XML 36 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2.2
Fair Value Measurements (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2022
Fair Value Measurements  
Summary of information about the company's financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

September 30, 2022

(in thousands)

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Warrant liability

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

—

Streeterville note

​

​

—

​

​

—

​

​

7,167

​

​

7,167

Total fair value

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

7,167

​

$

7,167

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

December 31, 2021

(in thousands)

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Warrant liability

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

1

​

$

1

Streeterville note

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

7,818

​

$

7,818

Total fair value

​

$

—

​

$

—

​

$

7,819

​

$

7,819

Summary of change in the estimated fair value of level 3 liabilities

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Nine Months Ended

​

​

September 30, 2022

(in thousands)

​

Warrant liability

    

Streeterville note

Beginning fair value of Level 3 liability

  

$

1

  

$

7,818

Additions

​

​

—

​

​

—

Exercises

​

​

—

​

​

—

Change in fair value

  

 

(1)

​

​

(651)

Ending fair value of Level 3 liability

  

$

—

  

$

7,167

Summary of information about the significant unobservable inputs used in level 3 fair value measurements

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Range of Inputs

​

​

​

​

(probability-weighted average)

​

Relationship of unobservable inputs

Unobservable Inputs

​

2022

​

2021

​

to fair value

Risk Adjusted Discount Rate

​

12.81%-27.34% (27.34%)

​

6.78% - 21.31% (21.31%)

​

If discount rate is adjusted to total of additional 100 basis points (bps), fair value would have decreased by $262,000.

If discount rate is adjusted to total deduction of 100 bps, fair value would have increased by $262,000.

Sales Proceeds: Amount of comparable TDPRV

​

$67.5 million to $350 million ($100 million)

​

$67.5 million to $350.0 million ($100.0 million)

​

If expected cash flows by Management considered the lowest amount of market indications for vouchers, FV would have decreased by $825,000.

If expected cash flows by Management considered the highest amount of market indications for vouchers, FV would have increased by $6.35 million.

Range of Probability for Timing of Cash Flows:
Variations of the terms and conditions of the timing of cash flows, including settlement of the note principal, interest, penalties, and acceleration clause.

​

0.39%-41.88%

​

0.35%-46.06%

​

If expected cash flows by Management considered the Scenario with the least amount of indicated value, FV would have decreased by $705,000.

If expected cash flows by Management considered the scenario with the greatest amount of indicated value, FV would have increased by $2.76 million.

Summary of the fair value and unpaid principal balance for items the Company accounts for under FVO

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

(in thousands)

​

Fair value

​

Unpaid Principal Balance

​

Fair Value Over (Under) Unpaid Principal Balance

At September 30, 2022

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Hybrid Instrument:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Streeterville note

​

$

7,167

​

$

6,221

​

$

946