
214.9

The Partnership's total installment payable, net of discount of $79.1 million assuming payments are made on January 7, 2017 and 2018
 
420.9

Total consideration
 
$
1,442.2

 
 
 
Purchase Price Allocation (in millions):
 
 
Assets acquired:
 
 
Current assets (including $12.8 million in cash)
 
$
23.0

Property, plant and equipment
 
423.2

Intangibles
 
1,034.3

Liabilities assumed:
 
 
Current liabilities
 
(38.3
)
Total identifiable net assets
 
$
1,442.2

The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 inputs. We recognized intangible assets related to customer relationships and determined their fair value using the income approach. The acquired intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated customer life of approximately 15 years.
We incurred $3.7 million of direct transaction costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016. These costs are included in general and administrative costs in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the period from January 7, 2016 to June 30, 2016, we recognized $72.2 million of revenues and $23.5 million of net loss related to the assets acquired.

10

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 gives effect to the January 2015 LPC acquisition, March 2015 Coronado acquisition, October 2015 Matador acquisition, November 2015 Deadwood acquisition and January 2016 Tall Oak acquisition as if they had occurred on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information has been included for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the transactions taken place on the dates indicated and is not intended to be a projection of future results. Pro forma financial information associated with the acquisitions is reflected below.
 
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2015
 
2015
 
 
(in millions)
Pro forma total revenues
 
$
1,283.3

 
$
2,350.9

Pro forma net income
 
$
27.7

 
$
31.5

Pro forma net income attributable to EnLink Midstream, LLC
 
$
12.2

 
$
22.8

Pro forma net income per common unit:
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
0.07

 
$
0.13

Diluted
 
$
0.07

 
$
0.13

(4) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill is the cost of an acquisition less the fair value of the net identifiable assets of the acquired business. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually as of October 31, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. We first assess qualitative factors to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as the basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. We may elect to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test without completing a qualitative assessment. If a two-step goodwill impairment test is elected or required, the first step involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the process involves comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying value of the goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss. During February 2016, we determined that continued further weakness in the overall energy sector driven by low commodity prices together with a further decline in our unit price and the Partnership's unit price subsequent to year-end caused a change in circumstances warranting an interim impairment test. Based on these triggering events, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis in the first quarter of 2016 on all reporting units.
We and the Partnership perform our goodwill assessments at the reporting unit level for all reporting units. The Partnership uses a discounted cash flow analysis to perform the assessments for the Texas and Crude and Condensate reporting units. We use a market approach to perform the assessment for our Corporate reporting unit. Key assumptions in the analysis include the use of an appropriate discount rate, terminal year multiples, control premium and estimated future cash flows including volume and price forecasts and estimated operating and general and administrative costs. In estimating cash flows, the Partnership incorporates current and historical market and financial information, among other factors.
The fair value of goodwill is based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 inputs. Using the fair value approaches described above, in step one of the goodwill impairment test, we and the Partnership determined that the estimated fair values of the Partnership's Texas and Crude and Condensate reporting units and our Corporate reporting unit were less than their respective carrying amounts. At the Partnership's Texas and Crude and Condensate reporting units, this is primarily related to increases in the discount rate subsequent to year-end. For our Corporate reporting unit, this is primarily due to a further decline in our unit price subsequent to year-end. The second step of the goodwill impairment test at the Partnership measures the amount of impairment loss and involves allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit among all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Through the analysis, a goodwill impairment loss for the Texas, Crude and Condensate, and Corporate reporting units in the amount of $873.3 million was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2016, which is included in the six months ended June 30, 2016 impairments line item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

11

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

We and the Partnership concluded that the fair value of goodwill of the Oklahoma reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, and the entire amount of goodwill disclosed on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet associated with this remaining reporting unit is recoverable. Therefore, no other goodwill impairment was identified or recorded for this reporting unit as a result of our goodwill impairment analysis.
Our and the Partnership's respective impairment determinations involved significant assumptions and judgments, as discussed above. Differing assumptions regarding any of these inputs could have a significant effect on the various valuations. If actual results are not consistent with our and the Partnership's assumptions and estimates, or assumptions and estimates change due to new information, we and the Partnership may be exposed to additional goodwill impairment charges, which would be recognized in the period in which the carrying value exceeds fair value. The estimated fair values of our Corporate reporting unit and the Partnership's Texas reporting unit may be impacted in the future by a further decline in our unit price or the Partnership's unit price or a continuing prolonged period of lower commodity prices which may adversely affect the Partnership's estimate of future cash flows all of which could result in future goodwill impairment charges.
The table below provides a summary of our change in carrying amount of goodwill, by assigned reporting unit (in millions):
 
Texas
 
Louisiana
 
Oklahoma
 
Crude and Condensate
 
Corporate
 
Totals
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
703.5

 
$

 
$
190.3

 
$
93.2

 
$
1,426.9

 
$
2,413.9

Impairment
(473.1
)
 

 

 
(93.2
)
 
(307.0
)
 
(873.3
)
Acquisition adjustment
0.7

 

 

 

 

 
0.7

Balance, end of period
$
231.1

 
$


$
190.3


$


$
1,119.9


$
1,541.3

Intangible Assets
Intangible assets associated with customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefits of the customer relationships, which range from ten to twenty years.
The following table represents the Partnership's change in carrying value of intangible assets (in millions):
 
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer relationships, beginning of period
 
$
744.5

 
$
(54.6
)
 
$
689.9

Acquisitions
 
1,034.3

 

 
1,034.3

Amortization expense
 

 
(57.5
)
 
