XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 2 - Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

2. Fair value measurement


As a basis for determining the fair value of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, the Company utilizes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


Level I—Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level II—Observable inputs, other than Level I prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.


Level III—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.


This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The carrying amount of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.


Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the entire fair value measurement requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.


The following tables present information about the balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques it utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates, and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. The Company did not have any financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.


           

Fair value measurements at September 30, 2014 using

 

(in thousands)

 

September 30, 2014

   

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
(Level
1)

   

Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)

   

Significant
u
nobservable
inputs
(Level 3)

 

Liabilities:

                               

Contingent purchase price consideration

  $ 1,234     $     $     $ 1,234  

Total

  $ 1,234     $     $     $ 1,234  

           

Fair value measurements at December 31, 2013 using

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2013

   

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
(Level
1)

   

Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)

   

Significant
u
nobservable
inputs
(Level 3)

 

Liabilities:

                               

Ordinary share warrants

  $ 296     $     $     $ 296  

Total

  $ 296     $     $     $ 296  

In May 2013, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement with Square 1 Bank that provided for an initial borrowing of $6.0 million and, subject to the achievement of certain revenue milestones, the ability to borrow an additional $1.0 million in January 2014. The Company also received access to a $5.0 million revolving line of credit. The Company concurrently issued a warrant to purchase up to 15,791 ordinary shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.80 per share. Due to the lack of market quotes relating to the Company’s ordinary share warrants, the fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model, which is based on Level 3 inputs. In December 2013, the Company repaid the loan in full and canceled the line of credit.


In April 2014, Square 1 Bank converted its warrant and received 15,148 ordinary shares of the Company, in accordance with a formula stated in the warrant agreement. Prior to the warrant conversion, the fair value of the warrant was adjusted to its fair value at the date of exercise of $318,000, with the loss on change in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. The liability for the warrant on conversion was then reclassified to additional paid-in capital.


On July 31, 2014, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Boulder, a privately owned company developing immunology-based assays for rheumatology and infectious diseases. The terms of the purchase agreement included contingent purchase price consideration consisting of future potential milestone payments totaling up to $6.1 million at any time on or prior to July 31, 2024. The milestone payments consist of completion of studies related to acquired technologies, development of diagnostic test kits, patient enrollment in an Institutional Review Board approved study, issuance of patents, and approvals or clearances by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The fair value of future potential milestone payments was determined based upon a probability weighted analysis of expected future milestone payments to be made to the seller, which are considered as Level 3 inputs.


The following tables provide a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 liabilities for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014:


(in thousands)

 

Three months ended September 30, 2014

 

Balance – beginning

  $  

Contingent purchase price consideration

    1,247  

Change in fair value of contingent purchase price consideration

    38  

Foreign currency adjustment

    (51 )

Balance at September 30, 2014

  $ 1,234  

(in thousands)

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

Balance – beginning

  $ 296  

Change in fair value of warrant liability

    22  

Reclassification of liability to additional paid-in capital upon exercise of warrants

    (318 )

Contingent purchase price consideration

    1,247  

Change in fair value of contingent purchase price consideration

    38  

Foreign currency adjustment

    (51 )

Balance at September 30, 2014

  $ 1,234