XML 28 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:
 (amounts in millions)
 
Performance Solutions
 
Agricultural Solutions
 
Total
Balance, December 31, 2014
 
$
961.2

 
$
444.1

 
$
1,405.3

Addition from acquisitions
 
1,258.3

 
1,697.1

 
2,955.4

Purchase accounting adjustments
 

 
80.2

 
80.2

Foreign currency translation
 
(72.3
)
 
(346.7
)
 
(419.0
)
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
2,147.2

 
1,874.7

 
4,021.9

Addition from acquisitions
 
66.9

 

 
66.9

Purchase accounting adjustments
 
29.7

 

 
29.7

Impairment write-off
 
(46.6
)
 

 
(46.6
)
Foreign currency translation
 
(64.8
)
 
156.7

 
91.9

Other
 

 
15.1

 
15.1

Balance, December 31, 2016 (*)
 
$
2,132.4

 
$
2,046.5

 
$
4,178.9


(*) Includes accumulated impairment losses totaling $46.6 million associated with the Company's Performance Solutions segment.
The Company performs its annual impairment analysis of goodwill at the reporting unit level during the fourth quarter.  Platform's goodwill impairment testing analysis varies by reporting unit, using the qualitative approach for certain reporting units and an income approach derived from a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of other reporting units.  Except for Offshore Solutions, within the Performance Solutions segment, the Company concluded that the fair values of the remaining reporting units exceeded the carrying values of their net assets based on the assessments used in the qualitative approach and the projections and other assumptions used in the analysis. Within Offshore Solutions, the Company recorded an impairment charge totaling $46.6 million as a result of continuing weak oil prices. The Company is now experiencing the impact on its results, which slightly lag the overall industry, as this ultimately has caused the industry to depress its overall investments. The fair value was determined using a combination of an income approach derived from a discounted cash flow model as well as market multiples. There was no impairment of goodwill in 2015 and 2014.
Within the Performance Solutions segment, we used a discounted cash flow analysis and considered guideline company and guideline transaction information, where available, to aid in the valuation of the reporting units. The discount rates used ranged from 9.0% to 10.0% and the annual long term revenue growth rates assumptions are between 2.0% and 6.5%.
Additionally, as of the assessment date of October 1, 2016, the excess of the fair value of the Agro Business, a reporting unit within the Agricultural Solutions segment, over its carrying value was 21.7%. Goodwill assigned to the Agro Business reporting unit totaled $2.08 billion as of the assessment date. In 2015, the excess of the fair value of this reporting unit over its carrying value was 16.1%. Goodwill assigned to the Agro Business reporting unit totaled $1.87 billion as of the assessment date. The primary components of and assumptions used in the assessment consisted of the following:
Valuation Techniques - The Company uses a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires assumptions about short and long-term net cash flows, growth rates, as well as discount rates.  Additionally, the Company considers guideline company and guideline transaction information, where available, to aid in the valuation of the reporting units.
Growth Assumptions - Multi-year financial forecasts are developed for each reporting unit by considering several key business drivers such as new business initiatives, client service and retention standards, market share changes, historical performance, and industry and economic trends, among other considerations.  The annual long term growth rates used in 2016 for the initial 8 year period ranged from 0.6% to 5.7% for the Agro Business. The long-term growth rate used in 2016 in determining the terminal value of the Agro Business was estimated at 3.0%.
The annual revenue growth rates used in 2015 for the initial 8 year period ranged from 1.3% to 7.2% for the Agro Business. The long-term growth rate used in 2015 in determining the terminal value of the Agro Business was estimated at 3.0%.
Discount Rate Assumptions - Discount rates were estimated based on a Weighted Average Cost of Capital, or WACC.  The WACC combines the required return on equity, based on a Modified Capital Asset Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, small stock risk premium and a company specific risk premium, with the cost of debt, based on BBB-rated corporate bonds, adjusted using an income tax factor.  The calculation resulted in a WACC rate for the Agro Business of 9.0% and 10.0% for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Estimated Fair Value and Sensitivities - The estimated fair value of each reporting unit is derived from the valuation techniques described above.  The estimated fair value of each reporting unit is analyzed in relation to numerous market and historical factors, including current economic and market conditions, company-specific growth opportunities, and guideline company information.
The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in these estimates and assumptions; therefore, in some instances, changes in these assumptions may impact whether the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying value.  Platform performed sensitivity analysis around these assumptions in order to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values.  In 2016, based on a sensitivity analysis performed for the Agro Business reporting unit, a 1% increase in the WACC, or a 1% decrease in the terminal value, does not result in the carrying value being greater than the fair value. In 2015, based on the sensitivity analysis performed for the Agro Business reporting unit, a 1% decrease in the terminal growth rate did not result in the carrying value exceeding its fair value, however, a 1% increase in the WACC rate would have resulted in the carrying value of the net assets to exceed their fair value, making it necessary to proceed to the second step of the impairment test.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, which consists solely of tradenames, was $377 million and $360 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company found no indications of impairment related to its indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of its annual impairment review.
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Intangible assets subject to amortization were as follows:
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 (amounts in millions)
 
Weighted average useful life (years)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization and Foreign Exchange
 
Net Book Value
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization and Foreign Exchange
 
Net Book Value
Customer lists
 
18.0
 
$
1,245.9

 
$
(174.5
)
 
$
1,071.4

 
$
1,297.2

 
$
(184.0
)
 
$
1,113.2

Developed technology (1)
 
11.6
 
2,022.1

 
(254.9
)
 
1,767.2

 
2,260.9

 
(440.4
)
 
1,820.5

Tradenames
 
7.7
 
25.1

 
(8.2
)
 
16.9

 
24.2

 
(5.4
)
 
18.8

Non-compete agreement
 
5.0
 
1.9

 
(1.1
)
 
0.8

 
1.9

 
(0.5
)
 
1.4

Total
 
14.0
 
$
3,295.0

 
$
(438.7
)
 
$
2,856.3

 
$
3,584.2

 
$
(630.3
)
 
$
2,953.9

 
(1) Includes in-process registration rights awaiting completion before amortization commences.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded amortization expense on intangible assets of $267 million, $202 million and $67.4 million, respectively.
Estimated future amortization of intangible assets for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows:
 (amounts in millions)
 
Amortization Expense
2017
 
$
266.7

2018
 
266.5

2019
 
266.4

2020
 
261.7

2021
 
253.5