(57.5
)
Customer relationships, end of period
 
$
1,778.8

 
$
(112.1
)
 
$
1,666.7

The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets is 13.7 years. Amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $30.0 million and $18.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $57.5 million and $29.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Partnership's estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years (in millions):
2016 (remaining)
$
58.4

2017
116.7

2018
116.7

2019
116.7

2020
116.7

Thereafter
1,141.5

Total
$
1,666.7


12

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(5) Affiliate Transactions
The Partnership engages in various transactions with Devon and other affiliated entities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, Devon was a significant customer to the Partnership. Devon accounted for 18.6% and 19.7% of the Partnership's revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and 14.2% and 15.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The Partnership had an accounts receivable balance related to transactions with Devon of $72.6 million as of June 30, 2016 and $110.8 million as of December 31, 2015. Additionally, the Partnership had an accounts payable balance related to transactions with Devon of $10.4 million as of June 30, 2016 and $14.8 million as of December 31, 2015. Management believes these transactions are executed on terms that are fair and reasonable and are consistent with terms for transactions with nonaffiliated third parties. The amounts related to affiliate transactions are specified in the accompanying financial statements.
EnLink Oklahoma T.O. Gathering and Processing Agreement with Devon
In January 2016, in connection with the Tall Oak acquisition, we acquired a Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement with Devon Energy Production Company, L.P. (“DEPC”) pursuant to which EnLink Oklahoma T.O. provides gathering, treating, compression, dehydration, stabilization, processing and fractionation services, as applicable, for natural gas delivered by DEPC. The agreement has a minimum volume commitment that will remain in place during each calendar quarter for the next five years and a remaining overall term of approximately 13 years. Additionally, the agreement provides EnLink Oklahoma T.O. with dedication of all of the natural gas owned or controlled by DEPC and produced from or attributable to existing and future wells located on certain oil, natural gas and mineral leases covering land within the acreage dedications, excluding properties previously dedicated to other natural gas gathering systems not owned and operated by DEPC. DEPC is entitled to firm service, meaning a level of gathering and processing service in which DEPC’s reserved capacity may not be interrupted, except due to force majeure, and may not be displaced by another customer or class of service. EnLink Oklahoma T.O. will take delivery of as much Devon natural gas as is permitted in accordance with applicable law.
(6) Long-Term Debt
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions):
 
June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
Partnership credit facility (due 2020), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, interest rate at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 2.2% and 1.8%, respectively
$
697.0

 
$
414.0

Company credit facility (due 2019), interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin, interest rate at June 30, 2016 was 4.25%
15.1

 

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2019), net of discount of $0.3 million at June 30, 2016 and $0.4 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 2.70%
399.7

 
399.6

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2022), including a premium of $17.5 million at June 30, 2016 and $18.9 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 7.125%
180.0

 
181.4

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2024), net of premium of $2.7 million at June 30, 2016 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 4.40%
552.7

 
552.9

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2025), net of discount of $1.2 million at June 30, 2016 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 4.15%
748.8

 
748.8

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2044), net of discount of $0.2 million at June 30, 2016 and $0.2 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 5.60%
349.8

 
349.8

The Partnership's senior unsecured notes (due 2045), net of discount of $6.8 million at June 30, 2016 and $6.9 million at December 31, 2015, which bear interest at the rate of 5.05%
443.2

 
443.1

Debt issuance cost, net of amortization of $7.0 million at June 30, 2016 and $5.1 million at December 31, 2015.
(22.2
)
 
(23.8
)
Other debt

 
0.2

Debt classified as long-term
$
3,364.1

 
$
3,066.0


13

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Company Credit Facility
The Company has a $250.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $125.0 million letter of credit subfacility (the “credit facility”). Our obligations under the credit facility are guaranteed by two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and secured by first priority liens on (i) 88,528,451 Partnership common units and the 100% membership interest in the General Partner indirectly held by us, (ii) the 100% equity interest in each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries held by us and (iii) any additional equity interests subsequently pledged as collateral under the credit facility.
The credit facility will mature on March 7, 2019. The credit facility contains certain financial, operational and legal covenants. The financial covenants are tested on a quarterly basis, based on the rolling four-quarter period that ends on the last day of each fiscal quarter, and include (i) maintaining a maximum consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) of 4.00 to 1.00, provided that the maximum consolidated leverage ratio is 4.50 to 1.00 during an acquisition period (as defined in the credit facility) and (ii) maintaining a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges to consolidated interest charges) of 2.50 to 1.00 at all times unless an investment grade event (as defined in the credit facility) occurs.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, at either the Eurodollar Rate (the LIBOR Rate) plus an applicable margin or the Base Rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, the 30-day Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%, or the administrative agent’s prime rate) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margins vary depending on our leverage ratio. Upon breach by us of certain covenants governing the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the credit facility, if any, may become due and payable immediately and the liens securing the credit facility could be foreclosed upon.
As of June 30, 2016 there was $15.1 million in outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, leaving approximately $234.9 million available for future borrowing based on the borrowing capacity of $250.0 million. The Company expect to be in compliance with all credit facility covenants for at least the next twelve months.
Partnership Credit Facility
The Partnership has a $1.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, which includes a $500.0 million letter of credit subfacility (the “Partnership credit facility”) that matures on March 6, 2020. Under the Partnership credit facility, the Partnership is permitted to, (1) subject to certain conditions and the receipt of additional commitments by one or more lenders, increase the aggregate commitments under the Partnership credit facility by an additional amount not to exceed $500.0 million and, (2) subject to certain conditions and the consent of the requisite lenders, on two separate occasions extend the maturity date of the Partnership credit facility by one year on each occasion. The Partnership credit facility contains certain financial, operational and legal covenants. Among other things, these covenants include maintaining a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership credit facility, which definition includes projected EBITDA from certain capital expansion projects) of no more than 5.0 to 1.0. If the Partnership consummates one or more acquisitions in which the aggregate purchase price is $50.0 million or more, the maximum allowed ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA may be increased to 5.5 to 1.0 for the quarter of the acquisition and the three following quarters.
Borrowings under the Partnership credit facility bear interest at the Partnership’s option at the Eurodollar Rate (the LIBOR Rate) plus an applicable margin or the Base Rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, the 30-day Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0% or the administrative agent’s prime rate) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margins vary depending on the Partnership’s credit rating. Upon breach by the Partnership of certain covenants governing the Partnership credit facility, amounts outstanding under the Partnership credit facility, if any, may become due and payable immediately.
As of June 30, 2016, there were $11.1 million in outstanding letters of credit and $697.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the Partnership’s credit facility, leaving approximately $791.9 million available for future borrowing based on the borrowing capacity of $1.5 billion.
All other material terms and conditions of the Partnership credit facility are described in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Indebtedness” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Partnership expects to be in compliance with all credit facility covenants for at least the next twelve months.

14

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(7)     Income Taxes
Income taxes included in the condensed consolidated financial statements were as follows for the periods presented:
 
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
(in millions)
ENLC income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
(1.8
)
 
$
10.2

 
$
(1.6
)
 
$
20.9

Total income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
(1.8
)
 
$
10.2

 
$
(1.6
)
 
$
20.9

The following schedule reconciles total income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal tax rate to income before income taxes:
 
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
(in millions)
Tax expense (benefit) at statutory federal rate (35%)
 
$
0.5

 
$
8.4

 
$
(160.0
)
 
$
17.4

State income taxes expense (benefit), net of federal tax benefit
 

 
0.6

 
(14.9
)
 
1.2

Income tax expense (benefit) from partnership
 
(2.3
)
 
0.7

 
(1.3
)
 
1.9

Non-deductible expense related to asset impairment
 

 

 
173.9

 

Other
 

 
0.5

 
0.7

 
0.4

Total income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
(1.8
)
 
$
10.2

 
$
(1.6
)
 
$
20.9


(8)      Certain Provisions of the Partnership Agreement
(a) Issuance of Common Units
In November 2014, the Partnership entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “BMO EDA”) with BMO Capital Markets Corp., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, the “Sales Agents”) to sell up to $350.0 million in aggregate gross sales of the Partnership’s common units from time to time through an “at the market” equity offering program. The Partnership may also sell common units to any Sales Agent as principal for the Sales Agent’s own account at a price agreed upon at the time of sale. The Partnership has no obligation to sell any of the common units under the BMO EDA and may at any time suspend solicitation and offers under the BMO EDA. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership sold an aggregate of 3.3 million common units under the BMO EDA, generating proceeds of approximately $52.3 million (net of approximately $0.5 million of commissions). The Partnership used the net proceeds for general partnership purposes. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $264.4 million remains available to be issued under the BMO EDA.
(b) Class C Common Units
In March 2015, the Partnership issued 6,704,285 Class C Common Units representing a new class of limited partner interests as partial consideration for the acquisition of Coronado. The Class C Common Units were substantially similar in all respects to the Partnership's common units, except that distributions paid on the Class C Common Units could be paid in cash or in additional Class C Common Units issued in kind, as determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion. Distributions on the Class C Common Units for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016 were paid-in-kind through the issuance of 209,044 and 233,107 Class C Common Units on February 11, 2016 and May 12, 2016, respectively. All of the outstanding Class C Common Units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis on May 13, 2016.

15

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(c) Preferred Units
In January 2016, the Partnership issued an aggregate of 50,000,000 Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units (“Preferred Units”) representing the Partnership's limited partner interests to Enfield Holdings, L.P. (“Enfield”) in a private placement for a cash purchase price of $15.00 per Preferred Unit (the “Issue Price”), resulting in net proceeds of approximately $724.1 million after fees and deductions. Proceeds from the private placement were used to partially fund the Partnership's portion of the purchase price payable in connection with the Tall Oak acquisition. Affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and affiliates of TPG Global, LLC own interests in the general partner of Enfield. The Preferred Units are convertible into the Partnership's common units on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain adjustments, at any time after the record date for the quarter ending June 30, 2017 (a) in full, at the Partnership's option, if the volume weighted average price of a common unit over the 30-trading day period ending two trading days prior to the conversion date (the “Conversion VWAP”) is greater than 150% of the Issue Price or (b) in full or in part, at Enfield’s option. In addition, upon certain events involving a change of control of the General Partner or our managing member, all of the Preferred Units will automatically convert into a number of common units equal to the greater of (i) the number of common units into which the Preferred Units would then convert and (ii) the number of Preferred Units to be converted multiplied by an amount equal to (x) 140% of the Issue Price divided by (y) the Conversion VWAP.
As a holder of Preferred Units, Enfield is entitled to receive a quarterly distribution, subject to certain adjustments, equal to (x) during the quarter ending March 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, an annual rate of 8.5% on the Issue Price payable in-kind in the form of additional Preferred Units and (y) thereafter, an annual rate of 7.5% on the Issue Price payable in cash (the “Cash Distribution Component”) plus an in-kind distribution equal to the greater of (A) an annual rate of 1.0% of the Issue Price and (B) an amount equal to (i) the excess, if any, of the distribution that would have been payable had the Preferred Units converted into common units over the Cash Distribution Component, divided by (ii) the Issue Price. A distribution on the Preferred Units for the three months ended March 31, 2016, was paid-in kind through the issuance of 992,445 Preferred Units on May 12, 2016. A distribution on the Preferred Units was declared for the three months ended June 30, 2016, which will result in the issuance of 1,083,589 additional Preferred Units on August 11, 2016. Income was allocated to the Preferred Units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, $18.0 million and $29.8 million of income was allocated to the Preferred Units, respectively.
(d)  Distributions
Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnership credit facility and/or the indentures governing the Partnership’s senior unsecured notes, the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter. Distributions are made to the General Partner in accordance with its current percentage interest with the remainder to the common unitholders, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved. The General Partner is not entitled to its general partner or incentive distributions with respect to the Preferred Units issued in kind.
Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnership's General Partner is entitled to 13.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48.0% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.375 per unit.
A summary of the Partnership's distribution activity relating to the common units for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is provided below:
Declaration period
 
Distribution/unit
 
Date paid/payable
Fourth Quarter of 2015
 
$
0.39

 
February 11, 2016
First Quarter of 2016
 
$
0.39

 
May 12, 2016
Second Quarter of 2016
 
$
0.39

 
August 11, 2016

16

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(e) Allocation of Partnership Income
Net income is allocated to the General Partner in an amount equal to its incentive distributions as described in (d) above. The General Partner's share of net income consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for unit-based compensation attributable to ENLC’s restricted units and the percentage interest of the Partnership’s net income adjusted for ENLC's unit-based compensation specifically allocated to the General Partner. The net income allocated to the General Partner is as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Income allocation for incentive distributions
$
14.2

 
$
11.3

 
$
28.0

 
$
20.1

Unit-based compensation attributable to ENLC’s restricted units
(3.6
)
 
(3.9
)
 
(7.6
)
 
(10.9
)
General Partner share of net income (loss)

 
0.2

 
(2.4
)
 
0.3

General Partner interest in drop down transactions

 
11.5

 

 
36.1

General Partner interest in net income
$
10.6

 
$
19.1

 
$
18.0

 
$
45.6

(9) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations
As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A, unvested unit-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations. Net income (loss) attributable to the drop down interests acquired during 2015 from Devon for periods prior to acquisition is not allocated for purposes of calculating net income (loss) per common unit as they were fully assigned to the general partner interest. The following table reflects the computation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in millions, except per unit amounts):
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
EnLink Midstream, LLC interest in net income (loss)
$
0.8

 
$
14.5

 
$
(456.8
)
 
$
30.8

Distributed earnings allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common units (1) (2)
$
45.9

 
$
41.1

 
$
91.5

 
$
81.3

Unvested restricted units (1) (2)
0.5

 
0.3

 
1.0

 
0.5

Total distributed earnings
$
46.4

 
$
41.4

 
$
92.5

 
$
81.8

Undistributed loss allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common units
$
(44.7
)
 
$
(26.7
)
 
$
(543.2
)
 
$
(50.7
)
Unvested restricted units
(0.9
)
 
(0.2
)
 
(6.1
)
 
(0.3
)
Total undistributed loss
$
(45.6
)
 
$
(26.9
)
 
$
(549.3
)
 
$
(51.0
)
Net income (loss) allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common units
$
1.2

 
$
14.4

 
$
(451.7
)
 
$
30.6

Unvested restricted units
(0.4
)
 
0.1

 
(5.1
)
 
0.2

Total net income (loss)
$
0.8

 
$
14.5

 
$
(456.8
)
 
$
30.8

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.01

 
$
0.09

 
$
(2.55
)
 
$
0.19

Diluted
$
0.01

 
$
0.09

 
$
(2.55
)
 
$
0.19

(1)
Three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 represents a declared distribution of $0.255 per unit payable August 12, 2016 and a distribution of $0.25 per unit paid on August 14, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 represents a distribution of $0.255 per unit paid on May 13, 2016, a declared distribution of $0.255 per unit payable on August 12, 2016 and distributions of $0.245 per unit paid on May 15, 2015 and of $0.25 per unit paid on August 14, 2015.

17

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per unit for the periods presented (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Basic and diluted earnings per unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common units outstanding
180.0

 
164.2

 
179.4

 
164.2

Diluted weighted average units outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average basic common units outstanding
180.0

 
164.2

 
179.4

 
164.2

Dilutive effect of restricted units issued
0.8

 
0.4

 

 
0.4

Total weighted average diluted common units outstanding
180.8

 
164.6

 
179.4

 
164.6

All outstanding units were included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit and weighted based on the number of days such units were outstanding during the periods presented.
(10) Asset Retirement Obligations
The schedule below summarizes the changes in the Partnership’s asset retirement obligation:
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
(in millions)
Beginning asset retirement obligations
$
14.0

 
$
20.6

Revisions to existing liabilities
(0.4
)
 
(4.0
)
Accretion
0.2

 
0.3

    Liabilities settled
(0.6
)
 
(3.2
)
Ending asset retirement obligations
$
13.2

 
$
13.7

There are no asset retirement obligations included in Other Current Liabilities as of June 30, 2016. Asset retirement obligations of $1.1 million are included in Other Current Liabilities as of December 31, 2015.

18

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(11) Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
The Partnership's unconsolidated investments consisted of a contractual right to the economic benefits and burdens associated with Devon's 38.75% ownership interest in Gulf Coast Fractionators (“GCF”) at June 30, 2016 and 2015 and approximately 31.0% ownership interest in Howard Energy Partners (“HEP”) at June 30, 2016 and 2015.
The following table shows the activity related to the Partnership’s investment in unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated (in millions):
 
Gulf Coast Fractionators
 
Howard Energy Partners
 
Total
Three months ended
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Contributions
$

 
$
34.7

 
$
34.7

Distributions
$
0.5

 
$
5.1

 
$
5.6

Equity in net income
$
0.5

 
$
0.3

 
$
0.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions
$
4.2

 
$
8.2

 
$
12.4

Equity in net income
$
2.9

 
$
3.0

 
$
5.9

 
 
 
 
 
 
Six months ended
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Contributions
$

 
$
41.8

 
$
41.8

Distributions
$
3.5

 
$
11.3

 
$
14.8

Equity in net loss
$
(1.2
)
 
$
(0.4
)
 
$
(1.6
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions
$
6.9

 
$
12.3

 
$
19.2

Equity in net income
$
6.3

 
$
3.4

 
$
9.7

The following table shows the balances related to the Partnership’s investment in unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated (in millions):
 
June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
Gulf Coast Fractionators
$
47.9

 
$
52.6

Howard Energy Partners
251.8

 
221.7

Total investment in unconsolidated affiliates
$
299.7

 
$
274.3

(12) Employee Incentive Plans
(a)         Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Partnership accounts for unit-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, which requires that compensation related to all unit-based awards, including unit options, be recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements. On April 7, 2016, the General Partner amended and restated the EnLink Midstream GP, LLC Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “GP Plan”). Amendments to the GP Plan included an increase to the number of the Partnership's common units authorized for issuance under the GP Plan by 5,000,000 common units to an aggregate of 14,070,000 common units and other technical changes.

19

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

The Partnership and we each have similar unit-based compensation payment plans for officers and employees, which are described below.  Unit-based compensation associated with ENLC's unit-based compensation plan awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership is recorded by the Partnership since ENLC has no substantial or managed operating activities other than its interests in the Partnership and EnLink Oklahoma T.O. Amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in millions): 
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Cost of unit-based compensation charged to general and administrative expense
$
5.7

 
$
6.6

 
$
12.0

 
$
18.5

Cost of unit-based compensation charged to operating expense
1.7

 
1.1

 
3.4

 
3.0

    Total amount charged to income
$
7.4

 
$
7.7

 
$
15.4

 
$
21.5

Interest of non-controlling partners in unit-based compensation
$
2.7

 
$
3.7

 
$
5.6

 
$
9.2

Amount of related income tax benefit recognized in income
$
1.8

 
$
1.5

 
$
3.7

 
$
4.6

(b)  EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Restricted Incentive Units
The Partnership's restricted incentive units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant, which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted incentive unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is provided below:
 
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30, 2016
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Restricted Incentive Units:
 
Number of
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
 Fair Value
Non-vested, beginning of period
 
1,253,729

 
$
29.59

Granted
 
1,046,685

 
10.03

Vested*
 
(297,439
)
 
30.33

Forfeited
 
(40,998
)
 
22.17

Non-vested, end of period
 
1,961,977

 
$
19.20

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in millions)
 
$
32.6

 
 

*
Vested units include 85,366 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
A summary of the restricted incentive units’ aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is provided below (in millions):


Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Restricted Incentive Units:

2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested

$
0.1

 
$
0.4

 
$
3.8

 
$
7.2

Fair value of units vested

$

 
$
0.5

 
$
9.0

 
$
7.5

As of June 30, 2016, there was $19.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted incentive units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
(c)       EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Performance Units
In 2016, the General Partner and the managing member of ENLC granted performance awards under the GP Plan and the EnLink Midstream, LLC 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LLC Plan”), respectively. The performance award agreements provide that the vesting of restricted incentive units granted thereunder is dependent on the achievement of certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance goals relative to the TSR achievement of a peer group of companies (the “Peer Companies”) over the applicable performance period. The performance award agreements contemplate that the Peer Companies for an individual performance award (the “Subject Award”) are the companies comprising the Alerian MLP Index for Master Limited Partnerships (“AMZ”), excluding the Partnership and the Company (collectively, “EnLink”), on the grant date for the

20

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Subject Award. The performance units will vest based on the percentile ranking of the average of the Partnership’s and ENLC’s TSR achievement (“EnLink TSR”) for the applicable performance period relative to the TSR achievement of the Peer Companies.
At the end of the vesting period, recipients receive distribution equivalents, if any, with respect to the number of performance units vested. The vesting of units range from zero to 200 percent of the units granted depending on the EnLink TSR as compared to the TSR of the Peer Companies on the vesting date. The fair value of each performance unit is estimated as of the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions used for all performance unit grants made under the plan: (i) a risk-free interest rate based on United States Treasury rates as of the grant date; (ii) a volatility assumption based on the historical realized price volatility of the Partnership's common units and the designated peer group securities; (iii) an estimated ranking of the Partnership among the designated peer group; and (iv) the distribution yield. The fair value of the performance unit on the date of grant is expensed over a vesting period of three years. The following table presents a summary of the grant-date fair values of performance units granted and the related assumptions:
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Performance Units:
 
January 2016
 
February 2016
Beginning TSR Price
 
$
14.82

 
$
14.82

Risk-free interest rate
 
1.10
%
 
0.89
%
Volatility factor
 
39.71
%
 
42.33
%
Distribution yield
 
12.10
%
 
19.20
%
The following table presents a summary of the Partnership's performance units:
 
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30, 2016
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP Performance Units:
 
Number of
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Non-Vested, beginning of period
 
118,126

 
$
35.41

Granted
 
258,078

 
9.81

Forfeited
 
(2,798
)
 
36.18

Non-vested, end of period
 
373,406

 
$
17.71

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in millions)
 
$
6.2

 
 
As of June 30, 2016 there was $4.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense that related to non-vested Partnership performance units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
(d)         EnLink Midstream, LLC Restricted Incentive Units
ENLC restricted incentive units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant, which is equal to the market value of the common units on such date. A summary of the restricted incentive unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is provided below:
 
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30, 2016
EnLink Midstream, LLC Restricted Incentive Units:
 
Number of
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Non-vested, beginning of period
 
1,148,893

 
$
34.78

Granted
 
1,038,619

 
9.44

Vested*
 
(320,497
)
 
36.92

Forfeited
 
(37,952
)
 
23.95

Non-vested, end of period
 
1,829,063

 
$
20.24

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in millions)
 
$
29.1

 
 

*
Vested units include 91,256 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.

21

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

A summary of the restricted incentive units’ aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are provided below (in millions):
 
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
EnLink Midstream, LLC Restricted Incentive Units:
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested
 
$

 
$
0.6

 
$
3.8

 
$
8.9

Fair value of units vested
 
$

 
$
0.6

 
$
11.8

 
$
9.2

As of June 30, 2016, there was $18.6 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested ENLC restricted incentive units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
(e) EnLink Midstream, LLC's Performance Units
In 2016, ENLC granted performance awards under the LLC Plan discussed in Note (c) above. At the end of the vesting period, recipients receive distribution equivalents, if any, with respect to the number of performance units vested. The vesting of units range from zero to 200 percent of the units granted depending on the EnLink TSR as compared to the TSR of the Peer Companies on the vesting date. The fair value of each performance unit is estimated as of the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions used for all performance unit grants made under the plan: (i) a risk-free interest rate based on United States Treasury rates as of the grant date; (ii) a volatility assumption based on the historical realized price volatility of ENLC's common units and the designated peer group securities; (iii) an estimated ranking of ENLC among the designated peer group and (iv) the distribution yield. The fair value of the unit on the date of grant is expensed over a vesting period of three years. The following table presents a summary of the grant-date fair values of performance units granted and the related assumptions:
EnLink Midstream, LLC Performance Units:
 
January 2016
 
February 2016
Beginning TSR Price
 
$
15.38

 
$
15.38

Risk-free interest rate
 
1.10
%
 
0.89
%
Volatility factor
 
46.02
%
 
52.05
%
Distribution yield
 
8.60
%
 
14.00
%
The following table presents a summary of the Company's performance units:
 
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30, 2016
EnLink Midstream, LLC Performance Units:
 
Number of
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Non-Vested, beginning of period
 
105,080

 
$
40.50

Granted
 
242,646

 
9.59

Forfeited
 
(2,525
)
 
41.31

Non-vested, end of period
 
345,201

 
$
18.76

Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in millions)
 
$
5.5

 
 
As of June 30, 2016, there was $4.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense that related to non-vested ENLC performance units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.  
(13) Derivatives
Commodity Swaps
The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuation in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge price and location risk related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs. The Partnership does not designate transactions as cash flow or fair value hedges for hedge accounting treatment under FASB ASC 815. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the Partnership's derivatives are recorded in revenue in the period incurred. In

22

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

addition, the Partnership's risk management policy does not allow the Partnership to take speculative positions with its derivative contracts.
The Partnership commonly enters into index (float-for-float) or fixed-for-float swaps in order to mitigate its cash flow exposure to fluctuations in the future prices of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil. For natural gas, index swaps are used to protect against the price exposure of daily priced gas versus first-of-month priced gas. They are also used to hedge the basis location price risk resulting from supply and markets being priced on different indices. For natural gas, NGLs, condensate and crude, fixed-for-float swaps are used to protect cash flows against price fluctuations: (1) where the Partnership receives a percentage of liquids as a fee for processing third-party gas or where the Partnership receives a portion of the proceeds of the sales of natural gas and liquids as a fee, (2) in the natural gas processing and fractionation components of its business and (3) where the Partnership is mitigating the price risk for product held in inventory or storage.
The components of gain (loss) on derivative activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations relating to commodity swaps are (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Change in fair value of derivatives
$
(8.4
)
 
$
(2.5
)
 
$
(14.4
)
 
$
(6.3
)
Realized gain on derivatives
2.7

 
3.7

 
8.3

 
7.7

    Gain (loss) on derivative activity
$
(5.7
)
 
$
1.2

 
$
(6.1
)
 
$
1.4

The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in millions):
 
June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
Fair value of derivative assets — current
$
5.3

 
$
16.8

Fair value of derivative liabilities — current
(5.8
)
 
(2.9
)
Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term

 
(0.1
)
    Net fair value of derivatives
$
(0.5
)
 
$
13.8

Assets and liabilities related to the Partnership's derivative contracts are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the change in fair value of these contracts is recorded net as a gain (loss) on derivative activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its derivative contracts using actively quoted prices. The total estimated fair value liability of derivative contracts of $0.5 million as of June 30, 2016 has a maturity date of less than one year.
Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets at June 30, 2016. The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than June 2017.
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2016
Commodity
 
Instruments
 
Unit
 
Volume
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
NGL (short contracts)
 
Swaps
 
Gallons
 
(31.9
)
 
$
3.4

NGL (long contracts)
 
Swaps
 
Gallons
 
11.4

 
(0.4
)
Natural Gas (short contracts)
 
Swaps
 
MMBtu
 
(6.3
)
 
(2.9
)
Natural Gas (long contracts)
 
Swaps
 
MMBtu
 
1.3

 
(0.1
)
Condensate (short contracts)
 
Swaps
 
MMBbls
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.5
)
Total fair value of derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(0.5
)
On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterparty's financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements (“ISDAs”) that allow for netting of swap contract receivables and payables in

23

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

the event of default by either party. If the Partnership's counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts, the Partnership's maximum loss as of June 30, 2016 of $5.3 million would be eliminated due to the offsetting of gross fair value payables against gross fair value receivables as allowed by the ISDAs. 
Interest Rate Swaps
The Partnership entered into interest rate swaps during April and May 2015 in connection with the issuance of the 2025 Notes in May 2015. The Partnership did not enter into any interest rate swaps for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
The impact of the interest rate swaps on net income is included in other income (expense) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as part of interest expense, net, as follows (in millions):
 
Three Months Ended  
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Settlement gains on derivatives
$

 
$
3.6

 
$

 
$
3.6

(14)      Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.
FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Partnership’s derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.
Net asset (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in millions):
 
June 30, 2016
Level 2
 
December 31, 2015
Level 2
Commodity Swaps*
$
(0.5
)
 
$
13.8

Total
$
(0.5
)
 
$
13.8

*
The fair value of derivative contracts included in assets or liabilities for risk management activities represents the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current arms-length transaction adjusted for the Partnership's and/or the counterparty credit risk of the Partnership as required under FASB ASC 820.

24

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Partnership has determined the estimated fair value of its financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value; thus, the estimates provided below are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Partnership could realize upon the sale or refinancing of such financial instruments (in millions):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
Long-term debt
$
3,364.1

 
$
3,148.5

 
$
3,066.0

 
$
2,585.5

Installment Payables
$
446.5

 
$
451.6

 
$

 
$

Obligations under capital leases
$
12.3

 
$
11.5

 
$
16.7

 
$
15.6

The carrying amounts of the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
The Partnership had $697.0 million and $414.0 million in outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. We had $15.1 million in outstanding borrowings under our credit facility as of June 30, 2016. As borrowings under either credit facility accrue interest under floating interest rate structures, the carrying value of such indebtedness approximates fair value for the amounts outstanding under the applicable credit facility. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership had total borrowings of $2.7 billion under senior unsecured notes maturing between 2019 and 2045 with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.7% to 7.1%. The fair value of all senior unsecured notes and installment payables as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was based on Level 2 inputs from third-party market quotations.  The fair value of obligations under capital leases was calculated using Level 2 inputs from third-party banks. 
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Severance and Change in Control Agreements
Certain members of management of the Partnership are parties to severance and change of control agreements with EnLink Midstream Operating, LP. The severance and change in control agreements provide those individuals with severance payments in certain circumstances and prohibit such individual from, among other things, competing with the General Partner or its affiliates during his or her employment. In addition, the severance and change of control agreements prohibit subject individuals from, among other things, disclosing confidential information about the General Partner or its affiliates or interfering with a client or customer of the General Partner or its affiliates, in each case during his or her employment and for certain periods (including indefinite periods) following the termination of such person’s employment.
(b) Environmental Issues
The operation of pipelines, plants and other facilities for the gathering, processing, transmitting or disposing of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, condensate, brine and other products is subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. As an owner or operator of these facilities, the Partnership must comply with United States laws and regulations at the federal, state and local levels that relate to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste management and disposal, and other environmental matters. The cost of planning, designing, constructing and operating pipelines, plants, and other facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement measures, including citizen suits, which can include the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements, and the issuance of injunctions or restrictions on operation. Management believes that, based on currently known information, compliance with these laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In February 2016, a spill occurred at the Partnership's Kill Buck Station in the Ohio operations.  State and federal agencies were notified and clean-up response efforts were promptly executed, which significantly lessened the impact of the spill.  On April 7, 2016, the state agency determined that the clean-up recovery efforts were completed and has internally transitioned monitoring to their water quality division.  The Partnership does not anticipate a material fine or penalty by either the state or federal agencies.  Additionally, although the spill that previously occurred in the Partnership's West Virginia operations in the third quarter of 2015 is still pending, the Partnership does not believe that any fine or penalty that may be issued will be material to its operations.  Lastly, the Partnership continues to work

25

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

with Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration regarding the notice of potential violation discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
(c) Litigation Contingencies
The Partnership is involved in various litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any liabilities that may result from these claims would not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 
At times, the Partnership’s subsidiaries acquire pipeline easements and other property rights by exercising rights of eminent domain and common carrier. As a result, from time to time the Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is a party to a number of lawsuits under which a court will determine the value of pipeline easements or other property interests obtained by the Partnership’s subsidiaries by condemnation. Damage awards in these suits should reflect the value of the property interest acquired and any diminution in the value of the remaining property owned by the landowner. However, some landowners have alleged unique damage theories to inflate their damage claims or assert valuation methodologies that could result in damage awards in excess of the amounts anticipated. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 
The Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is defending lawsuits filed by owners of property located near processing facilities or compression facilities constructed, owned or operated by the Partnership as part of its systems. The suits generally allege that the facilities create a private nuisance and have damaged the value of surrounding property. Claims of this nature have arisen as a result of the development of natural gas gathering, processing and treating facilities in urban and occupied rural areas. 
In July 2013, the Board of Commissioners for the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority for New Orleans and surrounding areas filed a lawsuit against approximately 100 energy companies, seeking, among other relief, restoration of wetlands allegedly lost due to historic industry operations in those areas. The suit was filed in Louisiana state court in New Orleans, but was removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.  The amount of damages is unspecified. The Partnership's subsidiary, EnLink LIG, LLC, is one of the named defendants as the owner of pipelines in the area.  On February 13, 2015, the court granted defendants’ joint motion to dismiss and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs have appealed the matter to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Partnership intends to continue vigorously defending the case. The success of the plaintiffs' appeal as well as the Partnership's costs and legal exposure, if any, related to the lawsuit are not currently determinable.
The Partnership owns and operates a high-pressure pipeline and underground natural gas and NGL storage reservoirs and associated facilities near Bayou Corne, Louisiana. In August 2012, a large sinkhole formed in the vicinity of this pipeline and underground storage reservoirs, resulting in damage to certain of the Partnership's facilities. The Partnership is seeking to recover its losses from responsible parties. The Partnership has sued Texas Brine Company, LLC (“Texas Brine”), the operator of a failed cavern in the area and its insurers, seeking recovery for these losses.  The Partnership has also sued Occidental Chemical Company and Legacy Vulcan Corp. f/k/a Vulcan Materials Company, two Chlor-Alkali plant operators that participated in Texas Brine’s operational decisions regarding the mining of the failed cavern. The Partnership also filed a claim with its insurers, which the Partnership's insurers denied. The Partnership disputed the denial and has also sued its insurers. In August 2014, the Partnership received a partial settlement with respect to the Texas Brine claims in the amount of $6.1 million but additional claims remain outstanding. The Partnership cannot give assurance that the Partnership will be able to fully recover its losses through insurance recovery or claims against responsible parties.
In June 2014, a group of landowners in Assumption Parish, Louisiana added a subsidiary of the Partnership, EnLink Processing Services, LLC, as a defendant in a pending lawsuit they had filed against Texas Brine, Occidental Chemical Corporation, and Vulcan Materials Company relating to claims arising from the Bayou Corne sinkhole. The suit is pending in the 23rd Judicial Court, Assumption Parish, Louisiana. Although plaintiffs’ claims against the other defendants have been pending since October 2012, plaintiffs are now alleging that EnLink Processing Services, LLC’s negligence also contributed to the formation of the sinkhole. The amount of damages is unspecified. The validity of the causes of action, as well as the Partnership's costs and legal exposure, if any, related to the lawsuit are not currently determinable. The Partnership intends to vigorously defend the case. The Partnership has also filed a claim for defense and indemnity with its insurers.
(16) Segment Information
Identification of the majority of the Company's operating segments is based principally upon geographic regions served.  The Company’s reportable segments consist of the following: natural gas gathering, processing, transmission and fractionation operations located in north Texas, south Texas and the Permian Basin in west Texas (“Texas”), the pipelines and processing

26

ENLINK MIDSTREAM, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

plants located in Louisiana and NGL assets located in south Louisiana (“Louisiana”), natural gas gathering and processing operations located throughout Oklahoma (“Oklahoma”) and crude rail, truck, pipeline and barge facilities in west Texas, south Texas, Louisiana and Ohio River Valley (“Crude and Condensate”). Operating activity for intersegment eliminations is shown in the corporate segment.  The Company’s sales are derived from external domestic customers.
Corporate expenses include general partnership expenses associated with managing all reportable operating segments. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash, property and equipment, including software, for general corporate support, debt financing costs and unconsolidated affiliate investments in HEP and GCF. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating revenues and segment profits.
Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables:
 
Texas
 
Louisiana
 
Oklahoma
 
Crude and Condensate
 
Corporate
 
Totals
 
(In millions)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Product sales
$
41.9

 
$
399.5

 
$
8.9

 
$
288.0

 
$

 
$
738.3

Product sales-affiliates
72.7

 
15.2

 
22.5

 
0.9

 
(79.6
)
 
31.7

Midstream services
23.2

 
52.7

 
18.0

 
14.4

 

 
108.3

Midstream services-affiliates
111.9

 
25.5

 
41.7

 
4.0

 
(22.5
)
 
160.6

Cost of sales
(103.6
)
 
(425.5
)
 
(31.6
)
 
(273.8
)
 
102.1

 
(732.4
)
Operating expenses
(43.0
)
 
(25.4
)
 
(11.8
)
 
(19.9
)
 

 
(100.1
)
Loss on derivative activity

 

 

 

 
(5.7
)
 
(5.7
)
Segment profit
$
103.1

 
$
42.0

 
$
47.7

 
$
13.6

 
$
(5.7
)
 
$
200.7

Depreciation and amortization
$
(48.7
)
 
$
(28.6
)
 
$
(34.8
)
 
$
(10.6
)
 
$
(2.2
)
 
$
(124.9
)
Goodwill
$
231.1

 
$

 
$
190.3

 
$

 
$
1,119.9

 
$
1,541.3

Capital expenditures
$
57.2

 
$
14.1

 
$
63.1

 
$
0.9

 
$
4.9

 
$
140.2

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product sales
$
81.2

 
$
401.2

 
$
0.1

 
$
473.7

 
$

 
$
956.2

Product sales-affiliates
35.0

 
17.0

 
1.7

 
14.0

 
(36.0
)
 
31.7

Midstream services
36.0

 
63.2

 
9.8

 
26.9

 

 
135.9

Midstream services-affiliates
115.8

 
0.3

 
29.1

 
4.3

 

 
149.5

Cost of sales
(118.4